14:01:21 <dprince> #startmeeting tripleo
14:01:22 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Dec  8 14:01:21 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dprince. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:01:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:01:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'
14:01:41 <tremble> o/
14:01:43 <jistr> o/
14:01:44 <trown|BOS> o/
14:01:49 <tzumainn> hiya!
14:02:23 <akrivoka> ohai \o
14:02:34 <dprince> hello all
14:02:34 <jaosorior> o/
14:03:02 <dprince> #topic agenda
14:03:02 <dprince> * bugs
14:03:02 <dprince> * Projects releases or stable backports
14:03:02 <dprince> * CI
14:03:04 <dprince> * Specs
14:03:11 <dprince> * confirm that people are okay with *not* renaming tripleo-common just yet, even though we're placing the API code in there (tzumainn)
14:03:17 <dprince> * open discussion
14:03:38 <dprince> ^^^ that looks like the agenda today (from the wiki)
14:04:59 <dprince> okay, lets get started
14:05:04 <dprince> #topic bugs
14:05:14 <trown|BOS> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1521922
14:05:14 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1521922 in tripleo "CentOS delorean has migrated to aodh but we haven't yet" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to John Trowbridge (trown)
14:05:40 <trown|BOS> This one is the only thing (as of last week anyways) blocking working trunk delorean
14:06:10 <trown|BOS> for RDO anyways, where we dont have the luxury of pulling some subset of packages from current
14:06:39 <dprince> trown|BOS: I like that you are a BOS(s) today
14:07:12 <dprince> trown|BOS: I saw your patch yesterday and was waiting for the -ha CI to pass before sending it
14:07:13 <trown|BOS> EmilienM is working on actually replacing the alarm functionality, but I put up two patches to do the removal part since it does not currently work anyways
14:07:20 <dprince> trown|BOS: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253716/
14:07:28 <trown|BOS> dprince: there is a similar patch needed for THT
14:07:36 <adarazs> o/
14:07:44 <EmilienM> this morning I sent a patchset to make the upgrade working from ceilo to aodh
14:07:44 <trown|BOS> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253717/
14:07:51 <EmilienM> it should pass CI
14:08:11 <EmilienM> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241412/
14:09:08 <dprince> EmilienM: thanks, will review these things
14:09:45 <dprince> trown|BOS: so it sounds like RDO is always going to be at risk for breakage from us because we treat some packages as "special" and build them inline
14:10:26 <trown|BOS> dprince: that is fine though... RDO current does not need to be stable
14:10:45 <trown|BOS> dprince: as long as we can get a stable snapshot, and keep moving it forward
14:10:53 <dprince> trown|BOS: okay
14:11:13 <trown|BOS> we just dont have a starting point yet for trunk
14:11:15 <dprince> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1522943
14:11:15 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1522943 in tripleo "UpdateDeployment on non-controller roles can leave packages not updated" [High,In progress] - Assigned to James Slagle (james-slagle)
14:11:33 <dprince> looks like slagle is working on that critical bug ^^^
14:11:45 <slagle> i've posted a patch and would like some reviews
14:11:48 <dprince> would be good to review that soon too
14:11:59 <dprince> slagle: cool, thanks
14:12:40 <dprince> any other bugs to highlight this week?
14:13:24 <dprince> #topic Projects releases or stable backports
14:13:47 <dprince> anyone have an update on stable branch progress this week
14:14:08 <rhallisey> ya I do
14:14:10 <slagle> i wanted to mention that we're going through and doing releases from the stable branches
14:14:33 <slagle> and as part of that, will be bumping the major versions on the master branches
14:14:39 <dprince> slagle: cool, for all the tripleo projects?
14:14:47 <slagle> which means releasing a 1.0.0 for some of the projects
14:14:55 <slagle> dprince: yea, eventually
14:14:58 <rhallisey> slagle, are you doing the releases?
14:15:20 <slagle> rhallisey: for some, not all of them
14:15:36 <rhallisey> slagle, who's doing tripleo-heat-templates and tripleo-image-elements?
14:15:48 <rhallisey> I just want those to be picked up in the next puddle
14:16:23 <slagle> marios was going to start looking at tht
14:16:29 <slagle> there is no timeframe on when it will be done
14:17:01 <rhallisey> I'll volunteer to help to speed it up
14:17:09 <rhallisey> if that's ok
14:17:16 <slagle> sur
14:17:17 <slagle> e
14:17:22 <rhallisey> cool
14:17:57 <rhallisey> dprince, I have a bunch of backports for stable liberty.  Should I mention the patch set?
14:18:13 <rhallisey> all container related
14:18:32 <dprince> rhallisey: probably wait for open discussion for the containers patches...
14:18:35 <rhallisey> kk
14:18:42 <dprince> rhallisey: any other updates here though?
14:18:48 <rhallisey> dprince, nothing else
14:19:09 <dprince> #topic CI
14:19:40 <dprince> we look to be running fairly smoothly. I noticed a few HA job failures which might need a closer look
14:23:21 <dprince> #topic Specs
14:24:33 <dprince> The composable roles spec is still under review... good feedback last week but we are still discussing the possability of using Heat resource chains to implement some of the internal features there
14:24:55 * dprince would like the external (Heat parameters) interface to be very simple though
14:26:44 <dprince> I noticed Steve Baker posted a nice spec about enhancing tripleoclient (or whatever) with extra output about heat software deployment failures
14:26:47 <dprince> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251587/
14:27:04 <dprince> I noticed this last Monday... but worth mentioning here
14:28:21 <dprince> any other specs to highlight this week?
14:29:19 <dprince> #topic one off agenda items
14:29:32 <dprince> tzumainn: your up
14:30:03 <tzumainn> hiya!  okay, I just wanted to confirm that people are okay with not renaming the tripleo-common repo
14:30:40 <tzumainn> from recent IRC conversations, it seems like most people think that renaming is premature, and I agree that it just seems to add extra work at a time when we're trying to add a bunch of new code
14:31:13 <tzumainn> er, that's all I had
14:31:34 <dprince> tzumainn: cool, yeah I tend to agree
14:32:15 <jistr> yea +1 for not renaming just yet
14:32:24 <trown|BOS> risk v. reward seems to favor not renaming at this point
14:34:06 <tzumainn> okay, awesome
14:34:25 <dprince> cool, moving on
14:34:31 <dprince> #topic open discussion
14:34:45 <dprince> rhallisey: you mentioned some containers stuff?
14:35:05 <rhallisey> dprince, ya I have a bunch of backports
14:35:06 <rhallisey> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254408/1
14:35:18 <rhallisey> that patch chian
14:35:21 <rhallisey> chain*
14:35:25 <trown|BOS> sweet
14:36:11 <akrivoka> just a gentle reminder about the ui spec, it hasn't been getting any attention recently (sorry I missed to mention in the spec topic)
14:36:13 <akrivoka> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239056/
14:37:01 <dprince> akrivoka: ack, thanks for mentioning this
14:37:45 <derekh> dprince: on CI, sorry missed topic change while in a meeting
14:37:50 <derekh> The rh1 overcloud is in a funny state, I've spent a little time trying to figure it out but havn't managed it yet, out of office all week so wont have a chance to look this week.
14:37:54 <derekh> too many instances are going to the error state, nodepool can't delete them so they are using up nodepools quota.
14:37:59 <derekh> things are only working because I'm running "nova reset-state" on instacnes in the error state every day or two(this allows nodepool to delete them).
14:38:39 <dprince> derekh: oh snap, I didn't realize we had this happening
14:39:01 <dprince> derekh: any pattern, like possibly a bad compute node or two?
14:39:15 <derekh> dprince: yup, its been happening since we had the nodpool regression a week two ago
14:39:44 <derekh> dprince: that regression caused lots of VM's (LOTS) to constantly get created and destroyed,
14:39:46 <dprince> derekh: would a stale (perhaps invalid) floating IP be the cause
14:39:54 <derekh> dprince: im thinking it provolked something,
14:40:00 <derekh> haven't noticed a pattern
14:40:04 <dprince> derekh: yeah, nodepool is aggressive
14:40:51 <trown|BOS> provolked?
14:41:05 <derekh> Anyways, I can get back to digging into it next week, but in the mean time if anybody else wants to take a look...
14:41:08 <dprince> trown|BOS: yeah, provoked. It picked a fight with us man
14:41:16 <trown|BOS> ah... haha
14:41:22 <derekh> trown|BOS: *provoked
14:41:39 * derekh can't spell
14:42:19 <dprince> derekh: thanks for the update
14:43:29 <derekh> np
14:46:05 <dprince> I mentioned this in
14:46:30 <dprince> the workflow email list this week... but I posted a Mistral demo yesterday
14:46:36 <dprince> #link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnAT37O-sdw
14:47:22 <dprince> 13 minutes if you are at all interested in the TripleO workflow discussions
14:48:16 <trown|BOS> havent watched the demo yet, but looked over the bulk introspection POC
14:48:19 * derekh downloads for air plane viewing
14:48:23 <trown|BOS> I think that will be a big improvement
14:48:32 <jrist> I think the ui people were looking into it as well
14:48:46 <jrist> right jtomasek ^ ?
14:48:58 * trown|BOS pictures derekh watching that 32 times in a row
14:49:17 <dprince> derekh: I hope you like my voice a lot
14:49:48 <derekh> trown|BOS: I'll put the speakers on to see what everybody else thinks
14:50:00 <jrist> :)
14:50:01 <jtomasek> jrist, dprince: yeah, we're looking forward to the meeting in 40 minutes
14:51:50 <dprince> okay, It sounds like it is all crickets now so lets call it
14:52:16 <dprince> thanks everyone
14:52:17 <tzumainn> thanks all!
14:52:20 <jdob> \o
14:52:24 <trown|BOS> thanks
14:52:26 <jrist> o/
14:52:31 <dprince> #endmeeting