14:01:31 #startmeeting tripleo 14:01:32 Meeting started Tue Jan 19 14:01:31 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dprince. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:33 o/ 14:01:36 The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo' 14:01:36 hi 14:02:24 hiya 14:03:35 #topic agenda 14:03:35 * bugs 14:03:35 * Projects releases or stable backports 14:03:35 * CI 14:03:35 * Specs 14:03:38 * one off agenda items 14:03:39 o/ 14:03:40 * open discussion 14:03:53 no on-off agenda items this week I think 14:04:29 lets get started 14:04:35 #topic bugs 14:06:02 any bugs to highlight this week? 14:06:02 It looks like bnemec has solved the neutron-nova bug 14:06:22 * derekh is testing it at the moment 14:06:22 still waiting on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269370/ to pass HA CI 14:06:27 * trown too 14:07:00 if that works it will make my proposal in the CI topic much less controversial 14:07:15 trown: cool, thanks for the update 14:07:43 #link https://launchpad.net/bugs/1519525 14:07:44 Launchpad bug 1519525 in tripleo "Cannot boot instance due to Neutron-Nova notifications" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Ben Nemec (bnemec) 14:07:56 for posterity sake 14:10:14 okay, I saw a few IPv6 releated bugs coming in too. I will try and look over some of those reviews today 14:11:40 #topic Projects releases or stable backports 14:13:08 I have a note from Dmitry that we need to release DIB to fix an ironic bug 14:13:20 dprince: I think marios did that 14:13:33 trown: ah, cool. :) 14:14:07 okay, so in general where do we stand as far as stable backports go 14:14:34 I think we are in the same place for stable backports as we are with master 14:14:55 that being, that without overcloud validation our CI is essentially nonsense 14:14:58 we had most everything backported, ergo ipv6 and ssl 14:15:11 not sure why i said "had" 14:15:15 we still do 14:15:40 slagle: maybe the couple of reverts where we 'had' them for a few weeks 14:15:42 there have been some recent ipv6 and ssl fixes that need to get backported still 14:15:54 okay, cool 14:15:56 and maybe a handful of bugfixes 14:17:45 o/ 14:18:26 #topic CI 14:18:34 trown: you wanted to say something here? 14:19:16 dprince: yes, I would like to propose that we do not merge anything to either master or stable/liberty until we have the ping test merged (with the obvious exeption of things needed to make the ping test pass) 14:19:48 trown: fine with me 14:19:50 without that, we will continue to merge broken things 14:19:54 +1 14:19:56 +1 14:19:58 trown: I would have agree to this long ago FWIW :) 14:20:15 Long ago we were still broken. ;-) 14:20:18 trown: like before we switched to instack ;) 14:20:22 It's been almost two months. 14:20:36 dprince: well I would use my time machine for better purposes :) 14:20:48 but we can do something now 14:21:13 thanks to bnemec, it should not be too painful 14:21:15 * slagle pockets that quip for future reuse 14:21:49 trown: is the etherpad updated? https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/delorean_master_current_issues 14:22:14 dprince: ya, and the sahara package one I do not think affects tripleoci 14:22:41 dprince: so I think we should just have the neutron-nova thing to get back on master/current 14:22:45 +1, when we switched to instack I opened cards for a bunch of things that needed to be done including the pingtest, hardly anybody has picked un on any of the card since then, 14:23:38 We have the ping test proposed now. It just hasn't been able to merge because we had no way of knowing if it worked. 14:23:57 yup 14:24:21 so if we land the neutron-nova fix and then the ping test passes we merge both we are good right? 14:24:23 It is also super important that we get our current-tripleo symlink updated. I believe it's still pointing at a version of Ironic that is broken on CentOS 7 hosts. 14:24:30 I mean until the next breakage... 14:24:40 dprince: Sounds like it. 14:24:48 bnemec: you patch gets me further, I still can't ping my instances though still trying to find the porblem (it could be local) 14:25:22 bnemec: yup, it has a inc command not found problem 14:25:46 derekh: appoligies if my comment about "since instack" seemed overly harsh. I just meant to say the idea of a ping test before landing code is something we've done before... 14:25:51 derekh: bnemec, tempest smoke is passing with that patch in RDO, so I think we are good 14:26:08 so agreeing not to land code if it breaks is I think reasonable again 14:27:11 dprince: no prob, just wanted to make sure eveybody wasn't looking at me, I never wanted use to go 4 months without testing the overcloud, we just havn't done it 14:27:26 trown: ack, thanks 14:27:37 derekh: wasn't even looking in your direction :) 14:27:50 derekh: I blame downstream, not you. :-) 14:28:15 * derekh goes back to his happy place 14:28:28 btw, I rebuilt the TE hosts for CI on sunday 14:28:43 our underclouds now have 2xvCPU and 5G RAM 14:28:48 \o/ memory 14:28:52 in ci 14:29:07 are we noticing that this helped the HA jobs pass more often? 14:29:41 Looks like it's passing about 50%, which is way better than before. 14:30:02 I've seen a lot of db issues in the bogus failures lately, so I think we may have an actual bug there. 14:30:14 dprince: things appear to be running faster at least when CI isn't under load, but were now more overcommited so not sure what will happen when CI is busy 14:30:40 derekh: I guess we cross our fingers and see 14:30:54 as for failure rate, Its probably a little to early to tell but it looks better 14:30:57 dprince: yup 14:33:05 okay, lets move on 14:33:12 #topic Specs 14:35:10 Oh, before I forget. I think we had 100% agreement on the ping test passing. So probably worth sending this out on the list too right? 14:35:17 just so everyone knows 14:35:28 not to merge code unless it passes 14:35:36 dprince: +1 14:35:52 yes, i'd say no concensus needed on the list 14:36:02 slagle: just a notification 14:36:02 just send it out as "the way" 14:36:23 okay I can do that 14:36:28 back to specs 14:36:32 anything new this week? 14:40:18 okay, so no specs updates for this week I think 14:40:24 #topic open discussion 14:45:18 hmm... maybe we can just close early 14:45:21 * bnemec has nothing and has another meeting starting right now 14:45:24 sounds like everyone is either tired or busy 14:45:53 Last week was kind of brutal for a lot of us. 14:45:54 okay, we can end early then 14:46:00 thanks everyone 14:46:01 thanks for chairing dprince 14:46:12 #endmeeting