14:00:03 <EmilienM> #startmeeting tripleo
14:00:04 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 27 14:00:03 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is EmilienM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:06 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:08 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'
14:00:16 <EmilienM> #topic rollcall
14:00:19 <EmilienM> hello there
14:00:20 <mwhahaha> ahoy
14:00:23 <bandini> o/
14:00:25 <cdearborn> \o
14:00:25 <d0ugal> Hello! \o/
14:00:37 <rhallisey> hi
14:00:43 <jpich> o/
14:00:51 <panda> o/
14:00:53 <jaosorior> o/
14:00:54 <derekh> o/
14:00:57 <ccamacho> hi!! \o/
14:01:05 <dprince> hi
14:01:46 <EmilienM> #topic agenda
14:01:48 <EmilienM> * one off agenda items
14:01:48 <trown> o/
14:01:50 <EmilienM> * bugs
14:01:52 <EmilienM> * Projects releases or stable backports
14:01:54 <EmilienM> * CI
14:01:55 <thrash> o/
14:01:56 <EmilienM> * Specs
14:01:57 <beagles> o/
14:01:58 <EmilienM> * open discussion
14:02:00 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items
14:02:47 <EmilienM> if you have any off item you would like to discuss, please add it to the etherpad or tell it now :)
14:02:50 <sshnaidm> o/
14:03:33 <EmilienM> if there isn't any item, we'll go through the regular agenda
14:03:56 <EmilienM> #topic bugs
14:04:09 <EmilienM> #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/newton-rc2
14:04:19 <EmilienM> 1 New, 1 Won't Fix, 9 Triaged, 8 In Progress, 57 Fix Released
14:04:34 <EmilienM> I'll call that a milestone!
14:04:39 <d0ugal> Nice!
14:04:40 <bandini> I hope to have a fix for the New one by tonight
14:04:49 <EmilienM> so we still have 18 open bugs
14:05:14 <EmilienM> marios: where are we with manila?
14:05:19 <EmilienM> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:tripleo/rc2
14:05:27 <EmilienM> I still see the bug open
14:05:47 <EmilienM> looks like we can close it
14:06:21 <EmilienM> I'll close the blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/manila-cephfs-integration since all code has been merged
14:07:16 <EmilienM> so there are 10 open bugs
14:07:30 <EmilienM> at this stage of the RC I'm not sure we can fix them all
14:07:39 <EmilienM> if you're willing to work on them, please assign it to yourself
14:07:58 <EmilienM> actually, only 2 bugs are not assigned
14:08:10 <EmilienM> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1624727 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1614928
14:08:12 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1624727 in tripleo "Could not fetch contents for file:///home/stack/tripleo-heat-templates/puppet/post.yaml" [Critical,Triaged]
14:08:14 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1614928 in tripleo "openstack overcloud update stack should be powered by a mistral workflow" [High,Triaged]
14:08:41 <EmilienM> if there is any volunteer to work on it, go4it :)
14:08:58 <EmilienM> also please let me know if you think your bug is not going to be fixed by Thursday
14:09:12 <EmilienM> we'll have to defer it to Ocata and add a backport-potential flag
14:09:25 <bandini> ack
14:09:27 <EmilienM> do we have outstanding bugs we need to discuss this week?
14:10:30 <EmilienM> I would like to congratulate the team for helping in fixing bugs in a such short timeframe
14:10:44 <EmilienM> that's a great team work here!
14:11:20 <EmilienM> I'll close this topic by reminding people to use tripleo/rc2 gerrit topic so reviewers can use https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:tripleo/rc2 to easily find importants reviews
14:11:46 <EmilienM> #topic Projects releases or stable backports
14:12:03 <EmilienM> so our plan is still to release TripleO RC2 on Thursday
14:12:29 <EmilienM> when it's done, we'll have stable/newton branch for all projects
14:12:38 <EmilienM> reminder: we already have stable/newton for tripleoclient
14:12:52 <EmilienM> I know jpich did a lot of backports already for ^
14:13:10 <EmilienM> jpich: could you please check if more backports are needed wrt oooclient?
14:13:28 <jpich> EmilienM: Yep, will go through the list
14:13:32 <EmilienM> thanks
14:14:06 <EmilienM> so i'll send the release request by Thursday and it will be processed end of day or early Friday.
14:14:23 <EmilienM> any questions or feedback about release management?
14:15:14 <EmilienM> let's move to the next topic then
14:15:22 <EmilienM> #topic CI
14:15:35 <EmilienM> #link http://tripleo.org/cistatus.html
14:15:40 <EmilienM> CI looks pretty stable recently
14:15:48 <EmilienM> #link https://dashboards.rdoproject.org/rdo-dev
14:15:58 <EmilienM> we also have packages promotions every day
14:16:37 <EmilienM> the only information I would like to share today is that I'm going to work on re-enabling the container CI job after the release - I would like to re-use the multinode framework that we did for scenarios
14:16:51 <EmilienM> derekh, sshnaidm, bnemec, dprince: anything to mention about CI this week ?
14:17:05 * derekh has nothing to add
14:17:07 <EmilienM> panda: have we made progress on testing ipv6 ?
14:17:17 <dprince> nothing from me
14:17:18 <sshnaidm> EmilienM, it's good :)
14:17:33 <panda> EmilienM: ha-ipv6 experimental job is blocked by this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1627729
14:17:34 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1627729 in tripleo "Rabbitmq fails to start on two nodes on HA IPv6 configuration" [Undecided,Confirmed]
14:17:58 <panda> EmilienM: deployment secceds and overcloud works, but cluster is inconsistent
14:18:37 <EmilienM> panda: is it transient?
14:18:42 <panda> EmilienM: we'll have to wait for rabbitmq and erlang packages to be updated
14:19:04 <EmilienM> i'm asking because I remember bnemec telling us that he could deploy an ipv6 overcloud
14:19:17 <bnemec> It varies.  I've had all three fail.
14:19:26 <bnemec> And other times it works for me.
14:19:31 <bandini> you can deploy one, but rabbit will only start on controller-0
14:19:47 <EmilienM> sounds like a critical bug to me
14:19:47 <bandini> so what happens after that is really "it depends"
14:20:02 <EmilienM> is it because of low performances?
14:20:07 <bandini> I spoke to haikel and he was going to look into it
14:20:08 <EmilienM> or is it a real software bug
14:20:15 <bandini> no because we are missing ipv6 patches in erlang and rabbit
14:20:19 <panda> EmilienM: real bug
14:20:22 <EmilienM> ok so that's a real bug :)
14:20:24 <bandini> so we need to update them
14:20:27 <EmilienM> thanks for looking at this one
14:20:33 <bnemec> EmilienM: It's not just a performance issue.  It happens in my local environment too, although not all the time.
14:20:43 <EmilienM> I tagged https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1627729 to rc2 and critical
14:20:45 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1627729 in tripleo "Rabbitmq fails to start on two nodes on HA IPv6 configuration" [Critical,Confirmed]
14:21:08 <EmilienM> bandini: ok, can you let us know in the bug report like you already do?
14:21:28 <bandini> EmilienM: as soon as I have some feedback I will update the LP bug sure thing
14:21:33 <EmilienM> thanks
14:21:50 <EmilienM> do we have anything else about CI today?
14:22:09 <bnemec> It's running fast now. :-)
14:22:11 <EmilienM> matbu|bbl: any update about upgrades? (yeah I know)
14:22:22 <EmilienM> bnemec: yes, it's much better
14:22:35 <bnemec> 279695,10 - 1h 31m
14:22:35 <bandini> EmilienM: I have an update about upgrades
14:22:43 <bnemec> One of these times we're going to break 90 minutes. :-)
14:23:07 <bandini> they mostly work now. there is one race condition that needs fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1627965
14:23:08 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1627965 in tripleo "M/N upgrades - pacemaker upgrade step2 is racy" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Michele Baldessari (michele)
14:23:15 <bandini> I will tackle it tonight
14:23:35 <EmilienM> bandini: let us know if you need help in fixing the bug or review. Also make sure to tag it tripleo/rc2 in gerrit
14:23:47 <bandini> EmilienM: aye, will do so
14:23:54 <EmilienM> thanks and nice work
14:24:23 <EmilienM> I guess people know why I pushed for an upgrade job some months ago :)
14:24:37 <EmilienM> hopefully we can make progress on this area during ocata
14:24:46 <bandini> that'd be awesome
14:24:49 <EmilienM> anything else about CI? next topic: specs
14:24:55 * gfidente would be happy to get updates back to start with
14:25:20 <bnemec> gfidente: I have a patch up to make that job work again, but it's blocked by the ipv6 issues.
14:25:40 <gfidente> bnemec, acl saw it
14:25:58 <EmilienM> I created an multinode update job, i'll check but i think it's still in experimental pipeline
14:26:24 <EmilienM> #topic specs
14:26:30 <EmilienM> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open
14:27:16 <EmilienM> I have one note about blueprints
14:27:53 <EmilienM> if your blueprint is for Ocata, please update it for the Summit so it's ready to be discussed prior in Gerrit and in real at the Summit
14:27:59 <trown> I started a CI blueprint, not sure if it will need a full spec or not https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/make-tripleo-ci-externally-consumable
14:28:07 * EmilienM is happy to see Container blueprint alive again :)
14:28:43 <trown> started with just an etherpad to start getting thoughts about the topic organized for summit https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/make-tripleo-ci-externally-consumable
14:29:49 <EmilienM> mhh, this one might need a spec
14:30:06 <EmilienM> but I'll let the team give opinion
14:30:21 <bandini> EmilienM: so the deadline for specs/blueprints for Ocata is before the BCN summit?
14:30:39 <EmilienM> trown: I updated https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-tripleo-ci
14:30:43 <trown> we have never had specs for CI, but I think if anything we could produce a spec after more discussion in BCN if we think it would be helpful
14:30:58 <EmilienM> bandini: deadline to submit a blueprint is Summit I would say
14:31:09 <bandini> EmilienM: ack
14:31:19 <EmilienM> trown: right, the idea is to use Gerrit to engage discussion and collaboration
14:31:31 <EmilienM> something we can't really do in Launchpad
14:32:27 <EmilienM> this topic is really important to continue to grow our community
14:32:39 <EmilienM> we have a lot of complaints about this problem, we really need to find solutions now.
14:32:43 <bnemec> Umm, we're really not accepting new feature proposals after summit?
14:33:00 <EmilienM> bnemec: well, it depends on the projetc
14:33:07 <EmilienM> as a reminder, Ocata is very short
14:33:11 <EmilienM> it's a 4 months release
14:33:12 <trown> ^ this
14:33:24 <EmilienM> so i'm not sure accepting features requests after the summit is a good idea for us
14:33:38 <EmilienM> I think we already burnt a lot of ernergy in Newton to accept everything we could
14:33:54 <EmilienM> I would like to use Ocata cycle to stabilize a bit the things and improve our CI
14:34:04 <EmilienM> so if you want a feature, come in BCN with a blueprint
14:34:08 <EmilienM> does it make sense?
14:34:17 <EmilienM> please shoot at me if I'm wrong
14:35:03 <beagles> +1 .. esp. when you consider there's a holiday season in there. It's a *short* four months.
14:35:23 <jaosorior> EmilienM: well... if I had already brought up my blueprint and was accepted, but ended up being deferred to Ocata. What do I do? The spec is out there with no reviews.
14:36:19 <EmilienM> jaosorior: after the release, we'll have more time to review the blueprints for Ocata
14:36:36 <jaosorior> ok
14:36:37 <EmilienM> and at the Summit we'll discuss what blueprints we take
14:37:02 <EmilienM> in other words, if you already have submitted your blueprint, you don' thave to worry
14:37:43 <EmilienM> do we have questions or feedback about specs/blueprints?
14:38:53 <EmilienM> great, we have time for open discussion
14:39:00 <EmilienM> #topic open discussion
14:39:20 <EmilienM> if you have any question or another topic to bring this week, please go ahead :)
14:40:06 <EmilienM> if there is nothing, I'll let people go back to work
14:40:49 <EmilienM> thanks everyone and stay awesome!
14:40:56 <beagles> cheers!
14:40:58 <trown> thanks for chairing EmilienM
14:41:01 <EmilienM> #endmeeting