14:00:07 #startmeeting tripleo 14:00:08 Meeting started Tue Oct 4 14:00:07 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is EmilienM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:11 o/ 14:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo' 14:00:14 o/ 14:00:18 hey 14:00:19 o/ 14:00:21 hello folks 14:00:21 <[1]cdearborn> \o 14:00:25 o/ 14:00:26 /o/ 14:00:26 hi2u 14:00:26 o/ 14:00:32 |o| 14:00:37 o/ 14:00:43 panda: r u a tie fighter 14:00:45 mwhahaha: hi2u2 14:00:51 jistr: I thought the same 14:00:58 o/ 14:01:14 o/ 14:01:16 :o 14:01:24 hi 14:01:48 if you have some off items please add them here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items 14:01:52 I mean o/ 14:01:57 o/ 14:02:05 #topic agenda 14:02:07 * one off agenda items 14:02:09 * bugs 14:02:11 * Projects releases or stable backports 14:02:13 * CI 14:02:15 * Specs 14:02:16 o/ 14:02:17 * open discussion 14:02:19 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items 14:02:34 o/ 14:03:05 ok sounds like we don't have off items this week 14:03:14 so we'll go through the regular agenda items 14:03:21 #topic bugs 14:03:42 as a reminder, this week is focused on delivering Newton RC3 14:03:44 #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/newton-rc3 14:03:55 we still have 10 bugs open 14:04:32 everything that is not critical to Newton, should be moved to ocata-1. Please do it yourself if it's the case for your assigned bugs 14:04:43 0/ 14:04:44 o/ 14:04:54 o/ 14:05:09 o/ 14:05:28 we have 3 bugs triaged but not in progress 14:05:40 d0ugal, rbrady: any progress on https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1626736 ? 14:05:42 Launchpad bug 1626736 in tripleo " Unable to delete overcloud node" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Ryan Brady (rbrady) 14:06:14 o/ 14:06:24 EmilienM: Not yet. I'm looking into it now 14:06:36 mhh ok 14:06:41 apetrich: same question for https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1623673 14:06:42 Launchpad bug 1623673 in tripleo "mixed deployment fails resources.ControllerServicesBaseDeployment_Step2 with status code: 6 " [High,Triaged] - Assigned to Adriano Petrich (apetrich) 14:07:05 o/ (sorry I'm late) 14:07:25 perfect timing 14:07:36 shardy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1625783 - any patch coming for this one? 14:07:37 Launchpad bug 1625783 in tripleo "unable to leverage swap-partition extraconfig" [High,Triaged] - Assigned to Steven Hardy (shardy) 14:08:08 EmilienM: Yes, I actually think it's either already fixed or will be fixed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/379547/ 14:08:11 EmilienM, it is working with workaround there 14:08:13 I would like to set a limit of Wednesday EOD to have bugfixes merged in master and eventually backported 14:08:17 EmilienM: I'll test it this afternoon and confirm on the bug 14:08:21 we plan to release on Thursday or Friday 14:08:37 shardy: ack, in that case, please update the bug report 14:09:05 apetrich: it's not clear to me if we need to fix something or not 14:09:41 do we have any other bugs to discuss? 14:09:50 is there an outstanding bug we missed this week? 14:10:11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bugs?field.tag=composable-roles 14:10:21 ccamacho and I are trying to solve as many of those as we can before release 14:10:23 EmilienM: just filed this fyi https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1630247 to track the sahara mitaka..newton 14:10:24 Launchpad bug 1630247 in tripleo "sahara services during mitaka to newton upgrade" [Undecided,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b) 14:10:29 but some may have to be backported after GA 14:10:51 marios: excellent. Upgrade bugs are High or Critical and targeted for RC3 of course 14:10:53 all submissions tagged as tripleo/rc3 14:11:04 shardy: ack, i'll try to make the RC3 release as late as I can this week 14:11:12 shardy: I'll sync with Doug on that topic 14:11:28 EmilienM: sounds good, thanks! 14:11:33 shardy: anyway, I think those are candidates to be backported 14:11:36 EmilienM, I'm not completely sure myself, I will comment my thoughts in the bug and we can go from there if that's ok 14:11:43 apetrich: ok thx. 14:11:49 anything else about bugs? 14:12:13 marios: don't forget to set "importance" of bugs when you report 14:12:16 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375540/ 14:12:17 and milestone 14:12:20 ^ easy review 14:12:23 marios: otherwise it's not in our radar 14:12:26 related to upgrades/updates 14:12:42 ... same for rhallisey https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1623978 14:12:44 Launchpad bug 1623978 in tripleo "overcloud update fails because of missing template in swift" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Ryan Hallisey (rthall14) 14:12:44 EmilienM: ack thanks 14:12:47 no milestone, no importance 14:12:54 I already sent reminders about that 14:13:05 please do auto triage, we don't have enough resources to triage all incoming bugs 14:13:45 #action EmilienM to configure launchpad with a message to make auto triage when creating new bugs 14:14:15 anything else about bugs? 14:14:46 #topic Projects releases or stable backports 14:14:54 so a couple of reminders : 14:15:14 1) please backport your patches that have been merged in master, into stable/newton, if they fix a bug that was targeted for RC3. 14:15:42 2) we'll tag RC3 (Final Newton) by end of week 14:16:09 after RC3, I encourage people to continue backports for critical/high bugs, specially about upgrades 14:16:32 there is nothing blocking us to propose a new Newton release after final release 14:16:51 do we have any question/feedback about release management? 14:17:31 #topic CI 14:17:54 matbu, weshay: do where are we with third party jobs to test tripleo upgrades? 14:18:01 s/do/so/ 14:18:23 EmilienM: for third party idk 14:18:47 I remember an action from you to start looking at it 14:18:48 EmilienM: for upstream CI, it should be fix by the https://review.openstack.org/379547 14:19:19 the jobs are in ci.centos and available, not passing obviously for mitaka -> master 14:19:27 matbu: ok 14:19:35 EmilienM: yes i started to look at, but tripleo-quickstart wasn't ready, the topic is in the hand of apetrich i guess 14:19:43 matbu: ok good 14:20:07 matbu: oh I remember now "matbu to move upgrade jobs to ovb and use experimental pipeline until it's stabilized then periodic + experimental" 14:20:14 is it done? ^ 14:20:14 EmilienM: the review ^ should also fix the update jobs 14:20:22 EmilienM: yep 14:20:25 good. 14:20:47 EmilienM: we loose time to fight with multinode with those jobs :/ 14:21:03 bnemec, derekh, dprince, slagle: anything special to mention about CI this week? 14:21:10 sshnaidm: also ^ 14:21:23 nothing from me 14:21:30 ditto 14:21:37 matbu: what do you mean "fight with multinode"? 14:22:50 EmilienM: nothing major other than I'm trying to get the uc upgrade job passing, and have moved the job to run on both instack-undercloud and tripleoclient 14:22:58 as previously it was only running on tripleo-ci patches 14:23:00 cool ^ 14:23:04 slagle: i mean we got (i and sshnaidm ) some failure, the job wasn't consistent 14:23:14 matbu: failures on what? 14:23:37 EmilienM: on upgrade job, when trying to install the undercloud 14:23:42 matbu: i've not seen the failures. is there a bug? 14:23:52 slagle: yep i fill a LP 14:24:25 please link it here and I will look 14:24:28 * matbu trying to find the number 14:25:57 Hmm, I see the ipv6 job finally passed. I wonder why the updates job still won't. 14:25:58 slagle: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1624448 14:25:59 Launchpad bug 1624448 in tripleo "CI Upgrade job hang or failed on undercloud install" [Undecided,New] 14:26:41 bnemec: me too, i'm wondering if we should move the job to the gate or just set ipv6 by default in ha job? 14:27:01 matbu: thanks. i will push a patch for that today. it doesnt happen very frequently, but it should be relatively easy to address. 14:27:23 slagle, matbu : thanks 14:27:24 slagle: ack, with the upgrade job it was arround 80% of the time 14:27:28 EmilienM: I think making it a gate was the main point for newton 14:27:30 EmilienM: I can try to reproduce the updates job failure locally. It's a single node pacemaker setup, so it is a little different from full ha. 14:28:09 slagle: but the workflow is a bit different than a classic job (i mean, start with a stable/mitaka, deploy, then build repo and upgrade) 14:28:10 bnemec: wdyt about switching current ovb job (HA) to ipv6 by default? 14:28:35 EmilienM: don't we have to test ha ipv4 jobs too ? 14:28:36 EmilienM: Then we lose coverage of the ipv4 net-iso case. 14:28:52 bnemec: non-ha is testing net-iso? 14:28:58 EmilienM: No 14:29:13 At least IIRC 14:29:22 matbu: ack, it just has to do with different cloud instances have different interface(s) and names. but we can account for that in tripleo-ci 14:29:34 bnemec: I too remember it's not 14:29:53 bnemec: ok. Well, we might want to 1) enable net-iso on nonha and 2) enable ipv6 on ha 14:29:54 slagle: k 14:29:56 wdyt? 14:30:06 slagle: Could you just pass nic2 and let os-net-config map it? 14:30:32 bnemec: i'm not even sure all the instances have 2 nics 14:30:44 bnemec: i don't think all the cloud providers used by nodepool use static ip's 14:30:51 Oh, that would be a problem. 14:30:52 some only have 1 14:30:59 1 interface 14:33:05 any thoughts on my proposal? 14:33:31 slagle: or have we tried to run multinode jobs with ipv6? 14:34:23 ok sounds like we'll catch-up after the meeting 14:34:43 anything else about CI this week? 14:35:03 EmilienM: someone could try it 14:35:22 I can try it 14:36:04 panda: we are interested on having both ipv4 and ipv6 coverage 14:36:08 so let's see what we can do 14:36:26 #action panda and EmilienM to investigate how to gate with ipv6 with current jobs 14:36:52 #topic specs 14:36:55 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open 14:37:47 it's more a reminder, if you would like your spec ready to be discussed and approved by end of next Summit, please update it, make sure it pass CI and maybe engage discussion on mailing list about the spec. 14:38:43 anything else about specs? 14:39:26 #topic open discussion 14:39:54 I have (another) reminder for Summit: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-tripleo 14:40:19 feel free to polish and prepare our design sessions, I'll continue to work on the agenda next week after RC3 thing 14:40:38 sounds like we start to have a bunch of sessions, /me looking forward 14:41:19 I'll keep the discussion open a little bit, feel free to ask anything or give any feedback now 14:42:22 sounds like we're good for this week, thanks for your time! 14:42:29 #endmeeting