14:00:43 <EmilienM> #startmeeting tripleo 14:00:44 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 17 14:00:43 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is EmilienM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:46 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:48 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo' 14:00:51 <EmilienM> #topic agenda 14:00:53 <EmilienM> * Review past action items 14:00:56 <EmilienM> * One off agenda items 14:00:58 <EmilienM> * Squad status 14:00:59 <EmilienM> * Bugs & Blueprints 14:01:01 <EmilienM> * Projects releases or stable backports 14:01:03 <EmilienM> * Specs 14:01:05 <EmilienM> * Open discussion 14:01:08 <EmilienM> hello folks! 14:01:09 <EmilienM> Anyone can use the #link, #action and #info commands, not just the moderatorǃ 14:01:11 <Tengu> «o/ 14:01:13 <trown> o/ 14:01:14 <fultonj> o/ 14:01:14 <shardy_> o/ 14:01:15 <rasca> o/ 14:01:17 <ksambor> o/ 14:01:22 <weshay> 0/ 14:01:25 <marios> o/ 14:01:25 <bogdando> o/ 14:01:26 <holser_> o/ 14:01:27 <quiquell> o/ 14:01:34 <chem> o/ 14:01:53 <EmilienM> oh what a nice crowd here :-) 14:01:55 <EmilienM> #topic review past action items 14:02:04 <EmilienM> mwhahaha to review current open blueprints for progress: DONE 14:02:19 <myoung> o/ 14:02:21 <EmilienM> #topic one off agenda items 14:02:27 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items 14:02:31 <EmilienM> feel free to propose topics 14:02:39 <florianf> o/ 14:02:40 <dpeacock> o/ 14:02:44 <EmilienM> On my side, I just wanted to remind folks about this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleoci-ptg-stein 14:02:58 <beagles> o/ 14:03:04 <EmilienM> weshay: maybe we could rename it to tripleo-ptg-stein, no? 14:03:17 <EmilienM> make it one etherpad would be easier, if you're ok with it 14:03:18 <rfolco> o/ 14:03:20 <weshay> EmilienM, what ever you want man 14:03:22 <weshay> don't care 14:03:32 <EmilienM> ok I'll rename it 14:03:38 <ccamacho> heeello! 14:03:39 <jtomasek> o/ 14:03:43 <Tengu> I'm working on validations, precisely on undercloud pre-deploy validations, and would require some interest on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/582917/ as a first step - more validations will come, and there's also an RFE for a good validation "framework". 14:03:45 <EmilienM> Tengu: go ahead, I think you had a topic 14:03:56 <Tengu> EmilienM: yep :). Took time to write. 14:04:17 <Tengu> so, basically, there are multiple things in the pipe: first, add a simple support in order to run ansible playbooks from the tripleoclient 14:04:19 <ccamacho> Tengu++ I have something similar but for pre-upgrade validations 14:04:30 <Tengu> second, use the validations from tripleo-validations 14:04:54 <Tengu> and do a thing allowing to run validations outside of the deploy context. 14:05:10 <Tengu> something like `openstack validators ......' - there's an opened RFE 14:05:14 <jrist> o/ 14:05:17 <EmilienM> it sounds like a appealing topic and a bunch of folks already investigated, I hope we can work together :) 14:05:22 <Tengu> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601739 14:05:22 <openstack> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1601739 in python-tripleoclient "[RFE] Support listing and launching validators from the client, same as from the GUI" [High,New] - Assigned to rhos-maint 14:05:35 <Tengu> and as well as thread on the openstack-dev ML 14:06:01 <Tengu> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-July/132263.html 14:06:24 <Tengu> so any comment, feedback, idea... please, feel free :) 14:06:29 <chem> Tengu: ccamacho this is something which would be definitively useful for upgrade 14:06:41 <chem> Tengu: looking into it 14:06:47 <Tengu> chem: yep, there were a dedicated thread on another ML for that same topic. 14:06:57 <EmilienM> it seems to me a tripleo-specs would be useful here 14:06:59 <Tengu> chem: I jumped in it and pointed the said RFE and public ML :). 14:07:17 <Tengu> EmilienM: I can provide a first draft for that RFE, hitting Stein. 14:07:21 <EmilienM> to talk design between folks involved/interested by this effort 14:07:21 <Tengu> as well as the BP. 14:07:27 <EmilienM> Tengu: ++ awesome 14:07:41 <Tengu> #action Tengu to open a spec + BP for validation framework 14:07:47 <EmilienM> Tengu: thank you 14:07:48 <Tengu> guess I did it right :) 14:08:07 <EmilienM> if you're done, mic is on myoung :) 14:08:13 <Tengu> done :) 14:08:38 <myoung> CI Community Meeting starts immediately upon this meeting closing @ https://bluejeans.com/7050859455. All are welcome, ask/discuss anything. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-squad-meeting 14:08:51 <florianf> Tengu: One point we should probably address is how to make a good distinction between validations that need the tripleo inventory and ones that can just run with a simple local hosts file 14:09:20 <EmilienM> myoung: thanks for sharing this info. 14:09:20 <Tengu> florianf: sure thing. Please point that either in the RFE or in the ML - and we will keep that in mind in the spec. 14:09:26 <florianf> Tengu: absolutely 14:09:36 * EmilienM moving on 14:09:38 <EmilienM> #topic Squad status 14:09:44 <EmilienM> ci 14:09:46 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-squad-meeting 14:09:48 <EmilienM> upgrade 14:09:50 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-upgrade-squad-status 14:09:52 <EmilienM> containers 14:09:55 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-containers-squad-status 14:09:56 <EmilienM> config-download 14:09:58 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-config-download-squad-status 14:10:00 <EmilienM> integration 14:10:02 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-integration-squad-status 14:10:04 <EmilienM> ui/cli 14:10:06 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ui-cli-squad-status 14:10:08 <EmilienM> validations 14:10:10 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-validations-squad-status 14:10:12 <EmilienM> networking 14:10:14 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-networking-squad-status 14:10:16 <EmilienM> workflows 14:10:18 <ooolpbot> URGENT TRIPLEO TASKS NEED ATTENTION 14:10:19 <ooolpbot> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1773325 14:10:19 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1773325 in tripleo "tempest.api.object_storage.test_object_services is failing on scenario002" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Arx Cruz (arxcruz) 14:10:19 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-workflows-squad-status 14:10:20 <EmilienM> security 14:10:22 <EmilienM> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-security-squad 14:10:24 <EmilienM> please take some time to update the etherpads, I'll send a weekly owl today (after a month break) 14:10:26 <EmilienM> i know you're all waiting for the weekly owl fact... sorry for that :P 14:10:33 <EmilienM> do we have any outstanding updates from the squads? 14:10:58 <EmilienM> I have one actually, the container squad is pleased to announce that undercloud is now containerized by default, let me know any problem 14:11:04 <shardy_> nice 14:11:18 <EmilienM> it was a large team effort, thanks everyone who was involved 14:11:28 <shardy_> for integrations (openshift/ceph) I need some reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:alternate_plans please 14:11:41 <shardy_> it's a first step to decouple plan management for different applications 14:12:01 <EmilienM> #action team to help on reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:alternate_plans 14:12:19 <shardy_> thanks! 14:12:43 <EmilienM> shardy_: sounds really nice, so we could have a plan to deploy openstack , another one for ceph, another one for openshift, etc? 14:12:56 <openstackgerrit> Carlos Camacho proposed openstack/python-tripleoclient master: Integrate the pre-upgrade and post-upgrade validations in upgrades CLI https://review.openstack.org/582088 14:13:04 <shardy_> EmilienM: exactly - that t-h-t patch is the pattern to enable that 14:13:18 <EmilienM> awesome 14:13:23 <shardy_> I'll add a CLI to select a specific plan-samples/foo, the workflow to enable that already landed 14:13:26 <EmilienM> shardy_: are we targeting Rocky? 14:13:39 <shardy_> EmilienM: yes I hope so as it's been under review for a while 14:13:46 <EmilienM> +1 to make it for Rocky, indeed 14:14:00 <EmilienM> do we have any other updates from squads? 14:14:27 <EmilienM> alright, moving on! 14:14:29 <EmilienM> #topic bugs & blueprints 14:14:34 <EmilienM> #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/rocky-3 14:14:35 <EmilienM> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/76 14:14:41 <EmilienM> so... Rocky Milestone 3 is next week (I know...) 14:14:54 <EmilienM> which means we'll cut the milestone 3 tag by the end of next week 14:15:05 <EmilienM> in theory, after this tag we're not supposed to land any feature code in tripleo 14:15:13 <EmilienM> unless there is FFE granted by the PTL+team 14:15:29 <EmilienM> ask for FFE in the ML, please, if you feel like your feature won't make it on time 14:15:48 <EmilienM> after milestone 3, we're in RC mode (release candidate), so bugfix + stabilization 14:15:58 <EmilienM> if any question or feedback please go ahead 14:16:04 <openstackgerrit> Carlos Camacho proposed openstack/python-tripleoclient master: Integrate the pre-upgrade and post-upgrade validations in upgrades CLI https://review.openstack.org/582088 14:16:19 <EmilienM> we currently have one outstanding bug (in alert): https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1773325 and it seems like arxcruz got it under control 14:16:19 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1773325 in tripleo "tempest.api.object_storage.test_object_services is failing on scenario002" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Arx Cruz (arxcruz) 14:16:33 <EmilienM> is there any other outstanding bug or blueprint that we should talk about this week? 14:16:43 <Tengu> ccamacho: hm, don't you want to wait a bit for a proper validation framework? :) 14:17:11 <EmilienM> alright moving on 14:17:12 <openstackgerrit> Carlos Camacho proposed openstack/python-tripleoclient master: Integrate the pre-upgrade and post-upgrade validations in upgrades CLI https://review.openstack.org/582088 14:17:16 <EmilienM> #topic projects releases or stable backports 14:17:33 <EmilienM> we released a stable version of ocata/pike/queens last week 14:17:47 <openstackgerrit> Dan Prince proposed openstack/ansible-role-tripleo-modify-image master: Add rpm_install tasks https://review.openstack.org/583258 14:17:51 <EmilienM> the next one is scheduled for next week, after we successfully release rocky m3 14:17:51 <Tengu> (see you guys, have to run away) 14:18:06 <EmilienM> any question about release management? 14:18:12 <ccamacho> Tengu yeah but if we wan't to run the post-upgrade validations in the overcloud we should use Mistral, right? 14:18:17 <ccamacho> we need to call them also from the UI 14:18:26 <openstackgerrit> Bogdan Dobrelya proposed openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras master: Unify custom t-h-t install steps for UC/OC/upgrade https://review.openstack.org/465047 14:18:28 <EmilienM> #topic specs 14:18:33 <EmilienM> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open 14:18:51 <ccamacho> for the Undercloud case should be only Ansible **let's wait for the meeting to finish and we can keep discussing it 14:18:56 <ccamacho> Tengu++ 14:19:22 <EmilienM> #action move https://review.openstack.org/#/c/566448/ to Stein (ping ayoung) 14:19:41 <openstackgerrit> Dan Prince proposed openstack/ansible-role-tripleo-modify-image master: Add rpm_install tasks https://review.openstack.org/583258 14:19:43 <EmilienM> bfournie: are we still targeting Rocky for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451584/ ? 14:19:43 <marios> /win 1 14:19:49 <EmilienM> bfournie: can you check with Dan maybe? 14:20:00 <EmilienM> #action investigate if https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451584/ is for rocky or stein at this point 14:20:14 <EmilienM> #action move https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567579/ to stein 14:20:36 <EmilienM> any question about specs? 14:21:24 <EmilienM> #topic open discussion 14:21:35 <EmilienM> any question or feedback can be brought here :-) 14:22:22 <trown> quick question about standalone 14:22:36 <EmilienM> trown: shoot! 14:22:48 <trown> is it intentional we dont have masquerade rules on "undercloud" or just something we missed? 14:23:22 <trown> ie. when you launch a vm on the standalone cloud... it cant ping to the internet, because there is no way to get from br-ctlplane to the external interface 14:23:22 <EmilienM> trown: I think it's intentional, as we don't need it 14:23:28 <openstackgerrit> Steven Hardy proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates master: Enable decoupled deployment plans e.g for OpenShift, DPDK etc https://review.openstack.org/574753 14:23:41 <EmilienM> trown: yeah? I'll have to reverify it, the last time I deployed I could ping internet 14:23:53 <shardy_> fultonj: ^^ Hey thanks for the review, sorry but I made a silly typo in the path which should be fixed now 14:23:55 <EmilienM> but maybe it was something in my env, I'll double check, good point trown 14:23:58 <trown> EmilienM: we need it for doing openshift stuff on top of the standalone 14:24:11 <EmilienM> oh nice 14:24:14 <openstackgerrit> Ronelle Landy proposed openstack-infra/tripleo-ci master: WIP - Add Browbeat to PROJECTS https://review.openstack.org/583261 14:24:17 <EmilienM> ok I'll look at that today and let you know 14:24:21 <trown> EmilienM: cool, I have a workaround, just wasnt sure if I should try to put up a patch for it 14:24:31 <fultonj> shardy_: ack 14:24:31 <EmilienM> #action EmilienM investigates if standalone needs masquerade iptables rules 14:24:52 <EmilienM> anything else folks? 14:25:10 <trown> EmilienM: http://paste.openstack.org/show/726114/ is my workaround btw 14:25:21 <EmilienM> trown: ack, got it 14:25:36 <EmilienM> trown: I'll investigate and let you know by today eod 14:25:40 <trown> nice 14:25:42 <openstackgerrit> Ronelle Landy proposed openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras master: Include minimal Browbeat playbook in baremetal playbook https://review.openstack.org/581488 14:25:55 <EmilienM> alright, thanks everyone for your time, have a great week! (and don't miss the Weekly Owl ;-)) 14:25:58 <EmilienM> #endmeeting