14:00:19 <mwhahaha> #startmeeting tripleo
14:00:19 <mwhahaha> #topic agenda
14:00:19 <mwhahaha> * Review past action items
14:00:19 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Oct  8 14:00:19 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mwhahaha. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:20 <mwhahaha> * One off agenda items
14:00:20 <mwhahaha> * Squad status
14:00:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:21 <mwhahaha> * Bugs & Blueprints
14:00:21 <mwhahaha> * Projects releases or stable backports
14:00:22 <mwhahaha> * Specs
14:00:22 <mwhahaha> * open discussion
14:00:23 <mwhahaha> Anyone can use the #link, #action and #info commands, not just the moderatorǃ
14:00:24 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'
14:00:24 <mwhahaha> Hi everyone! who is around today?
14:00:43 <weshay|ruck> 0/
14:00:52 <fmount> o/
14:01:14 <fultonj> o/
14:01:28 <marios> o/
14:01:36 <Tengu> «o/
14:01:38 <rfolco> o/
14:01:40 <ksambor> o/
14:03:01 <openstackgerrit> Luke Short proposed openstack/tripleo-ansible master: Install packages and load kernel modules before configuring sysctl.  https://review.opendev.org/687084
14:03:08 <mwhahaha> alright let's get started
14:03:12 <mwhahaha> #topic review past action items
14:03:13 <mwhahaha> mwhahaha review train-rc1 open bugs - DONE
14:03:13 <mwhahaha> I went through and kicked out any non-blocking related items to ussuri-1.
14:03:39 <ekultails> o/
14:03:49 <mwhahaha> that's it on previous action items, any questions?
14:05:08 <mwhahaha> sounds like nope
14:05:11 <mwhahaha> #topic one off agenda items
14:05:12 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-item
14:05:26 <mwhahaha> #undo
14:05:27 <openstack> Removing item from minutes: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-item
14:05:28 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-item
14:05:33 <mwhahaha> #undo
14:05:34 <openstack> Removing item from minutes: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-item
14:05:39 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items
14:06:17 <fmount> hey mwhahaha so I have one topic for the meeting
14:06:43 <fmount> first, the ceph dashboard blueprint is implemented https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/ceph-dashboard
14:06:58 <fmount> and we're enable the deployment automation on scenario001 ^
14:07:41 <fmount> and now we're working on get rid of puppet-ceph on the ceph rgw tripleo templates
14:07:48 <fmount> so we need some help on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676419
14:07:58 <gfidente> fmount++
14:07:59 <mwhahaha> so this is really late in the cycle to be trying to get this in
14:08:01 <fmount> basically we're moving to tripleo-ansible roles
14:08:17 <dpeacock> o/
14:08:17 <fmount> and we're going to add cloudnull and other folks to validate it
14:08:28 <fmount> to make sure we're doing right
14:08:39 <openstackgerrit> Bogdan Dobrelya (bogdando) proposed openstack/tripleo-common master: Never block or wait when workers upload images  https://review.opendev.org/686756
14:08:40 <EmilienM> like mwhahaha I think it's too late in the cycle to merge that code
14:08:57 <fultonj> perhaps it waits and merges into U then
14:09:01 <EmilienM> otherwise why are we doing stabilization milestones
14:09:25 <fmount> EmilienM: yeah exactly, it can wait and we can merge it into U
14:09:26 <EmilienM> i would rather land it in U, wait for things to be "stable" (tm) and backport it if needed
14:09:35 <fmount> EmilienM: sure
14:10:30 <fmount> I think here we just want to start reviewing the provided PS
14:10:39 <fmount> to make sure we're going in the right direction
14:10:47 <mwhahaha> k
14:10:51 <fmount> merging int U is fine
14:11:02 <fmount> s/int/into
14:11:32 <fmount> cloudnull: I'll add you in the https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676419
14:11:44 <mwhahaha> i'll try to take a look at it today as well
14:11:47 <mwhahaha> that's it on the agenda, any other questions/topics/concerns?
14:11:59 <cloudnull> fmount ++
14:12:10 <fmount> for me it's ok, fultonj gfidente do you have any topic in addition?
14:12:14 <fultonj> fmount++
14:12:25 <fultonj> not today
14:12:36 <openstackgerrit> Carlos Goncalves proposed openstack/tripleo-ansible master: Simplify octavia post deploy configs  https://review.opendev.org/687311
14:12:38 <fmount> ok, so we can move on
14:12:56 <fmount> thx mwhahaha
14:13:02 <mwhahaha> k
14:13:06 <mwhahaha> #topic Squad status
14:13:06 <mwhahaha> ci
14:13:06 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-squad-meeting
14:13:06 <mwhahaha> upgrade
14:13:06 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-upgrade-squad-status
14:13:07 <mwhahaha> edge
14:13:07 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-edge-squad-status
14:13:08 <mwhahaha> integration
14:13:08 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-integration-squad-status
14:13:09 <mwhahaha> validations
14:13:09 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-validations-squad-status
14:13:10 <mwhahaha> networking
14:13:10 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-networking-squad-status
14:13:11 <mwhahaha> transformation
14:13:11 <mwhahaha> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ansible-agenda
14:13:12 <mwhahaha> any status related items?
14:13:27 <weshay|ruck> sample job time data here: http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/si1tipHZk/jobs-exploration?orgId=1&from=now-6M&to=now&fullscreen&panelId=16
14:14:00 <weshay|ruck> rhel8 scenario001 - 004 are all green working, and voting in 3rd party.  Please do not ignore these jobs :)
14:14:15 <weshay|ruck> we may want to review where we are running those
14:14:20 <mwhahaha> a likely story
14:14:41 <weshay|ruck> meh.. /me flips table
14:15:06 <weshay|ruck> that's all from me
14:15:12 <mwhahaha> k anything else?
14:15:31 <matbu> mwhahaha: i have another point, can we move the upgrades job to voting
14:15:45 <matbu> since its really stable for a while
14:15:51 <matbu> https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades
14:16:08 <mwhahaha> i don't think we ever will have master upgrades voting
14:16:15 <mwhahaha> once we cut train, we can make the train version voting
14:16:28 <mwhahaha> because it's likely that'll we'll break something in like 2 weeks
14:16:39 <matbu> mwhahaha: then train and all the old releases would be nice
14:16:47 <openstackgerrit> Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates master: Convert container environment from a list to a dict  https://review.opendev.org/687293
14:16:56 <mwhahaha> i'm ok with making the stable jobs voting
14:16:58 <marios> mwhahaha: we've spoken about that before... the only other way is to make it voting 'during the right time' and then revert
14:17:06 <marios> mwhahaha: i.e. close to/after release its usually green.
14:17:27 <marios> matbu: stein is voting already for that reason (standalone-upgrade stein at least) but master isn't
14:17:40 <marios> matbu: so yeah once train available we do the same
14:18:11 <matbu> marios: yep but im talking about the upgrades (not standalone)
14:18:22 <matbu> i'm working on deguging other failing jobs
14:18:30 <matbu> to increase the coverage as much
14:18:48 <marios> matbu: ack
14:22:11 <mwhahaha> alright moving on
14:22:14 <mwhahaha> #topic bugs & blueprints
14:22:14 <mwhahaha> #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/train-rc1
14:22:14 <mwhahaha> For Train we currently have 27 blueprints and 514 (-7) open Launchpad Bugs. 5 train-rc1, 509 ussuri-1.  92 (+0) open Storyboard bugs.
14:22:14 <mwhahaha> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/76
14:22:22 <mwhahaha> any bug questions/issues?
14:25:07 <ekultails> Yes
14:25:38 <openstackgerrit> Alex Schultz proposed openstack/tripleo-common master: Make executor type dynamic  https://review.opendev.org/686181
14:26:48 <ekultails> We've been running into an issue relating br_netfilter in CI on random environments. I believe my latest patch should help fix the problem by avoiding dependency problems (i.e., a kernel module is not loaded first before applying sysctl settings). Would appreciate some reviews (but it's still pending CI tests). https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687084/
14:28:06 <mwhahaha> i thought br_netfliter was a built-in
14:28:07 * mwhahaha shrugs
14:29:10 <ekultails> Yeah, we're not sure why it's become a problem recently. It's only on some CI instances (not all of them) that we consistently don't have br_netfilter loaded in CentOS.
14:29:22 <EmilienM> new centos? dunno
14:30:05 <ekultails> And in TripleO we've never ensured br_netfilter was loaded. My new patch will now check for that.
14:30:58 <hjensas> unit tests TestUndercloudUpgrade in tripleoclient on stable/rocky is broken for me locally. Is that something we've seen in CI yet?
14:31:21 <Tengu> ekultails: your change seems nice.
14:31:49 <marios> hjensas: try oooq arxcruz|rover weshay|ruck (check there for known things https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ruckroversprint16 )
14:32:21 <openstackgerrit> Luke Short proposed openstack/tripleo-ansible master: Install packages and load kernel modules before configuring sysctl.  https://review.opendev.org/687084
14:32:27 <mwhahaha> hjensas: can you file a bug and i'll look into it later
14:32:46 <weshay|ruck> hjensas, which review? I've been bad about updating that.. very busy
14:33:02 <marios> weshay|ruck: 17:30 < hjensas> unit tests TestUndercloudUpgrade in tripleoclient on stable/rocky is broken for me locally. Is that something we've
14:33:12 <weshay|ruck> tripleoclient rocky got it
14:33:27 <hjensas> mwhahaha: marios: weshay|ruck, thanks, I did'nt push my review yet as tests failed. Then I noticed they fail when I checkout stable/rocky and do no changes.
14:33:46 <mwhahaha> k we might have some broken requirements or something
14:33:47 * hjensas will investigate a bit, and push a fix or open a bug if I can't figure it out.
14:33:49 <mwhahaha> i'll take a look
14:34:35 <mwhahaha> alright moving on
14:34:36 <mwhahaha> #topic projects releases or stable backports
14:34:45 <mwhahaha> we need to be thinking about rc1
14:34:56 <mwhahaha> perhaps next week unless there's some additional blockers that pop up
14:35:03 <mwhahaha> any thoughts on that?
14:35:39 <weshay|ruck> mwhahaha, just please loop me in
14:35:44 <mwhahaha> k
14:36:52 <mwhahaha> #topic specs
14:36:53 <mwhahaha> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open
14:37:00 <mwhahaha> once again, U is starting so get your specs in
14:37:06 <mwhahaha> #topic open discussion
14:37:11 <mwhahaha> anything else?
14:39:30 <Tengu> owalsh: btw, https://review.opendev.org/686388 makes zuul happy, and pretty sure Tobias will also be happier with that solution. Lemme know if it matches your thoughts.
14:40:51 <mwhahaha> alright thanks everyone
14:40:54 <mwhahaha> #endmeeting