14:00:01 <marios|rover> #startmeeting tripleo
14:00:02 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Dec  8 14:00:01 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is marios|rover. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:03 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:06 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'
14:00:14 <marios|rover> let's see then :)
14:00:18 <marios|rover> #topic agenda
14:00:18 <marios|rover> * Review last minutes & action items
14:00:18 <marios|rover> * One off agenda items
14:00:18 <marios|rover> * Bugs & Blueprints
14:00:18 <marios|rover> * Projects releases or stable backports
14:00:20 <marios|rover> * Specs
14:00:23 <marios|rover> * open discussion
14:00:25 <marios|rover> Anyone can use the #link, #action and #info commands, not just the moderator«É
14:00:28 <marios|rover> Hello folks, who is around today? o/
14:00:30 <beagles> o/
14:00:37 <marios|rover> \o/
14:00:53 <marios|rover> ;) i think it is going to be pretty quiet going off of the https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items ...
14:00:54 <slagle> hello
14:01:16 <tkajinam> o/
14:01:19 <beagles> heh yeah pretty light agenda
14:01:40 <marios|rover> beagles: that's ok. we do this a few more times then we can it if there are no takers...
14:01:58 <marios|rover> so lets go
14:02:01 <marios|rover> #topic review last meeting logs & action items
14:02:20 <marios|rover> #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2020/tripleo.2020-11-24-14.00.log.html
14:02:24 <rlandy> o/
14:02:28 <marios|rover> don't think we had any action items... checking
14:02:38 <chkumar|ruck> \o/
14:02:48 <marios|rover> ah well, about the specs merge but we have an agenda item for that...
14:02:57 <marios|rover> anything else about last week logs someone wants to point at?
14:03:06 <frenzy_friday> 0/
14:03:34 <marios|rover> k moving on
14:03:44 <marios|rover> #topic one off agenda items
14:03:47 <marios|rover> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items
14:04:03 <marios|rover> #info component pipeline standalone-upgrade jobs     added for tripleo component https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31200/
14:04:25 <marios|rover> not merged yet but almost there ^^^ this is something we discussed with the upgrades folks a little while back
14:04:54 <marios|rover> we can add to more components in time
14:05:11 <marios|rover> any other ongoing work folks want to hilight, or any other one-off agenda items?
14:05:48 <fultonj> o/
14:06:22 <marios|rover> k
14:06:32 <fultonj> apologies if this has been covered but...
14:06:40 <fultonj> w.r.t. the rdo issue
14:06:51 <marios|rover> #reminder use https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items for any items you want to bring to the next tripleo meeting
14:06:57 <marios|rover> #info reminder use https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items for any items you want to bring to the next tripleo meeting
14:07:03 <marios|rover> fultonj: which one :)
14:07:08 <fultonj> noone said not to re-run check-rdo
14:07:33 <fultonj> is it ok to do so or should we leave it be until it's fixed?
14:07:54 <marios|rover> fultonj: yeah, we were hoping that would have been resolved, if you are referring to https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1907193
14:07:56 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1907193 in tripleo "package podman-1.6.4-23.module_el8.3.0+566+4759265c.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering" [High,Triaged] - Assigned to Alex Schultz (alex-schultz)
14:08:10 <marios|rover> fultonj: resolved by https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31309/
14:08:16 <marios|rover> fultonj: or which rdo issue are you referring to
14:08:56 <marios|rover> fultonj: perhaps you are referring to yesterdays node failure issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1907049 ?
14:08:58 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1907049 in tripleo "Multiple node_failure on rdo jobs blocking rdo check jobs" [Critical,Triaged]
14:09:04 <fultonj> the one making my patch fail ci
14:09:06 <marios|rover> fultonj: which should be mostly fixed now (though we have new issues)
14:09:08 <marios|rover> fultonj: heh :)
14:09:12 <fultonj> sorry , i realize that is ambigous
14:09:18 * fultonj is unprepared and improvising
14:09:26 <marios|rover> fultonj: ack np... so yeah you make a good point
14:09:41 <fultonj> can i use check-rdo ?
14:09:47 <fultonj> 0|1
14:09:50 <marios|rover> fultonj: i thought we would have merged the fix for the 'new' rdo issue from today but there was a problem in the gate for that (https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31309/
14:10:35 <marios|rover> fultonj: we can have a look at your patch after the meeting?
14:10:39 <fultonj> yes
14:10:48 <marios|rover> anything else for one-off items?
14:11:57 <tkajinam> I have one item related to CI
14:12:13 <tkajinam> I noticed that there are still some open patches for new content provider job https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522new-ci-job%2522+(status:open)
14:12:15 <openstackgerrit> Alex Schultz proposed openstack/tripleo-ansible stable/victoria: Ansible-runner is failing when passing host to display  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/765947
14:12:17 <openstackgerrit> Rabi Mishra proposed openstack/python-tripleoclient master: Align lower-constraints for new pip  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-tripleoclient/+/765910
14:12:34 <tkajinam> I pushed the last patch for puppet modules, but we might need some attention to land the remaining ones for tripleo components...
14:12:41 <openstackgerrit> Alex Schultz proposed openstack/tripleo-ansible stable/ussuri: Ansible-runner is failing when passing host to display  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/765948
14:13:14 <openstackgerrit> Alex Schultz proposed openstack/tripleo-ansible stable/train: Ansible-runner is failing when passing host to display  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/765949
14:13:32 <marios|rover> tkajinam: can you please add info & pointers to https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items too ?
14:14:15 <tkajinam> marios|rover, done
14:14:25 <marios|rover> tkajinam: thanks for the info... some of those https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522new-ci-job%2522+(status:open) especially the stable/ussuri python-tripleoclient and tripleo-common are fighting the gate
14:14:39 <tkajinam> yeah
14:15:00 <marios|rover> #info     There are still some open patch for new ci job based on content provider jobs     https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522new-ci-job%2522+(status:open)
14:15:03 <marios|rover> thanks
14:15:13 <marios|rover> #info     [fultonj] we are basically ready to land https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22tripleo_ceph_client%22
14:15:28 <marios|rover> k anything else on one-off items?
14:16:10 <marios|rover> moving on
14:16:17 <marios|rover> #topic Bugs and blueprints
14:16:17 <marios|rover> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/
14:16:17 <marios|rover> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/tripleo-ansible
14:16:17 <marios|rover> #link  https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/wallaby-1
14:16:18 <marios|rover> #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/wallaby
14:16:51 <marios|rover> k, so first off, since wallaby-1 was last week, this morning i closed out wallaby-1 and moved bugs to wallaby-2
14:17:04 <marios|rover> #info released https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/wallaby-1 & moved bugs to wallaby-2 https://gist.github.com/marios/b3155fe3b1318cc26bfa4bc15c764a26#gistcomment-3554253
14:17:36 <marios|rover> wrt ongoing bugs - there are a couple of ongoing issues hitting gates, notably https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1907193 hitting ussuri
14:17:37 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1907193 in tripleo "package podman-1.6.4-23.module_el8.3.0+566+4759265c.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering" [High,Triaged] - Assigned to Alex Schultz (alex-schultz)
14:17:56 <marios|rover> chkumar|ruck: help me out anything else major on gates today
14:18:22 <marios|rover> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1907122 this is another ongoing major bug that affects upgrade jobs
14:18:23 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1907122 in tripleo "gating repo improperly enabled across releases, enabling the wrong patches to be integrated into build" [Critical,Triaged]
14:18:39 <chkumar|ruck> marios|rover: nope
14:18:45 <chkumar|ruck> marios|rover: just above bug
14:18:48 <marios|rover> thanks chkumar|ruck
14:19:25 <marios|rover> anything other bugs or CI issues someone wants to hilight? or any discussion about wallaby-1/wallaby-2
14:19:57 <marios|rover> we still have a huge number of bugs... 367 targetted to wallaby-2
14:20:15 <marios|rover> so as always please check https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/wallaby-2 and deal with any stale bugs that are assigned to you
14:20:32 <marios|rover> #info check https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/wallaby-2 and update or close stale bugs
14:21:08 <marios|rover> k moving on i think...
14:21:33 <marios|rover> #topic specs
14:21:33 <marios|rover> #info https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs
14:21:35 <marios|rover> #info https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/src/branch/master/specs/wallaby
14:22:10 <marios|rover> so last week i sent a reminder about merging these close to wallaby-1 http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019204.html
14:22:21 <marios|rover> #info     [tripleo] wallaby-1 milestone and open specs http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019204.html
14:22:43 <marios|rover> i think we still have a couple that are new and need reviews
14:22:51 <marios|rover> sorry, one is new, couple that are still in progress
14:22:56 <slagle> i filed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/765000 last week
14:23:03 <slagle> thanks for the feedback so far
14:23:30 <openstackgerrit> David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/tripleo-ansible master: Adding an optional startup delay to containers  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/766004
14:23:47 <openstackgerrit> Rafael Folco proposed openstack/tripleo-ci master: pytest-html report for tcib container builds  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/755124
14:23:59 <marios|rover> anything about the open specs folks want to discuss here?
14:24:11 <fultonj> #info ganesha spec modified; cephadm will now do what ceph-ansible did, we won't be forking anything (as discussed at PTG) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/759395
14:24:28 <marios|rover> thank you fultonj
14:24:31 <hjensas> I think https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/760536 is pretty close, thanks for all the feedback!
14:25:26 <marios|rover> k... moving on
14:25:39 <marios|rover> #topic open discussion
14:25:40 <marios|rover> Anything else that folks want to bring up to the meeting?
14:25:47 <marios|rover> so any other business tripleos?
14:26:12 <marios|rover> what do folks think about this meeting? any ideas about how we can get more folks to join?
14:26:37 <marios|rover> i mean, we took a vote at PTG to start it again. wondering if the biweekly is confusing/folks don't remember when
14:26:55 <beagles> do you think that the time of the year might be contributing to the light attendance?
14:27:03 <marios|rover> yeah possibly beagles
14:27:15 <openstackgerrit> David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates master: Adding an optional startup delay to containers  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/766005
14:27:29 <beagles> re biweekly my mitigating strategy is to always show up and see if I got the week right
14:27:38 <marios|rover> beagles: heh :)
14:27:40 <beagles> 50% chance of success :)
14:27:56 <marios|rover> beagles: i've been sending reminders about this hoping it would help i.e. reminder about the next meeting on the mailing list
14:28:25 <marios|rover> anyway, i mean we won't have this just for the sake of having it. if we the folks that are actually turning up here, find this useful, then we'll continue.
14:28:32 <marios|rover> otherwise we won't
14:28:39 <beagles> something that occurred to me is that I should be doing some more lobbying within the groups I work with to see if there are some issues that they want to bring forward
14:28:56 <beagles> I've been working more in "push model"
14:29:07 <marios|rover> so let's give it a few more weeks and we can have that conversation again...
14:29:12 <marios|rover> thanks beagles
14:29:26 <marios|rover> anything else last chance
14:30:06 <marios|rover> thanks for attending and participating, see you in 2 weeks :)
14:30:09 <marios|rover> #endmeeting tripleo