14:00:05 <marios> #startmeeting tripleo
14:00:06 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Dec 22 14:00:05 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is marios. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:09 <weshay|ruck> 0/
14:00:10 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'
14:00:15 <fultonj> o/
14:00:16 <marios> #topic agenda
14:00:16 <marios> * Review last minutes & action items
14:00:16 <marios> * One off agenda items
14:00:16 <marios> * Bugs & Blueprints
14:00:16 <marios> * Projects releases or stable backports
14:00:19 <marios> * Specs
14:00:21 <marios> * open discussion
14:00:24 <marios> Anyone can use the #link, #action and #info commands, not just the moderator«É
14:00:26 <marios> Hello folks, who is around today? o/
14:00:29 <marios> o/
14:00:32 <fmount> o/
14:00:36 <fultonj> \o
14:01:02 <marios> ok should be a nice and short meeting today then ;)
14:01:02 <ysandeep> o/
14:01:12 <marios> let's get going
14:01:20 <marios> #topic review last meeting logs & action items
14:01:32 <marios> #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2020/tripleo.2020-12-08-14.00.log.html
14:01:45 <marios> not sure we had any action items checking
14:02:04 <marios> #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2020/tripleo.2020-12-08-14.00.html
14:02:09 <marios> that one is easier to read quickly ^
14:02:29 <marios> anything someone wants to raise regarding last meeting?
14:03:09 <marios> k moving on
14:03:16 <marios> #topic one off agenda items
14:03:18 <marios> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items
14:03:49 <marios> #info Storage     [fultonj]      We hope to merge https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22tripleo_ceph_client%22 to complete spec https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/wallaby/tripleo-ceph-client.html
14:03:50 <ccamacho> o/ :)
14:03:58 <fultonj> 1 of the 4 specs for W is 2 reviews away from being completed
14:04:01 <fultonj> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/766097
14:04:02 <fultonj> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/760915
14:04:17 <fultonj> if anyone wants to review ^ that would be great
14:04:27 <marios> #info     We're adding cephadm to overcloud image https://review.opendev.org/767294 for https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/wallaby/tripleo-ceph.html
14:04:32 <marios> #info     We will merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/759395 after the meeting unless anyone objects
14:04:44 <marios> thanks fultonj ... i just copy/pasted the items here for the minutes ^
14:04:44 <fmount> the cephadm reviews are already merged
14:04:46 <fultonj> #info 1 of the 4 specs for W is 2 reviews away from being completed
14:05:37 <fultonj> so we're basically working on our 2nd spec (cephadm) and then we'll start our 3rd (ganesha). we seem to be on schedule.
14:05:52 <fultonj> that's all from storage i think
14:05:56 <marios> fultonj: nice thank you for the updates on that
14:06:14 <marios> zbr: around? you added one here for CI
14:06:22 <marios> #info CI     tripleo-repos got a regression on centos-7 because there were no testing on that, an attempt to enable testing was stopped around one year ago https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/674571 -- and that was aiming to validate repositories in less than ~10mins. We should need to make real deployments in order to valdiate that we are able to setup repositories on *all* supported
14:06:28 <marios> platforms.
14:06:52 <marios> zbr: sorin was referring to lack of molecule testing on tripleo-repos
14:07:15 <marios> zbr: any update on that is it something you're currently working on?
14:07:35 <weshay|ruck> #info centos-8 ovb 3rd party jobs are all running and passing at a good clip again..  master, victoria, ussuri, train :)
14:07:47 <marios> #info     component standalone-upgrade jobs (tripleo-component only so far) @ https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-upgrade-tripleo-ussuri&job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-upgrade-tripleo-master&job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-upgrade-tripleo-victoria - adding to promotion criteria
14:07:52 <marios> https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31358/ (ussuri blocked https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1907769/comments/8 )
14:07:54 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1907769 in tripleo "standalone-upgrade-ussuri can't start containers during deployment container-puppet step2" [Critical,Fix released]
14:08:09 <marios> after some discussion with the upgrades folks a few weeks back we have now added a component standalone-upgrade ^^
14:08:43 <marios> i know the upgrades team was interested in working on that so i need to reach out to them about expanding this coverage
14:08:45 <weshay|ruck> marios, aye.. is the plan to place upgrade jobs in non-tripleo components as well?
14:08:49 <marios> i.e. adding to other components
14:08:56 <weshay|ruck> boom.. :)
14:08:57 <weshay|ruck> thanks
14:08:57 <marios> weshay|ruck: right, depends on what/where it makes sense to
14:09:11 <marios> weshay|ruck: but mainly the upgrades team wanted to be involved there so they could see how 'this stuff works' type of thing
14:09:28 <ccamacho> jfrancoa: ^
14:09:39 <marios> we also improved the coverage in the tripleo-upgrade repo with
14:09:55 <marios> #info     tripleo-upgrade - moved to content-providers & improved coverage https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:tripleo-upgrade-provider-jobs-coverage
14:10:15 <marios> k, and a couple of community related items
14:10:23 <marios> #info     [TripleO] moving stable/rocky for tripleo repos to unmaintained (+ then EOL) OK? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019338.html
14:10:46 <marios> this one... we have brought up before and I said I would send something out to openstack-discuss about it. I haven't seen any response so far
14:10:47 <weshay|ruck> \0/
14:11:20 <marios> so in the new year we can start moving this. I am not sure yet if we need to do 'unmaintained' or if we can go straight to EOL. But we will find out once we start and post the eol patch if we decide to go that way
14:11:38 <marios> for unmaintained we don't actually need to do something other than 'declare' it afaik
14:12:03 <marios> any comments/thoughts about that? please respond to the list later as well if you prefer
14:12:04 <cloudnull> good mornings
14:12:05 <zbr> marios: busy picking xmas turkey
14:12:16 <marios> zbr: ;) o/ cloudnull
14:12:24 <zbr> o/
14:12:40 <marios> #info     [infra][tripleo] is it possible to control (tripleo) gate queue priority?http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019506.html
14:12:55 <marios> this came up recently when we were having some gate woes.
14:13:16 <marios> we were looking for a less disruptive way to clear the queue without abandoning all the things but it seems there is no alternative
14:13:22 <marios> so that will continue to happen when needed ...
14:13:58 <marios> any comments on this?
14:14:13 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist master: neutron NetworkSecGroupTest failing  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/768152
14:14:36 <marios> in some cases if we know we need a particular patch to merge that will fix all the things, we *can* reach out to infra as replied by jeremy but that is not something we could do all the time
14:15:08 <marios> #info     Last victoria release was around 2 months back https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/760571, can we have new tag releases for victoria?
14:15:29 <marios> k i was going to bring this up later in the agenda we have a release requests item ^^^ who added that are you around?
14:16:05 <marios> k noted anyway...
14:16:11 <marios> anything else on one-off items?
14:16:46 <ykarel> i added that
14:16:55 <fultonj> #info would be nice to merge the Network Data v2 - node ports spec
14:16:59 <fultonj> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/760536
14:16:59 <marios> ykarel: thanks and ack on that
14:17:26 <fultonj> #info probably need reviews from network/hardware prov people for that
14:17:30 <marios> thanks fultonj
14:17:53 <marios> fultonj: we can review those int he specs section in a minute if there is more to discuss there
14:18:01 <fmount> yeah, and just mentioning the new ceph integration depends on it
14:18:12 <marios> thanks fmount
14:18:20 <cloudnull> re: queue priority, I remember there being some mechanisms being worked on within Zuul for some better control over items in the various queues. Maybe worth reaching out to them?
14:18:58 <marios> cloudnull: so that's what the mail i sent to list was mainly about ... there is a mechanism that can be used, but it can't be delegated to us
14:19:04 <marios> cloudnull: so 'infra' has to do it on our behalf
14:19:11 <cloudnull> oh nevermind, looks like jeremey already commented on the thread
14:19:13 <marios> cloudnull: i was asking if we could do it instead of asking them
14:19:19 <gfidente> fultonj fmount marios I guess it depends on it if we split off ceph deployment from overcloud
14:19:23 * cloudnull went to the next message (slow reader)
14:19:28 <marios> ack thanks cloudnull
14:20:07 <fultonj> gfidente: i took it to be when (not if)
14:20:27 <fmount> +1
14:20:38 <marios> fultonj: yes this was my understanding too .. the if bit was 'if we can deliver it in wallaby ' ?
14:20:52 <marios> gfidente: fultonj: fmount: but let's hold on the specs discussion for a sec?
14:20:54 <fultonj> gfidente: but yes we can get other things done in the mean time during the overcloud deploy
14:20:59 * fultonj holds
14:21:03 <marios> thx :D
14:21:21 <marios> #topic Bugs and blueprints
14:21:22 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/
14:21:22 <marios> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/tripleo-ansible
14:21:23 <marios> #link  https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/wallaby-2
14:21:28 <marios> #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/wallaby
14:21:50 <weshay|ruck> thanks marios
14:21:52 <marios> as always just a reminder to please check the wallaby-2 bugs and if any are yours can you update them/close etc
14:22:07 <marios> #info reminder please close stale bugs https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/wallaby-2
14:22:34 <marios> any bugs worth hilighting this week? ruck|rovers around?
14:23:16 <marios> k moving on ...
14:23:25 <marios> #topic Project releases or stable backports
14:23:26 <marios> #info tripleo wallaby repos https://releases.openstack.org/teams/tripleo.html#wallaby
14:23:42 <marios> k so ykarel has requested a victoria release - ack on that ykarel
14:24:00 <marios> i was considering making a W release but i don't think anything is stable enough for it yet, doesn't make sense
14:24:05 <marios> but for victoria sure good idea ykarel
14:24:10 <ykarel> Thanks marios
14:24:19 <marios> any other requests for releases?
14:24:56 <marios> k let's move on to the specs discussion :) sorry to interrupt you fultonj
14:24:57 <marios> #topic specs
14:25:01 <marios> #info https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs
14:25:03 <marios> #info https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/src/branch/master/specs/wallaby
14:25:30 <marios> still a couple that are open and need some attention
14:25:31 <fultonj> #info would be nice to merge the Network Data v2 - node ports spec
14:25:31 <fultonj> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/760536
14:25:38 <marios> thank you
14:26:03 <fultonj> we mentioned a ceph dep for that, for when we do ceph deployment before the overcloud
14:26:10 <marios> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/765000 ephemeral heat depends on the network v2 as well
14:26:28 <marios> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/758249 FRRouter
14:26:32 <fultonj> i'm pretty sure that remains the plan though it might lead over to X given timing. we'll see. we can still make progress
14:26:51 <fultonj> but in general we have deps on this spec and it's in good shape IMO
14:27:02 <fmount> as long as we're confident to get network data v2 in W I think we can following the plan of splitting of the ceph deployment before the overcloud is deployed
14:27:08 <fmount> *follow
14:27:16 <marios> fultonj: i will just merge that now? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/759395 wdyt
14:27:24 <marios> (ceph-ganesha)
14:27:32 <fultonj> yes, thanks marios
14:27:33 <fmount> yeah
14:27:40 <marios> k done
14:27:42 <fmount> thanks a lot marios for the help
14:27:55 <marios> fmount: np really didn't do anything there ;)
14:28:23 <marios> anything else on specs?
14:28:58 <marios> i know hjensas has already started a lot of the implementation of the network ports v2 work with slagle and rabi
14:29:07 <marios> maybe we can get some updates in the new year on that
14:29:20 <fultonj> +1
14:29:36 <fmount> so on my side I don't have additionals things, just a reminder that the tripleo_ceph_client (which is the first spec) is landed and we need help on 766097 and 760915
14:29:42 <fmount> gfidente: ^
14:30:22 <marios> k let's move on if there is nothign further for today in this item
14:30:41 <marios> #topic open discussion
14:30:42 <marios> Anything else that folks want to bring up to the meeting?
14:30:45 <marios> ccamacho: o/
14:30:46 <fultonj> #link https://imgur.com/a/5rSXMTe
14:30:53 <marios> ccamacho: do you want to share your christmas card? ;D
14:31:02 <ccamacho> weshay|ruck fungi gfidente marios jfrancoa cloudnull Merry Christmas!
14:31:03 <ccamacho> jaja
14:31:05 <ccamacho> awesome!
14:31:06 <ccamacho> :)
14:31:08 <cloudnull> o/
14:31:10 <marios> nice fultonj :)
14:31:18 <fultonj> thx ccamacho
14:31:22 <marios> thanks ccamacho
14:31:25 <cloudnull> great job on the xmas card  ccamacho
14:31:33 <ccamacho> fultonj++ thank you for posting it here
14:31:42 <fmount> :D
14:31:55 <marios> well happy holidays to one and all. hope everyone gets some recharge time
14:32:03 <marios> all the best to you & yours for the new year !
14:32:10 <marios> i mean 2021 can only be an improvement!
14:32:13 <ccamacho> same guys!
14:32:33 <weshay|ruck> ccamacho, you too! have a relaxing break!
14:32:35 <fultonj> yes, 2021 can only be an improvement
14:33:06 <weshay|ruck> and now fultonj jinxes himself
14:33:17 <marios> thanks everyone for participating today. see you in the new year. next meeting tuesday 05 Jan
14:33:36 <marios> #info next meeting tuesday 05 Jan 2021 1400 UTC #tripleo
14:33:45 <gfidente> merry christmas and happy new year everyone :D
14:33:50 <marios> \o/
14:33:57 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/tripleo-specs master: Introduce tripleo-ceph-ganesha spec  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/759395
14:34:01 <marios> #endmeeting tripleo