14:00:00 <marios> #startmeeting tripleo
14:00:01 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Apr 27 14:00:00 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is marios. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:02 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:04 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'
14:00:17 <marios> #topic agenda
14:00:18 <marios> * Review last minutes & action items
14:00:18 <marios> * One off agenda items
14:00:18 <marios> * Bugs & Blueprints
14:00:18 <marios> * Projects releases or stable backports
14:00:20 <marios> * Specs
14:00:22 <marios> * open discussion
14:00:25 <marios> Anyone can use the #link, #action and #info commands, not just the moderatorǃ
14:00:29 <marios> hello tripleo good morning afternoon and evening o/
14:00:36 <marios> who is with us today?
14:00:38 <Tengu> «o/
14:00:51 <weshay|ruck> 0/
14:01:09 <jbadiapa> o/
14:01:23 <slagle> hi
14:01:27 <marios> ok lets get going and folks can join as usual or read back later ;)
14:01:31 <marios> hello all
14:01:40 <marios> #topic review last meeting logs & action items
14:02:00 <marios> #link last meet http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2021/tripleo.2021-04-13-14.00.html
14:02:15 <marios> is there anything to be brought from the last meeting ? /me checks quickly
14:02:20 <rlandy|rover> o/
14:02:40 <tkajinam> o/
14:02:43 <dpeacock> o/
14:02:54 <marios> cant see seomthing and we had ptg since then so ... lets go
14:03:06 <marios> #topic one off agenda items
14:03:09 <marios> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items
14:03:22 <marios> lets take them in order as always
14:03:28 <marios> slagle: o/ do you want to go ahead please?
14:03:33 <marios> no sorry
14:03:36 <marios> Tengu: first :)
14:03:46 <marios> apologies slagle and tengu... Tengu please go ahead?
14:04:22 <Tengu> ah, well - it's just in order to get feedback on the new spec
14:04:40 <marios> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-xena-drop-healthchecks
14:04:42 <marios> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/787535
14:04:42 <Tengu> I've seen some comment already, I have to address them.
14:04:44 <openstackgerrit> Douglas Mendizábal proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates stable/victoria: Add new options for Barbican PKCS#11 backend  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/787242
14:05:15 <Tengu> for the records, the goal is to remove """useless""" healthchecks, or replace them by something more accurate than "check_ports" and related.
14:05:39 * marios noting there are recordings for all the ptg sessions will provide links in a bit
14:05:40 <Tengu> this should lead to less pressure on the nodes, and maybe even less podman calls if we can go with an external service instead of the container healthchecks.
14:05:52 <marios> ( well, except day 1 :(  )
14:06:03 <openstackgerrit> Douglas Mendizábal proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates stable/ussuri: Add new options for Barbican PKCS#11 backend  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/788303
14:06:04 <Tengu> yeah, have linked the session's etherpad.
14:06:45 <marios> ok any comments or questions for tengu here pleas?
14:06:58 <marios> otherwise review this spec and participate if you are interested
14:07:06 <Tengu> thanks :)
14:07:12 <marios> thank you Tengu
14:07:17 <marios> o/ slagle please go ahead?
14:07:34 <slagle> just wanted to draw attention to the ephemeral heat branch
14:07:36 <slagle> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22ephemeral-heat%22+(status:open)
14:07:46 <slagle> it should be ready to merge based on previous reviews
14:07:56 <openstackgerrit> Douglas Mendizábal proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates stable/train: Add new options for Barbican PKCS#11 backend  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/788305
14:08:01 <slagle> one question is do we want to squash it down to a single patch?
14:08:15 <slagle> each patch has passed ci, and it might make it easier to merge and backport
14:08:30 <Tengu> I'd tend to agree with the squashing.
14:08:40 <marios> slagle: imo it makes it much harder to review as a single patch
14:08:51 <Tengu> master was already reviewed... ?
14:09:00 <marios> oh this is for stable?
14:09:12 <marios> no it is against master Tengu
14:09:15 <slagle> i'd squash on master as well
14:09:17 <Tengu> oh
14:09:20 <marios> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22ephemeral-heat%22+(status:open)
14:09:32 <Tengu> sorry, thought it was (already) the backport
14:09:42 <marios> Tengu: he is arguing that we squash all those ^^^ before merging it
14:09:54 <marios> in order for the eventual stable/wallaby /victoria ? backports to be easier
14:10:02 <marios> personally i'd argue against it but that is just me
14:10:21 <marios> slagle: so mainly you're referring to the tripleoclient patches i guess
14:10:25 <slagle> we can leave it as-is, but it needs reviews or we'll need to start blocking tripleoclient until it gets landed
14:10:35 <slagle> b/c of all the rebasing at this point
14:10:49 <Tengu> ... if I can use my core power outside of the validation scope, I might help on the reviews... ?
14:10:51 <openstackgerrit> Bogdan Dobrelya proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates stable/victoria: Run update tasks with become  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/788261
14:10:57 <marios> k so please help slagle to start merging those 17:09 < marios> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22ephemeral-heat%22+(status:open)
14:10:58 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/tripleo-validations stable/train: Make tls_everywhere validations compatible with ansible_facts  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-validations/+/787990
14:11:24 <marios> #info please help slagle merge https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22ephemeral-heat%22+(status:open)
14:11:31 <slagle> the tripleo-common release is needed as well, but i have worked around that for now
14:11:48 <marios> slagle: ack i added the ptl +1 on that few minutes ago lgtm
14:11:54 <slagle> thanks
14:12:19 <marios> any other comments or questions on this one please ?
14:12:20 <slagle> that is all from me :)
14:12:30 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/tripleo-heat-templates master: Simplify cephadm service templates  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/787910
14:12:43 <openstackgerrit> Bogdan Dobrelya proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates stable/ussuri: Run update tasks with become  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/788262
14:12:46 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/tripleo-heat-templates stable/ussuri: Moving nova-consoleauth to step4  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/787981
14:12:48 <marios> thank you slagle
14:12:53 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/tripleo-heat-templates stable/train: Moving nova-consoleauth to step4  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/787982
14:13:04 <marios> moving on .. i added something under upgrades anyone around here from upgrades team? holser chem odyssey4me o/
14:13:18 <marios> #info wallaby & https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:NovaHWMachineType_q35 & https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/785027/6/environments/nova-hw-machine-type-upgrade.yaml
14:13:26 <marios> i got a ping earlier from lyarwood and sean-k-mooney about ^^^
14:13:46 <marios> mainly i wanted to ensure the upgrades squad is aware of and signs off on that environment file and the upgrade being OK with it
14:14:17 <marios> mainly lyarwood was concerned about "getting this in for wallaby" and obviously it is a pretty late time to be making changes to defaults
14:14:18 <chem> marios: hey, thanks for the ping
14:14:58 <marios> o/ chem so lyarwood said he already reached out about this but wanted to hilight and sanity check in this meeting
14:15:22 <marios> chem: would be great if you could bring it back to the squad and folks comment on the patch especially the upgrade specific environment file in the tripleo-heat-templates reveiw
14:15:46 <chem> marios: ack, I'll make sure they are aware of thanks.
14:15:54 <marios> thank you chem++
14:16:13 <marios> any comments or questions about this from anyone?
14:16:45 <marios> k moving on ...
14:16:58 <marios> CI next... so first is update on our wallaby testing
14:17:06 <marios> #info     wallaby check/gate testing looks ok tests at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-tripleoclient/+/786647 & https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/786663
14:17:38 <marios> we think we are good to go ... integration/component pipelines were done last sprint and we are now good with upstream check/gate ^^^ based on those tests
14:18:04 <marios> rlandy|rover:++ ysandeep++ anbanerj|ruck++ and everyone else in ci team working on that thank you!
14:18:22 <marios> so we are clear to do the wallaby releases toward the end of this week
14:18:34 <marios> any comments/questions about that?
14:19:15 <marios> another ci topic i wanted to hilight is something we just discussed in our tripleo-ci community call
14:19:31 <marios> #link     tripleo-ci community call  https://hackmd.io/MMg4WDbYSqOQUhU2Kj8zNg?both     molecule jobs changes: https://hackmd.io/zVABAr4bSc2UzvIpjNtBew
14:19:47 <marios> tl;dr on that is we are starting a conversation around who 'owns' the molecule jobs in those repos that have them
14:20:19 <marios> ultimately we(tripleo-ci) want to put out a spec outlining such things as part of a wider 'tripleo CI jobs policy'
14:20:32 <marios> if anyone is interested please reach out and/or join our next community call
14:20:37 <marios> any questions or comments on this item ?
14:20:42 <marios> weshay|ruck: anything more to add here? ^^^
14:20:49 <marios> zbr: ^^
14:21:04 <weshay|ruck> nope.. thanks
14:21:22 <marios> k ... moving on in a sec
14:21:36 <fultonj> o/
14:21:55 <marios> #info     TripleO PTG - wrapup & links @ http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-April/021999.html
14:22:17 <marios> \o/ thanks everyone who took part we had a pretty good meetup i think lots of discussions and items for Xena came from it
14:22:39 <marios> there are links to the recordings on the main agenda etherpad as noted in ^^^
14:22:48 <marios> #info     PTG session summaries @ http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-April/022053.html & https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-ptg-xena-summaries
14:23:17 <marios> i put together some session summaried - grateful for sanity check lease update it either on the list or the etherpad
14:23:25 <marios> summaries :)
14:23:33 <marios> so please check if what i wrote about your session is total lies ;)
14:23:38 <marios> and correct it
14:24:25 <marios> k and as mentioned a minute ago we are planning the wallaby release towards the end of this week/merging next week  likely
14:24:31 <marios> i will obviously send out an email to announce it
14:24:39 <marios> any comments or questions about any of those please?
14:25:12 <marios> k lets go
14:25:26 <marios> #topic Bugs and blueprints
14:25:26 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/
14:25:28 <marios> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/tripleo-ansible
14:25:44 <marios> #link  https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/wallaby-rc1
14:25:51 <marios> #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/wallaby
14:26:10 <marios> hmmm i think i have to go create the xena milestones right ? :)
14:26:55 <marios> usual remidner please check and update your wallaby-rc1 bug status
14:27:09 <marios> 163 triaged some of those must be closed?
14:27:17 <marios> 79 in progress
14:27:26 <marios> comments questions about bugs?
14:27:36 <marios> rlandy|rover: do we have any gate blockers worth mentioning here?
14:27:40 <marios> weshay|ruck: ^
14:27:57 * marios didn't notice any today maybe we are ok
14:28:08 <weshay|ruck> nope
14:28:30 <marios> thanks moving on
14:28:35 <marios> #topic Project releases or stable backports
14:28:38 <marios> #info tripleo wallaby repos https://releases.openstack.org/teams/tripleo.html#wallaby
14:28:41 <rlandy|rover> not at this time
14:28:45 <marios> thanks rlandy|rover
14:28:49 <marios> any release requests?
14:29:14 <marios> slagle: i voted on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/788293/1#message-ebb94db73ec4da2bc3215556e13d57da2a186b60 and mwhahaha i voted on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/788008/1#message-9fb39fadd7c2a0350bc9a73edbb3d7678c8530bf
14:29:39 <marios> actually it is probably time for another round of releases since I said I'd try to do it once/month...
14:29:49 <marios> so i will start it end of week/next
14:30:04 <marios> any questions comments on releases?
14:30:16 <marios> #topic specs
14:30:18 <marios> #info https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs
14:30:23 <marios> now is the time for our X specs
14:30:37 <marios> i expect at least a few based on our conversations at ptg and some folks said they would be filing them
14:30:49 <marios> please help shape our work for X by reviewing the specs ^^^
14:31:03 <marios> comments or questions on specs?
14:31:27 <marios> well fantastic then ;)
14:31:31 <marios> #topic open discussion
14:31:32 <marios> Anything else that folks want to bring up to the meeting?
14:32:11 <marios> thank you all o/ next meeting in 2 weeks Tue 11 May
14:32:17 <marios> have a great day tripleo o/ bai
14:32:35 <marios> #endmeeting tripleo