14:01:18 <slagle> #startmeeting tripleo
14:01:18 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Oct 12 14:01:18 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slagle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:01:18 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:01:18 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'
14:01:31 <slagle> good morning! who is around today?
14:01:37 <marios> good afternoon o/
14:02:21 <fultonj> o/
14:02:28 <chandankumar> \o
14:02:41 <mwhahaha> hi2u
14:02:42 <ysandeep> o/
14:03:15 <rlandy|ruck> o/
14:03:35 <slagle> hello everyone
14:03:38 <slagle> #agenda
14:03:53 <slagle> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items
14:04:19 <slagle> our agenda is in the etherpad, and additionally we will go over the review priorities and outstanding specs, and then open discussion
14:04:50 <slagle> (one moment, there are some comments in the etherpad about joining the meeting that need to be answered)
14:04:56 <opendevreview> Brent Eagles proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates master: Deprecate env/enable-designate in favor of env/services/designate.yaml  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/813656
14:05:30 <jistr> o/
14:06:56 <anirudh> #tripleo
14:07:10 <slagle> #topic Community
14:07:16 <slagle> anirudh: hi, looks like  you made it
14:07:38 <slagle> first i would like to highlight the ptg session schedule at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-yoga-topics
14:07:43 <anirudh> <slagle> yes
14:07:43 <slagle> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-yoga-topics
14:07:52 <slagle> are there any concerns about the proposed schedule?
14:08:10 <anirudh> sure....no issues
14:08:35 <marios> lgtm... 3/day is good i think. last 2 we tried 4 or even more cos there were lots but that was also very tiring and a few times we had to cut discussion... this is much better
14:08:57 <slagle> well, we'll probably end up with 4 :)
14:09:03 <marios> :)
14:09:06 <slagle> based on what i'm hearing from upgrades.
14:09:10 <jistr> would it be ok to do some short session to update on the progress on OS Migrate (content migration tooling)?
14:09:31 <slagle> jistr: sure thing, please add it to the etherpad
14:09:33 <jistr> it's not strictly tripleo but feels somewhat related since it's an upgrade alternative of sorts
14:09:39 <jistr> slagle: thanks :)
14:09:47 <marios> jistr: would be nice to get an update we had one last time too
14:09:47 <slagle> and don't tell marios
14:09:51 <marios> :D
14:10:08 <jistr> :))
14:10:35 <slagle> i will send out another email as well, but for the informal hackfest on thursday, it would be good to have some resources, virtual is fine, prepared ahead of time
14:11:08 <slagle> if you plan to participate, then you wouldn't have to waste time setting that up. just a single vm is fine, but i'll send out some details
14:11:19 <slagle> and, no, i don't have any resources, or any clouds anyone can use
14:12:04 <slagle> ok, next item
14:12:10 <slagle> * How to deploy TripleO. Is there any working document that we can follow
14:12:32 <anirudh> I am struggling to deploy Openstack Tripleo
14:13:04 <slagle> i see, and welcome. we'd like to help
14:13:22 <slagle> i want to say we do have a working document, or at least we try to, but I see that is where you started
14:13:38 <anirudh> sure...Thanks....I have raised 2-3 queries as well....and got a response that documentation is quite old
14:13:50 <slagle> our meeting is not the best place to dig into the problems you're having, but thank you for raising it for attention
14:14:01 <anirudh> is there any working document which we can follow and deploy
14:14:41 <slagle> anirudh:i see your 2 issues on the ML are related to introspection and validations
14:15:02 <slagle> i will connect with a couple of contributors in those areas to see if they can help you
14:15:19 <slagle> Tengu / hjensas : FYI ^. please check out the ML.
14:15:26 <slagle> dpeacock: as well
14:15:32 <anirudh> ok sure...Thanks
14:16:05 <slagle> i'll try to connect with some folks to help, and try to get some responses in the next couple days
14:16:10 <Tengu> slagle: validations are more on gchamoul, matbu, dpeacock and VF team imho..
14:16:20 <opendevreview> Arx Cruz proposed openstack/tripleo-ci master: DNM - Testing upgrade jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813629
14:16:31 <slagle> Tengu: right, sorry. old associations never die.
14:16:34 <Tengu> :)
14:16:34 <anirudh> i am also facing issues in passing various templated while deploying the overcloud
14:17:42 <slagle> anirudh: ok, the other way to get attention is to file bugs at https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo, especially if you followed docs and they didn't work
14:17:51 <slagle> and it will be easier to go back and forth and get logs, etc.
14:18:07 <anirudh> ok...i will do that as well
14:18:28 <slagle> ok, thank you, and i will try to make sure you get some help this week
14:18:40 * dpeacock is paying attention and reading scrollback
14:19:06 <anirudh> Thanks al lot....bdw i am also raising another query today in ML....its regarding the issue being faces in deployment
14:19:11 <tkajinam> anirudh, which release are you using now ?
14:19:22 <anirudh> its wallaby release\
14:19:47 <slagle> #topic review priorities
14:20:01 <slagle> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-review-priorities
14:20:26 <slagle> i went through the list this morning, and I think it's in ok shape
14:20:33 <slagle> anything folks would like to highlight?
14:21:23 <Tengu> ah, yes
14:21:29 <Tengu> sorry, I didn't have time to push the link
14:21:35 <Tengu> but https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug%252F1946239%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) is really neede
14:21:42 <Tengu> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug%252F1946239%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
14:21:51 <chandankumar> On CentOS-9 side, in order to complete mini integration line for cs9 contents, We have got fake component jobs line up to promote content from consistent to component-ci-testing to prmoted component
14:21:57 <Tengu> it's for custom network names support on Master with network-v2 amongh other things.
14:22:23 <slagle> Tengu: thanks, i'll have a look. can you add it to the etherpad as well plz?
14:22:29 <chandankumar> The team is working on adding final patches for finishing mini integration line with container build, image build and standalone jobs
14:22:39 <Tengu> slagle: on my way
14:22:46 <chandankumar> More details can be found here: https://hackmd.io/H4esaBdPSZOTSWp17MP-NA?view
14:23:01 <Tengu> slagle: added under "other"
14:23:25 <slagle> chandankumar: thanks for the update! i looked at the patches this morning, and progress is looking good
14:24:15 <chandankumar> slagle: thanks :-)
14:24:43 <slagle> #topic specs
14:24:56 <slagle> i see one new spec proposed,
14:25:05 <slagle> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/813598
14:25:14 <slagle> just today, hot off the press. PTAL folks
14:26:04 <slagle> fpantano: anything additional to highlight?
14:26:34 <slagle> ade_lee: i reviewed your spec for secret management fyi. design lgtm. just a few questions
14:27:26 <fultonj> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/813598
14:27:34 <fultonj> will be for the ceph session during the PTG
14:27:56 <fultonj> (if people want to read before the session that would be nice)
14:27:59 <fultonj> fmount[m]: ^ fyi
14:28:54 <fpantano> slagle: fultonj  yeah, just started today that spec
14:29:04 <fpantano> I think it's useful to give more context
14:29:20 <fpantano> and support the ptg conversation around the change for the ceph nfs daemon
14:29:47 <fpantano> slagle: it's still WIP but I'm planning to improve it more by EOW
14:30:02 <slagle> sounds good, thanks. the context will definitely help. looking forward to it
14:30:11 <fpantano> slagle: thanks!
14:30:25 <opendevreview> chandan kumar proposed openstack/tripleo-common master: Update tcib for CentOS Stream 9  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/800580
14:30:34 <slagle> #topic open-discussion
14:30:44 <slagle> anything else before we wrap up?
14:30:52 <slagle> did everyone register for the PTG?
14:31:04 * fultonj registered
14:31:44 <marios> slagle: o/ one thing
14:31:53 <marios> slagle: wondering if there was any more discussion about the tags & xena discussion
14:32:50 <marios> slagle: should we make a release of our repos (now that xena has been branched elsewhere)
14:33:03 <marios> slagle: at least to timestamp it even if just once
14:33:18 <rlandy|ruck> yes - we were suppose to send those tags to RDO
14:33:33 <slagle> as i recall, we were just going to send the tags to rdo
14:33:45 <slagle> but we can certainly do a release if they need that
14:33:55 <marios> slagle: well 'tags' means make a release
14:33:57 <marios> slagle: same thing
14:34:04 <marios> slagle: like we make a release in order to tag the repos
14:34:10 <slagle> right ok
14:34:22 <slagle> i guess i was thinking just send them the sha1 to use
14:34:52 <marios> yeah my point was more like we should do it now that xena has just branched ish few days ago anyway
14:35:11 <slagle> ok, i'll look at this week
14:35:16 <slagle> thanks for the reminder
14:35:20 <rlandy|ruck> now would be good
14:35:23 <marios> slagle: i can help with that let me know
14:35:30 <rlandy|ruck> because we will move on
14:35:59 <slagle> marios: excellent, thanks. yea i need to know where to look to get the list. i guess latest promotion? we can discuss
14:36:12 <marios> slagle: ack np
14:36:25 <tkajinam> we might need some quick discussion to determine the version number we assign to the releases we won't create branches about.
14:36:34 <tkajinam> in the past we bumped major version for each release
14:36:56 <marios> tkajinam: yeah same now i think it is even more important to do that and we called that out explicitly in the spec too T^^
14:37:20 <marios> tkajinam: i mean the spec about moving to independent
14:37:36 <tkajinam> marios, yeah I understand
14:38:05 <tkajinam> just fyi I have already created xena release for puppet modules and from now on Puppet OpenStack Xena is not tested with TripleO master
14:38:18 <tkajinam> so far I'm not aware of any change which would break compatibility between them
14:38:37 <tkajinam> but will avoid merging any breaking change until the release is created in TripleO side
14:40:12 <slagle> alright thanks folks, we'll follow up on the release stuff for xena
14:40:19 <slagle> #endmeeting