14:02:44 <slagle> #startmeeting TripleO Edge Squad Meeting 14:02:44 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Dec 13 14:02:44 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slagle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:02:45 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:02:46 <slagle> ping slagle, csatari, jaosorior, owalsh, fultonj, gfidente, hjensas, jtomasek, bogdando, dtantsur, rbrady, d0ugal, toure 14:02:48 <slagle> #info remove or update your nick from the Meeting Template on the etherpad if you want (or don't want) to be ping'd for the start of the meeting 14:02:48 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo_edge_squad_meeting' 14:02:50 <slagle> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-edge-squad-status 14:02:52 <slagle> Anyone can use the #link, #action, #help, #idea, #agreed, and #info commands, not just the moderatorǃ 14:02:56 <owalsh> o/ 14:02:58 <fultonj> o/ 14:02:59 <dtantsur> o/ 14:03:05 <abishop> o/ 14:03:07 <toure> o/ 14:03:13 <slagle> #topic Agenda 14:03:14 <slagle> * Review past action items 14:03:16 <slagle> * Goals/action items for the week 14:03:57 <slagle> hi folks. sorry i was late 14:04:44 <slagle> here are the action items from last meeting: 14:04:46 <slagle> fultonj keep collaborating with slagle to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/621716 + https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614636 done 14:04:48 <slagle> fultonj collab w/ slagle to get split-controlplane-standalone.yml for CI using second node 14:04:57 <fultonj> slagle did my comments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/621716 make sense? 14:05:36 <fultonj> i'm ok with just merging it as is, but i thought they could make it a little better 14:05:52 <slagle> fultonj: yes. i need to review what 25.0 was for. i copied that from earlier up in the docs. 14:06:00 <slagle> not sure if it was for the floating ip network or not 14:06:20 <fultonj> i assumed it was your existing management network 14:06:38 <fultonj> ok, we can talk more about it post meeting if you like 14:06:58 <fultonj> as for my other doc review... 14:07:03 <fultonj> #action fultonj to update doc patch so 2nd node is called "standalone"; given it's special meaning as per https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614636/6/doc/source/install/containers_deployment/standalone.rst@729 14:07:21 <slagle> fultonj: oh i know why I added it now. 14:07:23 <fultonj> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614636/6/doc/source/install/containers_deployment/standalone.rst@729 14:07:31 <fultonj> oh? 14:07:37 <slagle> fultonj: b/c the format for MasqueradeNetworks was not documented, so I wanted to show an example 14:07:56 <slagle> i'll update the patch 14:08:05 <slagle> and put the example in a comment or something 14:08:18 <fultonj> slagle: right, the example helps but assumes context reader might not have (i thougt) 14:08:21 <fultonj> sounds good 14:08:21 <fultonj> thanks 14:08:49 <fultonj> regarding "fultonj collab w/ slagle to get split-controlplane-standalone.yml for CI using second node" 14:08:52 <fultonj> rocky maintenance issues blocked me on making progress on this 14:09:15 <fultonj> i think i'll punt it to an ai for next week 14:09:37 <slagle> yea i was preoccupied as well 14:09:49 <fultonj> #action fultonj collab w/ slagle to get split-controlplane-standalone.yml for CI using second node 14:10:22 <slagle> i did make a little progress on deploying from an undercloud. got some direction from abishop on setting up the cinder AZ's 14:10:37 <slagle> going to try and make more progress on that this week 14:10:59 <slagle> #topic Goals/action items for the week 14:11:25 <slagle> i was thinking we will probably want an additional example role that is basically HCI + CinderVolume. 14:11:33 <slagle> i don't think we have that already do we? 14:11:52 <fultonj> slagle: I agree, no i don't think we have that yet 14:12:01 <abishop> I don't think we have that 14:12:09 <slagle> ok 14:12:36 <slagle> so we need to add that and document how to deploy from the undercloud with separate stacks 14:12:58 <slagle> owalsh: do we have docs on configuring AZ's for nova? 14:12:59 <fultonj> might fit under https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/split-controlplane-templates 14:13:03 <abishop> what would the role be named? maybe Edge? 14:13:28 <owalsh> slagle: I assume we do 14:13:45 <abishop> it would be good if the name were flexible enough to easily support including other storage services, such as glance-api 14:14:29 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/tripleo-heat-templates master: Removing the deprecated environment files for hw offloading https://review.openstack.org/573102 14:14:31 <slagle> abishop: yea not sure. seems more generic than Edge. but i'm sure we can bikeshed in the review :) 14:15:26 <abishop> sounds like a good AI (to bikeshed on something) 14:16:00 <slagle> yea :) 14:16:10 <slagle> #action slagle to submit patch for edge role with cinder-volume 14:16:40 <openstackgerrit> David Peacock proposed openstack/tripleo-heat-templates master: flatten memcached service configuration https://review.openstack.org/624712 14:16:41 <slagle> owalsh: ok, i wasn't sure we had it anywhere in tripleo. i looked briefly but did not see anything 14:16:48 <fultonj> I'll include that in the CI when it's ready (CI needs to catch up) 14:17:01 <owalsh> slagle: no, don't have tripleo support AFAIK. 14:17:30 <slagle> owalsh: is there work to support it, or it just docs to run some commands post deployment? 14:19:55 <owalsh> slagle: I'll need to take a look. Possibly some conf + post deployment commands 14:19:59 <slagle> ok 14:20:14 <owalsh> #action owalsh to investigate nova AZ config 14:20:29 <slagle> thanks 14:20:39 <slagle> anything else to highlight before we wrap up? 14:22:03 <slagle> alright thanks folks 14:22:24 <slagle> next week's meeting might be off depending on who's around, but we can decide later 14:22:28 <slagle> ttyl! 14:22:30 <slagle> #endmeeting