18:00:11 #startmeeting trove 18:00:12 Meeting started Wed Jul 20 18:00:11 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is amrith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'trove' 18:01:27 Hello 18:01:32 o/ 18:01:41 hi mariam, trevor 18:01:48 Hi Amrith 18:01:55 will give others a couple of minutes 18:02:34 o/ 18:02:35 ./ 18:02:36 #agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TroveMeeting 18:02:43 o/ 18:02:48 hi peterstac mvandijk aliadil 18:02:51 o/ 18:02:53 hi all 18:02:56 o/ 18:03:00 o/ 18:03:06 #topic Action items from last week's meeting 18:03:18 hello all, too many now to do it individually 18:03:42 peterstac, pmalik did you look at the information I sent you re: redis failures? was a logstash result 18:03:50 don't know how to share it with everyone 18:03:56 other than the screenshot I sent to you. 18:04:26 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237710/ is still up for review 18:04:26 I saw the link/email but haven't perused the info yet 18:04:43 and I'm still looking into the machine size for gate/check 18:04:50 lately they've all been passing though (we fixed a couple issues over the last few days) 18:05:16 so I'm going to consider the first two as closed, and leave the third one open. 18:05:26 I proposed a topic for the midcycle to talk about moving some tests to gating 18:05:37 I will review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237710/ today 18:05:43 thx johnma 18:05:55 anyone have anything further to add ... 18:06:37 😎/ 18:06:52 going once 18:07:19 * just came in 18:07:38 #topic Trove pulse update 18:07:48 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vJxNaoR3VVNS1Cpiz7U--1zyJRZ6ybMxzJoayrjdduo/edit#gid=1104331956 18:07:59 #linkhttps://gist.github.com/amrith/76f199be5d736349a6e807c15c7e24ee 18:08:02 #link https://gist.github.com/amrith/76f199be5d736349a6e807c15c7e24ee 18:08:07 Sorry about the first link 18:08:16 the old bit.ly link no longer works in meeting agenda's 18:08:26 because some spambot believes that a bit.ly link is spam 18:08:34 I had to put the full googledocs link there. 18:09:01 the backlog is still there 18:09:20 we should take some time between now and next meeting to see if there are changes that we want to abandon for inactivity 18:10:02 we did get 13 changes merged last week, that's great 18:10:11 anyone have anything to add re: pulse 18:10:56 . 18:11:39 A question for everyone, do you find the pulse information useful? Should we continue to have it each week or can we drop it? 18:11:39 For https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337914/ I am still working on getting a type merged in oslo we can to improve port option validation so I'm not abandoning it yet :) 18:12:13 as for pulse information, the links are blocked. Google services like docs and shortened urls. 18:13:49 #startvote Should we retain the pulse information in future meetings? Yes, No 18:13:50 Begin voting on: Should we retain the pulse information in future meetings? Valid vote options are Yes, No. 18:13:51 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:14:25 anyone? 18:14:30 #vote yes 18:14:35 #vote yes 18:14:47 #vote yes 18:14:49 #vote yes 18:14:55 #vote yes 18:15:09 pulse stuff seems popular up in Canada. 18:15:39 #vote yes 18:15:44 * it may be useful to apply something like rolling average on the plots though. they would be more readable. 18:15:51 #endvote 18:15:52 Voted on "Should we retain the pulse information in future meetings?" Results are 18:15:53 Yes (6): amrith, mvandijk, aliadil, peterstac, pmalik, dougshelley66 18:16:03 sounds good, anyone have anything to add? 18:16:16 pmalik, feel free to give it a shot 18:17:03 going once 18:17:24 #topic Next week: mid-cycle 18:17:39 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-trove-midcycle 18:18:24 please add any topics you are interested in to that etherpad. I will make an agenda later this week. Also, it will be virtual, so using something like hangouts (maybe hangouts). Anyone have a preference, alternative? 18:20:18 going once 18:20:53 #topic Announcements 18:21:38 The only one I had was about project mascot. I'll send the first two in the agenda to the foundation later today. (a) Stingray, (b) Clam with a pearl in it. Any further questions? 18:22:17 I added number 4 to the list of midcycle topics because petersac mentioned it would be nice to talk about it in the last meeting. 18:22:53 thx trevormc 18:23:09 #topic N-2 milestone 18:23:16 so it is too late to consider the Parott? 18:23:24 nothing to add other than what was in the agenda. 18:23:28 or is it Parrot 18:23:41 johnma, would you remove your -2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329524/ 18:23:57 oh yes, I forgot I added -2 on that. will do now 18:24:01 thx 18:24:16 dougshelley66, a bit late. sorry. 18:24:26 is that ready to be merged 18:24:31 I believe so, yes 18:24:38 we shouldn't have any more N specs 18:24:43 any future specs should be O 18:24:44 ok, I will approve it then 18:24:49 right 18:24:54 thx 18:25:30 #topic Proposal for review 18:26:35 I see 3 there, not sure who added them, but if no one speaks up, I'm inclined to move on. 18:26:56 going once ... 18:27:23 hang on 18:27:34 looks like they are from pmalik ? 18:27:42 yes 18:28:35 yes pmalik 18:28:35 I was more interested in the Cassandra logging. It has been there for months. Got +2 from several ppl, just never made it due to constant conflicts... 18:29:38 I can take another look at that one (the other two are fairly trivial, can looka t them too) 18:30:06 ok 18:30:53 342312 seems straightforward 18:31:31 I'll look at them 18:31:38 pmalik, anything else you want re: these? 18:31:50 nope. 18:31:53 ok 18:32:03 anyone have anything to add 18:32:28 going once 18:34:13 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316381/ 18:34:13 So we have to get these API doc changes done soon. Is someone able to take a look at this change set? 18:34:21 #topic Open Discussion 18:34:24 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316381/ 18:34:26 So we have to get these API doc changes done soon. Is someone able to take a look at this change set? 18:35:25 I will take that to be a no. 18:35:33 Does anyone have anything else for the meeting? 18:36:23 so amrith, do we need to take over that patch? 18:36:35 johnma, yes. that's basically the situation 18:36:46 sean dague and anne worked on this cross project thing 18:37:00 I can't find the ML thread right now 18:37:14 I'll look at the change set. It says we need to fix our response tests? 18:37:20 but it was something that they started and the projects have to finish with specific stuff related to the projects. 18:37:35 that sounds about right trevormc 18:38:05 let me know if you need any help trevormc. I can also help if needed. 18:38:24 sounds good, thanks amrith and johnma 18:38:39 trevormc, let me know if you need help. either johnma or I will try to help. 18:38:43 thanks! 18:38:50 anyone have anything else? 18:38:57 if not, ... going once 18:39:50 Thanks for attending 18:39:52 #endmeeting