18:00:44 <johnma> #startmeeting trove
18:00:45 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb 15 18:00:44 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnma. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:46 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:00:49 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'trove'
18:00:51 <trevormc> o/
18:01:05 <johnma> Hi trevormc
18:01:07 <songjian> o/
18:02:15 <johnma> Hi songjian
18:02:34 <johnma> will wait another minute or so and see if there's anyone else joining
18:02:57 <songjian> Hi,johnma
18:03:12 <johnma> amrith is travelling this week as well, but will be back in time for next week's PTG in Atlanta
18:04:07 <johnma> I guess it is just us. might be a short meeting.
18:04:40 <johnma> anyone have anything you would like to bring up - reviews , etc
18:05:32 <johnma> last week we had some review requests from peterstac
18:06:16 <johnma> trevormc: I hit some issues with the redis tests. Not sure if you were seeing the same problem as I was but I saw amrith's comments
18:07:06 <trevormc> johnma: I'll give the patch another try. The latest stable version is no longer 3.2.7
18:07:25 <johnma> oh interesting. what is it then
18:07:30 <trevormc> #link https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES
18:07:53 <trevormc> on redis.io they say they released 3.2.9
18:08:16 <trevormc> sorry 3.2.9
18:08:19 <trevormc> 3.2.8
18:08:47 <johnma> ok, so I will also test this again and we can post our findings in the review section
18:09:03 <johnma> we need to see if we can get this merged soon.
18:09:31 <johnma> on the module-reapply patchset, I reviewed that and it looks good . I just need to add my comments in there which I will do after this meeting
18:09:45 <johnma> was there anything else in terms of reviews?
18:10:28 <johnma> if not, let us move on
18:10:38 <johnma> #topic Open Discussion
18:10:59 <johnma> we have our PTG happening next week in Atlanta
18:11:17 <trevormc> I'll be there!
18:11:20 <johnma> do we have a wiki for Trove
18:11:31 <trevormc> we have an etherpad but its empty
18:11:51 <trevormc> You can see it here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTG/Pike/Etherpads
18:12:06 <johnma> awesome. was about to ask for it
18:12:10 <johnma> thanks trevormc
18:12:17 <trevormc> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-pike-ptg-topics
18:13:00 <trevormc> I added a topic in there but I'm not sure if we handle our own devref or if the docs team does
18:14:34 <johnma> thats a good topic and I agree we need to improve our docs and update them. If that happens in this release, thats great
18:14:50 <johnma> another thing I know Amrith wants to focus on is gate stability
18:15:01 <johnma> in this release
18:15:13 <johnma> so there will be more work around that
18:15:52 <johnma> anything else? If not, I guess we can end this meeting early
18:16:05 <songjian> I have
18:16:16 <johnma> go ahead songjian
18:16:18 <songjian> I have two things, the first thing is that I would like to py3 related hacking rule added to the local test, has now tried to modify a, https: //review.openstack.org/#/c/431870/
18:16:46 <songjian> The other, please see the patch commit message https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434055/
18:18:34 <trevormc> songjian, I'll look at the hacking checks
18:18:47 <songjian> It seems to use six.moves.mock to be better, but it will be a big change, so would like to ask everyone's advice
18:18:56 <songjian> thx,trevormc
18:20:15 <trevormc> the second patch is probably something we want to do in trove as well if we every want to move to python 3.3+ testing
18:21:08 <johnma> songjian, let us add this topic to the PTG topic list. I think this will be a good item to discuss there with a broader audience
18:21:32 <songjian> If that makes sense, I will start working, which may have to bring near thousands of changes
18:21:51 <johnma> it looks like a wide impact and if we decide to do it , will be better to get it in early in the cycle
18:22:20 <johnma> before you make any changes, lets discuss this during the PTG session
18:22:50 <trevormc> that reminds me about something else I wanted to ask
18:22:56 <johnma> can you add some notes around this topic in the link provided by trevormc
18:23:35 <songjian> OK, this time I can not attend the PTG(regret), so will wait for the discussion results, thx
18:23:41 <trevormc> What do we think about adding bandit as a gate for trove? Like pylint, It has false positives that we can mark ourselves.
18:23:45 <johnma> and also include all the relevant links and impact you think this change will have on Trove side, etc
18:24:13 <songjian> I'll sort it out and add it to erthpad tomorrow during the day
18:25:01 <johnma> songjian, I understand that. If you can put all your thoughts around this topic in the etherpad, then we can have a good discussion at the PTG and we can update the etherpad with our thoughts
18:25:23 <johnma> sounds good songjian. Appreciate it
18:26:19 <johnma> I dont know much about bandit
18:26:40 <johnma> so what additional check does it provide that is missing today?
18:26:58 <trevormc> It does static code analysis for security vulnerabilities. Keystone I believe runs it as a gate
18:27:29 <trevormc> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security/Projects/Bandit
18:28:03 <johnma> anybody else runs it at gate?
18:28:30 <trevormc> Cinder is in the process of adding it, I think it's a non-voting gate for them
18:29:08 <trevormc> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179568/
18:29:54 <trevormc> That's just the tox support I believe but they are making more changes related to bandit
18:30:59 <trevormc> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/cinder+bandit
18:32:38 <johnma> ok. why dont you add this to the PTG topic list for discussion. I don't think this will affect gate stability in any ways. Might just be a question of priority
18:32:59 <trevormc> yeah I have the same thoughts
18:33:10 <trevormc> done!
18:33:29 <johnma> great. I need to see if I can gather some info around grenade tests also
18:33:42 <johnma> it has been on our to-do list for some time
18:34:00 <johnma> alright, anything else to discuss
18:34:26 <johnma> I thought this would be a short meeting but we are already half way through - neat!!
18:35:00 <trevormc> nothing else here
18:35:24 <songjian> nothing, and very much agree with trevormc about the documentation
18:35:38 <johnma> me too :)
18:35:55 <trevormc> thanks for the support! I think it will help bring on new contributors
18:36:02 <johnma> lets work on getting our docs up to the mark
18:36:40 <johnma> sounds like a plan. Thanks trevormc and songjian for your time and appreciate your thoughts and hardwork
18:37:11 <trevormc> you too johnma, much appreciated
18:37:34 <johnma> you all have a great rest of the week and look forward to talking to you soon. If anything else comes up in the mean time, ping me on our regular channel
18:37:55 <songjian> much appreciated
18:38:03 <trevormc> o/
18:38:05 <johnma> I an guessing we wont have our regular Trove meeting next week because of the PTG but will regroup the week after.
18:38:23 <johnma> Take care and safe travels trevormc
18:38:38 <trevormc> thanks
18:38:38 <johnma> #endmeeting Trove