08:00:16 <ifat_afek> #startmeeting vitrage
08:00:17 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb  8 08:00:16 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ifat_afek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:00:18 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:00:20 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vitrage'
08:00:24 <ifat_afek> Hi everyone :-)
08:01:24 <idan_hefetz> Hi!
08:02:47 <alexey_weyl> Shalom :)
08:03:09 <ifat_afek> Today’s agenda:
08:03:15 <ifat_afek> •	Ocata Release
08:03:19 <yujunz> Hi, I have two meetings at the same time slot. Ping me if any input required from me
08:03:20 <ifat_afek> •	Status and Updates
08:03:32 <ifat_afek> yujunz: no problem
08:03:52 <ifat_afek> last in the agenda:
08:03:53 <ifat_afek> •	Pike Design sessions
08:04:47 <ifat_afek> #topic Ocata Release
08:04:55 <ifat_afek> Last week I tagged vitrage modules:
08:05:00 <ifat_afek> vitrage 1.5.0
08:05:05 <ifat_afek> python-vitrageclient 1.1.1
08:05:10 <ifat_afek> vitrage-dashboard 1.1.1
08:05:20 <ifat_afek> These are our current release candidates. Please don’t push anything to stable/ocata, unless it is an important bug fix. You can use the master branch for Pike development.
08:05:38 <ifat_afek> The final release date is at the end of next week, by March 16th. The full Ocata schedule can be found here:
08:05:43 <ifat_afek> #link https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html
08:05:48 <ifat_afek> Any questions/comments?
08:06:33 <ifat_afek> #topic Status and Updates
08:06:41 <ifat_afek> Boston CFP is closed. The following etherpad contains the Vitrage proposals:
08:06:52 <ifat_afek> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/vitrage-boston-session-proposals
08:07:02 <ifat_afek> Good luck to us all
08:07:15 <ifat_afek> My updates: I wrote two use cases for Doctor manual, trying to push them to their gerrit
08:07:26 <ifat_afek> Next I’ll update the test script so it will check Vitrage in addition to Congress. And then I’ll have to check it in a Newton devstack with Ocata Vitrage.
08:07:40 <ifat_afek> (Trying to do both things in parallel…)
08:07:48 <ifat_afek> Who else wants to update?
08:08:38 <eyalb> \o
08:09:00 <eyalb> I will update
08:09:25 <eyalb> vitrage was merged to the RDO project
08:09:35 <eyalb> so now we have rpms
08:09:44 <ifat_afek> :)
08:09:49 <ifat_afek> great news!
08:10:11 <eyalb> still need to resolve some issues regarding the dashboard in order for it be added to RDO also
08:10:29 <yujunz> RDO is short for ?
08:10:45 <eyalb> I am now working on the puppet module so it can be run in RDO also
08:11:13 <eyalb> acceptance test were added to the puppet-vitrage module
08:11:47 <eyalb> #link https://www.rdoproject.org/
08:12:07 <eyalb> a repository for artifacts of openstack
08:12:23 <yujunz> Got it
08:13:19 <eyalb> there are still issues with the puppet-openstack-integration
08:13:39 <eyalb> which is another project to run tempest tests
08:13:46 <eyalb> once this is done
08:14:21 <eyalb> I will add the puppet also to RDO so tempest tests will run after an rpm creation
08:14:27 <eyalb> thats all
08:14:44 <yujunz> OK, my short update.
08:15:05 <yujunz> Preparing the trip to design session in Israel.
08:15:11 <ifat_afek> :-)
08:15:43 <eyalb> RDO is the RPM Distribution of OpenStack
08:15:46 <yujunz> I should fly to Tel Aviv right?
08:16:23 <ifat_afek> We have only one international airport in Israel ;-) Ben-Gurion
08:17:09 <yujunz> OK, I guess I need some information on how to get to the hotel. To be folloowed up in email
08:17:38 <ifat_afek> Sure, let’s discuss it in emails
08:17:41 <yujunz> Meanwhile, I'm reviewing Weiya's proposal on alarm deduction
08:17:51 <yujunz> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/423000
08:18:01 <ifat_afek> Yes, you asked us to discuss it in IRC
08:18:21 <ifat_afek> And I thought I’d better ask everyone to read it and think about it in advance, but forgot to do that
08:18:29 <ifat_afek> Because it’s a complicated issue
08:18:44 <yujunz> Weiya is not available today and I think we may need a pre-discussion in a small group before the design session
08:19:10 <ifat_afek> Sure, so let’s try to do it next week. Do you want to discuss via IRC or in another way?
08:19:13 <yujunz> Do you think it possible to arrange a conference call for it? ifat_afek
08:19:27 <yujunz> I think we may need a conference call
08:19:42 <ifat_afek> Sure. BTW, why is it important to discuss before the design session?
08:19:52 <ifat_afek> I just expect a long discussion here
08:20:48 <yujunz> Yes, just because it is long, I think discussion in a small group will be more efficient.
08:21:07 <yujunz> And we can share a more mature proposal on the design session
08:21:52 <yujunz> To get something clarified before Weiya goes detail in the design
08:22:14 <yujunz> To ensure we are going in the right direction
08:22:16 <ifat_afek> Ok. What is your availability next week?
08:22:34 <yujunz> I'll discuss with Weiya and reply to you in Email. Is that oK?
08:22:44 <ifat_afek> Ok
08:22:50 <yujunz> Thanks.
08:22:55 <yujunz> That's all from my side
08:23:03 <ifat_afek> Thanks
08:23:11 <ifat_afek> Anyone else wants to update?
08:24:02 <danoffek> My update is that I'm still working on vitrage ID.
08:24:10 <ifat_afek> Ok, thanks
08:24:16 <ifat_afek> Anyone else?
08:25:04 <ifat_afek> Moving to the next topic, which we actually started discussing
08:25:06 <ifat_afek> #topic Pike Design Sessions
08:25:17 <ifat_afek> We will hold Pike Design Sessions in Israel, on March 6th-9th
08:25:25 <ifat_afek> You are all invited to participate and to suggest topics for the discussions. The sessions will be mostly in the mornings, so ZTE colleagues from China can participate remotely.
08:25:30 <ifat_afek> The design session etherpad:
08:25:39 <ifat_afek> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/vitrage-pike-design-sessions
08:25:45 <ifat_afek> Feel free to edit the agenda and suggest new topics for discussion.
08:26:49 <ifat_afek> Any other issue to you would like to discuss?
08:27:41 <yujunz> You mean the design session?
08:28:15 <ifat_afek> Or anything else
08:28:37 <yujunz> Though aodh team is not joining, I think it worth discussion on the generic alarm proposal
08:28:49 <yujunz> It seems no conclusion yet, is it?
08:29:39 <ifat_afek> I think the conclusion is, at least my conclusion is, that Aodh do not see themselves as an alarm manager, and are not interested in the generic alarm feature
08:29:49 <ifat_afek> But we can discuss it, why not
08:30:17 <ifat_afek> We can think of alternative solutions for an Aodh-Vitrage integration. Since this is a non-trivial topic, I agree that it is worth a discussio
08:30:36 <yujunz> Agree
08:31:43 <yujunz> There is requirement of alarm management from vitrage and aodh may offer only part of it. So we need to fill the gaps in some way. That is my understanding of this topic.
08:32:06 <ifat_afek> Makes sense
08:33:22 <ifat_afek> Ok, anything else?
08:35:42 <ifat_afek> Goodbye then
08:35:49 <eyalb> bye
08:36:15 <danoffek> By Guys, Ifat, stay happy
08:36:28 <ifat_afek> danoffek: always :-) :-)
08:36:53 <ifat_afek> #endmeeting