08:00:07 <ifat_afek> #startmeeting vitrage 08:00:09 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Mar 29 08:00:07 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ifat_afek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:00:10 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:00:12 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vitrage' 08:00:32 <ifat_afek> Hi :-) 08:00:39 <annarez> Hi!! 08:01:18 <eyalb> \o/ 08:03:57 <ifat_afek> Today’s agenda: 08:04:03 <ifat_afek> • Status and Updates 08:04:13 <ifat_afek> • Boston Summit 08:04:20 <ifat_afek> • Open Discussion 08:04:26 <ifat_afek> #topic Status and Updates 08:04:40 <ifat_afek> There are two OpenStack community goals that we should handle: 08:04:48 <ifat_afek> #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/pike/deploy-api-in-wsgi.html 08:04:57 <ifat_afek> #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/pike/python35.html 08:05:20 <ifat_afek> eyalb checked the status 08:05:29 <ifat_afek> Regarding the WSGI: we already support it, although for some reason the wiki said that we don’t. I’ll update the status. 08:05:45 <ifat_afek> Regarding python 3.5 – we support it in most places, but not in our tempest tests 08:06:01 <danesihoffel> Hi Guys 08:06:03 <ifat_afek> For this, we need to install a devstack with python 3.5, and it seems like almost nobody has done this so far. I suggest that we wait a while until the other projects complete this goal. 08:06:31 <alexey_weyl> Hi 08:06:37 <ifat_afek> Other than that – I started working on the persistent database design 08:06:39 <yujunz> Hi, sorry for the late 08:06:48 <ifat_afek> Will update by blueprint/email once I figure out what to do, or at least have a clearer vision about the options 08:06:56 <ifat_afek> For now I’m checking OrientDB and ArangoDB. 08:07:11 <ifat_afek> yujunz: Hi, no problem 08:07:26 <ifat_afek> That’s it for me. Who else wants to update? 08:07:31 <yujunz> Good news for kicking off persistent database design 08:07:42 <yujunz> I will 08:08:25 <yujunz> I reviewed Idan's proposal on alarm deduction and will start working on it under a different subject 08:08:37 <yujunz> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/vitrage/+spec/entity-equivalence 08:08:56 <yujunz> The blueprint is working in progress 08:08:58 <yujunz> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451216/ 08:09:31 <yujunz> It seems introducing entity equivalence will have more wide use case than enhancing alarm deduction 08:09:35 <yujunz> So I'd like to design and implement in a generic way 08:09:46 <ifat_afek> +1 to that 08:09:53 <alexey_weyl> +1 08:09:56 <alexey_weyl> +2 08:10:05 <danesihoffel> Alexey, that means +#? 08:10:07 <danesihoffel> 3? 08:10:09 <ifat_afek> The general use case is less urgent, but let’s solve it “the right way” instead of solving just the current use casd 08:10:18 <yujunz> That's all. Comments are welcome though the bp is wip 08:10:38 <ifat_afek> Sure, thanks 08:10:48 <annarez> I have short update 08:11:14 <annarez> snmp traps support is merged! 08:11:25 <ifat_afek> Cool!! 08:11:45 <annarez> and the blueprint is also in github :) 08:12:05 <ifat_afek> Great, thanks 08:12:30 <ifat_afek> And please also update the status in launchpad, so we’ll have one more done for Pike 08:13:21 <ifat_afek> Who else wants to update? 08:13:51 <elisha_r> hey, sorry for being late 08:15:07 <alexey_weyl> I will update 08:15:40 <alexey_weyl> So, finally, after a very hard and long work on the "not" operator support for the templates and the evaluator 08:15:59 <alexey_weyl> And after plenty of feedbacks and comments 08:16:18 <alexey_weyl> I have successfully pushed it to github 08:16:29 <ifat_afek> Hurray! 08:16:39 <alexey_weyl> yep yep yep 08:16:40 <annarez> nice!! 08:17:18 <danesihoffel> Thanks for the merge conflicts. 08:17:22 <danesihoffel> Still, nice !! 08:17:30 <alexey_weyl> Now we can implement many use cases using the "not" operator such as HA of different entities and more 08:17:46 <ifat_afek> This is great 08:17:52 <alexey_weyl> Thats it for now 08:18:19 <ifat_afek> Can you update the blueprint on launchpad? 08:18:53 <alexey_weyl> of course 08:18:56 <ifat_afek> Thanks 08:19:06 <ifat_afek> Anyone else wants to udpate? 08:19:08 <ifat_afek> update 08:20:09 <ifat_afek> #topic Boston Summit 08:20:33 <ifat_afek> The brainstorming etherpad is finished with the descriptions of the sessions we wanted to propose. I plan to do it later today, so if you want to update something please do it now. 08:20:41 <ifat_afek> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-Vitrage-brainstorming 08:22:26 <ifat_afek> Besides that, I started writing the outline to two presentations: the Vitrage story and the project updates 08:22:31 <ifat_afek> That’s it for me 08:22:48 <danesihoffel> I'll open the Boston Updates preparation topic : 08:23:06 <danesihoffel> I'll update on my side: 08:23:33 <danesihoffel> The lab presentation is not too outdated, but I'll update it to be more current. 08:24:16 <ifat_afek> Do add the ‘not’ template :-) 08:24:17 <danesihoffel> We need to find out if the lab VMs are on OVH again. I'll ask this week. If not, we have a lot of preparations to do on the new service supplier. 08:24:37 <danesihoffel> I'll try to add th "not" template in the lab, but it might not happen. 08:24:49 <danesihoffel> I'll certainly add it to the presentation 08:25:04 <danesihoffel> It's a very very nice add, which is great for supporting any kind of HA 08:25:08 <danesihoffel> Thanks again for the merge, Alexey 08:25:11 <ifat_afek> The presentation is more important. Regarding the lab itself, this template might be confusing a bit 08:25:22 <danesihoffel> That Lab wise. 08:25:49 <danesihoffel> I'll also join the Advance Use Cases effort 08:26:20 <danesihoffel> If I'm up to it (ready), I'd like to do the presentation in OpenStack itself. 08:26:27 <danesihoffel> That's it. Thanks. 08:27:11 <ifat_afek> Great 08:27:29 <ifat_afek> Anything else regarding Boston? 08:28:13 <ifat_afek> I can update that we had a meeting with Maryam Tahan from Intel regarding the joint presentation about Vitrage and collectd. We talked in general about the demo, nothing concrete yet 08:28:58 <ifat_afek> If we finish the Vitrage-Mistral integration soon (that is, if we start it soon ;-)) then we can use it for the corrective actions in the collectd demo 08:29:13 <ifat_afek> Anything else? 08:30:06 <ifat_afek> #topic Open Discussion 08:30:15 <ifat_afek> Any other issue you would like to raise? 08:31:59 <ifat_afek> Goodbye then, see you next week 08:32:13 <eyalb> bye 08:32:13 <annarez> bye :) 08:32:19 <danesihoffel> bye :) 08:32:28 <ifat_afek> #endmeeting