08:03:04 <ifat_afek_> #startmeeting vitrage
08:03:05 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Apr 19 08:03:04 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ifat_afek_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:03:06 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:03:08 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vitrage'
08:03:08 <ifat_afek_> Hi again :-)
08:03:11 <alexey_weyl> ni hao
08:03:55 <dwj> 你好　：）
08:04:19 <ifat_afek_> And I assume that’s Hi in English? :-)
08:04:26 <yujunz> Hi
08:05:10 <ifat_afek_> Today’s agenda:
08:05:17 <ifat_afek_> •	Status and Updates
08:05:28 <ifat_afek> •	Boston Summit
08:05:37 <ifat_afek> •	Open Discussion
08:05:48 <ifat_afek> #topic Status and Updates
08:05:58 <ifat_afek> Some general updates:
08:06:04 <ifat_afek> Mitaka was declared EOL.
08:06:16 <ifat_afek> Vitrage was mentioned in OPNFV HA meeting last week, as part of the HA group architecture for supporting HA scenarios in NFV environments
08:06:28 <ifat_afek> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/33475
08:06:39 <ifat_afek> My updates:
08:06:41 <eyalb> \o/
08:06:53 <ifat_afek> I wrote down the Vitrage HA and alarm history vision, as we discussed. Will be happy to get more reviews
08:06:59 <ifat_afek> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455065/
08:07:06 <ifat_afek> That’s it for me
08:07:09 <elisha_r> hey
08:07:12 <ifat_afek> Who’s next?
08:07:31 <elisha_r> I'll go next
08:07:46 <elisha_r> I've been working on refactoring some of the code for the Machine Learning component
08:08:03 <elisha_r> I hope to get this done sometime next week, and then push it
08:08:35 <elisha_r> hopefully things will go smoothly, but of course the real test will be once we run it for a while in a live deployment, and that will take time
08:09:05 <elisha_r> Once this is in, I'll be running tests with synthetic data so we get a sense of performance
08:09:07 <elisha_r> that's it
08:09:19 <yujunz> I'll go next
08:09:49 <yujunz> Busy preparing OPNFV plugfest next week. No activity recently
08:10:05 <yujunz> Will start working on entity equivalent next week
08:10:05 <yujunz> That's it
08:10:21 <alexey_weyl> sounds good
08:10:33 <alexey_weyl> let us know if you need any hel
08:10:40 <alexey_weyl> *help
08:10:40 <ifat_afek> yujunz: Thanks. What are you presenting in the plugfest? (not relevant to this discussion, just curious)
08:10:57 <yujunz> QTIP benchmarking on different hardware
08:11:03 <ifat_afek> Cool
08:11:13 <yujunz> I'm not attending, but need to prepare it for the team
08:11:38 <ifat_afek> O
08:11:40 <ifat_afek> Ok
08:11:51 <eyalb> one small update
08:12:16 <eyalb> the rpm for the puppet was approved ad should be in the RDO repository
08:12:19 <eyalb> thats it
08:12:35 <ifat_afek> eyalb: Does it mean we are done? or there is still some work to do?
08:12:47 <yujunz> What is the package name?
08:13:02 <eyalb> puppet-vitrage :-)
08:13:16 <eyalb> there is always work to do
08:13:19 <yujunz> Does that mean we can install vitrage with it?
08:13:46 <eyalb> I need to check how to make the smoke tests run when an rpm is built
08:13:59 <eyalb> @yujunz yes
08:14:18 <eyalb> you could before now its is packaged as an rpm
08:14:33 <yujunz> Sounds good. How is the packaging done? I mean automatically by CI or manually?
08:14:44 <ifat_afek> So we can send Gergely instructions for rpm installations? or is it still too early?
08:14:55 <eyalb> yes automatically on every commit
08:15:00 <ifat_afek> (Gergely Catsary is working on Vitrage installation guide)
08:15:15 <eyalb> and also on a release
08:15:58 <eyalb> @ifat yes
08:16:03 <ifat_afek> Great
08:16:33 <yujunz> Every commit on vitrage or puppet-vitrage?
08:19:06 <elisha_r> (testing)
08:20:10 <yujunz> My last question before dropping: 	Every commit on vitrage or puppet-vitrage?
08:20:14 <ifat_afek_> In the meantime, I’ll update on behalf of danoffek that he is progressing with the Vitrage ID. He is having code reviews and fixes the tempests
08:20:21 <eyalb1> every commit on vitrage updates the vitrage rpm and every commit on puppet-vitrage updates the puppet-vitrage rpm
08:21:06 <alexey_weyl> I will update
08:21:29 <alexey_weyl> I am working on the advanced use cases session for Boston.
08:21:56 <alexey_weyl> Preparing it and making the use cases work.
08:22:40 <alexey_weyl> While doing so, found some bugs in the evaluator and the subgraph matching and fixed them
08:23:01 <alexey_weyl> I am going to push the fix of those bugs also to stable/ocata
08:23:16 <alexey_weyl> Thats it for now
08:23:22 <ifat_afek> Great, thanks
08:23:33 <ifat_afek> So I guess it’s time to move to the Boston topic :-)
08:23:39 <ifat_afek> #topic Boston Summit
08:24:25 <ifat_afek> I think there is a problem with openstack bot :-( I don’t see that the topic changed
08:24:32 <ifat_afek> Anyway…
08:24:42 <ifat_afek> One forum session was accepted for Vitrage, and I was asked to unite our four proposals into one.
08:24:53 <ifat_afek> The united session is scheduled in an inconvenient time (right after the collectd session), and so far I failed to move it
08:24:59 <ifat_afek> #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18799/vitrage-usability-and-new-insights-where-do-we-go-next?BackURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openstack.org%2Fsummit%2Fboston-2017%2Fsummit-schedule%2Fglobal-search%3Ft%3Dvitrage%23eventid%3D18799
08:25:07 <ifat_afek> (not sure why this link is so long…)
08:25:17 <ifat_afek> I’m still working on two presentations: the Vitrage Story and the Vitrage project updates.
08:25:28 <ifat_afek> Regarding the session with Intel, I got a presentation draft from Maryam Tahhan, need to go over it
08:25:40 <ifat_afek> I also started working on the demo configuration, and found some bugs
08:26:08 <ifat_afek> There seems to be a conflict between the static datasource and Nova instance datasource, when trying to reference an instance in the static file
08:26:10 <ifat_afek> Will check it
08:26:20 <ifat_afek> Anything else for Boston?
08:27:17 <ifat_afek> #topic Open Discussion
08:27:22 <ifat_afek> Any other issue to discuss?
08:27:35 <yujunz> I want to ask progress on use case repository
08:28:01 <ifat_afek> Right, I saw your mail and didn’t get to answer yet, sorry
08:28:33 <ifat_afek> We have a few use cases that are working in Nokia product. The problem is that they are specific to the Zabbix configuration that we have. We need to think of the best way to publish them
08:28:51 <ifat_afek> So far we have made no progress in this area, mainly because we are busy with Boston tasks
08:29:02 <ifat_afek> Sorry for that
08:29:08 <yujunz> Undertood. Thank you
08:29:53 <ifat_afek> This issue is still high on our list. But I’m not sure when we will start working on it
08:30:05 <ifat_afek> It’s not a lot of work, I guess
08:30:48 <yujunz> What was the case about? NFVI ?
08:32:28 <ifat_afek_> But of course the use case repository can hold other use cases that are not NFVI
08:33:39 <ifat_afek_> Anything else?
08:34:05 <yujunz> I lost the answer. What was before the "But"
08:34:18 <ifat_afek_> Yes, I was disconnected..
08:34:25 <ifat_afek_> Yes. An example use case: if Zabbix reports a high CPU load on the host, we create deduced alarms on the instances that their performance is suboptimal
08:34:29 <ifat_afek_> But of course the use case repository can hold other use cases that are not NFVI
08:34:35 <ifat_afek_> That’s the full answer
08:34:35 <yujunz> I see, thanks
08:35:15 <ifat_afek> Any other issue?
08:36:05 <yujunz> No from my side
08:36:48 <ifat_afek> Ok. Bye everyone :-)
08:37:09 <annarez> bye bye
08:37:14 <yujunz> bye
08:37:21 <alexey_weyl> bye bye
08:37:28 <ifat_afek> #endmeeting
13:00:08 <openstack> alex_xu: Error: Can't start another meeting, one is in progress.  Use #endmeeting first.
13:00:23 <alex_xu> #endmeeting