17:02:32 <tjones> #startmeeting vmwareapi 17:02:33 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Aug 13 17:02:32 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tjones. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:02:34 <tjones> sorry 17:02:35 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:02:37 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vmwareapi' 17:02:40 <tjones> im late 17:02:45 <tjones> who's here? 17:02:49 <vuil> o/ 17:02:50 <thangp> o/ 17:02:50 <arnaud> o/ 17:03:39 <garyk> i am here 17:03:42 <tjones> so i have a dentist appt at the top of the hour - so i will drop off about 15 min early. feel free to go on without me if you have stuff to discuss 17:03:51 <tjones> lets get started with... 17:03:53 <garyk> matt apologizes he will not be able to make 17:03:55 <tjones> #topic BP 17:04:06 <tjones> thats our approved BP of which we only have 3 17:04:16 <tjones> lets talk about our fav spawn refactor 1st 17:04:19 <garyk> i need to leave in about 30 minutes 17:04:22 <tjones> vui? 17:04:44 <garyk> tjones: sadly at the moment stuff is blocked by MS 17:04:51 <garyk> ESX deprectaion bit us in the behind 17:04:54 <tjones> yeah - that is such a pain 17:04:56 <vuil> it's still under review. Some phase 2 stuff left. I need to update some of the phase 3 patches as well. 17:05:23 <tjones> sorry vui my eye is off that ball - how many total have not yet merged ? 17:05:32 <vuil> a sec 17:05:52 <garyk> we need a MS for https://review.openstack.org/113923 17:06:35 <tjones> garyk: i thought that was actally blocking MS? 17:06:49 <vuil> * could find the fancy gerrit query * 17:06:56 <vuil> but https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104145/16 is the next in line 17:07:08 <vuil> that and 4 more makes ph 2, and 6 more for ph 3 17:07:16 <garyk> tjones: that patch should address the MS problem. we need a MS run on it ASAP 17:07:30 <vuil> among them there are about 3-4 sizeable ones, the rest are small 17:07:41 <tjones> garyk: does rhsu know? 17:07:55 <tjones> vuil: so im assuming all you need from us is reviews and reviews and reviews? 17:07:56 <garyk> tjones: yes. 17:07:59 <vuil> yes I told ryan. 17:08:18 <vuil> yes, but some work to rebase/update some ph 3 patches. 17:08:38 <vuil> But clearing all the ph2 stuff for a start would be great 17:09:15 <tjones> ok s lets focus on getting the phase 2 pathces reviewed. I'll find the link and post it here in a sec 17:09:36 <vuil> we will probably discuss next, but I think equally hi priority 17:09:45 <tjones> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/vmware-spawn-refactor,n,z 17:09:47 <vuil> is getting the oslo.vmware integration patch reviewed. 17:10:01 <tjones> yes lets talk about that one now 17:10:13 <vuil> If it merges, it will give some clarity on how the update the patches depending on them. 17:10:18 <tjones> that is just this one 17:10:19 <tjones> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/use-oslo-vmware,n,z 17:10:38 <tjones> but it's a big one 17:10:52 <vuil> yeah's its big, but mostly mechanical stuff 17:11:28 <tjones> i saw johnthetuba guy was reviewing it for a while but looks like he stopped 17:11:29 <garyk> yeah, we really the oslo stuff - it will make life a lot easier 17:11:41 <vuil> the issue is that several patches that addressed approve BP need its and arguably should be updated on top of the refactored code. 17:12:05 <vuil> It hard to post review that depends on two unmerged branches 17:12:10 <tjones> yes 17:12:28 <tjones> do you recommend rebasing oslo on top of the phase 2 refactor then - is that what you mean? 17:12:37 <tjones> or the other way around 17:12:57 <vuil> it has been rebased consistently to account for the merged refactored code. 17:13:23 <vuil> if and when it gets in, we rebase the rest of the unmerged refactored code on it one time,... 17:13:44 <vuil> then we allow dependent work to be build off one patch chain 17:13:53 <tjones> ok i see. so then what you are saying is that we should put reviewing oslo ahead of the other patches 17:14:18 <vuil> if possible, yes. Or at least get the ball rolling 17:14:19 <tjones> get that in and then start again with the rest of the refactors 17:14:35 <tjones> ok let me ping johnthetubaguy and see if i can get him engaged again 17:14:42 <vuil> otherwise it's just constant rebase (path 39 and counting) for nothin 17:14:52 <tjones> yes i know - frustrating and boring 17:15:05 <tjones> ok anything else for those 2 before we move on? 17:16:01 <tjones> garyk: v3 diags? 17:16:15 <garyk> tjones: done and dusted. 17:16:19 <tjones> and spbm? 17:16:21 <tjones> merged? 17:16:21 <garyk> justthe libvirt patch is pending review 17:16:35 <tjones> awesome! 17:16:40 <garyk> spbm needs to be rebased on to of the oslo stuff. hopefully tomorrow or day after 17:16:48 <tjones> and ephemeral? 17:16:55 <garyk> last in the refactor list 17:17:03 <garyk> code is up, just need to be revieweed 17:17:10 <tjones> ok - anything i missed? 17:17:33 <tjones> for approved BP? 17:17:45 <garyk> not that i am aware of 17:18:08 <tjones> if not - if everyone here can spend some cycles reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70175/ it sounds like it will really help us get over a number of humps. Please review so we can ping the core guys 17:18:12 <vuil> vsan/ova - those are the ones I was mentioning that depended on the oslo.vmware change. 17:18:49 <vuil> I held off rechecking 70175 due to the MS issues yesterday, but we should do one today 17:19:04 <tjones> vuil: since the status in launchpad is "not started" i fear they will not make it… 17:19:31 <tjones> the cores look at the state to decide what to review - if they are far enough along, please adjust the status 17:19:59 <vuil> I will, I thought I saw a list that said they are started. I just need to update them and am kinda in a bind as to how. 17:20:32 <vuil> I have been testing them internally, but I had the luxury of merging different branches of functionality I need 17:20:47 <tjones> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack?searchtext=vmware i think a number of states are stale. lets clean this up. sorry i should have been on this before but got a little disrtracted by other work 17:20:57 <tjones> ok lets move on to bugs 17:21:00 <tjones> #bugs 17:21:05 <garyk> i went over the bugs and did a little cleanup 17:21:29 <tjones> garyk: you are the proud owner of 2 critical bugs 17:21:33 <tjones> congrats! 17:21:59 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=vmware 17:22:45 <tjones> we are at 64 bugs 17:22:51 <tjones> 10 more than last week i think 17:23:20 <tjones> wow - we need to do some triage (later) 17:23:53 <tjones> garyk: these critical bugs are moving? just waiting on MS? 17:24:20 <tjones> BTW - my battery is close to dead so if i suddenly drop you will know why 17:24:40 <garyk> i am not sure. i will check the bugs again tomorrow 17:26:11 <vuil> maybe there went the battery 17:26:17 <tjones> no i am here 17:26:21 <tjones> was looking at the bugs 17:26:24 <vuil> k 17:26:27 <tjones> sorry 17:26:30 <tjones> got caught up 17:27:10 <tjones> i meant to spend some time looking at bugs before this meeitng but did not have time so i'll do it offline. 17:27:28 <tjones> anything else we need to talk about ? 17:27:53 <tjones> im happy to end early if not 17:27:58 <vuil> not for me 17:28:09 <tjones> please take this extra 1/2 hour and review oslo :-D 17:28:16 <tjones> that's what i am going to do 17:28:36 <tjones> *listening* 17:29:07 <tjones> ok lets end then 17:29:12 <tjones> *see* you next week 17:29:17 <tjones> #endmeeting