17:02:32 <tjones> #startmeeting vmwareapi
17:02:33 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Aug 13 17:02:32 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tjones. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:02:34 <tjones> sorry
17:02:35 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:02:37 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vmwareapi'
17:02:40 <tjones> im late
17:02:45 <tjones> who's here?
17:02:49 <vuil> o/
17:02:50 <thangp> o/
17:02:50 <arnaud> o/
17:03:39 <garyk> i am here
17:03:42 <tjones> so i have a dentist appt at the top of the hour - so i will drop off about 15 min early.  feel free to go on without me if you have stuff to discuss
17:03:51 <tjones> lets get started with...
17:03:53 <garyk> matt apologizes he will not be able to make
17:03:55 <tjones> #topic BP
17:04:06 <tjones> thats our approved BP of which we only have 3
17:04:16 <tjones> lets talk about our fav spawn refactor 1st
17:04:19 <garyk> i need to leave in about 30 minutes
17:04:22 <tjones> vui?
17:04:44 <garyk> tjones: sadly at the moment stuff is blocked by MS
17:04:51 <garyk> ESX deprectaion bit us in the behind
17:04:54 <tjones> yeah - that is such a pain
17:04:56 <vuil> it's still under review. Some phase 2 stuff left. I need to update some of the phase 3 patches as well.
17:05:23 <tjones> sorry vui my eye is off that ball  - how many total have not yet merged ?
17:05:32 <vuil> a sec
17:05:52 <garyk> we need a MS for https://review.openstack.org/113923
17:06:35 <tjones> garyk: i thought that was actally blocking MS?
17:06:49 <vuil> * could find the fancy gerrit query *
17:06:56 <vuil> but https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104145/16 is the next in line
17:07:08 <vuil> that and 4 more makes ph 2, and 6 more for ph 3
17:07:16 <garyk> tjones: that patch should address the MS problem. we need a MS run on it ASAP
17:07:30 <vuil> among them there are about 3-4 sizeable ones, the rest are small
17:07:41 <tjones> garyk: does rhsu know?
17:07:55 <tjones> vuil: so im assuming all you need from us is reviews and reviews and reviews?
17:07:56 <garyk> tjones: yes.
17:07:59 <vuil> yes I told ryan.
17:08:18 <vuil> yes, but some work to rebase/update some ph 3 patches.
17:08:38 <vuil> But clearing all the ph2 stuff for a start would be great
17:09:15 <tjones> ok s lets focus on getting the phase 2 pathces reviewed.  I'll find the link and post it here in a sec
17:09:36 <vuil> we will probably discuss next, but  I think equally hi priority
17:09:45 <tjones> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/vmware-spawn-refactor,n,z
17:09:47 <vuil> is getting the oslo.vmware integration patch reviewed.
17:10:01 <tjones> yes lets talk about that one now
17:10:13 <vuil> If it merges, it will give some clarity on how the update the patches depending on them.
17:10:18 <tjones> that is just this one
17:10:19 <tjones> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/use-oslo-vmware,n,z
17:10:38 <tjones> but it's a big one
17:10:52 <vuil> yeah's its big, but mostly mechanical stuff
17:11:28 <tjones> i saw johnthetuba guy was reviewing it for a while but looks like he stopped
17:11:29 <garyk> yeah, we really the oslo stuff - it will make life a lot easier
17:11:41 <vuil> the issue is that several patches that addressed approve BP need its and arguably should be updated on top of the refactored code.
17:12:05 <vuil> It hard to post review that depends on two unmerged branches
17:12:10 <tjones> yes
17:12:28 <tjones> do you recommend rebasing oslo on top of the phase 2 refactor then - is that what you mean?
17:12:37 <tjones> or the other way around
17:12:57 <vuil> it has been rebased consistently to account for the merged refactored code.
17:13:23 <vuil> if and when it gets in, we rebase the rest of the unmerged refactored code on it one time,...
17:13:44 <vuil> then we allow dependent work to be build off one patch chain
17:13:53 <tjones> ok i see.  so then what you are saying is that we should put reviewing oslo ahead of the other patches
17:14:18 <vuil> if possible, yes. Or at least get the ball rolling
17:14:19 <tjones> get that in and then start again with the rest of the refactors
17:14:35 <tjones> ok let me ping johnthetubaguy and see if i can get him engaged again
17:14:42 <vuil> otherwise it's just constant rebase (path 39 and counting) for nothin
17:14:52 <tjones> yes i know - frustrating and boring
17:15:05 <tjones> ok anything else for those 2 before we move on?
17:16:01 <tjones> garyk: v3 diags?
17:16:15 <garyk> tjones: done and dusted.
17:16:19 <tjones> and spbm?
17:16:21 <tjones> merged?
17:16:21 <garyk> justthe libvirt patch is pending review
17:16:35 <tjones> awesome!
17:16:40 <garyk> spbm needs to be rebased on to of the oslo stuff. hopefully tomorrow or day after
17:16:48 <tjones> and ephemeral?
17:16:55 <garyk> last in the refactor list
17:17:03 <garyk> code is up, just need to be revieweed
17:17:10 <tjones> ok - anything i missed?
17:17:33 <tjones> for approved BP?
17:17:45 <garyk> not that i am aware of
17:18:08 <tjones> if not - if everyone here can spend some cycles reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70175/ it sounds like it will really help us get over a number of humps.  Please review so we can ping the core guys
17:18:12 <vuil> vsan/ova - those are the ones I was mentioning that depended on the oslo.vmware change.
17:18:49 <vuil> I held off rechecking 70175 due to the MS issues yesterday, but we should do one today
17:19:04 <tjones> vuil: since the status in launchpad is "not started" i fear they will not make it…
17:19:31 <tjones> the cores look at the state to decide what to review - if they are far enough along, please adjust the status
17:19:59 <vuil> I will, I thought I saw a list that said they are started. I just need to update them and am kinda in a bind as to how.
17:20:32 <vuil> I have been testing them internally, but I had the luxury of merging different branches of functionality I need
17:20:47 <tjones> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack?searchtext=vmware  i think a number of states are stale.  lets clean this up.  sorry i should have been on this before but got a little disrtracted by other work
17:20:57 <tjones> ok lets move on to bugs
17:21:00 <tjones> #bugs
17:21:05 <garyk> i went over the bugs and did a little cleanup
17:21:29 <tjones> garyk: you are the proud owner of 2 critical bugs
17:21:33 <tjones> congrats!
17:21:59 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=vmware
17:22:45 <tjones> we are at 64 bugs
17:22:51 <tjones> 10 more than last week i think
17:23:20 <tjones> wow - we need to do some triage (later)
17:23:53 <tjones> garyk: these critical bugs are moving?  just waiting on MS?
17:24:20 <tjones> BTW - my battery is close to dead so if i suddenly drop you will know why
17:24:40 <garyk> i am not sure. i will check the bugs again tomorrow
17:26:11 <vuil> maybe there went the battery
17:26:17 <tjones> no i am here
17:26:21 <tjones> was looking at the bugs
17:26:24 <vuil> k
17:26:27 <tjones> sorry
17:26:30 <tjones> got caught up
17:27:10 <tjones> i meant to spend some time looking at bugs before this meeitng but did not have time so i'll do it offline.
17:27:28 <tjones> anything else we need to talk about ?
17:27:53 <tjones> im happy to end early if not
17:27:58 <vuil> not for me
17:28:09 <tjones> please take this extra 1/2 hour and review oslo :-D
17:28:16 <tjones> that's what i am going to do
17:28:36 <tjones> *listening*
17:29:07 <tjones> ok lets end then
17:29:12 <tjones> *see* you next week
17:29:17 <tjones> #endmeeting