09:00:05 #startmeeting watcher 09:00:06 Meeting started Wed Jan 4 09:00:05 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is acabot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 09:00:15 o/ 09:00:26 Hi 09:00:28 o/ 09:00:30 hi 09:00:34 happy new year everyone ! 09:00:39 hi 09:00:43 Thx 09:00:52 hi 09:01:00 #info our agenda for today #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#01.2F04.2F2016 09:01:01 Happy New Year ! 09:01:23 #topic Announcements 09:01:27 Bonne Année 2017 - Happy New Year to you all 09:02:00 #info Watcher ocata-2 has been released on December 15th 09:02:25 we missed 2 BPs for this release because of late reviews 09:02:25 +1 09:02:44 sorry alexchadin for postponing your 2 BPs to ocata-3 09:02:56 so now we have 12 BPs for ocata-3 ! 09:03:22 hi 09:03:34 #info Pike PTLs self nomination will start January 23rd and Watcher needs to find a new PTL 09:03:59 as said in the ML #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/109019.html I wont be candidate for a 4th cycle 09:04:49 so please think about becoming Watcher PTL before January 23rd 09:04:53 ;-) 09:05:34 you should also know that nobody from bcom will be candidate (vincentfrancoise, dtardivel, jed56) 09:06:04 and I'd like to avoid having no candidate for the election :-) 09:06:15 lets move on 09:06:22 #topic Review Action Items 09:06:40 we really need to finalize a couple of specs here 09:06:53 Audit tag in VM Metadata There are +1s but TODOs are still left in spec 09:07:02 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 09:07:22 hvprash told me that he will work on this one this week 09:07:52 #actio hvprash complete and finalize spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 09:08:22 #action hvprash complete and finalize spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 09:08:29 Define grammar for workload characterization needs a new PS an answering previous comments 09:08:36 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ 09:08:51 sballe : could you please try to add a new PS ? 09:09:08 sballe_ : could you please try to add a new PS ? 09:09:23 Yes hvprash and I will do that this week 09:09:47 #action hvprash sballe_ : answer comments on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ 09:09:55 Support Description For Dynamic Action needs a new PS 09:10:02 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401111/ 09:10:28 is hanrong here ? 09:11:06 #action hanrong add a new PS on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401111/ 09:11:11 nope. she will join very soon 09:11:25 Yumeng : thx 09:11:27 Spec for Noisy Neighbor Startegy needs reviews 09:11:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/ 09:11:42 who wants to review this strategy ? 09:12:31 Add improvements to the planner and workflow mechanisms needs final reviews 09:12:39 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ 09:12:50 I can review 09:13:21 #action sballe_ acabot : final review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ 09:13:37 Add improvements to Applier to make it parallel needs reviews 09:13:43 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/413079/ 09:14:19 #action sballe_ acabot hvprash review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/413079/ 09:14:31 cluster energy saving needs to be resubmitted as launchpad does not allow to change the superseded state 09:14:31 i want to review 09:14:45 #action hidekazu review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/413079/ 09:14:57 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/cluster-energy-saving 09:15:34 Yumeng hanrong : I cant remove the superseded state in launchpad so could you resubmit your BP with the same description ? 09:15:54 I'd like to keep the ZTE origin of drafted bps 09:16:44 Yumeng : could you do it ? 09:17:03 yes, will do. 09:17:32 #action Yumeng resubmit BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/cluster-energy-saving as a new PB 09:17:36 actually i think hanrong has updated that .. i didn't find the link 09:17:48 she updated the description 09:18:00 but I cant remove the superseded state 09:18:15 moving to Watcher 09:18:21 Add auto_trigger support to watcher needs final reviews & merge 09:18:28 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403718/ 09:19:10 do we need to create a new BP for BDB migration before moving on ? 09:19:11 acabot: I can review this one 09:19:23 Me too 09:19:41 #action vincentfrancoise sballe_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403718/ 09:19:54 What's BDB? 09:19:58 sorry DB 09:20:14 😀 09:20:19 Graph model needs reviews 09:20:25 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362730/ 09:20:32 acabot: if we want to have a Watcher 1.0, yes 09:20:36 I'd like to have it merge by octata-3 09:21:02 #action acabot submit a BP to handle DB migration 09:21:26 who wants to review the graph model ? 09:21:49 acabot: I started already so count me on 09:21:56 ok thx 09:22:13 #action vincentfrancoise review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362730/ 09:22:22 Added Monasca Helper needs reviews 09:22:29 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348891/ 09:23:21 I can review 09:23:22 who wants to review ? 09:23:38 I will 09:23:48 thx 09:24:11 +1 09:24:16 #action sballe_ hidekazu dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348891/ 09:24:26 Multi datasource support for Basic Consolidation needs discussions 09:24:32 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414617/ 09:25:10 the point from licanwei is should we add an abstraction layer 09:25:28 to deal with multiple datasource (Monasca, Gnocchi) 09:25:37 it has been a very long discussion on our side 09:26:12 vincentfrancoise proposed a BP for that #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/watcher-multi-datasource 09:27:03 for now we decided to implement a basic version with backend choice in the strategy 09:27:24 it means that every strategy will be specific to a metrics backend 09:28:17 who wants to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414617/ ? 09:28:24 +1 09:28:34 #action dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414617/ 09:28:57 New default planner & check the state of action plan needs final reviews 09:29:03 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406991/ 09:29:10 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391383/ 09:30:05 New default planner needs to be discussed with alexchadin 09:30:23 +1 09:30:44 I proposed an alternative that I would like to discuss with him 09:30:51 #action vincentfrancoise dtardivel : sync with alexchadin about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406991/ 09:30:54 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415505/ 09:32:05 #action vincentfrancoise dtardivel final reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391383/ 09:32:19 Watcher CLI 09:32:26 Add auto_trigger support needs final reviews & merge 09:32:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403716/ 09:33:10 acabot: there is a Depends-On rule 09:34:12 #action dtardivel review & merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403716/ 09:34:26 #topic Blueprint/Bug Review and Discussion 09:34:34 Watcher ocata-3 has started and finishes on January 23rd with 12 BPs to finish 09:34:38 #info Watcher ocata-3 has started and finishes on January 23rd with 12 BPs to finish 09:34:49 #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/ocata-3 09:35:14 we wont be able to deliver 12 BPs in 2 weeks ! 09:35:40 we should focus on "needs code review" BP ! 09:35:55 +1 09:36:01 I will move the others to the next release 09:36:48 does any one can update the status of his/her BPs ? set as started if it is 09:37:23 I will move all not started or unknown state BPs to ocata-rc today 09:37:54 i have just started https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/watcher-api-validation 09:38:19 but also pls move it to ocata-rc 09:38:32 Yumeng : do you plan to write a spec for it ? 09:39:32 Yumeng : you can use the one from keystone https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95957/14/specs/juno/keystone-api-validation.rst 09:39:44 i am doing with the code about initial implementation of the validator framework 09:40:12 can i just submit a rough implementaion first ? 09:40:19 Yumeng : sure you can 09:40:26 and see what's your suggestions 09:40:33 ok, thx 09:40:48 Yumeng: Can you explain to me/us how you want to do it? 09:41:16 i was following this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86483/ 09:41:32 but keep update with the new code in keystone 09:42:39 Yumeng: the idea was to use jsonschema if I remember correctly 09:42:59 yes, i will use jsonschema 09:43:38 Yumeng: ok 09:43:55 Yumeng: if you need help or you are not sure, please do ping me ;) 09:44:11 #action acabot move all unstarted BPs to ocata-rc1 09:44:17 vincentfrancoise: thx 09:44:27 #topic Open discussions 09:44:37 15 mins left for open discussions 09:45:05 acabot: https://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher/+bug/1640105 was fixed actually. 09:45:07 Launchpad bug 1640105 in watcher "Change hardware.cpu_util to compute.node.cpu.percent in workload_stabilization" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Hidekazu Nakamura (nakamura-h) 09:45:09 Yumeng : do you know the priority on your side for cluster-energy-saving ? 09:45:42 i don't know 09:46:04 hidekazu : ok this is because you didn't mention Closes-Bug in your commit msg 09:46:12 I will update 09:46:17 acabot: I did it ;) 09:46:21 acabot: yes, sorry. 09:47:29 anyone has submitted a new BP during holidays ? 09:47:36 I could have missed it 09:48:14 I will create Pike cycle in launchpad soon and start adding next BPs 09:48:19 acabot: can we have the priority of cluster-energy-saving as "high" ? 09:49:16 Yumeng : I can set it as high but it will be in the Pike cycle 09:49:47 aha~ that's ok 09:49:56 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/ocata 09:50:00 thx 09:50:21 we still have 3 BPs with high priority that needs to be implemented 09:51:07 any other topic to discuss ? 09:52:22 so thank you all 09:52:26 see you next week 09:52:36 #endmeeting