08:01:25 #startmeeting watcher 08:01:26 Meeting started Wed Apr 24 08:01:25 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is licanwei. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:01:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:01:29 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 08:02:20 thank you Corne for the agenda 08:02:36 no problem 08:02:39 Agenda for today: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#04.2F24.2F2019 08:03:32 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653344/ Formalize DataSourceBase interface needs review 08:04:51 All feedback on the interface is appreciated 08:06:20 Dantalion: you do a very good job :) 08:06:51 I'll review this spec again 08:07:38 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653931/ Add a force field to audit needs review 08:09:08 this spec proposes to add a force option when creating audit 08:09:25 I'll try and review this spec today 08:09:47 Dantalion: thanks! 08:10:24 help 08:11:35 #action Dantalion review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653931/ 08:12:04 Hi Dantalion, i am busy with an urgent project recently, i will understand your commit as soon as possible. 08:12:22 #action licanwei chenke review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653344/ 08:13:55 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/645294/ Allow for global datasource preference from config needs review 08:15:43 This implements the recently approved spec 08:16:09 Dantalion: LGTM! 08:16:30 final review 08:17:05 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653977/ Resolve problems with audit scope and add tests needs review 08:17:40 #action licanwei reveiw https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653977/ 08:19:26 very nice commits 08:19:51 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/654800/ Drop use of git.openstack.org needs review 08:20:24 i I think your coding ability is very strong. 08:20:40 #action licanwei reveiw https://review.opendev.org/#/c/654800/ 08:21:04 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653913/ separate launching audit scheduler needs review 08:21:58 I have seen issues with scheduling on devstack this patch seems to have solved it thanks 08:22:32 Dantalion: yes 08:23:08 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/651746/ Make the same method be self-explanatory in different strategies needs review 08:23:42 #action licanwei reveiw https://review.opendev.org/#/c/651746/ 08:24:19 Dantalion: I agree to add a base method 08:24:33 licanwei: Might need to re-execute those commands, you have a typo in review / reveiw 08:24:55 #action licanwei review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/651746/ 08:25:24 Yes, with add_migration as base method this patch would look good to me 08:25:52 ok, i will put the method as base method 08:26:23 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/654800/5/doc/source/contributor/testing.rst this patch look good to me 08:26:33 #action chenke add a new patch for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/651746/ 08:27:36 #topic discussions 08:28:24 Approved file based metric spec needs to be implemented [https://review.opendev.org/#/c/643312/] 08:29:34 I am unsure if sumitjami intents to implement his spec, I propose I try to contact him and ask. If he is not going to we can look at who can do it. 08:30:35 How are you going to contact him? 08:30:37 Dantalion: OK, thanks you 08:31:10 chenke: opendev users have an email address that is public 08:31:20 sjamgade@suse.com 08:31:24 haha 08:31:45 hello, sorry for being late 08:32:07 hello welcome 08:32:22 sum12: hi 08:32:28 welcome 08:33:42 sum12: Could you continue to implement your spec file based metric 08:34:01 ? 08:34:34 yes I am working on it, but was distracted preparing for workshop at the summit. 08:34:38 Dantalion: I think you are friends with sumitjami. I forgot the email. 08:35:07 will try to get initial review before going to summit 08:35:25 licanwei: i hope that is fine :-) 08:35:47 sum12: That's OK ,thank you! 08:35:52 chenke: I have never met sumitjami in person 08:36:25 sum12: thank you :) 08:36:54 about URL migration to opendev.org 08:37:30 Dantalion: What do you want to discuss? 08:37:47 Dantalion: if you are going to be at the summit, we can meet (i am sumitjami) (too many nicks !) 08:38:20 Are the 3 currently open patches enough to complete the migration to opendev? 08:38:41 sum12: I won't be there unfortunately but josecastroleon will be 08:39:14 Dantalion: I don't sure 08:40:00 i will check it 08:41:00 Dantalion: I don't think it's a problem~ 08:41:45 licanwei: the redirects will stay for long time so no problem indeed 08:41:49 chenke: thank you 08:41:51 topic: Watcher blueprints need cleaning https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher 08:42:36 I think we should clean up the blueprints to better reflect what currently is implemented and what is being worked on 08:42:52 Dantalion: There are many unimplemented specs 08:44:19 We are no more people to do these 08:45:14 Agreed we can not implement all unimplemented specs 08:45:36 the spec `Add Show Datamodel API` and `Add resource_name in action input parameter` i will implement it before this release. 08:46:02 But some status of blueprints is incorrect and train series is missing as option for example 08:46:24 Dantalion: I will check these bp when I have time 08:46:49 Okaj, thank you 08:49:41 we can discuss which need to do and invalid unused 08:50:09 Yes, could be topic for other meeting 08:51:56 any questions? 08:52:37 I have no other thoughts for the time being. 08:52:46 I have no more questions 08:53:44 OK, I'll end the meeting 08:53:53 Thank you all :) 08:54:04 Yes, thanks everyone :) 08:54:09 see you next meeting time:) 08:54:20 thanks everyone 08:54:34 #endmeeting