08:00:14 #startmeeting Watcher 08:00:14 Meeting started Wed Sep 11 08:00:14 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is licanwei. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 08:01:31 #topic Announcements 08:01:57 This week is Train-3 milestone 08:02:17 yes 08:02:30 It's time to freeze features 08:02:33 Some bp and codes need to be merged soon. 08:02:40 When is feature freeze? together with Train-3? 08:03:09 yes 08:03:33 Dantalion: yes, this week 08:04:00 Okaj, lets work on finishing accepted specs for release I propose to do threadpool for T-1 / T-2 of next release 08:04:09 https://releases.openstack.org/train/schedule.html 08:04:15 Since otherwise we do not have enough time 08:04:54 Agree. 08:05:02 First merge the spec 08:06:52 I plan to merge most of the commits this week 08:07:24 I suggest taking the time to review the code today, because the day after tomorrow we will have a holiday due to the Mid-Autumn Festival 08:07:41 and threadpool may be postpone to next release 08:08:02 I'll try to review code this week I have the friday off so I expect to do most reviewing then 08:08:17 I agree postpone threadpool to Ussuri 08:08:23 Dantalion: thanks! 08:08:58 #topic Review 08:09:32 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675871/ node resource consolidation spec needs review 08:09:51 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679827/ General purpose threadpool for the decision engine needs review 08:10:25 I'll review it tomorrow 08:10:59 we can merge the spec if it's ok 08:11:28 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677437/ Update show-datamodel-api spec needs review 08:12:08 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679402/ node resource consolidation needs review 08:12:20 I'll prioritize reviewing specs for friday since the node resource consolidation patches depend on it 08:13:17 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677407/ Add releasenote about bp show-datamodel-api needs review 08:14:00 +2 08:14:19 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/563477/ Watcher Planner Selector needs review 08:15:06 I will review this tomorrow. 08:15:07 this is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/watcher-planner-selector 08:15:58 3years ago. 08:16:03 this bp. 08:16:07 Is there a spec? or was this before specs 08:16:42 It's code for this bp 08:17:05 used to select planner for strategy 08:18:29 So planner is part of applier and determines how the actions in an action plan get applied / scheduled? 08:18:49 I find the default planner 'weight' can not work well for strategy 'node resource consolidation' 08:19:46 So I plan to merge this bp's code first 08:20:33 planner is not a part of applier, it's a part of decision engine 08:20:48 planner creates actions 08:21:37 So the same strategy with different planners could result in different actions or different orders of actions? 08:23:06 diffrent planner can result different order of actions 08:23:47 Okaj I understand that is good, currently strategies have a lot of responsibilities. Planner selector will help remove some responsibilities away from the strategies 08:24:23 but the same strategy has the same planner, different strategies can have diffrenet planners 08:25:10 Okaj so the strategy picks which planner to use, but we could make it so a single strategy could support multiple planners maybe in the future 08:25:28 But thats for later first planner selector, I will look at it friday 08:26:41 yes, you are right, strategy can select different planner 08:28:05 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680288/ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680288/ needs review 08:28:34 +2 08:28:36 This depends on 'node resource cosolidation' codes 08:28:53 I have reviewd this patch. 08:29:01 thanks 08:31:01 If no other questions I'll end the meeting 08:31:10 I have no further questions 08:31:32 no question. 08:31:45 thanks all. 08:31:56 Thanks and until next time 08:31:57 OK, thanks 08:32:10 bye~ 08:32:13 see you next time 08:32:31 #endmeeting