08:01:28 #startmeeting Watcher 08:01:29 Meeting started Wed Dec 18 08:01:28 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is licanwei. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:01:30 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:01:33 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 08:02:04 Dantalion: hi 08:02:43 licanwei: hello 08:03:33 Dantalion: are you still in holidays? 08:04:37 Licanwei: No, this week is exam week and next week will be holidays until 7th of Januari 08:05:21 Do you currently have holidays? 08:05:44 Dantalion: Good Lucky! 08:06:01 Are you following the watcher because of your personal interest or continue your previous research 08:06:06 Dantalion: no~ 08:06:26 #topic Review 08:06:51 chenke: personal interest, it will be around 1,5 years before I will start new formal research most likely 08:07:28 Great. 08:07:45 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698764/ Remove use of deprecated config options for volume API selection needs review 08:08:01 Our projects need your passion. 08:08:45 This is clear up for watcher tempest 08:09:05 looks reasonable. 08:09:12 Friday after exams I'll have time to review patches, on first gleanse clean up looks good to me 08:09:34 Dantalion: thanks 08:09:54 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698993/ [ussuri][goal] Drop python 2.7 support needs review 08:09:55 cool. 08:10:18 This is community goal, 08:11:02 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698841/ Add audit type: event needs review 08:11:16 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698842/ Support audit type event needs review 08:11:25 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698993/ I think it is necessary to pay attention to whether zuul.yml needs to be changed. I see that he changed zuul.yml in other components. 08:11:57 They are parts of the bp event-driven-optimization-based 08:12:50 chenke: changing tox.ini might be enough if zuul uses tox.ini will check 08:12:58 I wish you all have time to review 08:13:27 I can start with reviewing spec friday probably also be able to review implementation patches 08:13:37 Dantalion ok. I will check it. 08:13:54 I will review these patchs tomorrow. 08:14:05 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695646/ Support event based audit needs review 08:14:23 This is spec link 08:15:10 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691806/ rollback mechanism needs review 08:15:26 the spec for bp rollback mechanism 08:16:51 Can CONTINOUS audit generate multiple actionplans? did not know 08:17:08 one per interval / trigger? 08:17:22 Dantalion: yes 08:19:12 because of new year holiday, we will cancel next meeting. 08:19:30 For event based triggers my only question is how is authorization handled / who can trigger webhoop and who can not 08:20:20 The next meeting time is 15th Jan 08:20:52 Subsequent question beign, can this be managed in keystone?, I will also ask these on patch itself 08:21:03 licanwei: Okaj sounds, good next meeting 15th jan 08:22:16 good question. 08:23:04 Dantalion: I test in my devstack with aodh sending the webhook 08:24:05 Dantalion: Aodh send the webhook api without authorization 08:26:05 I will ask someone from CERN heavily involved with Keystone how he thinks permissions for webhooks are best managed 08:26:17 thanks. 08:26:43 Dantalion: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698832/5/watcher/api/config.py 08:26:45 I think we should have the authorization 08:29:50 Dantalion: https://opendev.org/openstack/watcher/src/branch/master/watcher/api/middleware/auth_token.py#L58 08:30:34 I imagine public == anyone with a OpenStack user account 08:31:23 Dantalion: yes, anyone can send webhook api 08:32:46 Dantalion: I wish you have a good solution 08:33:14 I will look into this and come back on it 08:33:30 Dantalion: ok ,thanks 08:35:45 I think I will be able to have a proposal by next meeting after speaking to someone at CERN 08:36:11 oh. 08:37:41 OK, 08:38:02 any question? 08:38:29 I'll end the meeting if no more questions 08:38:46 ok. 08:38:49 bye~ 08:38:54 no more questions 08:39:16 have a good holiday. 08:39:17 thank you all 08:39:27 Happy new year~ 08:39:52 #endmeeting