09:30:25 #startmeeting XenAPI 09:30:26 Meeting started Wed Feb 3 09:30:25 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is BobBall. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:30:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:30:29 The meeting name has been set to 'xenapi' 09:30:46 ping johnthetubaguy 09:31:37 Just waiting for johnthetubaguy :) 09:31:44 OK 09:31:48 sure 09:32:00 #topic Blueprints 09:32:03 oh, didn't see your first ping, chatting on #openstack-nova about xenapi live-migrate 09:32:08 I think you have one BP up huanxie ? 09:32:18 Soz - working from home so not in #openstack-nova atm 09:32:24 Worth bringing into here for a more focused chat? 09:32:33 BobBall: do you mean security group ? 09:32:59 sorry huanxie - wrong tab complete, I meant huazhihao 09:33:17 ah, i see 09:33:23 Ah the named vhd 09:33:33 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/bare-vhd-image 09:33:47 That's the one 09:34:22 johnthetubaguy: What's the rough schedule for when cores might start looking at Newton specs? Is it too early to ask for reviews? 09:34:24 I think the logic is quite straightforward and can be recognized as a specless one 09:34:38 yes, reviews are likely post mitaka-3 09:34:55 I mean do internal review, and folks might review them, but yeah 09:35:57 of course 09:36:12 we're aiming to have 3-4 specs 09:36:27 Feels like a lot for a driver, but we've got lots of ground to catch up on 09:36:57 #topic Bugs 09:37:14 Main item is we're still pushing for reviews on huanxie's fix for the VIF logic 09:37:24 as it's the head of a series including Neutron fixes 09:37:24 I have two patches ready for review 09:37:43 Do you have a link to the vif plug/unplug on huanxie? 09:37:50 yes, 09:37:58 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254022/ 09:38:27 johnthetubaguy: ^^ I know you've reviewed before, but all comments have been implemented now so a re-review would be appreciated. 09:40:18 Johnthetubaguy: yes, have changed some part according to comments and also there is another one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213112/ which you have approved but meet merge conflict so after rebase, need your help to review again:) 09:40:49 just ping me on IRC for the stuff that got a rebase, most cores will do a quick check an re-approve those quick 09:40:51 ly 09:41:05 right now I have spending all my time on the FFE reviews and planning 09:41:19 as are most nova-cores, in theory 09:41:36 johnthetubaguy: got it, thanks a lot 09:42:31 huanxie: sorry, I missed this before, but the deprecated configuration values need a Reno release note 09:43:31 this is the useful link for those things: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/code-review.html#when-a-release-note-is-needed 09:44:06 johnthetubaguy: thanks, I will refer this and finish this asap 09:44:09 good spot 09:44:24 I keep forgetting about reno - I'm stuck in the docimpact days ;) 09:44:44 #topic AOB 09:44:45 yeah, likewise 09:44:59 Anything else to talk about today 09:44:59 so I was just talking about this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254101/19 09:45:25 Yeah - was just looking at that one 09:45:38 its part of the nice live-migrate stuff, basically we are making most of the live-migrate arguments optional, because we know what to do better than the admin 99% of the time 09:46:22 its something I wrote a spec for a few years back and never had chance to implement, so I am excited to see it happen! 09:46:30 thats just a heads up 09:46:59 I've been vaguely following it and good to see it happen for sure 09:47:11 OK - are we done here? 09:47:16 I am. 09:47:23 AOB huanxie or huazhihao ? 09:47:23 that's all for me 09:47:42 Me too 09:47:45 Awesome - we'll close there then 09:47:49 #endmeeting