09:32:24 #startmeeting XenAPI 09:32:25 Meeting started Wed May 11 09:32:24 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is BobBall. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:32:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:32:28 The meeting name has been set to 'xenapi' 09:32:38 johnthetubaguy, jianghuaw_, huazhihao ping :) 09:32:58 * johnthetubaguy waves 09:33:07 Good morning Bob and johnthetubaguy. 09:33:08 Sorry for the late start all 09:33:30 #topic Blueprints / Reviews 09:33:42 jianghuaw_: I guess the VGPU blueprint is up first? 09:34:16 we got a +2 on the vgpu BP. 09:34:45 #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280099/ 09:34:55 This is the one that you suggested looked reasonable but needed a closer check johnthetubaguy 09:35:48 yes. johnthetubaguy: could you have a check on it again. 09:35:51 Any time you could give that to review it would be great 09:36:00 * BobBall would love to get the spec approved before the deadline... 09:36:25 which is approaching a lot faster than I thought it would 09:36:44 It's worth pointing out that these specs are in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-nova-priorities-tracking in priority order 09:37:20 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280099/7 - XenAPI: support VGPU via passthrough PCI 09:37:23 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274045/5 - Xenapi: a new VDI store via streaming 09:37:26 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304377/ - Xenerver compute driver support neutron security group 09:37:29 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277452/ - XenAPI independent hypervisor (fixing interaction layer between Nova + Hypervisor) 09:37:56 Please do let us know if there is anything we can do to give you more time to review these specs johnthetubaguy 09:38:06 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/bare-vhd-image 09:38:16 BobBall: something to do with making days longer, would be awesome 09:39:13 for clarity, my current priorities are all the OSIC roadmap items 09:39:35 but as always, I am doing other reviews too 09:39:56 So I've been thinking about the bare-vhd-image... we should talk about that huazhihao - I think we'd need Cinder changes too. 09:40:37 OSIC priorities are certainly interesting; although I am concerned that much of them are focused around improving things for libvirt+kvm 09:40:38 Thanks 09:40:55 (or generic things of course) 09:41:27 BobBall: they are focusing on libvirt+kvm, yes 09:41:44 why cinder changes for the bare-vhd-image? 09:41:51 for the extracting images into volumes? 09:42:12 Yes - I don't want to introduce another case where the type of image works for most things but not boot from snapshot 09:42:58 yeah, its related to the longer term discussion around why cinder and nova both have their own code to talk to glance and download/extra images 09:43:11 Very much 09:43:38 os-brick like thing for glance, was my thinking 09:44:09 Indeed 09:44:17 OK - anything else we should cover on specs? 09:45:13 Awesome 09:45:17 #topic Bugs 09:46:30 I don't think there are any new bugs that we care massively about, are there? 09:46:30 The only important one I know of is https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1566622 - which Corey is working on 09:46:32 Launchpad bug 1566622 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "live migration fails with xenapi virt driver and SRs with old-style naming convention" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Corey Wright (coreywright) 09:47:07 I'm going to take silence as a good thing :) 09:47:20 #topic AOB 09:47:25 Is there anything else we need to cover? 09:47:50 Again we need some cores help to review this change: 09:47:54 #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242846/ 09:48:32 this should now appear on the review dashboard that we are trying out 09:48:57 Great. thanks. 09:49:03 I guess its still very much a prototype, but trying out new ways to raise these kinds of changes for people to look at 09:49:17 First things first - johnthetubaguy - I know we talked about it before, but can you confirm you still agree this is a bugfix not a specless BP or similar? 09:49:49 For a bugfix we have time but if it needs a BP then it's more urgent 09:52:55 BobBall: its a good question, its boarder line 09:53:28 BobBall: I was going to say raise a specless BP for this, but then that makes you run up against the non-priority feature freeze, and it is a bit bug fixey 09:55:45 Hopefully very bug fixey :) 09:57:12 Do you have a call on it johnthetubaguy? Or is that a question I should ask someone else? 09:58:48 its worth asking around for a second optinion 09:58:59 opinion 09:59:19 Is yours bugfix based on the above? 10:00:24 yeah, I think its OK as a bug fix 10:00:33 mostly because its single virt impact anyways 10:00:33 ok, thanks. 10:00:40 Yeah, true 10:00:42 reno can cover any details you need to communicate anyways 10:02:07 ok 10:02:07 I think we're done 10:02:07 #endmeeting