09:32:16 <BobBall> #startmeeting XenAPI
09:32:17 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Oct 19 09:32:16 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is BobBall. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
09:32:18 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
09:32:20 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'xenapi'
09:32:26 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy: ping!
09:32:45 <johnthetubaguy> hey, half here, half away in a VC
09:32:55 <jianghuaw> Good morning Bob and johnthetubaguy.
09:32:59 <BobBall> VC? Video Call?
09:33:07 <BobBall> Anyway - hi :)
09:33:19 <BobBall> Two main points to talk about this week - that I know of anyway.
09:33:27 <BobBall> #topic Ocata Blueprints
09:33:35 <huanxie> Good morning BobBall and  johnthetubaguy
09:33:43 <BobBall> jianghuaw has posted two blueprints that we'd very much like to get into Ocata.
09:33:55 <BobBall> BP1: os-xenapi - jianghuaw can you talk to that?
09:33:56 <johnthetubaguy> yeah, video call, no startup nonsense
09:34:01 <jianghuaw> #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385810/5/specs/ocata/approved/generalize-pci-device.rst
09:34:17 <BobBall> Morning huanxie - I thought you were still in training :) Glad you could join us :)
09:34:29 <BobBall> ok - generalize pci device first :)
09:34:43 <BobBall> So this is agreed as a pre-requisite to the vGPU implementation
09:34:47 <jianghuaw> and this one for "
09:34:47 <jianghuaw> XenAPI: add common os-xenapi libary": #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/379279/
09:35:03 <BobBall> We should probably submit a BP/Spec at some point for vGPU too
09:35:42 <jianghuaw> BobBall, yes. I'm change vGPU spec basing on the generalizing PCI.
09:35:49 <jianghuaw> should be ready for a review soon.
09:36:00 <BobBall> but in terms of generalizing the PCI devices, we'd very much like to push for this to be in Ocata, and as it's something that's got the backing of Dan and Jay already and is a generic thing that needs to happen to unblock various other specs we were wondering what process would be needed to propose it for a priority BP in Ocata?
09:38:14 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy: that q was for you (to highlight so you see it when you have a moment from your VC)
09:41:28 <johnthetubaguy> just need the BP and spec first I guess
09:41:40 <johnthetubaguy> the scheduler stuff is generally a priority I would expect
09:42:44 <BobBall> If there's a consensus that the PCI refactoring can't be a priority, that's fine, but we're ready to do the work needed and it is something that will unblock other specs for future releases (vGPU, vTPM, others that I can't remember)
09:43:24 <BobBall> I know there is only so much resource (even if just reviewing bandwidth) and so the limit on the number of priority items needs to be kept down
09:43:50 <BobBall> Anyway - jianghuaw and huanxie will be in Barcelona next week and will attend the nova priorities session
09:43:50 <jianghuaw> someone was asking for support on FPGA also.
09:44:22 <BobBall> jianghuaw: Can you also chat with Dan / Jay to see what their thoughts on listing it as a priority BP are
09:44:45 <jianghuaw> BobBall: sure.
09:44:45 <BobBall> Getting some discussions going before the summit will always be useful.
09:45:08 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy: The other spec that we need your input on is the os-xenapi spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/379279/
09:45:09 <jianghuaw> Totally agree.
09:45:27 <johnthetubaguy> I should try get to that soon
09:45:28 <jianghuaw> But Jay seems is on vacation for this whole week.
09:45:48 <BobBall> we're pushing forward with the os-xenapi library as clearly if we wait for approval there won't be much time to do the work.
09:45:50 <jianghuaw> But sure I will chat with Dan.
09:46:21 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy: So some early approval of the general direction would be very helpful
09:46:36 <johnthetubaguy> yeah, totally
09:46:46 <johnthetubaguy> I mean it sounds sensible at a high level
09:47:54 <BobBall> The two things we're aiming to move over are the high level session management and the plugins
09:49:03 <BobBall> #topic AOB
09:49:14 <BobBall> They are the two things that we need to progress as soon as possible
09:49:36 <BobBall> Is there anything else we should discuss in this meeting?
09:50:01 <huanxie> I have one patch ready for review #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359548/
09:50:14 <huanxie> This is for the live-migration when using XS7.0
09:50:45 <BobBall> Ah yes -
09:50:52 <BobBall> This patch is very relevant to rackspace johnthetubaguy
09:51:44 <BobBall> XS 7.0 changed the default for whether xsm live migration should attempt to live migrate iscsi SRs but the detection logic in Nova didn't cope with that, so Nova was claiming that the live migrate couldn't work when actually it could.
09:52:44 <huanxie> This patch's logic is simple, check with XCP version and give default value for xsm
09:53:31 <BobBall> huanxie: Could you check / make sure it's on the etherpad for ocata reviews that are ready?
09:53:46 <huanxie> Sure, I will check that
09:54:07 <BobBall> Right.  Is there anything else we should cover today?
09:54:39 <BobBall> We can cover MOS 9.1 briefly; Mirantis have added a requirement for the tasks.yaml to have version numbers for each task.  We've got a fix in the works, but until we release a new plugin, the MOS 9.0 plugin cannot be used on an upgraded MOS 9.1 system.
09:54:43 <huanxie> BobBall, double checked, in ocata
09:54:52 <BobBall> Thanks huanxie.
09:55:12 <BobBall> jianghuaw: Likewise for your two BPs - please make sure they are listed in the ocata nova review priorities etherpad.
09:55:21 <BobBall> Anything else from anyone else?
09:55:49 <jianghuaw> BobBall, that's all for me.
09:55:59 <huanxie> None for me, I will modify my another patch for VIF hotplug, maybe discussing it next meeting
09:56:13 <BobBall> Sounds goo.d
09:56:21 <BobBall> Thanks all - will close the meeting there then.
09:56:22 <BobBall> #endmeeting