*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 00:34 | |
*** agopi has joined #oooq | 00:54 | |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 02:49 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 02:51 | |
*** skramaja has joined #oooq | 03:18 | |
*** udesale has joined #oooq | 03:47 | |
*** saneax has joined #oooq | 03:57 | |
*** ykarel has joined #oooq | 04:14 | |
*** ccamacho has quit IRC | 05:11 | |
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq | 05:12 | |
*** holser_ has joined #oooq | 05:13 | |
*** marios has joined #oooq | 05:17 | |
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq | 05:17 | |
*** ccamacho has quit IRC | 05:19 | |
*** ykarel has quit IRC | 05:21 | |
*** dmellado has joined #oooq | 05:27 | |
*** holser_ has quit IRC | 05:40 | |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 05:44 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 05:45 | |
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq | 06:07 | |
*** ratailor has joined #oooq | 06:09 | |
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq | 06:17 | |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 06:39 | |
*** apetrich has joined #oooq | 06:58 | |
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel|away | 07:02 | |
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 07:07 | |
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq | 07:09 | |
*** bogdando has joined #oooq | 07:15 | |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 07:33 | |
*** tosky has joined #oooq | 07:34 | |
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq | 07:36 | |
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 07:36 | |
*** gkadam has joined #oooq | 07:44 | |
*** ratailor has quit IRC | 07:49 | |
*** jaosorior has quit IRC | 08:10 | |
apetrich | arxcruz, morning | 08:13 |
---|---|---|
*** gkadam is now known as gkadam-afk | 08:14 | |
*** kopecmartin has joined #oooq | 08:20 | |
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 08:33 | |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 08:40 | |
dmellado | apetrich: o/ Wie geht's | 08:57 |
dmellado | I was told you moved to Berlin as well ,) | 08:57 |
apetrich | dmellado, I did. | 08:58 |
apetrich | dmellado, wait. did you also? | 08:58 |
dmellado | apetrich: heh, no | 08:59 |
apetrich | I know you were moving from Madrid but I thought it was to the coast | 08:59 |
dmellado | but I'll be there for the Summit | 08:59 |
dmellado | apetrich: yeah, just signed the apartment contract yesterday | 08:59 |
dmellado | xD | 08:59 |
apetrich | niice | 08:59 |
apetrich | I'm still trying to find an apartment here | 08:59 |
dmellado | but I'll be moving within a month | 08:59 |
dmellado | apetrich: It's hard! | 08:59 |
dmellado | with all the regulations and stuff | 09:00 |
dmellado | and german landlords and recommendations letters and all | 09:00 |
apetrich | it is awful. yesterday I went to an apartment viewing that the landlord did not appear. Second time that happened | 09:06 |
apetrich | 40 minutes in 60 minutes out and the damn guy does not show up or send an email | 09:07 |
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq | 09:08 | |
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 09:10 | |
*** ssbarnea has joined #oooq | 09:15 | |
ssbarnea | marios|rover: i have few questions regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594933/ | 09:15 |
ssbarnea | mainly what I did was to follow the same pattern wed did on master and rocky, which involved whildcard. Not doing this means a LOT of expansions, as there is a big numebr of rpms to mention. For me it feels like a recipe for more maintenance work not to use wildcards. | 09:17 |
marios | ssbarnea: yeah i don' think he will insist on the wildcards ;) | 09:17 |
marios | ssbarnea: we can discuss with him later | 09:17 |
marios | ssbarnea: but there is a precedent and we do the same on all the others | 09:17 |
marios | i mean for the branches | 09:18 |
ssbarnea | i am computing now the list of rpms, but the change should apply same rule on all branches. with or w/o wildcards. I wonder how does the rpm list varies across releases, as this woudl clearly slow me down in doing the patch. I wonder if it would not make sense to split it per release. | 09:19 |
ssbarnea | just to have fixes in faster, without it we have a growing number of failing patches | 09:20 |
marios | ssbarnea: no i wouldn't bother to be honest i mean with the list of packages | 09:25 |
marios | ssbarnea: at least imo | 09:26 |
*** holser_ has joined #oooq | 09:34 | |
arxcruz | dmellado: woot!!! will you be here for summit?!?! \o/ | 09:43 |
dmellado | arxcruz: probably yeah | 09:43 |
dmellado | I've two sessions there, so I imagine thatI'll be there | 09:44 |
arxcruz | beer++ | 09:44 |
arxcruz | we gonna drink with dtantsur and apetrich :D | 09:44 |
apetrich | arxcruz, btw have you ever been to http://www.berlinburgerinternational.com/ ? | 09:47 |
apetrich | I passed in front of it yesterday going to the viewing it looked very nice | 09:48 |
arxcruz | (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ | 09:48 |
arxcruz | never been there | 09:48 |
dtantsur | arxcruz: :) | 09:49 |
dtantsur | apetrich: oh, interesting | 09:49 |
apetrich | dtantsur, I was going to ask if you did know it | 09:50 |
dtantsur | apetrich: I'm not really strong in local restaurants, to be honest. Time not spent in front of computer is usually spent outdoors :) | 09:50 |
dtantsur | also I'm sorry re flats. it can be "fun" indeed. | 09:51 |
apetrich | dtantsur, that place is small inside but has couple of tables in the pavement. It felt to be a nice place to go before the cold arrives | 09:51 |
dtantsur | apetrich: is it a suggestion? ;) | 09:52 |
apetrich | It could be. the smell coming from it was amazing and the burgers on the tables looked nice, but I passed in front of it after I just had dinner so I didn't stop to taste | 09:53 |
apetrich | the chili fries were very tempting | 09:53 |
*** jaosorior has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
marios | you guys made me go put lunch in the microwave | 09:54 |
marios | its time | 09:54 |
dtantsur | marios: enjoy :) | 09:55 |
*** jaganathan has joined #oooq | 09:55 | |
marios | dtantsur: thanks | 09:56 |
rascasoft | marios|rover, ssbarnea|ruck, hey folks hi! Can I ask you 1 min of your time for this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/588327/ ? It's was approved all the way around, so a little more love and we can forget about it :) | 09:59 |
ssbarnea | rascasoft: i would gladly give it a +W but I do not have this right, maybe panda or sshnaidm ? | 10:01 |
marios | rascasoft: forget about it | 10:01 |
rascasoft | marios, I like your style man. ssbarnea thanks to you too! | 10:02 |
ssbarnea | out of curiosity do we have an unwritten policy about hiding command output in separate file in order to make the ansible output shorter (and less useful)? | 10:24 |
jfrancoa | sshnaidm: marios: hey, do you remember that container-to-container jobs were not even starting (failing at workspace setting up https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1788128), it should get fixed by this, if you can review please: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15866/ | 10:38 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1788128 in tripleo "[CI upgrades] legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-queens failing" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Jose Luis Franco (jfrancoa) | 10:38 |
marios | jfrancoa: ack thanks will check it | 10:40 |
marios | rascasoft: ;) | 10:40 |
marios | ssbarnea: did you see my comments in https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1785067 - looks like queens has same as ocata.. (via grafana the last two check fails are for this ) | 10:41 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1785067 in tripleo "without bootstrap-subnodes pike/ocata deployment fails for missing os-collect-config" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b) | 10:41 |
marios | ssbarnea: should be fixed by https://review.openstack.org/595527 | 10:42 |
marios | ssbarnea: ideally i'd like to make the gate checks depend on that but doesn't feel liek the right way to do it :) will discuss on the call later too | 10:42 |
ssbarnea | marios: can you have a look at http://logs.openstack.org/33/594933/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-oooq/72d2a4d/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/install_packages.sh.log.txt.gz ? | 10:49 |
ssbarnea | that is the result of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594933/ | 10:50 |
ssbarnea | my guess: broken delorean repo? should all deps be contained? | 10:50 |
ssbarnea | marios: on the bright side, that is a clear sign that we missed to update them previously. | 10:53 |
marios | ssbarnea: eek not sure about that one. looks like we have almost the right version but not quite like 9.2.1-0.2018 08 22 21394 vs 9.2.1-0.2018 08 11 014734 | 10:55 |
ssbarnea | I wonder if it would be more appropiate to add my comments on the bug instead of the CR, as is much easier to read than the CR. | 10:59 |
ykarel | ssbarnea, openstack-tripleo-common-contrainers smelling mistake | 11:00 |
ykarel | spelling | 11:00 |
ssbarnea | ahh! thanks | 11:00 |
ssbarnea | ykarel: still this does not explain the error, yum is not complaining about missing rpm, is complaining about missing dependency. | 11:04 |
ykarel | ssbarnea, so error happens because openstack-tripleo-common is installed from delorean-current, while openstack-tripleo-common-containers is missing in delorean-current(because of spelling mistake) | 11:05 |
ykarel | if u see version u will get that | 11:05 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 11:05 | |
ssbarnea|ruck | ahh, because the name change | 11:06 |
*** holser_ has quit IRC | 11:15 | |
*** udesale has quit IRC | 11:31 | |
ssbarnea|ruck | sshnaidm : can you please give this one a kick? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571180/ | 11:42 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea|ruck, do we want to support "local machines without sudo"? how is that? | 11:44 |
ssbarnea | sshnaidm: why not? libvirt or cloud usage does not explicitly require root on the machine running ansible, which is mainly a controller. | 11:46 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea, I don't think you can find a dev that doesn't have "sudo" on host.. | 11:47 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea, the patch itself makes sense, actually we need to try with local user firstly, idk why it has this logic now | 11:48 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea, but because of different reasons that not having "sudo" | 11:48 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea, maybe current logic has reasons.. | 11:49 |
ssbarnea | i have some doubts that it has some reasons but I could try a blame and see if the original author knows more. usually people want to escalate priviledges when needed, not as a default behaviour. | 11:51 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea, agree, but worth to check this commit | 11:54 |
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq | 11:54 | |
ssbarnea|ruck | sshnaidm I just wrote him an email asking for his feedback, indeed good idea to double check with original author. maybe he knows more than us. | 11:58 |
ssbarnea|ruck | sshnaidm: in case you wonder why I find these errors annoying, is because usually I used ANSIBLE_STRATEGY=debug on my machine(s), and this stops execution on each failed task, thats why I really hate fake-failures (expected failures). | 12:00 |
ssbarnea|ruck | for the moment I stopped using debug strategy because of too many such errors, takes too much time to reach the real failure. | 12:01 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea|ruck, does it stop even in block/rescue? | 12:02 |
ssbarnea|ruck | sshnaidm sadly yes, but i remember opening a bug on ansible and i know they changed behaviour in some cases (not sure about rescue), but this was in 2.6 or 2.7, not 2.5. | 12:05 |
*** trown|outtypewww is now known as trown | 12:15 | |
ykarel | sshnaidm, weshay time to promote rocky:- https://trunk.rdoproject.org/api-centos-rocky/api/civotes_detail.html?commit_hash=427de49c25e3506fb8209b49749c03460053e8a7&distro_hash=37857f6601c11c4b9f4426094aca4c45683842de | 12:22 |
ykarel | fs001 failed with some intermittent issue | 12:23 |
ykarel | need to skip fs037 from promotion criteria | 12:23 |
ykarel | amoralej|lunch, ^^ | 12:23 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 12:24 | |
ykarel | marios, i updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787910/comments/13 with my findings | 12:25 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1787910 in tripleo "OVB overcloud deploy fails on nova placement errors" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b) | 12:25 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, it's not transient issue, it can't find "previos-current-tripleo" https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-1ctlr-featureset037-updates-rocky/eb7939c/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-08-23_06_41_05_758502 | 12:25 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, but it won't find it until next 2 promotions.. | 12:25 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, transient issues is with fs001 | 12:25 |
ykarel | fs037 expected to fail,yes | 12:25 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, yeah, seems reasonable | 12:26 |
*** holser_ has joined #oooq | 12:28 | |
sshnaidm | weshay, ykarel marios ssbarnea|ruck https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15873/ | 12:29 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, not fs001 but fs037 | 12:30 |
*** rlandy has joined #oooq | 12:31 | |
sshnaidm | ykarel, but 001 failed | 12:32 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, 037 is already commented out | 12:32 |
amoralej | sshnaidm, 001 was rerun again with a test patch and it passed | 12:33 |
amoralej | lookm at https://trunk.rdoproject.org/api-centos-rocky/api/civotes_detail.html?commit_hash=427de49c25e3506fb8209b49749c03460053e8a7&distro_hash=37857f6601c11c4b9f4426094aca4c45683842de | 12:33 |
amoralej | there is a 001 which passed | 12:33 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, okk i see as it's already commented, then, we are good | 12:34 |
ykarel | 2018-08-23 12:09:17,408 3493 INFO promoter Promoting the container images for dlrn hash 427de49c25e3506fb8209b49749c03460053e8a7 on rocky to current-tripleo | 12:34 |
amoralej | so we don't need to chang anything | 12:34 |
sshnaidm | amoralej, oh, great | 12:34 |
amoralej | \o/ | 12:34 |
ykarel | so we might see promotion in next 1 hour :), promotion already started half hour ago | 12:36 |
*** ssbarnea|ruck has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
*** ykarel has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
weshay | ykarel, we are seeing a promotion :) | 12:51 |
weshay | marios|rover, ssbarnea fyi ^ | 12:51 |
*** ykarel has joined #oooq | 12:51 | |
marios | weshay: ack | 12:51 |
weshay | 2018-08-23 12:09:17,408 3493 INFO promoter Promoting the container images for dlrn hash 427de49c25e3506fb8209b49749c03460053e8a7 on rocky to current-tripleo | 12:51 |
* weshay goes back to sleep | 12:52 | |
ssbarnea | yay. i am still finding failures: like "12:32:03 fatal: [undercloud]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "msg": "AnsibleUndefinedVariable: 'container_build_id' is undefined"}" | 12:52 |
marios | weshay: we'll talk about it in a sec but please check https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1785067 comment #8 #10/11 && https://review.openstack.org/595527 | 12:52 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1785067 in tripleo "without bootstrap-subnodes pike/ocata deployment fails for missing os-collect-config" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b) | 12:52 |
weshay | ssbarnea, k.. good let's track it down | 12:53 |
marios | weshay: i know you'll not be happy about https://review.openstack.org/595527 but /me shrugs i think thats the same fix we need | 12:54 |
*** udesale has joined #oooq | 12:54 | |
weshay | marios, let's leave the bug open after this patch merges | 12:56 |
marios | weshay: ok | 12:57 |
marios | folks we talking? | 13:01 |
marios | call | 13:01 |
bogdando | PTAL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/595566 | 13:02 |
bogdando | takes 2min instead of 8 on my laptop | 13:02 |
bogdando | really no need enforcing tcg!.. | 13:02 |
bogdando | just keep it default safe | 13:02 |
rlandy | meeting? | 13:03 |
rlandy | weshay: ^^ | 13:03 |
rlandy | sshnaidm: ^^ | 13:03 |
sshnaidm | rlandy, joining.. | 13:03 |
ssbarnea | weshay: bug was already filed and marked as fix but I reached it few minutes ago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1777896 | 13:05 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1777896 in tripleo " "AnsibleUndefinedVariable: 'container_build_id' is undefined"}"" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to wes hayutin (weshayutin) | 13:05 |
rascasoft | weshay, hey, you pinged me recently, now I'm back :) | 13:06 |
rascasoft | weshay, rlandy, we need to merge this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537669 because otherwise rdophase2 jobs will continue to fail | 13:08 |
*** jaosorior has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
rlandy | rascasoft: reviewing again | 13:10 |
ykarel | arxcruz, chandankumar we need some more tempest plugins build in RDO | 13:16 |
ykarel | we need sahara-tests and watcher-tests-tempest | 13:16 |
ykarel | arxcruz, u there? | 13:17 |
rlandy | rascasoft: my only concern is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537669/20/playbooks/baremetal-full-overcloud-prep.yml | 13:21 |
rlandy | the rest are just tags | 13:21 |
rlandy | overcloud-network-prep | 13:21 |
rlandy | ovb runs with all tags | 13:21 |
tosky | ykarel: and you will have sahara-tests | 13:21 |
rlandy | need to check that that is protected | 13:21 |
tosky | I need two commits | 13:21 |
rascasoft | rlandy, not sure I understand. I needed to put overcloud-network-prep at the begin because otherwise RDOPhase2 jobs would fail | 13:22 |
rascasoft | rlandy, if you check the email I sent you before my PTO, there are links to the failing jobs | 13:22 |
chandankumar | tosky: watcher on it | 13:24 |
chandankumar | ykarel: get me the mssing list | 13:24 |
chandankumar | I will complete it now | 13:24 |
ykarel | chandankumar, sahara-tests, watcher-tempest-plugin for now | 13:24 |
ssbarnea | weshay: just tell me if this fix makes sense or not: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/595782/1/roles/undercloud-deploy/templates/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml.j2 | 13:25 |
rlandy | rascasoft: apologies - will look for that explanation | 13:26 |
tosky | ykarel: you can get the current master if you need sahara-tests now; I need two commits to release something that makes sense | 13:26 |
ykarel | tosky, yes that works, and will update after release | 13:28 |
ykarel | chandankumar, can u take care of it ^^ | 13:28 |
chandankumar | ykarel: aye sir | 13:30 |
chandankumar | ykarel: can you check whether we run barbican tests somewhere or not? | 13:30 |
chandankumar | i suspect that is also needed for promotion | 13:30 |
weshay | apetrich, need a few | 13:30 |
ykarel | chandankumar, yes that runs in tripleo | 13:30 |
chandankumar | ok 3 plugins | 13:31 |
ykarel | currently we need for weirdo jobs, i don't think it used there, but can check again | 13:31 |
apetrich | weshay, no worries. Just ping me when ready. my next meeting is in one hour | 13:31 |
rlandy | sshnaidm: marios: weshay: need some cores on this for rascasoft (my work so I can't vote) ... only concern is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537669/20/playbooks/baremetal-full-overcloud-prep.yml addition of overcloud-prep-network ... gates still pass | 13:31 |
rascasoft | rlandy, sshnaidm, marios, weshay: overcloud-prep-network was present also before, it was just moved at the beginning because of an error I'm facing in rdophase2 | 13:33 |
rlandy | rascasoft: looks ok to me - just want the other cores to confirm | 13:34 |
arxcruz | ykarel: hey, sorry | 13:34 |
ykarel | chandankumar, barbican was there in scenario002 and it passed, so possibly it tests didn't ran there, but it's good to take it as well | 13:34 |
arxcruz | I'm here | 13:34 |
ykarel | arxcruz, chandankumar is on it ^^ | 13:34 |
rascasoft | rlandy, yes I understand, but you wrote "addition of" and this was not added, just moved | 13:34 |
*** skramaja has quit IRC | 13:37 | |
ykarel | weshay, rocky promoted, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594357/ can be reverted | 13:45 |
ykarel | or any other hack can be reverted | 13:45 |
ykarel | to start testing rocky upstream | 13:45 |
weshay | apetrich, k.. ready | 13:48 |
ssbarnea | i found another interesting bug: fatal: [ip_address]: UNREACHABLE! --- https://ci.centos.org/job/tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-master-delorean-quick-basic/155/consoleFull --- looks like expansion didn't happen somwhere, am i wrong? | 13:49 |
ssbarnea | oops, is "cico inventory" and something is parsing the header line :D | 13:50 |
ssbarnea | someone needs to give me some hints about where to find cico | 13:52 |
rlandy | rascasoft: left my +1 - so other cores can see I am ok with the change | 13:54 |
rascasoft | rlandy++ | 13:55 |
*** rnoriega has joined #oooq | 13:55 | |
weshay | rlandy, pto cal please | 14:02 |
weshay | rlandy, see it now | 14:03 |
rlandy | weshay: yep all in | 14:04 |
rlandy | who is going to PTG? | 14:05 |
rlandy | we have some zuul topics to address | 14:05 |
rlandy | rfolco: catching up on quique's card - will need to touch base with you later today to see what you want me to do there | 14:06 |
rfolco | rlandy, I am creating the test patches, looks like quiquell had already done some testing... if you can clarify this to me I'd appreciate... look this comment: | 14:08 |
rfolco | Looks we are adding -e dlrn_hash=92bc004554d74863443f92ec8977b80124e5ee98_43694243 -e get_build_command=92bc004554d74863443f92ec8977b80124e5ee98_43694243 don't if this is a problem | 14:08 |
rfolco | so having this "extra args" for all featuresets... do you see any problem? | 14:09 |
rlandy | rfolco: k - reading back on this work - kind of out of the loop | 14:09 |
rfolco | I don't understand why we had emit_releases for some featuresets only | 14:09 |
rfolco | rlandy, thanks, we can chat afternoon, I'll keep you posted with the testing | 14:10 |
rlandy | great | 14:10 |
rlandy | marios; personal favor ... please vote on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537669 | 14:11 |
rlandy | thank you | 14:11 |
marios | rlandy: so that is not a simple review ;/ I mean i lack context, and i still need to check the +2 but do you mena, you have tested this and you would like a +2 there? | 14:17 |
marios | rlandy: especially removal of baremetalundercloud.yml .... ah maybe that is the depends on | 14:17 |
marios | checking | 14:18 |
marios | oh no | 14:18 |
marios | it isn't | 14:18 |
rlandy | most of it is tag addition | 14:19 |
rlandy | but take your time | 14:19 |
marios | rlandy: yeah i see that and you are instead including the baremetal-undercloud but you have rmeoved quite a bit of it i mean baremetal-undercloud | 14:19 |
marios | thats the 'splits ' part of the commit message i guess | 14:19 |
rlandy | marios: you're out tomorrow? so don;t worry - I'll ping someone else | 14:20 |
rlandy | baremetal-undercloud was rascasoft's work | 14:20 |
rlandy | now he should be using our roles from our playbooks | 14:20 |
marios | rlandy: yeah i realised now | 14:21 |
marios | rlandy: its easier to see with https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/commit/?id=f79d80c9f65778520150e01cf1c71f7fcb197311&context=3&ignorews=0&dt=0 | 14:21 |
marios | rlandy: so you're moving all the parts using include and tags flavors/images/networks/all thethings | 14:21 |
marios | rlandy: and removing them from baremetal-undercloud | 14:22 |
rascasoft | marios, yes, it is a coherent split that should not change anything of what we have around right now | 14:22 |
marios | rlandy: rascasoft ack sold | 14:22 |
marios | rlandy: am just disappointed i couldn't find somethign to -1 | 14:23 |
marios | ohwell | 14:23 |
marios | ;) | 14:23 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, amoralej do you know if it makes sense when my new built package (tripleoclient for example) has lower version than it's in /current/ ?? | 14:28 |
rlandy | marios: thank you | 14:30 |
marios | rlandy: welcome (joking about the -1 incase wasn't clear) | 14:31 |
rlandy | that's fine - we will wait for sshnaidm - of there is something to find :) | 14:31 |
rlandy | if | 14:31 |
*** ccamacho has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
ykarel | sshnaidm, yes i think(if not rebased) | 14:45 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, are u facing some issue? | 14:45 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, well, yeah, after rebase it seems ok, but I when I build locally, still lower version.. | 14:49 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, okk, how u build locally, command? | 14:50 |
amoralej | sshnaidm, where is it built to lower version that it's in current? | 14:50 |
amoralej | in oooq job? | 14:51 |
weshay | ssbarnea, marios|rover please take a look at these logs and tell me about the problem you see https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/fb64832/logs/ | 14:54 |
weshay | ssbarnea, marios|rover do either of you have a recreate started here? | 14:54 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, amoralej I just run playbook with build exactly as it's in oooq job, in reproducer | 14:55 |
amoralej | what version is building it in your reproducer? | 14:55 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, amoralej ok, lemme check if everything is correct there.. | 14:55 |
marios | weshay: checking that job (any hints?) | 14:56 |
weshay | chandankumar, arxcruz I'm in a managers meeting | 14:56 |
weshay | chandankumar, can you please lead the scrum | 14:56 |
rlandy | rfolco: what is in scope for testing? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589448 has two -1's and can't merge | 14:59 |
rlandy | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/585649/ - marked out of scope | 15:00 |
rfolco | rlandy, for 589448 I am chaning the order of extra vars, new patchset coming | 15:00 |
rlandy | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589068/ has two -1's | 15:00 |
rlandy | rfolco: ok - ping me when ready | 15:00 |
sshnaidm | amoralej, well, I see that I have not rebased version of the patch...maybe it's cached somewhere. | 15:01 |
chandankumar | weshay: ack | 15:01 |
rfolco | rlandy, for 585649, OOS from previous discussion with panda... but I believe we can test it and verify as weshay suggested | 15:01 |
amoralej | sshnaidm, the version is calculated using prb based on git | 15:01 |
amoralej | so, rebases affects to the version | 15:02 |
rfolco | rlandy, and finally the last one will need to resume what quiquel did... still have to look at what is the current state of that one | 15:02 |
weshay | marios, the overcloud nodes are not present in the logs | 15:03 |
rfolco | last one ==> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589068/ - refactor remaining time | 15:03 |
weshay | marios, because they didn't come up | 15:03 |
weshay | right | 15:03 |
rfolco | rlandy, will check with sshnaidm better ways of checking this... | 15:03 |
rfolco | remaining time I mean | 15:03 |
weshay | marios, ssbarnea the only way to figure out what is blocking master re: nova | 15:03 |
weshay | is to bring up a recreate | 15:03 |
weshay | marios, openstack-nova is not installed on the undercloud afaict | 15:03 |
weshay | which seems odd to me | 15:04 |
marios | weshay: i've seen these errors before poking at other bugs something in the deploy steps, but i also see this in mistral a lot 2018-08-23 01:56:41.716 ERROR /var/log/containers/mistral/mistral-db-manage.log: 11 ERROR mistral.actions.openstack.action_generator.base [-] Failed to create action: nova.certs_convert_into_with_meta: AttributeError: 'Client' object has no attribute 'certs' | 15:04 |
ssbarnea | what is recreate? | 15:04 |
weshay | marios, https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/fb64832/logs/undercloud/var/log/extra/rpm-list.txt.gz | 15:04 |
weshay | ssbarnea, https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/fb64832/logs/reproducer-quickstart.sh | 15:05 |
sshnaidm | amoralej, oh, I see, this ansible facts caching broke me.. :( false alarm, sorry | 15:09 |
amoralej | ok, no prob | 15:10 |
*** hamzy has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
marios | weshay: best i could come up with is 'nova certs? and/or mistral' via http://paste.openstack.org/show/728692/ | 15:11 |
marios | weshay: will update if i come up with something better ;) | 15:12 |
weshay | marios, do we have an recreate up and running? | 15:12 |
marios | weshay: i do not | 15:12 |
weshay | marios, ssbarnea please one of you get one running asap | 15:12 |
marios | weshay: i have avoiding answering, since i'll be away, i could spin one up on my rdo cloud tenant but not sure how useful itll be | 15:12 |
marios | ssbarnea: can you do that? i can help you if you need? pvt me? | 15:12 |
weshay | yes.. please spin one up in your personal rdo tenant | 15:13 |
ssbarnea | weshay: on it. | 15:13 |
ykarel | weshay, ssbarnea marios i added comment there https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787910/comments/16 for ovb master | 15:13 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1787910 in tripleo "OVB overcloud deploy fails on nova placement errors" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b) | 15:13 |
ykarel | so good to move ahead with that | 15:13 |
marios | ykarel: checking | 15:13 |
marios | ykarel: so you mean, latest run had new enough nova? | 15:14 |
ykarel | marios, yes | 15:14 |
marios | ykarel: cool thanks | 15:14 |
ykarel | from my first comment it was there | 15:14 |
rlandy | rfolco: k - pls just let me know what parts you are doing and what parts I should pick up | 15:14 |
ykarel | marios, sorry i didn't replied to ur comment there, there are some mistakes there, i can correct u if u want | 15:16 |
rlandy | rfolco: so is 585649 in scope or out of scope? | 15:16 |
marios | ykarel: ack sure thanks | 15:16 |
rlandy | in scope for testing? | 15:17 |
rlandy | the only diff is that we use it for all fs | 15:17 |
rlandy | also quiquell has a -1 on it | 15:18 |
ykarel | marios, so good way to check is the commit id(not timestamp), openstack-nova-18.0.0-0.20180820195340.722d5b4.el7.noarch.rpm (722d5b4) which is exactly the same commit we are looking for:- https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/722d5b477219f0a2435a9f4ad4d54c61b83219f1 | 15:25 |
rfolco | rlandy, I believe his -1 is due to his comment about the additional args he mentioned | 15:25 |
marios | ykarel: nice | 15:25 |
ykarel | apart from this whenever checking promotion pipeline u need to look tripleo-ci-testing hash not current-tripleo and current(these are meant for gate job) | 15:26 |
ykarel | marios, ^^ | 15:26 |
rlandy | rfolco:k - just going through failures currently showing in the associated test patches | 15:26 |
rfolco | rlandy, in scope from what I understand, trying weshay suggestions and lets see if we can make sure all fs are covered (or a way to ensure no breakages) | 15:26 |
rlandy | no breakages? | 15:26 |
rlandy | that's no fun | 15:27 |
marios | ykarel: thank you | 15:28 |
ykarel | marios, so can u start a fix as per my comment there | 15:28 |
ykarel | as it's blocking master promotion | 15:29 |
ykarel | or whosoever rover is | 15:29 |
ykarel | /me need to leave | 15:29 |
marios | ykarel: me leaving too :) will have to wait until i'm back , though am out tomorrow and next week | 15:29 |
marios | ykarel: its passed eod-o'clock here | 15:29 |
ykarel | here passed few hours back :) | 15:30 |
marios | ykarel: well, 'until im back' i hope not ! | 15:30 |
marios | ykarel: ack :) have a good one | 15:30 |
marios | ykarel: thanks | 15:30 |
ykarel | marios, ack enjoy ur outing | 15:32 |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 15:32 | |
ykarel|away | i am sure weshay will take care of it | 15:33 |
*** hamzy has joined #oooq | 15:35 | |
*** saneax has quit IRC | 15:40 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 15:41 | |
*** chem has quit IRC | 15:42 | |
rlandy | rfolco: any objection of we run recheck on the test patches - there are some failure (upgrades included) hard to tell if they are unrelated | 15:43 |
rlandy | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589383 in particular | 15:43 |
rfolco | rlandy, I put my own test patches | 15:45 |
rfolco | rlandy, https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:test-585649+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | 15:45 |
rfolco | except: | 15:46 |
rfolco | print('driving kid to school') | 15:46 |
rfolco | brb | 15:46 |
bogdando | folks, my overcloud libvirt deployment fails with : | 15:49 |
bogdando | Parameter 'OvercloudControllerFlavor' is invalid: Error validating value 'oooq_control': No Flavor matching {'name': u'oooq_control'} | 15:49 |
bogdando | Parameter 'OvercloudComputeFlavor' is invalid: Error validating value 'oooq_compute': No Flavor matching {'name': u'oooq_compute'} | 15:49 |
bogdando | I'm using this command https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/blob/master/README.md#quickstart-cli-wrapper-quickstartsh. I see in config/nodes/1ctlr_1comp.yml flavor names are control and compute. The same is shown at UC flavors list... So how come it fails to looking up for those strange oooq_control/compute names?.. | 15:49 |
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
bogdando | that 2nd -E file is just https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/blob/master/vars/quickstart.yaml | 15:53 |
rlandy | bogdando: those flavors are defined in https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/overcloud-prep-flavors/templates/overcloud-prep-flavors.sh.j2 | 15:53 |
bogdando | nothing to break the flavor names | 15:54 |
bogdando | rlandy: I see, thanks. So it seems my command is missing something?.. | 15:56 |
bogdando | I used tags all, hm | 15:57 |
rlandy | I was jut about to suggest tags :) | 15:57 |
rlandy | check to see of that role ran at all | 15:57 |
rlandy | step_overcloud_prep_flavors | 15:57 |
rlandy | ^^ is that var set to false? | 15:58 |
bogdando | yay, thanks | 15:58 |
bogdando | let me check | 15:58 |
rlandy | example ... https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/playbooks/baremetal-full-overcloud-prep.yml#L37 | 15:58 |
bogdando | I see no overcloud-prep-flavors.sh prepared at my UC, so prolly wasn't invoked | 15:58 |
*** ssbarnea|ruck has joined #oooq | 15:58 | |
rlandy | k - so check your playbook | 15:59 |
rlandy | and step_overcloud_prep_flavors var | 15:59 |
rlandy | those are the two switch points | 15:59 |
weshay | sshnaidm, rlandy panda https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15822/1 | 16:04 |
sshnaidm | weshay, what is vexxhost? | 16:06 |
weshay | an upstream cloud | 16:06 |
bogdando | rlandy: we have default set for step_overcloud_prep_flavors in quickstart... that's strange, how is the whole deployment with libvirt used to work then with the default command?.. | 16:06 |
bogdando | anyway, I'll add it | 16:06 |
*** gkadam-afk has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
rlandy | then why do we care about vexxhost in infra-setup? | 16:07 |
bogdando | but I still not sure how come I need oooq_flavors if the node config do not use it? | 16:07 |
weshay | rlandy, sshnaidm panda the infra team is experimenting with being able to run ovb jobs on a third party cloud | 16:08 |
weshay | there are not a lot of details | 16:08 |
weshay | atm | 16:08 |
bogdando | rlandy: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/tree/config/nodes/1ctlr_1comp.yml#n4 that'w what I use | 16:08 |
bogdando | any ideas why something still refers those oooq_foo things? | 16:09 |
weshay | rlandy, sshnaidm panda nhicher is working it | 16:09 |
weshay | bogdando, the image prep role should print out all the flavors you have avail | 16:09 |
weshay | is flavor control not there? | 16:10 |
bogdando | yes | 16:10 |
bogdando | but deployment fails as it looks for oooq_control | 16:10 |
bogdando | Parameter 'OvercloudControllerFlavor' is invalid: Error validating value 'oooq_control': No Flavor matching | 16:10 |
rlandy | bogdando: it's not in the nodes file ... https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/overcloud-deploy/defaults/main.yml#L59 | 16:10 |
bogdando | um | 16:11 |
rlandy | bogdando: you can override flavor args if you wish | 16:11 |
weshay | bogdando, rlandy http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/tree/roles/overcloud-deploy/defaults/main.yml#n47 | 16:11 |
rlandy | we do that in some cases ... getting ... | 16:11 |
bogdando | so do I need to have both sets of flavors control, compute, and oooq_* to make libvirt deployment? | 16:11 |
sshnaidm | weshay, I think te-broker may not to work as it is configured, we didn't deploy it with those playbooks.. So tell nhicher please turn to us when it fails to run, we can help with it | 16:12 |
rlandy | not necessarily ... if you override | 16:12 |
weshay | sshnaidm, aye | 16:12 |
rlandy | but of you just include that prep-flavors role, you can be fine with the oooq_* flavors | 16:12 |
rlandy | your choice | 16:12 |
weshay | sshnaidm, I'm sure just random pings on irc is enough collaboration | 16:13 |
* weshay sighs | 16:13 | |
rlandy | bogdando: see https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/search?q=flavor_args&unscoped_q=flavor_args | 16:13 |
rlandy | if you wish | 16:13 |
sshnaidm | weshay, of course, I didn't mean something else :) | 16:13 |
rlandy | easier to make sure the role is included | 16:13 |
weshay | sshnaidm, ya.. not poking at you | 16:13 |
weshay | just this silly organization we work for | 16:14 |
bogdando | rlandy: I thought, using defaults and node config file is enough :) | 16:14 |
weshay | sshnaidm, rlandy shit.. rhel 7.6 is in beta | 16:14 |
weshay | which means I need to get a job for centos that is using the latest stuff | 16:14 |
bogdando | so what a magic combination of flavor_map and flavor_args shall I need?.. | 16:14 |
weshay | fak | 16:14 |
rlandy | bogdando: node config does not create flavors | 16:14 |
* weshay digs up that card | 16:14 | |
bogdando | but it brings mappings, I hoped it overrides things | 16:14 |
bogdando | so those oooq_foo become not neede? rlandy? | 16:15 |
bogdando | not needed* | 16:15 |
rlandy | weshay: now would be the time to start playing the lottery - we don't even run rhel successfully anywhere with openstack | 16:15 |
sshnaidm | weshay, do we have way to stop this new centos? | 16:15 |
rlandy | if you override flavor_args, no | 16:15 |
rlandy | but I'd be interested to know why that role is not running | 16:16 |
bogdando | tight | 16:16 |
rlandy | bogdando: ^^ that is your easiest bet | 16:16 |
bogdando | right | 16:16 |
rlandy | review the playbooks | 16:16 |
rlandy | get it included | 16:16 |
rlandy | done | 16:16 |
rlandy | less debug than a new flavor | 16:16 |
bogdando | so I'll try without oooq_foo things, just using flavor_args: "" ? | 16:16 |
rlandy | which could be ironic errors | 16:16 |
bogdando | and my -N file | 16:16 |
rlandy | you can try | 16:17 |
*** dtrainor has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
rlandy | weshay: sshnaidm; this is not a simple patch to just review ... https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15822 | 16:18 |
rlandy | we can pick up a few assumptions | 16:18 |
rlandy | bit the whole te-broker thing is a mystery to me | 16:18 |
rlandy | how that would operate on open cloud | 16:18 |
rlandy | someone else's | 16:18 |
weshay | bogdando, so you are saying TASK [overcloud-prep-flavors : Prepare the scripts for overcloud flavors] ****** executed? | 16:19 |
weshay | bogdando, https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/jenkins-tripleo-quickstart-promote-master-current-tripleo-delorean-minimal-401/console.txt.gz | 16:19 |
weshay | bogdando, because if it didn't.. obviously that flavor will not be there? | 16:19 |
bogdando | weshay, rlandy: sooo did I got that right https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/commit/1b8b38d938f38634ab61ef6d200fb7a566c8f37b ? :) | 16:20 |
bogdando | weshay: ot was not | 16:20 |
bogdando | and I do not want it | 16:20 |
bogdando | I want just control, compute flavors created | 16:20 |
bogdando | from my nodes file | 16:20 |
bogdando | something created those control/compute flavors w/o that role executed, and I hope it is ok? :) | 16:21 |
bogdando | just something didn't get overriden in those tht OvercloudControllerFlavor/OvercloudComputeFlavor... sigh | 16:21 |
rlandy | bogdando: that should avoid the error but again, I think it's best to modify your code so that the prep-flavors role does run | 16:22 |
sshnaidm | rlandy, I'm pretty sure it won't work out of box, iirc it has different keys file name (tripleo-ci-team vs tripleo-admins) and god knows what.. | 16:22 |
weshay | bogdando, ya.. just turn it off w/ the tag man | 16:22 |
bogdando | sigh | 16:22 |
bogdando | I used -t all :D | 16:23 |
weshay | bogdando, https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/playbooks/quickstart-extras-overcloud-prep.yml#L44 | 16:23 |
bogdando | but I have no the script created | 16:23 |
weshay | bogdando, ya.. so use -t all and skip tag flavor | 16:23 |
bogdando | just got lost my _quickstart.log occationally ;( | 16:23 |
weshay | that's why we have it | 16:23 |
bogdando | weshay: ok, I'll try | 16:23 |
weshay | rlandy, do you know if anyone create a rocky release for rdo p2? | 16:24 |
weshay | don't thinks so | 16:24 |
rlandy | weshay: myoung|training? | 16:24 |
rlandy | wasn't me | 16:24 |
rlandy | sshnaidm: ack - which is why reviewing this patch seems premature to me | 16:24 |
rlandy | I'd like to know how the system would go down before saying whether a few variables are set right | 16:25 |
weshay | rlandy, sshnaidm need votes on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594933/ | 16:26 |
weshay | timeouts upstream should be resolved by merging that | 16:26 |
rlandy | hmmm - I thought I vote on that - apparently not | 16:26 |
sshnaidm | weshay, why to remove openstack-tripleo-* ? | 16:29 |
weshay | sshnaidm, so we're the only ones who would care.. but what I'm afaid of is that tripleo folks spin up a new repo | 16:29 |
weshay | that does not have a oooq gate on it | 16:30 |
weshay | anything merged to that repo would be built and added to all the jobs immediately | 16:30 |
weshay | sshnaidm, better to be explicit than to use wild cards | 16:30 |
weshay | for our sake | 16:30 |
weshay | would be hard to debug imho | 16:30 |
sshnaidm | weshay, yeah, so we'll know to add our jobs there imeediately | 16:30 |
rlandy | weshay: ssbarnea: left question on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594933 | 16:30 |
weshay | sshnaidm, heh.. ya.. but breaking everything is a lousy alarm clock | 16:31 |
sshnaidm | weshay, how would we know then? | 16:31 |
sshnaidm | weshay, I didn't have idea about this ansible roles, for example.. | 16:31 |
rlandy | ansible-tripleo-ipsec? | 16:32 |
sshnaidm | oh, some new tripleo role? rlandy | 16:32 |
weshay | rlandy, tripleo-ui is not needed | 16:32 |
weshay | sshnaidm, srsly man | 16:32 |
weshay | you want all of CI to go down? | 16:33 |
weshay | sshnaidm, vs.. email list, blueprint and review notification .. hey $new_role | 16:33 |
ssbarnea | rlandy: to summarize, i need to add "openstack-tripleo-puppet-elements", anything else to add to the list of rpms? | 16:36 |
rlandy | ssbarnea: idk - I am asking | 16:37 |
rlandy | the only other tripleo thing that came up on my search was ansible-tripleo-ipsec | 16:37 |
rlandy | the rest you had | 16:37 |
ssbarnea | to me, makes sense to include, also agree with weshay that tripleo-ui is probably not needed. | 16:37 |
ssbarnea | adding ipsec, likely needed too. | 16:38 |
rlandy | I see a maintenance burden here but not an error so I would +2 if we are agreed on the list | 16:38 |
rlandy | ssbarnea: not so fast on the ipsec thing - I just an rpm search | 16:39 |
ssbarnea | does anyone complain if I also perform a sort on this list? as part of the same change? | 16:39 |
rlandy | go ahead on the sort | 16:40 |
*** udesale has quit IRC | 16:40 | |
myoung|training | rlandy: I haven't prepped a rocky release for rdo2, I could later today, they way the JJB is factored it's not a heavy lift | 16:41 |
myoung|training | rlandy, weshay: let me know if you need this in the near term (today/tomorrow) - otherwise I can do it monday | 16:42 |
bogdando | rlandy, weshay: sigh. So I have no the task overcloud-prep-flavors executed, and I use flavor_args: "", but got the same error ._. | 16:42 |
rlandy | myoung|training: you are in training - weshay if we need that rocky ph2 now, I will do it | 16:43 |
myoung|training | rlandy: feel free to put me on the review, HTH | 16:43 |
rlandy | bogdando: pls paste your quickstart output and execution line | 16:44 |
myoung|training | but yeah I'm nose down on object storage and heat (later)( | 16:44 |
bogdando | rlandy: will do, trying with step_overcloud_prep_flavors: true | 16:46 |
bogdando | rlandy: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1C52Pw-ZeVpVYWQp2oQtNYIlfh3wQVbJw/view?usp=sharing | 16:52 |
bogdando | so I added https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/commit/bf1cc2478abf86da4843b5a0b8fd1f41c2df97cc#diff-4c164bf2a3ef315c2d1867203faddcb1R47 | 16:52 |
bogdando | and the command uses that env file | 16:52 |
bogdando | and I can not see the role invoked, strange!.. | 16:52 |
* rlandy looks | 16:55 | |
bogdando | rlandy: not sure why why these was not executed https://pastebin.com/hKvbtDhD ? | 17:01 |
ssbarnea|ruck | should i assign newly added tripleo bugs on LP to someone to triage them or not? | 17:05 |
rlandy | going through what was executed | 17:05 |
rlandy | I see those roles with handler and nothing else | 17:06 |
bogdando | right | 17:07 |
bogdando | I wonder why... | 17:07 |
ssbarnea|ruck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1788663 | 17:07 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1788663 in tripleo "reproducer-quickstart.sh fails when using v3 openstack rc file" [Undecided,New] | 17:07 |
bogdando | rlandy: --dry-run shows no tasks for these | 17:08 |
ssbarnea|ruck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1788652 | 17:08 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1788652 in tripleo "reproducer-quickstart.sh -r silently fails and returns 1 exit code" [Undecided,New] | 17:08 |
rlandy | you run overcloud-prep-config | 17:14 |
rlandy | and overcloud-prep-containers | 17:15 |
bogdando | rlandy: I think that may be ansible 2.4.1.0 I use | 17:18 |
rlandy | bogdando: no - your error is in - undercloud-scripts | 17:18 |
rlandy | you removed that tag | 17:19 |
rlandy | --skip-tags | 17:19 |
bogdando | hm | 17:19 |
bogdando | how come it's realted? | 17:19 |
rlandy | and that tag creates the scripts you need to run for the roles missed | 17:19 |
rlandy | see ... | 17:19 |
bogdando | omggg | 17:19 |
rlandy | https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/overcloud-prep-flavors/tasks/main.yml#L3 | 17:19 |
bogdando | rlandy: thanks!! | 17:20 |
rlandy | sure | 17:20 |
weshay | ssbarnea|ruck, is your env up yet? | 17:21 |
weshay | the ovb one? | 17:21 |
ssbarnea|ruck | nope | 17:21 |
weshay | ssbarnea|ruck, where is it at? | 17:21 |
weshay | in the install that is | 17:21 |
ssbarnea|ruck | weshay https://seashells.io/v/Dp2kFP65 | 17:22 |
weshay | ssbarnea|ruck, failed to deploy | 17:22 |
weshay | k | 17:22 |
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
ssbarnea|ruck | weshay i guess I need to ask for bigger quota | 17:25 |
ssbarnea|ruck | it went slower because I had to file two bugs while testing it :D | 17:25 |
*** dtrainor has joined #oooq | 17:25 | |
*** jrist has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
*** holser_ has quit IRC | 17:28 | |
ssbarnea|ruck | weshay: i am trying to understand why I got: Resource CREATE failed: OverQuotaClient: resources.baremetal_env.resources.openstack_baremetal_servers.resources[2].resources.baremetal_ports.resources.public_port: Quota exceeded for resources: ['port']. --- i checked my settings and i got a 60 quota and only 3 ports are used. | 17:36 |
*** holser_ has joined #oooq | 17:36 | |
weshay | ssbarnea|ruck, /me posted to rh-openstack-dev | 17:40 |
*** jrist has joined #oooq | 17:41 | |
*** rook has joined #oooq | 17:43 | |
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 17:46 | |
weshay | rlandy, rfolco can I consult with you guys for 5min regarding centos76 for 5 min | 17:47 |
weshay | when you guys have a minute | 17:47 |
ssbarnea | weshay: do I get the ok for this list? https://gist.github.com/ssbarnea/3ed5e4e6f644c29468eee1286c7c8e86 | 17:47 |
ssbarnea | i want to update the CR, so we can merge it. | 17:47 |
*** kopecmartin has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
rfolco | give me 30 min pls | 17:47 |
weshay | ssbarnea, seems good to me.. what ever alex ( mwhahaha ) wants man | 17:49 |
weshay | ssbarnea, he's the ptl | 17:49 |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 17:52 | |
*** holser_ has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|off | 17:54 | |
ssbarnea | sshnaidm: how about using python*-tripleo* pattern instead? seems legit to me and covers clients too. | 17:54 |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
rlandy | weshay: going to add rocky ph2 now - | 17:57 |
weshay | rlandy, I have a review up | 17:57 |
weshay | rlandy, https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/147921/ | 17:57 |
weshay | rlandy, it's not a priority for you | 17:57 |
weshay | but review is welcome :) | 17:57 |
*** weshay is now known as weshay|rover | 17:57 | |
weshay|rover | arxcruz, chandankumar you guys still around? | 17:58 |
rlandy | will look while we wait fir rfolco | 17:58 |
weshay|rover | arxcruz, chandankumar wondering if you guys would mind if we used fs21 to run full tempest w/o skip AND to test the latest centos packages | 17:58 |
weshay|rover | I'll add you guys to a review | 17:59 |
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch | 17:59 | |
arxcruz | weshay|rover: kind of around, you're the boss, i don't mind :) | 17:59 |
weshay|rover | lolz | 18:00 |
weshay|rover | arxcruz, I think it makes sense | 18:00 |
arxcruz | yup | 18:00 |
weshay|rover | arxcruz, will add you to a review it's not urgent | 18:00 |
arxcruz | ok | 18:00 |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 18:01 | |
rlandy | left two comments | 18:02 |
rlandy | ugh - gate failed again - timeout | 18:12 |
rlandy | 2018-08-23 16:41:18.728374 | RUN END RESULT_TIMED_OUT: [untrusted : git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/playbooks/tripleo-ci/run-v3.yaml@master] | 18:13 |
rlandy | what exactly is timing out here? | 18:13 |
rlandy | ssbarnea: ^^ have you seen this lately? | 18:16 |
rlandy | sova shows green on this job | 18:16 |
rlandy | but I don;t see how my change caused a timeout | 18:16 |
rlandy | 2018-08-23 13:17:07.082337 | primary | +(./toci_quickstart.sh:158): exit_value=143 | 18:16 |
rlandy | on fs037 | 18:17 |
ssbarnea | rlandy: likely not. didn't see recent timeouts, only failures from other causes. | 18:17 |
rlandy | shoot | 18:17 |
rlandy | this is blocking reparenting :( | 18:17 |
rlandy | ok - 037 is broken everywhere | 18:21 |
rlandy | recheck it is | 18:21 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, which log? | 18:22 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, is it master or a branch | 18:23 |
rlandy | yes | 18:24 |
rlandy | http://logs.openstack.org/08/594308/6/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode/9a42011/ | 18:24 |
rlandy | ^^ killed gate | 18:24 |
rlandy | nothing I can do - recheck | 18:25 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: I doubt my change did that | 18:25 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, oh I'm sure it did not | 18:26 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, we just need ssbarnea's patch to fix non-master jobs for timeouts | 18:26 |
weshay|rover | we also need sshnaidm|off's ara patch to figure out what else is causing timeout's | 18:26 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: I +2'ed it | 18:27 |
* rlandy goes on faith it's good now | 18:27 | |
ssbarnea|ruck | i wonder if my patch will ever get passing ci, never seen a +2 verified on it. hopefully in ~3h we will see some. | 18:27 |
rlandy | "i wonder if my patch will ever get passing ci" | 18:28 |
rlandy | ^^ we all think that today | 18:28 |
rlandy | about our pressing patches | 18:28 |
rlandy | can I get come reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581488/? last of the browbeat patches | 18:33 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: ssbarnea|ruck: rfolco: anybody | 18:33 |
rlandy | ^^ | 18:33 |
rlandy | mostly for the reproducer workflow | 18:34 |
rfolco | rlandy, weshay|rover can talk now, go? | 18:35 |
rlandy | fine by me | 18:35 |
weshay|rover | rfolco, rlandy just review that patch I linked you guys | 18:35 |
weshay|rover | I think it's smaller than I thought | 18:36 |
weshay|rover | was thinking a new pipeline | 18:36 |
rfolco | ah ok | 18:36 |
rlandy | looking at it now | 18:36 |
ssbarnea|ruck | weshay|rover give https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571180/ a +W as I got the ok from original author (amorale) that is ok to change order. sshnaidm|off asked me about this, for safety. | 18:40 |
rfolco | weshay|rover, what does cr stand for | 18:42 |
rfolco | cool repo | 18:42 |
weshay|rover | rfolco, read the bug :) | 18:42 |
*** apetrich has quit IRC | 18:42 | |
rfolco | weshay|rover, rtfm++ | 18:43 |
weshay|rover | heh | 18:43 |
rlandy | we should move downstream to 7.6 | 18:45 |
rlandy | rfolco: weshay|rover: meeting? | 18:50 |
rfolco | I am ok | 18:55 |
rfolco | rlandy, weshay|rover said no meeting, you want to make it? | 18:56 |
rfolco | rlandy, need your opinion about https://trello.com/c/DdSHkgnE/884-replace-tocijobtype-variable-s17-undercloud-playbooks-environment-tags?menu=filter&filter=label:Sprint%2018%20CI | 18:56 |
rlandy | rfolco: no - just want to know what to do | 18:56 |
rfolco | pls see my last comment, rlandy weshay|rover ^ | 18:56 |
rfolco | rlandy, ok lets bj | 18:56 |
rlandy | reading your comment - sec | 18:56 |
rlandy | rfolco: in your comment - both options are marked as 1. - which 1. do you prefer? | 18:58 |
rfolco | lolz | 18:59 |
rfolco | the 1st #1 | 18:59 |
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown | 19:01 | |
rlandy | rfolco: ok - so you're suggesting ... | 19:02 |
rlandy | export TOCI_JOBTYPE={{ environment_type }}-{{ nodes }}-featureset{{ featureset }} | 19:02 |
rlandy | ^^ to the reproducer | 19:02 |
rlandy | so we will land up with ... | 19:03 |
rlandy | toci_jobtype: {{ environment_type }}-{{ nodes }}-featureset{{ featureset }} | 19:03 |
rfolco | no, I suggest keeping as is until we have 2 workflows | 19:04 |
rfolco | adding more legacy code to reproducer to support legacy workflow sounds wrong to me | 19:04 |
rlandy | rfolco: that is fine | 19:05 |
rlandy | next sprint will be all about reworking the reproducer | 19:05 |
rlandy | anything that keeps the system rolling for this sprint gets a +1 from ,e | 19:05 |
rlandy | me | 19:05 |
rfolco | rlandy, :) | 19:06 |
rfolco | rlandy, move that card to complete or to backlog ? toci_gate is not entirely nuked | 19:07 |
rfolco | toci_jobtype I mean | 19:07 |
rlandy | that is a panda question | 19:09 |
rlandy | rfolco: can we meet about quiquell's card | 19:10 |
* rlandy is spinning there a bit | 19:10 | |
*** jrist has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
rfolco | rlandy, your bj? | 19:11 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, rfolco you guys need ua/pm help? | 19:12 |
rlandy | rfolco: sure | 19:13 |
rfolco | rlandy, bj id please | 19:14 |
rlandy | https://bluejeans.com/1167276556 | 19:15 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: if you want | 19:15 |
*** apetrich has joined #oooq | 19:21 | |
*** jrist has joined #oooq | 19:23 | |
rlandy | weshay|rover: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594308/ | 19:46 |
rlandy | http://logs.openstack.org/08/594308/6/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode/9a42011/ | 19:47 |
rlandy | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581488 | 19:50 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: ^^ | 19:50 |
*** holser_ has joined #oooq | 20:05 | |
*** panda has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 20:23 | |
*** holser_ has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
*** hamzy has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww | 21:03 | |
*** panda has joined #oooq | 21:34 | |
*** ssbarnea|ruck has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
weshay|rover | rlandy, ok.. I rebased that review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581488/ | 23:02 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: k - thanks | 23:07 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, ugh.. tomorrow point me at where I make legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-1ctlr-featureset037-updates-masterFAILURE in 3h 04m 34s nv | 23:10 |
weshay|rover | for rdo 3rd party | 23:10 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: looking ... | 23:13 |
rlandy | rdo-jobs | 23:14 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, ugh.. that get's me every time | 23:14 |
weshay|rover | thanks | 23:14 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/zuul-legacy-jobs.yaml#L493 | 23:15 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: I don;t have +2 there | 23:15 |
rlandy | I can put in the patch if you do | 23:15 |
weshay|rover | zuul.d/zuul-legacy-jobs.yaml:503: | 23:16 |
weshay|rover | oops | 23:16 |
weshay|rover | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/15902 | 23:16 |
weshay|rover | thnaks | 23:16 |
rlandy | cannot merge | 23:16 |
rlandy | do you see that? | 23:16 |
rlandy | do you have an option to rebase? | 23:18 |
weshay|rover | ya | 23:18 |
weshay|rover | fixed | 23:18 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, sssh.. I think your patch is going to land | 23:18 |
*** hamzy has joined #oooq | 23:18 | |
weshay|rover | don't tell the patch | 23:18 |
rlandy | OMG | 23:18 |
rlandy | party, party, party | 23:19 |
rlandy | I lie - I do have +2 | 23:19 |
rlandy | ha | 23:20 |
rlandy | weshay|rover: zuul +1 and I can w+1 - can you? | 23:20 |
weshay|rover | I just have +1 | 23:20 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, can you please wf | 23:21 |
rlandy | done | 23:21 |
rlandy | not sure how I got +2 on that - pretty sure I never had it before | 23:21 |
weshay|rover | rlandy, probably same rights as config | 23:22 |
rlandy | waiting for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594308/ | 23:23 |
rlandy | back in a few ... | 23:23 |
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|brb | 23:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!