Thursday, 2018-08-23

*** dsneddon has quit IRC00:28
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq00:34
*** agopi has joined #oooq00:54
*** dsneddon has quit IRC02:49
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq02:51
*** skramaja has joined #oooq03:18
*** udesale has joined #oooq03:47
*** saneax has joined #oooq03:57
*** ykarel has joined #oooq04:14
*** ccamacho has quit IRC05:11
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq05:12
*** holser_ has joined #oooq05:13
*** marios has joined #oooq05:17
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq05:17
*** ccamacho has quit IRC05:19
*** ykarel has quit IRC05:21
*** dmellado has joined #oooq05:27
*** holser_ has quit IRC05:40
*** dsneddon has quit IRC05:44
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq05:45
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq06:07
*** ratailor has joined #oooq06:09
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq06:17
*** dsneddon has quit IRC06:38
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq06:39
*** apetrich has joined #oooq06:58
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel|away07:02
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC07:07
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq07:09
*** bogdando has joined #oooq07:15
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej07:33
*** tosky has joined #oooq07:34
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq07:36
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel07:36
*** gkadam has joined #oooq07:44
*** ratailor has quit IRC07:49
*** jaosorior has quit IRC08:10
apetricharxcruz, morning08:13
*** gkadam is now known as gkadam-afk08:14
*** kopecmartin has joined #oooq08:20
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur08:33
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch08:40
dmelladoapetrich: o/ Wie geht's08:57
dmelladoI was told you moved to Berlin as well ,)08:57
apetrichdmellado, I did.08:58
apetrichdmellado, wait. did you also?08:58
dmelladoapetrich: heh, no08:59
apetrichI know you were moving from Madrid but I thought it was to the coast08:59
dmelladobut I'll be there for the Summit08:59
dmelladoapetrich: yeah, just signed the apartment contract yesterday08:59
dmelladoxD08:59
apetrichniice08:59
apetrichI'm still trying to find an apartment here08:59
dmelladobut I'll be moving within a month08:59
dmelladoapetrich: It's hard!08:59
dmelladowith all the regulations and stuff09:00
dmelladoand german landlords and recommendations letters and all09:00
apetrichit is awful. yesterday I went to an apartment viewing that the landlord did not appear. Second time that happened09:06
apetrich40 minutes in 60 minutes out and the damn guy does not show up or send an email09:07
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq09:08
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel09:10
*** ssbarnea has joined #oooq09:15
ssbarneamarios|rover: i have few questions regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594933/09:15
ssbarneamainly what I did was to follow the same pattern wed did on master and rocky, which involved whildcard. Not doing this means a LOT of expansions, as there is a big numebr of rpms to mention. For me it feels like a recipe for more maintenance work not to use wildcards.09:17
mariosssbarnea: yeah i don' think he will insist on the wildcards ;)09:17
mariosssbarnea: we can discuss with him later09:17
mariosssbarnea: but there is a precedent and we do the same on all the others09:17
mariosi mean for the branches09:18
ssbarneai am computing now the list of rpms, but the change should apply same rule on all branches. with or w/o wildcards. I wonder how does the rpm list varies across releases, as this woudl clearly slow me down in doing the patch. I wonder if it would not make sense to split it per release.09:19
ssbarneajust to have fixes in faster, without it we have a growing number of failing patches09:20
mariosssbarnea: no i wouldn't bother to be honest i mean with the list of packages09:25
mariosssbarnea: at least imo09:26
*** holser_ has joined #oooq09:34
arxcruzdmellado: woot!!! will you be here for summit?!?! \o/09:43
dmelladoarxcruz: probably yeah09:43
dmelladoI've two sessions there, so I imagine thatI'll be there09:44
arxcruzbeer++09:44
arxcruzwe gonna drink with dtantsur and apetrich :D09:44
apetricharxcruz, btw have you ever been to http://www.berlinburgerinternational.com/ ?09:47
apetrichI passed in front of it yesterday going to the viewing it looked very nice09:48
arxcruz(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻09:48
arxcruznever been there09:48
dtantsurarxcruz: :)09:49
dtantsurapetrich: oh, interesting09:49
apetrichdtantsur, I was going to ask if you did know it09:50
dtantsurapetrich: I'm not really strong in local restaurants, to be honest. Time not spent in front of computer is usually spent outdoors :)09:50
dtantsuralso I'm sorry re flats. it can be "fun" indeed.09:51
apetrichdtantsur, that place is small inside but has couple of tables in the pavement. It felt to be a nice place to go before the cold arrives09:51
dtantsurapetrich: is it a suggestion? ;)09:52
apetrichIt could be. the smell coming from it was amazing and the burgers on the tables looked nice, but I passed in front of it after I just had dinner so I didn't stop to taste09:53
apetrichthe chili fries were very tempting09:53
*** jaosorior has quit IRC09:54
mariosyou guys made me go put lunch in the microwave09:54
mariosits time09:54
dtantsurmarios: enjoy :)09:55
*** jaganathan has joined #oooq09:55
mariosdtantsur: thanks09:56
rascasoftmarios|rover, ssbarnea|ruck, hey folks hi! Can I ask you 1 min of your time for this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/588327/ ? It's was approved all the way around, so a little more love and we can forget about it :)09:59
ssbarnearascasoft: i would gladly give it a +W but I do not have this right, maybe panda or sshnaidm ?10:01
mariosrascasoft: forget about it10:01
rascasoftmarios, I like your style man. ssbarnea thanks to you too!10:02
ssbarneaout of curiosity do we have an unwritten policy about hiding command output in separate file in order to make the ansible output shorter (and less useful)?10:24
jfrancoasshnaidm: marios: hey, do you remember that container-to-container jobs were not even starting (failing at workspace setting up https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1788128), it should get fixed by this, if you can review please: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15866/10:38
openstackLaunchpad bug 1788128 in tripleo "[CI upgrades] legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-queens failing" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Jose Luis Franco (jfrancoa)10:38
mariosjfrancoa: ack thanks will check it10:40
mariosrascasoft: ;)10:40
mariosssbarnea: did you see my comments in https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1785067 - looks like queens has same as ocata.. (via grafana the last two check fails are for this )10:41
openstackLaunchpad bug 1785067 in tripleo "without bootstrap-subnodes pike/ocata deployment fails for missing os-collect-config" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b)10:41
mariosssbarnea: should be fixed by https://review.openstack.org/59552710:42
mariosssbarnea: ideally i'd like to make the gate checks depend on that but doesn't feel liek the right way to do it :) will discuss on the call later too10:42
ssbarneamarios: can you have a look at http://logs.openstack.org/33/594933/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-oooq/72d2a4d/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/install_packages.sh.log.txt.gz ?10:49
ssbarneathat is the result of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594933/10:50
ssbarneamy guess: broken delorean repo? should all deps be contained?10:50
ssbarneamarios: on the bright side, that is a clear sign that we missed to update them previously.10:53
mariosssbarnea: eek not sure about that one. looks like we have almost the right version but not quite like 9.2.1-0.2018 08 22 21394 vs 9.2.1-0.2018 08 11 01473410:55
ssbarneaI wonder if it would be more appropiate to add my comments on the bug instead of the CR, as is much easier to read than the CR.10:59
ykarelssbarnea, openstack-tripleo-common-contrainers smelling mistake11:00
ykarelspelling11:00
ssbarneaahh! thanks11:00
ssbarneaykarel: still this does not explain the error, yum is not complaining about missing rpm, is complaining about missing dependency.11:04
ykarelssbarnea, so error happens because openstack-tripleo-common is installed from delorean-current, while openstack-tripleo-common-containers is missing in delorean-current(because of spelling mistake)11:05
ykarelif u see version u will get that11:05
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch11:05
ssbarnea|ruckahh, because the name change11:06
*** holser_ has quit IRC11:15
*** udesale has quit IRC11:31
ssbarnea|rucksshnaidm : can you please give this one a kick? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571180/11:42
sshnaidmssbarnea|ruck, do we want to support "local machines without sudo"? how is that?11:44
ssbarneasshnaidm: why not? libvirt or cloud usage does not explicitly require root on the machine running ansible, which is mainly a controller.11:46
sshnaidmssbarnea, I don't think you can find a dev that doesn't have "sudo" on host..11:47
sshnaidmssbarnea, the patch itself makes sense, actually we need to try with local user firstly, idk why it has this logic now11:48
sshnaidmssbarnea, but because of different reasons that not having "sudo"11:48
sshnaidmssbarnea, maybe current logic has reasons..11:49
ssbarneai have some doubts that it has some reasons but I could try a blame and see if the original author knows more. usually people want to escalate priviledges when needed, not as a default behaviour.11:51
sshnaidmssbarnea, agree, but worth to check this commit11:54
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq11:54
ssbarnea|rucksshnaidm I just wrote him an email asking for his feedback, indeed good idea to double check with original author. maybe he knows more than us.11:58
ssbarnea|rucksshnaidm: in case you wonder why I find these errors annoying, is because usually I used ANSIBLE_STRATEGY=debug on my machine(s), and this stops execution on each failed task, thats why I really hate fake-failures (expected failures).12:00
ssbarnea|ruckfor the moment I stopped using debug strategy because of too many such errors, takes too much time to reach the real failure.12:01
sshnaidmssbarnea|ruck, does it stop even in block/rescue?12:02
ssbarnea|rucksshnaidm sadly yes, but i remember opening a bug on ansible and i know they changed behaviour in some cases (not sure about rescue), but this was in 2.6 or 2.7, not 2.5.12:05
*** trown|outtypewww is now known as trown12:15
ykarelsshnaidm, weshay time to promote rocky:- https://trunk.rdoproject.org/api-centos-rocky/api/civotes_detail.html?commit_hash=427de49c25e3506fb8209b49749c03460053e8a7&distro_hash=37857f6601c11c4b9f4426094aca4c45683842de12:22
ykarelfs001 failed with some intermittent issue12:23
ykarelneed to skip fs037 from promotion criteria12:23
ykarelamoralej|lunch, ^^12:23
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej12:24
ykarelmarios, i updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787910/comments/13 with my findings12:25
openstackLaunchpad bug 1787910 in tripleo "OVB overcloud deploy fails on nova placement errors" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b)12:25
sshnaidmykarel, it's not transient issue, it can't find "previos-current-tripleo" https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-1ctlr-featureset037-updates-rocky/eb7939c/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-08-23_06_41_05_75850212:25
sshnaidmykarel, but it won't find it until next 2 promotions..12:25
ykarelsshnaidm, transient issues is with fs00112:25
ykarelfs037 expected to fail,yes12:25
sshnaidmykarel, yeah, seems reasonable12:26
*** holser_ has joined #oooq12:28
sshnaidmweshay, ykarel marios ssbarnea|ruck https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15873/12:29
ykarelsshnaidm, not fs001 but fs03712:30
*** rlandy has joined #oooq12:31
sshnaidmykarel, but 001 failed12:32
sshnaidmykarel, 037 is already commented out12:32
amoralejsshnaidm, 001 was rerun again with a test patch and it passed12:33
amoralejlookm at https://trunk.rdoproject.org/api-centos-rocky/api/civotes_detail.html?commit_hash=427de49c25e3506fb8209b49749c03460053e8a7&distro_hash=37857f6601c11c4b9f4426094aca4c45683842de12:33
amoralejthere is a 001 which passed12:33
ykarelsshnaidm, okk i see as it's already commented, then, we are good12:34
ykarel2018-08-23 12:09:17,408 3493 INFO     promoter Promoting the container images for dlrn hash 427de49c25e3506fb8209b49749c03460053e8a7 on rocky to current-tripleo12:34
amoralejso we don't need to chang anything12:34
sshnaidmamoralej, oh, great12:34
amoralej\o/12:34
ykarelso we might see promotion in next 1 hour :), promotion already started half hour ago12:36
*** ssbarnea|ruck has quit IRC12:44
*** ykarel has quit IRC12:51
weshayykarel, we are seeing a promotion :)12:51
weshaymarios|rover, ssbarnea fyi ^12:51
*** ykarel has joined #oooq12:51
mariosweshay: ack12:51
weshay2018-08-23 12:09:17,408 3493 INFO     promoter Promoting the container images for dlrn hash 427de49c25e3506fb8209b49749c03460053e8a7 on rocky to current-tripleo12:51
* weshay goes back to sleep12:52
ssbarneayay. i am still finding failures: like "12:32:03 fatal: [undercloud]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "msg": "AnsibleUndefinedVariable: 'container_build_id' is undefined"}"12:52
mariosweshay: we'll talk about it in a sec but please check https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1785067 comment #8  #10/11 && https://review.openstack.org/59552712:52
openstackLaunchpad bug 1785067 in tripleo "without bootstrap-subnodes pike/ocata deployment fails for missing os-collect-config" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b)12:52
weshayssbarnea, k.. good let's track it down12:53
mariosweshay: i know you'll not be happy about https://review.openstack.org/595527 but /me shrugs i think thats the same fix we need12:54
*** udesale has joined #oooq12:54
weshaymarios, let's leave the bug open after this patch merges12:56
mariosweshay: ok12:57
mariosfolks we talking?13:01
marioscall13:01
bogdandoPTAL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59556613:02
bogdandotakes 2min instead of 8 on my laptop13:02
bogdandoreally no need enforcing tcg!..13:02
bogdandojust keep it default safe13:02
rlandymeeting?13:03
rlandyweshay: ^^13:03
rlandysshnaidm: ^^13:03
sshnaidmrlandy, joining..13:03
ssbarneaweshay: bug was already filed and marked as fix but I reached it few minutes ago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/177789613:05
openstackLaunchpad bug 1777896 in tripleo " "AnsibleUndefinedVariable: 'container_build_id' is undefined"}"" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to wes hayutin (weshayutin)13:05
rascasoftweshay, hey, you pinged me recently, now I'm back :)13:06
rascasoftweshay, rlandy, we need to merge this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537669 because otherwise rdophase2 jobs will continue to fail13:08
*** jaosorior has quit IRC13:09
rlandyrascasoft: reviewing again13:10
ykarelarxcruz, chandankumar we need some more tempest plugins build in RDO13:16
ykarelwe need sahara-tests and watcher-tests-tempest13:16
ykarelarxcruz, u there?13:17
rlandyrascasoft: my only concern is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537669/20/playbooks/baremetal-full-overcloud-prep.yml13:21
rlandythe rest are just tags13:21
rlandyovercloud-network-prep13:21
rlandyovb runs with all tags13:21
toskyykarel: and you will have sahara-tests13:21
rlandyneed to check that that is protected13:21
toskyI need two commits13:21
rascasoftrlandy, not sure I understand. I needed to put overcloud-network-prep at the begin because otherwise RDOPhase2 jobs would fail13:22
rascasoftrlandy, if you check the email I sent you before my PTO, there are links to the failing jobs13:22
chandankumartosky: watcher on it13:24
chandankumarykarel: get me the mssing list13:24
chandankumarI will complete it now13:24
ykarelchandankumar, sahara-tests, watcher-tempest-plugin for now13:24
ssbarneaweshay: just tell me if this fix makes sense or not: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/595782/1/roles/undercloud-deploy/templates/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml.j213:25
rlandyrascasoft: apologies - will look for that explanation13:26
toskyykarel: you can get the current master if you need sahara-tests now; I need two commits to release something that makes sense13:26
ykareltosky, yes that works, and will update after release13:28
ykarelchandankumar, can u take care of it ^^13:28
chandankumarykarel: aye sir13:30
chandankumarykarel: can you check whether we run barbican tests somewhere or not?13:30
chandankumari suspect that is also needed for promotion13:30
weshayapetrich, need a few13:30
ykarelchandankumar, yes that runs in tripleo13:30
chandankumarok 3 plugins13:31
ykarelcurrently we need for weirdo jobs, i don't think it used there, but can check again13:31
apetrichweshay, no worries. Just ping me when ready. my next meeting is in one hour13:31
rlandysshnaidm: marios: weshay: need some cores on this for rascasoft (my work so I can't vote) ... only concern is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537669/20/playbooks/baremetal-full-overcloud-prep.yml addition of overcloud-prep-network ... gates still pass13:31
rascasoftrlandy, sshnaidm, marios, weshay: overcloud-prep-network was present also before, it was just moved at the beginning because of an error I'm facing in rdophase213:33
rlandyrascasoft: looks ok to me - just want the other cores to confirm13:34
arxcruzykarel: hey, sorry13:34
ykarelchandankumar, barbican was there in scenario002 and it passed, so possibly it tests didn't ran there, but it's good to take it as well13:34
arxcruzI'm here13:34
ykarelarxcruz, chandankumar is on it ^^13:34
rascasoftrlandy, yes I understand, but you wrote "addition of" and this was not added, just moved13:34
*** skramaja has quit IRC13:37
ykarelweshay, rocky promoted, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594357/ can be reverted13:45
ykarelor any other hack can be reverted13:45
ykarelto start testing rocky upstream13:45
weshayapetrich, k.. ready13:48
ssbarneai found another interesting bug: fatal: [ip_address]: UNREACHABLE!  --- https://ci.centos.org/job/tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-master-delorean-quick-basic/155/consoleFull --- looks like expansion didn't happen somwhere, am i wrong?13:49
ssbarneaoops, is "cico inventory" and something is parsing the header line :D13:50
ssbarneasomeone needs to give me some hints about where to find cico13:52
rlandyrascasoft: left my +1 - so other cores can see I am ok with the change13:54
rascasoftrlandy++13:55
*** rnoriega has joined #oooq13:55
weshayrlandy, pto cal please14:02
weshayrlandy, see it now14:03
rlandyweshay: yep all in14:04
rlandywho is going to PTG?14:05
rlandywe have some zuul topics to address14:05
rlandyrfolco: catching up on quique's card - will need to touch base with you later today to see what you want me to do there14:06
rfolcorlandy, I am creating the test patches, looks like quiquell had already done some testing... if you can clarify this to me I'd appreciate... look this comment:14:08
rfolcoLooks we are adding -e dlrn_hash=92bc004554d74863443f92ec8977b80124e5ee98_43694243 -e get_build_command=92bc004554d74863443f92ec8977b80124e5ee98_43694243 don't if this is a problem14:08
rfolcoso having this "extra args" for all featuresets... do you see any problem?14:09
rlandyrfolco: k - reading back on this work - kind of out of the loop14:09
rfolcoI don't understand why we had emit_releases for some featuresets only14:09
rfolcorlandy, thanks, we can chat afternoon, I'll keep you posted with the testing14:10
rlandygreat14:10
rlandymarios; personal favor ... please vote on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53766914:11
rlandythank you14:11
mariosrlandy: so that is not a simple review ;/ I mean i lack context, and i still need to check the +2 but do you mena, you have tested this and you would like a +2 there?14:17
mariosrlandy: especially removal of baremetalundercloud.yml .... ah maybe that is the depends on14:17
marioschecking14:18
mariosoh no14:18
mariosit isn't14:18
rlandymost of it is tag addition14:19
rlandybut take your time14:19
mariosrlandy: yeah i see that and you are instead including the baremetal-undercloud but you have rmeoved quite a bit of it i  mean baremetal-undercloud14:19
mariosthats the 'splits ' part of the commit message i guess14:19
rlandymarios: you're out tomorrow? so don;t worry - I'll ping someone else14:20
rlandybaremetal-undercloud was rascasoft's work14:20
rlandynow he should be using our roles from our playbooks14:20
mariosrlandy: yeah i realised now14:21
mariosrlandy: its easier to see with https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/commit/?id=f79d80c9f65778520150e01cf1c71f7fcb197311&context=3&ignorews=0&dt=014:21
mariosrlandy: so you're moving all the parts using include and tags flavors/images/networks/all thethings14:21
mariosrlandy: and removing them from baremetal-undercloud14:22
rascasoftmarios, yes, it is a coherent split that should not change anything of what we have around right now14:22
mariosrlandy: rascasoft ack sold14:22
mariosrlandy: am just disappointed i couldn't find somethign to -114:23
mariosohwell14:23
marios;)14:23
sshnaidmykarel, amoralej do you know if it makes sense when my new built package (tripleoclient for example) has lower version than it's in /current/ ??14:28
rlandymarios: thank you14:30
mariosrlandy: welcome (joking about the -1 incase wasn't clear)14:31
rlandythat's fine - we will wait for sshnaidm - of there is something to find :)14:31
rlandyif14:31
*** ccamacho has quit IRC14:35
ykarelsshnaidm, yes i think(if not rebased)14:45
ykarelsshnaidm, are u facing some issue?14:45
sshnaidmykarel, well, yeah, after rebase it seems ok, but I when I build locally, still lower version..14:49
ykarelsshnaidm, okk, how u build locally, command?14:50
amoralejsshnaidm, where is it built to lower version that it's in current?14:50
amoralejin oooq job?14:51
weshayssbarnea, marios|rover please take a look at these logs and tell me about the problem you see https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/fb64832/logs/14:54
weshayssbarnea, marios|rover do either of you have a recreate started here?14:54
sshnaidmykarel, amoralej I just run playbook with build exactly as it's in oooq job, in reproducer14:55
amoralejwhat version is building it in your reproducer?14:55
sshnaidmykarel, amoralej ok, lemme check if everything is correct there..14:55
mariosweshay: checking that job (any hints?)14:56
weshaychandankumar, arxcruz I'm in a managers meeting14:56
weshaychandankumar, can you please lead the scrum14:56
rlandyrfolco: what is in scope for testing? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589448 has two -1's and can't merge14:59
rlandyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/585649/ - marked out of scope15:00
rfolcorlandy, for 589448 I am chaning the order of extra vars, new patchset coming15:00
rlandyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/589068/ has two -1's15:00
rlandyrfolco: ok - ping me when ready15:00
sshnaidmamoralej, well, I see that I have not rebased version of the patch...maybe it's cached somewhere.15:01
chandankumarweshay: ack15:01
rfolcorlandy, for 585649, OOS from previous discussion with panda... but I believe we can test it and verify as weshay suggested15:01
amoralejsshnaidm, the version is calculated using prb based on git15:01
amoralejso, rebases affects to the version15:02
rfolcorlandy, and finally the last one will need to resume what quiquel did... still have to look at what is the current state of that one15:02
weshaymarios, the overcloud nodes are not present in the logs15:03
rfolcolast one ==> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589068/ - refactor remaining time15:03
weshaymarios, because they didn't come up15:03
weshayright15:03
rfolcorlandy, will check with sshnaidm better ways of checking this...15:03
rfolcoremaining time I mean15:03
weshaymarios, ssbarnea the only way to figure out what is blocking master re: nova15:03
weshayis to bring up a recreate15:03
weshaymarios, openstack-nova is not installed on the undercloud afaict15:03
weshaywhich seems odd to me15:04
mariosweshay: i've seen these errors before poking at other bugs something in the deploy steps, but i also see this in mistral a lot 2018-08-23 01:56:41.716 ERROR /var/log/containers/mistral/mistral-db-manage.log: 11 ERROR mistral.actions.openstack.action_generator.base [-] Failed to create action: nova.certs_convert_into_with_meta: AttributeError: 'Client' object has no attribute 'certs'15:04
ssbarneawhat is recreate?15:04
weshaymarios, https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/fb64832/logs/undercloud/var/log/extra/rpm-list.txt.gz15:04
weshayssbarnea, https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/fb64832/logs/reproducer-quickstart.sh15:05
sshnaidmamoralej, oh, I see, this ansible facts caching broke me.. :( false alarm, sorry15:09
amoralejok, no prob15:10
*** hamzy has quit IRC15:10
mariosweshay: best i could come up with is 'nova certs? and/or mistral' via http://paste.openstack.org/show/728692/15:11
mariosweshay: will update if i come up with something better ;)15:12
weshaymarios, do we have an recreate up and running?15:12
mariosweshay: i do not15:12
weshaymarios, ssbarnea please one of you get one running asap15:12
mariosweshay: i have avoiding answering, since i'll be away, i could spin one up on my rdo cloud tenant but not sure how useful itll be15:12
mariosssbarnea: can you do that? i can help you if you need? pvt me?15:12
weshayyes.. please spin one up in your personal rdo tenant15:13
ssbarneaweshay: on it.15:13
ykarelweshay, ssbarnea marios i added comment there https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787910/comments/16 for ovb master15:13
openstackLaunchpad bug 1787910 in tripleo "OVB overcloud deploy fails on nova placement errors" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b)15:13
ykarelso good to move ahead with that15:13
mariosykarel: checking15:13
mariosykarel: so you mean, latest run had new enough nova?15:14
ykarelmarios, yes15:14
mariosykarel: cool thanks15:14
ykarelfrom my first comment it was there15:14
rlandyrfolco: k - pls just let me know what parts you are doing and what parts I should pick up15:14
ykarelmarios, sorry i didn't replied to ur comment there, there are some mistakes there, i can correct u if u want15:16
rlandyrfolco: so is  585649 in scope or out of scope?15:16
mariosykarel: ack sure thanks15:16
rlandyin scope for testing?15:17
rlandythe only diff is that we use it for all fs15:17
rlandyalso quiquell has a -1 on it15:18
ykarelmarios, so good way to check is the commit id(not timestamp), openstack-nova-18.0.0-0.20180820195340.722d5b4.el7.noarch.rpm (722d5b4) which is exactly the same commit we are looking for:- https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/722d5b477219f0a2435a9f4ad4d54c61b83219f115:25
rfolcorlandy, I believe his -1 is due to his comment about the additional args he mentioned15:25
mariosykarel: nice15:25
ykarelapart from this whenever checking promotion pipeline u need to look tripleo-ci-testing hash not current-tripleo and current(these are meant for gate job)15:26
ykarelmarios, ^^15:26
rlandyrfolco:k - just going through failures currently showing in the associated test patches15:26
rfolcorlandy, in scope from what I understand, trying weshay suggestions and lets see if we can make sure all fs are covered (or a way to ensure no breakages)15:26
rlandyno breakages?15:26
rlandythat's no fun15:27
mariosykarel: thank you15:28
ykarelmarios, so can u start a fix as per my comment there15:28
ykarelas it's blocking master promotion15:29
ykarelor whosoever rover is15:29
ykarel /me need to leave15:29
mariosykarel: me leaving too :) will have to wait until i'm back , though am out tomorrow and next week15:29
mariosykarel: its passed eod-o'clock here15:29
ykarelhere passed few hours back :)15:30
mariosykarel: well, 'until im back' i hope not !15:30
mariosykarel: ack :) have a good one15:30
mariosykarel: thanks15:30
ykarelmarios, ack enjoy ur outing15:32
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away15:32
ykarel|awayi am sure weshay will take care of it15:33
*** hamzy has joined #oooq15:35
*** saneax has quit IRC15:40
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off15:41
*** chem has quit IRC15:42
rlandyrfolco: any objection of we run recheck on the test patches - there are some failure (upgrades included) hard to tell if they are unrelated15:43
rlandyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/589383 in particular15:43
rfolcorlandy, I put my own test patches15:45
rfolcorlandy, https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:test-585649+(status:open+OR+status:merged)15:45
rfolcoexcept:15:46
rfolcoprint('driving kid to school')15:46
rfolcobrb15:46
bogdandofolks, my overcloud libvirt deployment fails with :15:49
bogdandoParameter 'OvercloudControllerFlavor' is invalid: Error validating value 'oooq_control': No Flavor matching {'name': u'oooq_control'}15:49
bogdandoParameter 'OvercloudComputeFlavor' is invalid: Error validating value 'oooq_compute': No Flavor matching {'name': u'oooq_compute'}15:49
bogdandoI'm using this command https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/blob/master/README.md#quickstart-cli-wrapper-quickstartsh. I see in config/nodes/1ctlr_1comp.yml flavor names are control and compute. The same is shown at UC flavors list... So how come it fails to looking up for those strange oooq_control/compute names?..15:49
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC15:51
bogdandothat 2nd -E file is just https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/blob/master/vars/quickstart.yaml15:53
rlandybogdando: those flavors are defined in https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/overcloud-prep-flavors/templates/overcloud-prep-flavors.sh.j215:53
bogdandonothing to break the flavor names15:54
bogdandorlandy: I see, thanks. So it seems my command is missing something?..15:56
bogdandoI used tags all, hm15:57
rlandyI was jut about to suggest tags :)15:57
rlandycheck to see of that role ran at all15:57
rlandystep_overcloud_prep_flavors15:57
rlandy^^ is that var set to false?15:58
bogdandoyay, thanks15:58
bogdandolet me check15:58
rlandyexample ... https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/playbooks/baremetal-full-overcloud-prep.yml#L3715:58
bogdandoI see no overcloud-prep-flavors.sh prepared at my UC, so prolly wasn't invoked15:58
*** ssbarnea|ruck has joined #oooq15:58
rlandyk - so check your playbook15:59
rlandyand step_overcloud_prep_flavors var15:59
rlandythose are the two switch points15:59
weshaysshnaidm, rlandy panda https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15822/116:04
sshnaidmweshay, what is vexxhost?16:06
weshayan upstream cloud16:06
bogdandorlandy: we have default set for step_overcloud_prep_flavors in quickstart... that's strange, how is the whole deployment with libvirt used to work then with the default command?..16:06
bogdandoanyway, I'll add it16:06
*** gkadam-afk has quit IRC16:07
rlandythen why do we care about vexxhost in infra-setup?16:07
bogdandobut I still not sure how come I need oooq_flavors if the node config do not use it?16:07
weshayrlandy, sshnaidm panda the infra team is experimenting with being able to run ovb jobs on a third party cloud16:08
weshaythere are not a lot of details16:08
weshayatm16:08
bogdandorlandy: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/tree/config/nodes/1ctlr_1comp.yml#n4 that'w what I use16:08
bogdandoany ideas why something still refers those oooq_foo things?16:09
weshayrlandy, sshnaidm panda nhicher is working it16:09
weshaybogdando, the image prep role should print out all the flavors you have avail16:09
weshayis flavor control not there?16:10
bogdandoyes16:10
bogdandobut deployment fails as it looks for oooq_control16:10
bogdandoParameter 'OvercloudControllerFlavor' is invalid: Error validating value 'oooq_control': No Flavor matching16:10
rlandybogdando: it's not in the nodes file ... https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/overcloud-deploy/defaults/main.yml#L5916:10
bogdandoum16:11
rlandybogdando: you can override flavor args if you wish16:11
weshaybogdando, rlandy http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/tree/roles/overcloud-deploy/defaults/main.yml#n4716:11
rlandywe do that in some cases ... getting ...16:11
bogdandoso do I need to have both sets of flavors control, compute, and oooq_* to make libvirt deployment?16:11
sshnaidmweshay, I think te-broker may not to work as it is configured, we didn't deploy it with those playbooks.. So tell nhicher please turn to us when it fails to run, we can help with it16:12
rlandynot necessarily  ... if you override16:12
weshaysshnaidm, aye16:12
rlandybut of you just include that prep-flavors role, you can be fine with the oooq_* flavors16:12
rlandyyour choice16:12
weshaysshnaidm, I'm sure just random pings on irc is enough collaboration16:13
* weshay sighs16:13
rlandybogdando: see https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/search?q=flavor_args&unscoped_q=flavor_args16:13
rlandyif you wish16:13
sshnaidmweshay, of course, I didn't mean something else :)16:13
rlandyeasier to make sure the role is included16:13
weshaysshnaidm, ya.. not poking at you16:13
weshayjust this silly organization we work for16:14
bogdandorlandy: I thought, using defaults and node config file is enough :)16:14
weshaysshnaidm, rlandy shit.. rhel 7.6 is in beta16:14
weshaywhich means I need to get a job for centos that is using the latest stuff16:14
bogdandoso what a magic combination of flavor_map and flavor_args shall I need?..16:14
weshayfak16:14
rlandybogdando: node config does not create flavors16:14
* weshay digs up that card16:14
bogdandobut it brings mappings, I hoped it overrides things16:14
bogdandoso those oooq_foo become not neede? rlandy?16:15
bogdandonot needed*16:15
rlandyweshay: now would be the time to start playing the lottery - we don't even run rhel successfully anywhere with openstack16:15
sshnaidmweshay, do we have way to stop this new centos?16:15
rlandyif you override flavor_args, no16:15
rlandybut I'd be interested to know why that role is not running16:16
bogdandotight16:16
rlandybogdando: ^^ that is your easiest bet16:16
bogdandoright16:16
rlandyreview the playbooks16:16
rlandyget it included16:16
rlandydone16:16
rlandyless debug than a new flavor16:16
bogdandoso I'll try without oooq_foo things, just using flavor_args: "" ?16:16
rlandywhich could be ironic errors16:16
bogdandoand my -N file16:16
rlandyyou can try16:17
*** dtrainor has quit IRC16:17
rlandyweshay: sshnaidm; this is not a simple patch to just review ... https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/1582216:18
rlandywe can pick up a few assumptions16:18
rlandybit the whole te-broker thing is a mystery to me16:18
rlandyhow that would operate on open cloud16:18
rlandysomeone else's16:18
weshaybogdando, so you are saying TASK [overcloud-prep-flavors : Prepare the scripts for overcloud flavors] ****** executed?16:19
weshaybogdando, https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/jenkins-tripleo-quickstart-promote-master-current-tripleo-delorean-minimal-401/console.txt.gz16:19
weshaybogdando, because if it didn't.. obviously that flavor will not be there?16:19
bogdandoweshay, rlandy: sooo did I got that right https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/commit/1b8b38d938f38634ab61ef6d200fb7a566c8f37b ? :)16:20
bogdandoweshay: ot was not16:20
bogdandoand I do not want it16:20
bogdandoI want just control, compute flavors created16:20
bogdandofrom my nodes file16:20
bogdandosomething created those control/compute flavors w/o that role executed, and I hope it is ok? :)16:21
bogdandojust something didn't get overriden in those tht OvercloudControllerFlavor/OvercloudComputeFlavor... sigh16:21
rlandybogdando: that should avoid the error but again, I think it's best to modify your code so that the prep-flavors role does run16:22
sshnaidmrlandy, I'm pretty sure it won't work out of box, iirc it has different keys file name (tripleo-ci-team vs tripleo-admins) and god knows what..16:22
weshaybogdando, ya.. just turn it off w/ the tag man16:22
bogdandosigh16:22
bogdandoI used -t all :D16:23
weshaybogdando, https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/playbooks/quickstart-extras-overcloud-prep.yml#L4416:23
bogdandobut I have no the script created16:23
weshaybogdando, ya.. so use -t all and skip tag flavor16:23
bogdandojust got lost my _quickstart.log occationally ;(16:23
weshaythat's why we have it16:23
bogdandoweshay: ok, I'll try16:23
weshayrlandy, do you know if anyone create a rocky release for rdo p2?16:24
weshaydon't thinks so16:24
rlandyweshay: myoung|training?16:24
rlandywasn't me16:24
rlandysshnaidm: ack - which is why reviewing this patch seems premature to me16:24
rlandyI'd like to know how the system would go down before saying whether a few variables are set right16:25
weshayrlandy, sshnaidm need votes on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594933/16:26
weshaytimeouts upstream should be resolved by merging that16:26
rlandyhmmm - I thought I vote on that - apparently not16:26
sshnaidmweshay, why to remove openstack-tripleo-* ?16:29
weshaysshnaidm, so we're the only ones who would care.. but what I'm afaid of is that tripleo folks spin up a new repo16:29
weshaythat does not have a oooq gate on it16:30
weshayanything merged to that repo would be built and added to all the jobs immediately16:30
weshaysshnaidm, better to be explicit than to use wild cards16:30
weshayfor our sake16:30
weshaywould be hard to debug imho16:30
sshnaidmweshay, yeah, so we'll know to add our jobs there imeediately16:30
rlandyweshay: ssbarnea: left question on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59493316:30
weshaysshnaidm, heh.. ya.. but breaking everything is a lousy alarm clock16:31
sshnaidmweshay, how would we know then?16:31
sshnaidmweshay, I didn't have idea about this ansible roles, for example..16:31
rlandyansible-tripleo-ipsec?16:32
sshnaidmoh, some new tripleo role? rlandy16:32
weshayrlandy, tripleo-ui is not needed16:32
weshaysshnaidm, srsly man16:32
weshayyou want all of CI to go down?16:33
weshaysshnaidm, vs.. email list, blueprint and review notification .. hey $new_role16:33
ssbarnearlandy:  to summarize, i need to add "openstack-tripleo-puppet-elements", anything else to add to the list of rpms?16:36
rlandyssbarnea: idk - I am asking16:37
rlandythe only other tripleo thing that came up on my search was ansible-tripleo-ipsec16:37
rlandythe rest you had16:37
ssbarneato me, makes sense to include, also agree with weshay that tripleo-ui is probably not needed.16:37
ssbarneaadding ipsec, likely needed too.16:38
rlandyI see a maintenance burden here but not an error so I would +2 if we are agreed on the list16:38
rlandyssbarnea: not so fast on the ipsec thing - I just an rpm search16:39
ssbarneadoes anyone complain if I also perform a sort on this list? as part of the same change?16:39
rlandygo ahead on the sort16:40
*** udesale has quit IRC16:40
myoung|trainingrlandy: I haven't prepped a rocky release for rdo2, I could later today, they way the JJB is factored it's not a heavy lift16:41
myoung|trainingrlandy, weshay: let me know if you need this in the near term (today/tomorrow) - otherwise I can do it monday16:42
bogdandorlandy, weshay: sigh. So I have no the task overcloud-prep-flavors executed, and I use flavor_args: "", but got the same error ._.16:42
rlandymyoung|training: you are in training - weshay if we need that rocky ph2 now, I will do it16:43
myoung|trainingrlandy: feel free to put me on the review, HTH16:43
rlandybogdando: pls paste your quickstart output and execution line16:44
myoung|trainingbut yeah I'm nose down on object storage and heat (later)(16:44
bogdandorlandy: will do, trying with step_overcloud_prep_flavors: true16:46
bogdandorlandy: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1C52Pw-ZeVpVYWQp2oQtNYIlfh3wQVbJw/view?usp=sharing16:52
bogdandoso I added https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/commit/bf1cc2478abf86da4843b5a0b8fd1f41c2df97cc#diff-4c164bf2a3ef315c2d1867203faddcb1R4716:52
bogdandoand the command uses that env file16:52
bogdandoand I can not see the role invoked, strange!..16:52
* rlandy looks16:55
bogdandorlandy: not sure why why these was not executed https://pastebin.com/hKvbtDhD ?17:01
ssbarnea|ruckshould i assign newly added tripleo bugs on LP to someone to triage them or not?17:05
rlandygoing through what was executed17:05
rlandyI see those roles with handler and nothing else17:06
bogdandoright17:07
bogdandoI wonder why...17:07
ssbarnea|ruckhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178866317:07
openstackLaunchpad bug 1788663 in tripleo "reproducer-quickstart.sh fails when using v3 openstack rc file" [Undecided,New]17:07
bogdandorlandy: --dry-run shows no tasks for these17:08
ssbarnea|ruckhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178865217:08
openstackLaunchpad bug 1788652 in tripleo "reproducer-quickstart.sh -r silently fails and returns 1 exit code" [Undecided,New]17:08
rlandyyou run overcloud-prep-config17:14
rlandyand overcloud-prep-containers17:15
bogdandorlandy: I think that may be ansible 2.4.1.0 I use17:18
rlandybogdando: no - your error is in - undercloud-scripts17:18
rlandyyou removed that tag17:19
rlandy--skip-tags17:19
bogdandohm17:19
bogdandohow come it's realted?17:19
rlandyand that tag creates the scripts you need to run for the roles missed17:19
rlandysee ...17:19
bogdandoomggg17:19
rlandyhttps://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/overcloud-prep-flavors/tasks/main.yml#L317:19
bogdandorlandy: thanks!!17:20
rlandysure17:20
weshayssbarnea|ruck, is your env up yet?17:21
weshaythe ovb one?17:21
ssbarnea|rucknope17:21
weshayssbarnea|ruck, where is it at?17:21
weshayin the install that is17:21
ssbarnea|ruckweshay https://seashells.io/v/Dp2kFP6517:22
weshayssbarnea|ruck, failed to deploy17:22
weshayk17:22
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC17:23
ssbarnea|ruckweshay i guess I need to ask for bigger quota17:25
ssbarnea|ruckit went slower because I had to file two bugs while testing it :D17:25
*** dtrainor has joined #oooq17:25
*** jrist has quit IRC17:26
*** holser_ has quit IRC17:28
ssbarnea|ruckweshay: i am trying to understand why I got: Resource CREATE failed: OverQuotaClient: resources.baremetal_env.resources.openstack_baremetal_servers.resources[2].resources.baremetal_ports.resources.public_port: Quota exceeded for resources: ['port'].  --- i checked my settings and i got a 60 quota and only 3 ports are used.17:36
*** holser_ has joined #oooq17:36
weshayssbarnea|ruck, /me posted to rh-openstack-dev17:40
*** jrist has joined #oooq17:41
*** rook has joined #oooq17:43
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk17:46
weshayrlandy, rfolco can I consult with you guys for 5min regarding centos76 for 5 min17:47
weshaywhen you guys have a minute17:47
ssbarneaweshay: do I get the ok for this list? https://gist.github.com/ssbarnea/3ed5e4e6f644c29468eee1286c7c8e8617:47
ssbarneai want to update the CR, so we can merge it.17:47
*** kopecmartin has quit IRC17:47
rfolcogive me 30 min pls17:47
weshayssbarnea, seems good to me.. what ever alex ( mwhahaha ) wants man17:49
weshayssbarnea, he's the ptl17:49
*** dsneddon has quit IRC17:52
*** holser_ has quit IRC17:53
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|off17:54
ssbarneasshnaidm: how about using python*-tripleo* pattern instead? seems legit to me and covers clients too.17:54
*** tosky has quit IRC17:54
rlandyweshay: going to add rocky ph2 now -17:57
weshayrlandy, I have a review up17:57
weshayrlandy, https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/147921/17:57
weshayrlandy, it's not a priority for you17:57
weshaybut review is welcome :)17:57
*** weshay is now known as weshay|rover17:57
weshay|roverarxcruz, chandankumar you guys still around?17:58
rlandywill look while we wait fir rfolco17:58
weshay|roverarxcruz, chandankumar wondering if you guys would mind if we used fs21 to run full tempest w/o skip AND to test the latest centos packages17:58
weshay|roverI'll add you guys to a review17:59
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch17:59
arxcruzweshay|rover: kind of around, you're the boss, i don't mind :)17:59
weshay|roverlolz18:00
weshay|roverarxcruz, I think it makes sense18:00
arxcruzyup18:00
weshay|roverarxcruz, will add you to a review it's not urgent18:00
arxcruzok18:00
*** bogdando has quit IRC18:01
rlandyleft two comments18:02
rlandyugh - gate failed again - timeout18:12
rlandy2018-08-23 16:41:18.728374 | RUN END RESULT_TIMED_OUT: [untrusted : git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/playbooks/tripleo-ci/run-v3.yaml@master]18:13
rlandywhat exactly is timing out here?18:13
rlandyssbarnea: ^^ have you seen this lately?18:16
rlandysova shows green on this job18:16
rlandybut I don;t see how my change caused a timeout18:16
rlandy2018-08-23 13:17:07.082337 | primary | +(./toci_quickstart.sh:158): exit_value=14318:16
rlandyon fs03718:17
ssbarnearlandy: likely not. didn't see recent timeouts, only failures from other causes.18:17
rlandyshoot18:17
rlandythis is blocking reparenting :(18:17
rlandyok - 037 is broken everywhere18:21
rlandyrecheck it is18:21
weshay|roverrlandy, which log?18:22
weshay|roverrlandy, is it master or a branch18:23
rlandyyes18:24
rlandyhttp://logs.openstack.org/08/594308/6/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode/9a42011/18:24
rlandy^^ killed gate18:24
rlandynothing I can do - recheck18:25
rlandyweshay|rover: I doubt my change did that18:25
weshay|roverrlandy, oh I'm sure it did not18:26
weshay|roverrlandy, we just need ssbarnea's patch to fix non-master jobs for timeouts18:26
weshay|roverwe also need sshnaidm|off's ara patch to figure out what else is causing timeout's18:26
rlandyweshay|rover: I +2'ed it18:27
* rlandy goes on faith it's good now18:27
ssbarnea|rucki wonder if my patch will ever get passing ci, never seen a +2 verified on it. hopefully in ~3h we will see some.18:27
rlandy"i wonder if my patch will ever get passing ci"18:28
rlandy^^ we all think that today18:28
rlandyabout our pressing patches18:28
rlandycan I get come reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581488/? last of the browbeat patches18:33
rlandyweshay|rover: ssbarnea|ruck: rfolco: anybody18:33
rlandy^^18:33
rlandymostly for the reproducer workflow18:34
rfolcorlandy, weshay|rover can talk now, go?18:35
rlandyfine by me18:35
weshay|roverrfolco, rlandy just review that patch I linked you guys18:35
weshay|roverI think it's smaller than I thought18:36
weshay|roverwas thinking a new pipeline18:36
rfolcoah ok18:36
rlandylooking at it now18:36
ssbarnea|ruckweshay|rover give https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571180/ a +W as I got the ok from original author (amorale) that is ok to change order. sshnaidm|off asked me about this, for safety.18:40
rfolcoweshay|rover, what does cr stand for18:42
rfolcocool repo18:42
weshay|roverrfolco, read the bug :)18:42
*** apetrich has quit IRC18:42
rfolcoweshay|rover, rtfm++18:43
weshay|roverheh18:43
rlandywe should move downstream to 7.618:45
rlandyrfolco: weshay|rover: meeting?18:50
rfolcoI am ok18:55
rfolcorlandy, weshay|rover said no meeting, you want to make it?18:56
rfolcorlandy, need your opinion about https://trello.com/c/DdSHkgnE/884-replace-tocijobtype-variable-s17-undercloud-playbooks-environment-tags?menu=filter&filter=label:Sprint%2018%20CI18:56
rlandyrfolco: no - just want to know what to do18:56
rfolcopls see my last comment, rlandy weshay|rover ^18:56
rfolcorlandy, ok lets bj18:56
rlandyreading your comment - sec18:56
rlandyrfolco: in your comment - both options are marked as 1. - which 1. do you prefer?18:58
rfolcololz18:59
rfolcothe 1st #118:59
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown19:01
rlandyrfolco: ok - so you're suggesting ...19:02
rlandy export TOCI_JOBTYPE={{ environment_type }}-{{ nodes }}-featureset{{ featureset }}19:02
rlandy^^ to the reproducer19:02
rlandyso we will land up with ...19:03
rlandytoci_jobtype: {{ environment_type }}-{{ nodes }}-featureset{{ featureset }}19:03
rfolcono, I suggest keeping as is until we have 2 workflows19:04
rfolcoadding more legacy code to reproducer to support legacy workflow sounds wrong to me19:04
rlandyrfolco: that is fine19:05
rlandynext sprint will be all about reworking the reproducer19:05
rlandyanything that keeps the system rolling for this sprint gets a +1 from ,e19:05
rlandyme19:05
rfolcorlandy, :)19:06
rfolcorlandy, move that card to complete or to backlog ? toci_gate is not entirely nuked19:07
rfolcotoci_jobtype I mean19:07
rlandythat is a panda question19:09
rlandyrfolco: can we meet about quiquell's card19:10
* rlandy is spinning there a bit19:10
*** jrist has quit IRC19:10
rfolcorlandy, your bj?19:11
weshay|roverrlandy, rfolco you guys need ua/pm help?19:12
rlandyrfolco: sure19:13
rfolcorlandy, bj id please19:14
rlandyhttps://bluejeans.com/116727655619:15
rlandyweshay|rover: if you want19:15
*** apetrich has joined #oooq19:21
*** jrist has joined #oooq19:23
rlandyweshay|rover: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594308/19:46
rlandyhttp://logs.openstack.org/08/594308/6/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode/9a42011/19:47
rlandyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/58148819:50
rlandyweshay|rover: ^^19:50
*** holser_ has joined #oooq20:05
*** panda has quit IRC20:05
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq20:23
*** holser_ has quit IRC20:47
*** hamzy has quit IRC20:48
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww21:03
*** panda has joined #oooq21:34
*** ssbarnea|ruck has quit IRC22:41
weshay|roverrlandy, ok.. I rebased that review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581488/23:02
rlandyweshay|rover: k - thanks23:07
weshay|roverrlandy, ugh.. tomorrow point me at where I make legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-1ctlr-featureset037-updates-masterFAILURE in 3h 04m 34s nv23:10
weshay|roverfor rdo 3rd party23:10
rlandyweshay|rover: looking ...23:13
rlandyrdo-jobs23:14
weshay|roverrlandy, ugh.. that get's me every time23:14
weshay|roverthanks23:14
rlandyweshay|rover: https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/zuul-legacy-jobs.yaml#L49323:15
rlandyweshay|rover: I don;t have +2 there23:15
rlandyI can put in the patch if you do23:15
weshay|roverzuul.d/zuul-legacy-jobs.yaml:503:23:16
weshay|roveroops23:16
weshay|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/1590223:16
weshay|roverthnaks23:16
rlandycannot merge23:16
rlandydo you see that?23:16
rlandydo you have an option to rebase?23:18
weshay|roverya23:18
weshay|roverfixed23:18
weshay|roverrlandy, sssh.. I think your patch is going to land23:18
*** hamzy has joined #oooq23:18
weshay|roverdon't tell the patch23:18
rlandyOMG23:18
rlandyparty, party, party23:19
rlandyI lie - I do have +223:19
rlandyha23:20
rlandyweshay|rover: zuul +1 and I can w+1 - can you?23:20
weshay|roverI just have +123:20
weshay|roverrlandy, can you please wf23:21
rlandydone23:21
rlandynot sure how I got +2 on that - pretty sure I never had it before23:21
weshay|roverrlandy, probably same rights as config23:22
rlandywaiting for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594308/23:23
rlandyback in a few ...23:23
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|brb23:24

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!