Tuesday, 2024-06-11

fungimeetin' time, y'all!14:00
ildikovo/14:01
spotz[m]Hey give me 2 minutes an egg broke on the counter14:03
fungiyikes!14:04
fungithe dangers of work-from-home ;)14:04
spotz[m]Danger of fresh eggs, sometimes the shells aren't that thick and they break in your hand14:06
spotz[m]#startmeeting diversity-wg14:06
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Jun 11 14:06:20 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is spotz[m]. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:06
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:06
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'diversity_wg'14:06
spotz[m]#topic Roll Call14:06
spotz[m]#chair fungi14:06
opendevmeetCurrent chairs: fungi spotz[m]14:06
ildikovo/14:07
fungiohai14:09
spotz[m]We tend to free form it but agenda is at #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda14:09
spotz[m]Being that we have ildikov I figured we could discuss the page/survey emails14:10
ildikov+114:10
fungiawesome, and yes we discussed it at some length in the community managers meeting yesterday, so she has some context at least14:10
spotz[m]Woohoo!14:11
ildikovyep, I really appreciate fungi keeping us on our toes about the D&I efforts!14:11
spotz[m]So better late then never I did get my version of the letter off to the Foundation list I believe on 5/3014:11
fungiyep, looked good, thanks for sending that!14:12
spotz[m]Sorry it took so long kept slipping my mind:(14:13
fungione of the things that came up in the cm meeting yesterday was that the communications so far haven't indicated the intended audience (who should take the survey)14:13
fungilike it's obvious to us that we want feedback from anyone who participates or has participated in our communities in any way, but i don't think we've actually stated that anywhere14:14
fungiso probably being clearer about that in the direct project community outreach is something we should be aware to include14:15
fungialso we were brainstorming additional ways to reach potential survey-takers, and another missed opportunity is post-conference attendee outreach from the foundation events people14:15
spotz[m]We might have reached out but it was a year ago at this point14:18
fungiyeah, i mean, we did have a keynote slide in vancouver but i don't recall it being included in the communications to attendees after the event14:18
fungithough maybe we did, my memory's gotten pretty terrible14:18
ildikovyeah, being more clear about audience and purpose might help people to feel more inclined to take the survey14:18
ildikovfungi: I don't remember it being included either14:19
spotz[m]I don't remember if we did or didn't:(14:19
ildikovso if it was, that just shows that we need to make the mention more prominent, or just mention it more often14:19
spotz[m]I do tend to think a bit historically where it was well known the survey was for everyone, we can definitely tighten up the wording that goes to the projects to make sure14:21
ildikovthere are various reasons someone can feel that the survey is not for them, so I think it's always good to re-state that14:22
ildikovand we get new people in our projects/ecosystem too, and they may not know anything about it yet14:22
ildikovI don't think we're saying that this should be explained in length all the time, just to be more explicit14:24
fungioh, also on the "more often" point, we did talk about the fact that it's probably worth periodically reminding our communities about too, so finding more long-lived means of doing that might help14:25
spotz[m]Yeah I think if we do that in the Community emails, and then say in 2 months we do another to the Foundation list and add it in there. I don't think we want to send another one there so soon14:26
fungii did include it in a foundation newsletter at the beginning of this year, though that didn't seem to result in any new takers14:26
spotz[m]Was that before the page revamp?14:27
fungii think it was immediately after14:28
fungi#link https://superuser.openinfra.dev/articles/openinfra-newsletter-62/14:29
ildikovspotz[m]: we were thinking about mentioning the webpage, survey and WG maybe quarterly on the community communication channels, unless there's a news item to share14:29
fungiand yeah, it links to the new page14:29
spotz[m]Oh sweet14:29
spotz[m]We did a semi-amateurish evaluation of the European events and I think next year we should be pro-active about encouraging diversity which we are for Asia. I did meet one new person at CERN and told them about the group14:30
ildikov+114:31
ildikovevents are easier to start getting involved, as you just show up and see what catches your interest, etc14:32
ildikovthis could be something to talk about with our member ecosystem as well, as a brainstorming idea14:32
ildikovsince the motivation to participate doesn't always line up with opportunity14:33
ildikovand we can be more mindful of mentioning diversity related efforts and the survey in event comms as well in general14:34
fungiwe could probably have some success more strongly leaning on project leaders to at least take the survey14:34
ildikovor even going that far to have them help encouraging their projects/teams14:35
spotz[m]Yeah I know at CERN I ran into people who took advantage of it being nearby. So in that case I think the roadshow was a success14:35
ildikovas them taking the survey will not be visible to others, it won't serve as an example to follow in itself14:36
spotz[m]Yeah it's hard, in the past I've posted I took the survey have you. But I think there's always the doubt that we're truly anonymous14:37
ildikovhave you heard people being concerned about that?14:38
spotz[m]No but I haven't heard anyone talking about it at all:(14:39
ildikovthere's so much going everywhere that if you don't do a big campaign about something, then it gets lost in the noise14:40
ildikova diversity survey shouldn't fall into that category, but at the end of the day mostly everything does14:41
spotz[m]Yeah which is why we pushed to announce at Summit hoping to get some attention14:41
ildikovexactly14:42
ildikovwhat I'm saying is, announcing it at a Summit in itself is not enough14:42
spotz[m]Which is why we're here a year later with no progress14:44
ildikovbut we are talking about how to communicate about it more14:44
spotz[m]So the individual communities, maybe Superuser and newsletters that go out from the Foundation?14:47
ildikov+114:48
fungioh, right, one of the possibilities we had discussed earlier in the year was a superuser article specifically about the wg's activities and the survey14:50
spotz[m]Ok 5 minutes left, do we want to put a checklist together of things to do? Next step I think is the community focused emails and maybe 4-8 week before we do something community wide?14:55
spotz[m]I don't want us to be "spam"14:56
fungithat sounds good to me14:56
fungiand yeah, the worst thing we could do is create reminder fatigue in our communities14:56
ildikov+1, finding the right balance will be important14:58
spotz[m]Ok I added a checklist in the agenda if you want to peek14:58
fungithanks!14:58
* fungi needs to bring in his trashcan really quick before his 15:00 utc conference call14:59
spotz[m]I think that's it for us timewise today anyways. Go get your can:)14:59
spotz[m]Thanks for joining us today ildikov 14:59
spotz[m]#endmeeting14:59
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Jun 11 14:59:57 2024 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:59
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2024/diversity_wg.2024-06-11-14.06.html14:59
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2024/diversity_wg.2024-06-11-14.06.txt14:59
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2024/diversity_wg.2024-06-11-14.06.log.html14:59
ildikov@spotz[m] sure thing, I'm happy I could make it!15:00

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!