Wednesday, 2015-09-02

*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck00:01
*** everjeje has quit IRC00:02
*** jhfeng has quit IRC00:09
*** insequent has joined #openstack-barbican00:30
pksinghdave-mccowan: pong00:41
dave-mccowanpksingh hi00:42
pksinghdave-mccowan: hi, good morning00:42
dave-mccowanpksingh  good morning.  i was wondering how the python3 work was going, how much you think is left, and if there is a way to split up the remaining work so other's can help to make it go faster.00:49
pksinghdave-mccowan: almost 90% tests are working,00:51
pksinghdave-mccowan: only few test files are failing00:51
pksinghi tried to resolve them but could not do so00:52
pksinghone problem is https://bugs.launchpad.net/barbican/+bug/148545200:53
openstackLaunchpad bug 1485452 in Barbican "test case "test_should_raise_container_no_content_type_header" is failing with py34 due to content-type header" [Undecided,New]00:53
dave-mccowanpksingh  great!  that's good news (the 90% part).  if i want to recreate to help debug, what code do i need?00:53
rm_workdave-mccowan: commented, the "-new" will be there for max a couple of days00:56
rm_workit's a little shuffle-dance of merging things right after each other to get it to switch to the new gates safely with no breakage00:56
dave-mccowanrm_work cool.  i like the dual-running approach.  the -V makes people nervous. :-)00:57
pksinghdave-mccowan: and barbican.tests.plugin.util.test_translations is also not working currently00:58
pksinghdave-mccowan: ahh, recreation is i think little bit difficult, because i created small patches, and they are dependent one ,if they get merged then life would be very easy00:59
pksinghdave-mccowan: for recreation you have to apply all dependent patches first01:00
pksinghdave-mccowan: and i am sorry, i missed to make them dependent earlier during commit01:01
dave-mccowanpksingh can you add the dependencies now?01:02
*** insequent has quit IRC01:04
dave-mccowanpksingh it's easy to do.  if you don't already know how, i can tell you.01:04
pksinghdave-mccowan: let me see, i will come to you soon01:07
*** tkelsey has quit IRC01:21
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC01:23
pksinghdave-mccowan: some patches are merged and some are not some are not merged, so i think changing few lines manually on master should work01:23
pksinghdave-mccowan: https://github.com/openstack/barbican/blob/master/barbican/model/repositories.py#L264 , s/func_name/__name__/01:25
pksinghdave-mccowan: apply changes in change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213574/3/barbican/api/controllers/__init__.py and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213574/3/barbican/api/hooks.py01:28
*** kebray has quit IRC01:30
pksinghdave-mccowan: after above two changes you will be able to test the tests failing with py34, i.e. barbican/tests/api/controllers/test_containers.py and barbican/tests/plugin/util/test_translations.py01:30
*** diazjf has quit IRC01:35
openstackgerritPradeep Kumar Singh proposed openstack/barbican: Replace dict.iteritems() with dict.items()  https://review.openstack.org/21912301:38
dave-mccowanpksingh i think it would be a good idea to link the patches together.  it would be really cool to show all the unit tests running in the final patch patch of the chain.01:40
rm_workyeah we discussed that earlier, but...01:42
rm_workerg.01:42
rm_workyou can test it locally by just cherry-picking them all in a row01:42
rm_workbut doing it in a chain during development is really limiting / a PITA01:42
rm_workwe just really need to start *merging some*01:43
pksinghrm_work: if two or three patches get merged then there would be no problems, and on some of then there are two +2s and on some of them one +2s01:44
pksinghso if these are reviewed early then that would be good01:45
rm_workyeah just need to get people actually *online*01:46
rm_worki haven't seen many core reviewers (especially redrobot or other rackers) responding in IRC for at least a week <_< not sure what is up01:47
*** Kevin_Zheng has joined #openstack-barbican01:47
rm_workbeen pinging people all of this week and last week and only ever really saw jaosorior and hockeynut around I think01:48
pksinghohh01:49
rm_workreally need reviewers to start moving stuff since we're so close to the freeze01:51
pksinghyes01:53
rm_workCORES: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167885/01:53
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC01:57
*** jhfeng has joined #openstack-barbican02:07
dave-mccowanpksingh have you committed a patch with base64 changes?02:10
pksinghdave-mccowan: yes, but all base-64 changes are not in the same patch02:17
pksinghdave-mccowan: i have followed the approach of fixing test module wise02:17
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican02:20
pksinghdave-mccowan: this patch has some changes related to base64 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216093/102:20
*** jhfeng has quit IRC02:25
*** gyee has quit IRC02:47
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC03:08
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-barbican03:20
*** woodster_ has quit IRC03:39
*** mmdurrant has quit IRC03:39
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-barbican03:53
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-barbican03:58
*** insequent has joined #openstack-barbican04:10
openstackgerritFernando Diaz proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Create Common functions used for cleaning up items used for testing  https://review.openstack.org/21839604:35
openstackgerritFernando Diaz proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Remove test behaviors abstraction for secrets  https://review.openstack.org/21341404:35
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-barbican04:43
*** Nirupama has joined #openstack-barbican04:44
*** insequent has quit IRC04:52
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC04:56
openstackgerritElvin Tubillara proposed openstack/barbican: Add Request ID to worker-side logs in barbican.  https://review.openstack.org/21777505:02
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC05:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/21890105:04
openstackgerritFernando Diaz proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Remove test behaviors abstraction for secrets  https://review.openstack.org/21341405:11
*** kebray has quit IRC05:13
*** diazjf has left #openstack-barbican05:21
*** insequent has joined #openstack-barbican05:41
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Replace itertools.ifilter with six.moves.filter for py3 compatibility  https://review.openstack.org/21444705:42
*** edtubill has quit IRC05:46
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Replace urllib with six.moves.urllib for py3 support  https://review.openstack.org/20677006:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Make tests in barbican.tests.api.middleware py3 compatible  https://review.openstack.org/21359406:02
pksinghredrobot: thanks for the reviews of py3 patches, could you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219123/06:07
openstackgerritPradeep Kumar Singh proposed openstack/barbican: Make files in barbican.tests.api py3 compatible  https://review.openstack.org/21357406:29
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-barbican06:43
*** jaosorior has quit IRC06:45
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-barbican06:50
*** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican07:26
*** insequent has quit IRC07:35
*** jaosorior has quit IRC07:38
*** insequent has joined #openstack-barbican07:48
*** shohel has quit IRC09:11
*** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican09:17
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-barbican10:29
*** jaosorior has quit IRC10:29
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-barbican10:30
*** insequent has quit IRC10:43
*** everjeje has joined #openstack-barbican10:51
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-barbican10:51
*** insequent has joined #openstack-barbican10:58
*** shohel has quit IRC11:00
*** dtadrzak_ has quit IRC11:06
rm_workjaosorior: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167885/11:23
rm_workjaosorior: you're the only core i've seen responding recently, would love a +2 for that :P11:24
rm_workbbl11:24
jaosoriorrm_work: Alright, let me take a look11:34
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Implement Enforce Method for QuotaEnforcer  https://review.openstack.org/21806411:42
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Add Functional Tests for Quota Enforcement  https://review.openstack.org/21871711:42
dave-mccowanjaosorior ^^ last 2 commits for quotas blueprint.  (not counting docs)11:43
jaosoriordave-mccowan: Those are gonna take me more time to review, give me some hours haha. Doing some stuff regarding my new job.11:44
*** DTadrzak has joined #openstack-barbican11:52
*** peter-hamilton has joined #openstack-barbican12:19
*** david-lyle has quit IRC12:27
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-barbican12:28
*** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican12:33
*** Nirupama has quit IRC12:38
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican13:04
*** jaosorior has quit IRC13:28
*** darrenmoffat has quit IRC13:31
*** darrenmoffat has joined #openstack-barbican13:32
*** rellerreller has joined #openstack-barbican13:34
openstackgerritKaitlin Farr proposed openstack/castellan: Update Barbican functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/21624713:56
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz14:06
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:06
*** jhfeng has joined #openstack-barbican14:16
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-barbican14:31
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-barbican14:31
*** edtubill1 has joined #openstack-barbican14:34
*** edtubill has quit IRC14:36
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC14:43
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican14:50
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-barbican14:53
*** silos has joined #openstack-barbican14:54
*** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican14:59
*** xaeth_afk is now known as xaeth15:03
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC15:03
openstackgerritFernando Diaz proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Remove test behaviors abstraction for secrets  https://review.openstack.org/21341415:12
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-barbican15:16
silosredrobot: ping15:19
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-barbican15:20
openstackgerritFernando Diaz proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Add functional test for updating a Secret  https://review.openstack.org/21973915:22
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Implement Enforce Method for QuotaEnforcer  https://review.openstack.org/21806415:22
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Add Functional Tests for Quota Enforcement  https://review.openstack.org/21871715:33
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Add Functional Tests for Quota Enforcement  https://review.openstack.org/21871715:33
redrobotsilos pong15:37
silosredrobot: In our endeavour to find a solution to federated barbican we turned over a rock and found a project called Mercador whose trying to setup federating independent clouds. I updated the wiki about it. Wanted to give you a heads up.15:39
silos*who's <grammar fail>15:39
redrobotsilos interesting...15:42
*** everjeje has quit IRC15:42
*** shohel has quit IRC15:43
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Add Request ID to worker-side logs in barbican.  https://review.openstack.org/21777515:50
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-barbican15:56
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC15:56
*** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican15:57
openstackgerritArun Kant proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Part 2: Adding ACL support for CLI commands and docs  https://review.openstack.org/20834316:03
openstackgerritArun Kant proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Part 1: Adding ACL support for Client API.  https://review.openstack.org/20669916:03
openstackgerritArun Kant proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Part 3: Adding ACL functional tests.  https://review.openstack.org/20834416:03
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican16:05
*** kebray has quit IRC16:05
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican16:06
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Change test_containers unit test to work around webtest issue  https://review.openstack.org/21977416:16
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican16:25
*** lisaclark2 has joined #openstack-barbican16:29
*** lisaclark2 has quit IRC16:30
*** lisaclark2 has joined #openstack-barbican16:30
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC16:31
*** kebray has quit IRC16:32
*** lisaclark2 has quit IRC16:35
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican16:35
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican16:40
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC16:49
*** SheenaG has left #openstack-barbican16:53
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-barbican17:03
*** silos has left #openstack-barbican17:03
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-barbican17:03
*** kebray has quit IRC17:07
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-barbican17:16
redrobotdave-mccowan hola dave17:29
redrobotdave-mccowan I'm hoping to get the last of the quota CRs merged today17:29
redrobotdave-mccowan but they seem to be failing at the gate right now.17:29
dave-mccowanredrobot hi doug!  woot!17:29
dave-mccowanredrobot  yep... i'm on it.  i just need to delete a couple tests.17:29
* redrobot knows about the coup and is permanently keeping an eye on dave-mccowan 17:30
dave-mccowanredrobot you left the keys in the car...17:30
redrobotlol17:30
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Implement Enforce Method for QuotaEnforcer  https://review.openstack.org/21806417:34
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Add Functional Tests for Quota Enforcement  https://review.openstack.org/21871717:35
dave-mccowanredrobot ^^17:35
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC17:36
chellygeli take full responsibility for putting the keys in the car17:36
chellygeland coming outside to see the engine running17:36
chellygeland letting it happen17:36
dave-mccowanredrobot let me know if there is any other blueprint that needs help to make the milestone17:36
redrobotdave-mccowan https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/barbican+branch:master+topic:bp/add-cas,n,z would be good as well,17:37
chellygel;~; i am sorry doug, 5 minutes late. i will commit sudoku! http://i.imgur.com/D9OqsCX.jpg17:37
redrobotchellygel lmao17:37
dave-mccowanchellygel (my accomplice) are you still working on update container?17:37
chellygeldave-mccowan,  yes -- i apologize, its been a bit of a crazy week!17:38
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Use the new Devstack external plugin method  https://review.openstack.org/16788517:38
chellygelI am; however, leaving on vacation after today17:38
*** jaosorior has quit IRC17:39
dave-mccowanchellygel no worries from me.  let me know if you need help with the patch, i've been playing in similar code with the quotas.  i can chip in if it needs anything after you leave for vacation.17:40
chellygelyeah for sure :) i appreciate the help. your reviews are great too.17:41
redrobotdiazjf ping17:47
diazjfredrobot, pong18:02
redrobotdiazjf just wondering if you wanted to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218117/ into liberty-3 ?18:02
diazjfredrobot, yeah that would be awesome18:03
redrobotdiazjf I can review if you want to update the patch to use only one .testr.conf as suggested18:03
diazjfredrobot, yeah I can do that. All it should entail is just removing the /home/stack/barbican/functionaltests/.testr.conf18:04
diazjfI'll have the change up in the next 15 min18:10
rellerrellerredrobot when is our code freeze?18:11
redrobotrellerreller Feature Freeze is liberty-3 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Liberty_Release_Schedule18:12
redrobotrellerreller we'll probably want a Feature Freeze Exception for alee's work on cas18:12
aleeredrobot, yes please18:13
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-barbican18:13
dave-mccowanredrobot what about the PY3 patches?  are these a "feature", of just refactoring that can trickle in?18:13
redrobotalee yeah, the magnum folks are expecting it for Liberty.18:13
rellerrellerredrobot thanks. I might try to get in more patch that does the standardized functional tests with the annotations.18:13
redrobotdave-mccowan I think those are low priority, I don't think we'll be py3 compliant by the liberty release.18:14
rellerrellerI need diazjf to get his .testr.conf patch accepted. I have been looking at that a lot today.18:14
redrobotrellerreller yeah, we'll try to get it merged today.  He's working on an updated patch.18:14
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican18:15
diazjfrellerreller,  posted a quick comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218117/18:15
diazjflet me know if thats ok18:16
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican18:16
rellerrellerdiazjf I think that is good. That is exactly what I was thinking.18:16
openstackgerritFernando Diaz proposed openstack/barbican: Use testr for running functional tests and documentation  https://review.openstack.org/21811718:18
diazjfrellerreller, redrobot, awesome! patch updated18:18
*** insequent has quit IRC18:23
arunkant_woodster, redrobot : Are you guys okay with this proposed change. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211671 .18:26
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC18:27
jaosoriorredrobot: Have you had some time to check out why the stable/kilo gate fails?18:28
redrobotarunkant yes, for development purposes a wsgi container is not needed.  we should not force everyone to use uwsgi18:28
redrobotjaosorior I spent a little bit of time on it and didn't get very far.  Haven't had a chance to go back and look at it again.18:29
arunkantrellerreller: Looks like pkymip change is not merged (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212579/) as its stuck because of global requirements pending change.18:29
arunkantredrobot, How concurrency support is provided in barbican..please see my comments.18:30
rellerrellerarunkant NNNNNNNNNNooooooooooo!18:30
rellerrellerEveryone should go +1 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215755/ :)18:31
redrobotarunkant barbican.sh is just a reference/convenience script.  anyone who deploys Barbican in a production environment should consider what WSGI container they will use.18:31
*** peter-hamilton has quit IRC18:31
arunkantredrobot, yes..but similar to other services, openstack service do provide concurrency support via oslo_service . I don't see that support for wsgi app in barbican which provides someone to deploy service as-is if they wish to.18:34
redrobotarunkant seems that we would want to add oslo_service support for that purpose then?  not force uwsgi on everyone.18:35
arunkantyes..that's definitely a better approach as it allows to deploy barbican as-is if someone wants that way18:36
*** tasalasc has joined #openstack-barbican18:36
arunkantredrobot: We should add that support before removing uswsgi which is currently providing that capability.18:37
*** tasalasc has left #openstack-barbican18:37
*** silos has joined #openstack-barbican18:39
woodster_arunkant: have you found examples of this approach in other projects?18:40
arunkantwoddster_, yes I have mentioned them in comments18:41
woodster_arunkant: sorry, I was focused on the inline comment18:45
rellerrellerdiazjf I don't know what the proper format is for .testr.conf. It seems to work the same with or without it. Perhaps someone else knows if it is needed.18:53
*** tkelsey has quit IRC18:55
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican18:57
woodster_arunkant: added a comment on that CR please18:57
*** lisaclark2 has joined #openstack-barbican19:01
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC19:03
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-barbican19:03
diazjfrellerreller, yeah someone else checking that would be good.19:05
diazjfThe way I have it runs all the test within the specified directory either way19:06
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Add Functional Tests for Quota Enforcement  https://review.openstack.org/21871719:06
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC19:06
rellerrellerdiazjf that is why it is so confusing to me. Why is there a --start flag?19:11
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-barbican19:12
diazjfrellerreller, I have no idea, why they even have that :-/19:13
diazjfkeystone does it the same way I have it setup19:13
rellerrellerredrobot I saw that you are core for global requirements. I have the pykmip 0.4.0 request, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215755/ that is outstanding and blocking the merge of my Barbican patch ;019:14
diazjfredrobot, should we get the test behavior abstreaction removal done for this release? That way when other features are added the functional tests are created properly.19:15
*** kebray has quit IRC19:18
*** lisaclark2 has quit IRC19:24
dave-mccowandiazjf barbican client is not part of this code freeze.19:25
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC19:26
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican19:28
hockeynutdave-mccowan - I went thru the quota CRs, lots of questions and still confusion in my little brain about project IDs - keystone and barbican :-)19:30
dave-mccowanhockeynut IDs. IDs everywhere.19:31
hockeynutexternal project ID is the keystone proj id?19:31
diazjfdave-mccowan, gotcha19:31
dave-mccowanhockeynut yep19:31
arunkantwoodster_, please see my reply comments on CR19:31
hockeynutdave-mccowan and everywhere else I see "project id" refers to the internal key in the db (which a user never sees nor uses)?19:32
dave-mccowanhockeynut yep.  your comments were right on.19:32
hockeynutdave-mccowan thanks.  we have so many overloaded terms in this industry its amazing that anything ever works :-D19:33
dave-mccowanhockeynut i copied that naming convention from the other controllers, so if i got it right, at least i haven't added confusion to the code base. :-)19:34
*** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican19:36
*** rellerreller has quit IRC19:37
openstackgerritFernando Diaz proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Add functional test for updating a Secret  https://review.openstack.org/21973919:37
*** gyee has quit IRC19:44
jaosoriorhockeynut, dave-mccowan: That is indeed the case. External project ID comes from keystone and is the one that comes in the request's headers. While "project id", is the id that was generated in the database. the user shouldn't really need to deal with that.19:45
hockeynutjaosorior dave-mccowan so our docs that reference project id are talking about keystone and not the internal one.  looking at the code that gets very confusing when we just see project_id19:46
jaosoriorinitially external project id was called keystone id... but I got rid of that, since we were asuming that that id might not necessarily be coming from keystone.19:46
hockeynutjaosorior that makes sense.  wish we had another thing internally besudes project19:46
hockeynutlike "tenant" :-D19:46
jaosoriorhockeynut: the thing is, the "project id" that is in the code is not something the user should even know about. It's just implementation details19:47
hockeynutjaosorior correct...just trying to be sure looking at the code that I'm clear what its doing19:47
jaosoriorso the documentation should be refferring to what in the code is the "external_project_id"19:47
jaosoriorI know this causes a lot of confusion but in the end I didn't come up with an alternative :/19:47
jaosoriorI remember having a lot of discussion about this with woodster19:48
jaosoriorbut no, "tenant" is not coming back haha :P19:48
hockeynutI guess a good rule of thumb could be: (1) if the docs refer to a project ID (like in a URL, its the EXTERNAL one.  (2) in the code, when you see external_project_id then its talking about the EXTERNAL one and if you see just project_id its talking about the internal one.19:49
jaosorioryep19:49
jaosoriorthat should be it19:49
jaosoriorthat should be documented somewhere though... not sure where19:50
hockeynutI am thinking about getting a tattoo19:50
hockeynutor maybe just put it on a shirt - less permanent :-D19:50
dave-mccowandocument it in the IRC channel every six months, right before code freeze19:50
hockeynutthx for clearing it up!19:50
hockeynutdave-mccowan MOTD !19:51
jaosoriorshirt + MOTD sounds like the way to go :P19:51
hockeynutpull request accepted19:51
dave-mccowanSorry.  Your project_id is in another castle.19:51
hockeynutperfect19:51
dave-mccowanor would that be external_project_id?19:53
jaosoriorhahaha dammit19:54
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-barbican19:57
*** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican20:06
*** kfarr has quit IRC20:16
*** peter-hamilton has joined #openstack-barbican20:18
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican20:20
dave-mccowanhockeynut ping20:22
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Implement Enforce Method for QuotaEnforcer  https://review.openstack.org/21806420:33
*** jaosorior has quit IRC20:41
redrobotdave-mccowan hockeynut  I disagree that quota=0 needs to be a special case20:54
redrobotdave-mccowan hockeynut I don't see the value in having different exceptions and different messages20:54
redrobotdave-mccowan hockeynut  we're really just talking about the quota not being high enough to add new entities.20:55
dave-mccowanredrobot   i was on the fence.  part of me liked the one exception, since it automatically told the user/admin to change project-quotas to fix it.20:55
dave-mccowanredrobot hockeynut i'll revert.20:56
dave-mccowanredrobot what do you think about hockeynut's suggestion on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218717/   ?20:57
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:01
redrobotdave-mccowan I don't have a strong preference... I would +2 your impl and let hockeynut follow up with a new patch if he wants to.21:04
dave-mccowanredrobot hockeynut that works for me.  i don't want to spend time refactoring the night before code freeze.  risk > reward.21:05
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Implement Enforce Method for QuotaEnforcer  https://review.openstack.org/21806421:07
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Add Functional Tests for Quota Enforcement  https://review.openstack.org/21871721:09
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC21:14
*** edtubill1 has quit IRC21:15
*** diazjf has left #openstack-barbican21:18
*** silos has left #openstack-barbican21:26
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican21:34
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:34
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican21:34
*** shohel has quit IRC21:34
*** kebray has quit IRC21:42
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-barbican21:45
*** xaeth is now known as xaeth_afk21:48
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:59
*** everjeje has joined #openstack-barbican22:00
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican22:04
woodster_redrobot: arunkant Are the changes in Amy's CR (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211671) needed for the release?22:12
woodster_redrobot: arunkant if not, I'd argue for putting that CR with a call out to the bin/barbican-api script to boot the app up, with a separate CR to modify that script to invoke an oslo_service server22:13
*** peter-hamilton has quit IRC22:31
woodster_hockeynut: Hey Steve, how adamant are you about data driven tests for Dave's CR: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21871722:39
*** jhfeng has quit IRC22:40
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck22:54
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/barbican: Update API Reference Docs with Project Quota Information  https://review.openstack.org/21476422:56
openstackgerritAmy Marrich proposed openstack/barbican: Removes pyenv from barbican.sh  https://review.openstack.org/21167122:57
*** rellerreller has joined #openstack-barbican23:03
*** kebray has quit IRC23:03
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz23:06
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Implement Enforce Method for QuotaEnforcer  https://review.openstack.org/21806423:17
*** rellerreller has quit IRC23:45
*** fnaval has quit IRC23:47
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-barbican23:50
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Add Functional Tests for Quota Enforcement  https://review.openstack.org/21871723:59
openstackgerritMerged openstack/barbican: Add Functional Tests for Quota Enforcement  https://review.openstack.org/21871723:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!