Tuesday, 2014-09-02

*** lsmola has quit IRC00:00
*** sbfox has quit IRC00:12
*** renatoar_ has quit IRC00:12
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:13
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC00:25
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: collector: Allows to requeue a sample  https://review.openstack.org/11222500:28
*** thomasem_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:36
*** thomasem has quit IRC00:37
*** thomasem_ has quit IRC00:40
*** promulo has quit IRC00:43
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:43
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:48
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:52
*** packet has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:45
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:48
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC01:57
*** zul has quit IRC02:08
*** asalkeld has quit IRC02:13
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Improve api_paste_config file searching  https://review.openstack.org/9959902:15
openstackgerritRikimaru Honjo proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Split bunch of samples into multiple messages  https://review.openstack.org/9415502:23
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:27
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:45
*** rbowen has quit IRC02:45
*** packet has quit IRC02:50
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:51
*** packet has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:51
*** packet has quit IRC02:51
*** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:16
*** asalkeld has quit IRC03:16
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:36
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:44
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:45
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:49
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:17
*** asalkeld has quit IRC04:25
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC04:33
openstackgerritRikimaru Honjo proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add validate alarm_actions schema in alarm API  https://review.openstack.org/10733004:34
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:42
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:06
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:23
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:31
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:38
*** asalkeld has quit IRC05:44
*** changbl has quit IRC05:46
*** flwang1 has quit IRC05:48
*** mspreitz has quit IRC05:53
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:06
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/11550806:10
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:12
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:14
eglynn_llu: good morning/evening!06:15
llumorning eglynn_06:15
eglynn_llu: I wonder could you check if the latest version of https://review.openstack.org/113549 now meets your liking?06:15
eglynn_llu: (it already has two +2s, but I didn't want to pull the trigger and approve until all cores who reviewed it had a chance to look at the latest)06:16
llugot that. Should we let this land in first, or wait until the pollster patch?06:17
llui'll check this this afternoon06:17
eglynn_llu: I think we should let the main patch land now, and allow the pollster-discovery patch to be punted to a post-juno3 bug if necessary06:18
eglynn_llu: thanks! (... BTW I've a 1:1 with the release manager at 11:45UTC, would be great to have it landed by then)06:19
lluok, then i'll check the patch now, and hope the jenkin's gate queue be nice with us06:20
eglynn_llu: thank you sir! :)06:23
* eglynn_ scurries off to a sacrifice a goat to the gating Gods ... ;)06:23
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:24
cmystereglynn_: wait! what if it is like a Hindu god?06:24
eglynn_cmyster: uh-oh, /me better find a more i18n'd sacrifice ... ;)06:25
llueglynn_: +2ed for that central agent patch, looks like we still need jd's review before +1 workflow?06:30
eglynn_llu: well IIRC jd__ is off on vacation this week06:31
eglynn_llu: ... at least I think dhellmann said that jd__ was off this week06:32
eglynn_llu: ... so if he is off, I don't think we can block the patch, given that juno-3 is due for Thursday06:34
llueglynn_: don't know that. i'm ok with that patch06:34
llueglynn_: you may kick that into the gate queue, it's up to your decision, commander :)06:34
eglynn_llu: cool, I'll approve it so ... and any remaining issues that jd__ might have, we can punt to post-j3 bugfixes06:35
eglynn_llu: thanks!06:35
*** ildikov has quit IRC06:54
*** sbfox has quit IRC06:57
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC07:02
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:04
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:06
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:20
*** Longgeek has quit IRC07:20
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:23
*** safchain has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:52
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:58
*** stzilli has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:02
*** stzilli has quit IRC08:02
nsaje_llu: can you give a quick look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115237/ ? I submitted a minor change stemming from Eoghan's comment on the initial patchset that I forgot before08:36
nsaje_eglynn: whoops! sorry, haven't seen you've approved the patch already (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115237/ )08:37
nsaje_eglynn_: can you check it again? ^^08:37
eglynn_nsaje_: np, looking08:37
*** ajc_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:39
*** nsaje_ is now known as nsaje08:39
llunsaje_: why need the min change for alarm?08:44
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:44
*** ildikov has quit IRC08:47
llunsaje: ok, I understand the need for the min08:47
nsajellu: we need to make sure that the coordination backend is more up-to-date than the speed at which we're evaluating alarms08:48
llunsaje: yeah, i think we also need to mention these in the doc configuration, which could be done in another patch08:49
nsajellu: true, adding this to my list of documentation TODOs :-)08:49
llunsaje: b.t.w, how about the heartbeat for central agent? each agent may having several different pipleline intervals08:50
nsajellu: I've had something very similar in there as well, but fabiog argued for a configurable option08:51
nsajellu: perhaps we should do a minimum there as well, true08:51
nsajellu: bugfix material :-)08:52
llunsaje: yeah08:52
cmysteranyone here has an issue with running devstack's stack.so with [ERROR] /home/stack/devstack/lib/ceilometer:245 ceilometer-api did not start ?08:53
nsajecmyster: what does the ceilometer-api screen session look like? which errors?08:53
cmysterI see none of that, only q-metering08:56
cmysterno sorry, my bad...08:59
cmysternsaje: its long, sec lemme see if it makes any sense...08:59
nsajefind some [ERROR] logs08:59
nsajeshould be towards the end, if it crashed after that08:59
cmysternsaje: here we go: http://paste.openstack.org/show/104648/09:00
cmysterprobably missing something09:00
nsajecmyster: yes. Try to update devstack and ceilometer repos09:01
cmysterdevstack does it for me, I always delete /opt/stack and git pull to latest devstack before running stack.sh09:01
nsajecmyster: ok, it's a bug then, some changes related to this landed 9 hrs ago09:02
nsajesileht: ^^ any idea?09:02
silehtnsaje, cmyster, I guess (hope :p)  an other error should found early in the log with stevedore error when it have tried to load dispatchers09:04
cmystersileht: hard to say... this is where stack.sh would exit. I need to go over the rest of the logs in screen (most is already there) and check for those09:05
nsajecmyster: just go into copy-mode in screen and do a backward search for 'stevedore'09:06
cmysterbtw just for good measure I tried twice to install it clean and it exit on the exact same spot09:06
cmysteroh here we go09:09
cmysternothing of the sort, just mongo being mongo09:09
cmysteror better: unstack.sh does not kill it09:09
cmysterit was holding the port open so it couldn't bind to it and died09:10
cmystershould unstack.sh do such things as killing mongo ?09:14
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:16
nsajecmyster: no idea, does it? quick search on devstack github repo doesn't reveal that it does09:18
cmysterwell I can confirm it does not. question is, should it?09:19
nsajeno, it's a system service09:26
nsajedevstack doesn't run it directly AFAIK, it just installs it if it's missing and starts it via the appropriate bash command09:27
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:42
*** nsaje has left #openstack-ceilometer10:03
*** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:03
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:05
eglynn_cdent: quick question, any IRC response from sdague or dtroyer yesterday about the grenade patch?10:07
cdentno, not as yet, I assume they weren't actually there10:07
eglynn_cdent: fair nuffski, let's do a full-court-press on them today when they come online ...10:14
* cdent nods10:14
jd__I'm off this week10:28
cdentYou're not doing a very good job at that then jd__10:33
eglynn_jd__: enjoy! :)10:37
*** flwang1 has quit IRC10:37
eglynn_cdent: ... just wondering about the reopening of https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1348818 (fix committed back to triaged)10:37
eglynn_cdent: ... should this be de-targeted from juno-3?10:38
cdentI think it's actually been fixed, we'll want to consult with gordc; it was closed but then some issues with WSME in the docs gate showed up, but _think_ I fixed those, I'm not sure of the status of those as gordc was the author on that commit, I just hopped on it as he was busy with other stuff...10:39
eglynn_cdent: cool enough, thanks, I'll check with gordc when he comes online10:40
cdentthis was the change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116371/10:41
cdentIt was never made quite clear to me how that problem was impacting the ceilo side of things10:41
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:42
cdentbummer about bug #1337761 eglynn_; there were about a billion different suggestsions on how to improve that but the original guy was quite insistent on his way being the way to go and it stalled10:48
eglynn_cdent: yeah, doesn't look doable for j3 at this point, nor self-contained enough for rc110:50
cdentthere is another person who wants the file removed from ceilometer into its own package, which makes sense , but will require some rejiggering10:50
eglynn_cdent: ... or am I wrong about it being doable post-j3/pre-rc1?10:50
cdentlong term I think removal is the right thing10:50
eglynn_cdent: "long term" == "kilo"? (... I can punt the bug to RC1 for now if that makes sense?)10:51
cdentI don't know. Probably something is doable, but not something that satisfies the many people involved in the larger "what should happen to the middleware"10:51
cdentI reckon the bigger solution is more important than the performance bug10:51
eglynn_cdent: OK, let's hang it on RC1 for now10:52
*** asalkeld has quit IRC10:52
eglynn_nsaje: I wonder could you file a bug for https://review.openstack.org/117728 which we could then target at juno-rc1?11:11
eglynn_(... so as to decouple that patch from the juno-3 BP)11:11
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:24
cdenteglynn_: Was just running through the reviews associated with juno-3 tagged bugs.11:35
cdentA lot of those haven't had any response from original authors to feedback on review11:36
cdentIs that standard and is there a standard procedure to deal with that?11:36
eglynn_cdent: yeah, it's a judgement call whether to untarget completely or bump to rc1 at this stage11:36
eglynn_cdent: can you paste a list of bug numbers that you're most concerned about?11:37
*** deepthi has quit IRC11:37
eglynn_cdent: ... and I'll give a quick lash through them before 1:1 with rel mgr at 11:45UTC11:37
cdentYeah, I have tabs open now to about 20 reviews, some from bps some from bugs, will extract the ones that look abandoned, or semi-abandoned, will be be fast, one mo11:38
eglynn_cdent: coolio, thanking you!11:38
cdentis that useful, or would you like a bit of metadata?11:44
eglynn_cdent: cool, thanks! that's good11:44
cdentthat latest statement is s/attention/attention required/11:45
*** k4n0 has quit IRC11:46
*** ajc_ has quit IRC11:55
cdenteglynn_: I just got Sean to +2 the javelin stuff, now looking for a second target11:56
eglynn_cdent: nice work!11:57
cdentafter this I'm going to run for minister of parliament11:57
eglynn_cdent: LOL :)12:02
eglynn_cdent: FYI rel mgr just bumped the grenade BP to rc1 as it's test only (so doesn't need a formal FFE)12:02
cdentyeah, read that12:03
eglynn_cdent: ... however I've let the ship's log show that's I'll reinstate to juno3 if it gets jogo's blessing12:03
*** claudiub has quit IRC12:06
nsajeeglynn: sorry, missed that earlier, will open a bug for that12:16
nsajeeglynn_: ^12:16
nsajeeglynn_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/136435212:19
eglynn_nsaje: thanks! ... target'd to RC112:20
*** arezmerita has quit IRC12:29
DinaBelovansaje, I've left some comments in your discovery change12:37
nsajeDinaBelova: thanks! let me check12:37
DinaBelovait looks like smth goes wrong with the discovery endpoints12:37
DinaBelovaas in the agent manager we're having the endpoint:image string to iterate12:38
DinaBelovaand others like that12:38
nsajehmm, ok12:38
DinaBelovansaje, it looks like discover in  the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117728/3/ceilometer/central/discovery.py,cm is not used there or smth like that12:39
DinaBelovadunno yet12:39
*** asalkeld has quit IRC12:40
nsajeprobably some detail I missed, I'll fix it. Thanks for the feedback!12:40
DinaBelovansaje, np12:41
DinaBelovansaje, and btw, it's the discovery param, not the self.default_discovery12:41
nsajeare you sure you're using the latest patchset?12:41
DinaBelovajust for the debug info12:41
nsajecause that sounds like patch set 112:41
DinaBelovawell, I was :D12:42
nsajeo k:)12:42
DinaBelovawell, I am not using the first one, as I have these default strings in the pollsters12:42
DinaBelovaso that is the last one12:42
DinaBelovalike https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117728/2..3/ceilometer/energy/kwapi.py,cm and pthers12:43
*** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:43
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:47
nsajeDinaBelova: found the mistake. Pretty weird it didn't bite me when I tested patchset 1 in devstack O.o12:50
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:50
DinaBelovansaje, great you found it :)12:51
* DinaBelova waiting the fixed change :)12:51
nsajeDinaBelova: just change L90, wrapping the pollster.obj.discovery in a list12:51
nsajeDinaBelova: I'd prefer to wait with a new patchset, currently working on the tests12:51
*** eglynn_ has quit IRC12:52
nsajeDinaBelova: I don't think even patchset 3 is good enough for testing12:54
nsajeDinaBelova: still some fixes incoming :)12:54
nsajeDinaBelova: but roughly it should work12:54
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:58
*** claudiub has quit IRC12:59
*** tongli has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:00
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:00
gordccdent: can you give the index patch a try when you free... want to see if it's just my system.13:00
cdentjust the index patch or some other bits too gordc ?13:03
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC13:04
gordccdent: well, if possible, could you test the normalise data patch as well...13:06
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:07
gordccdent: specifically, master performance vs post patch performance.13:07
cdentI ought to be able to do: current master, index patch, normalise, and normalise + index13:07
cdentthat part is relatively straightforward, it's different databases that are less so13:08
cdentspinning up a fresh devstack now for master tests13:08
gordccdent: i mean if you have time. just like to get verification on numbers.13:08
gordcive been using mariadb 5.5.3813:08
cdentI _think_ I have time, today and tomorrow I've been planning to review and read, so should be able to mix some database stuff in too13:09
cdentI'm the same version13:09
cdentgordc: how are you creating your test data?13:14
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:14
gordccdent: i create a few instances and i run the pollsters at a really short interval.13:15
cdentcool, thanks13:15
gordci've been testing ~10k samples... which was why i was curious how srinivas was testing since he was getting quicker performance on 3 times the data... that said i'm running a lowly laptop13:16
cdentall the testing done thus far has too many variables13:16
cdentbut it's hard to figure out a nice clean way of doing things13:17
cdentsome kind of harness would be handy13:17
gordcyeah... there was ilya's performance scripts but i couldn't for the life of me get it to work on my machine.13:17
cdentprobably something worth formalizing for kilo13:18
gordcit's pretty far behind master... i don't know if ityaptin has a newer version13:19
cdentyeah, I saw that a while ago and sort of dig a "I'll wait for this to mature"13:19
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:24
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:24
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:29
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:32
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:41
*** heyongli has quit IRC13:42
*** itisit has quit IRC13:42
*** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:48
*** lnxnut has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:51
*** ityaptin has quit IRC13:54
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:54
*** r-daneel has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:54
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:05
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:06
*** prad has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:07
*** arezmerita has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:28
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:32
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:41
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:46
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:48
*** Taytay is now known as Titilambert14:48
*** ildikov has quit IRC14:49
*** nosnos has quit IRC15:06
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:07
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC15:07
cdentgordc I'm not done yet, but data gathering at: https://tank.peermore.com/tanks/cdent-rhat/DatabasePerfTest15:10
gordccool stuff. what's ceilorunner? just something that calls api x number of times?15:11
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:11
*** nosnos has quit IRC15:11
cdentthat's the tool that fabio & co have been using15:12
cdentit's linked from one of the reviews15:12
gordccdent: oh. i must've missed that part.15:12
*** mspreitz_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:12
* cdent tries to find15:13
gordci think the numbers are pretty consistent with what i saw on mysql... you're getting better performance gains from normalised patch than i did.15:13
cdentactually I think it was from the private email thread we were in15:13
cdentemails i've since deleted15:14
cdenti'll link my own copy to that page15:14
gordccdent: that's fine. i think i still have emails15:15
*** mspreitz has quit IRC15:16
cdentgordc: I think it really comes down to mysql 5.5 being shit15:16
cdentnot to put too fine a point on it...15:16
gordclol so elegantly put15:17
gordcyeah, i tried postgres 9.3.5 and the performance gains were negligible for most part.15:18
cdentI don't think fabio got the point of you making that demonstration...15:18
cdent(based on his response)15:18
gordccdent: ... i'll try clarifying15:20
gordccdent: do you know differences between mariadb and mysql?15:20
cdentonly vague stuff from what I've read and already stated: it has a better query planner / index user15:21
gordccdent: that's pretty much all i know... i've only used mariadb since switching to fedora a month ago.15:21
eglynn_cdent: so is the TL;DR from DatabasePerfTest that the Index patch is pretty much a wash, significant gains are seen from Normalise Patch, but the jury is out on the combination of the two?15:26
cdenteglynn_: so far, yes, but I just did meter-list on the combo and it's good: 2.9215:27
cdenthowever, eglynn_, it's pretty important in this chat to keep in mind that the choice of database is relevant15:27
cdentthat's what's really driving all this15:27
* cdent saves page15:28
eglynn_cdent: right so the freakishly large gains, i.e. 9x improvement, are *only* seen on bare mysql 5.5 (not on new mysql or postgres)?15:28
cdenteglynn_: as far as I can tell, you are correct sir15:28
cdentI think testing methodology may be having an impact here, which is why I've tried to be clear about what I'm doing15:29
eglynn_cdent: yep sounds wise15:29
gordccdent: agreed. i think that was the main question i had... just trying understand how we're getting such differing results.15:30
gordci would expect the index would improve performance... i just wasn't sure how much... one of the reasons why i asked Srinivas to remove performance numbers from commit message since it's highly variable15:31
* cdent nods15:31
cdenteglynn_, gordc: reload to get sample-list and resource-list data15:33
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:33
*** mspreitz_ has quit IRC15:34
* eglynn_ refreshes ...15:36
gordccdent: interesting... seems like normalise and index is quite a bit better.15:38
cdentfor everything but sample-list15:38
eglynn_cdent: cool, a baseline for resource-list would be a useful datapoint also15:38
cdentyeah, I'm going to go back and getthat15:38
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:38
eglynn_cdent: excellent, thanks!15:39
cdentI think it is very hard to really trust this stuff...15:39
eglynn_cdent, gordc: ... but it does look like these patches are potentially complementary, not conflicting15:39
cdentthe index migration just needs a different name15:39
cdent(the file)15:39
gordceglynn_: definitely not conflicting...15:41
eglynn_gordc: is it significant at all which order these patches land in?15:42
gordceglynn_: although i have a slight preference to merge mine first if we do plan on accepting both since merging the index patch first means, my patch will need to destory that index and recreate it15:42
eglynn_gordc: that makes sense, let's aim to get your's in first so15:42
eglynn_gordc: ... would there be a non-trivial rebase for the index patch in that case?15:43
gordcthe index patch would need to be basically the same. probably just changing a column name15:44
gordci could technically just add it to mine a line or two to mine ot include patch but i don't want to hijack srinivas' work15:44
eglynn_gordc: yeah, from a collaboration PoV better to allow his patch to land separately even if the rebase actually makes for more work15:46
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC15:46
eglynn_gordc: ... OR if Srinivas is willing, maybe author a jointly attributed patch?15:46
gordceglynn_: either works for me.15:47
eglynn_e.g. use the "Co-Authored-By:" tag that sileht often uses on his patches15:47
gordceglynn_: i'm ok with that. i'll check with Srinivas to see if he's ok with the patch or not...15:48
eglynn_gordc: excellent! thank you sir :)15:48
*** cdent_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:51
*** Longgeek has quit IRC15:54
*** cdent has quit IRC15:54
*** cdent_ is now known as cdent15:54
*** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:59
*** julim has quit IRC16:01
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:04
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC16:20
*** arezmerita has quit IRC16:20
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:25
*** safchain has quit IRC16:34
*** xmltok has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:38
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC16:38
*** claudiub has quit IRC16:48
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:04
*** deepthi has quit IRC17:09
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:13
*** changbl has quit IRC17:18
*** eglynn_ has quit IRC17:29
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:43
cdentgordc: I've finished various combos of data tests and added resource-list to current master (very slow): https://tank.peermore.com/tanks/cdent-rhat/DatabasePerfTest17:46
cdentif you'd like to, please link it reviews and such if that's useful, or I'll get it later if you've not, is my dinner time now17:46
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Fix help strings  https://review.openstack.org/11841717:48
*** ssakhamuri has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:50
gordccdent: awesome! thanks so much17:54
gordci'll link now17:54
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Fix help strings  https://review.openstack.org/11841717:59
*** mspreitz_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:07
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:08
*** mspreitz has quit IRC18:08
*** harlowja has quit IRC18:12
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:13
*** mspreitz_ has quit IRC18:13
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:22
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:22
cdentthanks gordc, I'll be back a bit later to see what else is up18:24
*** cdent has quit IRC18:24
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:27
*** promulo_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:30
*** tjf_ has quit IRC18:34
*** tjf has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:35
*** adam_g` is now known as adaM_g18:44
*** adaM_g is now known as adam_g18:44
*** changbl has quit IRC18:52
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:55
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:14
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC19:54
gordcssakhamuri: i added a comment to my patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111313/19:56
gordcssakhamuri: let me know if it makes sense or if you have any concerns with the comments19:56
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:59
*** larsks has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:03
larsksHow many samples are required before an alarm (in this case on cpu_util) moves beyond the "insufficient data" state?20:04
*** julim has quit IRC20:11
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:13
*** promulo__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:14
*** promulo_ has quit IRC20:15
larsksUpon further investigation, I think it is a problem with some of the conditionals in the sample Heat alarms, which include: "metadata.user_metadata.stack == a058f5ff-6d96-466d-8880-04b919245c10".  It's not clear (to me) where this metadata is either set or visible.20:24
larsksAh, found it.20:29
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:29
*** julim has quit IRC20:34
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:35
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:36
*** flwang1 has quit IRC20:37
*** promulo__ is now known as promulo_20:37
*** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:39
*** julim has quit IRC20:39
*** promulo__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:51
*** promulo_ has quit IRC20:52
*** itisit has quit IRC21:08
*** promulo__ is now known as promulo_21:17
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC21:20
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:24
*** changbl has quit IRC21:35
*** asalkeld has quit IRC21:43
*** lnxnut has quit IRC21:46
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:49
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:49
openstackgerritFabio Giannetti proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer-specs: Ceilometer RBAC Support for API  https://review.openstack.org/11213721:51
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:52
*** dhellman_ has quit IRC21:54
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC21:57
openstackgerritFabio Giannetti proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer-specs: Ceilometer RBAC Support for API  https://review.openstack.org/11213722:06
*** shardy is now known as shardy_afk22:22
*** eglynn_ has quit IRC22:23
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:28
*** gordc has quit IRC22:28
*** promulo__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:28
*** promulo_ has quit IRC22:29
*** prad has quit IRC22:36
*** thomasem has quit IRC22:49
*** nijaba_ has quit IRC22:51
*** rbak has quit IRC22:58
*** promulo_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:13
*** promulo__ has quit IRC23:13
*** tongli has quit IRC23:16
*** tongli has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:16
openstackgerritZhai, Edwin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add IPMI support  https://review.openstack.org/11584523:46
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:53
*** nijaba has quit IRC23:53
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!