| *** promulo_ has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
| *** promulo_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:27 | |
| *** nijaba has quit IRC | 00:38 | |
| *** promulo_ has quit IRC | 00:40 | |
| *** r-daneel has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
| *** lnxnut has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:06 | |
| *** tongli has quit IRC | 01:06 | |
| *** lnxnut has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
| *** _cjones_ has quit IRC | 01:19 | |
| *** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:19 | |
| *** _cjones_ has quit IRC | 01:23 | |
| *** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:31 | |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 01:45 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:46 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:52 | |
| *** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:52 | |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
| openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Imported Translations from Transifex https://review.openstack.org/115508 | 02:21 |
|---|---|---|
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 02:39 | |
| *** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away | 02:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | Zhai, Edwin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add IPMI support https://review.openstack.org/115845 | 02:58 |
| *** cmyster has quit IRC | 03:21 | |
| *** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:42 | |
| *** ajc_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:04 | |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 04:24 | |
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 04:31 | |
| *** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:38 | |
| *** itisit has quit IRC | 04:47 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rikimaru Honjo proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Split bunch of samples into multiple messages https://review.openstack.org/94155 | 05:10 |
| *** yasukun has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:12 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 05:28 | |
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 05:37 | |
| *** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:54 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Imported Translations from Transifex https://review.openstack.org/118543 | 06:07 |
| *** k4n0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:18 | |
| *** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:27 | |
| *** cmyster has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:40 | |
| *** _cjones_ has quit IRC | 06:44 | |
| *** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:45 | |
| *** nsaje_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:55 | |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 06:56 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:57 | |
| *** lsmola has quit IRC | 07:16 | |
| *** nsaje_ has quit IRC | 07:21 | |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:21 | |
| *** shardy_afk is now known as shardy | 07:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/110096 | 07:35 |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rikimaru Honjo proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add validate alarm_actions schema in alarm API https://review.openstack.org/107330 | 07:37 |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 07:38 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:39 | |
| *** arezmerita has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:42 | |
| *** nsaje_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:44 | |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 07:45 | |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Switch partitioned alarm evaluation to a hash-based approach https://review.openstack.org/115237 | 07:52 |
| *** safchain has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:53 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/110096 | 07:54 |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:01 | |
| *** lsmola has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:08 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:11 | |
| krypto | hi can ceilometer be configured to monitor compute nodes | 08:11 |
| krypto | as far as i know it can monitor only instance | 08:12 |
| krypto | can it monitor compute node also? | 08:12 |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 08:16 | |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 08:18 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:20 | |
| *** jbuckley has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:22 | |
| *** drjones has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:24 | |
| *** _cjones_ has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:29 | |
| *** drjones has quit IRC | 08:29 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:39 | |
| *** nsaje- has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:41 | |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 08:41 | |
| *** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:44 | |
| *** nsaje- has quit IRC | 08:45 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 08:47 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| *** nijaba has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:53 | |
| *** nijaba has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| *** nijaba has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:53 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:53 | |
| *** foexle has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:59 | |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:03 | |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 09:08 | |
| DinaBelova | nsaje_, o/ | 09:13 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje_, do you have any news about that strange discovery behaviour? | 09:13 |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:15 | |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: is this a problem with the PoC endpoint discovery patch? | 09:18 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah, indeed | 09:18 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje_ and I were debugging it yesterday, I found several issues, nsaje_ told me to do some hacks and there were more issues :) | 09:19 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, I left the comments | 09:19 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: cool, /me re-reads the comment trail on gerrit | 09:19 |
| openstackgerrit | Zhai, Edwin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add IPMI support https://review.openstack.org/115845 | 09:19 |
| * DinaBelova is debugging and fixing, but I just thought nsaje_ could got some news there | 09:19 | |
| DinaBelova | :) | 09:19 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, ok | 09:19 |
| DinaBelova | if I'll make this change workable on my lab, I'll propose a new patchset I guess | 09:19 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, are you ok with it? | 09:20 |
| DinaBelova | to make the process quicker? | 09:20 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: yep, feel free to collaborate with nsaje_ to converge the patch towards correctness | 09:21 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, ok | 09:21 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, I'me testing it in the pair with merged HA change | 09:21 |
| DinaBelova | so I'll find out if they work ok with each other as well | 09:21 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: cool ... in terms of the time horizon, we've already agreed that patch can land post-juno3 as a bugfix, but if we could squeeze it in for tmrw that would be even better | 09:22 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah, I saw the comment in the HA change | 09:22 |
| DinaBelova | and when ityaptin will be on place, I'll speak with him about gordc change to test | 09:23 |
| DinaBelova | on something small and nice :) | 09:23 |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 09:24 | |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: excellent :) thank you! | 09:25 |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:27 | |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:31 | |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: just looking at that PoC patch again, should line 89 of ceilometer/agent.py be ... pollster_resources = [self.manager.discover(pollster.obj.default_discovery, discovery_cache)] | 09:31 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: nah, ignore that | 09:32 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, :D | 09:32 |
| DinaBelova | it looks like I found the issue | 09:32 |
| DinaBelova | ehm | 09:32 |
| DinaBelova | but after fix happened nothing :) | 09:32 |
| ityaptin | eglynn: Hi! I'll test a gordc's change as soon as possible. | 09:33 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: above I meant something more like pollster_resources = self.manager.discover([pollster.obj.default_discovery], discovery_cache) | 09:33 |
| eglynn_ | ityaptin: cool, thank you sir! | 09:33 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, actually I did the same, ueah | 09:34 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: a-ha, but still incorrect behavior? | 09:34 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah | 09:34 |
| DinaBelova | I guess that discovery extension load went wrong for some reason | 09:34 |
| * DinaBelova is checking | 09:34 | |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: presumably you've got the 'endpoint = ceilometer.central.discovery:EndpointDiscovery' in your entry_points.txt? | 09:35 |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 09:36 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, I have only these discovery extensions being loaded: ['local_instances', 'lb_pools', 'lb_health_probes', 'fw_services', 'lb_members', 'lb_vips', 'ipsec_connections', 'tripleo_overcloud_nodes', 'fw_policy', 'vpn_services'], endpoint extension load went wrong | 09:37 |
| DinaBelova | although it's set in the setup.cfg | 09:37 |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:38 | |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: have you re-run setup.py after applying nsaje's patch, or manually edited the entry_points.txt, to ensure that the setup.cfg change is taking effect? | 09:39 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, /me is checking | 09:39 |
| DinaBelova | I've rerun the setup.py right now | 09:39 |
| DinaBelova | it looks like now after some lines being changed it looks ok | 09:40 |
| DinaBelova | let's wait polling cycle in one minute :) | 09:40 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: cool, so wrapping the pollster.obj.default_discovery in an iterable seems like it does the trick? | 09:41 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, and some lines changes in the discover method + in one place we need to iterate the extensions list, not the ext manager object | 09:42 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah, it looks ok for now | 09:42 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: a-ha, cool, good digging! :) | 09:42 |
| DinaBelova | let me provide some quick fix I guess | 09:42 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: if you're push a new version of the patch, can you update the commit message with a link to the bug? | 09:43 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah, sure | 09:43 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1364352 | 09:44 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: thanks! | 09:44 |
| *** nijaba has quit IRC | 09:46 | |
| *** nijaba has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:46 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, btw, about caching lines in the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117728/3/ceilometer/agent.py,cm | 09:48 |
| DinaBelova | in the discover method | 09:48 |
| DinaBelova | currently it might be list in the discovery param | 09:49 |
| DinaBelova | in this case it'll be error in the dict[list] expression, as list is unhashable | 09:49 |
| *** nsaje_ has quit IRC | 09:49 | |
| DinaBelova | it looks like in this case discover will be list of one item - so we may use discover[0] there, but I'm not sure actually | 09:50 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, what do you think here? | 09:50 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: yeah, I see what you mean | 09:50 |
| cmyster | eglynn_: heya | 09:51 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: hi | 09:51 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: so this method is used for both the pollster-specific and the source-specific discovery | 09:51 |
| DinaBelova | because we're wrapping the [pollster.obj.default_discovery] earlier, /me is trying to find out if that'll be the only listing case here >_< | 09:51 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: this method being AgentManager.discover() | 09:51 |
| cmyster | eglynn_: I am wondering about something here, shouldn't devstack be creating ceilometer:ceilometer ? | 09:51 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, indeed | 09:52 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: ... but the logical mismatch is between the source-specific discovery being potentially a list, whereas the pollster-specific is alway just a *single* property | 09:52 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: one sec | 09:52 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yes, that's ture | 09:52 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: ... so how about moving line 183 to inside the for loop, with s/discovery_cache[discovery] = resources/discovery_cache[url] = resources/ | 09:53 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: ... similarly lines 169-170 would also have to move into the for loop | 09:54 |
| DinaBelova | a-ha, let me check that | 09:54 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: ... for example: | 09:55 |
| eglynn_ | for url in (discovery or self.default_discovery): | 09:55 |
| eglynn_ | if discovery_cache and url in discovery_cache: | 09:55 |
| eglynn_ | resources.extend(discovery_cache[url]) | 09:55 |
| eglynn_ | continue | 09:55 |
| eglynn_ | whoops bad indentation on the line resources.extend(discovery_cache[url]) (needs an extra 4 spaces) | 09:56 |
| cmyster | or -4 in the if line | 09:56 |
| eglynn_ | so then the caching is always on the basis of an inidividual discovery URL, not an entire list | 09:56 |
| eglynn_ | yeah, wot cmyster says ... | 09:57 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah, I see that, /me is just changing the lines to run some tests one more time to be sure it'll be ok | 09:57 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: you'd a devstack question? | 09:57 |
| cmyster | ja | 09:58 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: excellent, thank you! | 09:58 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: "ceilometer:ceilometer" is "user:tenant" or? | 09:58 |
| cmyster | user:group | 09:58 |
| cmyster | as in linux user:group | 09:58 |
| cmyster | packstack is doing it right, devstack's stack.sh did not however | 09:58 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: why would devstack need to create these users and groups, I thought it ran everything as sudo? | 09:59 |
| cmyster | hmmm | 09:59 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: ... whereas for packstack, it's installing RPMs and need to do the right WRT to using non-privileged users | 09:59 |
| cmyster | legit, | 10:00 |
| cmyster | ok | 10:00 |
| eglynn_ | k | 10:00 |
| cmyster | just creating a group and user should sufice if I need to do the same ? | 10:00 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: if you need to do the same with a devstack, do you mean? | 10:00 |
| cmyster | I'm running wossname's (Kevin?) modified script for 'sanity' testing it and it needs to chown a few things as ceilo:ceilo | 10:01 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: wouldn't you also need to ensure that this user actually owned the ceilometer service processes launched by devstack? | 10:02 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: ... and also that this ceilo user has appropriate perms on /etc/ceilometer, /var/log/ceilometer etc.? | 10:02 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: ... you mean kwhitney? | 10:02 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: ... I thought his sanity script was more oriented to testing an RPM-based install/deploy as opposed to devstack running git clones | 10:03 |
| cmyster | yes him. made his script working for IceHouse but it needs a lot more work | 10:03 |
| eglynn_ | cmyster: a-ha, and you want to make it capable of hitting up *both* a devstack and an RPM-based install? | 10:04 |
| cmyster | eglynn_: well, its creating data, then creating alerts then running those and checking that the alerts alerted as expected | 10:04 |
| cmyster | eglynn_: I think I'll scrap it altogether and rewrite it. it hurts my eyes if you know what I mean | 10:05 |
| * eglynn_ chuckles and thinks he knows what cmyster means ... ;) | 10:05 | |
| eglynn_ | cool, that's probably wise TBH | 10:05 |
| cmyster | just trying to get it to do things in baby steps so I can take those steps and incorporate into something better | 10:05 |
| *** claudiub has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:06 | |
| cmyster | things about babies though, they walk funny ;) | 10:06 |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 10:06 | |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:10 | |
| *** nijaba has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
| cdent | eglynn: I made some more comments on that IPMI stuff, the most important being the bit about nm_support. I think there must be some pastos going on in that code. | 10:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Dina Belova proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Migrate the rest of the central agent pollsters to use discoveries https://review.openstack.org/117728 | 10:16 |
| cdent | The most recent responses from Edwin raise that common point: | 10:16 |
| cdent | e.g. all Fan sensors are reported as same "hardware.ipmi.fan" without sensor ID. | 10:16 |
| cdent | (that's a quote) | 10:16 |
| cdent | I believe the same problem came up with disk metrics. | 10:17 |
| cdent | this is the samples-need-metadata-not-just-resources problem | 10:18 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, ^^ | 10:18 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, I'll check it one more time with multiple central agent running right now | 10:21 |
| DinaBelova | let's try merge it before tomorrow :) | 10:22 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, ehm, I need to understand infra work more I guess... as the patch set was proposed by me https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1364352 was assigned to me as well by OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) >_< | 10:23 |
| DinaBelova | wat?? | 10:23 |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 10:24 | |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 10:26 | |
| *** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:27 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:32 | |
| eglynn_ | cdent: w00t! finally your javelin patch seems to have pleased the gating Gods :) ... https://jenkins02.openstack.org/job/gate-tempest-dsvm-full/15464/ | 10:34 |
| cdent | \o/ | 10:34 |
| eglynn_ | cdent: ... that patch should suffice to reinstate the grenade BP onto the juno-3 slate, right? | 10:34 |
| cdent | yes | 10:35 |
| eglynn_ | cdent: (... i.e. we're no also gonna block that BP also on the WIP follow-up deeper testing patch?) | 10:35 |
| eglynn_ | cool :) | 10:35 |
| cdent | The belief on the qa side is that the merged patch satisfies the TC's requirements re grenade | 10:35 |
| cdent | whether that is actually true is unclear | 10:35 |
| *** Longgeek_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:36 | |
| eglynn_ | cdent: well, seeing as Sean is on the TC, I think we can take that interpretation to the bank :) | 10:37 |
| eglynn_ | ... our TC makes its own truth ;) | 10:38 |
| * cdent has descended into some kind of weird dystopic wilderness | 10:38 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 10:39 | |
| cdent | You weren't kidding when you said (in different words) that grace under compromise is important in this environment | 10:39 |
| eglynn_ | "weird dystopic wilderness" ... LOL :) | 10:42 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, I've proposed new patch set, started its testing, found one error by me (will be fixed in next several minutes) and one strange behaviour in the polling if the swift resources by multiple central agents | 10:46 |
| * DinaBelova is investigating | 10:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dina Belova proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Migrate the rest of the central agent pollsters to use discoveries https://review.openstack.org/117728 | 10:46 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: thanks! | 10:46 |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:49 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, it looks like it's partitioning the resources by endpoints if it's swift or lbaas, for instance. Like my subset will be ['object_store'], not the metrics | 10:52 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: I thought that was the intent of the patch, no? | 10:56 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, so do you think it's okay all swift metrics will be polled by one central agent? | 10:57 |
| DinaBelova | for instance, in case of the multiple compute agents they share the load via separating list of instances | 10:57 |
| DinaBelova | and poll everything needed for set of instances | 10:57 |
| DinaBelova | I supposes central agents should share the load by separating list of containers, for instance here | 10:58 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: so the original idea was, IIUC, that the way the glance etc. APIs are constructed, there's not a lot of benefit in spreading that load over multiple central agents | 10:58 |
| DinaBelova | well, okay, also I have problems with the endpoints :) | 10:59 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, looks like without changing Gordon's comment in the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117728/3/ceilometer/central/discovery.py,cm it'll be better | 11:00 |
| DinaBelova | let me check it | 11:00 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: however now that I look at the swift pollster, it seems that we could split per-tenant as opposed to allocating everything to a single central agent | 11:00 |
| DinaBelova | get_endpoints method is returning urls in the wrong format I guess | 11:01 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, a-ha | 11:01 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: nsaje's original version uses service_catalog.get_urls, or? | 11:01 |
| DinaBelova | yeah | 11:02 |
| *** Ephur has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
| * cdent is insufficiently savvy with the data _use_ sides of ceilometer, despite growing savvy with the data gathering | 11:03 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, for the swift changing of get_urls to the get_endpoints makes the world cry actually :) | 11:03 |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:03 | |
| * eglynn_ assumes that making the world cry is to be avoided at all costs ;) | 11:04 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah, with the nsaje original version it works okay, but one central agent polls all object.store metrics | 11:04 |
| DinaBelova | hm | 11:04 |
| DinaBelova | probably I have one container??? :-\ | 11:05 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: yeah, so I think we could probably do a better job of the splitting for swift, e.g. per tenant | 11:05 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, one moment, it looks like I anyway have one container presented | 11:05 |
| DinaBelova | let me create some :D | 11:05 |
| DinaBelova | after all my dances around this lab only one container survived | 11:06 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 11:06 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: ... though a per-container split across agents could be very fine-grained, i.e. potentially a very large number of containers involved | 11:06 |
| * cdent wants a lab | 11:06 | |
| DinaBelova | cdent :D | 11:06 |
| * cdent and dancing | 11:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dina Belova proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Migrate the rest of the central agent pollsters to use discoveries https://review.openstack.org/117728 | 11:07 |
| *** Ephur has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:08 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah, /me made sure we just have splitting by endpoints and that's it | 11:09 |
| *** gzhai has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:09 | |
| nsaje | eglynn_, DinaBelova: what a huge IRC backlog you guys got me | 11:09 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje :D | 11:09 |
| nsaje | eglynn_, DinaBelova: I'm gonna need a few minutes to get up to date :-) | 11:09 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: cool, let's assume that a per-endpoint split is good enough for now | 11:10 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, sorry, I just made some changes to your change | 11:10 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah | 11:10 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: np | 11:10 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: did the change I told you to make yesterday work? | 11:10 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, so now it works ok on multinode devstack lab with HA zookeeper like this: we share the load among multiple central agents by endpoint | 11:11 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, yeah | 11:11 |
| DinaBelova | with some more lines changed :) | 11:11 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: that's great! | 11:11 |
| DinaBelova | some moments with the caching and some moments with the things we are iterating - like not the ext manager, but actually the extensions inside, etc. | 11:12 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, although it looks like we might have some improvements in the follow-up patches | 11:12 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: great | 11:12 |
| DinaBelova | like more intelligent sharing the load among central agents | 11:12 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje - like eglynn_ proposed, share the load by tenants, not by only endpoints | 11:13 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, because for the swift, for instance, it makes much sence | 11:13 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: that's only possible for some pollsters, like swift (that's in the works) | 11:13 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: ah, yeah, I just didn't want to put it in one patch | 11:13 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, ok, cool | 11:13 |
| DinaBelova | are you working on the swift pollster right now? | 11:14 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: nope, need to fix up the tests for the current patch first | 11:14 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: quite some changes, so it's a bit of a chore | 11:14 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, ok, cool, thanks so much! | 11:14 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, what kind of estimations do you propose for this work? | 11:14 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: sounds wise, splitting further improvements over several patches is a god idea (... especially we still harbour a faint hope of squeezing the main patch into juno-3) | 11:15 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: tests up this evening | 11:15 |
| DinaBelova | I just think it'll be cool to merge this change before milestone cut | 11:15 |
| DinaBelova | yahoo :) | 11:15 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: cool :) | 11:15 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, it's actually really nice | 11:15 |
| cdent | This whole hashring distributed coordination whooha seems like a nice feather in the ceilo cap. Makes the project seem a bit cooler and smarter than before. | 11:17 |
| DinaBelova | cdent, yeah, that's actually true :) | 11:17 |
| nsaje | Let's just hope it doesn't fall apart in production :-) *fingers crossed* | 11:17 |
| cdent | If does nsaje we'll all blame you and you won't get any presents! | 11:18 |
| DinaBelova | lol | 11:18 |
| nsaje | :'-( | 11:18 |
| DinaBelova | folks, don't worry :) | 11:18 |
| DinaBelova | we'll fix it quicker it'll be found in production I guess :D | 11:18 |
| * DinaBelova hopes | 11:18 | |
| * cdent puts nsaje on his xmas list | 11:18 | |
| nsaje | better check it twice ;) | 11:19 |
| * DinaBelova thinks cdent is Santa and he did not bring Dina any presents last time | 11:19 | |
| cdent | last time cdent was not aware of DinaBelova's existence, apparently a fault in the list software | 11:20 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 11:20 |
| *** krypto has quit IRC | 11:20 | |
| *** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:20 | |
| nsaje | perhaps the list software uses hash ring partitioning and it didn't work yet | 11:21 |
| cdent | Are you registered with ChristmasKeystone DinaBelova ? | 11:22 |
| * DinaBelova is wondering what is that | 11:22 | |
| DinaBelova | heh, not yet :( | 11:23 |
| cdent | That explains it then. | 11:26 |
| * cdent needs lunch | 11:26 | |
| cdent | biab | 11:26 |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 11:26 | |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: I'm a bit confused by the ML responses to your hash-ring thread http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044566.html | 11:27 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: yeah, I need to reply | 11:27 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: IIUC the problem with the Ironic approach was that adding a new *conductor* causes a unlimted number of nodes to be re-assigned ... is that correct? | 11:28 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: yes. I'll need to state the problem more specifically | 11:28 |
| DinaBelova | jd__, sorry for disturbing, but /me goes crazy with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116821/4 - do you have any idea what is that strange thing??? it looks like I don't see something really easy and small... | 11:28 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: they don't understand their implementation yet :-) | 11:28 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje lol | 11:29 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: cool :) ... so maybe slightly clearer as s/when you add a new host/when you add a new conductor/ | 11:29 |
| eglynn_ | (... as folks may be thinking host == baremetal-node) | 11:29 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: yeah, but they have conductors as 'hosts' in the hash ring code | 11:29 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: that's why I put it in there :) | 11:29 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: a-ha, got it :) | 11:30 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: similarly 1/#nodes means 1/#conductors, or? | 11:30 |
| nsaje | nope, that actually means baremetal nodes | 11:30 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: a-ha, k, cool | 11:30 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: just a sec, let me check. It's starting to confuse me as well, lol | 11:31 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: sorry, yes, in the e-mail, 1/#nodes means 1/#conductors | 11:31 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: I'll make that clearer, thank you | 11:31 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: coolness :) | 11:31 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: replied to both | 11:50 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: thanks! ... /me looks | 11:50 |
| nsaje | eglynn_: oops, missed a reference in the 2nd email | 11:52 |
| *** Longgeek_ has quit IRC | 11:53 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:54 | |
| *** Longgeek_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:54 | |
| nsaje | eglynn_: it should be [1] https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/b56db42aa39e855e558a52eb71e656ea14380f8a/ironic/common/hash_ring.py#L72 | 11:55 |
| *** deepthi has quit IRC | 11:57 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 11:58 | |
| *** lsmola has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: can you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117728/6/ceilometer/agent.py, L213 please? | 12:02 |
| * DinaBelova looking | 12:02 | |
| DinaBelova | yeah | 12:02 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: is there a point in creating a discovery_cache if it doesn't exist? | 12:02 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: If it's not passed into the function, what use is there for it? | 12:03 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, well, because I supposed we need to put the partitioned to the discovery cache | 12:03 |
| DinaBelova | as it's dictionary that is passed time by time | 12:04 |
| DinaBelova | it'll be travelling from polling cycle to polling cycle | 12:04 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: yes, but shouldn't it be created outside the function? otherwise it won't survive between function executions | 12:04 |
| DinaBelova | hm, one moment | 12:04 |
| DinaBelova | interesting question | 12:05 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: it's already created in L89 | 12:05 |
| DinaBelova | I see that, but also I had errors with None cache there | 12:05 |
| DinaBelova | hm-m | 12:05 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: we should probably just have | 12:06 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, probably that's because this discovery method is pollster-specific and the source-specific discovery | 12:06 |
| nsaje | if discovery_cache: | 12:06 |
| nsaje | discovery_cache[url] = ... | 12:06 |
| DinaBelova | well, I got your idea, but what will be do with the discovered and partitioned info? | 12:07 |
| DinaBelova | if it'll be None | 12:07 |
| nsaje | then there's no caching :-) it's the caller's responsibility to pass in a cache | 12:07 |
| DinaBelova | well, yeah, it looks like I was a little bit crazy here | 12:07 |
| DinaBelova | please feel free to remove this code, nsaje :) | 12:08 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: cool! | 12:08 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, it looks like some over-work thing happened in my mind :D | 12:08 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: hehe :-) | 12:08 |
| *** lsmola has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:10 | |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: cool, I'll throw in my $0.02 on the thread also | 12:10 |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: I have some branch divergence going on right now, please tell me, you only modified the agent.py file after my last patch? | 12:13 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, yeah, and removed one line in lbaas module | 12:14 |
| DinaBelova | actually Itryed to fix all comments you had on your last patch set | 12:15 |
| DinaBelova | Gordon's was actually the thing I should not change | 12:15 |
| DinaBelova | after some checking it turned out it was not worth doing | 12:15 |
| DinaBelova | nsaje, so agent.py and lbaas.py | 12:15 |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 12:16 | |
| openstackgerrit | Zhai, Edwin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add IPMI support https://review.openstack.org/115845 | 12:16 |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:17 | |
| nsaje | DinaBelova: thanks | 12:17 |
| *** Longgeek_ has quit IRC | 12:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ilya Tyaptin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: [HBase] Catch AlreadyExists error in Connection upgrade https://review.openstack.org/113504 | 12:20 |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
| nsaje | eglynn_: thanks for helping out on the ML, you make explaining something look so easy, even though it's anything but :-) | 12:25 |
| eglynn_ | nsaje: np! ... hope it helped clarify | 12:26 |
| openstackgerrit | Rikimaru Honjo proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add validate alarm_actions schema in alarm API https://review.openstack.org/107330 | 12:28 |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:30 | |
| *** asalkeld_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:31 | |
| openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/pycadf: define the project goal https://review.openstack.org/115796 | 12:31 |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:36 | |
| *** asalkeld_ is now known as asalkeld | 12:37 | |
| *** asalkeld has left #openstack-ceilometer | 12:38 | |
| *** yasukun has quit IRC | 12:38 | |
| *** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:40 | |
| cdent | eglynn: This IPMI thing is getting challenging to track. | 12:40 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, may you take a look on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100558 ? It's +2'ed by Nadya ~2 weeks go and all other core team is afraid to touch HBase change :) | 12:48 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: the rel mgr has just requested that there are no further patch approvals before juno-3 to minimize load on the gate | 12:49 |
| openstackgerrit | Vitaly Gridnev proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Update docs with Sahara notifications configuration https://review.openstack.org/113272 | 12:50 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_ :( | 12:50 |
| DinaBelova | that's sad | 12:50 |
| eglynn_ | jd__, sileht, ildikov_, _nadya_, llu: the rel mgr has just requested that there are no further patch approvals before juno-3 to minimize load on the gate | 12:50 |
| cdent | rel mgr is drunk with power! ;) | 12:50 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: well, it's not that big an issue, as all the bugs will just get bumped to juno-rc1 | 12:51 |
| eglynn_ | DinaBelova: ... so that patch hasn't missed juno | 12:51 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn_, yeah, I just think I need to go through old changes more often :D | 12:52 |
| *** nijaba has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:52 | |
| *** nijaba has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
| *** nijaba has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:52 | |
| *** igor has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:52 | |
| *** ajc_ has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
| eglynn_ | cdent: yeah, do my comments about mixing the per-sensor and system-wide data in the same meter make sense to you? | 12:52 |
| *** igor has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
| *** igor has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:53 | |
| sileht | eglynn_, I have seen that, gate merge queue is 17 hr 47 min long | 12:53 |
| eglynn_ | sileht: yeah, does that qualify as record? ... sadly, probably not | 12:53 |
| cdent | eglynn_: yes, they make sense and seem to make some kind of sense to Edwin as well as he's proposed a solution | 12:54 |
| cdent | But the twisty turny passages are making it hard to be clear on if its right | 12:54 |
| sileht | eglynn_, I think we have made a better score in the past, with some sporadic issues gate :p | 12:55 |
| *** igor has quit IRC | 12:56 | |
| * cdent fetches car and goes home back in about 30 minutes | 12:56 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 12:56 | |
| _nadya_ | eglynn_: ack | 12:57 |
| *** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:00 | |
| *** eglynn_ is now known as eglynn-lunch | 13:07 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 13:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rich Bowen proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Adds some details and examples for alarming https://review.openstack.org/114329 | 13:18 |
| openstackgerrit | Rich Bowen proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Adds some details and examples for alarming https://review.openstack.org/114329 | 13:19 |
| *** tongli has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rich Bowen proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Adds some details and examples for alarming https://review.openstack.org/114329 | 13:20 |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:21 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:24 | |
| ildikov_ | eglynn: ok, thanks for the info | 13:26 |
| *** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:28 | |
| ildikov_ | eglynn: the docco is merged! \o/ :) | 13:29 |
| *** thomasem has quit IRC | 13:34 | |
| *** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rikimaru Honjo proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Split bunch of samples into multiple messages https://review.openstack.org/94155 | 13:36 |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
| *** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:39 | |
| *** r-daneel has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nejc Saje proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Migrate the rest of the central agent pollsters to use discoveries https://review.openstack.org/117728 | 13:48 |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:56 | |
| *** dhellmann has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
| *** dhellmann has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:58 | |
| *** nsaje_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:00 | |
| *** nsaje is now known as nsaje-office | 14:00 | |
| *** nsaje_ is now known as nsaje | 14:00 | |
| *** gzhai has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
| *** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:09 | |
| cdent | eglynn: I'm home now. What's the state of the IPMI stuff, still needing a poke? | 14:16 |
| eglynn-lunch | cdent: would be great if you could verify the new agent in the non-Intel case | 14:28 |
| eglynn-lunch | cdent: ... I gotta step out briefly now, back in a few mins | 14:28 |
| *** eglynn-lunch is now known as eglynn-afk | 14:28 | |
| cdent | I'll try, but since the endpoint is a stub, not sure if it will work. | 14:29 |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:36 | |
| *** ildikov_ has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
| *** shengjiemin has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
| *** arezmerita has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
| *** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:57 | |
| *** arezmerita has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:02 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:08 | |
| *** eglynn-afk is now known as eglynn_ | 15:13 | |
| cdent | eglynn_: I've done some digging | 15:21 |
| eglynn_ | cdent: cool, do share :) | 15:22 |
| cdent | The latest patchset plus my testing with lucas' ipmi host suggests that when the code address a host that does not support node manager it will give artificial stub data | 15:22 |
| cdent | cf: | 15:22 |
| eglynn_ | cdent: "artificial" == "invented data"? | 15:23 |
| cdent | look at read_power_all here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115845/10/ceilometer/ipmi/nodemanager/node_manager.py,cm | 15:23 |
| * eglynn_ looks | 15:24 | |
| cdent | nm_support will only be true if a raw request via ipmitool returns the right bits (literal) that indicate node manager support | 15:24 |
| cdent | I'm currently trying to determine if that's a commo thing or not | 15:25 |
| cdent | but the code isn't making a ton of sense | 15:25 |
| cdent | (because of the indirection of the decorator) | 15:26 |
| eglynn_ | cdent: yeah good spot, the "Get dummy data on platfrom without Node Manager" is sending shivers down my spine | 15:26 |
| cdent | My guess is that the response will be "we plan to do that later" | 15:29 |
| eglynn_ | cdent: yeah probably, though that was not my understanding of Edwin's reponse to my questions on the review about what happens on non-Intel platforms | 15:30 |
| eglynn_ | ... maybe I misunderstood, or wasn't specific enough in my question | 15:30 |
| eglynn_ | cdent: anyhoo, good digging, can you make a note on the review of your findings/suspicions | 15:31 |
| eglynn_ | ? | 15:31 |
| cdent | Yeah, will do | 15:31 |
| *** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:34 | |
| *** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:43 | |
| *** _cjones_ has quit IRC | 15:49 | |
| *** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:49 | |
| *** arezmerita has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
| cdent | comments up eglynn_ | 15:54 |
| eglynn_ | cdent: thank you sir! ... looking now | 15:55 |
| *** foexle has quit IRC | 15:56 | |
| *** arezmerita has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:57 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
| *** eglynn__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:04 | |
| cdent | gordc: you have any great learnings on the database front? | 16:04 |
| *** mrutkows has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:05 | |
| *** drjones has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:08 | |
| *** ondergetekende_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:08 | |
| *** xmltok_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:08 | |
| *** Ugallu has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:08 | |
| *** theanalyst has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** ondergetekende has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** jasondotstar has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** k4n0 has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** sileht has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** dougwig has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** _cjones_ has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** arezmerita has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** xmltok has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| gordc | cdent: sort of... i mean batching is possible... but not without caching i don't think... or if not caching, something even more heavyweight(ie.taskflow/tooz type stuff) | 16:08 |
| *** theanalyst has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:09 | |
| *** k4n0_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:09 | |
| *** arezmerita has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:09 | |
| *** dougwig_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:10 | |
| *** sileht has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:11 | |
| cdent | I suspect a two stage write might be workable: immeidately write raw data to some highly available store and then use that as a queue for writing to a more structure store. | 16:11 |
| cdent | But that's a big change. | 16:11 |
| gordc | cdent: yeah, that's too big. | 16:20 |
| cdent | yeah, not suggesting it as a now by any stretch | 16:20 |
| gordc | cdent: i'm not sure i can think of a way that can be contained within juno | 16:21 |
| cdent | yeah based on zzzeek's comments the only fixes are big changes | 16:21 |
| gordc | cdent: yeah. theh caching work isn't big... but i don't think it offers much value since profiling showed it was transaction | 16:22 |
| gordc | number which was slowing us down | 16:23 |
| * cdent nods | 16:23 | |
| gordc | 11ms per transaction does seem a bit high though. | 16:28 |
| *** safchain has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
| cdent | gordc: have you recorded the actual SQL that gets generated during a worst case of one of those transactions? | 16:29 |
| gordc | nope. i havent actually looked at it... i assume worse case you mean, it creates meter, resource, and sample | 16:30 |
| cdent | I _think_ so :) | 16:31 |
| cdent | I guess, however, that Mike's point, though was that the cost is estabishing the transaction, not actually running the queries? | 16:32 |
| gordc | yeah. i thikn it's the actual commit that is slow. | 16:32 |
| gordc | which seems strange... i'll dig into that. i think i might have another idea but i'll hash it out during lunch. | 16:33 |
| gordc | biab | 16:33 |
| * cdent waves | 16:33 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
| *** amalagon has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:39 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:41 | |
| *** claudiub has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: XenAPI support: Disk rates https://review.openstack.org/114873 | 16:59 |
| *** dougwig_ is now known as dougwig | 17:00 | |
| *** palar has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:11 | |
| *** renatoarmani has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:18 | |
| *** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja | 17:20 | |
| *** jbuckley has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| *** mrutkows has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| *** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 17:39 | |
| *** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:41 | |
| *** eglynn_ has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
| *** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:51 | |
| *** palar_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:12 | |
| *** palar has quit IRC | 18:15 | |
| *** mspreitz has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: warn against sorting requirements https://review.openstack.org/118732 | 18:31 |
| *** palar_ has quit IRC | 18:33 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:41 | |
| *** Ugallu has quit IRC | 18:45 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
| *** promulo_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:50 | |
| *** claudiub has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:56 | |
| mspreitz | It looks to me like python-ceilometerclient has been broken since August 7. https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+bug/1364760 | 19:23 |
| gordc | mspreitz: are you taking a look at that bug? | 19:25 |
| mspreitz | I just diagnosed it. I was hoping someone more expert would prepare the fix | 19:25 |
| gordc | mspreitz: ok cool. i'll try having a look. i need a break from current business | 19:26 |
| mspreitz | gordc: thanks! | 19:26 |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:29 | |
| *** renatoar_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:29 | |
| *** renatoarmani has quit IRC | 19:29 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 19:33 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:34 | |
| *** jergerber has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:35 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
| *** itisit has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
| *** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:46 | |
| *** amalagon has quit IRC | 19:46 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:13 | |
| *** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:13 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 20:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed a change to openstack/python-ceilometerclient: sync oslo code https://review.openstack.org/118762 | 20:23 |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jeremy Stanley proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Work toward Python 3.4 support and testing https://review.openstack.org/118770 | 20:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeremy Stanley proposed a change to openstack/pycadf: Work toward Python 3.4 support and testing https://review.openstack.org/118797 | 20:30 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeremy Stanley proposed a change to stackforge/gnocchi: Work toward Python 3.4 support and testing https://review.openstack.org/118821 | 20:31 |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 20:43 | |
| mspreitz | gordc: any progress on bug 1364760 ? | 20:54 |
| *** lynxbat has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:17 | |
| *** thomasem has quit IRC | 21:22 | |
| *** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_ | 21:28 | |
| *** dekozo has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** eglynn_ has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
| *** nsaje has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
| *** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:46 | |
| *** lynxbat has quit IRC | 21:46 | |
| *** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:47 | |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** lynxbat has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
| *** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:03 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:03 | |
| *** shardy is now known as shardy_z | 22:07 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:10 | |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 22:13 | |
| *** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:18 | |
| *** packet has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:22 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:30 | |
| *** asalkeld_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:37 | |
| *** sdake_ has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
| *** asalkeld_ has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
| *** yasukun has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:46 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:46 | |
| *** promulo_ has quit IRC | 22:49 | |
| *** itisit has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
| *** promulo_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:54 | |
| openstackgerrit | Phil Neal proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Document the standard for PaaS service notifications https://review.openstack.org/113396 | 22:57 |
| *** rbak has quit IRC | 22:58 | |
| *** jergerber has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** promulo_ has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| *** openstackstatus has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
| *** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:19 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus | 23:19 | |
| *** promulo_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:22 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:32 | |
| *** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
| *** promulo_ has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
| *** renatoar_ has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!