| opendevreview | Sam Clippinger proposed openstack/cinder master: Add additional rbd options to improve download speed. For some rudimentary benchmarks, see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2120509 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/957190 | 01:20 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: Add CI jobs to run unit tests with native threading (no-eventlet) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/988746 | 04:52 |
| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: Add CI jobs to run functional tests with native threading (no-eventlet) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/988747 | 04:52 |
| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: Adds threading mode tests for semaphore funcs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990681 | 04:52 |
| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: Add CI job to run cinder-tempest-plugin tests with native threading (no-eventlet) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/991065 | 04:52 |
| opendevreview | Vrinda Dhakad proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf Driver] Added support of clone operation for volumegroup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/982617 | 06:52 |
| opendevreview | Vrinda Dhakad proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf driver] Adding support for individual volume snapshots https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/949006 | 06:52 |
| opendevreview | Vrinda Dhakad proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf driver] Adding support for PBHA partition backend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/943364 | 06:52 |
| Anoop_Shukla | @jbernard, @rosmaita - Do we have a documented way of taking snapshots and in-place revert (snapshot revert) for boot volumes? | 07:27 |
| opendevreview | Damian Dąbrowski proposed openstack/cinder master: Add backup_default_availability_zone config opt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/978135 | 10:00 |
| opendevreview | Rutuja Pawar proposed openstack/cinder master: Added Verification for UT after Force detach execution Change-Id: I6da15f5296619b8546a90adecbce7ea1e3bf56bc Signed-off-by: Rutuja Pawar <rutuja.pawar@ibm.com> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/991304 | 10:19 |
| opendevreview | Rutuja Pawar proposed openstack/cinder master: IBM-SVF: Fix force detach volume bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/984538 | 10:34 |
| opendevreview | Jyotsna Lothe proposed openstack/cinder master: New cinder driver for HPE Alletra MP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/969373 | 10:49 |
| opendevreview | Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: mypy: Migrate to module-based configuration (1/2) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/985039 | 12:09 |
| rosmaita | Anoop_Shukla: no, all we can do now is re-image a boot volume: https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v3/#reimage-a-volume | 12:33 |
| rosmaita | but it would be worth discussing at the midcycle, Rajat has some ideas but i don't know if he's proposed a spec | 12:33 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Sure. We are discussing this with a customer who wants this feature. They have some ideas they want to vet. May be we can take it up in the mid cycle. | 12:46 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Do we have the etherpad for mid cycle? | 12:50 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/cinder master: typing: "Import" objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/985090 | 13:47 |
| rosmaita | Anoop_Shukla: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-hibiscus-midcycles | 14:04 |
| jbernard | meeting in a sec, waiting for a current one to wrap | 14:05 |
| agalica | unacceptable | 14:05 |
| jbernard | #startmeeting cinder | 14:06 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Jun 3 14:06:43 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:06 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:06 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:06 |
| jbernard | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-hibiscus-meetings | 14:07 |
| jbernard | #topic roll call | 14:07 |
| jbernard | o/ | 14:07 |
| agalica | o/ | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 14:07 |
| simondodsley | o/ | 14:07 |
| fqi | o/ | 14:08 |
| harsh | o/ | 14:08 |
| auniyal | o/ | 14:08 |
| erlon | \o | 14:09 |
| jayaanand | o/ | 14:10 |
| jbernard | #topic annoucements | 14:11 |
| jbernard | midcyle friday (day after tomorrow) | 14:11 |
| jbernard | in place of our review festival, 1400 UTC | 14:11 |
| jbernard | etherpad is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-hibiscus-midcycles | 14:12 |
| jbernard | agenda is very thin so far | 14:12 |
| jbernard | we need to take a look at cinder-spec and make sure they're in good shape | 14:12 |
| Anoop_Shukla | O/ | 14:13 |
| jbernard | looking at our periodic jobs, things look good | 14:14 |
| jbernard | https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fpython-cinderclient&project=openstack%2Fpython-brick-cinderclient-ext&pipeline=periodic-weekly&limit=14 | 14:14 |
| jbernard | py313 retried and passed | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | \o/ | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | btw, i miscounted, that should be "limit=18" to catch all the jobs | 14:15 |
| agalica | I saw "and passed" out of the corner of my eye and thought someone had died | 14:15 |
| agalica | I guess it's good news instead of bad news | 14:15 |
| jbernard | lol | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | depends on who you have in mind, i guess | 14:16 |
| agalica | lol | 14:16 |
| harsh | :D | 14:17 |
| jbernard | #topic ci docs followup with simon | 14:17 |
| jbernard | simondodsley: i had made a note a few meetings ago to follow up with you | 14:17 |
| jbernard | simondodsley: any updates or blockers the mention? | 14:17 |
| jbernard | s/the/to | 14:18 |
| simondodsley | yes - i haven't had much chance to work on this, but i di have an engineering resource now who is going to start looking at this | 14:18 |
| jbernard | that's good news | 14:18 |
| jbernard | #topic boot volume backup/snapshot workflows | 14:20 |
| jbernard | Anoop_Shukla was asking about the status of this effort, if any exists | 14:21 |
| Anoop_Shukla | I think its blocked based on volume type today? | 14:21 |
| jbernard | i haven't tried recently, is it indeed failing? | 14:22 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Is there any reason a user cannot power off the vm and still cannot inplace revert a boot volume? | 14:22 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Snapshoting should work..I think revert_to_snapshot wont. | 14:23 |
| jbernard | what error are you seeing? | 14:23 |
| Anoop_Shukla | It wouldnt map the volume because map call would not come to driver? | 14:24 |
| jbernard | does that imply that nova is holding on to the previous mapping? | 14:24 |
| auniyal | can you pass link of failing test | 14:25 |
| auniyal | logs | 14:25 |
| jbernard | yes, need to see the error, that would help a lot | 14:25 |
| auniyal | didn;t get the question actually | 14:25 |
| simondodsley | i think it is because the volume status is still in_use even when the VM is shutdown, so revert_to_snapshot won't process | 14:26 |
| simondodsley | shelving the instance should work | 14:27 |
| Anoop_Shukla | In an OpenStack-integrated environment using the NetApp Cinder driver, performing a “revert to snapshot” operation causes the original LUN to be destroyed and a new cloned LUN to be created. However, the newly created LUN is not automatically mapped back to the host initiators. As a result, the host loses access to the volume and the multipath devices fail. The issue is reproducible across all tested volumes. | 14:27 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Manual mapping of the cloned LUN on the storage side restores access successfully. | 14:27 |
| simondodsley | in your case does the new cloned lun have a different UUID? | 14:28 |
| Anoop_Shukla | So this workaround may work on the FC protocol, but iSCSI would require host rediscover | 14:28 |
| agalica | yeah, it's because you're creating a new LUN I suspect | 14:28 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Yes..its a new LUN Path | 14:29 |
| Anoop_Shukla | We delete the old LUN after restoring to a new volume | 14:29 |
| jayaanand | yea cloned LUN have different UUID | 14:29 |
| simondodsley | then that is the issue - Nova retains the UUID of the boot volume, so you can't link the ne wLUN | 14:30 |
| simondodsley | you need to change the DB links | 14:30 |
| jbernard | can we request nova to rediscover? | 14:30 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Is there an API to rediscover that nova exposes? | 14:32 |
| jayaanand | can we change UUID to original UUID?hacky? | 14:32 |
| jbernard | ^ this might be where some of the work is | 14:32 |
| Anoop_Shukla | hmm | 14:32 |
| jbernard | Anoop_Shukla: you're welcome to propose a spec, there may be some other folks interested in helping get this together as well | 14:34 |
| eharney | how many drivers implement revert_to_snapshot by cloning a new volume? | 14:35 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Sure..we will work on a spec but may not be possible by mid cycle.. | 14:35 |
| Anoop_Shukla | But good to discuss in mid cycle with everyone to answer questions that @eharney has and others may have | 14:36 |
| jbernard | Anoop_Shukla: yeah, it's going to be a non-trivial effort, especially with nova coordination required, but good to get things moving | 14:36 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Cool! Thanks | 14:37 |
| jbernard | Anoop_Shukla: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-hibiscus-midcycles | 14:37 |
| Anoop_Shukla | I have added this topic under topics list in the mid cycle etherpad | 14:37 |
| jbernard | awesome, thanks | 14:38 |
| jbernard | #topic 2025.1 ci is blocked | 14:38 |
| jbernard | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy&skip=0 | 14:38 |
| jbernard | also https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2155125 | 14:38 |
| jbernard | this is not great :) | 14:40 |
| eharney | that bug is about pyproject.toml but 2025.1 doesn't have pyproject.toml? | 14:40 |
| jbernard | i might have the wrong link | 14:41 |
| jbernard | im not sure who added this item, is there any additional context for this one? | 14:41 |
| auniyal | was afk, I added it | 14:42 |
| jbernard | i wonder what caused this to recently start failing, that's not supposed to happen on stable branchse | 14:43 |
| auniyal | yeah I didn;t look at bugs details - I saw stable/2025.1 was breaking so created and added it to discuss | 14:43 |
| eharney | the latest 2025.1 run failed with a dependency error setting up tempest | 14:44 |
| auniyal | I wonder if its something with gmaan email regarding tempest - but not sure | 14:44 |
| eharney | "[qa][stable] Tempest master and stable/2025.1 ubuntu jammy jobs are broken" covers the requirements issue w/ tempest | 14:45 |
| jbernard | i just looked at what we've merged, nothing to suggest it's the cause, it looks like something changed externally | 14:45 |
| eharney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/990436 looks like it fixes setuptools complaining about the license field | 14:47 |
| jbernard | ^ that merged 5 days ago, but today's run agains 2025.1 is still failing, maybe more is needed | 14:49 |
| eharney | yeah i'm confused on that part | 14:49 |
| eharney | oh, no | 14:50 |
| eharney | we only ran one today and it failed w/ the other bug | 14:50 |
| jbernard | am i right to conclude that we cannot fix this within our branch, we must wait for tempest to resolve? | 14:51 |
| eharney | so https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/991161 says that jammy jobs need to use a specific tempest tag to work now | 14:53 |
| eharney | and i'm not sure that tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy is doing that | 14:53 |
| eharney | gmaan: might be able to confirm | 14:54 |
| jbernard | in parallel, amit has composed a bug template for cinder's use | 14:55 |
| jbernard | https://paste.opendev.org/show/bf2pveEtDxaiLA3tmNqF/ | 14:55 |
| jbernard | take a look if you have a sec and post comments | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Add contributor doc for OVO https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/991429 | 14:56 |
| auniyal | eharney noticed we need to replace freenode with OFTC | 14:56 |
| jbernard | yep | 14:57 |
| jbernard | otherwise it looks fine to me | 14:57 |
| jbernard | unless there are any comments, ok to put this into use? | 14:58 |
| eharney | i'm not sure about the sosreport part | 14:59 |
| jbernard | it's stated as optional | 15:00 |
| auniyal | yeah its optional - but if people can provide somehow thats best | 15:00 |
| gmaan | eharney: auniyal let me know if any job failing now, and i can propose fix as i mentioned in email. | 15:00 |
| erlon | i would say that markdown is a better more adopted format | 15:00 |
| gmaan | tempest changes/fix are merged now | 15:00 |
| auniyal | both ubunut and fedora family provide utility | 15:00 |
| jbernard | gmaan: our 2025.1 tests are failing | 15:01 |
| erlon | where will that one live? | 15:01 |
| auniyal | gmaan https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy&skip=0 | 15:01 |
| jbernard | gmaan: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy&skip=0 | 15:01 |
| gmaan | jbernard: auniyal ack, will propose fix soon | 15:01 |
| jbernard | thanks | 15:01 |
| auniyal | erlon in lunachpad - https://launchpad.net/cinder, while creating new bug | 15:02 |
| jbernard | erlon: the aim is to gather necessary information early to reduce the back-and-forth of asking for steps, versions, logs, etc | 15:02 |
| auniyal | people will see template to fill - it will copy paste and then update | 15:03 |
| erlon | yes, it's a great idea. I haven't looked the contents but the first thing that called my attention was the formatting. | 15:03 |
| erlon | Is there a way to pre-fill the bug? I have just opened the bug form and today it doesn't pre-fill anything right? | 15:04 |
| eharney | it mentions creating a "Request for Feature Enhancements" but i'm not sure the term RFE shows up anywhere in our launchpad? | 15:05 |
| auniyal | in general rfe can be used as tag | 15:06 |
| auniyal | once report is filled people can tag it with rfe - then all rfe's will show up | 15:06 |
| eharney | i don't think we've done that historically... such items are marked as Wishlist in the importance field | 15:07 |
| erlon | auniyal: jbernard: I think we should create a patch adding that to the cinder contributor documentation. Then we have a place to better discuss it now and improve it in the future if we need. If we decide to put it there, then rst is the best format | 15:09 |
| jbernard | erlon: you're suggesting we add the template to the repo so we can iterate? | 15:11 |
| erlon | yes | 15:11 |
| auniyal | I think it should already be there how to create new bug - but rfe is for sure new. I guess most of the time downstream people start spec directly or discuss it in PTG | 15:11 |
| erlon | https://github.com/openstack/cinder/tree/master/doc/source/contributor | 15:12 |
| auniyal | https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/master/doc/source/contributor/launchpad.rst#bug-tracking | 15:12 |
| erlon | As a matter of fact, we already have some documentation for lunch pad | 15:12 |
| erlon | yep | 15:12 |
| jbernard | we can update the contributer docs, that seems fine with me | 15:14 |
| auniyal | we can skip rfe - but I think its good to have, anyway well ask repoter to create spec if dont want to we will discuss the importance of it in PTG. buts its good to see what new people want in Cinder | 15:15 |
| jbernard | when it lands we can update the LP config, but someone needs to remember to keep them in sync | 15:15 |
| jbernard | auniyal: i see what you're saying, i dont think we ever used the wishlist tag for that purpose | 15:16 |
| auniyal | jbernard ack, sure we can skip it | 15:17 |
| auniyal | please check if stuff under Environment is correct - that should help | 15:18 |
| auniyal | new people while creating bug they are not sure why its coming | 15:19 |
| jbernard | auniyal: lets get this into a contributer doc patch, that way we can collect comments and have a record | 15:20 |
| jbernard | auniyal: and update LP when it merges, I think it's really close | 15:20 |
| auniyal | you mean add bug template in user docs ? | 15:21 |
| auniyal | *contributer | 15:21 |
| auniyal | we can collect comment from etherpad too | 15:21 |
| auniyal | but yeah its better to dicuss in sync here | 15:22 |
| auniyal | sure I'll a patch - but I dont think it should be merged | 15:22 |
| auniyal | *I'll create - we should agree there and then update launchpad | 15:23 |
| jbernard | i think its helpful to have somethign to refer to if we later want to make edits | 15:23 |
| jbernard | sounds good | 15:23 |
| auniyal | ack lets start with it - I'll push patch | 15:23 |
| jbernard | auniyal: ack, thanks for this work | 15:24 |
| auniyal | :) | 15:24 |
| jbernard | ok, that's all we've got for agenda and we're over time, anything that /needs/ to be covered right now? | 15:25 |
| Jyotsna | As per Jens feedback on requirement patch, we have updated both the patches for new HPE Alletra MP driver for the latest flowkit version: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/969373 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/974322 Addressing comments from jayaanand borra meanwhile Request core reviewers to take a look again. | 15:25 |
| jbernard | Jyotsna: it's on the etherpad for friday | 15:26 |
| Jyotsna | thanks Jon | 15:26 |
| jbernard | np | 15:26 |
| jbernard | ok, last call | 15:26 |
| jbernard | #endmeeting | 15:27 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Jun 3 15:27:11 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:27 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-06-03-14.06.html | 15:27 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-06-03-14.06.txt | 15:27 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-06-03-14.06.log.html | 15:27 |
| jbernard | thanks everyone | 15:27 |
| agalica | time for a midnight snack and bed | 15:27 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/cinder stable/2025.1: Fix tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/991434 | 15:29 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Add contributor doc for OVO https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/991429 | 17:51 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/cinder stable/2025.1: Fix tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/991434 | 17:52 |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "OpenStack Block Storage (Cinder) - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder" | 18:31 | |
| gmaan | jbernard: eharney auniyal stable/2025.1 gate is green in this, please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/991434 | 20:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!