Thursday, 2016-09-08

« Wednesday, 2016-09-07 Index Friday, 2016-09-09 »
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC00:12
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas00:20
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-lbaas00:28
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas00:29
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC00:30
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-lbaas00:35
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas00:43
*** bank_ has quit IRC00:45
*** saju_m has quit IRC00:53
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas00:58
*** kevo has quit IRC00:59
*** chlong has quit IRC01:03
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC01:03
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas01:14
openstackgerritMichael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia: Option to restrict amp glance image owner  https://review.openstack.org/36703901:28
johnsomdougwig ^^^01:28
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC01:28
openstackgerritli,chen proposed openstack/octavia: Add class 'StatsMixin'  https://review.openstack.org/35576401:33
openstackgerritCedric Shock proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Allow creating loadbalancer with network_id  https://review.openstack.org/36330201:34
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas01:36
*** armax has quit IRC01:36
*** openstack has joined #openstack-lbaas01:46
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas02:19
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC02:31
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas02:32
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC02:34
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas02:35
openstackgerritli,chen proposed openstack/octavia: Add class 'StatsMixin'  https://review.openstack.org/35576402:44
*** yuanying has quit IRC02:47
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas02:53
*** bana_k has quit IRC02:54
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas02:56
openstackgerritMichael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia: Option to restrict amp glance image owner  https://review.openstack.org/36703903:28
openstackgerritMichael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia: Option to restrict amp glance image owner  https://review.openstack.org/36703903:34
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC03:35
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-lbaas03:51
reedipDear All, Can I get some reviews for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287035/04:15
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas04:23
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas04:28
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-lbaas04:28
johnsomHi reedip  I will take a look.  Please note we are past the feature freeze, so this will likely land in Ocata04:33
*** kevo has joined #openstack-lbaas04:34
reedipjohnsom : This is part of neutronclient . But if you feel that it should land in ocata, then ok  :) Thanks04:34
johnsomI don't have a say in neutron-client, but wanted to set expectations...04:34
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas04:36
*** reedip has quit IRC04:37
*** woodster_ has quit IRC04:39
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC04:40
*** gongysh has quit IRC04:52
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas04:56
*** chlong has quit IRC05:14
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas05:30
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas05:31
*** links has quit IRC05:31
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas05:37
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC05:41
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas05:46
*** chlong has quit IRC06:13
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-lbaas06:15
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas06:20
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas06:20
*** gcheresh has joined #openstack-lbaas06:22
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas06:26
*** saju_m has quit IRC06:34
*** gongysh has quit IRC06:37
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas06:38
*** zetab has joined #openstack-lbaas06:39
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC06:43
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-lbaas06:46
*** tesseract- has joined #openstack-lbaas07:04
*** bana_k has quit IRC07:15
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas07:25
*** kevo has quit IRC07:25
*** armax has quit IRC07:29
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC07:33
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-lbaas07:34
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-lbaas07:39
*** ihrachys has quit IRC07:45
*** bana_k has quit IRC07:52
*** chlong has quit IRC07:52
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas08:05
*** RichB has joined #openstack-lbaas08:09
*** ajo_ has quit IRC08:16
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-lbaas08:31
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas08:48
*** jsheeren has joined #openstack-lbaas09:03
*** saju_m has quit IRC09:11
*** jsheeren has quit IRC09:33
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas09:41
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC09:46
*** gongysh has quit IRC10:21
*** jsheeren has joined #openstack-lbaas10:37
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:42
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC10:47
*** amotoki has quit IRC10:48
*** kobis has quit IRC11:33
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas11:37
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas11:43
openstackgerritNir Magnezi proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Implements ProcessMonitor in the haproxy driver  https://review.openstack.org/34465811:45
openstackgerritNir Magnezi proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Implements ProcessMonitor in the haproxy driver  https://review.openstack.org/34465811:46
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC11:48
*** jsheeren has quit IRC11:51
*** links has quit IRC11:52
*** jsheeren has joined #openstack-lbaas12:08
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas12:11
nagyzhey guys12:33
nagyzare there any known netmask-related issues for the stable branch?12:33
nagyzfrom what I see the alias interfaces in the namespace always get a 255.255.255.0 netmask (at least in my testing)12:34
nagyzI've checked the vip_plug code in the amphora agent code and that looks good12:35
nagyzif you guys know this issue I'll stop investing time in tracking it down :)12:35
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC12:36
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas12:48
*** raalee has joined #openstack-lbaas12:54
*** jraju has joined #openstack-lbaas13:12
*** jsheeren has quit IRC13:15
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC13:15
*** jsheeren has joined #openstack-lbaas13:17
*** jsheeren has quit IRC13:22
*** jsheeren has joined #openstack-lbaas13:23
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:28
*** jsheeren_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:30
*** jsheeren has quit IRC13:33
*** jsheeren_ has quit IRC13:35
*** gongysh has quit IRC13:38
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC13:40
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:41
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC13:41
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:41
*** _ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:44
*** _ducttape_ has quit IRC13:45
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:45
*** _ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:45
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC13:48
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC13:55
*** duvarenkov has quit IRC13:56
*** diogogmt_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:58
*** ddaskal has joined #openstack-lbaas14:00
*** diogogmt has quit IRC14:00
*** diogogmt_ is now known as diogogmt14:00
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:01
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas14:02
*** matt-borland has joined #openstack-lbaas14:03
*** duvarenkov has joined #openstack-lbaas14:04
*** ddaskal has quit IRC14:04
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:17
*** _ducttape_ has quit IRC14:24
*** pglass has joined #openstack-lbaas14:25
*** ihrachys has quit IRC14:25
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-lbaas14:27
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas14:28
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:33
*** scarab_ has joined #openstack-lbaas14:39
*** gcheresh has quit IRC14:44
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed openstack/octavia: Add quota support to Octavia  https://review.openstack.org/36079414:48
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas14:49
*** jraju has quit IRC14:59
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas15:02
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC15:04
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas15:04
*** raalee has quit IRC15:05
*** scarab_ has quit IRC15:10
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas15:15
diltramptoohill: hahaha you didn't understand me :P15:26
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas15:29
*** amotoki has quit IRC15:34
diltramhow is working that commit msg tag like APIImpact, DocImpact and other?15:35
*** _ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas15:44
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC15:44
ptoohillWas thinking about that and why you didnt mention the others too, but I didnt atually look to see if it was looking for the 'blah'15:52
*** RichB has quit IRC15:53
openstackgerritPhillip Toohill proposed openstack/octavia: Fix No sql_connection parameter is established  https://review.openstack.org/36691315:55
johnsomdiltram those codes in the commit message trigger automatic bugs being opened in the project when it merges to address the changes, i.e. docs changes15:56
diltramnice :)15:57
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-lbaas15:57
diltramptoohill: +1 :)15:58
ptoohill:)15:58
johnsomdiltram It's not as slick as it could be...15:58
diltramlike always johnsom :P15:59
diltramjohnsom: this you're bug fix for admin_state_up we're merging right now, we're not waiting for O, am I right?16:04
johnsomYeah, that is a bug fix and not a new feature, so open to merge16:08
rm_workyeah i kinda held off on +2ing or +Aing anything because i am not sure what is *allowed* to merge now :/16:19
rm_workI guess I could still +216:19
*** tesseract- has quit IRC16:21
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:26
diltramok16:27
diltramI'm just spinning up devstack with that code to test it16:28
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas16:31
*** amotoki has quit IRC16:31
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas16:31
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas16:40
*** minwang2 has left #openstack-lbaas16:43
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC16:50
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas17:01
*** _ducttape_ has quit IRC17:04
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC17:12
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas17:13
*** kevo has joined #openstack-lbaas17:19
*** brad_behle has joined #openstack-lbaas17:20
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-lbaas17:20
*** bana_k has quit IRC17:22
ptoohillha, diltram, some of those other did check for it. I should have actually just looked at it ><17:31
openstackgerritPhillip Toohill proposed openstack/octavia: Fix No sql_connection parameter is established  https://review.openstack.org/36691317:34
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas17:40
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC17:45
*** duvarenkov has quit IRC17:50
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas18:07
*** ihrachys has quit IRC18:15
*** brad_behle has quit IRC19:12
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC19:55
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas19:55
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-lbaas20:06
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas20:18
openstackgerritStephen Balukoff proposed openstack/octavia: Fix active-active specs tox test  https://review.openstack.org/36761120:20
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC20:46
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas20:55
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC20:55
*** harlowja_ has joined #openstack-lbaas20:59
*** harlowja has quit IRC21:00
*** minwang2 has left #openstack-lbaas21:29
johnsomsbalukoff Around?21:49
*** matt-borland has quit IRC21:54
openstackgerritStephen Balukoff proposed openstack/octavia: Update tox 'docs' environment to test specs  https://review.openstack.org/36765122:04
sbalukoffjohnsom: Yep.22:05
johnsomHey there.  I was just looking at the specs update22:05
sbalukoffYes?22:05
johnsomI am trying to figure out how to fix the reference for haproxy-amphora-api.rst22:06
johnsomI was just about to try a relative URL using that :doc: tag (which I didn't know existed)22:06
johnsomMind if I push an update that fixes that?22:07
sbalukoffOh, I just made a dependent patch which adds spec testing to the docs environment (so we catch future problems in the gate).22:07
sbalukoffSo, could you tell me which line number that's on and I'll fix it so I can have an easier time updating the dependent patch?22:08
johnsomSure, bottom of both specs, number [6] in both22:09
sbalukoffOk! Give me a couple minutes to update that.22:09
johnsomI was going to try this: .. [6] :doc:`../../api/haproxy-amphora-api.html`22:09
sbalukoffGet rid of the .html and you're golden.22:10
johnsomNot sure if that will work though....22:10
sbalukoffAnyway, gimme a sec to hit that and test locally and I'll get a new patch set up.22:10
johnsomCool, I will let you at it.  Thanks!22:10
sbalukoffBy the way, the :doc: tag is sphinx-specific (it's one of several new inline markup that sphinx adds over the default docutils stuff). As far as I'm aware, it's not a problem to have that sort of thing in our specs, since sphinx is being used to generate the pretty-fied specs documentation.22:12
sbalukoffAnd also, our specs tests already ignore the graph stuff we put in specs (which is also spinx-specific.)22:13
sbalukoffThe dependent patch above makes docutils also supresses warnings about inline :doc: statements, in much the same way we don't warn about spinx graphs we insert in specs.22:14
*** BjoernT has quit IRC22:17
openstackgerritStephen Balukoff proposed openstack/octavia: Fix active-active specs tox test  https://review.openstack.org/36761122:18
bana_kif fail over fails to complete lbaas-loadbalancer-list still show the provisioning status as active, is it a desired behavior ?22:18
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas22:18
bana_kbut there is no corresponding amphora VM22:19
openstackgerritStephen Balukoff proposed openstack/octavia: Update tox 'docs' environment to test specs  https://review.openstack.org/36765122:20
johnsomNope, it should go to error and/or keep trying to failover22:21
bana_kjohnsom its not happening as of now22:21
sbalukoffFile a bug!22:21
bana_kyes sir !22:21
bana_kwill test it one more time to be sure and ll file a bug22:22
johnsomYeah, please include what caused the failover to fail in the details22:22
*** pglass has quit IRC22:22
bana_kok22:22
johnsomIs it a resource issue?22:22
*** harlowja_ has quit IRC22:22
bana_kit was active and had a VM22:22
johnsomFYI: http://www.openstack.org/ptg22:22
bana_kI am not sure why it failed22:23
sbalukoffjohnsom: Is that the new developer-only summit?22:23
johnsomYes22:23
sbalukoffHmmm...  well, it's falling about the same time as we'd do a mid-cycle. Which usually ends up being a hyper-productive week for us.... something tells me a PTG won't be nearly as productive for us... :P22:25
johnsomBut it is a bit odd as they are having a "forum" at the summits22:26
sbalukoffUnless they're just going to let us sit in a room and collaborate for a week.22:26
sbalukoffWhat is this "forum"?22:26
johnsomhttp://www.openstack.org/ptg/ptgfaq/22:26
sbalukoffOk, so the PTG is meant primarily for cross-team collaboration?22:27
johnsomYeah, I think a bunch of teams are thinking it will be their mid-cycle.  I agree however, that it could be distracting vs. productive.  Not sure.  I guess we will have to see how it's setup.  Plus it's basically requiring travel for the whole team vs. how we have done it.22:27
sbalukoffI'd hate for employers to see the PTG as a replacement for the mid-cycle meet up, since we get so much done at the mid-cycle.22:27
johnsomThe FAQ even states that the goal is to replace mid-cycles22:29
sbalukoffYeah, I don't see that working well for people who already attend multiple mid-cycles since they're deeply involved in more than one team. :P22:30
sbalukoffYou know, people like dougwig.22:30
sbalukoffBut...  I guess he can be the judge of that.22:30
sbalukoffAlso, there's benefit to locating the mid-cycle somewhere near where we have a lot of contributors so they don't have to travel far (or at all), which can mean more people can participate.22:31
sbalukoff(ie. less "employer won't let me travel" problems.)22:32
sbalukoffBut, eh... *shrug*22:32
dougwigsbalukoff: the announcement just seemed like more travel to me. initially i liked the idea of splitting the summit, but the implementation is adding time, not removing any.22:32
rm_worki mean... i hate to be the voice of anarchy (wait, no i don't), but we could just ignore that and do our thing again22:32
sbalukoffrm_work: Heh! Probably.22:32
johnsomYeah, it seems like it is totally adding expense/travel vs. reducing it.22:33
johnsomrm_work I have a big suspicion that might end up happening22:34
sbalukoffI guess we'll have to see how it goes.22:34
rm_workyep22:34
dougwiginitially i was hopeful that i could start skipping the marketing summit. that was one of the initial carrots.  that went out the window.22:34
sbalukoffdougwig: Yeah, that was basically the only benefit to the split that was obvious to me.22:34
sbalukoffBut it sounds like they just want us to go to both.22:35
johnsomYeah, the "forum" and "we still want dev presentations (though I'm not sure that is true after this round)" kind of break that22:35
dougwig"Mid-cycle sprints ended up being where the work can be done, but them being organized separately meant it is very costly for a member of a cross-project team (infrastructure, docs, QA, release management…) to attend them all. We basically set up our events in a way that made cross-project work prohibitively expensive"  <-- so, uhh, we just shifted that22:39
dougwigexpense to everyone else, then?22:39
johnsomRight22:40
sbalukoffYep.22:40
johnsomWhoever the next core is to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367611 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367651 merge them if you like what you see.  These are bugs/docs patches22:42
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-lbaas22:42
dougwigbye bye atc.22:43
johnsomYeah, saw that too22:45
bana_kjohnsom: stopping the amphora also should trigger a proper failover right ?22:59
johnsomIf you mean deleting yes, but stopping with Nova there is an open bug and patch (I'm actually testing that today).23:00
bana_koh ok. I stopped the nova instance and it failed to complete it.23:01
bana_kbut failover should happen again I guess23:01
*** BjoernT has quit IRC23:01
bana_kand amphora_health table is just empty !23:02
johnsomhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bug/161547123:02
openstackLaunchpad bug 1615471 in octavia "Failover fails when the amphora instance is stoped" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to li,chen (chen-li)23:02
johnsomAnd that one is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bug/153250623:03
openstackLaunchpad bug 1532506 in octavia "If an Amphora never sends a heartbeat, it does NOT get deleted and created again" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Trevor Vardeman (trevor-vardeman)23:03
bana_kjohnsom thanks23:03
johnsomSigh, we have closed out 64 bugs this cycle, but there are still more to go....23:03
bana_kbut the amphora_health being empty after the failover23:04
johnsomThat last one has a patch, but it is causing premature failovers so still needs some work23:04
bana_koh ok got it.23:05
johnsomYeah, that is what I would expect.  The failed amp got removed from that table (as it should) and the above bug means the new one never got inserted.23:05
bana_koh yea makes sense23:06
bana_kthanks23:06
johnsomNP23:06
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas23:40
johnsomCores, here is a guide to patches I think we should prioritize for reviewing to get into Newton: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/LBaaSOctaviaNewtonPatches23:46
sbalukoffNice!23:47
sbalukoffI'm hoping to add one or two more docs patches to the list (and yes, I know time is short).23:47
johnsomSend questions/comments/grumbles my way....23:47
johnsomYep, I expect it will be an evolving list.  I just wanted to try to have a guide to help people and feel more comfortable merging patches...23:48
sbalukoffIt's also good to know where we should be prioritizing our review time.23:49
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-lbaas23:52
rm_workok cool, i was going to ask you which things were actually mergable23:58
« Wednesday, 2016-09-07 Index Friday, 2016-09-09 »

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!