Monday, 2016-05-09

*** darrenc is now known as darren_afk00:09
*** gabriel-bezerra has quit IRC00:23
*** darren_afk is now known as darrenc00:23
*** gabriel-bezerra has joined #openstack-meeting-300:24
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:30
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-300:38
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-301:03
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-301:08
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-301:10
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-301:40
*** baoli has quit IRC01:43
*** julim has quit IRC01:51
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-301:53
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]01:53
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-302:03
*** spzala has quit IRC02:03
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-302:04
*** dedery has quit IRC02:06
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-302:07
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting-302:07
*** spzala has quit IRC02:08
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC02:15
*** stanzgy has joined #openstack-meeting-302:23
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan02:29
*** amit213 has quit IRC02:34
*** amit213 has joined #openstack-meeting-302:34
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-302:42
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-302:43
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-302:44
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:47
*** baoli has quit IRC02:49
*** ddieterly[away] has quit IRC02:54
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-303:07
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-303:09
*** amotoki has quit IRC03:18
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-303:26
*** markvoel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-303:29
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck03:29
*** markvoelker has quit IRC03:32
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-303:40
*** bpokorny has quit IRC03:45
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-303:46
*** tfukushima has quit IRC03:46
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC03:48
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC03:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-303:59
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:03
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-304:04
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-304:09
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck04:09
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck04:09
*** spzala has quit IRC04:10
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck04:19
*** bpokorny has quit IRC04:25
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-304:45
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting-304:45
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-304:46
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-304:46
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:49
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-304:51
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:51
*** irenab has quit IRC04:52
*** kenji-i has quit IRC05:09
*** markvoel_ has quit IRC05:20
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-305:23
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:30
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-305:35
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC05:35
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-305:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:36
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-305:36
*** sverma has joined #openstack-meeting-305:37
*** Poornima has joined #openstack-meeting-305:37
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-305:42
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:45
*** dedery has joined #openstack-meeting-305:47
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-305:51
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-305:57
*** stanzgy has quit IRC06:13
*** zhurong has quit IRC06:14
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-306:14
*** dedery has quit IRC06:16
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:19
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-306:28
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC06:29
*** egallen has quit IRC06:35
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC06:39
*** andymaier has joined #openstack-meeting-306:46
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-306:51
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-306:53
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-307:04
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-307:06
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting-307:06
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-307:08
*** spzala has quit IRC07:09
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-307:19
*** dedery has joined #openstack-meeting-307:22
*** vtech_ has joined #openstack-meeting-307:26
*** vtech has quit IRC07:26
*** jschwarz has joined #openstack-meeting-307:33
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-307:37
*** lpetrut has quit IRC07:40
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-307:41
*** egallen has quit IRC07:44
*** vtech_ has quit IRC07:45
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-307:45
*** mickeys has quit IRC07:50
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-307:50
*** scheuran has joined #openstack-meeting-307:51
*** jschwarz has quit IRC07:54
*** mickeys has quit IRC07:54
*** jschwarz has joined #openstack-meeting-308:00
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-308:01
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-308:03
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:07
*** eyalb has joined #openstack-meeting-308:17
*** eyalb has left #openstack-meeting-308:18
*** jed56 has joined #openstack-meeting-308:24
*** stendulker has joined #openstack-meeting-308:25
*** coolsvap has quit IRC08:25
*** scheuran has quit IRC08:27
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting-308:29
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-308:34
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-308:38
*** tfukushima has quit IRC08:38
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-308:41
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-308:43
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-308:44
*** neiljerram has quit IRC08:46
*** lpetrut has quit IRC08:49
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-308:49
*** itxaka has joined #openstack-meeting-308:51
*** stanzgy has joined #openstack-meeting-308:52
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-308:53
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-308:57
*** jlanoux has quit IRC09:03
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting-309:03
*** dedery has quit IRC09:05
*** lcastell has quit IRC09:12
*** luzC has quit IRC09:12
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:14
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-309:17
*** lpetrut has quit IRC09:17
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-309:17
*** itxaka has quit IRC09:20
*** itxaka has joined #openstack-meeting-309:21
*** lpetrut has quit IRC09:23
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away09:30
*** sverma has quit IRC09:38
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-309:44
*** vtech_ has joined #openstack-meeting-309:44
*** vtech has quit IRC09:44
*** fwdit has joined #openstack-meeting-309:45
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-309:50
*** nkrinner_afk has quit IRC09:50
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-309:51
*** baoli has quit IRC09:54
*** lcastell has joined #openstack-meeting-309:55
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:56
*** luzC has joined #openstack-meeting-309:56
*** sverma has joined #openstack-meeting-309:57
*** sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts09:57
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-310:01
*** nkrinner_afk has joined #openstack-meeting-310:02
*** zhurong has quit IRC10:16
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-310:19
*** dedery has joined #openstack-meeting-310:19
*** yamahata has quit IRC10:21
*** iyamahat has quit IRC10:25
*** sverma has quit IRC10:27
*** sverma has joined #openstack-meeting-310:40
*** fwdit has quit IRC10:46
*** dmellado|off is now known as dmellado10:47
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-310:51
*** marios has quit IRC10:52
*** baoli has quit IRC10:55
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-311:05
*** itxaka is now known as itxaka|away11:08
*** spzala has quit IRC11:09
*** egallen has quit IRC11:21
*** ccamacho is now known as ccamacho|lunch11:28
*** stendulker has quit IRC11:30
*** stanzgy has quit IRC11:32
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:36
*** banix has quit IRC11:38
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-311:39
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-311:40
*** rtheis has joined #openstack-meeting-311:42
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:44
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:44
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-311:48
*** itxaka|away is now known as itxaka11:57
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-311:58
*** baoli has quit IRC12:03
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-312:07
*** dobson has quit IRC12:14
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-312:14
*** sverma has quit IRC12:21
*** egallen has quit IRC12:24
*** ccamacho|lunch has quit IRC12:25
*** sverma has joined #openstack-meeting-312:26
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-meeting-312:28
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-312:29
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-312:33
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:38
*** dobson has joined #openstack-meeting-312:44
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-312:50
*** jmckind has quit IRC12:50
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting-312:50
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-312:57
*** irenab_ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:57
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-312:58
*** irenab has quit IRC12:58
*** irenab_ has quit IRC13:02
*** dtardivel has joined #openstack-meeting-313:02
*** ddieterly has quit IRC13:02
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-313:06
*** krtaylor has quit IRC13:12
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-313:13
*** jtomasek_ has joined #openstack-meeting-313:15
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-313:15
*** rossella_s has quit IRC13:16
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-313:17
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-313:18
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-313:19
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-313:21
*** jtomasek_ has quit IRC13:22
*** marios has quit IRC13:25
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting-313:25
*** jschwarz has quit IRC13:26
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-313:28
*** jmckind has quit IRC13:28
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-313:31
*** belmoreira has quit IRC13:31
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-313:32
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting-313:35
*** irenab has quit IRC13:36
*** mageshgv has joined #openstack-meeting-313:36
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-313:37
*** Poornima has quit IRC13:39
*** janzian has joined #openstack-meeting-313:40
*** janzian has left #openstack-meeting-313:40
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]13:43
*** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-meeting-313:48
*** mtanino has quit IRC13:49
*** bauzas_off is now known as bauzas13:49
*** david-lyle has quit IRC13:50
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly13:50
*** markvoelker has quit IRC13:55
sheeprineCloudKitty meeting is about to start, I know some people wanted to attend it.14:01
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-314:01
sheeprinehuats: sergio_nubeiu: ?14:03
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-314:04
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-314:05
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-meeting-314:05
*** dedery_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:05
*** nicodemus_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:05
*** dedery__ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:06
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2414:06
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-314:07
*** d0ugal has quit IRC14:07
*** sergio_nubeliu has joined #openstack-meeting-314:08
*** dedery has quit IRC14:08
*** spzala has quit IRC14:09
huatssheeprine: I am here !14:09
*** dedery_ has quit IRC14:10
huatssorry for the delay14:10
sheeprineI know sergio wanted to be here to talk about gnocchi support14:10
sheeprineI guess he wasn't able to do it14:10
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: I'm here too14:10
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-314:10
sergio_nubeliuHi14:10
sheeprineOh14:10
sheeprineGreat14:10
sheeprineLet's start then14:10
sheeprine#startmeeting cloudkitty14:10
openstackMeeting started Mon May  9 14:10:46 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sheeprine. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:10
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:10
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: cloudkitty)"14:10
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty'14:10
sheeprineWe've got a pretty small agenda for this meeting.14:11
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-314:11
sheeprine     Summit debriefing14:11
sheeprine    Gnocchi support stage214:11
sheeprine    Road to version 0.614:11
*** dedery__ has quit IRC14:11
sheeprine#topic Summit debriefing14:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Summit debriefing (Meeting topic: cloudkitty)"14:12
sheeprineAbout what happened during Austin summit.14:12
sheeprineWe've got more people interested in CloudKitty, which is great.14:13
sheeprineI got in touch with people from rackspace that started working on the project.14:13
sheeprineThey'll work on ansible roles and try to modify some parts to make it work for their deployments.14:14
sheeprineFrom what I've heard they should have 3 - 4 people working on it for 2 to 4 weeks.14:14
huatsI have been discussing with some of them during the weekend14:14
huatstrying to help them out a bit14:15
sheeprineSpeaking of that, we need to focus more on the doc. Most people don't know how to install or use CloudKitty.14:15
huatssheeprine: indeed14:15
huatsI have been discussing that with one of them14:15
huatsActually I was waiting for a patch to land on the trunk to work on that from a full view (installation and configuration)14:16
huatsand this patch should arrive quite soon from what we discussed last wednesday sheeprine  :)14:17
sheeprineGreat, I'll try to ping other cores to speed up review process.14:17
huatsI will make a review of your doc tomorrow14:17
huatssheeprine: ^14:17
huatsfor hashmap14:17
sheeprineAnything to add about the summit?14:17
sergio_nubeliuI agree that we need to improve the doc, and add some doc about gnocchi and cloudkitty14:18
huatssergio_nubeliu: actually this is something that I will adress14:18
*** tfukushima has quit IRC14:18
sergio_nubeliuhuats: great14:18
sheeprineYes especialy the current limitations around archive policy and the way cloudkitty is fetching data.14:18
huatsI have discussed that with err earlier today (a guy from the #cloudkitty chan)14:18
*** pgadiya has quit IRC14:19
huatsthat it was nice to meet Maximiliano :)14:19
huats(that is the thing I wanted to add on the Summit)14:19
sheeprineAnd see what you've done with CloudKitty ;)14:20
sergio_nubeliu:)14:20
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:21
sheeprineLet's focus on gnocchi support now, we've got some work about that.14:21
sheeprine#topic gnocchi support14:21
*** openstack changes topic to "gnocchi support (Meeting topic: cloudkitty)"14:21
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:21
sheeprineSo, what we all agreed on during the summit and session is to improve gnocchi support and to remove the need for an intermediary database.14:22
sheeprineWe've got 2 ways of doing it, 1 do a 1:1 mapping with gnocchi resources.14:22
sheeprine2 support dynamic resources thanks to the new API.14:22
sheeprineI think 1 is pretty easy to attain in a small timeframe14:23
sheeprinebut 2 might need more work.14:23
sheeprine1 has some limitations, we can't support data collected outside of gnocchi14:23
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-314:24
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: do you agree to use same resources and create a new metric for each metric that have rating rules?14:24
sheeprinesergio_nubeliu: Yep, it's the easiest way to do it.14:24
sheeprineJust do a metric.cost14:24
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: that's right. understood, the limitations14:25
huatsWe discussed that it would be best to address 1 dring that cycle and then to work on that during the O cycle for the 214:25
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: what kind of data are you thinking about outside of gnocchi?14:25
huatssince it would give time to work on things asides that are needed14:25
sheeprinesergio_nubeliu: No clear idea, but we're supposed to handle multiple collectors, which means data that is not coming from gnocchi.14:26
sheeprineAt the moment the only other collector is ceilometer... which is pointless if we are using gnocchi14:26
sheeprineBut some people might need it. Since at the moment it's not the case we'll first focus on point #114:27
huatssheeprine: isn't it possible to inject data inside gnocchi from the collectors so that there is just 1 data source ?14:27
sheeprineSame problem as storing, you are just moving the problem in the collector.14:27
sergio_nubeliuhuats: i think yes, its totally possible using the gnocchi api14:28
huatsok14:28
huatsI was just mentionning that if someone NEEDS that it is a possibility ...14:29
sergio_nubeliuhuats: sure...14:29
sergio_nubeliuso, are we agreed to develop this 1:1 option at first?14:29
sheeprineMight, but I really doubt we'll ever do something like that14:29
sheeprineYes14:30
huatssounds good for me too14:30
sheeprineI'm fixing a bug and doing some code cleanup in the current collector.14:30
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: are you ok if i work on this?14:30
sheeprineYeah sure.14:31
sheeprineI'll finish the collector part, but you can start the work on the storage.14:31
sheeprineThis way we can have good gnocchi support faster.14:31
sergio_nubeliugreat! i think it shouldn't take more than two weeks to have a first version?14:32
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom14:32
sheeprineI think that we should create a new driver.14:32
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: agree14:32
sheeprineYou can duplicate the gnocchihybrid but name it gnocchi14:32
sheeprineAs it's pretty different from the way it's working.14:32
sheeprineAnd then we implement #2 as new features.14:33
sheeprineIf you're working on storage I'll try to focus on new collector and internal objects.14:33
sheeprineDoes anyone as more to add about gnocchi?14:34
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:34
huatsnot from me14:34
sergio_nubeliuok, i'll be working on 1:1 storage for the next two weeks14:35
huatsgreat to hear sheeprine14:35
huatssergio_nubeliu:14:35
sheeprinegood.14:35
huats^14:35
huats:)14:35
sheeprinesergio_nubeliu: try to push you patch in review as work in progress14:35
*** itxaka has quit IRC14:35
sheeprineThis way I can have a look at the architecture and tell you if something should be modified earlier.14:35
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: i'll do it14:35
sheeprinegreat.14:35
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-314:36
sheeprineLet's move on.14:37
sheeprine#topic road to version 0.614:37
*** openstack changes topic to "road to version 0.6 (Meeting topic: cloudkitty)"14:37
sheeprineNothing really new here, we'll try to keep focus on what we planned for CloudKitty till now.14:37
sheeprineThe full roadmap is in the previous meeting logs.14:38
sheeprineWe worked on what we'll do (objectif libre) during the next spints.14:38
sheeprineWe'll try to get this published ASAP so everyone can have a clear picture of what is soon to come on what's on the map.14:38
sheeprinesergio_nubeliu: Any specific point you want to include in version 0.6?14:39
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-314:39
*** stendulker has joined #openstack-meeting-314:40
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: for this version 0.6, having the native gnocchi it fine by me14:41
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: when do you plan to release?14:41
sheeprinefor 0.6? improved gnocchi support, new collector resources modeling.14:42
sheeprineNot the awful list of dicts14:42
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:42
sheeprineYou'll have an object with all the parameters14:42
sheeprineBut it will still behaves as a dict some legacy code still works.14:42
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: i think, the native storage will be a major performance improvement14:43
sheeprineI guess it's pretty important for you.14:43
sheeprineI'm pretty sure yes.14:43
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: yes, you are right14:43
sheeprineAt some point of time it might be usefull to plug the fake collector and a dummy storage to profile rating code of cloudkitty.14:43
sergio_nubeliu:)14:43
sheeprineBut not for this release ;)14:43
sheeprineversion 0.7 will focus on storage14:44
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: do you have an estimated date for the release?14:44
sheeprine0.6? I hope less than a month14:44
sergio_nubeliusheeprine: thats great!14:45
sheeprineSo if you say you are done with the storage in 2 weeks it's perfect14:45
huatsit depends on you too sergio_nubeliu  ;)14:45
sergio_nubeliuI hope so14:45
sheeprinesergio_nubeliu: No presure ;)14:45
sergio_nubeliuhahahaha, no presures :)14:45
sheeprineAre we ok about what's v0.6?14:47
huatsI think we are sheeprine  !14:47
*** errr has joined #openstack-meeting-314:47
sheeprine#topic last minutes14:48
*** openstack changes topic to "last minutes (Meeting topic: cloudkitty)"14:48
sergio_nubeliuyes, i think so!14:48
sheeprineWe have a few minutes left, anything to add?14:48
huatsNot for me !14:48
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]14:49
sergio_nubeliuno, i'll contact you on irc while i develop the storage to discuss if needed14:49
*** dedery has joined #openstack-meeting-314:49
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:49
sheeprineOk great.14:50
sergio_nubeliuthank you guys!14:50
sheeprineWe're done then, thanks everyone.14:50
sergio_nubeliuhave a nice week!14:50
sheeprine#endmeeting14:50
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:50
openstackMeeting ended Mon May  9 14:50:23 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:50
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cloudkitty/2016/cloudkitty.2016-05-09-14.10.html14:50
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cloudkitty/2016/cloudkitty.2016-05-09-14.10.txt14:50
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cloudkitty/2016/cloudkitty.2016-05-09-14.10.log.html14:50
huatsthanks !14:50
sheeprineSee you all in #cloudkitty ;)14:50
catintheroofsheeprine, should we use #openstack-rating ?14:51
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-314:52
*** CaoWei has joined #openstack-meeting-314:52
sheeprinecatintheroof: #openstack-rating was used during the first steps of what will become cloudkitty.14:52
*** egallen has quit IRC14:52
sheeprineSince we were not an openstack project we were not supposed to use the name openstack-rating. As we were not affiliated with OpenStack.14:52
catintheroofsheeprine, oh, si it's a WAS14:52
sheeprineWe still happen to be in the channel but we all meet in #cloudkitty14:53
catintheroofsheeprine, because then we should ask to change the openstack-rating for cloudkitty on the official IRC list14:53
catintheroofsheeprine, maybe14:53
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly14:53
*** dedery has quit IRC14:54
sheeprinecatintheroof: Oh is it set to #openstack-rating in the official irc list?14:54
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-314:55
*** mickeys has quit IRC14:56
*** CaoWei has quit IRC14:56
sheeprinecatintheroof: indeed it is... I'll try to change it. Thanks for the info.14:58
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-314:58
*** dedery has joined #openstack-meeting-314:59
*** zhonghua-lee has joined #openstack-meeting-315:00
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC15:03
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:05
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-315:06
*** spzala has quit IRC15:06
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-315:07
*** d0ugal has quit IRC15:08
catintheroofsheeprine, NP15:09
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:12
*** spzala has quit IRC15:13
*** sverma has quit IRC15:16
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]15:20
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-315:26
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly15:26
*** lblanchard has quit IRC15:29
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-315:29
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-315:32
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-315:34
*** jed56 has quit IRC15:34
*** andreas_s has quit IRC15:36
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-315:38
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-315:38
*** bpokorny has quit IRC15:38
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-315:39
*** irenab has quit IRC15:46
*** rama_y has joined #openstack-meeting-315:46
*** bpokorny has quit IRC15:47
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-315:47
*** mariojv has joined #openstack-meeting-315:48
mariojv:q15:48
mariojvoops15:48
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-315:48
*** d0ugal has quit IRC15:51
*** numans has quit IRC15:51
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-315:56
*** hshiina has joined #openstack-meeting-315:58
sc`#startmeeting openstack_chef16:00
openstackMeeting started Mon May  9 16:00:11 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc`. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: openstack_chef)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_chef'16:00
*** hshiina has left #openstack-meeting-316:00
jklarehi16:00
*** mariojv has left #openstack-meeting-316:00
sc`ohai!16:00
sc`we have a few topics today, i think16:01
sc`#topic cutting stable/mitaka16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "cutting stable/mitaka (Meeting topic: openstack_chef)"16:02
jklarei think we are close to doing that :)16:02
sc`i think we're pretty close to a place where we can do this16:02
sc`the initial tempest stuff is in. i just looked at your multi node and role cleanup review. intend to spin a local instance today16:03
jklarethe bug for the virtlog not starting is still out there16:03
jklarehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/157745516:03
openstackLaunchpad bug 1577455 in libvirt (Ubuntu) "virtlogd not started automatically with libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10~cloud0" [Undecided,New]16:04
jklarenobody seems to care16:04
*** calbers_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:04
*** dedery has quit IRC16:04
jklarebut you can workaround that with just manually starting it16:04
jklareor restarting the instances16:04
sc`unfortunate. it's a workaround16:04
jklarei hope that ubuntu fixes it soon16:05
sc`need to light a fire under some people16:05
jklare^^16:05
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-316:06
sc`i think the release can happen this week16:06
jklaresounds good16:07
jklarebut we still need to close the bugs and blueprints16:07
jklareand i am quite busy this week16:07
jklareits CoreOSFest in berlin :)16:07
sc`yup. have to get lp in good shape16:08
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-316:08
sc`the refactoring blueprint can most definitely be closed out for mitaka16:08
jklare:)16:09
jklareat least for the core cookbooks16:09
sc`yeah. still needs to be done for openstackclient, swift, etc.16:09
sc`openstackclient is going to be more of an important cookbook going forward, i think16:10
*** vtech_ has quit IRC16:10
jklareyeah16:12
jklarebuts its not a very easy one i think16:12
sc`no16:12
*** piet has quit IRC16:13
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC16:14
sc`#topic newton on centos16:14
*** openstack changes topic to "newton on centos (Meeting topic: openstack_chef)"16:14
sc`though we still have mitaka to release, i changed a local copy of the cookbooks over to use the newton repo from rdo, and it works16:14
*** spzala has quit IRC16:15
*** lpetrut has quit IRC16:15
sc`the modifications were minimal, just a change to the attribute, and adding in the mitaka-deps repo16:16
sc`unfortunately, i can't say the same for ubuntu as... apparently there are no packages yet16:16
sc`it doesn't seem to work in ci, yet16:17
jklarethere wont be until 16.10 i guess16:17
jklarebut we can try to aim for xenial support in mitaka16:17
jklarei added the ci job a week ago16:18
jklareso we can start testing and maybe even include 16.04 support in our first stable/mitaka release16:18
jklarewhy are there packages for newton already on centos?16:19
sc`people like playing close to the bleeding edge16:19
jklareor does newton = master = nightly ?16:19
sc`sort of16:19
*** ccamacho is now known as ccamacho|afk16:19
jklarecool16:19
jklarehave not seen anything like that for ubuntu yet16:21
jklarebut maybe its out there16:21
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-316:21
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-316:21
*** lucasagomes has joined #openstack-meeting-316:22
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC16:22
*** andymaier has quit IRC16:23
sc`if not it should be!16:24
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-316:24
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-316:25
jklareyeah not sure16:27
jklarei think packaging is fine for stable stuff16:27
jklarebut if you really want to go for master/neutron things16:27
jklareyou probably want to build yourself16:27
jklarebut thats my opinion16:27
sc`for now, yeah16:27
sc`the closer packaging can get to master, the sooner people can start testing, but that's a larger topic16:28
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-316:29
jklareyou have a point there16:29
jklare:)16:29
jklareanything else you want to talk about?16:29
sc`that's about all i have16:30
jklaresame here16:30
sc`then let's call it. thanks for joining16:31
sc`#endmeeting16:31
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:31
openstackMeeting ended Mon May  9 16:31:09 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:31
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_chef/2016/openstack_chef.2016-05-09-16.00.html16:31
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_chef/2016/openstack_chef.2016-05-09-16.00.txt16:31
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_chef/2016/openstack_chef.2016-05-09-16.00.log.html16:31
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC16:37
*** mariojv has joined #openstack-meeting-316:43
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-316:44
*** irenab has quit IRC16:45
*** david-lyle_ is now known as david-lyle16:45
*** mickeys has quit IRC16:45
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-316:46
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-316:46
*** irenab has quit IRC16:46
*** mickeys has quit IRC16:47
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-316:48
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-316:49
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-316:54
*** cbouch has quit IRC16:54
*** ihrachys has quit IRC16:54
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-316:55
*** milan has joined #openstack-meeting-316:55
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-316:56
*** banix has quit IRC16:56
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-meeting-316:56
*** tiendc has joined #openstack-meeting-316:56
*** dtantsur has joined #openstack-meeting-316:57
*** alanmeadows has quit IRC16:57
* jlvillal prepares to o/16:59
*** sdake has quit IRC17:00
NobodyCamlol17:00
jrollohai17:00
jroll#startmeeting ironic17:00
openstackMeeting started Mon May  9 17:00:35 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jroll. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ironic'17:00
davidlenwello/17:00
mariojv\o17:00
NobodyCamo/17:00
jlvillalo/17:00
krtayloro/17:00
lucasagomes:-)17:00
mat128o/17:00
devanandao/17:00
rama_yo/17:00
jrollas always, agenda is here:17:00
jroll#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Agenda_for_next_meeting17:00
*** mjturek1 has joined #openstack-meeting-317:00
jrolllet's jump in17:01
mjturek1o/17:01
jroll#topic announcements and reminders17:01
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements and reminders (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:01
*** mgould has joined #openstack-meeting-317:01
stendulkero/17:01
mgouldo/17:01
jrollso uh, welcome back from the summit everyone :)17:01
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-317:01
jrollgate was broken this morning17:01
jrollrevert just merged in, should be better now17:02
jroll#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314024/17:02
*** rloo has joined #openstack-meeting-317:02
jlvillalThanks dtantsur for troubleshooting it :)17:02
dtantsuro/17:02
jroll+117:02
NobodyCamThank you dtantsur17:02
rlooo/ +117:02
*** hshiina has joined #openstack-meeting-317:02
jrollother than that, most of the team is working hard on upgrade testing, which is our #1 priority right now17:02
jrollI have summit summary coming out soon, only a couple more sessions to write about17:03
*** pt_15 has joined #openstack-meeting-317:03
jrolland midcycle things - there's a topic on today's agenda for that17:03
jrollany other announcements / reminders?17:03
rlooreminder to update subteam reports :)17:04
rlooand newton priorities were set17:04
jrollah, yes. newton priorities are here: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/priorities/newton-priorities.html17:04
jroll#link http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/priorities/newton-priorities.html17:05
*** wanyen has joined #openstack-meeting-317:05
jrollnothing else?17:05
jroll#topic subteam status reports17:05
*** openstack changes topic to "subteam status reports (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:05
jrollas always, those are on the whiteboard17:05
jroll#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard17:05
jrollstarts at line 8517:06
jrollI'll give folks a minute to review, and then I think we want to get meta about this for a moment17:06
sambettso/17:07
NobodyCamjroll: I wonder if we should have said something about your patch to switch to tinyIPA for gate jobs17:08
jrollNobodyCam: maybe, thank you17:09
dtantsurI'll repeat what I wrote there: I suggest we switch -2 from the portgroups API patch to the network drivers one17:09
jrollNobodyCam: (mine just switched grenade jobs)17:09
*** Pramod has joined #openstack-meeting-317:09
PramodHi17:09
dtantsurI understand it's nice to land them together, but these are huge patches which are not easy to review17:09
jrolldtantsur: possibly, though it would be nice to land the api changes somewhat together. devananda had a similar opinion17:09
dtantsursee above :)17:09
devanandadtantsur: I'm curious as to why. the API changes are the hardest to back out after we land17:09
jrollright, so17:09
dtantsurdevananda, do we expect any changes there? it's essentially CRUD17:09
jrollwe suggested in this morning's meeting that folks split those patches up17:10
dtantsurwe're artificially delaying landing of the whole thing, hence my concern.. people have to rebase so much code17:10
lucasagomessplitting would be nice yeah17:10
rloojroll: split up which patches?17:10
dtantsurno use in splitting if we're going to block the whole chain in the same manner17:10
jrollrloo: networks work17:10
*** nicodemos has joined #openstack-meeting-317:10
devanandait's basically two 2500 line patches right now17:10
dtantsurthey'll still have to rebase the whole thing every time17:10
devanandapretty hard to review IMO17:10
dtantsur+1 to "hard to review" though17:10
sambetts+117:10
rlooI've already reviewed the API patch so don't want to split that up.17:11
devanandathe other, what, ten patches after that are small enough and easy to review17:11
rlooi've reviewed the network patch and agree, would have been nice to split that up.17:11
jrollI guess I don't have a strong opinion either way on landing the portgroups patch17:11
PramodI am Pramod. i work for opendaylight SDN controller team! i have a question about the bandwidth limit field! Would like to know the maximum and minimum limit which is supported by QOS now17:11
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-317:11
jrollPramod: this is an ironic project meeting, I think you want #openstack-neutron channel17:11
devanandarloo: when did you review it? I don't see a +2 from you in the last couple months17:12
lucasagomesPramod, I think you are on the wrong channel, check neutron17:12
rloodevananda: wrt the API? I reviewed it months ago. did it change since then? I assuemd they were all rebases after that.17:12
dtantsurwith or without splitting, I think we can start merging patches not touching drivers17:12
dtantsurrloo raises a good point: it's hard to track out reviews after rebases...17:13
devanandarloo: I don' tknow if they were all rebases since then or not. it's hard for me to keep track ...17:13
dtantsurespecially on something THAT huge17:13
lucasagomesmaybe we should have this discussion later on in the meeting?17:13
jrolllucasagomes: +117:13
rloofwiw, i didn't re-review the api changes cuz i assumed they had all been rebases. i was only going to do it ONE LAST TIME...17:13
jrollor in channel17:13
dtantsurok fine :)17:13
lucasagomesyeah, sounds off-topic17:13
NobodyCam+1 to in channel17:14
jrollso rloo had some meta-discussion things on this topic17:14
jrollrloo: want to talk about those now?17:14
rloosure. so i added new subteams to reflect newton priorities.17:14
*** markvan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:14
rlooand live upgrades is no longer a priority. should i remove it.17:14
jrollI think so17:15
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-317:15
rloook, #something to removing live upgrades17:15
dtantsurI guess it's kind of merged into Grenade work17:15
jlvillallive upgrades is not a priority?17:15
lucasagomesif it's not a priority I think it would be fine to remove17:15
rloodtantsur: not true. there is code needed for live upgrades17:15
*** cdearborn has joined #openstack-meeting-317:15
jrolljlvillal: it is not on our list of high priority items17:15
*** Pramod has quit IRC17:15
cdearborno/17:15
jlvillalAh, okay.17:15
jrollit is a priority, but not a top priority17:15
rloojlvillal: i believe it was on the secondary list of priorities17:15
dtantsurgot it. then yeah, getting just upgrade tested is a bigger thing to have17:15
*** spzala has quit IRC17:16
rlooso agreed, good to remove live upgrades? any nays?17:16
* jroll pauses17:16
jrollokay, let's do it17:17
jrolldone17:17
rloomy next question. i notice that we have some subteams wrt cross project initiatives, oslo & nova.17:17
rloothere are lots of other cross projects  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons17:18
rloodo people think it worthwhile to list those other ones as subteams too?17:18
jrollI personally don't find the existing ones terribly useful, they usually don't have much info17:18
jrollor rather much to report17:18
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:18
rlooso do they not have much info cuz people aren't reporting, or cuz nothing to report?17:18
jrollI tend to think the latter17:19
rlooso would a 'cross-project liaisons' be sufficient? (or something like that)17:19
lucasagomesmaybe we can make it optional? If there's something to be reported we can freely add to the etherpad for that week17:19
jrollpartially because if there's something major, we raise it outside of the meeting17:19
rloowell 'outside the meeting' == ?? irc??17:19
jrolle.g. api-ref thing, if there was something horribly broken in nova irc pings and emails would happen, etc17:19
NobodyCammaybe a "Other" section where liaisons could put inserting bit should they have any?17:19
lucasagomesrloo, yeah maybe a topic for all seems a good spot17:19
dtantsur++ to just "Cross-Project" section17:20
rlooseems like we want to know what might be coming up, not what landed/decided?17:20
jrollsure17:20
rlooeg, i had no idea there was an api-ref for ironic.17:20
NobodyCamdtantsur: ++17:20
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-317:21
jrollI guess what I'm saying is I haven't personally found valuable info from that section, ever17:21
rlootrue. sort of. the oslo ones were informative.17:21
jrollrloo: well, there was an email thread that said "projects should move to this model"17:21
*** sdake has quit IRC17:21
rloojroll: what i mean was, you moved api-ref to our tree. i didn't even know there was api-ref outside our tree.17:21
devanandarloo: that was a repo the docs team managed for the last several years17:22
jrollrloo: oh, that's because only docs people worked on that. nobody in our project really knew or cared about it. same for most projects17:22
dtantsurI had no idea either17:22
rloojroll: even with a doc liaison, we might not have known about the api-ref outside our tree so it might be moot.17:22
devanandait just became cross-project17:22
jrollbecause the format was super exclusive, etc17:22
jrollanyway, I think a general "cross-project" section is a good middle ground17:23
rlooi'm good with cross-project. anyone against it?17:23
* lucasagomes is fine with it17:23
devananda++. I think it's very useful for folks who are doing cross-project tracking to raise any upcoming (or recently decided) things to the broader ironic team17:23
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]17:23
rloothat's all I had on this topic, for the time being :)17:24
jrollcool, thanks ruby17:24
jrollanything else from anyone here or can we move on?17:25
jroll#topic proliantutils in our governance17:25
*** openstack changes topic to "proliantutils in our governance (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:25
jroll#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313667/17:25
jrollthis was brought to my attention today17:25
*** sdake_ has quit IRC17:25
jrolland I think I'm okay with it, but wanted to see what folks thing17:26
stendulkerThis is wrt vendor CI discussion we had at summit, that CI information is fetched from stackalytics. Using python-dracclient as reference raised two patches for review.17:26
rloowould it be in scope for me to ask what does it mean to be an ironic project and what does it mean wrt responsibilites for ...17:26
jrollstendulker later pointed out that they were just copying what dracclient did17:26
stendulkerdriverlog - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/311277/ and in governance - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313667/17:26
lucasagomesdoes being in our governance means that the core team has to guarantee some quality of that code and things like that?17:26
lucasagomescause I have no means to test that project17:26
devanandalucasagomes: no, it doesn't17:26
jrollit means the PTL is responsible for the project and its governance, releases, etc17:26
stendulkerNot sure on the impact of being into governance...17:27
jrolland, as with all things, that can be delegated17:27
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-317:27
devanandait's akin to neutron's "stadium" -- we acknowledge that contributions to that repo are contributions to Ironic17:27
dtantsurthe same model is applied to dracclient, wsmanclient and pyghmi, right? and to some extent to inspector stuff?17:27
*** lpetrut has quit IRC17:27
lucasagomesyeah seems fine then17:27
devanandaso, eg, someone who contributes to proliantutils would be considered an ATC on theIironic project, get to vote on PTL election, etc17:27
devanandadtantsur: yep17:27
lucasagomesdracclient is already in part of the governance so, it makes sense to have the iLO one as well17:28
jrolldtantsur: well, pyghmi isn't in our governance, but otherwise yes17:28
lucasagomes(and potentially others)17:28
dtantsurjroll, aha. though if we start using vbmc in gate we might want to get more involved in pyghmi17:28
NobodyCamI believe there are other repos like this already under our governance like the Drac17:28
jrollthis is the current list of projects we "own" right now: http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/ironic.html17:28
jrolldtantsur: yes, I agree :)17:28
krtaylornot sure I understand the reference to CI and stackalytics, driverlog add isn't an infra requirement17:28
lucasagomesdtantsur, yeah, I've been trying to help with with17:29
sambettsI'm really interested on how this is going to work in the grand scheme of things after neutron just kicked all vendor specifc things out of their governance :/17:29
devanandasambetts: ohh?17:29
rlooso we should be consistent. if dracclient is there, so should proliantutils.17:29
devanandamaybe I missed that17:29
jrollkrtaylor: right, separate topic, but we did say they should do that17:29
jrolldevananda: heh. yeah, it's a thing.17:29
rloooh. let's follow neutron then.17:29
jrollsambetts: devananda: the krux there was that they were approaching hundreds of projects, afaik, with more coming.17:29
rlooi hope ironic will have hundreds of projects one day too :)17:30
jrollno, let's not blindly follow neutron. but we should consider their reasoning etc17:30
* jlvillal feels like they shouldn't be there. Mostly gut feeling17:30
jrollI think my proposal for now is that we should accept proliantutils for consistency, and if we feel like this is all unmanageable, talk about that at another time17:30
krtaylorjroll, should we require test teams to add their test system to driverlog?17:30
devanandasambetts: ooh. I see! No vendor drivers here: http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/neutron.html17:30
rlooi personally am not comfortable with the hw-specific ones being there. and/or is there a tag we can use to differentiate those.17:31
* sambetts is trying to find their spec for it 17:31
jrollkrtaylor: well, we wanted to keep marketplace up to date, which is fed by driverlog yes?17:31
krtaylorjroll, right, good point, then yes17:31
jrollso, I don't want to take the whole meeting on this17:31
jrollbut I see there are concerns with too many vendor things17:31
dtantsurrloo, I suspect there might be limitations like "non-official projects can't do XXX" like with stackforge...17:32
dtantsurthus people try to get into an official project tent17:32
sambettshttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-neutron-community-stadium-evolution17:32
devanandakrtaylor: governance inclusion in Ironic shouldn't affect driverlog or third-party CI, AIUI. but it does affect ATC status and contribution metrics on stackalytics17:32
rloodtantsur: oh. hmm.17:32
rlooi would like someone to talk to neutron folks, think about this, and report back next meeting.17:32
rloopros/cons. if what dtantur said is true. what are neutron vendors going to do.17:32
rloocan we at least tag them?17:33
jrollsure17:33
devanandayea. to be clear -- if we include the hw driver projects in ironic's governance, then folks who contribute ONLY to those projects (and not to openstack/ironic, our client, etc) will get ATC status and vote in Ironic's PTL election17:33
jrolland that's a long conversation to have17:33
jrolland lots of things to think about17:33
devananda++ to thinking about this more17:33
jrolland is on the order of months/years, not a week17:33
jrollso yes, we should continue this conversation17:33
rlooso we shouldn't have let any in, in the first place. sigh.17:33
rlooif this is going to take more than a week, then we should let proliant in.17:34
jrollfor NOW... I do not want to wait to decide on proliantutils17:34
jrollright, should we let them in or not, today17:34
dtantsurwell, cheating in a PTL election is not hard17:34
jrollI vote yes for consistency sake17:34
dtantsur++ for yes17:34
rlooyes (unfortunately)17:34
lucasagomes+1 for in, since we already have other vendors17:34
NobodyCamWe have already let some in17:34
NobodyCamso Yes17:34
jrolldoes anyone vehemently disagree?17:34
sambettsFor more context on the neutron stuff https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312199/9/specs/newton/neutron-stadium.rst17:35
devananda+1 for consistency today, and +1 for continuing the discussion more broadly17:35
jroll(counting 6 yes 0 no so far)17:35
rlooi assume the caveat would be if that vendor doesn't have CI, their packages are OUT17:35
jrollrloo: another interesting debate to have there :)17:35
dtantsurthis is a possibility17:35
krtaylor+1, we agreed, maybe informally, that new driver additions would require CI17:36
jrollit was pretty formal :)17:36
jrollokay, I'm going to ack that patch then. thanks y'all.17:36
devanandayea, we have a pretty clear agreement at this point: for a driver to be in ironic's tree, it needs CI17:36
* krtaylor need to make sure that was in the spec17:36
jrolllooking forward to someone raising the larger discussion17:37
devanandabut that didn't discuss the inclusion of hw-specific libraries in our project governance17:37
jrollyep.17:37
jrollok, moving on for now17:38
* sambetts has been through this nightmare with networking-cisco (our neutron drivers) and can say its not very fun17:38
sambettshence I've left cisco-ironic-contrib out of the goverence17:38
jroll#topic midcycle!17:38
*** openstack changes topic to "midcycle! (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:39
jrollso I've spoken privately with a few people on this17:39
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-317:39
jrollI think our virtual midcycle went very well last round17:39
jrollbut we need to decide whether that should be virtual or physical this year17:39
jrollsome folks have offered space if we do a physical midcycle17:39
jrollthe pros of a physical midcycle are higher-bandwidth comms, more networking opportunities, we get to see each other's beautiful faces17:40
NobodyCamI would like to have a physical midcycle for all the reasons jroll just listed17:40
jrollpros of a virtual midcycle are that generally more folks can attend (though some may be left out of virtual due to time zones)17:40
rlooif physical, is it in the US?17:40
NobodyCamcan we look at a hybrid type midcycle?17:41
jrollrloo: likely17:41
mariojv+1 hybrid17:41
* mgould thought the virtual midcycle went very well17:41
* dtantsur as usual votes for a virtual one17:41
sambetts+1 to virtual17:41
mgouldalso I'd be unlikely to be able to attend a physical one in the US17:41
jrollIME a room full of people talking over voice to a single person is terrible experience for the single person17:41
rloodoes time frame matter?17:41
jrollso -1 to hybrid17:41
davidlenwell-1000 to virtual17:41
mgould+2 to virtual, +1 to hybrid :-)17:41
* sambetts would also like to see multiple intercycle virtual meetings17:42
devanandaI would like to have a f2f midcycle this time, as well as regular virtual meetings (eg monthly, or something)17:42
* jlvillal personally likes physical ones. But he likely can't attend this time as he has vacation plans :(17:42
devananda-1 to hybrid, for the reason jroll mentioned17:42
jlvillal+1 for regular virtual meetings17:42
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-317:42
mgouldjroll, by "hybrid" I was thinking "some sessions are physical, others are virtual"17:42
jrollrloo: elaborate?17:42
krtaylor+1 virtual, frees up travel budget for summit17:42
rloothe cinder midcycle was hybrid, wasn't it17:42
mgouldI don't know if that could be made to work17:42
lucasagomesit's depends on the location for me (and most ppl I guess)17:42
davidlenwell+1 virtual meetings -1 virtual mid-cycles17:42
devanandajroll: have you talked with the Nova team about colocating?17:42
jrollrloo: the cinder midcycle was physical, virtual was read only17:42
rloojroll: I mean, folks prefer virtual/physical regardless of when it might be held?17:42
lucasagomes+1 virtual17:42
mariojvperhaps there should be a vote on the ML about this17:43
jrolldevananda: I have not17:43
rloojroll: there was utube video of cinder midcycle17:43
jrollrloo: right, but folks not in the room could not participate17:43
rloojroll: the one that TheJulia was in.17:43
* mgould is wondering if the voting is breaking down purely on geographical lines17:43
mariojvmany who would be affected by a TZ difference with a virtual midcycle or who may be traveling internationally might not be in this meeting17:43
rloojroll: OH.17:43
jrollto be clear I'm taking this to the mailing list after the meeting17:43
mgouldNAians want physical, rest-of-worldians want virtual...17:43
jrollbut wanted to get initial feedback17:43
rloo+1 for virtual just to wreck mgould's stats.17:44
devanandamgould: in my experience, it was never perfectly along those lines17:44
mgouldrloo, hah :-)17:44
devananda:)17:44
mat128+1 physical midcycle, +1 virtual meetings on a regular basis17:44
mat128oops late :P17:44
jrollmy personal vote is also for virtual, because there are people that I really wish were present, that won't or can't attend a physical midcycle17:44
cineramahaving been NA and !NA, i would still vote for physical midcycle even if i had to travel (pending funding)17:44
krtaylorI would rather be able to participate, even at a lower bandwidth, that not be able to go due to travel budget17:45
* sambetts doesn't see much gained for a 8+ hour flight over a virtual midcycle17:45
krtaylor++17:45
dtantsuryeah, oversees flight with its prices just for 2-3 days... I won't even remember you all due to jet lag :D17:46
mat128I'd be down to try a virtual meetup, considering I wasn't part of the last one and heard it went well17:46
devanandadtantsur, sambetts: arguing at a white board and then drinking together afterwards :)17:46
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC17:47
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly17:47
jlvillalEU could have a midcycle at the same time ;)17:47
jrollright, so "beer at night" is the primary reason for physical that I hear these days17:47
NobodyCamif we go virtual it might be good to have a screen share of some kind17:47
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]17:47
jrolland I don't think that's valuable enough to artificially exclude half of our cores17:47
jroll(half is a straw man number to be clear)17:47
dtantsuralso note that it's likely that both design summits the next year will be in NA ;)17:47
jrollso s/half/a significant portion/17:48
krtaylorIMHO, physical is less open, favors participants that have deep travel budgets17:48
cineramai'm more of a visual person so sometimes i get a bit lost in the audio-only stuff17:49
* mgould can drink beer during the virtual sessions, if it would help...17:49
krtaylorlol17:49
lucasagomeskrtaylor, +1 (mgould +1 there too)17:49
jrollmgould: that most certainly happened last cycle :)17:49
NobodyCammgould: lol17:49
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-317:49
jrollI'm going to open up discussion in case folks have other topics, feel free to continue this one as well. I'll send an email to the list later today.17:49
mariojvcinerama: i agree about the visual aspect being important; i was wondering if there's a video service where we could hold enough people17:49
jroll#topic open discussion17:49
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:49
cineramai also think that strengthening relationships between folks is an important thing that comes out of summit and midcycles, even if that doesn't directly map to a technical goal17:49
jrollmariojv: not with free software :(17:50
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC17:50
dtantsurmgould, I was drinking whiskey the last time :)17:50
mgouldmariojv, we looked into this and couldn't find a solution that was both scalable enough and open-source :-(17:50
mgoulddtantsur, me too :-)17:50
mariojvi see, that's unfortunate.17:50
sambettshangouts works for break out sessions up to a point17:50
devanandajroll: one other thing to consider, the proposed changes to summit and introduction of the new "PTG" event may replace midcycles in a year17:52
NobodyCamnothing for Open Discussion?17:52
*** catintheroof has left #openstack-meeting-317:52
rlooare we looking at July for the midcycle?17:52
lucasagomessambetts, yeah, I think that if we need to use video (to share screen or something like that) we can get a group of people that is working on specific problem and start a hangout to deal with it17:52
jrolldevananda: yep17:53
jrollrloo: likely, maybe early august. we didn't get to the "when" :)17:53
*** egallen has quit IRC17:54
devanandalucasagomes: most of the collaboration tools like that are proprietary / platform-specific17:54
rloojroll: ok. early aug is out for me so my vote wouldn't count if it was for then.17:54
jrolldevananda: lucasagomes: which is okay if it's a focused group of folks that all accept that. just not ok for the main event17:54
lucasagomesdevananda, yeah. But I was thinking about having a video chat (if needed) only with a sub group of the people working on a specific problem17:54
devanandalucasagomes: this is one of the big challenges with a virtual midcycle: we have folks on so many different platforms, some with high network latency17:54
lucasagomessay people working on grenade17:54
lucasagomesjroll, yes, not for the main event17:55
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-317:55
lucasagomeswell can talk about it on the ML17:55
devanandasome folks may be excluded due to technology, if the chosen communication medium is not open17:55
devanandaeven if they want to join that subgroup17:55
NobodyCambluejeans is web based no?17:56
devanandathere's no perfect answer17:56
dtantsurNobodyCam, it requires a plugin17:56
lucasagomesdevananda, +1 for the concerns17:56
jrolltl;dr if we choose a technology, it needs to be stallman-compatible and low-bandwidth, else someone gets excluded17:56
NobodyCam:(17:56
devanandajroll: exactly17:56
jlvillallucasagomes: Does Red Hat have an approved video conference system?17:56
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-317:57
jlvillalSince they tend to be the most open source pure.17:57
lucasagomesjlvillal, nop :-( we use bluejeans17:57
mat128jlvillal: blue jeans17:57
jlvillalk17:57
clarkbasterisk can do it but our install needs an upgrade?17:57
rloosigh. so if it is physical, folks will be excluded. if it is virtual, we want low-bandwidth so people aren't excluded.17:57
clarkbif people are interested pabelanger can probably provide more infos17:57
rlooand either way, folks in different time zones are/maybe excluded.17:57
NobodyCam*Two* Minutes17:58
rloowho really wants to be in the mid-cycle? :)17:58
NobodyCamclarkb: I would love more info17:58
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:58
mat128Can't believe in 2016 we dont have anything to host 50 participants and a video stream17:58
jrollcomputers are the worst17:59
jroll:)17:59
mat128rloo: I want to assist, physical or virtual17:59
jrollone minute left, shall we?17:59
NobodyCam++ thank you all great meeting17:59
jroll#endmeeting17:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:59
openstackMeeting ended Mon May  9 17:59:40 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2016/ironic.2016-05-09-17.00.html17:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2016/ironic.2016-05-09-17.00.txt17:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2016/ironic.2016-05-09-17.00.log.html17:59
jrollthanks all17:59
*** lucasagomes has left #openstack-meeting-317:59
*** dtantsur has left #openstack-meeting-317:59
*** mat128 has left #openstack-meeting-318:00
sambettso/18:00
*** rloo has left #openstack-meeting-318:01
*** sdake has quit IRC18:01
*** mickeys has quit IRC18:01
*** mariojv has left #openstack-meeting-318:01
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-318:01
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-318:01
*** mgould has quit IRC18:02
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting-318:02
*** cdearborn has left #openstack-meeting-318:02
*** mickeys has quit IRC18:06
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-318:06
*** hshiina has quit IRC18:10
*** stanchan has joined #openstack-meeting-318:12
*** sdake_ is now known as sdake18:15
*** nicodemos has left #openstack-meeting-318:19
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-318:22
*** sdake has quit IRC18:27
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:27
*** wanyen has quit IRC18:27
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC18:29
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC18:31
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC18:31
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-318:32
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC18:33
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly18:38
*** mickeys has quit IRC18:39
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-318:39
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-318:40
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz18:41
*** tiendc has quit IRC18:41
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-318:43
*** mickeys has quit IRC18:43
*** julim has quit IRC18:46
*** ajo has quit IRC18:47
*** dmellado has quit IRC18:47
*** mtanino has quit IRC18:47
*** spzala has quit IRC18:49
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-318:49
*** dtardivel has quit IRC18:49
*** s3wong has quit IRC18:50
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-318:53
*** baoli has quit IRC18:56
*** jlanoux has quit IRC18:56
*** stendulker has quit IRC18:58
*** jtomasek_ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:00
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-319:02
*** calbers_ has quit IRC19:04
*** pt_15 has quit IRC19:06
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:06
*** sdake has quit IRC19:07
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:08
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC19:09
*** lpetrut has quit IRC19:10
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-319:15
*** ihrachys has quit IRC19:15
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC19:16
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-319:26
*** egallen has quit IRC19:26
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]19:27
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC19:31
*** mbound has joined #openstack-meeting-319:36
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-319:38
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-319:39
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-319:42
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-319:44
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-319:45
*** baoli has quit IRC19:47
*** mbound has quit IRC19:47
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-319:47
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:47
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-319:49
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly19:50
*** tonytan_brb has joined #openstack-meeting-319:51
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-319:52
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC19:54
*** spzala has quit IRC19:57
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-320:06
*** egallen has quit IRC20:07
*** baoli has quit IRC20:13
*** vhoward has quit IRC20:13
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-320:14
*** baoli has quit IRC20:14
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-320:15
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom20:19
*** baoli has quit IRC20:21
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-320:21
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-320:23
*** tonytan_brb has quit IRC20:25
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-320:28
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk20:29
*** sergio_nubeliu has quit IRC20:30
*** rossella_s has quit IRC20:30
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:31
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-320:32
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-320:33
*** spzala has quit IRC20:38
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-320:38
*** baoli has quit IRC20:40
*** nicodemus_ has left #openstack-meeting-320:41
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-320:42
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-320:44
*** sdake_ has quit IRC20:47
*** baoli has quit IRC20:47
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-320:48
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:52
*** vtech has quit IRC20:53
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC20:57
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC20:58
*** baoli has quit IRC20:59
*** Daviey has joined #openstack-meeting-321:00
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-321:01
*** mageshgv has quit IRC21:03
*** rloo has joined #openstack-meeting-321:05
*** janzian has joined #openstack-meeting-321:06
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-321:06
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-321:09
*** mageshgv has joined #openstack-meeting-321:12
*** lpetrut has quit IRC21:13
*** Sandra_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:16
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-321:21
*** mjturek1 has quit IRC21:22
*** rtheis has quit IRC21:23
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-321:24
*** lblanchard has quit IRC21:24
*** d0ugal has quit IRC21:26
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-321:28
*** alanmeadows has joined #openstack-meeting-321:29
*** jtomasek_ has quit IRC21:38
*** mbound has joined #openstack-meeting-321:46
*** shwetaap has quit IRC21:46
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-321:47
*** mbound has quit IRC21:48
*** mbound has joined #openstack-meeting-321:48
*** Swami_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:52
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:52
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-321:54
*** Swami has quit IRC21:55
*** spzala_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:56
*** Swami_ has quit IRC21:58
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-321:58
*** padkrish has quit IRC21:59
*** rama_y has quit IRC22:00
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC22:00
*** shwetaap has quit IRC22:01
*** sdake has quit IRC22:02
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:03
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-322:03
*** rockyg has quit IRC22:03
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC22:05
*** janzian has quit IRC22:06
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC22:06
*** mageshgv has quit IRC22:06
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-322:07
*** ccamacho|afk has quit IRC22:07
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC22:08
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-322:10
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck22:10
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck22:10
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-322:10
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]22:19
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC22:19
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC22:19
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck22:20
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly22:23
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa22:24
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:25
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-322:29
*** piet has quit IRC22:30
*** neiljerram has quit IRC22:32
*** ddieterly has quit IRC22:33
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:35
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-322:37
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-322:38
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-322:38
*** sambetts|afk has quit IRC22:43
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-322:46
*** sambetts has joined #openstack-meeting-322:47
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC22:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-322:53
*** sdague has quit IRC22:58
*** rbak has quit IRC23:00
*** bpokorny_ has joined #openstack-meeting-323:00
*** bpokorny has quit IRC23:03
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC23:08
*** julim has quit IRC23:08
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-323:08
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck23:11
*** spzala_ has quit IRC23:12
*** bpokorny_ has quit IRC23:13
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-323:14
*** mbound has quit IRC23:18
*** rloo has quit IRC23:20
*** iyamahat has quit IRC23:22
*** mbound has joined #openstack-meeting-323:25
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-323:28
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-323:37
*** mickeys has quit IRC23:41
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-323:42
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:42
*** mickeys_ has joined #openstack-meeting-323:44
*** spzala has quit IRC23:45
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-323:46
*** mbound has quit IRC23:46
*** mickeys__ has joined #openstack-meeting-323:46
*** mickeys has quit IRC23:46
*** gabriel-bezerra has quit IRC23:47
*** mickeys_ has quit IRC23:48
*** spzala has quit IRC23:51
*** mickeys__ has quit IRC23:51
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-323:51
*** rloo has joined #openstack-meeting-323:54
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]23:55
*** armax has quit IRC23:57
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting-323:59
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-323:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!