Thursday, 2016-06-16

*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-305:59
*** mbound has quit IRC05:59
*** alex_xu has quit IRC06:03
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC06:03
*** Poornima has joined #openstack-meeting-306:06
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting-306:06
*** lpetrut has quit IRC06:13
*** TaylorHuang has joined #openstack-meeting-306:14
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting-306:16
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-306:18
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-306:18
*** sarob has quit IRC06:23
*** shwetaap1 has joined #openstack-meeting-306:23
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-306:24
*** shwetaap has quit IRC06:27
*** iyamahat_ has quit IRC06:29
*** coolsvap has quit IRC06:37
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-306:38
*** lpetrut has quit IRC06:40
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting-306:45
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:49
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-306:50
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC06:51
*** shwetaap1 has quit IRC06:51
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-306:54
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-306:55
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting-306:55
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:57
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-306:59
*** markvoelker_ has quit IRC07:01
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-307:01
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC07:03
*** gema has left #openstack-meeting-307:06
*** hdaniel has joined #openstack-meeting-307:06
*** tmazur has joined #openstack-meeting-307:11
*** coolsvap has quit IRC07:15
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-307:15
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-307:16
*** jed56 has joined #openstack-meeting-307:16
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-307:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-307:20
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-307:20
*** VW has quit IRC07:23
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-307:24
*** sarob has quit IRC07:25
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-307:28
*** wangbo has quit IRC07:31
*** egallen has quit IRC07:33
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-307:35
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting-307:36
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-307:39
*** jlanoux_ has joined #openstack-meeting-307:41
*** jlanoux has quit IRC07:41
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-307:42
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting-307:42
*** kashyap` is now known as kashyap07:46
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC07:49
*** dtardivel has joined #openstack-meeting-307:49
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-307:49
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-meeting-307:52
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-307:53
*** hoangcx_ has joined #openstack-meeting-307:54
*** hoangcx_ has left #openstack-meeting-307:54
*** numans has quit IRC07:54
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-307:59
*** sc has left #openstack-meeting-307:59
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-307:59
*** chandanc has quit IRC08:02
*** neil_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:03
*** tmazur has quit IRC08:04
*** sarob has quit IRC08:04
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC08:04
*** neil__ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:04
*** hichihara has quit IRC08:05
*** tmazur has joined #openstack-meeting-308:05
*** neiljerram has quit IRC08:06
*** coolsvap_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:07
*** coolsvap has quit IRC08:07
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-308:07
*** neil_ has quit IRC08:08
*** neil__ has quit IRC08:09
*** huats_ is now known as huats08:09
*** lpetrut1 has joined #openstack-meeting-308:12
*** lpetrut has quit IRC08:12
*** lpetrut1 is now known as lpetrut08:12
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-308:14
*** wangbo has quit IRC08:18
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-308:19
*** rbak has quit IRC08:20
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-308:21
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-308:31
*** rbak has quit IRC08:37
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-308:40
*** chandanc has joined #openstack-meeting-308:40
*** coolsvap_ is now known as coolsvap08:44
*** egallen has quit IRC08:44
*** coolsvap has quit IRC08:45
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-308:45
*** mdbooth_ is now known as mdbooth08:53
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:55
*** mickeys has quit IRC08:56
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-308:56
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-308:56
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-309:00
*** mickeys has quit IRC09:01
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:01
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC09:05
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-309:20
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-309:21
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-309:23
*** flwang1 has quit IRC09:24
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-309:26
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC09:27
*** VW has quit IRC09:28
*** itxaka has joined #openstack-meeting-309:30
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-309:31
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-309:34
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC09:39
*** rbak has quit IRC09:47
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC09:54
*** mbound has joined #openstack-meeting-309:56
*** ajmiller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-310:03
*** ajmiller has quit IRC10:03
*** lvdongbing has quit IRC10:04
*** egallen has quit IRC10:05
*** ajmiller_ has quit IRC10:06
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-310:06
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:09
*** sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts10:09
*** zhurong has quit IRC10:14
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-310:14
*** sarob has quit IRC10:19
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting-310:25
*** jtomasek_ has joined #openstack-meeting-310:30
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-310:40
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:42
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-310:42
*** sdake has quit IRC10:45
*** ppouliot__ has joined #openstack-meeting-310:47
*** ppouliot has quit IRC10:47
*** tmazur has quit IRC10:50
*** tmazur has joined #openstack-meeting-310:51
*** luis5tb has quit IRC10:54
*** ccamacho is now known as ccamacho|lunch10:56
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-310:57
*** jtomasek_ has quit IRC10:59
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-310:59
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC11:02
*** mickeys has quit IRC11:04
*** chandanc has quit IRC11:04
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-311:07
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:10
*** sdake_ has quit IRC11:10
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-311:11
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-311:11
*** rtheis has joined #openstack-meeting-311:13
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-311:13
*** irenab has quit IRC11:15
*** tfukushima has quit IRC11:17
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-311:22
*** calbers has quit IRC11:26
*** Niham has quit IRC11:31
*** jed56 has quit IRC11:34
*** jed56 has joined #openstack-meeting-311:34
*** luis5tb has joined #openstack-meeting-311:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:45
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-311:46
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-311:47
*** TheJulia_ is now known as TheJulia11:56
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-312:05
*** wangbo has quit IRC12:05
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]12:05
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-312:06
*** coolsvap has quit IRC12:10
*** tellesnobrega is now known as tellesnobrega_af12:11
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-312:15
*** sarob has quit IRC12:19
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-312:19
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting-312:20
*** tmazur has quit IRC12:22
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-312:25
*** wangbo has quit IRC12:25
*** VW has quit IRC12:26
*** ccamacho|lunch is now known as ccamacho12:26
*** itxaka is now known as itxaka|lunch12:27
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-312:29
*** lvdongbing has joined #openstack-meeting-312:30
*** ppouliot__ has quit IRC12:32
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-312:32
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-312:39
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-312:39
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]12:41
*** ddieterly[away] has quit IRC12:41
*** yujunz has joined #openstack-meeting-312:41
*** stanzgy has quit IRC12:42
*** wangbo has quit IRC12:44
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-312:47
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-312:49
*** ewang12 has joined #openstack-meeting-312:52
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:53
*** flwang1 has quit IRC12:54
*** baoli has quit IRC12:55
*** zhongshengping has joined #openstack-meeting-312:57
*** zhongshengping has left #openstack-meeting-312:59
*** dtroyer has joined #openstack-meeting-313:01
dtroyer#startmeeting openstackclient13:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 16 13:02:15 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dtroyer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstackclient'13:02
dtroyerWho is here for OSC today?13:02
dhellmanno/13:02
rtheiso/13:03
dtroyerWell, 33% increase over last week :)13:04
dtroyerout of context that sounds great!13:04
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-313:04
dtroyer#topic 3.0 reviews13:05
dtroyerThe initial KSA review and almost all of the osc-lib reviews have merged13:05
dtroyertangchen's IP commands are getting close13:06
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-313:06
dtroyerhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/325593/ is a re-work of our release notes to use a major-version organization rather than release cycle.13:07
dtroyerdhellmann is looking at an enhancement to reno that will make this a bit easier, but what we have looks like it will work until then13:08
rtheislgtm13:08
dtroyerspecifically specifying a range of versions to include by adding a latest-version directive13:09
dhellmannapproved13:09
dhellmannyes, that's on our to-do list, though it doesn't have a high priority right now so it may be a little while before we get to it13:09
dhellmannour == the release team13:10
dtroyeranything else specific to the 3.x changes?  I know there are a couple more ksa-related things, after which I will osc-lib-ify that too13:10
dtroyerthanks dhellmann, no hurry here13:10
rtheisnothing else13:10
*** pgadiya has quit IRC13:11
dtroyerI should note, also, in the release note change series I added some directives to simplify bug and doc pointers (back in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/325571).13:12
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting-313:12
dtroyerI don't recall if I've mentioned it in a meeting yet, this gets us out of needing full URLs to point back into our docs, and simplifies bug pointers13:13
*** MeganR has quit IRC13:13
dtroyer#topic reviews13:13
dhellmannthose custom roles don't translate well to the text version of the release notes used for email announcements, though :-/13:13
dtroyerAny other reviews we should talk about?13:13
rtheisdtroyer: since they don't translate well should we still use them in the release notes?13:14
dtroyerah, I didn't know that… should it be different?  I didn't want hard-coded URLs in the doc to be able to link back to our dev docs13:14
dhellmannit's a common enough thing to want to do, so it might be something we want to support in reno13:14
dhellmannbut yeah, I remember stevemar pointing out issues in the last release announcement email13:15
dhellmannhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-announce/2016-June/001183.html13:15
dtroyerI'll go back and look at it, I didn't read the notes in the email closely13:15
rtheisI had one review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330223/13:15
rtheisSounds like some good stuff here13:16
rtheisDo we play to leverage that in OSC to address the output formatting issues13:16
rtheis*plan13:16
dhellmannrtheis : that's the idea, this was a POC as much as anything13:16
rtheisok13:17
dtroyerthe driver was being able to format human-readable and machine-readable separately, specifcally for the formatters that do not have intelligent dump methods (shell, value, etc)13:17
dtroyerbut it would also encapsulate some of the other common things we do13:18
*** pcarver_ is now known as pcarver13:18
* dhellmann notes that cliff 2.1.0 is building13:18
dtroyerdhellmann: would you see some of the generic FormattableColumn subclasses going into cliff too?13:18
dhellmanndtroyer : sure13:18
*** wangbo has quit IRC13:19
dtroyerok, I'll plan for that as we develop them13:19
dhellmannI'm certain we could come up with some generic things like ObjectWithNameAndID or whatever13:19
dhellmannyeah, start with them in OSC and then move them to cliff as we figure out what's generic13:19
dtroyerthe ones that are osc-specific will go to osc-lib, but we'll skip that step for generic ones then13:20
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-313:20
dhellmannwell, wherever it makes sense to develop them out of cliff is fine, I just meant you'd iterate faster without needing releases of libs13:21
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:21
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-313:21
dhellmannonce we figure out what the base class API needs to look like, we'll need to write docs in cliff too13:21
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-313:21
dtroyerother reviews?13:22
rtheisnothing else from me13:23
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-313:23
dtroyer#topic bugs13:23
dtroyerI don't have any specific bugs to discuss...13:23
*** shwetaap has quit IRC13:23
rtheisme either13:24
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-313:24
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-313:24
dtroyer#topic open discussion13:24
dtroyerWhat else is going on?13:24
*** chandanc has joined #openstack-meeting-313:25
rtheisSlow progress on neutronclient supporting OSC plugin from me, but amotoki was planning to pick it back up13:25
*** pgadiya has quit IRC13:25
dtroyerrtheis: I saw something from briancurtin about more refactoring in the SDK, do you know how much he las left to do?13:26
rtheisHe has compute out for review.  I am hoping to look at that this week13:27
rtheisOnce compute is worked out then hopefully things can proceed quickly with the others13:27
briancurtindtroyer: unfortunately a lot, but it'll accelerate as I do more. working on image now13:27
dtroyerok, thanks briancurtin.  image is the one I am anxious to try out ;)13:27
dtroyergetting rid of glanceclient is high on my list due to its specific depenencies13:28
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-313:28
dtroyerWe have had a couple of reviews for stable branches that are not critical or security things… I think I need to write down our release policy more clearly somewhere…13:30
*** VW has quit IRC13:30
rtheissounds good13:30
dtroyerok, if nothing else, it's time for breakfast…13:31
dtroyerThanks guys13:31
rtheisnothing else13:31
rtheisthanks13:31
dtroyer#endmeeting13:31
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 16 13:31:38 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)13:31
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstackclient/2016/openstackclient.2016-06-16-13.02.html13:31
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstackclient/2016/openstackclient.2016-06-16-13.02.txt13:31
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstackclient/2016/openstackclient.2016-06-16-13.02.log.html13:31
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-313:32
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-313:35
*** dtroyer has left #openstack-meeting-313:37
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-313:40
*** ewang12 has quit IRC13:42
*** Poornima has quit IRC13:42
*** ewang12 has joined #openstack-meeting-313:43
*** itxaka|lunch is now known as itxaka13:43
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-313:44
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]13:44
*** rbak has quit IRC13:45
*** _sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus2413:46
*** sigmavirus24 has joined #openstack-meeting-313:46
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly13:49
*** esikachev has joined #openstack-meeting-313:50
*** elmiko has joined #openstack-meeting-313:53
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-313:55
*** calbers has joined #openstack-meeting-313:56
*** egafford has joined #openstack-meeting-313:59
*** mionkin has joined #openstack-meeting-313:59
vgridnev#startmeeting sahara14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 16 14:00:54 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is vgridnev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'sahara'14:00
elmikohi14:01
vgridnev#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda14:01
toskyhi14:01
vgridnevhi14:01
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:01
egaffordo/14:01
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-314:01
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-314:01
mionkinhi!14:02
vgridnev#topic News / updates14:02
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega14:02
egaffordo/ tellesnobrega!14:03
tellesnobregao;14:03
tellesnobregao/14:03
elmikosadly, not much from me, i am working on a presentation for an upcoming conference14:03
mionkinI'm working on adding CDH 5.7 in sahara-elements and in sahara14:03
*** lvdongbing has quit IRC14:03
egaffordI have a validation script for Ambari that's in pretty decent shape; working on getting the image generation script and remote working now that folks seem to be reasonably happy with the spec.14:04
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC14:04
* egafford is probably doing the usual trying-to-get-too-much-of-the-feature-done-before-posting-any-of-the-feature thing. There will be code by early next week, even if it's a little drafty.14:04
toskyrefining jobs for saha-ra-tests14:04
elmikosaha-ra, sounds like a character from one of the mummie movies14:05
vgridnevnot so much from me too, I was unable start testing my impl for plugins-api, so now I'm squashing our bugs and making improvements on our gate jobs.14:05
vgridnevso, we have then <= 70 open bugs14:05
egaffordvgridnev: That's better than >= 70 open bugs for sure.14:06
tellesnobregai'm starting to take a look on storm 1.0.0 so I can bring the newer version to sahara and I will also start a spec to allow python jobs to be run in sahara+storm14:06
egaffordShould we have a bug day/week?14:06
*** mickeys has quit IRC14:06
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-314:06
egaffordtellesnobrega: \o/14:06
vgridnevegafford, I guess that we can do that after around of end of N3 milestone14:06
toskyelmiko: Saha-ra, Princess of Power14:07
elmikohehe, nice!14:07
vgridnevesikachev, are you around?14:07
egaffordvgridnev: Sure; maybe if we have a ridiculous number it'd be good to do one earlier, but that sounds good.14:08
toskyvgridnev: good thing; are those 70 all bugs including wishlists?14:08
vgridnevtosky, that includes incomplete's and wishlists14:08
vgridnevdo we have other news?14:10
*** VW has quit IRC14:10
vgridnev#topic Review priorities14:10
vgridnev#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-review-priorities14:11
vgridnevso, I think that there is a good change to discuss14:11
vgridnev#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326582/14:11
egaffordYeah, agreed with that.14:11
vgridnevso, egafford, seems like it's ok to put Apache 2.0 license on MIT licensed code, and required copyright was added.14:13
elmikotheoretically, MIT is compatible with APL14:13
*** nanhai has joined #openstack-meeting-314:13
nanhaihello?14:13
elmikohi14:13
egaffordelmiko, vgridnev: Ack; if so, my blocking objection is withdrawn.14:13
egaffordStill, I suppose one question I'd ask is: do we truly need to use this functionality? If other projects aren't using sphinx-argparse and they're generating doc successfully, and sphinx-argparse is broken, is there a better way to address this problem?14:13
toskyvgridnev: so basically, will this change reverted if the new requirement lands in time for Newton?14:14
elmikoegafford: i think that's an excellent question14:14
elmikoshould we add a DocImpact to that review and try to get some guidance from the doc team?14:14
vgridnevtosky, I guess that we it should be reverted if we will get that in globals14:15
egaffordI'm okay with the change as it is, mind you: I don't think it's the end of the world to copy a module we can legally copy. elmiko: I like bringing in a doc team eyeball or two a bit, yeah. If they don't have time soon enough we can push this change.14:16
vgridnevegafford, no other projects are using this lib. We are using to bring simple docs auto-generation14:16
vgridnevother projects not using that for generation docs, seems like them are mostly hand-made14:17
nanhaisphinx-argparse?14:18
nanhaiauto generate?14:18
*** zhongshengping has joined #openstack-meeting-314:18
egaffordvgridnev: Hm; well, I'll admit that I don't like handmade and I do like auto-generation. :)14:18
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:18
*** huichun has joined #openstack-meeting-314:18
vgridnevhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/master/doc/source/command-objects/address-scope.rst14:18
vgridnevhttp://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-openstackclient/command-objects/address-scope.html#address-scope-create14:19
vgridnevjust an example14:19
egaffordYeah, we don't want that for sure.14:19
*** zhongshengping has quit IRC14:19
vgridnevnanhai, do you a specific questions?14:20
nanhaino, i just listenning14:20
egaffordvgridnev: Changed my -1 to a +1 with a note that we might want to ask the doc team if they had specific suggestions about doc autogeneration.14:20
nanhaii am listenning14:21
vgridnevegafford, I ll put DocImpact now14:21
*** nanhai has quit IRC14:21
egaffordCool; if we don't hear back at all by next meeting let's just do this and ask later.14:22
elmikoit may also be prudent to reach out to the doc team, just a heads up14:22
egaffordelmiko: Ack.14:22
vgridnevok, we can put that to ML and ask OpenStack client team14:22
vgridnevtoo14:22
*** vgridnev has quit IRC14:23
egaffordvgridnev: Yeah, I can't imagine other teams are uninterested in autogenerating docs.14:23
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-314:23
vgridnevoops14:24
egaffordvgridnev: :)14:24
*** ewang12 has quit IRC14:24
* egafford wrote 'vgridnev: Yeah, I can't imagine other teams are uninterested in autogenerating docs.' in your extremely brief absence.14:24
vgridnevok14:25
egaffordI think the other high-prio reviews just need a few more eyes; they look pretty good.14:26
vgridnev#topic API v2 progress14:26
elmikonot much to report since last week14:26
elmikoi don't think there has been any movement14:26
vgridnevok then14:27
elmikoit's possible, that i might have a little time after this conference to get back into things. we'll see14:27
elmikoi'll definitely keep the team up to date14:27
vgridnevok, thanks elmiko14:27
vgridnev#topic Specs / features status14:28
vgridnevso, there are two specs on review now14:28
*** ewang12 has joined #openstack-meeting-314:28
vgridnev#topic Initial kerberos integration14:28
egaffordI'll read the kerb spec today.14:28
elmikoyea, me too. i need to read that spec14:28
vgridnevok, super short topic then14:29
vgridnev#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327616/14:29
tellesnobregai started looking into it, but still haven't been through, will finish it today14:29
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-314:29
vgridnev#topic CLI for Plugin-Declared Image Declaration14:29
vgridnev#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327111/14:29
*** chandanc has quit IRC14:29
vgridnevegafford, seems like my questions was addressed14:30
egaffordResponded to your thoughts and comments (which were good ones), esp. vgridnev's question about deps. I think externalizing the libguestfs dep in a separate module for packagers is definitely a good idea.14:30
egaffordIt gives them a lot of options.14:30
egaffordvgridnev: Yeah, happily I designed the last feature while mostly thinking about this feature. :)14:31
egaffordSo the spec mostly wrote itself.14:31
vgridnevI did not got that: Yeah, happily I designed the last feature while mostly thinking about this feature. :)14:32
egaffordOh, just that when I was writing the validation spec last cycle, I was mainly thinking about how to implement this on top of it.14:32
vgridnevok, thanks14:33
egaffordSo it seems like that worked and people think the spec fits pretty well into the overall effort, which was the goal. That's all.14:33
vgridnevok, I'm pushing that14:33
egaffordvgridnev: \o/14:34
vgridnevcool14:34
vgridnev#topic Open discussion14:34
egafford(Some) code incoming by next meeting.14:34
elmikovgridnev: added a few questions to the kerberos spec14:35
tellesnobregaI discussed with vgridnev this week about storm upgrade, we came to an agreement that no spec is needed for that, does that make sense to all? how about python jobs for storm, spec is needed for that?14:36
esikachevsaharaclient functional tests moved to sahara-tests14:37
esikachevjob migration - in progress14:37
egaffordtellesnobrega: Python jobs seems worth a spec probably.14:37
vgridnevtellesnobrega, have you create blueprints for that?14:37
tellesnobregasure egafford14:37
tellesnobregavgridnev, not yet, will do it soon14:37
egaffordWe haven't dealt with storing binaries for an uncompiled, uncompressed language, for one thing.14:37
egaffordIt can probably be a short spec.14:38
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-314:38
vgridnevtellesnobrega, I think if spec will be there till the next meeting, we can review that quickly and push that at the meeting14:39
tellesnobregavgridnev, awesome, i will try to put that up to review asap14:39
*** pcaruana has quit IRC14:41
vgridnevelmiko, answered your questions on review14:42
vgridnevwill put short note about first question in spec14:42
elmikocool, thanks14:42
*** sarob has quit IRC14:43
egaffordvgridnev: Both Ambari and CDH have built-in KDCs that we can use then?14:44
*** uxdanielle has joined #openstack-meeting-314:44
egafford(Without installing any additional packages in SIE?)14:44
elmikovgridnev: makes sense, i think we are going to have issues with the proxy users feature and using an existing kdc14:44
elmikoor any kdc14:45
elmikoso, something to keep in mind14:45
vgridnevadditional packages are needed, as I remember14:45
egaffordvgridnev: Makes sense.14:45
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-314:45
vgridnevbut we will put that on images, I think. If not presented (I don't know, because of old openstack) we can install that14:46
*** thatsdone has joined #openstack-meeting-314:47
vgridnevelmiko, I hope no, proxy users are needed to access swift, not for hadoop services14:47
elmikook, let's hope not ;)14:48
vgridnevfor example, YARN or Oozie will his own key tabs to access other services like HDFS14:49
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-314:49
elmikoyeah, it makes sense14:49
vgridnevok, any other topics to discuss?14:50
tellesnobregai got nothing14:51
egaffordNothing here.14:51
vgridnev#endmeeting14:51
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 16 14:51:45 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:51
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2016/sahara.2016-06-16-14.00.html14:51
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2016/sahara.2016-06-16-14.00.txt14:51
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2016/sahara.2016-06-16-14.00.log.html14:51
vgridnevthanks14:51
elmikothanks vgridnev14:51
*** mionkin has quit IRC14:52
*** elmiko has left #openstack-meeting-314:52
tellesnobregathanks vgridnev14:52
*** vikram has joined #openstack-meeting-314:52
egaffordo/14:52
*** johnbelamaric has joined #openstack-meeting-314:53
*** jlanoux_ has quit IRC14:53
*** sarob has quit IRC14:54
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-314:54
*** sdake has quit IRC14:54
*** vikram has quit IRC14:55
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting-314:55
*** vgridnev has quit IRC14:56
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:56
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:57
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-314:57
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-314:58
*** johnbelamaric has left #openstack-meeting-314:59
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:59
*** janzian has joined #openstack-meeting-314:59
*** johnbelamaric has joined #openstack-meeting-314:59
*** john-davidge has joined #openstack-meeting-314:59
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-314:59
mlavalle#startmeeting neutron_l315:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 16 15:00:06 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3'15:00
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC15:00
*** amotoki has quit IRC15:00
pavel_bondarhi15:00
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-315:00
john-davidgehi15:00
johnbelamarichi15:00
njohnstono/15:00
mlavalle#chair carl_baldwin15:00
haleybhi15:00
openstackCurrent chairs: carl_baldwin mlavalle15:00
*** thatsdone_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:00
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-315:00
carl_baldwino/15:00
*** david-lyle_ is now known as david-lyle15:00
*** gouthamr has left #openstack-meeting-315:00
mlavallegood morning all. Thanks for attending15:00
mlavalle#topic Announcements15:01
mlavalleTeam's etherpad is here:15:01
mlavalle#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-l3-subteam15:01
*** SridarK has joined #openstack-meeting-315:02
mlavalleNewton-2 is approachin fast: July 11 - 1515:02
*** thatsdone has quit IRC15:02
mlavalle#link http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html15:02
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-315:02
mlavalleAlso reminder to all the team about the mid-cycle meeting in Cork, Ireland, August 17 -1915:03
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-315:03
*** shahid_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:03
mlavalleEtherpad is here:15:03
mlavalle#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-neutron-midcycle15:04
mlavalleAny other announcements from the team?15:04
mlavalleok, let's move on...15:05
mlavalle#topic Bugs15:05
*** yujunz has quit IRC15:05
mlavalleFirst up is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/156433515:06
openstackLaunchpad bug 1564335 in neutron " [Pluggable IPAM] delete subnet in ml2 plugin does not comply with pluggable ipam (deletes ip allocations directly from db)" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Pavel Bondar (pasha117)15:06
pavel_bondarSecond part of the fix is here #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323345/15:06
pavel_bondarI have added some UTs for it15:06
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC15:06
carl_baldwinI'll take a look.15:07
pavel_bondarThe first part is already merged into master and backport to mitaka is created #link  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330374/15:07
pavel_bondarcarl_baldwin: thanks15:07
pavel_bondarnot much here15:08
*** vikram has joined #openstack-meeting-315:08
mlavallepavel_bondar thanks for the update15:08
mlavalleAnd that was the only high priority bug we had for this week15:08
mlavalleAny other bugs from the team?15:08
*** tellesnobrega is now known as tellesnobrega_af15:09
mlavalleok, moving on15:09
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC15:09
mlavalle#topic Routed Networks15:09
carl_baldwinHi15:10
mlavallecarl_baldwin: hi15:10
carl_baldwinMoving right along.  We've had a few more merges.  I'll try to update the etherpad.15:10
carl_baldwinI still need to create a new Nova patch for the deferred IP thing.15:11
carl_baldwinI've been slow, sorry.15:11
*** vikram_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:11
carl_baldwinI'd like to get Brian's service subnet spec merged.15:12
carl_baldwin#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300207/15:12
*** vikram_ has quit IRC15:12
* haleyb 's ears perk up15:13
carl_baldwinkevinbenton: Do you think you might have a moment to read this one? ^15:14
*** vikram has quit IRC15:15
carl_baldwinmlavalle: That's all I have.  I'm still concerned about the Nova part.15:15
mlavalleme too15:15
carl_baldwinmlavalle: And, I need to try your vagrant environment.15:16
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-315:16
mlavallePushed changes to it this morning. Make sure you have the latest version15:16
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-315:16
mlavallemoving on...15:17
carl_baldwinmlavalle: I will15:17
mlavalle#topic BGP Dynamic Routing15:17
*** vikram_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:18
*** vikram has joined #openstack-meeting-315:18
mlavalleI don't see tidwellr around. Anything to discuss on this topic?15:18
vikramhi15:18
mlavallehi vikram :-)15:18
vikram:-)15:18
vikramJust a little update15:18
vikramWe have all the pieces merged15:19
*** shahid_ has left #openstack-meeting-315:19
*** shahid_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:19
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:19
vikramNow next step is making api and functional test voting15:19
vikramI am working on those15:19
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega15:20
vikramthat's all from my end ..15:21
mlavallethanks for the update vikram15:21
vikramur welcome15:21
mlavalle#topic FWaaS15:22
mlavallenjohnston: hi15:22
njohnstonHello!  So it looks like there aren't many more comments on the l3 agent extension spec, but any further comments welcome: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/315745/15:22
*** vikram_ has quit IRC15:22
*** VW has quit IRC15:22
njohnstonFirst part of this work is to move generalizable parts of agent extension logic out of l2 agent so they can be generally used - without breaking QoS: https://review.openstack.org/32970115:23
*** chandanc has joined #openstack-meeting-315:24
njohnstonI have been chatting a little with ajo to clarify what parts of the notification driver in neutron server are generalizable code and which parts are a repeatable pattern - looks like it leans more to the latter15:24
*** VW_ has quit IRC15:25
njohnstonso I hope to have code for the actual implementation next week, although it will be light on testing15:25
*** ihrachys has quit IRC15:25
*** ihrachys_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:25
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-315:25
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting-315:25
njohnstonthat's about the size of it15:25
carl_baldwinnjohnston: Sounds like good progress.15:26
SridarKcarl_baldwin: on the spec i just see ur +2 - what should be the next steps to get it approved - who else shd we reach out to15:26
njohnstoncarl_baldwin: I hope so, I am feeling the time pressure15:27
carl_baldwinI would start with asking ihrachys_ if he'll take another pass at it.15:27
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-315:27
SridarKcarl_baldwin: sounds good, thx15:27
ihrachys_sorry, what's the spec we are talking about? l3 agent extensions?15:28
njohnstonihrachys_: yep!15:28
ihrachys_ack15:28
njohnstonihrachys_: thanks!15:28
carl_baldwin#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/315745/15:28
* pavel_bondar has conflicting meeting starting now, see updates about conversion to15:29
pavel_bondarpluggable ipam in etherpad15:29
*** Swami has quit IRC15:29
carl_baldwinpavel_bondar: Thanks.15:29
*** andreas_s has quit IRC15:29
*** vikram_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:29
*** pavel_bondar is now known as pavel_bondar|afk15:29
mlavallenjohnston, SridarK: anything else?15:30
SridarKnothing more - we will continue to work thru this15:30
njohnstonnothing else here15:30
mlavallenjohnston, SridarK: thanks for the update15:31
SridarKmlavalle: thx15:31
*** vikram_ has quit IRC15:31
mlavalle#topic Conversion to Pluggable IPAM15:31
*** hdaniel has quit IRC15:31
*** zhongshengping has joined #openstack-meeting-315:32
mlavallewithout pavel_bondar, is there anything else to discuss today on this topic?15:32
*** zhongshengping has quit IRC15:32
johnbelamaricnope15:32
carl_baldwinI'm going to do another recheck or two to see if that error pops up again.  Otherwise, I think it is looking pretty good.15:33
carl_baldwinWe might need some update to the documentation15:33
carl_baldwin#link http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/adv-config-ipam.html15:33
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:33
*** steve_ruan has joined #openstack-meeting-315:34
carl_baldwinAny volunteers to update the docs?15:34
johnbelamaricOk, I can do that.15:34
*** wangbo has quit IRC15:35
carl_baldwinjohnbelamaric: thanks15:36
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-315:36
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-315:37
*** VW has quit IRC15:37
mlavalleanything else on this topic?15:37
carl_baldwinNot from me15:37
*** mickeys has quit IRC15:37
mlavallemoving on...15:37
mlavalle#topic Open Agenda15:38
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-315:38
mlavalleany topics that need to be brought up to the team today?15:38
*** VW_ has quit IRC15:38
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-315:39
mlavalleok, this was a relatively short one. Returning 20 minutes to everybody's agenda :-)15:40
mlavalle#endmeeting15:40
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 16 15:40:06 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:40
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2016/neutron_l3.2016-06-16-15.00.html15:40
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2016/neutron_l3.2016-06-16-15.00.txt15:40
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2016/neutron_l3.2016-06-16-15.00.log.html15:40
*** johnbelamaric has left #openstack-meeting-315:40
carl_baldwinbye!15:40
carl_baldwinThanks mlavalle!15:40
mlavalleHave a nice day / afternoon / evening !15:40
SridarKbye all and thx15:40
*** janzian has left #openstack-meeting-315:41
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting-315:41
*** wangbo has quit IRC15:42
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-315:42
*** ewang12 has quit IRC15:43
*** shwetaap has quit IRC15:43
*** ewang12 has joined #openstack-meeting-315:44
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-315:44
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-315:44
*** shahid_ has quit IRC15:45
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC15:46
*** mickeys has quit IRC15:46
*** reduxio has joined #openstack-meeting-315:47
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-315:50
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]15:51
*** Dinesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:51
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly15:51
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-315:56
*** vgridnev has quit IRC15:57
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting-315:58
cdent#startmeeting api wg15:59
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 16 15:59:41 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is cdent. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:59
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:59
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'api_wg'15:59
cdent#chair etoews15:59
openstackCurrent chairs: cdent etoews15:59
etoewswell hello16:00
edleafe\o16:00
cdentgood afternoon16:00
aimeeu0/16:00
edleafegood UGT morning!16:00
cdent#link agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/API-WG#Agenda16:00
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-316:00
*** reduxio has quit IRC16:00
cdentno action items from last meeting16:01
etoews:)16:01
cdentand I think we should do the newletter near the end so next is16:01
cdent #topic address all of the TODOs in the guidelines (turn them into bugs?)16:01
mfedosino/16:02
cdentI suspect I made that entry, which was effectively: let's agree to do that. Do we agree?16:02
edleafebugs would certainly be easier to track16:02
*** thatsdone_ has quit IRC16:03
cdent#agreed make todos in guidelines into bugs for easier tracking and stigmergy16:03
etoewsgrep -R TODO * | wc -l == 1816:03
etoewsso how do we do that?16:05
*** bpokorny has quit IRC16:05
cdentetoews: if you paste that grep into an etherpad, we can divide the list up into the number of people here and do it right now16:05
etoews++16:05
cdentas in make stubby buglets16:05
* edleafe learned a new word: stigmergy16:05
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-316:06
etoews#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-wg-todos-to-bugs16:06
cdentedleafe: that's probably one of my favorite concepts when it comes to remote collaboration16:06
*** abalutoiu has quit IRC16:06
cdentThere are at least three of us. Anyone else want to take a chunk of those, or shall we split by three?16:06
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-316:06
*** azemlyanov has quit IRC16:07
cdenti've taken a chunk16:07
edleafethreesies is fine16:07
edleafeone bug per TODO or one per file?16:08
cdentper todo16:10
cdentgranularity is nice16:10
etoewsper todo16:10
cdenthttps://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg16:10
*** shwetaap has quit IRC16:10
etoewsand i'm going to link back to http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/api-wg/16:10
etoewsin the bug16:10
etoewshmmmm...how do i get git.o.o to ref a certain commit16:11
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-316:12
etoewsso when we remove the TODOs the back links are still valid16:12
* cdent has never been able to figure cgit, so always ends up back at github :(16:13
etoewsme too :(16:13
*** ewang12 has quit IRC16:13
etoewsi'm okay with back links to github16:13
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom16:14
etoewsyep. i'm using github links.16:14
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-316:15
*** iyamahat has quit IRC16:15
etoewscdent: edleafe: shall we tag these with "todo" so we know where they came from?16:15
etoewstag all of these that is16:15
*** wangbo has quit IRC16:16
*** tellesnobrega is now known as tellesnobrega_af16:16
cdentmakes sense16:16
edleafeyeah, sounds sane16:16
etoewshere's my first crack at it https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg/+bug/159330516:16
openstackLaunchpad bug 1593305 in openstack-api-wg "HEAD is weird in a bunch of our wsgi frameworks" [Undecided,New]16:16
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-316:16
*** paul-carlton has joined #openstack-meeting-316:17
*** paul-carlton has quit IRC16:17
*** egafford has left #openstack-meeting-316:19
*** vikram has quit IRC16:20
etoewsha! already done this one. https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg/+bug/159330816:20
openstackLaunchpad bug 1593308 in openstack-api-wg "The recommended way of transmitting error/fault information back to the user" [Undecided,New]16:20
etoewsfiled bug because pedantic16:20
*** sdake has quit IRC16:20
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC16:21
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-316:21
etoewsno, i need to report a new bug16:23
edleafeI did me one too! https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg/+bug/159331216:23
openstackLaunchpad bug 1593312 in openstack-api-wg "compatibility.rst is missing the Guidance section" [Undecided,New]16:23
*** chandanc has quit IRC16:24
* etoews copies everything cdent is doing in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-wg-todos-to-bugs16:24
cdent?16:25
* edleafe is doing the same16:25
etoewscdent: the strike through and link to bug16:26
cdentah16:26
*** shwetaap has quit IRC16:26
cdentI only have time to do that because I'm not being as luxurious as you with links back github, just referencing the guideline filename16:27
etoewsi'm all about link luxury16:27
etoewsi'm done with my set16:27
* edleafe is also copying etoews links format16:27
edleafeI'm lagging16:27
etoewsgoing to remove the TODO from the files.16:27
edleafewhy remove?16:28
etoewswhy keep?16:28
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-316:28
etoewsi'd rather not have 2 things tracking the work16:29
edleafeBecause it's easier to find when editing?16:29
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:29
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]16:29
cdenttodo is now an official tag16:29
etoewsthey also clutter the guidelines/code16:30
etoewscdent: any feels on removing the TODOs or not?16:30
cdentI think removing them will introduces process noise because they'll have to wend their way through gerrit16:30
cdentand leaving them in place in the published version helps people to know that we are aware that there is stuff still to do16:31
etoewsi commit to remove them isn't too noisy16:31
etoews1 commit...16:31
cdentif it were code I'd say yes, for sure, but since it is narrative I think it is useful, here comes that word again, stigmergy16:31
cdentbut I'm not super concerned either direction16:31
etoewsthis also speaks to the next topic. "get out of draft mode"16:32
*** esikachev has quit IRC16:32
cdenttrue16:33
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:33
etoewsa) is that even something we want?16:33
etoewscurrently "draft" is pretty much meaningless to me16:34
etoewsi don't think it carries any meaning for openstack-land either16:34
cdentthe main question I have on that is that here http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/ it sounds like this is just for giggles and has no meaning16:34
cdentI'd be fine with just removing that note16:34
etoewslet's do it16:34
* cdent does it16:34
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:35
etoewscdent: does having 18 TODOs in the guidelines affect our decision to remove it?16:35
cdentI don't think it should16:35
cdentbecause was want to think of the guidelines as a live thing16:35
etoewsyep16:35
cdentmy concern with that header was that it seemed like we weren't even born yet16:35
edleafejust as having 18 todo bugs doesn't affect it :)16:35
etoewsalrighty. we'll keep the TODOs and remove the "draft mode".16:36
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-316:36
etoewsthis is good fodder for the newsletter. we should definitely do the newsletter in the later half of the meeting. but first...16:37
etoewsaimeeu: mfedosin: welcome to the api wg meeting. :)16:37
mfedosinetoews: hi!16:38
etoewswas there something you care to discuss in particular?16:38
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC16:38
mfedosinnothing special16:38
mfedosinbut I wanted to say that the spec is updated16:38
etoewsjust checking in after the glare review?16:38
etoewsgotcha16:38
mfedosinand we simplified glare api dramatically16:38
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-316:38
mfedosinhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/283136/10/specs/newton/glare-api.rst@90616:38
etoewsalways good to hear!16:38
mfedosinthanks cdent :)16:39
cdentmfedosin: excellent work tuning that stuff up16:39
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-316:39
cdent#link https://review.openstack.org/330687 Get rid of the DRAFT warning at the top of guidelines16:39
*** jlanoux has quit IRC16:39
etoewsmfedosin: i just noticed the /versions16:41
etoewshave you looked at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254895/1/guidelines/versioning.rst ?16:41
mfedosinbut how user will know what versions are supported?16:42
cdentedleafe: would you like some assistance with the rest of your chunk of todos or are you good?16:42
cdentgoes to look at /versions16:42
etoewsmfedosin: that's the point of that guideline16:43
etoewsEach service should advertise the API versions exposed by the service and the endpoint from where that service can be accessed. The purpose of this document is to standardize the format for these responses.16:43
etoewswhich is your intention behind /versions right?16:43
mfedosinetoews: return a list of available api versions I think16:44
cdentmfedosin: ah, yeah, so what you are proposing at /versions could be at / and following the guideline at http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/microversion_specification.html#version-discovery16:44
edleafecdent: I'm good. On the last ones16:45
cdentetoews: looks like we might have a bit of an overlap between versioning.rst and the microversion spec ?16:45
*** huichun has quit IRC16:45
etoewsjust saw that. they're in conflict.16:45
etoews:(16:46
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-316:46
mfedosincdent: so, we can return version just by GET / request?16:46
etoewsi think the nature of the conflict is microversions expose their versions one way, everything else does something a little differently.16:46
cdentmfedosin: sort of, but see what etoews just said16:47
etoewscdent: mfedosin: i'd say glare should stick to http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/microversion_specification.html#version-discovery since it's doing microversions16:48
etoewsmy bad for confusing things but at least we uncovered the conflict.16:48
mfedosinetoews: ok, it was done for bringing compatibility with Glance16:48
etoewsthat matters too :)16:48
cdentetoews: make a bug?16:49
mfedosinI'll update the spec in a minute16:49
cdentor should we (you! :) ) just comment on the versioning guideline since it is not merged yet?16:49
etoewscdent: ya. a comment is more appropriate. i'll do it now.16:49
etoewscdent: do you want to start on the newsletter?16:50
cdentyeah, I've got the etherpad up, will start on it16:50
etoews++16:50
edleafecdent: done16:51
*** olaph has joined #openstack-meeting-316:51
Dinesh_Hi all,16:52
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-316:52
Dinesh_Could you please give your suggestions on this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/315964/16:53
*** steve_ruan has quit IRC16:54
*** mbound has quit IRC16:54
*** esikachev has joined #openstack-meeting-316:54
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly16:54
cdentHi Dinesh_16:55
etoewscommented on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254895/116:55
cdentDinesh_: Is there a disagreement on it?16:55
edleafecdent: partial disagreement16:56
edleafebasically, strict status checking16:56
edleafeIOW, if you pass an invalid status (which nothign could match), should you get a 200 with an empty list, or a 40016:57
cdentetoews: we started to discuss this last week, but did we decide about abandoning old tired reviews that are not getting attention?16:57
cdentedleafe: ah.16:58
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-meeting-316:58
etoewscdent: i don't recall a decision...16:59
cdentI want to put a friendly threat of some kind in the newsletter16:59
etoewsor the discussion for that matter :P16:59
etoewsheh. sure. why not.17:00
etoewstime!17:00
etoews#endmeeting17:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 16 17:00:26 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2016/api_wg.2016-06-16-15.59.html17:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2016/api_wg.2016-06-16-15.59.txt17:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2016/api_wg.2016-06-16-15.59.log.html17:00
docaedocourtesy ping: kfox1111 olaph kzaitsev_mb igormarnat_ ddovbii__17:00
*** belmoreira has quit IRC17:00
olapho/17:01
docaedo#startmeeting app-catalog17:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 16 17:01:07 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is docaedo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'app_catalog'17:01
docaedo#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog#Proposed_Agenda_for_June_16th.2C_2016_.281700_UTC.29 Agenda17:01
docaedolet's see who shows up :) Hello olaph!17:01
olaphgreetings, program!17:01
*** cdent has left #openstack-meeting-317:01
kzaitsev_mbI'm here on igormarnat_ behalf, he's unfortunatelly on a bunch of meetings, but I can give some updates probably =)17:02
docaedoolaph: hah .. I always thought that glass keyboard with no keys must have been lame to type on17:02
docaedokzaitsev_mb: thanks, then let's set the topic to...17:02
docaedo#topic Status updates17:02
docaedoThere were two action items from last week:17:02
docaedo* ACTION: Igor to get on the Infra agenda to discuss app-dev CI17:02
docaedo* ACTION: Igor to start threads with Glance and Heat teams about automated validation of templates and images17:03
docaedoTake it away kzaitsev_mb, and thanks for filling us in17:03
kzaitsev_mbso from igors side — he told me, that he's in the process of drafting the proposal to the infra team (regarding the CI, tests and security). He hasn't started the discussion yet, but is actively preparring to do so17:04
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-317:05
docaedocool - please let him know that I would be happy to collaborate with him on that proposal17:05
docaedoif he wants to start it in an etherpad I would join him17:05
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-317:05
*** mbound has joined #openstack-meeting-317:05
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega17:06
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-317:06
kzaitsev_mbsure, would ping him and get that message to him17:07
docaedoCool thanks17:07
docaedoany status updates on the glare side of things?17:07
kzaitsev_mbnope unfortunatelly I'm still almost at the same point I was last week.17:08
kzaitsev_mbalthough I think we're going to have some more manpower allocated for the task pretty soon17:08
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:08
kzaitsev_mbso I really hope the situation to change next week17:09
*** esikachev has left #openstack-meeting-317:09
docaedokzaitsev_mb: thats cool, I'll keep my fingers crossed17:10
kzaitsev_mbme too.17:10
kzaitsev_mb=)17:10
kzaitsev_mbso I guess that's roughly all I had to share17:10
docaedogreat17:10
docaedoI don't have any notable status updates, have been mostly focused on $COMPANY things lately, so haven't poked much at the app catalog stuff17:11
docaedoI think we are done then unless anyone has anything else (open discussion stuff)?17:11
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:12
*** Dinesh_ has quit IRC17:12
* olaph hears crickets17:12
docaedo:)17:13
docaedoOk thanks you guys - talk to you later!17:13
docaedo#endmeeting17:13
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 16 17:13:15 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:13
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/app_catalog/2016/app_catalog.2016-06-16-17.01.html17:13
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/app_catalog/2016/app_catalog.2016-06-16-17.01.txt17:13
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/app_catalog/2016/app_catalog.2016-06-16-17.01.log.html17:13
*** gouthamr has left #openstack-meeting-317:16
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk17:21
*** bauzas has quit IRC17:23
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting-317:23
*** SridarK has quit IRC17:24
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]17:24
*** ihrachys_ has quit IRC17:24
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-317:26
*** lpetrut has quit IRC17:27
*** pvaneck has quit IRC17:30
*** ccamacho has quit IRC17:30
*** ewang12 has joined #openstack-meeting-317:31
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-meeting-317:31
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-317:31
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-317:34
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC17:35
*** kzaitsev1mb has joined #openstack-meeting-317:40
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC17:40
*** singlethink has quit IRC17:50
*** shwetaap has quit IRC17:52
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-317:53
*** s3wong has quit IRC17:55
*** hemanthravi has joined #openstack-meeting-317:55
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-317:56
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-317:58
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-317:58
*** mtanino has quit IRC17:59
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-318:00
*** marst has joined #openstack-meeting-318:00
*** baoli_ has quit IRC18:00
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck18:01
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: ivar-lazzaro hemanthravi igordcard: hi18:01
rkukurahi18:01
ivar-lazzarohi18:01
igordcardhello SumitNaiksatam, all18:01
SumitNaiksatam#startmeeting networking_policy18:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 16 18:01:54 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'18:01
*** kzaitsev1mb has quit IRC18:02
SumitNaiksatam#info agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#June_16th.2C_2nd.2C_May_26th.2C_201618:02
SumitNaiksatamsame agenda from past weeks18:02
SumitNaiksatamnothing new on the bugs, documentation, testing front18:03
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: anything to discuss on the packaging front?18:03
rkukuranope18:03
SumitNaiksatamokay18:03
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-318:03
SumitNaiksatamto be accurate, there were bugs which got fixed during the last week, one was critical regarding DB migration breaking on Suse18:04
*** tbachman has joined #openstack-meeting-318:04
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: hi18:04
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: hi!18:04
*** kmartin has quit IRC18:04
SumitNaiksatamthere were a couple of other bugs and fixes in review:18:04
SumitNaiksatam#link https://review.openstack.org/32882118:05
SumitNaiksatamin case if anyone is against using the admin context here ^^^18:05
SumitNaiksatamand second one:18:05
SumitNaiksatam#link https://review.openstack.org/32881818:05
SumitNaiksatamwithout the above fix, GBP does not work with Newton18:05
*** coolsvap has quit IRC18:06
SumitNaiksatambut its debatable whether we should merge the above patch as a fix first, an do the real fix as follow up18:06
SumitNaiksatami believe the author of the patch has agreed to investigate, so thats good18:06
SumitNaiksatamigordcard: anything new at your end that you need to discuss on QoS patches (I think you planned to post a follow patchset)18:07
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-318:07
igordcardSumitNaiksatam: no, not yet :(18:08
SumitNaiksatamigordcard: okay, np18:08
igordcardSumitNaiksatam: probably not next week as well18:08
SumitNaiksatamigordcard: okay18:08
SumitNaiksatam#topic NFP impl patches18:09
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: over to you18:09
*** wangbo has quit IRC18:09
hemanthravidon't have an update, need reviews on the nfp patches18:09
hemanthravilisted at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GroupBasedPolicy/GerritQueries/NFP18:09
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: you have been planning to update the wiki page?18:10
hemanthraviyes, getting delayed due to other tasks. will update it today18:11
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: thanks18:11
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-318:11
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: i had a comment on: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29838518:11
*** coolsvap has quit IRC18:12
SumitNaiksatamoh, just remembered, i have the status attributes patch for review: #link https://review.openstack.org/28953018:12
SumitNaiksatamthis is useful for GBP, and also for NFP18:13
hemanthraviregarding the service profiles18:13
SumitNaiksatamso requesting you all to review and help make progress18:13
hemanthraviwill address that18:13
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: yes, go ahead18:13
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: ok thanks18:13
*** hdaniel has joined #openstack-meeting-318:14
SumitNaiksatam#topic Open Discussion18:14
SumitNaiksatamanything else for today?18:14
*** songole has joined #openstack-meeting-318:14
SumitNaiksatamsongole: hi, just in time before the meeting ends :-P18:14
tbachmanlol18:14
SumitNaiksatamsongole: anything you wanted to bring up before we close for today?18:15
songoleAh18:15
SumitNaiksatamsongole: if we are ready, we can bring up the UI discussion next week18:15
*** VW has quit IRC18:15
songoleNo18:15
SumitNaiksatamsongole: will touch base offline on that18:15
songoleok18:15
SumitNaiksatamthat might be a longer discussion18:15
ivar-lazzarohemanthravi: there are tons of rebase on the NFP patches18:15
ivar-lazzarohave you addressed my comments of a while back?18:15
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-318:16
ivar-lazzaroit's kind of hard to figure out18:16
hemanthravii think they have been, but will review to make sure18:16
SumitNaiksatamso in general, regarding the NFP patches, shall we as a team put a tentative schedule in place to review and attempt merging the patches?18:17
SumitNaiksatamif there are critical issues found in the review, we change the schedule18:17
songoleSumitNaiksatam: that helps18:17
SumitNaiksatambut i think in the current state, lots of cycles are being spent in rebases18:18
SumitNaiksatambut we are not moving forward18:18
SumitNaiksatamand i think reviews are also sporadic18:18
SumitNaiksatamso thats probably not helping the authors18:18
SumitNaiksatamwe dont have to decide here, but i think we are getting to a point where we need to make a call on the NFP patches one way or the other, since they have been in the review queue for a long time18:19
songoleSumitNaiksatam: can we schedule a hackathon for next week18:20
SumitNaiksatamsongole: sounds good, let me touch base with offline on this18:20
SumitNaiksatam*with you18:20
songoleok18:20
SumitNaiksatamplease let me know if you anyone else in the team has any thoughts on this18:20
hemanthravirebases were done to sync up with the dependent patches, is there a way to avoid this?18:21
SumitNaiksatam(or you can speak up here, we have plenty of time :-P)18:21
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: i dont think anyone is saying that you should not be rebasing18:21
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: its just that its difficult to keep track of review comments when there are several rebases18:21
hemanthraviagree, just making sure18:22
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: the way to mitigate that is to respond to the review comments after they have been fixed18:22
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: that way the reviewer knows that a particulay comment has been addressed18:22
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-318:22
hemanthravii'll work on this to make sure they are all addressed18:22
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: thanks18:23
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: the wiki page could help in this regard as well18:23
SumitNaiksatamanyway18:23
*** wangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-318:24
SumitNaiksatamsongole: so no bugs are at your end that you need discuss? :-P18:24
hemanthraviyes, will update the wiki page18:24
SumitNaiksatamsongole: the neutron service_profiles is a tough one18:24
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-318:24
*** ddieterly[away] has quit IRC18:24
SumitNaiksatamperhaps we can have a quick discussion about it here18:24
songoleSumitNaiksatam: we addressed the floating ip issue.18:25
SumitNaiksatamsongole: okay good18:25
songoleNot sure if I should monkey patch gbp patch.py or do it as part of NFP18:25
SumitNaiksatamsongole: you want to summarize the resource name conflic issue (service_profile)18:25
SumitNaiksatamsongole: that would depend on what the fix is18:25
songolemonkey patching l3_db call.18:26
SumitNaiksatamsongole: i think patch.py should be the place18:26
songoleok18:26
SumitNaiksatamthat way its easy to find everything in one place18:27
SumitNaiksatamsongole: you want to summarize the resource name conflic issue (service_profile)18:27
SumitNaiksatam*conflict18:27
songoleok18:27
songoleneutron as part of flavors framework is exposing CRUD APIs for its own service-profile resource18:27
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-318:27
songolethe name directly conflicts with our service-profile resource18:28
songolemy original idea was to rename GBP resource18:28
SumitNaiksatamsongole: that comes with the downside that its a backward incompatible change18:28
*** VW has quit IRC18:29
SumitNaiksatamsongole: i was hoping that there would be a namspace resolution to this18:29
ivar-lazzarois the flavor framework merged?18:29
songoleyes, it is merged18:29
SumitNaiksatamivar-lazzaro: yes, its been merged for a while now (i think liberty)18:29
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-318:30
SumitNaiksatamso i do have a patch out for review in GBP, which adds loading the flavors plugin18:30
SumitNaiksatamthis is to try and validate the coexistence of GBP and the neutron flavors framework18:30
*** jproulx has joined #openstack-meeting-318:30
SumitNaiksatamin that patch i also invoke Neutron flavors CLI18:30
SumitNaiksatamall this seems to work18:31
SumitNaiksatamthe issue is specifically with regards to the ‘service_profile” resources18:31
songoleDo you excercise neutron service-profile resources?18:31
SumitNaiksatamsongole: no, per our discussion, i was waiting for you to provide me with the CLI for the workflow ;-)18:32
songoleTrying to find time for that .. :)18:32
*** hdaniel has quit IRC18:33
SumitNaiksatamthis is the patch #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296098/18:33
SumitNaiksatamsongole: np18:33
*** baoli has quit IRC18:34
SumitNaiksatamso anyway, rkukura ivar-lazzaro igordcard, if you have any suggestions on how to handle this resource name conflict, please let us know18:34
*** aarefiev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:34
ivar-lazzarook18:35
rkukuraI think we need to change our resource name, because we are the unofficial project18:35
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-318:35
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: but that is backward incompatible18:35
rkukurathat goes with the territory18:35
SumitNaiksatamfor current GBP users18:35
*** sarob has quit IRC18:36
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: i dont think we can just throw up hands like that18:36
rkukuraif we had our own server/endpoint, it wouldn’t be an issue18:36
*** john-davidge has quit IRC18:36
ivar-lazzaroMaybe we should keep both service-profile and the new name for a while?18:36
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: if we rename, we will have to provide a migration strategy18:36
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-318:37
rkukuraWhich neutron release introduced their service-profile resource?18:38
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-318:38
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: i think stable/liberty18:38
rkukuraso maybe we could make our kilo version support two names as a migration strategy, and only the new name in liberty forward18:39
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: okay18:39
rkukurathat would be cleanest if we think most users are still on kilo18:40
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: i agree18:40
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck18:41
SumitNaiksatamthats all i had for today18:41
SumitNaiksatamanyone have anything else?18:41
SumitNaiksatami think we should have a proper spec out to resolve the name conflict issue18:42
SumitNaiksatamso that we can all agree on the path forward18:42
rkukurayes, and hopefully fixed before stable/kilo is EOL18:42
SumitNaiksatamalrighty, thanks everyone for joining!18:42
rkukurathanks SumitNaiksatam!18:43
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: thanks!18:43
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: yes18:43
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-318:43
SumitNaiksatambye all!18:43
SumitNaiksatam#endmeeting18:43
*** tbachman has left #openstack-meeting-318:43
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 16 18:43:30 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:43
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2016/networking_policy.2016-06-16-18.01.html18:43
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2016/networking_policy.2016-06-16-18.01.txt18:43
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2016/networking_policy.2016-06-16-18.01.log.html18:43
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC18:43
rkukurabye18:43
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-318:43
*** maishsk has joined #openstack-meeting-318:44
*** hemanthravi has quit IRC18:45
*** songole has quit IRC18:49
*** maishsk has quit IRC18:49
*** kmartin has quit IRC18:50
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:50
*** amit213 has joined #openstack-meeting-318:50
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-318:51
*** sarob has quit IRC18:53
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC18:54
*** shamail has joined #openstack-meeting-318:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-318:55
*** maishsk has joined #openstack-meeting-318:56
*** baoli has quit IRC18:56
*** VW has quit IRC18:56
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting-319:00
shamail#startmeeting auc19:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 16 19:01:01 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is shamail. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'auc'19:01
shamailHi everyone.  Who’s here for the AUC meeting?19:01
MeganRo/19:01
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-319:01
maishsko/19:01
shamailHi MeganR and maishsk19:01
maishskNice to see the AUC plastered all over :)19:01
shamail:]19:01
MeganRHi Shamail and maishsk19:01
maishskHi all19:02
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC19:02
maishskanyone else here?19:02
shamailLet’s give it a couple of minutes and then we’ll start… I was hoping we would have a larger turn-out but at this point we have to continue making progress against the agenda.19:02
shamailTom needs to run prelimenary numbers by next week, we can discuss and share via ML19:03
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-319:03
shamail#chair maishsk19:04
openstackCurrent chairs: maishsk shamail19:04
shamailOkay, let’s start… the agenda for today can be found at:19:04
shamail#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/AUCRecognition#Meeting_Information19:04
shamail#topic Updates on action items from 6/219:04
shamailI just went through the logs, no action items from 6/2 (yay) so moving on19:05
shamail:)19:05
shamail#topic Review draft of milestone-3 output19:05
shamailIs the bot not working again?19:05
shamailoh well...19:05
maishskWay to go Shamail19:05
shamaillol19:06
*** hdaniel has joined #openstack-meeting-319:06
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-319:06
shamailSo we had really good discussions during milestone-319:06
shamailI summarized our conversations and decisions into an etherpad19:06
shamail#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc-recog-m3-output19:06
*** VW has quit IRC19:07
shamailPlease review the draft output from milestone-3… if majority agrees, we can mark it as final and move to milestone-419:07
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-319:07
shamailPlease let me know when you have reviewed it19:09
maishskack - looks fine to me19:09
MeganRLooks good to me19:09
shamailThanks19:09
shamailWe can always iterate later19:10
shamail#agreed milestone-3 can be marked as completed19:10
shamailWe can move on to milestone-4 now!19:11
MeganRWoo hoo!19:11
shamailThis is probably the last major milestone and then its downhill :)19:11
shamail#topic Kick-off milestone-419:11
shamail#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc-recog-metrics19:11
shamailI went ahead and documented some of the metrics that we already discussed in milestone-3 and added them as starting points to foster discussion19:12
*** lpetrut has quit IRC19:13
shamailShould we walk through each role on the list and discuss the criteria/questions?19:13
maishskSure19:13
shamailThanks19:13
MeganRplease19:13
shamailSo for Official User Group organizers we have a pretty clear-cut metric19:13
shamail“Listed as an organizer or coordinator for an official OpenStack user group"19:13
maishsk+1 - just the fact is what happens to changes over time19:14
maishskWhich means we have to define a period over which the status is valid. When it starts, and when it ends19:14
shamailOne thought i had was what about if organizers/contributors change during the course of the six months19:14
shamailI don’t think this will happen often so it might be overthinking the problem19:15
shamailif it does happen, I am sure the new (or former) organizers could just let us know via the self-nomination process19:15
maishskThat sounds like a plan - good idea19:16
shamailAwesome.19:16
MeganRtrue, and hopefully if they are involved enough to plan/coord. user groups, they are also active in other areas.19:16
shamailMoving on to “Active members of official UC Working Groups”19:16
shamailMeganR: +119:16
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC19:17
shamailFor this one, I added to initial metrics:19:17
shamailAttend 25% of the meetings over the last six months19:17
shamailContributed at least (100 if OR, 25 if AND) lines in meetings (based on logs) over the last six months19:17
shamailjust as a starting point19:17
maishskMind elaborating on  — Contributed at least (100 if OR, 25 if AND) lines19:17
shamailAbsolutely19:17
shamailMy thought process here was that most working groups meet weekly (some don’t) but 25% attendance even in the weekly WGs would mean roughly about 6 meetings in 6 months which should be easy for active members19:18
shamailThe second line was about the fact that simply showing up does not make someone “Active”, it’s about collaboration and discussion19:19
maishskBut I dont get how the numbers work19:19
shamailto that end, I was thinking that we would state that you have to show up to 25% of the meetings AND have logged at least 25 lines over six months19:19
maishsk:(19:19
shamailThat ensures that just saying “hello” and “bye” in each meeting won’t let you make the cut19:20
shamailOh, eavesdrop logs the number of lines each person says in a meeting19:20
MeganRok, that makes sense, so is it no less than 25 lines?19:20
shamailThink of this as being the total count of lines said by someone in 6 months and if > 25 AND they show up in the log for 25% of the meetings then they are included19:20
shamailYes MeganR19:21
shamailI did that because it would prevent “hello”, “bye”, and a single “+1” from meeting the threshold19:21
shamailif they only attended 6 meetings and did that19:21
MeganRok, I am good with that number, thank you19:21
maishskThat works19:22
MeganRPlaying Devil's Advocate - what about teams that don't use IRC - initially, are we relying on their attendance to mean active participation?19:22
shamailThe “100 if OR” reference was regarding whether we would consider someone an active member of the WG (regardless of how many meetings they attended) if they have over 100 lines logged19:22
shamailmeaning they couldve shown up for 1 or 2 meetings only but made significant contributions towards topic(s)19:22
MeganRhmm, I like that idea = we certainly have seen active contributors that aren't always able to attend every meeting.19:23
shamailMeganR: I forgot to list the criteria for those teams… I think we are relying on the WG chairs for this groups and therefore we don’t have additional criteria beyond the WG chair saying someone is active19:23
shamailCan you add the criteria for non-IRC WGs?19:23
maishskregarding those who dont use IRC - I think that relying on the chair to update their minutes somewhere and the minutes should include participants19:24
MeganRsure19:24
shamailmaishsk: +1, most of those WGs use etherpads so attendance is logged19:24
maishskIt could be me - but maybe we should reword the IRC criteria - I did not find it sraightforward to understand19:24
*** itxaka has quit IRC19:25
shamailwe would just ask the chairs though to reduce burden on the people determining AUC (otherwise we would have to mine all etherpads which could be a labor intensive process)19:25
shamailmaishsk: +119:25
shamailI did the initial wording to put down my thoughts19:25
MeganRand the etherpads don't always identify who was speaking, since someone else may be taking notes19:25
MeganRjust who attended19:26
shamailIt seems we all agree with the explanation so I will go back and rephrase appropriately19:26
maishsk#agreed19:26
shamailmaishsk: does line 17 capture the idea better now?19:27
maishskMuch clearer - thanks!19:28
shamailthanks!19:28
MeganRyes, that looks good!19:28
shamailPerfect, thanks for the addition MeganR!19:28
shamailOn to “Ops meetup moderators”19:28
shamailThe initial criteria here is listed as:19:28
shamailModerate a session at the operators meetup over the last six months19:29
shamailHost the operators meetup (limit 2 people from the hosting organization) over the last six months19:29
maishskI think the limit is fine - just who decided which two they actually are? first come first served? They duel it out themselves? At dawn? With featherdusters ?19:30
shamailI added a response on the etherpad but the “2 maximum” is arbitary19:30
shamailOh19:30
shamailThe hosting organization would decide19:30
maishskWorks for me!19:30
MeganRI personally am voting for the featherdusters idea!19:30
shamailso, for example, in Manchester… Matt was the main point of contact… we would’ve asked him if another person from his company helped.19:31
shamaillol MeganR19:31
MeganRwhat about people moderating the actual sessions?19:31
shamailThat is the other set of criteria19:31
shamail“Moderate a session at the operators meetup over the last six months"19:31
shamailbasically this is an OR situation19:31
MeganRah ha - that's what I was missing - thank you19:31
shamailyou can get eligibility in this category by moderating a session or hosting the meetup (but max 2 for hosts)19:32
shamailIs 2 a good number?19:32
shamailI could reasonably see this being anywhere from 2-1019:32
MeganRyes, I think 2 is a good number and I like making the host company decide19:32
maishskAgreed19:32
shamailCool19:32
MeganRthere are usually a lot of people involved, but not all participate in OpenStack19:32
shamailWe should share this information regarding host eligibilty with the Meetup-Admin WG19:33
shamailhopefully they will see it on the mailing list19:33
shamailMeganR: +119:33
shamailMoving on to “Contributions to any repository under UC governance (ops repositories, user stories repository, etc.)”19:33
*** sarob_ has quit IRC19:34
maishskSo I have made one correction there19:34
shamailThe intial set here:19:34
shamailSubmitted two or more patches to a UC governed repository over the last six months19:34
shamailHost the operators meetup (limit 2 people from the hosting organization)19:34
maishsktwo or more.19:34
shamailThanks maishsk, saw the “or more"19:34
shamailIt is not the same as the ATC criteira19:34
shamailcriteria*19:34
maishskand I dont understand why the Host Operators meetup is there?19:34
shamailI believe that criteria is at least one change in the last two releases19:34
shamailmaishsk: that’s an easy one, because this etherpad was made with 3 hours of sleep19:35
shamailxD19:35
maishskLOL!19:35
MeganRlol - makes perfect sense now!19:35
shamailRemoved it, good catch :19:35
maishskShould we not keep the criteria the same as ATC ?19:35
MeganRis ATC changing?19:36
shamailThat would mean that we are tracking AUC for 12 months versus 6 months of eligibility (as all other categories are)19:36
shamailI kept the two part the same but just made it over one release19:36
maishskit conforms with the rest of the Openstack19:36
maishskis ATC changing - I have been hearing rumors / rumblings… ?19:37
*** dtardivel has quit IRC19:37
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting-319:37
shamailIt would align with TC governed projects in that case but get unaligned with all other AUC categories19:37
*** oshidoshi has joined #openstack-meeting-319:37
shamaileverything else we are tracking is over 6 months19:37
shamailI am fine either way on this..19:38
maishskAnd the term for an AUC is for 6 or 12 months?19:38
shamail6 months, summit to summit19:38
MeganRI think we need to keep it consistent with everything else, but make a note about the difference19:39
maishskSo if that is the case - I am fine with the criteria - as they are on the etherpad19:39
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck19:39
*** hdaniel has quit IRC19:39
shamailMeganR: Can you eloborate?  Is this a note about the fact that it’s different from ATC criteria?19:40
MeganRyes, that this is based upon a 6 month cycle19:40
shamailmaishsk: I have heard some changes for ATC but they were discussed at the board meeting and I don’t know if it was brainstorming, executed plans, or intended plans.  I think it will change but I don’t think the formal conversations have started?19:40
shamailGot it, will do MeganR19:40
MeganRty19:41
shamailNext one: “Track chairs for OpenStack Summits”19:42
shamailIdentified track chair for the upcoming OpenStack Summit (based on when data is gathered) [this is a forward-facing metric]19:42
shamailThe criteria is easy but the one decision point is who gets AUC, the track chairs after the summit they chaired or track chairs for the upcoming summit19:43
MeganRQuestion: will this be Track chairs for the current or previous summit?19:43
*** mfedosin has quit IRC19:43
shamailThat is the question indeed19:43
MeganRok, I am reading that right19:43
MeganRI think this looks good, and we will figure out that nuance19:43
*** mbound has quit IRC19:43
shamailBasically, do you have to chair and then get recognized after the fact at the next summit or do we recognize track chairs for the current/upcoming summit once we know who they are19:43
shamailI am leaning towards forward-facing/current19:44
MeganRIdeally: recognize those for the current summit - if there is time - but at the very least recognized at the following summit.19:44
shamailThis would allow Barcelona track chairs to be in the initial AUC list19:44
shamailAgreed MeganR, but it would eventually be one or the other… (e.g. track chairs do not get recognized for more than 6 months either)19:45
maishskI think that it should be for the upcoming summit19:45
MeganRMy hesitation for the recognition at the following summit is how often people and positions change in between summits.19:45
shamailMeganR: +119:45
shamailI think this is why forward-facing/current makes more sense… it also allows effort/reward to more closely aligned19:45
MeganR+119:46
shamailnext: “Contributors to Superuser (articles, interviews, user stories, etc.)”19:46
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-319:46
shamailCriteria: “Listed as author in at least one publication at superuser.openstack.org over the last six months”19:46
maishskThis is an easy one19:46
shamailIs one publication sufficient?19:46
MeganRyes19:47
shamailI dont think there are that many superuser articles19:47
shamailcool19:47
shamailagreed maishsk19:47
shamailNext: “Submission for eligibility to review panel”19:47
maishskacutally there are at least 2-3 per week19:47
shamailso 48-72 in six months19:48
shamailroughly19:48
shamailwhich isn’t bad…19:48
shamailEven if we make the criteria single publication, it’s not a massive amount19:48
MeganRI am good with one19:48
shamailWe can always revisit the required count after we run the initial total AUC count19:49
maishskAnd we are talking about articles?19:49
shamailmaishsk: yes19:49
maishskAnd not posts about Video interviews?19:49
shamailbut I think it is broader19:49
shamailThose count too… most videos also have an associated article19:49
shamailthe person might not be the author but would be mentioned as the source of content19:50
maishskshamail: I am not sure about that19:50
MeganRI think that is fine to start, and we can always revisit19:50
shamailI think people actually wanted to remove SuperuserTV, etc from the criteria19:50
maishsktake this for example - http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/going-from-startup-to-established-in-the-openstack-ecosystem19:50
shamailbecause they didnt feel one 5-10 min interview was on-par with the effort required for other categories19:51
shamailarticle at least takes longer19:51
shamailYeah, so if we say it counts then Jesse and Boris would be AUC19:51
shamailMost people said don’t count it because the effort is minimal19:51
MeganRdon't underestimate the stress associated with an interview  :)19:51
maishsk:)19:51
shamaillol MeganR19:52
maishskbeen there done that :)19:52
MeganR+100019:52
shamailSo should we include it for now and revisit if people object?19:52
MeganRno, I think the articles are fine19:52
maishskI am fine with also excluding for now and adding it in later - if people object19:53
shamailGreat19:53
maishskand I think that is exactly what MeganR also just said19:53
shamailnext: “Submission for eligibility to review panel”19:53
maishskor perhaps not?19:53
MeganRlol19:53
shamailcriteria: “No formal criteria, anyone can self-nominate, and nominations will be reviewed per guidance established in milestone-5”19:53
shamailbasically for this one the answer is that there are no hard and fast rules and the process will be defined in the next milestone19:54
MeganRI like this one as it stands, but in the future would like to develop a template - so certain information is obtained and submitted, making it easier for the UC to review.19:54
shamailMeganR: +1, you can take the action item in milestone-5 ;)19:54
maishsk:)19:54
MeganRlol - I will keep quiet from here on out!19:55
shamailjokes aside, that should definitely be an output of milestone-5.. common questions19:55
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-319:55
MeganR+119:55
*** hdaniel has joined #openstack-meeting-319:55
shamailAaaand last one: “Active moderators on ask.openstack”19:55
shamailCriteria: “Listed as moderator on Ask OpenStack and have over 500 karma”19:55
shamailI checked out the ask moderator karma ranks19:56
maishskWhat does 500 karma mean?19:56
shamailYou get karma when people like your answer or accept it19:56
*** lblanchard has quit IRC19:56
maishskis 500 karma a lot ? a whole lot? how active ?19:56
shamailIf the threshold is 500 then approxiately 35 moderators would get AUC19:56
shamailIt is a decent amount, there is a huge tail on karma in Ask OpenStack19:57
shamailthe #1 has like 10,00019:57
shamailby #35, we are at 50119:57
shamailand there are over 500+ people overall19:57
MeganRoh wow - I think that is a good place to start, and can refine if we find there is more active participation.19:57
maishsk+119:58
shamailcool19:58
shamailthe only other issue here is time horizon19:58
MeganRThe time frame for this I think should be 6 mo as well, based on everything else19:58
shamailAsk OpenStack doesn’t show how much karma someone obtained in 6 months so we can say “earn 100 karma in six months”19:58
MeganRdoes that fit the 500?19:58
MeganRhow about 25019:58
shamailif the criteria is “500 karma” then that makes anyone with over 500 permanently eligibke19:59
maishskBut karma does not measure on a 6 month cycle - it from the day they started until now19:59
shamail#link https://ask.openstack.org/en/users/?sort=reputation19:59
maishskI think this one might need some more thought19:59
shamaileach page has 30 people19:59
MeganRhmm, what if they started within the past 6 months?19:59
shamailso 250 would mean about 100 people19:59
shamailexactly maishsk20:00
shamailMeganR: then if they achieve the karma threshold they would be eligible, otherwise not20:00
maishsklet’s defer this point to next week?20:00
shamailthere is no way in ask.openstack.org to say “show me the karma for user over this date range"20:00
MeganRI agree with maishsk - need to think about this more20:00
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC20:00
maishskI can take an AI to think of possible ways to measure this and present next meeting20:01
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-320:01
shamailThe counter-point here is that once you’ve answered a question20:01
shamailthe solution could be valid for a long time20:01
shamailso, in theory, something you answered a year ago could still be helping people today20:01
shamailthanks maishsk20:02
maishskI have to drop20:02
shamail#action maishsk to propose metrics for ask openstack20:02
maishskThis was really productiive (As always!!)20:02
shamailsounds good maishsk20:02
shamailWe are done!20:02
shamailI will send out this etherpad over the ML to get more feedback from the community20:02
MeganRGreat!20:02
shamailand let Tom know that he can run initial numbers using this set of requirements20:02
shamailThanks for joining MeganR and maishsk20:03
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:03
MeganRsounds good - interested in seeing the numbers20:03
maishskthanks for Chairing shamail20:03
shamail#action shamail to send etherpad via ML for further community discussion20:03
MeganRthank you for pulling all of this together - really helped move things along!20:03
shamailSame here! looking forward to prelim numbers20:03
shamailThank you both for helping with the process!  We are getting there!!20:03
shamailbye20:03
shamail#endmeeting20:03
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 16 20:03:56 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:03
MeganRbye!20:04
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/auc/2016/auc.2016-06-16-19.01.html20:04
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/auc/2016/auc.2016-06-16-19.01.txt20:04
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/auc/2016/auc.2016-06-16-19.01.log.html20:04
*** MeganR has quit IRC20:04
*** shamail has quit IRC20:06
*** VW__ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:06
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-320:07
*** VW__ has quit IRC20:07
*** VW has quit IRC20:07
*** VW_ has quit IRC20:07
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-320:07
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck20:07
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-320:07
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-320:09
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:10
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-320:11
*** sarob has quit IRC20:12
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-320:13
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]20:14
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:15
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-320:18
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC20:19
*** aarefiev_ has quit IRC20:20
*** maishsk has left #openstack-meeting-320:21
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-320:27
*** DevonBoatwright has joined #openstack-meeting-320:28
*** piet has quit IRC20:28
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:29
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-320:30
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting-320:32
*** mickeys_ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:32
*** mbound has joined #openstack-meeting-320:33
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:34
*** mickeys_ has quit IRC20:36
*** lpetrut has quit IRC20:38
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:38
*** oshidoshi has quit IRC20:41
*** sarob has quit IRC20:42
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly20:44
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-320:46
*** shwetaap has quit IRC20:46
*** sarob_ has quit IRC20:49
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC20:51
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-320:51
*** ihrachys has quit IRC20:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-320:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC20:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-320:53
*** baoli has quit IRC20:53
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-320:53
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC20:55
*** tellesnobrega is now known as tellesnobrega_af20:56
*** rtheis has quit IRC20:57
*** ewang12 has quit IRC20:58
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega21:00
*** tenobreg__ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:00
*** tenobreg__ has quit IRC21:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-321:02
*** sarob has quit IRC21:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-321:04
*** VW has quit IRC21:04
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-321:12
*** Eva-i has quit IRC21:15
*** krtaylor has quit IRC21:15
*** ihrachys_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:19
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-321:19
*** baoli has quit IRC21:21
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-321:21
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz21:22
*** ihrachys has quit IRC21:22
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-321:25
*** rossella_s has quit IRC21:27
*** VW has quit IRC21:27
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-321:28
*** dconde has joined #openstack-meeting-321:28
DevonBoatwright#startmeeting ops_guide21:30
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 16 21:30:15 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is DevonBoatwright. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:30
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:30
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ops_guide'21:30
DevonBoatwrightHello.. anyone here yet?21:30
*** jamespd_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:31
darrenchi!21:31
*** hdaniel has quit IRC21:31
DevonBoatwrightHey darrenc!21:31
darrenchow are you?21:31
DevonBoatwrightGood! How're you doing?21:32
vhowardo/21:32
*** bpokorny_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:32
darrencnot too bad21:32
darrenchey vic21:32
vhowardhey everyone21:32
DevonBoatwrightSo I think Shilla will be here but I can't remember21:33
darrencok cool21:33
DevonBoatwrightok. She won't be here so I'll just get started21:33
darrenclet me update the agenda21:33
darrencok done21:34
DevonBoatwrightOh good.. ok21:34
*** bpokorny has quit IRC21:34
DevonBoatwright#topic Ops Guide21:34
njohnstono/21:34
DevonBoatwrightDid that work? I haven't chaired a meeting in a while and I missed a couple meeting21:35
*** admin0 has joined #openstack-meeting-321:35
vhowarddont think so?21:35
DevonBoatwrightAccording to the agenda it looks like we still need people to be removed and/or updated in the ops guide.21:36
DevonBoatwrightHm... ok.. let me try that again21:36
*** bsv has joined #openstack-meeting-321:36
DevonBoatwrightNo, I think that should have worked. It will be bolded in the archives21:36
vhowardk21:37
DevonBoatwrightSo here's the link for the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-guide-reorg21:37
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck21:37
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck21:37
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck21:37
*** sarob has quit IRC21:37
*** matrohon has quit IRC21:38
DevonBoatwrightSo.. it sounds like we need some volunteers..21:38
darrenchi bsv21:38
darrencwelcome21:38
bsvdarrenc o/21:38
*** ShillaSaebi has joined #openstack-meeting-321:38
darrencyeah we need more ops ppl to review the ops guide21:38
vhowardwhere are folks signing up again?21:38
ShillaSaebihi everyone! I am here lurking21:38
vhowardjust on the etherpad, and hey shilla21:38
DevonBoatwrightHey Shilla!21:38
ShillaSaebiwokring on another project that has a due date so im halfway here21:38
darrencyeah etherpad21:39
darrenchi shilla21:39
*** lpetrut has quit IRC21:39
darrencReally it's just picking a chapter or section and commenting if it is out of date or should be moved to another guide21:40
darrencI've added my comments on there21:40
*** banix has quit IRC21:40
darrencfor instance, there's a section on contributing to openstack which doesn't belong in the ops guide21:40
darrencalso I've moved some of the architecture chapter to the Arch Guide21:41
vhowardthat makes sense21:42
darrencbut will only remove that content from the ops guide when the new Arch Guide is published21:42
DevonBoatwrightok.21:42
darrencAnyway I'll commit some patches to remove content in the ops guide, and let everyone know on the ops ML21:43
darrencso ppl can review the changes21:44
DevonBoatwrightThat sounds good, darren21:44
DevonBoatwrightSo, should we move on to Enterprise Ops Documentation?21:44
darrencsure21:44
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-321:44
DevonBoatwright#topic Enterprise Ops Documentation21:45
*** shwetaap has quit IRC21:45
DevonBoatwrightI don't know what that is?21:45
DevonBoatwrightheh21:45
*** uxdanielle has quit IRC21:45
darrencops documentation from companies21:46
darrencbasically an initiative to contribute content upstream21:46
DevonBoatwrightAh ok.. cool21:46
darrencThanks ShillaSaebi for providing some docs21:47
vhowardsounds good21:47
ShillaSaebino problem let me know if those are along the right track21:47
ShillaSaebii can get much  more if they are21:47
darrencI'm still trying to find what i source from Rackspac21:47
darrencRackspace*21:48
ShillaSaebiif not, i can look for others and get them up21:48
ShillaSaebiok21:48
*** woodster_ has quit IRC21:48
darrencI guess we should poke at those docs and see how we could be used for the ops guide21:49
darrencs/how we/what21:49
bsvEnt. Ops doc, would that be stuff like on-boarding procedures?21:49
vhowardsome m&p's as well21:50
darrencI think troubleshooting stuff21:50
vhowardyep21:50
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:51
darrencshall we move on?21:52
DevonBoatwrightSure! I'm always scared to move along too quickly.21:52
DevonBoatwright#topic Arch Guide21:52
DevonBoatwrightHere's the work items wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Architecture_Design_Guide_restructure_work_items21:52
darrencYeah I need to update that with things to migrate from mitaka21:53
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck21:53
darrencShaun hasn't been around, he's moving countries21:54
darrencI think that's about it21:55
DevonBoatwright#topic Open Discussion21:55
DevonBoatwrightThere's a note that we need volunteers to attend ops meetings: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Operators_Tag_Group_Meeting21:55
darrencSo I sent out an email to this team about this21:56
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck21:57
darrencthe ops-related meeting I could see were: Ops Tools and Monitoring  -   Every two weeks (on odd weeks) on Wednesday at 1900 UTC  (http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_OSOps/Monitoring_and_Tools_Working_Group)21:57
vhowardah okay21:57
darrenc Operators Tag Group meeting - Every two weeks (on odd weeks) on Thursday at 1400 UTC (http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Operators_Tag_Group_Meeting)21:57
darrenc OpenStack Operators Telco and NFV  - Every two weeks (on even weeks) on Wednesday at 1900 (UTC http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_Operators_Telco_and_NFV_Working_Group)21:58
darrencwe need some volunteets to attend21:58
darrencvolunteers*21:58
DevonBoatwrightI looked at the Tag Group meeting. I might attend that one.21:58
darrencok thanks21:58
vhowardI can do take telco21:58
vhowarddo AND take it21:58
darrenclol21:59
darrencthanks21:59
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-321:59
darrencI could attend the Ops Tools but it is a 5am meeting for me21:59
darrencthat's pushing it :)22:00
DevonBoatwright5am.. who is ever up that early? heehee22:00
darrencso the purpose of attending is to recruit more ops to review the ops guide and possibly join this team22:00
DevonBoatwrightok22:01
darrencDevonBoatwright: well if you're a parent...22:01
vhowardyeah only crazy people22:01
DevonBoatwright;)22:01
bsvlol22:01
DevonBoatwrightI am.. but to teens. I get up that early to hit the gym.. like  crazy person. lol22:01
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom22:01
darrencI have a 1 year old who just started sleeping through the night22:02
darrencso I'm enjoying my "sleep in"22:02
DevonBoatwrightOh yea.. I remember those days.. and I'm glad they're over! heh22:03
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-322:03
darrencif you can call 6am a sleep in22:03
DevonBoatwrightI actually do...22:03
DevonBoatwrightSo I guess I can do like an action.. hang on..22:04
DevonBoatwright#action DevonBoatwright attending Operators Tag Group Meeting22:04
DevonBoatwrightI wonder if that worked22:04
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_22:05
darrencit should22:05
*** mars_toktonaliev has joined #openstack-meeting-322:05
darrencfyi: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ChairaMeeting22:05
DevonBoatwright#action vhoward attending OpenStack_Operatores_Telco_and_NFV_Working_Group22:05
*** marst has quit IRC22:05
DevonBoatwrightYea, I have that up.. I keep flipping back and forth22:05
DevonBoatwrightAnd I have another irc page up with commands.22:06
DevonBoatwrightI should have used the link command for those links. I hope they come up in the logs22:06
*** bpokorny_ has quit IRC22:07
*** vhoward has quit IRC22:07
DevonBoatwrightI have nothing else on the agenda up for discussion..22:07
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-322:08
darrencthat's all from me22:08
DevonBoatwrightokie. Shall we end this meeting?22:08
darrencactually one last action item22:08
DevonBoatwrightok..22:08
darrencsorry to backtrack22:08
DevonBoatwrightNo worries.. we have an hour. :)22:09
darrencfor the team to review enterprise docs22:09
DevonBoatwright#topic review enterprise docs22:10
DevonBoatwright#action team to review enterprise docs22:10
darrencthanks22:10
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC22:10
DevonBoatwrightnp22:10
*** mars_toktonaliev has quit IRC22:11
DevonBoatwrightok.. If that was the last item to bring up, then I will go ahead and end the meeting.22:11
DevonBoatwrightThanks everyone for joining today!22:11
*** baoli has quit IRC22:11
darrencthanks everyone22:12
DevonBoatwright#endmeeting22:12
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 16 22:12:15 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:12
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_guide/2016/ops_guide.2016-06-16-21.30.html22:12
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_guide/2016/ops_guide.2016-06-16-21.30.txt22:12
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_guide/2016/ops_guide.2016-06-16-21.30.log.html22:12
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-322:12
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-322:14
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-322:15
*** bsv has quit IRC22:17
*** sarob has quit IRC22:19
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-322:20
*** uxdanielle has joined #openstack-meeting-322:22
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-322:24
*** baoli has quit IRC22:27
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-322:27
*** sarob has quit IRC22:28
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:29
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-322:30
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC22:31
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]22:32
*** ddieterly[away] has quit IRC22:32
*** darrenc is now known as darren_afk22:34
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:34
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-322:35
*** abalutoiu has quit IRC22:39
*** baoli has quit IRC22:40
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-322:42
*** VW has quit IRC22:45
*** ShillaSaebi has quit IRC22:46
*** admin0 has quit IRC22:46
*** VW_ has quit IRC22:46
*** darren_afk is now known as darrenc22:55
*** bpokorny_ has joined #openstack-meeting-322:56
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-322:58
*** bpokorny has quit IRC23:00
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-323:01
*** rbak has quit IRC23:01
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-323:07
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-323:08
*** sarob has quit IRC23:09
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:11
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-323:13
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC23:13
*** claudiub|2 has joined #openstack-meeting-323:16
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC23:16
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-323:18
*** claudiub has quit IRC23:20
*** ihrachys_ has quit IRC23:20
*** DevonBoatwright has quit IRC23:21
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-323:21
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz23:22
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting-323:23
*** uxdanielle has quit IRC23:26
*** claudiub|2 has quit IRC23:27
*** sarob has quit IRC23:29
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-323:36
*** piet has quit IRC23:45
*** bpokorny_ has quit IRC23:45
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-323:46
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-323:46
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC23:47
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-323:48
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC23:49
*** ihrachys has quit IRC23:51
*** sdake has quit IRC23:57
*** mbound has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!