Wednesday, 2017-06-14

*** Swami has quit IRC00:02
*** pvaneck has quit IRC00:03
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC00:04
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-300:08
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-300:13
*** mickeys has quit IRC00:18
*** armstrong has quit IRC00:18
*** emagana has quit IRC00:21
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-300:22
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-300:24
*** emagana has quit IRC00:26
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-300:30
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-300:35
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-300:39
*** slaweq has quit IRC00:39
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-300:45
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC00:53
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-meeting-301:00
*** lucasxu has quit IRC01:01
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-301:02
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-301:06
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC01:09
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-301:13
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting-301:14
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC01:15
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-301:15
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:16
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC01:16
*** mickeys has quit IRC01:18
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-301:26
*** zhurong has quit IRC01:33
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-301:35
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-301:35
*** sgrasley has quit IRC01:39
*** slaweq has quit IRC01:40
*** shu-mutou-AWAY is now known as shu-mutou01:47
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-301:49
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC01:56
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC02:10
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-302:14
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-302:16
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-302:17
*** iyamahat has quit IRC02:18
*** yamahata has quit IRC02:18
*** mickeys has quit IRC02:19
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:25
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-302:32
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-302:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-302:41
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC02:43
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-302:43
*** rossella_s has quit IRC02:46
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-302:48
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-302:54
*** tuanluong has joined #openstack-meeting-302:56
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC03:00
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC03:08
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-303:08
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-303:15
*** baoli has quit IRC03:18
*** mickeys has quit IRC03:19
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-303:37
*** slaweq has quit IRC03:41
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck03:47
*** ghs39ghsggf has joined #openstack-meeting-303:48
*** ghs39ghsggf has left #openstack-meeting-303:48
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-303:52
*** rossella_s has quit IRC03:54
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-303:54
*** amotoki_away is now known as amotoki03:55
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-303:57
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:02
*** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-meeting-304:07
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC04:08
*** gouthamr has quit IRC04:09
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-304:14
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-304:16
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-304:18
*** mickeys has quit IRC04:20
*** gcb has quit IRC04:24
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-304:25
*** zhurong has quit IRC04:28
*** EmilienM has quit IRC04:30
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting-304:35
*** rossella_s has quit IRC04:37
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-304:38
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-304:38
*** slaweq has quit IRC04:42
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom04:46
*** mikal has quit IRC04:48
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz04:49
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting-304:50
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-304:51
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-305:03
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-305:04
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:06
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC05:09
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-305:12
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-305:14
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC05:15
*** bnemec has quit IRC05:16
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-305:17
*** zhurong has quit IRC05:17
*** slaweq has quit IRC05:17
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-305:21
*** mickeys has quit IRC05:21
*** kaz has joined #openstack-meeting-305:26
*** soichi has joined #openstack-meeting-305:27
*** gouthamr_ has quit IRC05:29
soichihi05:32
soichi#startmeeting taas05:33
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun 14 05:33:48 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is soichi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.05:33
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.05:33
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: taas)"05:33
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'taas'05:33
soichihi05:33
kazhi05:33
soichi#topic (yamamoto) I updated "TaaS Review Inbox" link on the wiki. Please let me know if it has any05:34
*** openstack changes topic to "(yamamoto) I updated "TaaS Review Inbox" link on the wiki. Please let me know if it has any (Meeting topic: taas)"05:34
yamamoto_hi05:34
soichiyamamoto_: hi05:35
soichii think TaaS Review Inbox works fine.05:35
yamamoto_thank you05:35
yamamoto_in case you're interested in what was changed, see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473207/05:35
soichithank you for your information05:36
reedipHi05:38
kazyamamoto_: what is this link?05:38
soichireedip: hi05:38
yamamoto_kaz: gerrit-dash-creator is a tool to create gerrit query. it has a set of dashboard definitions, including taas. does this answer your question?05:40
kazyamamoto_: i see. thank you.05:40
soichi#topic Open Discussion05:41
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: taas)"05:41
reedipCFP for Sydney is open05:44
soichiCall for Presentations for OpenStack Summit Sydney: deadline: July 14th05:44
soichi#link: https://www.openstack.org/summit-login/login?BackURL=%2Fsummit%2Fsydney-2017%2Fcall-for-presentations%2F05:44
soichido you have any plan?05:45
yamamoto_are you going to submit something?05:45
yamamoto_i have no plan right now05:45
reedipnot from my side either05:45
soichikaz: will you retry submit a presentation?  submit to the operatoer's track?05:47
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-305:47
kazi have no idea.05:47
soichiokay. i think we need to consider how we can appeal taas for the OpenSatck community05:49
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-305:50
soichialso how to increase TaaS users05:51
yamamoto_i guess we should do our homework as well05:52
yamamoto_reedip: are you still working on l2 agent extension stuff?05:52
reedipnot right now yamatoto05:52
yamamoto_ok05:52
reedipnot right now yamamoto *05:52
reedipIf someone wants to take it up , then ok . I am currently working on some other things, I might take it up next month if no one is taking it05:53
soichido you have another topic?05:57
yamamoto_nothing from me05:58
soichithanks, see you next week06:00
soichi#closemeeting06:00
soichi#endmeeting06:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"06:00
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun 14 06:00:15 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)06:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/taas/2017/taas.2017-06-14-05.33.html06:00
yamamoto_bye06:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/taas/2017/taas.2017-06-14-05.33.txt06:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/taas/2017/taas.2017-06-14-05.33.log.html06:00
soichibye06:00
kazbye06:00
*** kaz has quit IRC06:00
*** soichi has left #openstack-meeting-306:00
reedipbye06:01
*** ltomasbo|away is now known as ltomasbo06:01
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC06:08
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-306:09
*** krtaylor has quit IRC06:10
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC06:13
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:13
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC06:13
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-306:14
*** bennco1 has joined #openstack-meeting-306:14
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC06:15
bennco1JOIN06:15
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-306:15
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-306:17
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom06:18
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-306:19
*** mickeys has quit IRC06:21
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC06:22
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-306:22
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-306:23
*** slaweq has quit IRC06:23
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-306:23
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC06:27
*** bennco1 has quit IRC06:27
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-306:27
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC06:28
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-306:29
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-306:30
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-306:33
*** iyamahat has quit IRC06:37
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting-306:37
*** cshastri has joined #openstack-meeting-306:42
*** yamahata has quit IRC06:45
*** david-lyle has quit IRC06:48
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting-306:48
*** dklyle has quit IRC06:49
*** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-meeting-306:49
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz06:50
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC06:51
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-306:51
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom06:52
*** Guest11 has joined #openstack-meeting-306:53
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-307:11
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC07:11
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-307:11
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC07:13
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-307:14
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-307:18
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-307:19
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-307:19
*** slaweq has quit IRC07:26
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-307:27
*** Guest11 has quit IRC07:28
*** Guest11 has joined #openstack-meeting-307:32
*** gcb has quit IRC07:34
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-307:37
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-307:39
*** rdopiera has left #openstack-meeting-307:46
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-307:52
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC07:52
*** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:00
*** mfedosin has joined #openstack-meeting-308:01
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC08:03
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz08:09
*** ltomasbo is now known as ltomasbo|away08:10
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-308:13
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-308:14
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-308:29
*** mickeys has quit IRC08:30
*** tobberyd_ has quit IRC08:31
*** ianychoi has quit IRC08:43
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC08:44
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC08:44
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-308:48
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-308:50
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC08:51
*** Guest11 has quit IRC08:52
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC08:53
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-308:53
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:01
*** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting-309:01
*** pgadiya has quit IRC09:05
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC09:05
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-309:11
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-309:12
*** alex_xu has quit IRC09:16
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:17
*** tobberyd_ has quit IRC09:18
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-309:19
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC09:19
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-309:19
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-309:20
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-309:23
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC09:24
*** slaweq has quit IRC09:28
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-309:31
*** mickeys has quit IRC09:36
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting-309:36
*** zhurong has quit IRC09:40
*** wanghao has quit IRC09:43
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:43
*** abalutoiu has quit IRC09:48
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting-309:49
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-309:50
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-meeting-309:53
*** sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts09:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-309:58
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC09:59
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-310:01
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-310:03
*** rossella_s has quit IRC10:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:05
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-310:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:05
*** shu-mutou is now known as shu-mutou-AWAY10:06
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-310:09
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC10:13
*** ansmith has quit IRC10:23
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-310:24
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-310:24
*** slaweq has quit IRC10:28
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-310:32
*** mickeys has quit IRC10:38
*** egallen has quit IRC10:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-310:51
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-310:54
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:55
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:55
*** egallen has quit IRC10:56
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-310:57
*** egallen has quit IRC10:57
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-310:58
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-311:01
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-311:01
*** ltomasbo|away is now known as ltomasbo11:04
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:06
*** tuanluong has quit IRC11:16
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-311:24
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-311:26
*** makowals_ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:27
*** makowals has quit IRC11:28
*** slaweq has quit IRC11:29
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-311:32
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-311:34
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:36
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-311:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:36
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-311:38
*** mickeys has quit IRC11:39
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-311:39
*** bobh has quit IRC11:46
*** lhx_ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:50
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-311:53
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:59
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-312:02
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC12:06
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:07
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC12:08
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-312:11
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-312:15
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-312:25
*** ltomasbo is now known as ltomasbo|away12:26
*** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-312:27
*** slaweq has quit IRC12:30
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-312:35
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-312:37
*** mickeys has quit IRC12:39
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-312:44
*** abalutoiu has quit IRC12:44
*** elmiko has left #openstack-meeting-312:58
*** baoli has quit IRC12:59
*** gmann has joined #openstack-meeting-312:59
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-312:59
*** gmann has quit IRC12:59
*** pgadiya has quit IRC13:00
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-313:00
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting-313:01
claudiubanyone here for the hyper-v meeting?13:01
*** baoli has quit IRC13:08
*** gcb has quit IRC13:14
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-meeting-313:15
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-313:26
*** slaweq has quit IRC13:31
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-313:36
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-313:37
*** cleong has joined #openstack-meeting-313:37
*** mickeys has quit IRC13:40
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-meeting-313:42
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-313:42
*** lhx_ has quit IRC13:44
*** Guest11 has joined #openstack-meeting-313:49
*** pgadiya has quit IRC13:51
*** julim has quit IRC13:51
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-313:55
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-313:56
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-313:56
*** amotoki is now known as amotoki_away13:59
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-314:01
*** VW has quit IRC14:02
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-314:02
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-314:05
*** iyamahat has quit IRC14:09
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:11
*** ccamacho is now known as ccamacho|brb14:17
*** Guest11 has quit IRC14:20
*** shuyingya has quit IRC14:23
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-314:27
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC14:28
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:30
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-314:33
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-314:36
*** julim has quit IRC14:38
*** cshastri has quit IRC14:38
*** slaweq has quit IRC14:40
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC14:40
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-314:41
*** mickeys has quit IRC14:41
*** psachin has quit IRC14:45
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom14:45
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz14:46
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting-314:47
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:49
*** bklei has joined #openstack-meeting-314:53
*** prometheanfire has joined #openstack-meeting-314:56
*** zhipeng has joined #openstack-meeting-314:57
*** bklei_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:58
*** bklei has quit IRC14:59
prometheanfire#startmeeting requirements15:00
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun 14 15:00:31 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is prometheanfire. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: requirements)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'requirements'15:00
prometheanfire#topic rollcall15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: requirements)"15:00
*** bklei_ has quit IRC15:01
prometheanfireo/15:01
*** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:01
prometheanfiregonna wait another min15:04
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-315:04
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC15:04
*** tobberyd_ has quit IRC15:06
*** alex_xu has quit IRC15:07
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting-315:07
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC15:08
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-315:10
prometheanfireok, ending15:10
prometheanfire#endmeeting15:10
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:10
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:10
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun 14 15:10:48 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:10
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/requirements/2017/requirements.2017-06-14-15.00.html15:10
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/requirements/2017/requirements.2017-06-14-15.00.txt15:10
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/requirements/2017/requirements.2017-06-14-15.00.log.html15:10
*** prometheanfire has left #openstack-meeting-315:10
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC15:16
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-315:16
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:18
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC15:30
*** mfedosin has quit IRC15:31
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:32
*** reedip_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:34
*** andreas_s has quit IRC15:36
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-315:37
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC15:38
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:38
*** yamahata has quit IRC15:39
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-315:41
*** mickeys has quit IRC15:42
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC15:45
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom15:52
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC15:52
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:56
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:59
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-315:59
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-315:59
*** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:00
*** mguiney has joined #openstack-meeting-316:00
markvoelker#startmeeting interopwg16:01
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun 14 16:01:44 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is markvoelker. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'interopwg'16:01
egluteo/16:01
markvoelkero/16:01
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-316:01
markvoelker#chair eglute hogepodge16:02
openstackCurrent chairs: eglute hogepodge markvoelker16:02
markvoelker#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropVertigo.4 Today's Agenda16:02
hogepodgeo/16:02
zhipengo/16:02
markvoelkerPlease take a quick look at today's agenda and amend as necessary16:02
markvoelker#topic Denver PTG16:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Denver PTG (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:03
markvoelkerThe next PTG is in Denver, Colorado, USA September 11-1516:04
egluteAs last PTG, we will be sharing a room with RefStack. Time to book hotel room if you are coming!16:04
Rockygo/16:04
egluteInterop/RefStack will be Monday/Tuesday16:04
*** gouthamr2 has joined #openstack-meeting-316:04
markvoelkerIf you're considering attending, you can find all the info you need at:16:04
markvoelker#link https://www.openstack.org/ptg Main PTG site16:04
mguineyo/16:05
markvoelkerSee also hotel block here:16:05
markvoelker#link http://www.marriott.com/meeting-event-hotels/group-corporate-travel/groupCorp.mi?resLinkData=the%20OpenStack%20Project%20Teams%20Gathering%5Edensa%60fntfnta%60149.00%60USD%60false%604%609/7/17%609/19/17%608/20/17&app=resvlink&stop_mobi=yes Hotel block for PTG16:05
markvoelkerAny questions/comments on the PTG?16:05
hogepodgeThere will also be a board meeting the Sunday prior to the PTG, and you may want to plan accordingly if you want to attend that.16:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:07
markvoelkerOk, hearing nothing further, let's move on16:07
markvoelker#topic 2017.08 Guideline16:07
*** openstack changes topic to "2017.08 Guideline (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:07
markvoelker#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467493/ non-admin token validation test16:07
*** julim has quit IRC16:07
* markvoelker watches mguiney push a new patchset16:08
*** gouthamr_ has quit IRC16:08
mguineyheh. sorry, just saw a tiny typo error that was causing pep8 failute16:08
mguiney*falure16:08
markvoelkerNo worries. =)  Anything we need to discuss on this?  Looks like it's just waiting for reviews.16:08
markvoelkerOk, moving on to:16:09
markvoelker#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467528/ catalog standardization test16:10
markvoelkerTHis is one we had decided was probably too early for 2017.08 but we'd mention in the BoD meeting16:10
mguineyyep, still working on that.16:10
markvoelkerOK then, that just leaves us with this:16:11
markvoelker#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472848/ Create 2017.08 Guideline16:11
eglutethanks markvoelker for creating it. looks like i left out moving one capability to required16:12
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:12
markvoelkereglute: Ok, I can push a new patcheset to correct that.16:13
eglutethank you markvoelker16:13
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-316:13
markvoelkerAnything else?  If not, I think this just needs folks to review.  Should be pretty straightforward, and even after we land it, it can be patched until the BoD meeting.16:14
egluteno, looks good to me16:15
markvoelkerOK then, I'll get the new patchset up today and we'll see if we can land it.16:15
markvoelker#action markvoelker respond to comment on 2018.07 patch16:16
markvoelkerAnything else on 2017.08?16:16
markvoelker#topic ML Discussion on Tempest tests, plugins, etc16:17
*** openstack changes topic to "ML Discussion on Tempest tests, plugins, etc (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:17
markvoelkerLast week we mentioned that there are some discussions about Tempest and test locations on the ML's, and new interop programs were brought up16:17
markvoelkerThere seemed to be some lack of clarity about what we were thinking, so I volunteered to take a stab at writing up what we're thinking about for the vertical and add-on programs16:18
markvoelkerI did that here:16:18
RockygThanks for doing that.16:18
markvoelker#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472785/ Create rough draft of extension programs16:18
markvoelkerAnd sent it out to the ML's here:16:18
markvoelker#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-June/118182.html ML message about future interop programs16:19
eglutethank you markvoelker!16:19
markvoelkerThere's been a little bit of feedback so far, but I'd specifically like to invite the rest of you to chime in on gerrit if there are things you want to discuss in the draft16:19
markvoelker(or if you just want to make fun of my terrible diagrams)16:20
eglutei will re-review again, but after reading it once it looked good to me16:20
eglutemarkvoelker i imagine once we go forward with this foundation will have someone create new diagrams as needed16:20
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:21
markvoelkerGood heavens, I sure hope so...I am many things, but a graphic artist isn't one of them. =)  Still, I thought having a rough sketch would be helpful for understanding.16:21
egluteheheh i think those diagrams are great!16:22
eglute:D16:22
eglutethere is a board meeting next week16:22
egluteand i would like us to present the draft to the board, if you think it is ready for that16:23
eglutejust so they can review it before it is presented for final aproval16:23
Rockygmaybe we should ask the tc for a tc meeting to discuss?16:23
Rockygor ask on the dev ml?16:23
markvoelkerSure--although I am traveling next week and may or may not be able to join the call.  Will need to check schedule.16:23
egluteRockyg it was already sent to the dev mailing list, as well as ops16:24
eglutemarkvoelker ok, we can discuss offline regarding your schedule16:25
RockygI know the initial mail was, but I'm wondering if we should do more to get the tc involved.16:25
markvoelkerRockyg: I know at least some of the TC folks are aware of it (cdent chimed in on IRC the other day), so if the TC would like to discuss it they're welcome to. I expect they'll let us know if they'd like to discuss in a meeting and have us be there to take questions (and I'm happy to do so).16:25
RockygThanks.16:26
markvoelkerAnd Sean McGinnis actually commented in gerrit too, which is great.16:26
eglutegreat suggestions Rockyg! and thanks markvoelker for following up on all the comments16:27
RockygFigure we should give the TCs at least a couple of weeks ;-)16:27
markvoelkerOk, anything else on this to discuss today?16:27
markvoelkerOk, moving on...16:28
eglutewe need more reviews on this, otherwise, no :)16:29
Rockygyup16:29
markvoelker#action everyone please review new programs draft16:29
markvoelker#topic 2.0 Schema16:29
*** openstack changes topic to "2.0 Schema (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:29
markvoelker#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430556/ Initial work on 2.0 schema16:30
markvoelkerhogepodge has picked up work on this again and I've been working through it in conjuction with the extension program draft16:30
eglutethank you hogepodge16:31
eglutei have not had a chance to look at the newest patch!16:31
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC16:31
hogepodgeYes, I need reviews to make sure I'm not missing anything, or don't have any glaring errors16:31
* eglute looking now16:31
markvoelkerhogepodge: I've got a couple of suggestions that I'm working through mentally locally while setting out the add-on and vertical program definitions16:31
hogepodgesuggestions, etc. It's a dense patch16:31
hogepodgemarkvoelker: cool.16:32
markvoelkerI Think I just need to get in a couple more cycles on those and then push them up in gerrit16:32
markvoelkerOverall though I think it captures the essence of what we need16:32
hogepodgeI'd like to get cranking on a schema and conversion of existing guidelines as soon as possible, in part to help refstack16:32
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC16:32
hogepodgeyeah16:32
hogepodgeshould match up with the extensions doc you sent up last week too16:32
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:33
*** egallen has quit IRC16:33
markvoelkerhogepodge: Also, one question that crossed my mind this week...assuming we get it done in time, do we want 2017.08 in 2.0 format?16:33
markvoelkerWe can cross that bridge if/when we come to it, but just occurred to me last week that it might be ready in time.16:33
markvoelkerI suspect not though, b/c we need to give RefStack time to adjust too....16:33
markvoelkerI'm open to suggestion though. =)16:34
hogepodgeI'd like us to transition as quickly as possible, but only if we feel ready.16:34
egluteif we want to ask for approval for new programs in august, then we would need to16:34
eglutebut16:34
eglutewe can ask for approval in september board meeting16:34
hogepodgeeglute: +1, yes, I'd like something to be available for that too16:34
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-316:35
*** david-lyle_ is now known as david-lyle16:35
egluteif we aim for september approval, then no need to rush 2017.08 update16:35
markvoelkerOk, let's see how far we can get and we'll make a decision as we get close to time16:35
RockygWouldn't a new program be advisory for 2017.08 no matter what?16:35
markvoelkerIn the meantime:16:36
hogepodgeRockyg: yes, the plan is advisory in August and possibly required in January (for extensions)16:36
markvoelker#action everyone review schema 2.0 patch16:36
egluteRockyg yes, new program would be advisory, but we can also have a 2017.09 guideline. no restrictions on how many guidelines per year16:36
*** makowals_ has quit IRC16:36
hogepodgePlease, be extremely critical. I want it to be correct.16:36
RockygAh, true.  Thanks, eglute16:36
hogepodgeWe don't get a second chance at our second chance. :-D16:36
markvoelkerOK, anything else on this?16:37
eglutehogepodge we just increase the number and call it a new chance ;)16:37
Rockyg2.116:37
Rockygor would it be 2.0.1?)16:38
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-316:38
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC16:38
markvoelker#topic Mandatory submission of test results16:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Mandatory submission of test results (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:38
markvoelkerI think the bullets in the etherpad say it all, but does anyone want to walk us through this one?16:39
markvoelker(I didn't add this item to the agenda =p)16:39
eglutei copied over from last week's agenda16:40
egluteit is one item we didnt get to discuss in Boston16:40
egluteI think we need to work on making test results required16:40
hogepodgeI don't know if I should lead it, but I can make my argument.16:40
markvoelkerI'll take a stab at it then:16:41
eglutego for it hogepodge16:41
hogepodgeIt's extremely easy to falsify test results. Keeping the output of the test run allows for forensics in case something is wrong.16:41
*** makowals_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:41
markvoelkerBasically we've been discussing making it mandatory that vendors submit results of all tests to RefStack rather than just required ones16:41
hogepodgeAh, I guess I have a different view of the topic. :-P16:41
markvoelkerOne benefit being that we get more data about what's supported and not across products16:41
zhipengdo we certify on all tests as well ?16:42
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:42
Rockygzhipeng, no.  Just the guidelines16:42
eglutezhipeng no, we would certify only on required tests.16:42
*** mickeys has quit IRC16:42
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-316:43
*** makowals has quit IRC16:43
*** lucasxu has quit IRC16:43
markvoelkerRight, the idea here was just that when we're considering including a new test in the next Guideline, we could go see that "wow, half of vendors who are currently OpenStack Powered failed that test, maybe we should look at it a little closer..."16:43
egluteyeah, that would be great if we had that data16:43
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|Afk16:44
*** sambetts|Afk is now known as sambetts|afk16:44
markvoelkerAnother requirement we'd been discussing was what hogepodge was just alluding to, though I think we hadn't decided exactly what artifacts we'd expect to be submitted16:45
markvoelker(hogepodge maybe you remember better than me?)16:45
hogepodgethe testrepository data16:45
hogepodgeor the tempest.conf (without the accounts.yaml)16:45
hogepodgeboth were discussed16:46
annegentleo/ heyo super late since I was double-booked, need to read scrollback :)16:47
* eglute waves to annegentle 16:48
Rockyghogepodge, what's the most likely ways the tests are gamed and what do we need to identify that?16:48
hogepodgeRockyg: anyone can just send up a json list of passed tests and get a passing result, without actually running the tests16:49
hogepodgeit's a major design flaw of the program, imo16:49
markvoelkerRockyg: I think that's hard to pin down...at the end of the day we're talking about plaintext files that can be falsified with any text editor.16:49
hogepodgehaving the testrepository data makes generation of the json file independently verifiable16:50
markvoelkerWe've relied mostly on legalese (in the trademark agreement) and community policing in the past16:50
hogepodge(by the foundation)16:50
hogepodgeit also helps with debugging (I get a lot of requests about "why is my cloud not passing?")16:50
Rockygi bet ;-)16:50
eglutei think we have sufficient reasons to want all the results16:51
eglutewhat would need to update to start asking for them?16:51
hogepodgefor example, one vendor sent in results where they modified tempest to remove a skip decorator. My conversations with them would have been a lot easier if I could see that the test actually ran in the output.16:51
RockygSo, what's the average size of the data set?  would we ccompress it or???16:51
markvoelkerRight, there were some concerns about what might be exposed there...e.g. passwords (in the configs) or sensitive stuff in the logs16:51
hogepodgeI can't speak to that in this meeting, but it's a text file.16:52
markvoelkerI think those are solvable16:52
hogepodgeif a password is exposed it's a tempest bug16:52
markvoelkerWe probably just need to have somebody play point on pinning that stuff down and putting together a proposal16:52
RockygI remember back a ways where refstack discussed stripping sensitive info before send full results.16:52
hogepodgedata would not be publicly available, and access to the database would be controlled by the infra team in the same way that all sensitive data is managed (with refstack entrypoints for foundation users)16:52
*** makowals_ has quit IRC16:53
RockygWe might even have the bundler code in the refstack repo16:53
RockygSo, insead of a jason file, the testrun log was expected to be sent.16:53
markvoelkerhogepodge: would you be willing draft up a proposal on this so we can move toward ironing out details and formalizing it?16:54
hogepodgemarkvoelker: sure16:55
*** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:55
markvoelker#action hogepodge to work on drafting a proposal on what data we should require vendors to submit16:55
annegentlehogepodge you're the man!16:55
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-316:55
eglutethank you hogepodge!16:55
markvoelkerOk, anything else on this topic today?16:56
eglutenot from me!16:56
markvoelker#topic Vertical programs16:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Vertical programs (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:56
markvoelkerJust a couple of minutes left, so I'll keep it short16:56
markvoelkerSee above for link to draft of vertical programs16:57
markvoelkerIn the meantime, to get something a little more concrete we need to start putting together a very preliminary list of capabilities for an NFV program16:57
*** zhipeng has quit IRC16:58
*** gouthamr_mbl has joined #openstack-meeting-316:58
markvoelkerThis is basically just a first pass, so we can flush out some of the real issues and figure out how to deal with them16:58
markvoelkerIf anyone wants to help with that, let me know.16:58
*** gouthamr2 has quit IRC16:58
markvoelkerAnd with that we're down to just a minute left...any last words folks?16:59
eglutethanks markvoelker, i will re-read it again16:59
eglutethanks everyone!16:59
egluteand thanks markvoelker for writing up add-ons/vertical programs draft16:59
hogepodgethanks everyone!16:59
Rockygthanks and review!  I will do it now16:59
markvoelker#endmeeting17:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:00
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun 14 17:00:06 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interopwg/2017/interopwg.2017-06-14-16.01.html17:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interopwg/2017/interopwg.2017-06-14-16.01.txt17:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interopwg/2017/interopwg.2017-06-14-16.01.log.html17:00
*** makowals has quit IRC17:00
mguineyhave a good day, all!17:00
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-317:01
*** gouthamr_ has quit IRC17:01
*** rstarmer has joined #openstack-meeting-317:02
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:03
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-317:03
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:05
*** rstarmer has quit IRC17:07
*** julim has quit IRC17:09
*** lpetrut has quit IRC17:10
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-317:13
*** julim has quit IRC17:16
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:18
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-317:18
*** reedip_ has quit IRC17:21
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz17:23
*** julim has quit IRC17:23
*** rstarmer has joined #openstack-meeting-317:26
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-317:26
*** pcaruana has quit IRC17:29
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-317:29
*** gouthamr_mbl has quit IRC17:30
*** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:30
*** annegentle has quit IRC17:32
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom17:32
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-317:33
*** neiljerram has quit IRC17:34
*** gouthamr_ has quit IRC17:34
*** rstarmer has quit IRC17:34
*** rstarmer has joined #openstack-meeting-317:35
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-317:35
*** lhx__ has quit IRC17:37
*** rstarmer has quit IRC17:37
*** mickeys_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:39
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-meeting-317:39
*** makowals has quit IRC17:40
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-317:41
*** makowals has quit IRC17:41
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-317:42
*** mickeys_ has quit IRC17:44
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC17:47
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz17:47
*** julim has quit IRC17:49
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC17:53
*** bobh has quit IRC17:53
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-317:57
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-317:57
*** makowals has quit IRC17:59
*** julim has quit IRC18:09
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-318:14
*** annegentle has quit IRC18:16
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom18:18
*** Rockyg has quit IRC18:20
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-318:20
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC18:31
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-318:35
*** Rockyg has quit IRC18:37
*** Guest11 has joined #openstack-meeting-318:37
*** mickeys_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:40
*** mickeys_ has quit IRC18:44
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-318:46
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:46
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC18:48
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-318:49
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC18:49
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-318:49
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz18:50
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-318:54
*** rdopiera has joined #openstack-meeting-319:02
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-319:03
*** julim has quit IRC19:05
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC19:12
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC19:21
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:21
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-319:23
*** annegentle has quit IRC19:27
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:34
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-319:40
*** ying_zuo has joined #openstack-meeting-319:43
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom19:43
*** mickeys has quit IRC19:45
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-319:51
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-320:00
robcresswell#startmeeting horizon20:00
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun 14 20:00:08 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is robcresswell. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: horizon)"20:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'horizon'20:00
david-lyleo/20:00
ying_zuoo/20:00
ducttape_o/20:00
e0nehi20:00
*** choyj has joined #openstack-meeting-320:00
robcresswellHi everyone20:00
choyjo/20:01
*** mguiney has left #openstack-meeting-320:01
robcresswellWe've an empty agenda again :)20:01
e0neso I've got a chance to ask a question today:)20:02
robcresswellI don't have any notices either, other than Pike-2 was tagged and released last week. There's also been a few more stable backports, so I'll tag new stables too.20:02
robcresswell#topic Open Discussion20:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: horizon)"20:02
robcresswellIf you have any questions, blueprints, bugs, patches, feel free to ask20:02
e0neI'll appreciate any feedback on my thread in openstack-dev: Poorly Pagination UX20:03
e0ne#link  http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-June/118352.html20:03
rdopierao/20:03
robcresswelle0ne: I disagree with the assessment that they "can't be fixed"20:03
david-lylee0ne, I think the long and the short is without something like searchlight it won't get better20:04
rdopieraI have a question about the federation and regions20:04
rdopieraHow stable is that feature, actually? Has anybody been using it?20:04
e0nerobcresswell: it's good20:04
robcresswellIts just not a trivial solution, because the delete is done via client side and ajax iirc, while the page (with back/next) is generated by the server20:04
robcresswellSo they get out of sync20:04
ducttape_until the apis have robust paging support, horizon will continue to be in trouble.  searchlight could have fixed that20:05
e0nerobcresswell: if I understand correct, deletion causes full page  reload20:05
robcresswelle0ne: Oh, does it? I can't remember off the top of my head20:05
david-lylerdopiera, federation and regions?20:05
ducttape_rdopiera: federation and regions???  more details please20:05
robcresswellHang on, lets talk pagination first.20:06
david-lyleget out of my head ducttape_20:06
robcresswellToo much crosstalk.20:06
*** jgravel has joined #openstack-meeting-320:06
rdopieraSo Horizn has this AVAILABLE_REGIONS feature, where you can have several Keystone addresses defined20:06
david-lylepagination, you're stuck20:06
david-lyleend of story20:06
rdopieraand then you can switch between them in the UI20:06
e0nerobcresswell: I don't have working env now, but it did GET and re-load all js files after delete call on my fresh devstack today20:06
e0nedavid-lyle: :)20:06
ducttape_yeah, not much to do to really fix paging.   says the inside of david-lyle's head20:06
robcresswelle0ne: Basically; those bugs can be fixed. I've done it locally with angular. The logic isn't terribly nice, and its a big change from what we have now.20:07
robcresswellIt also has to be done on a per-API basis because they all do things differently20:07
rdopieraand then it has web sso, which lets you share the logins between those multiple keystones20:07
e0nerobcresswell: could  you please submit that code to the gerrit?20:07
robcresswellYou *also* have to do a lot of the tracking yourself as the next/prev links aren't reliable from the API (they often show up even if "next" is empty, for example)20:07
robcresswelle0ne: It wasn't part of Horizon, totally separate investigation.20:08
ducttape_rdopiera  It's been a couple of years, but that multi region / login thing was kind of working for a deployment we had20:08
e0nerobcresswell: TBH, I don't know how to fix everything with current APIs without additional API calls20:09
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC20:09
ducttape_I would not be shocked if the multi region login thing is partially broken right now, as I'm not sure if anyone is still using it20:09
david-lylerdopiera, if you're wanting federated keystone between those regions that went in two cycles ago, should work20:09
david-lyleif you're wanting separate logins, that should work still too20:09
david-lylebut the UX is different20:09
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-320:09
rdopieradavid-lyle: I think they want common logins20:10
ducttape_so why not just have multi region and single login rdopiera???20:10
david-lyleI suppose you could set multiple REGIONS and use federation20:11
rdopieraducttape_: I have no idea, I didn't even KNOW about this feature until they came to me asking how stable it is :)20:11
rdopieraso I promised to ask upstream20:11
robcresswelle0ne: This is what I mean; its not an easy solution :)20:11
rdopieraand here I am20:11
david-lylebut the intended usage was provide a keystone REGION then your service catalog will contain the endpoints for the other federated keystones20:11
ducttape_here we all are.  indeed. ;)20:11
david-lylewhen you login, then you will get a drop down of other keystones to switch to20:12
e0nerobcresswell: I'm glad to help with it if you share your ideas20:12
e0nerobcresswell: here is a case what I can't resolve for now: http://paste.openstack.org/show/612591/20:12
lucasxurdopiera: I was using the keystone federation plugin20:13
lucasxuit works well20:13
robcresswelle0ne: The only sensible way to do that is probably to drop on to the first page after a refresh :/20:13
rdopierathanks you all for the feedback20:13
rdopierathank you*20:13
david-lylerdopiera, I think you're mixing two ways of using multiple keystones which is confusing things20:14
e0nerobcresswell: it's a bad idea from UX perspective if you've got a lot of pages :(20:14
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC20:14
rdopieradavid-lyle: it's possible I simply didn't understand what they are doing20:14
robcresswelle0ne: You shouldnt be trying to manipulating large amounts of data by paging through it. Use filtering.20:14
rdopieradavid-lyle: I will try to clarify20:14
rdopieradavid-lyle: thanks for the hints20:14
robcresswellOr up the page size. But going to page 10 to get something done is not productive.20:15
david-lylerobcresswell, e0ne I think storing the previous page marker in the session is what you would want20:15
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-320:15
david-lyleyou can store previous markers and page back20:15
david-lyleif back is all you want20:15
david-lylebut it's baggage to carry around20:16
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-320:16
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC20:16
robcresswellYeah, the only option would be to load the page, check its [], then load the page before20:16
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-320:17
e0neor the next page20:17
e0nebut in corner case, we still will get [] :(20:17
david-lyleyou should get an API error if you ask for a missing marker, no?20:17
e0nedavid-lyle: that's what is supposed to be20:17
robcresswelldavid-lyle: No, most APIs will return a Next link for an empty page.20:18
robcresswellCinder definitely does this.20:18
robcresswellI think I have bug open for it20:18
david-lylean empty result with a next link?20:18
david-lyle*result set20:18
david-lylehow does it know what next is?20:18
david-lyleif you're asking for a missing ID?20:19
robcresswellSo if I'm looking at page of items 5 - 10, with marker 4 (the last item in the previous page)20:19
e0neit depends on your pagination order: we need prev or next link20:19
robcresswellAnd I deleted 5 - 1020:19
rdopierahmm, there are prev and next links already20:19
rdopierayou have to genereate them for the page20:19
robcresswelland I request 1 - 4, for example, I'll get a "next" link even though there is nothing there20:19
ducttape_if you are going to have partially supported pagination apis underneath the UI, this seems pretty futile to have a consistent pagination experience20:20
rdopieraso we don't need to store the last marker20:20
robcresswellBecause the "next" link is always the last item on your current page, not the first item on the next one.20:20
david-lyleyeah, I gave up on pagination 4+ years ago in OpenStack20:20
david-lylehave washed away most of the painful memories20:20
robcresswellrdopiera: Right, this is what Im saying; those links aren't reliable, because they will still generate them even if the next page is empty.20:20
robcresswellAlso most APIs dont do Prev20:20
rdopierabummer20:21
david-lylethe real answer is filtering to reduce the result set and store all the results on the client and handle pagination there20:21
david-lylefor the handful of pages20:21
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC20:21
david-lylethat was part of the Paris accord IIRC20:21
david-lylenot the famous Paris accord of course20:21
david-lylebut the summit20:22
rdopierawhat is the sense of pagination then, if you have the whole list anyways20:22
rdopierajust display it all20:22
ying_zuoinstead of showing pre and next, would it be better if we just show a link for more and just keep adding more rows to the table?20:22
rdopierait's a web page, it can be scrolled, you know20:22
rdopieradoesn't have to fit on the screen20:22
david-lylebecause throwing more people into the pagination volcano hasn't quieted the pagination volcano's anger yet20:22
rdopieraying_zuo: that's an idea20:22
ying_zuothat will solve the problem for apis don't have pre20:22
ducttape_maybe we can just post all the cloud resources to twitter.  they do scrolling pretty well20:22
rdopieraying_zuo: and it's popular these days20:23
e0nehm... we can't always show all but links like "show more" are an option for me20:23
david-lylerdopiera, status checks can kill performance20:23
rdopieraand that would also encourage filtering20:23
david-lylethere were reasons, they may no longer be valid20:23
rdopieradavid-lyle: I see20:23
david-lylewe didn't limit the thread pool for polling previously20:24
robcresswellShow more works, but that has its own issues. Like how much data you hold in the client, and what your JS is doing20:24
ducttape_it was 10 requests for polling I thought20:24
david-lylethat has been fixed, so showing all may not make things fall over any more20:24
david-lylethat's why filtering20:24
david-lyle1000 pages isn't really useful, ever20:24
ying_zuoprobably the biggest problem for show more is the update20:25
e0nepolling for 100 items statuses per page is also not a good idea from the performance PoV20:25
e0neying_zuo: +120:25
ying_zuoupdate for the deleted resources20:25
david-lylethat's why the # of threads has been limited20:26
rdopierarobcresswell: that's where filtering comes in20:26
*** Guest11 has quit IRC20:26
david-lylelet's just agree to agree to filter20:27
david-lyle:)20:27
*** Guest11 has joined #openstack-meeting-320:27
e0ne:)20:27
rdopierapersonally, when there are more results than one page, I would just display "there are XXX results, that's too much to show, enter some filtering criteria"20:27
robcresswellrdopiera: How do you know how many results there are?20:27
david-lyleor make searchlight ubiquitous20:27
ducttape_the next item I'd like to talk about is the lack of a consistent search / filter feature on pages.  ;)20:27
rdopierarobcresswell: you stop reading them as soon as you get one pagefull20:28
robcresswellAh, I see your point.20:28
* david-lyle throws the search icon at ducttape_20:28
robcresswellducttape_: Its not toooo bad now. Davids minions improve it a lot.20:28
*** Guest11 has quit IRC20:29
rdopieraby the way, I wanted to ask about one more thing20:30
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:30
rdopieraI asked Richard about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410860/20:30
rdopieraand he said that he can't do it, but that it really needs to be done soon20:30
rdopieraand I'm familiar with the microversions code already...20:30
robcresswellOh yeah, that was the feature Cinder supported for ~1 cycle that I spent ages reviewing.20:31
david-lylerdopiera, you win20:31
robcresswellrdopiera: +120:31
robcresswellWell volunteered :)20:31
rdopierahowever, that patch is supposed to have subsequent patches20:32
rdopieraand that's not something I am up for20:32
*** julim has quit IRC20:32
e0nerobcresswell: TBH, we removed consistency groups in Pike in flavor of generic groups20:32
robcresswelle0ne: Yeah, that was the issue I was mentioning :)20:33
robcresswelle0ne: We spent a fair bit of time adding support only for it to be immediately deprecated. That's not really ideal when reviewer bandwidth is low.20:34
e0nerobcresswell: I have to agree with you :(20:34
*** mfedosin has joined #openstack-meeting-320:34
david-lyleon the plus side, no one must have been using it20:35
* david-lyle ducks20:35
robcresswelldavid-lyle: I don't think anyone's upgraded past Mitaka yet to notice20:36
rdopieraso if we remove it quickly, we should be fine?20:36
ducttape_no20:36
ducttape_thats now how it works20:36
ducttape_not*20:36
rdopieraaww20:36
ducttape_customers will be on Newton / whatever in another 6-9 months etc20:37
e0necan we have such features implemented as plugins?20:37
david-lyleIIUC it was a proprietary extension disguised as a Cinder API feature20:37
david-lylebut there are many of those20:37
david-lyleso there may be a limited set of people that used it20:37
e0nedavid-lyle: +120:38
e0neand now it's migrated to generic groups20:38
e0neso in a pike release, it would be good to have generic groups support instead of CGs20:38
ducttape_this isn't allowed I think, but in an ideal world you'd change the docs for old releases and tell people to avoid features like this20:39
david-lyleagreed20:39
robcresswellWell, microversions means its around forever now20:39
david-lyleyay, microversions20:40
david-lyle:(20:40
e0nerobcresswell: it's crazy world20:40
ducttape_every time a microversion is added, a kitten feels pain.  I hope upstream is happy with this path20:40
robcresswelle0ne: Regardless, its unlikely to get done unless somebody wants to really push for it.20:40
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-320:41
david-lyleguarding CG with microversions seems straightforward and volunteered for20:41
david-lylethe support for Groups less so20:42
david-lyleunless that's happening somewhere already?20:42
robcresswellNot until someone new volunteers to do it20:42
robcresswellI've got enough to get done for now :)20:42
rdopieraeven if we do that, should there be a migration path then?20:43
rdopierafrom cg to gg20:43
david-lylerdopiera, I would have to think that falls in Cinder's boat20:43
rdopieraI guess that's cinder's problem20:43
rdopieraright20:43
robcresswellyeah20:43
rdopierasee, could have been worse ;)20:44
e0necinder did migration from CGs to generic groups20:44
david-lylethere problem solved20:44
e0ne:)20:44
*** gouthamr has quit IRC20:45
rdopierathe problem is, by the time the users realise they need gg support, it will be too late to add it in Pike20:45
e0ne:(20:45
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:45
e0ne#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/106720.html20:47
rdopieraby Pike-1, haha20:48
rdopierawhen was that20:48
* rdopiera cries a little20:48
*** Guest11 has joined #openstack-meeting-320:48
rdopierae0ne: is the api very different?20:49
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck20:49
e0nerdopiera: I have to check a code to answer20:49
e0nerdopiera: I didn't use CGs at all20:49
* rdopiera reads https://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide/blockstorage-groups.html20:50
e0negeneric groups work for all backends, so everybody can  use it20:51
rdopieralooks similar to https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/cinder-specs/specs/kilo/consistency-groups-kilo-update.html20:52
rdopierafunctionality-wise20:52
david-lylethanks everyone, I have to run, #endmeeting robcresswell20:55
robcresswellYeah I was just reading20:55
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting-320:55
rdopieraI will ask our pm about this, maybe I will get a go ahead for it20:55
david-lyleah, thought you went for a pint20:55
robcresswellnah, just didn't have much to add20:55
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-320:56
robcresswellrdopiera: I can review it if you get the time to work on it20:56
e0nethanks!20:56
robcresswell..reluctantly.20:56
rdopierareluctant reviews are the best ;)20:56
e0nerobcresswell: I'll send a notes about paging to openstack-dev tomorrow as a follow-up of discussion20:56
robcresswelle0ne: The page numbers part will never get done, but the rest should be viable. The APIs should provide prev links, IMO, but many dont.20:57
robcresswellAnyway, we've 2 minutes left20:58
robcresswellany final remarks?20:58
e0nerobcresswell: page numbers is not a bug. I more care about current bugs than features20:58
*** dtp has joined #openstack-meeting-320:58
robcresswellSure20:58
robcresswellOkay well, thanks for your time everyone :)20:59
rdopierabye20:59
*** rdopiera has left #openstack-meeting-320:59
robcresswell#endmeeting20:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:59
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun 14 20:59:49 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2017/horizon.2017-06-14-20.00.html20:59
* dansmith puts away his wrap-it-up tape20:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2017/horizon.2017-06-14-20.00.txt20:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2017/horizon.2017-06-14-20.00.log.html20:59
dansmith#startmetting nova_cells21:00
dansmith#startmeeting nova_cells21:00
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun 14 21:00:08 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dansmith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova_cells)"21:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova_cells'21:00
melwitto/21:00
dansmithwho dat21:00
dtpHI21:00
*** choyj has quit IRC21:00
dansmithdtp: inside voice please21:00
dtp_hi_21:00
dansmithbetter21:00
* melwitt casts summon mriedem 21:00
mriedemo/21:00
dansmithno mriedem21:00
dansmithheh21:00
dtpcool!21:01
mriedemsaving throw failed21:01
dansmith#topic bugs/testing21:01
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs/testing (Meeting topic: nova_cells)"21:01
melwitthaha21:01
*** jgravel has left #openstack-meeting-321:01
dansmithmriedem: this is your section of the meeting21:01
mriedemoh god21:01
dansmithI have this fix up: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473931/21:01
mriedemthat's the only recent one that comes to mind21:01
dansmithwhich fixes ironic's devstack plugin when we're in multicell21:02
dansmithwoot, that's progress21:02
melwittI shall review it21:02
dansmithI shall be appreciative21:02
melwittso that's not a bug though? there's no bug reference in the commit message21:02
dansmithnothing else on fire?21:02
dansmithmelwitt: it is a bug but we found it pre-merge so nobody filed anything21:03
melwittoh k21:03
dansmithmelwitt: and it's really just a straggler from the bp21:03
mriedemright we aren't going to backport this21:03
mriedemso don't really need a bug21:03
dansmithno other bugs.. going once ...21:03
dansmithyeah21:03
melwittcool21:04
dansmith#topic open wounds21:04
*** openstack changes topic to "open wounds (Meeting topic: nova_cells)"21:04
*** ducttape_ has left #openstack-meeting-321:04
melwittquota battle damage21:04
dansmithmelwitt's stuff is still up,21:04
dansmithI +Wd the bottom change recently and the next one has a -1 on it21:04
melwittthe next one is updated already, mriedem said he'd +2 it :)21:05
dansmithoh cool21:05
mriedemi will after +2ing this stats thing21:05
melwittyeah, he's burning through these and it's awesome21:06
dansmithmelwitt: we call that "having given up"21:06
melwitt>:| hrmph!21:06
*** lucasxu has quit IRC21:06
mriedemi -1 each one :)21:06
mriedemso i haven't given up yet21:06
dansmithwell, it's still resulting in you getting patches merged, so ..21:06
melwittyeah, I mean it's great for one's stats21:06
*** abramley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:06
mriedemi'll give up when it comes to reviewing placement changes21:06
dansmithheh you and me both21:07
melwittnested resource providers anyone? anyone?21:07
dansmithanything else up for review?21:07
dansmithbueller?21:07
melwittthe placement project/user stuff is up and actively reviewed21:07
dansmithoh right21:07
melwittbut I think we all knew that21:07
mriedemi still have this host api one21:07
mriedemhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/461532/21:08
melwittyeah I need to review the host api ones21:08
mriedemhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/464280/ is also basically ready for review; the -2 is because i have to get the os-hypervisors API changes done and then we're going to lock-step those i think21:08
dansmithI just starrred it21:08
mriedemlike we did for 2.36 in newton21:08
mriedemso we -2 all other microversions until those get in, at some point21:08
mriedemthe os-hypervisors changes are turning out to be a major pain in my ass21:09
*** cleong has quit IRC21:09
dansmithyeah21:09
dansmithanything else up?21:10
mriedemif it weren't a total api rewrite,21:10
mriedemthen it woudn't be so bad21:10
dansmithhow come dtp gets away with not having open reviews?21:10
mriedemhe's an "operator"21:10
dansmithoh21:10
dtpi dunno about that..21:10
*** ying_zuo has left #openstack-meeting-321:10
dansmithokay well, anyway... anything else up we should mention here?21:11
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-321:11
dansmithokay then21:12
dansmith#topic open discussion21:12
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: nova_cells)"21:12
dansmithdiscuss, openly21:12
melwittI wanted to openly mention I resurrected the old console objects patches,21:12
dansmithI openly hear what you're saying21:13
melwittand they mostly worked, but the noVNC console isn't working as the code expects. so I'm digging into that more. but AFAICT so far, it's not something that's going to end up working (putting server uuid in the access url),21:13
*** abramley_ has quit IRC21:13
melwittand the effort might have to be redesigned in the worst case. I'm not 100% sure what's going on yet bc I don't know much about noVNC and how our websockets proxy works21:14
dansmithokay I remember discussing this but it has all fallen out of my head21:14
*** abramley has quit IRC21:14
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck21:15
melwittthe idea was that we could put server uuid in the access url we give out to make things work with cells v221:15
dansmiththis is the thing where the websocket proxy needs to know what cell to search for a token in?21:15
melwittand that it would be backward compatible with old proxies, but what I see in tempest is that for noVNC it is not backward compatible21:15
melwittyeah21:15
mriedemmelwitt: thorst and markus_z might be able to help21:15
dansmithand this is because we assume a global auth service thing?21:15
mriedemi think thorst's team added the vnc tests to tempest21:15
mriedemand markus has done a bunch of console crap21:16
dansmithmriedem: yeah21:16
melwittmriedem: cool, thanks. I think I'll soon be needing to ask some questions21:16
melwittthe problem is we thought old proxies would ignore the server uuid added to the url21:16
melwittbut noVNC isn't ignoring it and it's blowing up when the server uuid is added to the url21:16
dansmithwe should also consider if there's a reasonable way to shard this on cells too, like make each cell run its own proxy and just make the thing that returns the user point directly at the right one21:17
melwittbecause of the way it forwards the token as a header cookie21:17
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-321:17
*** abramley has quit IRC21:17
melwitthm, okay. will think on that21:18
melwittit sounds like that could work. would eliminate the need for instance uuid in url21:18
dansmithI would think sharding that service per cell would probably be good anyway,21:18
dansmithsince that could get overwhelmed by tons of people with open consoles21:18
* melwitt nods21:18
dansmithbut yeah, think on it and feel free to ping me if you want to dive deep on it21:19
melwittcool, thank you21:19
dansmithokay what else?21:19
mriedem+2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446241/ now so it's on dansmith21:19
mriedemoh wait,21:19
mriedemauthor, can't +W21:19
dansmithyeah21:19
*** baoli has quit IRC21:19
mriedemhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/473931/ +2 now it's on melwitt :)21:19
dansmithjay'll do it21:19
melwittmriedem: looking at it now21:20
mriedemnothing else from me21:20
dansmithaight cool21:20
* dansmith waits a few more seconds21:20
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-321:21
dansmith#endmeeting21:21
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:21
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun 14 21:21:06 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:21
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_cells/2017/nova_cells.2017-06-14-21.00.html21:21
*** mriedem has left #openstack-meeting-321:21
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_cells/2017/nova_cells.2017-06-14-21.00.txt21:21
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_cells/2017/nova_cells.2017-06-14-21.00.log.html21:21
*** dtp has left #openstack-meeting-321:21
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-321:25
*** Guest11 has quit IRC21:29
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-321:42
*** abramley has quit IRC21:43
*** mickeys has quit IRC21:47
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:48
*** bobh has quit IRC21:53
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-322:01
*** lyan has quit IRC22:05
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC22:07
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting-322:07
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:27
*** rbak has quit IRC22:29
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-322:43
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:45
*** mickeys has quit IRC22:47
*** emagana has quit IRC22:47
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-322:48
*** abramley has quit IRC22:49
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-322:51
*** bobh has quit IRC22:54
*** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-322:59
*** bnemec has quit IRC22:59
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz23:00
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC23:10
*** claudiub has quit IRC23:15
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-323:21
*** julim has quit IRC23:25
*** armstrong has quit IRC23:27
*** sdague has quit IRC23:30
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:34
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom23:35
*** Swami has quit IRC23:41
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-323:43
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz23:47
*** mickeys has quit IRC23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!