| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 00:05 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 00:06 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 00:13 | |
| *** lyan has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 00:33 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 00:39 | |
| *** tuanluong has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 00:42 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 00:44 | |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 00:46 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 00:48 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 00:52 | |
| *** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 00:54 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 00:56 | |
| *** amotoki_away is now known as amotoki | 01:10 | |
| *** mfedosin has quit IRC | 01:13 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 01:19 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 01:21 | |
| *** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 01:30 | |
| *** yamahata has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
| *** iyamahat has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 01:45 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 01:49 | |
| wanghao | hi | 02:00 |
|---|---|---|
| *** VW has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:02 | |
| *** tenobreg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:04 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 02:06 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:07 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 02:08 | |
| *** tellesnobrega has quit IRC | 02:08 | |
| *** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:10 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 02:32 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:33 | |
| *** shu-mutou-AWAY is now known as shu-mutou | 02:34 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 02:37 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:46 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 02:46 | |
| *** baoli has quit IRC | 02:47 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 02:50 | |
| *** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:57 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 03:01 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 03:04 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 03:08 | |
| *** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 03:12 | |
| *** rossella_s has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 03:46 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 03:51 | |
| *** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 03:55 | |
| *** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 03:57 | |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 03:58 | |
| *** iyamahat has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
| *** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:09 | |
| *** tobberydberg has quit IRC | 04:13 | |
| *** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:15 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:16 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:22 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 04:24 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 04:28 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:28 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:33 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:40 | |
| *** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:42 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:47 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
| *** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:05 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 05:07 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 05:08 | |
| *** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:08 | |
| *** haleyb_ has quit IRC | 05:12 | |
| *** abramley has quit IRC | 05:13 | |
| *** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:26 | |
| *** cshastri has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:43 | |
| *** zenirc369 has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:44 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:45 | |
| *** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:48 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:48 | |
| *** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:48 | |
| *** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:50 | |
| *** pgadiya has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 05:53 | |
| *** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:58 | |
| *** calbers has quit IRC | 06:02 | |
| *** salv-orl_ has quit IRC | 06:02 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:02 | |
| *** makowals has quit IRC | 06:03 | |
| *** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:04 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:04 | |
| *** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom | 06:10 | |
| *** ltomasbo|away is now known as ltomasbo | 06:13 | |
| *** gcb has quit IRC | 06:17 | |
| *** calbers has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:18 | |
| *** rossella_s has quit IRC | 06:24 | |
| *** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:28 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 06:37 | |
| *** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:40 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 06:44 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:46 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:58 | |
| *** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:01 | |
| *** ccamacho|brb has quit IRC | 07:12 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:12 | |
| *** iyamahat has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:16 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 07:19 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:19 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:21 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 07:22 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:23 | |
| *** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:26 | |
| *** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:30 | |
| *** ltomasbo is now known as ltomasbo|away | 07:32 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:34 | |
| *** bsilverman_ has quit IRC | 07:35 | |
| *** bsilverman_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:35 | |
| *** rossella_s has quit IRC | 07:38 | |
| *** neiljerram has quit IRC | 07:57 | |
| *** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:00 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:00 | |
| *** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:01 | |
| *** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:04 | |
| *** rossella_s has quit IRC | 08:05 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 08:08 | |
| *** shuyingy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:10 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 08:11 | |
| *** dosaboy has quit IRC | 08:11 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 08:14 | |
| *** ltomasbo|away is now known as ltomasbo | 08:17 | |
| *** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:19 | |
| *** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:22 | |
| *** yamahata has quit IRC | 08:23 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:32 | |
| *** shuyingy_ has quit IRC | 08:34 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:34 | |
| *** rstarmer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:34 | |
| *** rossella_s has quit IRC | 08:36 | |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 08:40 | |
| *** mfedosin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:41 | |
| *** rstarmer_ has quit IRC | 08:41 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:41 | |
| *** rstarmer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:42 | |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 08:43 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:43 | |
| *** dosaboy has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
| *** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:51 | |
| *** dosaboy has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 09:04 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:05 | |
| *** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:08 | |
| *** rstarmer_ has quit IRC | 09:19 | |
| *** rstarmer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:21 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 09:22 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:23 | |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 09:29 | |
| *** shuyingy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:31 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 09:34 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 09:38 | |
| *** shu-mutou is now known as shu-mutou-AWAY | 09:47 | |
| *** d0ugal has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
| *** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:49 | |
| *** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz | 09:52 | |
| *** wanghao_ has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:05 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 10:09 | |
| *** rstarmer_ has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
| *** rstarmer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:16 | |
| *** sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts | 10:23 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:34 | |
| *** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:36 | |
| *** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:48 | |
| *** rstarmer_ has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
| *** jpich has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:56 | |
| *** shuyingy_ has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:56 | |
| *** shuyingy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:57 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
| *** shuyingy_ has quit IRC | 10:59 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:00 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:04 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:05 | |
| *** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:06 | |
| *** tobberyd_ has quit IRC | 11:07 | |
| *** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:07 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 11:08 | |
| *** tobberydberg has quit IRC | 11:09 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 11:10 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 11:10 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:10 | |
| *** tobberyd_ has quit IRC | 11:10 | |
| *** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:11 | |
| *** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:31 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:34 | |
| *** tobberydberg has quit IRC | 11:34 | |
| *** tobberyd_ has quit IRC | 11:49 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:51 | |
| *** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:52 | |
| *** abramley has quit IRC | 11:54 | |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 12:00 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:06 | |
| *** tuanluong has quit IRC | 12:10 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 12:12 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
| *** ccamacho is now known as ccamacho|lunch | 12:15 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:23 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:28 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:28 | |
| *** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:31 | |
| *** donghao has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:35 | |
| *** donghao has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 12:36 | |
| *** donghao has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:37 | |
| *** shuyingy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:43 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 12:46 | |
| *** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:48 | |
| *** zenirc369 has quit IRC | 12:55 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:58 | |
| *** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:00 | |
| *** haleyb_ has quit IRC | 13:08 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:08 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:11 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 13:13 | |
| *** shuyingy_ has quit IRC | 13:19 | |
| *** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:20 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:26 | |
| *** ccamacho|lunch is now known as ccamacho | 13:30 | |
| *** shuyingya has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
| *** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:34 | |
| *** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:43 | |
| *** tenobreg has quit IRC | 13:45 | |
| *** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:45 | |
| *** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:46 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:47 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:48 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:49 | |
| *** VW has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
| *** lhx__ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:57 | |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:57 | |
| *** esikachev has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:58 | |
| *** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:00 | |
| *** shuyingya_m has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:00 | |
| *** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:00 | |
| tellesnobrega | #startmeeting sahara | 14:01 |
| openstack | Meeting started Thu Jun 15 14:01:20 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tellesnobrega. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
| *** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:01 | |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: sahara)" | 14:01 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'sahara' | 14:01 |
| vgridnev | O/ | 14:01 |
| jeremyfreudberg | o/ | 14:01 |
| shuyingya_m | o/ hi all, long time no see :) | 14:01 |
| *** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:01 | |
| esikachev | hi | 14:01 |
| tellesnobrega | shuyingya_m, its been a while | 14:01 |
| jeremyfreudberg | shuyingya_m, welcome back! | 14:02 |
| *** jpich has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:02 | |
| *** iwonka has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:02 | |
| tellesnobrega | is tosky around already? | 14:02 |
| shuyingya_m | Yep, have a business travel recently to improve our product | 14:02 |
| *** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:02 | |
| tosky | hi | 14:03 |
| tellesnobrega | turns out today is one of our most attended meetings lately | 14:03 |
| *** zemuvier has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:03 | |
| zemuvier | o/ | 14:03 |
| *** spzala has quit IRC | 14:03 | |
| tellesnobrega | #topic News/Updates | 14:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "News/Updates (Meeting topic: sahara)" | 14:03 | |
| tellesnobrega | I'm still working on images, got a new patch for CDH and will put a new up for ambari today | 14:04 |
| tellesnobrega | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448712/9 | 14:04 |
| tellesnobrega | please take some time to review it if you can | 14:04 |
| tosky | no much news, but I'm planning to test Pike soon; maybe you don't know, but TripleO added the support for deploying services in containers, and the patch which containerize Sahara just landed | 14:04 |
| tosky | tellesnobrega: already commented :) | 14:04 |
| tellesnobrega | other than that, I'm trying to find resources so we can deploy our CI again | 14:05 |
| jeremyfreudberg | tellesnobrega, bonus points if those new resources can also be used for ironic integration tests | 14:05 |
| tosky | you like challenges | 14:06 |
| vgridnev | Nothing new from me | 14:06 |
| tellesnobrega | jeremyfreudberg, that is kinda hard, we have been struggling to get resources to test ironic integration for a while, but let's see | 14:06 |
| esikachev | no updates from me | 14:06 |
| tellesnobrega | esikachev, once we get the resources I will let you know and we can work on deploying it | 14:07 |
| esikachev | ok | 14:07 |
| jeremyfreudberg | tellesnobrega, that's why it's bonus points :) anyway, not much new from me either, just trying to prioritize what can be done before pike-3 / feature freeze sneaks up on us | 14:07 |
| tellesnobrega | I have another update, I would like to present to you all iwonka, she is our outreachy intern and will be working with us for the next 3 months | 14:08 |
| tellesnobrega | iwonka, care to introduce yourself? | 14:08 |
| shuyingya_m | Working on add hbase to vanilla in my product,it works now | 14:08 |
| jeremyfreudberg | shuyingya_m, woah! awesome o__o | 14:08 |
| iwonka | hi everyone :) | 14:09 |
| tellesnobrega | that is awesome | 14:09 |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:09 | |
| jeremyfreudberg | (shuyingya_m, would it go upstream too?) | 14:09 |
| *** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:09 | |
| tellesnobrega | jeremyfreudberg, my next question exactly | 14:09 |
| shuyingya_m | I need further test,and will post to upstream later | 14:09 |
| shuyingya_m | Of course | 14:10 |
| tellesnobrega | shuyingya_m, awesome :) thanks for that | 14:10 |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 14:10 | |
| iwonka | as tellesnobrega wrote, i'm an intern now and i'm working on adding portable ode group templates and data sources to sahara | 14:11 |
| tellesnobrega | iwonka, you have to floor, just tell us a bit of your background and what you are going to be doing | 14:11 |
| shuyingya_m | And a new intern has posted some unit test to vanilla | 14:11 |
| tellesnobrega | shuyingya_m, rocky? | 14:11 |
| shuyingya_m | Yep. | 14:11 |
| tellesnobrega | cool | 14:11 |
| iwonka | tellesnobrega: project ^ | 14:11 |
| iwonka | and i think that's all, haven't done much yet | 14:12 |
| tellesnobrega | iwonka, great | 14:12 |
| tellesnobrega | #topic Denver PTG | 14:13 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Denver PTG (Meeting topic: sahara)" | 14:13 | |
| shuyingya_m | iwonka: feel free to ask us in sahara channel if you need help | 14:13 |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 14:14 | |
| tellesnobrega | SotK, in september 11-15th OpenStack is having the next PTG in Denver USA, who here is planning on attending? | 14:14 |
| tosky | uh, good question, I didn't have news from my manager yet | 14:14 |
| jeremyfreudberg | my organization will send me if there's something happening | 14:14 |
| shuyingya_m | I have applied for the travel support. My leader has no plan yet | 14:15 |
| tellesnobrega | jeremyfreudberg, awesome... basically I need to know if it will make sense to have PTG. I really think we should, let's try to take as much people as we can | 14:15 |
| esikachev | depend on TSP | 14:16 |
| vgridnev | I think that I will not be able to attend, : ( | 14:16 |
| jeremyfreudberg | vgridnev :( | 14:17 |
| tellesnobrega | I was talking with jeremyfreudberg and tosky and we thought about after the meetings working on bugs or documentation, so it would be good to get people there so we can both make important decisions and also if we have time to work alongside | 14:17 |
| *** pgadiya has quit IRC | 14:18 | |
| vgridnev | since there is no so much slots for TSP , so I think that it's not correct for me use this slot, so I will let new stackers to attend | 14:19 |
| tellesnobrega | vgridnev, you will be missed | 14:19 |
| tellesnobrega | vgridnev, did you start your new job already? | 14:19 |
| vgridnev | I'll start next week, now I have some free time to rest a little | 14:20 |
| tellesnobrega | vgridnev, enjoy | 14:20 |
| tellesnobrega | #topic Open Discussion | 14:21 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: sahara)" | 14:22 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
| tosky | I missed last week's meeting, so: thanks for all the work vgridnev! | 14:22 |
| *** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:22 | |
| *** ccamacho has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
| jeremyfreudberg | some good news on my end actually, red hat in boston has agreed to donate some office space to my organization. i'll be working there for the rest of the summer | 14:22 |
| *** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:22 | |
| tellesnobrega | jeremyfreudberg, that is awesome | 14:22 |
| esikachev | cool | 14:23 |
| tellesnobrega | on the new office? | 14:23 |
| jeremyfreudberg | yeah, tellesnobrega, the new one | 14:23 |
| tellesnobrega | jeremyfreudberg, cool | 14:23 |
| shuyingya_m | jeremyfreudberg: cool | 14:23 |
| tellesnobrega | iwonka is facing some issues with oslo.messaging on devstack | 14:24 |
| tellesnobrega | basically she has to update to 5.24.2 (I think) | 14:25 |
| tellesnobrega | anyone has done that? can help her out? | 14:26 |
| tellesnobrega | we suggested uninstalling oslo.messaging, unstacking and cleaning, installing new version and start stack again | 14:26 |
| jeremyfreudberg | i'm surprised unstack-restack didn't pull in fresh requirements | 14:26 |
| jeremyfreudberg | but it's not my expertise | 14:27 |
| vgridnev | You can try to pull new version of requirements repository | 14:28 |
| *** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:28 | |
| tellesnobrega | vgridnev, can you explain to her how to do that? | 14:29 |
| vgridnev | cd requirements ; git pull origin master | 14:29 |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 14:29 | |
| tellesnobrega | iwonka, ^ | 14:29 |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:30 | |
| shuyingya_m | iwonka: what kind of system you use? Ubuntu 16 installed many times，didn't meet such issues | 14:30 |
| vgridnev | Or you can just add RECLONE=True in local.conf | 14:30 |
| vgridnev | That will reclone latests versions of all repos | 14:31 |
| tellesnobrega | vgridnev, true, forgot about reclone | 14:31 |
| shuyingya_m | Pip-upgrade=true | 14:31 |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 14:31 | |
| shuyingya_m | May also help | 14:31 |
| iwonka | shuyingya_m: yes, ubuntu | 14:33 |
| iwonka | desktop | 14:33 |
| shuyingya_m | PIP_UPGRADE=True | 14:33 |
| *** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:33 | |
| iwonka | where? | 14:33 |
| iwonka | i mean which file? | 14:33 |
| tellesnobrega | local.conf | 14:33 |
| shuyingya_m | In local.conf | 14:33 |
| tosky | and I guess that oslo.messaging is not installed from debian packages, right? | 14:34 |
| tosky | deb packages* | 14:34 |
| iwonka | now it was installes with pip install | 14:35 |
| iwonka | *installed | 14:35 |
| tellesnobrega | iwonka, hopefully we can fix the issues with the ideas here | 14:37 |
| tellesnobrega | do we have anything else to discuss? | 14:37 |
| jeremyfreudberg | i'm done | 14:38 |
| iwonka | tellesnobrega: unstacked, did what vgridnev suggested and now waiting for stack to run again | 14:38 |
| tellesnobrega | iwonka, awesome, let us know on #openstack-sahara | 14:38 |
| iwonka | sure | 14:38 |
| tellesnobrega | I guess we can end the meeting now, thanks all for coming, lets keep up the good work | 14:39 |
| tellesnobrega | and let me know about PTG | 14:39 |
| tellesnobrega | #endmeeting | 14:40 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 14:40 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Thu Jun 15 14:40:18 2017 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:40 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2017/sahara.2017-06-15-14.01.html | 14:40 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2017/sahara.2017-06-15-14.01.txt | 14:40 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2017/sahara.2017-06-15-14.01.log.html | 14:40 |
| *** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:40 | |
| *** jeremyfreudberg has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:41 | |
| *** iwonka has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:43 | |
| *** shuyingya_m has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
| *** zenirc369 has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:46 | |
| *** makowals has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
| *** esikachev has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
| *** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:51 | |
| *** cshastri has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
| *** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:53 | |
| *** reedip_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:54 | |
| *** janzian has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:59 | |
| *** rstarmer has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:59 | |
| mlavalle | #startmeeting neutron_l3 | 15:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Thu Jun 15 15:00:07 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)" | 15:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' | 15:00 |
| mlavalle | #chair haleyb Swami | 15:00 |
| openstack | Current chairs: Swami haleyb mlavalle | 15:00 |
| Swami | hi | 15:00 |
| haleyb | hi | 15:00 |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:00 | |
| mlavalle | in case somebody disconnects, we have redundant charis :-) | 15:01 |
| mlavalle | chairs^^^^ | 15:01 |
| mlavalle | #topic Announcements | 15:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)" | 15:01 | |
| *** vkmc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:01 | |
| Swami | I need to leave early today. Just for your info. | 15:01 |
| *** davidsha_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:02 | |
| mlavalle | ok | 15:02 |
| mlavalle | We are well on our way to Pike-3 | 15:02 |
| mlavalle | #link https://releases.openstack.org/pike/schedule.html | 15:02 |
| mlavalle | any other announcements? | 15:02 |
| mlavalle | ok | 15:03 |
| mlavalle | #topic Bugs | 15:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)" | 15:03 | |
| mlavalle | let's start with dvr bugs, so Swami can leave early.... | 15:03 |
| Swami | mlavalle: thanks | 15:04 |
| Swami | New bug this week. | 15:05 |
| Swami | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1695140 | 15:05 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1695140 in neutron "SRC without FIP,DEST with FIP case is broken for dvr-multinode" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Brian Haley (brian-haley) | 15:05 |
| *** vgridnev has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
| *** lyan has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
| Swami | I saw the comment in there from brian and it seems that it might be due to the regression. I will monitor that in the coming week. | 15:06 |
| haleyb | Swami: now that we re-merged https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470063/ we should re-check | 15:06 |
| haleyb | er, just merged | 15:06 |
| Swami | There is one issue that I found with this patch. The functional test is failing with the ha combination. | 15:07 |
| Swami | I will try to push a patch to fix that test case. | 15:07 |
| mlavalle | is it a problem with the test or the code? | 15:07 |
| Swami | It is the problem with the test. | 15:08 |
| Swami | In the case of ha, there are two snat nodes and the host binding is not matching. | 15:08 |
| Swami | I will push in a patch that fixes the test case. | 15:08 |
| Swami | I just tested it and it is running fine. | 15:09 |
| *** rstarmer has quit IRC | 15:09 | |
| Swami | http://logs.openstack.org/07/474007/2/check/gate-neutron-dsvm-functional-ubuntu-xenial/4eee227/testr_results.html.gz | 15:10 |
| *** dklyle is now known as david-lyle | 15:10 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:10 | |
| Swami | here is the info about that test failure in gate. | 15:10 |
| Swami | The next one in the list is | 15:11 |
| Swami | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1696983 | 15:11 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1696983 in neutron "ovs-fw: flows on br-int are overlapping with dvr flows" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Jakub Libosvar (libosvar) | 15:11 |
| *** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:11 | |
| Swami | libosvar has already pushed in patch to address this issue. | 15:12 |
| Swami | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472691/ | 15:12 |
| Swami | I will review it. I have not reviewed it yet and I do see brian had already reviewed it. | 15:12 |
| mlavalle | I recently reviewed a spec that is going to help with this kind of problems | 15:13 |
| haleyb | yes, it looked ok to me | 15:13 |
| mlavalle | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320439/ | 15:13 |
| mlavalle | for the time, though, we need libosvar's patchset | 15:13 |
| mlavalle | time being^^^ | 15:13 |
| Swami | mlavalle: makes sense | 15:14 |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
| Swami | Those are the only new bugs this week. | 15:15 |
| haleyb | there is also https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1696796 | 15:15 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1696796 in neutron "No fip connectivity after switch to legacy mode from dvr_snat" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 15:15 |
| mlavalle | I was about to ask about that | 15:15 |
| haleyb | that seems like an invalid config to me | 15:15 |
| Swami | haleyb: yes I saw that and it seems to be an operation error. | 15:15 |
| haleyb | i will put a note and close as invalid, can't run a dvr router on a legacy node | 15:15 |
| Swami | The user just changed the agent mode and did not convert the dvr router. | 15:15 |
| haleyb | they need to convert first | 15:16 |
| Swami | haleyb: yes | 15:16 |
| Swami | mlavalle: haleyb: This patch is up for review again. #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474007/ | 15:16 |
| Swami | This was reverted recently for the error log. This was partially caused by the regression on the snat namespace. | 15:17 |
| haleyb | Swami: yes, saw that. Is the error gone? | 15:17 |
| mlavalle | is that Jenkins failure something you need to fix or just re-check? | 15:17 |
| Swami | Also I found another issue where the check_for_address_scopes were not checking for 'None'. | 15:18 |
| Swami | haleyb: yes I don't see the error anymore in my environment. But I will check again in the gate tests. | 15:18 |
| Swami | mlavalle: That jenkins failure is the one that I will fix, and it is due to the test case failure that I spoke above in combination with ha and dvr. | 15:19 |
| mlavalle | LOL | 15:19 |
| mlavalle | tripping ourselves | 15:19 |
| Swami | mlavalle: :) | 15:19 |
| Swami | That's all I have for the DVR bugs, there are still the monitoring bug related to DVR and I have not started my work on it, since I was focussing on the regression. | 15:20 |
| Swami | s/monitoring/metering | 15:21 |
| mlavalle | Thanks Swami. how did the move go? | 15:21 |
| Swami | All big items have moved. Just some items here and there. | 15:21 |
| Swami | But it was hard after 11 years. | 15:21 |
| haleyb | Swami: let me know if you want me to pick-up a patch, there are a few in progress that might need updates and it would be good to get them in | 15:21 |
| haleyb | think i had started one and ran into a rebase | 15:22 |
| Swami | haleyb: no problem, I will reach out to you. | 15:22 |
| *** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:22 | |
| mlavalle | ok | 15:22 |
| mlavalle | moving on | 15:22 |
| mlavalle | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1655567 | 15:23 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1655567 in neutron "DHCPv6 failures with "address already allocated in subnet" error" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel) | 15:23 |
| Swami | I need to leave now. I will catch up later on the neutron channel. | 15:23 |
| mlavalle | Swami: Thanks for the update | 15:23 |
| mlavalle | This bug has a fix proposed: | 15:24 |
| mlavalle | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469669/ | 15:24 |
| mlavalle | I think it is good to go, so please review when you have a chance | 15:24 |
| haleyb | mlavalle: it looks good to me, but ihar had one question - "is solution working for agentless dhcp drivers?" | 15:24 |
| mlavalle | haleyb: that question was based on the previous approach | 15:25 |
| *** tobberydberg has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
| *** claudiub has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
| haleyb | oh, i just never saw an answer, or a +2 from him so was waiting | 15:25 |
| mlavalle | to skip assigment of auto addr for dhcp ports, on the assumption that the agent was going to assign it | 15:26 |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 15:26 | |
| mlavalle | after he made that comment, I had an irc conversation with him | 15:26 |
| mlavalle | and adopted the current approach | 15:26 |
| haleyb | ok, great | 15:27 |
| mlavalle | namely, if the address has been assigned and it is a DHCP port, assume the agent already took care of it | 15:27 |
| mlavalle | makes sense? | 15:27 |
| haleyb | yes, makes sense | 15:27 |
| mlavalle | that way we don't run the risk of breaking agentless plugins | 15:28 |
| *** tobberyd_ has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
| mlavalle | Next is a new one https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1697925 | 15:29 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1697925 in neutron "as a tenant user not able to create a subnetpool associating with a shared address scope" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Roey Chen (roeyc) | 15:29 |
| *** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:29 | |
| mlavalle | haleyb: have you seen it before? | 15:29 |
| haleyb | mlavalle: no, haven't seen it. there's a review up now | 15:30 |
| mlavalle | I spent time with it this morning | 15:30 |
| mlavalle | in the bug, it is somewhat suggested that this might be a regresion | 15:31 |
| mlavalle | that in the past, this was possible | 15:31 |
| mlavalle | I dug out the original patchset that implemented address scopes, and it is always been like it is today: | 15:32 |
| *** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:32 | |
| mlavalle | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197552/15/neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py@707 | 15:32 |
| haleyb | so do you consider it a bug? | 15:34 |
| mlavalle | haleyb: based on this, I want to take this with caution. There may be a good reason we are enforcing this | 15:34 |
| mlavalle | it seems more a rfe to me as of now | 15:34 |
| amotoki | I commented in the bug, but I am not sure it is design decision or a bug. I wonder what is the purpose of 'shared' flag of address scope. | 15:35 |
| mlavalle | amotoki: yeah I saw you comments. It was implemented like that originally: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197552/15/neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py@707 | 15:35 |
| amotoki | based on the concept of address scope, it looks like a valid use case but I might be missing somethign | 15:35 |
| mlavalle | it seems also to me like a reasonable use case | 15:36 |
| mlavalle | but the fact that it was implmented like that since the beginning moves me to be cuatious | 15:36 |
| mlavalle | cautious | 15:36 |
| amotoki | me too | 15:37 |
| mlavalle | it's not that it was possible to do this in a previous release and now we have a regression | 15:37 |
| mlavalle | it is a new use case. I lean towards treating this as a rfe | 15:38 |
| amotoki | agree. perhaps is is a new use case. as you say, it was impossible in the past releases. | 15:39 |
| mlavalle | I will go through the original patchset and try to glean out from the comments if something was said about this | 15:39 |
| mlavalle | haleyb: do you have any recollections from this review?^^^ | 15:39 |
| haleyb | mlavalle: not down to that level of detail, no | 15:40 |
| *** donghao has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
| mlavalle | cool, I'll comment in the bug that we are open to discuss this, but that we are going to move with caution given what we just discussed | 15:41 |
| mlavalle | haleyb, amotoki: is that ok? | 15:41 |
| amotoki | mlavalle: agree | 15:42 |
| haleyb | mlavalle: i don't believe the current patch removing the check is correct at least | 15:42 |
| mlavalle | btw, I went through the chapter in the networking guide and it doesn't provides any specific guidance | 15:42 |
| mlavalle | haleyb: yeah, seems a bit rash | 15:43 |
| haleyb | at best we check for shared as well, but like you said, be cautious | 15:43 |
| mlavalle | amotoki: thanks for your comments | 15:44 |
| mlavalle | Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1683227 | 15:45 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1683227 in neutron "test_connection_from_same_address_scope failed with: Cannot find device "qg-74372988-7f"" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel) | 15:45 |
| *** cshastri has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:45 | |
| mlavalle | I intended to work on this one, but got distracted by the previous one. I will get back to it | 15:46 |
| mlavalle | Finally, for today, we have https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1694764 | 15:47 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1694764 in neutron "test_metadata_proxy_respawned failed to spawn metadata proxy" [High,Confirmed] | 15:47 |
| mlavalle | This one has no owner yet | 15:47 |
| mlavalle | any other bugs we should discuss today? | 15:48 |
| haleyb | i had none | 15:48 |
| mlavalle | ok, moving on | 15:49 |
| mlavalle | #topic DNS | 15:49 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "DNS (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)" | 15:49 | |
| mlavalle | haleyb: here I want to say that I have finish coding this, including unit tests | 15:49 |
| mlavalle | I hit a weird python 3.5 unit test failure | 15:50 |
| mlavalle | the test case passes python 2.7 | 15:50 |
| mlavalle | but if fails in 3.5 | 15:50 |
| mlavalle | so as soon as I fix that, I'll bug you for reviews :-) | 15:50 |
| davidsha_ | do you have a link to it or is this local? | 15:51 |
| haleyb | usually it's the other way around, fails on 3.5 | 15:51 |
| mlavalle | yeah, failed in 3.5 | 15:51 |
| haleyb | oh, i must be dyslexic :) | 15:51 |
| mlavalle | davidsha_: it is the failure here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468697/ | 15:52 |
| mlavalle | The patchset adds the test case that fails in the 3.5 job | 15:52 |
| *** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:53 | |
| davidsha_ | but passes in 2.7, that's weird, was expecting an attribute error or something. | 15:53 |
| mlavalle | #topic Open Agenda | 15:53 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Agenda (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)" | 15:53 | |
| davidsha_ | Just on the reason why there was a lock on tenants earlier: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197552/3/neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py@743 | 15:54 |
| davidsha_ | It seems the spec will be the place to find out. | 15:55 |
| mlavalle | davidsha_: yeah, I was looking for something like that | 15:55 |
| mlavalle | Thanks! | 15:55 |
| mlavalle | davidsha_: I still have to take time to look at your PoC | 15:56 |
| *** reedip_ has quit IRC | 15:56 | |
| mlavalle | I will do my best over the next few days :-) | 15:57 |
| *** tobberydberg has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
| davidsha_ | mlavalle: No problem, working on a follow on, there are a few issues with ipv6 so I'll try to have those fixed asap. | 15:57 |
| mlavalle | cool | 15:57 |
| mlavalle | any other topics? | 15:57 |
| davidsha_ | the spec mentioned in the comment: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180267/ | 15:58 |
| *** dtantsur has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:58 | |
| mlavalle | perfect, thanks! | 15:58 |
| mlavalle | let's call it a day, then | 15:58 |
| mlavalle | Tnanks for attending | 15:58 |
| mlavalle | #endmeeting | 15:59 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 15:59 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Thu Jun 15 15:59:03 2017 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:59 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2017/neutron_l3.2017-06-15-15.00.html | 15:59 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2017/neutron_l3.2017-06-15-15.00.txt | 15:59 |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:59 | |
| davidsha_ | Thanks, cya! | 15:59 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2017/neutron_l3.2017-06-15-15.00.log.html | 15:59 |
| amotoki | thanks | 15:59 |
| haleyb | bye | 15:59 |
| *** janzian has quit IRC | 16:00 | |
| cdent | #startmeeting api-wg | 16:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Thu Jun 15 16:00:11 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is cdent. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: api-wg)" | 16:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'api_wg' | 16:00 |
| cdent | #chair edleafe cdent elmiko | 16:00 |
| openstack | Warning: Nick not in channel: elmiko | 16:00 |
| openstack | Current chairs: cdent edleafe elmiko | 16:00 |
| cdent | #link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/API-WG#Agenda | 16:00 |
| cdent | who is here for some api-wg joy? | 16:00 |
| cdent | there's nothing new on the agenda | 16:01 |
| edleafe | \0/ | 16:01 |
| cdent | there were no action items from last week | 16:01 |
| dtantsur | o/ | 16:02 |
| cdent | oh hey dtantsur thank for joining in | 16:02 |
| cdent | do you have anything to bring up this week? | 16:02 |
| * dtantsur does not | 16:03 | |
| *** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:03 | |
| edleafe | There are now a whopping 6 votes in the naming survey | 16:03 |
| cdent | any clear winner? | 16:04 |
| edleafe | So far 'not_before' is narrowly edging out 'earliest_min_raise_date' | 16:04 |
| edleafe | with ' | 16:04 |
| edleafe | min_raise_not_before' trailing a bit further behind | 16:05 |
| *** haleyb_ has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| cdent | so if we went with that, then we'd be reverting back to the original and all this flim flam was for nothing and I should sit on a step and think about what I did | 16:06 |
| edleafe | Well, if you question a choice, put it up for a vote, and that choice wins, is that a bad thing? | 16:06 |
| edleafe | At least if there were strong feelings, they had a chance to be heard | 16:07 |
| cdent | true | 16:08 |
| *** lyan has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
| cdent | I was mostly just trying to inject the usual sarcasm into today's meeting, but I think the big tent is weighing me down. | 16:09 |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:09 | |
| edleafe | So I'll move ahead with that change? And maybe freeze next week? | 16:09 |
| cdent | yes, that sounds great | 16:09 |
| cdent | #action edleafe to update microversion to not_before | 16:09 |
| edleafe | yeah, I was thinking about tossing a molotov cocktail into that discussion | 16:09 |
| edleafe | and stop using "big tent"! | 16:09 |
| *** armstrong has quit IRC | 16:10 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:10 | |
| cdent | that's agreed | 16:10 |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 16:11 | |
| cdent | but the rest of it, not so much | 16:11 |
| cdent | #topic guidelines | 16:11 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "guidelines (Meeting topic: api-wg)" | 16:11 | |
| cdent | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z | 16:11 |
| cdent | nobody minused the frozen things | 16:12 |
| edleafe | merge 'em!! | 16:12 |
| * cdent does so | 16:12 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:13 | |
| * edleafe cheers | 16:13 | |
| cdent | anything from here and above ready? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459405/ | 16:14 |
| edleafe | Haven't looked in a few days | 16:14 |
| dtantsur | I haven't read it yet | 16:14 |
| *** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:15 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 16:15 | |
| cdent | then I reckon they can safely sit, yeah? | 16:15 |
| edleafe | So let's all read it, and maybe see about freezing next week? | 16:15 |
| edleafe | Speaking of next week, need me to run the meeting, cdent? | 16:15 |
| cdent | yes and yes | 16:16 |
| cdent | and the week after that | 16:16 |
| edleafe | ...and the week after that, no? When do you officially return? | 16:16 |
| cdent | the 5th, so I'll be around for the 6th and I'd like to set the precedent that this is one of the regular inviolable times | 16:17 |
| edleafe | cool | 16:18 |
| cdent | #topic bugs | 16:19 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: api-wg)" | 16:19 | |
| cdent | no changes | 16:19 |
| cdent | Obviously during those two weeks where I'm away dtantsur should fix all the bugs, right? | 16:19 |
| dtantsur | \o/ | 16:20 |
| dtantsur | $ cd api-wg && git rm . && git commit -am "boo" && git push -f | 16:20 |
| cdent | harsh | 16:20 |
| dtantsur | difficult times - difficult decisions! | 16:21 |
| cdent | true | 16:21 |
| *** yamahata has quit IRC | 16:21 | |
| edleafe | That's stolen from my inbox-zero method | 16:21 |
| cdent | any other concerns to think about before we declare it newsletter time? | 16:22 |
| cdent | if it was important they'll mail again | 16:22 |
| dtantsur | ++ | 16:22 |
| cdent | #topic weekly newsletter | 16:23 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "weekly newsletter (Meeting topic: api-wg)" | 16:23 | |
| cdent | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-wg-newsletter | 16:23 |
| cdent | any takers, or shall I? | 16:23 |
| *** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:23 | |
| edleafe | go for it | 16:24 |
| cdent | I'll ping when I want a proof | 16:24 |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| cdent | Thanks for your attention and attendance. If I show up next week it is only because I miss you and not because I'm obsessed. | 16:25 |
| cdent | #endmeeting | 16:25 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 16:25 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Thu Jun 15 16:25:41 2017 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:25 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2017/api_wg.2017-06-15-16.00.html | 16:25 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2017/api_wg.2017-06-15-16.00.txt | 16:25 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2017/api_wg.2017-06-15-16.00.log.html | 16:25 |
| *** dtantsur has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:25 | |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:32 | |
| *** abramley has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
| *** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:37 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:40 | |
| *** lhx__ has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
| *** Neptu has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** Neptu has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:51 | |
| *** pasquier-s_ has quit IRC | 16:55 | |
| *** ltomasbo is now known as ltomasbo|away | 16:56 | |
| *** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:57 | |
| *** Neptu has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| *** Swami has quit IRC | 16:59 | |
| *** yamahata has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| *** cdent has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:00 | |
| *** yamahata_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:01 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** neiljerram has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| *** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:07 | |
| *** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk | 17:08 | |
| *** abramley has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
| *** jtomasek has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:14 | |
| *** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:14 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
| *** Neptu has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:18 | |
| *** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
| *** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:25 | |
| *** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:30 | |
| *** vkmc_ has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| *** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| *** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:35 | |
| *** cshastri has quit IRC | 17:35 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:46 | |
| *** tbachman has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:48 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 17:50 | |
| *** davidsha_ has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: hi | 18:00 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: hi! | 18:00 |
| *** annak has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:00 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: hi | 18:00 |
| *** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:00 | |
| tbachman | they | 18:00 |
| tbachman | keep | 18:00 |
| tbachman | rolling | 18:00 |
| tbachman | in | 18:00 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: hi | 18:00 |
| rkukura | hi | 18:01 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: :-) | 18:01 |
| SumitNaiksatam | #startmeeting networking_policy | 18:01 |
| openstack | Meeting started Thu Jun 15 18:01:05 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 18:01 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 18:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_policy)" | 18:01 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy' | 18:01 |
| annak | hi | 18:01 |
| SumitNaiksatam | #info agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#June_15th_2017 | 18:01 |
| SumitNaiksatam | #topic Subnetpools in resource_mapping driver | 18:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Subnetpools in resource_mapping driver (Meeting topic: networking_policy)" | 18:01 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | #link https://review.openstack.org/469681 | 18:01 |
| * tbachman runs and hides | 18:01 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | we have been discussing this offline | 18:01 |
| *** cshastri has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:02 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: lol | 18:02 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: any new updates beyind what you mentioned in the emails? | 18:02 |
| annak | No | 18:03 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: ok | 18:03 |
| annak | Currently the patch implements the "ugly" solution | 18:03 |
| annak | with delete issue unsolved | 18:03 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: any new ideas besides what we discussed, since you mentioned that relaxing that the one subnetpool per netwok constraint is required | 18:03 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: right, come to that delete issue in a minute | 18:04 |
| *** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:04 | |
| rkukura | so why can’t proxy groups use subnets from the same subnetpool as the PTG? | 18:04 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: they can, and that is what we are doing, but we need to carve out dedicated prefix for them | 18:04 |
| rkukura | do we definitely need a dedicated prefix? | 18:05 |
| SumitNaiksatam | seems like | 18:05 |
| SumitNaiksatam | because that assignments from that prefix are only significant in the traffic stitched path | 18:06 |
| SumitNaiksatam | its not meant to eat into the “ip_pool” that the user may desire and has set for the l3p | 18:06 |
| annak | is there any significance in separating the two address spaces - ip pool and proxy ip pool? | 18:07 |
| SumitNaiksatam | besides there might be routing/connectivity implications which i am probably forgetting here | 18:08 |
| rkukura | annak: That is what I’m asking - after the proxy subnet is allocated, is it treated any differently? | 18:08 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: rkukura: i think routes might be set in the stitched path | 18:08 |
| rkukura | Like is some routing based on the proxy prefix? | 18:08 |
| SumitNaiksatam | yeah, which is easier to do with a completely separate prefix | 18:09 |
| SumitNaiksatam | and is how its most likely currently implemented | 18:09 |
| *** songole has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:10 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: hi | 18:10 |
| songole | Hi SumitNaiksatam | 18:10 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: discussing proxy_pool again :-) | 18:10 |
| songole | ok. goog timing | 18:10 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: rkukura: one thing came up while discussing with tbachman yesterday, i was thinking if GBP can extend the subnetpool API to take the list of prefixes for assignment | 18:11 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: should we bring songole up to speed? | 18:11 |
| SumitNaiksatam | (as opposed to the current API of a single prefix or everything) | 18:12 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: yes sure | 18:12 |
| rkukura | So do you mean we’d have a single subnetpool, but be able to allocate from different sets of prefixes for normal vs. proxy PTGs? | 18:12 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: yeah | 18:12 |
| tbachman | songole: we’re struggling a bit with the prefixes for the proxy | 18:12 |
| tbachman | right now, the implicit workflow allows the user to provide a prefix via the .ini file (or just use a default) to use for the proxy_ip_pool | 18:13 |
| songole | tbachman: ipv4 & ipv6 - separate prefixes? | 18:13 |
| annak | SumitNaiksatam: I think the problem with passing a cidr to subnetpool is that it has to be a complete cidr with prefix len, not just "give me something 192.168-ish" | 18:13 |
| tbachman | songole: yes, but I think we have this issue even with single staack | 18:13 |
| rkukura | I think the fundemental question is whether we really need the proxy subnets under a single distinct prefix, or if we could simply allocate them from the same subnetpool as regular PTGs use? | 18:13 |
| tbachman | when subnetpools are used to allocate subnets to a network, neutron requires that all subnets on that network also be allocated from that specific subnetpool | 18:14 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: to the extent i recall it needs to be distinct at least in the current implementation, thats the whole reason we defined this extention | 18:14 |
| * tbachman quiets down to minimize thread switching | 18:14 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: sorry, for talking over | 18:15 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: I think it was the other way around ;) | 18:15 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: please continue | 18:15 |
| songole | rkukura: the subnet size for proxy pool is very small. that is a reason why it is a separate pool | 18:15 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: yes, definitely one of the reasons, we did not want IPs to be wasted | 18:15 |
| rkukura | OK, but we I think decided not to use the default_prefix_len of the subnetpool anyway | 18:16 |
| rkukura | diifferent sized subnets can easily be allocated from the same subnetpool | 18:16 |
| annak | yes, we can respect the proxy prefix length parameter and still allocate from regular pool | 18:17 |
| rkukura | Is there a difference in need for public IPs? For example, might publicly routable IPs be needed for regular subnets but not for proxy subnets? | 18:17 |
| songole | SumitNaiksatam: the other reason being it to be quite distinct from the regular subnet.. doesn't have to be | 18:17 |
| songole | makes it easy to distinguish | 18:17 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: the “doesnt have to be” part is what we are debating about | 18:17 |
| songole | annak, rkukura: if we can allocate different sized subnets, I suppose it should be ok. | 18:18 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: i was also mentioning earlier, that it was indentified at that time we dont want to waste the “ip_pool” addresses for internal assignment | 18:19 |
| rkukura | SumitNaiksatam: Does “internal assignment” mean the proxy subnets don’t need to be publicly routable even when the regular subnets are (i.e. no-NAT)? | 18:20 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: this, along with the complexity of assigning routes, was the major motivating factor separating the two | 18:20 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: yes | 18:20 |
| annak | rkukura: "dont need to be" or "must not be" publicly routable? | 18:21 |
| rkukura | annak: I’d like to understand whether its “don’t need to be”, “must not be”, or “must be”. | 18:21 |
| songole | I believe we assign fips to proxy ips in the case of vpn | 18:22 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: no | 18:22 |
| rkukura | songole: That would mean “must be”, right? | 18:22 |
| annak | i understood proxy ip are only internal, is that wrong? | 18:23 |
| songole | SumitNaiksatam: I will get back on that. | 18:23 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: proxy_pool is only for interal stitching assignment | 18:23 |
| rkukura | or maybe not, since fips imply NAT | 18:23 |
| SumitNaiksatam | only IPs from “ip_pool” are NAT'ed | 18:23 |
| songole | when fw is inserted, traffic is routed to stitching ip | 18:24 |
| songole | which is allocated from proxy pool | 18:24 |
| rkukura | SumitNaiksatam: thanks - I guess one argument would be to not waste public IP space for proxy subnets when normal subnets are public (no-NAT) | 18:24 |
| *** rstarmer has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:25 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: it might not just be a public space issue | 18:25 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: even withing the organization, they might not want IPs to be wasted for internal assignment | 18:26 |
| *** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:26 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | when its possible to us a locally scoped space | 18:26 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: routing to proxy_ips only happens within the stitched path | 18:28 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: no entity outside the stitched patch is aware of the proxy_ip assignments | 18:28 |
| annak | sounds like the intuitive thing would be to configure two subnetpools. | 18:29 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: the proxy_group takes over the original PTG’s identitiy on one side, and connects to the original PTG via the proxy IPs and the stiched path (with the inserted service) on the other side | 18:29 |
| rkukura | annak, even if we did configure two subnetpools, these would need to reference the same address_scope, right, to ensure no overlap | 18:30 |
| annak | rkukura: yes | 18:30 |
| songole | SumitNaiksatam: right. vpn gets terminated on the fw. The only way you can reach vpn from outside would be by way of attaching a fip | 18:30 |
| songole | Again, I will get back on the fip part | 18:31 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: but the FIP would be associated with a PT’s IP, not an IP from the proxy_pool, right? | 18:31 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: okay | 18:31 |
| rkukura | And, assuming we need the proxy and normal subnets on the same L2 network, using separate subnetpool would require relaxing neutron’s restriction. | 18:31 |
| SumitNaiksatam | because no one else knows about that IP from proxy_pool | 18:32 |
| annak | rkukura: yes | 18:32 |
| SumitNaiksatam | i guess they could belong to separate address spaces and we can enforce that they dont overlap, but they would have to map to same backend VRF | 18:33 |
| SumitNaiksatam | so that they are all reachable | 18:33 |
| annak | rkukura: I asked salvatore about the limitation and he thinks its because subnet pools were introduced before address scopes. | 18:33 |
| rkukura | I’m not fundementally opposed to relaxing that restriction (as long as same address_scope is required for all subnetpools on a network), but I think it would be difficult to change in Neutron. The subnetpool’s address_scope_id attribute is mutable, and there would be no way to atomically associate a set of subnetpools with a new address_scope. | 18:34 |
| *** cshastri has quit IRC | 18:34 | |
| annak | rkukura: we can try to relax the limitation only for subnetpools that are already within same address scope | 18:35 |
| *** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:35 | |
| rkukura | annak: That might make sense on its own, but what if one of those subnetpool’s addres_scope_id value is changed? | 18:35 |
| *** rstarmer has quit IRC | 18:36 | |
| rkukura | Our mechanism driver currently blocks changing the address_scope_id of subnetpool, but there may be valid use cases for changing this. | 18:36 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: in the apic_mapping mechanism driver, is it possible to associate mutliple address_scopes with the same VRF? | 18:37 |
| SumitNaiksatam | address_scopes of the same family that is | 18:37 |
| annak | rkukura: i guess we should disallow such change if subnets are already allocated.. maybe similar checks are already in place, i can investigate that | 18:38 |
| rkukura | SumitNaiksatam: In the aim_mapping MD, at most one v4 and at most one v6 scope can reference the same VRF | 18:38 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: that validation would have to be in whichever Neutron mechanism driver or monolithin plugin is deployed | 18:38 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: okay, so i guess multiple address_scopes is a non-starter (even as a hack) | 18:39 |
| rkukura | I think the current one-subnetpool-per-family-per-network validation is done in neutron code, not in plugin or driver code, but I could be wrong. | 18:39 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: ah you mean the DB level code? | 18:40 |
| tbachman | I think there are two thigns here | 18:40 |
| *** rstarmer has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:40 | |
| tbachman | one is a mapping to VRFs, which is ACI specific | 18:40 |
| annak | rkukura: you're right, in neutron | 18:40 |
| tbachman | the other is mapping of subnets belonging to address scopes to networks | 18:40 |
| annak | (NetworkSubnetPoolAffinityError) | 18:40 |
| rkukura | SumitNaiksatam: yes, plus the code that populates network dicts with subnetpool and address scope IDs. | 18:41 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: annak: but that is something that is something that can be overridden at the plugin level (in theory) | 18:41 |
| annak | I think the scenario we're struggling with is not unique to GBP | 18:41 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: i agree, but I brought VRFs, because I am sure the same/similar concepts apply for other backends as well | 18:42 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: agree | 18:42 |
| SumitNaiksatam | *brought up | 18:42 |
| SumitNaiksatam | just a quick time check, we are 42 mins into the meeting :-) | 18:43 |
| tbachman | :) | 18:43 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: it’s a tough problem | 18:43 |
| SumitNaiksatam | couple of other topics to quickly touch up on | 18:43 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: yes definitely | 18:43 |
| rkukura | ok | 18:43 |
| SumitNaiksatam | should we quickly bring up those topics and revert to this discussion in the open discussion section? | 18:43 |
| annak | sorry I'll need to leave 5 min yearly | 18:44 |
| rkukura | sure | 18:44 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: oops | 18:44 |
| SumitNaiksatam | #topic Ocata sync | 18:44 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Ocata sync (Meeting topic: networking_policy)" | 18:44 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:ocata_sync | 18:44 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: we will try to do this quickly | 18:44 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: i know you are blocked on the dependent repos | 18:44 |
| annak | (I mean, 11:55) | 18:44 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: ah okay | 18:45 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: i am working on those | 18:45 |
| annak | SumitNaiksatam: thanks! | 18:45 |
| SumitNaiksatam | i finished the python-opflex-agent | 18:45 |
| SumitNaiksatam | which was fairly straightforward | 18:45 |
| SumitNaiksatam | but i am having trouble with the apic-ml2 repo | 18:45 |
| SumitNaiksatam | in trying to get the tests to be aligned with the refactored code | 18:46 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: anything I can help with? | 18:46 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: yes i will let you, thanks | 18:46 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: np! | 18:46 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: are you doing these under a topic? | 18:46 |
| * tbachman goes to gerrit | 18:46 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: i will keep you updated, i was hoping that i would have been long done with this | 18:46 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: no actually its a github repo | 18:46 |
| tbachman | ah, right | 18:47 |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:47 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | and i have not posted a new branch | 18:47 |
| SumitNaiksatam | but will do so | 18:47 |
| SumitNaiksatam | i thought i would fix the issue and do it | 18:47 |
| SumitNaiksatam | i did some whole sale changes, and i cant figure out what is causing a wierd failure | 18:47 |
| SumitNaiksatam | i think i got some mocking wrong somewhere | 18:47 |
| SumitNaiksatam | anyway | 18:48 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: which branch ? | 18:48 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: not posted yet | 18:48 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: anything else you wanted to bring up on this? | 18:48 |
| annak | SumitNaiksatam: no, I don't think so | 18:48 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: one question we had for you was whether the two patches which have been merged today, should be backported to stable/newton | 18:48 |
| SumitNaiksatam | i guess not required to be | 18:49 |
| rkukura | SumitNaiksatam: Do either of annak’s patches that merged to master today need to be back-ported to stable/newton? | 18:49 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: yeah, just asking | 18:49 |
| rkukura | should read as I type ;) | 18:49 |
| annak | i think we wanted this for the ease of merging? I can backport them | 18:49 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: ok cool | 18:49 |
| rkukura | makes sense to me | 18:49 |
| annak | np, will do | 18:49 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: i was just about to type “makes sense” :-) | 18:50 |
| SumitNaiksatam | #topic NFP patches | 18:50 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "NFP patches (Meeting topic: networking_policy)" | 18:50 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: hi, we can merge the patches now, my only probably was that the NFP gate job keeps failing | 18:50 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: is it because its something wrong with the job or is it the patches that are breaking the job? | 18:50 |
| songole | SumitNaiksatam: I believe it is the test issue. | 18:51 |
| songole | I will check | 18:51 |
| songole | again | 18:51 |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 18:51 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: so pleaese +2 the patches that are comfortable with, and the rest of the reviewers will check accordingly | 18:51 |
| SumitNaiksatam | songole: thanks | 18:52 |
| SumitNaiksatam | #topic Open Discussion | 18:52 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: networking_policy)" | 18:52 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | reverting back to the subnetpools discussion | 18:52 |
| SumitNaiksatam | in my mind one of the priorities is to unblock annak with respect to the patch | 18:53 |
| rkukura | For that purpose, I don’t think we can really consider any changes to neutron itself, right? | 18:53 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: we could patch neutron in GBP, no? | 18:54 |
| rkukura | Even if apic_aim or vmware drivers/plugins want to change Neutron, don’t we need the RMD to work with arbitrary neutron back-ends? | 18:54 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: overriding by | 18:55 |
| SumitNaiksatam | sorry, hit enter too soon | 18:55 |
| SumitNaiksatam | annak: i guess its time for you to take off | 18:55 |
| annak | sorry i have to leave, will read the discussion afterwards, thanks everyone! | 18:55 |
| tbachman | Let’s presume we aren’t patching neutron — is there another solution other than either using the exisgint pool or adding the prefix to it? | 18:55 |
| *** annak has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
| tbachman | can we have a separate network, as annak was asking? | 18:56 |
| rkukura | My point was simply that if GBP were to monkey-patch neutron to relax the restricition, that could break neutron plugins or drivers that expect that restriction to be enforced. | 18:56 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: i dont think so | 18:56 |
| tbachman | and can we entertain other options for services and/or the proxy? | 18:56 |
| tbachman | (i.e. how much are we open to changing here) | 18:57 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: yes I agree, although in this case, GBP is being less restrictive | 18:57 |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: that becomes a longer discussion, and to my earlier point, it does not allow annak to make progres in the near term | 18:57 |
| SumitNaiksatam | hence i was suggesting that we add an additional API option to the subnetpools | 18:58 |
| SumitNaiksatam | one we implement in GBP and extend subnetpools | 18:58 |
| SumitNaiksatam | and that allows taking in a one or more prefixes for assignment | 18:58 |
| SumitNaiksatam | in the easiest implementation, it would just iterate throught the prefixes until an allocation is successful | 18:59 |
| SumitNaiksatam | this would most likely be less optimal than allowing neutron subnetpool implementation to handle the choosing of the prefix | 18:59 |
| * tbachman notes the time | 19:00 | |
| SumitNaiksatam | tbachman: thanks | 19:00 |
| SumitNaiksatam | yes we got to end it there for today | 19:00 |
| rkukura | Is it worth looking at just using the same subnetpool and a different prefix_len? Do we know what other code would need to change (setting up routes, etc.)? | 19:00 |
| SumitNaiksatam | back to the offline discussion on this | 19:00 |
| rkukura | thanks SumitNaiksatam! | 19:00 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: thanks for leading this! | 19:00 |
| SumitNaiksatam | rkukura: yes, i believe that would required rewriting the traffic stitching implementation | 19:00 |
| SumitNaiksatam | thanks all for attending | 19:00 |
| SumitNaiksatam | bye! | 19:00 |
| rkukura | bye | 19:01 |
| tbachman | SumitNaiksatam: bye! | 19:01 |
| SumitNaiksatam | #endmeeting | 19:01 |
| songole | bye | 19:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 19:01 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Thu Jun 15 19:01:01 2017 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 19:01 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2017/networking_policy.2017-06-15-18.01.html | 19:01 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2017/networking_policy.2017-06-15-18.01.txt | 19:01 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2017/networking_policy.2017-06-15-18.01.log.html | 19:01 |
| *** tbachman has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:01 | |
| *** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:01 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:11 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:11 | |
| *** abramley has quit IRC | 19:17 | |
| *** anilvenkata has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
| *** ducttap__ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:21 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 19:24 | |
| *** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:26 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:27 | |
| *** songole has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
| *** ducttap__ has quit IRC | 19:29 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:34 | |
| *** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:37 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:38 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:47 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
| *** mfedosin has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
| *** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:56 | |
| *** Guest11 has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 20:00 | |
| *** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 20:23 | |
| *** zenirc369 has quit IRC | 20:25 | |
| *** rstarmer has quit IRC | 20:31 | |
| *** rbak has quit IRC | 20:31 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
| *** armstrong has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 20:49 | |
| *** baoli has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
| *** tobberydberg has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
| *** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:10 | |
| *** Guest11 has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
| *** tobberydberg has quit IRC | 21:15 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 21:25 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:34 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:36 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:40 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:41 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:43 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:50 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:55 | |
| *** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:56 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 22:14 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 22:17 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 22:17 | |
| *** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 22:22 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 22:31 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 22:34 | |
| *** salv-orl_ has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
| *** Swami has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** neiljerram has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 22:51 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 22:59 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:06 | |
| *** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:06 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 23:10 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:18 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:22 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 23:26 | |
| *** sdague has quit IRC | 23:28 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:32 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:52 | |
| *** zhipeng has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:53 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 23:56 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!