Wednesday, 2017-10-11

*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-300:01
*** chyka has quit IRC00:06
*** zshi__ has quit IRC00:07
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-300:07
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting-300:08
*** Patifa has quit IRC00:13
*** yamahata has quit IRC00:18
*** armstrong has quit IRC00:25
*** pvaneck has quit IRC00:29
*** wanghao has quit IRC00:30
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-300:30
*** wanghao has quit IRC00:31
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-300:32
*** wanghao has quit IRC00:32
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-300:32
*** anupn has left #openstack-meeting-300:53
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-301:42
*** shuyingy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-301:45
*** shuyingya has quit IRC01:45
*** shuyingy_ has quit IRC01:48
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-301:50
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-301:51
*** jlvillal has quit IRC02:21
*** jlvillal has joined #openstack-meeting-302:21
*** gengchc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-302:36
*** markvoelker has quit IRC02:54
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-302:55
*** chyka has quit IRC02:56
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-303:17
*** yamamoto has quit IRC03:25
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-303:27
*** chyka has quit IRC03:29
*** flwang1 has quit IRC04:04
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-304:13
*** kaz has joined #openstack-meeting-304:13
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-304:32
*** chyka has quit IRC04:40
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-304:41
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-304:42
*** yamamoto has quit IRC04:43
*** reedip has quit IRC04:45
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-304:55
*** gouthamr has quit IRC05:12
*** Guest2849 is now known as sdake05:20
*** sdake is now known as Guest9543005:21
*** Guest95430 is now known as sdake_fixing05:23
*** sdake_fixing has quit IRC05:29
*** sdake_fixing has joined #openstack-meeting-305:29
*** markvoelker has quit IRC05:30
*** sdake_fixing has quit IRC05:35
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC05:42
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-305:43
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-305:49
*** cshastri has joined #openstack-meeting-305:49
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:49
*** lpetrut has quit IRC05:50
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-305:51
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-305:54
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting-305:55
*** wanghao has quit IRC05:57
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-305:57
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:58
*** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-meeting-306:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-306:02
*** wanghao has quit IRC06:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC06:04
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-306:18
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-306:21
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-306:26
*** kaz has quit IRC06:31
*** wanghao_ has quit IRC06:44
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC06:44
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-306:44
*** TuanLA has joined #openstack-meeting-306:46
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-306:46
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-306:47
*** lpetrut has quit IRC06:49
*** georgk has joined #openstack-meeting-306:57
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:00
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-307:01
*** sdake has quit IRC07:01
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-307:01
*** reedip has joined #openstack-meeting-307:07
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-307:13
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-307:16
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-307:18
*** wanghao has quit IRC07:29
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-307:29
*** qwebirc56275 has joined #openstack-meeting-307:31
*** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-meeting-307:32
*** nikhil has quit IRC07:34
*** yamamoto has quit IRC07:35
*** wanghao has quit IRC07:36
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-307:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC07:36
*** lpetrut has quit IRC07:49
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-307:57
*** wanghao_ has quit IRC07:59
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting-308:00
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-308:02
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-308:16
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:19
*** shuyingy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:20
*** shuyingya has quit IRC08:20
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-308:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-308:23
*** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:24
*** pcaruana has quit IRC08:27
*** wanghao has quit IRC08:27
*** rossella_s has quit IRC08:30
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:30
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-308:31
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-308:32
*** rossella_s has quit IRC08:37
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-308:38
*** ianychoi has quit IRC08:42
*** qwebirc56275 has quit IRC08:54
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:58
*** belmoreira has quit IRC08:58
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-309:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:06
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting-309:06
*** milan has joined #openstack-meeting-309:07
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-309:08
*** belmoreira has quit IRC09:08
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-309:10
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-309:10
*** sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts09:11
*** julim_ has joined #openstack-meeting-309:23
*** julim has quit IRC09:24
*** lpetrut_ has joined #openstack-meeting-309:25
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-309:28
*** lpetrut has quit IRC09:28
*** wanghao_ has quit IRC09:29
*** ralonsoh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-309:32
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC09:36
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-309:40
*** kaz has joined #openstack-meeting-309:45
*** kaz has quit IRC09:46
*** belmoreira has quit IRC09:53
*** qwebirc98225 has joined #openstack-meeting-309:55
*** ywat has joined #openstack-meeting-309:59
*** TuanLA has quit IRC10:00
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:01
*** kaz has joined #openstack-meeting-310:02
*** kaz has quit IRC10:02
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-310:03
*** gengchc_ has quit IRC10:11
*** pbourke has quit IRC10:12
*** pbourke has joined #openstack-meeting-310:14
*** dobson has quit IRC10:29
*** dobson has joined #openstack-meeting-310:32
*** RuiChen has joined #openstack-meeting-310:38
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-310:43
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-310:49
*** shuyingy_ has quit IRC10:52
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-310:58
*** uli-k has quit IRC11:02
*** mrhillsman has quit IRC11:03
*** kiseok7 has quit IRC11:03
*** sergek_ has quit IRC11:03
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC11:04
*** uli-k has joined #openstack-meeting-311:04
*** mrhillsman has joined #openstack-meeting-311:05
*** kiseok7 has joined #openstack-meeting-311:06
*** sergek_ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:06
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-311:16
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-311:16
*** chyka has quit IRC11:21
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:30
*** rmart04 has quit IRC11:41
*** tobberydberg__ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:51
*** tobberydberg__ has quit IRC11:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-311:55
*** prometheanfire has joined #openstack-meeting-311:55
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:59
prometheanfire#startmeeting requirements12:00
openstackMeeting started Wed Oct 11 12:00:06 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is prometheanfire. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.12:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.12:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: requirements)"12:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'requirements'12:00
prometheanfire#topic rollcall12:00
*** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: requirements)"12:00
prometheanfiretonyb, prometheanfire, number80, dirk, coolsvap, toabctl, smcginnis: ping12:00
coolsvapo/12:00
prometheanfireo/12:01
*** domi007 has quit IRC12:02
prometheanfirelooks like it's just us12:02
prometheanfire#topic Any controversies in the Queue12:02
coolsvapYeah12:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Any controversies in the Queue (Meeting topic: requirements)"12:02
*** smcginnis has joined #openstack-meeting-312:02
smcginniso/12:03
* coolsvap haven't seen the queue since the weekend12:03
prometheanfireI don't see anything, the main things I'm focused on reqs wise is zuulv3 and getting known breaking packages update (like the new iso8601)12:05
prometheanfireso, moving on12:05
prometheanfire#topic Open Discussion12:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: requirements)"12:05
smcginnisAre we tracking the iso8601 thing somewhere. Last I remember there were still a few projects needing updates.12:05
prometheanfireanything people want me to include in the project update in sydney?12:06
prometheanfirehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.versionedobjects/+bug/171548612:06
openstackLaunchpad bug 1715486 in IoTronic "py35 tests failing due to iso8601 module change" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to zhangyangyang (zhangyangyang)12:06
prometheanfire#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.versionedobjects/+bug/171548612:06
prometheanfireI think that's as close as we are going to get12:06
prometheanfireif it passes gating we should allow it in12:06
smcginnisOh right, hopefully I got all users in there.12:06
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-312:06
toabctlhi12:07
prometheanfiresmcginnis: :D12:07
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-312:08
*** shuyingya has quit IRC12:08
smcginnisNo ideas for the Sydney update.12:09
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-312:09
prometheanfirek, anything else?12:09
coolsvapCan we revise the meeting time?12:10
coolsvapIt falls in my commute time mostly12:10
smcginnisIt could be a little easier for me if it was slightly later. Even by an hour.12:11
coolsvapBut I don't think we get everyone in the meeting to decide as well12:11
prometheanfireI'll talk to tony and see if we can move it later12:11
prometheanfire6 AM is early for me too12:11
smcginnisBut whatever works best for the group as a whole.12:11
prometheanfirehe isn't here much anymore12:11
smcginnisprometheanfire: Yikes, 6 am is brutal.12:12
prometheanfireyep, alarm set for 5:5012:12
prometheanfireif that's it I'll close12:12
coolsvapYup12:12
prometheanfire#endmeeting12:13
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"12:13
openstackMeeting ended Wed Oct 11 12:13:05 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)12:13
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/requirements/2017/requirements.2017-10-11-12.00.html12:13
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/requirements/2017/requirements.2017-10-11-12.00.txt12:13
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/requirements/2017/requirements.2017-10-11-12.00.log.html12:13
smcginnisprometheanfire: Thanks!12:13
*** prometheanfire has left #openstack-meeting-312:13
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-312:18
*** bobmel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:23
*** bobmel has quit IRC12:26
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-312:31
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:31
*** bobmel_ has quit IRC12:34
*** shuyingya has quit IRC12:35
*** belmoreira has quit IRC12:41
*** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-312:46
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-312:52
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-312:57
*** shuyingya has quit IRC13:02
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-313:02
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-313:07
*** sdake has quit IRC13:11
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-313:11
*** sdake has quit IRC13:11
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-313:11
*** sdake has quit IRC13:15
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-313:19
*** sdake has quit IRC13:19
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-313:19
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-313:20
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-313:22
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-313:24
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-313:24
*** VW has quit IRC13:24
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-313:25
*** egallen has quit IRC13:40
*** srobert has joined #openstack-meeting-313:46
*** sballe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-313:47
*** seanhandley has joined #openstack-meeting-313:50
*** zhipeng has joined #openstack-meeting-313:52
*** yankcrime has joined #openstack-meeting-313:55
tobberydberg#startmeeting publiccloud-wg14:02
openstackMeeting started Wed Oct 11 14:02:36 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tobberydberg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: publiccloud-wg)"14:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'publiccloud_wg'14:02
tobberydbergHi everyone! o/14:02
zhipenghi !14:02
tobberydbergWho is here for the PCWG meeting?14:03
*** gmann is now known as gmann_afk14:03
tobberydbergPlease sign your name at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg14:03
tobberydbergAgenda is there as well!14:03
yankcrimehi!14:04
*** zhipeng has quit IRC14:04
tobberydbergHi yankcrime14:04
*** zhipeng has joined #openstack-meeting-314:04
tobberydbergI guess seanhandley is around as well14:04
seanhandleyo/14:04
tobberydbergI guess we get started and let more people join in later...14:05
tobberydberg#topic 1. Review Action Points14:05
*** openstack changes topic to "1. Review Action Points (Meeting topic: publiccloud-wg)"14:05
tobberydbergeanhandley To write up initial draft spec for Passport Program v1 technical workflow14:05
tobberydbergseanhandley: Missed an "s" there... =)14:05
seanhandleyYes14:06
seanhandleySo I got started on that here: https://github.com/seanhandley/publiccloud-wg/commit/5329342b79dd95f1f24306bb354aa0eea02fb83d14:06
seanhandleyStill needs a lot of editorial work14:06
seanhandleyand I got a reasonable way through discussing publishing specs on specs.openstack.org with clarkb14:06
seanhandleythere's some special process to get docs published there14:07
seanhandleybut he's been swamped with the zuul v3 rollout14:07
seanhandleyso sadly I'm still uncertain what needs to happen in order to publish14:07
seanhandleyAnyway, there's some content in the .rst file there so that's something :)14:07
seanhandleyI guess my next AP is to follow up with clarkb and get it published whenever possible14:07
tobberydbergOk. Nice work seanhandley14:08
seanhandleyIn the meantime I can merge it to our master branch via gerrit so others can contribute14:08
tobberydbergyes, would be good!14:08
zhipengwe could host it at the publiccloud wg repo right ?14:08
tobberydberg+114:08
seanhandleyYes zhipeng, that's where the RST files will be14:08
seanhandleyjust like the api-wg do14:08
tobberydbergCan you take that as an action?14:08
zhipengseanhandley you will need git review that using openstack gerrit14:08
zhipengit could not be done on github14:09
seanhandleyI know zhipeng14:09
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-314:09
seanhandleyI've merged some changes via gerrit there already14:09
zhipeng:) gr8t !14:09
seanhandleyI just held out on this change because I wanted to know clearly how to deploy specs14:09
zhipengyou could add tobias and me for review14:09
seanhandleySure - I'll do that shortly14:09
tobberydbergok, good!14:10
tobberydbergNext: * tobberydberg to submit 1 x technical forum session14:10
tobberydbergDid submit 2 sessions....should be reviewed and decided today I believe14:10
*** wondra has joined #openstack-meeting-314:10
tobberydbergOne on missing features and one passport moving forward basically14:11
seanhandley(PS there's a gerrit link in the #openstack-publiccloud channel if you want to review)14:11
*** donghao has joined #openstack-meeting-314:11
zhipengah nice !14:11
hogepodgeHi14:12
tobberydbergwelcome14:12
wondraHi.14:12
tobberydbergwill do review as soon as my ubuntu account let me in...14:12
tobberydbergwelcome wondra and hogepodge14:13
*** lyan has quit IRC14:13
tobberydbergplease put your name at the etherpad14:13
*** s3wong has quit IRC14:13
*** chyka has quit IRC14:13
seanhandleyhi o/14:13
hogepodgeI'm on mobile right now14:13
tobberydberg* zhipeng DeathPing Melvin for a response on the SIG transformation process14:13
tobberydbergany update on that zhipeng?14:14
*** rajinir-afk is now known as rajinir14:14
zhipengmelvin told me he discussed with you ?14:14
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-314:14
zhipenglike the week before last week14:14
tobberydbergwe had a discussion I remember...will look into that14:15
tobberydberg zhipeng Contact Tom to get the meetup series officially recognised14:16
zhipengI need to do that tmr, sorry14:16
tobberydbergPretty close to deadline now, but maybe we can get something out of it14:16
tobberydbergmoving on14:16
tobberydberg2. Passport Program14:16
tobberydberg#topic 2. Passport Program14:17
*** openstack changes topic to "2. Passport Program (Meeting topic: publiccloud-wg)"14:17
*** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-314:17
tobberydbergSo, please help me out here with the things I miss...14:17
tobberydbergBut, status14:17
tobberydbergWe are reviewing applications (can be found at the link at the agenda)14:17
tobberydbergFoundation are working on graphics right now, and there will be 2 webinars this week for questions14:18
tobberydbergFirst webinar is tomorrow at 1500 UTC, next one friday 0000 UTC (?)14:19
seanhandleyI'll be able to attend the 1st webinar14:19
seanhandleybut not the 2nd14:19
seanhandley(Sorry, 5 year anniversary)14:19
tobberydbergEveryone with questions regarding the launch or something else regarding the program are welcome14:19
yankcrimehave those sessions been announced anywhere in particular tobberydberg ?14:20
tobberydbergnp seanhandley...if I manage to stay awake, I'll try to join14:20
tobberydbergIn emails to all the signed up parties yankcrime14:20
*** smcginnis has left #openstack-meeting-314:20
hogepodgeWe can send the same announcement to the mailing list14:21
tobberydberg+114:21
seanhandley+114:21
yankcrimeif it's still open to all, i.e there's still a chance for more public clouds to sign up then yes, i think it should be circulated a bit more widely14:21
tobberydbergcan you do that hogepodge ?14:21
hogepodgeYes14:21
tobberydbergThanks!14:21
tobberydbergI would say it is semi-open ... we will not have time to "evaluate" all new signups I guess... AND they will not have time to integrate the landingpage/graphics/texts14:22
*** lhx_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:23
seanhandleyOne thing I should mention just FYI all14:24
* tobberydberg approved your commit seanhandley14:24
seanhandleyThanks tobberydberg +114:24
seanhandleyDataCentred is officially set to cease trading at the end of October :(14:24
seanhandleyWe had a rescue bid for the business but it failed14:24
yankcrimeactually, datacentred is no longer trading14:25
seanhandleyso if you see it anywhere regarding the Passport Program, strike out the name - we won't have a running cloud very soon14:25
seanhandleyYeah, technically14:25
yankcrimebut yes, it's over for datacentred in its current form14:25
tobberydbergas you know, sorry for you guys!14:26
seanhandleyThanks tobberydberg. Don't want to dwell on it anyway - just want to make sure people know the situation. Now back to our regular programming :-)14:27
tobberydbergAnd hope you find interesting challenges containing openstack very soon14:27
tobberydberghttps://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Y2_TiSjElnPdNvVtIsco2_PVTtfKdZDMtvL5mmW6E7A/14:27
tobberydbergThat is something that is up for feedback!14:27
tobberydbergWould like to encourage you all to read and comment, all feedback is welcome14:27
tobberydbergThe first part in particular, since that regards the webinar14:28
tobberydbergwe can have this question a little open and get back to during the meeting if you don't have any questions or something that you would like to discuss right away...14:29
seanhandleyAh nice - thanks!14:29
yankcrimeyeah i think that'll take a little time to review14:29
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:29
tobberydbergyes...I move on and we can get back to it later...14:29
tobberydberg...more passport...14:30
tobberydbergOct 16 - Finalize text/layout for Passport landing page on openstack.org14:30
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-314:31
tobberydberg...next on the timeline that is14:31
*** s3wong has quit IRC14:31
*** coolsvap has quit IRC14:31
tobberydbergNext: Oct 28th - Deadline for participating providers to have their website live/tested before launch14:31
tobberydbergand finally ...14:31
tobberydbergNov 6 - launch passport program14:31
tobberydbergwhat we hope for, first day of the summit14:32
tobberydbergquestions about that are also welcome at the webinars14:32
tobberydbergso...leaving the PP for now, we return later during meeting14:32
tobberydberg#topic 3. Meetup Copenhagen14:32
*** openstack changes topic to "3. Meetup Copenhagen (Meeting topic: publiccloud-wg)"14:32
tobberydberg#link  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MEETUPS-2017-publiccloud-wg14:33
tobberydbergIn the bottom at that ether, please add your name if you plan to attend IRL or remote14:34
zhipengwill we have a room ?14:34
hogepodgetobberydberg: that was everything, thanks!14:35
tobberydbergthanks hogepodge!14:35
tobberydbergWe will zhipeng ... but we are not part of the official schedule, which is to bad and something that I will push for next time14:35
zhipengI could put the information on the meetup group I created14:36
zhipengso i suppose it would be 19th right ?14:36
tobberydbergTHe room and time/day isn't set either ... depending on peoples arrival etc14:36
*** georgk has quit IRC14:36
zhipengI'm also wondering if we could do a followup meetup next day, just find a cafe or some place14:37
tobberydbergHaven't decided that either, but I guess that is for the best, some time during the afternoon there14:37
zhipengif we got anything left uncoverd on 19th14:37
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-314:37
tobberydbergI will not be available 20th unfortunately14:37
tobberydbergbut, I'm there all day 18th and 9th14:37
tobberydberg*19th14:38
zhipengokey14:38
zhipengjust a thought :P14:38
tobberydbergIf you have suggestion of agenda items, please add them to the meetup ether14:38
tobberydberggoes for all of you14:38
seanhandley+114:38
zhipengso for the format14:38
seanhandleyI'll do what I can14:38
tobberydbergwondra: will you be in Copenhagen?14:38
seanhandleystill not clear if I'll be able to attend in person btw zhipeng14:38
seanhandleyMay just be you and tobberydberg chairing14:39
zhipengseanhandley understood14:39
tobberydbergrmart04: will you be in Copenhagen?14:39
tobberydbergWe still hope for you seanhandley ;-)14:39
wondraNo, but I'll be in the conference call tomorrow.14:39
tobberydbergok ok ... we will announce the day and time as soon as decided for meetup-meeting and hope that a few more will be able to join remotely14:40
zhipengtobberydberg will we only have discussions or we could have presentations as well ?14:41
tobberydbergDiscussions14:41
tobberydbergIf we set an agenda, I will reach out to people I know will be there14:42
*** egallen has quit IRC14:42
tobberydbergOk, leave that for now...14:42
tobberydberg#topic Forum sessions14:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Forum sessions (Meeting topic: publiccloud-wg)"14:42
rmart04tobberydberg: Unlikely unfortunately :( I will also be on the call tomorrow though14:42
tobberydbergok rmart0414:43
tobberydberg#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg-sydney-forum-sessions14:43
tobberydbergThose are the once submitted14:43
tobberydberg#link http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/2914:43
tobberydberg#link http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/2814:44
tobberydbergNo voting I believe, but thats the links to the official entries14:44
tobberydbergSo....Who will be in Sydney?14:44
tobberydbergzhipeng: You will be there right?14:45
zhipengunfortunately i propably will not be there14:45
tobberydbergoh =)14:45
seanhandleythat's a shame!14:45
zhipeng:(14:45
tobberydbergI will have things to do then =)14:45
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-314:45
tobberydbergGlad we didn't submit more sessions =)14:45
zhipengand melvin should be there, so i will delegate things to him :)14:46
tobberydbergsounds good, maybe he can help moderating as well ... since we have a few sessions...14:46
zhipengyep14:47
tobberydbergbut ok, I'll look for other help as well, Naser and Brono from Catalyst will be there I believe, will reach out to them later....14:47
tobberydberg(good that question came up) ;-)14:48
tobberydberg#topic Other matters14:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Other matters (Meeting topic: publiccloud-wg)"14:48
tobberydberg?14:48
seanhandleyOh!14:49
seanhandleyTesting signed up clouds14:49
tobberydberg...or for that matter... Moving back to other topics14:49
seanhandleywe should mention this14:49
yankcrimemnaser is like, the ultimate forum session moderator ;)14:49
tobberydbergah....yes14:50
tobberydbergyes he is yankcrime14:50
yankcrimewasn't the thought there that we'd make interop a pre-req?14:50
seanhandleyLong term yes14:50
tobberydbergwe had a few of those, but foundation had a will not to close out to many from the beginning14:50
seanhandleynot in the first iteration14:51
tobberydbergAnd we thought that was a good idea14:51
yankcrimerighto, now i remember14:51
seanhandleyregarding testing the signed up clouds: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10ID98gJTMd91hmQuKJDfdm6YtC1AjAbcf4QsgnqsPFI/edit#gid=102903001414:51
yankcrimeyeah, launch schedule is pretty aggressive14:51
yankcrimealthough any cloud worth its salt should be part of interop, obvs ;)14:51
tobberydbergBut, trying ut a few clouds, we will some job there...14:51
seanhandleymyself, tobberydberg and zhipeng have four clouds each to test14:51
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-314:52
tobberydbergtotally agree yankcrime14:52
wondraDoes Interop also mean Foundation membership and the Powered logo? Cause we kindnofndon't have the budget for that.14:52
tobberydbergbasically yes wondra14:53
seanhandleytobberydberg: when is our deadline for ux testing of public clouds?14:53
tobberydbergNot sure14:53
tobberydbergthe sooner the better14:54
seanhandleyzhipeng: I know last week was a vacation for you14:54
tobberydbergI would like to be able to send a decision to the clouds (approved or not) at the same time as the graphics are sent...14:54
seanhandleyAny chance you can take a look at some of those on the spreadsheet this week?14:54
zhipengyes definitely14:54
tobberydbergbut, that is just a thought from my side14:54
seanhandleyawesome14:54
seanhandleytobberydberg is ahead there14:55
seanhandleyI've fallen behind in my testing this week - still 3 to go14:55
tobberydbergwhich also will give them some time fixing some things if they need to14:55
tobberydbergfor example "privacy policy"14:55
tobberydbergeven though I know those are not done very quickly14:56
tobberydbergso, maybe thats not a good idea?14:56
tobberydberg...wait with decision until 28th?14:56
*** georgk has joined #openstack-meeting-314:56
seanhandleysounds reasonable to me14:57
seanhandleyI'm sure the Foundation wants to square things away quickly14:57
tobberydbergbecause then we will need to have another round of evaluation (are graphics in place)14:57
seanhandleythe ramp up to the summit will make all foundation staff very busy14:57
tobberydbergmmm14:57
*** egallen has quit IRC14:57
tobberydbergAnd probably us as well14:57
seanhandleyany thoughts there hogepodge ?14:57
*** julim_ has quit IRC14:58
*** srobert has quit IRC14:58
*** srobert has joined #openstack-meeting-314:59
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:59
seanhandleyhmm maybe continue in #openstack-publiccloud if necessary then?14:59
seanhandleyGuess we're done for time in this room15:00
tobberydbergyes15:00
*** VW_ has quit IRC15:00
tobberydbergsounds good15:00
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-315:00
tobberydbergthanks for today folks!15:00
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:00
tobberydberg#endmeeting15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:00
openstackMeeting ended Wed Oct 11 15:00:37 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
yankcrimethanks tobberydberg15:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/publiccloud_wg/2017/publiccloud_wg.2017-10-11-14.02.html15:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/publiccloud_wg/2017/publiccloud_wg.2017-10-11-14.02.txt15:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/publiccloud_wg/2017/publiccloud_wg.2017-10-11-14.02.log.html15:00
*** yankcrime has left #openstack-meeting-315:00
*** seanhandley has left #openstack-meeting-315:01
*** cshastri has quit IRC15:01
*** psachin has quit IRC15:02
*** VW has quit IRC15:03
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-315:04
*** egallen has left #openstack-meeting-315:04
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC15:05
*** shuyingya has quit IRC15:07
*** wondra has quit IRC15:07
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom15:13
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-315:17
*** ralonsoh_ has quit IRC15:18
*** zhipeng has quit IRC15:19
*** zhipeng has joined #openstack-meeting-315:19
*** shuyingya has quit IRC15:21
*** VW_ has quit IRC15:21
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-315:22
*** daidv_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:33
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-315:43
*** caboucha has joined #openstack-meeting-315:46
*** srobert has quit IRC15:47
*** srobert has joined #openstack-meeting-315:47
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-315:54
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-315:56
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-315:56
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-315:57
*** zhipeng has quit IRC15:57
*** marios has quit IRC15:57
*** pcaruana has quit IRC15:59
*** VW has quit IRC16:00
*** VW__ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:00
eglute#startmeeting interopwg16:00
openstackMeeting started Wed Oct 11 16:00:46 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is eglute. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'interopwg'16:00
markvoelkero/16:00
georgkhi16:00
eglute#chair markvoelker hogepodge16:00
hogepodgeo/16:01
openstackCurrent chairs: eglute hogepodge markvoelker16:01
eglute#topic agenda16:01
*** openstack changes topic to "agenda (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:01
Rockygo/16:01
egluteHello Everyone! Today's agenda: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropVertigo.1816:01
egluteplease feel free to update as needed16:01
eglutehogepodge has a conflict, so his availability will be limited16:02
mguineyo/16:02
markvoelker#topic OpenStack Summit Sydney16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Summit Sydney (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:02
*** VW__ has quit IRC16:02
markvoelkerJust a general reminder here about the Forum session.  If folks would like to note other related sessions in the pad for general awareness, please do!16:03
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-316:03
markvoelkerOut of curiosity: who's going?  I know hogepodge and I are and eglute isn't.  Anyone else?16:03
georgkI´ll be there16:03
markvoelker\o/16:04
georgk:-)16:04
dimso/16:04
markvoelker\o/ (again)16:04
RockygI'm thinking I won't be making it.16:04
markvoelkerbummer16:05
*** slaweq has quit IRC16:05
*** ppiela_ has left #openstack-meeting-316:05
Rockygwhich means someone will need to help georgk with the refstack/opnfv sessions16:05
markvoelkerhogepodge: ^^ (even though you're not here, just recording for the minutes)16:06
Rockygif they make it on the schedule.  which they should16:06
georgkyeah...16:06
*** milan has quit IRC16:07
markvoelkerAnything else we need to talk about for Sydney today?16:07
markvoelker#topic Verticals: NFV16:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Verticals: NFV (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:07
Rockyguh, on the etherpad at the top, should the "next" be sydney summit not boston summit?16:07
markvoelkerRockyg: yes =p  Old copy/paste16:08
egluteRockyg thanks! will fix that :D16:08
markvoelkerTwo topics I'd like to get some input on today for the NFV program:16:08
markvoelkerFirst, one of the questions that's come up while I've been drafting an initial capabilities list is how many releases we should cover16:08
Rockyggreat question16:09
markvoelkerAs a reminder, the OpenStack Powered program covers 3.5 releases (e.g. you can currently get a logo agreement if you have a compliant offering that uses Mitaka, Newton, Ocata, or Pike)16:10
georgkso, you are wondering if NFV is developing so fast that we cannot maintain a 3 release compatibiulity16:10
markvoelkergeorgk: Partly, yes.  Some of the features we've been considering actually didn't appear until after Mitaka, for example.16:11
markvoelkerThis could be a one-off issue (there have been a *lot* of NFV-driven changes in the past few releases, that may cool down a bit in terms of what's widely deployed enough to meet criteria though).  Or not.16:11
markvoelkerMy general inclination is to stick with the precedent set by Powered for the time being and solicit some feedback16:12
markvoelkerI can make note of capabilities that don't make the list because of the timing in the scoring sheet16:12
eglutemaybe keep it in advisory until cover enough releases?16:12
eglutewould that work?16:12
markvoelkereglute: That's an option too, but there's been some sentiment that there's been enough new stuff going into OpenStack in recent releases that's driven by NFV that we may end up with a pretty weak Guideline, at least initially.  E.g. realistically you may need more capabilities than what we require.16:13
georgkeglute: that sounds reasonable16:13
eglutemarkvoelker mitaka would roll off next year anyways, correct?16:14
egluteif all the nfv features available in newton?16:14
egluteor are they even later?16:14
eglutewe need to start out with advisory anyways16:15
*** rmart04 has quit IRC16:15
markvoelkerAs always, I think that depends a little on who you ask. =)  Hence I thought I'd bring it up here to discuss.16:15
eglutemarkvoelker what do you propose16:16
markvoelkereglute: Per above, my initial though is to stick with the coverage from Powered and I'll make note in the scoring worksheet of anything that doesn't get considered because of it that folks have asked about.16:17
markvoelkerThat should give us a more concrete list and we can make changes as necessary.16:17
eglutemarkvoelker sounds good16:17
markvoelkerAny objections?16:18
eglutenot from me!16:18
markvoelker#agreed We'll stick with the 3.5 release requirement for the NFV vertical16:18
markvoelkerOk, on to the second issue....16:18
markvoelkerOne of the buckets of capabilities we're considering here is LBaaS.16:19
RockygYeah.  Remember the first powered guideline was awful weak, too.16:19
RockygThe third one finally got a little meat.16:19
markvoelkerAs most of you are aware, there are currently basically two implementations fo the LBaaS v2 API: classic neutron LBaaS and Octavia.16:19
georgkRockyg: honestly, OPNFV has the same issue16:19
RockygYeah. It's hard to have stricter Openstack guidelines than OPNFV has for itself ;-)16:20
markvoelkerIn my (completely anecdotal, YMMV) experience there are currently more deployments of classic neutron LBaaS in production, but the future direction is toward Octavia.16:20
egluteRockyg good point. We did follow up 1st guideline with 2 others pretty fast.16:20
markvoelkerWe've talked about this once or twice now but haven't come down on a firm decision about how to handle it.16:21
eglutemarkvoelker we had this issue with neutron vs nova networks16:21
Rockygeglute, ++16:21
eglutenot sure if it is the same exact situation16:21
markvoelkereglute: this is different because they are two implementations of the same  API16:21
Rockygand glance v216:21
markvoelkerWhereas nova-net vs neutron were very different capability sets and completely different API's16:22
eglutemarkvoelker if apis are the same, are the tests the same?16:22
markvoelkereglute: they *could* be in some cases.  Generally they aren't as of now.16:23
markvoelkerSo, two things to think about with this situation:16:23
markvoelker1.) Do we think this is a general situation that's likely to come up more and more often (two implementations of the same API), or is this sort of a one-off?16:24
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting-316:24
markvoelker2.)  If we want to consider saying "either implementation of the API is acceptable since a tool calling the API won't know the difference" then do we want to tackle this with a schema change, or try to just use comments?16:24
georgkI am wondering about this: what about all the different Neutron backend implementations?16:25
markvoelkerThe answer to 2 may depend on 1 obviously16:25
georgklike different SDN controllers. Why are those not problematic? they also implement the same API16:25
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-316:25
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-316:25
markvoelkergeorgk: the backend plugin/driver is generally abstracted: e.g. if I want to create a network or a port, the API call is the same whether my backend is OVS, NSX, or Linux Bridge.16:26
markvoelkerPlugins are explicitly not designated sections16:26
markvoelkerWhereas API code is16:26
RockygYeah.  In the early days, we talked about same api, different implementations.  that was the motivation for required code segments16:26
markvoelker(generally)16:26
georgkmarkvoelker: and there IS a difference in the LBaas v2 API16:26
georgkok16:27
Rockygbut for other things, lke sdn controllers, especially stuff openstack doesn't control, we should ust have a good set of api tests and scenario test16:27
markvoelkerWell, again: the LBaaSv2 API generally provides an abstraction layer from whatever LB you're actually using (haproxy or NSX or whatever).16:27
markvoelkerBut in this case if we want the API server to be a designated section, we'd have to make the neutron API designated, the Octavia API designate, or both.16:27
georgkmarkvoelker: got it, thanks16:28
markvoelker(and our schema is currently designed around a single implementation...e.g. there's no concept of "you can use A or B to meet this requirement")16:28
eglutei would be inclined to say either implementation is fine for as long as API is the same but not sure about the tests...16:29
markvoelkereglute: right, that's sort of the next point here...ok, I'll jump to that. =)16:29
*** shuyingya has quit IRC16:29
markvoelkerSo if the API implementations are the same, it's entirely possible that tests could be written agnostic of the implementation16:30
eglutethat would be ideal for us i think16:30
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-316:30
RockygThat would certainly demonstrate interop between the two implementations ;-)16:30
markvoelkerIn practice, this mostly isn't the case (https://github.com/openstack/octavia/tree/master/octavia/tests/tempest and https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas/tree/master/neutron_lbaas/tests/tempest for example)16:30
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:30
egluteof course it is not...16:31
markvoelkerSo, if we go with "either implementation is ok" then we also need to think about how to handle "you can pass test A or test B"...potentially.  Or we could just hold off making these required until we're sure we have agnostic tests.16:31
Rockygquestion is, could the lbaas test run successfully against Octavia and/or vice versa?16:31
markvoelkerOr we could wait until everybody runs Octavia and classical lbaas is removed from the treee...16:32
markvoelkerOr...16:32
markvoelkerWell, you get the picture.16:32
georgkcan we review the tests and only include those which are implementation agnostic?16:32
*** VW__ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:32
egluteRockyg would you be able to help us test it?16:32
*** VW_ has quit IRC16:33
*** VW has quit IRC16:33
markvoelkergeorgk: Possibly.  Octavia does run some neutron tests at the gate.16:34
RockygI can reach out to some of our guys and see what we can do.  Zhipeng and our Netron guys might be able to do some stuff.16:34
egluteRockyg that would be great16:35
*** d0ugal has quit IRC16:35
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-316:35
markvoelkerWe can look into that as part of building the capabilities list, but what I'd like to get down to today is: do we want to potentially allow two implementations of an API, and is that something we want to build into the schema?16:36
markvoelkerI'll point out that the later means we might need to make some adjustments to RefStack (particularly if we end up with "test A or test B").16:36
eglutemarkvoelker i think that is not the ideal scenario but one we should consider. especially if it is just different tests for same api16:36
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-316:37
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:38
RockygYeah.  I would think ther should be a set of common tests for a specific network function16:38
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC16:39
Rockygnon common tests would be to help the user understand which implementation is the right one for them16:39
markvoelkerOk, so what I'm generally hearing is "let's see how far we can get with an 'or' for designated sections but not different tests".  Yes?16:39
egluteYes16:39
Rockygyes.16:39
Rockyggeorgk, what do you think?16:39
markvoelkerOk, I'll start drafting with that assumption then and we'll see how it turns out (/me makes mental note to set up both implementations in his lab this week for testing).16:40
eglutethank you markvoelker for tackling this16:40
georgkyes16:41
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-316:41
markvoelkerIf this works out, I'm hopeful we may not need a schema change.  I'm pretty sure I can handle the designated sections stuff in commentary and RefStack doesn't really do much with designated sections anyway (other than display them as part ofthe guideline)16:41
eglutethanks markvoelker16:41
markvoelkerOk, let's move on...19 minutes to go and plenty of agenda stuff left16:41
markvoelker#topic Microversions16:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Microversions (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:42
markvoelkerThis may be a short topic since I think hogepodge had the AI's from last week but isn't around. =)16:42
eglutehogepodge said he had no updates on his items16:42
egluteunless mguiney can add anything?16:42
hogepodgeJust have to send a patch. Find time to send the patch16:43
eglutethank you hogepodge16:43
markvoelkernifty16:43
markvoelkerOk, moving on....16:43
markvoelker#topic Scoring for 2018.0116:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Scoring for 2018.01 (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:43
markvoelkerPatches are drifting in and discussions are being had, which is good.  =)16:44
markvoelkerAre there specific items folks want to discuss here today?16:44
eglutei think nova one needs discussion16:44
eglutebut perhaps first let people review?16:45
markvoelkereglute: You mean the patch adding keypairs?16:45
egluteyes16:45
markvoelker#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509955 Nova scoring patch16:45
*** chyka has quit IRC16:45
eglutethough i dont think Matt is on IRC right now16:46
markvoelkerWas there something you wanted to bring up about it in particular?  Looked pretty reasonable to me...16:46
egluteso this would include microversion16:46
eglutelooks reasonable to me as well16:46
eglutebut wanted to make sure people review and voice any concerns16:47
egluteif no concerns, reviews and +1 :)16:47
markvoelkerIMHO this is something that's been around since Kilo and I've yet to run across a cloud that didn't support it that I can think of.  If hogepodge does end up adding a microversion annotation to the schema we can add that later.16:48
*** milan has joined #openstack-meeting-316:48
Rockyg++16:48
eglutegreat! will get +2 from me as well16:49
markvoelkerOk, if folks can land their comments/approvals in gerrit por favor, that's be lovely.16:49
eglute+216:49
markvoelkerOther scoring items folks want to talk about today?16:49
egluteluzC noted her patch needed discussing16:49
eglute#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509638/16:50
eglutethough I don't think luzC is online right now16:50
egluteQuestion: identity-v3-list-projects capability was marked required 2017.09.16:50
egluteBut the only TC available was flagged since it needs 2 users.16:50
egluteShould we move the capability back to advisory until TC is fixed?16:50
eglute   or until other suitable TCs are added?16:50
eglutei am not sure i am entirely clear on the question16:51
eglutewe could wait to discuss it till luzC is online16:51
egluteoh, TC i think is Test Case16:51
eglutenot technical committee16:51
markvoelkerI'm ok with leaving it (and leaving the flag) personally.  I'd like to check if there's been any motion on a better test though.16:52
eglutei agree.. maybe luzC could check on a better test16:52
markvoelkerReverting a capability to advisory is something I don't think we've actually ever done.16:52
markvoelkerOk, other scoring stuff for today?16:53
eglutewe could break new ground and try it :D but yes, flagging is fine16:53
markvoelker(7 minutes...)16:53
eglutenot from me!16:53
markvoelker#topic Add-on Programs16:53
*** openstack changes topic to "Add-on Programs (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:53
markvoelkerhogepodge: anything to note here today?16:53
hogepodgeno, same, no room for interop work this week sadly16:54
markvoelkerThanks.  Ok then, moving along16:54
markvoelker#topic Future project consultation16:55
*** openstack changes topic to "Future project consultation (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:55
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting-316:55
markvoelkerAny updates here (none from me this week...)?16:55
mriedemblarg keypairs16:55
mriedemRockyg: told me to show up16:55
mriedembut now it seems i don't need to16:55
eglutemriedem thank you for the patch!16:56
markvoelkermriedem: I think we're good.16:56
markvoelker#topic Open Floor16:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Floor (Meeting topic: interopwg)"16:56
Rockygsorry, matt!  but you did a good enough job we all agreed16:57
eglute+116:57
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-316:57
markvoelkerOK gang, that's pretty much today's agenda.  Anything folks want do discuss in the remaining 3 minutes?16:57
eglutemarkvoelker no other updates from me, thank you!!16:57
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC16:57
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-316:57
Rockygwait, got lance on keystone...16:57
lbragstado/16:58
*** tssurya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:58
lbragstadheard keystone was giving you problems?16:58
lbragstadhow can i help?16:58
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-316:58
eglutenot problems exactly! we need a different test for one capability16:58
eglute#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509638/16:58
eglutebasically, we need a test with one user, non admin16:59
markvoelkerThis thing: https://github.com/openstack/interop/blob/master/2017.09.json#L1070-L109316:59
*** baoli has quit IRC16:59
markvoelkerI think we'll have to switch over to #openstack-interop though, we're out of time...17:00
lbragstadah - and this needs to be added to tempest?17:00
eglutelbragstad correct17:00
lbragstad before https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509638/ can actually be included as a requirement17:00
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-317:00
Rockygyup.  moving to 3openstack-interop17:00
markvoelkerSorry gang, we need to yield the channel...17:00
markvoelker#endmeeting17:01
eglutesince we are out of time, lets move! thanks everyone!17:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:01
dansmith#startmeeting nova_cells17:01
openstackMeeting ended Wed Oct 11 17:01:00 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interopwg/2017/interopwg.2017-10-11-16.00.html17:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interopwg/2017/interopwg.2017-10-11-16.00.txt17:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interopwg/2017/interopwg.2017-10-11-16.00.log.html17:01
openstackMeeting started Wed Oct 11 17:01:03 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dansmith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova_cells)"17:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova_cells'17:01
melwitto/17:01
tssurya_0/17:01
mriedemo/17:01
dansmithwow tssurya_ has a tall head17:01
melwitthaha17:01
tssurya_hehe :D17:01
dansmith#topic bugs17:01
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: nova_cells)"17:01
dansmithmriedem: are you still debugging that one from a few minutes ago or are you good now?17:02
mriedemi marked it incomplete17:02
mriedemand put my notes in there17:02
dansmithright on17:02
melwittI found a couple of bugs while working on improving our usage of CellDatabases17:02
melwitthttps://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/172167017:02
openstackLaunchpad bug 1721670 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Build notification in conductor fails to send due to InstanceNotFound" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt)17:02
dansmithyep, and patches are up for them all yes?17:02
melwitthttps://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/172240417:03
openstackLaunchpad bug 1722404 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Database transactions can fail with "TypeError: Can't upgrade a READER transaction to a WRITER mid-transaction" because of scatter_gather_cells" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt)17:03
melwittyep patches are up. first one is merged so I proposed a backport for pike17:03
dansmithand backports?17:03
dansmithcool17:03
dansmithso there was another bug filed last week, I think after this meeting, about instance list17:04
melwittI requested nominations for pike series on both bugs17:04
dansmithwhich has since been fixed17:04
*** gouthamr has quit IRC17:04
dansmithit was a fairly obscure detail I think, but otherwise haven't heard other complaints about our instance listing, so tentatively hopeful that that stuff is good17:04
dansmithso anything else here? any open/unsolved bugs?17:05
mriedemnot from me17:05
dansmithcool17:05
dansmith#topic open reviews17:05
*** openstack changes topic to "open reviews (Meeting topic: nova_cells)"17:05
dansmithtssurya_: has a patch for nova-manage17:05
tssurya_I have my first ever open stack patch here for the enhancement Wishlist bug . Reviews are most welcome (and sorry for large number of duplicate patch sets, was having some trouble regarding patch merge conflicts) : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510844/17:05
dansmithI saw some traffic on it, but haven't circled back to look yet17:05
dansmithtssurya_: cool17:06
dansmithI have some remaining instance list patches up for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50859517:06
dansmiththey squash buildrequests into the instance list stuff so we stop having stupid sorting with those17:07
*** Patifa has quit IRC17:07
dansmithand also a patch that makes us only query cells we have instances in,17:07
dansmithwhich will help performance for people that segregate users by class into cells for organization or locality17:07
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting-317:07
dansmiththe buildrequest one is definitely something I'd like to land soon17:07
dansmiththe smarter cells patch is kinda optional, but I think it's worth doing17:08
mriedemsegregate users by class into cells?17:08
mriedemso, tenant isolation host aggregates?17:08
dansmithif you take the edge case,17:08
dansmithyou might have users in a remote office be booting things in the cell that is in their office17:08
dansmithor if people use cells for segregating new/old hardware,17:09
dansmithyou might have performance users only booting new instances in the new hardware cell17:09
dansmithbut yeah, basically,17:09
dansmithif your aggregate mapping makes you only boot things in one cell, no reason to make instance list always query other cells17:09
mriedemi was just trying to figure out how you make the connection,17:09
mriedemsince it'd have to be via the host mappings implicitly17:09
dansmithno, organization through one of the available methods, like aggregates,17:10
dansmithbut just making the cells lister thing not list unnecessary cells17:10
dansmithbased on what cells you have instancemappings for17:10
mriedemthat's this one right https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509002/ ?17:10
dansmithif we fix the instance archive thing deleting instance mappings,17:10
dansmithyou'd also not list against cell0 if you have no error instances right now17:10
dansmithmriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508595/717:10
dansmither, no17:11
dansmiththe one at the end of that one17:11
dansmithmriedem: 002 is just a query method to make the next patch quick17:11
mriedemyeah, have you run this through the danperftestmachine9000?17:11
mriedemto see that the up front grouping doesn't affect a normal list too much?17:12
dansmithno, because it will only affect things with more cells17:12
dansmithI can't tell a difference between 500/500 cell0/cell1 and 1000 in cell1 reliably, so I'm not going to be able to see this either I think17:12
dansmithI can do it if you want, but it's not high on the prio list I don't think17:12
dansmithanyway, other open reviews.. melwitt has those fixes and corresponding fixture tweaks17:14
dansmithwhat else?17:14
melwittyeah, the fixture patch is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508432 and I would appreciate review on it17:14
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting-317:14
*** VW__ has quit IRC17:15
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-317:15
dansmithokay nothing else I guess, so moving on17:16
dansmith#topic open discussion17:16
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: nova_cells)"17:16
mriedemcrap mel's notification fix reminds me i was going to collapse the 2 for loops in schedule_and_build_instances17:16
melwittohh, right17:16
dansmithanything else here?17:16
mriedemi have another patch to do the instance.tag stuff at server create better too,17:16
mriedembut it has to be cleaned up17:16
dansmithokay17:17
mriedemnot directly cells related, but it came up when adding that stuff in schedule_and_build_instances17:17
dansmithyeah17:17
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk17:17
dansmithokay if nothing else, I propose we get back to work17:18
mriedemyup17:18
melwittyis17:18
tssurya_yes17:18
dansmith#endmeeting17:18
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:18
openstackMeeting ended Wed Oct 11 17:18:46 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:18
*** mriedem has left #openstack-meeting-317:18
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_cells/2017/nova_cells.2017-10-11-17.01.html17:18
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_cells/2017/nova_cells.2017-10-11-17.01.txt17:18
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_cells/2017/nova_cells.2017-10-11-17.01.log.html17:18
*** tssurya_ has left #openstack-meeting-317:18
*** egallen has quit IRC17:22
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:33
*** baoli has quit IRC17:35
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-317:41
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-317:44
*** lpetrut_ has quit IRC17:45
*** donghao has quit IRC17:47
*** shuyingya has quit IRC17:48
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-317:48
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:49
*** VW has quit IRC17:53
*** slaweq has quit IRC17:53
*** VW_ has quit IRC17:54
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-317:55
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-317:55
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:06
*** lpetrut_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:10
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-318:16
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-318:17
*** s3wong has quit IRC18:19
*** baoli_ has quit IRC18:24
*** d0ugal has quit IRC18:24
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-318:24
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-318:27
*** georgk has quit IRC18:27
*** shuyingya has quit IRC18:31
*** rubasov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:33
*** lhx_ has quit IRC18:43
*** Rockyg has quit IRC18:46
*** milan has quit IRC18:51
*** milan has joined #openstack-meeting-318:57
*** milan has quit IRC18:59
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC19:09
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-319:15
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-319:18
*** rdopiera has joined #openstack-meeting-319:18
*** flwang1 has quit IRC19:22
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-meeting-319:25
*** seizadi has quit IRC19:25
*** milan has joined #openstack-meeting-319:34
*** coolsvap has quit IRC19:36
*** makowals_ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:39
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-319:40
*** Patifa has quit IRC19:42
*** lyan has quit IRC19:51
*** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-319:52
*** gary-smith has joined #openstack-meeting-319:53
*** harlowja has quit IRC20:00
ying_zuo#startmeeting horizon20:01
openstackMeeting started Wed Oct 11 20:01:00 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ying_zuo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: horizon)"20:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'horizon'20:01
ying_zuoo/20:01
gary-smitho/20:01
rdopierao/20:01
makowals_Hello20:01
e0nehi20:01
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC20:02
rubasov_o/20:02
ying_zuo#topic Notices20:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Notices (Meeting topic: horizon)"20:02
ying_zuo#info Queens-1 milestone is expected to be released by Oct 1820:02
robcresswello/20:02
ying_zuoplease try to focus on closing the tickets listed on https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/queens-120:02
ying_zuo#info Sydney summit sessions20:03
ying_zuowe have the project update and project onboarding sessions confirmed20:03
ying_zuo I am still waiting to hear about the user feedback session.20:03
ying_zuoany suggestions on the topics for the project onboarding session?20:04
* e0ne will miss this summit :(20:04
ying_zuo:(20:04
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting-320:05
ying_zuo#topic Bug Reports Review20:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Bug Reports Review (Meeting topic: horizon)"20:06
ying_zuohttps://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/uClL7g56/20:06
*** apetrich has quit IRC20:07
ying_zuo#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/168162720:07
openstackLaunchpad bug 1681627 in Zun UI "Page not found error on refreshing bowser " [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Shu Muto (shu-mutou)20:07
ying_zuo#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/170411820:07
openstackLaunchpad bug 1704118 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Spinner is stuck when deleting image in angularized panel" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Lajos Katona (lajos-katona)20:07
ying_zuoshu-mutou left a note to ask for reviews on the patches for these two tickets20:07
ying_zuothese are the patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491346/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490868/20:08
robcresswellYeah I haven't got round to looking at that refresh patch yet20:08
robcresswellI'm not a big fan of the current solution. It's very verbose.20:08
ying_zuohe made some changes20:09
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-320:10
ying_zuostill a pretty big change20:11
ying_zuoI left a comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490868/20:11
ying_zuojust a nitpick. I think it's good other than that20:12
ying_zuo#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/172128620:12
openstackLaunchpad bug 1721286 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Create volume from image displays incorrect AZs" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Ivan Kolodyazhny (e0ne)20:12
ying_zuothanks e0ne picking it up20:13
e0nejust assigned this bug to myself today. will take a look on this later this week20:13
e0neying_zuo: np20:13
robcresswellawesome20:13
ying_zuo#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/164053720:13
openstackLaunchpad bug 1640537 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Federated users should not see change password page" [Undecided,New]20:13
gary-smithI put that one on the list because I thought david-lyle could quickly triage it20:14
ying_zuothanks20:14
gary-smith(I'm not very familiar with keystone federation)20:15
ying_zuoI think it makes sense to hide the page20:15
robcresswellIsn't this a policy issue really?20:16
robcresswellI don't know if it stretches that far though20:17
gary-smithDoes being federated necessarily preclude the ability to change the password via keystone?20:17
robcresswellEither way should be controllable by information that we already have20:17
ying_zuoOPENSTACK_KEYSTONE_BACKEND is on local_seetings.py to control some actions on the identity panel20:17
robcresswellgary-smith: I don't know unfortunately :(20:17
ying_zuoI don't think it's policy20:18
gary-smithwould setting can_edit_user to False in OPENSTACK_KEYSTONE_BACKEND suppress the password change setting?20:20
ying_zuoI think the user can still use keystone or other logins20:21
ying_zuoon a cluster20:21
ying_zuogary-smith: I would think that just control the edit user action20:21
gary-smithmakes sense20:21
ying_zuoI was thinking to add can_change_password there20:21
ying_zuobut that will work just like setting a policy rule20:22
ying_zuoso adding a setting probably won't work20:22
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-320:23
robcresswellYou could make it setting controlled, all I meant was that I think you may be able to already tell anyway20:24
*** slaweq has quit IRC20:24
robcresswellI don't know enough about how keystone presents federated logins vs keystone ones20:24
robcresswellIf we can distinguish, we can just solve that bug without extra settings20:24
ying_zuoyes20:24
ying_zuowill need to make a call to check how the logged in user is authenticate instead of using a setting20:25
robcresswellYeah I don't know if there's any way of distinguishing. Lets put this to the side anyway, since none of us know20:26
*** milan has quit IRC20:26
ying_zuosure. that's a good start20:26
ying_zuo#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/169079020:26
openstackLaunchpad bug 1690790 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "policy checks for detach_interface not working correctly" [Undecided,Confirmed]20:26
ying_zuothe policy rule for detach interface is still not defined on the sample nova policy20:28
ying_zuothere's one for attach interface though20:29
ying_zuomaybe we can use that for the detach interface too?20:29
ying_zuoit's not ideal20:30
robcresswellWhat does Nova do, just use attach for both?20:31
*** gary-smith__ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:31
ying_zuogood question20:31
ying_zuojust need to look into that then :)20:32
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-320:32
robcresswellalso nova dont provide sample policy files, it needs to be generated20:32
ying_zuoyes20:32
robcresswellYeah, just duplicate the nova equivalent20:32
robcresswellIts a one line change at best, just need to check the rule20:32
ying_zuoI was referring to the one in horizon20:32
ying_zuoI didn't see one in nova20:33
ying_zuolike you said, needs to be generated20:33
ying_zuo#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/168626620:33
openstackLaunchpad bug 1686266 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "upload images with an invalid URL lead to a "Queued" status image forever" [Undecided,New]20:33
*** gary-smith has quit IRC20:34
ying_zuoshould we do any validation for the url?20:34
robcresswellYeah, but the one in Horizon isn't pushed automatically from anywhere; we just manually update it from time to time20:34
robcresswellNo, we should just do what the API does20:35
robcresswellWhich is leave it queued forever, apparently.20:35
ying_zuocool20:35
ying_zuo#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/164918320:35
openstackLaunchpad bug 1649183 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "image category buttons don't appear in newton" [Medium,Confirmed]20:35
robcresswellpffft20:37
robcresswellHow demanding.20:37
robcresswellIts a regression that we should fix20:37
robcresswellThough I dislike their attitude :/20:37
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-320:37
robcresswell"Would be good to have a test system with say 150 images so these bugs are found before release" Yes, that would be wonderful if someone would provide that.20:38
ying_zuois it a regression?20:38
robcresswellYep20:38
robcresswellThe bug explanation seems fairly clear IMO20:39
ying_zuoI thought it's just asking for the option to filter20:39
robcresswellNo, its asking for an option that existed before, that was introduced in Grizzly20:39
robcresswellhttps://docs.openstack.org/horizon/latest/configuration/settings.html#images-list-filter-tenants20:40
robcresswell"Just installed the Newton version of the openstack dashboard and when listing images the buttons to filter by category no longer appear."20:40
robcresswellIts when we used the new images panel20:40
robcresswelladded, even.20:40
ying_zuoI see20:40
robcresswellI'll leave a comment20:42
ying_zuothank you20:42
robcresswellJust target it to Next or something, someone can pick it up20:42
ying_zuolast one20:43
ying_zuo#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/172270420:43
openstackLaunchpad bug 1722704 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Image name filter on instance panel doesn't work" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Feilong Wang (flwang)20:43
*** dev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:43
*** dev_ has quit IRC20:43
ying_zuoflwang asked about this in openstack-horizon20:43
ying_zuoany thoughts about these two issues?20:44
*** caboucha has quit IRC20:45
e0neneed to check #172270420:46
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC20:46
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-meeting-320:47
e0neit should be easy to fix20:48
e0nelet's wait or ask flwang we any help is needed20:48
ying_zuoe0ne: can you give some pointers?20:49
*** gary-smith has joined #openstack-meeting-320:50
e0neying_zuo: looks like we just need put correct value for 'filters' param and pass it to glanceclient20:50
flwango/20:51
flwangsorry, i was in a meeting20:51
e0neying_zuo: I have not environment by the hand20:51
robcresswelle0ne: I'm not sure its that simple. It looks like we are passing the correct item to glance, but only using the first image by that name20:51
flwange0ne: unfortunatley, we can't get the correct value :)20:51
flwangrobcresswell: exactly20:51
*** gary-smith__ has quit IRC20:51
flwangrobcresswell: and even worse20:52
flwangwe're not sending the correct value to 'glance' but use the local image list already get based on a call /v2/images?limit=100020:52
e0ne:(20:52
flwangit's related to the #1 issue i mentioned in the bug20:52
flwangwe're assume there are less than 1000 images the tenant can see and we assume there is no dup-name images20:53
flwangthat's alright for most of the cases,20:54
flwangbut20:54
flwangthe problem is to get the filter works, we have to make the call to glance and nova async20:54
flwangi don't like it because I"m working on the performance improvement of the instance panel20:54
flwanghence I'd like to raise the bug and get feedback from the team20:54
*** ccamacho has quit IRC20:55
*** gary-smith has quit IRC20:55
robcresswellWhy don't we just pass the name query straight to Glance?20:55
flwangrobcresswell: you can do that, and you still get a list of images20:56
flwangand you still need to chose one, because I don't think the serach_ops of nova list api can support query many image ids?20:56
* david-lyle arrives just in time for the end 20:57
flwangdavid-lyle: we're talking about the one you may interested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/172270420:57
openstackLaunchpad bug 1722704 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Image name filter on instance panel doesn't work" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Feilong Wang (flwang)20:57
robcresswellI think it just takes single IDs yeah.20:57
robcresswellWell, thats problematic. One solution would be to display the image ID on hover or something, and then remove the Image Name filter entirely20:57
robcresswellNova doesnt support filtering by image name, so us working that in sounds awkward.20:58
robcresswellafaik,20:58
rdopierathat would make it hard to copy the id20:58
flwangrobcresswell: that's probably the one I'd like to do, though I know somebody don't like it.20:58
robcresswellrdopiera: Not necessarily. The flavor popup is fine to copy from iirc.20:58
flwanghorizon is good, but we shouldn't do everything to make it perfect20:58
rdopieraah, as long as it's a popup and not a tooltip20:59
flwangmapping the id to name is too heavy work for dash20:59
robcresswellhttps://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/javascript/#popovers20:59
robcresswellOne of those20:59
flwangwe can still keep the image name in the instance detailed page21:00
ying_zuosorry guys. we are at the top of the hour. please continue the discussion on #openstack-horizon or on the ticket.21:00
ying_zuo#endmeeting21:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:00
openstackMeeting ended Wed Oct 11 21:00:31 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2017/horizon.2017-10-11-20.01.html21:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2017/horizon.2017-10-11-20.01.txt21:00
*** rdopiera has left #openstack-meeting-321:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2017/horizon.2017-10-11-20.01.log.html21:00
*** makowals_ has quit IRC21:00
*** rubasov_ has quit IRC21:00
david-lyleflwang, the image API for get looks to take image name as a filter option21:01
david-lylehttps://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/image/v2/#show-images21:02
david-lyleare we just not passing in the name value?21:02
flwangdavid-lyle: yep, but you still get a list, not only one21:02
flwangdavid-lyle: let's back to horizon channel21:02
david-lyleyup21:02
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-321:04
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC21:05
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-321:07
*** shuyingya has quit IRC21:09
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC21:09
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-321:13
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:16
*** VW has quit IRC21:19
*** VW_ has quit IRC21:20
*** slaweq has quit IRC21:20
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-321:22
*** slaweq has quit IRC21:27
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting-321:30
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:31
*** ppiela has joined #openstack-meeting-321:51
*** ppiela has left #openstack-meeting-321:51
*** lpetrut_ has quit IRC22:09
*** lyan has quit IRC22:10
*** baoli has quit IRC22:11
*** bobh has quit IRC22:11
*** Patifa has quit IRC22:17
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:29
*** shuyingya has joined #openstack-meeting-322:43
*** shuyingya has quit IRC22:47
*** kbyrne has quit IRC22:48
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting-322:50
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting-323:03
*** hongbin has quit IRC23:11
*** ttx has quit IRC23:20
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting-323:21
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-323:28
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-323:40
*** VW has quit IRC23:41

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!