Thursday, 2020-06-11

*** cheng1 has quit IRC00:05
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-300:06
*** hongbin has quit IRC00:16
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-300:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-301:00
*** cheng1 has quit IRC01:03
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-301:04
*** hongbin has quit IRC01:42
*** cheng1 has quit IRC02:02
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-302:02
*** cheng1 has quit IRC02:21
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-302:22
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-302:39
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-302:43
*** cheng1 has quit IRC03:26
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-303:30
*** cheng1 has quit IRC04:18
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-304:18
*** hongbin has quit IRC04:33
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting-304:50
*** links has quit IRC05:12
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting-305:21
*** cheng1 has quit IRC05:31
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-305:36
*** cheng1 has quit IRC05:55
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-305:57
*** dustinc has quit IRC06:35
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-306:38
*** cheng1 has quit IRC06:59
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-306:59
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-307:21
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:06
*** slaweq has quit IRC08:15
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-308:20
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-308:20
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-308:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:26
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-308:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:42
*** njohnston|pto has quit IRC08:52
*** slaweq has quit IRC09:19
*** e0ne_ has joined #openstack-meeting-309:20
*** e0ne has quit IRC09:20
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-309:28
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC09:28
*** cheng1 has quit IRC09:31
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-309:34
*** cheng1 has quit IRC09:52
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-309:55
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-309:57
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-309:59
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:01
*** slaweq has quit IRC10:20
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-310:32
*** jraju__ has joined #openstack-meeting-310:35
*** cheng1 has quit IRC10:35
*** links has quit IRC10:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:38
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-310:40
*** ricolin has quit IRC10:47
*** purplerbot has joined #openstack-meeting-310:58
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-311:24
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-311:35
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:55
*** cheng1 has quit IRC11:59
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-312:00
*** slaweq has quit IRC12:13
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-312:28
*** gmann has quit IRC12:33
*** gmann has joined #openstack-meeting-312:33
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:33
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-312:34
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-312:43
*** slaweq has quit IRC12:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:49
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-312:50
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-313:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:42
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-meeting-313:50
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-313:51
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-314:00
jeremyfreudberg#startmeeting sahara14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 11 14:00:21 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jeremyfreudberg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'sahara'14:00
jeremyfreudbergo/14:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-314:00
toskyo/14:00
tosky(a bit busy as usual)14:01
jeremyfreudbergno worries14:01
jeremyfreudberg#topic action items14:01
*** openstack changes topic to "action items (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:01
jeremyfreudberg(trying a new meeting structure)14:02
jeremyfreudbergrespond to stable/train z release reviews https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:train-stable+message:sahara+-message:puppet14:02
toskyI missed those14:03
jeremyfreudbergtosky: do you need anything from me? perhaps a review for native zuulv3 grenade on stable/ussuri?14:05
toskythat one for sure14:05
toskywe also have a pending set of cleanup reviews (dependencies) from other people14:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:05
jeremyfreudbergyeah14:05
jeremyfreudbergokay, that's really it from me for today14:07
jeremyfreudbergalright, let's close14:12
jeremyfreudbergthanks all14:12
jeremyfreudberg#endmeeting14:12
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"14:12
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 11 14:12:53 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:12
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2020/sahara.2020-06-11-14.00.html14:12
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2020/sahara.2020-06-11-14.00.txt14:12
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2020/sahara.2020-06-11-14.00.log.html14:12
*** jeremyfreudberg has left #openstack-meeting-314:13
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-314:15
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-314:43
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:48
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-314:52
*** jraju__ has quit IRC14:57
*** slaweq has quit IRC15:20
*** e0ne has quit IRC15:48
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-315:49
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-315:54
*** elod has joined #openstack-meeting-315:55
*** markvoelker has quit IRC15:56
*** belmoreira has quit IRC15:57
gibi#startmeeting nova16:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 11 16:00:05 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'16:00
gibio/16:00
artomo/16:00
dansmitho/16:00
bauzas\o16:01
*** sean-k-mooney has joined #openstack-meeting-316:01
gmanno/16:01
sean-k-mooneyo/16:02
gibilets get started16:02
gibi#topic Bugs (stuck/critical)16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (stuck/critical) (Meeting topic: nova)"16:02
gibino critical bug16:02
gibi#link 22 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting): https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New16:02
gibiat some point we reached 16 new untriaged during last week16:02
gibiso that +2 is a bit misleading16:03
gibi:)16:03
gibianyhow bugtriage is always appreciated16:03
gibiany bug we need to mention here?16:03
gibi#topic Runways16:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Runways (Meeting topic: nova)"16:04
gibiwelcome to our new resident meeting topic16:04
gibiRunway etherpad is up for Victoria #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-runways-victoria16:04
gibiwe have 3 open runway slots16:05
gibiThere is one item in the queue: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/use-pcpu-and-vcpu-in-one-instance+status:open16:05
dansmithso, I would like my glance store thing to be in the queue,16:05
dansmithbut I'm still working on the devstack test,16:05
dansmithand it turns out that the glance support for testing this in devstack requires work16:05
dansmithI've tested it locally a lot, but I'm working with them to get their stuff fixed so we can run that config16:06
gmanndansmith: for file store it was done16:06
dansmithgmann: I dunno what that means16:06
gibidansmith: if you feel that the non-tempest patches are ready then we can take those in to the queue16:06
gmanndansmith: this one cover some flag - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/689104/16:07
sean-k-mooneygmann: it can create multiple files stores but the image import workflow does not work.16:07
gmannwe have not added test yet i think.16:07
dansmithgibi: yeah the nova patches are ready, IMHO16:07
dansmithgmann: yeah that's not really related to what I'm doing16:07
dansmithgibi: starts here: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/731550/216:08
dansmithit's really just two real patches in nova,16:08
gibidansmith: cool. lets queue them. Will you have time in the next two weeks to iterate on those patches if there is review?16:08
dansmiththen a doc patch I'm waiting for some input/help with, but that could go later at another time and then the devstack test at the end once I get it working16:08
dansmithgibi: I'm out tomorrow but next week yes16:09
gibiI think that works16:09
artomAll of RH is out tomorrow, FWIW16:10
dansmithuep16:10
bauzasalready said to our Great Leader ;)16:10
gibiare there other willing to review the dansmith patches if I put then in a runway slot?16:10
gibis/other/others/16:10
bauzasI could16:11
gibicool16:11
bauzas=> next week tho16:11
gibiack16:11
bauzasIIUC, that's the spec we merged last release ?16:11
gibistephenfin also confirmed that the hi will have time to iterate on the patches in use-pcpu-and-vcpu-in-one-instance next week16:11
dansmithglance does not test the configuration we need at all,16:11
dansmithso this will also increase coverage in that area if I can get the test working16:12
dansmithbauzas: no, merged this release16:12
bauzasokay, will get the context16:12
gibiso use-pcpu-and-vcpu-in-one-instance could go in a runway slot to if there are people willing to review16:13
gibito be precise the first 7ish patch of that series are ready for a slot16:13
gibiif nobody jumps on this then I will look at it next week16:14
gibi#action gibi to put the glance multistore patches to runway slot16:14
artomWe should probably update the topic in the main channel with the correct runways link16:15
artomIt's still saying ussuri16:15
gibi#action gibi to put use-pcpu-and-vcpu-in-one-instance to a runway slot16:15
gibiartom: good point16:15
gibiI'm wondering If the bot would op me to change the topic16:15
bauzasyou need +o16:16
gibianyhow I will check it after the meeting16:16
gibi#action gibi to make sure that the #openstack-nova channel topic is up to date16:16
gibiany other runway related thing to discuss?16:17
dansmithgibi: I put it in the queue with linkes,16:17
dansmithso you can move that to queue if/when ready16:17
gibidansmith: thanks!16:17
gibi#topic Release Planning16:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Release Planning (Meeting topic: nova)"16:18
gibiVictoria Milestone 1 is next week.16:18
gibiWe have ~5 open specs #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open16:18
gibiDo we want / need a spec review day next week?16:18
artomThat's a *massive* drop16:19
artomI'm trying to remember if we (RH) have anything outstanding we want to propose16:19
artomBut - brainstorming here - we could try using some of that bandwidth that's theoretically freed to work on bugs/tech debt16:20
gibiartom: no rush, we did not do spec freeze until M216:20
gibiI mean we will not do spec freeze16:20
gibiuntil M216:20
dansmithwe've already merged some specs,16:20
gibiartom: also we have a list of already approved bp16:20
dansmiththose are just the open ones right?16:21
gibidansmith: yes those are just the open ones16:21
artomFair - no point in rushing anything16:21
gibihere are the approved bps https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/victoria16:21
dansmithdidn't we only merge like 15 specs of work last cycle or something? I think we're probably fine :)16:21
gibidansmith: we merged 20 out of 30 approved bps16:21
gibibut some was specless16:22
dansmithyeah I meant specs16:22
dansmithbut anyway, we're not far off in terms of approved-to-merged for where we are in the cycle16:22
gibiyeah, we don't need lot more work to fill our bw16:23
gibianyhow based on the reactions I don't see the need for a spec review day next week16:23
bauzasanyone can review16:24
gibisure, anyone anytime :)16:24
gibiany other thing to discuss about the V release?16:25
gibi#topic Stable Branches16:26
*** openstack changes topic to "Stable Branches (Meeting topic: nova)"16:26
gibiThere is a stable/train release proposed https://review.opendev.org/#/c/73495216:26
gibiIs there anything we should wait for before release the next train point release?16:26
bauzashaven't seen the stable/train branch for a while16:27
bauzasdo we need to review some changes ?16:27
gibithere are some open patches but also there is good content in the proposed stable/train release so I'm OK to pull the trigger on it16:27
gibiif you have anything important that is open in stable/train then tell me and we can wait for it to land16:28
elodthere are 2 bugfix close to +W, but maybe we don't need to wait for them16:28
gibiI don't see any objection and we can always release another stable/train. so I will +1 the release patch after the meeting16:29
elod+116:29
gibiany other stable branch related topic we need to talk about?16:29
elodi don't see such16:30
gibi#topic Sub/related team Highlights16:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Sub/related team Highlights (Meeting topic: nova)"16:31
gibiAPI (gmann)16:31
gmannnothing much to share today.  i need to update healthcheck things as per what we discussed in PTG. i think i will  next week16:31
gibicool thanks16:32
gibiLibvirt (bauzas)16:32
gmannand policy side, we have oslo spec to list all we need to do on oslo side16:32
bauzas#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-libvirt-subteam16:32
bauzasnothing this week to relatez16:32
bauzasrelate*16:32
gibi#topic Stuck Reviews16:33
*** openstack changes topic to "Stuck Reviews (Meeting topic: nova)"16:33
gibinothing on the agenda16:33
gibidoes anybody has anything to raise?16:33
gibi#topic Open discussion16:34
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"16:34
gibi(bauzas): Seeking approval for specless bp #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/offline-reshape-tool16:34
bauzashonestly, I'm torn16:34
bauzaswe discussed it at the PTG16:34
dansmithseriously?16:34
bauzasand I think we have a direction16:34
bauzasbut do we need a spec ?16:35
bauzaswe already have https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/stein/approved/reshape-provider-tree.html#offline-upgrade-script16:35
dansmithwe did, but surely seems like a spec is warranted just to codify what we discussed and briefly noted in an etherpad into a coherent plan for posterity to me16:35
dansmithmaybe it's just me16:35
bauzasthe concern from sean-k-mooney was about compute nodes not being able to call the DB because of some network16:35
artomHow we're going to do that with the virt-driver offline makes no sense to me, so I'd like to read a spec :)16:35
sean-k-mooneybauzas: actully i was concerned that we would require db acess for the tool to work when exectued16:36
bauzasso we would have to explain how to use the (possible) two clients16:36
dansmithsean-k-mooney: we would have to, AFAIK16:36
gibibauzas: let's have a spec, and you can copy as many thing from reshape-provider-tree.html#offline-upgrade-script as you can reuse16:36
bauzascool, will do as it's a consensus16:37
bauzasthanks16:37
sean-k-mooneydansmith: well i mean copleing it so it required vs spliting into two commands16:37
dansmithcoupling?16:37
sean-k-mooneydansmith: e.g. one command ran on the compute to figure out what to reshape and a second run with db access using the outpu of the first16:38
dansmithmeaning break the "gather data" from the "apply changes" piece like we discussed for the cross-project case I guess? yeah16:38
dansmithack16:38
gibinext point (we have couple of bps on the agenda)16:38
dansmithsounds like spec material indeed :)16:38
gibiSeeking approval for specless bp #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-rebuild-and-evacuate16:38
gibiit already has the code proposed16:38
gibi#link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715326/16:38
dansmithI assume this is just feature fleshing-outing, and that there's nothing major that needs to change because of cyborg?16:39
dansmithif so, then I'm okay with that being specless since it should be straightforwardf16:39
gibiI have the same assumption, and I agree to approve it as specless16:39
sean-k-mooneythe rebuild and evecauate is the patch i did at the end of the cycle, so it change the rpc to pass the arq uuids but that about it16:39
sean-k-mooneythe rest is pretty simple16:40
dansmithack16:40
gibiI don't see any objection16:40
gibi#action gibi to approve https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-rebuild-and-evacuate16:40
sean-k-mooneythe other operations shelve,suspend and resize are similer in scope and will be propsoed sepereatly16:40
gibinext16:40
gibiSeeking approval for specless bp #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-shelve-and-unshelve16:40
dansmithack16:41
gibithere are WIP patches up16:41
gibiany objection?16:41
dansmithnot from me16:41
sean-k-mooneyya the summary is at shelve offload, delete arqs and release the device, on unshelve claim it again via new arqs like fresh spawn16:42
dansmithoh, hmm16:42
dansmithdidn't think about that16:42
sean-k-mooneythe rest of shelve already works16:42
dansmithif it roughly follows the same as spawn though then probably okay16:42
sean-k-mooneyya it just does not pass the request to placemnet or claim the device on unshelve today16:43
dansmithokay well, I'll have to look at the code,16:43
gibiOK, don't see any objection to approve the bp16:43
dansmithand may change my mind if it looks too hairy, but okay for the moment to be specless16:43
gibiwe can continue the discussion in the code review16:43
gibicool16:44
gibinext16:44
gibi(gibi): I will be on PTO between 27th of July and 3rd of August (and between Aug 10 - 24). 30th of July is Milestone 2 and spec freeze, so I would need a stand-in handling the freeze during that week.16:44
dansmithcan we wait until closer to that time to find a volunteer?16:44
dansmithplans are kinda up in the air for a lot of people right now16:45
gibisure, I wanted to give a heads up16:45
* dansmith nods16:45
gibicool16:45
gibinext16:45
gibi(stephenfin): Can we make the 'cherry-picked from' line in backports preferred instead of mandatory? They're definitely nice to have, but they incur pain for larger backports consisting of multiple patches per branch (change one patch higher up and you invalid all lower backports). Maybe use Gerrit's model (add -x for first backport since it's landed and ignore for anything older)16:45
dansmithcripes too many things16:45
gibisome discussion about it on IRC: #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2020-06-10.log.html#t2020-06-10T15:02:1816:45
dansmithassuming that irc link includes my -1 vote16:45
gibidansmith: it does16:45
artomYeah, -1 from me too16:46
artomYeah, they're a pain, but it keeps things patient and organized16:46
dansmithagree16:46
gibiI also does not feel the pain for using git cherry-pick -x but I do follow the backport to N-1 when it merged to N policy16:46
*** cheng1 has quit IRC16:47
bauzasI don't see the problem we'd like to resolve ?16:47
dansmithwhich this helps reinforce16:47
artombauzas, stephenfin's in a rush ;)16:47
dansmithyeah basically that :)16:47
sean-k-mooneygibi: ya the fact i dont do that is normally why my urls are wrong sometimes16:47
sean-k-mooneyi normally do all the backports up front and then have to fix it16:47
bauzasI mean, I can type 2 letters more than usual16:48
dansmithmaybe we could have a fast8 check that verifies the hashes?16:48
*** ricolin has quit IRC16:48
bauzasand sha1s are nice when you just git log16:48
bauzasand not use the Gerrit API16:48
dansmithbauzas: the concern is that stephenfin wants to backport everything to N releases as soon as the master one merges, but might have to fix things later and doesn't want to have to change the hashes16:48
gmanntrue, history check are more easy16:48
dansmithbauzas: and my thoughts are that having to correct the hashes keeps things from going too quickly and out of order16:49
bauzasdansmith: well, I don't see how you can't do it by once16:49
dansmithand makes the lineage discoverable at the command line16:49
bauzasif you got merge conflicts on the first backport16:49
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-316:49
bauzasyou basically need to resolve your conflicts on the first stable branch before you can proceed to the next ones16:49
dansmithbauzas: you're preaching to the choir :)16:49
gibihm, a precommit check that verifies that the hash is part of the newer branch could work but we have stable only patches so it would need some intelligence16:50
bauzashonestly I think we're bikeshedding16:50
dansmithgibi: you wouldn't have the cherry-picked-from line in those16:50
dansmithso it would be fine16:50
bauzasbut in the absence of stephenfin, I'd propose to revisit it next week16:50
gibidansmith: true16:50
stephenfinI'm here16:50
gibistephenfin: o/16:50
bauzasmaybe I misunderstood the concern16:50
gibidansmith: except when you backport a stable only to stable-116:51
bauzasstephenfin: cool, then explain me how you can backport at once, unless you hope getting no conflicts ?16:51
gibidansmith: but then the hash should be valid16:51
dansmithgibi: right :)16:51
stephenfinBut I said what I wanted yesterday. Left it on the agenda to see if opinions from people in addition to dansmith. Sounds like there's a consensus to keep them. I tried :)16:51
dansmithgibi: and I think all we need to do is check that the hashes are valid, not that they're on the next branch or anything like that16:51
bauzasoh, I think he's referring to a merge patch that has a different SHA116:51
bauzasso you need to wait for the patch to merge in order to be sure you won't get another sha116:52
stephenfinnigs doing the pep8 check16:52
artom... "nigs" o_O16:52
* dansmith googles "irish slang nigs"16:52
stephenfinnot in goals16:52
bauzasbut honestly, sha1s in git commits are good16:52
stephenfinheh, sorry16:52
artomWith the BLM stuff going on, I was worried for a second16:52
* dansmith stands back16:52
bauzasloosing this information would require us to turn into Gerrit in order to get this information16:53
dansmithexactly my concern16:53
stephenfinbauzas: 'git log --grep=$CHANGE_ID'16:53
dansmithI don't want to have to go to gerrit to find lineage16:53
sean-k-mooneystephenfin: i always uses "nigs" more like "not it" like the opisite of "dibs"16:53
dansmithsearching by change-id gets relations but not ordering and not necessarily the same thing16:53
bauzasstephenfin: not if the master patch is on another branch, right?16:54
stephenfinsean-k-mooney: that was the context I was using it (not doing the hacking check)16:54
dansmithstephenfin: so that people won't notice when you don't update them? :)16:54
stephenfin...16:54
dansmithmmhmm :)16:54
stephenfinand now I've made sure my commit IDs will always be correct16:54
bauzasalso, double-checking but I think the -x rule comes from the Stable team, and not use16:55
bauzasus*16:55
gibiOK I think we are done with the topics on the agenda16:55
dansmithit does16:55
gibianything else to mention before we run out of time?16:55
dansmithnot from me16:55
stephenfinnarp16:55
* dansmith googles "irish slang narp"16:55
stephenfinother than /me is off tomorrow16:55
dansmith(kidding)16:55
* bauzas can't go to the shop for getting a new keg so meh16:56
gibiI will feel alone tomorrow I guess16:56
dansmiths/alone/productive/16:56
bauzasgibi: write a joking bot16:56
stephenfindansmith: I really hope you are kidding https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir1sVy9JLyo16:56
gibiOK, lets close this.16:56
dansmithstephenfin: honest16:56
gibithanks for joining16:57
stephenfinwell worth a watch so ^16:57
gibi#endmeeting16:57
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"16:57
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 11 16:57:20 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:57
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-06-11-16.00.html16:57
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-06-11-16.00.txt16:57
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-06-11-16.00.log.html16:57
*** elod has left #openstack-meeting-317:14
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-317:23
*** artom has quit IRC17:26
*** artom has joined #openstack-meeting-317:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:28
*** sean-k-mooney has left #openstack-meeting-317:34
*** cheng1 has quit IRC17:59
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-318:00
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC19:15
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-319:49
*** cheng1 has quit IRC20:22
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-320:22
*** slaweq has quit IRC20:26
*** artom has quit IRC21:13
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-321:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:32
*** cheng1 has quit IRC21:37
*** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-321:39
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-321:49
*** markvoelker has quit IRC21:54
*** dustinc has joined #openstack-meeting-321:55
*** artom has joined #openstack-meeting-322:13
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-322:49
*** markvoelker has quit IRC22:54
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-323:03
*** yamamoto has quit IRC23:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!