Tuesday, 2015-06-09

*** blahRus has quit IRC00:02
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-400:04
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:05
*** dims has quit IRC00:08
*** igordcard has quit IRC00:12
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-400:14
*** puranamr has quit IRC00:25
*** saneax has quit IRC00:28
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-400:29
*** jckasper has quit IRC00:32
*** sdake_ has quit IRC00:32
*** fnaval has quit IRC00:33
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:39
*** Swami has quit IRC00:39
*** sdake has quit IRC00:42
*** bharath has quit IRC00:43
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-400:43
*** IlyaG has quit IRC00:48
*** chuckC_ has quit IRC00:49
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom00:53
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa01:06
*** sarob has quit IRC01:14
*** zehicle_IRL has joined #openstack-meeting-401:19
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC01:19
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2401:20
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-401:22
*** asselin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-401:25
*** banix has quit IRC01:37
*** s3wong has quit IRC01:40
*** dims_ has quit IRC01:43
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-401:52
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-401:58
*** xingchao has quit IRC01:58
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-402:00
*** sdake_ has quit IRC02:01
*** tony_v has quit IRC02:02
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz02:05
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-402:06
*** sarob has quit IRC02:11
*** eghobo has quit IRC02:14
*** Hunner has quit IRC02:16
*** bradjones has quit IRC02:17
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-402:18
*** bradjones has quit IRC02:18
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-402:18
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-402:19
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC02:19
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom02:20
*** Hunner has joined #openstack-meeting-402:20
*** yamahata has quit IRC02:21
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-402:24
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-402:27
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC02:31
*** amotoki has quit IRC02:31
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-402:38
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-402:40
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC02:40
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz02:42
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-402:43
*** dims has quit IRC02:50
*** tonyv has quit IRC02:51
*** ajayaa has joined #openstack-meeting-402:54
*** KunalGan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-402:57
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC02:58
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-402:59
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-403:04
*** markvoelker has quit IRC03:04
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-403:05
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:05
*** briancurtin has quit IRC03:06
*** zhiyan has quit IRC03:06
*** serverascode has quit IRC03:06
*** xgerman has quit IRC03:07
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC03:09
*** sdake has quit IRC03:31
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-403:32
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-403:32
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom03:33
*** sdake has quit IRC03:34
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:35
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC03:36
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC03:39
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC03:40
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa03:40
*** bharath has joined #openstack-meeting-403:44
*** KunalGan_ has quit IRC03:47
*** Nisha has joined #openstack-meeting-403:48
*** bharath has quit IRC03:49
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-403:49
*** Nisha has quit IRC03:50
*** Nisha has joined #openstack-meeting-403:50
*** Nisha_away has joined #openstack-meeting-403:52
*** Nisha has quit IRC03:53
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting-403:53
*** fnaval has quit IRC03:58
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-403:58
*** jckasper has quit IRC04:09
*** saneax has joined #openstack-meeting-404:12
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-404:13
*** ajayaa has quit IRC04:15
*** eghobo has quit IRC04:16
*** watanabe_isao has joined #openstack-meeting-404:21
*** yfried has quit IRC04:27
*** banix has quit IRC04:37
*** aswadr has joined #openstack-meeting-404:40
*** Nisha_away has quit IRC04:43
*** puranamr has quit IRC04:43
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-404:45
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC04:45
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz04:46
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-404:47
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-404:48
*** Nisha has joined #openstack-meeting-404:49
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-404:49
*** zehicle_IRL has quit IRC04:50
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-404:51
*** dims has quit IRC04:51
*** markvoelker has quit IRC04:53
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-404:58
*** zehicle_IRL has joined #openstack-meeting-405:03
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-405:05
*** tobe has quit IRC05:05
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-405:09
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC05:20
*** eghobo has quit IRC05:21
*** eghobo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-405:21
*** numan has joined #openstack-meeting-405:25
*** yfried has joined #openstack-meeting-405:27
*** sarob has quit IRC05:30
*** eghobo_ has quit IRC05:32
*** yamahata has quit IRC05:32
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-405:36
*** saneax has quit IRC05:38
*** eghobo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-405:39
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-405:39
*** eghobo has quit IRC05:42
*** armax has quit IRC05:45
*** watanabe_isao has quit IRC05:51
*** saneax has joined #openstack-meeting-405:52
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-405:57
*** yfried has left #openstack-meeting-406:00
*** Nisha has left #openstack-meeting-406:04
*** wojdev has quit IRC06:05
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-406:06
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC06:10
*** sdake has quit IRC06:16
*** eghobo_ has quit IRC06:19
*** dougwig has quit IRC06:33
*** sweston has quit IRC06:34
*** serverascode has joined #openstack-meeting-406:37
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-406:45
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting-406:46
*** masteinhauser has quit IRC06:53
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-407:00
*** xgerman has joined #openstack-meeting-407:03
*** masteinhauser has joined #openstack-meeting-407:08
*** masteinhauser is now known as Guest826107:08
*** briancurtin has joined #openstack-meeting-407:09
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-407:17
*** Slower has quit IRC07:20
*** Slower has joined #openstack-meeting-407:20
*** paramite has joined #openstack-meeting-407:22
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-407:29
*** irenab has quit IRC07:31
*** dougwig has joined #openstack-meeting-407:34
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting-407:37
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-407:37
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-407:39
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-407:42
*** sdake has quit IRC07:43
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:43
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-407:44
*** sdake_ has quit IRC07:47
*** wojdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-407:52
*** wojdev has quit IRC07:54
*** wojdev_ is now known as wojdev07:54
*** paramite is now known as paramite|afk08:20
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-408:22
*** sdake has quit IRC08:25
*** paramite|afk is now known as paramite08:29
*** sdake_ has quit IRC08:34
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-408:36
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-408:39
*** sdake_ has quit IRC08:41
*** sdake has quit IRC08:42
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-409:05
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC09:09
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-409:14
*** wojdev has quit IRC09:17
*** izadorozhna_ has joined #openstack-meeting-409:18
*** izadorozhna_ has quit IRC09:25
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-409:26
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-409:27
*** jyuso1 has joined #openstack-meeting-409:28
*** jyuso1 has left #openstack-meeting-409:28
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:32
*** rods has joined #openstack-meeting-409:34
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-409:48
*** dims has quit IRC09:54
*** wojdev has quit IRC09:57
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-410:07
*** matrohon has quit IRC10:08
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-410:09
*** wojdev has quit IRC10:24
*** tobe has quit IRC10:32
*** gchamoul is now known as gchamoul|aFk10:33
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-410:33
*** tobe has quit IRC10:47
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-410:49
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC10:53
*** tobe has quit IRC10:53
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-410:54
*** ajayaa has joined #openstack-meeting-411:01
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting-411:04
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC11:05
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting-411:08
*** spredzy is now known as spredzy|afk11:09
*** wznoinsk_ has joined #openstack-meeting-411:25
*** wznoinsk_ has quit IRC11:25
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-411:29
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:34
*** aswadr has quit IRC11:41
*** aswadr has joined #openstack-meeting-411:43
*** gchamoul|aFk is now known as gchamoul11:45
*** Guest8261 is now known as masteinhauser11:53
*** rods has quit IRC11:54
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-411:57
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-412:11
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting-412:12
*** xingchao has quit IRC12:16
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-412:21
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-412:22
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-412:24
*** saneax has quit IRC12:27
*** xingchao has quit IRC12:39
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-412:39
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2412:41
*** bknudson has quit IRC12:41
*** wznoinsk has quit IRC12:44
*** VW has quit IRC12:52
*** klamath has joined #openstack-meeting-413:07
*** spredzy|afk is now known as spredzy13:14
*** rods1 has joined #openstack-meeting-413:14
*** zehicle_IRL has quit IRC13:16
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-413:17
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-413:23
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-413:30
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting-413:34
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-413:36
*** wojdev has quit IRC13:37
*** rods2 has joined #openstack-meeting-413:38
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting-413:38
*** rods1 has quit IRC13:39
*** fnaval has quit IRC13:41
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-413:41
*** wojdev has quit IRC13:52
*** jckasper has quit IRC13:53
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-413:53
*** singleth_ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:54
*** sdake has quit IRC13:56
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting-413:57
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-413:57
*** wojdev has quit IRC13:58
*** singlethink has quit IRC13:58
*** GB21 is now known as GB21-afk14:01
*** aventerav has joined #openstack-meeting-414:03
*** Bjoern__ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:07
*** Bjoern__ is now known as BjoernT14:09
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner14:10
*** asrangne has joined #openstack-meeting-414:13
*** gchamoul is now known as gchamoul|BRB14:13
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:16
*** aswadr has quit IRC14:16
*** jckasper has quit IRC14:17
*** aventera_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:20
*** aventerav has quit IRC14:23
*** aventera_ has quit IRC14:24
*** aventerav has joined #openstack-meeting-414:25
*** nkrinner has quit IRC14:37
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-414:37
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC14:44
*** gchamoul|BRB is now known as gchamoul14:46
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:51
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-414:51
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:52
*** kbyrne has quit IRC14:54
*** dhruvdhody has joined #openstack-meeting-414:56
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-414:57
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:58
EmilienM#startmeeting puppet-openstack15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun  9 15:00:57 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is EmilienM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'puppet_openstack'15:01
EmilienMhello, how is here today?15:01
EmilienMwho is here, err15:01
crinkleo/15:01
spredzyhey15:01
claytonhere15:01
richmhere15:02
EmilienM#topic review past actions15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "review past actions (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:02
EmilienMspredzy submit a review in openstack-infra to integration the cookiecutter templates15:02
EmilienMdone: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188929/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189216/15:02
EmilienMspredzy, clayton create a POC and send an email to the ML about parameter default policy15:02
spredzywell second link is about msync15:03
EmilienMspredzy: it comes together :-)15:03
spredzyEmilienM, we haven't talk about it this week, need to postpone to next week15:03
EmilienMoh ok15:03
EmilienMclayton to investigate virtualenv support and possibly create a blueprint15:03
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-415:04
claytonI won't be able to work on that until after we finish our kilo upgrades, probably a week or two15:04
EmilienMok15:04
EmilienMclayton to help fix auth_uri issues in providers15:04
EmilienMclayton: I've seen a patch, I think it's WIP, right?15:04
claytonI think you've seen this one, I put up a review, but there is another one already15:04
mgagneo/15:04
claytonI'll likely end up abandoning mine15:04
EmilienM#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186863/15:04
EmilienMcrinkle to propose review abandonment policy15:05
EmilienMwe have an agenda topic, ^15:05
EmilienMand spredzy to request feedback on db_sync type on ml15:05
EmilienMsame, agenda topic ^15:05
EmilienMso let's start15:05
EmilienM#topic CI status15:05
*** openstack changes topic to "CI status (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:05
EmilienM#link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1i2z5QyvukHCWU_JjkWrTpn-PexPBnt3bWPlQfiDGsj8/edit#gid=015:05
EmilienMbeaker is in pretty good shape, we have coverage for most important modules15:05
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-415:05
*** GB21-afk is now known as GB2115:06
EmilienMthanks crinkle and sbadia for your help15:06
EmilienMpuppet4 now: sbadia, cody?15:06
*** mdorman has joined #openstack-meeting-415:06
*** sdake has quit IRC15:06
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-415:06
EmilienMcody has a patch WIP for neutron15:06
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC15:06
crinkle_ody usually has conflicts with this meeting15:07
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-415:07
EmilienMok np, I'll catch-up with him15:07
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom15:07
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-415:07
EmilienMand I talk on  behalf of sbadia (afk), he's doing swift atm15:07
EmilienManything else on CI ?15:07
EmilienM#action cody to finish neutron patch15:07
EmilienM#action sbadia to patch swift module for puppet415:07
EmilienM#topic Fix released bugs15:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Fix released bugs (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:08
EmilienMcrinkle: o/15:08
crinklemfedosin: ^15:08
crinklemfisch:15:08
crinklesorry15:08
mgagnehas a new version been released/tagged?15:08
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-415:08
EmilienMmgagne: not yet15:09
crinklenot yet15:09
EmilienMok, mfisch is not here I think let's catch-up later in the release topic15:09
crinklemfisch: might be in standup, could move this to later in the meeting15:09
EmilienM#topic Decision about Abandoned reviews policy15:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Decision about Abandoned reviews policy (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:09
EmilienMcrinkle: o/15:09
EmilienMsounds like mailing list was useful15:10
crinkleokay, so we started discussing it on the mailing list but i'm not sure we really got anywhere15:10
crinklelots of different opinions15:10
*** _ody has joined #openstack-meeting-415:10
mgagnetrue15:10
_odyo/15:10
crinkleo/15:10
mgagneis there a common ground?15:10
mgagneshould we use the abandon change or not? (auto or manual)15:10
crinklemy preference is to abandon as infrequently as possible15:11
crinklemany other opinions shared were pro-abandonment15:11
EmilienMI understand big projects have auto-abandon, but do we need that?15:11
crinklei don't think we have nearly enough traffic for that15:12
EmilienMcrinkle: though we have some very old patches sometimes. Do we really care?15:12
richmprobably best to be consistent with other openstack projects15:12
*** markvoelker has quit IRC15:12
crinklethere isn't an openstack-wide policy15:12
EmilienMrichm: first we would need to check if they all apply this policy.15:12
crinkleso there's nothing t obe consistent with15:12
EmilienMcrinkle: good to know15:12
mgagneshould this one be abandoned? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93990/15:12
mgagneUpdated May 17, 2014 10:58 AM15:12
EmilienMI don't think so15:13
crinkleit has no -1 or -215:13
crinkleit should be reviewed15:13
EmilienMand rechecked against CI.15:13
crinkleoh but for puppet-openstack15:13
mgagnewe deprecated puppet-openstack a long time ago15:13
EmilienMand rebase15:13
EmilienMoh true15:13
EmilienMso yeah15:13
mgagneIMO we shouldn't have any change older than a month or 2. Our policy should derivate from that requirement15:14
EmilienMI'm also in favor of this, but it might be too strict for our community.15:14
mgagne1-2 months without update15:15
EmilienMsome patches are not landed just because nobody reviewed them15:15
mgagnecould be a comment to poke the original author15:15
crinklemy concern is that it is hard for someone who is not core and not the author to restore an abandoned change, so we could lose work that might otherwise be valuable or someone could accidentally repeat someone else's work15:15
EmilienMif the patch does not pass CI or has negative reviews, I'm in favor of abandon it15:15
mgagnewhy can't anyone un-abandon a change?15:16
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC15:16
crinklemgagne: gerrit acls don't let them15:16
EmilienMit's a policy in gerrit15:16
mgagnecrinkle: why not?15:16
EmilienMcrinkle: we could patch that.15:16
mgagnecrinkle: it's just an acl15:16
HunnerThis is why I think a human should be involved; we don't want them abandoned because it was never reviewed15:16
mgagnecrinkle: if there is an ack for a reason, I would like to know about it15:17
crinklemgagne: as fungi explained to me it's because it's attached to the same thing that lets them abandon other people's changes15:17
EmilienMthis topic was about to take a decision, I feel like we need more discussion each others and the mailing list would be useful to save our meeting15:17
mgagnecrinkle: oh, that makes sense then15:17
HunnerAutoclose for not-passing or negative-reviews may be fine though15:17
crinkleHunner: but sometimes there's something with a -1 that's just nearly good enough, but the author moves on15:18
EmilienMcrinkle: indeed, that would be against our review policy15:18
fungiright, the acl permission in gerrit for abandon and restore are the same setting15:18
Hunnercrinkle: At PL we still close those; we just don't have the bandwidth to deal with "nearly good enough" as much as I would like to :(15:18
EmilienMcrinkle: well, the author can also ask us to restore it...15:18
fungiit's specifically because of the fact that it grants abandon control that we limit it to the change owner and core reviewers of the repo15:18
crinkleEmilienM: that's true but if it's a weekend or they're new and don't know that's available then it's hard15:19
*** blahRus has joined #openstack-meeting-415:19
EmilienMthe question is: do we have the bandwidth to manage old patches ?15:19
fungiin prior versions of gerrit it was limited to the change owner and not configurable, so the fact that we can now allow it for the core reviewers as well is a big improvement in usability15:19
*** dims has quit IRC15:19
EmilienMautomation could really help us15:19
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:19
crinkleEmilienM: i think there are enough of us that we can, and having them around in the queue for a while while we wait for free time doesn't hurt anything15:20
EmilienMfungi: good to know, thx15:20
crinklethank you fungi15:20
fungiyou're welcome!15:20
EmilienMcrinkle: ok. Let's start by your solution #2 and see how it works.15:20
EmilienMcrinkle: if we realize it does not work for us and we need automation, well... #3 with some communication to our community will be chosen15:21
EmilienMwhat do you think?15:21
crinklewfm15:21
_ody+115:21
crinklei can send that to the mailing list15:21
* EmilienM is waiting for mgagne's -1/+115:21
_odyWe all around probably need to be more willing to pick up abandoned changes too and just get them merged.15:22
mgagnesorry, got distracted15:22
mdorman+1 on #2 and see how it goes.15:22
mgagnetbh, I'm fine with the popular opinion15:22
EmilienMok15:22
*** Santosh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:22
EmilienM#action crinkle to close this ML thread and explain our decision15:22
EmilienMcrinkle: anything else about that?15:22
crinklenope15:23
EmilienM#topic releases15:23
*** openstack changes topic to "releases (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:23
*** rhefner has joined #openstack-meeting-415:23
*** belmoreira has quit IRC15:23
EmilienMfirst question: does anyone want to cherry-pick something or are we good now? ( crinkle did a lot of backports lately)15:23
mgagnecrinkle: tyvm for that great work15:24
EmilienMyeah15:24
crinklei skipped a bunch that didn't cherry-pick cleanly15:24
EmilienMcrinkle: btw we broke keystone15:24
EmilienM#link https://review.openstack.org/18974215:24
EmilienMbut out of context15:24
Hunnercrinkle++ for doing that15:24
crinkleEmilienM: :(15:24
EmilienMok, if no more cherry picks, please review the patches from crinkle15:24
EmilienMwhen everything is merged, we will hopefully make a Juno release15:25
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC15:25
EmilienMfor Kilo, we are waiting for keystone v3 only iirc15:25
EmilienMrichm: o/15:25
richmyes15:26
EmilienMcrinkle, richm: do you think it's reasonable to wait until keystone v3 is merged before doing a kilo release?15:27
EmilienMthat means puppet-openstacklib,keystone (and also all provider?)15:27
_odyAre we down to simple review or is what remains able to be split up among more people?15:27
richmkeystone v3 (for all modules) depends on 1) use openstack 2) use auth restructure code15:28
richmthe current patches do 1) and 2) for puppet-keystone only15:28
richmthere is a puppet-glance patch to do 1)15:28
EmilienMrichm: is it required to patch other modules or can it work without the patches for now?15:28
EmilienMwe have a lot of providers afik...15:29
richmit "works" for some value of "works"15:29
crinklei think just openstacklib and keystone is fine15:29
richm"works" == installs with basic defaults15:29
richm"works" != every openstack component can use v3 auth everywhere15:29
EmilienMcrinkle: ok. So it won't break other modules providers, right?15:29
crinkleno15:29
EmilienMrichm: ok15:29
EmilienMlgtm for now15:30
*** sdake has quit IRC15:30
EmilienMfor a first kilo release I mean15:30
EmilienMso if you agree, we wait for keystone/openstacklib patches merged and we release our first Kilo15:30
richmworks for me15:30
EmilienMjust an highlight to people here, this is a huge feature useful for anyone. Reviews and testing are welcome :-)15:31
richmI would also appreciate a review of the bp15:31
EmilienMI consider silence as a yes :)15:31
mdormanso tehse are any keystone v3 related reviews on openstacklib or keystone module, right?  are their multiples, or just one each?15:31
richmI think it is ready15:31
_odyWe need the v3 support just to go production with our OpenStack deployment at PL.15:32
richmopenstacklib - one review15:32
EmilienMmdorman: we have a lot of patches, defined in topics15:32
richmopenstack-specs - one review - bp15:32
richmpuppet-keystone - many, many reviews15:32
EmilienM_ody: everyone does I think :)15:32
mdormankk15:32
richmthe topic for all of these is bp/api-v3-support15:32
EmilienMok let's move on15:32
EmilienManything else richm on v3 ?15:32
richmEmilienM: no15:33
EmilienMrichm: thanks!15:33
EmilienM#ŧopic openstacklib::db::sync proposal and decision15:33
*** sambetts has quit IRC15:33
EmilienMspredzy: o/15:33
spredzySo I'd like simply to open a vote there based on what I said on the ML15:34
spredzyvote doesn't have to take place now, but rather in the ML15:34
EmilienM#ŧopic openstacklib::db::sync15:34
spredzyso we can move forward with that15:34
EmilienMtopic does not change anyway15:34
crinklehmm15:35
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC15:35
EmilienMmgagne: don't you like what spredzy suggests, having the exec in openstacklib itself for consistency?15:35
mgagneEmilienM: I think I explained myself on the ML: it adds little value for the amount of work required15:36
crinklei'm with mgagne, it doesn't provide a lot of value15:36
EmilienMwell, it adds consistency at least15:37
crinklean exec has a consistent interface on its own15:37
EmilienMok15:37
mgagneunless you come up with an actual use case you can't realize with it, then I don't see why15:37
mfischsorry guys I'm here now15:37
spredzypoint is mainly not about the exec, but have a common resource across every module to do one thing15:37
mgagnewhat crinkle said15:37
spredzyI understand mgagne point here15:37
*** ajayaa has quit IRC15:37
spredzybut the idea is that if someone brings on a new module this person knows for the db sync action it will be openstacklib::db::sync, the same way it is for mysql (ie. openstackli::db::mysql)15:38
spredzyfor keystone, rabbitmq, etc...15:38
mgagneand you still have to make the interface consistent across all modules anyway, even if you have a common one and update it, you will still have to update all the modules to benefit from it, it's not magic15:38
spredzyjust giving a common resource that does one thing and only onething acoss every module15:38
*** singleth_ has quit IRC15:38
*** paramite has quit IRC15:39
mgagneisn't called an exec?15:39
spredzymgagne, that is correct, but again this is true for every openstacklib:: component15:39
mgagneno15:39
mgagnedidn't you read my latest answer?15:39
mgagnethere is NO logic in db::sync, it's just rebranding an exec resource15:40
mgagnefor the sake of having common code15:40
spredzyI don't deny that, but it is indeed for the sake of having common code so every module can rely on a meaning full classes name15:41
mgagnewe could argue that openstacklib::service::install would be a great idea too because we are installing stuff with package resource everywhere and have package_ensure too. so lets create openstacklib::service::install($package_name, $package_ensure) then15:41
spredzyagain if most of you thinksits not worth it we can go with #215:41
EmilienMmgagne: +1 with that15:42
spredzyjust moving everythin under CLASS::db::sync for the db_sync15:42
EmilienMok15:42
mgagneyes, that would be a great change15:42
EmilienMspredzy: can you close the thread with the decision and maybe send a patch as reference?15:43
spredzy#action spredzy Send a patch as an implementation reference15:43
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-415:43
spredzy#action Send an email on the ML to let community know the final word on that thread15:43
EmilienMspredzy: thanks!15:43
EmilienMwell, I don't like final :-) but if it works now, let's go like this15:44
EmilienM#topic move git repos under openstack15:44
*** openstack changes topic to "move git repos under openstack (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:44
EmilienMw00t topic changed !!!15:44
EmilienMthe patch in project-config is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176326/15:44
EmilienM#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176326/15:44
mgagneI have to go now, +1 for that change if redirections are put in place15:44
EmilienMand the blueprint https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189388/15:45
EmilienMmgagne: of course it will15:45
mgagnecool, thanks15:45
EmilienM#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189388/15:45
EmilienMplease review  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189388/ before https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176326/15:45
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-415:45
EmilienMwe need to agree on "compliant" modules15:45
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC15:46
EmilienMbasically, the modules we test with beaker or/and tripleo + puppet-tripleo which is part of tripleo itself, so it makes sense to move it too15:46
EmilienMafter all of this, I'll make sure redirections work and also openstack/governance is updated.15:46
EmilienMI'm also working on the blueprint that we discussed during the summit about "what is a compliant module"15:46
EmilienMplease don't hesitate to review these patches on Gerrit, that would be useful to move forward on this15:47
EmilienMany thoughts about that?15:47
crinklethe list looks reasonable to me15:48
*** numan has quit IRC15:48
EmilienMok. Let's move on then. We have mfisch here, let's re-open #Fix released bugs15:48
EmilienM#topic Fix released bugs15:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Fix released bugs (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:48
EmilienMmfisch: o/15:48
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-415:48
mfischhey ok15:48
mfischso the first part is that we have a ton of bugs marked as FC (Fix Committed)15:49
mfischI went through and moved them to FR for a few projects15:49
mfischkeystone, glance, and maybe cinder?15:49
mfischwe might need to crowdsource the rest of that its pretty tedious15:49
mfischI typically mark them to a release15:50
mfischwhich is the 2nd part, we need a new release created in all the projects15:50
mfischnot sure who does that maybe mgagne ?15:50
EmilienMmfisch: he's afk now15:50
mfischI can follow-up on the ML15:51
EmilienMyeah15:51
mfischI also marked invalid or incomplete a bunch of stuff15:51
EmilienMbefore doing liberty target, we might want to release kilo, no?15:51
mfischif we're going to be welcoming to new members we need to watch the bugs15:51
EmilienMmfisch: thanks a lot for that. I'll give a hand on this later this week15:51
*** ajmiller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:51
mfischwell we could add the L target whenever, I just wanted to find out who did it15:51
EmilienMmfisch: it is supposed to be part of our tasks.15:52
*** ajmiller has quit IRC15:52
mfischI'll write up a ML item about all this today15:52
EmilienMmfisch: awesome15:52
crinklethanks for doing that mfisch15:52
*** marcusvrn1 has joined #openstack-meeting-415:52
EmilienMmfisch: maybe in your email you can ask for help to the core group15:52
mfischsome projects went from 30 bugs to 815:52
mfischnice to see15:52
EmilienM\o/15:53
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-415:53
crinkle\o/15:53
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-415:53
*** ajmiller_ is now known as ajmiller15:53
EmilienMI think we are done with the agenda15:53
EmilienM#topic open discussion (no troll please)15:53
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (no troll please) (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:53
EmilienMno troll because it's not Friday15:53
EmilienMbut feel free to share your patches/bugs/thoughts here15:54
EmilienMwe have 7 min left15:54
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC15:54
EmilienMI have one, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189742/ (a backport from crinkle that seems breaking keystone/juno)15:54
mfischwhats the break?15:55
EmilienMmfisch: keystone does not start, it can't find the file. see bug report15:55
EmilienM#link https://launchpad.net/bugs/146335815:55
openstackLaunchpad bug 1463358 in puppet-keystone "default value of paste_config breaks apache+wsgi on Ubuntu" [High,Confirmed]15:55
EmilienMI think it's not only wsgi but all keystone15:56
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC15:56
*** rrickard has joined #openstack-meeting-415:56
dougwigo/15:56
dougwigany gslb folks here today?15:57
crinkleEmilienM: time to end the meeting15:57
dougwigoops, sorry15:57
mfischEmilienM: I'll look at it today15:57
EmilienM#endmeeting15:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:58
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun  9 15:58:00 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:58
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-06-09-15.00.html15:58
EmilienMhave a great day15:58
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-06-09-15.00.txt15:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-06-09-15.00.log.html15:58
dougwigEmilienM: sorry, not awake yet.  :)15:58
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting-415:58
*** Kiall_ is now known as Kiall15:59
*** asselin_ has quit IRC15:59
*** praveens has joined #openstack-meeting-415:59
Kialldougwig: heya16:00
dougwig#startmeeting gslb16:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun  9 16:00:13 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dougwig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: gslb)"16:00
dougwig#chair Kiall16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'gslb'16:00
openstackCurrent chairs: Kiall dougwig16:00
dougwigKiall: hiya16:00
mugsie#link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit?usp=sharing16:00
Kiallmugsie and barclaac should be joining too.. Anyone else about?16:00
mugsieuse case doc ^16:00
dougwigty, was just digging for that.16:00
dougwig#topic Use cases16:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Use cases (Meeting topic: gslb)"16:01
*** adduarte has quit IRC16:01
*** johnsom has joined #openstack-meeting-416:01
dougwigi don't see kunal here this morning.16:01
johnsomo/16:01
KiallFYI - I'm only just getting a link to that doc, so just reading now..16:01
*** hp-meeting-room has joined #openstack-meeting-416:01
*** eghobo has left #openstack-meeting-416:01
dougwigditto16:01
*** mdorman has left #openstack-meeting-416:02
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-416:02
*** _ody has left #openstack-meeting-416:02
*** Maha_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:02
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz16:03
KiallLooks like Kunal joined16:03
KunalGandhiHi All16:03
*** barclaac has joined #openstack-meeting-416:03
KunalGandhiHi Kiall16:03
dougwigKunalGandhi: hiya.  we were just reading your doc quickly.16:04
KunalGandhidougwig: ok cool..16:04
KunalGandhiFor folks who dont have the link to the doc.. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit16:04
dougwigfolks should jump in with comments or other use cases.  if we can agree on that doc today, we can move forward to a draft api.  if folks need more time, then we can probably end early and let folks digest.16:05
KunalGandhiI have put together an initial draft of use cases based on my understanding of gslb16:05
Kialldougwig: Q - Can you expand on what you mean by the least connection strategy?16:06
Kiallsorry - KunalGandhi*16:06
mugsiedougwig: I think we need to agree on how we are going to orchestrate things before we move to an API ..16:06
mugsiei.e. how thin a layer GSLB will be16:06
Santosh_Hi All16:06
Maha_Hi All16:08
*** dhruvdhody has quit IRC16:08
KunalGandhi@Kiall ... sure.. the GSLB will return the public VIP on the regional LB that has the fewest connections16:08
mugsieKunalGandhi: that doc is set to view only16:08
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-416:08
mugsie(we cannot comment / edit atm)16:09
dougwigmugsie: that'd be fine.  speaking personally, a rough and quick api would let me see what we need to build, which would help me figure out orchestration, not the other way around. but whatever works.16:09
KiallKunalGandhi: So, I guess I'm considering the latency on making a change to the VIPs return (limited by DNS TTL, say 60 sec realisticially) vs the rate at which each regional LB's connection count might change16:09
KunalGandhimugsie: ok.. let me change the permission so that everyone can comment on it.16:09
mugsiedougwig: true, that is a good way of finding missing bits alright16:10
Kialli.e. is least connections something feasible to do?16:10
dougwigKiall: i'd expect that to be more along the lines of 'least connection at lookup', i.e., some level of session persistence.  not constant zone tweaking.16:10
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-416:11
KunalGandhi@mugsie .. I have changed the permission so that anyone with a link can comment16:11
*** praveens has quit IRC16:11
mugsiedougwig: I would be afraid of it being a constant swing back and forth if we did that way - or is that an issue?16:12
KunalGandhiYou might have to refresh the page to start commenting16:12
Kialldougwig: Okay, I get where your going with that. Actually implementing that would be a nightmare tho, and most "normal" DNS server has that easy hook point.. But, it makes more sense now :)16:12
*** dhruvdhody has joined #openstack-meeting-416:12
bloganhi, sorry im late16:12
Kialldo not have that easy hook point*16:13
dougwigKiall, mugsie: i think it's safe to leave that off v1, personally.  :)16:13
mugsiedougwig: ++16:14
KunalGandhi@Kiall.. Ok.. Please put that as a comment on the doc..16:14
KiallYea, lots will be off V1 .. But wanting to understand the thinking :)16:14
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-416:15
KiallOkay - I think it pretty much all makes sense16:15
Kiall(Left 2 comments where I see some potential issues coming in, but those would "tomorrow problems"16:16
johnsomWe should probably clarify "Geo-based" as there are different approaches; BGP AS route based, IP-Geo map tables, etc.16:16
mugsiejohnsom: i think that should be an excersise for the DNS provider (designate)16:18
KiallOkay - Everyone done reading?16:18
mugsieas they may provide layered EDNS / BGP etc16:18
sballeyep16:18
KiallCool, so.. Are are key use cases missing?16:19
blogandoes the GSLB need to be HA?16:20
mugsieblogan: well, it really should be16:20
blogani agree but does that need to be documented16:20
mugsiebut that will be down the the architechtre we use for it / deployer choice16:20
KunalGandhi@blogan ..Yes..there should at least be in pair16:20
mugsieit should be in a simalar style to other OpenStack services16:21
bloganso will there be an open source driver for this?16:21
mugsie(horizontaly scalable active - active componants)16:21
KiallYea, we should add to the doc that we expect the failure of a region to be acceptable - it should continue working etc16:21
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting-416:21
dougwigblogan: there has to be, from what i understand.16:21
mugsieI would expect this to be fully open source16:21
bloganmugsie: is there an open source GSLB appliance right now?16:22
mugsieno, but we are looking at using designate as the dns provider to do the load balencing16:22
blogandougwig: i do belive there has to be but i dont know of an open source version right now16:22
mugsiewhich is part of openstakc, and fully open source16:22
dougwigmugsie: speaking as a vendor, i'd like to see a driver mechanism in place for some parts of this.16:22
bloganmugsie: what about monitoring?16:22
mugsiedougwig: definitly16:23
KiallOkay, So.. What's the next steps here? If the use cases are not missing any key things (bar a mention of HA), dougwig suggested talking API, but I wonder if we need to figure out where this lives before that? Is it in Designate, in Neuton, a new service? etc16:23
KunalGandhi@mugsie .. we should still need a driver that would configure the GSLB for monitoring and other settings right ?16:23
bloganmugsie: and i assume designate has the ability or the plans to have the ability to do geo-based (sorry for my ignorance)16:23
Santosh_ plugin --> vendor specific driver(NetScaler GSLB)16:23
dougwigblogan: i'm not aware of an open-source gslb monitoring appliance. i think we'll be writing parts of the gslb stuff.16:23
Kiallblogan: it's planned for Designate, but isn't there yet16:23
mugsieblogan: we have in the plans16:23
bloganokay that works for me, same teams involved to drive both16:24
mugsieI think we should have a driver interface, but allow people to use designate and neutron lbaas v2 to do this without a vendor16:24
dougwigKiall: i could see it as a neutron extension that interfaces with designate, or... what would it look like plugged into designate directly?16:24
dougwigmugsie: agree.16:24
mugsiei dont think it should be in designate16:26
mugsieor in neutron16:26
bloganis it common for a GSLB appliance to set up the load balancers as well?16:26
mugsieneutron is a regional service16:26
rrickardi agree.16:26
KunalGandhi@mugsie .. i agree16:26
Kiallblogan: GSLB appliances typically have a DNS server, and Load Balancer "in the box"16:26
rrickardwith mugsie. :)16:26
dougwigblogan: no.16:26
KunalGandhi@blogan ... GSLB appliances typically act as an LB and a DNS server..16:27
mugsiecan we plan this out assuming designate / neutron with driver hook points then, as a separate service?16:27
dougwigright now, neutron is a global service, not regional, and the extension mechanism would let it all land in a new stackforge repo and bypass the normal goo surrounding a new project (rest, auth, test infra, docs infra, ...). but i'd be fine either way.16:27
KunalGandhi@blogan .. The LB part is for health monitoring and the DNS is for managing the global zone16:27
blogani know, im just wondering if this GSLB API will orchestrate setting them all up or do we just leave it o the user to create hte load balancers and point the GSLB API to those vips16:27
Kialldougwig: neutron is global?16:28
mugsiedougwig: are you sure neutron is global? I have only ever seen it deployed as a regional one16:28
bloganah maybe im misunderstanding using the lbaas v2 api then sorry16:28
mugsieblogan: I think for v1 / v.05 they would be pre set up16:29
mugsiev0.5*16:29
dougwigKiall, mugsie: ok, that's fair.  i'm thinking in terms of cells, not regions.16:29
Kialldougwig: ah :)16:29
mugsiedougwig: ah, yes, fogot about cells16:29
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-416:29
bloganmugsie: ah okay makes sense16:30
rrickardso, separate service?16:30
KunalGandhi@blogan .. i would presume that the VIP's on the regional LB's are pre-configured.16:30
mugsieOK, I can take this feedback and try and draft a rough API for next week, if people like?  - Or is there more discussion?16:30
bloganso separate API entirely from any other service right?16:30
mugsieblogan: I would say yes16:30
bloganmugsie: will the API including monitoring?16:31
dougwigsounds like we should draft it that way, and assume that's the plan of record, unless something else shakes out while we figure out the API.16:31
KunalGandhi@blogan .. +1.. since GLB is more at the global level rather than regional..16:31
KiallI would agree, I don't think it quite belongs in Designate or Neutron .. It's a mashup of Designate, Neutron, Monasca, etc16:31
dougwigKunalGandhi: sounds good, and i'd like to help with that part.16:31
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-416:31
rrickardwe should add that to the use cases - monitoring.16:32
KunalGandhi@dougwig .. cool.. thanks16:32
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-416:32
*** daneyon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:32
dougwigrrickard: can you edit the doc with what you're thinking?16:32
KiallSo - Is anyone feeling strongly this belongs in Neutron or Designate?16:33
blogani gotta go guys, but thanks for answering my questions :) i'd like to stay involved in this project as well, at least a high level16:33
dougwig#action KunalGandhi dougwig draft initial API by next meeting16:33
KunalGandhi@rrickard .. are you talking about monitoring the GSLB's themselves or monitoring the VIP's on the regional LB ?16:33
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-416:33
barclaacHow about option #3 - it's own thing?16:33
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC16:33
bloganKunalGandhi: i'm talking monitoring the vips to pull them out of rotation16:34
dougwigbarclaac: that's the current decision. i think Kiall is trying to suss out whether we have any strong feelings in the other direction.16:34
Kialldougwig: bang on ;) trying to see if anyone disagrees's before we say "yep, own service+API"16:34
barclaacblogan: do you see glsb managing one vip per data center or balance the individual machines?16:34
*** dannywilson has quit IRC16:34
KunalGandhi@blogan ... ok.. i can clarify that further.. i briefly mentioned it in point #316:35
barclaace.g. glsb -> servers or gslb -> data center lb (ahem: octavia :-) -> machines?16:35
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-416:35
blogani can see people outside of this group disagreeing with another service simply because there are many many different endpoints in openstack right now16:35
mugsieblogan: with big tent it is not as big a deal anymore16:35
Kiallblogan: yea, agreed.. But there's also pain involved in putting something that doesn't belong into a project16:35
barclaacBut API bloat has been a problem with openstack16:36
*** jckasper has quit IRC16:36
bloganspeaking to the choir, but just throwing it out there16:36
mugsieblogan: :)16:36
barclaaclet's have a cohesive service defn.16:36
KunalGandhi@blogan ... GSLB API's will mainly run as a global service in most of the deployment..16:36
barclaacalthough we could always add glsb to the neutron api server ;-)16:36
*** daneyon has quit IRC16:36
bloganbarclaac: hmmm i would think multiple vips in one dc but haven't thought about it much16:36
dougwigwe're now arguing about what people *might* argue about. i think i need more caffeine.16:36
KunalGandhi@blogan .. and services like neutron typically run at the region level..16:36
sballedougwig: +116:37
bloganlol16:37
KiallOkay - So, rrickard, as far as what an API might look like since you got #action'd on that.. Are you familar with for e.g. he Netscaler APIs look like?16:37
mugsiedougwig: :D16:37
blogandougwig: its openstack what do you expect16:37
rrickardlet's move forward with GSLB as it's own service.16:37
blogan+116:37
sballe+116:37
johnsom+116:37
KunalGandhi+!16:37
barclaacrrickard +116:37
KunalGandhi+116:37
mugsie+116:37
Kiall+116:37
rrickardkiall: i am not.16:38
bloganor we just do it all in heat16:38
Kiallactually.. It was KunalGandhi / dougwig who go #action'd.. sorry! same question to them16:38
barclaacI'd go with gslb -> data center -> server model. It makes the individual data center LB responsible for pool management16:38
blogankidding16:38
sballe@blogan -116:38
dougwigviolent agreement, it seems.16:38
barclaacglsb managing the pools would be potentially slower16:38
mugsieKunalGandhi: dougwig I would like to give a hand on that spec as well, if possible16:38
dougwigmugsie: great16:38
Santosh_Can we put point wrt  expectations from  vendor specific drivers ?16:38
rrickardKunalGandhi: obviously i am available too if you need help with Designate questions.16:39
KunalGandhi@rrickard .. thanks :)16:39
mugsieSantosh_: yup, that should be added to the doc16:39
dougwigSantosh_: just a guess, but i think we need to sort out an api before we can know what the driver interface will look like.16:39
KiallSantosh_: Q - With NetScaler, I'm guessing you would expect this to be a shim API towards the NetScaler, no involvment from Designate/Neutron LBaaS - Right?16:40
KunalGandhi@dougwig +!16:40
rrickardregardless of API, we should be able to say this will be designed in a modular/driver fashion.16:40
KunalGandhi@dougwig +116:40
barclaac+116:40
Santosh_For monitor related configuration it is managed by vendor GSLB16:40
Santosh_Yes16:41
KunalGandhi@rrickard .. it will be designed in a driver fashion.. similar to what LBaaS is16:41
dougwigKiall: well, there's two halves at play.  the dns side and the monitor side.  and the glsb appliances can play on both sides.  do they do dns directly, or as a provider/driver/plugin to designate directly?  or does designate still do dns, but delegate for vips?  many questions.16:41
dougwigi'm not suggesting we try to answer them this morning.16:41
dougwigjust that it's not necessarily an "either or" thing.16:42
*** richm has left #openstack-meeting-416:42
Kialldougwig: yea, exactly.. I kinda see the likes of NetScaler as providing all the pieces already, if you own one. The exception being OpenStack "style " API/Auth/Multi-Tenancy etc16:42
KunalGandhi@dougwig ... i think whether the dns part is done by the GSLB appliance or not competely depends on the vendor's impl right ?16:42
Santosh_Kiall yes16:42
dougwigKunalGandhi: assuming our driver interface is flexible enough, yes.16:43
KunalGandhi@dougwig ..ok..16:43
KiallSantosh_: cool, thanks.. I think that makes the most sense, letting NS/F5 etc do their thing, while allowing Designate/Neutron LB/Monasca to be combined into an a driver16:43
KunalGandhiso the next step is @dougwig and I work on an intial draft of the API right ?16:44
mugsieyup16:44
Kiall15 min warning.16:44
dougwigand mugsie16:44
dougwiganything else to discuss this morning?16:44
dougwig#topic Open discussion16:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: gslb)"16:44
dougwignot that we haven't been in open discussion the entire time anyway.16:44
Kialldougwig: lol, yea.. Let's get an agenda page up on the wiki for next time.. :)16:45
dougwigKiall: agreed.  :)16:45
dougwigok, unless there's more, let's get out of here.16:46
KiallSounds good :) Till next week...16:46
dougwigthank you, and bye folks16:47
dougwig#endmeeting16:47
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:47
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun  9 16:47:27 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:47
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/gslb.2015-06-09-16.00.html16:47
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/gslb.2015-06-09-16.00.txt16:47
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/gslb.2015-06-09-16.00.log.html16:47
*** rrickard has quit IRC16:47
mugsiedougwig: drop me an email / ping me on IRC when you want to look at the API16:47
*** hp-meeting-room has quit IRC16:47
*** johnsom has left #openstack-meeting-416:48
*** Maha_ has left #openstack-meeting-416:48
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-416:49
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC16:50
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-416:56
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-416:56
*** xingchao has quit IRC17:00
*** dhruvdhody has quit IRC17:00
*** markvoelker has quit IRC17:01
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-417:04
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC17:04
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-417:04
*** matrohon has quit IRC17:05
*** barclaac has quit IRC17:08
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-417:09
*** kenhui has quit IRC17:10
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-417:10
*** ajmiller has quit IRC17:14
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-417:19
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC17:24
*** daneyon has quit IRC17:24
*** asrangne has quit IRC17:30
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-417:34
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC17:36
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-417:36
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC17:37
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-417:38
*** jwagner is now known as jwagner_away17:48
*** dannywilson has quit IRC17:51
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-417:52
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC17:52
*** bharath has joined #openstack-meeting-417:54
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-417:56
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC18:00
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-418:00
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-418:00
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC18:01
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-418:01
*** puranamr has quit IRC18:02
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-418:03
*** Santosh_ has quit IRC18:03
*** hichtakk has joined #openstack-meeting-418:04
*** xingchao has quit IRC18:05
*** kenhui1 has joined #openstack-meeting-418:06
*** kenhui1 has quit IRC18:07
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-418:07
*** bradjones is now known as bradjones|away18:07
*** kenhui has quit IRC18:07
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-418:07
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-418:08
*** zehicle_SWA has joined #openstack-meeting-418:12
*** bharath has quit IRC18:16
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-418:18
*** puranamr has quit IRC18:19
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom18:19
*** kenhui has quit IRC18:29
*** zehicle_SWA has quit IRC18:31
*** zehicle_SWA has joined #openstack-meeting-418:32
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-418:33
*** zehicle_SWA has quit IRC18:34
*** zehicle_SWA has joined #openstack-meeting-418:35
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-418:37
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-418:38
*** dannywilson has quit IRC18:41
*** zehicle_SWA has quit IRC18:42
*** zehicle_SWA has joined #openstack-meeting-418:42
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-418:43
*** GB21 has quit IRC18:43
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-418:45
*** dannywilson has quit IRC18:48
*** puranamr has quit IRC18:48
*** markvoelker has quit IRC18:49
*** zehicle_SWA has quit IRC18:50
*** zehicle_SWA has joined #openstack-meeting-418:51
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-418:52
*** zehicle_SWA has quit IRC18:53
*** zehicle_SWA has joined #openstack-meeting-418:54
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-419:00
*** VW_ has quit IRC19:00
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-419:00
*** VW has quit IRC19:01
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC19:03
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-419:04
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-419:05
*** singlethink has quit IRC19:07
*** zehicle_SWA has quit IRC19:07
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-419:07
*** zehicle_SWA has joined #openstack-meeting-419:07
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner19:09
*** kenhui has quit IRC19:11
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting-419:24
*** marcusvrn1 has quit IRC19:28
*** sdake has quit IRC19:31
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-419:31
*** jwagner is now known as jwagner_away19:32
*** zehicle_SWA has quit IRC19:33
*** zehicle_SWA has joined #openstack-meeting-419:34
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-419:35
*** puranamr has quit IRC19:36
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-419:36
*** bharath has joined #openstack-meeting-419:37
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner19:37
*** puranamr has quit IRC19:46
*** belmoreira has quit IRC19:56
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-420:01
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC20:03
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-420:04
*** puranamr has quit IRC20:05
*** banix has quit IRC20:06
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC20:07
*** mwang2 has quit IRC20:08
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-420:11
*** singleth_ has joined #openstack-meeting-420:17
*** singlethink has quit IRC20:20
*** rhefner has quit IRC20:21
*** xgerman has quit IRC20:21
*** ajmiller has quit IRC20:21
*** bradjones|away has quit IRC20:21
*** rhefner has joined #openstack-meeting-420:23
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-420:23
*** bradjones has quit IRC20:23
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-420:23
*** xgerman has joined #openstack-meeting-420:24
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-420:31
*** dannywilson has quit IRC20:32
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-420:33
*** CheKoLyN has joined #openstack-meeting-420:34
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-420:34
*** markvoelker has quit IRC20:39
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-420:41
*** zehicle_SWA has quit IRC20:44
*** singleth_ has quit IRC20:44
*** matrohon has quit IRC20:46
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC20:52
*** dannywilson has quit IRC20:54
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-420:56
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-420:57
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-421:03
*** puranamr has quit IRC21:07
*** kenhui has quit IRC21:08
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC21:12
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-421:13
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC21:14
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-421:14
*** marcusvrn1 has joined #openstack-meeting-421:17
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-421:18
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-421:19
*** Slower has quit IRC21:22
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-421:25
*** puranamr has quit IRC21:29
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-421:29
*** daneyon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-421:32
*** marcusvrn2 has joined #openstack-meeting-421:33
*** marcusvrn1 has quit IRC21:33
*** daneyon has quit IRC21:34
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-421:35
*** marcusvrn2 has quit IRC21:37
*** Slower has joined #openstack-meeting-421:44
*** puranamr has quit IRC21:50
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-421:52
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-421:52
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC21:53
*** daneyon has quit IRC21:58
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-421:58
*** rods2 has quit IRC21:59
*** klamath has quit IRC22:02
*** puranamr has quit IRC22:12
*** bknudson has quit IRC22:13
*** BjoernT has quit IRC22:17
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-422:18
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:24
*** singlethink has quit IRC22:25
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-422:25
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:30
*** VW_ has quit IRC22:36
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-422:37
*** daneyon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-422:40
*** daneyon has quit IRC22:40
*** aventerav has quit IRC22:47
*** xingchao has quit IRC22:53
*** sarob has quit IRC22:55
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:59
*** puranamr has quit IRC23:03
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-423:05
*** mwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-423:06
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-423:09
*** CheKoLyN has quit IRC23:13
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:14
*** AlanClark has quit IRC23:16
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-423:16
*** blahRus has quit IRC23:19
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-423:21
*** markvoelker has quit IRC23:26
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-423:27
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:45
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-423:45
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-423:48
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-423:51
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-423:51
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC23:55
*** dannywilson has quit IRC23:56
*** bradjones has quit IRC23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!