Thursday, 2014-03-06

stevebaker#startmeeting heat00:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar  6 00:00:03 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is stevebaker. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.00:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.00:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: heat)"00:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'heat'00:00
stevebaker#topic rollcall00:00
*** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: heat)"00:00
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:00
asalkeldo/00:00
*** michael-yu has quit IRC00:00
mspreitzo/00:00
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:00
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
*** liang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
stevebakerspzala: hey, mind if we add the template conversion tool to the agenda?00:01
*** rpothier has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
spzalastevebaker: not at all :-)00:01
tangoo/00:01
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
zanebI'm awake00:02
*** ssurana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
sdakeo/00:02
lianghi00:02
stevebakerliang: hi!00:03
asalkeldstevebaker, also wouldn't mind gauging peoples enthusiasm for an image building plugin00:03
liangstevebaker, hi ;)  I got messed up with the schedule last time after coming back from holiday.00:04
stevebakerSpamapS: about?00:04
stevebaker#topic Review last meeting's actions00:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Review last meeting's actions (Meeting topic: heat)"00:04
stevebakerasalkeld: I've added that00:04
asalkeldcool00:04
stevebakerno actions00:04
stevebaker#topic Adding items to the agenda00:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Adding items to the agenda (Meeting topic: heat)"00:05
*** Slower has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:05
stevebakeranything else to add to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282014-3-6_0000_UTC.29 ?00:05
*** walker_ has quit IRC00:05
*** JoshNang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:06
stevebaker#topic Feature Freeze Extensions00:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Feature Freeze Extensions (Meeting topic: heat)"00:06
stevebakericehouse-3 has been branched, this is what we got in. Well done everybody00:06
stevebaker#link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-300:07
SpamapSo/00:07
stevebakerI see this critical didn't make it in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128798000:07
stevebakerttx: any chance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1287980 can be added to i-3 once it lands?00:07
stevebakerThere are 4 blueprints which didn't land in time. I'd like to go through each one to check we should be going for a FFE for all of them00:09
stevebaker#link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-rc100:09
stevebakerfirst up is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/function-plugins00:09
*** JoshNang has left #openstack-meeting-alt00:09
zanebgate is running on those right now00:09
stevebakerzaneb: there seems to be a bit in the merge queue00:09
stevebakerzaneb: there are other un-approved changes in that series. Would you say they are part of that blueprint?00:10
zaneblet's say that they are00:10
stevebakerzaneb: which seems to have morphed into a allthethings-plugins ;)00:10
zanebindeed00:10
zanebthe function thing is only really interesting in the context of allthethings00:11
stevebakerthere doesn't seem much left, I assume there are no objections to us committing to review these in the next hours/days?00:11
zanebthere's only 2 that haven't been approved00:11
zaneb#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77754/00:12
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC00:12
zaneb#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77755/00:12
*** ametts has quit IRC00:12
stevebaker#agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/function-plugins reviews will be complete in hours or days00:12
stevebakerhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/instance-users00:12
*** radix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:13
* radix arrives00:13
stevebakerso this is high risk and has already broken things downstream, but it delivers a critical feature so seems worth the pain00:13
stevebakeranyone object to giving these reviews a high priority over the next days? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/heat+branch:master+topic:bug/1089261,n,z00:14
zaneb+100:15
stevebakerI'll take that as a no00:15
stevebaker#agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/instance-users to be reviewed over the next days00:16
stevebakerhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/hot-software-config00:16
stevebakerremaining reviews are here https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/heat+branch:master+topic:bp/hot-software-config,n,z00:16
stevebakerthis is all shiny, new and self-contained. So I doubt anybody else has tried this stuff yet00:17
stevebakerI expect there will be bug fixes throughout feature freeze00:18
zanebit's not going to hurt anyone who isn't specifically using it, I assume00:18
stevebakerzaneb: correct, minor chance of regression in OS::Nova::Server00:19
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC00:19
zanebpffft00:19
liangthat is cool. I took a look at that, but haven't got time to really look into the detail00:20
stevebaker#agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/hot-software-config to be reviewed over the next days00:20
stevebakerand finally https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/oslo-messaging00:20
stevebakerthe nature of the beast, its mostly in one uber-commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72798/00:21
zanebyikes, it would take an hour just to review that commit message00:22
sdake;-)00:22
sdakeI did that as a pointer to how to actually review the change ;)00:23
stevebakerprobably a medium risk of regressions00:23
*** markwash has quit IRC00:23
stevebakerthis is the one blueprint that ttx is reluctant to give an FFE on, so all I'm asking for here is to get some committment to giving it some reviews00:23
*** ametts has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:24
zanebsdake: is this change something that has immediate benefit, or is it just long-term architectural tidy-up?00:24
*** kevinconway has quit IRC00:24
sdakeI sent a message to stevebaker with the advantages00:24
sdakeI'll cut and paste sec00:24
stevebakersdake: race you00:24
*** markmcclain has quit IRC00:25
sdake1. oslo-incubator/rpc is only maintained on a best effort basis.  No new features go into oslo-incubator/rpc00:25
sdake2. oslo.messaging has far superior test coverage vs oslo-incubator. Over time new test cases will go into oslo.messaging but no new test cases will go into oslo-incubator/rpc.00:25
sdake3. I believe, but am not certain, that oslo-incubator/rpc->oslo.messaging (the actual oslo part, not our implementation specifically) may break on-wire compatibility over AMQP.  If we are going to break the on-wire compatibility, it is better to do it now since heat is not in wide deployment and I expect atleast for RHT customers, Juno Heat will be widely deployed.  If we wait to Juno, RHT customers will be negatively impacted.00:25
stevebakerhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/72731/00:25
sdake4. oslo.messaging has a far larger community of developers that support and maintain the code then oslo-incubator/rpc.  The oslo-incubator crew seem uninterested in maintaining oslo-incubator/rpc.00:25
sdake5. oslo-incubator/notifications is incompatible with oslo.messaging/notifications on the wire (I am certain of this) - creating further upgrade problems later on00:25
sdake6. oslo.messaging allows easy migration to new messaging systems by the addition of new transport drivers to oslo.messaging.  This is not possible with oslo-incubator/rpc since new driver development only happens in oslo.messaging.00:25
SpamapSoslo.messaging doesn't spew deprecated amqp messages into the log too.00:26
stevebakerpersonally I think its worth getting this in early rc100:26
asalkeldmessaging could support trullius00:26
asalkeldhelp move to py300:26
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:27
sdakei'm almost ready to go00:27
stevebakersdake: how are those last tests going?00:27
sdakeworking on the config generator atm (which is broken in master)00:27
sdakeafter that, I'm going to tackle the test cases00:27
sdakethe config generator is causing the gate to fail, so I need to sort thatout first00:27
radixsorry to interrupt, but I've gotta take off, I just want to mention I'm testing the new AS resources a bit harder over the next week (and thanks for all the reviews)00:27
* stevebaker sharpens sdake's yack shavers00:27
zanebstevebaker: I'm remaining sceptical until I have reviewed the megapatch00:27
sdakezaneb feel free to review now00:28
sdakeI'd apprecate it00:28
zanebyeah, on my list for tomorrow00:28
sdakethere are about 7 tests commented out which clearly needs addressing00:28
sdakeother then that, I think its ready to rock00:28
stevebakerzaneb: Yep, I won't say we'll land it, I'll say we'll review it00:28
* radix steps out00:29
stevebaker#agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/oslo-messaging will be reviewed over the next days00:29
stevebakerradix: hai bai00:29
stevebaker#topic update failure recovery00:29
*** openstack changes topic to "update failure recovery (Meeting topic: heat)"00:29
*** noslzzp has quit IRC00:30
stevebakerSpamapS: can you give us an update on your journal change?00:30
SpamapSYes00:31
SpamapSso I have a set of changes in progress to record which resources have been processed in an update...00:31
SpamapSthis is an attempt at a non-invasive resumable update00:31
SpamapSit is at the point where it records the things that have been done properly in a table..00:32
SpamapSbut it still does not use that information yet to fast-forward through the update to the actual failed spot00:32
SpamapSI have been distracted with the tripleo sprint.. where I've spent much of the time dealing with the recent change to heat to require keystone domains.00:32
zanebSpamapS: how is this journal table different to the events table?00:32
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
SpamapSwhich will hopefully get through the gate in the next 30 minutes00:33
SpamapSzaneb: it is cleared after a successful update, and it is built to have lookups done by resource, which the events table is not built for00:33
zanebinteresting00:34
SpamapSzaneb: it is entirely possible events could be used00:34
*** jjmb has quit IRC00:34
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC00:34
SpamapSzaneb: I made a shallow attempt at that before pushing toward a specific journal table.00:34
SpamapSthe intention of this is to allow fixing the "can't resume stacks" bug without major surgery, so that we can reasonably merge this post freeze..00:36
stevebakerSpamapS: so we're in feature freeze now. Could you justify this change as being a bug fix?00:36
SpamapSlong term we should do the right thing and record the actual state as we do an update ,and resume fully.00:36
SpamapSstevebaker: IMO it is a bug fix, but I can accept that others will argue it is a feature.00:36
SpamapSI don't actually care, I just want to use Heat for managing large stacks over long periods of time without having to run a fork.00:37
stevebakeryes, I'd like to avoid that too00:37
zanebSpamapS: so you're saying just the journal stuff is to be merged now?00:38
zaneband the rest after the Juno thaw?00:38
zanebor am I misreading?00:38
SpamapSjust the journal and the resume using the journal00:39
zanebah, ok00:39
SpamapSbut then Juno, we rip that out and replace it with a full stateful update and resume.00:39
zanebunderstood00:39
SpamapSbecause this carries problems00:39
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC00:40
SpamapSsuch as the fact that it won't really work if your new template doesn't have the same resources _before_ the fail.00:40
SpamapSbecause we're just going to skip the things we've done.. we're not going to have something to diff with00:40
SpamapSbut I can accept that, as that will still be useful for recovering updates.00:40
SpamapSanyway, I haven't finished the code yet..00:41
SpamapSbut I expect it  by Friday00:42
stevebakerI'm happy to treat this as a bug fix00:42
SpamapSmy other missing feature is graceful updates using a pre-action-notification-thing .. but I can reasonably do that in a plugin until we get a good implementation in Heat00:42
stevebakerSpamapS: can you elaborate on that a bit?00:43
*** pvaneck has quit IRC00:44
SpamapSin tripleo, we want to migrate instances off compute nodes before we rebuild them00:44
SpamapSI can just write an OS::Nova::Server subclass plugin that does that00:44
SpamapSuntil we have something more awesomer00:44
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:45
stevebakerSpamapS: you can have a SoftwareDeployment which runs its config in DELETE (or any other combination of actions)00:45
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:45
sdakeso that handles server quiesing stevebaker?00:45
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:45
stevebakersdake: that was the intent00:45
*** amcrn has quit IRC00:46
stevebakeranyway, 14 minutes left00:46
stevebaker#topic TOSCA HOT conversion tool00:46
*** openstack changes topic to "TOSCA HOT conversion tool (Meeting topic: heat)"00:46
SpamapSstevebaker: DELETE is not the problem, rebuild is.00:47
stevebakerspzala: could you post a couple of links related to the tool00:47
spzalaSure00:47
liangSpamapS,  that does also mean we can do some customized work after a instance is deleted from a instance group?00:47
spzalastackforge project is created and approved - https://github.com/stackforge/heat-translator00:47
stevebakerSpamapS: ah, I understand. let me think about that one00:48
SpamapSliang: yes that is part of it too.00:48
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
spzalaand https://github.com/spzala/heat-translator00:48
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
*** rockyg has left #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
sdakespzala that will only be able to handle a subset of tosca, correct?00:48
*** dprince has quit IRC00:48
stevebakerspzala: it would be nice if you could use https://github.com/openstack-dev/cookiecutter to build a standard project layout00:48
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
spzalaper the next step on new stackforge project instructions, I still need to work on setting up initial review requests and I will be doing it soon. Code not yet ready for review. ( first code drop is there on modelling but it's a work in progress)00:48
spzalasdake: for now, yes that's correct00:49
*** derekh has quit IRC00:49
sdakespzala go ahead and get your work in progress into the queue so people can look at it00:49
*** rockyg has left #openstack-meeting-alt00:49
spzalastevebaker: oh.. sorry, didn't know about it. Yup, will do.00:49
sdakeotherwise one big code drop = suboptimal :)00:49
asalkeldnice spzala00:49
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:49
*** jdob has quit IRC00:49
liangSpamapS, That's great. thanks!00:49
spzalaasalkeld: thanks! :-)00:49
spzalasdake: :-) will do00:50
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:50
stevebakerI'd like this tool to eventually not just do TOSCA<->HOT00:50
spzalastevebaker: agree, that's how trying to design it.00:50
stevebakera real basic cfn->HOT would be nice00:50
spzalasdake: tosca yaml specs is in progress but getting close to finalize for the first working draft so it's not a blocker now.00:50
zanebspzala: have you been following the Murano incubation thread on openstack-dev?00:50
zanebreally interesting00:50
asalkeldooo, yeah and remove cfn from heat00:50
stevebakerzaneb: have you been doing some tosca stuff?00:51
asalkeldis it going to have api endpoints too?00:51
spzalazaneb: yes, I am. I did have some discussion with tspatzier and I did see his few replies on that thread00:51
*** noslzzp has quit IRC00:51
spzalaasalkeld: :-)00:51
stevebakerasalkeld: at this point its just a cli and lib. Maybe eventually we can put it in a heat service00:51
zanebstevebaker: I joined the TOSCA TC. Mostly just keeping lines of communication open at this stage00:51
spzalaasalkeld: no api endpoint thought for now00:52
asalkeldk00:52
*** jcoufal has quit IRC00:52
stevebakerzaneb: you've come a long way ;)00:52
spzalazaneb: yup it was great to see you on those calls00:52
asalkeldso are we putting murano in heat-translate?00:52
* asalkeld ducks00:52
spzalazaneb: everyone on the TC liked it too00:52
* stevebaker kicks asalkeld's ankles00:52
zanebasalkeld: I think we should :)00:53
spzalaasalkeld: lol00:53
*** slagle has quit IRC00:53
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
asalkeldsaying that, we could put a part of solum there00:53
asalkeldkinda00:54
stevebakeranyway, thats all I wanted to say. except that we should eventually consider bringing heat-translator into openstack and heat-core instead of stackforge00:54
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC00:54
spzalastevebaker: thanks!00:54
stevebaker#topic image building plugin00:54
*** openstack changes topic to "image building plugin (Meeting topic: heat)"00:54
asalkeldin generral I think we should make a mega openstack program with murano heat and solum00:54
stevebakerasalkeld: go!00:55
zanebasalkeld++00:55
asalkeldok, so in solum we are making a image building service00:55
sdakemight as well throw in workflow at the same time00:55
mspreitzwhat would it do?00:55
asalkeldwould people be interested in a heat pluging00:55
*** eankutse has quit IRC00:55
asalkeldso it could expose a tripelo element00:55
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:56
asalkeldand you post a base image glance id00:56
zanebasalkeld: that has always sounded like a workflow thing, not a Heat thing to me00:56
asalkeldand the link to a git repo00:56
stevebakerasalkeld: so it would spin up a compute and run diskimage-builder in it, then post to glance?00:56
Slowermassive is a good word for it.. :)00:56
asalkeldstevebaker, something like that00:56
asalkeldso we need to convert app code into images00:57
stevebakerasalkeld: how about it goes into contrib at first?00:57
asalkeldthe question is does any one else need such a thing00:57
sdakeseems like whatis needed is an actual imagebuilding service00:57
asalkeldthat is what we are doing00:57
sdakerather then heat dealing with that - we end up in same situation as we have with autoscaling atm00:57
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:57
asalkeldsdake, ^00:57
sdakeasalkeld soyou mean a solum plugin to said image building service00:58
asalkeldyeah00:58
stevebakersdake: maybe we should be the home of that service though. nobody else wants it00:58
sdakeseems fine to me, we put all kinds of shit in contrib00:58
sdakesoudns like solum wants it00:58
zanebwe have a workflow library (taskflow), a workflow service (mistral), a workflow orchestration thing (murano)... let's not put workflow resources into Heat. It just fragments things further00:58
asalkeldzaneb, it's a resource to customize an imaeg00:59
Slowersounds like aeolus00:59
asalkelda better version of software config00:59
asalkeld:)00:59
zanebasalkeld: customising an image is an action, not a thing00:59
asalkeldso is installing software00:59
asalkeldyour point?01:00
sdakeagree01:00
mspreitzdisagree01:00
sdakewe ahve some workflow features in heat already01:00
*** sarob__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:00
* stevebaker will continue the meeting until someone kicks us out01:00
mspreitza software deployment declares deployed software01:00
zanebwe don't have a software installer resource. we have a software config resource01:00
zanebfirst would be an action, second is a thing01:00
*** banix has quit IRC01:00
asalkeldzaneb, the resource it the element/ url to that01:01
asalkeldno difference01:01
SlowerI don't think we got super far with the actual image customization01:01
zanebasalkeld: my point is that there are logical ways to accomplish this in both Mistral and Murano01:01
*** yamahata_ has quit IRC01:01
asalkelder, no01:01
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:01
zanebshoehorning it into Heat is IMHO a mistake01:01
* mspreitz has to go but hopes Zanes talks sense into the rest of you01:01
*** yamahata_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:02
zanebwe're clearly desperately missing a workflow service01:02
asalkeldok, my suggestion was not to put the service in heat01:02
Slowerhttp://blog.aeolusproject.org/building-openstack-images-with-image-factory/01:02
spzalastevebaker: seems like this will be a looooong meeting :-)01:02
*** sarob_ has quit IRC01:02
zanebIMO we need to get our story straight around workflows across all of OpenStack01:02
asalkeldonly if you want a plugin01:02
*** mspreitz has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:02
stevebakeralright, lets move to #heat01:02
Slowerzaneb: agreed01:02
stevebaker#endmeeting01:02
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"01:02
asalkeldSlower, I'll have a look01:02
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar  6 01:02:46 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)01:02
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2014/heat.2014-03-06-00.00.html01:02
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2014/heat.2014-03-06-00.00.txt01:02
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2014/heat.2014-03-06-00.00.log.html01:02
*** ametts has quit IRC01:04
*** sarob__ has quit IRC01:05
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC01:05
*** rpothier has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:05
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:05
*** spzala has quit IRC01:05
*** atiwari has quit IRC01:08
*** tango has quit IRC01:08
*** ssurana has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:10
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:10
*** michael-yu has quit IRC01:15
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:15
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC01:18
*** IlyaE has quit IRC01:20
*** caleb_ has quit IRC01:21
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:23
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC01:23
*** richm has quit IRC01:24
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:25
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:26
*** jjmb1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:30
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:30
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:32
*** jjmb has quit IRC01:32
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:33
*** ccrouch has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:33
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:35
*** mozawa has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:37
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:37
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC01:39
*** funzo has quit IRC01:39
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:40
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:40
*** stevebaker has quit IRC01:40
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:40
*** funzo has quit IRC01:43
*** asalkeld has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:43
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:44
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:44
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:44
*** liang has quit IRC01:45
*** alazarev has quit IRC01:47
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC01:47
*** liang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:50
*** michael-yu has quit IRC01:50
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:53
*** flwang has quit IRC01:53
*** rwsu has quit IRC01:54
*** harlowja has quit IRC01:58
*** bdpayne has quit IRC01:58
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:03
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:04
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:08
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:10
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC02:11
*** jjmb1 has quit IRC02:12
*** slagle has quit IRC02:14
*** liang has quit IRC02:15
*** markvoelker1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:19
*** jjmb1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:19
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:20
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:20
*** jjmb has quit IRC02:21
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:21
*** liang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:22
*** dprince has quit IRC02:22
*** Barker has quit IRC02:25
*** cjellick has quit IRC02:25
*** jcoufal has quit IRC02:25
*** d0ugal has quit IRC02:25
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC02:27
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:27
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:28
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan02:31
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC02:36
*** Alexandra is now known as alex-lunch02:37
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:43
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:47
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:48
*** jjmb2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:50
*** khyati has quit IRC02:50
*** alazarev has quit IRC02:50
*** jjmb1 has quit IRC02:50
*** jjmb has quit IRC02:51
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:51
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC02:52
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:53
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:55
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:55
*** markmcclain has quit IRC02:56
*** sarob_ has quit IRC02:57
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:57
*** d0ugal has quit IRC02:57
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:57
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:58
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC02:59
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC03:00
*** funzo has quit IRC03:02
*** liang has left #openstack-meeting-alt03:02
*** stevebaker has quit IRC03:02
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:02
*** sarob_ has quit IRC03:02
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:03
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:03
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:04
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:04
*** jjmb2 has quit IRC03:05
*** stevebaker has quit IRC03:05
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:05
*** arnaud__ has quit IRC03:05
*** gokrokve has quit IRC03:08
*** alex-lunch is now known as Alexandra03:09
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:16
*** IlyaE has quit IRC03:19
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC03:22
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:23
*** SushilKM has quit IRC03:26
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:28
*** jjmb1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:29
*** samstav has quit IRC03:31
*** jjmb has quit IRC03:32
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:32
*** Barker has quit IRC03:32
*** SushilKM has quit IRC03:32
*** samstav_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:34
*** samstav has quit IRC03:37
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:37
*** stevebaker has quit IRC03:38
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:38
*** stevebaker has quit IRC03:42
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:42
*** stevebaker has quit IRC03:42
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:43
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC03:53
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC03:53
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:03
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:04
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:11
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:12
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:19
*** julim has quit IRC04:21
*** stevebaker has quit IRC04:27
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:27
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC04:30
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:31
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC04:32
*** caleb_ has quit IRC04:32
*** funzo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:33
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:33
*** funzo has quit IRC04:34
*** baoli has quit IRC04:38
*** caleb_ has quit IRC04:38
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:41
*** sarob_ has quit IRC04:45
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:45
*** stevebaker has quit IRC04:47
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:47
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away04:49
*** sarob_ has quit IRC04:50
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:57
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:02
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja05:02
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:07
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC05:21
*** caleb_ has quit IRC05:21
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:22
*** garyduan has quit IRC05:22
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:22
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:24
*** sarob_ has quit IRC05:30
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:30
*** caleb_ has quit IRC05:31
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:32
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:32
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC05:33
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:33
*** sarob_ has quit IRC05:35
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:36
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC05:40
*** cjellick has quit IRC05:41
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:43
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC05:47
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:49
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:51
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC05:52
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:54
*** gyee has quit IRC06:00
*** jcoufal has quit IRC06:01
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:04
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC06:04
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:04
*** samstav_ has quit IRC06:04
*** gokrokve has quit IRC06:08
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:15
*** caleb_ has quit IRC06:19
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:21
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:24
*** Alexandra is now known as alex-gone06:24
*** slagle has quit IRC06:25
*** alazarev has quit IRC06:26
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:30
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:33
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:40
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:41
*** sarob_ has quit IRC06:45
*** banix has quit IRC06:48
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:48
*** yogesh has quit IRC06:49
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away06:59
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:01
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:02
*** cjellick has quit IRC07:10
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC07:12
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** arnaud has quit IRC07:19
*** harlowja_away has quit IRC07:21
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:32
*** sarob_ has quit IRC07:36
*** alazarev has quit IRC07:43
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:46
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:56
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:59
*** gokrokve has quit IRC08:00
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:00
*** cjellick has quit IRC08:01
*** gokrokve has quit IRC08:04
*** saju_m has quit IRC08:06
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:08
*** eankutse has quit IRC08:19
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:19
*** yogesh has quit IRC08:19
*** shakayumi has quit IRC08:21
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8708:22
*** saju_m has quit IRC08:24
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:24
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:28
*** jjmb1 has quit IRC08:32
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:32
*** amuller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:36
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:36
*** sarob_ has quit IRC08:37
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:42
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:43
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** sarob_ has quit IRC08:46
*** gokrokve has quit IRC08:47
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC08:48
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC08:49
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-meeting-alt08:55
*** dteselkin has quit IRC09:03
*** sergmelikyan has quit IRC09:04
*** markvoelker1 has quit IRC09:05
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:05
*** dteselkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:07
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:09
*** luqas has quit IRC09:10
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:11
*** flwang has quit IRC09:12
*** saju_m has quit IRC09:12
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:16
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:24
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:26
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:33
*** sarob_ has quit IRC09:37
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC09:39
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:39
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:45
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC09:49
*** gokrokve has quit IRC09:50
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:50
*** banix has quit IRC09:50
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:56
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:59
*** xuhanp has quit IRC10:13
*** dmakogon_ is now known as denis_makogon10:18
*** enikanorov has quit IRC10:18
*** enikanorov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:18
*** mozawa has quit IRC10:22
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:34
*** amuller has left #openstack-meeting-alt10:38
*** sarob_ has quit IRC10:38
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:42
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:45
*** saju_m has quit IRC10:46
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:47
*** gokrokve has quit IRC10:50
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:54
*** eankutse has quit IRC10:58
*** jjmb has quit IRC10:59
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:03
*** ujuc has quit IRC11:05
*** jgallard has quit IRC11:13
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:23
*** Ranjitha_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:27
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC11:27
*** Ranjitha_ is now known as Ranjitha11:27
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC11:28
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:33
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:35
*** cjellick has quit IRC11:37
*** sarob_ has quit IRC11:39
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:45
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:47
*** gokrokve has quit IRC11:49
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:53
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:53
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:54
*** baoli has quit IRC11:56
*** jjmb has quit IRC11:59
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:04
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** eanxgeek|log is now known as eanxgeek12:17
*** jjmb has quit IRC12:25
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC12:27
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:29
*** jjmb has quit IRC12:30
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:38
*** baoli has quit IRC12:41
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:41
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** gokrokve has quit IRC12:49
*** sarob_ has quit IRC12:50
*** jjmb has quit IRC12:51
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:51
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:53
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:55
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:55
*** jjmb1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:59
*** yamahata has quit IRC13:00
*** jjmb has quit IRC13:01
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:04
*** eankutse has quit IRC13:06
*** david-lyle has quit IRC13:10
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:13
*** esker has quit IRC13:13
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:14
*** esker has quit IRC13:14
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:14
*** esker has quit IRC13:19
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:21
*** rbrady-afk is now known as rbrady13:22
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:25
*** cjellick has quit IRC13:25
*** saju_m has quit IRC13:27
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:29
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:36
*** thurloat has quit IRC13:38
*** thurloat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:38
*** sarob_ has quit IRC13:40
*** yamahata has quit IRC13:41
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
*** gokrokve has quit IRC13:49
*** ujuc has quit IRC13:52
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
mriedemoh right14:00
russellb#startmeeting nova14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar  6 14:00:57 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is russellb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'14:01
russellbo/14:01
mriedemhi14:01
n0anoo/14:01
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** PhilD has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
russellb#topic Icehouse14:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Icehouse (Meeting topic: nova)"14:01
russellbfeature freeze week!14:01
russellb#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-314:02
russellbicehouse-3 is out14:02
russellb39 blueprints and 172 bugs14:02
*** llu-laptop has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
russellbfocus now is on RC114:02
russellb#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-rc114:02
russellbthere are 5 blueprints there.  those are the ones that have been given an exception so far14:02
russellbthere are a number of requests for FFEs on openstack-dev.  most of them are blocking on nova-core sponsors14:03
russellbno point in approving an exception without reviewers ready to push the review to completion ASAP14:03
russellbin case you missed it, there's a ML post about FFE process:14:03
russellb#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/029021.html14:03
russellbalso relevant, ttx wrote a nice blog post about why we do feature freeze14:04
russellb#link http://fnords.wordpress.com/2014/03/06/why-we-do-feature-freeze/14:04
mriedemrussellb: has that bug list been scrubbed?14:04
ttxTl;Dr: we do FF because we care14:04
russellbttx: :-)14:04
*** dripton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
russellbmriedem: i beleive it's the carry over from icehouse-314:04
mriedemyeah, that's what it looks like14:04
mriedeme.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1240043 doesn't seem high prioirty given the v3 diagnostics bp dropped out14:05
russellbagreed14:05
johnthetubaguymriedem: +114:05
mriedemi'll update it14:05
russellbwe need to make the bug list our "blocking release of RC1" list ASAP14:05
mriedemyeah, that's why i was looking14:05
russellbanything that's "would be nice, but not worth blocking" should just be tagged with icehouse-rc-potential14:05
russellband from past experience, we have to be diligent about maintaining this list14:06
russellbpeople will just target the whole world to it14:06
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
russellband it gets frustrating :-)14:06
garykhas the meeting started?14:06
russellbgaryk: yes.14:06
mriedembut my very driver specifc thing needs to be in icehouse!14:06
russellbmriedem: critical priority?14:07
mriedemjoking14:07
russellbSo, that pretty much covers the overview of current status14:07
russellbwith that, i'm happy to use the rest of the time to talk about specific FFE requests, or bugs14:07
russellbbased on who's here and what you want to talk about14:07
* russellb waits for any requests14:08
garykrussellb: thanks for the work on the instance groups14:09
garykthe api comments were  addressed14:09
garykthe update method was removed.14:09
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:09
russellbgaryk: np ... they were? ok, i will review again asap then14:09
russellbi was pretty concerned14:09
garyki am not sure if i like this one and was wodnering what you thought?14:09
russellbwhich one?14:09
garykthe fact that we support only one policy most probably makes sense14:09
johnthetubaguyrussellb: might be good to get feedback on the crazy scheme for Juno-1, but thats for the end of the meeting14:10
garykjohnthetubaguy: is that your proposal for the bps?14:10
*** BobBall has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:10
johnthetubaguyyeah14:10
russellbjohnthetubaguy: yeah i replied on list14:10
* johnthetubaguy reads email14:10
garyki dont think that it was crazy. just sensible and trying to unblock the bottleneck14:10
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:10
russellbjohnthetubaguy: basically +1, kind of, with caveats that we can't guarantee anything ... but in general i think you're encouraging best practice14:11
*** PaulMurray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:11
garyki think that we should adopt it for all milestones14:11
garykthen will not be a crazy rush at the end.14:11
russellbi think there's a crazy rush most of the time, and then just insanity at the end14:12
johnthetubaguyrussellb: yep, the extra caveats are importing, I am +1 those14:12
PhilD:-)14:12
garykthat is, we should make sure we focus on certain bps in each milestone. then we can split the load across the release cycle instead of the last 2 days14:12
*** lcostantino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
johnthetubaguygaryk: that is the plan, but often the code just isn't up for review before the last few weeks14:12
russellbthere be dragons as you approach feature freeze14:13
garykjohnthetubaguy: i just think that if we indicated that if BP X had to be ready by milestone Y then it may solve the problem14:14
russellbso, we had this cool plan for icehouse that incorporated that idea14:14
russellbreviewers would sponsors BPs to commit to reviewing them, as long as it was ready for the cycle it was sponsored for14:14
russellbif it was late, priority dropped14:14
russellband then, you know ... that totally fell apart because nobody sponsored anything :-)14:14
russellbhard to figure out the best thing that works14:15
PhilDStill feels to me that too often we are doing design reviews right up to the end of what should be implemenation reviews (i.e. BP gets approved, code goes through multiple review cycles (the first few of which settle the design issues) and then right at the end a new "approach" type issue is raised.   Anything we can do to break that pattern would be good14:15
russellb+114:15
johnthetubaguy+114:15
alaskiagreed.  o/ btw14:16
garyk+114:16
russellbalaski: o/14:16
johnthetubaguyup front blueprint designs are better now, but we need to evolve that14:16
alaskiFor api bps, I think having a schema defined is a good start14:16
johnthetubaguynow we use them for sure, I was OK with at least examples before, but thats probably a bit lax14:16
garykmost of the time the bps are very sparse when it comes to implementation details14:17
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:17
PhilDLike more rigor in the BP stage, recognising that design reviewres and code reviewers aren't necessarily the same skill set, some non coders probably have a really useful role at the design review stage14:17
garyki do not think that there is a bp that indicates a complete design from A - Z14:17
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
johnthetubaguyso, in part they were blueprints that were approved a while ago, I plan to do a build un-approve soon...14:17
russellbi think if we're hurting bad enough in review bandwidth, we absolutely *can* afford to be a lot more strict on the blueprint approval side14:17
garykif there was the review will be on the BP and not the code.14:17
russellbfilter out more of the stuff higher up in the  process, to ensure that when stuff makes it to code review it's closer14:18
PhilDWell that's a problem in the BP - there should be a minimum set of detail required,   Sometimes seems that the BP just gets rasied as a reason for posting the code14:18
alaskiI don't think we can expect all blueprints to have a complete design14:18
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:18
russellbalaski: indeed ... case by case14:18
alaskiwhat I typically look for is a clear scope, so it's clear when the blueprint can be considered done14:18
russellbalaski: but we should at least be able to bless a direction, maybe we need a 2 stage blueprint review14:18
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:18
russellb"yes we like the tasks concept, now come back for stage 2 review with an API design"14:18
johnthetubaguyrussellb: two stage?14:18
russellbfor example14:18
johnthetubaguyah got you14:19
alaskirussellb: makes sense14:19
johnthetubaguydirection then detail I guess?14:19
russellbyeah, perhaps14:19
*** eankutse has quit IRC14:19
russellbjust thinking out loud14:19
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:19
russellb"out loud"14:19
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
alaskiheh14:19
russellbnot actually talking to myself :)14:19
PhilD@alaski I know some concepts are easier to understand once the basic code is there, but that's not an excuse really for a -2 on a design issue after months of work / refinement14:19
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
russellbPhilD: yep, that's a process failure i think14:19
russellbnot that we shouldn't -2 if it really is bad ... but ... we broke down if we let it make it that far14:20
johnthetubaguy+1 that shows a bad blueprint review14:20
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
alaskiPhilD: agreed.  but the times I remember things like that happening is when the code creeps a bit beyond what the blueprint was understood to entail14:20
johnthetubaguyone issue we have is tooling, thinking we might start using wiki pages so we can at least track history...14:20
sdagueso what if we used gerrit for detailed blueprint review instead of launchpad?14:20
sdaguelike make a doc directory in Nova14:20
sdaguefor proposed blueprints14:21
russellbsdague: NEP, Nova Enhancement Proposal?  :)14:21
johnthetubaguysdague: hmm, that could work...14:21
garykmaybe we should create a checklist for BP's. that is, we expect that the drafter of the BP fill in a certain template. then maybe we can encounter problematic issues before the review14:21
russellbquite interesting idea ...14:21
PhilDRight - if we really need to -2 code because it will break the system badly then we have to do that of course - but it still means we failed somewhere along the way and wasted a lot of someones effort14:21
johnthetubaguygaryk: we have the review checklists already14:21
sdaguethen we'd get the benefits of the review process, could link it from the blueprint14:21
russellbgaryk: we have that on the wiki ... https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints14:21
russellbor that's the idea14:21
alaskias long as NEP8 can be something about style/hacking checks14:22
russellbhmmmm, so blueprints just a link to gerrit, and it's approved with the gerrit review is approved ...14:22
sdague:)14:22
russellbeasier for people to participate14:22
alaskibut I am intrigued by the idea14:22
russellbeasier to track revisions14:22
driptonI think Nova having a different BP process than the rest of OpenStack would be an extra hurdle for people working on multiple projects.  I don't see a ton of upside.14:22
sdaguerussellb: yeh, I think all the details would still need to be figured out14:22
russellbFWIW, we basically did this for the TC, we have an openstack/governance repo14:22
russellband it works *really* well14:22
johnthetubaguya separate nova-bp repo might be good14:22
johnthetubaguyrussellb: cool14:23
sdaguedripton: it's not really a different process14:23
russellbdripton: i think all projects have this problem, i think it's good to experiment with solutions.  someone has to lead the way14:23
russellbi still think we'd use the blueprints system for status tracking14:23
sdaguebecause there is no commonality on *how* blueprints get reviewed14:23
russellbright ... it's about the review side14:23
PhilD@sdague - that's part of the problem14:23
sdaguePhilD: agreed, but the reason we have that problem is no ones found a system that works14:24
russellband storyboard isn't coming out tomorrow14:24
sdagueand gerrit is a really good tool for reviewing things14:24
russellbbut even with that, we may still like gerrit on the review side, i dunno14:24
russellbsdague: i think we should take this idea to a wider audience14:24
sdaguerussellb: agreed14:25
PaulMurrayrussellb sdague: some problems come from bp in common areas - things change as we go14:25
russellbbecause if we want to try it for juno, we need to jump on it14:25
PaulMurrayreview a single bp is one thing14:25
sdaguesure, you want to do that this week still, or not distract from FFE14:25
*** mozawa has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:25
sdagueI can take some first pass on thsi14:25
russellbsdague: that would be excellent14:25
PhilDMaybe - I think the reason we still have the problem is that the code review is seen as the design review.  That probably worked in the early days, and still works on the smaller projects.   This is just a part of the project maturing14:25
sdagueand get it on the list for discussion14:25
russellbsdague: and i think we should start it now, so we have time to imlpement it before juno reviews start14:26
russellbright now i feel like "why the heck haven't we considered this already"14:26
sdaguesure, I'll look to get something on -dev tomorrow14:26
russellbok14:26
mriedemthis would have really helped with garyk's v3 diags blueprint since the design was in a wiki and comments were in the ML14:26
russellbi think we'd get a lot wider participation in reviews this way too14:26
mriedemwhich wasn't fun14:26
johnthetubaguyPhilD: the blueprint is certainly where there is design review, but I don't feel we should stop that at the code review stage, just need to get better at the blueprint stage?14:27
garykone of the issues with the bp is that the interface is terrible.14:28
garykcomments are hard to follow14:28
russellbheh, yes14:28
russellbgerrit would help that immensely14:28
garyki have now started to write my name and the date with bp comments14:29
garykin some blueprints i did not even get updates14:29
PhilDThat wouls be good a start - I'd like to see some point in the code review though where we can say "the design is agreed and locked from here in", and it takes more that a single -2 to block it from that point (for example)14:29
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:29
PhilDMaybe this is to do in part with sponsorship of the BPs14:29
driptonMaybe we need to make the BP approval deadline earlier in the cycle to force front-loading the design and design approval work?14:30
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:30
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:30
garykdripton: agreed14:30
driptonOf course, the only guarantee is that whatever the deadline is, there will be people clamoring for extensions the next day.14:30
garykbut there are N bps and M sponsors. problem is that N >> M. as a community we need to cide which BP's get preference14:30
johnthetubaguyPhilD: not sure that feels right, feels too process heavy, and there are always exceptions14:30
sdagueyeh, once we have different mechanics, we can figure out different process14:30
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC14:30
sdaguelike when BP review would have to be approved by14:31
sdagueetc14:31
sdaguebut I think this would move the ball forward14:31
johnthetubaguysdague: +114:31
russellb+214:31
russellblike, i want it today14:31
johnthetubaguyyeah14:31
PhilDAgree there has to be a balance here between process, but any new process always feels heavy compared to anachy ;-)14:31
sdaguePhilD: we could all just Quake deathmatch for approvals :)14:32
russellblol14:32
russellbold school14:32
PhilDWe used to just send a gunship - that's what I consider old school14:32
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
*** funzo_ is now known as funzo14:33
russellb#topic open discussion14:33
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"14:33
russellbwe're pretty far off of the "icehouse" topic now, heh14:33
russellbany other topics for today14:33
russellb?14:33
johnthetubaguyo/14:33
BobBallo/14:33
russellbwoah now14:33
russellbgo for it :)14:33
PhilDBTW Monty tells me this will all be a lot easier when we move to StoryBoard14:33
BobBalljohn got his hand up first :/14:34
johnthetubaguyBobBall: that was for your topic :)14:34
driptonrussellb: Has anyone volunteered to put your review stats code up on OpenStack hardware?14:34
BobBalloh haha14:34
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC14:34
russellbdripton: no14:34
*** HenryG has quit IRC14:34
BobBallyes - now that the XS CI has been running for a while, I wanted to know a) if there were any concerns that needed to be addressed for Icehouse14:34
russellbPhilD: yeah, but can't bank on futureware14:34
driptonI think I'll have to volunteer then.  I think those stats were giving people a bit of a carrot and we need that.14:34
russellbBobBall: IMO, you're in the clear for Icehouse, just keep up the good work14:35
russellbdripton: should be easy enough to run locally14:35
russellbdripton: but that'd be great14:35
russellbit's a matter of some puppetizing14:35
BobBallIn which case I'd ask b) what we need to do / show to suggest a vote to get voting +/-1 votes14:35
russellbBobBall: for that, vote when you're ready to vote14:35
russellband if the votes suck, you'll get attacked by a mob14:36
russellbso make sure they don't suck14:36
BobBallWe think we're ready, but the -infra team say that nova team need to vote and agree that the CI is stable enough! :)14:36
russellbno need to be formal, i think we want the votes when you feel it's ready14:36
russellbheh14:36
russellbok, point me to a gerrit review or wheverever I need to ACK it14:36
BobBallUnderstood - will do.14:36
russellbprobably a good gate for them to have14:36
BobBallThat was easier than I thought! :)14:36
sdaguerussellb: there has been so much bad on the 3rd party on neutron, infra is conservative now14:36
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:36
russellbsdague: that makes sense14:37
russellbsdague: any concerns here?14:37
sdaguenope, it's seemed sane to me14:37
russellbi guess i like being able to ACK it in case bizarro CI wants to vote14:37
sdagueyep14:37
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:37
BobBall*nod* well thanks for the ACK - I'll request voting permissions by email and paste your IRC ACK ;)14:38
russellbheh that's fine14:38
russellbor CC me and I can reply14:38
russellbwhatever is needed14:38
BobBallThanks.14:38
johnthetubaguyBobBall: thats for the work you an matel did on this, really good to see it working now14:38
johnthetubaguylol, thanks^14:39
russellb+114:39
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:39
russellbany other topics?14:39
russellbalright then ... #openstack-nova always open for chatter if anything comes up14:40
garyki have an icehouse installation at a local college where we are using openstack as a teaching tool :)14:40
russellbthanks everyone!14:40
russellbgaryk: awesome14:40
russellb#endmeeting14:40
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:40
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar  6 14:40:57 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:40
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-03-06-14.00.html14:40
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-03-06-14.00.txt14:41
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-03-06-14.00.log.html14:41
*** sarob_ has quit IRC14:41
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:41
*** PaulMurray has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** mriedem has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:46
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** gokrokve has quit IRC14:49
*** jswarren has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
*** eankutse has quit IRC14:50
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:51
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** nosnos has quit IRC14:55
*** jjmb1 has quit IRC14:57
*** demorris has quit IRC14:57
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** caleb_ has quit IRC14:58
*** llu-laptop has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** bswartz1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** bswartz1 is now known as bswartz15:01
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:01
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar  6 15:01:17 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:01
bswartzhello everyone15:01
bswartzis anybody here?15:01
vponomaryovhello15:01
*** bill_az_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
bswartzlooks like low attendence today15:02
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
bswartzthanks for joining vponomaryov!15:02
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
vponomaryovShould we wait some time?15:02
bill_az_Hi -15:03
bswartzyeah I don't have much of an agenda15:03
*** banix has quit IRC15:03
bswartzthe main issue for me is the NetApp driver is still stuck in review15:03
bswartzbut we can also run through dev status for the benefit of those who read the minutes later on15:03
bill_az_bswartz:  I will take a look at that by end of the week15:04
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
bswartzbill_az_: it's not that we need more reviews, we've reviewed the crap out of it15:04
bswartzthe problem is that there are some unresolved changes to the code that's common between the netapp cinder driver and the netapp manila driver15:04
bswartzwe want to achieve a long term solution to sharing that code and it's going slower than I'd hoped15:05
vponomaryovactually, it has been updated several minutes ago15:05
bill_az_bswartz:  ok- I'd still like to take a pass through it, and also through generic driver15:05
bswartzoh15:05
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
bswartzhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/59100/15:05
bswartzthat's the one I'm looking at15:06
bill_az_I've been tied up with cinder lately, but will be shifting focus back to manila now15:06
bswartzhmm it looks like yportnova did a lot of work here15:06
bswartzyportnova: are you here?15:06
yportnovabswartz: we still need to wait until Navneet upload new patchset to cinder15:07
yportnovabswartz: I am here. hi!15:07
bswartzyportnova: okay thanks -- are your changes complete regarding the syncing of the api.py file?15:07
yportnovaYes, but waiting for fix to cinder15:08
*** zns has quit IRC15:08
bswartzI don't think we should wait15:08
bswartzI'll do a review of the latest patches and give my comments15:08
bswartzs/patches/patchset/15:08
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
bswartzI've talked to a few companies that are looking to beta test manila15:09
bswartzthere is interest in both the generic driver and the NetApp driver, so I want them both upstream where we can get some real testing15:09
bswartzand there are several other vendors who have expressed plans to have drivers ready before Atlanta15:10
bswartzso I'm happy to get those merged when they're ready15:10
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC15:10
bswartzyportnova: anything else to discuss regarding the netapp driver?15:11
yportnovabswartz: Nothing15:11
bswartzbill_az_: can you remind us what state the IBM driver is in?15:11
bswartzor anyone else lurking who wants to talk about drivers before we go on?15:12
bill_az_bswartz:  We have had a proof of concept version of gpfs manila driver since late last year - the goal is to get this wrapped up and submitted by end of this month15:12
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
bill_az_single tenant only15:12
bill_az_nfs only15:12
bill_az_(ganesha or kernel nfs)15:12
bswartzah okay15:12
bswartzbill_az_: is there a WIP on gerrit?15:12
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:13
bill_az_bswartz: I think there is a very early code drop but nothing recent15:13
bswartzokay15:13
bswartzif you make any progress feel free to put it up as a WIP so we can take a look at it before it's done15:14
bswartz#topic dev status15:14
*** openstack changes topic to "dev status (Meeting topic: manila)"15:14
vponomaryovDev status:15:14
bswartzvponomaryov: do you want to give your normal update?15:14
bill_az_bswartz:  sure, I will do that15:14
vponomaryov1) NetApp Cmode driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59100/15:14
vponomaryovChanges due to review issues has been implemented. Ready for review.15:14
vponomaryov2) Devstack with generic driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74647/15:14
vponomaryovReady to review. Used processed ubuntu cloud image with nfs and cifs, that can run with 64mb RAM and without discs, its weight ~290 Mb.15:15
vponomaryov3) Generic driver's modularity: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74154/15:15
vponomaryovChanges due to review issues has been implemented. Ready for review.15:15
bswartzvponomaryov: where can that image be obtained?15:15
vponomaryovlink is present ingerrit commit15:15
bswartzokay good15:15
bswartzcsaba: you here?15:16
vponomaryovlink: https://www.dropbox.com/s/vi5oeh10q1qkckh/ubuntu_1204_nfs_cifs.qcow215:16
bswartzlooks like he's AFK and not in channel15:16
bswartzalright, thanks vponomaryov15:17
vponomaryovthis image works, but can be improved, so can be updated after a while15:17
bswartzyeah having something that works is the most important -- I'm looking forward to csaba's image as our longer-term solution15:17
bswartzso it looks like some reviews are needed15:18
bswartzfor those that are wondering, the horizon support for manila is coming along too15:18
bswartzhere is a preview15:19
bswartz#link https://github.com/NetApp/horizon/tree/manila15:19
vponomaryovAlso, wanted to mention TODO list15:19
bswartzokay15:19
vponomaryovTODO:15:19
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
vponomaryov1) Make drivers (Generic, Cmode) use activation/deactivation API15:20
vponomaryov2) Update tempest to use activation of share-networks15:20
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
vponomaryov3) (generic driver) Change service instance connectivity directly to private subnet15:20
vponomaryov4) Update Horizon extension for Manila due to API changes, bugfixing15:20
vponomaryov5) Implement volume types server side15:20
vponomaryov6) Implement quota for activation of share-networks15:20
bswartznavneet: you here?15:20
bswartzyeah that's a lot of work to do before the conference15:21
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
bswartzwe will see about getting help from our side to get it all done15:21
bswartzokay I don't have anything else15:22
bswartz#topic open discussion15:22
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: manila)"15:22
*** navneet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
vponomaryovFirst priority after merging of Cmode driver?15:22
bswartzAssuming there's nothing else I'll give you all back 35 minutes15:22
bswartzthe cmode driver is top priority, then horizon15:23
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
bswartzalthough your (1) and (2) TODO items looks pretty small15:23
vponomaryovbut drivers does not use activation15:23
bswartzvponomaryov: how much work is (1) and (2)15:23
vponomaryovno much work, if no blockers15:24
bswartzokay let's knock those out next as long as they're quick to do15:24
*** sarob_ has quit IRC15:25
*** shamail has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
vponomaryovHorizon depends on API, so it requires stable API15:25
bswartzokay grab me in #manila or PM me if you need anything, I think we're done15:25
vponomaryovok15:25
bswartz#endmeeting15:25
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:25
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar  6 15:25:37 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:25
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-06-15.01.html15:25
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-06-15.01.txt15:25
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-06-15.01.log.html15:25
*** shamail has quit IRC15:25
*** BobBall has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:32
*** cjellick has quit IRC15:34
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:34
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:35
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:36
*** beagles has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:38
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs15:39
*** juice has quit IRC15:40
*** k-pom has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
*** safchain has quit IRC15:42
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
*** Barker has quit IRC15:48
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** sarob_ has quit IRC15:50
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
*** vponomaryov has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:54
*** caleb_ has quit IRC15:57
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** alazarev has quit IRC16:01
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
*** caleb_ has quit IRC16:01
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
*** jecarey has quit IRC16:03
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:07
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:07
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC16:08
*** xuhanp has quit IRC16:12
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC16:13
*** dukhlov has quit IRC16:14
*** dukhlov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:15
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** dukhlov has quit IRC16:18
*** dukhlov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
*** noslzzp has quit IRC16:19
*** sarob__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
*** sarob___ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:22
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:22
*** sarob__ has quit IRC16:24
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:26
*** sarob___ has quit IRC16:26
*** slagle has quit IRC16:27
*** jjmb has quit IRC16:31
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
*** navneet has quit IRC16:32
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:39
*** noslzzp has quit IRC16:39
*** cjellick has quit IRC16:44
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC16:45
*** demorris has quit IRC16:45
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:46
*** garyk has quit IRC16:46
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** amcrn has quit IRC16:53
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:53
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:55
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman17:01
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC17:04
*** phil_h has quit IRC17:05
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** fouxm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** sarob_ has quit IRC17:08
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:10
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:13
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:16
*** hockeynut has quit IRC17:16
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC17:18
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:24
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:24
*** phil_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** eankutse has quit IRC17:25
*** sarob_ has quit IRC17:25
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:26
*** garyk has quit IRC17:27
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC17:27
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:28
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC17:31
*** cjellick has quit IRC17:32
*** NehaV has quit IRC17:34
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
*** jgallard has quit IRC17:35
*** safchain has quit IRC17:39
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:40
*** esmute has quit IRC17:43
*** colinmcn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:43
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:45
*** colinmcn_ has quit IRC17:47
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC17:48
*** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:49
*** alazarev has quit IRC17:49
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_17:49
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
*** yaroslavLobanko1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:53
*** yaroslavLobanko1 has quit IRC17:53
*** _tmckay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** SushilKM has quit IRC17:56
*** paulmo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** ylobankov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** jjmb has quit IRC17:56
*** banix has quit IRC17:57
*** michael-yu has quit IRC17:58
*** crobertsrh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
*** mattf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
SergeyLukjanovoops. it was wrong channel ;)18:02
SergeyLukjanovhey savanna folks!18:02
ErikBHi Everyone18:02
ylobankovhello!18:02
*** paulmo has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
SergeyLukjanov#startmeeting savanna18:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar  6 18:02:57 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SergeyLukjanov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'savanna'18:03
SergeyLukjanov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda18:03
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
SergeyLukjanov#topic News / updates18:03
*** openstack changes topic to "News / updates (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:03
SergeyLukjanovlet's start from it to wait for some more folks18:03
*** sballe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** _tmckay is now known as tmckay18:03
*** sballe has quit IRC18:04
*** sballe_ has quit IRC18:04
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC18:04
SergeyLukjanov#info lawyers response about new name options: "From the trademark search, Sahara and Caravan are the best options."18:04
mattfbest or only?18:04
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
SergeyLukjanovso, I'd like to discuss it later on the meeting18:04
*** bob_nettleton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
*** eankutse has quit IRC18:05
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:05
SergeyLukjanovmattf, I've already asked them to clarify that, but I think that we should choose the option that is best from the PoW of lawyers to avoid renaming in future18:05
SergeyLukjanovone more, 3rd renaming, it'll kill me :(18:05
SergeyLukjanovfolks, please18:05
SergeyLukjanovshare your news/updates18:05
SergeyLukjanovIcehouse 3 released, more info in separated topic18:06
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_18:06
SergeyLukjanovylobankov, ping18:06
mattfonly 2 reviews on api, so no progress there18:06
ylobankovsorry, I am here18:06
crobertsrhA couple of dashboard bug fixes, a few new bp for the future.18:07
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:07
SergeyLukjanovmattf, sorry about that - end of cycle is a difficult time for such huge features - anyway, I'm trying to dedicate some time for reviewing it18:07
ylobankovI was working on test for transient cluster18:07
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:07
*** ErikB1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:07
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, ErikB, tmckay ?18:08
*** ajo has quit IRC18:08
mattfSergeyLukjanov, eh, it's been over a month..18:08
tmckayI've been tweaking cli tests, currently my environment is messed up with strange errors.   I have some examples to add to savanna-extra18:08
SergeyLukjanovylobankov, the plan is to have two separated lightweight jobs to test transient clusters creation (== trusts usage) on both direct and heat engines, am I right?18:09
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
alazarevIntel finally got environment for openstack development, could probably see contribution to Savanna soon18:09
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
ylobankovSergeyLukjanov: yes18:09
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, yup, good start18:09
*** ErikB has quit IRC18:09
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, that's nice, anyway we already have about 7 commits from them :)18:09
tmckayalso, we have a new savanna guy, elmiko.  I showed him how to do a gerrit review yesterday :)18:10
ErikB1Not many updates from our side this week. We are still plugging away at (Ambari) Blueprints. Hope to get back to Savanna proper soon.18:10
SergeyLukjanovErikB1, we're in FF, so, that's fine ;)18:11
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: yeah, but I'm talking about something bigger than changing assertEquals(None, ) to assertNone18:11
mattfErikB1, anything on the neutron wrapper. it aged out this morning.18:11
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:11
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, gerrit is really scary for newcomers :)18:11
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:11
SergeyLukjanovsreshetnyak, any updates about vanilla hadoop 2?18:12
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, is elmiko working with you?18:12
sreshetnyakhi18:12
ErikB1mattf: let me follow up on that.18:12
tmckaySergeyLukjanov, yes18:12
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, cool18:13
alazarevalso, Mirantis has customer interested in savanna over multi-region environment, planning to add support of multi-regions (already in J)18:13
sreshetnyakbasic implementation on vanilla hadoop 2 was merged18:13
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC18:13
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, yup, this bp is approved18:13
*** yogesh has quit IRC18:13
SergeyLukjanovsreshetnyak, what's about scaling/testing/edp?18:13
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: could you also take care of integration tests for IDH 3.0.2?18:14
*** phil_h has quit IRC18:14
sreshetnyakin the base implementation has supported scaling, validation, swift and provisioning user configs18:15
alazarevsreshetnyak: question for you, not for SergeyLukjanov18:15
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, I don't think that sreshetnyak will be able to finish both plugins till the rc18:16
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, I thought that you'll do it18:16
SergeyLukjanovI mean IDH plugin part18:16
SergeyLukjanovany other news/updates?18:17
SergeyLukjanovlet's move on18:17
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: will need to learn from Yaroslav how to write integration tests18:17
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC18:17
sreshetnyakalazarev, after the completion working on hadoop vanilla 2 plugin :)18:18
alazarevsreshetnyak: do you have estimates?18:18
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, please, contact ylobankov and sreshetnyak to clarify how'll help you to write or just write itests for you, it's quite important18:18
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:18
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, we'll not include plugin to release notes w/o working itests18:18
*** nacim has quit IRC18:19
sreshetnyakalazarev, about 2 weeks18:19
SergeyLukjanov#info design summit sessions proposition site will be open soon18:19
*** elmiko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
SergeyLukjanovsreshetnyak, it sounds like around the rc18:19
SergeyLukjanovok, alazarev, sreshetnyak, ylobankov, please discuss it and tell us the plan next time18:20
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk18:20
ylobankovok18:21
alazarevok18:21
SergeyLukjanovthanks18:21
SergeyLukjanov#topic Project naming collision18:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Project naming collision (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:21
SergeyLukjanovthat's the most painfull topic18:21
sreshetnyakok18:21
SergeyLukjanov(double l in painful to mark it especially painful)18:21
SergeyLukjanovso, we have a response from lawyers18:22
SergeyLukjanov"From the trademark search, Sahara and Caravan are the best options."18:22
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
SergeyLukjanovdue to the http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_5dd4f18fde38ce8e Sahara is #2 option and Caravan is #518:22
mattfwe should have included fusor18:23
alazarev"Sahara beats Caravan 10–4"18:23
SergeyLukjanovI think that we should avoid any risk to rename again and use options suggested by lawyers18:24
SergeyLukjanovany objections?18:25
ruheagree18:25
ErikB1agree18:25
SergeyLukjanovI see mattf has some, if still yes, please, add details18:25
mattfoh, mine is a statement of regret. i wish we'd included it.18:26
mattfi'm not suggesting we re-enter the lawyer process or pick something they've not vetted.18:27
mattfdid they provide any details on why options were ruled out?18:27
mattfin my experience there are good reasons and it's easy to provide them so we can all understand the reasoning18:27
SergeyLukjanovmattf, not yet, I've requested them, but I'm afraid that it could take a long time again...18:27
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
mattfthe reasoning should be readily available "pick sahara or caravan" is just the executive summary18:28
*** ndipanov has quit IRC18:29
*** hockeynut has quit IRC18:29
SergeyLukjanovmattf, probably, http://www.fusor.net or http://www.fxpansion.com/index.php?page=62&tab=185 or something else18:29
SergeyLukjanovanyway, I think that if lawyers say that "Sahara and Caravan are the best options" that it's better to use them18:29
alazarevagree18:30
SergeyLukjanovand we've choose them as a top 5 candidates18:30
*** gyee has quit IRC18:30
mattffeels like we're lingering. no one is going to be happy w/ the change. time to rip the bandaid off...18:30
SergeyLukjanovmattf, we need the new name and we had enough time to propose tons of options18:31
SergeyLukjanovwe've selected top 518:31
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
SergeyLukjanovand the #2 is available18:31
mattfor rather, it's time to rip the adhesive bandage off18:31
ruheSergeyLukjanov: so, do we need a new vote or do you think we can use the one which already won?18:32
*** eankutse has quit IRC18:32
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:32
IlyaEmattf: I have opinion from our lawyers that even keeping Savanna should be fine, as long as product doesn't do the same thing18:32
IlyaEthe main problem is that foundation believes we have to remove18:33
IlyaEand do it before the release18:33
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
IlyaEand it based on advise of their lwayers18:33
IlyaEour judgement call is to comply18:34
SergeyLukjanovyup18:34
*** yogesh has quit IRC18:34
SergeyLukjanovthe main reason is that we'd like to graduate ;)18:34
ErikB1good reason18:35
SergeyLukjanovruhe, IMO "Sahara beats Caravan 10–4" and google.com -> images -> caravan are enough to skip voting18:35
ruheSergeyLukjanov: +1 :)18:36
SergeyLukjanov#vote Choose the new name from the options suggested by lawyers *Sahara and Caravan) as the best from the trademarks pov? Yes, No, Abstain18:37
SergeyLukjanov#startvote Choose the new name from the options suggested by lawyers *Sahara and Caravan) as the best from the trademarks pov? Yes, No, Abstain18:37
openstackBegin voting on: Choose the new name from the options suggested by lawyers *Sahara and Caravan) as the best from the trademarks pov? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain.18:37
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.18:37
SergeyLukjanovfolks, please18:37
ErikB1#vote yes18:37
ruhe#vote Sahara18:37
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, ErikB1, mattf, sreshetnyak, IlyaE, ^^18:37
openstackruhe: Sahara is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Abstain.18:37
alazarev#vote yes18:37
_nadya_#vote yes18:37
ruhe#vote yes18:37
sreshetnyak#voyr yes18:37
mattf#vote ruhe18:37
bob_nettleton#vote yes18:37
openstackmattf: ruhe is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Abstain.18:37
tmckay#vote yes18:37
mattf#vote yes18:37
NikitaKonovalov#vote yes18:37
ylobankov#vote yes18:37
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC18:37
sreshetnyak#vote yes18:38
crobertsrh#vote yes18:38
SergeyLukjanov<@openstack> mattf: ruhe is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Abstain. :(18:38
SergeyLukjanov#vote yes18:38
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
elmiko#vote yes18:38
tmckayhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/picturegalleries/7198319/The-best-retro-caravans.html?image=1118:39
tmckaylooks just like an openstack guy18:39
*** tnovacik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:39
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, ;)18:39
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:39
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, OpenStack RetroCaravan, heh18:39
mattftmckay, oh no, are those jeans cuffed?!18:39
tmckaylol18:40
* SergeyLukjanov thinking about RetroCaravan vs. Stackadoop18:40
tmckaythat would be a close one18:40
elmikolol18:40
SergeyLukjanov#endvote18:40
openstackVoted on "Choose the new name from the options suggested by lawyers *Sahara and Caravan) as the best from the trademarks pov?" Results are18:40
openstackYes (13): bob_nettleton, ruhe, ErikB1, elmiko, ylobankov, NikitaKonovalov, crobertsrh, tmckay, mattf, SergeyLukjanov, alazarev, _nadya_, sreshetnyak18:40
SergeyLukjanovyay!18:40
SergeyLukjanovdemocracy!18:40
SergeyLukjanovwith total agreement18:40
*** roeyc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:40
*** roeyc has quit IRC18:40
SergeyLukjanovand as ruhe proposed to just choose Sahara and start renaming18:41
alazarevhere how democracy works: "you MUST change name, here is #2 and #5 available, please vote!"18:41
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, yup, that's it...18:41
ruheobey the system18:42
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC18:42
mattfvoting is a component of democracy18:42
* mattf grins18:42
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
SergeyLukjanov#starvote Choose "Sahara" w/o additional voting? Yes, No, Abstain18:43
IlyaE#vote yes18:43
SergeyLukjanovNOTE: "Sahara beats Caravan 10–4" in the first voting round and google.com -> images -> caravan are enough to skip voting18:43
*** coolsvap has quit IRC18:43
sreshetnyak#vote yes18:43
tmckay#vote yes18:43
SergeyLukjanov#vote yes18:43
ruhe#vote yes18:43
NikitaKonovalov#vote yes18:43
alazarev#vote yes18:43
_nadya_#vote yes18:43
ErikB1#vote Abstain18:43
ylobankov#vote yes18:43
elmiko#vote yes18:43
mattf#vote ErikB118:43
mattfwhat, no chastising?18:44
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:44
mattf#vote abstain18:44
bob_nettleton#vote abstain18:44
* mattf isn't good at this voting thing18:44
SergeyLukjanovooops, I don't see voting bot18:44
SergeyLukjanovopenstack, ping18:44
SergeyLukjanovoops, it was a typo18:45
SergeyLukjanovshame on me18:45
mattfstar vote!18:45
SergeyLukjanovplease, re-vote18:45
mattf*vote!18:45
SergeyLukjanov#startvote Choose "Sahara" w/o additional voting? Yes, No, Abstain18:45
openstackBegin voting on: Choose "Sahara" w/o additional voting? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain.18:45
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.18:45
tmckay#vote yes18:45
SergeyLukjanovopenstack, thank you!18:45
ruhe#vote yes18:45
ErikB1#vote Abstain18:45
crobertsrh#vote yes18:45
alazarev#vote yes18:45
_nadya_#vote yes18:45
NikitaKonovalov#vote yes18:45
elmiko#vote abstain18:45
bob_nettleton#vote Abstain18:45
ylobankov#vote yes18:45
mattf#vote ErikB118:46
openstackmattf: ErikB1 is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Abstain.18:46
sreshetnyak#vote yes18:46
mattf#vote abstain18:46
ErikB1mattf: I see, just testing.18:46
SergeyLukjanov#vote yes18:46
*** michael-yu has quit IRC18:47
SergeyLukjanovwe're missing some folks...18:47
SergeyLukjanovIlyaE, ping18:47
IlyaEI voted18:47
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
IlyaE#vote yes18:47
ErikB1IlyaE: you need to vote again...18:47
SergeyLukjanovIlyaE, one more time please, It wasn't recorded18:48
SergeyLukjanovok, looks like we have all votes18:48
SergeyLukjanov#endvote18:48
openstackVoted on "Choose "Sahara" w/o additional voting?" Results are18:48
openstackYes (10): NikitaKonovalov, ylobankov, ruhe, crobertsrh, tmckay, SergeyLukjanov, _nadya_, alazarev, sreshetnyak, IlyaE18:48
openstackAbstain (4): bob_nettleton, mattf, ErikB1, elmiko18:48
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
SergeyLukjanovnoone votes "No"18:49
tmckaynow we need to vote on pronunciation18:49
tmckayhar  -- like "hair", or like a pirate "arrrrr"18:49
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:49
tmckayI hear people do both18:50
IlyaEjust curios - mattf, ErikB1, elmiko, bob - do you have any concrete alternative proposals?18:50
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, Russian folks accent will kill any agreement on pronunciation :)18:50
tmckaylol18:50
SergeyLukjanovbob_nettleton, mattf, ErikB1, elmiko, which kind of concern do you have? that we need to vote or Sahara name just sucks?18:50
ErikB1IlyaE: mine were already knocked out in the voting process18:51
elmikoIlyaE, not really, i'm new to the project and i'm still getting up to speed on the reasoning for the name change18:51
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs18:51
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC18:51
tmckayelmiko, lawyers18:51
elmikotmckay, kk18:51
SergeyLukjanovelmiko, http://www.thetus.com/savanna18:51
ruhetmckay: we pronounce it suh-har-uh (like a pirate)18:51
*** phil_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
mattfeh, rather not say18:52
ErikB1I am +1 with the process and the name we ended up with18:52
tmckayruhe, okay, that works.  Just want to be consistent18:52
elmikoSergeyLukjanov, i don't have a good suggestion for an alternate and i'm neutral as to what we change to, although it would be cool to have a name that relates to the project. i'm not sure that's possible.18:52
mattfcan we close on this topic?18:52
IlyaEwell, I also don't like situation, but we got to do something18:52
bob_nettletonI am also +1 with the naming process.  No objections on my part.  I do like the sound of "18:52
mattfnext up and some sort of team to do the renaming?18:52
bob_nettletonof "Caravan"18:52
bob_nettletonbut I'm not opposed to Sahara.18:53
elmikoSergeyLukjanov, ty for the link18:53
mattfdo we have a scope for the change from the lawyers?18:53
*** mbukatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
mattfe.g. do we have to change readthedocs, or things is stackforge etc?18:53
SergeyLukjanovmattf, everything18:54
mattfeven the sticker on my laptop!?18:54
* mattf kids18:54
SergeyLukjanovI have several stickers too and t-shirts18:54
ruhemattf: even t-shirt which aignatov gave you18:54
* mattf throws his tshirts away18:54
SergeyLukjanovdon't know how to change them :(18:54
mattftho,m they may be collectors items now18:54
SergeyLukjanovmattf, but we'll keep links from old resources and will append (ex. Savanna) to everything ;)18:54
SergeyLukjanovok, looks like we're in agreement18:55
mattfso, everything on openstack and stackforge18:55
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
SergeyLukjanovmattf, yup18:55
mattfwhat about in the code, if a variable has savanna in the name but is not user visible?18:55
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
alazarevprobably we should keep old resources with redirect for a while18:55
SergeyLukjanovmattf, eventually we should rename them but not now18:56
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, sure18:56
SergeyLukjanovmattf, you still can find quantum in neutron I think18:56
mattfwhat's the scope of things that must change?18:56
SergeyLukjanov#agree rename project to "Sahara"18:56
ruhemattf: what about RPM packages? will you have a time to rename?18:56
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC18:56
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
SergeyLukjanovmattf, user visible stuff, like API, docs18:56
mattfruhe, depends. in the past name of package != brand name. but it all depends... so there's some guidance needed here.18:57
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
SergeyLukjanovwe'll have new pypi packages too18:57
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
SergeyLukjanovso, I think rpms should be renamed too18:58
mattfhere's the thing. we should probably spend the next 4 weeks w/ the full team removing all references to savanna across the project's history, but we need to prioritize. so i'm keen to find out what MUST be changed and do it first, save the SHOULD for post graduation.18:58
*** prasadv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
SergeyLukjanovoh, two mins left... I'll email all info about FF, release and etc.18:58
mattfsorry, "we COULD probably spend"18:58
SergeyLukjanovmattf, I'll check the expectations18:59
mattfSergeyLukjanov, did the lawyers provide any guidance on what needs to change?18:59
SergeyLukjanovmattf, and mail details18:59
mattfthanks18:59
SergeyLukjanovmattf, thanks for catching this, good question18:59
SergeyLukjanovfolks, let's move to the #savanna channel18:59
SergeyLukjanovthank you all!18:59
SergeyLukjanov#endmeeting18:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar  6 18:59:56 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2014/savanna.2014-03-06-18.02.html18:59
ErikB1Thanks!19:00
mattfciao!19:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2014/savanna.2014-03-06-18.02.txt19:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2014/savanna.2014-03-06-18.02.log.html19:00
*** bob_nettleton has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** mattf has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** michael-yu has quit IRC19:00
mesteryHello Neutron Group Policy participants!19:00
cgoncalves\o/19:00
banixmastery, others hi19:00
prasadvhi mestery19:00
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC19:00
*** ylobankov has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** ywu has quit IRC19:01
rkukurahi19:01
mandeepmestery: Hi19:01
*** crobertsrh has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
mestery#startmeeting networking_policy19:01
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk19:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar  6 19:01:09 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'19:01
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
* mestery thinks meetbot appears slow today, perhaps an ominous sign.19:01
*** alazarev has quit IRC19:01
banix:)19:02
mestery#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron_Group_Policy Agenda19:02
SumitNaiksatamhi all!19:02
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: Hi sumit19:02
banixSmitNaiksatam: hi19:02
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
s3wonghello19:02
cgoncalveshi everyone19:02
mestery#topic Action Item Review19:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Item Review (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:02
banixs3wong: Hi19:02
SumitNaiksatambanix s3wong mandeep hi19:02
mesteryGreetings everyone!19:02
mesteryLets walk through action items from last week's meeting now.19:02
mesteryFirst up:19:02
mesterySumitNaiksatam and prasadv to update document to add contracts to Object Model19:02
mesteryAny updates on this one?19:03
SumitNaiksatamyeah19:03
*** NehaV1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
prasadvsumit do you want to update19:03
*** samstav_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: sure19:03
SumitNaiksatamwe haven't updated the main document yet19:03
*** samstav_ has quit IRC19:03
SumitNaiksatamprasadv hemanth mandeep and I got together and brainstormed19:03
SumitNaiksatamwe made progress19:04
mesteryAwesome!19:04
*** OSM is now known as songole19:04
SumitNaiksatambut still work to be done19:04
*** samstav_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
SumitNaiksatam#link https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/presentation/d/1Nn1HjghAvk2RTPwvltSrnCUJkidWKWY2ckU7OYAVNpo/edit#slide=id.g1c910cf8b_03819:04
*** zns has quit IRC19:04
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
mesteryCool, thanks SumitNaiksatam for the update!19:04
SumitNaiksatamhence we did not add to the document19:04
mesteryOK19:04
SumitNaiksatamhappy to discuss here19:04
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
*** jecarey_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
*** caleb_ has quit IRC19:05
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: you want to add?19:05
prasadvyou summed it pretty well19:05
*** walker_ has quit IRC19:05
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: shouldn't action be a list?19:05
*** NehaV has quit IRC19:05
s3wongthat is, one classifier to n actions?19:05
banixso is "policy" more like "policy rule" we had earlier19:05
SumitNaiksatams3wong: hmmm…yeah it was a list before19:05
SumitNaiksatams3wong: but what is an example of multiple actions?19:06
SumitNaiksatambanix: yeah19:06
s3wongalso - policy should have more than one {classifier: list of actions}19:06
banixwith contract essentially being the "policy" in the terminology we have been using?19:06
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes thats the idea19:06
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ^^^19:06
*** jinsao has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:06
*** jecarey has quit IRC19:06
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:06
*** samstav has quit IRC19:06
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: there are several different action types. For example, it can be 'allow', then 'redirect' to a mirror, then set some 'qos' action19:07
s3wongall off of one classifier match19:07
SumitNaiksatams3wong: can we think of that as a composite action?19:07
SumitNaiksatams3wong: with a list, you get into priority issues19:08
mesteryAgree on the priority issue front here.19:08
mandeeps3wong: Yes, were trying to use a white list model that did not need priority19:08
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:08
*** samstav_ has quit IRC19:08
mandeeps3wong: But this is still work in progress, and this is good input19:09
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: actions are quite orthogonal though - also, some type does not make sense to have multiple, for example 'security'19:09
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:09
s3wongbut OTOH, 'qos' action type can have multiple actions19:09
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yeah, we thought if we can could collapse multiple actions into one19:09
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yeah19:09
*** walker_ has quit IRC19:09
SumitNaiksatambut yeah, like mandeep said, not set in stone19:09
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: the endpoing group mapping to a neutron network is just the default value, right? because it is defined in the BP doc that it can be either a network or port19:10
mandeepcgoncalves: Yes19:10
prasadvwe still need to work further on action(s)19:10
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: yes for the former, no for the latter19:10
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: how is actions represented then?19:10
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away19:10
SumitNaiksatams3wong: we will need to have an extensible set of defined actions19:10
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: port is an endpoint19:11
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: peg is a collection of end points19:11
SumitNaiksatam*epg19:11
mandeepcgoncalves: A neutron network identifies a group of endpoints with "default neutron policy", but a group could exist with a different membership19:11
*** eankutse has quit IRC19:11
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: I do agree we shouldn't have priority on the set of actions19:12
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam, mandeep: ok, thanks for clarifying :)19:12
banixand an peg can contain endpoints and one single network?19:12
s3wongand that was never the intention anyway19:12
*** ywu has quit IRC19:12
* mestery thinks peg may be sticking now ... :)19:12
banix:)19:12
mandeep;-)19:12
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
s3wongwhat is peg? :-)19:13
banixpolicy endpoint group19:13
SumitNaiksatamspell correct tries to invent new terms and i like to take credit :-)19:13
SumitNaiksatampeg -> epg19:13
SumitNaiksatamsorry19:13
cgoncalvesIIRC we have been using different terminology in different places (e.g., 'connectivity group' in the BP, 'endpoint group' in BD and/or DB (not sure right now))19:13
mandeepcgoncalves: Good pint19:14
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: we will normalize19:14
mandeepcgoncalves: We need to fix this in the doc update19:14
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: thanks for catching that19:14
s3wongjust use peg :-)19:14
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: agreed19:14
banixSO I think as we proceed a bit but not too far we should take the discussion to the google doc as we did earlier19:14
mandeepbanix: +119:14
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: make comments on the doc if you see inconsistencies ;-)19:14
cgoncalvesand for the neutron CLI I've used as is in the BP, i.e. 'connectivity group'19:14
s3wongbanix: I agreed. We should be commenting on the doc a lot19:15
prasadvbanix:+119:15
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes sure19:15
s3wongthat was the working model before19:15
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: we must first defined which one to use. either connectivity group or endpoint group19:15
cgoncalvess/defined/define19:15
s3wongI think we had been using endpoint group for a long time19:15
SumitNaiksatamso should i replace the current diagram with the one i posted in the link above?19:16
banixLet us stay with the terms we agreed on earlier unless there is a need to change19:16
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
s3wongthough we used "connectivity group" in both the API doc and the actual API implementation :-)19:16
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
mesteryAt various points, we've used both terms.19:16
mesteryWhat should we settle on then?19:17
*** sballe has quit IRC19:17
mandeeplet us not get hung up on names ... let us take that discussion to the doc19:17
SumitNaiksatamend point group seems more natural to me19:17
*** jcoufal has quit IRC19:17
*** jcoufal_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:17
mesteryGood call mandeep, didn't mean to resolve here either. :)19:17
banixI think even though our work is independent of ODL effort along the same direction,19:17
SumitNaiksatamsince its a collection of end points19:17
prasadv+1 for end point group19:17
SumitNaiksatammandeep: sorry19:17
SumitNaiksatammandeep: i agree, not get hung up on names :-)19:18
*** PhilD has quit IRC19:18
banixwe can use similar terms to avoid confusing everybody later on; just a suggestion19:18
mandeepbanix: I agree, we should stay consistent with ODL model where applicable19:18
s3wongbanix: agreed - in ODL we settled on the project being call GBP (group-based policy)19:18
mestery+1 to staying consistent with ODL model19:18
* cgoncalves thinks we will settle for 'endpoint group', but moves on the subject :-)19:18
s3wongand the official term for the group is endpoint group19:18
s3wongso if we are going with the ODL terminology, we should go with endpoint group19:19
banixor e.g. (as in egg)19:19
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:19
banixsorry, lets move on19:19
SumitNaiksatam+1 for consistency19:19
s3wongso for the model, all of us will make our comments on doc?19:20
s3wongis that the next step?19:20
mandeeps3wong: Yes, that was my understanding19:20
mesteryMakes sense to me s3wong.19:20
*** cjellick has quit IRC19:20
SumitNaiksatams3wong: which doc?19:21
banixthose working on the first draft, need a bit time to add more?19:21
banixto the doc i meant19:21
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: the google preso doc you sent above19:21
mandeeps3wong: OK19:21
s3wong"Neutron Group Policy Model"19:21
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ok19:22
mesteryThis one: https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/presentation/d/1Nn1HjghAvk2RTPwvltSrnCUJkidWKWY2ckU7OYAVNpo/edit#slide=id.g1c910cf8b_0019:22
mesteryRight?19:22
*** luqas has quit IRC19:22
SumitNaiksatammestery: yeah that was the one i pasted earlier19:22
SumitNaiksatamok got it19:22
s3wongmestery: correct, the one that starts with "Work In Progress!!!"19:22
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC19:22
prasadvbanix: we do need more time to add more, right sumit?19:22
mestery#action Group Policy members to comment on the document here for next week https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/presentation/d/1Nn1HjghAvk2RTPwvltSrnCUJkidWKWY2ckU7OYAVNpo/edit#slide=id.g1c910cf8b_0019:22
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: yeah19:23
mandeepprasadv: Yes19:23
mesteryOK, lets hit the second Action Item for review19:23
mesteryFrom last week: mandeep to setup neutronclient shared repo19:23
mandeepdone19:23
mesteryAwesome! Thanks mandeep!19:23
mandeepUpdates the meeting minutes with the repo19:23
cgoncalvesmandeep: thanks!19:23
*** tnovacik has quit IRC19:23
mesteryPerfect, thanks!19:23
mestery#topic Plugin status update19:23
*** openstack changes topic to "Plugin status update (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:23
mesterySumitNaiksatam?19:23
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:24
cgoncalvesI've pushed code to branch cgoncalves/group-policy19:24
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:24
SumitNaiksatammestery: yeah19:24
mesterycgoncalves: Sweet!19:24
SumitNaiksatami pushed code as well :-)19:24
mesterySweet!19:25
banixcgoncalves: thanks; can you say bait about what it does19:25
SumitNaiksatamnot to get too excited - an initial post on the plugin19:25
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:25
banixSumitNaiksatam: cool!19:25
SumitNaiksatambanix: thanks19:25
banixtoo late, we are already excited :)19:25
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:25
mesteryhahahahah19:25
* mestery thinks the group policy team is easily excitable.19:25
SumitNaiksatam"-)19:25
banix:)19:25
SumitNaiksatam:-)19:25
SumitNaiksatamso this was after a bit of experimentation19:26
cgoncalvesbanix: it's just a first draft of commands and API calls. will have to be refactored to keep up with the latest models changes19:26
SumitNaiksatamthere is some insight gained19:26
*** caleb_ has quit IRC19:26
banixi see; will look; thanks.19:26
SumitNaiksatamwe agreed that we would be doing a single plugin19:26
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:26
SumitNaiksatamwhich would be configured as a "core" plugin19:26
mesteryYes19:26
s3wongOK19:27
SumitNaiksatamthe "core" configuration part of it is a bit tricky19:27
SumitNaiksatamsince we still want to use the L3, L3, services plugin19:27
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:27
SumitNaiksatamso what i am doing in the patch is, you still configure all other plugins as before19:27
SumitNaiksatamso ML2 still gets configured as "core_plugin"19:28
SumitNaiksatamthen we introduce an additional piece of configuration for the policy plugin19:28
SumitNaiksatamcall it an interceptor19:28
SumitNaiksatamso now, the neutron plugin loading mechanism loads all the plugins as before (including core)19:28
SumitNaiksatamthen we introduce a hook for this interceptor19:29
mesterySumitNaiksatam: Reminds me of what Broace/Vyatta was proposing in Hong Kong :)19:29
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:29
*** eankutse has quit IRC19:29
SumitNaiksatamok19:29
SumitNaiksatami hope i don't step on their terminilogy19:29
SumitNaiksatamit might mean different things19:29
mesteryNope, not at all.19:29
mesteryYeah, true.19:29
s3wongmestery: yeah, the Geoff Arnold dynamic resource mgmt thingy19:29
SumitNaiksatamif the interceptor is configured19:29
mesterys3wong: Exactly!19:29
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:30
SumitNaiksatamthen, the loaded references to the core and other plugins are replaced with the interceptor/policy-plugin19:30
*** thinrichs has quit IRC19:30
SumitNaiksatamand those references will be passed to the policy plugin19:30
SumitNaiksatamnow the policy plugin is in the path of all the calls (which is what we want)19:30
mesteryThat sounds pretty nice SumitNaiksatam!19:31
SumitNaiksatamwhat this does is, it allows us to stay consistent with wherever "core_plugin" is used19:31
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: would that break the non-policy Neutron calls?19:31
SumitNaiksatamsay for example devstack19:31
SumitNaiksatamwe just become and additional/optional configuration19:31
SumitNaiksatamso i hope i have managed to confuse everyone by now! :-)19:32
banixCool; Looking forward to seeing the code.19:32
mestery:)19:32
*** jinsao has quit IRC19:32
SumitNaiksatami have run into an issue with the way the extensions are loaded19:32
*** jim003 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:32
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC19:32
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: Cool.19:32
SumitNaiksatamso the current patch is breaking at that19:32
banixwe are an excitable easily confused bunch :)19:32
SumitNaiksatambut working on it19:32
SumitNaiksatambanix: hahaha19:32
banixgreat thanks.19:32
SumitNaiksatamopen to questions comments on this19:33
rkukuraSumitNaiksatam: sounds great to me!19:33
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: I think that's the way to go, even later on. replacing ML2 with yet another core plugin is troublesome for sysadmins. we would also have to come up with a migration tool if ML2 that's deprecated; or am I understanding the ML2-replacement wrong?19:33
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: thanks19:33
*** tedross has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:33
cgoncalvess/that's/gets19:34
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: so in this scheme, i don't think they will have to change their references to the core_plugin (ML2 that is)19:34
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: so this is an infra to get interceptor loaded - my guess is this interceptor is meant to be generic, not only for policy (other projects that need to intercept calls can use it in the future too)?19:34
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: there will be additional config (which might required migration)19:34
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann19:34
mandeeps3wong: Correct, say for debugging19:34
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: exactly, in this scheme such wouldn't be required19:34
SumitNaiksatams3wong: exactly19:34
SumitNaiksatambut we have to be careful with setting the expectations on migration :-)19:34
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: just wanted with my previous comment that this way of introducing group policy as an interceptor is better in the long run I think19:35
SumitNaiksatami mean from a legacy to a group policy based system19:35
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: They have to work ...19:35
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: true true19:35
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs19:35
s3wongvery good19:35
* cgoncalves is excited to have a working, even if minimal, group policy + redirect setup flowing19:36
mesterySumitNaiksatam: This is very encouraging work! Awesome!19:36
*** annashen_ has quit IRC19:36
SumitNaiksatammestery: sure19:36
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: a fair bit to go before that19:36
mesteryAny other questions/discussions on the plugin?19:37
prasadvsumitnaiksatam: very good work!!19:37
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: thanks19:37
mandeepprasadv: +119:37
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: I know, I know :)19:37
s3wongI can only imagine how much testing is needed before this patch can make it upstream :-)19:37
mesterys3wong: :P19:37
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ha good one19:37
banixGreat Sumit. thanks.19:37
cgoncalvess3wong: you're no fun! hehe19:37
SumitNaiksatamso thats what i mean by setting the expectations19:37
SumitNaiksatami think there is a huge overhead even for a tiny change19:38
mesteryYeah, good call.19:38
SumitNaiksatamso we have to sandbox accordingly19:38
*** jecarey_ has quit IRC19:38
SumitNaiksatami think most of us have experienced that in icehouse :-)19:38
SumitNaiksatamnot funny actually19:38
*** tedross has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:38
* s3wong sighs19:39
mesteryTrue19:39
banixDo we want to bring this approach to the larger community; not now but may be later on when we make more progress?19:39
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:39
SumitNaiksatambanix: oh absolutely19:39
banixMay be part of what we discuss at the sumit19:40
s3wongbanix: yeah, that was my question above actually :-)19:40
SumitNaiksatambanix: lets get it work to a reasonable extent19:40
banixyes makes sense19:40
SumitNaiksatambanix: with some UTs19:40
SumitNaiksatambanix: but i agree better to socialize sooner than later19:40
banixYes, will have much more time to work on this after the ongoing deadlines are passed19:41
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: correct, probably want to give a heads up on the ML once this works to a certain extent19:41
SumitNaiksatambanix: sure19:41
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yes sure19:41
SumitNaiksatami think the best thing will be to post on gerrit at the earliest19:41
mestery+1 to that SumitNaiksatam19:42
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:42
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:42
banixsounds good19:42
*** jcoufal_ has quit IRC19:42
mesteryOK, lets move on then.19:43
mestery#topic Model19:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Model (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:43
mesteryI guess we talked bout this a lot already.19:43
mesteryAnything else to discuss here now?19:43
s3wong16 more minutes!!!19:44
mestery:)19:44
mesteryI mean, object model discussions.19:44
mesteryWe did this earlier I think. Anything else to ponder further?19:44
banixWe had started discussing connection to services framework19:44
SumitNaiksatambanix: yeah19:45
s3wongbanix: that will happen on a separate meeting, no?19:45
mesterybanix: This is true, yes. We had decided to move that out right SumitNaiksatam?19:45
mesteryYes19:45
mesteryseparate meeting I think19:45
s3wongWednesdays @1900 UTC19:45
SumitNaiksatammestery: yeah, we thought we had enough fires to fight for icehouse 319:45
mandeepbanix: Yes19:45
s3wongand daylight saving time will come for us US people19:45
banixyes i agree19:45
mestery:)19:45
SumitNaiksatamso next wednesday works for everyone?19:45
banixwanted to say something else:19:45
* mestery will be on vacation, but please proceed without me. :)19:46
prasadvi am ok19:46
*** samstav has quit IRC19:46
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: sure, works for me19:46
SumitNaiksatamok19:46
banixok will talk later.19:46
mestery#topic Open Discussion19:46
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:46
mesteryAnything else this week then?19:46
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan19:46
SumitNaiksatambanix: you were saying something19:47
s3wongyeah, waiting for banix to finish his something else :-)19:47
banixno i just wanted to say we could have a basic framework that does not require services19:47
banixas such and we can have that as a separate complementary but not necessary thing. that's all.19:47
s3wongbanix: for PoC, sure, we should keep it simple19:47
mandeepbanix: Yes, that could a first phase19:47
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes, we can incrementally evolve19:47
banixexactly; that was it from my side.19:48
SumitNaiksatamonly thing is that we have certain requirements down the line, we need to start planning now19:48
*** tmckay has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
SumitNaiksatamit takes a really long time to get anything in19:48
SumitNaiksatamespecially resource/api changes19:48
s3wongyeah, the group-policy meeting can hopefully focus more on actually coding and PoC19:49
banixI agree.19:49
s3wongand the service meeting will focus on doing service with group-policy19:49
mestery+119:49
SumitNaiksatamyeah, we don't have much time left for the PoC19:49
mandeepLooks like we have violent agreement ;-)19:50
SumitNaiksatamgood thing is we don't rely on neutron reviewers to accept the PoC :-)19:50
s3wongconsensus!!!19:50
banixGreat job starting the ball rolling19:50
mesteryYes, nice work SumitNaiksatam!19:51
SumitNaiksatammestery: thanks, good team work19:51
mestery+119:51
mesteryOK, if there's nothing else, lets call this meeting 9 minutes early! :)19:51
SumitNaiksatamexcitable team is a great thing!19:51
banix:)19:51
mestery:)19:51
SumitNaiksatammestery: sure thanks!19:51
s3wongAll good19:51
cgoncalveslet's pat ourselves on the back for early meeting ending and tremendous aggreement overall :)19:51
banixexcited about leaving early!19:52
mesteryThanks for everyone's help and excitement!19:52
mestery;)19:52
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: +119:52
mestery#endmeeting19:52
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:52
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar  6 19:52:09 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:52
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-06-19.01.html19:52
mesteryThanks folks!19:52
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-06-19.01.txt19:52
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-06-19.01.log.html19:52
*** prasadv has quit IRC19:52
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:52
*** jim003 has quit IRC19:52
SumitNaiksatamlater all, bye!19:52
banixthanks everybody19:52
*** songole has quit IRC19:52
s3wongthanks! bye19:52
cgoncalvesthanks! cya19:52
*** mandeep has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:52
*** s3wong has quit IRC19:53
*** Barker has quit IRC19:54
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:55
*** amytron has quit IRC19:55
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:56
*** annashen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:57
*** samstav has quit IRC19:57
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** harlowja has quit IRC20:03
*** michael-yu has quit IRC20:04
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** ashwini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC20:04
markwashglance folks around?20:04
ameadeo/20:04
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:05
markwashlet's start up20:05
markwash#startmeeting glance20:05
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar  6 20:05:28 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is markwash. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:05
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:05
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance)"20:05
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance'20:05
arnaud__o/20:05
nikhil___o/20:05
ameadeo/20:06
rosmaitao/20:06
markwasho/20:07
iccha_o/20:07
markwashso, we are in feature freeze20:07
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk20:07
markwashthere are some blueprints and bugs targeted to rc120:07
markwash#link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/icehouse-rc120:07
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC20:07
markwashthe idea is to get these in before tuesday so that I don't have to beg or explain the case for more time :-)20:08
markwashand so we can cut rc1 sooner20:08
*** demorris_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:08
iccha_will do mark20:09
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:09
markwashalso, landing fixes to important bugs is high priority20:09
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:09
markwashthe sooner we can do that, the sooner we can cut rc1, and the sooner we can get it in some more people's hands20:09
*** demorris has quit IRC20:10
*** demorris_ is now known as demorris20:10
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:10
ameadepeople should feel free to slam me with review requests, i may be able to pick up a bug here and there20:10
markwashI don't have any more immediate items for today's meeting, should we check in on the status of the artifacts work?20:10
arnaud__that would be nice20:11
ameademarkwash: yeah whats the word?20:11
*** luqas has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
ameadeare there any blueprints?20:12
markwashseems we're still in design phases. . but I don't see alex or jbernard around to discuss with20:12
arnaud__at the end of the meeting I would like to discuss a behavior that I am seeing: I want to confirm that this is not a bug20:12
markwashameade: there are blueprints but they're still being defined IIRC20:12
rosmaitahttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/artifact-repository-api20:13
rosmaitaalso, https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-artifacts-api-faq20:13
ameaderosmaita: ty sir20:14
rosmaitanp20:14
arnaud__Mark do we have randall working on the heat side?20:14
markwashseems there's not much new information however20:14
markwasharnaud__: I haven't heard from him in a bit, but I think he's still interested20:15
arnaud__okay20:15
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
markwasharnaud__: you and I had some good conversation about directions the artifacts structures could go20:16
markwashiirc, we had hoped to share that info with alex, have you had a chance to follow up with him?20:16
arnaud__Iwas busy on some other stuff this week20:16
markwashits been one of those weeks for me as well20:16
arnaud__I have our conversation20:16
arnaud__I will talk to him before next meeting20:16
markwashall right, looks like we don't have much more in terms of status updates20:17
ameademarkwash: do you know if anyone is working on the cinder driver?20:17
markwashameade: not that I'm aware of20:17
ameadeit's basically just a stub atm20:17
arnaud__I know zhiyan was interested in it20:17
zhiyanameade: cinder store driver? what do you think?20:17
ameadezhiyan: i'd like it to get finished :)20:18
zhiyanameade: IMO the issue for it is Brick20:18
markwashthere are a few other issues as well that have come up20:19
ameadezhiyan: can you summarize brick and why it's a blocker? i know brick is part of cinder20:19
markwash1 is that we don't have support for multi-format images, so its a bit hard to use cinder drivers for anything other than raw images20:19
zhiyanameade: without it we/Glance (and other project who outside Cinder) can't access volumes20:19
ameadeah i see20:19
markwash2) is that its not clear that the deployment pattern for glance and cinder would allow glance to own the cinder volumes, so they could get deleted, leaving the location a dangling reference20:20
ameadethat makes sense too20:20
ameadei really dont want dead code sitting there then20:20
zhiyanright, currently it is *part of* cinder, but a standard lib20:20
ameadewhat i really wanna see is the glance.store code turn into a transfer service20:21
nikhil___+120:21
ameadebut it gets weird i think when you mix block and object storage20:21
markwashthere was a really interesting idea put forward by lifeless at the triple O summit that could help us kick off the transfer service20:21
zhiyanameade: is is not a dead code, via image_handler within nova, we can consume that volume acted image as we needed (since nova side has volume accessing code)20:21
lifeless\o/20:22
markwashI captured it in a blueprint (which links to lifeless ideas in an etherpad) https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/multicast-image-transfer20:22
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:22
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:23
ameadehmm ok, i'll try to digest this stuff and form some opinions20:24
markwashthe whole idea of the transfer service isn't entirely clear in my mind20:24
nikhil___that seems to overlap a bit with the bittorrent protocol within the xfer service20:24
markwashso a usecase like that was interesting in that it seemed like it *could* help clarify some things20:24
markwashnikhil___: yeah, I think there is a lot of similarity20:24
nikhil___we have a few use cases markwash20:24
zhiyanimo multicast still is a thing for "copy", my idea is zero-copy20:25
markwashI kind of think they would be side-by-side protocols20:25
nikhil___would like to provide feedback20:25
nikhil___markwash: yeah20:25
nikhil___zhiyan: ?20:25
markwashzhiyan: you're right, but I think there are requirements for good copy support as well20:25
*** alazarev has quit IRC20:25
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC20:25
markwashanyway, I'd like to avoid ratholing too far down at this point :-)20:26
ameadeyeah i think both are important though20:26
markwashso, arnaud__ you had a quick bug you wanted some discussion about?20:26
zhiyanmarkwash: ok, but tbh prevent copy is my finial target.20:26
ameadezhiyan: you mean related to multi-attach volumes?20:27
arnaud__markwash: yes20:27
ameadezhiyan: are you the one working on that in cinder?20:27
zhiyanameade: they are different topic, iiuc.20:27
arnaud__+120:27
zhiyanyes, i am20:27
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:27
ameadekk, sorry we can move on now20:28
arnaud__ok :) so here is the story20:28
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:29
arnaud__in nova, I create an image - upload content of size 0 (StringIO('')) - then get the location for the image - then replace the bits at this location with something much bigger than 0 - then update the image with the new size of this big thing20:30
*** eanxgeek is now known as eanxgeek|log20:30
arnaud__this works20:30
arnaud__after that I am able to boot the new image from nova20:30
arnaud__I feel like something is messed up :) (i.e. the checksum)20:31
*** samstav has quit IRC20:31
arnaud__is it clear?20:31
nikhil___hmm20:31
ameadearnaud__: ah yeah, like nova isn't checking the checksum?20:32
*** zns has quit IRC20:32
zhiyanarnaud__: did you check the checksum value after you update the image?20:32
gokrokve_Hi. Sorry I am late.20:32
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:32
nikhil___may be we need to add verificaion of the etag (checksum returned from store) with the one store in glance?20:32
markwasharnaud__: so you just update the size directly in glance?20:33
arnaud__yes20:33
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC20:33
arnaud__markwash: yes, I just update the size20:33
arnaud__and modify what is at the location20:33
arnaud__this is cool for me, but that make works what I want to do20:33
arnaud__but I want to make this isn't working because of a bug20:34
arnaud__:)20:34
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:34
arnaud__zhiyan: the checksum of the image is populated after update20:34
zhiyanok, if so seems like it's a bug in nova but glance20:34
arnaud__so this is OK behavior to have Nova replacing a location behind Glance's back? and update the size?20:35
markwashit does seem like there is a bug in glance somewhere if you can update the size or the checksum, or have the download work with an invalid checksum20:35
arnaud__ok20:35
arnaud__ok, cool.20:36
zhiyanarnaud__: humm, i think this use case is too hack to glance20:36
rosmaitamarkwash: are you saying that checksum, size, and location should be linked so you must update all at the same time?20:36
markwashthis is sort of hilarious, asking you to file a bug for a functionality you really want to use :-)20:36
arnaud__zhiyan: I agree with you, but at this point I need to get the Glance location and size the location is provided after content is uploaded20:36
zhiyanarnaud__: why you need replace image bits via location?20:37
arnaud__markwash: I don't want to file a bug, but I want to be sure that in the future no one else file a bug and change the behavior20:37
arnaud__to move the bits of the snapshot instead of uploading them20:38
nikhil___zhiyan: upload behind the scenes20:38
arnaud__yep nikhil___20:38
nikhil___;)20:38
markwashthe core problem here is that clients don't know where to put data if they don't want to send it through glance20:39
arnaud__yes20:39
*** yogesh has quit IRC20:39
markwasharnaud__: I think its pretty likely that we will file a bug and "fix" the behavior you're seeing :-)20:39
arnaud__ok...20:40
arnaud__:)20:40
nikhil___feel even more need for a xfer service which is kinda glance aware20:40
arnaud__I would like to see a location provided before having to upload the content20:40
arnaud__+1 nikhil___20:41
markwashthere was a suggestion at some point for glance to provide the "upload location" that clients could use20:41
zhiyanarnaud__: iiuc, currently we support it20:41
*** tanisdl has quit IRC20:41
arnaud__zhiyan: could you develop?20:41
arnaud__I am not seeing the direct_url just by doing image_create afaik20:41
ameadeisn't this what breaking out glance.store is for?20:42
arnaud__not exactly20:42
zhiyanarnaud__: create a image, it under "queued" status, and you an prepare the image bits on nova side, then use PATCH api to add that location to glance20:42
zhiyanarnaud__: then the image will turn to "active"20:42
markwashameade: sort of, but its difficult to imagine all of the clients getting the right credentials for talking directly to the store20:42
arnaud__zhiyan: the thing is that I need to have this location20:42
ameadeheh yeah20:42
arnaud__before20:42
ameadeso this is what a third party transfer service would do20:42
arnaud__you don't know the format that is used by glance to store the image20:43
arnaud__the file name, the folder or whatever info contained in the URL of the image20:43
*** jswarren has quit IRC20:43
arnaud__do you get my point zhiyan?20:44
markwashso, can someone file a bug documenting this behavior?20:44
arnaud__I will markwash20:44
zhiyanarnaud__: yes, but i'm thinking if this use case on nova side is make sense20:44
markwashokay, cool20:44
markwashif there aren't any other items atm, I have something I need to run off to20:44
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:45
arnaud__thank you guys20:45
ameadebye everyone20:46
markwashthanks!20:46
markwash#endmeeting20:46
nikhil___thanks20:46
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:46
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar  6 20:46:25 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:46
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-06-20.05.html20:46
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-06-20.05.txt20:46
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-06-20.05.log.html20:46
zhiyanthanks bye20:46
*** ashwini has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
*** walker_ has quit IRC20:51
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:52
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:54
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC20:58
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC21:00
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:00
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:07
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs21:07
*** hockeynut has quit IRC21:09
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
*** lcostantino has quit IRC21:13
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:14
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:14
*** jswarren has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:16
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk21:17
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:20
*** eankutse has quit IRC21:23
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:23
*** NehaV has quit IRC21:24
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:24
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:25
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC21:27
*** eankutse has quit IRC21:31
*** jcoufal_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** jcoufal has quit IRC21:31
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** demorris has quit IRC21:34
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:36
*** jcoufal_ has quit IRC21:37
*** julim has quit IRC21:39
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
*** atiwari has quit IRC21:46
*** ameade has quit IRC21:46
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:47
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:47
*** Barker has quit IRC21:48
*** alazarev has quit IRC21:48
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs21:51
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:55
*** hockeynut has quit IRC21:56
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:56
*** demorris has quit IRC21:56
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC21:57
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:58
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_22:00
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
rockygmeetingstart Refstack22:01
rockygstartmeeting Refstack22:01
malinigreetings!22:01
rockygHey!22:01
*** catherine|2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:02
pleia2rockyg: you want a # before startmeeting :)22:02
rockygdoh!22:02
rockyg#startmeeting RefStack22:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar  6 22:02:20 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rockyg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:02
*** zns has quit IRC22:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: RefStack)"22:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'refstack'22:02
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:02
*** waiman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:02
zehicle_at_dello/22:03
*** pdmars has quit IRC22:03
catherine|2here22:03
waimanhi22:03
rockygo/22:03
*** ken1ohmichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
rockygrollcall for those who haven't typed in since meeting start...22:04
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:05
*** bswartz has quit IRC22:05
*** flwang has quit IRC22:06
rockygagenda:  Update from zehicle_at_dell on refstack demo and defcore discussion at board; project status; selection of next sprint stories; schedule?; open discussion22:06
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
*** tedchang_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
rockyghi tedchang_22:07
rockygLet's start with report from zehicle_at_dell about board meeting decisions/discussions22:08
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
tedchang_Hi :)22:08
zehicle_at_dellok22:08
zehicle_at_delllots to report22:08
sarob_yo22:09
zehicle_at_dellwe reported about the progres  of the program overall22:09
zehicle_at_delland got board OK to keep going with expanding the community involvement in the process22:09
*** khyati has quit IRC22:09
zehicle_at_dellwe did NOT demo TCUP but asked the board members to identify people who would run it as a alpha user group22:10
zehicle_at_dellwe said that we would start that program next week22:10
zehicle_at_dellWe worked out an agreement with the driver testing team from Mirantis22:10
zehicle_at_dellthat they would bring that code into RefStack22:10
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:10
zehicle_at_delland we also talked to Monty from the Infra team to start the process of getting a FOO.openstack.org domain22:11
zehicle_at_dellrunning the RefStack code started22:11
zehicle_at_dellFOO = TBD22:11
zehicle_at_delloutside of the board meeting, I also talked to Boris about considering if TCUP could be used as an alternate method of driver testing22:12
zehicle_at_dellthat will take some community discussion22:12
zehicle_at_dellI think those are the the highlights22:12
*** yogesh has quit IRC22:12
zehicle_at_dellquestion?22:13
maliniWould like to comment from my attendance at the Operator Summit March 3 at eBay.22:13
rockygkewl22:14
catherine|2For the alpha user group, do they stand up their own RefStack?22:14
*** zns has quit IRC22:14
maliniTheir action item was to get involved in filing bugs, joing blueprint discussions and stability stability"22:14
malinisoo provide test use cases22:14
rockygExcellent22:14
malinimay be we should get them to help rank defcore tests/weights22:15
zehicle_at_dellwe talked about the operator summit at the board meeting too - I was wondering if the operators would find the capabilities chart we are making helpful22:15
zehicle_at_dellmalini, yes, that's what we want from refstack22:15
zehicle_at_dellthe plan is to get the capabilities up on the website and start collecting results from TCUP22:15
maliniI think so, there was also a sense of being excluded, free pass, credit for reviews/bugs22:15
rockygwe are thingking of having a voting method for identifying the most wanted/needed capabilities22:16
zehicle_at_dellthen we will allow people to vote +/- on their preference for that capability22:16
sarob_stefano and tom will work on the pass thing22:16
zehicle_at_dellhow we score that will be interesting - will need a dedicated meeting to discuss22:16
malininice -- voting :-)22:16
sarob_i joined the storyboard meet this morning22:16
sarob_providing more blueprint information and operator feedback is part of their plans22:17
rockygIt would also be great to get some alphas from the ops community.22:17
zehicle_at_dellI'm excited to see malini and sarob_ on!  anyone else missed in the roll call?22:17
malini:-) thank you zehicle_at_dell !22:18
* sarob_ yip yip22:18
rockygI think a lot of the user community finds it difficult to follow blueprints beyond the blueprint and included links.  Going off to reviews gets very confusing.  We need a better feedback/discussion mechanism on bps22:18
zehicle_at_dellas a use-case, it would be great to link capabilities (which are from tests) back to blueprints22:19
* zehicle_at_dell lasso we're a bit off topic22:19
* zehicle_at_dell sets_expectations that's likely for the next cycle after the summit22:20
rockygok.  let's get back on topic.  last call for board meeting discussion22:20
rockygOops..I forgot to set topic.  Dang.22:21
*** lblanchard has quit IRC22:21
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
catherine|2About tests by alpha group, will they set up their own refstack?22:21
rockyg#topic project status22:21
*** openstack changes topic to "project status (Meeting topic: RefStack)"22:21
zehicle_at_dellalpha?22:22
catherine|2we talk about have some group to test and collect results  ..22:22
rockygwe need to provide either source or some sort of distro (zipped tar?) that will give them tcup and gui.22:23
*** tedchang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:23
catherine|2They can download refstack from github ..22:24
rockygSo let's see where we are on having a tcup we can hand out and the simple gui you guys put together.  I know there was code check in but I haven't reviewed it yet.22:24
catherine|2to their environment and test ..22:24
rockygdownload will work as long as we can provide build instructions.  Seems to me we want dev-ops, rather than just ops folks for alpha.22:25
zehicle_at_dellJosh worked out a a way to inject the dockerfile22:26
zehicle_at_delland we have a kick.py to start it off22:26
zehicle_at_dellwe made a specific design decision on Monday:22:26
rockygLet's hear where we are then discuss what needs to get done to get a usable download.22:26
zehicle_at_dell1) you clone the git repo22:26
zehicle_at_dell0) install docker (I always forget 0)22:26
zehicle_at_dell2) run the kick.py script22:27
*** caleb_ has quit IRC22:27
zehicle_at_dell1.5) source openrc.sh22:27
zehicle_at_dellneed coffee, I'm getting out of order22:27
rockygzehicle_at_dell: also test results are in csv format22:27
rockygI'll clean up the order numbers when I put on in the wiki ;-)22:28
zehicle_at_dellthanks22:28
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:28
davidlenwellsorry im late guys22:28
davidlenwellreading scroll back now22:28
rockygWhere do the test come from? tempest repo?22:28
sarob_let me know where to start, i can be an alpha tester22:29
zehicle_at_dellI think that we have some control over that22:29
zehicle_at_dellbut I think the thought is to prefer a repo22:29
rockygAnd we have to remember they are havana tests22:29
*** eankutse has quit IRC22:30
davidlenwellcaught up22:31
davidlenwellso it sounds like we are done with this topic22:32
rockygThe other question that will come up a lot is whether more packages will need to be loaded to the test vm to run refstack22:32
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:32
zehicle_at_dellexpect when we are going to have it22:32
zehicle_at_dellso, a little more time22:32
rockygdo you have any status to add?  API or db schema?22:32
zehicle_at_dellwe're still missing the config step22:32
zehicle_at_dellso the docker file gets the env variables22:33
rockygAh, yes.22:33
zehicle_at_delland can run tempest, but we do not build the tempest config yet22:33
zehicle_at_dellthe good news is that we don't have to do that in the container, we can just test it22:33
zehicle_at_delland the container will read it out of the local diretory because of file mappings22:33
rockyghow?22:33
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: have you looked at the code that has merged today?22:33
zehicle_at_dellactually, it would create it from the code22:33
zehicle_at_dellno!  joy?22:33
davidlenwellmuch joy22:34
zehicle_at_dellI'm behind then - can you give an update?22:34
rockygNope.  Kewler.22:34
* zehicle_at_dell catching up with day job22:34
davidlenwellwe've merged most of the changes from catherines team22:34
davidlenwelltwo are hung up and need rebase before they can pass tests.. but they have been fantastic about our nit picky changes22:34
rockyg+122:35
davidlenwellI'm hoping we can handle those today22:35
catherine|2not all nit picky .. many are great suggestion ..22:35
davidlenwellyeah .. we had 3 piston folks code reviewing22:35
davidlenwellanyways if you guys will talk to me after in #refstack we'll get the rest in22:36
davidlenwellthen josh has a patch that uses env variables and runs as root and is more secure22:36
catherine|2we will talk to you after this ... David22:36
davidlenwellexcelent22:36
zehicle_at_delldavidlenwell, so did we get those two parts glued together too?  what's the delta once the patches land?22:37
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: not just yet .. will have to look at it after josh submits its for review22:37
zehicle_at_dellkk22:37
davidlenwellhe was just telling me he had it working this morning22:37
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:38
zehicle_at_dellI've been trying to get to it - maybe tomorrow22:38
davidlenwellSo I have three open tasks..22:38
zehicle_at_dellbut that would let me start testing it22:38
davidlenwellone. update db schema to what was discussed a few weeks ago in our f2f22:38
davidlenwelltwo. write code for parsing results into score cards and indexable data22:39
davidlenwellthree. redeploy the new version of refstack on refstack.org and set up ci for it .. so that it updates when stuff merges without me having to ssh in and do it manually22:39
davidlenwellI'm moving to the bay area next week and am packing like a mad man this week ..22:40
rockyg1.5 get me the diagrams/schemas for archtecture and db22:40
rockygWelcome!22:40
davidlenwelladded to my list rockyg22:40
davidlenwellI am running a bit behind on a lot of things as a result .. but I am still putting in at least 6 hours a day and should get through at least the first one on my list before the weekend22:41
rockygIf we can get one and 2, can we run and get test results in csv form?22:41
malinidavidlenwell welcome! other than the real estate prices, i like it here, moved 20 months back22:41
davidlenwellrockyg: im sure thats possible .. it might actually be easier than I am thinking as I think I might have already written that code and forgotten to commit it22:42
rockygGreat! we have critical mass for not just dev f2f but ops/training/docs f2f!22:42
*** walker_ has quit IRC22:42
*** sarob_ has quit IRC22:42
rockyg+2!22:42
* zehicle_at_dell agenda_parking_lot driver testing UI work in RefStack22:42
davidlenwellI just need to get my hands dirty on it tonight and I think its handled22:43
rockygOK.  Can we motve to next sprint work discussion?22:43
zehicle_at_dellso, tomorrow we should be able to do an integrated TCUP test22:43
zehicle_at_dellI'll block time for it tomorrow and hang out on #refstack22:43
davidlenwelloh another thing on my plate refstack related is that for some reason stackalitics stopped tracking our project .. need to fix that22:43
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC22:43
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: I think thats possible yes22:44
zehicle_at_dellcoolio22:44
davidlenwellI'll make sure im around at least the first half of the day ..22:44
rockygI'll be there if I remember.22:44
zehicle_at_dellstackalitics should be fixable considering Mirantis team coming over to play22:44
davidlenwellalso .. worth mentioning22:44
zehicle_at_dellanyone from the Driver Test group?22:44
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: indeed22:44
zehicle_at_dellwe should make sure to topic that22:45
*** NehaV has quit IRC22:45
zehicle_at_dellit related to how we need to collect/track the capabilities -> tests map (was a brief topic from Monday)22:45
rockyg#topic work for sprint222:45
*** openstack changes topic to "work for sprint2 (Meeting topic: RefStack)"22:45
rockygLet's move davdlenwell's 3 to sprint 222:46
*** alex-gone is now known as Alexandra22:46
davidlenwellso I just laid out 4 tasks on my plate22:46
davidlenwellif we count stackalitics22:46
rockygIf we get the the integrated tcup test running tomorrow, what are the next steps?22:47
davidlenwellrockyg: I'll make 1.5 part of 1 .. since I have a thing that will generate a diagram from sql22:47
zehicle_at_dellis anyone from Mirantis on the call?  can someone take Stackalitics off davidlenwell plate?22:47
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: that would be ideal22:47
rockygI can possibly get some help from Jerry here at Huawei.  He did some stackalytics fixes for Compass22:47
*** esker has quit IRC22:47
zehicle_at_dellhold off on that then and see if we can expand it - not urgent22:47
zehicle_at_dellrockyg, thanks.22:48
davidlenwellaltho it will retroactively track stuff .. so its not like we need it in now22:48
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:48
rockygI've also reviewed some of the code.  Pretty straightforward.22:48
rockygOr I can jsut file a bug;-)22:49
davidlenwellyeah .. I am about to commit to it anyways to put some more piston people in the right files for tracking our stuff ..22:49
zehicle_at_dellwhat other work is in the queue to drop?22:49
davidlenwellso its not the end of the world if I just deal with it22:49
rockygSo.  We have working integrated tcup.  Next development needs?22:49
davidlenwellwe need a remote execution thing22:49
davidlenwellright now tcup gets launched on the server thats running refstack22:50
davidlenwellwhich is fine for dev .. but won't scale22:50
zehicle_at_dellcan we get the upload post working first?22:50
rockygAh.22:50
davidlenwellof course22:50
davidlenwellthats one of my list of three22:50
davidlenwellthis is for after that22:50
rockyg1. get post working22:50
zehicle_at_dellalso, who's working w/ infra team on hosting the site?22:50
davidlenwelli fix database22:50
zehicle_at_dell(oh, we need to take poll for naming22:51
davidlenwell2 get post working22:51
zehicle_at_dell)22:51
davidlenwellnaming what ?22:51
rockyghosting refstack.org?22:51
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: right now im hosting it22:51
zehicle_at_dellrefstack.openstack.org22:51
davidlenwelluntil there is governance22:51
zehicle_at_dellok, that's enough for now -> let's move on22:51
davidlenwellso back to remote execution22:51
rockygI can make some inquiries.  what about Catherine and her team?  What are they gonna do for sprint2?22:52
zehicle_at_dellFWIW, with the addition of the driver test, they want to accelerate getting it hosted by infra and a base name22:52
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:52
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: I'm all for that .. however until we're a little further along they aren't going to be happy about hosting us22:52
davidlenwellwhich brings me to something I should share22:52
*** esker has quit IRC22:52
rockygLemme look into the infra hosting, too.22:53
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:53
davidlenwellwe sort of got bashed last night in the infra room22:53
davidlenwellrockyg: I'm in close contact with them and have good relationships with the team22:53
rockygOK.22:53
davidlenwellrockyg: I've already broached the subject of them hosting it ..22:53
davidlenwellI don't think it will be a problem22:53
zehicle_at_dellsounds like a topic22:53
davidlenwellbut right now we aren't built right22:53
davidlenwellso they were bashing us for our use of docker.. one of them tolt me we arne't very openstacky22:54
davidlenwell#topic infra hosting us22:54
davidlenwellwe need a scaleable testing model22:54
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:55
davidlenwellI plan to use gearman for that .. run a pool of workers to run tests22:55
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:55
davidlenwellits pretty much how they are used to doing things22:55
rockygIt's one of the selling points of refstack-- you don't have to build a new stack to run it against your openstack....22:55
davidlenwellwe'd also have to write a bunch of puppet stuff in order for them to be able to host it22:56
davidlenwelleverything they deploy is puppet22:56
davidlenwellpiston is close to hiring someone mostly to work for the infra team ..22:56
davidlenwellonce we do I can make that his first assignment22:56
davidlenwellI think we can get there in the next two sprints .. but we shouldn't spend a lot of time bothering them about it until we are ready22:57
*** cjellick has quit IRC22:57
*** hockeynut has quit IRC22:57
zehicle_at_dell+122:57
rockyg+122:57
davidlenwellin the mean time..  I can talk to catherine|2 after this about what tasks her team has time for ..22:58
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:58
catherine|2davidlenwell: yes we are here ...22:58
zehicle_at_delllast call for topics....22:58
davidlenwellthey aren't assigned to this project full time so we might loose 1 or all of them anytime now .. so I'd like to figure out how to use them as best we can22:58
catherine|2really want to get the last 2 commits in ..22:58
rockygI'd like to take some of this discussion over to #refstack (with malini if possible) to get more detailed planning.22:58
zehicle_at_dellwe'll have to carry integrating Driver Test & DefCore Reports to next meeting22:59
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC22:59
davidlenwellsounds good22:59
zehicle_at_delloh, for the record.  I think we decided to create a config file (type to be decided) that has the test -> capabliitiy mapping22:59
rockygyup.22:59
zehicle_at_dellthat would allow us to manage/version it in the repo very easily22:59
davidlenwellexactly23:00
zehicle_at_dellwe may need to have different ones per OSrelease23:00
zehicle_at_dellsince they are going to drift per release23:00
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: I think we will23:00
zehicle_at_dellok, +123:00
davidlenwellor a json structure in the file that allows lots of versions23:00
rockygI'd like to publicize the bps, the launchpad site and the wiki for the ops folks interested23:00
zehicle_at_dellsince there are >1000 tests already23:00
zehicle_at_dellI'd rather not create an endlessly growing file23:01
zehicle_at_dellwould be harder to maintain23:01
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: thats fine23:01
davidlenwellwe23:01
davidlenwell'we'll come up with a clean way of naming them23:01
rockyg#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/RefStack23:01
davidlenwellokay .. lets end and move ofer to #refstack23:01
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
zehicle_at_dellI've got to sign off - I'll join there tomorrow23:01
*** ken1ohmichi has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:02
rockyg#link https://launchpad.net/refstack23:02
zehicle_at_dellgreat meeting everyone!  progress is great23:02
rockyg#endmeeting23:02
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"23:02
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar  6 23:02:27 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)23:02
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-03-06-22.02.html23:02
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-03-06-22.02.txt23:02
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-03-06-22.02.log.html23:02
*** catherine|2 has quit IRC23:03
*** luqas has quit IRC23:06
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC23:08
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC23:11
*** NehaV has quit IRC23:13
*** banix has quit IRC23:13
*** caleb_ has quit IRC23:14
*** PeterSchwaller_ has quit IRC23:17
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:19
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC23:23
*** malini has quit IRC23:39
*** Leonr has quit IRC23:40
*** mozawa has quit IRC23:44
*** waiman has quit IRC23:45
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC23:50
*** jdob has quit IRC23:56
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57
*** jcoufal has quit IRC23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!