Tuesday, 2014-03-11

*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:00
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC00:01
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:03
*** caleb_ has quit IRC00:04
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:08
*** IlyaE has quit IRC00:11
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:15
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:15
*** atiwari has quit IRC00:17
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC00:20
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:24
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:28
*** bdpayne has quit IRC00:28
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:28
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC00:30
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:33
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC00:35
*** michael-yu has quit IRC00:36
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:37
*** esker has quit IRC00:39
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:39
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:42
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:42
*** esker has quit IRC00:44
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
*** Vijay_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:52
*** woodster1 has quit IRC00:52
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:55
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:02
Vijay_Hi,  I need to create a new extension API in neutron and have some questions in this regard. Can someone help me out?01:04
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC01:06
Vijay_I understand that if I create a new extension like xyz, so that the api looks like GET v2.0/xyz, I must create a new file called xyz.py in neutron/extensions/, define the new API extension there in a dictionary, and then in the get_resources() method of the xyz class, register that dict with a controller object, and create a resource for it, and return that..01:07
Vijay_I did the above, but when I invoke the CLI, it hits a 404 error, and I see an error in the q-svc logs : DEBUG routes.middleware [-] No route matched for POST /xyz.json from (pid=54551) __call__ /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/routes/middleware.py:9701:08
Vijay_Am not sure what I'm missing01:09
Vijay_I don't have a plugin for this new extension yet - do I have to implement one? This doesn't involve any device, so do I still need to implement a plugin?01:09
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:10
Vijay_For now, I'm just passing manager.NeutronManager.get_plugin() for the plugin parameter, to create_resource()01:11
*** rbrady-afk is now known as rbrady01:14
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:14
*** tanisdl has quit IRC01:14
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:15
*** michael-yu has quit IRC01:15
*** lblanchard has quit IRC01:20
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:33
*** richm has quit IRC01:34
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:36
*** bill_az_ has quit IRC01:36
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:37
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:40
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC01:40
*** woodster1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:44
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:48
*** woodster1 has quit IRC01:49
*** woodster1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:49
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC01:54
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:54
*** flwang has quit IRC01:55
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:56
*** baoli has quit IRC02:05
*** khyati has quit IRC02:06
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:09
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:10
*** yamahata has quit IRC02:11
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC02:12
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:12
*** tanisdl has quit IRC02:13
*** zns has quit IRC02:28
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:31
*** Vijay_ has quit IRC02:32
*** derekh has quit IRC02:33
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC02:34
*** rbrady is now known as rbrady-afk02:46
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:46
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC02:48
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan02:51
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away02:54
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:57
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:06
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja03:06
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:08
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC03:12
*** banix has quit IRC03:13
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:13
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:14
*** baoli has quit IRC03:15
*** ken1ohmichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:15
*** ken1ohmichi has left #openstack-meeting-alt03:15
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:16
*** sballe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:22
*** gokrokve has quit IRC03:22
*** dripton has quit IRC03:23
*** sballe has quit IRC03:24
*** dripton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:24
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:27
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:35
*** enikanorov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:36
*** michael-yu has quit IRC03:36
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:36
*** jecarey has quit IRC03:38
*** enikanorov has quit IRC03:38
*** arnaud has quit IRC03:50
*** amcrn has quit IRC03:50
*** bdpayne has quit IRC03:56
*** markmcclain has quit IRC04:00
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:02
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:05
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:08
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC04:09
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:11
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:12
*** demorris has quit IRC04:12
*** flwang has quit IRC04:13
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:14
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:15
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:15
*** michael-yu has quit IRC04:16
*** banix has quit IRC04:18
*** hockeynut has quit IRC04:32
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:33
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:42
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:43
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:45
*** sarob_ has quit IRC04:46
*** esker has quit IRC04:47
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC04:49
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:50
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC04:55
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:57
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC04:57
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:57
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:58
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:06
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:08
*** caleb_ has quit IRC05:09
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:10
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:10
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:11
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:11
*** tanisdl has quit IRC05:13
*** gokrokve has quit IRC05:13
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:14
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:15
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:16
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** baoli has quit IRC05:19
*** caleb_ has quit IRC05:21
*** walker_ has quit IRC05:23
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:23
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC05:24
*** esker has quit IRC05:24
*** michael-yu has quit IRC05:26
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:26
*** michael-yu has quit IRC05:27
*** samstav has quit IRC05:28
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:28
*** IlyaE has quit IRC05:29
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC05:30
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC05:30
* IgorYozhikov is now away: went away...05:39
*** IgorYozhikov is now known as IYozhikov_away05:39
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:41
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt05:41
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:41
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:43
*** edhall has quit IRC05:44
*** woodster1 has quit IRC05:46
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:47
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:47
*** sarob_ has quit IRC05:49
*** tanisdl has quit IRC05:52
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:52
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC05:53
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:54
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:54
*** edhall has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:55
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:58
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:05
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:07
*** eghobo has quit IRC06:07
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:08
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC06:08
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away06:08
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:09
*** eghobo has quit IRC06:09
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:09
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC06:10
*** michael-yu has quit IRC06:11
*** eguz has quit IRC06:11
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:12
*** bdpayne has quit IRC06:14
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:16
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC06:18
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:18
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:18
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:23
*** samstav has quit IRC06:25
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:34
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:39
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:40
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:41
*** gyee has quit IRC06:43
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:50
*** khyati has quit IRC06:51
*** michael-yu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:59
*** michael-yu has quit IRC06:59
*** michael-yu_ is now known as michael-yu06:59
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC07:02
*** IlyaE has quit IRC07:18
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:26
*** michael-yu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:32
*** michael-yu has quit IRC07:32
*** michael-yu_ is now known as michael-yu07:32
*** michael-yu has quit IRC07:35
*** zns has quit IRC07:37
*** julienvey_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:37
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:38
*** julienvey_ has quit IRC07:41
*** michael-yu has quit IRC07:42
*** woodster1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:46
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8707:50
*** woodster1 has quit IRC07:51
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:52
*** markmcclain has quit IRC07:53
*** michael-yu has quit IRC07:57
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:00
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:14
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC08:15
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:16
*** eghobo has quit IRC08:18
*** michael-yu has quit IRC08:20
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:24
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:24
*** michael-yu has quit IRC08:27
*** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:28
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:30
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:30
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:32
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:37
*** ken1ohmichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:39
*** luqas has left #openstack-meeting-alt08:39
*** stannie has quit IRC08:50
*** spredzy has quit IRC08:51
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:55
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:58
*** julienvey has quit IRC08:59
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC08:59
*** jcoufal has quit IRC09:00
*** jcoufal_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:00
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:01
*** jcoufal_ has quit IRC09:02
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:04
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC09:04
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:05
*** jrist has quit IRC09:07
*** denis_makogon_ has quit IRC09:08
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:15
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:19
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:21
*** jjmb has quit IRC09:36
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:41
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC09:44
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:44
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:48
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:48
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC09:50
*** tanisdl has quit IRC09:52
*** sarob_ has quit IRC09:54
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:57
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC10:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:02
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:05
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:08
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:09
*** stannie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:13
*** xuhanp has quit IRC10:15
*** saju_m has quit IRC10:18
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:31
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:51
*** saju_m has quit IRC10:54
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:55
*** sarob_ has quit IRC10:55
*** dmakogon_ is now known as denis_makogon11:07
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC11:09
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:09
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:09
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:22
*** jgallard has quit IRC11:26
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:28
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:29
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt11:30
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:33
*** tanisdl has quit IRC11:37
*** jjmb has quit IRC11:38
*** hgedikli_ has quit IRC11:40
*** jtomasek has quit IRC11:46
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:52
*** jrist has quit IRC11:58
*** sarob_ has quit IRC11:58
*** crimi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:58
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:00
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC12:04
*** sadasu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:08
*** ken1ohmichi has left #openstack-meeting-alt12:08
*** yamahata has quit IRC12:09
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC12:17
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:17
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:18
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:18
*** david-lyle has quit IRC12:21
*** Barker has quit IRC12:21
*** rbrady-afk is now known as rbrady12:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:25
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:29
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:30
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:31
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:37
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC12:39
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:40
*** nosnos has quit IRC12:44
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** woodster1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:53
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:55
baoli#startmeeting PCI Passthrough13:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 11 13:00:07 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is baoli. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: PCI Passthrough)"13:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'pci_passthrough'13:00
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC13:00
baoliHello13:00
*** sarob_ has quit IRC13:00
irenabHi13:00
rkukurahi13:00
heyonglihi13:00
baoliGreat, everyone is here13:00
baoliLet's start with code review13:01
irenabok13:01
irenabnova or neutron first?13:01
baoliIrenab, can we start with yours?13:01
irenabsure13:02
baoliMy main question is whether or not we'll support non-identical vNICs (therefore multiple sriov MDs) in the same cloud13:02
irenabIink https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74464/13:02
*** jecarey has quit IRC13:02
irenabI think that teoretically it can be possible, but for real cloud not sure...13:03
baoliIf that's not a concern, then I think that it's ok to check the vendor info after the agent query13:04
irenabbaoli: any reason you need the assumtion for single SRIOV MD?13:04
baoliirenab, my comments to your change is that the vendor infor should be checked before the agent query13:05
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:05
irenabbaoli: I probably miss your point here, why the order is critical?13:05
rkukuraI think it does make sense for the MD to ignore (not bind) ports using unrecognized devices13:06
baoliirenab, the agent query requires DB access.13:06
sadasubaoli, irenab: from the info that I have so far, it is possible to have a cloud with sr-iov devices from diff vendors13:06
sadasuso we need to check for vendor info before L2 agent query13:07
irenabbaoli: so the order is just for optimization, right?13:07
*** beagles has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:07
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:08
irenabrkukura: any chance you can take a look at MechnismDriver at review I posted to see if looks OK or you suggest reordering?13:08
baoliirenab, yea, it won't affect functionality13:08
rkukurairenab: I'll give it a closer review, but at a quick glance, I think I agree with baoli and sadasu that checking the vendor 1st makes sense13:09
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:09
irenabbaoli: good comment anyway. I need to see how to take an advantage of basic agent MD logic13:09
baoliirenab, cool13:09
baoliLet's move on13:10
baoli#topic port admin_state13:10
*** openstack changes topic to "port admin_state (Meeting topic: PCI Passthrough)"13:10
irenabsadsu: regarding PCI vendor info check, shall we add some utils?13:10
irenabbaoli: just few more minutes on previous topic, please13:10
baoliSorry, sure13:10
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:11
sadasuirenab: yes...makes sense13:11
baoliirenab, rkukura, is it ok to have a separate base class for SRIOV?13:11
irenabI am not sure that creating SRIOVBaseMD for Agent based makes sense13:11
rkukurabaoli: sure, but keep in mind that some use agents and some don't, so mixin might make sense13:11
sadasutakes supported vendor info as params and checks against the port that is trying to bind13:11
baolior is it ok to add vendor_info the current agent base class?13:12
irenabsadasu: ok13:12
irenabbaoli: can you please elaborate a bit13:13
sadasurkukura: +1 for Mixin, although I don't know of any other MD (other than mine) that does not use an agent13:13
rkukuragiven we are not rushing to get this in icehouse, my general advice would be to not initially worry too much about sharing common code between SR-IOV drivers. That can be done later as a refactoring step once we see what's really common.13:13
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:13
baoliirenab, in the current AgentBase class, we can add vendor_info13:14
baolirkukura, I agree.13:14
irenabrkukura: still we joined effort here, seems we do not want to spend cycles at both sides, both for code and unittest for common parts13:14
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:14
sadasurkukura: agreed.13:15
*** eankutse has quit IRC13:15
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC13:15
rkukuraagreed that sharing code where it is obvious will reduce effort13:15
irenabat least we can try to share13:15
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
irenabseems we ca skip to next topic13:15
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
rkukuramaybe start with a simple mixing for common SR-IOV-specific code13:16
rkukuras/mixing/mixin/13:16
irenabrkukura: you had some objections for Mixin before13:16
irenabnot relevant here?13:16
sadasurkukura, irenab: this method of adding proposed common code to existing patches so others can take a look, is working for me13:16
sadasuthen when we converge, we can move that to a diff BP13:17
rkukurano objection to using a mixin from me13:17
rkukurarefactoring can often be handled as a bug13:17
irenabsadasu: I am ok with it too13:17
baolirkukura, I took an attempt to come up with a common SRIOV base class, take a look at this thread when you have time: RE: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV binding of ports13:17
sadasurkukura: ok13:18
irenabI think its possible to push number of patches for same bp, so common part can be pushed separatly if needed13:18
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:18
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:18
rkukurabaoli: hadn't seen that, looking13:19
baoliOk then, can we move on now?13:19
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:20
irenabsure13:20
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:20
baoliso neutron port API supports change of port state.13:20
baoliI checked the ovs implementation for it13:20
irenabovs pushed DEAD vlan for port disable13:21
baoliit basically installed a dead vlan and a flow to drop packets to/from the port13:21
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC13:21
*** daneleblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:21
baoliand I think the vm is not aware of the status change of the port13:21
rkukurabaoli: right13:22
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:22
irenabI thought to use 'ip link set ' command to enforce it on VF13:22
rkukuraalthough there is a patch in review to push some port status changes from neutron to nova13:22
beaglesrkukura, +1 yeah that is one of the future purposes of that series of patches13:22
baolirkukura, that seesms to make more sense13:22
irenabwhat nova action will be once get the notification?13:23
baolirkukura, can you share links for those patches/bugs, etc?13:23
beagleshttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/admin-event-callback-api,n,z13:23
baolibeagles: thanks13:23
rkukuraRight now, my understanding of nova's use of this is simply to block VM boot until the ports are up.13:24
*** BrianB_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:24
baolirkukura, can you change the status after the VM is up?13:24
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC13:24
beaglesin short the mechanisms are in place, but it is not employed everywhere it might be13:24
irenabadmin state can be changed after VM is already up13:24
rkukuraThe neutron API allows the admin state to be changed any time, and I don't think nova is involved in those changes after boot13:25
baolirkukura, that's what I'm trying to discuss13:25
rkukuraIn fact, it should be possible to create a port with admin state down, and allow nova to boot with it, and bring it up later via the API13:25
irenabrkukura: agree13:25
baoliThe question is should the VM be aware of port status change?13:26
irenabadmin state should be enforced on port and not VIF13:26
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
baolianother question is why would admin decides to change the port status?13:26
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
irenabbaoli: VM awareness probably depends on Vif type13:27
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:27
irenabFor SR-IOV it should be aware13:27
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC13:27
baoliirenab, my question to you is that with direct passthrough, how do you admin down/up a port?13:27
rkukuraCan that be done using the PF?13:28
baoliafter it's attached to a vm13:28
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:28
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:28
irenabprobably via 'ip link set' command13:28
baoliirenab, after it's attached, you can't do that any more13:28
baoliit's not a ip link on the host any more, isn't it?13:28
irenabI think you cando it via pf net device and vf index.13:29
sadasubaoli: lets clarify that it works this way for the cisco pci passthrough ports13:29
irenabI need to recheck, but I think it works for mellanox nics13:29
baolisadasu, we need to check as weel13:30
baolis/weel/well13:30
sadasubaoli: ok13:30
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC13:30
irenabbaoli: sadasu: if it works for your case, I think you may need L2 agent to handle it13:30
*** daneleblanc has quit IRC13:30
sadasuirenab: no, even L2 agent will not solve the problem13:31
*** tanisdl has quit IRC13:31
sadasubecause the host looses control of the port to the VM13:31
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:31
sadasuif 'ip link set' works then L2 agent would work13:32
rkukuraI think the model for admin state is that it just stops/starts flow of packets. The VM should not see it as a hot-plug or anything like that.13:32
sadasubut with some initial testing 'ip link set' isn't working13:32
irenabbaoli: speaking of hot-plug, does your patch support it?13:32
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:32
sadasulets stay on topic13:33
baoliirenab, not yet13:33
irenabok13:33
baoliirenab, the patch can get you going with basic testing.13:33
sadasurkukura: so the VM will not know that the port is admined down, and may still keep sending traffic?13:34
rkukuraI think that's the model, but not positive13:34
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC13:34
irenabany action items to record?13:34
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:35
baoli#action, check ip link to see if it can change a vf state after it's attached to a vm13:35
sadasuis it Ok to reject an admin down of the port after VM is attached?13:35
sadasubefore moving on, I had this additional q on this topic?13:36
baolisadasu, I'm still thinking about the question why would a admin like to change the port state after it's attached to a vm which is running.13:37
irenabsadasu: you may add another cisco MD that talks to switches/controller to enforce admin state on physical switch13:37
irenabbaoli: it may be for the case tenant is not paying :-)13:37
sadasuirenab: in that case we could also unbind13:38
baoliirenab, that would be an interesting way to get the money back13:38
rkukurahow about some sort of fencing for fault isolation?13:38
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:39
baolirkukura, that sounds like a possibility.13:39
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:39
irenabrkukura: looks like real case13:39
irenabrkukura: so unbind is an option for this?13:39
rkukurano idea if anyone is using it that way, just a thought13:40
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:40
*** kevinconway has quit IRC13:40
irenabI wanted to discuss plans for Juno summit13:40
rkukurairenab: Changing the host_id or something to force unbinding would prevent the port from being plugged, but doesn'13:40
rkukuradoesn't necessarily do anything after the port is plugged13:41
*** yamahata has quit IRC13:41
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:41
irenabrkukura: thanks13:42
rkukuraI don't think we should spend too much time on this right now, but I'm not sure the semantics of admin state and status are all that clear/consistent right now.13:42
*** Barker has quit IRC13:42
baolirkukura, ok. let's move on13:42
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC13:42
rkukuraThis might be something to try to get agreement on at the summit.13:42
irenabworks for me13:43
baoliagreed13:43
sadasurkukura: point taken...will look into this some more13:43
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:43
irenabthe design sessions proposal is open: link http://summit.openstack.org/13:43
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC13:43
sadasuwe had agreed upon a joint nova/neutron session13:44
irenabI think we need to arrange the plan and proposal13:45
irenabseems also that there is more content for nova and maybe need one joined and one anly for nova13:45
irenab^only13:45
sadasuagree13:46
irenabwe need to see how to get nova cores to sponsor this13:46
heyongliirenab, this is the key problem.13:47
baolifirst thing first, we can add the proposed sessions first, right?13:47
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:47
irenabbaoli: I think so13:48
heyonglii will proposed a nova common sriov support topic13:48
rkukuralets propose beagles for nova core!13:48
irenabrkukura: +113:48
beaglesrkukura, don't embarass me :)13:48
beaglesit will quickly come to everyones attention how I'm so distributed that I'm not fit to be core anywhere ;)13:48
*** ftcjeff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:48
beaglesI do need to talk to some cores about some related subjects13:49
rkukuraIt could be argued that nova really needs a core focusing on the networking13:49
beagleswhile I can't promise anything maybe that could garner some interest13:49
beaglesrkukura, no question... for the moment it'll be proxy I guess13:49
beaglesby proxy that is13:50
beagles(how appropriate ;))13:50
*** jcoufal has quit IRC13:50
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC13:50
beaglesin all seriousness, I was in a nova related conversation and SR-IOV/PCI Pass through came up. I'm following up on some details13:51
irenabfor joint nova-neutron session on SRIOV what do we want to discuss?13:51
beaglesmaybe if we get the summit proposal in before I have the conversation I can reference that13:51
baoliirenab, certainly the interface between the two13:51
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
irenabbaoli: seems it is defined already,thanks to rkukura work on profile and vif_details13:52
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs13:52
irenabdo I miss something?13:52
*** crimi has quit IRC13:52
beaglesare the use-cases the group have in mind sufficiently fleshed out to use in that or a related discussion. I'm aware (painfully one might say) that these discussions have occurred but would it be fair to say that they are "set" at the moment?13:53
*** woodster1 has quit IRC13:53
rkukuramaybe a nova session on scheduling taking network connectivity (including special things like SR-IOV, QoS) into account?13:53
baoliirenab, agreed. And also how neutron make uses of the nova pci generic support13:53
beaglesby "set" I mean established or at least tentatively agreed upon13:53
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
sadasubeagles: I think that is the case w.r.t use cases13:54
irenabrkukura: agree13:54
irenabbeagles: proably need to refresh and put together13:55
baolibeagles, is there a IRC for the meeting you attends?13:55
sadasurkukura: we can keep that as a separate session...neutron aware nova scheduler13:55
beaglessadasu, okay cool. That's one of the things want to make sure is generally "known" among at-least-a-few cores so we are all on the same page13:55
irenabwe need also the nova api related discussion, for requesting vnic_type13:56
sadasuat this point  our "base" session should cover use cases, API changes and flavor discussion13:56
beaglesirenab, not at the moment, but this is something we might want to look at... ie. acting as a subgroup that is attached to both neutron and nova13:56
beaglesI should've done something like that for parity, but wasn't savvy and afaik, nobody has done before13:57
sadasuthat was the major point of contention for icehouse13:57
*** zns has quit IRC13:57
irenabbeagles: I think we need to define and get agreement how to request specific vnic_type, working via neutron port is not convenient for end users13:58
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
beaglesirenab, agreed13:58
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC13:58
irenabshall we set some etherpad for topics to discuss and send it to ml?13:59
beaglesafaict, this is a specifc point of contention... how this kind of thing can be used in a fashion that is compatible with 'cloudness'13:59
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC13:59
baoliok, times is up.13:59
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
baoliwe should continue with eitherpad, and in the next meeting.13:59
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
irenabbaoli:  do you want to open one?14:00
baoliin the mean time, we should add the session in the design summit.14:00
baoliirenab, sure14:00
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
irenabgreat, thanks14:00
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
baolithanks, everyone14:00
baoli#endmeeting14:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:00
heyonglibye,14:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 11 14:00:56 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/pci_passthrough/2014/pci_passthrough.2014-03-11-13.00.html14:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/pci_passthrough/2014/pci_passthrough.2014-03-11-13.00.txt14:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/pci_passthrough/2014/pci_passthrough.2014-03-11-13.00.log.html14:01
irenabbye14:01
*** heyongli has quit IRC14:01
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
rkukurabye14:01
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
*** daneleblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC14:09
*** sarob_ has quit IRC14:10
*** phil_h has quit IRC14:11
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:11
*** resker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:14
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:14
*** esker has quit IRC14:14
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk14:15
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
*** resker has quit IRC14:18
*** phil_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** alcabrera has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** sadasu has quit IRC14:20
*** alcabrera has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:21
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:21
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs14:21
*** sriram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:22
*** Barker has quit IRC14:22
*** xuhanp has quit IRC14:23
*** hhoover has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:24
*** hockeynut has quit IRC14:26
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:27
*** eankutse has quit IRC14:28
*** woodster1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:29
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** jrist has quit IRC14:43
*** zns has quit IRC14:44
*** irenab has quit IRC14:45
*** esker has quit IRC14:47
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
*** briancline has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:56
*** lcostantino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** pdmars has quit IRC14:57
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** alcabrera has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
kgriffs#startmeeting marconi15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 11 15:00:31 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kgriffs. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'marconi'15:00
flaper87<o/ <o> \o>15:00
sriramo/15:00
kgriffsroll call15:00
kgriffso/15:00
malinio/15:00
*** hhoover has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
flaper87flapercop is here o/15:01
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
flwango/15:01
alcabrerao/15:01
balajiiyero/15:01
funzoo/15:01
kgriffsthanks everyone for coming!15:02
alcabrerahurray15:02
*** lcostantino has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
kgriffshmmm... missing our interns15:02
*** roshanagr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
kgriffswell, let's get going15:02
kgriffs#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Marconi#Agenda15:02
kgriffs#topic graduation prep15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "graduation prep (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:03
*** nacim has quit IRC15:03
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
kgriffsso, we have docs and sqla to finalize, plus tempest15:03
maliniplus devstack issues15:03
kgriffsanything else?15:03
flaper87kgriffs: sqla is done15:03
flaper87says flaper87 before finding a new bug in sqla15:04
alcabreralol15:04
kgriffsflaper87: ok, I wasn't sure if you still had something cookin'15:04
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
flaper87kgriffs: just testing it and fixing things as I find them15:04
flaper87but looks like it's in good shape now15:04
kgriffshave we tested it with pgres?15:04
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
flaper87it runs on mysql, at least15:04
alcabreraand sqlite15:04
flaper87kgriffs: I knew you were going to ask that15:04
flaper87:P15:04
flaper87kgriffs: not yet15:04
flaper87that's the next one15:04
alcabreracool15:04
balajiiyerkgriffs: pecan eval is not part of graduation, but based on the discussion yday Im going to redo benchmarks. Might need a day or two to do this right.15:05
alcabrera#note flaper87 has tested sqlalchemy on mysql and sqlite - looks good, needs postgres15:05
kgriffsok. well, we should do that. but graduation req. was we work on a non-AGPL db, which we do now (MySQL)15:05
kgriffsbalajiiyer: actually, it is part of graduation15:05
flaper87pecan is part of graduation15:05
kgriffswe agreed to do a serious Pecan eval15:05
kgriffssorry, I forgot to mention above15:06
flaper87what is not part of the graduation requirement is to migrate to pecan15:06
kgriffsright15:06
flaper87but we have to have a good understanding of where we're standing15:06
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:06
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
kgriffsflaper87: I understand that infra doesn't like to take on additional deps in the gate15:07
kgriffsbut, isn't Falcon already running in the gate with no adverse affects?15:07
*** aratim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
flaper87it's running in the gate15:07
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
flaper87it's part of the global requirements15:07
*** fungi has quit IRC15:07
balajiiyerso with pecan eval, there is no patch reqd, so thats good. Im working on the benchmarks, took help from kgriffs on how to structure the email that will be sent out. Im drafting the email, and will send it out for review.15:08
kgriffssome dependency must have caused a big problem in the past for them to be so cautious now, methinks15:08
kgriffs#topic pecan eval15:08
*** openstack changes topic to "pecan eval (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:08
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
flaper87kgriffs: many dependencies, starting with sqlalchemy15:08
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
kgriffsflaper87: after this mtg, can you elaborate?15:09
* kgriffs is seeking first to understand15:09
kgriffs#note balajiiyer working on benchmarks for Pecan eval, will take another day or two to finish that up and draft the report15:10
balajiiyeralright, looks like I jumped the gun a bit15:10
flaper87kgriffs: sure15:10
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:10
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC15:10
vkmco/15:10
*** hockeynut has quit IRC15:10
alcabreravkmc: \o/!15:11
kgriffsso, just so everyone knows, I just suggested a rough outline for the report, but have been trying to let balajiiyer work out the details15:11
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
kgriffsbalajiiyer: btw, one more criterion you might add is runtime support (Python 2.6-3.3, PyPy)15:11
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
kgriffsI'm curious to know whether Pecan works on PyPy, for example15:12
balajiiyerkgriffs: noted15:12
kgriffsvkmc: o/15:12
kgriffsbalajiiyer: thanks15:12
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC15:12
alcabreraI'd like to narrow that a bit: 2.6, 2.7, 3.315:12
alcabrera3.2 is not necessary15:12
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:12
kgriffsalcabrera: +115:12
alcabreraalso, pypy15:12
*** daneleblanc has quit IRC15:12
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:13
alcabreraso, regarding pecan eval15:13
kgriffsso, I suggested that balajiiyer get some folks outside our team to review the draft before it goes out15:13
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:13
alcabrerawe've got some benchmarks and writing to do15:14
kgriffsjust to make sure it is as reasonable and as objective as possible15:14
alcabrerasounds good15:14
alcabreraI'm looking forward to the report. :)15:15
sriram+115:15
alcabreraany other thoughts on pecan eval?15:15
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC15:15
kgriffsbalajiiyer is putting together a weighted decision matrix, and I'm helping him set up an autobench run so we can get some serious numbers15:15
flwangmaybe we can take a look at Ceilometer15:15
*** swat30 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
kgriffsthat's all I had15:16
flwangsince it's using Pecan + WSME15:16
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:16
kgriffsit would be interesting to use WSME and redo the benchmarks, but that may have to wait for a "round #2"15:16
*** tanisdl has quit IRC15:16
*** thurloat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
alcabrera#note ceilometer uses Pecan + WSME15:17
kgriffs#note would be nice to benchmark WSME some time15:17
*** daneleblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
kgriffs#topic ATL summit15:17
*** openstack changes topic to "ATL summit (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:17
kgriffsjust a couple reminders15:18
*** datsun180b has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:18
kgriffs#1 design session proposals are now open - submit yours now!15:18
vkmcI saw somewhere that Oslo working on building a common library for Pecan as well15:18
kgriffs#2 Make your travel arrangements ASAP if you haven't already15:18
kgriffsvkmc: at the last summit it was mentioned they wanted to put together common code into a shared lib15:19
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:19
flwangkgriffs: what's the context for #2?15:19
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:19
kgriffstravel to the summit15:19
*** tanisdl has quit IRC15:19
kgriffsI hope we can get as many marconi team members there as possible15:20
vkmckgriffs, Indeed, thanks15:20
flwangkgriffs: seems there is a team dinner?15:20
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
*** amitgandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
flwangkgriffs: got it15:20
alcabreraflwang: there will be many team dinners, if we can help it. :D15:21
kgriffsflwang: yes, evening of the 10th. We can also do another meetup during the week15:21
flwangkgriffs: alcabrera: fabulous........................15:21
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
kgriffsvkmc: I am a little hesitant to endorse the common Pecan lib approach - i would rather see us creating generic libs that can be dropped into any kind of hook method15:21
kgriffsthat would allow us to contribute upstream these libs to the broader Python community15:22
* kgriffs doesn't like tight coupling if he can help it15:22
*** cjellick_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
kgriffsone more thing wrt the summit15:22
alcabrerakgriffs: +115:22
kgriffsI was thinking of these themes for Juno:15:22
*** cjellick_ has quit IRC15:22
kgriffs#1 Operational Maturity15:22
kgriffs#2 Notifications15:22
kgriffs#3 Flavors15:22
*** cjellick_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
vkmckgriffs, Its reasonable, +115:23
kgriffsI think most of the stuff we've been talking about for Juno can fit in one of those15:23
flaper87kgriffs: re-conceptualize marconi ? :D15:23
sriramSounds good.15:23
maliniDoes Operational Maturity include new gatecheck jobs etc ?15:23
alcabrerahaha15:23
flaper87s/queuing/messaging/15:23
*** nwidell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
kgriffsmalini: tests, security, logging, etc.15:23
flwangflaper87: +115:23
alcabreraI'm favorable towards these themes.15:23
maliniWe have a lot of infra work tht needs to be done15:23
flwangflaper87: it's important, IMHO15:23
kgriffsflaper87: we can rework #3 to fit in that stuff15:24
kgriffsmeaning, re-conceptualize15:24
*** cjellick has quit IRC15:24
flaper87kgriffs: sounds good15:24
kgriffslet me think on #3 - I think we can play around with that theme, broaden it a bit15:24
flwangflaper87: pls involve me when you start to work on the topic/tag stuff15:24
kgriffs#topic sqla driver GC15:25
*** openstack changes topic to "sqla driver GC (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:25
flaper87flwang: sure thing15:25
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:25
kgriffsso, iirc we delete expired messages each time someone posts a new one?15:25
flaper87kgriffs: yeah, we haven't changed that bit yet15:25
flaper87but I think we may want to15:25
kgriffsis there a plan to add an out-of-band GC?15:25
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
flaper87kgriffs: not a concrete plan but I think we should15:26
kgriffsflaper87: can you file a bug for that?15:26
flaper87kgriffs: sure thing15:26
kgriffsthanks!15:26
alcabreraout of band GC would unify the operational semantics of sqla vs. mongodb15:27
kgriffs#action flaper87 to add a bug for sqla GC15:27
alcabreraso I like this, however we manage to solve it15:27
kgriffskewl15:27
kgriffs#topic api v1.1 updates15:27
*** openstack changes topic to "api v1.1 updates (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:27
kgriffsso, there are three proposals15:28
kgriffs#1 lazy-create queues15:28
kgriffsthis is where we auto-create a queue when someone posts a message15:28
flaper87#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/marconi/+bug/129090715:29
flaper87kgriffs: yeah15:29
kgriffsI think if we do this, app developers will be less likely to think about lifecycle management for queues15:29
flaper87so, we need to:15:29
flwangkgriffs: will we introduce the topic/tag concept at that stage?15:29
flaper871) Decide if what I proposed makes sense and vote15:29
flaper872) Decide what's the migration plan towards that15:29
kgriffsmeaning, they will neglect deleting them as well15:29
kgriffsflwang: nope, not until 2.015:29
flaper87FWIW, the plane we came up with yday still makes sense to me15:30
kgriffsflaper87: ok, let's jump to your proposal and circle back15:30
flaper87#link http://blog.flaper87.com/post/531cd585d987d24e83f082a5/15:30
alcabreraso, it sounds like we might want to make queue auto-deletion configurable; a kind of queue TTL15:30
kgriffs#topic queues -> topics15:30
*** openstack changes topic to "queues -> topics (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:30
flwangflaper87: seems we didn't touch the migration plan a lot15:30
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC15:30
flaper87flwang: we did15:30
*** ycombinator has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
*** nwidell has quit IRC15:30
flwangafter I dropped :)?15:31
flaper87So, TL;DR of the proposal is that we don't need the queue to be a first-citizen resource nor it to be exposed to the client15:31
*** cpallares has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
flaper87users want to post messages and have a nice way to group them together15:31
flaper87the concept of queue is getting old15:32
flaper87and we could adopt topics as a way of grouping messages15:32
*** catohornet has quit IRC15:32
flaper87the main difference between topics and queues is that queues are a resource on top of messages15:32
flaper87whereas topics are attributes of the message15:32
alcabrerawhat benefits do you see us reaping over time as a result of changing the way we address messaging, flaper87?15:32
flaper87they don't require to be created beforehand15:32
flwangflaper87: the 'migration' I'm saying is migrating a legacy Marconi deployment to new15:32
flwangflaper87: are we on the same page?15:33
flaper87flwang: hold on, we'll get there15:33
*** gokrokve has quit IRC15:33
flwangflaper87: ok15:33
flaper87alcabrera: Usability is the main one15:33
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
flaper87then we'll make creation of amqp 1.0 based drivers easier15:33
kgriffsI would also say, it gives us more flexibility. For example, now we could have a message be associated with more than one topic15:34
flaper87we'll reduce the space required since we don't need a separate storage for the queue15:34
flaper87A table in sqla, a collection in mongodb15:34
alcabreracool15:34
* alcabrera takes notes15:34
flaper87kgriffs: right15:34
sriramyes the space required for storage might reduce.15:34
flaper87and it'll be easier to route messages based on topics15:35
alcabrera#note +1 - queues as topics leads to usability benefits: easier to use marconi15:35
flaper87ah also, we won't need to query the queues collection everytime15:35
flaper87every time*15:35
flwangflaper87: but we may need another table for sqla against topics/tags15:35
alcabrera#note +1 - queues as topics leads to flexibility: message associated with multiple topics15:35
flaper87(the query of the queue's collection depends on the driver)15:35
kgriffsidk about the space - assuming no metadata, a normalized schema can save space. but that is assuming people always delete their queues when they are done with them. :p15:35
alcabrera#note +1 - queues as topics leads to storage reduction: no concrete store allocated for topics15:35
kgriffsanyway, adding a bit of text with topic name to each record is not a big deal15:36
flaper87kgriffs: yeah but during the queue life, that space is required15:36
flwangflaper87: right15:36
flaper87anyway, those are the main ones15:36
sriramDoes the working of claims change in anyway due to this?15:36
flaper87sriram: nope15:36
flaper87sriram: claims work on messages15:36
alcabreraI don't expect it to, since claim status is a property of a message15:36
alcabrerawhat flaper87 said15:37
flaper87sriram: so, we'll still be able to claim messages15:37
sriramcool, was just making sure.15:37
kgriffsalcabrera: topics are kind of like RSE channels15:37
*** woodster1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:37
*** gokrokve has quit IRC15:37
flwangyes, queues is like a 'container' for messages, but now we don't need it anymore15:37
kgriffsok, any other questions before we vote15:38
alcabrerakgriffs: fair enough, though I admit I never studied RSE in depth. :)15:38
alcabrerahmmm15:38
flwangwe can just give messages a topic/tag to distinguish it15:38
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja15:38
flwang+1 from me15:38
sriramyeah, it sounds good to me as well.15:38
flwangfor the lazy queue in v1.115:38
kgriffs#startvote Queues -> Topics in v2.0: yes, no15:38
openstackUnable to parse vote topic and options.15:38
kgriffscrap15:39
kgriffscan't remember the syntax15:39
flaper87#vote yes15:39
alcabrera #startvote Should we vote now? Yes, No, Maybe15:39
kgriffs#startvote Queues -> Topics in v2.0? yes, no15:39
openstackBegin voting on: Queues -> Topics in v2.0? Valid vote options are yes, no.15:39
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.15:39
flaper87#vote yes15:39
alcabrera#vote yes15:39
sriram#vote yes15:39
kgriffs#vote yes15:39
kgriffsbalajiiyer: ?15:40
balajiiyeryes15:40
flaper87malini: ?15:40
flwang#vote yes15:40
malini#vote abstain15:40
openstackmalini: abstain is not a valid option. Valid options are yes, no.15:40
kgriffsbalajiiyer: can you revote with the hash15:40
malini:(15:40
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC15:40
kgriffsmalini: sorry, forgot to add that option.15:40
kgriffsmalini: noted your abstain15:40
*** michael-yu has quit IRC15:40
balajiiyer#vote yes15:40
vkmc#vote yes15:41
kgriffsclosing the vote in 30 seconds15:41
cpallares#vote yes15:41
flaper87cpallares: you bet >.>15:41
flaper87:P15:41
cpallares:P15:41
kgriffs#endvote15:42
openstackVoted on "Queues -> Topics in v2.0?" Results are15:42
openstackyes (8): alcabrera, balajiiyer, vkmc, kgriffs, cpallares, flwang, sriram, flaper8715:42
kgriffsok, thanks!15:42
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
flaper87awesome15:42
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
kgriffs#agreed queues -> topics in v2.015:42
flaper87so, migration plan15:42
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
kgriffs#topic migration plan15:42
flaper87mind if I take the floor ?15:42
*** openstack changes topic to "migration plan (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:42
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** noslzzp has quit IRC15:42
kgriffsgo for it15:42
flaper87so, we discussed it yday a bit and this is what we came up with15:42
*** harlowja has quit IRC15:43
flaper871) We introduce lazy queues in v1.1 (this doesn't affect the user)15:43
flaper872) We remove queue's metadata in v1.1 (this affects the user, if they cry, we can add it back in v2.0 somehow)15:43
flaper873) We rename queues into topics in v2.0 and complete the work15:43
flaper87That's roughly what we discussed15:44
flaper87The migration will require updating the client15:44
flaper87I added some notes on the blog post about the client15:44
kgriffsI have some thoughts re metadata15:44
flaper87there's a way to migrate the client without breaking users code15:44
*** eankutse has quit IRC15:44
flaper87kgriffs: shoot15:44
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
* flaper87 STFU15:44
kgriffs:)15:44
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
kgriffsso, I was thinking that people will probably want to access the same queue from both v1.0 and v1.1, right?15:45
*** jcoufal-mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
kgriffsif that is true, then once way to accomplish that is lazy metadata creation15:45
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
kgriffswait, I'm conflating this with #115:46
flwangkgriffs: i'm curious how to implement the lazy metadata creation for sqla?15:46
kgriffsso, my idea was to make queue an attribute of each message15:46
kgriffsand then simulate it being it's own resource15:46
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
kgriffsso, we only create a separate resource if someone sets the metadata15:46
flaper87kgriffs: I'd leave that to v2.0, though15:47
kgriffslisting queues and such would have to do a grouping query15:47
flaper87I was thinking the v1.1 work to be something like:15:47
flaper871) Check if the queue exist (we already do this) and create it if it doesn't15:47
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
flaper87I'd prefer making the change in v1.1 as minimum as possible15:48
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:48
flaper87and slightly change the API towards a lazier one15:48
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
flaper87then SBRANG, we swap it in v2.0 and laugh watching users crying15:48
flaper87wait, did I say that?15:48
kgriffsmmm, now that you mention it, I think messing with the data schema may be best left to 2.0 after all15:48
flaper87:P15:49
kgriffs:p15:49
alcabreraheh15:49
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
flaper87so, really small change for v1.1 (since we don't even have sqla migrations yet) and then bigger change in v2.015:49
alcabrerayeah, let's hold off on schema changes as much as possible until v2.015:49
kgriffsusers may be less likely to think about deleting queues they no longer use if they are doing lazy-create15:49
kgriffsbut, I guess those records don't take much space15:50
flaper87yeah15:50
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_15:51
flwangalcabrera: yep, and as an end user, I don't want to the see the application is changing drastically15:51
* flaper87 reads flwang message and laughs.... muahahaha muahahah MUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA15:51
flaper87:D15:51
alcabreralol15:51
flwangand the developers are laughing me :D15:52
alcabreraflaper87 - smiter of end users15:52
cpallareslol15:52
sriramdeveloper vs end user. Stay Tuned.15:52
vkmcMaybe we could use something like a dirty-bit for lazy queues deletion... it may need checking those periodically though15:52
kgriffsok, so if an operator ends up with a ton of dead queues, that should be taken care of by the eventual migration to v2.015:53
flwangthen user will beat the developer if they can meet at somewhere :)15:53
flaper87kgriffs: plus, the operator can delete them too :)15:53
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
kgriffsflaper87: yes, I suppose so15:53
kgriffsvkmc - yeah, I think we will need to be creative when we plan the v2.0 upgrade process15:54
kgriffswe'll have to decide whether we want v2.0 topics to be exposed as v1 queues15:54
kgriffsand stuff15:54
* flaper87 was thinking something along: "Stop marconi, delete the database; upgrade marconi; start marconi"15:54
flaper87:D15:55
vkmcYeah... it would require some thinking15:55
kgriffsok, one last thought re metadata15:55
sriramoh yeah. the topic-> queue exposure will be important15:55
kgriffsI was thinking we could ask rackspace to check and see how many people are using that feature15:55
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:55
flwangkgriffs: it would be great15:56
kgriffsotherwise, I'm cool with lazy queues and removing metadata for queues in v1.115:56
flaper87awesome15:56
kgriffsany vehement objections?15:56
flwangkgriffs: to get some thoughts from the RAX product manager and the end uers15:56
kgriffsflwang: +115:56
flwangbefore they beat us :D15:56
flaper87we should actionize this things and create some bps for v1.115:56
cpallareskgriffs: +115:56
flaper87I can do that15:56
kgriffsflaper87: bps already there, man15:56
* kgriffs lives in the future15:56
flaper87s/this/these/15:56
flaper87kgriffs: waaaaaaaat?15:56
flaper87holy moly15:57
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
kgriffs#topic open discussion15:57
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:57
*** michael-yu has quit IRC15:57
alcabrerawe made it through all the topics15:57
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
alcabreraI'm pleased. :)15:57
flaper87o/15:57
*** paulczar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
flaper87o/15:57
flaper87o/15:57
alcabrerawe're getting really good at this15:57
vkmc:)15:57
sriramnice. :)15:57
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
* alcabrera picks flaper8715:57
flaper87so, Yday was the last day of cpallares intership. I would like to thank her for her really AMAZING job, for being around all this time, participating in meetings and providing the help he provided15:58
flaper87so, lets all thank her and a huge round of appluse15:58
* kgriffs claps loudly15:58
cpallaresflaper87: :D15:58
kgriffscpallares: THANK YOU!!!15:58
alcabreracpallares: I'm so happy to have worked with you! Thanks fo joining in with us. :D15:58
malinithank you cpallares!!15:58
alcabrera*for15:58
* sriram claps15:58
flwangcpallares: thank you for your contribution :D15:58
malinihope you come back15:58
vkmcYay cpallares \o/15:58
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
flaper87malini: oh, she's not going anywhere15:59
sriramThank you cpallares! :)15:59
kgriffscpallares: Hopefully this was a good experience for you and you have some good takeaways.15:59
flaper87I said the intership ended not that she's free to go15:59
flaper87:P15:59
alcabreralol15:59
cpallareshaha15:59
balajiiyercpallares: thank you15:59
cpallareskgriffs: I did :)15:59
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
maliniflaper87: that was a big LIE!15:59
* flaper87 is obviously kidding15:59
malinibut anyways..cpallares happy to have you around15:59
cpallaresthanks malini :)15:59
cpallaresI will stick around thanks to flaper8716:00
kgriffs#endmeeting16:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 11 16:00:14 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/marconi/2014/marconi.2014-03-11-15.00.html16:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/marconi/2014/marconi.2014-03-11-15.00.txt16:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/marconi/2014/marconi.2014-03-11-15.00.log.html16:00
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
kgriffsthanks everyone! back to #openstack-marconi16:00
*** zhanglei_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
adrian_otto#startmeeting Solum Team Meeting16:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 11 16:01:17 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is adrian_otto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"16:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'solum_team_meeting'16:01
datsun180bo7 morning16:01
adrian_otto#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum#Agenda_for_2014-03-11_1600_UTC Our Agenda16:01
*** amitgandhi has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
adrian_otto#topic Roll Call16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"16:02
adrian_ottoAdrian Otto16:02
roshanagrRoshan Agrawal16:02
stanniePierre Padrixe16:02
julienveyJulien Vey16:02
paulczarPaul Czarkowski16:02
datsun180bEd Cranford16:02
devkulkarniDevdatta Kulkarni16:02
aratimArati Mahimane16:02
gokrokveGeorgy Okrokvertskhov16:02
*** alcabrera has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
coolsvapSwapnil16:03
adrian_ottohi everyone16:03
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC16:03
adrian_ottoDaylight Savings Time (yay)16:03
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
adrian_ottoI'd like to pursue a #agreed to end Daylight Savings time, all time zones will be eliminated, and move everyone to UTC16:04
adrian_otto;-)16:04
devkulkarni:D .. good luck with that .. which channel you will be discussing it ;)16:04
datsun180bI agree, so long as we move to metric time16:05
adrian_ottoheh, It's an exercise in futility16:05
adrian_otto#topic announcements16:05
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"16:05
adrian_ottoour Solum Summit event is growing closer.16:05
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC16:05
adrian_ottoif you are planning to attend, be sure you have registered so Dan at Red Hat can get an accurate count16:06
adrian_ottodo other team members have announcements to share?16:06
devkulkarniand add topics to discuss here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SolumRaleighCommunityWorkshop16:06
*** pballand has quit IRC16:06
adrian_otto#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SolumRaleighCommunityWorkshop Solum Summit Agenda Topics16:07
adrian_ottothanks devkulkarni16:07
*** xuhanp has quit IRC16:07
adrian_ottook, let's look at our action items from last week16:07
adrian_otto#topic Review Action Items16:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Action Items (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"16:08
adrian_ottoadrian_otto to adjust the wiki to show intent for incubation (adrian_otto, 16:20:35)16:08
adrian_ottothis is done. See:16:08
adrian_otto#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum#Summary Solum Wiki16:08
devkulkarniis that that timestamp when you finished it? :D16:08
adrian_ottojust in the nick of time16:08
*** cpallares has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
adrian_ottothe timestamp above is from the prior meeting chat log, so you can find it in context16:09
devkulkarni"Solum is planning to pursue incubation as an OpenStack project upon achievement of development milestones." — awesome16:09
devkulkarniah! I see.16:09
adrian_ottoanyone is welcome to edit that to improve it if you feel so motivated.16:09
adrian_ottonext is the mission statement16:10
adrian_ottoadrian_otto to draft mission statement and solicit input form interested contributors (adrian_otto, 16:35:50)16:10
adrian_ottoI did not act on this item. I think this would be a valuable exercise for our upcoming Solum Summit event16:10
adrian_ottoI plan to come with a draft for us to iterate on then16:11
devkulkarnioh yeah. that is a great idea. discuss it at the summit16:11
adrian_ottowho would like to work with me to make that initial draft via etherpad and IRC?16:11
gokrokve+116:11
devkulkarniI would like to help16:12
adrian_ottogokrokve: excellent16:12
adrian_ottook, the three of us can touch base after we adjourn here, and sort out a convenient time.16:12
devkulkarnisounds good16:13
adrian_ottoso I will carry this action item forward16:13
*** demorris has quit IRC16:13
adrian_otto#action adrian_otto to draft mission statement and solicit input form interested contributors (gokrokve, devkulkarni)16:13
julienveyI'm in !16:13
*** markvoelker has quit IRC16:13
adrian_ottojulienvey: excellent, I will include you16:13
adrian_ottolet's pick an etherpad now. one sec16:14
adrian_otto#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/solum-mission Mission Statement Draft work16:14
adrian_ottook, so those interested are welcome to check that16:15
adrian_ottonext topic16:15
adrian_otto#topic Review Blueprints: https://launchpad.net/solum/+milestone/milestone-116:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Blueprints: https://launchpad.net/solum/+milestone/milestone-1 (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"16:15
adrian_otto#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/api Solum API (aotto)16:15
adrian_ottoThe API is looking reasonably complete at this point16:16
adrian_ottoat least for M1.16:16
devkulkarni+116:16
adrian_ottonoorul mentioned this morning that we believe everything for the CLI is in there16:16
adrian_ottoI have links to chare16:16
julienveyyes, we are solving the last problems by doing the functionnal tests16:16
adrian_otto1. Add solum builder client (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78315/)16:17
adrian_otto   This one is required as it fixes a bug.16:17
adrian_otto2. Add plan manager and corresponding tests16:17
adrian_otto(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72105/)16:17
adrian_otto   Takes care of the app commands16:17
adrian_otto3. Connect assembly commands and Rest API16:17
adrian_otto(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79606/)16:17
adrian_otto   Takes care of the assembly commands.16:17
adrian_ottoI will focus on making sure these get the attention needed to merge16:18
adrian_ottoplease review these as well to offer your input16:18
devkulkarni+1 to that adrian_otto16:18
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
adrian_ottothat is a good intro to the related topic16:18
adrian_otto#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/solum-minimal-cli Command Line Interface for Solum (devdatta-kulkarni)16:18
devkulkarniyou gave the updates already :)16:18
adrian_ottodevkulkarni: any additional status beyond the above?16:18
devkulkarninope16:19
adrian_ottosweet, we can move on16:19
adrian_otto#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/solum-git-pull Pull integration of Solum from an external Git repo (kraman)16:19
devkulkarniabout this:16:19
devkulkarniwe have the code for it in image_handler + build_app.16:19
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
devkulkarniso we are good for now. the remaining things are:16:19
*** betsy has quit IRC16:19
devkulkarni1) When a plan is registered we need to send back the trigger url to the user so that they can add it manually as a git webhook to their repo.16:20
devkulkarni2) Testing that the git webhook is getting triggered.16:20
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
*** zhanglei_ has quit IRC16:21
devkulkarni3) Invoking the assembly create workflow when trigger is received16:21
devkulkarnithat is all16:21
julienveyI can do 1. but I don't understand what you mean in 2. ?16:21
julienveyThere is also some discussions about the trigger16:21
julienveyif it should belong to plan or assembly16:22
devkulkarnijulinevey: thanks. for 2, I mean just testing that the trigger is actually working (may not be code based test though)16:22
devkulkarnijulienvey: yes, I remember that discussion.16:22
devkulkarnidon't know where we landed on that.16:22
julienveyit is currently in assembly16:22
adrian_ottodevkulkarni: on #2, did you mean that we need help from team members, or that this is what will be worked next?16:22
devkulkarniadrian_otto: actually, I might have spoken incorrectly. I don't think we need any code for #2.16:23
adrian_ottowe do16:23
adrian_ottobecause I'm reasonably sure the trigger handler code is just a comment still, right?16:23
julienveyfor #2, we have an integration test, is that enough ?16:24
julienveyfor the trigger part, the comment should be replaced by #316:24
devkulkarnijulienvey: yes, I think integration test will be enough16:24
devkulkarniadrian_otto: trigger handler code is kind of there (need to double check). julien, might know the current status on that16:24
adrian_ottook, seems like #2 depends on #316:24
julienvey#1 is missing16:25
julienvey#2 is tested16:25
devkulkarni#3 is definitely missing.16:25
julienveyand #3 is missing yes16:25
devkulkarniyes, #1 is missing16:25
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:25
adrian_ottook16:25
julienveywe just need to plug it16:25
julienveyall the plumbing is here16:25
devkulkarniyep16:25
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC16:26
adrian_ottodo we have enough brains applied to that work, or should I help with recruiting more?16:26
devkulkarniI think we have it covered.16:26
devkulkarniof course we will need reviews :)16:26
julienveyyes16:26
adrian_ottook, thakns for the update devkulkarni. Exciting to be so close!16:26
devkulkarniyep!!16:27
adrian_otto#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/specify-lang-pack Specify the language pack to be used for app deploy (devdatta-kulkarni)16:27
devkulkarniokay. the updates on this are:16:27
adrian_ottowe touched on this on the ML this week too16:27
devkulkarni1) aratim finished the GET lang-pack16:28
devkulkarni2) what adrian_otto said16:28
adrian_ottoaratim: !! yay !!16:28
paulczarI have some quick notes that touch on both M1 and LP blueprints adter devkulkarni is done16:28
devkulkarnipaulczar: please share them :)16:28
devkulkarniI am done16:29
devkulkarnioh wait!16:29
julienveyI am also working on POST/PUT/DELETE for LP, to be able to create initial data with the API16:29
devkulkarniyep. was about to add that16:29
devkulkarnithanks julienvey16:29
julienveyshould have a review tomorrow16:29
devkulkarni+1016:29
paulczarIf we want to use Docker nova-driver for M1 We need the following reviews merged into their various projects:16:29
adrian_ottojulienvey: Thanks!!16:29
paulczardevstack fixes for docker driver install - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78322/   ( we have an easy localrc workaround for this,  so not a huge problem )16:30
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
adrian_ottopaulczar: let's revisit this one in Open Discussion today. I have news to share about this.16:30
paulczarolso-common libraries fail out when glance images have no name - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78642/ ( this is BREAKING )16:30
paulczaroh ok16:30
adrian_ottotx16:31
adrian_ottodevkulkarni: any more on specify-lang-pack BP?16:31
devkulkarniadrian_otto: that will be all.16:31
adrian_otto#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/logging Logging Architecture (paulmo)16:31
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
devkulkarniI think this is done, right?16:32
devkulkarnipaulmo is out today16:32
adrian_ottostructured logging is in scope for M116:32
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
adrian_ottobut I don't recall seeing code for that16:32
adrian_ottolet's ask paulmo when he returns16:32
adrian_otto#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/deploy-workflow Workflow outlining deployment of a DU (asalkeld/devdatta-kulkarni)16:32
devkulkarniPaul's patch did get merged. Georgy is using that right?16:32
devkulkarniok. about the deploy-workflow.16:33
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
gokrokvePatch was merged16:33
devkulkarniAngus has started on adding the Heat client16:33
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
adrian_ottodevkulkarni: did we get the unit/func test code added for that?16:33
adrian_ottoI have not looked at that review thread since Thu16:34
devkulkarniyou mean for the Heat client?16:34
devkulkarniwill check.16:34
adrian_ottobut I did see that asalkeld posted a series of newpatchset actions16:34
adrian_ottoif that's not yet done, we might seek volunteers to assist him with that16:34
devkulkarniyeah. I need to also go back and check that..16:35
devkulkarniokay. let me take a look soon and get back to you.16:35
adrian_ottook, one moment16:35
adrian_ottook, we can revisit that later16:36
adrian_ottoI think we are in pretty good shape with it16:36
devkulkarnisounds good16:36
*** jcoufal-mobile has quit IRC16:36
devkulkarniyeah, I thought so too.16:36
*** jcoufal-mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:36
adrian_otto#topic Open Discussion16:36
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"16:36
devkulkarnithat will be all on that bp16:36
adrian_ottoso paulczar16:36
paulczaryes16:36
*** jcoufal-mobile has quit IRC16:37
adrian_ottoI met with members of the Nova team this past week16:37
*** catohornet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:37
adrian_ottoand got a sense of clarity with respect to where our containers support should come from16:37
adrian_ottoearly on we evaluated options for using Docker, or similar technologies16:37
adrian_ottoour favorite one was to use the Nova Docker Driver.16:37
devkulkarniwas?16:38
adrian_ottothat driver is somewhat incomplete, and has some open bugs, although Sam Alba is continuing to work on it16:38
adrian_ottothere is also work on an equivalent solution that plugs in container support underneath the libvirt driver16:38
adrian_ottoso Nova would interact with libvirt just like it does to get a KVM instance16:39
adrian_ottobut would get a Docker container back16:39
adrian_ottothis also provides an integration point for other emerging container technology16:39
adrian_ottoso we should expect that driver to mature.16:40
paulczarThat sounds similar to how lxc is implemented16:40
adrian_ottoexactly16:40
paulczarit may be difficult to do for docker due to the complexity of the union filesystem16:40
*** michael-yu has quit IRC16:40
adrian_ottoto the implication to Solum is that we can couple to that driver without necessarily coupling to any singe container tech.16:40
adrian_ottos/singe/single/16:41
devkulkarnihow would this affect Heat? As in, in the HOT that Solum generates would we have to worry about the compute?16:41
adrian_ottowe will still need to use a container image format16:41
adrian_ottoand Docker's is suitable, so I doubt we have a good reason to deviate from that16:41
devkulkarni*type of compute16:41
adrian_ottodevananda: great question16:42
adrian_ottos/devananda/devkulkarni/16:42
adrian_ottosorry devananda (again)16:42
adrian_ottoso..16:42
adrian_ottowe ask Heat for a compute instance16:42
adrian_ottoand Nova is configured to use the libvirt driver16:43
adrian_ottoand produces a Docker container16:43
adrian_ottoor potentially a KVM instance16:43
adrian_ottodepending on hints passed through16:43
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:43
adrian_ottoso that is very convenient for us16:43
paulczardevkulkarni, adrian_otto:  the image type being set to 'container' would tell the scheduler to use a nova-compute host in an AZ that supports that container type16:43
julienveythat looks nice16:44
paulczarso yeah, we should get that for free16:44
adrian_ottopaulczar: yes, from the appropriate compute aggregate16:44
adrian_ottoso the hint is actually in the form of glance metadata16:44
paulczarso,  what to do for m1 ?  stick to docker driver for speed of instantiation,  swap to kvm for compat ?16:45
devkulkarnipaulczar: I see. And we don't need to worry about placement of containers because Heat + Autoscale will take care of that for Solum.16:45
paulczarorrrr,  switch to LXC and get the instantiation speed, but lose the unionfs ( which only affects the time taken to copy the image to the nova host )16:45
adrian_ottodeployment speed is important to reduce the CI/CD cycle time, so we want to use the Docker driver until we have a working libvirt driver option to substitute there.16:46
julienveyadrian_otto: do you have some links (reviews, bps..) to share about the libvirt container support ? Maybe we could help them16:46
paulczarright.  we need to get at least two bugs pushed through to use docker for m116:46
devkulkarni-1 to switching to LXC (since we already have Docker based builds)16:46
adrian_ottojulienvey: not yet, but I would be happy to track them down16:46
julienveyI talked to the Docker team recently, their current focus is on getting the CI working in nova, that's why there is not much work on the driver16:47
adrian_otto#action adrian_otto to locate Nova blueprints/reviews on libvirt driver support for Docker16:47
julienveyEric Windisch is leading that16:47
paulczarjulienvey: I got the same story talking with Eric16:48
devkulkarniis the Docker team also working on the libvirt option?16:48
adrian_ottodevkulkarni: I will check with them to confirm16:48
paulczarthey're using my dockenstack project as a base which is pretty cool.16:48
devkulkarnipaulczar: link please :)16:48
adrian_ottoI do know that RAX is contributing to that effort16:48
devkulkarniadrian_otto: awesome. thanks!16:48
*** ameade has quit IRC16:48
paulczarwe have two blocking bugs in oslo and nova that will stop us from using docker driver16:49
adrian_ottopaulczar: each has open reviews in Nova, right?16:49
paulczarI have patched oslo, and fixed the patch for nova16:49
paulczaryes16:49
paulczarhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/78642/16:49
paulczarhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/65393/16:49
paulczarand this is a nice to have - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78322/16:50
*** roshanagr has quit IRC16:50
paulczardevkulkarni: https://github.com/ewindisch/dockenstack16:50
paulczarheh,  sudden flurry of +1's :)16:51
devkulkarnipaulczar: cool.. thanks!16:51
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:52
ewindischpaulczar: feel free to add me to any such reviews as above... (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78322/)16:52
adrian_ottohardcoding a specific username in https://review.openstack.org/78322 is likely to raises concerns16:52
paulczarspecific username ?16:53
adrian_ottoif other solutions are possible, we should explore those16:53
adrian_ottothe patch adds "samalba/registry" as a default16:53
ewindischpaulczar: ewindisch16:53
*** roshanagr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:53
paulczaradrian_otto: that's just the name of the trusted build16:53
*** sergmelikyan has quit IRC16:54
paulczarewindisch: thx16:54
ewindischpaulczar / adrian_otto: that's off the master branch. What is used right now is the cut release.16:54
*** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
ewindischif there is a bug in the release we should cut a new one16:54
paulczarewindisch: I gave up asking for that!  ( before you started ) ;)16:55
adrian_ottook, seeing something named after a person jumped out at me16:55
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:55
paulczarhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/78642/ wants a unit test … does a real dev want to help out with that ?16:56
julienveypaulczar: sure16:56
adrian_ottopaulczar: thanks for raising those reviews to our attention16:57
*** stanlagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
paulczarnp16:58
adrian_ottopaulczar: Doug Hellman asked for a unit test on https://review.openstack.org/7864216:58
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
paulczaradrian_otto: julienvey just offered to help with that16:58
adrian_ottolagged. thanks!16:58
adrian_ottoanyone else that would like to be recorded in the attendance, please chime in16:59
paulczarwith those merged in I think we'll be good to M1 on docker16:59
ewindischas long as we're linking reviews... I've got a pile for Docker stuff: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+owner:ewindisch,n,z16:59
adrian_ottoewindisch: thank you!16:59
adrian_ottothanks everyone17:00
adrian_otto#endmeeting17:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 11 17:00:15 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/solum_team_meeting/2014/solum_team_meeting.2014-03-11-16.01.html17:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/solum_team_meeting/2014/solum_team_meeting.2014-03-11-16.01.txt17:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/solum_team_meeting/2014/solum_team_meeting.2014-03-11-16.01.log.html17:00
*** paulczar has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** devkulkarni has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** adrian_otto has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
ativelkov#startmeeting murano17:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 11 17:00:42 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ativelkov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: murano)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'murano'17:00
katyaferventHi all!17:00
ativelkovHi folks17:00
ativelkovThose who are here for Murano, please identify yourself17:01
dteselkinHi17:01
*** noorul has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
gokrokveHi17:01
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:01
stanlagunhi17:01
*** aratim has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
ativelkovOk, some folks around, let's start then17:01
ativelkov#topic AI review17:02
*** openstack changes topic to "AI review (Meeting topic: murano)"17:02
ativelkovWe have just a few of AIs from the last week17:02
*** igormarnat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** noorul has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** roshanagr has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
ativelkovBTW, agenda is here: #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda#Agenda17:02
igormarnat_Howdy17:02
*** IlyaE has quit IRC17:02
sergmelikyano/17:02
*** akuznetsova_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
ativelkovSo, the first AI was on ruhe: ruhe to add repository-reorganization BP to roadmap17:03
*** datsun180b has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
ativelkovhe is not jere, as far as I can see17:03
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
katyaferventDidn't we postpone this activity?17:04
*** jcoufal has quit IRC17:04
ativelkovBut eventually it was decided to drop repository reorganization blueprint from this delivery17:04
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
ativelkovkatyafervent: yes, we did. We just did it after the previous weekly meeting17:04
*** caleb_ has quit IRC17:04
*** demorris has quit IRC17:04
katyaferventwell if we will unite 3 repos to one we'll kind of reach this)17:05
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
ativelkov#agreed to postpone explicit repo reorganization till the delivery is done17:05
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
ativelkovWe have a section in agenda to discuss this17:05
katyaferventI'm talking about contributing new code to murano-api17:05
katyaferventOk, sorry)17:05
ativelkovIt's more then just 3 repos17:05
ativelkovSo, the next one: tsufiev to create a BP on Marconi usage17:05
ativelkovIs Timur here today?17:06
*** tsufiev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:06
tsufievhi17:06
ativelkovHi Timur17:06
*** zns has quit IRC17:06
ativelkovThere was an AI on you: tsufiev to create a BP on Marconi usage17:06
tsufievi did it )17:06
ativelkovCould you please share the link?17:07
tsufievhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/investigate-marconi-messaging17:07
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
ativelkov#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/investigate-marconi-messaging17:07
ativelkovThanks17:07
ativelkovDid you have a chance to do the initial investifation about it?17:07
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC17:08
*** malini has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
ativelkovtsufiev: ?17:08
tsufievnope (. i've been doing a lot of CR recently17:09
ativelkovOk, no problem. We are not in a rush with this. We'll need to coordinate with Dmitry on unified agent initiative, but this waits till the AppCatalog MVP is live17:09
ruheHi!17:10
*** ijw has quit IRC17:10
ativelkovHi17:10
gokrokvehi17:10
*** khyati has quit IRC17:10
ativelkovSo, the last AI: ruhe to create BPs for infrustructure-related items in roadmap17:10
tsufievativelkov: yes, as soon as I finish with AppCatalog UI, i'll able to do it17:10
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:10
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:11
gokrokveruhe: Do you have +2 rights?17:11
gokrokveWe need to improve our review activity.17:11
ruhegokrokve: no, i didn't earn this privilegy yet :)17:11
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
ruhegokrokve: but i'm reviewing as hard as i can17:12
gokrokvecool17:12
ativelkovYEs, we have quite a long backlog17:12
ativelkovWe need to catch up on this17:12
gokrokvesure17:13
*** tzumainn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:13
*** luqas has quit IRC17:13
ativelkovBut let's keep with the Agenda )17:13
*** d0ugal has quit IRC17:13
gokrokvethere are some patches with did not get any review since March 9th17:13
gokrokvesure17:13
ativelkovSo, as for the last AI, I believe ruhe has made all the blueprints for our infra-changes17:13
ativelkovSo, we can proceed17:14
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
ativelkov#topic Repo-reorganization progress17:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Repo-reorganization progress (Meeting topic: murano)"17:14
ativelkovSo, we have decided not to explicitly spend any time on repo-migration during this phase17:15
*** arnaud has quit IRC17:15
ativelkovhowever, there are chances to do a lot of work seemlessly17:15
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC17:15
ruhethe only item under question is murano-common17:16
ativelkovWe have two major blocks which are going to land to our codebase in the nearest month: a new DSL engine and a new repository API17:16
ruheshould we get rid of that repo by copy-pasting it across other projects or leave it as is?17:16
ativelkovWe've decided to put them both into the murano-api repository (instead of murano-conductor and murano-repository accordingly)17:16
ativelkovruhe - yes, it seems like this is the only part which will remain outside of joined murano-api17:17
katyaferventbtw, did we make change in review that is already in progress?17:17
*** sarob_ has quit IRC17:17
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:17
*** IYozhikov_away is now known as IgorYozhikov17:17
ativelkovI believe we should fallback to copy-pasting this into the agent till we are done with its unification17:17
ativelkovkatyafervent: which review do you mean?17:18
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:18
katyaferventhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/75882/17:18
katyaferventthis one17:18
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:18
ativelkovAh, we will finish reviewing it17:19
tsufievkatyafervent: ruhe has already copy-pasted this commit into murano-api17:19
katyaferventgreat!17:19
ruhekatyafervent: i've copied this CR to murano-api. see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79629/17:19
ativelkovand oncah, then, tsufiev, please abandone it17:19
igormarnat_oncah?17:19
tsufievativelkov: ok, once it get 2 +217:19
ativelkovSure17:19
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
ativelkovoncah was a typo, sorry )17:20
tsufieveverybody is eager to know what did you mean )17:20
ativelkovSo, we are on a good progress with this: in 0.5 we are going to have all murano services in one repo, and a single python-client17:20
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:21
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:21
*** xwizard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:21
ativelkovthat was supposed to be the beginning of "and once we have it approved.."17:21
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:21
ativelkovWe'll manage murano-docs and murano-tests during the next iteration17:22
sergmelikyanI think copy-pasting murano-common may be not so good.17:22
ativelkovwhat do you propose instead?17:22
sergmelikyanWe will end-up not only copying existing functionality to murano-agent, but also all other functionality that is currently provided by packages that is not available in global-requirements17:23
ativelkovwhat is this funcitonality?17:23
sergmelikyanbunch?17:23
sergmelikyandeepcopy?17:23
sergmelikyandeep?17:24
*** safchain has quit IRC17:24
ativelkovwe need to consider them one by one17:24
xwizard_we should remove these dependencies17:24
ativelkovprobably we may either find other ways of doing that, or publish them17:24
tsufievsergmelikyan: do you propose to first remove the dependencies and then copy-paste the result?17:24
*** nacim has quit IRC17:25
*** hhoover has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
stanlagunmaybe we can merge agent with the rest of murano repositories and leave murano-common as a module within this unified repository17:26
*** hhoover has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:26
sergmelikyantsufiev, I am not sure why we need to have this troubles at all (with copy-pasting). We expect to have troubles to publish murano-common in global-requirements if Murano will be incubated before migration on other agent implementation?17:26
*** eankutse has quit IRC17:26
ativelkovBut this will mean that the agent will be have to install everything, including engine and apis17:26
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
*** venkatesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
ativelkovHm, folks, a funny idea... what about putting that "utils" block into the python-muranoclient?17:27
sergmelikyanativelkov, anyway when you installing API you will also install engine17:27
ativelkovsergmelikyan: that's ok for a service node, which may even change its roles on the fly. It may be not ok for the client17:28
ativelkovs/client/agent17:28
stanlagunmaybe we can find a way to customize installation somehow17:29
ativelkovprobably17:29
stanlagunthis would be also useful for API vs Engine17:29
ativelkovBut I am still not convinced about the need to use all those dependencies in the Agent17:30
sergmelikyanI suggest to postpone merging murano-common code ether to murano repo or murano-agent17:30
ativelkovsergmelikyan: +117:30
*** baoli has quit IRC17:30
ativelkovactually we already agreed on that17:30
*** marun has quit IRC17:30
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
ativelkovWe are not in a rush17:30
ativelkovthe only problem which is really hot is Puka17:31
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
sergmelikyanI have already submitted patch for Puka17:31
stanlagunAnyway lets try to avoid copy-pasting by all means possible.17:31
sergmelikyanhttps://review.openstack.org/7963917:31
ativelkovAs soon as openstack-infra updates tox on their CI, we'll get everything broken for Murano17:31
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:32
ativelkovAs new tox will bring new pip with it, and the new pip is unable to install from untrusted sources17:32
sergmelikyanativelkov, I have found one more issue today (it is already fixed), but had no time to fully test this patch on a lab.17:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:32
ativelkovsergmelikyan: that's good. Let's speed-up this process17:32
*** eankutse has quit IRC17:32
sergmelikyanSo I believe we can ger rid of Puka in a matter of days17:32
tsufievativelkov: you mean the dev versions?17:32
ativelkovtsufiev: no, everything17:33
*** daneleblanc has quit IRC17:33
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC17:33
tsufiev:(17:33
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC17:34
ativelkovJenkins runs tox, tox runs pip install -r requirements.txt, and it fails if pip is 1.5.417:34
stanlagunThere is always a temporary solution - to use regular puka instead of custom fork17:34
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
ativelkovstanlagun: I would prefer permanent solutions :)17:34
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk17:34
ativelkovAs sergmelikyan has almost got one ready, I would wait for it17:35
stanlagunativelkov: me too. Consider it as plan B17:35
ativelkovGot it17:35
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
*** sarob_ has quit IRC17:36
ativelkovSo, are we all agree on the repositories?17:36
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:36
sergmelikyan+17:36
katyafervent+17:37
tsufiev+17:37
ativelkovNo objections. Cool ) Let's move on17:37
ativelkov#topic ApplicationCatalog API17:37
stanlagunativelkov: +1 for merging but so that it would be possible to choose what deamon runs at each place. And without copy-paste17:37
*** openstack changes topic to "ApplicationCatalog API (Meeting topic: murano)"17:37
ativelkovSo, as far as I understand, gokrokve has some proposal on the repository APIs17:38
gokrokveyes17:38
ativelkovBut we have already designed an API and started implementing it17:38
gokrokveI still want to split APi and have artifacts API which will be moved to Galnce17:38
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
*** daneleblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
gokrokveand Catalog API with handles Catalog specific actions17:39
ativelkovWhat do you mean?17:39
ativelkovI think that Catalog API will wrap artifact API17:39
*** khyati_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
*** akuznetsova_ has quit IRC17:39
ativelkovAt least during the transition period17:40
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:41
stanlagungokrokve: so we will have 3 APIs for the near future?17:41
*** walker_ has quit IRC17:41
gokrokveYoa are right it will wrap17:41
gokrokveWe will17:41
ativelkovstanlagun: Glance API will not appear in the nearest future17:41
gokrokveOne APi will be Glance artifacts repository API17:41
ativelkovnot till the mid of summer17:41
gokrokveand Murano will have its own API for catalog17:42
gokrokveAs we don't want to change API again when artifacts API will move17:42
stanlagunWhy don't we split them as soon as Glance API becomes available?17:42
ativelkovFrom my point of view, there may be two possible approaches: 1) murano user interacts only with Murano API for both catalog and deployment tasks, while Murano API wraps some of this calls and sends them to Glance17:42
gokrokvethen I suggest to have a clear separation now17:42
gokrokvestanlagun: We can't change APi frequently17:43
gokrokveIf we design it properly now, we will need to change endpoint instead of making a new PAI version17:43
ativelkov2) There are no catalog APIs in Murano at all, everything related to catalogization is done via a glance-plugin, while murano just handles the "deployment", same as nova does it now for images17:44
stanlagunWe would not have to if Glance API is left as an implementation detail. UI should not talk to Glance directly. At least if Murano API didn't explicitly told it to do so17:44
stanlagunativelkov: +1 for 1)17:45
*** esker has quit IRC17:45
ativelkovgokrokve: I don't understand how do you suppose to use glance17:45
gokrokveI don't say that17:45
gokrokveI am ok with wrapping Glance API17:45
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
gokrokvebut we need to design this properly17:45
sergmelikyanativelkov, +1 for 117:46
katyaferventativelkov, +1 the way of Glance usage17:46
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
katyafervent api version could be v1.1 or even v1.1.117:46
*** zns has quit IRC17:46
tsufievwrapping Glance is fine to me17:46
ativelkovgokrokve: if we stick to p1 above, Glance becomes a back-end for us17:46
ativelkovSo, we will not have to change the API when we move to Glance17:47
gokrokveok17:47
ativelkovSay, there is a POST /v?/catalog/packages call to publish a package17:47
ativelkovit is in our API17:47
stanlagunativelkov: not neccessary17:48
stanlagunit may change17:48
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
ativelkovthen it may either store the package in our db (as it does now), OR it may extract the archive, inspect-validate-preprocess it - and then make a glance/v2/artifacts/.. call17:48
ativelkov(By "as it does now" I mean "as it is designed in the version being currently developed")17:49
ativelkovstanlagun: I would prefern not to change the APIs unless absolutely nesessary17:49
*** markwash has quit IRC17:49
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC17:50
ativelkovActually, it depends on the actual logic we put there17:50
*** esker has quit IRC17:50
ativelkovI still see a possibility of the direct interaction with Glance (p2 in my "options" above)17:51
*** morazi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
ativelkovI like this option less then option 1, but it has its pros as well17:51
stanlagunativelkov: yes. But there are no guarantee we will not have too unless Murano API would proxy all Glance traffic. Murano API may still tell UI/Engine/Whatever do doenload something directly from Glance. Especially large files17:51
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
ativelkovstanlagun: in the case of large files it is more likely that they will be doesnloaded from the storage17:52
ativelkovdirectly, I mean, not via glance17:52
stanlagunIsn't Glance would be our storage frontend?17:52
*** eghobo has quit IRC17:53
stanlagunGlance abstracts Swift and other storages17:53
stanlagunI don't really want to write support for all possible storage backends17:54
ativelkovGlance does indeed provide such an abstraction17:54
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
ativelkovBut download link provided by it may target directly to the storage17:55
ativelkovBut I am not sure yet17:55
ativelkovThis needs to be verified17:55
ativelkovSo, we are almost run out of time17:56
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs17:56
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
ativelkov4 mins left, and still one agenda item17:56
ativelkov#topic UI for the Application Catalog17:56
*** openstack changes topic to "UI for the Application Catalog (Meeting topic: murano)"17:56
stanlagunativelkov: Again I agee on p1. Just wanted to tell that it doesn't guarantee we don't make breaking API changes once we move to Glance17:56
ativelkovSo, any questions of the new UI drafts?17:57
tsufievso we started implementing new UI layout for AppCatalog17:57
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
tsufievit uses tile layout instead of tables17:58
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
ativelkovYes, did we share the UI design anywhere?17:58
tsufievnot yet17:58
ativelkovI am sure we need to17:59
ativelkovWe dont' have much time left to discuss it here17:59
ativelkovSo I suggest either to move to the ML or to #murano channel17:59
katyaferventWill we remove the Service Definition tab right?18:00
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
tsufievmore to say, the UI discussion doesn't look like a fruitful one18:00
*** amcrn has quit IRC18:00
*** venkatesh_ has quit IRC18:00
ativelkovIt worth discussing, but now here anyway18:00
ativelkovThanks everybody18:00
ativelkov#endmeeting18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 11 18:00:47 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2014/murano.2014-03-11-17.00.html18:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2014/murano.2014-03-11-17.00.txt18:00
*** derekh has quit IRC18:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2014/murano.2014-03-11-17.00.log.html18:00
*** venkatesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
*** esker has quit IRC18:01
*** pballand has quit IRC18:01
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** cadenzajon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** thinrichs has quit IRC18:02
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC18:04
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
*** esker has quit IRC18:06
*** ijw has quit IRC18:06
*** venkatesh has quit IRC18:07
*** venkatesh_ has quit IRC18:07
*** tanisdl has quit IRC18:07
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk18:08
*** jgallard has quit IRC18:08
*** rockyg has quit IRC18:09
*** eankutse has quit IRC18:12
*** baoli has quit IRC18:16
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:16
*** rlandy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:23
*** SumitNaiksatam_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC18:27
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC18:28
*** michael-yu has quit IRC18:29
*** SumitNaiksatam_ is now known as SumitNaiksatam18:29
*** ramashri has quit IRC18:29
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:32
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:32
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
*** pballand has quit IRC18:33
*** arborism is now known as amcrn18:34
*** khyati_ has quit IRC18:34
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs18:34
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk18:35
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
*** walker_ has quit IRC18:37
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
*** esker has quit IRC18:38
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
*** pballand has quit IRC18:38
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC18:39
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:43
*** lsmola2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC18:45
*** Barker has quit IRC18:47
*** jprovazn has quit IRC18:47
*** demorris has quit IRC18:49
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC18:52
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
*** giulivo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
*** rpodolyaka has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
*** khyati_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
*** tchaypo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
*** jistr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
*** ccrouch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** lblanchard has quit IRC19:00
SpamapShelleeewwwww?19:00
jdobo/19:00
lsmola2hello19:00
dprinceyo yo yo19:00
bnemeco/19:00
rpodolyakahey!19:00
jdobat the appropriate time because I'm not a naive american who forgets about DST19:00
marioso/ hey tripleoers19:01
GheRiverohi all19:01
greghayneshihi19:01
SpamapSlifeless seems MIA today so I will run it19:01
slaglehi19:01
SpamapS#startmeeting tripleo19:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 11 19:01:35 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SpamapS. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tripleo)"19:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'19:01
SpamapS#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO19:02
lifelessSpamapS: I am here, but thanks!19:02
SpamapSlifeless: well you're late and quiet. ;)19:02
SpamapSI sense a ruse.. ;)19:02
SpamapS#topic bugs19:02
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: tripleo)"19:02
tchaypomorning19:02
SpamapS#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/19:02
SpamapS#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/19:02
SpamapS#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-refresh-config19:02
SpamapS#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-apply-config19:02
SpamapS#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-collect-config19:02
SpamapS#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tuskar19:02
SpamapS#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-tuskarclient19:02
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
SpamapSwe are _swimming_ in criticals19:03
*** igormarnat_ has quit IRC19:04
SpamapShttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1290969 in particular has broken our CI19:04
SpamapSrevert was submitted upstream, but we're also dealing with it by listing the stores we need19:04
SpamapSfix is winding through CI now19:04
*** gyee has quit IRC19:04
*** harlowja has quit IRC19:04
*** sgrasley1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC19:05
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
*** cjellick_ has quit IRC19:06
SpamapSThere are so many, I'm not sure which ones to call out.19:06
slaglewhy not +A the tripleo fix?19:06
slagle(for the glance one)19:06
SpamapSslagle: Waiting for it to pass. :)19:06
slaglelooks like it hit some other issue19:07
slagleunrelated19:07
*** jogo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:08
lifelessyay breaking changes19:08
slaglehttp://logs.openstack.org/31/79631/4/check-tripleo/check-tripleo-overcloud-precise/d2ff806/console.html19:08
slaglenot sure if anyone has seen that one before ^^19:08
*** sballe_ has quit IRC19:08
slagle"Authentication required" after creating endpoints, failed the overcloud job19:09
lifelessoh *fun*19:09
slagleso, now that's blocking the fix for glance19:09
*** matty_dubs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:09
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:09
*** tanisdl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:09
* slagle files19:09
lifelesspragmatism vs fear interact in my head :)19:10
SpamapSmoar criticals19:10
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
*** cjellick has quit IRC19:10
SpamapSsuffice to say, we are a bit under water right now with openstack bugs breaking us as much as anything else19:10
*** rollerj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
SpamapSin theory "the process is working" .. as we're feeding fixes into OpenStack.. achieving the goal that a deployment system built on OpenStack will improve OpenStack. :-P19:11
SpamapSbut it burnssss ussssss19:11
jdobis that common this late in a cycle or a side effect of us having our feet under us better?19:11
slaglewe just need to convince everyone else :)19:11
lifelessjdob: feature freeze  generally breaks the world19:12
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs19:12
jdobsounds familiar19:12
lifelessjdob: I hate it with a passion, but the only folk that understand are deployers.19:12
lifelesseveryone else seetakes the view that this is a good thing19:12
*** tanisdl has quit IRC19:12
*** tanisdl_ is now known as tanisdl19:12
lifelessI'm now focused on getting in the gate and helping them understand in a more visceral way19:12
SpamapSright so, bugs there are many19:13
SpamapSTriage seems to be happening more now than it was19:13
SpamapSmoving on?19:13
lifelessDO ALL HDo all the criticals have volunteers against them ?19:14
* SpamapS wishes launchpad would tell him that without opening them all :-P19:15
lifelessSpamapS: turn on the assignee column via the cog.19:15
SpamapShttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1270646  -  no19:15
greghayneshttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1285269 no19:15
SpamapSlifeless: DOHHHHH19:15
SpamapSok so you can all do that19:16
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
SpamapSLooks like none of the triaged/confirmed ones have assignees19:16
*** strapak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
*** gyee has quit IRC19:16
SpamapSso, if you are twiddling your thumbs in #tripleo.. -> grab a critical today19:16
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:17
lifelessslagle: that authentication required is super odd19:17
lifelessslagle: since its in the middle of setup-endpoints19:17
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:18
SpamapSI suspect something crashed19:18
SpamapSENEEDLOGS BADLY19:18
slaglelikely19:18
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:18
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk19:19
lifelessSpamapS: bug 129075919:19
SpamapSlifeless: there are two bugs there19:20
SpamapSlifeless: one is log levels.. the other is actually shipping the logs back to jenkins19:20
SpamapSor logstash.. or something19:20
lifelessSpamapS: we get the logs for seed and undercloud atm19:20
SpamapSbecause AFAIK, we don't have the logs from the overcloud or undercloud when something like init-keystone fails.19:21
SpamapSoh we have undercloud now? that I missed.19:21
lifelessSpamapS: check toci :)19:21
SpamapS2014-03-11 18:52:11.226 2774 WARNING keystone.common.wsgi [-] You are not authorized to perform the requested action, identity:revocation_list.19:23
SpamapS2014-03-11 18:52:11.697 2774 WARNING keystone.common.wsgi [-] You are not authorized to perform the requested action, identity:revocation_list.19:23
SpamapSI bet we need a new policy.json19:23
SpamapSanyway, should we move on or are there other bugs people want to discuss?19:23
*** strapak has quit IRC19:24
lifelessonwards and upwards19:24
*** sarob_ has quit IRC19:24
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:25
tchaypoand twirling19:25
*** SpamapS has quit IRC19:26
bnemecENOSPAMAPS19:27
*** pblaho has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:27
pblahoo/19:27
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
SpamapSdoh19:28
SpamapSmy IRC host just went down19:28
*** stanlagun has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
lifelesswhat did it go down on?19:28
* SpamapS has no snark for that19:29
SpamapSAnyway, I may have missed the "yes lets move on"19:29
*** demorris_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:29
*** SpamapS_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:29
*** sarob_ has quit IRC19:29
*** SpamapS has quit IRC19:30
*** SpamapS_ is now known as SpamapS19:30
SpamapSaand we're back19:30
SpamapS#topic reviews19:30
*** openstack changes topic to "reviews (Meeting topic: tripleo)"19:30
SpamapS#link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-openreviews.html19:31
SpamapS#link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt19:31
mariosthey dont work any more19:31
SpamapS#link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt19:31
lifelessstill down19:31
SpamapSoh19:31
SpamapSlovely19:31
jistrseems like Russel took that down19:31
slaglerussel must have about a million hits on that blog post by now19:31
SpamapSthere's a different one19:31
jistrslagle: lol yes19:31
lifelessit was OIOOOmin his VM19:31
lifelessooming19:31
russellbyes19:32
russellband i've been too busy with feature freeze / icehouse to deal with it19:32
russellbso i just pulled it19:32
russellband would rather bring it back up in -infra19:32
*** demorris has quit IRC19:32
*** demorris_ is now known as demorris19:32
bnemecOh, that's probably what killed my VM the other day.19:32
ccrouchfwiw19:33
ccrouchhttp://www.stackalytics.com/report/reviews/tripleo-group/open19:33
ccrouchhttp://www.stackalytics.com/report/contribution/tripleo-group/3019:33
SpamapSmikal: didn't you have a review stat thing too?19:33
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC19:33
*** markmcclain has quit IRC19:34
SpamapSso, our stats are going to be weird as far as landing changes right now19:34
SpamapSbecause CI is like, always broken19:34
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:34
jistrccrouch: neat. i know about stackalytics but i missed these charts19:34
mariosindeed, thanks charles19:35
SpamapSso in summary..19:36
SpamapS1) Keep reviewing!19:36
SpamapS2) Don't +A without CI passing!19:36
SpamapS3) Keep calm and recheck no bug19:36
SpamapSzomg. new t-shirt.19:36
*** michael-yu has quit IRC19:37
lifelessso, I think that derekh is probably right about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79502/ being key to stability19:37
lifelessspI like19:37
lifelessbah19:37
*** khyati_ has quit IRC19:37
lifelessSpamapS: I like19:38
*** amcrn has quit IRC19:38
SpamapSthat and "wow. such recheck. much no bug. very SUCCESS."19:38
*** Leonr has quit IRC19:38
SpamapSanyway.. on a more serious note.. sdague was just reminding me that it will take a long long time to get tripleo into the gate19:39
SpamapSand we have some really big hurdles..19:39
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC19:39
SpamapSthe biggest one is probably that we really need to start using ironic.19:39
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:39
ccrouchsurely that cant be the *biggest* hurdle19:39
SpamapSccrouch: it is huge19:39
SpamapSnova baremetal is effectively deprecated19:40
SpamapSand ironic is not graduated yet19:40
SpamapSand we're not allowed to have not-graduated openstack things in the gate19:40
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
ccrouchi guess I meant "biggest" == "most difficult for us to achieve"19:40
SpamapSthere are some real challenges19:40
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
lifelessnova bm isn't deprecated, thats waiting for Ironic to incubate19:40
SpamapSto switching ot Ironic I mean.19:40
SpamapSlifeless: s/incubate/graduate/19:41
*** sarob_ has quit IRC19:41
SpamapSoh19:41
SpamapSsame diff19:41
SpamapSn/m19:41
devanandaafaict, it's going to be a source of pain for tripleo for all of the J cycle19:41
lifelessSpamapS: not the same, and I was being precise :)19:41
*** fuzzygeorge has quit IRC19:41
lifelessSpamapS: but possibly wrong :)19:41
ccrouchcan i we make being in the gate a target for J ?19:41
SpamapSlifeless: if we don't switch to Ironic now, we can get in the gate sooner you think?19:41
ccrouchs/i//19:41
devanandaSpamapS: lifeless is correct. russellb has expclitly _not_ frozen the baremetal driver19:41
tchaypolifeless: definitely being saucy19:41
*** eanxgeek is now known as eanxgeek|log19:42
lifelessSpamapS: our being in the gate is now primarily limited by tripleo-test-cloud scale19:42
devanandaccrouch: it can be a target for K, aiui, but not J, because ironic will not be graduated until then19:42
devanandalifeless: ^19:42
SpamapSlifeless: yes, but if we added ironic, we'd also be limited by Ironic's status.19:42
SpamapShang on let me switch topics19:42
lifelessSpamapS: for which, when the patches to make ci-overcloud regions be fully straightforward to deploy, I think we need to go hit up the folk that offered hardware and have a serious talk19:43
SpamapS#topic Ironic and being in the gate19:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Ironic and being in the gate (Meeting topic: tripleo)"19:43
devanandashall i summarize?19:43
ccrouchdevananda: please19:43
devanandaintegrated projects can't gate on non-integrated projects19:43
lifelessSpamapS: Ironic's status is chicken and egg, and if we use Ironic, and are in the gate, we deliver all the criteria AFAIK, subject to Nova merging the patch.19:43
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:43
devanandaironic is not integrated (and probably wont be until teh start of the K cycle)19:43
devanandathus, if tripleo depends on ironic, it can't be in teh gate until ironic can be in the gate19:44
devanandaergo, not in the J cycle19:44
lifelessdevananda: they can once the project is in incubation, because the incubation cycle is the cycle where the symmetric gating is setup.19:44
devanandano19:44
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC19:44
lifelessno?19:44
SpamapSso this seems like something where we need to get aligned and moving forward _now_19:44
devanandalifeless: this is a point ive continually run into19:44
devanandalifeless: the TC and -infra teams have made it VER Yclear to me19:44
bnemecThis seems like a serious flaw in our incubation process.19:44
lifelesssdague: ^ help me understand please19:44
*** daneleblanc has quit IRC19:44
devanandaironic needs to remain ASYMMTETRRICALLY gated until AFTER graduation19:44
devanandawhich means for all of J, ironic's gate is likely to break based on changes in nova, glance, keystone, neutron, etc ....19:45
lifelessdevananda: or presumably consume releases and treat Ironic like every other third party external dependency?19:45
devanandalifeless: that's a possibility as well19:45
lifelessexcept that the link to Nova internal API is a huge issue there.19:45
devanandaright19:45
*** dprince has quit IRC19:46
*** rohit404 has quit IRC19:46
devanandabnemec: i agree19:46
SpamapSSo I think this is a really big, important conversation that we need to have, perhaps inviting the right people so we don't miss any nuances.19:47
ccrouchapologies for missing this: but if we can't get into the gate with ironic until K, why cant we get into the gate using nova-bm?19:47
devanandafwiw, i raised this on the list here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/028459.html19:47
lifelessccrouch: we can19:47
devanandawhere this == asymmetric gate pain19:47
SpamapSBut IMO, this is the biggest thing standing in the way of TripleO. If we're not in the gate... we have to run our own git mirrors and gate openstack ourselves or our velocity will drop to a ridiculously low level.19:48
lifelessccrouch: and since we want to support H for at least a cycle, we just need to use both nova-bm and Ironic, and not gate on Ironic.19:48
SpamapS(which it already has...)19:48
lifelesswe can trivially run non-voting Ironic jobs19:48
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC19:48
ccrouchlifeless: ok, great. So is that the intermediate goal, i.e. a goal for J ? To gate with nova-bm?19:48
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
devanandalifeless: your goal is gate tripleo with nova-bm for J, and with ironic for K ?19:49
devanandathat is not what I thought your plan was19:49
lifelessdevananda: my goal is to get in the gate *anyway we can*19:49
devanandaah19:49
devanandaheh19:49
ccrouchlifeless: +10 :-)19:49
SpamapSwhat he said. ;)19:49
lifelessdevananda: honestly, the baremetal backend used in nova is not the problem19:49
lifelessas I said above19:49
devanandasure19:49
*** rjbrady has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
lifelessour problem is test capacity19:49
SpamapSWhat I'd like to get confirmation on ..19:49
lifelessany other discussion is solvable via code19:49
devanandait's just a feature-limitation for tripleo itself -- not a gate limitation19:49
lifelessthat one isn't19:49
SpamapSis whether we can switch to Ironic and still remain in the gate. :-P19:49
lifelessSpamapS: Can I reframe that?19:50
devanandalifeless: so if you want features taht ironic has AND you want tripleo in the gate19:50
devanandalifeless: i think there's a conflict of interest in deprecating nova-bm19:50
SpamapSlifeless: yes, but I do suspect there is a rabbit in your hat. ;)19:50
lifelessdevananda: go on19:50
devanandalifeless: i thought that was pretty clear19:50
* lifeless raises both hands palms up with a quizzical expression on his face19:51
devanandahehe19:52
SpamapS~o~19:52
devanandaok, i'll rephrase19:52
ccrouchdevananda: is saying we cant have both: if we move to ironic, we get kicked out of the gate19:52
ccrouchiiuc19:52
devanandaaiui, tripleo needs certain features taht nova-bm does not have19:52
SpamapSso let's not speculate19:52
SpamapSCan we pose this quiestion to infra?19:52
devanandasome are inherently in ironic, some need to be implemented19:52
SpamapSquestion too19:52
devanandaSpamapS: ++19:52
lifelessso19:52
lifelessI still don't understand 'move to Ironic'19:52
lifelessthats like saying 'move to glusterfs'19:52
devanandaerm19:53
ccrouchsigh19:53
* devananda is confused19:53
ccrouchyou know what i mean :-)19:53
lifelesswe support nova-bm today19:53
*** zns has quit IRC19:53
devanandalifeless: i thought we talked about "move to ironic" last week extensively19:53
devanandaperhaps not as extensively as other things19:53
lifelessdevananda: I deeply desire the ability to say that TripleO can a) deploy using and b) deploy, Ironic.19:53
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
devanandasure19:54
*** baoli has quit IRC19:54
ccrouchi think he's drawing the distinction about tripleo would support both nova-bm and ironic19:54
lifelessdevananda: neither a) nor b) imply that TripleO cannot c) deploy using and d) deploy, Nova-BM19:54
devanandaindeed19:54
lifelessSymmetric gating may be limited to making statements about c) and d)19:54
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:54
lifelessbut that in no way implies that a) and b) will not work, nor that we cannot do check jobs for them.19:55
devanandalifeless: so my question becomes, does it matter to tripleo if the features which ironic and nova-bm provide are substantially different?19:55
devanandafor a case in point, the need for ephemeral (which, yes, is now in both)19:55
devanandaand then, wil tripleo be able to support back-porting those changes to nova-bm19:55
devanandaand hwo does nova feel about that19:55
lifelessdevananda: so there are threes ways Ironic might differ; it might be better (more secure/faster/leaner/more robust)19:55
lifelessit might have additional features (e.g. UEFI)19:56
lifelessit might have less features (e.g. missing nova rebuild --preserve-ephemeral)19:56
* devananda sighs19:56
lifelessIn my mind for TripleO we have a subset of Nova-BM features (perhaps all of them minus Tilera :))19:56
lifelessthose are what we have to have to say that a) above works19:57
lifelessbut there's nothing holding Ironic back19:57
devanandalifeless: when tripleo needs a given feature, and that feature is not in nova-bm, please, do not add it19:57
devanandaunless you guys can also add it to ironic19:57
devanandafirst19:57
devananda:)19:57
SpamapSright so I want to summarize and then we're out of time..19:57
devanandathe more feature-ful that nova-bm becomes, the harder the testing and upgrade path becomes, and the more i get concerned taht our community fragments the way n-net and neutron did19:58
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
*** d0ugal has quit IRC19:58
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
SpamapS- We are likely to find ourselves testing with nova-baremetal and ironic for all or at least most of the J cycle.19:58
lifelessdevananda: so lets get Ironic in the gate. I just don't see how that impacts getting TripleO in the gate - a,c are distinct from c,d.19:58
SpamapS- We should exercise rigor and not expand nova-baremetal anymore so as to not prolong that any further.19:58
devanandalifeless: agreed. except ironic can't get in the gate until K, for political reasons19:59
devanandaor s/politic/policy/19:59
devanandadepending on your POV19:59
SpamapS- There is a question as to whether TripleO's gate jobs can make use of an incubated but not integrated project, like Ironic, that needs answering.19:59
lifelessdevananda: if you're incubated then nova-bm is deprecated19:59
lifelessdevananda: so J should see us right there.19:59
devanandalifeless: no. we are incubated. nova-bm is not deprecated.19:59
lifelessup, next meeting time20:00
SpamapSAlright, fun times20:00
SpamapS#endmeeting20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 11 20:00:24 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-03-11-19.01.html20:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-03-11-19.01.txt20:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-03-11-19.01.log.html20:00
*** matty_dubs has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** tchaypo has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
jistrthanks, bye20:00
*** jistr has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
*** casanch1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
pblahobye20:01
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC20:01
*** pblaho has quit IRC20:01
*** demorris_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** michael-yu has quit IRC20:02
*** AndChat|25625 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** igormarnat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** pdmars has quit IRC20:03
lsmola2thanks, good night20:03
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** rpodolyaka has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** demorris has quit IRC20:04
*** demorris_ is now known as demorris20:04
*** casanch1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** julienvey_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:05
*** julienvey_ has quit IRC20:05
*** rjbrady has quit IRC20:05
*** tzumainn has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:05
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:06
*** rockyg has quit IRC20:07
*** kevinconway has quit IRC20:09
*** AndChat|25625 has quit IRC20:09
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
*** daneleblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
*** kevinconway has quit IRC20:11
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC20:11
*** denis_makogon_ is now known as denis_makogon20:11
*** BrianB_ has quit IRC20:11
*** dmakogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:13
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
*** arnaud has quit IRC20:18
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:18
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:18
*** rlandy has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
*** kevinconway_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:20
*** kevinconway has quit IRC20:20
*** kevinconway_ is now known as kevinconway20:20
*** igormarnat_ has quit IRC20:24
*** ameade has quit IRC20:25
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:26
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:26
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:26
*** kykharenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:30
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:32
*** phil_h has quit IRC20:32
*** sriram has quit IRC20:33
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:35
*** IlyaE has quit IRC20:35
*** d0ugal_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:38
*** khyati_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:39
*** d0ugal has quit IRC20:39
*** julim has quit IRC20:40
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:40
*** kykharenko has quit IRC20:42
*** phil_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:43
*** d0ugal_ has quit IRC20:43
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC20:43
*** daneleblanc has quit IRC20:43
*** vialvoks has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:43
*** d0ugal_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
*** spredzy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC20:47
*** vialvoks has quit IRC20:47
*** rohit404 has quit IRC20:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:51
*** amcrn has quit IRC20:51
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:51
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:53
*** kevinconway has quit IRC20:56
*** jdob has quit IRC20:58
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC21:00
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:03
*** Barker has quit IRC21:06
*** demorris has quit IRC21:09
*** jprovazn has quit IRC21:20
*** searchit has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:20
*** searchit has quit IRC21:24
*** HenryG has quit IRC21:28
*** markwash has quit IRC21:28
*** ramashri has quit IRC21:28
*** phil_h has quit IRC21:28
*** irenab has quit IRC21:28
*** harlowja has quit IRC21:28
*** walker_ has quit IRC21:28
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC21:28
*** sergmelikyan has quit IRC21:28
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC21:28
*** noslzzp has quit IRC21:28
*** banix has quit IRC21:28
*** ftcjeff has quit IRC21:28
*** morazi has quit IRC21:28
*** vkmc has quit IRC21:28
*** matrohon has quit IRC21:28
*** enikanorov__ has quit IRC21:28
*** rwsu has quit IRC21:28
*** leifz has quit IRC21:28
*** eanxgeek|log has quit IRC21:28
*** sarob_ has quit IRC21:28
*** d0ugal_ has quit IRC21:28
*** michael-yu has quit IRC21:28
*** alazarev has quit IRC21:28
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC21:28
*** markvoelker has quit IRC21:28
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC21:28
*** rollerj has quit IRC21:28
*** bdpayne has quit IRC21:28
*** atiwari has quit IRC21:28
*** samstav has quit IRC21:28
*** spredzy has quit IRC21:28
*** edhall has quit IRC21:28
*** ativelkov has quit IRC21:28
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC21:28
*** amrith has quit IRC21:28
*** fouxm has quit IRC21:28
*** ycombinator has quit IRC21:28
*** annegentle has quit IRC21:28
*** dansmith has quit IRC21:28
*** jvrbanac has quit IRC21:28
*** stevebaker has quit IRC21:28
*** funzo has quit IRC21:28
*** lisaclark has quit IRC21:28
*** zhiyan_ has quit IRC21:28
*** tnurlygayanov has quit IRC21:28
*** gyee has quit IRC21:28
*** zns has quit IRC21:28
*** baoli has quit IRC21:28
*** cjellick has quit IRC21:28
*** lsmola2 has quit IRC21:28
*** julienvey has quit IRC21:28
*** giulivo has quit IRC21:28
*** loquacities has quit IRC21:28
*** slagle has quit IRC21:28
*** sdague has quit IRC21:28
*** hgedikli has quit IRC21:28
*** asadoughi has quit IRC21:28
*** konetzed has quit IRC21:28
*** zaneb has quit IRC21:28
*** sankarshan_away has quit IRC21:28
*** kanzaros has quit IRC21:28
*** briancline has quit IRC21:28
*** shortstop has quit IRC21:28
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC21:28
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC21:28
*** tanisdl has quit IRC21:28
*** betsy has quit IRC21:28
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:28
*** eghobo has quit IRC21:28
*** caleb_ has quit IRC21:28
*** xwizard_ has quit IRC21:28
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:28
*** jtomasek has quit IRC21:28
*** dripton has quit IRC21:28
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC21:28
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC21:28
*** mtreinish has quit IRC21:28
*** esmute has quit IRC21:28
*** Kiall has quit IRC21:28
*** sfineberg has quit IRC21:28
*** nikhil__ has quit IRC21:28
*** vipul has quit IRC21:28
*** sbadia has quit IRC21:28
*** dkehn has quit IRC21:28
*** dhellmann has quit IRC21:28
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC21:28
*** lsmola has quit IRC21:28
*** ewindisch has quit IRC21:28
*** clarkb has quit IRC21:28
*** kevinbenton has quit IRC21:28
*** rbrady has quit IRC21:28
*** arborism has quit IRC21:28
*** marun has quit IRC21:28
*** coolsvap has quit IRC21:28
*** thurloat has quit IRC21:28
*** n0ano has quit IRC21:28
*** juice has quit IRC21:28
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC21:28
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC21:28
*** jaypipes has quit IRC21:28
*** vgnbkr has quit IRC21:28
*** Slower_ has quit IRC21:28
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC21:28
*** IgorYozhikov has quit IRC21:28
*** yamahata_ has quit IRC21:28
*** flaper87 has quit IRC21:28
*** annashen_ has quit IRC21:28
*** aignatov has quit IRC21:28
*** beagles has quit IRC21:28
*** esheffie1d has quit IRC21:28
*** _jmp_ has quit IRC21:28
*** glucas has quit IRC21:28
*** khyati_ has quit IRC21:28
*** pballand has quit IRC21:28
*** ameade has quit IRC21:28
*** Leonr has quit IRC21:28
*** sgrasley1 has quit IRC21:28
*** ijw_ has quit IRC21:28
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC21:28
*** swat30 has quit IRC21:28
*** richm has quit IRC21:28
*** jecarey has quit IRC21:28
*** jeblair has quit IRC21:28
*** ityaptin has quit IRC21:28
*** shanks has quit IRC21:28
*** aginghipster has quit IRC21:28
*** ZangMingJie has quit IRC21:28
*** dukhlov has quit IRC21:28
*** dteselkin has quit IRC21:28
*** early has quit IRC21:28
*** cweid has quit IRC21:28
*** alaski has quit IRC21:28
*** NikitaKonovalov has quit IRC21:28
*** westmaas has quit IRC21:28
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC21:28
*** ruhe has quit IRC21:28
*** DinaBelova has quit IRC21:28
*** ogelbukh has quit IRC21:28
*** haleyb has quit IRC21:28
*** notmyname has quit IRC21:28
*** pleia2 has quit IRC21:28
*** rosmaita has quit IRC21:28
*** rahmu has quit IRC21:28
*** plomakin_ has quit IRC21:28
*** dosaboy has quit IRC21:28
*** shadower has quit IRC21:28
*** kin has quit IRC21:28
*** scottda has quit IRC21:28
*** jcooley has quit IRC21:28
*** peterstac has quit IRC21:28
*** jogo has quit IRC21:28
*** qiuyu has quit IRC21:28
*** lifeless has quit IRC21:28
*** jesusaurus has quit IRC21:28
*** marios has quit IRC21:28
*** gpocentek has quit IRC21:28
*** mordred has quit IRC21:28
*** markmcclain has quit IRC21:28
*** greghaynes has quit IRC21:28
*** boris-42 has quit IRC21:28
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC21:28
*** troytoman-away has quit IRC21:28
*** EmilienM has quit IRC21:28
*** chmouel has quit IRC21:29
*** codekobe has quit IRC21:29
*** wendar has quit IRC21:29
*** russellb has quit IRC21:29
*** ttx has quit IRC21:29
*** gondoi has quit IRC21:29
*** laurelm has quit IRC21:29
*** radix has quit IRC21:29
*** mikal has quit IRC21:29
*** yportnova has quit IRC21:29
*** iccha_ has quit IRC21:29
*** ChanServ has quit IRC21:29
*** cadenzajon has quit IRC21:29
*** flwang has quit IRC21:29
*** ekarlso has quit IRC21:29
*** megan_w has quit IRC21:29
*** bnemec has quit IRC21:29
*** kgriffs_afk has quit IRC21:29
*** anteaya has quit IRC21:29
*** jomara has quit IRC21:29
*** hdd has quit IRC21:29
*** abramley has quit IRC21:29
*** devananda has quit IRC21:29
*** gondoi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
*** pballand has quit IRC21:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:34
*** baoli has quit IRC21:35
*** zhiyan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** edhall has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** fouxm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** wendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** codekobe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** laurelm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jvrbanac has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** russellb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ycombinator has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** radix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** spredzy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** troytoman-away has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** lisaclark has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** iccha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** enikanorov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** HenryG_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** yportnova has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** khyati_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jogo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** sgrasley1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** giulivo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** lsmola2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** cadenzajon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** xwizard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** thurloat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** swat30 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** briancline has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** beagles has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dripton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** loquacities has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** vgnbkr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** Slower_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jeblair has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** esmute has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** shanks has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** shortstop has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** kanzaros has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** sankarshan_away has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** konetzed has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** asadoughi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** hgedikli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** sfineberg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** nikhil__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** vipul has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** IgorYozhikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** yamahata_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** sbadia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dkehn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** aginghipster has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ZangMingJie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** annashen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dukhlov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dteselkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** early has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** cweid has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** glucas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** alaski has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** NikitaKonovalov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** rbrady has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ekarlso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** clarkb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** westmaas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** kevinbenton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** DinaBelova has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ogelbukh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** pleia2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** megan_w has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** esheffie1d has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** _jmp_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** kgriffs_afk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jomara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** hdd has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** rahmu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** plomakin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** kin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** scottda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jcooley has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** peterstac has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** qiuyu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jesusaurus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** gpocentek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** mordred has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ChanServ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** devananda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** dickson.freenode.net sets mode: +o ChanServ21:41
*** atiwari has quit IRC21:41
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** chmouel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** kiall has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** pballand has quit IRC21:42
*** Adri2000 is now known as Guest6828321:42
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:43
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
*** rollerj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
*** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:45
*** ameade has quit IRC21:45
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:45
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:45
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs21:46
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:46
*** giulivo has quit IRC21:46
*** phil_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:46
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk21:46
*** xwizard_ has quit IRC21:46
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:47
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:49
*** morazi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:49
*** AlanClark has quit IRC21:50
*** Barker has quit IRC21:50
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC21:51
*** tnurlygayanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** edhall has quit IRC22:03
*** sarob has quit IRC22:03
*** cadenzajon has quit IRC22:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
*** edhall has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:05
*** bmelande has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** sarob has quit IRC22:09
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:15
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk22:19
*** pballand has quit IRC22:22
*** bmelande has quit IRC22:24
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC22:24
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC22:26
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:28
*** eankutse has quit IRC22:35
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:35
*** eankutse has quit IRC22:35
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:36
*** edhall has quit IRC22:40
*** betsy has quit IRC22:43
*** yamahata has quit IRC22:43
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:44
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC22:44
*** edhall has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:44
*** Leonr has quit IRC22:46
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC22:48
*** lsmola2 has quit IRC22:54
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:55
*** arborism is now known as amcrn22:55
*** sgrasley1 has quit IRC22:57
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:59
*** OSM has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:02
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:06
*** OSM is now known as songole23:07
songoleHello, no neutron meeting?23:07
*** pballand has quit IRC23:07
*** david-lyle has quit IRC23:08
*** songole has quit IRC23:09
*** caleb_ has quit IRC23:10
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:19
*** shakayumi has quit IRC23:19
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC23:22
*** michael-yu has quit IRC23:27
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:29
*** jogo has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:38
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:45
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:48
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!