Wednesday, 2014-06-04

*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:03
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:03
*** alazarev has quit IRC00:04
*** meghal has quit IRC00:07
*** cjellick_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:07
*** meghal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:09
*** cjellick has quit IRC00:10
*** cjellick_ has quit IRC00:12
*** kenhui has quit IRC00:13
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:14
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:14
*** sarob has quit IRC00:16
*** rmoe has quit IRC00:16
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:16
*** kenhui1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:16
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC00:17
*** kenhui1 has quit IRC00:17
*** jmcbride has quit IRC00:17
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:18
*** kenhui has quit IRC00:20
*** kevinbenton_ has quit IRC00:23
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC00:25
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:26
*** meghal has quit IRC00:27
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan00:28
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:31
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:31
*** shakayumi has quit IRC00:31
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC00:32
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:33
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:38
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:39
*** bdpayne has quit IRC00:39
*** ramashri has quit IRC00:40
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:41
*** kevinbenton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:45
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:47
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC00:51
*** annashe__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:51
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:52
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC00:53
*** yamahata has quit IRC00:53
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
*** meghal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:59
*** maurosr has quit IRC01:00
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:02
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:04
*** Haiying has quit IRC01:07
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:08
*** arnaud has quit IRC01:08
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:18
*** baoli has quit IRC01:20
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:21
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:22
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:23
*** richm has quit IRC01:23
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC01:23
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:24
*** alazarev has quit IRC01:26
*** spzala has quit IRC01:26
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:29
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:34
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:38
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC01:39
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:39
*** amotoki has quit IRC01:40
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:45
*** amcrn has quit IRC01:48
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:49
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:49
*** baoli has quit IRC01:50
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC01:50
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC01:50
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:52
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC01:53
*** gokrokve has quit IRC01:59
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:01
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:09
*** Stanzi has quit IRC02:09
*** IlyaE has quit IRC02:10
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:10
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:10
*** jmcbride has quit IRC02:14
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:15
*** Stanzi has quit IRC02:15
*** demorris has quit IRC02:15
*** meghal has quit IRC02:16
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:17
*** emagana has quit IRC02:20
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:20
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:21
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:22
*** JHop has quit IRC02:22
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi02:23
*** gyee has quit IRC02:27
*** kenhui has quit IRC02:28
*** spzala has quit IRC02:28
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:29
*** baoli has quit IRC02:33
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:35
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:37
*** gmurphy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:38
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi02:39
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:41
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:41
*** xianghui has quit IRC02:42
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away02:42
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:43
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** dims has quit IRC02:45
*** ramishra has quit IRC02:48
*** bdpayne has quit IRC02:51
*** mberlin1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:52
*** mberlin has quit IRC02:54
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:58
*** xianghui has quit IRC02:58
*** Stanzi has quit IRC03:03
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:06
*** Haiying has quit IRC03:08
*** gokrokve has quit IRC03:09
*** samstav has quit IRC03:09
*** rwsu has quit IRC03:10
*** meghal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:11
*** bdpayne has quit IRC03:11
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:12
*** Barker has quit IRC03:15
*** xianghui has quit IRC03:22
*** vkmc has quit IRC03:23
*** banix has quit IRC03:25
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:29
*** satish has quit IRC03:34
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:36
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:40
*** Stanzi has quit IRC03:40
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC03:42
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:43
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:44
*** meghal has quit IRC03:47
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:47
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:52
*** banix has quit IRC03:53
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:58
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:58
*** beyounn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:02
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:07
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:11
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_04:15
*** xianghui has quit IRC04:17
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan04:17
*** ramishra has quit IRC04:19
*** dtx00ff_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:20
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:21
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC04:22
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:26
*** oomichi has quit IRC04:26
*** emagana has quit IRC04:27
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:30
*** xianghui has quit IRC04:32
*** emagana has quit IRC04:33
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:33
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC04:35
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:39
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC04:44
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:44
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:55
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:56
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:57
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC04:57
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC05:02
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:04
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:05
*** dtx00ff_ has quit IRC05:08
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:15
*** Kiall has quit IRC05:15
*** tdruiva has quit IRC05:15
*** meghal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:15
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** Kiall has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:19
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:21
*** eankutse has quit IRC05:21
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:28
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap05:30
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:30
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:34
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:36
*** jtomasek has quit IRC05:38
*** dkehnx has quit IRC05:41
*** dkehnx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:41
*** noslzzp has quit IRC05:45
*** sarob has quit IRC05:46
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:46
*** meghal has quit IRC05:48
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:49
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:49
*** meghal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:50
*** sarob has quit IRC05:50
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk05:52
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap05:58
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:03
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:08
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:10
*** sarob has quit IRC06:12
*** stannie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:12
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:16
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:17
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC06:18
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:19
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:20
*** sarob has quit IRC06:21
*** sarob_ has quit IRC06:24
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC06:24
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:25
*** yogeshme_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:26
*** beyounn has quit IRC06:26
*** beyounn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:27
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:28
*** amytron has quit IRC06:29
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC06:30
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk06:31
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:33
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:36
*** meghal has quit IRC06:36
*** stannie has quit IRC06:36
*** lsmola has quit IRC06:40
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:42
*** beyounn has quit IRC06:45
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap06:47
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC06:48
*** yogeshme_ has quit IRC06:52
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:53
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:56
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC06:57
*** artem_panchenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:57
*** ativelkov has left #openstack-meeting-alt06:57
*** artem_panchenko has left #openstack-meeting-alt06:57
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:59
*** noslzzp has quit IRC07:00
*** alazarev has quit IRC07:01
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:04
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:08
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:09
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:16
*** emagana has quit IRC07:16
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:18
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:19
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk07:21
*** tdruiva has quit IRC07:21
*** uvirtbot has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:21
*** soren has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:21
*** sarob has quit IRC07:23
*** eghobo has quit IRC07:24
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:24
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC07:25
*** bdpayne has quit IRC07:29
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap07:29
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:30
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_07:34
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC07:36
*** oomichi has quit IRC07:38
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:46
*** xwizard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:49
*** IlyaE has quit IRC07:55
*** andreaf has quit IRC07:55
*** nacim has quit IRC07:58
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** derekh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:59
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:07
*** nacim has quit IRC08:07
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:09
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC08:10
*** SushillKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:14
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:17
*** meghal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:18
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:19
*** annashe__ has quit IRC08:20
*** sarob has quit IRC08:21
*** cloudon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:26
*** ramishra has quit IRC08:26
*** akuznetsova_ has quit IRC08:30
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:31
*** julienvey has quit IRC08:35
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8708:35
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC08:35
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:35
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC08:36
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:37
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:40
*** cloudon has left #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** jamie_h has quit IRC08:48
*** mkoderer has quit IRC08:48
*** sballe has quit IRC08:48
*** rmoe has quit IRC08:48
*** sergmelikyan has quit IRC08:48
*** esheffield has quit IRC08:48
*** ityaptin has quit IRC08:48
*** ajo has quit IRC08:48
*** goneri has quit IRC08:48
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** esheffield has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** goneri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:49
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:49
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:49
*** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:49
*** SushillKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt08:52
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:54
*** jjmb has quit IRC08:57
*** meghal has quit IRC09:00
*** xenolog has quit IRC09:02
*** aglarendil has quit IRC09:02
*** xenolog has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:03
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:03
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:05
*** SpamapS has quit IRC09:08
*** julienvey has quit IRC09:08
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:11
*** xwizard is now known as tnurlygayanov_09:11
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:17
*** xianghui has quit IRC09:20
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:23
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:24
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:33
*** ramishra has quit IRC09:33
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:40
*** julienvey has quit IRC09:42
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:43
*** r has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:44
*** markmcclain has quit IRC09:44
*** r is now known as Guest162109:44
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:45
*** julienvey has quit IRC09:45
*** Guest1621 has quit IRC09:47
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC09:48
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:48
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC09:52
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC09:53
*** xianghui has quit IRC09:54
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:01
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC10:06
*** nosnos has quit IRC10:08
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:09
*** markmcclain has quit IRC10:11
*** jgallard has quit IRC10:13
*** ramishra has quit IRC10:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:17
*** sarob has quit IRC10:22
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:23
*** xianghui has quit IRC10:24
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC10:28
*** dguitarbite_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:32
*** sballe has quit IRC10:35
*** matrohon has quit IRC10:36
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:37
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:40
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC10:41
*** sballe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:42
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:45
*** sballe has quit IRC10:45
*** yamahata has quit IRC10:47
*** dguitarbite_ has quit IRC10:48
*** sballe_ has quit IRC10:48
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC10:48
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:50
*** SpamapS has quit IRC10:50
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC10:51
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:52
*** nacim has quit IRC10:55
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:56
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:05
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:05
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:08
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:10
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:11
*** dims_ has quit IRC11:14
*** julienvey has quit IRC11:15
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:17
*** stannie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:18
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC11:19
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:20
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:20
*** ramishra has quit IRC11:21
*** sarob has quit IRC11:21
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:21
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk11:23
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk11:25
*** ramishra has quit IRC11:26
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:27
*** demorris has quit IRC11:27
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:28
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:34
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:38
*** jjmb has quit IRC11:40
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:41
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:41
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC11:43
*** baoli has quit IRC11:43
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:44
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC11:46
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:46
*** kenhui has quit IRC11:49
*** yamahata has quit IRC11:50
*** jjmb has quit IRC11:50
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:50
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:50
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:51
*** beagles is now known as brent11:53
*** alaski_ is now known as alaski11:53
*** nacim has quit IRC11:54
*** brent is now known as b3nt_pin11:54
*** b3nt_pin is now known as beagles11:54
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC11:56
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap11:58
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:59
*** kenhui has quit IRC12:01
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:03
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk12:04
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:05
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:05
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:09
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:13
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:16
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC12:16
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:17
*** davidpc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:17
*** radek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:20
*** esker has quit IRC12:21
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:21
*** sarob has quit IRC12:21
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:22
*** demorris has quit IRC12:25
*** dims_ has quit IRC12:29
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:29
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:31
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:31
*** jecarey has quit IRC12:32
*** banix has quit IRC12:34
*** Haiying has quit IRC12:41
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:48
*** Obulpathi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:48
*** beagles is now known as beagles_brb12:49
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:49
*** tbarron1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:49
*** tbarron1 has quit IRC12:50
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** mfer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:53
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:56
*** cloudon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:58
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:59
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:01
*** HenryG has quit IRC13:02
*** markmcclain has quit IRC13:03
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
*** Obulpathi has quit IRC13:04
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:04
*** tvoran has quit IRC13:04
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:05
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:05
*** eankutse has quit IRC13:06
*** ramishra has quit IRC13:07
*** julienvey has quit IRC13:08
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:10
*** tbarron has quit IRC13:11
*** nickchase has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
*** nickchase has quit IRC13:16
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:18
*** sarob has quit IRC13:22
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:24
*** betsy has quit IRC13:31
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC13:31
*** Obulpathi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:31
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:38
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC13:38
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:39
*** julienve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:41
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC13:41
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:43
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:43
*** julienvey has quit IRC13:44
*** ramishra has quit IRC13:47
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:50
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi13:51
*** ramishra has quit IRC13:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** jdob has quit IRC13:53
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** Alon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** ramki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** sgordon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:55
*** NehaV has quit IRC13:55
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** jjmb has quit IRC13:56
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** NehaV1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** danpb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** tianst has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** smazziotta has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** foliveira has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** yjiang51 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
nijabao/13:59
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
russellbwe'll get started with the NFV meeting in just a couple minutes14:00
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
russellbgoing to give it a couple minutes to make sure folks make it to the proper IRC channel14:00
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** NehaV has quit IRC14:00
*** pballand has quit IRC14:00
*** dandrushko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** ch_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** imendel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** vladikr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
ijwo/14:02
*** pdmars has quit IRC14:02
mesteryo/14:02
yjiang51o/14:02
cdubo/14:02
russellb#startmeeting nfv14:02
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun  4 14:02:30 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is russellb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:02
*** ronr84 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
tiansto/14:02
lukegoo/14:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:02
russellbHello!14:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nfv)"14:02
vladikro/14:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nfv'14:02
dandrushkohi!14:02
bauzaso/14:02
yamahatahi14:02
russellbwho has joined us for our first chat?14:02
* sgordon is here14:02
s3wonghello14:02
thinrichsHi all14:02
cgoncalveshi14:02
nijabao/14:02
xuhanphi14:02
russellb#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NFV14:02
heyonglihi14:02
foliveirahi14:02
cloudonHello14:02
mesteryo/14:02
Alonhi14:02
pballandHi14:02
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
smazziottahello14:02
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
*** JohnHaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
*** ulikleber has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
vladikrHi14:03
yjiang51hi14:03
*** TapioTallgren has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
imendelhi14:03
*** r-mibu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
russellbAgenda for today is on the wiki page14:03
danpbgreetings14:03
*** NZHOU has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
russellbfor future weeks, we'll switch to an etherpad to make it easier for everyone to add topics ahead of time that they would like to cover14:03
* nijaba is happy to see a full house14:03
russellbyeah, a good crowd for sure14:03
russellbso let's jump to the first item ...14:04
*** edube has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
*** adrian-hoban has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
russellb#topic mission statement14:04
*** openstack changes topic to "mission statement (Meeting topic: nfv)"14:04
*** martin_t has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
*** SridarK has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
russellbthe first thing we should discuss is ... what do we want to achieve with this group?14:04
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC14:04
russellbsomeone has drafted a mission statement here14:04
*** jchapman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
russellb#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nvf-subteam-mission-statement14:04
russellbexcuse the typo in the URL :-)14:04
nijabathat was me with input from 3 or four others14:04
russellbnijaba: great14:05
*** jtomasek has quit IRC14:05
russellbso, everyone take a look at that and see what you think14:05
sgordoni think it captures the central parts of what we talked about @ summit14:05
nijabaand that must be my typo too :)14:05
*** FJRamon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
russellbif we can nail something down, we'll move it to the wiki page to be more static14:05
ijwlooks good to me14:05
*** fracar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
sgordonbut i know there are some questions about interaction with other projects/subteams14:05
sgordonparticularly in the servicevm meeting yesterday14:05
russellbsgordon: yeah, let's cover that next14:05
russellbany concerns with the proposed mission?14:05
cdub+1 on mission14:06
Alon+114:06
s3wong+114:06
FJRamon+114:06
nijaba+114:06
sgordon+114:06
lukego+114:06
cloudonAny desire to pass feedback upstream to ETSI?14:06
thinrichs+114:06
cgoncalves+114:06
russellb#agreed mission statement as drafted on the etherpad looks good14:06
tianst+114:06
JohnHaller+114:06
bauzas+114:06
russellbgreat thanks :)14:06
smazziotta+114:06
foliveira+114:06
SridarK+114:06
ndipanov+114:06
russellbcloudon: hm, a good question14:06
*** GGarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
dandrushko+114:06
cdubcloudon: not a bad idea14:07
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:07
edube+114:07
adrian-hobanThe comment about "without any special hardware or proprietary software" may conflict with the need for 3rd party CI?14:07
cdubcloudon: i don't know if we need to formally capture in mission or have it be a side-effect14:07
nijabaadrian-hoban: "If special setups are required which cannot be reproduced on the standard OpenStack gate, the use cases proponent will have to provide a 3rd party CI setup, accessible by OpenStack infra, which will be used to validate developments against." should cover that14:07
*** Sam-I-Am has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:07
russellbcdub: as a side effect seems reasonable14:07
sgordonadrian-hoban, mmm i think the point raised was that everything must be testable on at least 1 open source impl14:07
russellbseems like a natural outcome as we go forward14:07
cloudonHappy with a side effect14:07
sgordoni think we possibly need to be more specific there14:07
ijwI think the point of that was that in all cases whatever we're up to should be testable by anyone in its base form of functionality, even if there are vendor specific bonuses.14:07
cdubrussellb: agreed14:08
sgordonijw, right14:08
bauzasadrian-hoban: I don't see a problem with the statement14:08
adrian-hobanOk, +114:08
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
cgoncalvescloudon: I would advice on following close to ETSI NFV terminology14:08
mestery+1 from me too14:08
russellbijw: yeah i think that's key, that's pretty much how all of openstack is developed14:08
bauzasadrian-hoban: it leaves possibility to run 3rd-party CIs14:08
*** Nic has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
bauzasadrian-hoban: for specific hardware resources14:08
imendelI find the ETSI terminology too cpmplex and less relevant for os14:08
adrian-hobanbauzas: Agreed, it will be needed for some use cases14:08
russellbso let's discuss the relationship of this group with other openstack teams14:08
*** Nic is now known as Guest9346414:08
cdubcgoncalves: we discussed this at summit, i suggest we translate to openstack language14:09
sgordoncdub, right14:09
*** Obulpathi has quit IRC14:09
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
russellbon the ETSI terminology concerns, let's come back to that in a few minutes when we get to use cases14:09
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
*** amrith has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
russellbso, other groups, in particular, servicevm14:09
cgoncalvesrussellb: ok14:09
*** kenichi_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
*** Obulpathi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
*** funzo has quit IRC14:09
*** Dale_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
russellbin general, i think it makes sense that some development efforts will be big enough that some specific coordination is fine14:09
russellband i think this group is a bit more broad focused14:10
cdubrussellb: what is the question, exactly?14:10
russellbacross all of openstack, and gathering requirements14:10
russellbcdub: there seemed to be some concern with overlap with the servicevm effort14:10
yamahataWhat's the issue with servicevm?14:10
russellbsgordon: have some comments on that?14:10
sgordoni was just lurking the minutes there14:10
sgordonthere is some overlap in terms of concerns about ETSI terminology14:10
sgordonand use cases14:10
russellbOK14:10
cdubrussellb: ah, ok.  it is likely that servicevm is relevant14:10
yamahataservicevm has mostly overlapped requirement as https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/neutron-and-other-project-items14:11
russellbso hopefully we can keep the ETSI terminology / use case translation work focused here14:11
sgordonalthough servicevm is a more specific effort in terms of having a specific set of deliverables14:11
s3wongrussellb: what is the overlap? is there any development charter for the NFV subteam yet? or are we still working on requirements?14:11
sgordonnow in the form of a service14:11
ijwServiceVM has a large non-overlapping requirement, too, though14:11
sgordonwhereas i see this effort as more broadly formulating and driving NFV requirements into openstack14:11
NZHOUI know there is going to have an open source project named OPN. This NFV team get requirement from vendors or operators directly or just from OPN?14:11
sgordonwherever that may be14:11
ijwNFV is creating user-run services.  ServiceVM is about providing APIs to those services through Openstack.  And in both cases I don't think we actually care who does the work as long as it gets done14:11
sgordonso servicevm, neutron, nova, heat, ipv6 subteam etc14:11
cgoncalvesnote that besides servicevm there is also the advanced services sub-team whih is covering some relevant NFV work items14:11
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:11
sgordonijw, +114:12
*** adrian_istrate has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
ijwNZHOU: as in any community, I think we get our requirements from the community14:12
russellbok, seems we're generally all with the same understanding about how these groups relate14:12
russellbwanted to make sure there wasn't major concern there14:12
adrian-hobanNZHOU: Both OPN and from vendors/operators14:12
sgordoni dont think there is a major concern14:12
*** mjbright has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
sgordonbut we should collaborate when it comes to terminology and use cases14:13
NZHOUijw: ok14:13
sgordonif it makes sense14:13
russellb#topic use cases14:13
*** openstack changes topic to "use cases (Meeting topic: nfv)"14:13
sgordonrather than independently creating two etsi -> openstack glossaries for example14:13
russellbwe've done a nice job early on with gathering a big list of blueprints14:13
*** tinoue has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:13
ijwcgoncalves: The advanced services stuff is all about plugging the service VM services - and others - into Openstack.  Again, they'll use the tools we make, but we won't have a complete overlap14:13
russellbi think one big work area for us is the use cases and terminology translation for openstack14:13
ijwI don't know how many ETSI bods we have, I know adrian-hoban is one...14:14
sgordonright, and the question there is do we want to target specific VNFs or more generally translate the ETSI NFV use cases14:14
russellbwhat would we like to accomplish in this area?14:14
sgordonin a way it's, how do we define success14:14
FJRamonII am not that sure if that mapping is actually required14:14
nijabasmazziotta: I think you are in ETSI NFV, right?14:14
imendelI thought we want to drive requirements. The ETSI use cases are far too high level14:14
FJRamonI guess most ETSI folks are familiar with OpenStack terminology as well14:14
FJRamonYes14:14
russellbfrom an openstack developer perspective, I feel like we need a "tl;dr" of why this stuff is important14:14
ijwPersonally, I was more interested in making it possible to run VNFs.  I don't think we should be 'creating VNFs' for ourselves (and there perhaps the serviceVM guys really do want to do that)14:15
imendelnot rwally14:15
sgordonimendel, agree14:15
GGarciaI am in ETSI NFV too.14:15
smazziottayes. I need to register enovance :-)14:15
GGarciafjrs, agree14:15
sgordonimendel, i am just trying to get a feel for how we get to something more specific14:15
imendeli gree, we need somthing specifc14:15
*** tvvcox has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:15
cdubrussellb: should we aim to have that for next week?14:15
russellbit would be nice to have something, even brief, written up that ties blueprints to the "why"14:15
adrian-hobanOpenStack fits _mostly_ in what ETSI-NFV describe as a Virtualisation Infrastructure Manager (VIM)14:15
nijabaijw:  would be happy to work with you on writing about this14:15
russellbcdub: yeah14:15
GGarciaTerminology in openstack is clear for most of ETSI folks14:16
GGarciaadrian-hoban, agree14:16
*** charles_xavier has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
russellbmaybe a few people can go off and start a first cut at something?14:16
*** luizfar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
NZHOUadrian-hoban:+114:16
cdubrussellb: ok, i'll help with that14:16
nijabarussellb: volunteering14:16
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
*** charles_xavier has quit IRC14:16
adrian-hobanrussellb: Are you looking for a terminology translation or use cases?14:16
russellbok great, who wants to coordinate it?14:16
russellbmainly use cases that the blueprints can be tied to, personally14:17
ijwCertainly we should draw the mapping diagram, if nothing else; it's always the first thing people want to see14:17
*** AndyV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
sgordonso far ijw, cdub, nijaba14:17
cdubijw: agreed re: building vnfs14:17
sgordoni am happy to assist as well14:17
s3wongadrian-hoban: I think russellb was talking about why the listed blueprints are relevant to NFV according to use cases14:17
russellbcdub: OK, want to coordinate it?14:17
cdubrussellb: sure14:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
adrian-hobans3wong: Ok, makes sense14:17
JohnHallerIn addition to VIM, there is some intersection between Heat and possibly new projects like Climate and the Management/Orchestration (MANO)14:17
imendelme too14:17
*** mgarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
cdubrussellb: so sgordon, nijaba ...anyone else?14:17
russellb#agreed cdub to coordinate a first pass on starting some openstack use case documentation, contact him if you'd like to help14:17
russellb#undo14:17
*** TapioT has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Agreed object at 0x2690110>14:17
adrian-hobanThere are ~9 key use cases that are being assessed14:17
russellb#note cdub to coordinate a first pass on starting some openstack use case documentation, contact him if you'd like to help14:18
*** Qiming has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:18
adrian-hobanI will help too14:18
*** imendel has quit IRC14:18
Sam-I-Ami'd also like to help14:18
russellbOK, let's come back to this next week and review what you guys come up with :)14:18
s3wongcdub: how can we contact you?14:18
cdubchrisw@sous-sol.org14:18
russellband we'll have something more specific to poke holes in and discuss14:18
GGarciaUse cases in NFV are too detailed and telco-oriented to establish a mapping14:18
cdubmay be slow until later today to reply14:18
cdubGGarcia: we need to dig under14:19
ijwtelco oriented is rather the point of NFV, no?14:19
sgordonGGarcia, we need to find a middle ground to progress14:19
ijwAlso, kind of the worst cases of what you'd like from network services, so in some senses the best way to drive an architecture.14:19
*** Imendel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
FJRamonSo the question I guess is what we do understand as use case14:19
cgoncalvesperhaps a small contribution to the ETSI-NFV VIM part: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92477/6/specs/juno/traffic-steering.rst,unified (problem description section)14:20
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
cdubFJRamon: that's a good question, and we started at fairly high level (ETSI driven)14:20
GGarciaFJRamon, cdub, sgordon: if we are meaning by use cases the ones here (http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV/001_099/001/01.01.01_60/gs_NFV001v010101p.pdf), it is too complex14:20
sgordonGGarcia, we are actually saying that is too high level i believe14:20
tvvcoxGGarcia> nfv use cases maps very well with HPC use cases.. that'd enrich the target cases for OSP... not to say that numa, sriov, etc generally speaking high performance VMs are a need today14:20
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:21
FJRamonYes, that is correct14:21
s3wongGGarcia: too high level actually14:21
ijwWe have time.  Let's see what we can do with the NFV docs in a week.  We're not saying other people can't work independently if they have bright ideas and there's a mailing list out there too.14:21
*** sarob has quit IRC14:21
*** betsy has quit IRC14:21
russellbsounds good14:22
sgordoncgoncalves, suggest adding it to the wiki if it's relevant for tracking14:22
russellbwe can come back to this at the end in "open discussion" if needed14:22
russellb#topic blueprints and tracking14:22
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprints and tracking (Meeting topic: nfv)"14:22
adrian-hobanAgreed that they are high level, but we can start with them and decompose into lower level requirements that are being expressed in the current set of blueprints that we have captured.14:22
russellbso, we've got a big list of blueprints, a good start :)14:22
sgordonadrian-hoban, that's the idea yeah14:22
russellb1) how complete is the list of active work?14:22
cdubtvvcox: agreed and it's something i know i've been using to advocate14:22
sgordon:)14:22
russellband 2) any thoughts on a better approach to tracking it all than wiki hacking?14:22
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:23
sgordonso i think it was ijw raised on the list14:23
sgordonwe need to define what is actually realistic for juno14:23
ijwrussellb: like I said on the ML, I think what we have there is a lot of work but a lot of it is nice-to-have stuff14:23
bauzasrussellb: we could make use of a gerrit dashboard14:23
*** ramk_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:23
sgordonand the low hanging fruit that would get best bang for buck14:23
ijwYou can do NFV if only you can get traffic from one VM to another, which is currently at issue14:23
bauzasrussellb: provided all specs are tracked14:23
russellbbauzas: cool idea, willing to take a look at that?14:23
adrian-hobanRe 1), I think this is just the starting point, but a good one that we can build on14:23
sgordonright that sounds like a good idea bauzas14:23
ijwBeyond that, we should work out how to rate the rest and focus on what we can agree on and accomplish when we have the ground work14:24
bauzasrussellb: okay, count me in14:24
sgordonim concerned that the wiki will grow stale14:24
russellb#action bauzas to take a look at building a custom gerrit dashboard14:24
sgordonso ideally that might provide something we can more easily automate14:24
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:24
*** kenhui has quit IRC14:24
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:24
tvvcoxcdub> there's many offerings from public cloud providers such as Amazon, Google, Verizon where high performance VMs are the differentiator14:24
russellbyeah, i was concerned about the work to keep it current, because if not current, it's not that useful14:24
s3wongijw: an issue for getting traffic from one VM to another?14:24
FJRamonYes, at line rate it is14:25
russellbijw: yeah, i think some prioritization is a good idea.14:25
cloudonFJRamon: +114:25
*** jjmb has quit IRC14:25
cdubtvvcox: exactly14:25
russellbboth priority, as well as some breakdown of what we think is achievable in each release14:25
cdubtvvcox: e.g. look aw hpc aws flavors ;)14:25
russellbbased on who we know is working on stuff14:25
adrian-hobanijw: I think it's more complex than just connectivity, line rate, jitter, latency characteristics all important14:25
GGarciaFJRamon, cloudon: +1       40Gbps from one VM to another without loses14:25
cdubs/look aw/look at/14:25
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:25
sgordoni think the dashboard will be helpful14:26
sgordonbut does that also help with priority?14:26
russellbi don't think so ...14:26
sgordonthe other thing i started doing was tagging bugs14:26
bauzassgordon: nope14:26
sgordonwith nfv14:26
*** cloudgeek_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
ijwadrian-hoban: fair point, but again, you can test stuff with less than that14:26
sgordonunfortunately you cant do that with BPs14:26
russellbi think we need something else to communicate priority and release breakdown14:26
bauzassgordon: that's only a high-level view of specs and patches14:26
sgordonbauzas, right14:26
russellbwe don't really have anything for that in openstack infrastructure today14:26
russellbso we may just be stuck with doing that on the wiki14:27
bauzasrussellb: +114:27
cloudonGGarcia,FJRamon: though lots of valuable control plane NFV apps don't need anywhere near line rate of course14:27
sgordonyes14:27
ijws3wong: passing traffic without having it dropped by the fabric and firewalled by security groups, for starters14:27
FJRamonYes14:27
sgordoni went to the storyboard session at summit but it doesnt quite seem ready for this14:27
FJRamonBut there is not much work needed there14:27
sgordon(in particular no dep tracking)14:27
sgordonsomething to keep an eye on14:27
FJRamonThe thing is that data plane is the elephant in the room14:27
GGarcia+114:27
FJRamonMost of the network equipment requires that14:27
cdubcloudon: true, i usually describe as spectrum14:27
bauzasrussellb: if we create different gerrit users for P1, P2, etc. then we got our views :)14:28
russellb#agreed build gerrit dashboard for current design/code status, continue to use wiki to document priorities and release targeting for now14:28
russellb^^ that sound good?14:28
ijwWell, given we meet for an hour a week, I think if we picked the first five to discuss over the next week we could make that work - more than that and how do we talk about them?14:28
ramk_i think we should isolate the use cases between performance and functionality14:28
sgordonFJRamon, GGarcia so i think that feeds into the use cases discussion that cdub will follow up with the others14:28
FJRamonI agree14:28
GGarciaagree14:28
bauzasrussellb: if we say that this patch is P1, then we add P1 user as reviewer of that patch14:28
sgordone.g. "which blueprints directly relate to improving the control plane performance"14:28
russellbijw: i like that14:28
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs14:28
adrian-hobanYes, we need to make sure we can deploy the data plane at sufficient performance. A number of items listed in the NFV wiki will help14:28
*** beagles_brb is now known as beagles14:28
s3wongramk_: absolutely14:28
sgordonramk_, performance, determinism, reliability14:29
*** Imendel has quit IRC14:29
bauzassgordon: that's the goal of tagging blueprints :)14:29
*** james_li has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:29
ijwadrian-hoban: maybe you could point at the relevant stuff in an ML email?14:29
russellb#topic open discussion14:29
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: nfv)"14:29
adrian-hobanijw: Sure thing14:29
cloudonramk_, sgordon: +114:29
russellbit has been kind of open discussion throughout, but that's ok :)14:29
*** MikeBugenhagen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:29
*** heyongli has quit IRC14:29
ijwCan someone tell me if I got the BPs I wrote right, or if I missed anything?14:30
cdubrussellb: current ML [NFV] tag is ad-hoc, at some point perhaps we formalize w/ infra request?14:30
cdubrussellb: and ditto for #openstack-nfv14:30
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap14:30
sgordoncdub, probably should do that now14:30
russellbcdub: yes, that's easy enough14:30
adrian-hobancdub: +114:30
russellb#action russellb to formally request NFV mailing list tag14:30
cdubsgordon: i just figured we should prove we need it (by using it ;)14:30
russellb#action russellb to request infra management of #openstack-nfv IRC channel14:30
lukegoHowdy! I am working on an NFV deployment for Deutsche Telekom this year. We want to use the standard upstream Juno release. We would need to upstream around 100 lines of simple non-disruptive code into OpenStack during this cycle. That's a VIF and ML2 mech driver for the open source Snabb NFV (http://snabb.co/nfv.html). If we get this upstream then it saves us maintaining a fork and it also makes it available to the community.14:30
cgoncalvesijw: please refresh the wiki page. just added the traffic steering BP. hope it is relevant to this team to track14:30
ijwcgoncalves: certainly wants consideration with the rest14:31
lukegoOur blueprints, specs, and code are submitted last week and proposed for juno-2. There is a dependency on a new QEMU feature that should upstream any week now.14:31
sgordonlukego, thanks - that one is already listed in the wiki right?14:31
lukegoYep14:31
sgordon:)14:31
GGarcia:-)14:31
ijwI'd be surprised if you needed much help with that, lukego14:32
cdublukego: have you had feedback on qemu dep? (e.g. capability negotiation?)14:32
nijabarussellb: how do we work on priorization?  Vote?14:32
*** ChristianM_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
* ijw sits next to a Neutron core and can beat him with a stick till he gives you a +2 if you like14:32
*** zhangleiqiang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
nijabaijw: nice to have :)14:32
*** Imendel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
lukegocdub: afaik we are targetted for QEMU 2.1 and should merge real soon now.14:32
sgordonlukego, where is the qemu dep tracked14:32
* cdub notes ijw's offer down for later14:32
yjiang51 ijw: it will be better if two :)14:33
russellbi've set up an etherpad to work on the agenda going forward14:33
sgordonlukego, link to that as well might be useful14:33
russellb#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda14:33
*** deepakcs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
ijwtwo cores, or two sticks?14:33
nijababoth14:33
russellbnijaba: fight over it?  i'm not sure yet :)14:33
adrian-hobanlukego: We will need to check for overlap with some other proposals in the wiki14:33
lukegoijw: The risk I see is core devs being overloaded with too many BPs and these ones falling through the cracks.14:33
cloudonWhat practical help do folk envision this group being able to provide to help e.g. lukego's work reviewed and accepted?  Direct reviewing, peer pressure etc?14:33
*** jmcbride1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
russellbnijaba: i think we should discuss requirements in detail, a few each week as time permits, and have priority be a part of that discussion14:33
ijwlukego: do you have libvirt changes you need, too?14:33
sgordonlukego, yes that is where as a group we need to help prioritize14:33
danpbijw: it is submitted to upstream libvirt and pending review14:34
lukegoI’d like help to have the code reviewed so that it’s good enough to be merged upstream14:34
nijabarussellb: sounds good.14:34
ijwcloudon: best help is always work, so go review14:34
*** jmcbride has quit IRC14:34
lukego(and I am willing to help review the other stuff we prioritize here)14:34
nijabarussellb: priority should also be linked to commitment to do something too14:34
*** ulikleber has quit IRC14:34
s3wongcloudon: all of us can help code-review; and with enough +1s we will eventually get core's attentions14:34
russellbnijaba: +114:34
russellbs3wong: have you looked at setting up CI?14:35
russellbI think that's requirement if you have a new neutron driver14:35
*** ulikleber has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
russellberr, i mean lukego14:35
lukegoOur code is submitted to QEMU, Libvirt, Nova, and Neutron. Linked on the wiki (if you search for “Snabb”). We are blocked on QEMU merging our code right now but once that happens I hope we can merge everything quickly.14:35
ijwIt is, and mestery's in the corner over there if you need expert advice on anything else Neutron14:35
mesteryI'm already in contact with lukego on his stuff. :)14:35
* ijw hands you a stick14:35
lukegorussellb: I will setup 3rd party CI. Have to coordinate that with mestery. I am already developer/maintainer of one mech driver for Neutron so I know the ropes of that part pretty OK14:36
russellbless sticks, more carrots14:36
russellblukego: ah cool14:36
ijwIt'd need to be a really tough carrot.14:36
mesteryI always use carrots, never sticks. :)14:36
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:36
lukegoThanks all of the encouraging comments/suggestions (!)14:36
adrian-hobanlukego: Can you also have a look at some of the other blueprints related to hugepages & user space vhost?14:37
*** Alon has quit IRC14:37
lukegoadrian-hoban: I looked briefly but saw no code ?14:37
adrian-hobanlukego: On the way...14:37
lukegoOK. I will follow those BPs.14:38
*** Alon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:38
russellblots of this stuff is just proposed designs so far14:38
TapioT:q114:38
russellbbut it's important to get feedback on the designs14:38
russellbbecause that covers how we expose these things in openstack14:38
russellbwhich is often quite tricky14:38
russellbto do it in a way that is cloudy enough14:38
russellbso we need to make sure it's acceptably cloudy, but also satisfies what people actually need14:39
lukegoI have everything implemented to an “alpha” level now. heavy development/testing is happening on code outside the tree during the Juno cycle.14:39
Imendeli am afraid of those being too hw specific14:39
*** tvvcox has quit IRC14:39
adrian-hobanrussellb: Agreed, we need to give the NFV guys enough of control and at the same time keep the rest of the community safe14:39
*** jprovazn is now known as jprovazn_afk14:40
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
GGarciaImendel: determinism and high performance requires some HW specific14:40
Imendelas per russelb remark14:40
ijwOn BP review, please express horror and disgust on the ones I stuck up in a hurry - they really are blockers for a lot of things and I want to get them cleared out if people are happy with the proposals.14:40
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
ijw(horror and disgust mainly at the formatting, they don't even pass spec tests right now...)14:40
*** luizfar has quit IRC14:41
Imendelggarcia , not sure i agree. at the end apps shoudnt care about hw choices14:41
danpbijw: fyi you can just run 'tox'  locally with no args to verify the specs14:41
*** andreaf has quit IRC14:41
ijwI suspected there'd be a command, cheers danpb14:41
*** luizfar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:41
yamahataijw: I gave some comments on BP. but it was quick comments. later I need to look at it closely.14:41
russellbijw: yeah, and let me know if you have trouble with it14:42
adrian-hobanImendel: There is a need in NFV to be more specific about certain aspects of HW. Scale out cannot solve all of the perf related items we need to consider14:42
FJRamonAgreed14:42
s3wongijw: thanks for filing them. even for serviceVM team some of those items were raised during the J-Summit14:42
GGarciaadrian-hoban, FJRamon: agree14:42
*** tianst has quit IRC14:42
cgoncalvesijw: which spec are you referring to, sorry?14:42
ijwrussellb: doubtful - it was 2am and I was more interested in making sure they went up than whether they passed test, I wasn't exactly expecting them to go through first time of trying14:43
ChristianM_s3wong: agree14:43
Imendelnot saying tools shluldnt exist. but being very specific is a sleepery road14:43
ijwcgoncalves: the three in the first table on the meeting page14:43
cgoncalvesijw: ah, thanks.14:43
smazziottaon perf and determinisme , we can document precise use-case so that we can justify the need to these features in Openstack14:43
ijws3wong: the problems we both hit aare much the same in terms of plumbing14:43
*** boblebauce has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:43
ChristianM_Imendel: some NFV use case will require some perf guarantee and HW knowledge could help here14:44
FJRamonYes, that it the point14:44
GGarciaagree14:44
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi14:44
*** alank has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:44
smazziottaNFV use case like CDN or any data-plane VNF14:44
ijwsmazziotta: It's not something you can work with without infrastructure help, certainly, be it constraint specifications or monitoring, but I don't have a mental picture of what you need to ask for there, I have to say, that's where adrian-hoban could really help14:44
Imendeli am aware of the use cases. i really dont think that nfv is the only one facing perf issues.14:44
s3wongijw: agreed. 97716 was raised during transparent firewall discussion, and 97715 was repeatedly brought up just for having a service VM pool14:45
Imendelit doesnt means that nfv = hw aware.14:45
adrian-hobansmazziotta: I think that is part of the action a few of us agreed to work on for review next week14:45
FJRamonYes, that is true14:45
ChristianM_imendel: agree14:45
ijwChristianM_: you have to be careful about 'HW knowledge' - there's an abstraction between you and the hardware.  You really need to do things independent of HW at the API level.14:45
*** markmcclain has quit IRC14:45
*** alank has quit IRC14:45
russellbijw: yes, and that's where things get tricky14:45
ijw(I say this having had 101 discussions about that sort of violation as a quick fix)14:45
russellbexpress something that allows you to express your performance requirements, without being hw specific14:46
FJRamonImendel: But it is also true that I/O intensive only is essential in NFV, so you need to take different things into account14:46
ijwrussellb: yup, and monitor to make sure you can take corrective actions14:46
Imendelrussellb, yes14:46
russellbif you try to go hw specific in nova at least, you'll get rejected pretty quick14:46
smazziottamy point is that it's not all NVF that require HW awareness. it's only for data plane. agree ?14:46
*** kenhui has quit IRC14:46
ijwrussellb: beyond abstract connections to the outside world, the same is true of Neutron14:46
FJRamonI think that one thing is being hw specific and another being concrete on what you request in terms of machine layout14:46
ChristianM_ijw: yes but for some IO intensive apps I might want to know where sriov is supported for example, a hw feature. But I agree about the abstractions14:47
ijwsmazziotta: anything that needs a guarantee of service14:47
cdube.g. "tie this VM to that core" vs. "give numa optimized VM"14:47
ImendelFJRamon, yes take under consideration but abstract the underlying from the need14:47
ijwChristianM_: the answer to that is more often to constrain your VMs to run where you want them to run.14:47
cdubChristianM_: that could be part of aggregate definition, for example14:47
FJRamonImendel: I think we are saying the same but with different wording14:47
ijwAlso, Paul Carver had good information on QoS and bandwifth allocation from work in AT&T that I rather liked14:47
MikeBugenhagenThere are some Standard Telecom WAN abstractions that are used inter-company that will show up in NFV14:47
adrian-hobanImendel: Certain optimisations are required in order to meet some of the requirements that NFV appliances will have14:47
JohnHallerIt's not just dataplane, some of the control applications have some pretty high throughput, such as control plane protocol-aware firewalls14:47
*** alank has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:48
*** TapioTallgren has quit IRC14:48
ImendelFJRamon, hope so... lets work the details in the design14:48
FJRamonImendel: Yes14:48
ijwMikeBugenhagen: what specifically were you thinking of?14:48
MikeBugenhagenThe Metro Ethernet forum service abstraction are commonly used14:48
cdubJohnHaller: hmm, makes the firewall a dp app, no?14:48
cdub(where the data in the dp is control plane traffic...)14:48
FJRamonThe details on this discussion are relevant, and will be clearer once we have the use cases14:49
ijwcdub's right - dp is not necessarily customer traffic, it's any traffic that's being passed for the sake of passing traffic, really14:49
*** tvoran_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
FJRamonNot really14:49
JohnHallercdub, yes14:49
FJRamonDepends on the order of magnitude14:50
ijwFJRamon: ?14:50
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
FJRamonBroadly speaking in a carrier network there are two types of pipes: the big ones and the others14:50
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
ramk_regarding NFV use cases such as NFVIaasS, vCDN, reliability etc. we have a concrete proposal as part of the solver-scheduler blueprint. Would be glad to discuss further with whoever is interested14:51
FJRamonThe big ones are 10 Gbps and above, essentially14:51
cdubso perhaps dataplane/controlplane aren't the useful categories14:51
GGarciaFJRamon, ijw: for me data plane means tens of Gbps processed by a VM, either a firewall, router or whatever14:51
alankwould be interested to discuss the solver-scheduler14:51
s3wongramk_: I am interested14:51
thinrichsI’m interested in the solver scheduler too14:52
*** sballe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
cloudonme too14:52
cdubramk_: looks like a good way to handle our scheduling needs14:52
*** tinoue has quit IRC14:52
alankdata plane typically refers to normalised traffic from a give app that traverses one hop to the next......ingress/egress14:52
bauzasalank: what do you want to know ?14:52
smazziottaramk_ : interested as well14:52
russellbok, so i think the scheduler is interesting14:52
ijwGGarcia: You have to be somewhat realistic about this - you'll get 10s of Gbit through a service, but not necessarily through a single VM, depending on what you're doing.  Also, even if a VM can do that speed it can do lower, for internal firewalling, and it can be vertically split if you really care about how many VMs you use14:52
*** tvoran has quit IRC14:52
alankControl traffic is for apps mgmt/control14:52
russellbbut from a practical perspective, i don't see it getting in short term14:52
bauzasrussellb: +114:52
russellbi think nova's priority right now is getting the current scheduler prepared to be split out into an independent project14:52
russellbonce that's one, there should be more room to focus on new scheduling approaches14:53
bauzasthe current focus is to split the scheduler into a separate project14:53
russellbso that should be our view for when that can go in14:53
adrian-hobanijw: We will have some options. E.g. SR-IOV progress we want to make in Juno.14:53
alankDo we really need to split the scheduler out to handle this?14:53
ijwyup14:53
FJRamonijw: The real thing is that there are already VMs doing that14:53
bauzasalank: yup14:53
alankI am not sure i understand the reasoning14:53
ijwalank: I think it's more an issue of how many people want to change it in drastic ways at the same time14:53
GGarciaFJRamon: agree14:53
alankyes, would agree ijw14:53
ramk_we can have a reasonable starting point without splitting the scheduler14:54
russellbijw: yes, exactly14:54
alank+114:54
russellbit's partially an issue of priorities and bandwidth within the nova project14:54
danpbrussellb: once the scheduler is split out, where will filters live - eg if we have a "numa scheduling" filter will that be in the schedular project or provided by the nova project as an add on  ?14:54
russellbcertainly fine to continue experimenting with it now14:54
russellbdanpb: tbd :)  bauzas ?14:54
ndipanovdanpb, I hope that filter will be in befor the split14:54
ijwWe can work on scheduling, but if we do it will have to be out of tree.  I don't think we have better options than that right now.14:54
bauzasrussellb: danpb: that's still a question unresolved14:54
ndipanovso we will have to decide along with other filters14:54
russellbyeah, i think new filters can go in now14:54
danpbrussellb: i mean i would rather expect the latter myself14:55
smazziottaa lot of NFV use cases are dependant on the scheduler modifications...14:55
danpbotherwise we could end up with tight bi-directional coupling between nova & the schedular14:55
ijwAnd given the usual resource constraints with openstack dev that usually means people find other things to do in tree, in my experience...14:55
russellbi guess i'm sayuing ... if we can solve stuff with filters/weights ... much better chance of being merged14:55
bauzasdanpb: probably nova could make use (or not) of an external scheduler depending on the operator choice14:55
alankagree, in my mind we should address what info we want to make available, then decide later how best to use that info for a given scheduler etc etc14:55
alankimho, filters and weights are insufficent14:55
russellbsure, that may be the case14:55
*** sballe has quit IRC14:56
ijwalank: I agree.  We can't tell you what to do, we're just offering advice on the current situation.14:56
russellbanything that can't be solved with the current approach is just going to be further out14:56
alankfilters adn weights are usefull for static14:56
bauzasalank: that's exactly why we spin-off the scheduler :)14:56
ijwAnd that advice is that regardless of what you want it's not all that likely you'll get this in in the Juno cycle14:56
ramk_yup ... scheduler is the foundation for NFV14:56
alankagree ijw....thats what i would agree on and makes sense so we do something that others can find a use of that "info" for14:56
bauzasalank: some dynamic approach requires to get other metrics than the ones provided the usual way14:56
*** sballe__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
alankHmm......just to clarify, "scheduler is NOT the foundation for NFV"....its an "element in the NFV"14:57
MikeBugenhagenramk : NFV may also introduce OAM end pionts that don't exist14:57
ijwbauzas: now, finding more metrics for scheduling with, you might get further than that14:57
ijwfurther with that, even14:57
alank+114:57
yjiang51bauzas: currently the compute node provide an infra to provide metrics for compute node.14:57
ramk_agree michael14:57
adrian-hobanalank: I also think the filters/weighs are insufficient in the medium to long term. We need to decide if the extensions being proposed now will be sufficient in Juno time frame?14:57
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** beyounn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
s3wong2 minutes, guys :-)14:58
ijwadrian-hoban: sufficient for what, precisely?  They're almost certainly what you're getting regardless, to be pragmatic about it14:58
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
sgordonyjiang51, it's infrequent though right?14:58
russellbyep, if we have proposed requirements that can't be met, let's put them on the agenda to discuss in more detail14:58
alankIF i may and i think ijw and adrian-hoban are saying the same, we should focus on "what information to gather and expose/make available"14:58
russellbmaybe we can come up with some alternative approaches14:58
GGarciaProposal of use case from Openstack perspective: VMs with high I/O BW requirements (tens of Gbps)14:58
sgordonwhereas NFV typically wants more rapid updates to those metrics14:59
yjiang51sgordon: depends on the requierment, yes.14:59
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:59
alankSome of that will be through Nova, some through Neutron, some through other elements14:59
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
sgordonalank, ack14:59
adrian-hobanijw: Sufficient for deploying NFV at scale considering the increase in the complexity that will be needed in scheduling14:59
ramk_is there any easy way i can share with the group the NFV scheduler proposal ?14:59
s3wongramk_: ML?14:59
russellbi'm not sure what the NFV scheduler proposal is?14:59
sgordondid you send it to the list or was that just in the servicevm meeting i saw it?14:59
alankright sgordon, its more about acting before, not after14:59
ijwThere's more than one, so that's hardly straightforward.14:59
russellbbut yes, mailing list threads are good14:59
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** zzelle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** sadasu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
ijwI would say 'more research needed' is likely to get us further on that.  Some things we can  commit, some we'd just have to test out15:00
sgordonok i think people are drifting in for the next meeting15:00
russellbOK, we're out of time15:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
russellbthanks for coming everyone!15:00
russellbsee you all next week, same time, same place.15:00
bauzasthanks15:00
s3wongthanks!15:00
russellb#endmeeting15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Zuul is offline due to an operational issue; ETA 2200 UTC."15:00
GGarciathanks15:00
FJRamonThanks!15:00
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun  4 15:00:29 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nfv/2014/nfv.2014-06-04-14.02.html15:00
alankok, lets discuss further on mail thread15:00
*** sballe_ has quit IRC15:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nfv/2014/nfv.2014-06-04-14.02.txt15:00
cloudonthanks15:00
nijabathanks for running the show russellb15:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nfv/2014/nfv.2014-06-04-14.02.log.html15:00
*** Dale_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
MikeBugenhagenramk : it would be nice if we had a stack-nfv email distro list to sent that BP too15:00
sgordonwe have people joining #openstack-nfv now as well15:00
sgordonfyi15:00
*** Imendel has quit IRC15:00
*** AndyV has quit IRC15:00
ramk_thanks, will send it to the mailing list15:00
yamahatathanks15:00
ijw-> #openstack-nfv, now open for business15:00
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** pballand has quit IRC15:00
MikeBugenhagenthanks15:00
*** OSM has quit IRC15:01
bauzasijw: thanks15:01
*** MikeBugenhagen has quit IRC15:01
alankcheers, bye.15:01
*** james_li_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** jmcbride1 has quit IRC15:01
*** thinrichs has quit IRC15:01
*** danpb has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** ch_ has quit IRC15:01
*** JohnHaller has quit IRC15:01
*** kenichi_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** GGarcia has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
*** ulikleber has quit IRC15:02
Swamihi carl15:02
*** adrian-hoban has quit IRC15:02
*** cloudon has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
*** jecarey has quit IRC15:02
*** ChristianM_ has quit IRC15:02
xuhanphello15:02
chuckChi15:02
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
Swamixuhanp: hi15:02
*** davidpc has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
Swamipcm_: hi15:02
*** Alon has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
SwamichuckC: hi15:03
*** ramishra has quit IRC15:03
pcm_hi. I can onky be on for about 15 mins. :(15:03
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk15:03
pcm_will monitor the log15:03
Swamipcm_: thanks for the heads up.15:03
*** james_li has quit IRC15:03
Swamicarl: hi15:04
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
Swami#startmeeting distributed_virtual_router15:05
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun  4 15:05:07 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is Swami. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:05
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:05
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: distributed_virtual_router)"15:05
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'distributed_virtual_router'15:05
Swamihi folks,15:05
*** mrsmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
*** pballand has quit IRC15:05
*** james_li_ is now known as james_li15:05
*** IlyaE has quit IRC15:05
*** cloudgeek_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
Swamimrsmith: hi15:05
mrsmithhi hi15:06
*** edube has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
Swamiping armax15:06
armaxHi Swami15:06
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
*** sballe__ has quit IRC15:06
SwamiAgenda:15:07
SwamiDVR Progress update15:07
*** annashe__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
*** r-mibu has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
*** SridarK has quit IRC15:07
SwamiL3 Extension15:07
SwamiL3 Agent update15:07
*** pcarver has quit IRC15:08
SwamiML2/OVS update15:08
SwamiL3 Extension - Update15:08
armaxSwami: I can go15:08
*** bauzas has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
Swamiarmax I did see that you have pushed patches on the L3 Extension.15:09
SwamiHow is the review going.15:09
Swamican you give an update.15:09
armaxso the patch in question is this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84223/15:09
*** sadasu has quit IRC15:09
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:10
armaxI did some preliminary refactoring in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97028/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97275/15:10
armaxas for patch 84223, it has gone through a number of reviews15:10
armaxI am now in the process of adding UT’s15:10
armaxand I think it’s then ready to go back into swami’s hands15:10
*** flaviof has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
armaxreason being, there are a number of issues unvelied during the review cycles that I am not sure how to proceed forward15:11
armaxI expect to be done by the end of today, as for the UT’s15:11
Swamiarmax: Thanks for your help and patch update15:11
armaxI tried the patch locally and it should get all the Jenkins’ jobs to pass15:12
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
SwamiSorry I was a busy last couple of days, I can take a look at the review comments in a day or so.15:12
armaxwe will miss functional testing15:12
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
armaxbecause I’d hate to go the ‘wrong’ way of testing API extensions15:12
armaxso for now I am sticking to UT proper15:12
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi15:12
armaxwhen functional testing in neutron is ready (something that marun_afk is working on)15:13
armaxI’ll get that done15:13
Swamiarmax: yes that sounds reasonable.15:13
armaxSwami: ping me back when you have some time15:13
armaxthat’s all from me15:13
*** radez has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:14
Swamiarmax: I did you that you have created an additional table for the handling the distributed routers, was that based on the review comments.15:14
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk15:14
armaxI did it for a number of reasons15:14
*** FJRamon has quit IRC15:14
armaxwe could have kept the extra column in the router table15:15
*** aginghipster has quit IRC15:15
armaxbut that was affecting plugins that did not support the extra attribute15:15
*** ronr84 has quit IRC15:15
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
*** vladikr has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
armaxalso everything in the logic was cobbled together15:15
armaxmaking extensibility and maintainability a lot more difficult15:15
Swamiarmax: Yes I realized it after seeing the patches.15:16
armaxnow l3 base and l3 dvr are a lot more decoupled15:16
armaxwhich I think it’s beneficial15:16
Swamiarmax: Yes I went that route in my first couple of patches and then moved back again.15:16
armaxalso, I am planning of reconciling nsx’s implementation of distributed routing15:17
armaxso that we’ll have a unique extension point..15:17
armaxbut that’s for later15:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
Swamiarmax: Ok thanks for the information.15:17
armaxSwami: what made you go back on your steps?15:17
armaxSwami: even though we can take this offline, I don’t want to hog the meeting15:18
Swamiarmax: I heard from the Juno summit that for any attribute extensions we don't need to introduce additional extensions.15:18
SwamiThat's what compeled me to go back to the original table instead of extensions.15:18
armaxis there a discussion on the ML?15:19
armaxthere’s a discussion on idempotent DB migrations, but that’s slightly differnet15:19
SwamiYes I sent out an email to Mark/Kyle asking for their feedback on this.15:20
armaxic15:20
*** pcarver has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
Swamiok, I can discuss about this offline.15:20
armaxSwami: sure15:20
Swamiarmax: Thanks for the update15:20
SwamiL3 Agent Update15:21
Swamimrsmith: Any updates on the L3 Agent.15:21
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
*** sarob has quit IRC15:21
mrsmithwe got SNAT sync'd up with Icehouse-ga15:22
mrsmithstarted moving to juno/top15:22
*** afveitch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
Swamimrsmith: great15:22
mrsmiththe merge doesn't look as bad as previous (ice-2 and ga)15:22
*** afveitch has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
mrsmithworking on some corner-cases, etc15:22
mrsmithas part of moving to ga, we got all unit tests passing15:23
*** malini_afk is now known as malini15:23
mrsmithnot much else to report15:23
mrsmithone question15:23
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
mrsmithas far as the wip code 'patch'15:23
Swamimrsmith: that's good news15:23
mrsmithshould we update that patch with juno/top or start a new submittal?15:24
Swamiyou might have to push the code with the top.15:24
mrsmithabandon the previous patch?15:24
carl_baldwinmrsmith: Use the same patch.15:24
SwamiYou don't need to start a new patch. Just upate the original one with the new one.15:24
mrsmithya - got it15:24
mrsmithsame patch, but updated to juno/top - right?15:24
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
*** hgedikli_ has quit IRC15:25
SwamiYes, use the same patch, just rebase to the new top of the branch code and then merge your changes and do a git review.15:25
mrsmithk - sounds good15:25
Swamimrsmith: Thanks mike15:26
mrsmithswami - one outstanding issue is our rpc/plugin port binding issue15:26
mrsmiththat is ongoing15:26
mrsmithyou and murali are working that out right?15:26
*** dtx00ff_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
*** mgarcia has quit IRC15:27
Swamimrsmith: I think we can move to the plugin instead of rpc, if there is not timing issue.15:27
mrsmithk15:27
mrsmiththat is all from me15:28
Swamimrsmith: For the FIP, we don't have any issue for the plugin as far as the plugin does the port binding.15:28
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap15:28
mrsmithI think you're right - we have SNAT remaining15:28
SwamiFor the SNAT I will check with Murali and confirm to you.15:28
mrsmithgreat15:28
*** gokrokve has quit IRC15:29
Swamimrsmith: Thanks for your information.15:29
mrsmithnp15:29
SwamiI think vivek is on FTO, so we don't have any update on the L2 Agent.15:29
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
*** beyounn has quit IRC15:29
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
*** abbrown has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC15:29
SwamiIs murali in here.15:29
Swamiping murali15:29
mrsmithFTO = vacation :)15:30
Swamimrsmith: Thanks for the clarification15:30
*** Romil_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
SwamiYes Yi in here15:31
*** Rajeev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
Swamirajeev: hi15:31
*** vikasd has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
RajeevSwami: Hello15:32
*** jmcbride has quit IRC15:32
Swamirajeev: mrsmith just gave an update on the L3 Agent.15:32
SwamiDo you have any update to share.15:32
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
Rajeevcsnat is coming along well15:33
Rajeevwhen is east-west expected t be in by?15:34
*** diga has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:34
Rajeevwe can then start getting the n/s items in too15:36
*** Swami has quit IRC15:37
*** jamie_h has quit IRC15:37
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:37
*** jmcbride has quit IRC15:37
mrsmithdid we lose Swami ?15:37
mrsmithping Swami15:38
chuckCseems so15:38
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:38
*** annashe__ has quit IRC15:39
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:39
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:39
*** venkatesh has quit IRC15:40
chuckCshift to open discussion until swami returns?15:41
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
*** tvoran__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
*** tvoran has quit IRC15:42
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** tvoran_ has quit IRC15:42
*** dims_ has quit IRC15:42
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** xianghui has quit IRC15:42
*** yamahata has quit IRC15:43
*** shivharis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
mrsmithswami is telling me he is having probs re-joining15:43
mrsmithlooking back at the agenda15:43
mrsmithI think l3 extension was next15:43
mrsmithbut I think we already hit that15:43
*** baoli has quit IRC15:43
mrsmithright armax?15:43
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
armaxyes15:44
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
Swamifolks back on15:44
mrsmithbam - there he is15:44
Swamisorry guys I got disconnected.15:44
mrsmithwe hadn't gone far without you Swami :)15:44
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
Swamimrsmith: Thanks for communicating.15:44
SwamiNext topic I wanted to discuss is the Services.15:45
*** meghal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
SwamiIs 'Yi' in here.15:45
*** jgallard has quit IRC15:45
Swamiwe were discussing with the FWaaS team about addressing the FWaaS service with the DVR15:45
*** dtx00ff_ has quit IRC15:45
SwamiThere is a mailing thread that we started with the team.15:46
SwamiRajeev: Did you hear anything back from Yi or Sumit on the FWaaS15:46
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
RajeevSwami: no, I haven't15:46
Rajeevnot sure I am on the thread15:47
Swamiok, I will check with the FWaaS team tomorrow.15:47
Swamirajeev: Thanks15:47
SwamiI will also check with "yi' on this.15:48
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
Swamirajeev: before I got disconnected I was stating that we had plans to push the East-West first and move the North-South.15:49
RajeevSwami: that makes sense. Tentative timeline you can share ?15:50
*** dmakogon_ is now known as denis_makogon15:50
SwamiIf have the csnat work coming up, then we can think about pushing both East-West and North-South15:50
*** vthapar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi15:51
*** rmoe has quit IRC15:52
*** Swami has quit IRC15:54
Rajeevsure. Any thoughts on how the scheduler is to be brought in?15:56
*** caleb_ has quit IRC15:56
*** dtx00ff_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
chuckCswami is gone again15:57
*** rcurran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** prashmi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** s3wong has quit IRC15:59
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:59
SukhdevHello ML'ers16:00
RajeevThanks for the meeting16:00
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
shivharishi all, DVR meeting is still in progress...16:01
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC16:01
chuckCSukhdev: previous meeting leader disconnected, so no #endmeeting16:01
*** pcm___ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
emaganaah ok..16:01
banixhi there16:01
emaganaI am here anyway!16:01
rkukurahi16:01
SukhdevchuckC: opps16:01
*** BrianB_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
chuckCSukhdev: opps?16:01
banix#endmeeting16:01
SukhdevchuckC: can you type #endmeeting with the meeting name16:02
shivharishi all16:02
chuckC#endmeeting distributed_virtual_router16:02
*** asadoughi is now known as Swami16:02
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
Swami#endmeeting16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Zuul is offline due to an operational issue; ETA 2200 UTC."16:02
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun  4 16:02:51 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:02
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/distributed_virtual_router/2014/distributed_virtual_router.2014-06-04-15.05.html16:02
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/distributed_virtual_router/2014/distributed_virtual_router.2014-06-04-15.05.txt16:02
*** Swami is now known as asdoughi16:02
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/distributed_virtual_router/2014/distributed_virtual_router.2014-06-04-15.05.log.html16:02
*** asdoughi is now known as asadoughi16:02
asadoughi;)16:03
chuckCnice16:03
Sukhdevcool - guys the previous meeting is now ended -16:03
*** asomya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
SukhdevAre we ready with our ML2 meeting16:03
SukhdevHello again :-)16:03
yamamotohi16:03
rcurranhi16:03
asomyahello16:03
Sukhdev#startmeeting networking_ml216:03
chuckChi16:03
*** Stanzi has quit IRC16:03
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun  4 16:03:40 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_ml2)"16:03
*** milton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_ml2'16:03
*** ramishra has quit IRC16:04
emaganalet's go for it16:04
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
Sukhdev#topic Agenda16:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda (Meeting topic: networking_ml2)"16:04
trinathsHi ML2ers16:04
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:04
Sukhdev#topic Announcements16:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: networking_ml2)"16:04
*** esker has quit IRC16:04
SukhdevI have one announcement -16:05
rkukura#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML216:05
SukhdevDid you folks look at the new Neutron Policies wiki yet?16:05
trinathsSukhdev: yes16:05
*** tvoran__ has quit IRC16:05
Sukhdevrkukura: thanks - I missed that :-)16:05
banixSukhdev: yes, just a quick look16:05
Sukhdev#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronPolicies16:05
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
banixSukhdev: anything to update there wrt ML2?16:06
SukhdevThere is really good info in there -16:06
shivharisyes, guick look from me too16:06
*** diga has quit IRC16:06
*** mjbright has quit IRC16:06
Sukhdevbanix: I was going to ask the team to look at it and feel free to provide the feedback related to ML2 content16:06
*** adrian_istrate has quit IRC16:06
*** sel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
*** Rajeev has quit IRC16:07
banixi see the mention of subteams and review process through that16:07
SukhdevWhen I started with OpenStack - I had to striggle to get this kind of info, so this is good for the new commers :-)16:07
shivharissub-team section needs to be updated with sub-team reviews etc.16:07
chuckCNeutronPlugins is just a framework so far, too16:08
rkukurashivharis, banix: I’m not sure there is any general agreement on subteam reviews yet16:08
*** Stanzi has quit IRC16:08
SukhdevYes, there was a lot of discussion during summit about the sub-team roles - we should provide feedback to get it captured here16:08
shivharisrkukura: it can be a good start, to formalize this process16:08
Sukhdevshivharis: agreed16:09
SukhdevAnything else on this topic?16:09
Sukhdev#topic Action items from last week16:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Action items from last week (Meeting topic: networking_ml2)"16:09
Sukhdevrkukura: any update on the etherpad update?16:10
trinathssub-team reviews means, the mentioned reviewers will review the spec. right ?16:10
*** tbarron has quit IRC16:10
SukhdevI looked at it earlier this week and made some updates16:10
rkukuraI have not tried to set priorities yet, or anything like that16:10
rcurranSukhdev, is this in regards to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Neutron_ML2_Juno_Spec_Tracking16:11
rkukuraI’d like some input from the sub-team, and then will discuss with mestery what priorities we should assign16:11
shivharisrcurran: yes16:11
rkukuraI think the various vendor-specific drivers need to generally have equal priorities16:11
SukhdevI have noticed no body signed up as reviewer for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93613/16:11
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
nlahoutisukhdev: looks like list not updated16:12
rcurranSukhdev, ok, dumb q then, are engineers suppose to update this w/ new bp, specs or is just one person doing this work16:12
rkukuraAnd BPs that effect the plugin itself, are needed by multiple drivers, and are generally considered useful should be higher priority than the drivers16:12
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
rkukurarcurran: I’d hope we’d all update the etherpad as we do reviews16:12
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:13
banixrkukura: makes sense16:13
rkukuraand as we file BPs16:13
Sukhdevrcurran: rkukura had taken action to update it intially, but, now, I think any team member should be able to update it ---16:13
shivharisrkukura: +116:13
*** demorris has quit IRC16:13
rkukuraotherewise it will get more and more out of date16:13
rcurranrkukura, i need to add three bp's (all cisco_nexus related)16:13
rcurranSukhdev, ok - i'll add in these three BPs16:13
Sukhdevbut, I would like rkukura to monitor the priority16:13
Sukhdevrcurran: sure16:13
rkukuraMy big question about prioriies is whether we should try to priority within the new feature BPs, and whether the lower priority of these should be same as or below vender driver BPs16:14
*** meghal has quit IRC16:14
*** katyafervent2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:14
SukhdevI would request the team to be reviewers on other specs as well and provide feedback16:14
rkukuras/try to priority/try to prioritize/16:14
*** katyafervent2 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:14
banixI am wondering if having priority is a great idea16:14
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:15
Sukhdevrkukura: on thought would be based upon the impact on the others16:15
Sukhdevs/on/one16:15
*** dtx00ff_ has quit IRC16:15
banixi think wrt  reviews considering the number of us and the number of reviews, the goal should be to hit all during the week16:15
rkukurabanix: good goal16:15
banixdont want to create a queue before getting to the bigger Neutron wide queue16:15
Sukhdevbanix: this might help get them move along quckly16:16
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
rkukuraI’d like to be able to distinguish between things needed by several drivers and things that one person thinks are nice to have16:16
shivharisthere may be things that may be contentious..16:16
SukhdevOn a second thought, if we made sure that we have at least two reviewers on each spec from this team, then we can leave on them to move the process along16:16
banixmanishg: hi16:16
manishgbanix: hi16:17
manishgsorry , got late today.16:17
*** jcoufal has quit IRC16:17
Sukhdevrkukura: yes, that is what I meant by the impact to others16:17
rkukuraThe priorities we set on the BPs apply to both spec and code review priority, right?16:17
banixSukhdev: yes i think that should be the main goal16:17
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC16:17
shivharisrkukura: that is reasonable16:17
rkukuraI want to make sure reviews for ML2 drivers aren’t so low priority that cores and others outside the team never look16:18
*** ewindisch has quit IRC16:18
Sukhdevrkukura: good point….16:18
*** alazarev has quit IRC16:19
rkukuraOk, I’ll keep my action item for next week, and will chat with mestery about how we should be assigning these priorities16:19
SukhdevOnce the sub-team blesses it, we will coordinate with the cores to get these approved16:19
Sukhdevrkukura: Thanks16:19
SukhdevAnything else on this topic?16:19
rkukuraIdeally, for drivers, core reviews should be mostly a rubber stamp if the subteam reviewers have done their jobs!16:19
*** katyafervent2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
trinathsrkukura: for ML2 reviews, cores and outsiders need to have good understanding of the work flow rather than simple code review.16:20
shivharis#action rkukura to talk to mestery for blueprint priorities16:20
*** julienve_ has quit IRC16:20
*** katyafervent2 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
*** zhangleiqiang has quit IRC16:20
Sukhdev#action: rkukura to discuss with Kyle for BP priorities16:20
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
rkukuratrinaths: agreed - that’s why sub-team reviews are so important - we are the ones that understand the work flows within ML2 in detail16:20
Sukhdev#topic: banix to recruit folks interested in Moduler L2 agent implementation16:20
*** openstack changes topic to ": banix to recruit folks interested in Moduler L2 agent implementation (Meeting topic: networking_ml2)"16:20
banixThere were a few emails on the ML. I have started coding and will have something out for comment/review before the next meeting; something people can comment on and can become the basis for writing the spec.16:21
Sukhdevbanix: any update?16:21
trinathsrkukura: okay..16:21
banixmatrohon: manishg and yamahata_ have been offering to help and I will get in touch with them and the rest as soon as I have the code out for review16:21
shivharisbanix: code before spec?16:21
Sukhdevshivharis: :-)16:22
banixshivharis: not the final code; some sketches, a bit more as to figure out the details and options16:22
shivharis:-) I am fine...16:22
manishgshivharis: I think some skeleton code is much clearer than docs sometimes :)  (imho)16:22
Sukhdevbanix: makes sense - kind of like POC..16:22
banixduring the previous discussions we said we need to work out the details a bit more so that has been my goal16:22
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC16:23
*** Youcef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
shivhariswhere can i take a peek at the code? I am interestred..16:23
yamamotobanix: i have an impression that you are mixing yamahata and me.16:23
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
*** ramishra has quit IRC16:23
Sukhdevbanix: anything else?16:23
banixshivharis: will post to the mailing list when have something to share; well before the next meeting16:23
banixSukhdev: that’s it for me16:24
rkukurabanix: +116:24
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:24
Sukhdev#topic: Bugs16:24
*** openstack changes topic to ": Bugs (Meeting topic: networking_ml2)"16:24
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:24
banixyamamoto: sorry16:24
Sukhdevshivharis: the floor is yours16:24
shivharisok16:24
shivharishttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1227336, thank banix for closure16:24
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1227336 in neutron "ml2 plugin update operations" [Medium,Fix released]16:24
banixshivharis: np16:25
shivharisalso in this situation does the closure require that it will not be fixed?16:25
shivharisbecause it indicated that it is fixed..16:25
shivharismoving on.. i dont have an answer to this hoping others had an answer16:26
banixshivharis: wasn’t sure what to use; there is a temp fix released; there is a plan to fix for the long run so wont fix didnt make sense16:26
shivharisbanix: ok16:26
shivharishttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/119386116:26
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1193861 in neutron "ML2 plugin needs to override bulk operations" [Medium,Triaged]16:26
*** ramishra has quit IRC16:27
shivharissukhdev: can this bug also have the same fate....16:27
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:27
shivharissync work planned should cover this?16:27
rkukuraI’m not sure this is related to sync16:27
*** ramishra has quit IRC16:27
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC16:27
banixshivharis: dont think so16:28
Sukhdevshivharis: from the description it looks differnt - let me take action to discuss with Andre16:28
banixwasn’t this fixed?16:28
rkukuraIs the description text true?: Bulk operations on the ML2 plugin will simply call each action sequentially within one transaction.16:28
shivhariscan someone take this and update the stutus on this...16:28
rkukuraIf that is the case, and postcommits are called within that transaction, this is a valid bug16:29
Sukhdev#action : Sukhdev to investigate bug 119386116:29
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1193861 in neutron "ML2 plugin needs to override bulk operations" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/119386116:29
*** radek has quit IRC16:29
shivharisthe title does not do justice, should be fixed16:29
banixignore my last comment; this is a different bug16:29
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi16:29
Sukhdevshivharis: I will follow up on this one....16:29
shivharisnext bug i am following up with Oleg, have not heard back.16:30
shivharishttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1246737, pending response from oleg16:30
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1246737 in neutron "ML2 plugin deletes port even if associated with multiple subnets on subnet deletion" [Medium,Confirmed]16:30
shivharishttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/123612716:31
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1236127 in neutron "ML2 plugin needs additional unit tests" [Medium,In progress]16:31
shivharisneed new owner...16:31
shivharisany takers.. requires unit test16:31
shivhariskyle needs to move it to someone..volunteers needed16:32
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
shivharisdead silence. will tackle at a later time....16:32
Sukhdevrkukura and I will discuss this with Kyle -16:32
shivharisi am done with bugs for now.. more next time..16:33
rkukuraThis might be a good task for someone new wanting to get started on ml216:33
chuckCI can try, but still working on my test environment16:33
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
SukhdevI was hoping some volunteer will rise :-)16:33
SukhdevchuckC: thanks16:33
chuckCnp16:33
shivharischuckC: get started, we will muster help for you.16:34
*** emagana has quit IRC16:34
chuckCshivharis: thanks16:34
shivharischuckC: thx16:34
shivharissukhdev: i am done16:34
Sukhdevshivharis: thanks16:34
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
Sukhdevany question on bugs?16:34
Sukhdev#topic: Spec Reviews16:34
*** openstack changes topic to ": Spec Reviews (Meeting topic: networking_ml2)"16:34
SukhdevWe discussed about the etherpad earlier16:35
*** james_li has quit IRC16:35
nlahoutiyamamoto: a question for you: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89728/ is under your name as sub-team reviewer. Have you had chance to review it?16:35
Sukhdevany body has anything more to add?16:35
*** ndipanov has quit IRC16:35
rkukuraI’d like to clarify that everyone should update the etherpad as needed, make sure BPs are listed, add yourself as reviewers, etc.16:35
nlahoutirkukura: that's great16:36
trinathsSukhdev: for code revies too can you add sub teams from ML2 for those which are already approved.16:36
Sukhdevrkukura: can you please sign up for  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93613/16:36
rkukuraAnd when you do a review, please try to update the status line with the general state of the review16:36
banixdo we do anything proactively when a spec is reviewed within the group and has a few +1s?16:36
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:36
Sukhdevrkukura: this is the one we discussed during summit in the POD area16:37
yamamotonlahouti: yes i did +1 on it16:37
rkukurabanix: I was thinking that once we have at least 3 sub-team +1s, and no -1s, we should update the status to something like “ready for core review”16:37
shivharisbanix: start coding... :-)16:37
Sukhdevtrinaths: I am hoping the members who sign up for spec review, will also do the code review16:37
nlahoutiyamamoto: thx for the update. what is next step? can it be approved.16:37
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
trinathsSukhdev: how abot already approved ones, they dont have sub-team reviewrs. We need to update on that.16:38
banixrkukura: i think that is a good idea; so need to keep track of status. i think the owner can update when they see the +1s16:38
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
trinaths[doubt] Am I eligible to do a (no-voting) spec review ?16:38
banixtrinaths: of course16:38
rkukurabanix: I agree the owner should do that status update16:39
Sukhdevtrinaths: feel free to reach to the team members in that case for the reviews16:39
rkukuratrinaths: Your vote counts within the subteam!16:39
yamamotonlahouti: as it has two +1 already, ask for core review?16:39
trinathsbanix: okay..16:39
trinathsrkukura: sure..16:39
rkukuraSukhdev, yamamoto: I’ll review that one16:40
nlahoutiyamamoto: thx.16:40
trinathsI will mail the owner on doubts with respect to specs and post a review.16:40
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC16:40
Sukhdevrkukura: cool thanks16:40
banixyeah there a re a few spec with a few +1s16:40
nlahoutirkukura: thx16:40
banixi think we may just have a subsection for sub team approved and the owner can move the spec under that heading after seeing the +1s16:41
banixjust a suggestion16:41
shivharisbanix: +116:41
rkukurabanix: Makes sense to me!16:41
rkukuraWhay should the sub-team +1 threshold be?16:42
yamamotobanix +116:42
Sukhdevbanix: do you want to say anything on the Modular L2 agent BP? - It is on the agenda16:42
*** demorris has quit IRC16:42
rkukuraI was kind of thinking we’d want 3 +1s just to make sure enough people have had a chance to review it16:42
banixSukhdev: I said what I had earlier; Will have more next week.16:42
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
banixrkukura:  3 +1s sounds reasonable16:43
*** dims_ has quit IRC16:43
banixSukhdev: hope that is ok16:43
Sukhdevbanix: yes - wanted to make sure you get the floor on this - as it is on the agenda16:43
rkukuraSo sub-team members - your vote counts - don’t give your +1 until you feel the spec or code is really ready for core review16:44
banixSukhdev: thanks16:44
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:44
SukhdevOn to the last topic - on the ML2 sync16:44
trinathsbut reviews are specific to the reviewer views on the topic. As I see there can be many views for a topic for many. if there are 3 +1s and 1 '-1' what will be the case.16:44
Sukhdevrkukura: you had filed a BP for ML2 Sync, right?16:44
*** annashe__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:44
rkukuraSukhdev: Yes16:44
Sukhdevrkukura: can we add that on the etherpad?16:45
Sukhdevrkukura: or did I miss it?16:45
banixtrinaths: will try to answer the -1 and get the reviewer who gave -1 change the vote when satisfied16:45
shivhariswill it be ok to move "sync", "ml2-agent" to high priority16:45
trinathsbanix: oka16:45
rkukuratrinaths: That might be a situation to discuss at this meeting if it cannot be resolved by ansering the comments and/or communicating wit hte reviewer who left the -116:45
trinathsrkukura: okay..16:45
rkukuraSukhdev: Thats should be under planned, right?16:46
Sukhdevrkukura: I think so16:46
rkukuraOn sync, I think we need to take a close look at the taskflow library and decide whether to try to use it at the plugin level and/or the driver level16:46
SukhdevWant to ask the team a question: Did every body had a chance to review the ML2 Sync spec16:47
*** amytron has quit IRC16:47
Sukhdevrkukura: yes - did you have a chance to speak with Mark on that?16:47
banixSukhdev: unfortunately missed it; have a link?16:47
*** lukego has quit IRC16:47
Sukhdevbanix: it is on the etherpad that we used to present at summit -16:48
Sukhdevwill look for it and post it again16:48
banixSukhdev: thanks16:48
*** james_li has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
rkukuraI’ve been following the email discussion on task-based API, and kind of think that ML2 can address the sync using taskflow independently of decisions on exposing tasks in the API16:48
*** Guest8820 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
SukhdevI think we, as a team, need to review it and bless it…..as this will impact almost everybody16:48
*** ewindisch has quit IRC16:48
rkukuraSukhdev: bless what?16:49
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
*** ijw has quit IRC16:49
Sukhdevrkukura: the direction which we want to take in regards to the implementation of the sync16:49
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
*** ramishra has quit IRC16:50
Sukhdevrkukura: we have few approaches to consider16:50
shivharisrkukura: in which case it is the plugin not the driver, that actually decides it if that is the approach16:50
rkukuraSukhdev: Weren’t we going to look into taskflow? If so, should we update the google doc after doing so, then do a formal BP spec once we have concensus on an approach?16:50
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** jbratton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** alank has quit IRC16:50
banixyeah i think the sync operation is a substantial/significant new feature16:51
shivharistask level approach looks cleaner16:51
Sukhdevrkukura: correct….16:51
Sukhdevrkukura: you were going to talk to Mark to get the info on taskflow…any luck on that?16:51
shivharisbut will it cover all cases and nuances of vendor drivers/hardware?16:51
rkukuraSukhdev: not yet - thanks for the reminder16:51
*** pcm_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:52
*** pcm___ has quit IRC16:52
banixis there anything beyond the taskflow library and doc itself that we can use to educate ourselves?16:52
rkukurashivharis: don’t know yet - haven’t done the investigation16:52
Sukhdevrkukura: Shall I assign to action?16:52
rkukurabanix: The task API email discussion is relevant16:52
rkukurasure16:52
rkukuraSukhdev: sure16:52
banixrkukura: ok thanks16:53
Sukhdev#action: rkukura to discuss with Mark regarding taskflow and provide feedback16:53
Sukhdevwe have 5 min16:53
Sukhdev#topic: Open Discussion16:53
*** openstack changes topic to ": Open Discussion (Meeting topic: networking_ml2)"16:53
SukhdevAny thing on folks mind?16:54
trinathsFreescale CI - voting status..16:54
Sukhdevtrinaths: what about it?16:54
trinathscurrently non-votin16:54
rkukuraI see code reviews and open discussion are not on today’s agenda - we need to keep up with these as well as spec reviews16:54
*** vinod1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
trinathsneed your reviews on the voting suggestion16:54
asadoughiovs-firewall-driver is being discussed on mailing list.. lots of good feedback being addressed16:55
Sukhdevrkukura: good point…16:55
shivharisrkukura: i'll volunteer to take that on next meeting...16:55
Sukhdevshivharis: cool thanks16:55
Sukhdevtrinaths: I am still not clear as to what is that you are asking?16:55
*** derekh_ has quit IRC16:56
Sukhdevtrinaths: there is tons of info in CI stuff….do you have any specific question>16:56
trinathsSukhdev: how can  I move Freescale CI to voring16:56
banixnot sure what is the process to get a CI system to voting status16:56
trinathsSukhdev: voting*16:56
*** rjrjr_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:56
trinathsas I see its the community decision16:56
Sukhdevtrinaths: that should be brought up at IRC channel #openstack-infa16:56
trinathsfrom jeremy email16:56
trinathsokay..16:57
banixi think now the CI systems start as non voting; may need to bring up in Neutron meeting?16:57
Sukhdevtrinaths: did you discuss this there?16:57
shivharistrinath: can you ping anteaya on that, and also report back for edification16:57
trinathsreviewers kindly review my  change for ML2 MD16:57
fungitrinaths: the process is that whatever project you intend to vote on needs to request that you have voting rights16:57
trinathsshivharis: sure will talk to anteaya16:57
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
fungitrinaths: so perhaps a vote in the weekly neutron meeting or get kmestery to request voting access for you if this is neutron-related16:57
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
banixfungi: trinaths yeah thats what i recall; bring up at Neutron IRC call or talk to mestery16:58
trinathsfungi: okay.16:58
mesterytrinaths: Your CI is too new for votring rights IMHO.16:58
emaganaptrinaths: I believe the voting will be accepted after the community verifies a consistent performance from the CI16:58
anteayatrinaths: anteaya will tell you to read this: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#permissions-on-your-third-party-system16:58
*** tsimmons has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
mesteryIt hasn't been running long enough yet, and it's had issues over the past 2 weeks. FYI.16:58
Sukhdevtrinaths: #openstack-neutron and #openstack-infra are the channels16:58
trinathsokay.16:58
mesterytrinaths: Once it's stable, has been running well and correctly, I woudl be supportive of giving it voting rights.16:59
Sukhdevtrinaths: there you go…. mestery gave you the answer...16:59
SukhdevFolks we are almost out of time…..16:59
Sukhdevany last thing?16:59
Sukhdevmestery: any last word of wisdom?16:59
trinathsmestery: okay16:59
emaganapenjoy your day!17:00
banixThanks all and have a great day/night17:00
trinathsmestery: patchset 24 did not fail17:00
mesterySukhdev: Nope, that's it, thanks!17:00
mesterytrinaths: OK, looking again.17:00
rkukurathanks Sukhdev!17:00
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
SukhdevOK folks we are done17:00
trinathsthanks all17:00
shivharisbye, thanks all17:00
rkukurabye17:00
Sukhdev#endmeeting networking_ml217:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Zuul is offline due to an operational issue; ETA 2200 UTC."17:00
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun  4 17:00:40 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_ml2/2014/networking_ml2.2014-06-04-16.03.html17:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_ml2/2014/networking_ml2.2014-06-04-16.03.txt17:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_ml2/2014/networking_ml2.2014-06-04-16.03.log.html17:00
*** asomya has quit IRC17:00
*** sel_ has quit IRC17:00
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** vthapar has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** ijw has quit IRC17:01
*** jmcbride1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** jmcbride has quit IRC17:02
*** msisk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
Kiall#startmeeting designate17:03
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun  4 17:03:12 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is Kiall. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: designate)"17:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'designate'17:03
KiallHeya - WHo's about?17:03
*** martin_t2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
timfreundhello17:03
jmcbride1o/17:03
betsyo/17:03
vinod1o/17:03
rjrjr_here17:03
eankutsehere17:03
tsimmonso/17:03
dtx00ffhere17:03
mugsieo/17:03
*** prashmi has quit IRC17:03
*** james_li has quit IRC17:04
KiallOkay - So, there's only 1 agenda item today:17:04
Kiall#topic How does our dependency tree get updated based on our Atlanta sessions?17:04
*** openstack changes topic to "How does our dependency tree get updated based on our Atlanta sessions? (Meeting topic: designate)"17:04
*** nlahouti has quit IRC17:04
Kiall#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/designate/+spec/server-pools#deptree17:04
*** trinaths has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
Kiall#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-design-summit-designate-session-217:04
vinod1how about action items from last week?17:04
*** james_li has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
KiallCrap! Forgot about those. U-Turn17:05
shakamunyihello team17:05
Kiall#topic Review action items from last week17:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Review action items from last week (Meeting topic: designate)"17:05
*** milton has quit IRC17:05
KiallSo - 4 actions from last week, first was: eankutse to get initial answers to jbrattons questions17:05
Kiallsecond was similar, eankutse to pick Jbratton's brain on ops side of things for minidns/pools17:05
eankutsenot much progress this week17:05
KiallOkay - We'll leave them to next week?17:06
eankutseyes17:06
*** martin_t has quit IRC17:06
KiallOkay, next two were:17:06
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:06
Kiallkiall to write our various initial load scenarios and kiall to file BP on exposing the NS (and SOA?) record in the V2 API17:06
KiallAs eankutse says, not much progress this week17:06
eankutse:-)17:07
KiallOther duties have kept me from them.17:07
Kiall#action Carry forward all actions from previous week.17:07
shakamunyiok17:07
*** manishg has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
KiallApologies for that :)17:07
Kiall#topic How does our dependency tree get updated based on our Atlanta sessions?17:07
*** openstack changes topic to "How does our dependency tree get updated based on our Atlanta sessions? (Meeting topic: designate)"17:07
jmcbride1I posted that agenda item and can speak to it.17:08
KiallI'm not sure who filed this one?17:08
Kiall(As a note - can we add names next to agenda items please? :))17:08
jmcbride1no prob, will do next time.17:08
jmcbride1We did a lot of good work in the etherpad at the summit17:08
Kialljmcbride1: was there a specific concern/question etc? or general discussion?17:08
jmcbride1I want to be that info gets translated to blueprints so that anyone who works on them knows what to expect.17:08
mugsieyeah - afik, the basic break down is the same17:09
mugsie(aka the actual bp's)17:09
mugsiewe just need to reflect the decissions in the bluerpints17:09
KiallAh - Okay, so I think the tree itself remains the same (or at the least, very similar). But - Yes - Notes from the etherpad's should be moved into the BPs for reference17:09
jmcbride1mugsie: good, I wanted to get the validation.17:09
mugsiefrom a quick look, I don't see any glaring issues with the current tree17:10
mugsieI can take an action to update (or in some cases fill in) the blueprints17:10
Kiallmugsie: thank you - that would be great.17:10
jmcbride1Sweet, thanks mugsie17:10
mugsieI should have a good start for the next meeting17:10
Kiall#action mugsie to translate etherpads over to launchpad blueprints.17:10
KiallOnce done, we should probably review them and agree the translation is correct + what we agreed etc17:11
mugsieyup17:11
*** saurabhs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
KiallOkay - Since there was only 1 agenda item, and it seems we're OK with it, we can move to Open Discussion - I have a few bits for that section :)17:12
richmo/17:12
*** dtx00ff_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
Kiall#topic Open Discussion17:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: designate)"17:12
mugsieKiall: missed one?17:12
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
KiallGRR -_-17:12
mugsieBIND9? or is that from last week?17:12
Kiall#topic Status of BIND9 backend driver (Ron)17:12
Kiall;)17:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Status of BIND9 backend driver (Ron) (Meeting topic: designate)"17:13
*** thomasem has quit IRC17:13
rjrjr_thanks!17:13
KiallIt was de-indented, I missed it :(17:13
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC17:13
rjrjr_i just wanted to give a status on what is going on with the BIND9 driver.  i have been working on it on and off since the summit.17:13
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:13
KiallI've noticed :) It's nice to see it getting some attention17:13
rjrjr_so, after talking to kiall, it seems like the BIND9 driver as written shouldn't work.17:14
KiallBut - It does. Which is little offputting :/17:14
rjrjr_but since it does, we think there might be an underlying issue with storage.17:14
betsyexcept for the delete bug :)17:14
Kiallbetsy: well, the fix for that highlighted something.. weird.. is going on :)17:14
rjrjr_even an add shouldn't work, but it does. 8^)17:14
*** tjanczuk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:15
rjrjr_in a nutshell, there is reason to believe commits are happening that are not explicit in the code.17:15
*** kevinbenton_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:15
*** dtx00ff has quit IRC17:15
KiallSo - Central wraps the storage changes in a TX, that TX will not be committed until after the backend operation succeeds. The problem is - the BIND9 backend is calling back out to central for info, which shouldn't be able to "see" the uncommitted DB changes.17:15
rjrjr_i'm tracking down the problem to see if it is a general issue or an issue specific to a database (i'm using mysql).  i have reason to believe it is specific to mysql.17:16
rjrjr_mysql does autocommits and i've read enough to believe sqlachemy has some magic to perform to bypass mysql's autocommits.17:16
mugsiehave you run mysql with full query logging on to see what happens?17:16
mugsieafik you can force mysql NOT to auto commit - can't remember how though17:17
rjrjr_anyway, i wanted everyone to know i'm looking at it.  regardless, the BIND9 driver will be rewritten to not use syncs to the backend database once i understand the underlying issue.17:17
mugsiecool17:17
richmIf you are running code inside a transaction, shouldn't that code see what's happening inside the transaction?17:17
*** safchain has quit IRC17:17
mugsieif it shares the same connection it might actually17:18
Kiallrichm: Oooo - Wait. How are you deploying the BIND backend? Inside central, or in the agent?17:18
Kiallrichm: Oooo - Wait. rjrjr_: How are you deploying the BIND backend? Inside central, or in the agent?*17:18
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:18
rjrjr_richm: i'm looking at it.  BIND9 backend is in central.  but you bring up a good way for me to test this some more.17:18
KiallI assumed agent - which means it would be separate DB TX, while if running inside central, it will be inside the same DB TX17:19
richmI don't understand - all backends run inside central?17:20
rjrjr_but, as you can imagine, that just shows the issue.  if someone uses the agent, things shouldn't work.17:20
rjrjr_but, they are. 8^)17:20
Kiallrjrjr_: exactly.. The fact that there is a different is an issue. If the issue is worth fixing is another matter, as mdns is coming in.17:20
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
mugsierichm: you can run backend in designate-agent17:21
mugsiebackends*17:21
Kiallrichm: They can run inside central, or, inside the remote agent. The behavior is going to differ between the two I think.17:21
rjrjr_that brings up a good question, is it worth my pursuing a rewrite of the BIND9 backend or do we wait for Juno?  regardless, i am still going to track down if we have an issue here.17:21
rjrjr_kiall: unless mysql autocommit is occurring.17:22
rjrjr_http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23256128/cannot-defeat-mysql-autocommit-via-sqlalchemy17:22
*** Guest8820 has quit IRC17:22
jmcbride1rjrjr_ We are not looking to adopt designate/bind before juno.17:22
Kiallautocommit should be disabled once you issue a BEGIN17:22
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
*** tjanczuk has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
*** venkatesh has quit IRC17:23
Kiallrjrjr_: I think it's valuable to continue, considering the issue it's identified.17:23
*** dims_ has quit IRC17:23
rjrjr_i will.  i'll have an update at the next meeting.17:23
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:23
KiallGreat - Let's chat after the meet re the embedded in central vs external agent if you want?17:23
rjrjr_sure.17:24
Kiall#topic Open Discussion17:24
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: designate)"17:24
rjrjr_so, rewrite BIND9 driver or not?17:24
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
jmcbride1Is it something the TC will care about for incubation? If not, I would wait.17:25
Kiallrjrjr_: well, I think we should identify the issues external to bind9 driver, and fix the BIND9 driver assuming it's not a massive endeavour. Even if the only value is hardening the other components in the process17:25
richm+117:25
mugsiejmcbride1: not an issue17:25
mugsieKiall: +117:25
rjrjr_it won't be that easy because of how the serial number is updated right after the add/delete.17:26
mugsieit will also give us a heads up for the juno cycle17:26
rjrjr_delete then serial number, both sync.  add then serial number, both sync.17:26
Kiallrjrjr_: well, I wonder if we can re-use some of the import/export code.. Load up the zonefile, make the change, write it out. Same as powerdns etc17:26
Kiallinstead of calling back out to central for everything17:26
KiallIn theory, that should be pretty easy (theory often differs from reality though)17:27
jmcbride1kiall: why not focus all our time on BIND in server pools/minidns?17:27
rjrjr_okay, we can move on.17:27
jmcbride1^instead of fixing the current implementation17:28
richmI would like to get bind9 working for "legacy" clients/customers17:28
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC17:28
rjrjr_jmcbride1: we'd be waiting 6 months for BIND9 support.  remember, we though most people are going to be interested in BIND.17:28
Kialljmcbride1: Because in fixing the driver, we seem to have identified some issues external to the driver, I think ensuring we have a good way to handle these issues is a good thing.17:28
Kiallrjrjr_: ++17:28
jmcbride1richm: OK, that is a great reason17:28
KiallOkay .. So .. Open Discussion.. I have one: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/designate-specs/17:29
KiallAll the OpenStack projects are moving from writing blueprints on the Wiki, to doing them in a specs repo.17:29
KiallOurs has been setup, and is ready to go for newly written blueprints.17:29
KiallAn example from nova is http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/specs/juno17:30
*** cp16net has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
*** dandrushko has quit IRC17:30
betsyI knew that Heat had started doing that, but I didn’t know it was all of openstack17:30
KiallYep - Everything is slowly migrating17:30
KiallOnce rendered, the specs look like this:17:30
betsyWhat’s the advantage?17:30
Kiallhttp://docs-draft.openstack.org/99/97499/6/gate/gate-designate-specs-docs/7b3ae45/doc/build/html/17:30
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
Kiallbetsy: code review etc of the specs similar to actual code17:30
rjrjr_history maybe?17:30
Kiall^ too17:31
mugsiebetsy: it is clear when a blueprint is aprroved17:31
KiallSorry - Example rendered spec: http://docs-draft.openstack.org/99/97499/6/gate/gate-designate-specs-docs/7b3ae45/doc/build/html/specs/juno/example.html17:31
tsimmonsSo more of an official process for writing/reviewing blueprints.17:31
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
mugsietsimmons: yup17:31
Kialltsimmons: exactly, and no horrible wiki markup :D17:31
Kiall(I'm an oddball who likes RST format ;))17:31
rjrjr_so, the core team will +2 the blueprints?17:31
tsimmonsKiall: That I can get behind.17:31
mugsieand it is much easier to leave feedback17:31
mugsierjrjr_: yes17:32
betsyThe wiki markup sucks17:32
Kiallrjrjr_: Yes, the designate-core team have the +2/+A rights on the repo17:32
KiallNow - launchpad blueprints should still be filed.17:32
mugsiebut link to the review17:32
KiallThe name of the BP on LP should match the filename in the repo17:32
mugsieKiall: it might be worth writing this up17:33
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
KiallThe openstack-infra folks are working on some automation to manage the LP side, similar to what happens when you reference a bug in a commit message17:33
mugsie(or ripping it from another projects wiki)17:33
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
Kiallmugsie: Yea, I've not see anything on the other projects wiki yet17:33
eankutseAre dependency graphs auto generated here as well?17:33
rjrjr_i notice Gerrit has some sort of time limit on how long things are shown on the list without activity.17:33
Kialleankutse: no, Launchpad will still be used for that kinda thing. The specs repo replaces the use of the Wiki17:33
Kialle.g. we used to have LP+Wiki, now we have LP+Specs17:34
eankutsethx17:34
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
mugsierjrjr_: that only kicks in after a negitve review17:34
*** nicole has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
mugsieaka a -1 or a failed build test17:34
Kiallrjrjr_: I actually think that's been disabled now17:34
*** nicole is now known as Guest1169717:34
rjrjr_cool.17:35
rjrjr_was troubling to see my WIP disappear.17:35
betsySo should we change to this for any open blueprints?17:35
mugsiepools17:35
*** SushillKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
betsyOr just new ones in the future17:35
mugsiei will move them to this anyway17:35
Kiallbetsy: If a wiki page already exists, I'd say no. Otherwise, yes.17:35
*** SushillKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
betsykiall: cool17:35
KiallCool :)17:36
*** beyounn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:36
KiallNext one I had was - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97348/ - Add Designate DevStack/Requirements/Docs Jobs17:36
KiallJust an FYI these jobs will be coming in real soon now.17:36
mugsie:D17:37
KiallDevStack is obvious - same thing we had before, just as part of OpenStack CI directly.17:37
mugsiereal soon - we need them for incubation ;)17:37
KiallThe docs job validates the docs don't fail to build.17:37
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:37
*** meghal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
Kialland the requirements jobs validates our requirements align with https://github.com/openstack/requirements17:37
KiallAll are requirements for incubation and/or gradutation.17:37
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
KiallTo start - There all non voting, i.e. a fail won't prevent a merge, after we're happy they are stable, we'll switch them to voting.17:38
KiallAny Q's?17:38
*** jchapman has quit IRC17:38
richmsounds good17:38
betsy+117:39
eankutse+117:39
KiallCool .. That was all I ad to add..  :)17:39
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja17:39
KiallAnyone else?17:39
mugsiei have one17:39
betsyI have something17:39
mugsiehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/97609/17:39
mugsie#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97609/17:39
betsygo ahead17:39
mugsievoting is underway for incubation17:39
mugsieso keep an eye on that link above17:40
eankutseYay!17:40
mugsieonce that reaches a consensous - we will be incubated17:40
richmhow to configure gerrit to email any time there is any activity in a review?17:40
Kiallmikal has given us an -1.. Hopefully we can convince him to change his mind after updating the incubation application :P17:40
mugsieadd yourself as a reviewer17:40
Kiallrichm: you can Star it17:40
*** jjmb has quit IRC17:40
Kiallor do that17:40
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC17:40
*** pballand has quit IRC17:40
* mugsie did not know about staring in gerrit17:41
betsyJames Blair made a comment that he wants devstack running first17:41
KiallYep - I'm pushing to get that devstack change merged :)17:41
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:41
mugsieyeah - so Kiall's last link has to merge17:41
KiallI've asked infra to review it as a priority, not that they don't have enough to do already ;)17:41
mugsiethat was a pretty much universal req from them17:41
richmstar - how do I "star" a review?17:42
mugsieat the top beside the title17:42
richmAh - I see - to the left of the text "Commit Message" there is a "hollow" star17:42
KiallYep17:42
richmIf you click on it, it gets filled in with yellow17:43
*** yogeshme_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC17:43
*** rcurran has quit IRC17:43
vinod1What happens after you "star" the review?17:43
richmThen if you go to the "Starred Changes" link, it will show up17:43
mugsiethats all i had17:43
KiallOkay, anyone have anything else?17:43
betsyme17:44
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:44
betsyKiall - we had talked about whether RecordSet table should be split or not17:44
betsyI talked to a dba this week (different than the last one I talked to) and he agreed with you that it should remain one table17:44
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:44
betsySo, I’ll rewrite the bp to reflect that17:44
betsyWe’ll only split out the Record table17:45
Kiallbetsy: cool - I'm happy to hear that, the split of the RRSet table made me nervous :)17:45
betsy:D17:45
*** dtx00ff_ has quit IRC17:45
betsythat’s all I had17:45
Kiall(for those who weren't around, we discussed splitting the Record and RecordSet table into a table per RRType (A, AAAA, MX, etc)17:46
KiallOkay - Anything else? 13 mins or so left.17:46
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
mugsiei am good17:47
KiallI'll take silence as a no :)17:47
rjrjr_also good.17:47
eankutsenothing17:47
KiallOkay - Thanks all17:48
KiallIll go bug infra people again ;)17:48
Kiall#endmeeting17:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Zuul is offline due to an operational issue; ETA 2200 UTC."17:48
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun  4 17:48:22 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:48
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/designate/2014/designate.2014-06-04-17.03.html17:48
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/designate/2014/designate.2014-06-04-17.03.txt17:48
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/designate/2014/designate.2014-06-04-17.03.log.html17:48
*** vinod1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
*** mugsie has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:49
*** zzelle has quit IRC17:49
*** jbratton has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:49
*** smazziotta has quit IRC17:49
*** jamie_h has quit IRC17:49
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
*** tsimmons has quit IRC17:51
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** nedbat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** martin_t2 has quit IRC17:52
*** Guest11697 has quit IRC17:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
*** nedbat has quit IRC17:53
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** esp2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** esp2 has quit IRC17:55
*** demorris has quit IRC17:55
*** eankutse has quit IRC17:55
*** tbarron has quit IRC17:56
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** jamie_h has quit IRC17:57
*** kenhui has quit IRC17:58
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
SlickNik#startmeeting trove17:59
openstackMeeting started Wed Jun  4 17:59:00 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SlickNik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:59
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:59
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: trove)"17:59
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'trove'17:59
*** k-pom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
iccha1o/17:59
*** lparvu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
vgnbkro/17:59
kevinconwayo/17:59
kevinconwayjumping the gun there SlickNik ?17:59
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
*** boblebauce has quit IRC18:00
*** gokrokve has quit IRC18:00
SlickNikjust giving folks a couple of extra minutes to arrive. :)18:00
amritho/18:00
mattgriffino/18:00
kevinconwayi know we have a big agenda for today18:00
*** james_li has quit IRC18:00
*** cweid has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
cweido/18:01
vipulo/18:01
glucaso/18:01
SlickNikYeah, agenda at:18:01
SlickNik#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TroveMeeting#Agenda_for_Jun_418:01
dougshelley66o/18:01
*** cjellick_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
SlickNikPrevious meeting summary:18:02
SlickNik#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/trove/2014/trove.2014-05-28-18.00.html18:02
*** grapex has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
grapexo/18:02
juiceo/18:02
juiceo_18:02
*** jcru has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
SlickNikOkay let's get started.18:02
SlickNik#topic Action Items18:02
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Items (Meeting topic: trove)"18:02
juiceo_,18:02
SlickNikjust one here:18:02
cp16netyup18:03
SlickNikcp16net make etherpad for breaking up the modules for log auditing bug18:03
cp16net#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/132420618:03
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1324206 in trove "audit logging levels" [Low,New]18:03
cp16netcouple links18:03
*** kenhui1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
cp16net#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Juno-Trove-audit-logging-levels18:03
cp16netso i wrote this up and dougshelley66 started on some of this18:03
dougshelley66yes - schang, peterstac and I have signed up for some18:04
kevinconwayman that todo person has a lot of work!18:04
*** deepakcs has quit IRC18:04
*** sarob has quit IRC18:04
SlickNikSounds good. Thanks for signing up, dougshelley66, peterstac and changsimon18:04
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** kenhui has quit IRC18:04
*** cjellick has quit IRC18:05
dougshelley66cp16net - we should make sure we are all on the same page w.r.t. the use of the i18n stuff18:05
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
cp16netthanks for looking at this dougshelley66 and schang and peterstac18:05
*** beyounn1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
SlickNikI'm going to try and recruit aginghipster to look at some of this too. :)18:05
cp16netnice18:05
hub_capthat is the awesomest handle ever18:06
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
SlickNikcp16net: Thanks for the follow up. Anything else to add?18:06
cp16netdougshelley66: yeah we should make sure of that18:06
*** beyounn has quit IRC18:06
cp16netSlickNik: i dont think so18:07
dougshelley66cp16net: should we finalize that discussion here?18:07
dougshelley66so everyone sees it?18:07
cp16netdougshelley66: that might not be a bad idea18:07
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
dougshelley66cp16net: go for it18:08
cp16netwhat is the differences you are seeing?18:08
SlickNik#Topic i18n discussion18:08
*** openstack changes topic to "i18n discussion (Meeting topic: trove)"18:08
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
dougshelley66so the logging standards doc talks about the use of _LE(), _LI() etc18:08
*** tdruiva has quit IRC18:08
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
dougshelley66but i don't think we believe these are "baked" yet18:08
cp16netOH...18:08
cp16netright18:08
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:08
kevinconwaywhere are these topics coming from?18:09
cp16netso the log translation page was talking about using _LI() _LW _LE _LC18:09
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:09
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
iccha1kevinconway: follow up from the follow up of action items from prev meeting18:09
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:09
*** sarob has quit IRC18:09
cp16neti could not determine yesterday what benifit they have for the translation18:09
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
cp16netkevinconway: they are coming from the common incubator18:10
cp16netgettext changes18:10
cp16net#link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo-incubator/tree/openstack/common/gettextutils.py#n13318:10
cp16neti saw that denis_makogon added a review to pull in these updates18:10
amrithdenis_makogon has this change set https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97472/18:10
cp16netwhich is fine but i dont think its nesseary to make these changes globally18:11
cp16netif it comes to be an issue later we can go back and change it18:11
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:11
*** jprovazn_afk has quit IRC18:11
cp16netbut i dont think there is a precedent set yet for this18:11
cp16neti'd just rather not mandate something thats not really used any where18:12
*** ujuc has quit IRC18:12
dougshelley66right so the proposal is to continue using _()18:12
cp16netyes18:12
SlickNikcp16net: that sounds good to me.18:12
cp16netany concerns about that decision18:12
amrithI have a question related to this ...18:12
*** meghal has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
amrithin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77551/ (for example) I requested denis_makogon make some changes to localize strings which didn't use _()18:13
*** arturt_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
amrithI had suggested he use _LE() ... etc.,18:13
amrithI'm assuming that reviewers are still to identify strings which aren't localized18:13
amrithand suggest using _()18:13
amrithis that correct?18:13
*** atomic77 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
amrithor do we expect this independent project to go find all strings and periodically _()'ize them?18:14
amrith<end-of-question>18:14
dougshelley66amrith: i believe we are saying that it is too soon to switch to those _LE etc notations18:14
cp16netamrith: there is a script that creates the po files for locaization18:14
dougshelley66and more specifically, that anyone working on the logging audit shouldn't do that18:14
SlickNikamrith: So reviewers should still look out for string that are localizable and point them out if they're not using _()18:15
SlickNikamrith: I believe we're saying that we're not mandating to use _LE() though.18:15
amrithok, thanks SlickNik18:15
dougshelley66SlickNik: what is the short term review verdict if someone uses _LE() etc?18:16
amrith(and dougshelley66 and cp16net )18:16
SlickNikI think the short term verdict is that they would need to wait until the oslo gettextutils  sync merges.18:16
dougshelley66ok so after that gets merged is it ok for people to start using those new notations?18:17
cp16netyeah it would break otherwise18:17
dougshelley66cp16net: ?18:17
*** esp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
SlickNikI think so. We probably have to verify (as part of the merge, perhaps) that the new way is working.18:18
cp16neti think it would be fine but its not something we should -1 about18:19
dougshelley66ok thx18:19
SlickNiksounds good.18:19
SlickNikThanks guys. Let's move on.18:19
cp16netok we beat this one down18:19
SlickNik#Topic Juno-1 release to be cut next week18:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Juno-1 release to be cut next week (Meeting topic: trove)"18:19
cp16netseems so soon18:20
SlickNikSo we're gonna be tagging the Juno-1 milestone next week.18:20
dougshelley66yeah, my hangover is just wearing off18:20
hub_capaww yea18:20
iccha1SlickNik: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/list-datastore-type-and-versions needs to be tagged18:20
cp16netlol18:20
SlickNikSo can you guys go through your bugs and bp and make sure things are tagged correctly.18:20
SlickNik#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/juno-118:21
vipulok18:21
SlickNik#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-troveclient/+milestone/juno-118:21
SlickNik#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove-integration/+milestone/juno-118:21
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
cp16netoh boy18:21
SlickNikIf there's something that should be there and isn't showing up, let me know.18:21
cp16netor if you cant change the bug/bp let us know18:22
SlickNikBeginning next week, I'm going to be bulk moving a lot of the items that are not going to be completed in Juno-1 to Juno-218:22
cp16neti should say let SlickNik know ;-P18:22
SlickNikYes, send me a note on IRC :)18:22
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:23
*** tdruiva has quit IRC18:23
cp16netSlickNik: when you "next week" is there a day its going to happen?18:23
*** arturt has quit IRC18:23
SlickNikcp16net: different projects are doing it on different days.18:24
cp16netok18:24
SlickNikcp16net: sometime between Tuesday and Thursday.18:24
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:24
cp16netgotcha18:24
SlickNikI was planing on getting it done early on Tuesday.18:24
cp16netok18:24
iccha1thanks for the heads up18:25
SlickNikOkay, that's all I had on this.18:25
SlickNik#topic Open Discussion18:25
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: trove)"18:25
SlickNikAnything else?18:26
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:26
amrithyes, a quick question18:26
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:26
amrithcould someone share a link for this new workflow thing?18:26
amrithin review's18:27
amrithI've seen some people set it but I'm not sure what it means18:27
cp16netamrith: the -1 on workflow?18:27
amrithcp16net ... yes18:27
amrithand it's twin, the +118:27
*** Stanzi has quit IRC18:27
*** jdob has quit IRC18:28
cp16netright its used for "work in progress"18:28
SlickNikamrith: Workflow −1 = Work in Progress, 0 = Ready for review, +1=Approved18:28
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
cp16netthere ya go thanks SlickNik18:28
amrithso, if a developer submits a patch set and after review he/she sets it to -118:28
amrithdoes it mean not yet ready for review?18:28
cp16netright the developer has the control of that18:29
iccha1yeah it means you are still working on it18:29
SlickNikamrith: yes, that means they're aware they still need to make changes to the review, and are working on it.18:29
amrithOK, thanks18:29
iccha1useful if u want to show early work on a patch18:29
iccha1even though its not ready yet18:29
cp16netor make a patch show its age18:29
cp16net:-P18:29
amrithok, cool18:29
amrithI guess one can safely update the search filter to include workflow != -1 ;)18:29
*** dtx00ff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
amriththanks18:30
amrithnothing more from me18:30
SlickNikNp, thank you!18:30
SlickNikAnything else?18:30
SlickNik*crickets*18:31
SlickNik#endmeeting18:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Zuul is offline due to an operational issue; ETA 2200 UTC."18:31
openstackMeeting ended Wed Jun  4 18:31:19 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:31
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/trove/2014/trove.2014-06-04-17.59.html18:31
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/trove/2014/trove.2014-06-04-17.59.txt18:31
grapexThanks SlickNik!18:31
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/trove/2014/trove.2014-06-04-17.59.log.html18:31
SlickNikThanks guys!18:31
cp16netthx18:31
espthx!18:31
iccha1thanks SlickNik18:31
*** esp has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:32
*** Stanzi has quit IRC18:32
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
*** betsy has quit IRC18:34
*** k-pom has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:36
*** nicole has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
*** nicole is now known as Guest2175818:37
*** tdruiva has quit IRC18:38
*** emaganap has quit IRC18:39
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:39
*** arturt_ has quit IRC18:40
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:40
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:40
*** yjiang51 has quit IRC18:42
*** james_li has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
*** jcoufal has quit IRC18:42
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC18:45
*** denis_makogon_ is now known as denis_makogon18:45
*** dmakogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:45
*** TapioT has quit IRC18:46
*** ujuc has quit IRC18:47
*** dprince has quit IRC18:48
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC18:48
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
*** arnaud has quit IRC18:51
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
*** jmcbride1 has quit IRC18:57
*** pballand has quit IRC19:01
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
*** SushilKM has quit IRC19:04
*** tbarron has quit IRC19:05
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** kenhui1 has quit IRC19:07
*** kevinconway has quit IRC19:10
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
*** kevinbenton_ has quit IRC19:11
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
*** emagana has quit IRC19:14
*** atomic77 has quit IRC19:14
*** gokrokve has quit IRC19:15
*** james_li has quit IRC19:21
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC19:23
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC19:23
*** cjellick_ has quit IRC19:27
*** lukego has quit IRC19:27
*** alazarev has quit IRC19:28
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
cweiddevs: Can you folks peep dis. Fixing the redis pkg name. https://github.rackspace.com/Cloud-Database/Cloud-Database/pull/84019:29
cweidoh totally wrong window...19:31
cweidsorry19:31
*** cweid has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
*** malini is now known as malini_afk19:32
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:33
*** jamie_h has quit IRC19:33
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC19:33
*** grapex has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
*** esker has quit IRC19:35
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
*** james_li has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:36
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:36
*** shivharis has quit IRC19:38
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:38
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:39
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
*** esker has quit IRC19:40
*** rueben has quit IRC19:40
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:43
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC19:43
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:44
*** radix has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:47
*** ujuc has quit IRC19:48
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** resker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** eankutse has quit IRC19:49
*** sarob has quit IRC19:49
*** HenryG has quit IRC19:51
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** esker has quit IRC19:53
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:54
*** malini_afk is now known as malini19:56
*** baoli has quit IRC19:57
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** pballand has quit IRC20:00
*** greghaynes has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
*** yogeshme_ has quit IRC20:01
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC20:04
*** yogeshme_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC20:04
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:05
*** mattgrif_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:05
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC20:06
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:07
*** msisk has quit IRC20:09
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:09
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:09
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC20:10
*** mattgrif_ has quit IRC20:10
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:10
*** pballand has quit IRC20:10
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC20:12
*** PeterSchwaller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:13
*** rjrjr_ has quit IRC20:13
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC20:15
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:17
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC20:18
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC20:18
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
*** ajo|mac has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:20
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC20:20
*** lparvu` has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:21
*** Stanzi has quit IRC20:23
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** lparvu has quit IRC20:24
*** Stanzi has quit IRC20:27
*** emaganap has quit IRC20:29
*** michael-yu has quit IRC20:31
*** BrianB_ has quit IRC20:33
*** yjiang51 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** yjiang51 has quit IRC20:33
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:34
*** armax has quit IRC20:36
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:41
hub_capHAH20:41
hub_capnice cw20:41
*** hub_cap has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:41
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:43
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:43
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
*** TravT has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** vikasd has quit IRC20:47
*** ujuc has quit IRC20:48
*** vikasd has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:49
*** jecarey has quit IRC20:53
*** harlowja has quit IRC20:54
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:54
*** boblebauce has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
*** tnurlygayanov_ has quit IRC20:57
*** pdmars has quit IRC20:58
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:00
*** jdob has quit IRC21:01
*** tbarron has quit IRC21:03
*** Guest21758 has quit IRC21:04
*** vikasd has quit IRC21:04
*** michael-yu has quit IRC21:05
*** vikasd has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:05
*** mfer has quit IRC21:05
*** mfer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:07
*** amcrn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:07
*** mrsmith has quit IRC21:08
*** amcrn has quit IRC21:09
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** jmcbride has quit IRC21:10
*** resker has quit IRC21:11
*** mfer has quit IRC21:11
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:12
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:12
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC21:14
*** emagana has quit IRC21:14
*** yogeshme_ has quit IRC21:15
*** sarob has quit IRC21:15
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:16
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC21:19
*** derekh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:20
*** thangp has quit IRC21:20
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:20
*** Obulpathi has quit IRC21:22
*** alazarev has quit IRC21:23
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:23
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:24
*** rueben has quit IRC21:26
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC21:26
*** sgordon has quit IRC21:28
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC21:30
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** julim has quit IRC21:32
*** kenhui has quit IRC21:32
*** demorris has quit IRC21:33
*** armax has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:33
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC21:38
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** andreaf has quit IRC21:40
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n321:45
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC21:46
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:47
*** rueben_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:49
*** ujuc has quit IRC21:49
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC21:51
*** bdpayne has quit IRC21:51
*** jmcbride has quit IRC21:52
*** betsy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:53
*** rueben has quit IRC21:53
*** betsy has quit IRC21:53
*** betsy_ is now known as betsy21:53
*** rueben_ has quit IRC21:53
*** vkmc has quit IRC21:55
*** abbrown has quit IRC21:55
*** mspreitz has quit IRC21:55
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:58
*** Barker has quit IRC21:58
*** jgrimm has quit IRC21:59
*** richm has quit IRC21:59
*** nedbat has quit IRC22:00
*** Stanzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
*** sarob_ has quit IRC22:04
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:05
*** malini has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
*** mkoderer has quit IRC22:06
*** jtomasek has quit IRC22:10
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:11
*** sarob has quit IRC22:11
*** demorris has quit IRC22:11
*** james_li has quit IRC22:11
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi22:11
*** abbrown has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:12
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:12
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:13
*** SpamapS has quit IRC22:14
*** kenhui1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:16
*** caleb_ has quit IRC22:17
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:18
*** SpamapS has quit IRC22:18
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:18
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:19
*** aglarendil has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
*** emaganap has quit IRC22:22
*** amcrn_ has quit IRC22:24
*** spzala has quit IRC22:24
*** tdruiva has quit IRC22:27
*** kenhui1 has quit IRC22:27
*** eankutse has quit IRC22:28
*** luizfar has quit IRC22:28
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC22:29
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC22:30
*** jmcbride has quit IRC22:30
*** julienvey has quit IRC22:30
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:31
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:31
*** jjmb has quit IRC22:36
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:37
*** banix has quit IRC22:38
*** Leonr has quit IRC22:38
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:40
*** dprince has quit IRC22:40
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:42
*** gokrokve has quit IRC22:43
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:45
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC22:49
*** derekh_ has quit IRC22:50
*** ujuc has quit IRC22:50
*** dims_ has quit IRC22:51
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:51
*** bdpayne has quit IRC22:53
*** boblebauce has quit IRC22:55
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:57
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC22:58
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:58
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:59
*** jcru has quit IRC22:59
*** luizfar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:59
*** saurabhs has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:02
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:04
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:04
*** tvoran has quit IRC23:06
*** sarob has quit IRC23:07
*** luizfar has quit IRC23:07
*** markmcclain has quit IRC23:08
*** NZHOU has quit IRC23:08
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:08
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:08
*** julienvey has quit IRC23:09
*** atiwari has quit IRC23:09
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC23:10
*** demorris has quit IRC23:14
*** shakayumi has quit IRC23:15
*** abbrown has quit IRC23:19
*** sarob_ has quit IRC23:23
*** amytron has quit IRC23:29
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:29
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:45
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:46
*** jaypipes has quit IRC23:48
*** gmurphy has quit IRC23:49
*** amytron has quit IRC23:49
*** gmurphy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:49
*** ujuc has quit IRC23:50
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:51
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:52
*** michael-yu has quit IRC23:53
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:56
*** betsy has quit IRC23:57
*** igordcard has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!