Thursday, 2015-11-12

sc68calhello all00:00
mickeyshi00:00
Aishhi00:00
yushirohello00:00
hoangcxHi sc68cal and all00:00
s3wonghello00:00
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:00
sc68cal#startmeeting networking_fwaas00:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 12 00:00:52 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.00:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.00:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_fwaas)"00:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_fwaas'00:00
annpHi00:00
*** SridarK has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
xgermanhi00:01
SridarKHi All00:01
sc68cal#topic announcements and housekeeping00:01
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements and housekeeping (Meeting topic: networking_fwaas)"00:01
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
sc68calI'd like to say that it was really great to meet everyone at the summit00:01
mickeys+100:02
sc68calthanks to SridarK, xgerman and those who presented at the summit about fwaas00:02
SridarKsc68cal: huge +1 yes this was great00:02
hoangcx+100:02
xgerman+100:02
yushiro+100:02
SridarKthe discussions we had f2f were invaluable00:02
*** Piet has quit IRC00:02
ajmillerhi00:02
*** jwarendt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
*** sdake has quit IRC00:03
*** baoli has quit IRC00:03
annp+100:03
sc68calxgerman: SridarK: anything you can think of to announce, besides the new spec?00:03
xgermanMitaka schedcukle00:04
SridarKat least left feeling that we had made good progress, we still have a few things to close on but it looks positive00:04
xgerman#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mitaka_Release_Schedule00:04
xgermanreally tight this time00:04
SridarKsc68cal: we probab have to evolve the plan for us00:04
sc68calyeah it is quite tight this time00:05
sc68calhonestly the second development cycle of the year is always shorter due to holidays and stuff00:05
SridarKyes, we shd target for some basic things to be in place by end Jan00:05
xgerman+100:06
sc68calok00:06
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:07
sc68cal#topic New API spec00:07
*** openstack changes topic to "New API spec (Meeting topic: networking_fwaas)"00:07
sc68cal#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243873/ API spec00:07
xgermanreally good discussion in the comments - mickeys is setting me quite straight ;-)00:08
sc68calthanks to Aish for submitting - I'm sure it took some wranging to get everything from the etherpad00:08
mickeysJust a little fun back and forth :-)00:08
*** annp_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:08
xgermanAish +100:08
*** annp_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:08
*** annp has quit IRC00:09
*** annp_ is now known as annp00:09
AishActually yes, it took me sometime to understand stuff from ether pad…00:09
AishI am going through the review comments… I see that there is a lot to be added/modified..00:10
xgermanyeah, but it’s a great start00:11
AishThanks..00:11
sc68calWe'll have to figure out how to handle updates00:13
sc68calIt might be a bit much to expect Aish to update some parts, based on how new she is00:14
sc68calbut I don't want it to be a free-for-all either :)00:14
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC00:14
xgermanyep - we should coordinate a bit00:14
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:15
SridarKsc68cal: but i think it should be fine for others (mickeys primarily) to update as well00:15
mickeysI can work on some text. Perhaps use IRC when someone wants to submit a patch?00:15
reedipMaybe ask for voluntters ?00:15
reedipvolunteers*00:15
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:15
SridarKmickeys: u can also update as well00:15
mickeysI plan to00:15
AishI agree. I shall help updating some basic stuff..00:15
jwarendtI'll volunteer as well.00:16
xgermanyeah, I think with all the text mickeys offered to write he should be able to make his own patch ;-)00:16
SridarKxgerman: +100:16
SridarKbut lets not proliferate00:16
jwarendt+100:16
sc68calyeah, let's keep it to the one gerrit review00:16
xgerman+100:16
SridarKwe can have a few folks update and rest of us can always comment00:16
xgermanyep, I think comments is the preferred way00:17
mickeysAish: Go ahead making changes replying to smaller comments. I will work on the sections I indicated in my comments and ping you on IRC when I am ready to merge and submit.00:17
xgermansounds good!!00:17
sc68cal^ this sounds good to me00:17
reedip+100:17
SridarK+100:17
AishSure..00:18
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC00:19
sc68calThat's really all I had - SridarK xgerman ?00:19
jwarendtThere is a fundamental question - the patch just blindly copies existing FWaaS behaviors like port contain port-ranges, or insert being a completely unRESTful PUT +rule.  Did we intend to keep the existing interfaces in place for some reason, or was that just a strawman starting point?00:19
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC00:19
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:20
*** xyang1 has quit IRC00:20
xgermanI think the API design is a starting point and we can make more changes as we see fit00:21
jwarendtThat is what I thought too, and not wanting to change "just because".  Will comment in spec.00:22
mickeys+100:22
xgermanyep, commenting is good00:22
*** shadower has quit IRC00:23
jwarendtIf I could just keep up with mickeys and other's changes :-)00:23
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:23
SridarKFrom an overall perspective, at least in my head - we also want to end M with something that works even if it is evolving00:23
mickeysOne big issue that we need to sort out. Are we still trying for backwards compatibility? Do we intend to migrate existing deployments automatically to the new API? Do we think that is feasible?00:23
*** memogarcia has quit IRC00:23
xgermanthe only backwards compatibility I need is for existing drivers if possible (+ there is heat and horizon)00:24
SridarKmickeys: this is something that we definitely figure out -00:24
*** bmoss has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:24
SridarKi am still on the wall00:24
*** bmoss has left #openstack-meeting-alt00:24
reedipkeeping backward compatibility wont help much I guess00:25
SridarKOn Fri of summit - xgerman & I also had a conversation with Alex from HP who also discussed the move to lbaas v200:25
reedipin terms of Client side implementation00:25
SridarKso some careful thought into that00:25
xgermanyeah, in lbaasv2 most vendors adapted but we still don’t have heat nor horizon despite the API being out two cycles00:26
*** svinota has quit IRC00:26
SridarKI was thinking of pinging vendor implementors for their comments and thoughts as well00:26
SridarKat least the ones i am familiar with00:26
mickeysFor example, the firewall rules table currently has source_ip_address and destination_ip_address that are marked as "deprecated" in the description. If we are not trying for backwards compatibility, we can remove them.00:27
SridarKso we have a migration plan in place00:27
reedipThat would clear up some use cases00:27
*** kfarr has quit IRC00:27
xgermansince vendor support is key I think we need to hear from them before making the final call00:27
*** annp has quit IRC00:27
*** annp_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:27
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:28
xgerman#action SridarK to talk to vendors and report00:28
mickeysWith LBaaS, does user provisioning through LBaaS v1 stay as v1? Or does it automatically migrate to LBaaS v2?00:28
xgermanit stays v100:28
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:28
xgermanthere are two different things bu only one can run00:29
s3wongfor LBaaS, I thought the API endpoint itself was different?00:29
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:29
mickeysCan you use both API endpoints at the same time, depending on user provisioning?00:29
xgermanyep, that, two00:29
xgermanno, only one endpoint — they use the same database (and V2 has different columns in the v1 tables)00:30
xgermanso two endpoints one DB which interprets columns differently depending if v2 or v100:31
xgermanwhich means only one can run00:31
*** kenji__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:31
reedipwould devstack implementation change , i.e. a new extension created for v2? ( or maybe I am thinking too far)00:31
xgermanbut even if you can run both in parallel I think that would just create some mess00:31
mickeysWhat happens to user provisioning done using v1, if the controller migrates to v2?00:31
xgermanI think we will just replace the existing one00:31
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC00:32
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC00:32
sc68calfwaas never went past experimental status, also it didn't have an API version00:32
xgermanall the v1 stuff is lost00:32
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:32
SridarKreedip: i think devstack implications are not an issue now00:32
reedipso I am thinking too far00:32
sc68caliirc00:32
s3wongmickeys: in that case, the new v2 backend would not be reading the v1 db entries00:32
xgermanwell, it would and trip over itself...00:33
SridarKsc68cal: yes that is correct00:33
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
xgermanthen also even if you an migrate people like that to be hot so...00:33
xgermananyhow I am with sc68cal we just replace the existing thing with the new thing and maybe offer a migration tool00:34
*** angdraug has quit IRC00:34
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:34
*** egallen has quit IRC00:34
sc68calwe'll do our best, basically. But the previous API wasn't versioned00:34
*** achanda has quit IRC00:35
xgermanyeah,I think since it was experimental we can just replace it with little notice00:35
SridarKyes and we can think thru a migration plan00:35
xgermanyep, people who use experimental features should understand the risk00:35
reedip^ +100:36
SridarKxgerman: that is what i though when i added the router extension, but i was asked to come up with migration on my patch00:36
xgermanyep, I am pretty sure the people I answer to will ask for the same ;-)00:36
SridarKbut yes now we have more flexibility, my point was to make sure we dont surprise anybody and hopefully we can get vendors to sign up for any refactoring if needed00:37
mickeysShould we try to minimize the rules table? Remove source_ip_address and destination_ip_address and source_address_group and destination_address_group in favor of source_firewall_group and destination_firewall_group?00:37
mickeysShould we go straight to service_group, removing protocol, source_port, and destination_port?00:38
xgermanyes00:38
xgerman+ yes00:38
Aish+100:38
reedipIn favor00:38
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC00:38
SridarKI am fine as well, but can we code this up for M as well ?00:38
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:39
mickeysIf we move to neutron_classifier, a fair amount of this gets ripped up anyways00:40
mickeysat DB. Reference implementation is another issue.00:40
sc68callet's try and keep this managable00:40
* xgerman ships sc68cal lot’s of redbull00:40
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:41
sc68calmy concern is trying to squeeze everything in, and I don't know if service groups is really a must have in the first iteration thing00:41
sc68calobviously it's a feature we want to have - but do we need to do it at the beginning00:41
SridarK the classifiers is also WIP if i am not mistaken00:42
sc68caloh believe me it is :)00:42
*** annp has quit IRC00:42
s3wongnot holding my breath on the common flow classifier00:42
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:42
mickeysThe structure of the classifier is pretty different between flat and service groups00:42
xgerman+100:43
SridarKsc68cal: my concern too, lets have the full plan but stage it so we come out of M with something working00:43
*** annp has quit IRC00:43
*** annp_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:43
xgermanit also depends on how many people will be working on stuff00:43
xgermanand whatever we do will be held together by chewing gum and duct tape00:44
*** zns has quit IRC00:44
jwarendtDuct tape can fix a lot of ills.00:45
SridarKMy life story :-)00:45
mickeysSo is the consensus yes on moving to source_firewall_group and destination_firewall_group, but don't force service_group just yet?00:46
*** IlyaG has quit IRC00:46
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC00:46
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:46
*** Swami has quit IRC00:46
xgermanI think we should get the interface to vendors relatively stable00:46
*** annp has quit IRC00:46
xgermanin the beginning - so getting most of the models in would be good00:47
SridarKmickeys: i would lean that way, the highest priority being applying on ports, next how do we resolve SG and FWaaS on VM port and next address groups00:47
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
*** annp__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
reedipI would prefer the staging proposed by SridarK00:47
*** annp__ has quit IRC00:48
*** annp has quit IRC00:48
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
sc68calas would I00:48
xgermanmy worry is if we introduce big changes to the model the next few cycles vendors will stop supporting us00:48
*** vilobhmm has quit IRC00:48
xgermanso dish out the pain in the beginning00:48
SridarKCaution - i am only talking in terms of implementation, i agree we should lay out the full plan in the spec00:48
*** annp_ has quit IRC00:48
sc68calwhat vendors support us currently00:49
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:49
*** yamahata has quit IRC00:49
sc68calour driver list is fairly small00:49
SridarKsc68cal: i believe we have 500:50
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:50
xgermanin my (limited) experience vendors like to write a driver and then forget about it00:51
*** bana_k has quit IRC00:52
xgermanbut I am not a vendor so second guessing...00:52
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away00:52
sc68calwe currently have two 3rd party CIs that report - both fail00:52
sc68calbrocade-ci-fwaas00:52
sc68calngfw-test00:52
SridarKcisco has been flaky as well00:53
xgermanthat strengthens my set-and-forget argument00:53
*** kenji__ has quit IRC00:53
*** IlyaG has quit IRC00:53
sc68calso - we'll do our best to have migration strategy and not disrupt vendors00:54
SridarKxgerman: my concern is more abt how many bodies we will have to do all the things we need to do in the remaining time in M00:54
sc68calbut, without CI for these vendor drivers, stuff will break00:54
xgermanyep, I hear you… and I am ok with slipping M to have more vendor buy-in00:54
*** memogarcia has quit IRC00:55
reedipSridarK , xgerman : Maybe first break down the implementation, after you have had a discussion with the vendors, and then as per the possible action items, take a roll call in the next IRC meeting ( or whenever) as to who can do what00:55
xgermanlet’s agree on the API first ;-)00:55
*** kenji__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:55
reedipThat would allow the possible identification of the targets and their implementation dates00:55
xgermanreddip +100:55
xgermanreedip +100:55
SridarKreedip: +100:56
s3wong4 minutes00:56
SridarKbut let this not derail our API00:56
xgermanyeah, we can always make a bigger spec and then break it down insnatges00:56
xgermanso mickeys let’s put service groups in00:56
SridarKxgerman: yes my point too00:57
SridarKmay be we think of this as a parent spec00:57
xgermancool00:57
xgermanyeah, it took us like two or three cycles to implement octavia 0.500:57
mickeysBut leave protocol, source_port, dest_port since we are not sure we will get service groups right away, and the impact on vendors may be larger if we remove them?00:57
xgermanlet’s keep them and mark them as deprecated00:58
reedipmickeys : and mark them deprecated ( I think they already are, but if they are not)00:58
s3wongFWaaS specs go to Neutron spec repo, right?00:58
mickeys+100:58
mickeyss3wong: yes00:58
SridarKmickeys: yes and for addresses -> we move to groups ?00:58
sc68cal1 minute00:59
s3wongI don't know if big parent / ambitious specs can be in for per-release spec repo...00:59
xgermanSridarK yes00:59
mickeysWe have to do the work for groups anyways. If you do not support firewall groups in rules, you do not support FWaaS 2.000:59
mickeysSo I think it is simpler to minimize the table on that one00:59
xgerman+100:59
xgermans3wong things slip all the time...00:59
xgermanso I am not too worried01:00
xgermanok, time ism out01:00
AishOk, I shall remove source_ip_address and destination_ip_address and source_address_group and destination_address_group from rules table.01:00
sc68calAish: no.01:00
Aishoh, did i get it wrong?01:00
sc68calok, we're out of time. Let's try and resync tomorrow01:00
xgermank01:01
SridarKor on gerrit01:01
Aishkok.01:01
xgerman#endmeeting01:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"01:01
yushirobye01:01
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 12 01:01:12 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)01:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-11-12-00.00.html01:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-11-12-00.00.txt01:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-11-12-00.00.log.html01:01
annpBye01:01
reediptc01:01
s3wongbye01:01
SridarKBye01:01
xgermanbye01:01
mickeysbye01:01
jwarendtbye01:01
Aishbye01:01
hoangcxBye all and have a nice day :-)01:01
*** hoangcx has quit IRC01:02
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:02
*** yushiro has quit IRC01:02
*** julim has quit IRC01:02
*** annp has quit IRC01:02
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:03
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC01:04
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:04
*** wangqun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:05
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:06
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC01:06
*** kenji__ has quit IRC01:08
*** yasui_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:09
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC01:09
*** eilert has quit IRC01:09
*** SridarK has quit IRC01:09
*** sdake has quit IRC01:10
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC01:11
*** ajmiller has quit IRC01:15
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:15
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:17
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:19
*** yamahata has quit IRC01:21
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed01:22
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:22
*** pvaneck has quit IRC01:22
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away01:29
*** Aish has quit IRC01:30
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC01:31
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC01:34
*** dkalleg has quit IRC01:41
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC01:41
*** minwang2 has quit IRC01:44
*** mtanino has quit IRC01:45
*** mickeys has quit IRC01:45
*** neilus has quit IRC01:46
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:46
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:47
*** edwardb has quit IRC01:51
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:56
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:01
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:03
*** bana_k has quit IRC02:06
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:07
*** zeih_ has quit IRC02:07
*** memogarcia has quit IRC02:08
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC02:08
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:10
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:13
*** gyee has quit IRC02:14
*** ijw has quit IRC02:14
*** sdake has quit IRC02:15
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:15
*** baoli has quit IRC02:17
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:17
*** baoli has quit IRC02:18
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:18
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:19
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:19
*** gongysh has quit IRC02:23
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:23
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:25
*** gongysh has quit IRC02:26
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:26
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:30
*** gongysh has quit IRC02:32
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:32
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC02:34
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:36
*** zns has quit IRC02:37
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan02:38
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:40
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:40
*** Aish has quit IRC02:40
*** rebase has quit IRC02:41
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:42
*** mickeys has quit IRC02:43
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC02:47
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:48
*** kebray has quit IRC02:49
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:50
*** houming-wang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:50
*** gongysh has quit IRC02:52
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:54
*** dims has quit IRC02:57
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:59
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:00
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC03:06
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:07
*** IlyaG has quit IRC03:08
*** memogarcia has quit IRC03:09
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:09
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:11
*** dims has quit IRC03:14
*** gongysh has quit IRC03:16
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:16
*** zhurong_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:18
*** zhurong has quit IRC03:21
*** memogarcia has quit IRC03:23
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:24
*** dims has quit IRC03:25
*** neilus has quit IRC03:25
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:25
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:31
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:31
*** diazjf has quit IRC03:34
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:36
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:37
*** sdake has quit IRC03:39
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:40
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:42
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:43
*** gongysh has quit IRC03:46
*** stevemar_ has quit IRC03:49
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:49
*** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:50
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:51
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:51
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:52
*** stevemar_ has quit IRC03:53
*** memogarcia has quit IRC03:54
*** zhurong_ has quit IRC03:54
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:56
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC03:57
*** zehicle has quit IRC03:58
*** gongysh has quit IRC04:00
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:01
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:02
*** annp has quit IRC04:03
*** neilus has quit IRC04:06
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:14
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:16
*** hichihara has quit IRC04:17
*** Leo_ has quit IRC04:18
*** neilus has quit IRC04:19
*** zhurong has quit IRC04:28
*** Liuqing has quit IRC04:31
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:34
*** cknight has quit IRC04:38
*** memogarcia has quit IRC04:39
*** kebray has quit IRC04:41
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:41
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:42
*** rebase has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:50
*** edleafe has quit IRC04:57
*** achanda has quit IRC05:04
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:09
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:11
*** neilus has quit IRC05:13
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:14
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:16
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC05:17
*** sgotliv_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:18
*** baoli has quit IRC05:20
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:23
*** diazjf has quit IRC05:26
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC05:27
*** reedip has quit IRC05:32
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:41
*** neelashah has quit IRC05:41
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:41
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC05:44
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:44
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:44
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:44
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC05:45
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:47
*** jecarey has quit IRC05:48
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:48
*** neelashah has quit IRC05:48
*** nadya has quit IRC05:50
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC05:50
*** reedip has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:50
*** Liuqing_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:50
*** Liuqing has quit IRC05:52
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:55
*** SridharG has left #openstack-meeting-alt05:56
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away05:57
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:01
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:05
*** jecarey has quit IRC06:05
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:06
*** irenab has quit IRC06:07
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:10
*** jecarey has quit IRC06:10
*** achanda has quit IRC06:10
*** bana_k has quit IRC06:14
*** numans has quit IRC06:14
*** jwarendt has quit IRC06:15
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:15
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:18
*** vahidh has quit IRC06:18
*** edwardb has quit IRC06:19
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:19
*** gongysh has quit IRC06:21
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:22
*** vahidh has quit IRC06:23
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:25
*** sage has quit IRC06:30
*** banix has quit IRC06:32
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:33
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:35
*** nadya has quit IRC06:35
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:36
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:41
*** zehicle has quit IRC06:44
*** kebray has quit IRC06:44
*** sc68cal has quit IRC06:45
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC06:46
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:49
*** jhesketh has quit IRC06:54
*** Liuqing_ has quit IRC06:55
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:55
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:56
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:56
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:57
*** numans has quit IRC06:58
*** jhesketh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:59
*** woodster_ has quit IRC06:59
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:01
*** baoli has quit IRC07:01
*** neilus has quit IRC07:02
*** bgaifullin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:03
*** scheuran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:07
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:10
*** edwardb has quit IRC07:11
*** numans has quit IRC07:12
*** zhangjn has quit IRC07:12
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:13
*** sirushti has quit IRC07:14
*** marios has quit IRC07:16
*** gibi has quit IRC07:16
*** sirushti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** gibi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** nkrinner has quit IRC07:17
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** reedip has quit IRC07:18
*** reedip has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:18
*** tfukushima has quit IRC07:19
*** achanda has quit IRC07:20
*** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:21
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:21
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** yamamoto has quit IRC07:22
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:23
*** stevemar_ has quit IRC07:24
*** Liuqing has quit IRC07:26
*** harlowja_at_home has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:27
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:29
*** bana_k has quit IRC07:31
*** zhangjn has quit IRC07:32
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:33
*** armax has quit IRC07:34
*** zhangjn has quit IRC07:34
*** matbu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:38
*** svinota has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:39
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:44
*** houming-wang has quit IRC07:54
*** harlowja_at_home has quit IRC07:54
*** apetrich has quit IRC07:58
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** svinota has quit IRC07:59
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan08:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:01
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC08:04
*** j______ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:05
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:05
*** Liuqing has quit IRC08:06
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:07
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:08
*** vahidh has quit IRC08:09
*** zeih has quit IRC08:10
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC08:18
*** jichen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:19
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:21
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:21
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:21
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:23
*** sdake has quit IRC08:24
*** houming-wang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:24
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:25
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:27
*** rebase has quit IRC08:28
*** rebase has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:28
*** rebase has quit IRC08:29
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:29
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:30
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:31
*** svinota has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:33
*** andymaier has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:35
*** andymaier_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:35
*** andymaier_ has quit IRC08:38
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:38
*** numans has quit IRC08:39
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:39
*** amotoki has quit IRC08:40
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:46
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:47
*** sdake has quit IRC08:49
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:49
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:50
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC08:51
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:53
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:56
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:00
*** sdake has quit IRC09:00
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC09:01
*** MarkAtwo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:01
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:03
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:03
*** gcb has quit IRC09:04
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:05
*** obondarev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:05
*** MarkAtwo_ has quit IRC09:06
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:07
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:11
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:12
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:16
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:22
*** Liuqing has quit IRC09:23
*** eliqiao has quit IRC09:23
*** eliqiao has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:24
*** memogarcia has quit IRC09:25
*** tfukushima has quit IRC09:26
*** zns has quit IRC09:28
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:29
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:30
*** juggler has quit IRC09:31
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:32
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC09:32
*** bgaifullin has quit IRC09:32
*** achanda has quit IRC09:34
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:35
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:37
*** gcb has quit IRC09:37
*** houming-wang has quit IRC09:38
*** obondarev_ has quit IRC09:39
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:40
*** zhurong has quit IRC09:41
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:43
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC09:44
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:46
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:46
*** shwetaap has quit IRC09:46
*** sdake has quit IRC09:46
*** obondarev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:48
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:48
*** edwardb has quit IRC09:49
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:49
*** obondarev_ has quit IRC09:52
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC09:53
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:54
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:55
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:56
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:57
*** memogarcia has quit IRC09:58
*** vahidh has quit IRC09:58
*** andymaier has quit IRC09:58
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC09:58
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:04
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:06
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC10:07
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:09
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:17
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:18
*** mickeys has quit IRC10:21
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:22
*** annp has quit IRC10:23
*** wangqun has quit IRC10:24
*** kaisers has quit IRC10:25
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:25
*** bgaifullin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:25
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC10:28
*** vgridnev has quit IRC10:29
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:29
*** kaisers has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:33
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC10:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:37
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:39
*** sdake has quit IRC10:41
*** memogarcia has quit IRC10:41
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:41
*** tvvcox has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:44
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:45
*** vgridnev has quit IRC10:45
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC10:46
*** lkoranda_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:48
*** oomichi has quit IRC10:48
*** ihrachys_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:48
*** ihrachys has quit IRC10:48
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:49
*** zns has quit IRC10:49
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:50
*** lkoranda has quit IRC10:51
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:51
*** ihrachys_ has quit IRC10:52
*** lkoranda_ has quit IRC10:53
*** memogarcia has quit IRC10:55
*** tfukushima has quit IRC10:56
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:57
*** sdake has quit IRC10:57
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:57
*** lkoranda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:58
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:58
*** regebro has quit IRC10:59
*** baoli has quit IRC11:03
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:09
*** fzdarsky_ has quit IRC11:11
*** sdake has quit IRC11:13
*** esker has quit IRC11:13
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:13
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:14
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:14
*** regebro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:14
*** irenab has quit IRC11:14
*** memogarcia has quit IRC11:16
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:17
*** baoli has quit IRC11:19
*** esker has quit IRC11:22
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:23
*** monester has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:25
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:26
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:27
*** sdake has quit IRC11:29
*** mwagner has quit IRC11:34
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC11:35
*** memogarcia has quit IRC11:41
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:41
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:42
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:42
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:44
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:45
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:46
*** baoli has quit IRC11:46
*** vahidh has quit IRC11:46
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:47
*** ndipanov has quit IRC11:50
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:51
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:54
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away11:55
*** gcb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:59
*** gcb has quit IRC12:03
*** Liuqing has quit IRC12:03
*** thomnico has quit IRC12:06
*** rmoe has quit IRC12:06
*** svinota has quit IRC12:07
*** zhurong has quit IRC12:08
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC12:09
*** memogarcia has quit IRC12:11
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:19
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:19
*** svinota has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:23
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC12:25
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:27
*** houming-wang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:30
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC12:30
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:33
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:39
*** qwebirc98722 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:40
*** qwebirc98722 has quit IRC12:40
*** qwebirc71670 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:41
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:42
*** memogarcia has quit IRC12:43
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:43
*** baoli has quit IRC12:44
*** houming-wang has quit IRC12:45
*** lbelivea has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:50
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:50
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** dane_leblanc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:53
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC12:55
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC12:55
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC12:58
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
*** jprovazn has quit IRC13:02
*** svinota has quit IRC13:07
*** qwebirc71670 has quit IRC13:08
*** mwagner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:09
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:11
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:12
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
*** gcb_ has quit IRC13:17
*** annegentle has quit IRC13:17
*** sage has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:19
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:19
*** svinota has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:21
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:21
*** zhurong has quit IRC13:24
*** dims_ has quit IRC13:24
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
*** houming-wang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
*** memogarcia has quit IRC13:27
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:29
*** gcb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:30
*** nadya has quit IRC13:30
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:31
*** zhurong has quit IRC13:36
*** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:38
*** regebro is now known as Guest5628013:40
*** regebro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:41
*** edleafe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:41
*** memogarcia has quit IRC13:42
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
*** Piet has quit IRC13:45
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:46
*** boris-42 has quit IRC13:48
*** flaviof has quit IRC13:51
*** e0ne has quit IRC13:51
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:52
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC13:54
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:55
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** EinstCrazy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** jcsp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** sdake has quit IRC14:02
*** e0ne has quit IRC14:04
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC14:04
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:06
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith14:07
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
*** dane_leblanc_ has quit IRC14:12
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
*** memogarcia has quit IRC14:12
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC14:13
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:13
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:13
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
*** EinstCrazy has quit IRC14:19
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed14:20
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** jichen has quit IRC14:20
*** fzdarsky_ has quit IRC14:21
*** sdake has quit IRC14:21
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:21
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:22
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:22
*** nelsnels_ has quit IRC14:23
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:24
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:25
*** memogarcia has quit IRC14:26
*** hackathon has quit IRC14:28
*** vahidh has quit IRC14:30
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:30
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
*** jmckind is now known as jmckind_14:31
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
*** sdake has quit IRC14:37
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:38
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:38
*** memogarcia has quit IRC14:40
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:44
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:44
*** dustins has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:46
*** apetrich has quit IRC14:47
*** houming-wang has quit IRC14:52
*** zeih_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
*** JayXu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
*** zeih has quit IRC14:53
*** dkusidlo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:53
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC14:53
*** sdake has quit IRC14:53
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:54
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:56
*** memogarcia has quit IRC14:56
*** Zhongjun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:56
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** markstur__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** dkusidlo has quit IRC14:59
*** u_glide1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** houming-wang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 12 15:00:38 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:00
bswartzhello all15:00
dustins\o15:00
JayXuhello15:00
xyang1hi15:00
gansohello15:00
u_glide1hello15:00
markstur__hello15:01
*** dims has quit IRC15:01
Zhongjunhi15:01
bswartzlong agenda today15:01
bswartzI saw a lot of agenda updates in the last 4 hours ;-)15:01
cknightHi15:01
bswartz#agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings15:01
JayXufirst topic I submitted. :)15:01
ameadeo/15:01
JayXuin the last minute15:02
bswartzno announcements today so let's get going15:02
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
bswartz#topic Which method is better for Manila QoS15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Which method is better for Manila QoS (Meeting topic: manila)"15:02
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC15:02
bswartzzhongjun: you're up15:02
*** jasonsb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz15:02
bswartz#link http://paste.openstack.org/show/477677/15:03
Zhongjunlink http://paste.openstack.org/show/477677/15:03
bswartzwow paste.openstack.org is ultra slow this morning15:03
*** Yogi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
ameadeI'd like to note that at the summit folks were leaning towards #2 but I don't think we all clearly understood the downsides15:04
Zhongjunyes, ameade show some different in this link.15:04
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
bswartzyeah #2 is what I proposed15:04
bswartzI'm not convinced that it's worth the extra complexity in Manila to make it easy to share a common qos spec between share types15:05
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
ameadeif we do #2, then the complexity for handling share types as an admin is harder...that i think we all understand15:05
ameadebut in order for #2 to work15:05
bswartzwe have no data on the relative number of share types and qos specs deployers actually use15:06
ameadewe need a way to have netapp_iops=10 OR hwawei_iops=2015:06
bswartzand I don't see why qos-related extra specs are more deserving a reusable wrapper than other extra specs15:06
ameadewe would also need to have extra specs that are values and not just bools15:06
toabctlhey15:06
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
ameadefor the min_ and max_ stuff15:06
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
markstur__re-usable spec groups sounds useful15:07
ameadeas an admin, i would love to have a single qos group that means gold and has what that means for all vendors i support15:07
bswartzmarkstur__: if we go down that path, I would perfer something more generic, such as inheritable share types or something15:07
cknightbswartz: +115:08
gansobswartz: +115:08
markstur__bswartz: +115:08
jasonsbinheritable share types sounds more sympathetic to programmatic discovery15:08
*** stevemar_ has quit IRC15:08
jasonsbor programmatic in general15:08
ameadei'd prefer having multiple share types over inheritable maybe15:08
ameadeor share type bundles15:08
ameadeinheritance sucks15:08
bswartzokay but can we agree that inheritable share types is a totally separate enhancement on top of basic qos extra spec support?15:08
ameadeyeah i agree with that15:09
*** csaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:09
gansobswartz: +115:09
bswartzI'd like to get qos working, then come back and focus on the management complexity15:09
ameadewe still need a way to do ORs and ranges15:09
bswartzameade: example?15:09
cknightwhy do you need a range if you can use min/max values?15:10
ameadecknight: i mean, wouldn't that mean the driver reports a range?15:10
cknightameade: not sure I see the difference15:11
gansoameade: quite the opposite the way I understand, the type specifies a range, the driver reports a value15:11
cknightganso: +115:11
bswartzI think we're starting to discuss something else -- which is more like performance capacity based scheduling15:11
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:11
bswartzthat's an interesting topic, but not the same as QoS (IMO)15:12
ameadeboth do ranges?15:12
ameadebswartz: so the need for OR is so i can specify qos values for 2+ vendors in a single share type15:12
bswartzthe most basic form of qos is a throttle15:12
bswartzfor a throttle, the admin just specifies a number and the backend implements it15:12
ameadeotherwise even with only 2 vendors the number of share_types explodes15:12
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
bswartzameade: I'm not sure I see why15:13
*** pballand has quit IRC15:13
bswartzyour paste shows how to do 2 vendors in one share type -- it seems trivial to extend to 315:13
*** memogarcia has quit IRC15:13
ameadethat example wouldnt work because it would try to find a backend that matches both netapp_iops and huawei_iops no?15:14
bswartzno15:14
bswartzin reality we'd used scoped keys15:14
bswartzso the filter scheduler would never see them15:14
bswartzI would edit your paste if it were possible15:15
*** zns has quit IRC15:15
ameadeso we still need to know backend capable of applying those qos values15:15
bswartzwe should use a wiki for qos design not paste15:15
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
bswartzwe can agree on one common extra specs -- qos_support = True/False15:15
bswartzthat's what you would filter on15:16
ameadeso it's all or nothing for qos support?15:16
bswartzwell part of the agreement would be to define EXACTLY what it means15:16
bswartzand document that definition15:16
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
ameadeso any vendor who has a unique qos thing they can provide is out of the picture?15:16
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
gansoif the most common production approach is something similar as to "bronze, silver, gold, platinum", then for each type the admin would specify QoS ranges that fit those share type standards15:16
bswartzwe would have to agree on what the basic requirement is for qos support15:16
cknightameade: no, you can just use vendor-specific scoped keys15:16
*** svinota has quit IRC15:16
ameadecknight: and report vendor specific qos capabilities?15:17
gansoin order to implement OR, I think we need a QoS spec group... because no backend can match both huwawei and netapp QoS extra specs15:17
bswartzcknight: I think what ameade is getting at is that if we use unscoped keys for filtering, like netapp_qos_support and huawei_qos_support, then your share type needs to have an OR expression15:17
cknightbswartz: thanks, I get it15:18
bswartzthat's why I'd be in favor of a common capability for the basic qos_support15:18
*** neilus has quit IRC15:18
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:18
bswartzbut the unscoped keys can be vendor specific because the scheduler never sees them anyways15:18
bswartzs/unscoped/scoped/15:18
bswartzI like the idea of inheritable share types of some way to bundle multiple types -- we should discuss that later on15:19
ameadeso my huawei backend could report qos_support = true but my share type has all netapp qos specs15:19
ameadeso it ends up on huawei but doesnt apply anything15:19
bswartzameade: I think we could agree on some common extra specs for throttling too15:20
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
bswartzlike max_read_bps and max_write_bps15:20
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
bswartzfor other things, they would need to be vendor specific and we'd just have to document how to avoid doing the wrong thing15:20
ameadesounds like we need to flesh out the design for option #2 in the paste to think about these corner cases15:21
bswartzI really don't see this being a huge problem in practice15:21
ameadewhich is method one in15:21
ameade#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/QoS15:21
bswartzclouds with multiple storage vendors are rare, and when they exist it's even more rare to have a share type that covers 2 or more vendors -- typically people create different share types for each backend vendor15:22
*** rawlin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
*** rawlin has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
ameadebswartz: I think that last point is a problem in itself tbh15:22
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
bswartzZhongjun: I'm sorry we don't seem to be getting closer to a decision here15:23
bswartzwe might need to schedule a working session to get qos hammered out15:23
ameade+115:23
bswartzI dont' want to take up the whole meeting with qos though because we have other business15:23
ameadeand if someone has the bandwidth to design what 'method 1' would need to look like exactly15:23
Zhongjunbswartz: It's ok15:23
bswartzI'd like to see more detailed example of what it should look like in the real world15:24
*** apetrich has quit IRC15:24
bswartzameade's paste is a good start, but we need more examples that support a particular design or show why a particular design has problems15:25
ameade+115:25
*** vahidh has quit IRC15:25
bswartzand right now I'm less concerned with administrator quality of life and more concerned with whether we can even implement something that makes sense15:25
bswartzI think we can come back and solve manageability issues after we have a design that makes sense15:25
bswartzLet's use the ML to continue discussing this one15:26
ameadejust want to make sure we don't pigeon hole ourselves15:26
bswartzand I will try to schedule a specific time next week to discuss qos15:26
ameade+115:26
bswartz#topic  Manila DR update15:26
*** openstack changes topic to "Manila DR update (Meeting topic: manila)"15:26
bswartzameade: this one's your15:26
ameade#link  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238572/15:26
bswartzyours15:26
ameadehaven't gotten any reviews but i have a couple things to run by folks in the meeting15:27
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
ameadeat the summit we agreed that we need a first party driver implementation of DR to run in the gate15:27
bswartzameade: yes15:27
*** gcb_ has quit IRC15:27
ameadei want to know if we should do that in the current generic driver or if we were going to have another generic driver soon15:27
ameadeand who can do that work and do we need it right away15:28
ameadewhile the api is experimental15:28
bswartzameade: there are 2 new first party drivers in development -- both should have reviewable code15:28
*** sbjorn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
bswartzI honestly don't know if it would be easier to build replication support in the existing generic driver or one of the new ones15:29
*** memogarcia has quit IRC15:29
*** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
bswartzat the very least, replication support would create additional dependencies in the driver15:29
bswartzso it would need to be optional15:29
bswartzthe 2 most promising approaches I'm aware of are:15:30
cknightbswartz: I'm very hesitant to continue investing in the current generic driver15:30
gansoI don't know of the implementation details of DR, but wouldn't it make more sense to use Cinder to replicate in the current generic driver since it uses Cinder... as soon as Cinder implements DR properly...15:30
bswartz1) block layer replication using DRBD, and using a filesystem which support replication on top of it15:30
ameadeis this something we want in one of these drivers right away in Mitaka?15:30
bswartzand 2) filesystem layer replication, using ZFS15:30
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
bswartzganso: cinder's replication semantics are too weak for us to use them, even if it was working today (it's not)15:31
*** jckasper has quit IRC15:31
jasonsbmaybe 3) filesystem layer replication, using glusterfs?15:31
*** rob__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:32
*** mrmartin has quit IRC15:32
*** vgridnev has quit IRC15:32
bswartzthe advantage to a DRBD solution is that we could do active/active15:32
bswartzthe ZFS-based approach would be active/passive for sure, but could probably implement "readable" semantics rather than "dr"15:32
ameadeif we do active/active then it can test promote :P15:32
*** nkrinner has quit IRC15:32
ameadecant*15:32
bswartzameade: maybe we should just do both then15:33
toabctlDRBD is also relativly simple to setup15:33
bswartzjasonsb: I'm not familiar enough with glusterfs to know what it can do, replication-wise15:33
jasonsbbswartz: i can check on it and give some more details on how suitable15:34
bswartzI'd be happy to hear about additional proposals for replication in a first-party driver15:34
bswartzespecially if it's less work to get it up and running15:34
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:35
ameadeok so design aside, is it ok to just require this for when we transition off of experimental?15:35
csababswartz: wrt. glusterfs: I'm not familiar with state of the art either, but can check about15:35
bswartztoabctl: I hope you're right -- do you have any interest in writing a prototype?15:35
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:35
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:35
ameadeor is it something we need right away (obviously sooner is better)?15:35
cknightbswartz: so this could be in *any* of the drivers that run in the gate (gluster, generic, ceph, hdfs, etc.), right?15:35
*** jmckind_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:36
bswartzameade: I'm of 2 minds about that -- part of me thinks we need a first party implementation before it can merge, but then I can also imagine merging it as experimental and adding support in a first party driver afterwards15:37
toabctlbswartz: interest yes, but no time. next SUSE cloud release is on the agenda currently. sorry15:37
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC15:37
bswartzI'd like to hear more opinions on that15:37
bswartztoabctl: okay I understand15:37
cknightbswartz: I'd say it cannot leave the experimental state until it's tested in the gate.15:37
ameadebswartz: same, it definitely can't be promoted from experimental without it, i think we all agree there15:37
*** jmckind has quit IRC15:38
ameade* time check, 23min left *15:38
bswartzameade: you're okay with moving on?15:38
*** jmckind_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:38
ameadeyeah for now, we can revisit later15:38
bswartz#topic Manila Driver minimum requirements document update15:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Manila Driver minimum requirements document update (Meeting topic: manila)"15:38
bswartzganso: you're up15:38
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC15:39
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:39
gansook so, it seems the last issue remaining in the document is that we are not sure if manage feature is mandatory or not in DHSS=False mode15:39
bswartzganso: I think we agreed that it's optional15:39
*** sdake has quit IRC15:39
gansowe know it is not mandatory in general, because the driver can implement DHSS=True mode and not have to worry about this15:39
gansobut if the driver operates in DHSS=False, does it have to implement manage?15:40
bswartzthere's confusion about what not supporting it means, so we should be very clear that drivers don't need to implement anything15:40
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC15:40
*** scheuran has quit IRC15:40
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
gansoalso, Valeriy questioned that if all drivers can implement this, then this should be mandatory for DHSS=False mode...15:41
gansoI agree with him, for interoperability15:41
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
*** jmckind has quit IRC15:41
bswartzso it's an admin-only feature, so interoperability is less critical15:41
bswartzand even for drivers that support it, it's allowed to fail for arbitrary reasons15:41
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
bswartztherefore even if we made it mandatory, a driver could simply always fail and still meet the contract of the driver interface15:42
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
markstur__that sounds optional15:42
bswartzthus it's silly to make it mandatory15:42
*** jmckind has quit IRC15:42
gansohumm ok, so it is completely optional, even in DHSS=False... I will update the document15:42
*** minwang2 has quit IRC15:42
*** fzhadaev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
bswartzyes I think that's what we said in tokyo15:43
cknightganso: thanks for handling this document!15:43
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
bswartzfwiw this is not a change in thinking, but just a change in how we communicate to driver maintainers15:43
markstur__+1 thanks15:43
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
*** baoli has quit IRC15:44
bswartzwe've always known that drivers can get away with a noop implementaiton so it's effectively optional15:44
*** jmckind has quit IRC15:44
bswartz#topic Manila Data Copy service name15:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Manila Data Copy service name (Meeting topic: manila)"15:44
bswartz#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244286/15:44
*** minwang2 has quit IRC15:44
bswartzso thanks to ganso for starting work on the new data copy service15:44
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
bswartzthe proposed named was manila-data_copy which is gross for 2 reasons (mixing hypens and underscores, and it's 2 words instead of 1)15:45
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
bswartzI prefer manila-data, or m-dat for short15:45
*** numans has quit IRC15:45
*** jmckind has quit IRC15:45
bswartzbut I'm soliciting other ideas15:45
bswartzwe don't need to spend much time on this -- please use the code review to register feedback15:45
bswartzI just wanted to raise awareness that we need to choose a name15:46
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
gansoI already changed to m-dat and manila-data15:46
*** memogarcia has quit IRC15:46
gansoif we all agree to this, then it is decided15:46
cknightbswartz: +1 on needing another name.  your suggestion seems a good starting point for a service in the control plan that must access backends on the data plane.15:46
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC15:46
bswartzganso: thanks -- I want to know if anyone else has better/different ideas15:46
bswartzif everyone is fine with manila-data, then we're done15:47
*** minwang2 has quit IRC15:47
bswartz#toic Upcoming change for Manila CI hooks15:47
*** sdake_ has quit IRC15:47
bswartzvponomaryov: you're up15:47
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
xyang1is he on irc today15:47
bswartzoh vponomaryov isn't here15:48
*** baoli has quit IRC15:48
bswartzmust be connection issues15:48
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC15:48
bswartzhe added this topic right before the meeting15:48
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
bswartzvponomaryov: hello!15:48
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC15:48
bswartzit's time for your topic15:48
vponomaryovsorry, missed the timings15:48
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** Damjanek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
vponomaryovso, this topic is about head up for driver maintainers15:49
vponomaryovand theirs Third-party CIs15:49
bswartzoh yes I remember this15:49
vponomaryov#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243233/15:49
bswartzyeah this change has the potential to break CI systems, depending on how they're implemented15:50
vponomaryovfirst reason - we use fixed version of Tempest and our plugin is updated from time to time, so we store value in manila CI hooks15:50
bswartzmost of them should be fine (as we can see from the votes)15:50
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
bswartzCI maintainers should take a closer look at this one, and after it merges make sure they're not broken15:51
vponomaryovand to ease sync for all third-party CIs common parts are being separated to another file15:51
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
bswartzany questions on this?15:51
vponomaryovand now is right time to make updates to Third-party CIs to support both - old and new approach15:52
gansonew approach is much better :)15:52
bswartzganso: agreed15:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
bswartz#topic  Manilaclient enhancement to provide request_id when set http_log_debug is True15:52
*** openstack changes topic to "Manilaclient enhancement to provide request_id when set http_log_debug is True (Meeting topic: manila)"15:52
bswartzJayXu: you're up15:52
*** neilus has quit IRC15:53
JayXuwe are refactoring our component test15:53
bswartz#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243233/15:53
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
JayXuand find that there is no way to correlate the failed request with its id15:53
bswartzerr15:54
bswartzwrong link15:54
JayXuso I propose to add request_id into http resp body15:54
bswartzthe agenda got screwed up15:54
JayXuhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/478675/15:54
*** SridharG has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
JayXuany comment on that?15:54
xyang1there is a cross project effort to add request id to response data, may be related to this15:55
vponomaryov bswartz: just update page )15:55
vponomaryov bswartz: *refresh15:55
bswartzJayXu: was there a cross project discussion about this in tokyo?15:55
xyang1let me dig out some info15:55
JayXuno15:55
bswartzI think it's a good idea -- especially if it can be done cheaply15:55
*** angdraug has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:55
JayXuI just got it this week when I tried to update my component test cases15:56
xyang1I have a link, give me a sec15:56
bswartzwhen I first heard about this idea I wondered if it would require much code to track the ID everywhere we want to log it15:56
jasonsb#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Mitaka_Cross_Project_Logging15:56
*** asvechnikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
jasonsbno spec yet i think15:56
*** memogarcia has quit IRC15:56
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC15:56
bswartzI'm sure QA guys and deployers/troubleshooters would be thrilled to have this though15:57
*** igajsin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** mwhahaha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
xyang1https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-cinderclient/+spec/return-request-id-to-caller15:57
bswartzit might even enable some cool scripting to tie together log files15:57
xyang1there is also an oslo spec15:58
bswartzxyang1: thanks15:58
*** yottatsa has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** baoli has quit IRC15:58
bswartzJayXu: if you haven't seen these, I suggest reading them and making sure the proposal for Manila fits in with what others are doing15:58
JayXuokay, thx15:59
bswartzit sounds like a good idea, but we should be consistent with our approach15:59
bswartz#topic open discussion15:59
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: manila)"15:59
bswartzonly 1 minute left15:59
bswartzanyone have a last minute topic?15:59
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** sbog has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
bswartzwe need to followup on both qos open items and replication open items15:59
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
bswartzlet's use the ML for those16:00
bswartzthanks everyone16:00
bswartz#endmeeting16:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 12 16:00:22 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2015/manila.2015-11-12-15.00.html16:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2015/manila.2015-11-12-15.00.txt16:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2015/manila.2015-11-12-15.00.log.html16:00
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** a_ta has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** markstur__ has quit IRC16:00
*** bookwar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** csaba has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** jasonsb has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** ikalnitsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
kozhukalov_#startmeeting Fuel16:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 12 16:01:26 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kozhukalov_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'fuel'16:01
*** cindy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
kozhukalov_hey guys16:01
ikalnitskyo/16:01
*** dustins has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
sboghey16:01
yottatsahi!16:01
DamjanekHi16:01
kozhukalov_agenda as usual16:01
xenolog13\~/16:01
monesterhi16:01
*** akasatkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
angdraugo/16:01
fzhadaevHi16:01
kozhukalov_#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda16:01
*** achanda has quit IRC16:02
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
ashtokolovhi16:02
rvyalovhi16:02
asvechnikovhi16:02
akasatkinhi16:02
*** kebray has quit IRC16:02
kozhukalov_#topic Action Items from last meeting16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Items from last meeting (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:02
kozhukalov_dklenov will figure out the current status of persistent interface naming (ubuntu bootstrap)16:02
kozhukalov_dklenov around?16:02
*** u_glide1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
fzhadaevOk. I think I will16:02
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
fzhadaevAnd... AFAIK Persistent interface naming task is now in progress by ashtokolov.16:03
mwhahahahi16:03
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
mattymohi16:03
aderyugin0/16:03
kozhukalov_fzhadaev, has the spec been merged?16:03
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
*** gomarivera_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
*** achanda has quit IRC16:04
fzhadaevNo AFAIK16:04
fzhadaevhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/236848/16:04
kozhukalov_tests failed16:05
*** houming-wang has quit IRC16:05
*** Yogi has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:05
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:05
kozhukalov_asyriy ashtokolov please make sure this spec passes tests16:05
ikalnitskyfzhadaev: are we going to implement this spec in 8.0 ?16:05
kozhukalov_ok, moving on16:06
*** JayXu has quit IRC16:06
kozhukalov_vkramskikh will review the spec https://review.openstack.org/241202 to make sure everything is clear and it is enough info16:06
vkramskikhhi, the spec is still not populated with instructions from asilenkov and didn't have +1 from CI until the last moment. will review when it's close to reviewable state16:06
fzhadaevikalnitsky: I think it sholud be done in current iteration16:06
kozhukalov_ci guys, could you please help to review and discuss this spec16:07
kozhukalov_asilenkov, around?16:07
*** ikutukov has quit IRC16:07
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:07
angdraugbookwar: ^16:07
kozhukalov_could you please give the necessary instructions in the spec?16:08
angdraugspec says "Infra impact: none", is that really true?16:08
*** dpyzhov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
cfoutshi16:08
kozhukalov_kozhukalov will review all requests in fuel-main16:08
*** shwetaap has quit IRC16:09
kozhukalov_not all of them but many of them have been reviewed since last meeting16:09
ashtokolov folks, fyi: enhancements team is working only on nailgun and nailgun-agent support for new interface naming16:09
kozhukalov_nurla will poke tatyana or someone else to review all requests in fuel-ostf16:09
kozhukalov_nurla, around?16:09
kozhukalov_monester will make sure that people from MAINTAINERS are added as reviewers automatically16:09
*** mihgen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
kozhukalov_monester, could you please give any comments on this task?16:10
angdraug#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/149765516:10
openstackLaunchpad bug 1497655 in Fuel for OpenStack "Add reviewers automatically based on MAINTAINERS data" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Alexander Charykov (acharykov)16:10
monesterScript to add reviews is ready, now I need to integrate it with our repos using jenkins or try to add a hook to the openstack gerrit. Also I can't find spec with fixed format of MAINTAINERS file, so I make it compatible with files from fuel-* repos.16:10
angdrauglooks like not done16:10
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2416:10
*** baoli has quit IRC16:10
*** nijaba_ is now known as nijaba16:11
*** jckasper has quit IRC16:11
monesterreview  https://review.fuel-infra.org/#/c/12228/16:11
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:11
monestermihgen is there any spec with fixed format of MAINTAINERS file?16:12
angdraugthere's no spec for the format, if you come up with a formal definition of it lets add it to http://specs.fuel-infra.org/fuel-specs-master/policy/team-structure.html16:12
kozhukalov_monester any eta on when jenkins-jobs patches will be ready?16:12
ikalnitskyangdraug: +1. let's fix format in team structure16:12
*** esker has quit IRC16:12
monesterI want to try integrate it as a hook in gerrit, so not to checkout repos every time which would be done by jenkins16:13
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:13
*** neelashah has quit IRC16:13
*** ihrachys has quit IRC16:13
kozhukalov_zuul?16:13
monesterso there I need help from openstack-infra team, I'll try to point out this question with them16:14
angdraugwhy zuul?16:14
kozhukalov_angdraug, i don't know, why not?16:14
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC16:14
angdraugigorbelikov bookwar: can you folks help monester with his gerrit hook problem?16:14
monesterright now you can review the script16:15
kozhukalov_zuul is a standard tool to listen gerrit events and run jenkins jobs?16:15
kozhukalov_right?16:15
igorbelikovangdraug sure16:15
angdraugzuul listens to merge events16:15
bookwarkozhukalov the point here is not to run jenkins job at all16:15
igorbelikovkozhukalov_ zuul is not suited for this task16:15
bookwarbut do all changes server side on Gerrit16:15
kozhukalov_ok, maybe i am wrong16:15
kozhukalov_moving on?16:16
bookwarso we need to discuss option to install this gerrit hook with Openstack Infra16:16
bookwaryes, let's move on16:16
*** memogarcia has quit IRC16:16
kozhukalov_first topic we've just discussed16:16
kozhukalov_#topic external snapshots in fuel-devops https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/system-test-external-snapshots (akaszuba)16:16
*** openstack changes topic to "external snapshots in fuel-devops https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/system-test-external-snapshots (akaszuba) (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:16
*** jmckind has quit IRC16:17
*** stevemar_ has quit IRC16:17
angdraugakaszuba is not around, lets push this to next week16:17
*** jmckind_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** davideagnello has quit IRC16:17
kozhukalov_ok16:17
kozhukalov_#topic Telco Team Status (fzhadaev)16:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Telco Team Status (fzhadaev) (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:17
*** merooney has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** spzala has quit IRC16:17
fzhadaevTelko team is continue work on Ubuntu bootstrap feature. Here is the current status:16:17
fzhadaev1) Fuel menu was changed. All commits are merged.16:17
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
fzhadaev2) Bootstrap creation script enhancements - all basic functionality is done, but some of commits are still in active review and testing stage.16:17
fzhadaev3) Nailgun-agent enhancement - add ability to collect information about loaded bootstrap image uuid. Commit is on review.16:17
*** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
fzhadaev4) Work on CLI for bootstrap images management was started.16:18
fzhadaev5) Work on changes related to fuel-library was started.16:18
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
fzhadaev6) Fuel menu and bootstrap image modifications were shown on demo. According to feedback that was received during demo it was decided to:16:18
fzhadaev6.1) Do not delete CentOS bootstrap image, but use Ubuntu by default.16:18
fzhadaev6.2) Make additional changes in fuel menu for better User Experience.16:18
*** vsakharov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
kozhukalov_fzhadaev, 1) including pbr?16:18
fzhadaevNope. It wasn't related to BP16:18
kozhukalov_2) yes, we need to review, the ball is on our side16:19
ikalnitskyfzhadaev: so basically, we're building ubuntu bootstrap image during master node deployment ? and it's already in master, right?16:19
kozhukalov_3) we've just discussed this with alexey zvyagintsev16:19
fzhadaevikalnitsky: nope. it's not merged now16:19
kozhukalov_and agreed about how to do this16:19
mihgenfzdarsky: so when exactly image build happens?16:20
mihgenwhen we run puppet to install master node containers /configure them?16:20
angdraugfzhadaev: ^16:20
fzhadaevmihgen: When all changes will be merged this will happen during master node deployment16:21
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
angdraugmihgen is asking about which specific stage of master node deployment16:21
kozhukalov_fzhadaev, ok, like it does now bootstrap-image-builder shell script, right?16:21
fzhadaevyes, but we'll have an ability to build images manualy after master node will be deployed16:22
kozhukalov_fzhadaev, great16:22
mihgendo we expect our master node install time to be extended? if so, for how much?16:22
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:22
angdraugcan you skip this during master node deployment?16:22
kozhukalov_i think that exactly what we need16:22
fzhadaevangdraug: yes16:22
angdraugis there an option to provide a pre-cooked image?16:22
angdraugany other way to make life easier in an environment without internet access?16:23
ikalnitskyif master node deployment time will be increased (and it should), we have to increase our timeouts in fuel-qa tests.16:23
*** zeih_ has quit IRC16:23
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
angdraugikalnitsky: no, lets agree not to increase master node deployment time instead16:23
angdraugat least not in an automated test environment16:24
kozhukalov_angdraug, why should we skip this? fuelmenu allows to choose the flavor of bootstrap image. if centos is choosen then we don't spend time for building image, if ubuntu, we should build16:24
*** jcsp has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:24
fzhadaevangdraug: we'll have an ability to skip building image aand import pre-builded image after master node will be deployed16:24
ikalnitskyhow can you can achieve this? by placing pre-cooked image?16:24
ikalnitskywe anyway should do some tests that image could be automatically built during master node deployment16:24
angdraug+1 -- can this be triggered from fuel-qa?16:24
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:24
kozhukalov_fzhadaev, it is even better16:25
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC16:25
angdraugif so, we can have just one fuel-qa test scenario where image build is tested during master node deploy16:25
mihgentime folks. fzhadaev - it should be in the spec, so please let us know where to look for all these answers16:25
angdraugand in all other scenarios, save time and upload a pre-build image16:25
mattymowe have verify that the image can be built too^16:26
mihgen+1 to angdraug16:26
mattymotest coverage is important16:26
*** memogarcia has quit IRC16:26
kozhukalov_ok, guys, i think the progress here is good and all the details can be discussed either in ML or chat16:26
fzhadaevspec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229063/16:26
kozhukalov_moving on?16:26
kozhukalov_#topic Enhancements Team Status (ashtokolov)16:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Enhancements Team Status (ashtokolov) (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:27
*** ysm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:27
ashtokolovEnhancements weekly status: Inbox - 62(was 65), In progress - 12(was 12), On review - 23(was 25), QA - 15(was 17), Done - 24(was 16)16:27
ashtokolovFix committed+Fix released = 39 (was 33)16:27
ashtokolovalso we are working on new network naming16:27
ashtokolovsupport multiple floating ranges16:28
ashtokolovand openstack-ci integration16:28
kozhukalov_ashtokolov, about persistent naming. are you following this spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236848/ ?16:28
mihgenthanks ashtokolov, any work on enabling plugin after env is deployed?16:28
ashtokolov kozhukalov_ yes we do, Alexaner Gordeev and Vova Sharshov are reviewing it16:29
kozhukalov_moving on? comments on plugin stuff?16:30
ashtokolovmihgen: we try to figure out what was made in this feature by mixed team16:30
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
ashtokolovbecause it was in their backlog till last week...16:31
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
kozhukalov_#topic Mixed Team Status (damjanek)16:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Mixed Team Status (damjanek) (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:31
DamjanekFuel Mixed team is currently working on feature which enables adjusting OpenStack configuration parameters in post-deployment phase:16:31
Damjanek1. We have completed research on puppet modules idempotence - done.16:31
Damjanek2. We've created puppet resource for handling configuration changes - merged.16:32
Damjanek3. We're working on allowing to change config values via API and CLI - in development.16:32
Damjanek4. We're working on keyston/nova/neutron granular tasks to allow configuration change - in development.16:32
*** jaranovich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
Damjaneks/keyston/keystone/16:32
kozhukalov_any q here?16:33
yottatsaDamjanek is there any bp?16:33
*** gouthamr has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
Damjanekyottatsa: Yup. Here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239897/16:33
yottatsathnx16:33
Damjanekn/p16:33
kozhukalov_Damjanek, thanks, moving on then16:33
angdraugso, enabling plugins after env is deployed?16:33
angdraugashtokolov: Damjanek: can you sync up in #fuel-dev after the meeting?16:34
Damjanekangdraug: Sure thing16:34
angdrauglets move on then16:34
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC16:34
kozhukalov_#topic UI Team status (vkramskikh)16:35
*** openstack changes topic to "UI Team status (vkramskikh) (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:35
vkramskikhHi! Here are the results of Iteration #2:16:35
vkramskikh- Multirack support: 1 of 3 stories merged, 2 stories left: support of node network groups on the networks tab (was moved to iteration #3) and view of all available nodes. We plan to complete both stories by the end of the next week.16:35
vkramskikh- Support IP ranges for all networks in UI - done16:35
vkramskikh- GUI support for Ironic - done, but still waiting to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229879/16:35
vkramskikh- Segment settings tab logically - was converted to an Epic and new stories were added as it seems it's not possible to segment the tab properly without splitting some existing groups. This will require update of puppet manifests - we'll reach for help from library guys after we update openstack.yaml.16:35
vkramskikh- Webpack - done, we finally got the new package with JS libraries merged after 6 week of being blocked. Though the process of its updating isn't established yet - we've filed another update request on Monday, and it's still not updated yet. That's sad - I thought it won't be taking more than 1-2 days.16:35
vkramskikh- Separate deployment and provisioning in UI - most likely will be moved out of 8.0 due to very poor quality of the backend16:35
vkramskikhFor Iteration #3 we plan to finish Multirack support and Segment settings tab logically epics and also deliver support for bootstrap images and link to external plugin dashboards. Thanks.16:35
*** vponomaryov has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:36
kozhukalov_webpack you mean npm bundle?16:37
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:37
vkramskikhnpm bundle is a prerequisuite for this quite big change16:37
vkramskikhhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/219036/16:37
*** neelashah has quit IRC16:38
angdrauglooks merged to me )16:38
vkramskikhyes16:38
vkramskikhbut we also wanted to establish the process16:38
kozhukalov_aha, but it took a lot more than was expected16:38
vkramskikhfor updating the bundle16:38
*** artur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
vkramskikhand it seems the speed of updates isn't good enough16:38
ikalnitskyvkramskikh: you said "very poor quality of backend".16:39
ikalnitskywhat's wrong with it?16:39
vkramskikhas the update request filed on monday is still not processed16:39
vkramskikhjaranovich: could you comment please?16:39
ikalnitskydo we have ticker or bp that should improve it?16:39
jaranovichyes16:39
jaranovichSee the following issues with provisioning:16:39
jaranovich- no notification about finished provisioning on UI16:39
jaranovich- ready provisioning task has message = null, so there is nothing to show the user on UI after finished provisioning16:39
jaranovich- provisioned nodes has pending_addition flag = False, so user can not change node roles, disks, ifc configuration, or even delete from environment without depolyment16:39
angdraugvkramskikh: link to update request from monday?16:39
vkramskikhangdraug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/151451216:40
openstackLaunchpad bug 1514512 in Fuel for OpenStack "JS modules bundle needs to be updated" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Fuel build team (fuel-build)16:40
*** sdake has quit IRC16:40
jaranovichmoreover, deployment of provisioned node(s) fails constantly16:40
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:40
jaranovich>> Deployment has failed. Method granular_deploy. Deployment failed on nodes 1.16:40
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:40
jaranovichthis is an error message after failed deployment16:40
kozhukalov_deployment fails constantly? sounds like a CRITICAL bug16:40
jaranovichwas tested on ISOs16:41
ikalnitskyjaranovich: thanls. (1) and (2) second are easy to fix, and UI anyway shouldn't rely on these. but yeah (3), perhaps, we should manage our blags more precisely.16:41
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:41
ikalnitskyjaranovich: but how that works from CLI then?16:41
*** mwagner has quit IRC16:41
*** memogarcia has quit IRC16:41
angdraugasilenkov: any comment on why your commits for bug linked by vkramskikh above are not merged yet?16:41
ikalnitskyi believe you guys doing something wrong, or in some unusual way. perhaps there's a bug and we should fix it, but the main case should work16:41
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC16:41
*** minwang2 has quit IRC16:42
vkramskikhjaranovich: could you please give ikalnitsky a link to the request?16:42
vkramskikhwith UI change which calls provisioning separately16:42
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
jaranovichi don't know about CLI but i can file a bug about failed deploy and attach logs there. Also, I use /api/clusters/x/provision/ url to launc provisioning process16:42
jaranovichis it Ok?16:42
jaranovichikalnitsky: ^^16:42
ikalnitskyit should.. but i think you have to pass a list of node there16:43
*** j______ has quit IRC16:43
ikalnitskyok, let's move on16:43
ikalnitskywe can discuss the issue a bit later16:43
angdrauglets make sure there's a bug16:43
ikalnitskythank you16:43
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:43
angdraugand yes lets move on16:43
jaranovichthank you, will create a bug16:43
kozhukalov_thanks guys16:43
kozhukalov_#topic Multirack status (akasatkin)16:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Multirack status (akasatkin) (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:43
akasatkin3 stories were completed during last iteration:16:44
akasatkin1. Make additional setup of dnsmasq on master node when admin network parameters are changed in any node network group. User should do that by hands now.16:44
akasatkin2. It should be allowed to allocate VIP in any node group to allow proper separation of HA services into different nodes.16:44
akasatkin3. Make it possible to set floating IP range from non-default node network group. So, it will be possible to deploy controller nodes in any node group.16:44
akasatkinThe following is in progress now:16:45
akasatkinThere is an ability to share network between several node network groups or to use separate L2/L3 parameters for each node network group.16:45
akasatkinWe have limited resources so it seems that the following may be out of scope:16:45
akasatkin1. It should be allowed to set user-defined IP for any VIP. This IP can even be out of any environment's networks. (It should be discussed how to reduce its scope.)16:45
akasatkin2. There is a special case when network managed by dhcp (PXE network) needs VIPs to be assigned. IP addresses should be excluded from Admin networks' IP ranges (i.e. from DHCP ranges). This can be done manually as a workaround.16:45
akasatkinThat's it.16:45
kozhukalov_akasatkin, thanks16:45
kozhukalov_any q?16:46
kozhukalov_#topic Granularize monolyth Neutron task status. (svasilenko)16:46
*** openstack changes topic to "Granularize monolyth Neutron task status. (svasilenko) (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:46
xenolog13"Granularizing Neutron" feature is done, main code merged more than week ago. Tests merged last week.16:46
xenolog13  Some of network plugins for 8.0 may be affected.16:46
xenolog13  blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/make-neutron-deployment-task-more-granular16:46
ikalnitskyxenolog13: i remember that the patch has a lot of hardcoded "net04" / "net04_ext" stuff. have we get rid if this?16:48
ikalnitskysince it blocks one of my patches16:48
xenolog13No, Enchacement team works on it.16:48
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
*** shelleea007 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
ikalnitskyany eta?16:49
*** annegentle has quit IRC16:49
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
mihgenxenolog13: thanks Sergey. can we separate api / data plane to different nodes?16:49
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
mattymoikalnitsky, xenolog13 the naming still needs to be done and it should be exposed to the user16:50
xenolog13this feature doesn't affect nailgun16:50
mattymoI think we're clear to finally merge your portion ikalnitsky16:50
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
ikalnitskymattymo: xenolog13 just said we didn't get rid of it?16:51
xenolog13ikalnitsky, net04* names hardcode used only if network names not given from YAML16:51
mattymoikalnitsky, we're still going forward with what's on review. xenolog13 is referring to the neutron_config values in astute.yaml that we already discussed16:51
angdrauga hardcode is a hardcode16:51
mattymoangdraug, there's a default if the value isn't present in astute.yaml (so we can do it in pieces)16:52
mattymootherwise we break CI and someone cries16:52
bookwarthanks, mattymo16:52
kozhukalov_one more topic left in our agenda16:52
angdraugare you saying you will remove the hardcode before the feature is finished?16:53
kozhukalov_are we done here?16:53
mattymoangdraug, yes16:53
angdraugok, lets move on then16:53
kozhukalov_Too much question like "how to extend bridge mappings" into Neutron. Proposal of micro-feature. (svasilenko)16:53
xenolog13last time too many peoples interested two question:16:53
xenolog13  How to make provider networks by fuel?16:53
xenolog13  How to make multiple external (floating) networks?16:53
xenolog13  Unfortunately Fuel does not support out of box such features.16:53
xenolog13  I propose following changes:16:53
xenolog13  If we authomatize calculation of bridge mapping and vlan-ID mappings from neutron_config hash16:53
xenolog13  we will got ability for flexible create required configuration.16:53
xenolog13  After this each plugin-writers wil have ability16:53
xenolog13  to override neutron configuration and add his own non-standart mappings to our default.16:53
xenolog13  This changes not so complicated.16:53
xenolog13  Also this changes will cober bugs, like bug/1515197, bug/1489718.16:53
xenolog13  This changes give us ability to implement provider networks as plugin, because FF is coming.16:54
*** memogarcia has quit IRC16:54
angdraugwhat components need to be changed to support that?16:54
xenolog13change some hardcode in Nailgun (1 python developer/1day)16:55
angdraugis that all?16:55
*** zeih has quit IRC16:55
xenolog13make function for generate required resources (1 puppet end/2 days)16:55
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:55
xenolog13s/end/engineer/g16:56
angdraug3 person-days looks cheap to me16:56
angdraugwhat about testing and documentation?16:56
mihgenxenolog13: this sounds like a good idea16:56
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:56
kozhukalov_enchancments team?16:57
angdraugwill existing tests be affected by this change?16:57
xenolog13I can make small blueprint and loop test for this task.16:57
xenolog13Yes, we has test for current configuration, but for extended configuration we should add some new16:57
*** tmcpeak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
mihgenit's probably more for unit-like tests and get partner team to review / play with code16:58
angdraugmihgen: +116:58
angdrauglets do it16:58
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
kozhukalov_ok, if we have people for this, let's do this, probably we first need a little bit for formal description16:58
xenolog13+116:58
kozhukalov_2 minutes16:58
angdraugopen discussion?16:59
kozhukalov_no time16:59
*** mrmartin has quit IRC16:59
kozhukalov_closing16:59
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** akasatkin has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
kozhukalov_thanks everyone16:59
kozhukalov_#endmeeting16:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 12 16:59:34 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2015/fuel.2015-11-12-16.01.html16:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2015/fuel.2015-11-12-16.01.txt16:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2015/fuel.2015-11-12-16.01.log.html16:59
*** mwhahaha has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** ikalnitsky has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** michaelxin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** holser has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** yottatsa has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
tmcpeak#startmeeting security17:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 12 17:00:46 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tmcpeak. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: security)"17:00
tmcpeako/17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'security'17:00
tmcpeak\o17:00
tmcpeako\17:00
elmikothanks tmcpeak , was just looking up the meeting name ;)17:00
tmcpeako~17:00
tmcpeakwhatup17:01
michaelxin_morning17:01
*** mvandijk_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** fzhadaev has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** wayward710 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
tmcpeakmr. Hyakuhei sends his regrets but he's doing customer things17:01
tmcpeakhe has provided me with a wonderful agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-20151112-agenda17:01
*** nkinder has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
elmikono worries17:01
tmcpeaknkinder: whatup!17:01
*** tremble has quit IRC17:01
*** holser has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** dg_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
nkindertmcpeak: hey!17:01
tmcpeaklong time man17:01
tmcpeakwb17:01
*** asvechnikov has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
michaelxin_hi17:02
bknudsonhi17:02
tmcpeak#topic roll-call17:02
*** openstack changes topic to "roll-call (Meeting topic: security)"17:02
tmcpeako/17:02
bknudsonpresent17:02
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:02
*** michaelxin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
elmikoo/17:02
tmcpeaksweet17:03
tmcpeakstragglers be damned17:03
bknudsonbueller?17:03
tmcpeak#topic Midcycle17:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Midcycle (Meeting topic: security)"17:03
tmcpeakhyakuhei has set us up to do a joint midcycle with Barbican17:03
tmcpeakwhich is legit17:03
redroboto/17:03
michaelxin_+117:03
tmcpeakas he said in etherpad, since I literally have 0 to do with this…17:03
shelleea007o/17:03
bknudsonwould be nice to be in san antonio in january17:03
tmcpeak"we'll likely be in SA"17:03
elmikobknudson: +117:04
tmcpeak"we'll likely be there Jan 11-15"17:04
tmcpeak"redrobot has said we'll have enough space"17:04
tmcpeak-hyakuhei17:04
tmcpeakso legit!17:04
tmcpeakthis is going to be awesome17:04
*** Damjanek has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
redrobotyeah, looking into space right now17:04
bknudsonwe haven't discussed a keystone midcycle yet17:04
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC17:04
redrobotanyone know avg attendance from OSSP for the mid-cycles?17:04
tmcpeakpersonally Barbican is at the top of my list of cool projects which I know disappointingly jack-s about17:04
tmcpeakredrobot: ~1517:04
dg_tmcpeak +!17:04
bknudsonfor keystone we've met at a hackerspace near the riverwalk17:04
bknudsonI still haven't seen the rackspace castle.17:05
redrobotbknudson Geekdom!17:05
redrobotI'm looking at space in the Castle17:05
tmcpeakis it a castle?17:05
michaelxin_we have more than enough space17:05
redrobotmichaelxin_  +117:05
elmikodon't you guys have an old mall or something?17:05
tmcpeakSA is also way up on the list of US cities I haven't been but want to have been17:05
*** bana_k has quit IRC17:05
tmcpeakgood food, good booze, etc, etc17:06
redrobotelmiko yup, used to be a shady mall17:06
elmikowe could meet at the Hot Topic ;P17:06
tmcpeakelmiko: :P17:06
* elmiko chuckles17:06
redrobotelmiko lol17:06
*** minwang2 has quit IRC17:06
tmcpeakredrobot: have you guys worked out sponsorship yet?17:06
tmcpeakyou guys buying? ;)17:06
tmcpeakI'm sure HP can pick up a night of drinking at least17:07
redrobottmcpeak hehe17:07
tmcpeakI won't speak for Rob though17:07
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
redrobotI don't know yet...  we could probably do a few lunches at least17:07
bknudsontmcpeak: you can speak for rob he's not here.17:07
tmcpeakI can, but whatever I say doesn't carry weight, so..17:07
tmcpeakok cool17:07
tmcpeakthis is going to be awesome17:07
bknudsonwhen do the food trucks show up?17:07
tmcpeaknext week we'll start with the list of attendees, topics, etc17:07
redrobotbknudson Tuesdays and Fridays17:07
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
bknudsonso midcycle is tue thru fri.17:08
tmcpeakI for one think this might be the best midcycle yet17:08
tmcpeakI'm excited about it17:08
michaelxinI talked with my manager17:08
michaelxinOur team will cover the cost for security mid-cycle17:08
michaelxinI also talked with Lisa17:08
tmcpeakmichaelxin: !!17:08
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
tmcpeaklegit!17:08
michaelxinShe should be able to take care of Baribican side17:09
elmikonice17:09
*** sdake has quit IRC17:09
tmcpeakmichaelxin is the new Opera17:09
redrobotmichaelxin awesome!17:09
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:09
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:09
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:09
*** michaelxin_ has quit IRC17:09
michaelxinthanks17:09
tmcpeakok awesome, I hope everybody can attend the whole week17:10
tmcpeakthis has been long overdue, I'm glad you guys set it up17:10
tmcpeakok cool17:10
tmcpeaknext up:17:10
tmcpeak#topic Anchor17:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Anchor (Meeting topic: security)"17:10
*** memogarcia has quit IRC17:10
tmcpeakdg_, tkelsey: what's up?17:10
dg_ive not touched anchor this week, dont know if tkelsey has?17:11
tmcpeaktkelsey looks away17:11
tmcpeakok cool17:12
tmcpeakthen...17:12
tmcpeak#topic Killick17:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Killick (Meeting topic: security)"17:12
tmcpeakdg_ what's up?17:12
*** qwebirc51097 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
*** baoli has quit IRC17:12
bknudsonwhat's killick?17:12
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:13
tmcpeakdg_: what is killick?17:13
tmcpeakit sounds weird, I'm a little resistant ;)17:13
dg_killick - 'a form of Anchor used by primitive societies' - thanks google :)17:13
*** vahidh has quit IRC17:13
wayward710This? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-October/076486.html17:13
dg_its basically a traditional PKI using the anchor validation functionality, so you can use it to automatically enforce a certifiate policy17:14
dg_the intention is that it will plug in behind barbican if necessary, or be deployed as a stand-alone pki17:14
tmcpeakcool what's the status, where is it going, and by when?17:14
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
dg_currently a POC exists, you can curl it a CRL and it sticks it in the queue, and then you can connect to the admin api and deny/issue it17:15
tmcpeakawesome!17:15
tmcpeakwhat's next?17:15
tmcpeakwhere is it? stackforge?17:15
dg_the revocation API is working, but i havent had time to add the CRL signing code to anchor (because thats just going to be a whole bundle of bikesheds)17:15
tmcpeakdg_: is this your baby?17:15
dg_currently on github, stackforge isnt a thing afaik17:16
*** sicarie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:16
tmcpeakwut17:16
tmcpeakthey killed stackforge?17:16
elmikoyea, it's either openstack or not17:16
dg_yeah its loosely my baby, tim and I thought it up on a plane and I wrote a POC on a different plane17:16
elmikoor, openstack-dev i suppose17:16
tmcpeakoooh17:16
tmcpeakok cool, it sounds awesome (not from this description, I've also seen more thorough presentations of it).  So what's next?17:17
tmcpeakhow can we help?17:17
tmcpeaksince we own security, can we just move it in to our project?17:18
dg_yeah I was talking to Rob and he suggested we pull it into our project once the POC works17:18
dg_I need to have a think about the auth of it - really must sit down and talk that through with rob17:18
*** mihgen has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:19
tmcpeakdg_ ok cool17:19
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:19
tmcpeakit's going to be a great addition to OSSG when it's ready17:19
tmcpeaklet us know if you need anything17:19
tmcpeak#topic OpenStack-Ansible-Security17:19
dg_once we've pulled it in, there will be lots of dev work - we will need to write a barbican plugin, I want to add ACME functionality (so we can kill coyotes), it will need a gui17:19
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack-Ansible-Security (Meeting topic: security)"17:19
tmcpeakdg_: sweet, sounds good17:19
tmcpeakdon't hesitate to reach out..17:19
michaelxindg_: +117:19
dg_thanks tmcpeak - tis never going to be exciting like anchor, but its kinda useful when you want to deploy a cloud17:19
dg_ty :)17:19
tmcpeaksounds very useful17:19
*** mwagner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
tmcpeakmhayden: you around?17:20
tmcpeakok.. if he comes around we'll come back17:20
tmcpeak#topic Bandit17:20
*** openstack changes topic to "Bandit (Meeting topic: security)"17:20
tmcpeakok… so tkelsey and I have been working like crazy people on baseline17:21
tmcpeakbasically baseline is this17:21
tmcpeak1) I check in something   2) I run Bandit on the parent commit of whatever I check in   3) I run Bandit on what I've checked in   4) I subtract old findings from new   5) I report *just the new issues*17:21
tmcpeakthis is going to be awesome, and the quintessential gate I think17:21
dg_nice17:21
elmikoneat17:21
dg_i like that, so i can see the stuff I've messed up17:22
tmcpeakwe're busting ass on this for an internal project, but once it's ready we'll upstream it17:22
tmcpeakthis should be a usable gate for any project17:22
*** AndreyPavlov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
bknudsoncurrent on keystone the gate doesn't allow anything broken in.17:22
dg_tmcpeak - lets have this as a gate for anchor (and killick)17:22
*** thomnico has quit IRC17:22
tmcpeakdg_: awesome, I was hoping you might say that17:22
bknudsonso anything reported in a review is new.17:23
tmcpeakbknudson: exactly17:23
dg_bknudson thats good :)17:23
elmikoi'm curious, how does this compare to just diffing the output of 2 runs?17:23
michaelxinone of the feedbacks from summit is that people want to know what defects Bandit found17:23
michaelxinmaybe, we can document them somewhere for good defects.17:23
bknudsona tag in the launchpad bug might help17:24
tmcpeakelmiko: this is different because code position doesn't matter.  It's using Bandit's awareness of the issues.  So basically I have a tmp file issue - it moves.  No new issue17:24
wayward710So this is Bandit? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security/Projects/Bandit17:24
tmcpeakI have one temp file issue and now I have two - one of them is new.  Bandit shows what are the possible locations of the new issue17:24
elmikotmcpeak: interesting, sounds complicated ;)17:24
tmcpeakwayward710: yep17:24
wayward710thanks17:24
tmcpeakwayward710: not sure we've seen you before17:24
tmcpeakquick intro?17:24
wayward710Sure.  I'm Wendy Edwards, hopefully future volunteer with OpenStack security.  Got a little bit of a backlog on some other open source tasks, which I'd like to clear before committing to anything else.  So right now, trying to watch and learn.17:26
elmikowelcome wayward710 =)17:26
michaelxinwayward710: welcome17:26
dg_o/17:26
wayward710Thanks, elmiko!17:26
wayward710Thanks!17:26
tmcpeakwayward710: awesome!  welcome :)17:26
dg_wayward710 out of interest, how did you hear about OpenStack Security? Tmcpeak wants to know if his marketing drive is getting results...17:27
wayward710Have done a little work in security and IAM, but eager to learn more.17:27
tmcpeakalso I've snazzed up the HTML reporter a bit17:27
wayward710I think I know @pleia2 (who is AFK right now) and she's talked a lot about OpenStack17:27
*** neilus has quit IRC17:27
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:28
tmcpeakhere's the new HTML report: http://pasteboard.co/25o5qfQI.png17:28
*** sdake_ has quit IRC17:28
elmikoooh shiny17:29
tmcpeakelmiko: thanks! you just made the top of my christmas card list17:29
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
tmcpeakallright, enough braggies17:29
elmikohaha17:29
tmcpeak0.16.0 coming up, then we should really be able to hit the projects hard for Bandit gates17:29
tmcpeakit doesn't matter how many issues you have, Bandit can make sure you don't introduce new ones17:29
elmikosahara has taken on a task for Mitaka to get our bandit gate voting17:29
elmikonot sure we'll make it, but it's a goal17:30
tmcpeakelmiko: awesome! so far that's an exclusive bknudson club17:30
michaelxinelmiko: +117:30
tmcpeakallright: OSSN17:30
bknudsonI don't want to be the only member.17:30
tmcpeak#topic OSSN17:30
*** openstack changes topic to "OSSN (Meeting topic: security)"17:30
tmcpeaknkinder: wassssssup?17:30
*** zns has quit IRC17:30
*** sdake has quit IRC17:30
nkinderPretty slow on the OSSN side of things, but there is one private/embargoed issue I'll be writing up today.17:31
tmcpeaksaw that you assigned that to yourself…looks fun :D17:31
nkinder:)17:31
tmcpeakwhat's the backlog like?17:31
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
nkinderthere are 5 others in the backlog17:31
bknudsonthis one will be full of apologies17:31
tmcpeak;)17:31
tmcpeakwe're the OSSN.  We don't apologize17:32
tmcpeakOSSG even ;)17:32
nkinderI believe that only one of them is picked up already17:32
nkinderso we have 4 up for grabs17:32
tmcpeakhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ossn17:32
tmcpeak#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ossn17:32
tmcpeak6 it looks like17:32
tmcpeak4 untriaged17:32
tmcpeakoh yeah17:32
tmcpeak5.. one fix commited?17:32
*** ccneill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
nkinderYeah.  I should be able to get the one michaelxin worked on published today.  It has the needed acks it seems.17:33
ccneillhowdy. sorry I'm late!17:33
tmcpeakhey ccneill, how it do?17:33
*** flaviof has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
ccneilldoin' just fine B)17:33
michaelxinccneill: +117:34
*** kebray has quit IRC17:34
tmcpeaksweet17:34
nkindertmcpeak: the fix commited one might just need to be closed (I'll follow up on it)17:34
michaelxinnkinder: thanks17:34
tmcpeakok cool, nkinder want to have a triage party on these others?17:34
nkinderyeah17:34
nkinderwe can do that on the main IRC channel17:34
tmcpeakok cool, reach out to me early your time17:34
tmcpeakI'm in deep-dark Europe ATM17:35
tmcpeak#topic Security-Docs17:35
*** openstack changes topic to "Security-Docs (Meeting topic: security)"17:35
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC17:35
tmcpeaksicarie: whattttup?17:35
sicarieStill not much in that front17:35
*** dtynan has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:36
sicarieI think the case studies were merged, there might be one outstanding17:36
elmikowe've got some nice checklists shaping up =)17:36
sicarie+117:36
tmcpeakoooh, I like checklists17:36
sicariepdesai has put together a good framework for the checklists17:36
sicarienext step is still get leaf version pushed as soon as possible17:36
tmcpeaka checklist checklist? :P17:36
sicariethat's really it for the guide ATM17:36
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
tmcpeakok cool17:37
sicariewell, how else will you know if you completed all the checklists?17:37
tmcpeakI guess we'll need a checklists checklist checklist17:37
tmcpeak#topic Specs17:37
sicarie+1 i'll open a bug17:37
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs (Meeting topic: security)"17:37
tmcpeakhttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/security-specs,n,z17:37
tmcpeakwut is this17:37
tmcpeakI see a lot of dg_ on this17:38
tmcpeakdg_ wut is this17:38
elmikonice to see some specs17:38
*** ikutukov has quit IRC17:38
tmcpeakdg, dg, anchor, dg, anchor...17:38
dg_looks like the specs repo to me17:38
tmcpeakyesss17:38
elmikoit's only like 3 specs from dg_ ...17:39
tmcpeakbut they're 3 of the first 4, so17:39
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
tmcpeakthis feels like a dg project17:39
dg_we use specs to define ideas for things we want to build17:39
* elmiko thinks tmcpeak is hitting the sangria early tonight... ;P17:39
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
tmcpeak:P17:39
tmcpeakwonderufl17:39
tmcpeakwonderful17:39
dg_elmiko its 5 o clock somewhere17:39
tmcpeakok, I have nothing else witty to say about this17:39
elmiko+117:39
tmcpeakit's 6:40 here17:39
tmcpeak:#17:39
tmcpeakso… next item?17:39
tmcpeakor does anybody want to talk about specs?17:40
*** qwebirc51097 has quit IRC17:40
dg_we should probably close those specs17:40
tmcpeak#topic Syntribos17:40
elmikoor get some more reviews on them?17:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Syntribos (Meeting topic: security)"17:40
tmcpeakmichaelxin, ccneil: what's up with Syntribox?17:40
*** apetrich has quit IRC17:40
michaelxinwill work on it next week17:40
tmcpeakgeeze, can't type17:40
tmcpeak5:00 or not17:40
dg_at least some of them, i think we are done bikshedding killick, and my anchor spec merged a month back17:40
michaelxinno update this week.17:40
tmcpeakok fair enough17:41
tmcpeakok cool17:41
*** memogarcia has quit IRC17:41
tmcpeakmy favorite topic17:41
tmcpeak#topic PR17:41
*** openstack changes topic to "PR (Meeting topic: security)"17:41
tmcpeakok guys, we have some good material17:41
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC17:41
tmcpeakbetween the slide deck, the graphics that michaelxin has spearheaded getting for us..17:41
tmcpeaklet's roll some recruiting :)17:41
tmcpeakwe have a few teams set up17:41
tmcpeakfirst meeting is on the books in Seattle17:41
tmcpeaktangible action items are god17:42
michaelxinAre we ok with the logo?17:42
tmcpeakwow17:42
tmcpeakgood17:42
tmcpeakmichaelxin: link again?17:42
michaelxinI am thinking about printing some stikcers17:42
elmikomichaelxin: i like the shield logo that was used on the flag for the flyer17:42
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:42
michaelxinhttp://5a6aa6580e900b8e8020-e5e45c5cb10329ebc9fb69948bb1b1a5.r65.cf1.rackcdn.com/ossp-badge-logo-01.png17:42
*** tristanC has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
elmikoyea, that one. +1 for stickers17:43
michaelxinhttp://5a6aa6580e900b8e8020-e5e45c5cb10329ebc9fb69948bb1b1a5.r65.cf1.rackcdn.com/ossp-flag-flyer_v3.pdf17:43
tmcpeakmichaelxin: I really like this17:43
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
michaelxinelmiko: I thought you like the pirate one?17:43
tmcpeakI remember a pirate one I also like17:43
tmcpeakbknudson: how are you doing with setting something up17:43
elmikohehe, well yea... but for general use, you know, we need something more "official"17:43
tmcpeakredrobot, michaelxin: same17:43
bknudsontmcpeak: I haven't made any progress.17:43
tmcpeakbknudson: ok anything I can help with?17:44
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC17:44
michaelxinok17:44
bknudsontmcpeak: not that I can think of17:44
michaelxinI will print some stickers17:44
tmcpeakmy boss, mr. chair6 is deeply busy ATM, so we're probably relying mostly on sicarie for Seattle17:44
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:44
tmcpeakbknudson: ok, can you sign up for a few presos this week you think?17:44
tmcpeakI'll sign up for some in the bay17:44
wayward710Out of curiousity, is the logo still readable at small scale, and does that matter?17:45
tmcpeakwayward710: how small?17:45
bknudsontmcpeak: presos?17:45
tmcpeakit's a PNG so should scale17:45
elmikowayward710: good question17:45
tmcpeakbknudson: yeah, basically we want to present what the security group is to OpenStack folks, security folks, and college students in your area17:45
sicarietmcpeak: I went through the deck yesterday17:45
elmikoi'm guessing that png was generated from an svg though, it kinda looks like it17:45
tmcpeakMinnesnowda or bust17:46
sicarieI can speak well to anything on there except Syntribos - I need to spend some time in that17:46
sicariedid we want to add ansible to the deck as well? Or the presenter notes?17:46
elmikonot a bad idea17:46
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:46
elmikohow does ansible fit into the greater security project though?17:46
tmcpeakI'd love to, I think Ansible is one of the cooler projects… I'll try to find mhayden and see if he's interested in adding something17:46
tmcpeaksicarie: good idea17:46
wayward710I understand that vector graphics do well with scaling -- I just meant if you needed a smallish version of the logo -- say something that would fit in a 200x200 box, would you be able to read the lettering?17:47
elmikoaside from securing it, we haven't talked much about our approach to using ansible17:47
sicarieelmiko: mostly the ansible-security effort17:47
elmikowayward710: yea, i'm guessing it would not be very readable at those resolutions17:47
bknudsontmcpeak: I'll have to see what kind of meetups are going on. I don't know if I'm going to have time for this.17:47
redrobotI passed out flyers at a security meetup in SA last night17:47
bknudsonthis week anyways17:47
redrobotnot sure if anyone came out though17:47
elmikowayward710: honestly though, for a micro version of the logo we could probably drop the lettering and just go with the shield, leaves, and openstack logo17:48
elmikomichaelxin: ^^17:48
tmcpeakbknudson: ok fair enough17:48
tmcpeakif we an do Seattle, the Bay, Texas, and UK I'm happy17:48
tmcpeakdg_; you still around?17:48
*** numans has quit IRC17:48
*** mrmartin has quit IRC17:48
elmikosicarie, tmcpeak, re: ansible, i think we should have a stronger user story about ansible usage before we start including it17:48
tmcpeakelmiko: have you seen the Ubuntu secure deployment stuff?17:49
elmikotmcpeak: yea, i've seen some cool stuff about using ansible, i just havent' heard any of it coming from ossp17:49
*** jckasper has quit IRC17:49
tmcpeakmhayden has mostly done it on his own17:49
elmikoi think we should increase our messaging, if that means including it in the presos. cool, but we should have more to our message.17:49
tmcpeakif he's willing though we can mention it in our security presentation17:50
tmcpeakelmiko: solid point17:50
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
tmcpeaklet me synch with him and see how interested he is in making it a security project17:50
tmcpeakok cool17:50
tmcpeak#topic AOB17:50
elmikoif we go down this path, we should help to generate information about how folks can get involved with deploying openstack through ansible17:50
*** openstack changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: security)"17:50
elmikothere was a really nice talk at summit about it too17:51
tmcpeakthe openstack stuff?17:51
tmcpeakerr17:51
tmcpeakansible stuff?17:51
elmikoyea, using ansible to deploy17:51
tmcpeakthat project is doing some awesome stuff17:51
tmcpeakafter the Bandit baseline is merged I'm going to set up a vagrant deploy for it17:51
elmikocheck this one out, #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/videos/presentation/life-without-devstack-upstream-development-with-osad17:52
tmcpeakwe've been interested in some STIG-y stuff, I'm sure some of your orgs are as well17:52
*** pino|work has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
tmcpeakthe ansible stuff is a good solution for that17:52
elmikoyea, seems really nice17:53
tmcpeakok cool, so I think that's a wrap for this week?17:53
*** memogarcia has quit IRC17:53
elmikonothing else from me17:53
*** cindy_ has quit IRC17:53
tmcpeaknext week I'll hopefully have confirmed dates for bay area meetups17:53
tmcpeak#endmeeting17:54
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:54
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 12 17:54:00 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:54
*** sdake has quit IRC17:54
tmcpeakThanks everybody!17:54
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2015/security.2015-11-12-17.00.html17:54
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2015/security.2015-11-12-17.00.txt17:54
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2015/security.2015-11-12-17.00.log.html17:54
tmcpeakhave a good week17:54
*** sicarie has quit IRC17:54
*** wayward710 has quit IRC17:54
*** tmcpeak has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** derekh has quit IRC17:54
ccneillo/17:54
*** ccneill has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** iyamahat has quit IRC17:55
*** nkinder has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** crobertsrh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** tmckay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** huichun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
elmiko#startmeeting sahara18:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 12 18:00:09 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is elmiko. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'sahara'18:00
elmikohi all18:00
AndreyPavlovhi)18:00
crobertsrhhel\o18:00
*** dg_ has quit IRC18:00
elmiko#topic roll call18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:00
huichunhello18:00
vgridnevhi18:00
NikitaKonovalovo/18:00
elmikowe'll give folks a minute or 2 =)18:00
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
elmikoeveryone recovered from summit?18:01
crobertsrhalmost18:01
*** neilus has quit IRC18:01
elmikook, let's get rolling18:01
elmiko#topic sahara@horizon status (crobertsrh, vgridnev)18:01
*** openstack changes topic to "sahara@horizon status (crobertsrh, vgridnev) (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:01
elmikoanything to report?18:02
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
crobertsrhSeveral patches available for review, not much action.18:02
elmikoi -1'd something yesterday =)18:02
crobertsrhHopefully, we can start moving on our repo move someday soon.18:02
vgridnevI have nothing at this topic today.18:02
elmiko+118:02
crobertsrhelmiko:  Yes, I noticed that18:02
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
elmikoi think we can probably move this topic down further in our agenda too18:03
NikitaKonovalovcrobertsrh: anything stopping us from doing it now, rather the pushing patches to horizon?18:03
elmikoor, we should once we separate the repos18:03
elmikogood question NikitaKonovalov18:03
tmckayI think the sooner, the better.  Same pain, might as well do it early18:04
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
tmckayassuming agreement from the horizon folks18:04
crobertsrhI believe that david-lyle was doing a bit of work/poking on what the extraction would take.  I need to follow up with him.18:04
elmikocool18:04
NikitaKonovalovok18:04
elmikoshould we start to develop an etherpad to lay out our strategy for migrating to a new repo?18:04
tmckay#action croberts to follow up with dlyle on sahara repo extraction18:04
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC18:04
* tmckay hopes he did that right18:05
crobertsrhI'll follow-up first, and see how much or how little is involved18:05
elmikoor really, crobertsrh, would you be willing to work on an etherpad for migration?18:05
elmikoor NikitaKonovalov, or vgridnev18:05
elmikoi think we should have some sort of plan we can all look at18:06
tmckay+118:06
tmckayit can be a placeholder at first, containing feedback from dlyle18:06
elmikowho's willing to take an action on this one... ?18:06
elmikoyea, that works18:06
crobertsrhI will18:07
elmikocool, thanks18:07
crobertsrhsorry..was fighting devstack18:07
elmikolets ammend that previous action18:07
elmiko#undo18:07
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Action object at 0x972d210>18:07
tmckaywhat??? devstack?18:07
* pino|work sees devstack doing a supplex and beating crobertsrh once again18:07
elmiko#action crobertsrh to followup with david-lyle about separating sahara ui, and create an etherpad for migration plans18:07
elmikook, thanks18:08
*** nadya has quit IRC18:08
elmiko#topic News/Updates18:08
*** egafford has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
*** openstack changes topic to "News/Updates (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:08
elmikoso, what's everyone working on?18:08
tmckayI put up a spec for smoothing overlap between is_default and is_protected, +2s just needs a merge18:09
vgridnevI am working on collecting nice-to-have changes for stable/liberty and make backports18:09
egaffordThrowing around and testing image generation possibilities; should start posting specs by EONW.18:09
huichunFix some unit test on edp engine18:09
tmckay#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241773/18:09
*** jichen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
NikitaKonovalovStill in internal performance testing18:09
AndreyPavlovfew patches to client from me18:09
elmikoi'm getting back into improved secret storage, and starting for the next phase of apiv218:09
*** dkalleg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
crobertsrhI've been doing shares on active clusters18:10
tmckayalso, I am thinking about a spec to allow "is_public" to be set even if "is_protected" is set.  Thinking about UI workflow, public should just be a checkbox you can toggle without unprotect/toggle/re-protect18:10
elmikotmckay: looks like egafford gave that a +A18:10
tmckaywhat do you all think?  ^^18:10
tmckayif such a spec will be dead-on-arrival, I won't bother writing it18:10
*** ysm has quit IRC18:10
elmiko#topic is_public/is_protected18:10
*** openstack changes topic to "is_public/is_protected (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:10
tmckayis_public is just meta-info, not object content18:10
elmikothe floor is yours tmckay18:11
*** memogarcia has quit IRC18:11
vgridnevtmckay, FYI there is already an change that implements acl operations from ui https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239671/18:11
elmikotmckay: only the owner would be able to set is_public?18:11
tmckayyes18:12
tmckayvgridnev, how does it handle this?18:12
tmckayfrom the CLI, I had to unprotect, change public, reprotect18:12
tmckayseems unnecessary18:12
tmckayif a payload contains only "is_public", I think we should honor it (as long as the tenant check passes"18:13
*** ikutukov has quit IRC18:13
elmikoi don't have an objection to the owner being able to set is_public on a protected resource18:13
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
vgridnevYou can create is_public / protected object and also can make updates of these fields for several templates in 1 click18:13
vgridnevtemplates -> objects18:14
tmckayvgridnev, but what if public is false on a protected object, and I want to set public true18:14
elmikohow is it implemented, does it unprotect/set public/reprotect?18:14
tmckayI have to set protected = false, public = true, submit, then set protected = true, submit again, right?18:14
egaffordThinking about it, we need protected objects to be able to be made public while protected; otherwise there's a window in which they are freely editable.18:14
tmckaythat's two forms to turn on public18:15
tmckayegafford, also true18:15
elmikoegafford: +118:15
egaffordCould be pretty suboptimal.18:15
vgridnevtmckay, there is no way to do so, because of restrictions on sahara side18:15
elmikoit's all metadata anyways, this operation should be allowed by the owner18:15
*** edwardb has quit IRC18:15
tmckayvgridnev, right, which is what my spec will fix! :)18:15
elmikovgridnev: right, tmckay is proposing we make a change on sahara18:15
egaffordI suppose there are potential issues with making a public, protected object non-public (what if someone needs it?)18:15
tmckayvgridnev, do you think it's a good idea?18:15
*** memogarcia has quit IRC18:16
tmckayegafford, up to the owner.  That can happen now.18:16
elmikoegafford: ooh, good point18:16
egaffordBut I don't think this affects that problem (the owner can just unprotect and the unpublish anyway.)18:16
egaffordtmckay: Right.18:16
tmckaywe could put a reference check on it, I suppose. maybe a different spec/bug18:16
elmikoas long as it's limited to the owner, i think it's a good change18:16
vgridnevLooks good for owner, I think18:16
egaffordBest practice should probably be to copy public resources if you strictly depend on them.18:17
elmikotmckay: i wouldn't do the reference check. that way lies madness18:17
tmckayokay.  It sounds like there is support, so I'll write it up.  Should be a short, simple spec18:17
tmckayegafford, ack18:17
egaffordelmiko: +1 to the maw of refs.18:17
elmikoegafford: agreed about the copy18:17
tmckayelmiko, alright, we can change topics, I got the warm fuzzies I was hoping for18:17
*** Zhongjun has quit IRC18:17
elmikocool18:17
*** sdake has quit IRC18:18
elmiko#topic post summit recap18:18
*** openstack changes topic to "post summit recap (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:18
elmikoso, we had some really good sessions at summit18:18
elmikoany specific issues that folks would like to discuss from them?18:18
*** vilobhmm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
pino|worki have few questions about the image generation session, but if it is too long i can always pestt^W anno^W ask egafford later18:19
elmikogo ahead pino|work, ask away =)18:19
pino|work * Idempotent steps capable of creating an image either before or after nova spawn18:20
pino|work(reading from the pad)18:20
pino|workwhat does the above mean?18:20
egaffordpino|work: Essentially, we came to "we are slightly concerned about switching away from DIB or from DIB style elements, but we are agreed that we need an engine that reproducibly works. We also all want to move image generation into the API itself and make image gen process part of each plugin, and make sure that we can run the same logic to pack images as we can to build from clean images."18:20
egaffordpino|work: Essentially that last bit.18:21
*** bnemec has quit IRC18:21
pino|workso no more a single script/repo for all the image types?18:21
egaffordBasically, we want to make sure that we can pack images that the plugins can test to make sure they're up to spec, build them out further if they're not right, or use them as-is if they are.18:21
egaffordThat probably means enforcing idempotence (or at least check-then-act) in all cases.18:22
egaffordpino|work: That's certainly what SergeyLukjanov and I agreed should probably happen. We really only get version mismatch that way, and moving it into plugins lets us eventually make a 1-click build image button in OpenStack itself.18:23
egaffordEspecially as our options grow, we'll want to expose that ability to public cloud users easily.18:23
pino|workaha, i see18:23
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:23
pino|workbut still leaving the possibility for pre-built images, right?18:24
egaffordIn the end, if we go to plugins-as-real-plugins-in-separate-repos, we won't be able to support a single repo for images anyway.18:24
egaffordYes, absolutely.18:24
huichunegafford: so we will not have a repo for all images?18:24
egaffordhuichun: It doesn't really scale to n plugins and it introduces versioning issues besides, and it doesn't help us build image gen into our actual flow.18:25
egaffordhuichun: So eventually, yeah, I think that's the direction we want to go as of the summit discussion.18:25
*** iyamahat has quit IRC18:26
elmikoi suppose, as long as we can run sahara in an isolate mode and still generate images that would be cool18:26
egaffordelmiko: Yup.18:26
sreshetnyakif OpenStack environment doesn't have internet access, how build image?18:26
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:26
elmikoit would be a loss, imo, if you need to have a full openstack cloud going to generate images18:26
*** memogarcia has quit IRC18:26
*** eilert has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:26
egaffordsreshetnyak: If the whole OpenStack env doesn't, then yeah, we can't.18:26
elmikosreshetnyak: good question18:26
pino|workegafford: is this break-up of the image generations also matching a potential break-up of the plugins in own repos?18:26
egaffordpino|work: It's a foundational step to help breaking up plugins into their own repos.18:27
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:29
NikitaKonovalovso the envs w/o internet we can have images published somewhere18:29
egaffordsreshetnyak: I believe that we'll likely want to provide a command-line wrapper around the image gen process as well, so that folks can build images anywhere if they don't want to on OpenStack.18:29
elmikothis process still has a long way to go though, we don't even have a spec to beat around yet18:30
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
elmikoany other topics related to summit?18:30
egaffordelmiko: Yeah, I expect the spec to have the tar beaten out of it (validly.)18:30
elmikoegafford: +118:31
sreshetnyakegafford, SIE is a good command line wrapper for building images18:31
elmikopino|work: did you have other questions?18:31
pino|workelmiko: not at the moment, thanks (egafford too)18:31
egaffordsreshetnyak: :)18:31
elmikonp18:31
elmikoso, i have a question related to the improved secret store. this came up at summit and ideally i'd love to hear from SergeyLukjanov, but i'm curious what the group thinks...18:32
elmikoso, i'm wrapping the castellan configuration options18:32
elmikopreviously, i had been exposing them, but SergeyLukjanov recommended that we wrap them in sahara specific options18:32
elmikois it ok if i just create a sahara specific config option like "use_barbican_key_manager"?18:33
elmikoinstead of using castellan's api specific class config18:33
*** dustins has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
egaffordelmiko: If you can wrap it in a single boolean without losing functionality that we need, that's great.18:34
tmckayhmm, if we're wrapping castellan, I don't see why not18:34
crobertsrhYeah, single boolean is lovely18:34
egaffordelmiko: Less burden on the user. Question, though, is what we lose.18:34
elmikoi'm thinking about how to make it simple for a deployer18:34
tmckayhiding is hiding, after all18:34
elmikoi guess is an infra issue that is starting to get traction, in terms of wrapping config options for libraries instead of exposing them18:34
egaffordelmiko: +1 if we can do it. One man's hiding is another man's encapsulation.18:35
elmikoit's a tough issue with regard to oslo.config18:35
elmikook, thanks. next question, should i update the spec to reflect these changes?18:35
elmiko(just for completeness sake)18:35
elmikoi'm fine not updating it, but wanted to see if there were any objectsions18:36
elmikoobjections even18:36
elmikook, then... any other summit related topics?18:37
*** bana_k has quit IRC18:37
tmckayminor detail, I think you can skip spec update18:37
tmckaycomment it in the change18:37
elmikoyea, will do. plus i'm writing docs as well18:37
*** mrmartin has quit IRC18:37
elmiko#topic apiv218:37
*** openstack changes topic to "apiv2 (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:37
elmikojust wanted to bring this up18:38
*** diazjf has quit IRC18:38
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
elmikowe had some great discussion at summit about the path forward, but it will require input from the group18:38
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
elmikoi'd like to ask everyone to take a look at the etherpad and the review18:38
elmiko#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-mitaka-apiv218:38
elmiko#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212172/18:38
elmikoin the next few weeks i will be trimming the list of changes and looking to update the spec18:39
tmckaywill do18:39
elmikoif you have any comments or suggestions for the first draft of apiv2, please add them18:39
tmckayI'll add the job type name change stuff there too18:39
elmikoawesome, thanks!18:39
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:39
*** svinota has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:39
tmckayMapReduce -> map-reduce18:39
tmckaymore openstacky18:39
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC18:39
elmikoi'll add a section at the bottom of the etherpad for suggestions18:39
tmckayor just mapreduce in that case, maybe, but you get the idea18:40
elmikoyea18:40
elmiko#topic Open Discussion18:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:40
elmikoany other business or topics?18:41
crobertsrhnothing from me18:41
NikitaKonovalovnothing from me either18:41
elmikogoing once...18:42
elmikotwice...18:42
vgridnevstable guardians, please review the stable/liberty changes https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/sahara+branch:stable/liberty,n,z18:42
elmiko#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/sahara+branch:stable/liberty,n,z18:42
elmikogood point, thanks vgridnev18:42
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
*** EmilienM has quit IRC18:42
vgridnevalso, please note that we need release notes modifications in stable branch now18:43
elmikois there a guide for that vgridnev ?18:43
vgridnev#link  http://docs.openstack.org/developer/reno/usage.html#creating-new-release-notes18:44
elmikothanks18:44
*** IlyaG has quit IRC18:44
tmckayelmiko, good meeting18:44
elmikoif nothing else, let's take back 15 minutes =)18:45
elmikogoing once...18:45
tmckay+118:45
elmikotwice...18:45
elmikoSOLD!18:45
elmikothanks all18:45
elmiko#endmeeting18:45
egaffordBye!18:45
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:45
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 12 18:45:37 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:45
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2015/sahara.2015-11-12-18.00.html18:45
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2015/sahara.2015-11-12-18.00.txt18:45
*** cathR has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:45
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2015/sahara.2015-11-12-18.00.log.html18:45
huichunbye18:45
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:45
*** crobertsrh has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:47
*** gomarivera_ has quit IRC18:49
*** pino|work has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** Leom has quit IRC18:50
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away18:50
*** dustins has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
*** yamahata has quit IRC18:50
*** sdake has quit IRC18:51
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC18:51
*** AndreyPavlov has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
*** tonytan_brb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
*** gyee has quit IRC18:56
*** Piet has quit IRC18:57
*** angdraug has quit IRC18:58
*** memogarcia has quit IRC18:58
*** minwang2 has quit IRC18:58
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC18:59
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** tonytan_brb has quit IRC19:01
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** pballand has quit IRC19:02
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
*** zns has quit IRC19:06
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:06
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
amitgandhinz#startmeeting Poppy Weekly Meeting19:08
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC19:08
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 12 19:08:13 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is amitgandhinz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:08
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:08
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:08
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'poppy_weekly_meeting'19:08
amitgandhinz#topic Roll Call19:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:08
malinio/19:08
tonytan4evero/19:08
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:08
*** neilus has quit IRC19:08
*** kebray has quit IRC19:08
*** Piet has quit IRC19:09
amitgandhinz#link Agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Poppy19:09
amitgandhinz#topic Last Week Today19:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Last Week Today (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:10
amitgandhinz#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/poppy_weekly_meeting/2015/poppy_weekly_meeting.2015-11-05-19.15.html19:10
amitgandhinzamitgandhinz to add the poppy talk link to the wiki page19:10
amitgandhinzthis is done19:10
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
amitgandhinz#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Poppy/Talks#OpenStack_Tokyo_Conference_.28Oct_2015.2919:10
cathRo/19:11
malinicathR: \o/19:11
amitgandhinz#topic Update on Mitaka Cycle19:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Update on Mitaka Cycle (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:11
cathR:)19:11
amitgandhinz#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/poppy/mitaka19:11
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:11
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
*** egafford has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
amitgandhinztonytan4ever: update on the 3 SSL blueprints?19:11
tonytan4everI'd leave it for In Good Progress.19:12
amitgandhinzok19:12
amitgandhinzmalini: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/poppy/+spec/gate-api-tests19:12
malinihaven't started on tht yet19:12
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
*** mkmad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
maliniwill get to it soon19:13
amitgandhinzok i dont believe any of the other blueprints are being worked on yet etither =(19:13
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:14
amitgandhinzwe need a bp for the analytics story19:14
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:15
amitgandhinz#action amitgandhinz to create the story for CDN analytics drivers19:15
amitgandhinz#topic Open Discussion19:16
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:16
*** iyamahat has quit IRC19:17
amitgandhinzok one of the things i want to start doing is tagging releasable code19:17
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:17
tonytan4ever+119:17
amitgandhinzso when the branch is stable and we know the tests are passing etc, we tag the branch and operators can deploy it19:17
mkmadSounds good.19:18
amitgandhinzthis is in line with some of the stuff discussed in Tokyo19:18
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:18
amitgandhinzim still trying to figure out the process but you should start seeing this happen shortly19:18
amitgandhinzok anything else anyone want to chat about?19:18
malininothing from me19:19
tonytan4everI am good as well.19:19
amitgandhinzok in that case, thanks everyone19:19
amitgandhinz#endmeeting19:19
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:19
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 12 19:19:58 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:20
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/poppy_weekly_meeting/2015/poppy_weekly_meeting.2015-11-12-19.08.html19:20
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/poppy_weekly_meeting/2015/poppy_weekly_meeting.2015-11-12-19.08.txt19:20
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/poppy_weekly_meeting/2015/poppy_weekly_meeting.2015-11-12-19.08.log.html19:20
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC19:20
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz19:20
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz19:21
*** achanda has quit IRC19:21
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:21
*** cathR has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:21
*** iyamahat has quit IRC19:22
*** iben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:22
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:22
*** monester has quit IRC19:22
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:22
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:23
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz19:25
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC19:25
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz19:25
*** Aish has quit IRC19:26
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:27
*** bana_k has quit IRC19:27
*** memogarcia has quit IRC19:27
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:27
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:30
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:33
*** iben has quit IRC19:35
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:37
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:39
*** angdraug has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed19:41
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC19:41
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:41
*** ijw has quit IRC19:43
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:44
*** tkelsey has quit IRC19:45
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:46
*** nadya has quit IRC19:47
*** greghaynes_ has quit IRC19:47
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:47
*** sdake has quit IRC19:49
*** minwang2 has quit IRC19:49
*** greghaynes_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:51
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:52
*** iyamahat has quit IRC19:52
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC19:52
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:54
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:57
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
*** malini has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** mkmad has quit IRC20:02
*** ihrachys has quit IRC20:03
*** artur has quit IRC20:04
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** matbu has quit IRC20:08
*** edwardb has quit IRC20:09
*** matbu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:10
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC20:12
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:13
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:13
*** sdake_ has quit IRC20:14
*** mat-lowery has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:17
*** tkelsey has quit IRC20:18
*** esheffield_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:20
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:20
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:21
*** hemanth has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:21
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC20:22
*** diazjf has quit IRC20:22
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** dprince has quit IRC20:24
*** kfarr has quit IRC20:24
*** mestery has quit IRC20:24
*** diazjf has quit IRC20:27
*** matbu has quit IRC20:27
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
*** diazjf has quit IRC20:28
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:29
*** matbu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:30
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC20:31
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:32
*** iyamahat has quit IRC20:32
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:36
*** mkmad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:36
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:36
*** ijw has quit IRC20:37
*** numans has quit IRC20:38
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:40
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:40
*** nadya has quit IRC20:43
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC20:43
*** merooney has quit IRC20:44
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:45
*** memogarcia has quit IRC20:46
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:46
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC20:48
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:48
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC20:48
*** bgaifullin has quit IRC20:49
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC20:51
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:51
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:52
*** sdake has quit IRC20:54
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:54
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
*** huichun has quit IRC20:55
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
*** memogarcia has quit IRC20:57
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** iyamahat has quit IRC20:59
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:00
*** mkmad has quit IRC21:02
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC21:02
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC21:03
*** jichen has quit IRC21:07
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC21:08
*** jprovazn has quit IRC21:08
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** banix has quit IRC21:13
*** merooney has quit IRC21:13
*** mkmad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:15
*** shelleea007 has quit IRC21:16
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:16
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:17
*** sdake has quit IRC21:17
*** Aish has quit IRC21:21
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:22
*** artur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:22
*** achanda has quit IRC21:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:24
*** stevemar_ has quit IRC21:25
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:25
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:26
*** achanda has quit IRC21:26
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
*** tvvcox has quit IRC21:27
*** iyamahat has quit IRC21:30
*** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** pvaneck has quit IRC21:32
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC21:32
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:35
*** tkelsey has quit IRC21:36
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:37
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:37
*** jmckind has quit IRC21:38
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** matbu has quit IRC21:38
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:39
*** jmckind has quit IRC21:39
*** shardy has quit IRC21:39
*** mbu3 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC21:40
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC21:42
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC21:43
*** jmckind has quit IRC21:46
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:46
*** tellesnobrega is now known as tellesnobrega_af21:47
*** iyamahat_ has quit IRC21:47
*** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:48
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:48
*** memogarcia has quit IRC21:48
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:49
*** jhesketh has quit IRC21:50
*** bswartz has quit IRC21:50
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** iben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** jhesketh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:53
*** achanda has quit IRC21:54
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** ikutukov has quit IRC21:55
*** zeih has quit IRC21:56
*** memogarcia has quit IRC21:58
*** iben has quit IRC22:04
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:05
*** vilobhmm has quit IRC22:05
*** vgridnev has quit IRC22:05
*** vilobhmm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:05
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC22:05
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:05
*** vilobhmm has quit IRC22:06
*** ddmitriev1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
*** iyamahat_ has quit IRC22:07
*** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:10
*** bookwar has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:12
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC22:13
*** IlyaG has quit IRC22:14
*** julim has quit IRC22:14
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:16
*** minwang2 has quit IRC22:19
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:19
*** Aish has quit IRC22:19
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:19
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:19
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:22
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:23
*** mkmad has quit IRC22:23
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:23
*** dims has quit IRC22:25
*** maxabidi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:26
*** zeih has quit IRC22:26
*** tmckay has quit IRC22:27
*** jckasper has quit IRC22:29
*** svinota has quit IRC22:30
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:33
*** crc32 has quit IRC22:35
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:36
*** crc32 has quit IRC22:39
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:39
*** iyamahat_ has quit IRC22:40
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:41
*** memogarcia has quit IRC22:43
*** sdake_ has quit IRC22:44
*** kaisers has quit IRC22:45
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:49
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC22:49
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:49
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:50
*** jecarey_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:52
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC22:54
*** edtubill has quit IRC22:55
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:55
*** zeih has quit IRC22:56
*** jecarey_ has quit IRC22:56
*** kaisers has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:56
*** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:56
*** stevemar_ has quit IRC22:59
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa22:59
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC23:00
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC23:01
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** memogarcia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:03
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC23:03
*** crc32 has quit IRC23:03
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:04
*** neelashah has quit IRC23:04
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:05
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC23:07
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:07
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:07
*** artur has quit IRC23:09
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC23:09
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:10
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC23:12
*** jckasper has quit IRC23:12
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:12
*** obondarev has quit IRC23:14
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:15
*** memogarcia has quit IRC23:16
*** Aish has quit IRC23:18
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:19
*** gyee has quit IRC23:19
*** cknight has quit IRC23:20
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC23:20
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:21
*** ihrachys has quit IRC23:21
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:23
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC23:23
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:24
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC23:24
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC23:26
*** zeih has quit IRC23:26
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:26
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:26
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:28
*** sdake has quit IRC23:28
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:29
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:30
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:30
*** Leo_ has quit IRC23:31
*** jecarey has quit IRC23:33
*** mkmad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:33
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:43
*** edwardb has quit IRC23:45
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:45
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:48
*** Aish has quit IRC23:50
*** apetrich has quit IRC23:51
*** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:54
*** sankarshan_away has quit IRC23:54
*** achanda has quit IRC23:55
*** zeih has quit IRC23:55
*** harshs has quit IRC23:56
*** e0ne has quit IRC23:56
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz23:56
*** ihrachys has quit IRC23:57
*** sankarshan_away has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57
*** xyang1 has quit IRC23:58
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC23:58
*** sputnik1_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:58
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!