Monday, 2015-11-30

*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:13
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack14:13
bauzasoh oh14:13
bauzaswelcome back, openstack !14:13
*** openstack has quit IRC14:13
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack14:16
*** openstack has quit IRC14:16
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:22
*** openstack has quit IRC14:22
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:23
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack14:23
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
-wolfe.freenode.net- [freenode-info] if you're at a conference and other people are having trouble connecting, please mention it to staff: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#gettinghelp14:35
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack14:35
*** rcurran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
*** rcurran has quit IRC14:36
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack15:43
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC15:47
*** johnsom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
*** scheuran has quit IRC15:49
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away15:50
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
*** tremble has quit IRC15:51
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
*** tedross has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
*** corvus is now known as jeblair15:52
*** amotoki has quit IRC15:53
*** eddie__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** agireud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** thomnico has quit IRC15:54
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
*** rpodolyaka has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** jimbobhickville has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
dims#startmeeting oslo16:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Nov 30 16:00:36 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dims. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
dimscourtesy ping for GheRivero, amotoki, amrith, bknudson, bnemec, dansmith, dhellmann, dougwig, e0ne, flaper87, garyk, harlowja, haypo,16:00
dimscourtesy ping for ihrachyshka, jd__, jecarey, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti, kragniz, lifeless, lintan, ozamiatin, redrobot, rpodolyaka, spamaps16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
dimscourtesy ping for sergmelikyan, sreshetnyak, sileht, sreshetnyak, stevemar, therve, thinrichs, toabctl, viktors, zhiyan, zzzeek, gcb16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'oslo'16:00
ihrachyso/16:00
silehto/16:00
johnsomo/16:00
bknudsonhi16:00
kgiustio/16:00
gcbo/16:00
jecareyo/16:00
harlowja_at_homeyo yo16:01
*** ChrisPriceAB has quit IRC16:01
kragnizo/16:01
dimskick things off :) Welcome to our new oslo core - welcome gcb!!16:01
*** ChrisPriceAB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
rpodolyakao/16:01
kzaitsev_mbo/16:01
silehtgcb, welcome !16:01
bknudsoncongrats to gcb16:01
harlowja_at_homeyaaaa welcome!16:01
bknudsonwell deserved16:01
amrith./16:01
gcbIt's really excited to become an Oslo core reviewer. Thanks, everyone :-).16:01
dhellmanno/16:01
ozamiatin__o/16:01
dhellmannwelcome to the team, gcb!16:01
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:02
dims#topic Red flags for/from liaisons16:02
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Red flags for/from liaisons (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:02
bknudsonnothing for keystone.16:02
johnsomNothing here16:02
johnsom(Though I have been out of the office)16:03
ihrachysjust curious how it goes with deprecation warning on 'obsolete' oslo.messaging driver aliases.16:03
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
dimsliaisons, please take a look at lifeless' openstack-spec for backward compats https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226157/16:03
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
dimslifeless is looking for feedback on that16:03
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
dimsihrachys : don't think we have nailed that yet16:04
johnsomOk, will have a look16:04
dimsthanks bknudson johnsom16:04
dims#topic Releases for Mitaka16:04
dimsDoes anyone need releases today? please file reviews in openstack/releases repo.16:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Releases for Mitaka (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:04
dimsany specific requests for this week?16:05
* harlowja_at_home thinks some people still in turkey coma lol16:05
*** zhangjn has quit IRC16:05
dimsexactly, just wanted to be sure16:06
dims#topic cleanup oslo-incubator16:06
dimsPlease bid fond farewell to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245461/16:06
*** openstack changes topic to "cleanup oslo-incubator (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:06
dimsplease cast your vote to cleanup oslo-incubator code, will +2A it later today!16:06
dimsyay!16:06
harlowja_at_homelol16:06
dimsdhellmann wanted to give it a proper sendoff16:06
harlowja_at_homeha16:06
*** kevinbenton_ has quit IRC16:07
*** apetrich has quit IRC16:07
harlowja_at_homedoes that include a burial at sea?16:07
dhellmannwe all built it, we should all have a role in killing it :-)16:07
dimstreat it as a pirate? :)16:07
bknudsonthe incubator repo still exists?16:07
*** kevinbenton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:07
dhellmannit does still, I think, have some of our tool scripts in it, doesn't it dims?16:08
bknudsonI'm wondering if we delete the repo or the coce16:08
dimsNow, question was, what to replace it with, lifeless to the rescue again16:08
dimsdhellmann yes, just yanking out the code for now16:08
dimswill completely cleanup later in the cycle16:08
dims#topic Policy Spec Review16:08
dims#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247902/ (Replace incubator with unstable libraries.)16:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Policy Spec Review (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:08
dimsbknudson just the code in that review16:08
* harlowja_at_home also not sold on v1, v2...16:09
dimsin the spec review, please note the v1/v2 package names for public api16:09
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
dimsalternatives are very welcome. my alternative is to just say what we did before, "till library is 1.0, anything can change"16:09
harlowja_at_homeya, i like that...16:09
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC16:09
harlowja_at_homethats more normal imho16:09
gcbSo, some useful stuff can move to oslo.*  like #https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249107/16:09
dimsgcb : let's try to keep that to a minimum16:10
*** markvan_ is now known as markvan16:10
bknudsonif the code isn't backwards compatible then how to release without breaking everything?16:10
harlowja_at_homedims, and if a library releases a 1.0 and everything is all broken, well thats why debtcollector exists and such, to make it so that u can change things in a manner that works as people use your library...16:10
dimsbknudson : we file reviews in consumers first and then release16:10
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
dimsjust like we catch backwards incompat bugs today16:11
harlowja_at_home+1 v1/v2/v3 starts to feel like ummm, we can do better... using known patterns of how to do better...16:11
dimsi just did not want to formalize on v1/v2 names as they tend to NOT go away16:11
bknudsonmaybe we'll have caps on libs for tox eventually16:11
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
dimsany way  let's add stuff to the review please16:12
dims#topic Stuck Spec Review16:12
dims#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103825/ (OSprofiler cross service & project profiling)16:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Stuck Spec Review (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:12
dimsboris-42_ is trying really hard to get projects to accept the concept and agree on implementation16:13
*** haypo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:14
dimsplease take a look as this is something that will affect a lot of projects16:14
haypo(crap i forgot the oslo meeting)16:14
harlowja_at_homelol16:14
dimsmy specific feedback was what changes we needed in oslo.messaging and oslo.db, that was not clear to me16:14
dimshaypo : haha16:14
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:15
dimsoslo.messaging was relying on a class that we were yanking out and oslo.db was relying on a global thing that Nova no longer uses16:15
dimsfor examle16:15
dimsexample16:15
rpodolyakadims: I'll take a look at oslo.db part16:15
*** nadya_ has quit IRC16:15
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus16:16
dimsanother point of contention was if we can switch it off completely for projects that do not want it enabled by default16:16
gcbagree, we need a way to disable it16:16
dimsso liaisons, please take a look at the review, there's one in openstack-specs as well i think16:17
dimsboris-42_ : are you around?16:17
* harlowja_at_home although i do wonder if the projects that think they want to enable it don't quite understand how useful it is 16:17
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
dimsjd__ : around?16:17
harlowja_at_home*that think they don't want to enable it16:17
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC16:18
dimsharlowja_at_home : yes, hence the ask for reviews. last time there was significant pushback from nova folks i think16:18
rpodolyakaI didn't look at the spec, but I thought the idea was to have it enabled by default and triggered by special API requests16:19
rpodolyakaso you don't profile all the time16:19
rpodolyakabut you don't have to enable it explicitly and restart the services either16:19
dimsrpodolyaka : right, in the oslo-spec, what does that mean to our libraries16:19
rpodolyakaack, will take a look16:19
dimsthanks!16:19
dims#topic New Spec Review16:19
dims#link https://review.openstack.org/243114 (Pluggable CMDB for oslo.config)16:19
*** openstack changes topic to "New Spec Review (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:19
dims#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247668/ (message compression proposal)16:19
silehtapi call relies of a hmac, if deployer doesn't set the hmac we can't enable it16:20
silehtif we put a default value, we introduce security issue16:20
rpodolyakasileht: got it. thanks!16:20
*** zynzel has quit IRC16:20
dimssileht : interesting16:20
dimssileht what do you think of using driver-supported compression16:20
silehtdims, I like :)16:20
dimssileht, kgiusti : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247668/16:21
dimsozamiatin__ ^^16:21
silehtdims, I was thinking of using msgpack in the past as a new message format, but the compression approach looks better16:21
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
ozamiatin__dims: +1 already)16:21
dimstcammann : i think https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243114/ is ready now16:21
kgiustiinteresting...16:21
dimslxsli : you had looked at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243114/ as well, please take another look16:22
* harlowja_at_home woah we have messages that pass through openstack that are dozens of MB in size :-/16:22
harlowja_at_homesounds like, ummm, that should be fixed, ha16:22
silehtharlowja_at_home, I agree that's ugly16:23
dimskgiusti : one thing that ozamiatin__ and others were looking at was, if we could do a compression before we hit the driver. but apparently some drivers like zmq using pickled stuff16:23
dimsharlowja_at_home : +1000016:23
harlowja_at_homecrazy ugly, lol16:23
dimskgiusti and kombu for example has compression built in16:23
kgiustidims: amqp1 driver doesn't have compression built in16:23
harlowja_at_homewhich messages are these? any idears? (scheduler select * hosts message?)16:24
kgiustidims: so something above the driver would be the only option atm16:24
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:24
lxslidims: re-reviewed that this morning16:24
dimsalso another issue that crops up is rolling upgrades16:24
dimslxsli thanks!16:24
haypowe can just ask some stats on message sizes in a comment on the spec16:25
kgiustidims: IIRC nothing in amqp1 needs access to the msg contents, so pre compressed isn't a problem16:25
dimskgiusti : so would it be ok for some drivers to use "above the driver" and some use "in the driver"?16:25
harlowja_at_homehaypo, +116:25
kgiustidims: we should allow for that IMHO16:25
dimskgiusti : cool, please chime in on the review when you get a chance16:25
sileht about upgrades, just a description of how the driver should take care of the new format should be suffiscient16:25
kgiustidims: will do16:25
dimsdhellmann, harlowja_at_home : would love your input to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243114/16:26
dimsoslo.config changes are scary :)16:26
harlowja_at_homedims, yup, i'll look over that one again, i'm fine with it honestly, it will be interesting to see where it goes,16:26
dhellmanndims : yes, I'm deeply skeptical of this being a good idea16:26
harlowja_at_homelol16:26
haypocan we stop making *everything* pluggable in openstack please?16:27
dimsdhellmann : the idea is for a container to start up say using keystone, and when the container is starting up, it pulls the configuration needed to start itself16:27
*** rhagarty has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:27
harlowja_at_homehaypo, impossible!16:27
dimshaypo : use case ^^16:27
harlowja_at_homelol16:27
haypo(i didn't read the spec)16:27
dhellmannthe central config service becomes a single-point-of-failure for the entire cluster, it introduces all sorts of complexity and synchronicity issues, *and* it doesn't eliminate the need to have client-specific configuration (client id at least) on each node16:27
dhellmanndims : sure, I understand it, I just think it's a bad idea ^^16:28
dimslol :)16:28
dimsplease let's tell them about potential problems :)16:28
dims#topic Open discussion16:29
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:29
dimsAny other stuck reviews?16:29
dimsopen floor16:29
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC16:29
harlowja_at_homeso another option is to have oslo.cmdb or something that provides common cmdb -> oslo.config translators or something16:29
*** baoli has quit IRC16:29
dimsamrith : kzaitsev_mb : kragniz : jecarey : anything from your side?16:30
haypoyes, i would like your opinion on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250731/ "Fix request_id type on Python 3: use text (Unicode)" IHMO my change fixes a bug in oslo.context, but dhellmann  complains (as always) that "i break the API"16:30
silehtIf people can take a look to this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234716/, and tell me if this looks good or not or need a spec to discus16:30
haypomy change only impacts python 3, and i checked most openstack projects, to update them (see the comments and dependency list)16:30
amrithdims, nothing from my side. I thought there was something to bring up last week at the meeting but it turned out to be a false alarm.16:30
dimssileht : does it break API for python 2.7?16:30
kzaitsev_mbdims: nothing here either16:31
* dhellmann refers haypo to the number of library releases in the last year blocked from global-requirements because of breaking API changes16:31
silehtdims, I guess you mean haypo16:31
dimsoops yes16:31
*** xarses has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
*** xarses has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
dimsdhellmann : right16:31
haypodims: my change is specific to python 3, it doesn't change oslo.context on python 216:31
harlowja_at_homesileht, i'll look over for that today16:31
harlowja_at_homehaypo, is python 4 out yet?16:31
dhellmannhaypo : so you're saying that things will only break when applications start trying to port to python 3?16:31
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
dimshaypo : so if we break, we'd break python3 unit tests16:32
haypodhellmann: the major risk is breaking voting python3 jobs16:32
bknudsondon't even joke about python 4.16:32
dimsbknudson : haha16:32
dhellmannhaypo : right.16:32
harlowja_at_home:)16:32
bknudsonI think request ID is bytes is a bug.16:32
bknudsonshould be text16:33
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
dimshaypo : you have looked for and ran tests on lots of projects already right?16:33
dimsamrith : thanks16:34
haypodims: "major" projects yes16:34
dimshaypo : and searched using codesearch.openstack.org too16:34
* harlowja_at_home just learned about codesearch16:35
haypodims: cinder, neutron, nova, ceilometer, heat16:35
dimsharlowja_at_home : that was intentional plug :)16:35
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC16:35
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:35
haypodims: yes. but i'm not sure that my search is enough to find all cases16:35
dimshaypo : let's drop an email to the -dev list as heads up, wait for all the Depends-On to merge that you filed already16:36
haypobknudson: "I think request ID is bytes is a bug. should be text" exactly. oslo.log currents write lines like [b'req-83a6...' 54492... - - -] ...16:36
dimsand then let the change in16:36
haypodims: an email to [all]?16:36
dimshaypo [oslo][all]16:37
lxslidhellmann did offer a way around this16:37
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:37
dimshaypo : what's the counter to doug's work around?16:38
dimsquickly rip off band-aid? :)16:39
haypodims: sorry, which work around?16:39
*** j___ has quit IRC16:39
dimshaypo : "Instead of changing the return type of this function, we could add a new function that returns a unicode string, deprecate the old function, and update all of our applications to use the new one "16:40
haypodims: my problem is the .request_id attribute, i don't care of the generate_request_id() function, i guess that it's not called directly (but i didn't check)16:40
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC16:40
*** snackewm has quit IRC16:40
haypodims: i don't want to deprecate the .request_id, it's like used everyone (i guess)16:40
haypoeverywhere*16:41
dimsack thanks haypo16:41
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:41
dimsany other reviews or things to discuss?16:41
*** achanda_ has quit IRC16:41
lxslidhellmann mentioned a multi-callback system on um...16:41
*** zynzel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
lxslihttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/25142216:42
* harlowja_at_home should try to write up an oslo blog entry soon16:42
dimsharlowja_at_home : ++16:42
harlowja_at_homei swear i'm gonna finally do it! lol16:42
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC16:42
lxsliFrom taskflow. Is that a thing?16:42
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
dhellmannlxsli : yeah, I really  thought at the summit we said we wouldn't put callbacks into oslo.config at all, so I'm surprised to see it growing support for handling multiple callbacks.16:42
*** rvyalov_ has quit IRC16:42
harlowja_at_homelxsli, define thing :-P16:42
harlowja_at_hometaskflow is a thing, ha16:42
lxslidhellmann: I was in Nova meetings the whole summit so please educate me16:43
*** hemanthm_ is now known as hemanthm16:43
dhellmann lxsli : the idea is that since the service-level code receives whatever signal to trigger the config reload, it can handle that, the application updates, and any other libraries at the same time16:43
lxslidhellmann: what's your solution and will it take more than 6 months to achieve?16:43
*** sgotliv has quit IRC16:43
dhellmannlxsli : I'm just saying this code needs to live somewhere else.16:44
lxslidhellmann: OK seems fair - then I'd like to remove the singular hook before oslo.config releases next16:44
dhellmannoslo.config is at the bottom of the stack right now, and we don't want to make it really complicated16:44
harlowja_at_homelxsli, http://docs.openstack.org/developer/taskflow/types.html#taskflow.types.notifier.Notifier was an idea, but i think we didn't want to go there yet, but maybe people still want to16:44
dhellmannlxsli : yes, I'll +2 that change if you ping me16:44
lxsliwill do, cheers16:44
dhellmanndims : is this what you remember? ^^16:44
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:45
dimsdhellmann : don't recall, will find my notes later16:45
dhellmanndims : ack16:45
dhellmannI'm trying to remember if that was an oslo session, or if it was the cross-project session on reloading config data. Probably the latter.16:45
dimsdhellmann : yes, it was probably the latter16:45
* harlowja_at_home thinks it was the latter16:46
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:46
dimsas i did not attend it LOL16:46
dhellmanndims : oh, right16:46
dhellmannharlowja_at_home : were you in that session? am I remembering correctly?16:46
*** sdake has quit IRC16:46
harlowja_at_homedhellmann, don't think i was, i just heard your results from what i remember16:47
*** carl_baldwin_ is now known as carl_baldwin16:47
harlowja_at_home(your summary)16:47
haypo17:30 < sileht> If people can take a look to this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234716/, and tell me if this looks good or not or need a spec to discus16:47
*** baoli has quit IRC16:48
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
harlowja_at_homehttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cross-project-dynamic-config-services dhellmann dims i think that was the one16:48
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
dimsk let's take this to our channel and let everyone else go.16:49
dimsthanks everyone!16:49
harlowja_at_homenp16:49
dims#endmeeting16:49
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:49
openstackMeeting ended Mon Nov 30 16:49:36 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:49
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2015/oslo.2015-11-30-16.00.html16:49
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2015/oslo.2015-11-30-16.00.txt16:49
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2015/oslo.2015-11-30-16.00.log.html16:49
*** kgiusti has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** harlowja_at_home has quit IRC16:50
*** johnsom has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:51
*** cinerama has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:51
*** jimbobhickville has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** markvan has quit IRC16:59
*** coolsvap has quit IRC17:01
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
*** gcb has quit IRC17:05
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC17:06
*** sdake_ has quit IRC17:06
*** chandankumar has quit IRC17:07
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** ashleighfarnham has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:10
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:10
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:11
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:11
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC17:12
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
*** pnavarro has quit IRC17:13
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:15
*** boris-42_ has quit IRC17:15
*** dsariel has quit IRC17:16
*** neilus has quit IRC17:17
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:17
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:17
*** rebase has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:19
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:26
*** ihrachys has quit IRC17:28
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:28
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC17:30
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
*** chandankumar has quit IRC17:33
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:36
*** nkrinner has quit IRC17:38
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC17:40
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:42
*** egallen has quit IRC17:42
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC17:45
*** markus_z has quit IRC17:50
*** egallen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** egallen has quit IRC17:51
*** egallen_ is now known as egallen17:51
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** achanda has quit IRC17:54
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck17:55
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC17:56
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC18:01
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck18:02
*** derekh has quit IRC18:02
*** nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** jwang_ has quit IRC18:04
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_18:06
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:07
*** shashank_hegde has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
*** jwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** baoli has quit IRC18:14
*** sarob has quit IRC18:14
*** shashank_hegde has quit IRC18:16
*** nurla has quit IRC18:16
*** neilus has quit IRC18:16
*** vkramskikh has quit IRC18:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** ndipanov has quit IRC18:17
*** rm_work has quit IRC18:17
*** sbog has quit IRC18:18
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
*** baoli_ has quit IRC18:18
*** vkramskikh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
*** fungi has quit IRC18:20
*** uli-k has quit IRC18:21
*** nadya_ has quit IRC18:21
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC18:21
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
*** Guest44042 has quit IRC18:22
*** nikhil|afk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
*** rm_work has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:23
*** rods has quit IRC18:23
*** sbog has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:24
*** reed has quit IRC18:24
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:25
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** rods has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:27
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** banix has quit IRC18:29
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
*** catherineD|2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:34
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:36
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
*** nurla has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:43
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** ikutukov has quit IRC18:44
*** shashank_hegde has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** jichen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:48
*** HeOS has quit IRC18:48
*** nurla has quit IRC18:49
*** minwang2 has quit IRC18:49
*** nurla has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
*** shashank_hegde has quit IRC18:51
*** weshay_xchat is now known as weshay18:52
*** vilobhmm11 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
*** pnavarro has quit IRC18:54
*** vilobhmm111 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
*** vilobhmm11 has quit IRC18:58
*** shashank_hegde has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
catherineD|2#startmeeting refstack19:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Nov 30 19:00:41 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is catherineD|2. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: refstack)"19:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'refstack'19:00
catherineD|2roll call19:01
pvanecko/19:01
catherineD|2pvaneck: hi .. maybe a quiet week ...19:02
*** pnavarro has quit IRC19:02
pvaneckyea, maybe. still kinda recovering from my vacation19:02
*** aginwala has quit IRC19:02
catherineD|2#link meeting agenda and notes, please feel free to add items https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-15-11-3019:04
catherineD|2not a lot to discuss today ... just want everyone to review Andrey Pavlov's patch  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249160/19:05
*** sileht has quit IRC19:05
pvaneckso with this, does tempest automatically know about the ec2 tests?19:07
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
pvaneckalso should these additional test requirements be installed by default?19:08
catherineD|2all this should do is to enable external testing whether it is in-tree swift test or ec2 tests or any other in-tree tests19:08
*** egallen has quit IRC19:09
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
catherineD|2that is something we should discuss after review this patch ... this patch should enable external test cases testing which should be configured by the user .... However, in the future if DefCore requirement includes external test then these tests should be installed/configured automatically ..19:12
pvaneckwill need to try it out19:14
pvaneckfor the case of swift, it seems that the additional plugin code is still needed19:14
catherineD|2yea we need to test this out ...19:15
catherineD|2I want to thank Andrey to submit this patch ... it is a good start ..19:15
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC19:19
pvaneckin any case, I think we should review some of the refstack patches as well19:19
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:19
pvaneckand maybe try to get the user association patch in soon19:19
catherineD|2yup19:19
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:20
*** xek has quit IRC19:21
*** egallen has quit IRC19:23
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:23
*** aginwala is now known as aginwala8719:24
*** aginwala87 is now known as aginwala19:24
*** safchain has quit IRC19:24
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:25
catherineD|2pvaneck: it is 25 mins after .. I think we can end the meeting for this week unless you have anything to discuss ?19:26
pvanecknope, all good here19:26
*** mkoderer has quit IRC19:26
catherineD|2ok thanks for joining ...19:26
catherineD|2#endmeeting19:26
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:26
openstackMeeting ended Mon Nov 30 19:26:57 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:26
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2015/refstack.2015-11-30-19.00.html19:26
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2015/refstack.2015-11-30-19.00.txt19:27
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2015/refstack.2015-11-30-19.00.log.html19:27
*** aginwala has quit IRC19:27
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC19:27
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC19:29
*** lisaclark2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:29
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC19:30
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:31
*** lisaclark2 has quit IRC19:31
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:33
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
*** markmcclain has quit IRC19:41
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:41
*** sdake has quit IRC19:43
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC19:43
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:43
*** minwang2 has quit IRC19:47
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** sslypushenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** silos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:54
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck19:56
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
kfarr#startmeeting barbican20:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Nov 30 20:00:05 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kfarr. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:00
*** arunkant_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'barbican'20:00
elmikohello/20:00
kfarrWelcome back from Thanksgiving!20:00
kfarr#topic Roll Call20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:00
arunkant_o/20:00
silos0/20:00
diazjfo/20:00
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
elmikowb to you as well kfarr =)20:01
edtubillo/20:01
*** jhfeng has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
jmckindo/20:01
jhfengo/20:01
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
hockeynuto/20:01
kfarrAs usual, the agenda can be found here:20:01
kfarr#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican20:02
kfarrLots of Barbicaneers today!20:02
kfarr#topic Action Items from last meeting20:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Items from last meeting (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:02
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
kfarr#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2015/barbican.2015-11-23-20.00.log.html20:03
*** alee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** panatl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
aleeo/20:04
kfarrOh, rellerreller just made it20:04
kfarrDid everyone review the federation use cases?20:04
kfarr#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-federation-use-cases20:04
elmikoa little bit, not extensively20:05
kfarrAlright, we'll just keep that action item open20:05
*** pdesai has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:05
kfarr#action everyone review the federation use cases20:05
kfarrThe next action item was to meet to discuss the Castellan context objects20:06
kfarrThere was a good chat with alee, elmiko, and diazjf20:06
elmiko+120:07
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:07
dave-mccowano/20:07
kfarrWas there any follow-up notes or etherpads?20:07
hockeynutdave-mccowan buys the donuts next week :-)20:07
diazjfkfarr, alee, elmiko, Still going over SAML to determine how we should create the Barbican Auth Middleware. I'm planning on updating it soon.20:07
elmikokfarr: none that i've seen20:07
elmikodiazjf: ack20:07
kfarrGreat, thanks diazjf!  Do you have the link to the blueprint handy?20:08
diazjfkfarr, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241068/ but I have yet to update it20:08
kfarrOk, great.  I'll just put that as an action item for next week then20:09
kfarr#action diazjf to update the Barbican context blueprint20:09
kfarr#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241068/20:09
kfarralee, there was another action item from last week about the cinder volume encryption blog post20:10
aleekfarr, yeah -- I'm still working on it ..20:10
kfarralee, ok thanks!  I'll just keep that action item on there because I'm interesting in seeing the finished product!20:11
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
kfarr#action alee to post blog post on testing Cinder volume encryption20:11
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck20:11
kfarrlisaclark1, there was a note last week about hotel recommendations, did you have a chance to pull together a list?20:12
kfarrAlso, lisaclark1 do you have the link to the eventbrite page?20:12
kfarrMaybe lisaclark1 is busy, we'll just keep that on there for next week20:14
kfarr#action lisaclark1 to post links to hotel recommendations and mid-cycle eventbrite link20:14
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:14
kfarrThere was an action for me to work on the next release of Castellan, which is out there, version 0.3.0, so action item completed20:15
kfarrI think that was it for action items20:15
kfarrOn to the meeting items..20:15
kfarr#topic mitaka-1 milestone20:16
*** openstack changes topic to "mitaka-1 milestone (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:16
kfarrOne thing I realized is that all projects need to integrate reno into their codebase before the release can occur20:16
kfarrthere was information on the mailing list about this20:16
kfarrIt's a tool for managing release notes during development.  It's meant to take the burden of managing the release notes off of the release managers20:17
kfarrI gave it a shot at adding it, but reviews would be appreciated.20:17
kfarrWe need to integrate reno before we can cut a release20:18
elmiko#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-November/080694.html20:18
elmikojust fyi20:18
kfarrthanks elmiko!20:18
elmikonp20:18
kfarr#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248918/20:18
kfarr^^ that's the link for adding it to barbican, reviews would be appreciated20:19
elmikoack, added to the queue20:19
kfarrThanks elmiko!20:19
kfarrDoes anyone have any questions about it?  I'm still trying to read up on it myself..20:20
kfarrIf not, we'll move on to the next topic20:20
elmikoseems like a convenient system for release notes20:20
kfarrAlright, next topic20:21
kfarr#topic Castellan logging options20:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Castellan logging options (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:21
kfarrelmiko I think this was yours?20:21
elmikoyea, thanks20:21
elmikoso, the configuring of logging options in castellan is currently causing some downstream issues20:21
elmikonamely, if an application that is using castellan has already configured logging, then calls to key_manager.API() will fail20:22
elmiko#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/castellan/+bug/152126520:22
openstackLaunchpad bug 1521265 in castellan "Log configuration causes error in applications that have already processed configuration arguments" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Fernando Diaz (diazjf)20:22
elmikoi opened that for it, but it got me thinking about logging in castellan in general20:22
elmikoi don't think we should auto config castellan for logging20:22
elmikosince it is a library, we should not be making assumptions about how a user has configured their application20:22
elmikoi think it would be ok to provide a function for convenience, to setup logging where none is already configured, but in general we shouldn't do anything20:23
elmikodiazjf and i talked about this a little, but i wanted to talk with the group about it20:23
kfarrelmiko, that makes sense to me, how do the logging configuration get passed into it then?20:23
*** ihrachys has quit IRC20:23
elmikowell, in general, there is no need to pass in logging configuration.20:24
elmikothe python logging package will be used under the covers, and oslo_log will mediate those configurations20:24
elmikoso, if my application has already configured oslo_log then it should "just work"20:24
kfarrelmiko, that sounds fine to me20:25
*** ikutukov has quit IRC20:25
*** panatl has quit IRC20:25
diazjfkfarr, I'll keep working with elmiko to get a patch up20:25
elmikowe should definitely add to the configuration documentation for castellan to inform users how to setup the castellan log level though20:25
*** egallen has quit IRC20:25
*** panatl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:25
kfarrsounds good to me!20:25
elmikocool20:26
kfarrAlso a +1 from rellerreller20:26
* elmiko waves to rellerreller ;)20:26
kfarrHe says hi back!20:26
elmikonice20:26
kfarrelmiko, is there anything else about this topic, or we can move to the next one20:27
*** tremble has quit IRC20:27
elmikoi don't think so, if no one has objections i'll just keep working with diazjf to get a good solution20:27
elmikobut, we do need to be mindful of getting a patch out20:27
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC20:27
elmikothis has effectively stopped any progress downstream in sahara because of the error20:27
elmikoi imagine other projects would have similar issues20:28
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
kfarrelmiko, I'll be keeping an eye out for when that fix merges so I can cut a new release20:28
diazjfelmiko, I'll try to resolve the bug quickly today and add the documentation after20:28
elmikoack, thanks kfarr and diazjf20:28
kfarris there something we can do in the meantime so sahara isn't blocked?20:28
elmikonot really, it's gonna be slow going. we need to get a patch out, then bump the vers in global reqs. we might want to hold off on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248911/ and wait to bump until 0.3.1 is available?20:29
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:29
kfarrelmiko, that's fair.  It's not passing jenkins anyway, which is another issue20:30
elmikobut, this does dovetail nicely into the next topic ;)20:30
kfarrgot it!20:30
kfarr#topic Castellan integration testing20:30
*** openstack changes topic to "Castellan integration testing (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:30
elmikohey!20:30
elmikoso, while debugging this logging issue it got me thinking about testing castellan20:30
*** achanda has quit IRC20:31
elmikocould we setup some sort of integration testing using the not implemented key manager, or something, to test a full end-to-end usage of castellan?20:31
*** rcurran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:31
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC20:31
kfarrelmiko, what do you mean by full end-to-end usage?20:32
elmikoif we had a couple small sample applications we could emulate the behavior that castellan consumers might expect, and hopefully catch something like this earlier in the future20:32
elmikoso, i can expect that other openstack service controllers might use castellan20:32
elmikothey would be using the common openstack design patterns, which means they would have oslo.log already in place20:33
elmikowe woud have been able to detect the exception during an integration test then20:33
*** stevebaker has quit IRC20:33
elmikoadditionally, we could test out some of the more complex configuration details20:33
elmikoif this sounds interesting, i could try putting together a spec for it. i'm just not sure what we could use to gate it (machine-wise)20:34
*** rcurran has quit IRC20:34
kfarrelmiko, that makes sense, it could be useful.  Do you think it could live with the already existing functional tests?20:35
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC20:35
elmikokfarr: possibly, the current tests just use the unittest harness, right?20:35
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:35
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:35
kfarrYeah, there are unit tests, and then there are functional tests which kind of sound like what you want to do20:36
kfarrbut yeah, they are using the unittest library to run the functional tests20:36
elmikook, i missed the functional tests. i'll take another look at those, maybe it would just fit right in20:36
kfarrelmiko, the functional tests are not running in the gate, but I have a patch up so hopefully they could be20:37
lisaclark1o\20:37
lisaclark1o/20:37
elmikoi was envisioning something like the integration tests where it would deploy castellan and then attempt to run some small applications against the deployment.20:37
elmikokfarr: very cool, sounds like i need to do a little more reading and then figure out what to propose20:37
elmikoshould i use the [barbican] subject or [castellan] to bring this up on the ml?20:38
kfarrelmiko what do you mean deploy castellan?20:38
kfarrelmiko you could use both!20:38
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:38
elmikokfarr: well, i say "deploy" but it mainly just means installing to a venv and creating a config file for the testing applications.20:38
*** neiljerram has quit IRC20:38
elmikoit wouldn't actually use the barbican key manager, it would just use the testing key manager20:39
*** aginwala has quit IRC20:39
elmikoalthough, it might be possible in the future to build out a full barbican test (if needed)20:39
kfarrelmiko I'd be interesting in seeing what that looked like!20:39
elmikobut i envision something more "real world" than the isolation of the unit tests20:40
elmikokfarr: cool!20:40
siloselmiko: it kind of sounds like a devstack instance with barbican and castellan deployed and also some OS service to test against. would that work?20:41
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC20:41
elmikosilos: that would be ultimate, but we could start with something smaller20:41
elmikoin other projects they use devstack, i don't see why we couldn't test castellan in a similar fashion20:42
siloselmiko: that's what I was thinking. Icarus was flying to close to the sun right there.20:42
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:42
elmikosilos: hehe, yea ;)20:42
kfarrelmiko, silos, that is what the functional tests do20:42
kfarrwell, once they're integrated20:42
elmikokfarr: ah, cool. that would be perfect then20:42
elmikokfarr: is there a review up for them now?20:43
kfarrbut they launch devstack with barbican, though it doesn't create the separate os application.20:43
kfarrthe functional tests mimic what an application would do20:43
elmikook, so maybe we just need to build more tests =D20:43
kfarr#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229115/20:44
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
kfarrelmiko +1 (and +1 from rellerreller)20:44
elmikokfarr: awesome, thanks!20:44
elmikokfarr: i'll read through that review and maybe we can just generate some more tests on top of it20:45
kfarrelmiko, ok great!  That review just adds the gate hooks, but they call the functional tests, let me know if you have any questions about it!20:45
elmikoat the very least we can cover the usages and configurations that are suggested by the castellan documentation. it's becoming complicated enough that i think it would be beneficial to potential end-users20:45
lisaclark1hi.  i wanted to add a topic for the midcycle info/registration20:46
kfarrok lisaclark1! elmiko, was there anything else?20:46
elmikokfarr: no, i think we've covered everything i was concerned about. thanks!20:46
kfarrok great!20:46
kfarr#topic midcycle info20:47
*** openstack changes topic to "midcycle info (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:47
kfarrIt's all you lisaclark1!20:47
*** catherineD|2 has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
lisaclark1I added an eventbrite event for barbican midcycle registration20:48
lisaclark1and have also updated the openstack wiki sprints page with some details20:48
lisaclark1#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints20:48
lisaclark1#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/BarbicanMitakaSprint20:48
lisaclark1#link http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-barbican-mitaka-midcycle-tickets-1978467449420:48
lisaclark1I still have the action item (that I saw was also captured earlier) to review preferred hotel options20:49
lisaclark1fin.20:49
kfarrThank you lisaclark!  That's some really great info20:49
kfarrDoes anyone else have anything?20:50
kfarr#topic open discussino20:50
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussino (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:50
pdesaihi kfarr, i had a question for folks on how are they running functinal tests20:51
pdesaitrying to delete some duplicate code and here is the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247810/20:52
kfarrok pdesai taking a look now20:52
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:53
pdesaithe doc has instructions on setting up devstack followed by running functional test, it doesnt have details on setting up keystone accounts20:53
pdesaiwhich is done as part of devstack barbican plugin20:53
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:53
pdesaiif anyone is using keystone_data.sh to create necessary accounts, then it make sense to add how to create necessary accounts after we have deleted this script20:54
aleepdesai, sometimes I run functional tests by setting up keystone and postgres in a docker instances20:54
aleethen I use that script to set up the relevant barbican accounts20:55
*** nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
dave-mccowanthat's the hockeynut taught me... run keystone inside a VM, run keystone_data.sh against it, and then run barbican in a pyenv.20:55
elmikopdesai: sounds like good content for developer docs on running the func. tests20:55
*** thingee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith20:56
*** dims has quit IRC20:56
*** regebro is now known as Guest7331420:56
*** regebro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:56
pdesaiyup, looks like that script is used for folks without having to run devstack20:56
*** nadya_ has quit IRC20:56
dave-mccowanpdesai maybe keystone_data.sh can source devstack/lib/barbican to remove the duplicate code.  but, both files would remain.20:57
pdesaiyeah i will check if its possible (should be)20:57
pdesaii agree to not have duplicate code but source it from devstack/lib/barbican20:58
pdesaithanks dave-mccowan20:58
pdesaithanks everyone20:59
dave-mccowanpdesai... not to pile-on... but, for folks just running devstack, it's probably weird to add all of those accounts that are used by barbican functional tests.  it might be best to separate what's needed for devstack and what's needed for functional tests.20:59
kfarrAlright folks, that's about all the time we have for today.  Some good discussions, let's continue back in the barbican channel!20:59
kfarr#endmeeting20:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:59
openstackMeeting ended Mon Nov 30 20:59:38 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2015/barbican.2015-11-30-20.00.html20:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2015/barbican.2015-11-30-20.00.txt20:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2015/barbican.2015-11-30-20.00.log.html20:59
elmikothanks kfarr20:59
*** silos has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
diazjfmuchas gracias kfarr21:00
*** barrett has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:00
*** arunkant_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
hughhalfo/21:02
kencjohnstonhughhalf Easy there turbo :)21:02
barrett#startmeeting Product Working Group21:02
openstackMeeting started Mon Nov 30 21:02:34 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is barrett. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'product_working_group'21:02
*** aginwala has quit IRC21:02
hughhalfo/21:02
kencjohnstono/21:02
*** dims_ has quit IRC21:03
barrett#topic roll call21:03
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:03
kencjohnstonI'm IRC only today21:03
thingeeo/21:03
hughhalfo/21:03
barrett#chair sarob21:03
openstackCurrent chairs: barrett sarob21:03
sarob_o/21:03
sarob_sarob_21:03
sarob_This time21:03
*** panatl has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
*** Mr_T has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
barrett#chair sarob_21:04
*** Piet has quit IRC21:04
*** leong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
openstackCurrent chairs: barrett sarob sarob_21:04
leongo/21:04
sarob_Searching21:05
barrett#agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG_11_30_1521:05
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:05
barrett#topic: rolling upgrades user story update - Leong & Kenny21:06
*** openstack changes topic to ": rolling upgrades user story update - Leong & Kenny (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:06
barrettKenny/Leong - Can you give an update and let us know where help is needed or issues?21:07
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC21:07
barrettKenny - You still here?21:07
kencjohnstonWe continue to need additional reviews of the user story21:07
*** dprince has quit IRC21:07
kencjohnstonAnd I have the action to update the user story with references to the blueprints underdevelopment in the Mitaka cycle21:07
kencjohnstonOnce those are updated I'll send around a link and ask for product help in pushing those blueprints to completion21:08
barrettI wonder if we want to use a team meeting to review the user story?21:08
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away21:08
sarob_What's a team meeting?21:08
kencjohnstonIt is a task that is very accommodating to being done asynchronously21:09
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** zeih has quit IRC21:09
sarob_Ah21:09
barrettI meant this weekly team meeting - add an agenda item and dedicate a significant amount of time to it21:09
sarob_Right on21:09
kencjohnstonI'd be happy to, but it seems like we could use our time for better purposes21:09
kencjohnstonand I'd want the review to happen as much in gerrit as possible21:09
leongthe link for rolling user story is here: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-user-stories/user-stories/proposed/rollingupgrades.html21:10
sarob_Gerrit is the place to collaborate21:10
leongagree.. should try to use gerrit for review21:10
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
barrettgood point kencjohnston - was thinking we could take advantage of having people at the meeting21:10
sarob_Here is the place for sprint update, like a need more reviews21:10
*** weshay has quit IRC21:10
kencjohnstonsarob_ +121:10
barrettIs there anything preventing people from reviewing the user story today?21:11
barrettor is it just time?21:11
sgordonis there actually a gerrit review open for this?21:11
sgordon(the above link is to a committed item?)21:11
kencjohnstonI'll make this offer, if you are intimidated by the change/commit process you can send me offline comments/suggestions and I'll add them21:11
kencjohnstonsgordon I guess I should say git not gerrit, our process was to accept items to draft folder, and then ask for changes to them21:12
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:12
sgordonright21:12
sgordonthis is one of my concerns i guess about that process21:12
thingee+121:12
sarob_What is the outstanding tasks for rolling upgrades user story?21:12
sarob_Are21:12
sgordonin that once it's merged there is no way to do inline comments21:12
sarob_That is21:12
barrettsgordon - can you say a few more words on your concern?21:12
*** vgridnev has quit IRC21:13
thingeebarrett: typically an item is considered draft when it's in review.21:13
sgordonsimply that, we merge stuff to draft very quickly21:13
sgordonbut then there is no way to do inline commenting - because it's merged21:13
thingeeis there some gain by this process?21:13
kencjohnstonsgordon Agreed we thought it was more important to get it to a place where more people could view it via HTML21:13
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
sgordonkencjohnston, you can do that anyway21:13
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
sgordonkencjohnston, one of the jenkins jobs creates html21:13
*** diazjf has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
sgordonalthough that may not be set up for this repo21:14
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:14
sarob_New patch for this21:14
sgordonit is for e.g. nova-specs21:14
leongthere are three status of User Story: Draft, Proposed and Tracked21:14
sgordon(and docs for that matter)21:14
kencjohnstonsgordon ahh - I didn't know that. Honestly shamail might have had some additional logic for why we accepted to draft21:14
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:14
leongAll user stories today are in Draft folder21:14
kencjohnstonThere is one in proposed21:15
kencjohnston:)21:15
leongThe only user story in Proposed folder is "Rolling Upgrade"21:15
kencjohnstonThis might need to be added to another agenda item for next week21:15
sgordonkencjohnston, so for example if i go to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251442/ which you submitted and click "toggle ci" the jenkins comment includes the link to html21:15
barrettIs there any reason not to use patches to a user story as the mechanism for making comments/changes?21:15
sgordoneven though it isn't merged yet21:15
kencjohnstonThere are pros and cons for both approaches, we don't have a lot of reviewers on this project for gerrit review.21:16
kencjohnstonThat might be a problem of our own creation though.21:16
kencjohnstonAgain, my suggestion, let's add it as a topic for a later meeting. We should revisit the process and conform to community standards.21:17
leongThe workflow is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam/User_Stories#User_Story_Workflow21:17
barrettLeong - Thanks.21:17
barrettDo we need to be more specific on the "comments can be made.."?21:18
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC21:18
barrett#action: Carol add work flow discussion to next team meeting agenda21:18
sarob_Good plan21:19
thingeeso far the only advantage I have read is so we can see it as HTML. How often are the documents really hard to parse in raw rst format?21:19
*** aginwala has quit IRC21:19
thingeeI mention this just because this is the only group I have seen take this approach for this advantage.21:19
*** bana_k has quit IRC21:20
thingeethis document for rolling upgrades for example is not really complex. it's some bullet points.21:20
barrettthingee - We took this approach because not everyone in the team is familiar with rst, gerrit or git and we wanted to lower the barriers to participation21:20
barrettI'll add that to the agenda item for the next meeting too21:21
*** mrmartin has quit IRC21:22
barrettKencjohnston: anything else? Do you think you are on track for Mitaka deliverables? And N-design summit?21:22
thingeebarrett: so this is difficult to read raw? https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/openstack-user-stories/master/user-stories/proposed/rollingupgrades.rst21:22
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed21:22
barrettthingee: I think it's readable21:23
sarob_Me too21:23
kencjohnstonbarrett Nope, nothing else. We haven't defined Mitaka deliverables in the user story, but I will be next week.21:23
barrettkencjohnston: thanks, will look for an update again next week.21:23
hughhalfI must admit I'd not thought of it until thingee pointed it out - but yes the RST is hardly tricky to parse by a human.  Maybe we are doing ourselves a disservice here ?21:23
*** jcooley has quit IRC21:23
barrettNext up is Onboarding Legacy apps.21:24
barrettGerd - Are you here?21:24
sarob_Link to the rst would save time and stale data21:24
leongas part of the "workflow", we need to dedicate/allocate resources to work on the User Story/Blueprint for Rolling Upgrade21:24
barrettDo we want to have the work flow conversation now?21:24
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:25
kencjohnstonI vote for keeping the current agenda21:25
*** jcooley has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:25
sarob_#top#topic onboarding legacy applications21:26
sarob_Arg21:26
barrettOk - we'll stay with the current agenda. Maybe we should air the work flow discussion on the ML ahead of next week's meeting. Any volunteers to start that?21:26
hughhalfI think workflow is important, but lets discuss that on list and/or put on agenda for next meeting21:26
* hughhalf nods at barrett 21:26
leongagree! :)21:27
*** Arkady_Kanevsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
barrett#action Sarob Start ML discussion on Work Flow, with goal to close any changes in our team meeting next week21:27
Arkady_Kanevskyhello everybody21:27
sarob_#topic onboarding legacy applications21:27
*** openstack changes topic to "onboarding legacy applications (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:27
barrettGerd - Are you here?21:27
barrettMoving along....Onboarding Hosts and VM into Openstack for management21:28
sarob_#topic onboarding hosts and VMs21:28
*** openstack changes topic to "onboarding hosts and VMs (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:28
barrettJay or Deric - are you here?21:28
barrettok .....21:28
sarob_#topic complex instance placement21:28
*** openstack changes topic to "complex instance placement (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:28
barrett#topic Complex Instance Placement - Steve21:29
*** openstack changes topic to "Complex Instance Placement - Steve (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:29
barrettsgordon - any update?21:29
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
sgordon#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251442/21:29
sgordonintegrates calum's feedback from the original proposal21:29
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_21:30
*** dklenov has quit IRC21:30
sgordonso currently awaiting further feedback on that21:30
sgordonit was the only incomplete section21:30
kencjohnstonYeah, that was me this morning. barrett can you review?21:30
leong(sorry was distracted :-) for "onboarding hosts", IBM shared a presentation about PowerVC onboarding process in the previous meeting.21:30
*** jprovazn has quit IRC21:30
leonghttps://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0gXxpcL9MhGUHAtS2p5R3EwbHc21:30
barrettkencjohnston - yes, will review after the meeting21:30
* kencjohnston barrett Thanks!21:31
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
leongsorry i'm slow..:-)21:31
barrettLeong - hang on a sec, we'll come back to that one21:31
leonganyone can check out the link above if you are interested..21:31
leongi'm done with that.. :-)21:31
leongpls continue.. :-)21:31
barrettsgordon - anything else?21:32
sgordonnope not at this time21:32
barrettsgordon - thanks.21:32
barrett #topic onboarding hosts and VMs21:32
barrett#link:  https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0gXxpcL9MhGUHAtS2p5R3EwbHc21:33
*** crc32 has quit IRC21:33
*** regebro has quit IRC21:33
barrettLeong: is the presentation an approach to implementing the user story or ?21:33
leongthat's the approach that IBM PowerVM is working on21:33
leonghaven't decided on the approach on get that "upstream"21:34
barrettOK21:34
leongPlatform9 also share a presentation previously on their approach21:34
barrettDo you have a link to that?21:34
*** kfarr has quit IRC21:34
sarob_Page 8, 1121:35
sarob_Can be retooled into a user story21:35
sarob_Format I think21:35
leongplatform9: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B0gXxpcL9MhGMy1tOU5ZbEFjRVU21:35
barrettsarob: ?21:35
barrett#link platform9:  https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B0gXxpcL9MhGMy1tOU5ZbEFjRVU21:36
leong#link platform 9 presentation: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0gXxpcL9MhGYl9FUlk0eVlmenc/view21:36
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:37
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC21:38
barrettAny other User Stories for updates?21:38
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
hughhalfnone from me at this point21:38
barrett(for arkady): There is the database hygiene - Leong are you going to submit this or should Arkday?21:39
Arkady_KanevskyDB hygiene. Leong do you want me to resubmit it or do you want me do it?21:39
leongsorry i haven't got time to review the DB-hygiene.21:39
sarob_#topic db hygiene21:39
*** openstack changes topic to "db hygiene (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:39
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:39
leongArkday: can you resubmit that?21:39
Arkady_Kanevskysure21:39
leonghttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/237178/21:40
barrett#action Arkady resubmit DB-Hygiene21:40
barrettGood - Any other User Stories we want to cover?21:40
sarob_Any other user stories?21:40
sarob_Oops21:40
sarob_#topic midcycle planning21:41
*** openstack changes topic to "midcycle planning (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:41
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
barrett#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG_Mitaka_Midcycle21:41
sarob_Thanks21:41
barrettI think we're still waiting on the final plans for the Ops Mid-cycle21:41
barrettAre there any additions or comments on the agenda?21:42
sarob_Looks right to me21:42
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
leongLooks good on agenda21:43
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:43
*** baoli has quit IRC21:43
kencjohnstonI think this was discussed last week, but Rackspace is willing to host a UK event at our London office if we end up deciding to hold the meeting there.21:43
*** dims has quit IRC21:43
kencjohnstonI'll add a note to the Etherpad.21:43
sarob_Cool21:44
barrettkencjohnston - Thanks21:44
sarob_Maybe the operator midcycle as well?21:44
sarob_At rax London?21:44
kencjohnstonI think that is already scheduled in Manchester21:44
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:45
sarob_Oh duh, right21:45
kencjohnstonBut if it isn't I can look into it.21:45
sgordonit is21:45
barrettkencjohnston - you might want to reach out to Tom21:45
Arkady_KanevskyMr. grodron I commented on complex use case for groups21:45
barrettnevermind....21:45
barrettLet's revisit the timing and location of our Midcycle next week and if we have a final decision on Ops Midcycle, let's try to finalize our location and date21:45
Arkady_Kanevskydoes operator/user WG plan second midcycle in USA?21:46
barrett#action Carol add Midcycle planning to agenda for next week and bring current status on Ops Midcycle21:46
kencjohnstonArkady_Kanevsky That is the outstanding question.21:46
sarob_Do we want to discuss a f2f in Portland in addition to UK no matter what21:46
*** cknight has quit IRC21:46
sgordonbarrett, tbh i dont believe there was going to be a second mid-cycle21:47
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:47
sgordonbarrett, there was discussion of having more regional ops *events*21:47
sgordonbarrett, but one mid-cycle21:47
*** sdake has quit IRC21:47
barrettsgordon - Thanks for the clarification21:47
sarob_That's started happening a bit already21:47
sgordonthere was certainly a fair bit of back and forth on this but there is still only one mid-cycle planned21:47
sgordonright exactly21:48
sarob_Plus the larger operators21:48
barrettsgordon - do you know if the location/date are set and not going to move?21:48
*** aginwala has quit IRC21:49
* hughhalf nods noting that tallies in with his reading of ML traffic on the topic21:49
barrettLet's finalize this next week - what our plans are for covering (at a minimum) the Ops Mid-Cycle and where/when we want to have ours.21:50
barrett#topic Opens21:50
*** openstack changes topic to "Opens (Meeting topic: Product Working Group)"21:50
barrettAnyone have opens to share?21:50
hughhalfNone for me21:51
leongnope21:51
kencjohnstonNone for me21:51
sarob_I posted to the ML on how to hold these meetings21:51
barrettFYI - There's a board meeting on Thursday. You can find more info here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/3Dec2015BoardMeeting21:52
sarob_My opinion!21:52
barrettThanks Sarob_21:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
barrettIf there's nothing else, let's all get back 8 mins....21:52
sarob_anyone can attend the bod meeting btw21:52
Arkady_Kanevskyhow does one update wiki - http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-user-stories/?21:53
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:53
barrettarkady: it's updated automatically, once merged21:53
leongthat's still under review.. so is not "merged" in the Draft folder yet21:54
barrettanything else21:54
barrett?21:54
sarob_It's it for me21:54
Arkady_Kanevskygot it. still expected it to be listed in the wiki21:54
barrett#endmeeting21:54
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:54
barrettbye21:54
openstackMeeting ended Mon Nov 30 21:54:39 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:54
Arkady_Kanevskybye21:54
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2015/product_working_group.2015-11-30-21.02.html21:54
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2015/product_working_group.2015-11-30-21.02.txt21:54
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2015/product_working_group.2015-11-30-21.02.log.html21:54
hughhalflater21:54
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC21:54
*** jichen has quit IRC21:55
*** Mr_T has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:55
*** matrohon has quit IRC21:55
*** leong has quit IRC21:55
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC21:57
*** sarob_ has quit IRC21:57
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:59
*** sdake_ has quit IRC22:02
*** Haunted has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:02
HauntedHi22:02
*** notmyname has quit IRC22:05
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:07
*** dhawley has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:11
*** dhawley has quit IRC22:12
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz22:14
*** julim has quit IRC22:16
*** vilobhmm111 has quit IRC22:18
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz22:19
*** vilobhmm11 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:19
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:26
*** vgridnev has quit IRC22:27
*** haypo has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:30
*** barrett has quit IRC22:30
*** barrett1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:31
*** Haunted has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:33
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC22:33
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:34
*** jhfeng has quit IRC22:37
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:38
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC22:39
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:43
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC22:44
*** lkoranda_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:48
*** thingee has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:50
*** lkoranda has quit IRC22:50
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC22:51
*** jmcbride has quit IRC22:52
*** lkoranda_ has quit IRC22:52
*** sgotliv_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:53
*** barrett1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:54
*** sgotliv has quit IRC22:56
*** kfarr has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:56
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:57
*** lkoranda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:58
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:58
*** banix has quit IRC22:59
*** sgotliv_ has quit IRC23:00
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC23:02
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:02
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:03
*** dims_ has quit IRC23:03
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:05
*** aginwala_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:06
*** jecarey has quit IRC23:06
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC23:07
*** Arkady_Kanevsky has quit IRC23:08
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz23:08
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:08
*** minwang2 has quit IRC23:09
*** edtubill has quit IRC23:09
*** aginwala has quit IRC23:10
*** jecarey has quit IRC23:13
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:14
*** jmckind has quit IRC23:23
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC23:26
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz23:26
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:26
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:28
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:30
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC23:31
*** pdesai has quit IRC23:35
*** barra204 has quit IRC23:38
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:38
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:38
*** pdesai has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:40
*** xyang1 has quit IRC23:41
*** f13o has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:41
*** jecarey has quit IRC23:43
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa23:44
*** egallen has quit IRC23:45
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz23:49
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC23:51
*** ikutukov has quit IRC23:52
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!