Thursday, 2015-12-10

xgermano/00:00
SridarKHi xgerman: and all00:00
mickeysHi all00:00
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:00
yushiroHi :)00:00
xgermanSridarK you remember our meeting name?00:00
*** hoangcx has quit IRC00:00
annpHi00:00
SridarKno worries let me start00:00
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:00
*** jwarendt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
SridarK#startmeeting Networking FWaaS00:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 00:01:04 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SridarK. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.00:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.00:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Networking FWaaS)"00:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_fwaas'00:01
*** aginwala has quit IRC00:01
SridarK#chair SridarK xgerman00:01
openstackCurrent chairs: SridarK xgerman00:01
xgerman#topic midcycle00:01
bharathmo/00:01
*** openstack changes topic to "midcycle (Meeting topic: Networking FWaaS)"00:01
xgerman#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lbaas-mitaka-midcycle00:01
xgermanthey now have hotels. I recommend the ones near the airport00:01
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
*** kebray has quit IRC00:02
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
SridarKxgerman: thanks, i am waiting on travel approval00:03
mickeysI will get approval. Not yet sure when I get to the point to actually book travel.00:04
xgermanwell, they have motels near the RAX office :-)00:04
*** kebray has quit IRC00:04
Aisho/00:04
mickeysDowntown sounds like more fun than the airport?00:05
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:05
xgermanRAX is near the airport so you are saving the drive in the morning00:05
xgermanwhich is key since they are two hours ahead00:05
mickeysFine. I will move downtown for the weekend :-)00:06
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:06
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck00:06
xgermanValencia is a really nice place ;-)00:06
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC00:06
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:06
SridarKxgerman: also in terms of agenda - we will do fwaas all 4 days or u see some breakup ?00:06
SridarKwith an lbaas focus on some days - to help folks like u who overlap both projects ?00:07
xgermanyep, that’s my plan00:07
xgermanbut I should be 90% FWaaS00:08
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:08
mickeysIf FWaaS is only a subset of the days, I prefer skipping the first part of the week and focusing on the later part of the week. If we meet the whole time, that is OK as well.00:08
SridarKok wanted to be sure - so if we are not on fwaas all 4 days - can make travel arrangements00:08
SridarKmickeys: +100:09
mickeysI will be stuck in Texas until the middle of the following week00:09
xgermanI am fine with either. We can start Wednesday or use the time for more coding00:10
SridarKmakes sense - i wanted to optimize my time as well with some internal stuff so will be good to figure this out00:10
xgermanI get less interrupted when I am off site ;-)00:10
jwarendtI can fix that00:11
*** madhu_ak has left #openstack-meeting-alt00:11
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC00:11
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:11
*** madhu_ak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:11
SridarKi hope jwarendt: & Aish: can make it as well00:11
xgermanstill trying to get more travel money00:12
jwarendtWaiting on travel approvals for some of us; will be there if can be and engaged regardless00:12
*** ashleighfarnham has quit IRC00:12
SridarKsounds good00:13
AishYup. The same as jwarendt said.00:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:13
SridarKxgerman: may be u can think thru if it is Wed or Tue and sync with sc68cal: and then we can decide on travel dates00:13
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:14
xgermanwell, let’s just pick one. I will be there the whole week… so whatever works for you...00:14
xgermanwe had people come and go in previous mid cycles...00:15
xgermanand some might leave early Friday...00:15
*** snackewm has quit IRC00:15
xgermananyway, let’s move on00:16
xgerman#topic FWaaS API V2 spec00:16
*** openstack changes topic to "FWaaS API V2 spec (Meeting topic: Networking FWaaS)"00:16
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC00:16
SridarKAish: thanks for the updates00:16
xgerman+100:16
mickeys+100:16
AishI am working on a new patch right now.00:16
SridarKi think we are in decent shape and may be a few nits00:17
Aishyup, will be fixing those nits.00:17
xgermanyeah, I will try to push for approval so we can start working00:17
xgerman(dougwig ahem?)00:17
*** dane has quit IRC00:18
xgermanmickeys you wanted to look at the Security Group workflow?00:18
mickeysIn the data model, firewall policy rule associations, priority needs to be CRU rather than just R00:18
Aishok..00:18
SridarKmickeys: on the spillover discussion from last week - we were leaning more towards position for simplicity and look at priority later ?00:19
mickeysI wonder whether we have complete consensus on position versus priority. To me, priority means that the user provides the value, not necessarily sequential, and that there can be conflicts (same priority value) which need to be resolved deterministically. Position means sequential with no conflicts, with insert_before, insert_after stuff.00:19
SridarKmickeys: u answered my question :-)00:20
mickeysExcept I did not pick one ...00:20
xgermanwell, we can keep priority in the data model anyway00:20
xgermanand we can throw CONFLICT when the priority already exists00:20
*** crc32 has quit IRC00:20
mickeysThe attribute was already moved to the firewall policy rule association. Now we have to agree on the term and the semantics.00:21
SridarKthings like conflict resolution adds to the complexity - but not doing resolution is certainly an approach00:21
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC00:21
mickeysDo people agree with my definition above? Any preference?00:21
xgermanpriority since then we can have all kinds of integers (even negative)00:21
SridarK+1 on the move to the policy rule association00:22
jwarendtI prefer priority, since position changes with every insert.00:22
SridarKi am still on the wall w.r.t to position and priority - mainly due to complexity in what we need to do in terms of implementation now00:22
badvelicurrently we can specify the insert_before and after is there a problem00:22
mickeysThe API has insert_before, insert_after. Do we see that staying? Or do see that changing? If we change it, where would that go in the API? We don't have an explicit firewall policy rule association in the API.00:22
mickeysThe argument for position is minimizing changes to the API00:23
xgermanwell,  I think position-before/after are independent if we use priority or not00:24
xgermanI also don;t think priority makes it more complex if we don’t allow overlapping ones00:25
mickeysIf you insert_before, what if there is no priority value in between the previous rule and the rule you are inserting before? Does the value change for rules other than the one being inserted?00:25
*** zhangjn has quit IRC00:26
xgermanyou would change the priority… but I also like specifying it explicitly better00:26
mickeysRight now there is just an ordered list of rules in a policy, so it is not explicit in the current API or the current proposal. Do we want to change that?00:27
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:27
*** fnaval has quit IRC00:28
xgermanI am thinking of changing it to be more flexible...00:28
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:29
*** atiwari2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:29
xgermanbut channeling my inner sc68cal he would probably like us to minimize changes00:29
mickeysThe simplest option is to put it in the rule, but that may affect your ability to reuse rules. If everything else is identical but you need to insert in a different place within another policy, do you have to replicate the rule just to specify a different priority value?00:30
SridarKxgerman: i would align with that00:30
mickeysI do think position minimizes changes00:30
jwarendtOnly if a rule is only 1 to 1.00:30
jwarendtPosition 2 means different things to different ordered lists00:31
jwarendtBut both have issues00:31
*** minwang2 has quit IRC00:31
mickeysWe took position out of firewall rule for that reason. It was read only. The actual configuration is through the ordered list of rules in the policy.00:31
*** atiwari1 has quit IRC00:31
mickeysIf position is only in the ordered list of rules in the policy, then position can vary for the same rule, when it is bound to different firewall policies00:32
SridarKessentially the attribute which one it is also tied to the policy that the specific (shareable) rule will be associated to00:32
SridarK*whichever one00:32
*** snackewm has quit IRC00:33
Aishmickeys: +100:33
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:34
mickeysFor priority, it seems like you either need to make the ordered list a list of (rule, priority) tuples (somewhat ugly), or you would need to add an explicit firewall rule / firewall policy association in the API, which adds complexity00:34
xgermanI was thinking tuples00:34
xgermanbut I think we will end up with the same result whatever we choose...00:35
bharathmThough Priority seems to add flexibility and future proof,, I am inclined towards Position (with insert_before/after) for its ease of implementation00:37
xgermanI sense we settled on position...00:38
xgermanso let’s do that00:38
jwarendtSecurity groups don't really need ordering, since just a whitelist, so just make sure that we don't kill distributed functionality by using a global lock with client required knowledge of ordering state or something similarly stupid when not needed.00:38
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:39
SridarKi still think we can move the attribute to the policy - rule association table00:39
xgermanyeah, that for sure00:39
mickeysSridarK: The data model already reflects that00:39
SridarKand the API will be experimental so we can come back to this00:40
xgerman+100:40
bharathm+1 on policy-rule association00:40
SridarKmickeys: yes just want re iterate00:40
*** gokrokve has quit IRC00:41
mickeysAre we agreed to start with position? Once we get things running, anyone can propose changing it to priority if they think it is important?00:41
xgermanwell, it’s hard to make API changes like that00:42
xgermanbut yes, let’s run with that00:42
SridarKxgerman: i think we should get a pass for at least the N cycle00:42
SridarKas things settle in00:42
xgermanwell, I just had Horizon blow me off because they felt the LBaaS API wa sunstable00:43
xgermanaka in not finalized00:43
xgerman(which is entirely not true BTW)00:44
xgermanso what I am saying is if we think we need it in the next two cycles we should do it now...00:45
xgermansince the earlier we can declare we are done with changes we can get heat and horizon engaged00:46
SridarKi agree with u on that aspect, my concern is really on how much we can get done. IMO, the port binding  and getting the SG interactions right could consume significant cycles00:48
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2400:48
xgermanyeah, usually API’s are fast the problem is in those peaky drivers ;-)00:49
SridarK:-)00:49
mickeysTo avoid going in circles, perhaps we should leave the API as is in the next patch set, then German can make a comment with the replacement text to change the API to a (rule, priority) tuple, then we can all comment whether we like it or not?00:49
SridarKsounds like a plan00:50
jwarendtSounds good to me.00:50
xgerman+100:50
bharathm+100:50
Aish+100:50
* xgerman likes going in circles reminds me of a carousel00:50
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:50
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:50
SridarK:-)00:50
xgermanwell, next topic00:50
xgermanin the API we need to discuss...00:50
xgermanAish?00:51
*** pvaneck has quit IRC00:52
mickeysShould we move on to service groups?00:52
xgermanyes00:52
xgerman#topic service groups00:52
*** openstack changes topic to "service groups (Meeting topic: Networking FWaaS)"00:52
mickeysSeveral issues where we have not yet reached consensus00:52
mickeys1) Firewall rule specifies a single service group, or a list of service groups?00:53
mickeysI prefer single service group00:53
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
SridarKmickeys: yes this was driven earlier as a collection00:53
mickeysAnd do people think we really need a list of lists?00:53
xgermanno, no list of list00:53
SridarKpossible we can live without this00:54
mickeysService group is already a list of service objects00:54
SridarKi think this came from a requirement of reusing a list00:54
SridarKbut i think we can live without it00:54
mickeysBadveli: Your argument for a list of service groups?00:54
SridarKnot sure if badveli: is around but we can discuss this with him00:55
mickeysbadveli's reply in the comments: A firewall rule can specify multiple service groups, since the usability of the service groups is not tailored for any specific use case. As mentioned the service groups are meant to be reusable across tenants we do not want to tailor one service groups and ask everyone to use it, one service groups need not be overloaded even it is a list of service objects, instead they can choose which service groups00:56
mickeysthey want.00:56
badveliyes00:56
*** aginwala has quit IRC00:56
mickeysI still prefer the simplicity of a single service group in a firewall rule00:56
mickeysOthers?00:56
badvelibut it gets complicated when we say multiple service groups00:56
badvelialready currently the service groups can have multiple service objects00:57
badveliand the reverse way00:57
SridarKbadveli: so that helps (multiple serv obj)00:57
SridarKso if there isnt a compelling need we can avoid this ?00:58
SridarKtime check 2 mins00:58
xgermanyep, no lists00:58
badveliSridarK: currently the ideal scenario is multiple service groups in firewall00:58
badvelimultiple service objects in service groups00:58
SridarKbadveli: maybe we discuss more on gerrit00:58
badvelibut this gets more complicated00:58
xgermanlet’s start with 1:1 and expand if we find the use case00:58
badveliok, thanks00:59
badvelithat is the reason we say our intentions but modelling wise00:59
badvelii had restrictions00:59
SridarKwe also want to see when we want service groups implemented00:59
badvelixgerman: then the spec should not mention the multiple service objects in service group vice versa00:59
xgermank, I am on vacation until the end of the year. Most teams do next week and then skip for the re01:00
xgermanst of the year01:00
xgermanwell, ML...01:00
xgerman#endmeeting01:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_dvr)"01:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 01:00:50 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)01:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-12-10-00.01.html01:00
SridarKxgerman: i think we can do next week01:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-12-10-00.01.txt01:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-12-10-00.01.log.html01:00
badvelibye for now01:01
annpBye01:01
SridarKbye all01:01
hoangcxbye, thanks01:01
bharathmbye01:01
xgermanSridarK +101:01
jwarendtBye01:01
xgermano/01:01
Aishbye01:01
mickeysbye01:01
*** annp has quit IRC01:01
*** hoangcx has quit IRC01:01
*** zhhuabj_ has quit IRC01:02
*** ikutukov has quit IRC01:02
*** zhangjn has quit IRC01:05
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:05
*** Aish has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:06
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:06
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:07
*** markvoelker has quit IRC01:11
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:12
*** zhhuabj_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:14
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC01:15
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa01:16
*** jwarendt has quit IRC01:21
*** ajmiller_ has quit IRC01:22
*** mtanino has quit IRC01:23
*** atiwari1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:27
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC01:27
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:28
*** atiwari2 has quit IRC01:29
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:30
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:33
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:34
*** Swami has quit IRC01:35
*** bharathm has quit IRC01:36
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:37
*** atiwari2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:38
*** neilus has quit IRC01:38
*** jet-rongl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:39
*** gongysh has quit IRC01:39
*** jet-rongl has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:40
*** atiwari1 has quit IRC01:40
*** Prem has quit IRC01:41
*** jet-rongl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:42
*** armax has quit IRC01:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:43
*** wangqun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:45
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:47
*** apetrich has quit IRC01:47
*** aginwala has quit IRC01:48
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:48
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:49
*** snackewm has quit IRC01:49
*** madhu__ak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:50
*** pashkin has quit IRC01:53
*** pashkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:53
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:53
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:54
*** boris-42_ has quit IRC01:54
*** madhu_ak_ has quit IRC01:54
*** wangqun has quit IRC01:54
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:54
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC01:54
*** wangqun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:54
*** nijaba has quit IRC01:55
*** wangqun has quit IRC01:55
*** wangqun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:56
*** boris-42_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:56
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:56
*** nijaba has quit IRC01:56
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:56
*** wangqun has quit IRC01:56
*** madhu__ak_ has quit IRC01:57
*** wangqun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:57
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:57
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC01:58
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:00
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC02:01
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:03
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC02:04
*** bana_k has quit IRC02:06
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:07
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:10
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC02:10
*** zhurong has quit IRC02:11
*** wangqun has quit IRC02:12
*** wangqun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:12
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:13
*** wangqun has quit IRC02:14
*** wangqun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:14
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC02:15
*** wangqun has quit IRC02:16
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:16
*** wangqun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:16
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:18
*** zhangjn has quit IRC02:21
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:24
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting-alt02:24
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:25
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:25
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:28
*** edwardb has quit IRC02:29
*** wangqun has quit IRC02:29
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC02:30
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:32
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC02:32
*** neilus has quit IRC02:32
*** zhurong has quit IRC02:35
*** yushiro has left #openstack-meeting-alt02:35
*** yushiro has quit IRC02:35
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:37
*** aginwala has quit IRC02:38
*** liangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:38
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:39
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:39
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:43
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:43
*** houming has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** Liuqing has quit IRC02:46
*** houming has quit IRC02:49
*** houming has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:50
*** bana_k has quit IRC02:52
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:53
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC02:53
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:54
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:55
*** mickeys has left #openstack-meeting-alt02:57
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC02:58
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:00
*** aginwala has quit IRC03:02
*** boris-42_ has quit IRC03:03
*** ajo has quit IRC03:04
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:05
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:06
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:07
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:10
*** aginwala has quit IRC03:10
*** markvoelker has quit IRC03:12
*** ijw has quit IRC03:13
*** sputnik1_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:18
*** merooney has quit IRC03:18
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:22
*** eliqiao has quit IRC03:27
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith03:31
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:31
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:32
*** badveli has quit IRC03:32
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC03:35
*** gongysh has quit IRC03:37
*** neilus has quit IRC03:38
*** baoli has quit IRC03:39
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:40
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:41
*** gyee has quit IRC03:41
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:41
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC03:42
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:42
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:44
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:49
*** irenab has quit IRC03:52
*** irenab_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:52
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:52
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC03:54
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:02
*** shwetaap has quit IRC04:03
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC04:06
*** gongysh has quit IRC04:06
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC04:07
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:09
*** zhangjn has quit IRC04:09
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:10
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:13
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:14
*** gongysh has quit IRC04:17
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:18
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:22
*** neilus has quit IRC04:22
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:23
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:25
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC04:26
*** vilobhmm11 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:30
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:33
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:37
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:39
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:41
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:41
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:45
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:46
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:46
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:48
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting-alt04:48
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:51
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:51
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:01
*** zhhuabj_ has quit IRC05:01
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:03
*** ijw has quit IRC05:03
*** zhangjn has quit IRC05:04
*** Poornima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:05
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:07
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:11
*** markvoelker has quit IRC05:12
*** oomichi_away is now known as oomichi05:12
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:12
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC05:15
*** SridarK has quit IRC05:16
*** neilus has quit IRC05:16
*** zhhuabj_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** crc32 has quit IRC05:17
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:18
*** alee has quit IRC05:18
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC05:20
*** ashleighfarnham has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:20
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC05:28
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:29
*** alee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:29
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:30
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:38
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:42
*** Liuqing has quit IRC05:43
*** zhurong has quit IRC05:43
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:44
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:44
*** bana_k has quit IRC05:46
*** red_trela is now known as red|05:51
*** ijw_ has quit IRC05:51
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:52
*** neelashah has quit IRC05:55
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:57
*** greghaynes has quit IRC05:58
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:00
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC06:04
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:06
*** iyamahat has quit IRC06:06
*** neilus has quit IRC06:10
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC06:19
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:20
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:23
*** banix has quit IRC06:26
*** zhurong has quit IRC06:26
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:27
*** zhangjn has quit IRC06:30
*** vilobhmm11 has quit IRC06:30
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:33
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:34
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:34
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:36
*** vilobhmm11 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:40
*** red| is now known as red|trela06:42
*** sgotliv_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:48
*** gcb has quit IRC06:51
*** zhangjn has quit IRC06:54
*** armax has quit IRC06:57
*** EvgenyF has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:59
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:59
*** ashleighfarnham has quit IRC07:01
*** vilobhmm11 has quit IRC07:01
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:03
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:03
*** aginwala has quit IRC07:05
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:06
*** zhangjn has quit IRC07:07
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:08
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:10
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:11
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:13
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:16
*** neilus has quit IRC07:17
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:23
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:26
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:32
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC07:36
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:38
*** vahidh has quit IRC07:41
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:41
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:43
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:43
*** houming has quit IRC07:44
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:44
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC07:47
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC07:48
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:48
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:49
*** liangbo has quit IRC07:55
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:56
*** tremble has quit IRC07:56
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:56
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC07:58
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:01
*** peterstac has quit IRC08:04
*** dloi_ has quit IRC08:04
*** dloi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:04
*** dansmith has quit IRC08:05
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:05
*** edwardb has quit IRC08:05
*** sirushti has quit IRC08:05
*** timfreund has quit IRC08:05
*** bhunter has quit IRC08:05
*** krugg has quit IRC08:05
*** mvandijk has quit IRC08:05
*** amrith has quit IRC08:05
*** dougshelley66 has quit IRC08:05
*** annp has quit IRC08:06
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:07
*** dansmith is now known as Guest1777908:07
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:07
*** zhangjn has quit IRC08:08
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:10
*** sirushti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** bhunter has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** peterstac has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** dougshelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** mvandijk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:12
*** krugg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:12
*** aginwala has quit IRC08:13
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:14
*** regebro has quit IRC08:14
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC08:14
*** regebro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:15
*** mhickey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:18
*** timfreund has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:19
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC08:21
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:25
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:25
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:27
*** korzen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:30
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:31
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:31
*** oomichi is now known as oomichi_away08:32
*** oomichi_away has quit IRC08:32
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:32
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:34
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC08:35
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:35
*** vgridnev has quit IRC08:36
*** numans has quit IRC08:37
*** vahidh has quit IRC08:38
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:39
*** scheuran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:40
*** bana_k has quit IRC08:41
*** gongysh has quit IRC08:42
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC08:42
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:42
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** vgridnev has quit IRC08:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:52
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:52
*** liangbo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:53
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC08:59
*** chandankumar has quit IRC09:07
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:08
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:09
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:09
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting-alt09:10
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:14
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** zhurong has quit IRC09:14
*** tfukushima has quit IRC09:14
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:15
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:18
*** zhurong has quit IRC09:18
*** ndipanov has quit IRC09:20
*** eranra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:20
*** red|trela has left #openstack-meeting-alt09:20
*** eranra has quit IRC09:22
*** eranra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:22
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:26
*** hogepodge has quit IRC09:26
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:27
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:28
*** ihrachys has quit IRC09:33
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:33
*** red_trela has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:34
*** red_trela has left #openstack-meeting-alt09:34
*** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:35
*** houming has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:36
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:37
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:44
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:44
eranracrc3209:45
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:49
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:49
*** ganso has quit IRC09:49
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:50
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:51
*** andreykurilin__ has left #openstack-meeting-alt09:52
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:53
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:53
*** tfukushima has quit IRC09:54
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:55
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:57
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC09:58
*** igordcard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:58
*** igordcard has quit IRC09:58
*** tfukushima has quit IRC09:58
*** wojdev has quit IRC09:59
*** thomnico has quit IRC09:59
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC09:59
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:59
*** aglarendil has quit IRC10:00
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:00
*** ashtokolov has quit IRC10:01
*** briancurtin has quit IRC10:01
*** ashtokolov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:02
*** aglarendil has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:02
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:02
*** ganso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:02
*** lbeliveau has quit IRC10:02
*** briancurtin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:03
*** lbeliveau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:03
*** igordcard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:04
*** igordcard has quit IRC10:07
*** neiljerram has quit IRC10:07
*** rvyalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:14
*** rvyalov_ has quit IRC10:18
*** Liuqing has quit IRC10:19
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC10:20
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:25
*** bgaifullin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:25
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:29
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:33
*** annp has quit IRC10:33
*** bgaifullin has quit IRC10:34
*** zhangjn has quit IRC10:38
*** bgaifullin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:38
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC10:39
*** vgridnev has quit IRC10:40
*** vgridnev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:40
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:41
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:41
*** liangbo has quit IRC10:41
*** Liuqing has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:42
*** zhhuabj_ has quit IRC10:43
*** [1]evgenyf has quit IRC10:49
*** EvgenyF has quit IRC10:49
*** igordcar1_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:50
*** igordcar1_ has quit IRC10:50
*** igordcar1_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:50
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC10:50
*** igordcar1_ has quit IRC10:50
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC10:53
*** zhhuabj_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:54
*** jaypipes has quit IRC10:55
*** shwetaap has quit IRC10:57
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:03
*** korzen has left #openstack-meeting-alt11:04
*** dims_ has quit IRC11:04
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:04
*** nelsnels_ has quit IRC11:06
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC11:07
*** jet-rongl has left #openstack-meeting-alt11:10
*** jet-rongl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:11
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:12
*** SridharG has quit IRC11:12
*** tfukushima has quit IRC11:13
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:15
*** nelsnels_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:18
*** igordcard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:20
*** iyamahat has quit IRC11:21
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC11:21
*** darkwsh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:22
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:22
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:27
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:31
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC11:34
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:36
*** apetrich has quit IRC11:41
*** sylwesterB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:43
*** sylwesterB has quit IRC11:43
*** kei_yama has quit IRC11:44
*** wojdev has quit IRC11:44
*** vgridnev_ has quit IRC11:45
*** zhangjn has quit IRC11:45
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:45
*** pnavarro is now known as pnavarro|lunch11:55
*** tfukushima has quit IRC11:55
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC11:57
*** qwebirc94090 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:00
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC12:01
*** qwebirc94090 has quit IRC12:01
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:10
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:10
*** tfukushima has quit IRC12:11
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:11
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** tfukushima has quit IRC12:12
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC12:14
*** igorbelikov has quit IRC12:16
*** bgaifullin has quit IRC12:20
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC12:22
*** eliqiao has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:23
*** weshay_xchat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:25
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:26
*** chandankumar has quit IRC12:27
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:27
*** bgaifullin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:27
*** zhangjn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:29
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:30
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC12:37
*** weshay_xchat is now known as weshay12:39
*** EvgenyF has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:40
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:40
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:41
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** atiwari1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:46
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:47
*** atiwari2 has quit IRC12:48
*** baoli has quit IRC12:50
*** atiwari1 has quit IRC12:50
*** atiwari1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** 7F1AA6H41 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:53
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:53
*** notmyname has quit IRC12:57
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:57
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:57
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:59
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:01
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:05
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:06
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:08
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:14
*** EricGonc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:14
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC13:14
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
*** mgrohar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC13:17
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:21
*** markmcclain has quit IRC13:23
*** jprovazn has quit IRC13:26
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:28
*** jaypipes has quit IRC13:28
*** rbrady has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:28
*** ikutukov has quit IRC13:33
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:34
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:35
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:36
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC13:37
*** wojdev has quit IRC13:41
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_13:43
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:43
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
*** enikanorov has quit IRC13:47
*** bgaifullin has quit IRC13:47
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:48
*** dims has quit IRC13:48
*** enikanorov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:49
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
*** zhiyan has quit IRC13:51
*** tkhno has quit IRC13:51
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** tkhno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC13:54
*** bgaifullin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:55
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC13:57
*** cfouts has quit IRC13:57
*** aleksandr_null has quit IRC13:58
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** mgrohar has quit IRC13:58
*** sc68cal has quit IRC13:58
*** egafford has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2413:59
*** aleksandr_null has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** pmalik has quit IRC14:00
*** gnarld_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** pmalik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** hyakuhei_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** 7F1AA6H41 has quit IRC14:00
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** sc68cal has quit IRC14:01
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC14:02
*** julim has quit IRC14:03
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
*** julim has quit IRC14:08
*** eranra has quit IRC14:08
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:11
*** gongysh has quit IRC14:13
*** esker has quit IRC14:13
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:14
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC14:17
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
*** scheuran has quit IRC14:17
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:17
*** pnavarro|lunch is now known as pnavarro14:17
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** hyakuhei_ has quit IRC14:20
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:21
*** hyakuhei_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:21
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:22
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:24
*** [1]evgenyf has quit IRC14:25
*** EvgenyF has quit IRC14:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:26
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC14:28
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:30
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed14:30
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
*** darkwsh has quit IRC14:35
flaper87e14:35
*** Guest17779 is now known as dansmith14:36
*** dansmith is now known as Guest1812414:37
*** Guest18124 is now known as dansmith14:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:38
*** zhangjn has quit IRC14:39
*** Poornima has quit IRC14:41
*** wojdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:43
*** wojdev has quit IRC14:43
*** wojdev_ is now known as wojdev14:43
*** dustins has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:46
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:48
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** neilus has quit IRC14:49
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** csaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
*** zhongjun2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:51
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:51
*** EricGonc_ has quit IRC14:51
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:54
*** markstur_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:54
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:54
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** dane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** zhaohua has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** boris-42_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** u_glide1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** aovchinnikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 15:00:30 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:00
bswartzhello all15:00
u_glide1hello15:00
vponomaryovhi15:00
markstur_hi15:00
aovchinnikovhi15:00
xyang1hi15:00
gansohello15:00
*** jet-rongl has quit IRC15:01
zhongjun2hi15:01
bswartz#agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings15:01
csabahi15:01
*** cknight1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
cknight1Hi15:02
bswartzokay15:02
bswartz#topic announcements15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: manila)"15:02
toabctlhi15:02
*** amotoki has quit IRC15:02
bswartzThe midcycle meeting has been scheduled for Jan 13-1415:02
dustins\o15:03
bswartzthat's pretty early, which may be a good thing15:03
*** atiwari2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
ameadeo/15:03
bswartzI'll be updating the wiki and etherpad with relevant details15:03
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
bswartzbut the date is set now15:03
tbarronhi15:03
bswartz#topic QoS_support15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "QoS_support (Meeting topic: manila)"15:04
bswartzzhongjun2: you're up15:04
zhongjun2Link:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247286/15:04
*** kozhukalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
zhongjun2The most of the driver already report the "'QoS_support': False" to scheduler.15:04
zhongjun2Does we need to save Qos_support as common capabilities and write 'QoS_support' to capabilities_and_extra_specs.rst?15:04
bswartzzhongjun2: so the first step is for us to agree that we need a qos_support common extra spec, and to agree what it means15:05
bswartzthen we add it to the dev doc you mentioned15:05
bswartzwe've discussed how qos should work in manila a few times15:05
*** atiwari1 has quit IRC15:05
bswartzand I want to thank you for taking lead on the topic of qos and continuing to push for progress15:06
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
*** neilus has quit IRC15:06
*** iNeilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
bswartzzhongjun2: do you have a definition for what the qos_support extra spec should mean?15:06
bswartzoh n/m it's in the link15:07
zhongjun2Driver could define extra specs as what the need.15:08
*** kozhukalov_ has quit IRC15:08
bswartzokay so I think we all agreed that we want admins to be able to set qos limits in their share types, but that the limits should be set by vendor-specific extra specs15:08
bswartzso what does this standard QoS_support extra spec give us?15:08
*** iNeilus has quit IRC15:09
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC15:09
zhongjun2Currently, QoS_support is a common capabilities in Manila Code, just not write in doc.15:09
*** chandankumar has quit IRC15:09
bswartzis the idea that you'd like to setup a filter in your share type for QoS_support=True?15:09
zhongjun2I write extra spec in patch 4.15:10
bswartzthen if you have multiple backend types, some of which have QoS and some of which don't, you'll only get the QoS-supporting backends?15:10
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:10
bswartzwhen was the QoS_support extra spec added to the code? does anyone know?15:10
bswartzwas that part of the cinder fork? or was it added later?15:11
zhongjun2Yes, I like to setup a filter in my share type for QoS_support=True15:11
kaisers\o15:11
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
zhongjun2https://github.com/openstack/manila/blob/master/manila/scheduler/host_manager.py#L11115:12
markstur_I'd suggest we remove the old QoS_support=False as unused copy/paste code15:12
bswartzokay so we know that different backends may have different levels of QoS support -- some may support throttling, while others may support minimum guarantees15:13
bswartzif we just have a single extra spec that implies "support" it won't tell the admin that much15:13
zhongjun2long ago, we already have qos_support15:13
markstur_For zongjun2 either add a capability like huawei_qos = True to do what he wants, or get some agreement on what qos = True will be15:13
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:14
bswartzmarkstur_: I'm thinking something similar15:14
gansomarkstur_: s/he/she15:14
zhongjun2:)15:15
*** neilus has quit IRC15:15
markstur_Thanks, ganso15:15
bswartzI'm thinking if we have huawei_max_iops and huawei_max_bytes_per_sec (or whatever they are) then you setup your share_type with extra specs like:15:15
bswartzdriver_name <is> Huawei, huawei_max_iops = 100015:15
zhongjun2QoS_support = True, and huawei_max_iops=300 is enough?15:16
bswartzand in that case you don't need a QoS_support capability15:16
bswartzif you have both netapp and huawei, then it looks like15:16
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
bswartzdriver_name <in> (Huawei, NetApp), huawei_max_iops = 1000, netapp_max_iops = 100015:17
bswartzI think you can get what you want without needing a common extra_spec15:17
bswartzI'm not opposed to a common extra spec if it adds something, but so far I can't see what it adds other than a simple shorthand for the driver_name <in> .... filter15:18
zhongjun2In Cinder, QoS_support is exist, and different manufacturers have different qos parameters, it is ok15:18
bswartzand my worry is that as different vendors add different ways of doing QoS, the capability might actually cause confusion15:18
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away15:18
bswartzzhongjun2: the difference in cinder is that they've defined a common way of specifying limits which everyone is supposed to support -- so the meaning of the QoS_support flag is explicit in that case15:19
bswartzwe decided that the common definition can actually lead to inconsistent behavior though, in case one vendor's IOP is different from another vendor's IOP15:19
gansobswartz: I think QoS_support only says if it is enabled or not. Like, if a user has a share in a backend that supports QoS and, and he would like to continue having QoS after a retype or migration, that would be the case... even if other QoS-related extra-specs are different15:19
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
gansobswartz: so instead of huawei specifying huawei_qos = True + other extra_specs, and HDS specifying hds_qos = True + other extra_specs, both can specify QoS_support = True15:20
bswartzbtw since Tokyo I've looked into exactly how NetApp does QoS and it's somewhat complicated15:21
*** zeih has quit IRC15:21
bswartzit seems unlikely that the NetApp method would match exactly with another vendor's method15:21
bswartzthe differences might be small enough to ignore, but I worry about the case when they're not15:21
zhongjun2In Huawei driver, some array support qos, some array not support qos, so we need a qos flag to choose which one it ok, driver_name <in> (Huawei, NetApp) not enough.15:22
bswartzganso: I get what you're saying, but what happens when some driver support qos ceilings only and other driver support qos ceiling and floors?15:22
gansobswartz: defining specs like "max_iops" is complicated across vendors, but zhongjun2 is proposing something simpler for now15:22
*** hyakuhei_ has quit IRC15:22
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck15:22
gansobswartz: anything besides "QoS_supports True/False" would be vendor specific, not cross-vendor15:23
bswartzganso: if qos_support only implies that the driver support some kind of throttling, then how to you filter to drivers that also support qos guarantees?15:23
gansobswartz: I guess right now you don't, unless they are from the same vendor15:23
bswartzif we do this then we just need to be very clear that qos_support doesn't have any specific meaning -- it's just a common convention that all drivers can use to express whether their specific QoS feature is enabled on that array15:23
gansobswartz: +115:24
*** hyakuhei_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
cknight1bswartz: +1  But I still don't see the value.15:24
*** rvyalov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
bswartzcknight: you'd prefer that huawei adds a huawei_qos_support flag to distinguish between huawei arrays with qos and huawei arrays without?15:25
*** alyson_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
cknight1bswartz:  something like that, I guess.  it just seems odd to add a flag that is common for all drivers if there is no related QoS feature in common.15:25
bswartzcknight1: I agree -- the benefit that I see is less namespace pollution15:26
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
bswartzand also the fact that the code has been in tree for a long time -- less disruption to leave it in and give it an explicit meaning15:26
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
*** shwetaap has quit IRC15:26
*** shwetaap1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
bswartzas long as we clearly document what the flag means and doesn't mean, I think we're okay15:27
markstur_I guess a common capability would allow you to do the example w/ both huawei and netapp specs (scoped specs)15:27
cknight1bswartz: no harm there, I suppose.  but you'll still need vendor-specific flags to take advantage of any QoS features.15:27
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
bswartzit would be great if there was a QoS example for admins that showed how to configure qos on a real array in the real world15:27
markstur_otherwised we'd need OR for scheduler capabilities (don't have that do we???)15:27
zhongjun2Ok, I will add some example(huawei and netapp etc)15:27
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith15:28
bswartzmarkstur_: that's an excellent point15:28
bswartzokay I'm sold15:28
markstur_Previously I preferred huawei_qos, but it would get ugly if we all did that, I guess.15:28
gansomarkstur_: +115:28
markstur_for a similar capability15:28
bswartzwithout an OR operator in the filter scheduler, a common extra spec solves a real serious problem15:28
markstur_"Common and/or Similar Capability-like-things"15:29
bswartzokay so let's move this discussion to the gerrit review15:29
*** shwetaap1 has quit IRC15:29
bswartzI'll propose the wording I'd like to see in the dev docs, and we can iterate there until we're all happy15:29
bswartz#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/24728615:30
gansobswartz: +115:30
*** tatyana_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
bswartzzhongjun2: does that work for you?15:30
*** sneti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
zhongjun2Ok, Thanks. so we agree with use qos_support as commom capabilities?15:31
*** iben_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
bswartzzhongjun2: I don't hear any strong opposition15:31
bswartzzhongjun2: thanks again for continuing to pursue this15:31
bswartz#topic Architectural concerns and interoperability of new features15:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Architectural concerns and interoperability of new features (Meeting topic: manila)"15:31
bswartzcknight: you're up15:32
cknight1It's a touch premature to go into details until I can write everything down, so this is largely a teaser about an upcoming proposal.15:32
cknight1Over the last several months, Manila has added or proposed a number of experimental features like migration, CGs, and replication.15:32
* bswartz mutters about migrating replicated consistency groups...15:32
cknight1Migration is generic, but CGs and replication will be limited to just a few backends, so the user experience is irregular.15:32
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:32
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC15:32
cknight1Apart from Ben and me muttering, not much thought has been given to how those features will interoperate.15:33
cknight1And there are more things on the roadmap, such as backup and retype, that must fit cleanly into the feature matrix.15:33
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
cknight1I'm very concerned that we are adding major features without an overarching architectural vision.15:33
cknight1If that continues, we will end up with a hugely complicated feature support matrix and codebase that makes life miserable for both users and developers.15:33
bswartz+115:33
dustinsAnd testers!15:33
ameade+115:34
cknight1dustins: Yes!15:34
cknight1dustins: never forget the testers15:34
cknight1I've been developing a set of ideas that could provide an orderly framework for advanced features while making the user experience more uniform.15:34
dustinsbswartz's scenario is the stuff of my nightmares15:34
*** banix has quit IRC15:34
ganso+115:34
cknight1(Incidentally, the vision I will propose would apply equally well to Cinder, which IMHO is further down the path towards a supportability disaster.)15:34
cknight1But with new features labeled as experimental, Manila is better positioned to show the way.15:34
cknight1Kudos to Ben for insisting the new stuff be experimental.15:35
bswartzxyang1 and tbarron both know about the discussions going on in cinder to try to reconcile similar issues15:35
cknight1Before next week's meeting, I will add everything to a wiki and post a link to the Manila DL.  So stay tuned!15:35
xyang1bswartz: sure15:35
cknight1And if you have ideas of your own, please share them or add to the wiki.15:35
dustinscknight1: looking forward to it15:36
bswartzcknight1: want to give us the 2 sentence summary of the proposal?15:36
ameadei for one and really excited about mitigating these feature matrix issues15:36
cknight1bswartz: OK, I'll try.15:36
tbarronthat was one sentence right there15:36
gansolol15:36
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC15:37
cknight1bswartz: Look at CGs.  It's a highly specific grouping concept with very valuable but limited applicability.15:37
*** dbilunov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:37
cknight1bswartz: Anyone with a non-CG backend can't use it.15:37
cknight1bswartz: And now, all other advanced features have to be CG aware.  That snowballs very fast.15:37
cknight1bswartz: So instead, here are two ideas:15:38
cknight1bswartz: #1  Add a generic grouping construct to Manila.  Without any guaranteed high-value features.15:38
*** eranra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:38
*** sneti_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:38
*** sneti has quit IRC15:38
cknight1bswartz: If a driver doesn't do CGs or group-based replication, no problem, the share manager just handles groups in a simple loop.15:39
cknight1bswartz: So all drivers, even LVM or Generic, get simple grouping functions.15:39
cknight1bswartz: #2  Add the notion of a Share Group Type, similar to the existing Share Type.15:39
cknight1bswartz: So a group can have capabilities like consistent snapshots, group_replication, etc.15:40
cknight1bswartz: If a group has those set, the manager can defer to its driver to handle the advanced feature.15:40
toabctlcknight1: #1 means that everything is a group (and groups with a single member are possible) ? so no difference between CGs and non-CGs ?15:40
bswartzcknight1: that was more than 2 sentences, but I think that at least make the proposal clear15:41
cknight1bswartz: So *all* functions available on primitives (i.e. shares) are available in groups.15:41
vponomaryovcknight1: what if we make all shares be relate dto some CG? but by default as relation 1to1?15:41
cknight1bswartz: The user experience is much simpler and uniform.15:41
vponomaryovtoabctl: +1 ))15:41
cknight1bswartz: And the framework is there for advanced grouping functions like CGs, replication of CGs, retype of things in groups, migration of replicated groups, etc.15:42
cknight1vponomaryov: That's an implementation detail that I've thought about but not concluded on.  Insight welcome!15:42
bswartztoabctl: I think there is a difference between CGs and non-CGs, but the difference comes in the extra specs on the group type15:42
cknight1bswartz: OK, that's the high-level summary.  More coming in a wiki.15:43
xyang1I am opposing doing this in Cinder because we have explored it before and decided not to do it15:43
bswartzat the manila DB level the groups would look the same15:43
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
bswartzxyang1: if you remember the reasons why cinder decided against a similar approach they would be really valuable feedback for cknight15:43
*** esker has quit IRC15:43
xyang1a long story and I think a lot of those are captured in reviews15:44
cknight1bswartz: +1.  Don't want to repeat the mistakes others.15:44
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
cknight1xyang1: Please send links to relevant reviews!15:44
xyang1I can provide links later15:44
bswartzxyang1: when cknight mentioned the idea to me it sounded like the proposal matched fairly well with that you've been pushing in cinder15:44
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
xyang1we are not doing group type in cinder15:45
xyang1#1 may be closer to what we are trying in cinder15:45
bswartzso if we're missing a crucial detail then let's find out what it is15:45
xyang1but we are trying to use the same replication api for volume and group15:46
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
xyang1sure15:46
bswartzxyang1: was is a case of difficulty with forwards/backward compatibility with existing APIs? because we don't have those problems in Manila15:46
*** Leom_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
tbarronxyang1: I think cknight1's idea may be related to winston's ?15:46
bswartzwe are fortunate that the existing CG implementation in Manila is marked experimental we can can rewrite it if we choose15:47
xyang1it was because of the complexity it will bring15:47
xyang1we eventually gave up on it15:47
xyang1that was in Grizzly15:47
xyang1I am referring to the type group15:48
bswartzxyang1: I agree that groups with types adds a new level of complexity -- but my fear is that trying to mix features like replications, cgs, and migraiton without a common grouping concept will result in even worse complexity15:48
ameade+115:48
bswartzso I'm willing to entertain this proposal15:48
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC15:48
cknight1bswartz: +1  My thoughts exactly.15:48
xyang1that is fine, but I don't think we should do it in cinder15:48
xyang1our file based storage does not have CG concept, so it is different in manila and cinder that way too15:49
bswartzwell that's a discussion for the cinder meeting -- we're not here to talk about cinder, other than as an example of what's been tried before and how it's turned out15:50
*** armax has quit IRC15:50
*** Leom has quit IRC15:50
xyang1you said something about cinder in the beginning15:50
bswartzI think I care less than others about maintaining commonality between cinder and manila15:50
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
*** akislitsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
xyang1If you want to try in Manila, I don't have problem15:51
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
cknight1xyang1: fair enough, thanks.  I look forward to seeing some of the earlier Cinder discussions.15:52
bswartzwell I hope we can discuss cknight's idea in more depth next week after there is a doc about it15:52
*** igorbelikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
bswartz#topic open discussion15:52
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: manila)"15:52
bswartzdoes anyone have something else for this week?15:53
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC15:53
xyang1cknight1:  one important thing is the difference between a group and pool15:53
bswartznext week the manila meeting should happen as usual, but the following 2 weeks we start to run into holidays so we should discuss if those meetings should be cancelled15:53
cknight1xyang1: yes, very true.15:54
tbarronxyang1: +1 :-)15:54
bswartzdoes anyone plan to work dec 24th and dec 31?15:54
*** IvanBerezovskiy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
vponomaryovbswartz: yes15:55
bswartzI hate canceling 2 meetings in a row15:55
dustinsI'm not15:55
*** mattymo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:55
*** xarses has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:55
xyang1vponomaryov: no holiday break?15:55
bswartzokay well we can decide next week about meeting cancelations15:55
vponomaryov xyang1: jan 1th and 7th15:55
*** eranra_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:55
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:55
cknight1bswartz:  I have no issues canceling the meeting those weeks.  The DL & IRC are still available, but lots of folks would probably appreciate the break.15:56
bswartzcheck the meeting wiki to see when the next meeting is15:56
bswartzwe may hold brief meetings if anything comes up -- in any case I don't expect everyone to be there15:56
*** vkmc is now known as vkmc-lunch15:56
bswartznext week we're still on though15:56
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
bswartzokay I guess we're done for today15:57
bswartzthanks everyone15:57
*** yottatsa has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
dustinsthanks!15:57
bswartz#endmeeting15:57
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_dvr)"15:57
*** tbarron has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 15:57:34 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:57
*** markstur_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2015/manila.2015-12-10-15.00.html15:57
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2015/manila.2015-12-10-15.00.txt15:57
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2015/manila.2015-12-10-15.00.log.html15:57
*** aovchinnikov has quit IRC15:57
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** csaba has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** Prem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** zotoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** SheenaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** mwhahaha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** vponomaryov has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** eranra has quit IRC15:58
*** skolekonov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** salmon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** romcheg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** dustins has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
xarses#startmeeting fuel16:00
xarses#chair xarses16:00
xarsesTodays Agenda:16:00
xarses#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda16:00
xarsesWho's here?16:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 16:00:09 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is xarses. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'fuel'16:00
*** fzhadaev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
openstackCurrent chairs: xarses16:00
maximovhi16:00
mwhahahahi16:00
*** asvechnikov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
dbilunovhi16:00
fzhadaevHi!16:00
asvechnikov_hi16:00
*** akasatkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
dpyzhovhi16:00
SheenaGHi guys16:00
alex_didenkohi16:00
tatyana_hi16:00
akislitsky_hi16:00
yottatsahi16:01
*** u_glide1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
holser_o/16:01
romcheg\0/16:01
vkramskikhhi16:01
*** ikalnitsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
xarsesok, lets get started with action items from last meeting16:01
igorbelikovo/16:01
xarses#topic last meeting actions16:01
*** openstack changes topic to "last meeting actions (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:01
xarsesholser to follow up creating bp for plugging ubuntu bootstrap16:01
sboghi16:02
*** eranra_ has quit IRC16:02
*** eranra_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
xarsesholser_: ?16:02
*** mmosesohn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
*** mattymo_ has quit IRC16:02
ikalnitsky\o16:03
holser_we created plan but I’ve not not created blueprint16:03
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
xarsesok, lets get a stub together then on launchpad so we don't loose it16:03
*** wanghua has quit IRC16:03
*** houming has quit IRC16:03
holser_sure thing16:03
xarsesholser to follow up creating bug for injecting drivers into boostrap for 8.016:04
holser_it’s the same16:04
xarsesIIRC this was about creating a docs bugs16:04
xarsesok16:04
*** zhaohua has quit IRC16:04
xarsesdklenov will follow up with with details on enabling ubuntu bootstrap on FFE thready16:05
fzhadaevIt was done16:05
xarsesthanks16:05
xarsesmattymo will create ML to discuss issues with oslo.logging not sending some tracebacks on syslog16:05
*** degorenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
dims_mattymo : xarses : https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.log/+bug/151482816:06
openstackLaunchpad bug 1514828 in oslo.log "tracebacks are not logged to syslog" [Low,Triaged]16:06
xarsesdims_: thanks, did we get anywhere with that?16:06
mmosesohn_xarses, I didn't get to it. It was a bug directly in cinder code16:07
dims_xarses : no one has looked in yet16:07
mmosesohn_I'm still fixing the actual issue which is far more critical16:07
bgaifullinhi all.16:07
xarsesdims_: what can we do to help this one get attention?16:07
*** jmcbride has quit IRC16:08
mmosesohn_dims_, is more aware of why trace logs don't get sent out16:08
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
dims_xarses : need someone familiar with syslog that i can work with16:09
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC16:09
mmosesohn_dims_, me16:09
warpchi!16:09
dims_mmosesohn_ : yay!16:09
xarsesok, I16:09
*** eranra_ has quit IRC16:09
*** zhongjun2 has quit IRC16:10
*** Akanksha08 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
xarsesok, I'll add an action for you to16:10
xarses*too16:10
xarsesnope, two16:10
xarseson to the main show16:10
xarses#topic Moving Fuel services out of Docker containers (kozhukalov)16:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Moving Fuel services out of Docker containers (kozhukalov) (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:10
xarses#action dims and mattymo will follow up on https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.log/+bug/151482816:11
openstackLaunchpad bug 1514828 in oslo.log "tracebacks are not logged to syslog" [Low,Triaged]16:11
*** armax has quit IRC16:11
*** dsariel has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:11
xarsesok, moving on16:12
xarses#topic Adding Fuel CI jobs to puppet-openstack workflow16:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Adding Fuel CI jobs to puppet-openstack workflow (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:12
xarsesthe puppet-openstack guys have asked for some follow up on this. Who was leading this?16:12
*** iyamahat has quit IRC16:12
degorenkohey16:12
degorenkoas i know from alexandra fedorova16:12
bookwarxarses: we have a pending hw request for this task16:13
*** zeih has quit IRC16:13
degorenkowe are awaiting for hardware16:13
mwhahahawe need to fix our code before the hardware16:13
bookwarbut i think we should start on the implementation part16:13
*** mihgen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:13
mwhahahacause it'll fail right now even without hardware16:13
xarsesok I was going to ask that16:13
mwhahahawe also need to figure out how to inject the upstream versions into our fuel-library build process16:13
mwhahahasince we currently do not track upstream master16:14
bookwarat the moment we don't have proper blueprint for this activity, but you can assign the action item on me to create one for next week16:14
*** apetrich has quit IRC16:14
xarsesI'd like to identify who will be responsible for the status, and I'd like to see some regular updates (ML is fine) so that the two teams know what's going on16:14
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC16:15
bookwari'll work with Dmitry B and others to track this properly16:15
xarsesok, thanks16:16
xarses#topic FFEs and their status (mihgen)16:16
*** openstack changes topic to "FFEs and their status (mihgen) (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:16
mihgenhi folks, I'd like to go one by one and check where we are16:16
mihgen1. CentOS 7. ETA: Monday 7th. Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/master-on-centos716:16
mihgenall done, right?16:16
xarses#action bookwar will create blueprint for Fuel CI on puppet-openstack projects16:16
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
mihgenholser_: ikalnitsky: kozhukalov: bookwar ^^^ can we consider centos7 fully merged?16:17
xarsesmihgen: sounded that way, but I'd too like to hear its complete16:17
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** sicarie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
mihgenincluding all CI pieces?16:17
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:18
ikalnitskyfrom my pov - it's merged. we have files tech-debts, and they aren't resolved yet (afaik)16:18
ikalnitskys/files/filed/g16:18
bookwarmihgen: yes16:18
*** dprince has quit IRC16:19
mihgengood.16:19
mihgen2. Disable queue mirroring for RPC queues in RabbitMQ. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/rabbitmq-disable-mirroring-for-rpc16:19
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
mihgendidn't give second FFE so it goes to 9.016:20
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:20
mihgenikalnitsky: holser_ Correct?16:20
ikalnitskycorrect16:20
*** tremble has quit IRC16:20
*** wojdev has quit IRC16:21
mihgenholser_: ?16:21
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
mihgenconfirm from library side16:21
xarsesmihgen: the library commit isn't merged16:22
nurlaxarses: what commit isn't merged? O_016:22
holser_correct16:22
xarses#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249180/16:22
holser_technically, centos7 is merged, though we still catch bugs16:23
mihgenok, so we are waiting for 9.0. No FFE. Moving on16:23
*** Akanksha08 has quit IRC16:23
*** neilus has quit IRC16:23
mihgen3. Task based deployment with Astute. ETA: Friday, 11th. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/task-based-deployment-astute16:23
ashtokolovTask-based-deployment: Astute and Nailgun parts: code is ready and on review. 2 commits to nailgun are already merged. For 1 commit tests are in progress.16:23
mihgenin progress?16:23
ashtokolovLibrary part (aka cross-node dependencies are in progress) we are testing on real deployment cases.16:23
ashtokolovHere is a list: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/branch:master+topic:bp/task-based-deployment-astute+NOT+status:abandoned+NOT+project:openstack/fuel-specs,n,z16:23
ashtokolov#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/branch:master+topic:bp/task-based-deployment-astute+NOT+status:abandoned+NOT+project:openstack/fuel-specs,n,z16:24
aglarendilwe are very close to finishing even library part16:24
ashtokolovToday evening we are going to have final merge plan for library16:24
aglarendilwe have almost gotten to post-deployment stage. there was a bug in OCF script16:24
aglarendilthe fix is on review as well16:24
mihgensounds like running at full speed..are we converging to make it happen by the end of the week?16:24
ikalnitskyfrom fuel-web pov, there're two patches. one of them is almost done. i think we can merge it today. the second one - i didn't review yet.16:25
ikalnitskyi think we can manage to complete fuel-web part in time16:26
mihgenaglarendil: ashtokolov are you guys targeting end of the week?16:26
ashtokolovYes we expect custom iso today evening16:26
ashtokolovand finish till the end of this week16:26
mihgenok, great16:26
mihgen4. Component Registry. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/component-registry16:27
xarseswhat is the impact of not merging any more of it?16:27
SheenaGxarses: is your question about component registry?16:27
SheenaGxarses: or task-based deployment?16:27
mihgenXarses: if you are about task-based, then you don't get task-based in 8.0 if you don't merge all those :)16:27
xarsestask based16:28
SheenaGmihgen: I believe component registry merged yesterday16:28
aglarendilxarses: it is completely backward-compatible16:28
mihgencomponent registry - can we consider it's all done and qa can test it?16:28
ikalnitskyxarses: it won't be default option, so..16:28
ikalnitskymihgen: yes, we can.16:28
mihgenexcellent.16:29
*** a_ta has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
mihgen5. Add vmware cluster after deployment.  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/add-vmware-clusters16:29
SheenaGmihgen: also merged16:29
mihgenis assignee here of this bp.. ? If it's finished, we need to set Iplemented16:30
SheenaGmihgen: I don't see Adrian here, but I can track this down with him16:30
mihgenthanks16:30
mihgen6. Support murano service broker https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/implement-support-for-murano-service-broker16:30
mihgenis this one done too?16:30
IvanBerezovskiypatches are merged16:31
mihgenexcellent16:31
mihgenand the last one16:31
mihgen7. Ubuntu bootstrap16:31
mihgenI saw email in openstack-dev, all done, right?16:31
fzhadaevAll commits are merged. Feature is done.16:31
mihgenwonderful! thanks all, I'll provide summary in openstack-dev.16:32
mihgenplease update status of bps16:32
*** spzala has quit IRC16:32
*** rvyalov_ has quit IRC16:33
mihgenI didn't throw away those 8.0 which are not in implemented status, but I still plan to do it16:33
mihgenXarses: moving on?16:33
xarses#topic UI Team status (vkramskikh)16:33
*** openstack changes topic to "UI Team status (vkramskikh) (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:33
vkramskikhHi, we're working on bugfixing and are doing it quite well. This week we've reduced the number of area-ui bugs from 63 to 36: http://i.imgur.com/9DhsD5x.png16:33
vkramskikhWe're on track of fixing all High bugs before SCF - there are 3 High bugs left.16:33
vkramskikhUI for Component Registry blueprint (FFE) was merged yesterday, some extra fixes are expected.16:33
vkramskikhQuestions?16:33
xarsesawesome, images today16:33
*** EricGonc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
mihgenvkramskikh: great, any plans for what you could start working in terms of features?16:34
mihgenwe open master on SCF16:34
vkramskikhprobably we'll start first on separating vendor-specific code from core Fuel16:35
vkramskikhbut we also have some plans to solve tech debt16:35
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:35
dpyzhovmihgen: is it a final decision to open master on SCF?16:35
mihgenthat sounds good.16:35
mihgendpyzhov: yes, I believe it was communicated by PTL quite a while ago16:35
mihgenno one was opposed16:36
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:36
mihgenis there any problem with it?16:36
dpyzhovgreat16:36
dpyzhovNo, I'm happy )16:36
vkramskikhtotally support branching on SCF16:36
vkramskikh++16:36
*** nkrinner has quit IRC16:36
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:36
*** mdong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:36
mihgengreat then :)16:36
xarses#topic Telco Team Status (fzhadaev)16:36
*** openstack changes topic to "Telco Team Status (fzhadaev) (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:36
fzhadaevHere is the current Fuel Telco team status:16:36
fzhadaev1) We're finnished work on ubuntu-bootstrap feature. Now it's enabled by default.16:36
fzhadaev2) The main activity for now is bug fixing.16:36
xarsesgreat to hear16:37
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC16:37
mihgenI'm aware that you guys have identified things to be further improved in this feature16:38
mihgenany public bp opened so far.. ?16:38
*** Akanksha08 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
fzhadaevNot yet. There are listed in internal ticket16:38
fzhadaevBP will be created16:39
mihgenplease create public one. We want to track it, and ideally to start work on it while we still have fresh memory on the code )16:39
fzhadaevsure16:39
xarses#topic Bugs team status (dpyzhov) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-bugs-status16:39
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs team status (dpyzhov) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-bugs-status (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:39
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed16:40
dpyzhovI’ve updated statistics. It is not so оptimistic as usual. We have bunch of reports for new features.16:40
*** neilus has quit IRC16:40
dpyzhovI’ve checked with team leads and we are targeting to fix current high priority issues by SCF. However we’ll appreciate hints for bugs from SME.16:40
dpyzhovI have a question. Do we have a preliminary date for QA acceptance results?16:40
*** zeih has quit IRC16:40
xarsesdpyzhov: I though we agreed that SME's are supposed to help with bugs from their features16:41
dpyzhovRight now we see really low number for late-discovery bugs income. We are fighting with several tricky bugs. It is almost the same bugs that we had last week16:41
*** dprince has quit IRC16:41
dpyzhovxarses: feature developers fixing their own bugs16:41
mihgenI see 26 bugs income over the last week16:41
mihgenhigh priority ones16:41
dpyzhovI'm talking about tricky bugs in existing functionality16:42
mihgenam I correct?16:42
dpyzhovmihgen: yes, this is a raw income16:42
xarsesdpyzhov: ok good. Then are we having problems getting SME's to help?16:42
*** rcernin has quit IRC16:42
*** hyakuhei_ has quit IRC16:43
mihgenoh it's just python. And it's not in the category of delivery teams16:43
mihgendoes it mean that we've got 26 bugs against old functionality which we released in 7.0... ?16:43
dpyzhovIt is a total income of python bugs with high priority16:43
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:43
dpyzhovfor all teams16:43
mihgenhow many bugs do we see coming for new functionality vs old 7.016:44
dpyzhovLaunchpad is bad at statistics, really16:44
dpyzhovI've walked through high bugs16:44
dpyzhovAnd I've found only 1 real bug that is late discovery16:45
dpyzhovMost of new bugs are about new functionality16:45
dpyzhovIt sounds optimistic16:45
dpyzhovBut we had a broken master this week16:45
dpyzhovso there was no real chance for QA to find old bugs16:45
mihgenis it all fixed now.. ?16:45
dpyzhov?16:46
dpyzhovMaster is fixed16:46
dpyzhovBugs are partially fixed16:46
mihgenok. thanks. I'd expect that delivery teams will be helping out initially quite actively16:46
dpyzhovyou can see 8 bugs on network team16:46
dpyzhovother teams have about 1-2 bugs16:47
dpyzhovRight now I assume that they will deal with bugs on their features16:47
*** vgridnev has quit IRC16:47
nurla@dpyzhov please keep in mind, that we fixed tests after centos merge16:47
dpyzhovDo we have preliminary date for QA acceptance?16:47
nurlai think you will get issues :)16:48
mihgennumbers don't match16:48
mihgenif it's 1-2 bugs on a team16:48
mihgenand total backlog is 6016:48
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC16:48
dpyzhovbugs on teams are only about python16:48
dpyzhovstill doesn't match16:49
dpyzhovOh, I got it16:49
dpyzhovMissed bugs are duplicates16:49
dpyzhovI'm trying to count them now and looks like I count them not in every place16:50
mihgendpyzhov: pls figure it out then, we just need to ensure that we are converging by HCF ;)16:50
mihgenmoving to the next topic?..16:50
dpyzhovI'll update the report in 15 minutes16:50
xarses#topic Network team status (alex_didenko)16:50
*** openstack changes topic to "Network team status (alex_didenko) (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:51
alex_didenkoRight now we're working on bugfixing and bugs related to multi-rack support and on the following BPs:16:51
alex_didenkohttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/external-lbs16:51
alex_didenkohttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/allow-any-vip (the most of work is done by enhancements team, so I believe they can give more details on this if needed)16:51
alex_didenkoAlso we're going to start working on the following BPs shortly:16:51
alex_didenkohttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/selective-default-gateway-net16:51
alex_didenkohttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/dhcp-vips16:51
alex_didenkoAs for external-lbs - we have some blockers for this functionality, they are reported as bugs and attached to external-lbs BP.16:51
alex_didenkoWith fixes applied on my local virtual lab I was able to deploy cluster with controllers in different racks using external load balancer.16:51
alex_didenkoNote: in such case floating IPs do not work (known limitation of multirack based on static routes).16:51
alex_didenkoEverything else except floating IPs seems to work fine: VMs are running, no issues with internal network/connectivity, volumes, images (swift), etc.16:51
alex_didenkoI'm going to prepare some documentation on how to set up cluster with controllers in different racks using external LB when we address all blockers.16:51
alex_didenkoSorry for wall of text :)16:51
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:52
mihgengreat wall of text)16:52
xarsesalex_didenko: it's great, well prepared =16:52
xarses=)16:52
mihgenI have a question about advanced networking16:52
mihgenwe have templates now, any work being done in a direction to make it fully available in the UI16:53
mihgenand flexible?16:53
mihgenAPI level first, of course16:53
alex_didenkowe've discussed it during tech-talk16:53
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:53
alex_didenkoand it's quite problematic - network templates are much more complex and flexible than default net config16:54
akasatkinit is in a story, no BPs yet16:54
alex_didenkoit could be extremely tricky to try to visualize it on UI16:54
mihgenwell may be it is OK to have some of that configurable in YAML16:54
mihgenbut majority of things should be exposed to the UI I believe16:55
alex_didenkoI'm afraid that we could end up with a single input text field for template yaml :)16:55
akasatkinit will look like a graphics editor..16:55
mihgenwell then may be we can just ask for what template user wants to choose16:55
mihgenand then show only limited things on the UI16:56
SheenaGmihgen: I've talked to DP about this some, but will continue that conversation16:56
SheenaGmihgen: we agree that some subset of the functionality should probably be exposed, but providing a yaml editor is the wrong way to do it16:56
xarses4 min16:56
SheenaGmihgen: the conversations haven't gone much past that yet16:56
*** mdong has quit IRC16:56
mihgenakasatkin: SheenaG yes please, we need to continue this effort. Current implementation with templates is still over complex for users16:56
mihgenand once you went there, you can't do anything through UI anymore as far as I understand16:57
SheenaGmihgen: that's right16:57
akasatkinnot anything, just interfaces to networks mapping is disabled16:57
akasatkinbut it is not good, also16:58
mihgenwell it's huge deal...16:58
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** greg_a has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** ccneill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** atomic77 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
SheenaGmihgen: I'll reach out to DP again to see if we can make some progress on what to expose and how.  Right now he is working on descriptions for Networking settings in Fuel, so he's definitely heads down on the Networking usability issues.16:59
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC16:59
xarses#action SheenaG to follow up with DP regarding network templates in ui16:59
xarsesthats the time we have folks16:59
xarses#endmeeting17:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_dvr)"17:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 17:00:06 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2015/fuel.2015-12-10-16.00.html17:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2015/fuel.2015-12-10-16.00.txt17:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2015/fuel.2015-12-10-16.00.log.html17:00
*** igorbelikov has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** ikalnitsky has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** mihgen has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** akislitsky_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** michaelxin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** yottatsa has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
hyakuhei#startmeeting Security17:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 17:00:34 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hyakuhei. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
*** holser_ has quit IRC17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Security)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'security'17:00
*** xarses has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** mdong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
hyakuheiHey everybody!17:00
*** dbilunov has quit IRC17:00
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
elmikohi17:00
ccneillhowdy o/17:00
*** tatyana_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** mwhahaha has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
greg_ahello!17:01
michaelxin_hi17:01
mdongo/17:01
*** ntrueblo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** gmurphy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** akasatkin has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
nkindero/17:01
gmurphyo/17:01
sicarieo/17:01
*** fzhadaev has quit IRC17:01
SheenaGOh man, I didn't realize you guys had a meeting right after Fuel - lots of familiar names!  Hi michaelxin_!  Hi ccneill!17:01
*** asvechnikov_ has quit IRC17:01
ccneillhi there SheenaG!17:01
*** ysm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** wayward710 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
ccneilllong time no see17:01
bknudsonhi17:01
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
SheenaGccneill: no kidding.  Time for me to duck out, you guys have a good meeting!17:02
*** belmoreira has quit IRC17:02
michaelxin_SheenaG: How are you?17:02
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
hyakuheiheh17:02
SheenaGmichaelxin_ I'm good!  I miss you guys!  Looking forward to seeing everyone up at the Austin summit17:02
michaelxin_SheenaG: sure17:02
*** mmosesohn_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** tmcpeak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
tmcpeako/17:03
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC17:03
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC17:03
*** SheenaG has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
tmcpeaktime ran away with me ;)17:03
hyakuheipffft!17:03
elmikohehe17:03
tkelseyo/ all17:03
tmcpeakdebugging my crappy gate failure17:03
hyakuheiRight so I don’t have a locked in agenda for today (my bad)17:03
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
tristanCgreeting!17:03
tmcpeakpffft17:03
hyakuheiDid anyone pick up any of hte OSSNs this week?17:03
hyakuheiHey tristanC17:03
elmikotmcpeak: lol17:03
michaelxin_hyakuhei: not me17:04
michaelxin_how many do we have?17:04
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
ccneillI'm just back from vacation17:04
elmikoneither did i :/17:04
tmcpeakI was supposed to check out the OSSA's but I got stuck on something and forgot :(17:04
nkinderhyakuhei: no new ones picked up.  Still finishing the embargoed one17:04
hyakuhei3-4 I think, I’ve got one in review17:04
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
hyakuhei#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254427/17:04
nkinderhyakuhei: ah, I'll take a look at your draft17:04
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
*** jprovazn has quit IRC17:05
hyakuheiCheers17:05
*** matrohon has quit IRC17:05
michaelxin_hyakuhei: +117:05
michaelxin_will check it later.17:05
*** vkmc-lunch is now known as vkmc17:05
hyakuheiThanks17:05
hyakuheiIt was an easy one because the initial writeup was good17:06
*** dims_ has quit IRC17:06
nkinderThat always helps :)17:07
hyakuheiok, here’s a copy-pasted agenda whoop!17:07
tmcpeakhyakuhei: looks legit17:07
hyakuhei#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-20151210-agenda17:07
hyakuhei#topic Publicity17:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Publicity (Meeting topic: Security)"17:07
hyakuhei#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-raising-profile17:07
hyakuheiAnyone managed to pick up any sessions?17:08
hyakuheiBy that I mean - drop in and say hello...17:08
tmcpeakI think we decided to be ready with the Bandit baseline job first?17:08
tmcpeakI'm working on that as we speak17:08
hyakuheiAh yeah that’s right17:08
tmcpeakor was prior to the meeting17:08
hyakuheiIn the meantime the boilerplate needs working on17:08
tmcpeak+117:08
michaelxin_I picked up two17:08
elmikohyakuhei: had not seen this pad, but i'll look into taking a session17:09
michaelxin_and I will go to one of them today.17:09
tmcpeakmichaelxin: hold off until we have the Bandit stuff ready so we can demo it during the meeting?17:09
michaelxin_I missed one early this morning due to some other duty17:09
*** zeih has quit IRC17:09
michaelxin_tmcpeak: ok17:09
elmikoi'll definitely followup with the api-wg17:09
tmcpeakthat way they can play with it, see (hopefully) it's good, and then we can get next steps to put it in their tox17:09
michaelxin_elmiko: sahara? right17:09
elmikomichaelxin_: yes17:10
tmcpeakoh yeah, I have an update on that I can wait until bandit slot17:10
michaelxin_elmiko: +117:10
hyakuheiWell, you can take any meeting you want, whenever you want :) If you want to wait for Bandit so that there’s a nice way to demo / leverage it then that’s absolutely fine17:10
tmcpeakahh ok, if you're already set up go ahead17:10
michaelxin_maybe, we can start to say hi17:10
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:10
michaelxin_and learn what other people is doing.17:10
tmcpeakseems reasonable17:11
hyakuheiWhatever works for you as individuals, it’d be nice to drop in on the same group more than once17:11
michaelxin_There is some emails about security issue for Fuel17:11
tmcpeakwith Sahara I'm sure elmiko can push Bandit anyway ;)17:11
hyakuheiMaybe even being more of a security rep…17:11
*** HeOS has quit IRC17:11
hyakuheibut that gets time intensive17:11
michaelxin_Maybe, we can leverage opportunities like that17:11
elmikotmcpeak: hehe, yea. we are working towards a voting bandit gate17:11
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:11
tmcpeakyep17:11
tmcpeakelmiko: ok, with the baseline I think it will be easier for you ;)17:11
elmikocool17:11
michaelxin_yes17:11
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
michaelxin_we might have to spend time on projects to learn what people are doing17:12
michaelxin_the challenges they face17:12
elmikoseems like we already have good engagement with some of the projects on this list. should we just note that in the etherpad?17:12
michaelxin_and help them17:12
elmiko(for example, barbican)17:12
michaelxin_elmiko: +117:12
michaelxin_ccneill: is working on lots of barbican security testings.17:13
elmikonice17:13
ccneill<_< something like that17:13
michaelxin_and designate17:13
ccneillI at least know what's going on I think ;)17:13
tmcpeakgotta start somewhere17:13
michaelxin_mdong: too.17:14
*** holser_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
*** holser_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
ccneillI've been able to poke at the code manually a bit, and mcdong and I have written some functional security tests17:14
hyakuheiThats excellent news17:14
ccneillstill have to figure out what we want to do with the tempest-lib CR I have open..17:14
tmcpeakccneill: you writing them for tempest?17:14
ccneillhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/216303/ + https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237263/17:14
tmcpeakor just unit tests in Barbican?17:15
ccneillso I originally started with barbican, then Designate was added to my plate, and I realized that maintaining a one-off file for every product I test would be tedious17:15
*** EricGonc_ has quit IRC17:15
ccneilland someone from designate recommended putting it in tempest-lib17:15
tmcpeakyeah, good to reuse17:15
ccneillbarbican + designate both use tempest-lib, so I figured it was the lowest barrier to entry17:16
ccneillthis also happened before syntribos, so there's some confusion of how/if they fit together17:16
*** dims has quit IRC17:16
*** ntrueblo_ has quit IRC17:16
ccneillI think the stuff I've written makes sense mostly as a data generator; the validators I have are very simplistic17:16
tmcpeakyeah, looks like there is some overlap17:16
tmcpeakbut still, cool stuff17:16
*** ashleighfarnham has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:16
ccneillsorry for that tangent, but figured it kind of fits in with our outreach17:17
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:17
tmcpeakdefinitely17:17
hyakuheino it’s very useful17:17
ccneillsince we'll want to figure out what tools we recommend/use ourselves/etc.17:17
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:17
michaelxin_ccneill: +117:17
ccneillI think maybe in Q1 I can work on integrating Syntribos and my stuff a little more17:17
ccneillat least feeding the stuff I've done into Syntribos or something17:17
tmcpeakmaybe we can spend some time reconciling this at the midcycle17:18
tmcpeak+ planning out where we want to do our fuzzing and drawing the lines17:18
ccneillyeah17:18
ccneillthis was built purely to serve my needs for the tests I wanted to write for those 2 products; there is definitely room for improvement haha17:18
tmcpeakit seems to make sense to have this in tempest17:19
*** browne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:19
tmcpeaksince those are already being run in the gate17:19
tmcpeakwould have less barrier to entry than introducing a separate tool17:19
ccneillyeah, and it's super trivial to write your own functional tests and just plug in my data generators17:19
michaelxin_agree17:19
hyakuheiI saw a Mirantis blog on security highlightly Syntribos17:20
hyakuheibut completely missing the Security project as a whole17:20
tmcpeakoh sweet, link?17:20
tmcpeak:P17:20
hyakuheiwhich made me both sad with mirantis and sad generally17:20
tmcpeakwell yeah, you'd think we'd at least have one participant from there17:20
hyakuhei#link https://www.mirantis.com/blog/openstack-security-issues-self-defense-without-weapons/17:21
hyakuheiYou’d think right? hehe.17:21
hyakuheiAnyway, do you guys have specific bandit things to talk about?17:21
tmcpeakyeah17:22
hyakuhei#topic Bandit17:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Bandit (Meeting topic: Security)"17:22
*** dprince has quit IRC17:22
tmcpeakok cool17:22
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC17:23
tmcpeakso we were going to make it easy to do a Bandit gate17:23
*** michaelxin_ has quit IRC17:23
tmcpeakwith the baseline stuff17:23
tmcpeakand I was going to do just make a gate job template like I did for the HP stuff17:23
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:23
tmcpeakbut the project-config guys had the idea that we should just make a command line tool, and then projects can add it to their tox.ini and run it as part of flake8 checks17:23
hyakuheigood idea17:23
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC17:23
tmcpeakthen a project doesn't have to do anything with config changes, they can change it themselves with their tox.ini17:24
tmcpeakand it's also easy for developers to check locally17:24
tmcpeakyeah17:24
hyakuheiOk that makes sense17:24
ccneill+1 for easy peasy17:24
tmcpeakso I've got this tool I've been working on: https://review.openstack.org/25445517:24
*** dims has quit IRC17:24
tmcpeakthe unit tests are broken (I'm deubgging them)17:24
tmcpeakbut the tool works17:24
tmcpeakif you guys want to play with it17:24
tmcpeakbasically it checks out the parent commit, runs Bandit, checks out the current commit, runs Bandit baseline, and compares17:25
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC17:25
tmcpeakso even if your project has a bunch of problems, you'll only get results that are introduced as part of your code change17:25
tmcpeakyou basically run 'bandit-baseline <bandit args>' and away you go17:25
tmcpeakit can do HTML report, txt output, etc17:25
brownenice17:26
elmikotmcpeak: very cool17:26
tmcpeakand most importantly we can just add it to the tox target17:26
wayward710That sounds useful17:26
tmcpeakso a project that wants to use a bandit gate but has existing issues should still be able to use it17:26
tmcpeakit will just make sure new issues aren't introduced17:26
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
tmcpeakso yeah, as soon as this unit test gets fixed we should be able to merge it, push a new Bandit that includes it, and then start socializing it17:27
ccneillsounds awesome17:27
tmcpeakcool, thanks guys17:27
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
ccneillsome of the feedback I got presenting the OSSP deck at the OS Austin meetup was one guy was VERY interested in seeing every product gate on bandit17:27
michaelxintmcpeak: great job17:27
elmikotmcpeak: +117:27
hyakuhei:D17:27
ccneillso this is great stuff17:28
*** edwardb has quit IRC17:28
tmcpeakcool, so next week it should be merged and everybody can go play around with it17:28
tmcpeakthat's all I had, tkelsey I assume you were busy?17:28
tkelseynope im here17:28
hyakuhei#topic Anchor17:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Anchor (Meeting topic: Security)"17:28
hyakuheiSo not a lot has happened but viraptor has been working on integrating CMC messaging17:29
tmcpeakI mean with the changes you're working on (config stuff)17:29
tkelseytmcpeak: I'll look it over, I have been a bit snowed under :)17:29
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa17:29
tmcpeakheh ,yeah, figured17:29
*** IvanBerezovskiy has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
hyakuheibecause we want to leverage that (possibly) for attestation in Leeson too (certificate things)17:29
hyakuheitkelsey: I don’t think there’s any other Anchor things?17:29
tmcpeakwhat's CMC messaging?17:29
hyakuheis/messaging/requests17:30
hyakuhei(brainfart)17:30
tmcpeakwhat's CMC requests?17:30
hyakuheiIt’s like google17:30
hyakuheiCMC is a way of packaging up certificate requests17:30
hyakuheiIt comes in two variants, simple and … not17:30
hyakuheiBarbican has a simple implementation, we want to try and implement it too17:30
tmcpeakahh17:31
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC17:31
hyakuhei#link https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc527217:31
tmcpeakI take it we've rushed right out and started integration with the complicated one? :P17:31
tkelseymy IRC client is being lame, BRB while i relaunch it sorry!17:31
*** tkelsey has quit IRC17:31
hyakuheiWe also need to put something together to better explain why ephemeral certificates are a good thing (revocation not working etc)17:32
hyakuheibecause I basically have to do a coffee talk every time someone new hears about it…17:32
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:32
tmcpeakhaha17:32
elmikoheh, i'll bet17:32
hyakuhei“You dont revoke certificates!” INSECURE!17:32
hyakuheiWell, you don’t really revoke them either, you just think you do....17:33
ccneillyeah, from presenting at OSSP, it was definitely clear that at least I am unable to articulate all the benefits of Anchor...17:33
wayward710I would be interested in helping with that, but there will be a learning curve for me, making for a slower timeline.  Is that OK?17:33
hyakuhei…. lets grab a coffee and maybe a white board.17:33
ccneiller *at Austin OpenStack17:33
*** gjayave__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
tmcpeakhyakuhei: you love doing coffee talks tho? :)17:33
hyakuheiI’d  be happy to try and get some design summit space to talk abotu Anchor17:33
hyakuheiOf course there’s some content on youtube already17:33
tkelseyok back17:33
hyakuheiwb tkelsey17:34
tkelseyapologies17:34
tkelseyty hyakuhei17:34
hyakuheiI don’t have much to add really17:34
hyakuheiDoug doesn’t appear to be here so nothing to add on the Killick things.17:35
hyakuheisicarie: What’s up with security docs?17:35
hyakuhei(if he’s here….)17:35
sicariehaven't had time to mess with it much the last few weeks17:35
sicarievery little going on17:35
hyakuheiIs it all shiny RST now ?17:35
sicarieyep17:36
sicarieall RST17:36
sicariestill working on getting sphinx to build the pdf17:36
elmikoand very shiny ;)17:36
sicariethat's a huge pain17:36
hyakuheiWell that makes the bar for contribution significantly lower17:36
hyakuheicongratulations17:36
elmiko+117:36
hyakuheimassive bit of work to complete17:36
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:36
hyakuhei#topic Last meeting17:36
*** openstack changes topic to "Last meeting (Meeting topic: Security)"17:36
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC17:37
hyakuhei#Vote should we hold a meeting on Thursday the 17th?17:37
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus17:37
tmcpeaklast meeting?17:37
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC17:37
michaelxinlast meeting of this year?17:37
tmcpeak#sure17:37
tkelseyof the year i'm guessing?17:37
elmikoi have no objection to that17:37
*** dg_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
nkinder+117:37
*** Akanksha08 has quit IRC17:37
tkelsey+1 I can be there then17:37
hyakuhei#startvote Last meeting of the year on the 17th?17:37
openstackBegin voting on: Last meeting of the year on the 17th? Valid vote options are Yes, No.17:37
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.17:37
tkelsey+117:38
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
tmcpeak#vote Yes17:38
hyakuhei^ Yay bot votey thing works :P17:38
sicarie#vote Yes17:38
tkelsey#vote yes17:38
nkinder#vote Yes17:38
elmiko#yes17:38
michaelxinI will be here. +vote Yes17:38
ccneill#vote yes17:38
elmiko#vote yes17:38
hyakuhei#vote yes17:38
michaelxin#vote Yes17:38
wayward710#vote yes17:38
gmurphy#vote No - just to be different17:38
hyakuheiOk well I guess that was easy enough, I’m presuming we’ll skip the meeting on christmas eve17:38
elmikogmurphy: nice ;)17:38
hyakuheigmurphy: you were already way different enough!17:38
tmcpeak#vote no Xmas eve meeting17:38
tkelseylol17:38
hyakuheilol +117:38
*** Akanksha08 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
hyakuhei#showvote17:39
elmikowait, i thought we were doing ossp santa tracker on xmas eve?17:39
michaelxinelmiko: +117:39
elmikohehe17:39
hyakuhei#endvote17:39
openstackVoted on "Last meeting of the year on the 17th?" Results are17:39
tmcpeakossp santa modding?17:39
hyakuheiwow the openstack bot is having a bad day....17:39
elmikonaughty/nice list injection exploits, ftw17:39
tmcpeakthinking… thinking17:39
tmcpeak#santaglitches17:40
gmurphy4217:40
nkinderit's goign to tell us we have to meet on xmas eve...17:40
elmikohaha17:40
tmcpeaklol17:40
michaelxinhaha17:40
hyakuheirofl17:40
tmcpeakthis voting has worked wonderfully17:40
hyakuheiok that’s more-or-less all I had17:40
tmcpeakmidcycle?17:40
hyakuhei#topic Any other business17:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Any other business (Meeting topic: Security)"17:40
hyakuheiYes, so afaik we’re just waiting for people to confirm numbers17:40
michaelxinmdong: can you update Syntribos?17:41
*** esker has quit IRC17:41
tmcpeakcool, fair enough17:41
*** mhickey has quit IRC17:41
tmcpeakwe good on topics?17:41
hyakuhei#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-mitaka-midcycle17:41
michaelxinmdong has been working on Syntribos recently.17:41
mdongI can talk a little bit on it17:41
bknudsonfestivus is dec 23 so I'll be busy17:41
hyakuheiWe need to build the topics out more, add some structure, leaders for each bit as we’ve done with previous summits17:41
hyakuheis/summits/mid-cycles/17:41
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:41
*** weshay has quit IRC17:41
mdongso I’ve been working on making Syntribos more usable, namely working on its reporting17:41
elmikobknudson: +117:42
tkelseymdong: insteresting17:42
tkelsey*interesting17:42
mdongtrying to make it output like bandit instead of what it’s doing right now, which is writing stack traces to logs17:42
hyakuhei+117:42
tmcpeakmdong: feel free to steal :)17:43
tmcpeakthat's what open source is all about17:43
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC17:43
michaelxintmcpeak: +117:44
mdongalready on it ;)17:44
michaelxinhttps://review.openstack.org/25535717:44
*** iben_ has quit IRC17:44
mdongI should have a few more CRs up for it shortly17:44
tmcpeaknice17:45
tmcpeaklooks like it's coming along17:45
tkelseymdong: nice17:45
hyakuheiI’m really excited to see where this project goes17:46
tmcpeakhyakuhei: +117:46
*** shelleea007 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
hyakuheiand aligning outputs of bandit and syntribos is very classy17:46
dg_+117:46
*** weshay_xchat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
*** Leom_ has quit IRC17:47
mdongreally the problem is that Syntribos, being based on OpenCafe, behaves very differently from Bandit17:47
elmikohyakuhei: +117:47
hyakuheiI get that, they’re different tools doing different things17:47
mdongas far as the way its tests are written and run17:47
*** weshay_xchat is now known as weshay17:47
mdongbut as far as aligning the output it’s not too hard17:47
michaelxincool17:47
hyakuheibut if the outputs, although different can potentially be consumed in similar ways with similar look and feel that’s going ot play very nicely with developers17:47
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
tmcpeakyep ye17:48
tmcpeakp17:48
hyakuheiExcellent. Right what else to discuss people?17:49
*** degorenko is now known as _degorenko|afk17:49
tkelseydg_: anything on Killick?17:49
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:49
tmcpeakhttps://media1.giphy.com/media/4PvmF62Tl3KLe/200_s.gif17:50
hyakuheilol17:50
elmikolol, ouch17:50
tkelseylol17:50
tmcpeak:P17:50
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
michaelxinplease sign up for mid-cycle meeting if you have not done it yet.17:50
michaelxin:-)17:50
hyakuhei+117:50
hyakuhei#endmeeting17:50
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_dvr)"17:50
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 17:50:40 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:50
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2015/security.2015-12-10-17.00.html17:50
tkelseymichaelxin: +117:50
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2015/security.2015-12-10-17.00.txt17:50
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2015/security.2015-12-10-17.00.log.html17:50
tmcpeakhave a good week everybody!17:50
* hyakuhei slaps tmcpeak 17:50
elmikothanks hyakuhei17:50
michaelxinThanks.17:50
ccneillo/17:50
tkelseythanks everyone :)17:50
tmcpeak;)17:50
elmikoyou too tmcpeak17:50
michaelxinbye17:50
hyakuhei(logging finished) :D17:50
*** greg_a has quit IRC17:50
*** tmcpeak has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** Liuqing has quit IRC17:51
*** mdong has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** ccneill has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** ysm has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** shelleea007 has quit IRC17:51
*** wayward710 has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC17:53
*** dims has quit IRC17:53
*** browne has quit IRC17:54
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC17:54
*** gmurphy has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** esikachev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
SergeyLukjanovhey sahara folks17:59
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
NikitaKonovalovo/18:00
elmikohi18:00
Akanksha08Hello folks18:00
*** pino|work has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
*** huichun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
huichunhello18:00
esikachevhi!18:00
*** crobertsrh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
SergeyLukjanov#startmeeting sahara18:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 18:02:00 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SergeyLukjanov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'sahara'18:02
*** jaypipes has quit IRC18:02
SergeyLukjanov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda18:02
SergeyLukjanov#topic sahara@horizon status (crobertsrh, vgridnev)18:02
*** openstack changes topic to "sahara@horizon status (crobertsrh, vgridnev) (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:02
*** tmckay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
SergeyLukjanovfolks, how is it going with horizon @ sahara-dashboard back to home :)18:02
vgridnevit's going18:03
elmikogoing well from what i can see18:03
vgridnevthere is an integration job to project-config is pending18:03
vgridnev#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255232/18:03
crobertsrhStill need reviews :)18:03
*** s3wong has quit IRC18:05
vgridnevnext topic?18:05
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
NikitaKonovalovvgridnev, have we got the installation of the devstack plugin fixed18:06
*** vilobhmm11 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
huichunvgridnev: hi vgridnev , not sure how can I update scenario framework to allow replacement of self-defined var with some values18:07
NikitaKonovalovI mean that the dashboard should be installed with -e flag so that pip does not copy it ti the dist-packages18:07
huichunAccording to your review comments18:07
SergeyLukjanov#topic18:07
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:07
SergeyLukjanov#topic News / updates18:07
*** openstack changes topic to "News / updates (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:07
vgridnevNikitaKonovalov, right know no, I did not uploaded fix for that yet18:07
NikitaKonovalovvgridnev: thanks18:08
SergeyLukjanovvgridnev, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255232/3 -1'd by tsufiev18:08
elmikohey folks, i want to introduce Akanksha08, she is an intern working through the outreachy program on the sahara project18:08
*** bana_k has quit IRC18:08
Akanksha08Hi guys18:08
huichunWelcome18:08
tmckayAkanksha08, hi!18:08
esikachevhi!18:09
vgridnevSergeyLukjanov, I think that right now there is no way to use scheme that Timur suggested, because we need different plugins enabled18:09
vgridnevAkanksha08, welcome!18:09
*** pnavarro has quit IRC18:09
elmikoshe will be working on improving the anti-affinity support we have, based around the wishlist bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/sahara/+bug/142639818:09
openstackLaunchpad bug 1426398 in Sahara "Current anti-affinity only allows instances equals to number of hypervisors" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Michael McCune (mimccune)18:09
Akanksha08Thanks!18:09
elmikoand, i need to switch that bug assignment to her ;)18:10
*** gjayave__ has quit IRC18:10
*** jmckind has quit IRC18:10
vgridnevelmiko, do we need bug for that, or we need to have blueprint?18:10
elmikovgridnev: it was a bug registered by a user. we will most likely need to generate a bp18:10
huichunvgridnev: do you have any related patches to let me see how to do this update on scenario framework? Confused on this18:11
Akanksha08yes we wanted to discuss if need a bp or not18:11
elmikoi think we'll need to discuss a solution, i know SergeyLukjanov had some nice ideas about this18:11
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:11
Akanksha08SergeyLukjanov, can we discuss the ideas you have?18:12
huichunhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/sahara/+bug/255173 vgridnev18:12
openstackLaunchpad bug 255173 in easytag-aac (Ubuntu) "easytag crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_selection_select_iter()" [Medium,New]18:12
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
vgridnevhuichun, hi. I will find some links for that18:12
*** dims has quit IRC18:12
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC18:12
vgridnevhuichun, strange bug18:12
huichunvgridnev: thx, just put that link on under this patch18:12
*** tlashchova_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
huichunvgridnev:  sorry wrong link18:13
vgridnevhuichun, you welcome to email me in case of questions18:13
elmikoin other news, the castellan updates are all in place and the improved secret store patch is passing CI. also the apiv2 progress continues...18:13
*** tlashchova_ has quit IRC18:14
huichunvgridnev: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/25517318:14
*** shwetaap has quit IRC18:14
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: re: anti-affinity, we had talked once about the idea of creating additional server groups to allow more than 1:1 node:hypervisor, is this still the path we should follow?18:14
*** amit213 has quit IRC18:14
huichunvgridnev:  you can put the link under this patch as review comments,  thx18:15
*** amit213 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:15
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:15
vgridnevhuichun, ok18:15
SergeyLukjanovhm, I have no real ideas for a-a18:16
*** alee has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
elmikohmm, ok. you had mentioned that before, i was thinking we could allow a config option to define the number of nodes per hypervisor, then create server groups to allow those numbers. does that make sense?18:17
huichunSergeyLukjanov: since vanilla 2.6.0 is deprecated, should we remove these2.6.0 code ?  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/25511118:17
vgridnevforgot something, I've updated tempest test with new plugins versions, need some reviews18:17
vgridnev#https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255968/18:17
vgridnevhuichun, we need to update tempest tests first18:17
huichunOk18:17
toskyhuichun: you could put a Depends-On: to that tempest review in your review, maybe18:18
SergeyLukjanov#topic elmiko, I think it make sense to be user-configurable when choosing services for a-a18:18
*** openstack changes topic to "elmiko, I think it make sense to be user-configurable when choosing services for a-a (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:18
elmikohehe18:18
vgridnev#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255968/18:18
huichunvgridnev:  do we have patch to update tempest?18:18
huichuntosky:  thx18:18
vgridnev^^18:18
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: so, basically, when the user chooses services for a-a, they could define the ratio?18:19
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
vgridnevhuichun, see links above18:19
SergeyLukjanovelmiko, I think so18:19
huichunAh see this18:19
toskyhuichun: not because of your change; we should have added the support to the new version before18:19
elmikook, i can work with Akanksha08 on creating a spec for this18:19
SergeyLukjanovcool18:20
Akanksha08yes, I agree that the ratio should be user-configurable18:20
SergeyLukjanovhuichun, was it deprecated in Liberty?18:20
*** delatte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
huichunIn this release? I think18:20
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
SergeyLukjanovhuichun, then it should be removed in the next release18:21
huichunOk18:21
SergeyLukjanovre sahara-tests extraction, seems like we need more reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250419/ (shame on me :( )18:21
Akanksha08elmiko, and using that ratio we can decide in which manner we want to distribute nodes18:21
elmikoAkanksha08: yea, that makes sense18:22
elmikosome of this will depend on our ability to instruct nova how to distribute nodes18:22
elmikootherwise, we might want to keep it simple and just create a number of server groups depending on the overload ratio requested.18:23
Akanksha08yes I did not go through the nova code yet as in how it creates the server group18:23
*** delattec has quit IRC18:23
elmikoAkanksha08: i can point you at our code after the meeting18:23
*** sanghai___ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:24
*** sanghai___ has quit IRC18:25
Akanksha08elmiko: yes we can do that way as well18:25
huichuntmckay: currently, when we delete a cluster, there is no check on whether there are edp jobs running on this cluster? If not, should we have to add this check and refuse this operation?18:25
vgridnevhuichun, I've added link to your review with an example18:26
tmckayhuichun, hmm, I am unsure.  Those jobs could certainly be canceled18:26
tmckayhuichun, that is a good question, we should check if there is current code to handle it18:26
huichunvgridnev:  thx VG18:27
huichuntmckay:  there is no check on this18:27
*** bookwar has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
vgridnevhuichun, about cluster I think that we should allow deletion of cluster in case of running job on top of it18:28
huichunSo if there are jobs running, I think we should reject this delete cluster operation?18:28
vgridnevI think no18:28
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
tmckayhuichun, hmm, we probably need a spec to discuss it.  I lean with vgridnev, I think18:28
tmckaybut I can see both sides18:28
tmckaywe could add a "--force" type flag, potentially18:29
huichunvgridnev:  if user are forgot there are jobs on cluster?18:29
huichunOk I will raise a spec on this topic for discuss18:29
huichuntmckay:18:30
vgridnevI most cases I think it's enough to add some kind of warnings in UI and CLI18:30
tmckayvgridnev, right, but a warning is worthless unless it asks for confirmation18:30
egafford+1 to vgridnev and tmckay: particularly in the case of stuck jobs, we should allow deletion during a job.18:30
tmckayso, warn without disabling the action just lets the user know too late :)18:30
tmckayWARNING: okay, I am nuking your jobs ....18:31
tmckaystop!!!18:31
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
tmckaytoo loate18:31
huichunYes waring is too late18:31
tmckaythat's why I suggest warn with --force18:31
egafford--force is sensible for the CLI, yeah.18:31
tmckayvgridnev, on the UI, you can do the whole "Are you sure?" thing18:32
tmckaycrobertsrh, ^^ :)18:32
tosky--i-really-want-to-do-it18:32
tmckaylol18:32
crobertsrhtmckay can work on the "undo" operation :)18:32
huichun+1 for --force18:32
vgridnevI think we will need some confirmation like apt-get install vs apt-get install -y18:32
*** delatte has quit IRC18:32
tmckayundo cluster deletion with jobs, oh my head hurtws18:32
egaffordIf you're making pure REST calls, do we just hope you know what you're doing, or do we push the force arg to the server layer to protect those who desperately hate all tools?18:32
egafford(But love webservices).18:32
egafford(They're complicated).18:32
elmikoi'm not sure we want to enshrine the force option in the rest api18:33
egaffordelmiko: +1.18:33
egaffordJust seemed like the next question.18:33
huichuntmckay:  I will raise a spec on this topic , I think-- force is better currently18:33
*** delatte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
elmikoyea, good question, but i think the rest interface should operate like you would expect a programattic api to work18:33
tmckayhuichun, thanks for bringing it up, good question18:34
egaffordI agree.18:34
*** crc32 has quit IRC18:34
pino|workjust fail if any of the conditions is not met18:34
* tmckay it's "are you sure?" all the way down .... ;-)18:34
SergeyLukjanov(I'm ok with any kind of --force + confirm on horizon side for user)18:34
pino|workbut otherwise, just go head doing the operation18:34
* tmckay imagines "Are you sure?" at weddings ...18:35
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: +118:35
elmikotmckay: that may actually help things, but make for some odd wedding moments ;)18:35
*** tkelsey has quit IRC18:36
pino|worktmckay: hey, isn't there already a "speak out now, or shut up forever"?18:36
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:36
tmckaypino|work, that's for the audience18:36
elmikopino|work: yea, but that's for the audience not the participants18:36
pino|workahh ok18:36
tmckayjinx, by me some baremetal18:36
tmckaybuy, sorry18:36
pino|work(see how much experience with that i have)18:36
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:36
elmikolol, sure baremetal ARM boxes XD18:36
elmikoi vote we change the #topic18:37
tmckayhey, are we on open topics yet, it seems like it18:37
tmckayI have one ...18:37
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC18:37
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
*** aginwala has quit IRC18:39
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: maybe a second chair?18:41
tmckayelmiko, maybe we should try to change it ...18:41
elmikocan't need to be a chair18:42
tmckaydoh18:42
elmiko#topic tmckay is awesome18:42
elmikosee18:42
tmckaythat is a very deep topic18:42
elmikohehe, i know right?18:42
tmckayprobably need a second meeting :)18:42
* elmiko chuckles18:42
huichun^^18:43
tmckaySergeyLukjanov, we want open discussion, or we will go on strike18:43
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:43
*** dg_ has quit IRC18:43
SergeyLukjanovsorry folks, bad internet connection :(18:43
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:43
elmikono worries18:43
SergeyLukjanov#topic Open discussion18:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:43
tmckaythanks :)18:43
SergeyLukjanovjust reconnected to znc18:43
SergeyLukjanov#chair tmckay18:43
openstackCurrent chairs: SergeyLukjanov tmckay18:43
SergeyLukjanov#chair elmiko18:44
openstackCurrent chairs: SergeyLukjanov elmiko tmckay18:44
SergeyLukjanovPTL HA mode enabled18:44
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC18:44
elmikohehe, thanks18:44
tmckayheh. okay, so here is my question SergeyLukjanov and other ironic experienced folks ...18:44
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
tmckayI have been spending much time with ironic since Paris, hence my scarcity on the channel, and reviews, and patches, etc18:44
*** browne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
tmckayironic/nova/neutron confluence can be difficult. But that's another story.  Anyway ...18:45
*** salmon_ has quit IRC18:45
esikachevguys, we are missed topic "Discuss sahara scenario tests extraction"18:45
esikachev:(18:45
tmckayit seems there is no good automated setup mechanism for access to the nova metadata service over 169.254.169.254 from baremetal ...18:45
egafford:o18:45
SergeyLukjanovdo we have something to discuss re sahara-tests extraction right now?18:46
SergeyLukjanovI think we still need more reviews on spec, folks, please18:46
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: +118:46
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC18:46
toskyyep (sorry, I was a bit slow on the review)18:46
*** aginwala has quit IRC18:47
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
*** hyakuhei__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC18:47
*** hyakuhei__ is now known as hyakuhei18:47
tmckaySergeyLukjanov, so, I ended up using the "--config-drive" option for setting up cloud-init.  Is this what you did in your sahara/ironic experiments?18:47
tmckayactually, I set "force_config_drive" in the nova.conf18:47
tmckaySergeyLukjanov, or did you find some way of setting up access to 169.254 for the metadata service?18:48
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, I'm not sure, you should chat with NikitaKonovalov and degorenko18:48
tmckaysorry, not Paris, Tokyo ....18:48
SergeyLukjanovprobably esikachev knows something too18:48
huichunOh, just one important issue, do we have any plan to modify the current design to support the old Hadoop version for customer,  if we remove CDH 5.0 code, but the customer is using CDH 5.0, and we say:" sorry, we Sahara do not support CDH5.0 now" it's really strange18:48
huichunSergeyLukjanov:18:48
huichuntmckay:18:48
huichunelmiko:18:48
tmckayso we're talking about deprecation policy for plugins ...18:49
tmckaywe've discussed many times18:49
huichunIt's the point18:49
*** kebray has quit IRC18:49
NikitaKonovalovtmckay: as far as I remember the experiments were on nova network, and degorenko could somehow make cloud-init work18:50
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC18:50
elmikoSergeyLukjanov had a great idea about the plugins and backward compat, but it is still an idea at this point18:50
elmikohuichun: ^^18:50
tmckayNikitaKonovalov, okay, thanks, I'll ask him18:50
huichunOk18:50
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
elmikohuichun: for the time being though, there is not a good way to support older plugins from current server18:50
tmckayI'm not even sure if we have a plugin deprecation policy doc in the official sahara docs, do we?  Maybe we should18:51
toskywe should, I agree18:51
huichunI think we should18:51
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC18:51
elmikoyea, we had a whole session about deprecation policy, we definitely need to write that stuff down somewhere18:51
huichunCustomer need this, or it will be crazy18:51
elmiko+118:51
*** bana_k has quit IRC18:52
*** thomnico has quit IRC18:52
SergeyLukjanovwith a plugin separation - it's still not clear how to implement it18:53
*** browne has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
SergeyLukjanovthe best working solution from UX PoV will be overcomplicated and non-supportable18:54
*** zotoff has quit IRC18:55
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
elmikoah, that's too bad18:56
*** harlowja has quit IRC18:56
SergeyLukjanovI'm still evaluating the options...18:56
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
SergeyLukjanovprobably we'll find some balance18:57
elmikocool, i thought it was a great idea18:57
*** sneti_ has quit IRC18:58
*** sneti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
elmikobefore we finish, quick reminder. the api v2 spec has been updated again, please take a look sometime18:58
elmiko#link https://review.openstack.org/21217218:58
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
*** dprince has quit IRC18:58
SergeyLukjanovthx!18:59
tmckaythanks elmiko. You are the V2 hero18:59
SergeyLukjanov1 min left, any last second updates?18:59
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC18:59
elmikotmckay: not a hero, just a man with a dream ;)18:59
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
tmckayheh. So was Batman :)18:59
elmikolol!19:00
*** ikutukov has quit IRC19:00
*** cknight1 has quit IRC19:00
SergeyLukjanov#endmeeting19:00
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_dvr)"19:00
SergeyLukjanovthx folks!19:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 19:00:08 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2015/sahara.2015-12-10-18.02.html19:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2015/sahara.2015-12-10-18.02.txt19:00
elmikothanks SergeyLukjanov19:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2015/sahara.2015-12-10-18.02.log.html19:00
huichunGood night19:00
tmckaybye19:00
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
esikachevbye19:00
*** esikachev has quit IRC19:00
toskyo/19:01
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** pino|work has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** sneti has quit IRC19:01
*** sneti_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
*** delatte has quit IRC19:06
*** chandankumar has quit IRC19:06
*** delatte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
Akanksha08bye19:07
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC19:07
*** ysm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** tmckay has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** sriram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:08
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC19:09
*** rmoe has quit IRC19:09
amitgandhinz@startmeeting Poppy Weekly Meeting19:09
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:09
amitgandhinz#startmeeting Poppy Weekly Meeting19:09
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 19:09:26 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is amitgandhinz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:09
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:09
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:09
sriramo/19:09
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'poppy_weekly_meeting'19:09
amitgandhinz#topic RollCall19:09
*** openstack changes topic to "RollCall (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:09
malinio/19:09
sriramo/19:10
amitgandhinz#topic Recap19:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Recap (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:10
amitgandhinz#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/poppy_weekly_meeting/2015/poppy_weekly_meeting.2015-11-12-19.08.html19:10
*** mkmad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
amitgandhinzi think i created that story for analytics driver19:11
*** hyakuhei_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
amitgandhinzlet me look19:11
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2419:11
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC19:11
sriramok I'll go assign it to myself.19:12
amitgandhinzhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/poppy/+spec/analytics19:12
sriramoh its already assigned to me :)19:12
amitgandhinzmkmad: sriram: you can split this up amongst yourselves19:13
*** merooney has quit IRC19:13
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
sriramamitgandhinz: =119:13
sriramerr19:13
sriram+119:13
mkmadYes +119:13
maliniatleast wasn't zero :D19:13
amitgandhinz#topic Progress19:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Progress (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:13
amitgandhinz#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/poppy/mitaka19:13
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
amitgandhinztonytan4ever: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/poppy/+spec/akamai-ssl-driver19:14
amitgandhinzcan we call this done?19:14
*** Akanksha08 has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:14
*** kebray has quit IRC19:14
tonytan4everIf the scope is just mod-san one, then yes19:15
tonytan4everwe still got custom, custom-shared though19:15
amitgandhinzyep just changed the scope19:15
amitgandhinzi think we have another bp for custom19:15
tonytan4everOkay,19:15
tonytan4everThen that one is done.19:15
amitgandhinzmalini: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/poppy/+spec/gate-api-tests19:16
malinino progress :(19:16
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
maliniI probably should unassign tht19:17
amitgandhinzok will unassign19:17
amitgandhinzsriram: mkmad: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/poppy/+spec/analytics19:17
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC19:17
sriramactive work ongoing19:18
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:18
mkmadYes, working on it as we speak.19:18
srirampull from provider store, is just logs that are shipped by the provider19:18
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC19:18
sriramtonytan4ever has a few stubs out there for the api19:18
sriramon poppy's side.19:18
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC19:19
sriramthe spark functions, and posting stuff on rabbit queue is done.19:19
*** aginwala has quit IRC19:19
sriramthe backing store from which metrics would be pulled, after being posted to from rabbitmq will be generic.19:20
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:20
amitgandhinzsriram: can you update the WorkItems list in the bp to show the DONE stuff19:20
sriramamitgandhinz: sure19:20
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:20
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:20
sriramwill update the blueprint19:20
amitgandhinzthanks19:20
mkmadI am working on parsing the data from rabbitmq and pushing it to buckets in cloud metrics19:20
amitgandhinzgreat19:20
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:21
sriramtonytan4ever: your patch on stubs for metrics was merged right?19:22
tonytan4everOn poppy's side ?19:22
sriramyeah19:22
tonytan4everI think not.19:22
sriramwas it in review?19:22
tonytan4everShould be in review, let me check19:22
tonytan4everOh, I haven't even made the PR yet19:23
sriramlol19:23
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:23
tonytan4everLet me roll out the PR first19:23
sriramok19:23
tonytan4everWe can call it's started.19:23
sriramcool19:23
*** ijw has quit IRC19:24
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:24
sriramok lets move on to the next one.19:24
sriramamitgandhinz: ^19:24
*** crobertsrh has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:24
amitgandhinzokie doke19:24
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:24
amitgandhinzanything else in progress we need to talk about19:24
malininothing from me19:25
sriramjust bug fixes which went through19:25
sriramnothing big on features currently.19:25
amitgandhinzwhich brings me to the next topic19:25
amitgandhinz#topic Bugs19:26
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:26
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:26
amitgandhinz#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppy19:26
amitgandhinzso first, we need to get better at referencing bugs in our patches19:26
amitgandhinzwe still are not doing that19:26
sriram+119:26
amitgandhinzif you fix a bug (documented or not), please add the bug in launchpad and then reference that in your commit19:26
mkmadAgreed.19:27
*** yalie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:27
amitgandhinzthat way when i tag releases, we have bp and bugs that i can bind to the release, and works as release notes19:27
sriramyes will do that.19:27
sriramon that note:19:27
sriramhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/poppy/+bug/148610319:27
openstackLaunchpad bug 1486103 in Poppy "Fix Flaky tests due to Cassandra inconsistency issues" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to Sriram (thesriram)19:27
amitgandhinzeveryone needs to enforce this during review time19:27
sriramthe fix has been released right?19:27
amitgandhinzya19:28
amitgandhinzi actually updated its milestone to the 1.0.2 release already ;-)19:28
sriramok, I can change the status on that then19:28
amitgandhinzjust did19:28
sriramoh cool19:28
sriramok19:28
amitgandhinzany other bugs we need to sweep up19:28
sriramI just added this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppy/+bug/152396419:28
openstackLaunchpad bug 1523964 in Poppy "Change function mapping to be kwargs instead of args" [Wishlist,New]19:28
sriramcan be a low hanging fruit19:29
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC19:29
sriramfor any new contributor to pick up19:29
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:29
*** hyakuhei_ has quit IRC19:29
sriramI have seen this be a cause of bugs.19:29
amitgandhinz"fruit hanging low" lol19:29
amitgandhinzlets use "low-hanging-fruit" instead19:29
sriramheh19:29
mkmadlol19:30
sriramok changed that :P19:30
amitgandhinzcool19:30
amitgandhinz#topic OpenDiscuss19:31
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenDiscuss (Meeting topic: Poppy Weekly Meeting)"19:31
*** mrmartin has quit IRC19:31
amitgandhinzso, we are coming up on the holiday period, so the next meeting will be first week of jan19:31
amitgandhinzjan 719:32
sriramat some point we need to start discussing about "big tent"19:32
srirammalini: ^19:32
amitgandhinzyup, i want a discussion around big tent, merits, etc19:32
malinisure :)19:32
sriramand happy holidays everyone! :D19:33
amitgandhinzalso, im wondering if we want to change these meetings to biweekly instead of weekly19:33
maliniwill miss everybody for a loong time ;)19:33
sriramamitgandhinz: +119:33
mkmad+119:33
sriramlets do that19:33
amitgandhinzcool19:33
malinidepends on the question above19:33
amitgandhinzok anything else?19:34
*** ysm has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
sriramthaaats it from me19:34
amitgandhinz#agreed hold meetings every two weeks19:34
amitgandhinz#agreed discuss Big Tent in the new year19:34
amitgandhinzthats all folks19:34
amitgandhinzhappy holidays19:34
amitgandhinzhappy workdays for those without holidays19:35
sriramsee ya, have a great time :)19:35
amitgandhinz#endmeeting19:35
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_dvr)"19:35
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 19:35:18 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:35
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/poppy_weekly_meeting/2015/poppy_weekly_meeting.2015-12-10-19.09.html19:35
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/poppy_weekly_meeting/2015/poppy_weekly_meeting.2015-12-10-19.09.txt19:35
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/poppy_weekly_meeting/2015/poppy_weekly_meeting.2015-12-10-19.09.log.html19:35
*** delattec has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
*** jaypipes has quit IRC19:36
*** jmcbride has quit IRC19:38
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:38
*** delatte has quit IRC19:38
*** cath6184 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:38
*** wojdev has quit IRC19:45
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC19:48
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:50
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:52
*** baoli_ has quit IRC19:53
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:54
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:55
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away19:56
*** greg_a has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:56
*** neiljerram has quit IRC19:57
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC20:00
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:02
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** minwang2 has quit IRC20:03
*** armax has quit IRC20:09
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:10
*** shwetaap has quit IRC20:13
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
*** cath6184 has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:17
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:18
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
*** sneti_ has quit IRC20:20
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:22
*** mixos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC20:25
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
*** alex_xu has quit IRC20:30
*** sneti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:30
*** mrmartin has quit IRC20:32
*** bgaifullin has quit IRC20:32
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** bgaifullin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:35
*** dims has quit IRC20:35
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC20:35
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:35
*** dprince has quit IRC20:37
*** mixos has quit IRC20:38
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:41
*** bgaifullin has quit IRC20:44
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
*** Swami has quit IRC20:44
*** jmcbride1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:48
*** greg_a has quit IRC20:57
*** banix has quit IRC20:58
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_21:01
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC21:01
*** huichun has quit IRC21:04
*** regebro has quit IRC21:05
*** regebro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:05
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC21:06
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa21:10
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2421:10
*** ysm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:12
*** ysm has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:12
*** malini has quit IRC21:12
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
*** julim has quit IRC21:14
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC21:16
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:18
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:19
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC21:19
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:20
*** baoli has quit IRC21:20
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:21
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:25
*** atiwari2 has quit IRC21:25
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC21:26
*** atiwari2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
*** dteselkin has quit IRC21:27
*** pashkin has quit IRC21:27
*** HeOS_ has quit IRC21:27
*** kzaitsev_ws has quit IRC21:27
*** pashkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:28
*** meow-nofer__ has quit IRC21:28
*** dilyin has quit IRC21:28
*** ativelkov has quit IRC21:28
*** katyafervent has quit IRC21:28
*** akurenyshev has quit IRC21:28
*** akuznetsova has quit IRC21:28
*** IgorYozhikov has quit IRC21:28
*** asilenkov has quit IRC21:28
*** HeOS_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
*** kzaitsev_ws has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
*** akurenyshev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
*** meow-nofer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
*** dilyin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
*** IgorYozhikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
*** agireud has quit IRC21:31
*** akuznetsova has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** egafford has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** katyafervent has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** dteselkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** baoli has quit IRC21:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:33
*** asilenkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:33
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC21:33
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:34
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC21:34
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:34
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:39
*** atiwari1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** atiwari2 has quit IRC21:43
*** agireud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:43
*** baoli has quit IRC21:44
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:45
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC21:46
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC21:46
*** dslevin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:48
*** agireud has quit IRC21:48
*** agireud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** jmckind_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** baoli has quit IRC21:52
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck21:52
*** Swami has quit IRC21:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:53
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC21:54
*** jmckind has quit IRC21:54
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:56
*** baoli has quit IRC22:00
*** mixos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
*** snackewm has quit IRC22:02
*** aginwala has quit IRC22:04
*** sriram has quit IRC22:05
*** alex_xu has quit IRC22:07
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed22:07
*** derekh has quit IRC22:07
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:09
*** hogepodge has quit IRC22:10
*** delattec has quit IRC22:10
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC22:10
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC22:11
*** aleksandr_null has quit IRC22:11
*** atiwari1 has quit IRC22:11
*** vahidh has quit IRC22:11
*** gyee has quit IRC22:12
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC22:12
*** pballand has quit IRC22:12
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:13
*** baoli has quit IRC22:13
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:13
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:13
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:14
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:14
*** aleksandr_null has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:14
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:15
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:15
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:15
*** dane has quit IRC22:17
*** atiwari has quit IRC22:20
*** merooney has quit IRC22:20
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:20
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:20
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:20
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:23
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:24
*** yamahata has quit IRC22:24
*** baoli has quit IRC22:24
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:24
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:25
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:26
*** cknight has quit IRC22:26
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:26
*** Swami has quit IRC22:27
*** eilert has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:28
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:28
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:29
*** mixos has quit IRC22:29
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC22:31
*** jmcbride1 has quit IRC22:32
*** agireud has quit IRC22:32
*** agireud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:34
*** baoli has quit IRC22:36
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:37
*** flaviof_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:38
*** flaviof has quit IRC22:39
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC22:40
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:41
*** flaviof_ is now known as flaviof22:42
*** dslevin has quit IRC22:42
*** dslevin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:43
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC22:43
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:43
*** sdake has quit IRC22:44
*** vgridnev has quit IRC22:44
*** rcernin has quit IRC22:45
*** sdake_ has quit IRC22:46
*** baoli has quit IRC22:48
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:49
*** madhu_ak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:50
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:50
*** mkmad has quit IRC22:52
*** sgotliv_ has quit IRC22:52
*** ndipanov has quit IRC22:52
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC22:54
*** sneti has quit IRC22:54
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:55
*** dslevin has quit IRC22:55
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:56
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC22:58
*** armax has quit IRC23:00
*** baoli has quit IRC23:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC23:01
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:03
*** shwetaap has quit IRC23:04
*** safchain has quit IRC23:06
*** baoli has quit IRC23:07
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:11
*** edtubill has quit IRC23:12
*** apetrich has quit IRC23:16
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC23:16
*** baoli has quit IRC23:17
*** ysm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:18
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:18
*** aginwala has quit IRC23:21
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC23:25
*** aginwala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:26
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:29
*** cknight has quit IRC23:29
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:32
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:32
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC23:33
*** derekh has quit IRC23:35
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC23:39
*** weshay has quit IRC23:40
*** ysm has quit IRC23:41
*** jwang has quit IRC23:43
*** atiwari1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:47
*** jwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:47
*** atiwari has quit IRC23:49
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:56
*** yalie has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!