Tuesday, 2016-01-12

*** bdrich has quit IRC00:00
*** pratikmallya has quit IRC00:01
*** Leo_ has quit IRC00:02
*** asselin has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck00:04
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck00:05
*** pradk has quit IRC00:06
*** yfujioka has quit IRC00:07
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC00:07
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_00:08
*** markmcclain has quit IRC00:09
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting00:10
*** pratikmallya has joined #openstack-meeting00:11
*** singhj has quit IRC00:14
*** pratikmallya has quit IRC00:14
*** bdrich has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting00:15
*** mudassirlatif has quit IRC00:19
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:20
*** otter768 has quit IRC00:20
*** irenab_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:20
*** IlyaG has quit IRC00:22
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting00:22
*** tochi has quit IRC00:22
*** irenab has quit IRC00:23
*** irenab_ is now known as irenab00:23
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting00:24
*** annegentle has quit IRC00:24
*** ajmiller has quit IRC00:25
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC00:31
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting00:31
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC00:35
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting00:35
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck00:36
*** bdrich has quit IRC00:38
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:39
*** markmcclain has quit IRC00:39
*** banix has quit IRC00:39
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting00:39
*** dims has quit IRC00:40
*** annilai has quit IRC00:40
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting00:40
*** rfolco has quit IRC00:41
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC00:41
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC00:42
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** abhiraut has quit IRC00:44
*** stanchan has quit IRC00:45
*** stanchan has joined #openstack-meeting00:46
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting00:46
*** dmacpher-afk has quit IRC00:48
*** stanchan has quit IRC00:51
*** stanchan has joined #openstack-meeting00:51
*** stanchan has quit IRC00:51
*** hoangcx has quit IRC00:52
*** angdraug has quit IRC00:52
*** rbak has quit IRC00:53
*** comay has quit IRC00:54
*** gyee has quit IRC00:55
*** barra204 has joined #openstack-meeting00:56
*** piet has quit IRC00:57
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC00:57
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** hemna is now known as hemnafk00:58
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC00:58
*** mmedvede has quit IRC00:58
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** Swami has quit IRC00:59
*** dixiaoli has joined #openstack-meeting01:00
*** abhiraut has joined #openstack-meeting01:01
*** oomichi has quit IRC01:04
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting01:04
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting01:08
*** IlyaG has quit IRC01:08
*** garthb__ has quit IRC01:09
*** aeng has quit IRC01:09
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting01:09
*** alop has quit IRC01:09
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** pvaneck has quit IRC01:11
*** kebray has quit IRC01:11
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting01:12
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC01:13
*** barra204 has quit IRC01:14
*** jckasper has quit IRC01:15
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting01:15
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting01:17
*** markmcclain has quit IRC01:17
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting01:21
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting01:21
*** vahidh has quit IRC01:21
*** ljxiash has joined #openstack-meeting01:22
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting01:22
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting01:22
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC01:23
*** rbak has quit IRC01:24
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:24
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC01:24
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:25
*** markvoelker has quit IRC01:25
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting01:25
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:25
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC01:25
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC01:26
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:26
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC01:26
*** unicell1 has quit IRC01:27
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:27
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC01:27
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting01:27
*** trozet has joined #openstack-meeting01:28
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:28
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC01:28
*** ianychoi has quit IRC01:29
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** jjmb1 has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** barra204 has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC01:32
*** jjmb2 has joined #openstack-meeting01:32
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting01:33
*** jjmb3 has joined #openstack-meeting01:33
*** asselin has quit IRC01:34
*** shz has quit IRC01:34
*** shz has joined #openstack-meeting01:35
*** abhiraut has quit IRC01:35
*** jjmb has quit IRC01:35
*** jjmb1 has quit IRC01:35
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting01:36
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting01:36
*** leeantho has quit IRC01:36
*** jjmb2 has quit IRC01:37
*** trozet has quit IRC01:37
*** barra204 has quit IRC01:38
*** barra204 has joined #openstack-meeting01:38
*** spzala has quit IRC01:38
*** tfukushima has quit IRC01:39
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC01:39
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting01:39
*** thorst_ has quit IRC01:39
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting01:40
*** mmedvede has joined #openstack-meeting01:41
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting01:42
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting01:43
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** barra204 has quit IRC01:45
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting01:46
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck01:47
*** manjeets1 has left #openstack-meeting01:47
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC01:48
*** dims_ has quit IRC01:48
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC01:48
*** 14WAAN277 has joined #openstack-meeting01:48
*** thorst has quit IRC01:48
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting01:48
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting01:49
*** 14WAAN277 has quit IRC01:50
*** tellesnobrega is now known as tellesnobrega_af01:50
*** baohua has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** markmcclain has quit IRC01:51
*** mtanino has quit IRC01:52
*** dims has quit IRC01:54
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC01:54
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting01:55
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC01:55
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:56
*** rbak has quit IRC01:56
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith01:56
*** spandhe has quit IRC01:56
*** asselin has joined #openstack-meeting01:57
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting01:58
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting01:58
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting02:01
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC02:01
*** markmcclain has quit IRC02:03
*** singhj has joined #openstack-meeting02:04
*** piet has quit IRC02:04
*** jhesketh has quit IRC02:05
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** jhesketh has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** aeng has quit IRC02:08
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting02:08
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting02:08
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC02:10
*** kaisers1 has quit IRC02:10
*** rbak has quit IRC02:10
*** kaisers has joined #openstack-meeting02:11
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** markmcclain has quit IRC02:15
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting02:17
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting02:18
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting02:21
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting02:22
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC02:22
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting02:23
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck02:24
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting02:26
*** otter768 has quit IRC02:26
*** baohua has quit IRC02:29
*** dixiaoli has quit IRC02:29
*** baohua has joined #openstack-meeting02:29
*** dixiaoli has joined #openstack-meeting02:29
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting02:31
*** yamamoto has quit IRC02:31
*** cwolferh has quit IRC02:32
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC02:32
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:38
*** IlyaG has quit IRC02:38
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC02:40
*** keedya has joined #openstack-meeting02:40
*** houming has joined #openstack-meeting02:41
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:42
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting02:44
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC02:46
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:47
*** spandhe has joined #openstack-meeting02:47
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting02:48
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:50
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** xingchao_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** xingchao has quit IRC02:52
*** thorst has quit IRC02:53
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting02:54
*** roxanagh_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
*** kevinbenton_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:00
*** apoorvad has quit IRC03:02
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting03:02
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting03:03
*** kevinbenton_ has quit IRC03:03
*** markmcclain has quit IRC03:04
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC03:05
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck03:06
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting03:07
*** ljxiash has quit IRC03:08
*** ljxiash has joined #openstack-meeting03:08
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting03:10
*** amotoki has quit IRC03:12
*** markmcclain has quit IRC03:12
*** ljxiash has quit IRC03:13
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** trozet has joined #openstack-meeting03:15
*** ljxiash has joined #openstack-meeting03:16
*** spandhe_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:16
*** spandhe has quit IRC03:18
*** spandhe_ is now known as spandhe03:18
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting03:18
*** spzala has quit IRC03:19
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting03:20
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC03:20
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2403:22
*** dims has quit IRC03:24
*** spzala has quit IRC03:25
*** markmcclain has quit IRC03:25
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting03:26
*** IlyaG has quit IRC03:26
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting03:27
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-meeting03:30
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting03:30
*** harshs has quit IRC03:31
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:33
*** amotoki has quit IRC03:36
*** piet has quit IRC03:38
*** ddieterly has quit IRC03:42
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting03:46
*** singhj has quit IRC03:46
*** singhj has joined #openstack-meeting03:48
*** tochi has joined #openstack-meeting03:48
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting03:51
*** vivekd has joined #openstack-meeting03:53
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting03:53
*** tfukushima has quit IRC03:53
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting03:55
*** doug-fish has quit IRC03:58
*** thorst has quit IRC03:58
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting03:59
*** cwolferh has quit IRC04:03
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting04:03
*** vahidh has quit IRC04:03
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting04:04
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** jjmb3 has quit IRC04:07
*** topol has quit IRC04:07
*** kevinbenton_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:07
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting04:09
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:10
*** yamahata has quit IRC04:10
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC04:12
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:13
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting04:16
*** markmcclain has quit IRC04:17
*** spandhe has quit IRC04:18
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom04:18
*** singhj has quit IRC04:19
*** singhj has joined #openstack-meeting04:19
*** IlyaG has quit IRC04:20
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting04:20
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** spzala has quit IRC04:25
*** dmorita has quit IRC04:25
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz04:25
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting04:26
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting04:26
*** otter768 has quit IRC04:26
*** jmckind has quit IRC04:27
*** roxanagh_ has quit IRC04:28
*** coolsvap|away is now known as coolsvap04:29
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck04:29
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:30
*** aeng_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:30
*** aeng has quit IRC04:31
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting04:38
*** trozet has quit IRC04:42
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting04:42
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom04:45
*** sudipto has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz04:51
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC04:52
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting04:53
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting04:55
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck04:55
*** ddieterly has quit IRC04:55
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting04:57
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC04:58
*** pradipta has joined #openstack-meeting04:58
*** ljxiash has quit IRC04:58
*** markvoelker has quit IRC04:58
*** ljxiash has joined #openstack-meeting04:59
*** baoli has quit IRC04:59
*** piet has quit IRC05:00
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting05:00
*** ljxiash has quit IRC05:01
*** ljxiash has joined #openstack-meeting05:02
*** thorst has quit IRC05:03
*** dmacpher has quit IRC05:05
*** mudassirlatif has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** kebray has quit IRC05:09
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting05:09
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck05:09
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting05:10
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting05:12
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting05:15
*** jckasper has quit IRC05:16
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa05:18
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting05:22
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting05:22
*** harshs_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:22
*** harshs has quit IRC05:24
*** harshs_ is now known as harshs05:24
*** ijw has quit IRC05:24
*** IlyaG has quit IRC05:26
*** spzala has quit IRC05:26
*** sudipto has quit IRC05:29
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting05:30
*** aeng_ has quit IRC05:30
*** harshs has quit IRC05:31
*** zhurong has quit IRC05:32
*** banix has quit IRC05:32
*** IlyaG has quit IRC05:32
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC05:33
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** markmcclain has quit IRC05:34
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting05:35
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting05:35
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** pradipta has quit IRC05:37
*** dmacpher_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** sudipto has joined #openstack-meeting05:39
*** harshs has quit IRC05:40
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:42
*** dmacpher has quit IRC05:42
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting05:42
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:44
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting05:47
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:49
*** aeng_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:50
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting05:52
*** jmckind has quit IRC05:52
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting05:56
*** harshs has quit IRC05:57
*** ildikov has quit IRC05:57
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting05:58
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting05:59
*** ddieterly has quit IRC06:01
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting06:01
*** dmorita has quit IRC06:02
*** pots1 has quit IRC06:04
*** kevinbenton_ has quit IRC06:04
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting06:05
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:06
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:07
*** ryu25 has joined #openstack-meeting06:07
*** shamail has joined #openstack-meeting06:08
*** thorst has quit IRC06:08
*** st_mobile has joined #openstack-meeting06:10
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC06:12
*** mrmartin has quit IRC06:14
*** mudassirlatif has quit IRC06:15
*** hoangcx has quit IRC06:17
*** rossella_s has quit IRC06:22
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
shamail.06:22
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting06:23
*** st_mobile has quit IRC06:25
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting06:26
*** 6A4ABMVDU has joined #openstack-meeting06:26
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting06:26
*** AmirBaleghi11118 has joined #openstack-meeting06:26
*** sudipto has quit IRC06:27
*** dmacpher_ has quit IRC06:28
*** dmorita has quit IRC06:28
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting06:28
*** spzala has quit IRC06:29
*** AmirBaleghi11118 has quit IRC06:31
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-meeting06:33
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting06:33
*** aeng_ has quit IRC06:34
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting06:42
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:46
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC06:47
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting06:49
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC06:49
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC06:50
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC06:50
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting06:50
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting06:51
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting06:51
*** aeng_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:52
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting06:52
*** esker has quit IRC06:53
*** xingchao_ has quit IRC06:53
*** pots1 has joined #openstack-meeting06:56
*** dmorita has quit IRC06:58
yamamoto_hi07:00
*** xingchao_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:01
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC07:02
yamamoto_anyone here for networking-midonet meeting?07:03
* yamamoto_ wait for a while07:03
*** 6A4ABMVDU has quit IRC07:03
*** xingchao has quit IRC07:04
*** singhj has quit IRC07:04
*** vgridnev has quit IRC07:05
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting07:05
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting07:06
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting07:06
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting07:07
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting07:07
*** pots2 has joined #openstack-meeting07:10
ryu25yamamoto: i'm here07:10
yamamoto_hi07:11
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting07:11
yamamoto_let's start07:12
*** joe__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:12
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting07:12
yamamoto_#startmeeting networking_midonet07:12
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 07:12:43 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yamamoto_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.07:12
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.07:12
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)"07:12
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_midonet'07:12
*** kitsuneninetails has joined #openstack-meeting07:12
yamamoto_#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NetworkingMidoNet agenda07:13
yamamoto_#topic Announcements07:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)"07:13
*** pots1 has quit IRC07:13
yamamoto_no announcements from me.  anyone has anything?07:13
*** thorst has quit IRC07:13
ryu25nothing from me07:13
kitsuneninetailsI'm good07:14
yamamoto_#topic Bugs07:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)"07:14
yamamoto_https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-midonet/+bug/153304707:15
openstackLaunchpad bug 1533047 in networking-midonet "Format chack is failing with N330 Use assertEqual(*empty*, observed) in test_extension_gateway_device.py" [Critical,Confirmed] - Assigned to YAMAMOTO Takashi (yamamoto)07:15
yamamoto_this one is urgent as it's blocking gate07:15
ryu25will review asap07:15
yamamoto_ryu25: thank you07:16
*** roxanagh_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
yamamoto_any volunteer for bug deputy of this week?07:17
ryu25i did it last week but since it was very quiet and did not do much, I can do it again07:18
yamamoto_ryu25: thank you!07:18
joe__I can also do it this week or next week07:18
kitsuneninetailsWe should try to spread it around07:18
kitsuneninetailsThere are some ppl who haven't done yet07:18
ryu25sure :-)07:18
ryu25well, looks like joe__ has volunteered!07:19
kitsuneninetailsNice!  Thanks joe__!07:19
kitsuneninetails:)07:20
joe__np :)07:20
yamamoto_#info joe__ is a bug deputy of this week07:20
*** kebray has quit IRC07:20
yamamoto_joe__: can you update the chart in the wiki?07:21
joe__yamamoto: will do07:21
yamamoto_joe__: thank you!07:21
*** bvandenh has quit IRC07:22
ryu25btw, I have noticed that there are bugs for packaging07:22
ryu25i think we can close these.  I have verified that downstream packages have these issues resolved, and the upstream packaging (RDO/UCA) should be tracked in their respective project07:23
*** berendt has joined #openstack-meeting07:23
yamamoto_you mean this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-midonet/+bug/150672007:24
openstackLaunchpad bug 1506720 in networking-midonet "neutron-lbaas/fwaas dependency missing in packages" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Ryu Ishimoto (ryu-midokura)07:24
ryu25i've also noticed that i added these bugs :)  Anyone against marking them as invalid?07:24
ryu25yeah that one07:24
ryu25i thought there was one more... but maybe i'm wrong07:24
yamamoto_i'm fine with closing them07:24
*** odlD2 has quit IRC07:25
ryu25thanks, will do so now07:25
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting07:25
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC07:25
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
yamamoto_anyone has anything more about bugs?07:27
ryu25nothing more from me07:27
yamamoto_#topic Open Discussion07:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)"07:28
yamamoto_i have a question07:30
yamamoto_https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-midonet/+bug/152745107:30
openstackLaunchpad bug 1527451 in networking-midonet "oom killer in gate jobs" [Medium,New]07:30
*** gongysh has quit IRC07:30
yamamoto_is there any easy way to reduce memory consumption of midolman?07:31
yamamoto_occasionally it triggers oom killer on gate07:31
kitsuneninetailsthere are some settings in midolman-env.sh to set the size of the VM, I think07:32
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting07:32
yamamoto_kitsuneninetails: i'll take a look.  thank you07:33
kitsuneninetailsI think the line: MAX_HEAP_SIZE="2048M" might get the best bang for the buck07:34
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting07:35
yamamoto_kitsuneninetails: thank you07:36
yamamoto_anything else to discuss?07:37
ryu25i'm good07:37
kitsuneninetailsnothing from me07:37
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting07:38
yamamoto_thank you for attending07:39
yamamoto_#endmeeting07:39
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"07:39
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 07:39:23 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)07:39
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_midonet/2016/networking_midonet.2016-01-12-07.12.html07:39
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_midonet/2016/networking_midonet.2016-01-12-07.12.txt07:39
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_midonet/2016/networking_midonet.2016-01-12-07.12.log.html07:39
kitsuneninetailsthanks!07:39
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC07:40
ryu25thanks!!07:41
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting07:42
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting07:42
*** adiantum has quit IRC07:43
*** ddieterly has quit IRC07:47
*** odlD2 has joined #openstack-meeting07:48
*** vivekd_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:49
*** neeti has joined #openstack-meeting07:51
*** vivekd has quit IRC07:52
*** vivekd_ is now known as vivekd07:52
*** kitsuneninetails has quit IRC07:52
*** Qiming has quit IRC07:52
*** isaacb has joined #openstack-meeting07:53
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting07:53
*** klkumar has joined #openstack-meeting07:54
*** berendt1 has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC07:56
*** ricolin has quit IRC07:56
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting07:57
*** berendt has quit IRC07:57
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC07:59
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:59
*** vgridnev has quit IRC08:00
*** spzala has quit IRC08:00
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC08:00
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC08:01
*** anteaya_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:01
anteaya_#startmeeting third-party08:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 08:01:29 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.08:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.08:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: third-party)"08:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'third_party'08:01
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:01
anteaya_hello08:01
lennyb_hi08:01
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting08:02
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:02
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:02
anteaya_hey lennyb_08:02
anteaya_how are you today?08:02
lennyb_thanks. how are you?08:03
anteaya_good thanks08:04
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC08:04
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
anteaya_my weechat client apparently is still connected but I couldn't ssh into it, hopefully it will work for me later08:04
anteaya_yay xchat08:04
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
lennyb_:(08:05
anteaya_lennyb_: is there anything you would like to discuss today?08:05
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:05
anteaya_lennyb_: it is a small inconvenience08:05
lennyb_not really. have a good noght08:05
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC08:06
anteaya_thanks you too08:06
*** otter76__ has joined #openstack-meeting08:06
anteaya_I'll wait around a bit to see if anyone else shows up08:06
lennyb_sure08:06
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:06
*** sbelous_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:08
*** otter76__ has quit IRC08:08
*** sbelous_ has quit IRC08:08
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting08:08
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:09
*** hdaniel_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:09
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:09
*** dmorita has quit IRC08:09
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:10
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting08:11
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:12
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting08:12
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting08:12
anteaya_lennyb_: I don't see anyone else today, I'm going to close the meeting08:12
*** gcb has quit IRC08:12
*** adahms has quit IRC08:12
anteaya_lennyb_: thanks for being here today, see you next week08:12
anteaya_#endmeeting08:12
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"08:12
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 08:12:57 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)08:12
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-01-12-08.01.html08:12
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-01-12-08.01.txt08:13
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-01-12-08.01.log.html08:13
*** anteaya_ has quit IRC08:13
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:14
*** otter76__ has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:14
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:16
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:16
*** esker has quit IRC08:17
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:17
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:17
*** otter76__ has quit IRC08:18
*** baohua has quit IRC08:18
*** thorst has quit IRC08:18
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:19
*** baohua has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
*** jichen has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:21
*** ricolin has quit IRC08:21
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC08:22
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting08:22
*** otter76__ has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:23
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting08:24
*** otter76__ has quit IRC08:25
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:25
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:25
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC08:26
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:26
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting08:27
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:27
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:29
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:29
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting08:29
*** bryan_att has quit IRC08:29
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting08:30
*** joe__ has quit IRC08:30
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:30
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:31
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:31
*** dmorita has quit IRC08:32
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:32
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:33
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:33
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:35
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:36
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:37
*** hichihara has quit IRC08:37
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:37
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:38
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:38
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting08:39
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:40
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:40
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
*** phil__ has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC08:42
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting08:43
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:44
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:45
*** markmcclain has quit IRC08:45
*** macsz has left #openstack-meeting08:46
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting08:47
*** jlanoux has quit IRC08:48
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:48
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting08:48
*** ddieterly has quit IRC08:48
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:48
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:51
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:51
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:52
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting08:52
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting08:52
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:53
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
*** ijw has quit IRC08:54
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting08:54
*** xingchao_ has quit IRC08:55
*** spzala has quit IRC08:55
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:56
*** otter768_ has quit IRC08:57
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:58
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:58
*** esker has quit IRC08:58
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:59
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:00
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC09:01
*** belmoreira has quit IRC09:01
*** 77CAAI2UM has joined #openstack-meeting09:01
*** mbound has joined #openstack-meeting09:01
*** ndipanov has quit IRC09:01
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:01
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:02
ryu25hello midonet meeting about to start09:02
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:03
ryu25#startmeeting midonet09:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 09:03:30 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ryu25. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.09:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.09:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: midonet)"09:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'midonet'09:03
ryu25#topic announcements09:04
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: midonet)"09:04
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:04
*** joemi has joined #openstack-meeting09:04
ryu25hi joeme09:04
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:05
joemiits "joemi"09:05
ryu25oops sorry, joemi09:05
*** zhurong has quit IRC09:05
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:05
*** nicolas_s has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
*** otter76__ has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
ryu25no major announcement.  I've started adding some bugs in Launchpad for midonet instead of JIRA but I just got started so there are only a few.09:06
*** ijw has quit IRC09:06
ryu25i don't really know how/when/if this transition will occur yet.09:06
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting09:07
*** otter7___ has joined #openstack-meeting09:07
*** otter76__ has quit IRC09:07
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:07
ryu25another announcement: v5.1 release candidate is scheduled for the 19th.  It will depend on whether the release blocker bugs exist or not09:07
ryu25if we can provide v5.1 RC on the 19th, we are looking at the end of the month for the official v5.1 release09:08
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting09:09
*** otter____ has joined #openstack-meeting09:09
ryu25that's about all the annoucment I have.  Anyone else?09:09
yamamoto_new bugs should go to lp?09:10
ryu25I have not made any official announcement, but I would like to this week, which is yes, we should migrate over to LP for new bugs09:11
*** otter____ has quit IRC09:11
ryu25I'm still hearing conflicting voices regarding the fate of the midonet project in openstack currently09:11
*** otte_____ has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** otter7___ has quit IRC09:11
ryu25which I'm trying to get to the bottom of09:12
ryu25I will get the details and share with everyone in ML tomorrow09:12
ryu25i would like to get some feedback from sandro who is not around today09:12
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting09:13
*** otte_____ has quit IRC09:13
*** otter____ has joined #openstack-meeting09:13
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting09:14
*** spzala has quit IRC09:14
ryu25#action ryu25 summarize the current state of the midonet project joining the big tent, and decide on where the bugs should be reported09:14
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:15
*** otter____ has quit IRC09:15
ryu25#topic Bugs09:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: midonet)"09:15
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting09:16
ryu25thanks jfjoly and joemi for serving as the bug deputies the last two weeks09:17
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:17
ryu25does anyone want to volunteer for this week?09:17
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC09:18
ryu25I'll add myself for now since I need to figure out the LP/JIRA situation anyway.  But if anyoen wants to volunteer later, let me know09:18
*** jckasper has quit IRC09:18
ryu25https://bugs.launchpad.net/midonet09:19
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:19
*** nicolas_s has quit IRC09:19
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting09:19
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting09:19
ryu25as you can see only a small set of bugs have been reported in LP, mostly related to router peering.  And only one issue in progress:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/midonet/+bug/152748009:20
openstackLaunchpad bug 1527480 in midonet "Translation spec for Device Manager and L2GW missing" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Ryu Ishimoto (ryu-midokura)09:20
*** jfjoly has joined #openstack-meeting09:20
ryu25this one is simply updating the C3PO translation spec09:20
ryu25hi jfjoly09:20
jfjolyhi everyone, sorry for joining late!09:20
joemiI opened one today under networking-midonet, but maybe this should have been opened under midonet: https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-midonet/+bug/153309809:20
openstackLaunchpad bug 1533098 in networking-midonet "private to FIP traffic is dropped" [Undecided,New]09:20
*** otter76__ has joined #openstack-meeting09:21
ryu25joemi: Yes, I think this one should go to midonet09:21
joemiok, ill move it09:22
ryu25thanks09:22
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:22
*** otter76__ has quit IRC09:22
ryu25jfjoly would you like to go over the bugs that are blocking the release for v5.1?09:22
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:23
*** mhickey has joined #openstack-meeting09:23
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:23
*** ddeja has left #openstack-meeting09:23
jfjolyactually, I'm more tracking the blocking bugs for 5.0.109:23
joemiryu25: updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/midonet/+bug/153309809:23
openstackLaunchpad bug 1533098 in midonet "private to FIP traffic is dropped" [Undecided,New]09:23
ryu25I know that they are not tracked publicly just yet but we can still refer to them by titles09:23
*** thorst has quit IRC09:23
ryu25ah sorry 5.0.109:24
ryu25joemi: thanks09:24
jfjolyI have a list of 5 known issues, should I create them in LP?09:24
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:24
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:24
ryu25jfjoly: yes, let's do that, and I can comment on them there09:25
jfjolyok great, will do09:25
ryu25thanks09:25
jfjolyI will create in LP and send a mail to the list09:25
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:26
jfjolyhow do you create an action in the meeting log?09:26
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:26
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:27
ryu25#action jfjoly create LP bugs for the 5.0.1 blockers09:27
jfjolythanks !09:27
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-meeting09:27
*** joeljwright has left #openstack-meeting09:27
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:28
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:28
ryu25ok nothing else from me wrt bugs.  anyone else?09:29
joemiactually, i have a question09:29
jfjolynothing from my side09:30
joemiregarding the bug I linked just above09:30
jfjolyno bugs reported in LP last week09:30
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:30
joemiI am looking for opinions on how bad that is09:30
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting09:30
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:30
joemiim not sure if this is the time/place to discuss specific bugs though...09:31
*** garyk1 has quit IRC09:31
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:31
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting09:32
*** aeng_ has quit IRC09:32
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:32
ryu25joemi: that's done during the triage process, but let me take a stab at it.  I personally think it's not a high priority, but medium09:32
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:34
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
ryu25but perhaps someone more in touch with users can weigh in.  Basically the question is whether a VM with no FIP accessing a VM with FIP where both VMs are on the subnets connected to the same tenant router, via FIP09:34
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting09:35
ryu25whether that is a highly important use case09:35
jfjolyit's private IP to public IP traffic?09:35
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting09:35
joemijfjoly: right09:35
*** emsomeoneelse has joined #openstack-meeting09:35
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting09:35
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:35
jfjolyshould be public to public09:36
jfjolyI haven't looked into that bug in details but doesn't look critical09:36
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:36
joemiOK, fair enough09:36
yamamoto_there can be users.  https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/142888709:36
openstackLaunchpad bug 1428887 in neutron "Unable to communicate to floatingip on a same network" [Medium,Fix released] - Assigned to Itsuro Oda (oda-g)09:36
ryu25yamamoto_: nice find!09:37
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:38
ryu25joemi: I think medium priority is still applicable, but you may want to look at how it was resolved here and see if the same thing can be applied to midonet09:38
joemiok, sounds good. I'll look at the solution09:39
joemithanks ryu25 and yamamoto_09:39
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:39
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:40
*** esker has quit IRC09:40
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:40
ryu25ok moving onto the next topic09:41
ryu25#topic Open Discussion09:41
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: midonet)"09:41
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:41
*** dixiaoli has quit IRC09:41
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:41
ryu25there is nothing in particular that I need to bring up today09:42
jfjolydid we designate who is the next bug deputy?09:43
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting09:43
ryu25I have volunteered since the whole JIRA->LP migration is still in limbo09:43
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:43
jfjolyok thanks ryu25!09:43
ryu25and wanted to have some discussion with stakeholders about it asap09:44
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:44
ryu25and make a decision on it, which will impact whether we do JIRA/LP09:44
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting09:44
*** aeng_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:45
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:45
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:45
ryu25if no one has anymore topic to discuss, I will end the meeting09:46
ryu25#endmeeting09:47
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:47
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"09:47
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 09:47:13 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:47
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/midonet/2016/midonet.2016-01-12-09.03.html09:47
ryu25thanks everyone!09:47
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/midonet/2016/midonet.2016-01-12-09.03.txt09:47
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/midonet/2016/midonet.2016-01-12-09.03.log.html09:47
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:47
*** ddieterly has quit IRC09:48
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting09:48
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:49
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:49
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:51
*** clayton has quit IRC09:51
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:51
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC09:51
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:51
*** jfjoly has quit IRC09:51
*** mrmartin has quit IRC09:51
*** clayton has joined #openstack-meeting09:51
*** pratap__ has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** keedya has quit IRC09:52
*** macsz has quit IRC09:52
*** n0ano has quit IRC09:52
*** darvon has quit IRC09:52
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** slagle has quit IRC09:52
*** guitarzan has quit IRC09:52
*** joemi has quit IRC09:52
*** sileht has quit IRC09:52
*** pratap_ has quit IRC09:52
*** rossella_s has quit IRC09:53
*** dixiaoli has joined #openstack-meeting09:53
*** Akis_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:53
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC09:53
*** keedya has joined #openstack-meeting09:53
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:53
*** _sombrafam_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** derekh has quit IRC09:54
*** vishwana_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** darvon has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** guitarzan has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** egon_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:54
*** gongysh has quit IRC09:55
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** cbader_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** akiskourtis has quit IRC09:56
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC09:56
*** mdenny has quit IRC09:56
*** egon has quit IRC09:56
*** cbader has quit IRC09:56
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:56
*** baoli has quit IRC09:56
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:57
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting09:57
*** joemi has joined #openstack-meeting09:57
*** houming has quit IRC09:58
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-meeting09:58
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:59
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting09:59
*** otter768_ has quit IRC09:59
*** 77CAAI2UM has quit IRC10:01
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:01
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC10:01
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting10:01
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting10:02
*** sileht has joined #openstack-meeting10:02
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting10:02
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC10:04
*** ljxiash has quit IRC10:04
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:04
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:04
*** ljxiash has joined #openstack-meeting10:04
*** otter768_ has quit IRC10:06
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:07
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:07
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:07
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:08
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:08
*** ljxiash has quit IRC10:09
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:10
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:10
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:10
*** otter768_ has quit IRC10:12
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:12
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:14
*** hoangcx has quit IRC10:15
*** rossella_s has quit IRC10:15
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC10:16
*** derekh has quit IRC10:16
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting10:16
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:16
*** egon_ has quit IRC10:16
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting10:17
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting10:17
*** egon has joined #openstack-meeting10:17
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC10:17
*** otter768_ has quit IRC10:18
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:18
*** xingchao_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:18
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** dixiaoli has quit IRC10:19
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC10:20
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:20
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:20
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting10:21
*** esker has quit IRC10:21
*** xingchao has quit IRC10:21
*** otter768_ has quit IRC10:21
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:22
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting10:22
*** otter768_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:24
*** otter76__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:25
*** otter768_ has quit IRC10:26
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:26
*** otter76__ has quit IRC10:27
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** thorst has quit IRC10:28
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:28
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:29
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting10:29
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:29
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC10:33
*** weshay_xchat has joined #openstack-meeting10:34
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:34
*** epico has quit IRC10:35
*** electrofelix has joined #openstack-meeting10:36
*** xingchao_ has quit IRC10:37
*** itzdilip has quit IRC10:42
*** ildikov has quit IRC10:43
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting10:44
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting10:45
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting10:47
*** tfukushima has quit IRC10:48
*** ddieterly has quit IRC10:50
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting10:52
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC10:52
*** itzdilip has quit IRC10:52
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting10:53
*** sudipto has joined #openstack-meeting10:54
*** yassine has quit IRC10:55
*** baoli_ has quit IRC10:55
*** itzdilip has quit IRC10:56
*** egallen has quit IRC10:56
*** weshay_xchat has quit IRC10:56
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|away10:56
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting10:56
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting10:58
*** esker has quit IRC11:02
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC11:02
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:03
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting11:05
*** roxanagh_ has quit IRC11:05
*** ljxiash has joined #openstack-meeting11:07
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting11:08
*** adahms has joined #openstack-meeting11:08
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC11:09
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC11:10
*** tfukushima has quit IRC11:10
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting11:10
*** ljxiash_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** itzdilip has quit IRC11:11
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** ljxiash has quit IRC11:12
*** weshay_xchat has joined #openstack-meeting11:14
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting11:15
*** spzala has quit IRC11:15
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting11:15
*** vivekd has quit IRC11:17
*** adrianofr has joined #openstack-meeting11:18
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC11:19
*** jjmb has quit IRC11:19
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC11:19
*** Guest11707 has joined #openstack-meeting11:19
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting11:20
*** Guest11707 has quit IRC11:20
*** zeih has quit IRC11:21
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting11:22
*** aysyd has joined #openstack-meeting11:25
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting11:26
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting11:28
*** jlanoux has quit IRC11:29
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting11:30
*** irenab has quit IRC11:31
*** tochi has quit IRC11:32
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting11:32
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting11:33
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting11:33
*** zqfan has joined #openstack-meeting11:33
*** SridharG has quit IRC11:33
*** thorst has quit IRC11:33
*** dmorita has quit IRC11:37
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting11:38
*** ildikov has quit IRC11:40
*** vivekd has joined #openstack-meeting11:40
*** baohua has quit IRC11:41
*** vivekd has quit IRC11:41
*** vivekd has joined #openstack-meeting11:42
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC11:42
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting11:44
*** itzdilip has quit IRC11:46
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting11:46
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:46
*** jlanoux_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:47
*** jlanoux has quit IRC11:47
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting11:47
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting11:48
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC11:48
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:49
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting11:50
*** ddieterly has quit IRC11:51
*** vivekd has quit IRC11:54
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting11:54
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:54
*** itzdilip has quit IRC11:54
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting11:56
*** sudipto has quit IRC11:57
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting11:59
alex_xu#startmeeting nova api12:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 12:00:05 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is alex_xu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.12:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.12:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova api)"12:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova_api'12:00
alex_xuwho is here today?12:00
oomichio/12:00
alex_xuoomichi: hey :)12:01
alex_xuoomichi: are you already move to US?12:01
oomichialex_xu: hi :)12:01
jicheno/12:01
oomichialex_xu: not yet. it is 11th/Feb :)12:01
alex_xuoomichi: cool! but sad, we lost one core in asia timezone :(12:02
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:02
oomichialex_xu: ah, nice point12:02
cdento/12:02
alex_xuemm...super quiet in community in the recently12:02
alex_xubut let start the meeting12:02
alex_xu#topic content patches up for review12:02
*** openstack changes topic to "content patches up for review (Meeting topic: nova api)"12:02
alex_xu#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/complete-todo-in-api-concept-doc,n,z12:02
cdentalex_xu: I think that's just the nature of january12:03
alex_xuwe have some patch about server query, user, microversion for api concept doc12:03
alex_xucdent: people didn't get work status yet?12:03
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting12:03
alex_xujust need more review for those api concept doc12:03
alex_xu#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-site+branch:master+topic:fix-compute-api-ref,n,z12:04
oomichialex_xu: yeah, +112:04
sdagueo/12:04
alex_xuthere are some nice fix from jichen12:04
alex_xujichen: appreciate that, when I clear up the etherpad, also found a lot of review comment for the api ref :)12:04
alex_xu#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-v2.1-api-doc12:05
jichenalex_xu: yeah, still need some patches for the comments :)12:05
alex_xuI did some cleanup for these etherpad, hope it's more clear12:05
alex_xujichen: :)12:05
alex_xu#topic most needed next content patches12:05
*** openstack changes topic to "most needed next content patches (Meeting topic: nova api)"12:05
jichenok, thanks ~12:05
alex_xunot sure, but I will begin to write something for extension in api concept12:06
*** mrmartin has quit IRC12:06
alex_xufree to sign up, still have few todo, then api concept is very close12:06
alex_xu#topic remove project id12:07
*** openstack changes topic to "remove project id (Meeting topic: nova api)"12:07
sdaguegiven that extensions are now deprecated, I wouldn't write about them much12:07
sdaguewe don't want people doing that12:07
alex_xusdague: yea, I want to clear that, to tell people extension are deprecated12:07
sdagueok, on the remove project_id from urls effort, there is a wrinkle which has to do with overlapping routes12:08
alex_xuthat sounds like that part will more easy to write :)12:08
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting12:08
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:08
*** roxanagh_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
sdaguehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/256089 I was trying to figure out why randomly we'd fail 1 functional test that was doing a get of 'extensions/os-agents'12:09
alex_xusdague: for legacy v2 mode?12:09
sdagueno, for v2.112:09
sdagueand because of the way we parse out '{project_id}'12:09
sdaguewhich can be anything12:09
*** vgridnev has quit IRC12:10
sdagueThe following request: /v2.1/extensions/os-agents can either match to project_id == extensions, controller = os-agents12:10
sdagueor project_id = None, controller = extensions12:10
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting12:10
alex_xuemm...ok12:11
sdaguethere are about 5 extensions that produce this overlap12:11
*** mrmartin has quit IRC12:11
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting12:11
sdaguethis is because of how python routes module works12:12
* alex_xu add that patch to review list12:12
*** alkhodos has quit IRC12:12
sdaguewhere it builds a giant routing regex - http://paste.openstack.org/show/483489/12:12
sdagueand we just get match answers at the end12:12
cdentsdague: were you able to roust anybody on that pull req?12:12
sdaguecdent: dhellmann is following up on it, he knows the maintainer12:13
cdentdhellmann++12:13
alex_xucool12:13
sdagueto be clear, the routes pull request don't solve this issue for us, it just gives us some new options12:13
sdaguethe problem is, project_id actually has no schema definition in openstack except string < 64 chars (keystone db constraint)12:14
sdagueso even though uuid is expected from keystone, you can wedge other things in there12:14
sdaguerax has ints12:14
*** roxanagh_ has quit IRC12:15
cdentYour suggestion of making it a configuration character class or something along those lines, makes sense. And make the default the most common (or better: most correct) thing?12:15
oomichisdague: project-id of rax is integer?12:15
sdagueoomichi: yes12:15
oomichisdague: oh, surprised..12:15
sdaguecdent: yes. Given this is only an issue during overlap, I'm thinking about the smallest possible fix now, instead of the right one12:16
*** spzala has quit IRC12:16
sdagueso even just requring project_id to be [0-9a-f]+ (i.e. hex of any sort) would kill the overlap12:17
sdagueand would work fine for ints12:17
sdaguethat regex doesn't work without the routes fix though12:17
*** irenab has quit IRC12:17
sdagueanyway, this remains an unsolved problem right now12:18
alex_xusdague: ok, thanks for the update12:18
alex_xuso lets move on12:18
alex_xu#topic API futures - patches for approved specs12:19
*** openstack changes topic to "API futures - patches for approved specs (Meeting topic: nova api)"12:19
alex_xu#link https://review.openstack.org/25726112:19
alex_xuI want to discuss this patch. I feel we are missing something. This patch adds the macs and ip type back to the API, due to we missing those fields when we port v2.1 API12:20
jichenyeah, you said : We should have a patch remove those extension name from extension API https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/extension_info.py#L45-L4612:20
alex_xuBut the extension entry ExtendIPs and ExtendIPsMac still in the extension API12:20
alex_xujichen: yea, I think we should those extension entries from extension API, and backport that patch.12:21
alex_xubecause that will break the v2 legacy user. We assume legacy v2 user still use extension to detect whether the macs address and type in the API response12:22
jichenum... so they won't need extention anymore, just use the API microversion from then on?12:23
oomichialex_xu: you are meaning we need to remove those extensions from "list extensions" API in this patch?12:23
alex_xuoomichi: yes12:23
alex_xuoomichi: no, a separated patch12:23
oomichialex_xu: ok, in long term, it is nice to remove extensions.12:24
alex_xujichen: yes, your patch just add two new fields in the api12:24
oomichialex_xu: but I agree with that should be done with separated patch.12:24
alex_xuand we should backport it12:24
oomichialex_xu: difficult to do that. that is not a bug.12:25
sdaguehonestly, I'm not thrilled with the changing of the ips sub resource12:25
*** eliqiao has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:25
sdagueit does what is expected today, lists ips12:25
alex_xumac address looks like close to ip address is fine12:26
*** rtheis has joined #openstack-meeting12:26
sdagueI disagree.12:26
oomichiI am fine on current implementation with bumping a microversion without removing those extensions.12:27
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:28
alex_xusdague: ok, you expected user get that from neutron?12:28
sdaguealex_xu: or a new resource entirely12:29
sdaguein the neutron case are we going to be making a call to neutron under the covers?12:29
alex_xusdague: that sounds like extend more network API in nova12:30
alex_xusdague: I guess that in the network cache12:30
*** vgridnev has quit IRC12:30
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
sdagueyeh, I feel like we should be really careful about becoming the primary interface for more network info, and if we do, be really explicit about it.12:30
sdagueit's also not hugely clear to me what the mac address does for the end user12:31
cdentI was going to ask that12:31
cdentip, sure. mac addr, huh?12:31
sdaguejichen: what was the use case you had here where you needed this data?12:31
*** emsomeoneelse has quit IRC12:32
jichenI see this code used to be there with some comment and with an extension, so I think it would be helpful to add it12:32
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting12:32
sdaguejichen: because it was there once upon a time, isn't really a good reason12:33
*** berendt has joined #openstack-meeting12:33
sdaguewhat use case do you have for using this data12:33
cdentsorry, I have to go, will catch up with the logs later12:34
*** cdent has quit IRC12:34
jichensdague: yeah, you are right, it's not a reason ;   I just think ,someone might want to check mac address for some analysis purpose12:34
sdaguejichen: I think we should put this on hold without a use case for it12:34
sdaguebecause every interface we add we have to support forever12:35
*** berendt1 has quit IRC12:35
*** otter768 has quit IRC12:35
sdagueso lets only do that if we really really need it12:35
oomichithis patch doesn't get approval of the corresponding nova-spec?12:35
jichenit's approved12:36
alex_xuno, we have a spec...12:36
oomichican we see the url?12:36
sdaguemaybe, but I think it's ok for us to realize that we made a mistake12:36
oomichias alex_xu said, the bp is not written on the commit message and we cannot see it easily now12:36
jichenhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/247496/1/specs/mitaka/approved/ips-add-max-and-type.rst12:36
*** pratikmallya has joined #openstack-meeting12:37
sdaguethe spec is not approved12:37
sdagueoh, old link12:37
oomichioh, the spec doesn't contain the use case.12:37
oomichieven if I +1d..12:38
sdagueyeh, it just says this was in the v3 code12:38
alex_xuok, learn that...12:38
sdagueyeh, I want to reopen this conversation and have a use case for this12:38
alex_xuok12:38
oomichisdague: +1 for concrete use case12:38
jichenok, I agree I am going to search for more info on original code on the user case12:39
alex_xujichen: thanks12:39
jichenthanks a ll12:39
jichenall12:39
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
alex_xuok, any more want to bring up?12:39
oomichisdague: related to project-id change, it is great to approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181393/ faster.12:40
oomichisdague: how to get approve on the openstack-spec?12:40
sdagueoomichi: it's on the TC agenda today12:40
oomichiit spec gets a lot of +2s already12:40
oomichisdague: cool :)12:40
sdagueyeh, we'll try to get that sorted12:41
alex_xucool:)12:41
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting12:41
alex_xu#topic open12:41
*** openstack changes topic to "open (Meeting topic: nova api)"12:41
sdaguejichen: so, honestly, I would say unless there is a really compelling reason, don't bother. We shouldn't just add code because it was there before.12:41
sdagueI -2ed the patch until we have a use case in the spec12:41
jichensdague: yeah, I will try to find more info on that then update the spec if I have, thanks for the help~12:42
*** d0ugal has quit IRC12:42
alex_xucool12:42
alex_xuwe are close to mid-cycle, so anything we want to talk about that?12:42
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting12:43
*** d0ugal is now known as Guest5838512:43
sdaguewho all is going to be there?12:43
sdagueo/12:43
alex_xuo/12:43
* alex_xu go to mid-cycle first time~12:43
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC12:43
oomichisdague: alex_xu: cool :) I cannot make it at this time12:43
alex_xuoomichi: :(12:44
oomichifor preparing my live-migration to US12:44
oomichianyways, enjoy the mid-cycle :)12:44
alex_xuoomichi: cool, good luck for live-migration, I guess that is block migration...12:45
jichen not far away but not able to :(   enjoy ~12:45
eliqiaocool oomichi , when will you do `live-migration`?12:45
*** Guest58385 is now known as d0ugal12:45
*** d0ugal has quit IRC12:45
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting12:45
oomichieliqiao: 11th/Feb12:45
alex_xujichen: I thought you can, as you are more close to UK...12:45
eliqiaoand city?12:45
oomichiSan Jose, CA12:45
alex_xuanything we want to discuss at mid-cyle about api?12:46
oomichialex_xu: how about fairy-slipper thing?12:46
oomichiI cannot understand it yet12:47
sdagueyeh, that would be nice to know more about12:47
alex_xuoomichi: yea12:47
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting12:47
alex_xulooks like it's on very early stage yet12:49
jichenany more info about fairy-slipper ? thanks12:49
alex_xusdague: does mid-cycle meetup is same as summit design session?12:49
jichenjust googled but not https://github.com/russell/fairy-slipper ?12:49
sdaguealex_xu: we typically have a rolling agenda of an etherpad12:50
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-meeting12:50
alex_xujichen: yea, that one12:50
oomichijichen: https://github.com/openstack/fairy-slipper12:50
alex_xuyea, it move to openstack project, cool12:50
jichenoomichi: got it ,thanks~12:50
oomichijichen: and http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-January/083670.html12:51
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting12:51
alex_xu#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-nova-midcycle12:52
alex_xuah, I found the link12:52
alex_xuThere is API discussion at first day12:52
*** ddieterly has quit IRC12:52
alex_xuok, i guess people just free to put the idea12:53
alex_xuif no more question, let us close the meeting early today12:53
oomichithanks all12:53
alex_xuthanks all!12:53
sdagueok, thanks folks12:53
jichenthank you12:53
alex_xu#endmeeting12:53
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"12:53
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 12:53:53 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)12:53
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2016/nova_api.2016-01-12-12.00.html12:53
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2016/nova_api.2016-01-12-12.00.txt12:53
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2016/nova_api.2016-01-12-12.00.log.html12:53
*** ryu25 has quit IRC12:55
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** rbak has quit IRC12:57
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** MaxPC has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC13:01
*** cdub has quit IRC13:02
*** ItSANgo has quit IRC13:03
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting13:03
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC13:08
*** baoli has quit IRC13:08
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC13:08
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** roxanagh_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC13:11
*** derekh has quit IRC13:11
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** MIDENN_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting13:14
*** roxanagh_ has quit IRC13:15
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
*** markvoelker has quit IRC13:15
*** mdenny has quit IRC13:15
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting13:16
*** spzala has quit IRC13:17
*** jckasper has quit IRC13:20
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting13:23
*** oomichi is now known as oomichi_away13:23
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC13:28
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting13:28
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2413:31
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC13:34
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** vikram_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** ygbo has quit IRC13:36
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** msagheer has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** msagheer has left #openstack-meeting13:38
*** ItSANgo has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** eliqiao_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
*** rubasov has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
*** msagheer has joined #openstack-meeting13:40
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting13:40
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa13:40
*** eliqiao has quit IRC13:41
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** regXboi has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** dslev has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** hdaniel_ has quit IRC13:42
*** eliqiao_ is now known as eliqiao13:42
*** qwebirc20169 has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** cdent has quit IRC13:46
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** ppetit has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting13:50
*** topol has quit IRC13:51
*** sbelous_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** zhonghua-lee has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** jckasper has quit IRC13:55
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** huats has quit IRC13:55
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** zengyingzhe has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** myoung has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** saggi has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** jckasper has quit IRC13:57
saggi#startmeeting13:59
openstacksaggi: Error: A meeting name is required, e.g., '#startmeeting Marketing Committee'13:59
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
saggi#startmeeting Smaug Biweekly13:59
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 13:59:28 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is saggi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:59
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:59
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"13:59
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'smaug_biweekly'13:59
*** tidwellr has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** chenying_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
saggi#topic roll call14:00
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"14:00
chenying_Hi14:00
saggiHi everyone14:00
*** qwebirc20169 has quit IRC14:00
zhonghua-leehi14:00
zengyingzheo14:00
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC14:00
*** aysyd has quit IRC14:00
*** regXboi has left #openstack-meeting14:00
*** dasm has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
saggigampel is mid-flight so he will be missing this meeting14:00
*** aysyd has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
saggiare we waiting for anyone?14:01
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC14:01
saggiYinwei?14:01
*** diltram has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
zengyingzheLet's begin?14:01
zhonghua-leeis there any topic related yinwei?14:01
*** chenzeng has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
saggiProtection Service tasks14:01
zengyingzheTalk other topics first14:02
*** korzen has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
smcginniso/14:02
saggisure14:02
zhonghua-leethe first one?14:02
saggi#topic API, Last call for comments14:02
*** openstack changes topic to "API, Last call for comments (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"14:02
saggiSo I want to finalize the API soon14:02
*** dslev has quit IRC14:02
zengyingzheThere are some put methods to add.14:03
zhonghua-leeis it the last version now?14:03
zengyingzhePlease see Eran's comment.14:03
*** dandruta has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
saggiNo, I have some minor comments from gampel.14:03
*** diltram has left #openstack-meeting14:04
*** macsz has quit IRC14:04
saggiBut I hope it's the last iteration14:04
*** annp has quit IRC14:04
saggismcginnis, I don't know if you are here but I would appreciate you giving it a second look.14:05
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting14:05
*** rubasov has left #openstack-meeting14:05
smcginnissaggi: I will try to do that later today.14:05
saggithanks14:05
smcginnissaggi: No problem. I'm travelling, so I might not get to it right away.14:05
*** dkranz has quit IRC14:05
smcginnisBut it's on my list now. :)14:05
chenying_ smcginnis: Thanks.14:05
*** dasm has left #openstack-meeting14:06
saggiSo if people have any questions or comments please post them. Even if you don't understand something. It's very important as changing APIs is hard.14:06
zengyingzhesure14:06
smcginnissaggi: Very true!14:06
chenying_I see14:07
zengyingzheNext topic?14:07
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
chenying_API service14:07
chenying_Api resource controller design is in progress.14:07
saggi#topic API Service14:08
*** openstack changes topic to "API Service (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"14:08
chenying_I plan to do api service design and resource controller development.14:08
*** sbelous_ has quit IRC14:08
zhonghua-leechenying_: wo can work together14:08
saggichenying_: please coordinate with yinwei about serializers and other integration between the API and the protection service.14:08
chenying_Ok14:09
saggiI see some stuff that appear to be duplicate effort between you two14:09
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
zhonghua-leesaggi: you mean chenying_ and yinwei?14:10
saggiyes14:10
saggiStuff that could be moved to common code between the services14:10
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
saggichenying_: All in all you are doing a good job14:11
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC14:11
saggichenying_: Is there anything you need from anyone else?14:11
chenying_She has explained that serializers in manager is for bankplugin.14:11
*** vikram_ has quit IRC14:11
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
saggiI understand. Than we might need something that will also work for the plugins. I will think about it.14:12
*** krtaylor has quit IRC14:13
chenying_ I will coordinate with yinwei about it.14:13
*** pc_m has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
saggiGood, you will need to coordinate the schema transfer and other information from the checkpoint.14:13
saggiShould we move to Pluggable Proection Provider Q/A14:14
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
zengyingzheyes14:14
saggi#topic Pluggable Proection Provider Questions and Answers14:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Pluggable Proection Provider Questions and Answers (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"14:14
saggiI posted the design doc about the pluggable protection provider.14:15
saggiThis will be the reference implementation and recommended way to extend Smaug.14:15
saggiFor cases where you need small modifications to the existing backup.14:15
saggiAre there any questions about the design?14:15
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
zengyingzheContinue the discussion this afternoon. create_checkpoint needs to add a checkpoint info parameter?14:16
*** dane has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
zengyingzheright?14:16
saggicreate_checkpoints get's a checkpoint info14:16
saggiIn the post request14:17
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
zengyingzheBut there gotta be a way to pass this info.14:17
*** ddieterly has quit IRC14:17
saggizengyingzhe: I don't understand the question.14:17
zengyingzheto create_checkpoint()14:17
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** trozet has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
zengyingzheLet14:18
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
saggizengyingzhe: Oh14:18
zengyingzheLet's talk this latter14:18
saggiNow I understand what you are talking about14:18
zengyingzhesaggi, yes?14:19
saggizengyingzhe: You are correct I need to change this in the diagram.14:19
saggizengyingzhe: I kept thinking you are talking about the API diagram.14:19
saggiCompletely my mistake.14:19
saggiI'm very sorry14:19
saggiI will fix it14:19
*** dane has quit IRC14:20
zengyingzhe:) Don't be sorry. I explained it unclearly14:20
*** jichen has quit IRC14:20
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
saggiSo please everyone, make sure you understand it. It's going to be the heart of Smaug so your comments are very important.14:21
*** jckasper has quit IRC14:21
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:21
saggiYinwei, and zengyingzhe are already doing a good job finding my mistakes :)14:21
*** spzala has quit IRC14:21
*** rossella_s has quit IRC14:22
zengyingzheAnd another one. I see create_checkpoint() is for protect operation, does there need other interfaces for restore or enable?14:22
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** ppetit has quit IRC14:22
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC14:22
saggizengyingzhe: Yes, it's missing. I thought I already did that but I guess I didn't.14:22
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
zengyingzhesaggi, thanks.14:23
saggiShould we move to protection Service tasks14:23
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:23
saggi?14:23
zengyingzheyinwei14:23
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
*** ZZelle has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
saggiWe'll start without her14:25
saggi#topic Protection Service tasks14:25
zhonghua-leeit seems she is not here14:25
*** openstack changes topic to "Protection Service tasks (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"14:25
*** pc_m has left #openstack-meeting14:25
saggiI've added tasks to the etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/smaug-bootsrap14:25
zengyingzhewhat's this topic about?14:26
saggiThis are things that we are more or less closed on how we want to do them14:26
*** mtanino has quit IRC14:26
saggiSo if you have time to do some coding. You should pick something from the list.14:26
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
chenzengcan we move to operationengine?14:27
saggiThe Protectables are low handing fruit as you can make a small tool and just make sure you can query openstack etc14:27
saggi#topic Operation Engine design status\14:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Operation Engine design status\ (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"14:28
saggi#topic Operation Engine design status14:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Operation Engine design status (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"14:28
chenzengtoday, I have finished the coding and simple tests of TimeTrigger. I will submit it this week. next, I will modify the design of OperationEngine, and finish the remaining coding.14:28
chenzengone question. according to the discussing with saggi, OperationEngine need to track the operation. does it mean some operations like delete operation need finish its logic when executing it.14:28
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC14:28
*** ppetit has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega14:29
saggiDelete is simple as it just means to mark the checkpoint as deleted. Another pass will actually free all the resources asynchronously.14:29
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** peristeri has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
saggiThis is because we want to assume atomic deletes.14:29
saggis/assume/assure14:30
chenzengyes, i aggree.14:30
chenzengso, we need to encapsulate the logic into the operation class, right?14:31
*** itzdilip has quit IRC14:31
saggiWhat logic?14:31
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting14:31
*** m1dev has quit IRC14:31
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
saggiThe actual deletion pass, or GC (Garbage Collection) pass is done in Smaug independently from the operation.14:32
chenzengthe operation14:32
*** esker has quit IRC14:32
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting14:33
saggiSo the operation just needs to make sure it maked all the required checkpoints as deleted. This should be in the operation. For example if we need to mark 10 checkpoints and we crashed after the 5th we need to continue once we restart.14:33
chenzengok, understand.14:33
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck14:34
*** ajmiller has quit IRC14:34
saggiWhen creating multiple checkpoints. We also need to track those.14:34
*** johnbelamaric has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
zengyingzheSo OperationEngine needs to record the progress of one operation to DB?14:34
saggiYes. It needs to make sure it handles crashes in the middle of operations or cases where the trigger was missed.14:35
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
*** SridharG has quit IRC14:35
chenzengwhat is the meaning of " trigger was missed"14:36
*** otter768 has quit IRC14:36
saggiYou have a trigger at 00:00 and the host was down between 23:59 and 00:01.14:36
saggiIn that case you will miss that daily backup14:36
*** jmckind_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:36
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
chenzengi think operation class need to make sure the logic be finished correctly.14:37
*** johnbelamaric has left #openstack-meeting14:37
saggiYes, and make sure it actually started14:37
*** esker has quit IRC14:38
*** brad_behle has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
saggiAnd if you were down until 14:00 than you might not want to backup since it will stress the system during high load. So timed triggers should have a window of operation.14:38
saggiuser defined window of operation14:38
*** dslev has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
*** timcline has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
chenying_saggi I have a question about Operation action.14:39
chenying_In pluggable_protection_provider.pu this file. I note that enum Operation  ony have protect, enable,disable,restore these action , but do not have 'delete'. Why?14:39
*** jmckind has quit IRC14:39
chenying_As a user he have a requirement deleting the backup data of a volume resource.14:40
saggichenying_: I think I missed it14:40
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting14:40
chenying_OK  I see14:40
saggichenying_: Good catch!14:41
saggi#topic open discussion14:41
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: Smaug Biweekly)"14:41
chenzengsaggi: can we use the crontab format for the timetrigger ?14:41
chenying_I will do some review about the protection_provider later.14:41
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:42
*** hichihara has quit IRC14:42
chenzengi don't understand the rfc244514:42
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** msagheer has quit IRC14:43
saggihttp://www.kanzaki.com/docs/ical/rrule.html14:43
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
chenzengsaggi:thanks14:44
saggichenzeng: But you are right, crontab is simpler.14:44
*** ddieterly has quit IRC14:45
saggiI say we will start with crontab and see if users ask for the more complex features of ical\rrule14:45
chenzengsaggi:will we use crontab, or support both14:45
zengyingzherfc2445 is complex indeed.14:45
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** korzen has quit IRC14:45
saggichenzeng: OK, I agree with you. crontab for now.14:46
smcginnissaggi: Speaking from experience from working on a data protection product in the past, user protection rules usually end up being more complex than cron can represent.14:46
chenzengsaggi:ok14:46
saggismcginnis: hmmm14:46
*** timcline has quit IRC14:46
smcginnisBut that said, I think it's probably simpler to start with cron and make it more complex later if that's what's needed.14:46
*** kbyrne has quit IRC14:46
*** adahms has quit IRC14:46
smcginnisProbably better not to go for the more complex scheme right away. ;)14:46
saggichenzeng, smcginnis: We'll add a format specifier in the trigger. crontab only for v114:47
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:47
smcginnissaggi: +114:47
*** tellesnobrega is now known as tellesnobrega_af14:47
chenzengsaggi:ok14:47
*** hichihara has quit IRC14:47
saggi#action add format specifier for timed triggers14:48
*** zeih_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
*** rossella_s has quit IRC14:48
saggiAnything else? We have 10 more minutes!14:48
*** zeih has quit IRC14:48
*** dslev has quit IRC14:49
chenzengsaggi:in order to make sure the consistance of operation, do you have any good ideas?14:49
*** sudipto has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** links has quit IRC14:50
saggiAlways persist before doing anything. Make sub operations that are either idempotent or sub operations you can always verify if they occurred or not.14:50
*** pratikmallya has quit IRC14:50
saggichenzeng: We could talk in #openstack-smaug about specific operations if you like14:50
saggiOK, that I think we are done.14:51
chenzengsaggi:ok14:51
saggiThanks everyone14:51
smcginnisThanks!14:51
chenying_Thanks14:51
chenzengthanks14:51
zengyingzheBye14:51
saggiI hope that next time yinwei will join us.14:51
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
saggi#endmeeting14:52
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:52
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 14:52:07 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:52
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/smaug_biweekly/2016/smaug_biweekly.2016-01-12-13.59.html14:52
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/smaug_biweekly/2016/smaug_biweekly.2016-01-12-13.59.txt14:52
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/smaug_biweekly/2016/smaug_biweekly.2016-01-12-13.59.log.html14:52
*** zengyingzhe has left #openstack-meeting14:52
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_14:52
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** topol has quit IRC14:55
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz14:55
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:56
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
*** roxanagh_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
*** annegentle has quit IRC14:56
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** hichihara has quit IRC14:58
*** dslev has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** regXboi has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** singhj has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC14:59
armaxhello there14:59
ihrachyso/14:59
neiljerramhi14:59
ihrachysat least that meeting will actually occur! yay14:59
HenryG'allo 'allo15:00
armaxamotoki, mestery, carl_baldwin, HenryG, dougwig, kevinbenton: you there?15:00
vhowardo/15:00
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
*** topol has quit IRC15:00
armaxihrachys: this is the drivers meeting15:00
kevinbentonhi15:00
dougwighere, but i have to divide between this meeting and getting the midcycle rolling15:00
ihrachysI know15:00
ihrachysarmax: should I leave? :D15:00
*** pc_m has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
* mestery waves15:00
armax#startmeeting neutron_drivers15:00
armaxihrachys: no15:00
kevinbentono\ \o o/ \o15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 15:00:29 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is armax. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers'15:00
kevinbenton#agreed15:00
* regXboi finds a seat in the back and starts snoring quietly15:00
dougwigwe should spend 58 minutes on meeting times.15:00
mestery\m/  (  -_-   )  \m/15:01
mesterydougwig: One can dream15:01
*** jlanoux_ has quit IRC15:01
armaxmestery: I was dreaming only a few minutes ago15:01
regXboimestery: I want to see the ascii art for "rock concert movement #1"15:01
*** hichihara has quit IRC15:01
mesterylol15:01
njohnstono/15:01
*** roxanagh_ has quit IRC15:01
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** houming has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
armaxlet’s go over the list of triaged bugs15:02
armax#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=Triaged&field.tag=rfe&orderby=datecreated&start=015:02
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
armaxin order they have been submitted15:02
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
carl_baldwinHi15:02
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
armaxbug #137003315:02
openstackbug 1370033 in neutron "Admin should be able to manually select the active instance of a HA router" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1370033 - Assigned to Hong Hui Xiao (xiaohhui)15:02
*** chenzeng has quit IRC15:03
armaxthis was approved and then shot down15:03
armaxcarl_baldwin reinstated it15:03
*** mfranc213 has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** annegentle has quit IRC15:03
armaxbut amuller is not in the room15:03
*** jrist has quit IRC15:03
carl_baldwinarmax: I almost marked as won't fix but I thought I'd bring it up today.15:03
*** markmcclain has quit IRC15:03
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
kevinbentonwhy did it get shot down?15:04
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
*** markmcclain1 is now known as markmcclain15:04
armaxany strong reason why we’d keep looking at this one?15:04
*** edtubill has quit IRC15:04
carl_baldwinI don't think a strong use case for manually intervening has been made yet.15:05
armaxkevinbenton: amuller (reporter) realized that wasn’t a strong use case15:05
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
armaxand the admin pain could be dealt with differently15:05
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
kevinbentonok, i'll defer to carl_baldwin on this then15:05
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC15:05
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
armaxas to what was proposed in the spec15:05
*** esker has quit IRC15:06
*** amuller has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
carl_baldwinBut, I've heard the request from customers.  I've asked to push back on that request to see if there is really a strong use case.15:06
amullerI need a calendar reminder for this meeting15:06
ajoamuller : http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/calendars/neutron-drivers-meeting.ics15:07
ajo:-)15:07
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
carl_baldwinSo, I'm thinking of marking won't fix for the time being.  What do you think?15:07
armaxcarl_baldwin: as far as I understand this is a typical example of something that could be scripted15:07
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
*** ninag has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
armaxon top of existing API’s?15:08
carl_baldwinarmax: I don't think there is an API to set it.  Isn't that what it asks for?15:08
ajoI think it's not scriptable, but I also agree there's probably no strong use case15:08
ajo(hi btw) :)15:08
amulleryou can kinda use the admin-level add/remove routers to do this15:08
carl_baldwinamuller: good point15:09
amulleralso from reading the spec I think we'll need to enable preempt in keepalived.conf in order for the priority field to be used15:09
amullerwhich is something I don't want to do15:09
dougwigmanually picking is something that is abnormal in HA, but kind of an expected primitive.15:09
*** chenying_ has quit IRC15:09
ajoI guess it can be used to balance traffic across network nodes15:10
mesterydougwig: ++15:10
mesterydougwig: But don't let common sense get in the way :)15:10
amullerit it's current iteration the spec doesn't mention an API change btw15:11
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC15:11
amullerit's just a scheduler change, but the way to enforce it on the keepalived level is problematic15:11
armaxamuller, carl_baldwin: I think the use case is reasonable but how it’s tackled doesn’t let us see the end in sight15:11
armaxanyhow we should continue the discussion offline15:11
armaxit looks like we still have no consensus on this one15:12
kevinbentontag it as low-hanging-fruit for new contributors :)15:12
armaxkevinbenton: bad idea15:12
armaxthis is not a trivial fix15:12
kevinbentonmid-hanging-fruit?15:12
armax#bug 150563115:12
openstackbug 1505631 in neutron "QoS VLAN 802.1p Support" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150563115:12
armaxbug #150563115:12
ihrachysarmax: not sure what you meant by saying qos is limited to hypervisor15:13
armaxihrachys: if I understand the proposal of the submitter correctly15:13
armaxihrachys: he’s suggesting to control QoS at the switch15:13
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
armaxnot the vswitch on the hypervisor15:13
ihrachysreally?..15:14
ihrachyswhere is that? Is that what 'ECN' abbreviation means?15:14
armaxbut I might be wrong15:14
* ihrachys sees it the first time15:14
ajohe's suggesting to mark packets with an specific vlan 802.1p priority15:14
ihrachysmy understanding is proposal is about tagging frames; then tags may be used by external switches15:15
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
ajoit's the same thing as dscp, just different technology.15:15
neiljerramECN is Explicit Congestion Notification, I believe15:15
armaxajo: where do we stand on the dscp implementation?15:15
amullersuper similar to dscp no? just at the ethernet level instead of ip15:15
ihrachysit's just another mechanism for the same thing15:15
dougwigwhen are vlans created that you'd want to specify priority, inside neutron?  differing priorities for tenant vlans?  provider vlans are created outside neutron.15:15
*** wznoinsk1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
neiljerram#link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicit_Congestion_Notification15:16
*** jrist has quit IRC15:16
ajoarmax , njohnston can probably update better about DSCP, I need to sync with them, but I believe it was on good fit15:16
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
ihrachysarmax: it has chances for M, but it has several missing pieces15:16
ihrachysarmax: like upgrade for rpc callbacks or l2 agent extension thing15:16
ihrachysbut I think we track it all15:17
ajoabout dependencies, correct15:17
*** wznoinsk1 has quit IRC15:17
*** houming has quit IRC15:17
ajodougwig , I think he means tagging the traffic that goes to the switches15:17
armaxI suppose that this proposal could complements DSCP15:18
njohnstonYes, the dscp code is coming along well I think, but those prerequisites are concerns for getting it into M.  The DSCP change is concerned with bits 2-7 of the DiffServ field in the IP header; this change proposes to maange bits 0 and 1 as well.15:18
*** dlundquist has joined #openstack-meeting15:18
armaxat the l2 level15:18
ajoarmax : right15:18
dougwigajo: for tenant networks?  can't the switch auto-tag all of that?  for providers?  wouldn't you set that up in ovs manually at network creation time?  where is the use case?15:18
armaxbut from an API perspective it’s too tightly coupled to the underlying l2 isolation technology15:18
armaxof choice15:18
*** blogan_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
armaxso I am not sure it’s a good fit15:19
*** pratikmallya has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
dougwigkevinbenton told me to say "timebox".15:19
*** isaacb has quit IRC15:19
ajoarmax : correct, we may analyze that, probably it's better to postpone VLAN 802.1p to be evaluated for N15:19
njohnstonI think it's reasonable to ask for a solid use case for why this is important to do.15:19
armaxwell, I wonder if we should shoot it down entirely…but I’ll continue the discussion on the bug report15:19
ajobecause it introduces a dependency from the policy to the type of tenant isolation (or extenral network type)15:20
ajoarmax : ack15:20
armaxbug #150749915:20
openstackbug 1507499 in neutron "Centralized Management System for testing the environment" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150749915:20
ihrachysvalid concern15:20
ajonjohnston ++15:20
armaxwhich duplicates somewhat bug 151953715:20
openstackbug 1507499 in neutron "duplicate for #1519537 Centralized Management System for testing the environment" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150749915:20
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:20
regXboiwait15:21
ihrachysfor that one, I know a new guy in Red Hat team works on something similar and should come up with exact plan for neutron-debug in next days.15:21
regXboidid I just read a request for a use case for why its a good idea to support an IEEE standard?!?!?!15:21
kevinbentonregXboi: 802.11 is an IEEE standard, but we aren't defined SSID APIs yet :)15:22
dougwigregXboi: yes, because in the neutron api context, i'm not sure it makes sense just to tick a checkbox.15:22
* regXboi remains stunned into near insensibility15:22
armaxihrachys: are you saying that a new RFE is going to be submitted?15:22
kevinbentoni'm not sure why something that logs into VMs to run pings should live in Neutron15:22
dougwigregXboi: if it's so obvious, it should be dead easy to do, right?15:22
ihrachysarmax: I guess you suggest not to ;)15:22
ihrachysarmax: I will communicate the bug number to the guy :)15:23
kevinbentoncouldn't troubleshooting live in a separate project or at least a completely separate service plugin?15:23
regXboikevinbenton: ++ on the VMs running pings living in Neutron comment15:23
*** myoung has quit IRC15:23
armaxihrachys: no I think here we should discuss whether creating a set of tools to troubleshoot connectivity issues belong to NEutron first15:23
ihrachyskevinbenton: should be decoupled, yes.15:23
*** zhonghua-lee has quit IRC15:23
armaxand then how we go about it :)15:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:24
kevinbentonmakes sense, i can see making some internal APIs to help inspect state that a troubleshooting service plugin could call15:24
*** zhonghua-lee has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC15:24
ihrachysarmax: well, there is a lot of knowledge here internalized by neutron, and there is an established orchestration bus15:24
amullerThere's an argument to be made to having a neutron-maintained troubleshooting tool15:24
amullershows we're serious as a community to make Neutron more usable15:24
amullerI don't know about going in to VMs, but that's another manner :)15:25
kevinbentonthat's fine, but it doesn't need to be in neutron15:25
dougwig1 minute remaining on the timebox for this one.15:25
ihrachyskevinbenton: neither neutron-debug15:25
armaxI think we need to scope this one better to judge whether it can be part of neutron or not15:26
mesteryWe're going to put things into tenant VMs? Are we nuts?15:26
mesteryWho in their right mind would allow that?15:26
mesteryWhat tenant I mean?15:26
ihrachyspersonally, I would be ok having it a separate but blessed subproject15:26
regXboimestery: we shouldn't do that15:26
armaxihrachys: where it lives is not so much important if we don’t agree where we draw the line15:26
regXboibut, we should be able to do the equiv of telecom fault isolation15:26
ihrachysmestery: not VMs. we will tinker with switch15:26
amullerCan we present specifics before we decide where it should live?15:26
amullerotherwise how can you decide if it's in the scope of neutron or not?15:27
kevinbentonthis blueprint mentions running ping in VMs15:27
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
ihrachysbad, bad blueprint15:27
mesteryamuller: ++, not sure why this needs to be in neutron at all15:27
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
ihrachyslet's postpone that one, there are no details and no agreement here15:27
amullerkevinbenton: we had something very different in mind15:27
armaxok it’s clear that the existing proposal may not be ideal but we’re still interested in augumenting our ability to troubleshoot connectivity issues15:27
*** zhonghua-lee has quit IRC15:28
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
*** berendt has quit IRC15:28
kevinbentonamuller: file a blueprint describing your plan15:28
armaxihrachys: we might even shoot it down in the existing form, asking the submitter or whomever interested to come up with a different proposal15:28
kevinbentonamuller: because it sounds different from this one15:28
amullerkevinbenton: we're still working out the details but we will15:28
kevinbentonamuller: s/blueprint/rfe15:28
ihrachysarmax: as you wish, I don't mind killing old artifacts15:28
*** ljxiash has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
ihrachysnot that the idea would be lost if it's killed15:29
armaxihrachys: it keeps things tidy15:29
regXboiarmax: I will point out that bug 1519537 is a bit more specific about the troubleshooting items it is looking for, so it may not be a dup15:29
openstackbug 1507499 in neutron "duplicate for #1519537 Centralized Management System for testing the environment" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150749915:29
armaxnext bug15:29
armaxbug #150784615:29
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC15:29
openstackbug 1507846 in neutron "Filtering ICMP packet based on ICMP code" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150784615:29
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
*** kbyrne has quit IRC15:29
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC15:29
armaxis sc68cal around?15:29
*** ljxiash_ has quit IRC15:29
ihrachyssecurity group API extension? I am sure sc68cal will love it15:29
kevinbentoni thought the port field with icmp already allows exactly this?15:30
armaxihrachys: not quite a security group api extension15:30
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
ihrachysoh fwaas? ok.15:30
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting15:31
armaxsounds like no-one feels strongly about this one15:31
regXboiarmax: I thought the last message put it back in the camp of the filer?15:31
kevinbentoni think it needs more triage15:31
armaxok15:32
kevinbentonour iptables firewall internal API can certainly do this if i understand it15:32
*** bvandenh has quit IRC15:32
kevinbentonand i think it's exposed via security groups as ports on ICMP rules15:32
armaxkevinbenton: ok, that’s good feedback15:32
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck15:33
armaxkevinbenton: not 100% sure that’s what the user is asking but we can provide this back on the bug report15:33
armaxbug #150815515:33
openstackbug 1508155 in neutron "NFTables Firewall Driver" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150815515:33
* sc68cal looks15:34
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC15:34
*** isaacb has joined #openstack-meeting15:34
armaxanyone feels strongly against an NFTable based firewall driver for linuxbridge?15:35
ihrachyslet them do it15:35
ajono feel against it (for linuxbridge)15:35
armaxI assume we’ll keep the strategy for ovs firewalling unchanged15:36
sc68calhang on, why are they trying to sell nftables as a way to do floating IPs for ipv615:36
ihrachysyeah, for ovs it's a different story (there are already two new drivers proposed in gerrit)15:36
kevinbentonsc68cal: they said it's possible, not the reason for the switch though15:36
armaxsc68cal: the guy was just making conversation ;)15:37
armaxsc68cal: don’t read too much into it15:37
armaxat least that’s how I interpreted it15:37
kevinbentonihrachys, ajo: if it's a firewall driver, there wouldn't be anything stopping people from using it with OVS i don't think15:37
sc68calI mean if someone wants to write it - my concern is just having CI to test it15:37
regXboiso we are talking (in theory) about conntrack for ovs and nftables for LB?15:37
armaxregXboi: that’s the idea, yes15:37
* regXboi thinks about that15:38
ajokevinbenton : I think supporting the whole matrix could be a mess15:38
kevinbentonalso, the OVS support for conntrack is still dependent on specific OVS versions and kernel drivers15:38
ihrachyskevinbenton: I mean, yeah. just that there is some OTHER use case for that driver (if that would be just ovs, we could probably say it's better to have e.g. just flows based)15:38
armaxthe question is: do we want a more performant firwall driver for linuxbridge?15:38
armaxthe answer is yes15:38
armaxand that can’t be the ovsfirewall15:38
armaxso it’s gotta be something else15:38
kevinbentonajo: so nftables is worse than iptables in the hybrid ovs bridge?15:39
*** timcline has joined #openstack-meeting15:39
kevinbenton(not kernel drivers, kernel code)15:39
ajokevinbenton : we could try when they implement it, I haven't tried it15:39
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith15:39
regXboiI think ihrachys may have nailed it then: let them do it15:39
armaxajo: you’re assuming we have already candidates willing to implement this?15:39
kevinbentonif we went this way, i would advocate for this to replace our iptables stuff completely15:39
armaxhow optmistic!15:39
ajokevinbenton : but I'd assume, new drivers = new bugs => more things to support.15:40
sc68cal^ +115:40
kevinbentonso no new OVS firewall driver then!15:40
kevinbenton:)15:40
ajokevinbenton : fair point15:40
ajoiptables forever15:40
armaxkevinbenton: eventually iptables stuff will be superseded by nftable on linuxbridge and ovsfirewall on ovs15:40
ajo:-)15:40
*** numans has quit IRC15:41
armaxif they both prove to be more performance and simpler to deploy15:41
ajoyes, once they prove stable, that seems like a reasonable thing to do15:41
armaxbut15:41
ajo(there's always a but.)15:41
armaxthere might be a chance we would end up keeping the iptables drivers for a very long time15:41
armaxanyhoo15:41
armaxthat’s beyond this discussion15:41
kevinbentoni'd say let them start doing it15:41
kevinbentoni will review their code15:42
armaxok, it seems we now would need to find a volunteer15:42
regXboidoes this make sense as a feature branch then so that we can do performance comparisons at the end?15:42
armaxbug #150824315:42
openstackbug 1508243 in neutron "Store Private Key Passphrase in Neutron-LBaaS for TLS Terminations" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150824315:42
kevinbentonregXboi: no need, it would just be separate driver not replacing anything15:42
ajoI agree with kevinbenton, I don't mind reviewing it a bit too (curious about how nftables works)15:42
armaxdougwig: a reminder for you15:42
regXboikevinbenton: thx15:42
*** tidwellr has left #openstack-meeting15:42
ihrachysfeature branches are heavy, let's not15:42
dougwigwe're going to argue this one here at the midcycle shortly. most people think its not worth it.15:43
armaxdougwig: you told us you were going to figure out what to do with this one at the mid-cycle15:43
armaxok15:43
ajothis is probably a single patch and pluggable  (firewall driver interface) regXboi , so let's avoid feature branches, that's heavy15:43
dougwigwe literally got started 5 minutes ago.  gimme a few.  :)15:43
armaxdougwig: I won’t shoot it down right now15:43
armax:)15:43
armaxbug #150904615:43
openstackbug 1509046 in neutron "Refactoring of L3 Scheduler" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1509046 - Assigned to Aman Kumar (amank)15:43
kevinbentoni don't see a reason not to try to unify the schedulers a bit15:44
armaxpersonally I am not sure if code refactoring fall in the RFE category15:44
armaxI guess this is a matter of: can we support the submitter in the code review that would clean this stuff up?15:45
kevinbentonyeah, i could see wanting load based scheduling being an RFE15:45
armaxI’d say the answer should be yes15:45
carl_baldwinI can review15:45
armaxkevinbenton: we have that already15:45
armaxkevinbenton: this bug doesn’t affect that15:45
kevinbentonok, then i agree this doesn't really need to be tracked as an RFE15:46
armaxok, based on amotoki’s feedback, let’s see what the code looks like15:46
armaxbug #151615615:46
openstackbug 1516156 in neutron "IPAM migration from non-pluggable to pluggable" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/151615615:46
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
*** amuller has left #openstack-meeting15:47
ihrachysno-brainer?15:47
*** ppetit has quit IRC15:47
armaxihrachys: yeah, but I suppose this would need a spec?15:47
ihrachyswould it be a copy of comment #6?15:47
armaxI’d hope it’d be a little more elaborated than that15:48
armaxbut sure15:48
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
armaxwe can get on with this15:48
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
carl_baldwin++15:48
armaxbug #152119415:48
openstackbug 1521194 in neutron "Qos Aggregated Bandwidth Rate Limiting" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/152119415:49
armaxthis one is still unclear to me15:49
ihrachysthat one, I am really confused. There was a spec with a proposal that seems to me too naive; and there is no explanation how to implement anything other than naive approach.15:49
armaxit sounds to me that this wouldn’t have been submitted if we had stuff documented properly15:50
ajoThe current behaviour was documented clearly and discussed in the community15:50
ajoit could be missleading, but it's documented15:50
ajonot sure why we want to change it now.15:50
ihrachysarmax: I still wait for someone to show where it's documented badly15:50
*** kbyrne has quit IRC15:50
armaxajo: can you provide me with a pointer?15:51
ajoI agree with ihrachys , such a thing could be implemented as a separate rule, when we're ready to do that15:51
armaxajo: we can then put in the bug report15:51
ajoarmax , sure, sec15:51
*** lpabon has left #openstack-meeting15:51
armaxand perhaps be done with this15:51
ajoI think it's both in the devref and networking guide15:51
ihrachysajo: ... and for a separate rule, that would require huge (!) pile of code15:51
armaxajo: perhaps is not super cler15:51
armaxclear15:51
ajohttp://docs.openstack.org/liberty/networking-guide/adv_config_qos.html15:52
ajo"You can attach networks to a QoS policy. The meaning of this is that any compute port connected to the network will use the network policy by default unless the port has a specific policy attached to it. Network owned ports like dhcp and router ports are excluded from network policy application."15:52
*** ygbo has quit IRC15:52
ihrachysajo: should we add an explicit note that it's NOT the aggregated limit?15:52
armaxajo: this doesn’t mention anything on how the problem the author states though15:53
ajomay be ihrachys is right, and we should add a note about that specific15:53
ihrachysarmax: it's a separate feature, there is nothing wrong about how current one is implemented or documented15:53
*** neeti has quit IRC15:53
armaxihrachys: I am not saying it’s wrong15:53
*** pratikmallya has quit IRC15:53
armaxihrachys: but the existing documentation is ambiguous15:53
ihrachysarmax: now, the general idea of the RFE is great. I just don't see how we implement it in any meaningful way.15:53
ajoihrachys : it could be implemented, but I'm not sure the use cases will pay for the development time of something like that.15:54
ihrachysarmax: I can't see it. Do you have a better wording?15:54
armaxihrachys: not on the top of my head15:54
ihrachysarmax: ok, how about posting the link and asking the reporter to provide a better wording?15:55
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
armaxfor this one, let’s figure out if the author still wants to pursue the per-port bw limit after we better specified how QoS policies are applied15:55
armaxfair?15:55
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
ajosounds reasonable.15:56
ihrachysarmax: there is per port limit15:56
ihrachysarmax: just not aggregated from network15:56
ajoI assumed armax meaned per-network (aggregated)15:56
ihrachysbut yeah, generally let's give the reporter a chance to show it's really useful to spin on it further15:57
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC15:57
armaxihrachys: yeah..I am still sleepy15:57
armaxok last one15:57
armaxfor today15:57
armaxbug #152178315:57
openstackbug 1521783 in neutron "RfE: Cascading delete for LBaaS Objects" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/152178315:57
armaxdougwig: ^15:58
armaxI am personally starting to loathe these orchestration calls15:58
*** houming has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
armaxwhen we have native api’s that can be used in order to achieve the same task15:58
*** dlundquist has quit IRC15:58
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
dougwignot high priority. the use case is simpler UIs.15:59
ihrachysI am with armax here15:59
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_15:59
armaxok15:59
armaxkilled15:59
armaxI’ll capture the outcome of this meeting on the discussed bug reports15:59
armaxthanks for joining15:59
armaxhave a good day/evening!15:59
armax#endmeeting15:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:59
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 15:59:59 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:00
ihrachys\o16:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2016/neutron_drivers.2016-01-12-15.00.html16:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2016/neutron_drivers.2016-01-12-15.00.txt16:00
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith16:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2016/neutron_drivers.2016-01-12-15.00.log.html16:00
*** dlundquist has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** ppetit has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** regXboi has left #openstack-meeting16:00
*** isaacb has quit IRC16:00
*** hichihara has quit IRC16:01
*** cdub has quit IRC16:03
*** krtaylor has quit IRC16:03
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
*** pc_m has left #openstack-meeting16:03
*** madorn has left #openstack-meeting16:04
*** mfranc21_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:04
ajohave a good day too!16:04
*** mfranc213 has quit IRC16:04
*** kebray has quit IRC16:05
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** egallen has quit IRC16:05
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** julim has quit IRC16:06
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom16:06
*** redixin has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** brad_behle has left #openstack-meeting16:07
*** garthb__ has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting16:09
*** vgridnev has quit IRC16:11
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC16:11
*** adiantum has quit IRC16:12
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC16:13
*** arvinc_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** dandruta has quit IRC16:14
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC16:14
*** ayoung has quit IRC16:16
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:16
*** myoung has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2416:18
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:18
*** pratikmallya has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** liusheng has quit IRC16:21
*** pratikma_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting16:23
*** hemnafk is now known as hemna16:24
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** galstrom has quit IRC16:24
*** galstrom has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** pratikmallya has quit IRC16:25
*** sparkyco_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
*** galstrom has quit IRC16:26
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
*** galstrom has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
*** gongysh has quit IRC16:26
*** isaacb has joined #openstack-meeting16:29
*** eharney has quit IRC16:29
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC16:30
*** jdurgin1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** rtheis_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** rtheis has quit IRC16:32
*** sudipto has quit IRC16:32
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
*** otter768 has quit IRC16:37
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
*** itzdilip has quit IRC16:37
*** ljxiash has quit IRC16:39
*** piet has quit IRC16:41
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
*** hockeynut_afk is now known as hockeynut16:45
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting16:46
*** derekh has quit IRC16:46
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting16:46
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC16:49
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** harshs has quit IRC16:49
*** hemna is now known as hemnafk16:50
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC16:50
*** sparkyco_ has quit IRC16:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC16:53
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** bradjones has quit IRC16:55
*** rderose has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** iben_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** sputnik13 has quit IRC16:57
*** ja3 has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** bradjones has quit IRC16:58
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC16:58
*** sputnik13 has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** brucet has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** spzala has quit IRC16:59
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC17:00
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** dslev has quit IRC17:01
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
asselin#startmeeting third-party17:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 17:03:04 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is asselin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: third-party)"17:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'third_party'17:03
ja3moin moin asselin17:03
*** pratikma_ has quit IRC17:03
asselinhi, anyone here for 3rd party working group meeting?17:03
asselinhi ja317:03
ja33rd party, aye17:03
mmedvedeo/17:03
*** cdent has left #openstack-meeting17:03
asselinhappy new year everyone17:03
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
mmedvede+117:03
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
asselin#link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty#Agenda_for_next_Working_Group_meeting17:04
*** spzala has quit IRC17:04
asselin#topic announcements17:04
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: third-party)"17:04
asselinanyone have any announcements?17:04
*** jlanoux has quit IRC17:04
*** phil__ has quit IRC17:05
asselinI would like to share that the 3rd party ci docs are now officially published17:05
asselin#link published 3rd party ci docs: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/openstackci/third_party_ci.html17:05
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz17:06
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
asselin#topic ci-watch17:06
*** openstack changes topic to "ci-watch (Meeting topic: third-party)"17:06
*** tongli has quit IRC17:07
mmedvedeyay for ci docs!17:07
*** houming has quit IRC17:07
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC17:07
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega17:07
mmedvedeI did update puppet-ciwatch,17:07
asselinyeah, I think it's a much nicer read :)17:07
mmedvede#link initial puppet-ciwatch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238606/17:08
ja3sounds like the review gauntlet being thrown down again there, asselin17:09
asselinyeah, looking forward!17:09
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
asselinmmedvede, +117:10
*** safchain has quit IRC17:10
asselinmmedvede, any other open reviews?17:10
*** ALUVial has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** isaacb has quit IRC17:10
mmedvedeasselin: not yet. Back from a long vaca :)17:11
mmedvedebut I am working on adding unit testing. it is proving to be hard17:12
asselinmmedvede, do you want to share a wip patch? what are the challenges?17:12
*** mhickey has quit IRC17:13
*** apoorvad has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
mmedvedeasselin: I have started refactoring config implementation first. Could push wip, definitely17:14
mmedvedeI mentioned before, as is, the code is not testable17:14
*** jdurgin1 has quit IRC17:14
mmedvedemaybe config testing is too low level, and we should add more useful tests, e.g. to the event parsing17:15
asselinyeah, I'd like to help out without duplicating effort17:15
*** rderose has quit IRC17:15
*** klkumar has quit IRC17:15
*** hemnafk is now known as hemna17:15
*** penick has quit IRC17:16
mmedvedeit is circular - hard to refactor without tests, and hard to write tests for existing code. Could start with failing test cases probably17:19
*** ygbo has quit IRC17:19
asselinI think that's fine.17:20
asselinwe could create a feature branch if you prefer to develop it there17:21
*** alop has joined #openstack-meeting17:21
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:22
*** bdrich has joined #openstack-meeting17:22
mmedvedeare we able to create it ourselves?17:23
*** hashar has quit IRC17:23
asselinprobably not, but we can ask in infra17:23
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom17:26
mmedvedeasselin: also on ciwatch, I do not mind this to merge: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258125/17:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:27
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC17:27
asselinmmedvede, ok, then I think we should merge it.17:28
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
asselin#action asselin to request a feature branch for ci-watch to refactor for testability17:28
*** yassine has quit IRC17:29
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting17:29
asselinmmedvede, anything else?17:29
mmedvedeno17:29
asselinok I did create some blueprints for ci-watch17:29
*** mudassirlatif has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:30
asselin#link ci-watch blueprints: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ciwatch17:30
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
asselini kept these minimal so we can track and develop them further using launchpad instead of the wiki page.17:30
asselinbut first priority is testability imo17:31
apoorvadhi17:31
*** vahidh has quit IRC17:31
*** zqfan has quit IRC17:31
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:31
asselinhi apoorvad17:31
*** leeantho has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
apoorvadUsually I miss the first half due to conflict. I would be able to chip in to testing as mmedvede mentioned17:32
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
mmedvedeasselin: thank you for the blueprints17:33
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:33
asselinapoorvad, ok we're going to create a feature branch so facilitate testability.17:34
asselinany preferences on branch name?17:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
apoorvadasselin: cool. ciwatch-dev ?17:34
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
mmedvedeasselin: would it be temp branch just to implement initial tests?17:35
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:35
*** dmorita has quit IRC17:35
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:36
*** arvinc_ has quit IRC17:36
asselinmmedvede, I can see it two ways17:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:36
asselinwe create the branch, and commit to it as usual. When we're happy, we merge it to master, or squash it, and proposed that as a patch to master.17:36
*** vahidh has quit IRC17:36
asselinif we squash it, it would be temporary. If we don't....actually not sure if git keeps the branch name17:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:37
asselinI guess it doesn't...so the name wouldn't stick. we can delete the branch after we merge it.17:38
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:38
mmedvedeasselin: I thought merges were a bit hard with gerrit17:39
*** esker has quit IRC17:39
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
asselinI would prefer to have 'test' in the branch name, or something that hints at testability17:39
mmedvedee.g. you can not review a merge commit17:39
mmedvedeunless it changed17:39
clarkbmmedvede: can you expand on that? you definitely can review emrge commits17:39
mmedvedeasselin: +1 for more specific branch name17:39
asselinclarkb, can we simply merge a feature branch to master in gerrit?17:40
clarkbasselin: ya, you push it like any other change, it gets reviewed, and merges just like anything else17:40
*** mbound has quit IRC17:41
asselinclarkb, so you push the n commits of it? or something else?17:41
*** ALUvial_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
clarkbthere are two major considerations, the first is we don't allow pushing merge commits by default but can delegate that to individuals and the diff shows in the change for a merge commits shows you the conflicts iirc17:41
clarkbasselin: well you push the n commits of it to branch testfoo, they merge there17:41
clarkbasselin: then you merge testfoo into master and push that commit as a change against master17:41
*** garthb has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
mmedvedeclarkb: That is great I am wrong. Not sure where I got it from17:41
*** ALUVial has quit IRC17:42
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:42
*** xingchao has quit IRC17:42
asselinclarkb, and we need special permissions to do that?17:42
clarkbasselin: you need special permissions to push merge commits yes17:42
*** zeih_ has quit IRC17:42
clarkbbut we give those out when projects use feature branches17:42
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting17:42
mmedvedeclarkb: but do you need special permissions to submit merge commits for review?17:43
*** garthb__ has quit IRC17:43
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
clarkbmmedvede: yes17:43
clarkbbut thats not a big deal, we give them out regularly17:43
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
clarkbthat permission is not on by default because it helps avoid problems with people pushing up trees that have had implicit merges locally from eg git pull17:44
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:44
*** unicell has quit IRC17:44
*** pratikmallya has joined #openstack-meeting17:44
*** tsymanczyk has joined #openstack-meeting17:45
asselinclarkb, and to create a feature branch, we just ask for on in -infra?17:45
asselinone*17:45
clarkbyes17:45
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC17:45
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:45
*** mfranc213 has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
asselinclarkb, thanks for the clarification17:46
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** xingchao has quit IRC17:47
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
*** xingchao has quit IRC17:48
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
*** Leom has quit IRC17:48
asselinok, so back to branch names17:49
mmedvedeasselin: I suggests to name the branch "tests"17:49
asselinor unit-tests17:50
mmedvedeand then merge/delete it once initial testing is implemented17:50
mmedvedeasselin: or unit-tests17:50
asselin+117:50
*** mfranc21_ has quit IRC17:50
apoorvad+117:50
clarkbthe name should have a feature/ prefix to follow convention17:50
asselinfeature/unit-tests17:50
clarkbprobably less important here, but nice to follow anyways17:50
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz17:51
asselin#action asselin to request -infra for feature/unit-tests branch created after merging any outstanding reviews we'd like to start with17:52
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:52
asselinanything else on this topic?17:53
*** xingchao has quit IRC17:53
*** mrmartin has quit IRC17:53
asselin#topic Common-CI Solution17:54
*** openstack changes topic to "Common-CI Solution (Meeting topic: third-party)"17:54
asselin#link Cannot run jobs on jenkins master: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252768/17:54
asselin#link Zuul cannot connect to openstack gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266041/17:54
*** harshs has quit IRC17:55
asselinjust needs some reviews ^^17:55
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom17:56
asselin#topic open discussion17:56
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: third-party)"17:56
ja3nothing on my end17:56
asselinanything else to discuss?17:56
mmedvedeasselin: was the zuul patch tested? (266041)17:56
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz17:56
mmedvedeI guess you are not the author :)17:57
asselinI did not test it, but patrick-east did. I can test it quickly today17:57
*** breton_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
asselinok, if nothing else we can end the meeting.17:58
mmedvedethank you, asselin17:58
asselin#endmeeting17:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:59
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 17:59:10 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-01-12-17.03.html17:59
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-01-12-17.03.txt17:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-01-12-17.03.log.html17:59
*** hurricanerix has left #openstack-meeting18:00
lbragstadstevemar o/18:00
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
tsymanczyk\o18:00
tjcocozzo/18:00
*** mspreitz has quit IRC18:00
henrynashhappy new tuesday18:00
*** rderose has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
*** dmorita has quit IRC18:01
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC18:01
gyeehenrynash, nice one :-)18:01
raildo\o/18:01
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
henrynashgyee: gotta be happy new <something>18:01
*** gcb has quit IRC18:01
*** dmorita has quit IRC18:01
gyee++18:02
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** redixin has left #openstack-meeting18:02
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom18:02
*** brucet has quit IRC18:02
dstanek\o/18:02
*** abhiraut has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
*** roxanaghe_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
lbragstaddo we not have a fearless leader today?18:03
*** jichen has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
marekdhi18:03
*** gjayavelu has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
gyeemust be the *new* DST18:04
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** zeih has quit IRC18:04
henrynashthere’s new DST?18:04
gyeedaylight saving time18:05
henrynash#startmeeting keystone18:05
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 18:05:03 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is henrynash. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:05
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:05
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:05
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:05
*** shaleh has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
bknudson_hi18:05
*** lhcheng has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
shaleho/18:05
*** jckasper has quit IRC18:05
lbragstadcourtesy ping18:05
lbragstadajayaa, amakarov, ayoung, breton, browne, davechen, david8hu, dolphm, dstanek, ericksonsantos, geoffarnold, gyee, henrynash, hogepodge, htruta, jamielennox, joesavak, lbragstad, lhcheng, marekd, morganfainberg, nkinder, raildo, rodrigods, roxanaghe, samueldmq, shaleh, stevemar, tsymanczyk, topol, vivekd, wanghong, claudiub, rderose, samleon, xek, MaxPC, tjcocozz18:05
htruta\o18:05
MaxPC\o18:06
henrynashOk, let’s get started anyway….Steve can take over when he gets here18:06
rodrigodshello18:06
henrynashI’m sure he will have some comments on the midcyle, will let him raise those18:06
henrynash#topic Bug 1490804: PKI Token Bypass18:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Bug 1490804: PKI Token Bypass (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:07
openstackbug 1490804 in OpenStack Security Advisory "PKI Token Revocation Bypass (CVE-2015-7546)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149080418:07
tjcocozzHello with this patch: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1490804  we were wondering if it was possible to backport the debate came to a draw and we were wondering if bknudson_ could be the tie breaker.18:07
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
henrynashtjcocozz: maybejust summarize teh issue?18:07
tjcocozztbh i don't know the exact issue18:08
*** dmorita has quit IRC18:08
*** lblanchard has quit IRC18:08
dolphmtjcocozz: there are no -1's on the backports? have a link to the issue?18:08
bknudson_we usually do allow backports for security fixes.18:09
tjcocozzwhat is happening is that there is an extra key added to a dict.  I can get the log18:09
notmorgani am worried about the middleware change causing issues with people who have not gotten audit id responses in the rev list18:09
bknudson_Some deployments might not like that listing revoked tokens is going to be slower (perhaps much slower)18:09
notmorganaka, an upgrade of middleware w/o the similar upgrade to keystone18:09
notmorgani didn't want to -1 but wanted to raise that as a real concern since it requires fixes on both sides.18:10
dstaneki think line 247 here is the issue https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266022/2/keystone/token/persistence/backends/sql.py - adding new data to the response18:10
bknudson_the code was written such that auth_token works with the old and new reponses18:10
notmorganok. i was seeing failures.18:10
notmorganthat was why i wanted to raise the concern18:10
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
bknudson_oh, well that's broken then. I didn't see failures in my own testing... maybe I didn't do it right18:10
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
notmorganit might have been something else18:10
henrynashnotmoran, bknudson_: ok so the goal was for it to cope with both formats?18:11
notmorganalso i expect folks to complain that we're breaking them because they will be doing something weird with the data in the revocation list18:11
bknudson_yes, auth_token middleware should work with and without audit_id18:11
bknudson_let me see if I can find the code.18:11
notmorganbut i can't use that as a reason to block this.18:11
notmorgannor would it18:11
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
notmorgani just know touching token and revocation list data has historically netted us "OMG YOU BROKE US" because they expect specific datasets even in dicts18:12
notmorgannon-python code consuming18:12
notmorganwith master, i am less worried as it is an upgrade cost, stable push can sneak up on people depending on how they deploy18:12
bknudson_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265988/3/keystonemiddleware/auth_token/_revocations.py -- x['audit_id'] for x in revoked_tokens if 'audit_id' in x18:12
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
notmorganso, bknudson_ if you think it's a non-issue i'm fine with it18:13
henrynashi’m kind of surprised for revocation lists that peopel process it that way, but hey, I’m ofetn surprised18:13
bknudson_so if there's no audit_id in the revocation list entry you just get an empty list and it doesn't validate by audit id18:13
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC18:13
notmorganhenrynash: people do silly things =/18:13
henrynashOk, so sounds to me like we are (tentively) ok to do this….I’ll run it by Steve since may have a view (I know he wante dit discussed here)18:14
gyeeadding fields in the token shouldn't cause trouble right?18:14
*** matrohon has quit IRC18:14
notmorgangyee: shouldn't but has in the past18:14
*** Paratosh has joined #openstack-meeting18:14
henrynash#action Tentative Go for making Bug 1490804: PKI Token Bypass fix, stevemar to confirm18:15
openstackbug 1490804 in OpenStack Security Advisory "PKI Token Revocation Bypass (CVE-2015-7546)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149080418:15
*** Shrews has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
henrynash#topic Bug 1527759: Revert domain ownership check18:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Bug 1527759: Revert domain ownership check (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:15
openstackbug 1527759 in OpenStack Identity (keystone) "Default domain no longer lets keystone tenant-list work" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1527759 - Assigned to Morgan Fainberg (mdrnstm)18:15
henrynashthis is actually steve’s…anyone want to pick up on it, or I will defer18:16
henrynash(well Steve put his name against it on the agenda)18:16
henrynashnotmorgan: comment?18:16
notmorganhenrynash: hmm?18:16
henrynashgood comment18:16
*** angdraug has joined #openstack-meeting18:16
notmorganthe master fix landed18:16
notmorganthe stable/* are pending18:17
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
*** ddieterly has quit IRC18:17
notmorganfrom what steve told me the revert of non-default domain user/projects in v2 tokens was the root18:17
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz18:17
* stevemar sneaks in18:18
stevemarthanks notmorgan18:18
*** pauloewerton has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
henrynashnotmorgan, stevemar: so not sure what the question in here…is it whether we should backport?18:19
stevemarhenrynash: yep18:19
stevemarhenrynash: notmorgan proposed the backport18:19
notmorganhenrynash: we should backport it imo.18:19
stevemarbut gyee mentioned some sort of swift concern18:20
notmorganthis broke real deployments.18:20
notmorganswift worked with the previous behavior18:20
stevemaryeah, it broke at least 2 people18:20
henrynashcan’t really think why we would not….gyee?18:20
stevemari think it goes all the way to kilo18:20
gyeeswift ACLs allows names only18:20
notmorganand the fix for wift was "don't use v2 specific middleware with the ACLs"18:20
notmorganwe can't keep this in tree18:20
notmorganthe non-reverted setup that is18:20
notmorganbecause of the real world deployment breakage18:21
henrynashok, any objections to backport?18:21
gyeeno objection, so as long as people understand the implications18:21
stevemari think we need to reverse it18:21
stevemargyee: you propose we send an email out to the list?18:22
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC18:22
gyeestevemar, yes, we should18:22
stevemargyee: you volunteering? :)18:22
gyeestevemar, sure, OK18:22
*** dmorita has quit IRC18:22
stevemaryay18:22
notmorganfwiw, this was a behavior swift coped with back before we "fixed" it18:22
notmorganthe changes gyee is pointing to were documented in 201418:23
notmorganjust as a data point.18:23
gyeehey, two wrongs make it right :-)18:23
henrynash#action gyee to send email to list with implications of reversal detailed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/152775918:23
openstackLaunchpad bug 1527759 in OpenStack Identity (keystone) "Default domain no longer lets keystone tenant-list work" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to Morgan Fainberg (mdrnstm)18:23
*** jckasper has quit IRC18:24
henrynashand we are backporting to L and K ?18:24
*** jmckind has quit IRC18:24
notmorganyes18:24
notmorganfixes are proposed18:24
stevemaryeah, it was reported with kilo.218:24
stevemarwe need someone to propose it to kilo https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I4a303a5fcc8c2dacef5960e9e26ad9402f34a790,n,z18:24
notmorganthe other deployment broke with upgrade to liberty18:24
notmorganstevemar: there is a kilo fix proposed18:24
notmorganjust gerrit ui is wonky18:24
henrynash#action go ahead with Liberty and Kilo backports of https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/152775918:25
openstackLaunchpad bug 1527759 in OpenStack Identity (keystone) "Default domain no longer lets keystone tenant-list work" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to Morgan Fainberg (mdrnstm)18:25
notmorganhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/265019/18:25
notmorgankilo fix ^18:25
notmorgan#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265019/18:25
henrynashexcellent18:25
henrynashok moving on18:25
henrynash#topic v2 deprecation/v3 support18:25
*** openstack changes topic to "v2 deprecation/v3 support (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:25
notmorganthe search for the changeid doesn't work for some reasons...18:25
stevemarnotmorgan: link me?18:26
stevemaroh i found it18:26
stevemaryeah, same change id18:26
*** berendt has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
stevemarthats weird18:26
*** berendt has quit IRC18:26
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
henrynashhtruta, raldo: you’re up18:26
stevemarstable maint folks, review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265019/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265023/ :)18:26
htrutaso, raildo and I have been investigating what's left to do in Mitaka to maximize the amount of things that we can deprecate of improve v3 support18:27
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting18:27
htrutaand as talked yesterday with notmorgan and jamielennox, looks like the main services in general have good support18:27
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting18:27
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:27
samueldmqyes, core services already support it18:28
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
bknudson_do we have a gate where there's no v2?18:28
htrutaI wonder what else we can do at short-term, besides putting the patch stevemar mentioned in the agenda forward18:28
samueldmqbknudson_: yes, in devstack as nonvoting18:28
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC18:28
htrutasamueldmq: ++18:28
stevemarmake it voting :)18:28
htrutaIn liberty jamielennox said it was too soon to make v3 default in devstack18:29
stevemardeprecate v2 calls, like the patch18:29
notmorganit should be doable in mitaka18:29
samueldmqbknudson_: the idea is to propose it in tempest as well, and make it voting (cc mtreinish)18:29
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:29
notmorgandefault in devstack that is18:29
samueldmqstevemar: yes taht's the idea, I can work on that with qa18:29
stevemarstart moving clients and other projects to v3 setups by default18:29
stevemarand clients to keystoneauth18:29
htrutanotmorgan: I mean, using v3 in devstack when doing . openrc18:29
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
htrutawhich is not what we currently have18:29
notmorganand we should have a gate (voting) job that ensures no v2 stuff is enabled/everything still works18:30
notmorganhtruta: right, statement stands :)18:30
samueldmqnotmorgan: agreed, isn't v3 default in devstack already ? for roles and other entities, I remember jamie had a couple of patches which merged isn't v3 default in devstack already ? for roles and other entities, I remember jamie had a couple of patches which merged18:30
htrutanotmorgan: how so? I still had to export some env variables when created a v3 only devstack18:30
samueldmqsorry for duplicate18:30
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:31
notmorganhtruta: things that need to be fixed.18:31
notmorganbut we should be able to do it18:31
notmorganmost everything should "work".18:31
htrutasamueldmq, notmorgan: in that case, what do you mean by v3 by default?18:31
stevemarhtruta: samueldmq: you could start re-writing the the v2 keystone methods to call v3 functions18:31
henrynashI really think we have to nail this for Mitaka….we can’t go another cycle with anything other than v3 being the defacto standard18:31
htrutaeverything work, but in default, they use v2... that's my point18:32
*** rderose has quit IRC18:32
notmorganhtruta: sorry ensure that .openrc is only v3, that v2 can be disabled with no impact on stacking up/tempest [except v2 specific checks]18:32
stevemarhtruta: samueldmq make sure the clients are using keystoneauth18:32
*** zeih has quit IRC18:32
notmorganclients using keystoneauth is a work in progress, but using ksc.session should be fine for this18:32
*** rderose has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
samueldmqnotmorgan: exactly18:32
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** piet has quit IRC18:32
htrutastevemar: we're doing that18:33
gyeeoff topic, where does devstack ppl usually hang out? #openstack-devstack?18:33
samueldmqnotmorgan: I think this is how devstack works with v2 completely disabled, usign sessions18:33
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting18:33
samueldmqgyee: -qa18:33
henrynashok, so plan of action……1)  make v3 teh default - htruta, are you on that one18:33
*** neelashah has quit IRC18:33
gyeesamueldmq, thanks18:33
htrutahenrynash: sure18:33
samueldmqgyee: devstack, tempest and grenade are under qa18:33
henrynash2) maek it gating I assume?18:34
gyeelooks like cinder is broker when USE_SSL is set to true18:34
gyeeI need to chase people down18:34
gyeebroken18:34
henrynashdo we need to disable v2 in that gating test?18:34
dolphmhtruta: get in touch with me before you "rewrite the v2 keystone methods to call v3 functions" - that's not quite how it should be done!18:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting18:35
raildogyee: I found similar error on trove18:35
notmorgansamueldmq: i need to ask you a question post meeting re paste things18:35
htrutahenrynash: I don't think we need to disable v218:35
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:35
notmorganstevemar: ^ uou too18:35
*** krtaylor has quit IRC18:35
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting18:35
raildogyee: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/129382618:35
samueldmqnotmorgan: sure sir18:35
openstackLaunchpad bug 1293826 in Trove "Trove doesn't work with Keystone that accepts HTTPS connections" [Low,In progress] - Assigned to Amrith (amrith)18:35
htrutamaybe making the v3 gate voting is enough for now18:35
htrutadolphm: sure18:35
*** abhiraut has quit IRC18:35
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
samueldmqhtruta: yes18:36
henrynashhtruta: OK,18:36
samueldmqdisabling v2 is the way we found to make sure everything is working with v318:36
stevemarand reviewing the patch to deprecate v2 API calls :)18:36
htrutaI also think that we can create extra tests in tempest, like using domain scoped tokens and projects in different domain than default tokens18:37
samueldmqand not making mixed calls with v2 and v3 later18:37
stevemardolphm: thanks for knowing what i meant :)18:37
*** jckasper has quit IRC18:37
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting18:37
bknudson_we could get a gate that uses ldap!18:37
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:37
*** otter768 has quit IRC18:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
stevemarbknudson_: :O18:38
htrutahenrynash, samueldmq: I mean... we don't need to disable all v2 tests in devstack... but the v3 only gate totally disables v2, if that's what you mean18:38
stevemarthat would be good too!18:38
henrynashbknudson_: oh, boy18:38
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
samueldmqdolphm: should we make an adpter for v2->v3 controllers (as we have for versioned drivers) ?18:38
htrutastevemar: btw, are you working on removing the resource ldap backend? :(18:38
henrynashhtruta: ok, that’s what i meant… our v3 gating test ensures v2 is off18:38
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:38
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
*** dmorita has quit IRC18:39
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting18:39
amrithhello, did I miss something?18:39
samueldmq:)18:39
henrynashamrith: the answer to that question is always going to be yes18:40
stevemarhtruta: i keep getting sidetracked and it's a PITA to remove18:40
samueldmqhenrynash: ++18:40
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting18:40
samueldmqhenrynash: action point for this topic ?18:40
stevemarhenrynash: also, ayoung added something to the meeting agenda18:40
notmorgansamueldmq: the v2 auth miht need to be maintained va an adapter18:40
amrithsorry, I just saw irc blink and my name seems to be referenced with some bug. how can I help.18:40
henrynash#action htruta to ensure v3 default is proposed along with gating v3 only tests18:41
notmorganbknudson_: heh i tried at one point ldap was so poorly supported....18:41
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC18:42
notmorganbknudson_: now thjat we don't have writable or assignment it would prob. be more doable18:42
henrynashstevemar: ah , got ti18:42
htrutaan action to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251530/ too?18:42
*** asselin_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:42
*** yolanda has joined #openstack-meeting18:42
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting18:43
henrynash#action: cores to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251530/ as well, we’ve been working up t this for w ahile :-)18:43
henrynashok new topic18:43
htrutahenrynash: thanks18:43
henrynash#topic Enforce token Bind based on Catalog18:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Enforce token Bind based on Catalog (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:43
henrynashayoung, gyee: you’re up18:43
gyeedo it!18:43
henrynashgyee: succinct, as ever18:44
shaleh:-)18:44
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
shalehhenrynash: only on a terminal. In person he can really go for a while :-)18:44
henrynashis this just a request for reviews…or are there some concerns we need to discuss here18:44
gyeewhere's Craig Lee and others, they are using it to implement VOs, afaik18:45
gyeeand we are using it to control service activation and visibility18:45
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:45
bknudson_we never implemented checking endpoint in service catalog in auth_token?18:45
gyeeso there are production use cases on endpoint filtering already18:45
notmorgan-118:46
notmorganwe should never muck with the catalog18:46
gyeebknudson_, there's a patch18:46
notmorgancatalog should be as static as possible18:46
notmorgandon't change the catalog based on user/project/etc18:46
gyeenormorgan, we had a session at Mitaka summit about it18:46
shalehare we really going to have this conversation again18:46
notmorganand i'm still -1 on it18:46
notmorganshaleh: yes.18:46
gyeewhat's the point of advertising endpoints user have no access to?18:46
notmorgangyee: the catalog is about discovery of services. either use roles or a separate field.18:47
gyeethere are UX benefits as well18:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:47
notmorgandon't actually change the catalog itself18:47
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
notmorganendpoint filtering should never have landed - i am sorry i let that through in hindsight18:47
dstanekgyee: what's the point of Google indexing a page that you don't have access to?18:47
gyeewhat are you going to do with endpoints you have no access to?18:47
dstanekgyee: ask for access if you feel you need them18:48
shalehdstanek: how often do you find a google search result you cannot access?18:48
henrynashnotmorgan: I’d say that the catalog still as static as it’s every been, just that you don’t necessarily haev the rights to see it all18:48
notmorganhenrynash: and i disagree with the need to mutate it18:48
dstanekshaleh: all the time. lot's of news sites have pay walls18:48
notmorganbased upon user/etc18:48
notmorgandstanek: ++18:48
henrynash(ignore that we always had things like project_id substitutions in it!)18:48
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC18:48
notmorganhenrynash: those are going away :) so i treat them as if they don't exist18:48
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:49
shalehI am not going through this again. You guys can argue the same points all over18:49
notmorganhenrynash: [active work to solve that is landing in mitaka]18:49
gyeewe are doing the same thing with federation, filter service providers18:49
samueldmqand we're also extending endpoint filter (for me in the wrong place) to serve as sp filtering18:49
*** AJaeger has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
notmorgansamueldmq: i want to deprecate endpoint filtering18:50
notmorgansamueldmq: to be honest18:50
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:50
henrynashappreacite that others will have differning views, but I don;t send there is sufficent weight for blocking this, we are already down this path of a “filterable catalog”…this patch is just hardening an existing filter18:50
notmorganSP filtering != filtering catalog18:50
gyeewe are having double standards here18:50
notmorganerm endpoints18:50
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
marekdnotmorgan: ++18:50
gyeeendpoint filter have production use cases18:50
notmorganhenrynash: i didn't -2 the change [yues i feel that strong] because i wanted to talk about it in the meeting18:51
henrynashwhcih we are!18:51
gyeeSP are identified by endpoints18:51
samueldmqnotmorgan: endpoints filtering != filtering catalog ?18:51
notmorganhenrynash: but i still feel strong enough that this is something we should back away from18:51
marekdgyee: what?18:51
notmorgansamueldmq: endpoint/services shouldn't be filtered18:51
*** rossella_s has quit IRC18:52
gyeemarekd, how do you access an SP?18:52
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:52
henrynashcomments from others….18:52
henrynash?18:52
notmorganthe fact the SPs are in the catalog was conviencne and probably an incorrect choicce but we have to live with it.18:52
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:52
samueldmqnotmorgan: cool and in the case endpoint is too big ? should we make it globally available (catlog, as it won't change ?)18:52
notmorgansamueldmq: "endpoint too big"?18:52
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting18:52
marekdi have to reauth18:52
marekdgyee: ^^18:52
samueldmqnotmorgan: catalog I meant18:52
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting18:52
gyeeservice provider need to be able to control how they advertise their services18:52
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:53
gyeethey don't have to discuss all the services globally18:53
notmorgangyee: then add a different field.18:53
gyeedisclose18:53
notmorgangyee: the discovery part of the catalog should not change.18:53
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
notmorganat all18:53
*** BobH_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:54
notmorgani am not saying don't have enforcement i'm saying don't "change the catalog itself" the catalog shouldn't change based upon user/project/etc18:54
gyeenot sure what you mean by add another field18:54
*** neiljerram has quit IRC18:54
gyeehow can I control what NOT to discover?18:54
bknudson_we still have the templated catalog?18:54
notmorganbknudson_: sadly18:54
notmorgangyee: you don't get to.18:54
notmorgangyee: in my view that is a new keystone18:54
notmorgangyee: why are you "preventing" disclosure of endpoints?18:55
gyeethat's the whole point, we need to be able to control the services we are not advertising to the end users18:55
notmorgangyee: i don't buy it18:55
ayoungso...that is not the same as binding the endpoint.18:55
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:55
notmorgangive me a real usecase18:55
gyeenotmorgan, service activation18:55
ayoungbinding is saying the token can only be used on that endpoint...that is the part I want to nail down18:55
notmorgannot a "we want x cause we have some thing we think we need" which is what i've gotten from this.18:55
gyeeregion access18:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
notmorgangyee: don't see that as a real use18:56
gyeedon't tell me I have to create a role for each endpoints18:56
notmorgansorry18:56
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:56
notmorganendpoint bindging would be a good solution18:56
gyeewhat is endpoint binding?18:56
*** mrmartin has quit IRC18:56
henrynashok, coming up on teh end of our slot here18:57
ayounggyee, token must have endpoint in its catalog to be used on endpoint18:57
notmorganit's hooking into the work ayoung did to say you need KRB5 or such to work with an endpoint18:57
notmorganbut i don't want us to do filtering on the catalog18:57
gyeeayoung, that's endpoint filter18:57
ayoungnotmorgan, ah, binding to auth...18:57
notmorganmake it explicit list not filtering18:57
ayoungnotmorgan, nah, that is dead18:57
ayoungthat was a PKI thing.18:57
gyeethat patch was the enforcement part of it18:57
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
notmorganwell i stand by my -1. i am >< close to a -2 but obviously i'm in the minority here18:57
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:57
henrynashnotmorgan: does this proposed change make teh catalog any less static…are we not just enforcing something we already do?18:58
notmorgani very much think we're doing this wrong.18:58
notmorganhenrynash: it is driving us down the "use endpoint filtering" path18:58
notmorganand we should remove that functionality18:58
ayoungnotmorgan, I think it is very right to say "I want a token with roles 1,2,3 for endpoint e118:58
notmorganit is terrible.18:58
ayoungfiltering is related, but this is doable even without filtering18:58
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
ayoungthis is more "this token should only be used for Neutron"18:59
henrynashI’m not disputing taht you have concerns over whether we should be doing filtering at all, just seems taht this change is completing work we arleady approved, releasd….which we can schose to retire in teh fiture if we havea better aternaitive18:59
gyeeayoung, you ended up with a much compact catalog either way18:59
notmorganayoung: if we are going down that path we should just make it a specific field added saying it18:59
*** kebray has quit IRC18:59
*** shaleh has left #openstack-meeting18:59
ayounggyee, true, but side effect18:59
notmorgannot change the catalog that is my complaint.18:59
gyeewe are not changing the format of it18:59
notmorgani don't want to see the catalog change between auths18:59
notmorganit's not the format it's the contant that shouldn't change18:59
gyeewe are controlling what to advertise18:59
ayoungnotmorgan, no change to the format.  It is only a change to the request18:59
henrynashok, sounds like we need to contoinue this discussion….probably set some tiem ot teh midcylce, stevmar?19:00
ayoungwhat I request a token, I say "and only endpoint E"19:00
samueldmqhenrynash: time's over, infra time ?19:00
notmorganthe catalog should not be different depending on scope19:00
henrynash#endmeeting19:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 19:00:09 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:00
notmorganor user or auth.19:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2016/keystone.2016-01-12-18.05.html19:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2016/keystone.2016-01-12-18.05.txt19:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2016/keystone.2016-01-12-18.05.log.html19:00
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:00
clarkbhello19:00
mordredlook it's a clarkb19:00
* Clint looks.19:00
crinkleo/19:00
fungiactivate interlock! dynotherms connected! infracells up! mega thrusters are go!19:00
Zara\o/19:00
taronwarp drive active19:00
*** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
dhellmanno/19:00
pabelangero/19:01
pleia2o/19:01
AJaegero/19:01
* craige opens his bleary eyes.19:01
*** abhiraut has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
jhesketho/19:01
ianwo/19:01
fungijeblair: SergeyLukjanov: yolanda: around for a weekly meeting?19:02
*** rockyg has quit IRC19:02
funginibalizer: ^19:02
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting19:02
jeblaira/19:02
anteayathat's the hat19:03
yolandahi19:03
fungithat makes at least 7 of 919:03
asselin_o/19:03
fungi8. let's go!19:03
fungi#startmeeting infra19:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 19:03:22 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is fungi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)"19:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'infra'19:03
nibalizero/19:03
craigeo/19:03
fungi#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting19:03
yolandao/19:03
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
fungi#topic Announcements19:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: infra)"19:04
*** dmorita has quit IRC19:04
zaroo/19:04
*** electrofelix has quit IRC19:04
fungii didn't have any specific announcements at this point, anything i need to mention for posterity which we won't cover as part of the agenda?19:04
*** breton_ has left #openstack-meeting19:04
*** roxanaghe_ has quit IRC19:04
SotKo/19:04
*** austin81 has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
*** lhcheng has left #openstack-meeting19:05
fungi#topic Actions from last meeting19:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: infra)"19:05
fungi#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-01-05-19.05.html19:05
fungithere were none, completed successfully19:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:05
fungi#topic Specs approval19:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs approval (Meeting topic: infra)"19:05
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC19:05
krotschecko/19:05
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
fungi#info "Consolidation of docs jobs" specification voting is deferred and placed back into an in-progress state due to requested revisions19:06
*** balajiiyer1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:06
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/24655019:06
*** julim has quit IRC19:06
AJaegerfungi, yep. I want to enhance a bit more but currently concentrate on the translation work since that's more urgent.19:06
*** rbak has quit IRC19:06
fungithere were no approvals or new proposed specs for voting this week19:06
fungi#topic Priority Efforts: Zuul v319:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts: Zuul v3 (Meeting topic: infra)"19:06
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC19:06
jeblairjhesketh timrc pabelanger anteaya Clint mordred GheRivero zaro yolanda rcarrillocruz SpamapS fungi fbo cschwede greghaynes nibalizer fdegir: ping!19:07
*** AmirBaleghi11118 has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
* Clint twitches. 19:07
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
jeblairyou all put your name on an etherpad in vancouver to help with zuulv319:07
jheskethpong!19:07
anteayaI did19:07
yolandayes19:07
Clintyup19:07
fungiyep19:07
nibalizeryep19:07
anteayaI have reviewed some patches19:07
jeblairand, as we all know, you can't edit an etherpad after the fact.19:07
Clinttrue19:07
fungitotally impossible19:07
anteayathat is the law19:07
jeblairso you're stuck with it.19:07
fungiis there a list of next steps we can get more specific about volunteering to tackle now?19:08
jeblairanyway... i have some really bad code that very roughly sketches out the bulk of the major changes in zuulv319:08
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
jeblairand in the spec, there are a few major work items that i think can proceed in parallel: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/zuulv3.html#work-items19:08
fbopong - yes19:08
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:08
*** ayoung has quit IRC19:08
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
jeblairi think we can take my very bad code and land it on the v3 branch19:09
jeblairand then start to make it better with some parallel efforts19:09
jeblairprobably not too many yet19:09
*** rderose has quit IRC19:09
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:09
anteayajeblair: the gerrit topic you are using is feature/zuulv3 (v3) yes?19:09
fungiit's actually a branch19:10
jeblairbut i think that a) nodepool, b) job definition and playbook loading/organization, c) ansible launching  are all major areas that can happen without too much toe stepping19:10
pabelangerjeblair: indeed!19:10
anteayasorry that is the branch yes: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:feature/zuulv3+topic:v319:10
jheskethyes, I've been landing some of jeblair's code.. There are some very large patchsets so I haven't finished reviewing them all, but the strategy was to land them and then create followups where necessary19:10
clarkbre nodepool, current plan is to get image builder changes in tomorrow and have it running for thursday image builds19:10
greghaynesohai19:10
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:10
clarkbwhich is sort of an ancillary to zuulv3 related work19:11
pabelangerclarkb: nice, already to start using them19:11
jeblaircool, so we can probably branch nodepool next week for work on (a)19:11
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:11
greghaynesYa, hopefully19:11
fungithe udea was to branch nodepool after the image worker stuff is in then?19:11
greghaynesthird time is the charm19:11
fungier, idea19:11
clarkbfungi: yes19:11
fungirighteous19:11
jeblairdoes anyone want to start hacking on any of those things?  i'm thinking i'd like to take (b).. anyone want (a) or (c) ?19:11
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:12
jheskethI'm happy to take a look at c)19:12
jeblairor did someone have their heart set on (b)? :)19:12
jhesketh(also happy for (b) if there are no other takers)19:12
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:12
anteayaI will continue to open patches and stare at them saying i did so and asking questions if I can19:13
mordredwe want to branch nodepool before we land the shade patches?19:13
*** ppetit has quit IRC19:13
*** gyee has quit IRC19:13
jeblairmaybe we should land shade?19:13
jhesketh(err, (a) I meant)19:13
jeblairmordred: how ready is shade?19:14
fungiso we're mostly in need of a volunteer for a so that jhesketh doesn't need to work on both a and c19:14
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom19:14
*** ihrachys has quit IRC19:14
mordredjeblair: shade patch I've been ignoring until the image worker patches land19:14
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting19:14
jeblairyeah, the nodepool work is fairly self-contained19:14
fungispecifically "Modify nodepool to support new allocation and distribution"19:14
mordredjeblair: largely just needs to be rebased once the codebase is not churn19:14
yolandasorry, i cannot compromise for that in the next weeks, but i'll be happy to review, and help on the future19:15
clarkbmordred: don't we also need to get to the bottom of the larger api call counts?19:15
clarkbmordred: or was that figured out?19:15
mordredjeblair: how about I take a quick stab at the rebase after the image builders land, and if it's big, we can shelve it until v3 timeframe19:15
mordredclarkb: figured out19:15
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:15
clarkbyay19:15
jeblairmordred: sounds like a plan.19:15
mordred\o/19:15
jeblairso, no volunteers yet to actually do the nodepool v3 work?19:16
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:16
mordredon, I'll definitely work on it19:16
fungimy pipeline has backed up a lot since the summit, so while i'm willing to take a stab at item (a) i'm hoping someone else steps up19:16
* mordred actively wants to work on it19:16
fungiall yours, mordred!19:16
nibalizerjeblair: i want to work on a) but I'm worried about overcommiting19:16
jeblaircool, i'll propose a change to the spec to add these19:17
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:17
funginibalizer: overcommitting is a time-honored infra tradition19:17
jeblairnibalizer: i'm hoping that as these larger things take shape we can start having more people chip in on less all-encompasing tasks19:17
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC19:17
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting19:18
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:18
fungii expect some somewhat tightly scoped subtasks to fall out of these larger tasks as well19:18
jeblairjhesketh: i've learned some things this very day about ansible, so we'll chat later19:18
jheskethjeblair: sounds good19:19
*** AmirBaleghi11119 has joined #openstack-meeting19:19
jeblairfungi: i think that's good for now19:19
jhesketh(I'd also like to chat a few zuul things after this)19:19
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting19:19
*** AmirBaleghi11118 has quit IRC19:19
fungithanks jeblair, mordred, jhesketh!19:19
fungi#topic Turning off HPCloud node provider(s) gracefully (clarkb)19:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Turning off HPCloud node provider(s) gracefully (clarkb) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:19
fungithis was held over from last week's agenda19:20
fungiwe chatted a little after the meeting about plans, but would help to echo the nuggets of that in the meeting19:20
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:20
*** rockyg has quit IRC19:20
clarkbsure, basic plan was to not ease off of it and instead just turn it off off at some point before the 31st19:20
fungii believe we decided some time shortly before the 31st we should gracefully shift from current quotas to 0 in nodepool19:20
clarkbthat way we can control when it happens and don't run into funnyness with nodepool operations (say 500 tests all turning off at the same time like aderaan19:21
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting19:21
jeblairclarkb: a great disturbance indeed19:21
pleia2(alderaan)19:21
fungijeblair beat me to the quote19:21
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:21
clarkbthe changes to do this have been written, there are two portions, first is to set our max-servers to -1 so that we stop running jobs, then the second removes the configuration from nodepool.yaml19:21
mordredpleia2: did your IRC client just show you a picture of alderaan?19:21
pleia2makes sense, and I spoke with some HPE folks last week and they were asking about our plans19:21
craige+1 pleia219:21
clarkblet me get change links19:22
*** yarkot has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
clarkb#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264371/19:22
clarkbthat one and its child19:22
jeblairit might be good to push this back as far as we feel comfortable though...19:22
fungiit would help to get confirmation from hpe that they don't intend to pull that rug out from under us before the 31st19:22
pleia2fungi: no, the 31st it is19:22
yolandawe will be fine until 3119:22
fungiokay, awesome19:22
jeblairso that a) we have more opportunity for other quota to magically show up, and b) do we have some image types that are hpcloud only?19:23
anteayathe 31st is a Sunday19:23
fungiso given that's a sunday we likely want to do it on a day people are more likely around to pull the trigger19:23
pleia2jeblair: ++19:23
clarkbjeblair: there is one that is only in hpcloud19:23
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
clarkband I actually need to finish detangling that (or someone does)19:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:23
clarkbit is devstack-centos7 iirc19:23
*** lpabon has quit IRC19:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
clarkbyup19:23
fungiianw: were there issues getting that booting in other providers?19:23
anteayaI'm at nova mid-cycle the last week of Jan, so won't be around to answer the phone19:24
clarkbso I may need to split the 3 changes into 2 changes with devstack-centos7 handled first, then max-servers = -1, then remove hpcloud from config19:24
clarkber 2 into 319:24
jeblairclarkb: ++19:24
clarkbI can maths19:24
ianwfungi: i haven't tried it on the other providers yet.  it's on my new-year todo list19:24
fungiclarkb and i aren't really around that week leading up to the 31st either19:24
clarkbright, traveling sunday through thurs19:24
anteayafewer phone answers19:24
fungiianw: are there any voting jobs depending on it? i assume no?19:25
ianwgiven past experience, my inclination is that it will not work19:25
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:25
*** yarkot has quit IRC19:25
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
ianwshould not be voting jobs19:25
pleia2yeah, I'm leaving for LCA on the 27th19:25
clarkbianw: rax is the only provider with funny lack of dhcp, we may be able to get it workin on the other providers with dib19:25
ianwclarkb: yep, that's the plan19:25
fungii won't be home until mid-day on friday the 29th but could approve changes that afternoon19:25
clarkbianw: kk19:25
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:26
clarkbthere is also a non zero possibility that I may be buying a house which makes everyting extra crazy19:26
anteayaso who _is_ avalilable the 28th/29th to answer the channel and calm and disgruntled masses?19:26
anteayas/and/any19:26
jheskethI should be around until the 31st then off to LCA (but still available)19:26
anteayathanks19:26
fungii mean, i _could_ do it from the plane or a hotel before the afternoon of the 29th but would rather not commit to that19:26
anteayaone19:26
anteayafungi: yup19:26
* krotscheck is probably not available19:26
jheskethclearly a different timezone to the masses though19:26
AJaegerI might be around but can't commit yet either ;(19:26
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:27
anteayajhesketh: we'll take what we can get19:27
jheskethor alternatively we move it to a few days earlier19:27
anteayajhesketh: ++19:27
* yolanda will not be available, on travel19:27
jeblairi expect to be around then19:27
* craige will be already at LCA but you can ping me to help, jhesketh 19:27
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:27
anteayacraige: you'd need to be here to help19:27
*** dmorita has quit IRC19:27
anteayajeblair: yay two19:27
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC19:28
fungiso as for what to expect, we're going to roughly halve our current capacity. if that coincides with some major problems in another provider (particularly rackspace) then that could be pretty terrible. otherwise it's likely we'll just be backed up a bit more than usual at peak times19:28
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:28
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC19:28
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:29
*** jckasper has quit IRC19:29
clarkbright we also need to work on getting unittests on the new providers19:29
*** vijendar has quit IRC19:29
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
*** MarkAtwo_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC19:30
clarkbwhich is the bindep and pre test setup related work19:30
*** hurricanerix has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
fungiyeah, those macros should in theory be ready to get added to jobs/job-templates now, but more testing would help19:31
*** cartik has joined #openstack-meeting19:31
*** baoli has quit IRC19:31
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:31
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:31
fungithe trick is that we need to reorder builders a little bit because bindep's ability to read a project-supplied list of package names means that repo cloning needs to happen prior to revoking sudo19:31
*** mrmartin has quit IRC19:32
clarkbthough we could flip to bindep with the global list to start19:32
fungiright now our jobs which revoke sudo do so before cloning the repo19:32
*** Leom_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:32
clarkbthen reorder, either way we have options and much of the work is done we just need to get it in place19:32
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC19:32
fungiyeah, it should just work and ignore repo-supplied package lists in that case19:32
fungirather, ignore the fact that it can't find any19:33
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC19:33
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
clarkbI am not sure I have time to take that on this week, but can attempt next week19:33
jeblairi don't think the reorder should be problematic19:33
fungithe database setup and bindep macros should just be a no-op on bare-.* workers so could be added now19:33
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
fungidoes anybody have time to hack on that a little between now and the end of the month?19:34
*** austin81 has left #openstack-meeting19:34
fungii can help but am wary of promising to have available time to do it all before then19:34
*** abhiraut has quit IRC19:34
*** Leom has quit IRC19:35
*** _sombrafam_ has quit IRC19:35
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:35
ianwi think i can get involved with that19:35
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC19:35
fungiianw: awesome--it would actually help to have more rh-oriented insight on it too19:36
ianwas mentioned, i'll be keeping on the general rpm distro side of things throughout19:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:36
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
fungii'll get up with you after the meeting on that19:37
fungiso did we decide to merge the hpcloud turn-down changes on friday the 29th?19:37
*** mrunge has quit IRC19:37
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:38
* craige thought we did.19:38
fungithat's the soonest i could do it that week, but i didn't see anybody else volunteer19:38
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
anteayaI won't be here to respond to questions so I don't have an opinion19:39
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC19:39
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting19:39
clarkb29th sounds good19:39
fungi#agreed HPCloud nodepool quotas will be set to 0 on some time on Friday, January 29th in preparation for their public cloud sunset on the 31st19:39
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:39
clarkbgives us a couple of additional days to work through anything funny that may come up19:39
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
*** julim has quit IRC19:40
fungimeh, my grammar was terrible on that but not so terrible that i'm going to fix it19:40
*** armax has quit IRC19:40
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
fungiokay, so 3 more topics in the next 20 minutes19:40
fungier, 419:40
fungi#topic puppetlabs-apache migration (pabelanger)19:40
*** openstack changes topic to "puppetlabs-apache migration (pabelanger) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:40
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/20559619:41
fungipabelanger: how's this going?19:41
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:41
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** jjmb has quit IRC19:42
*** cwolferh has quit IRC19:42
fungior anybody else know why he wanted to discuss it in the meeting?19:42
Clint*crickets*19:43
fungii guess we can come back to it after the other topics if he returns and there's still time19:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
anteayaI do not know19:43
fungi#topic clarifying requirements for moving release tools into project-config repository (dhellmann)19:43
*** openstack changes topic to "clarifying requirements for moving release tools into project-config repository (dhellmann) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:43
dhellmannhi!19:43
anteayadhellmann: hi19:43
fungihowdy19:43
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** zehicle_ has quit IRC19:44
dhellmannso last week during the discussion of release automation it was mentioned that the scripts would need to move as part of that work19:44
dhellmannI interpreted that as them needing to move into project-config, though that may not be a valid interpretation19:44
dhellmannso I'm looking for clarification on why and where, to make sure I can line up that work19:44
*** cartik has quit IRC19:44
dhellmannin fact, now that I think harder, I think fungi said the jenkins slave scripts directory?19:44
anteayadhellmann: sorry if this is obvious, which release tools?19:44
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:45
fungidhellmann: basically any scripts that run on the release.slave or signing.slave hosts will need to be in project-config's jenkins/scripts directory19:45
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:45
anteayafungi: ah thanks now I understand19:45
dhellmannanteaya : good question. There are a bunch of tools in openstack-infra/release-tools. Some shell, some python. They are all needed as part of the release tagging and publishing process.19:45
pabelangersorry19:45
jeblair19:50:16 <fungi> dhellmann: i think we discussed a while back that it might need to move to project-config jenkins/scripts directory instead19:45
jeblairhttp://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-01-05-19.05.log.html19:45
dhellmannfungi : ok, so that's where. I want to understand why, because that's going to make maintaining them much more inconvenient for us.19:45
anteayadhellmann: sounds like scripts that run on release or signing slaves are the ones that need to be moved, yes?19:45
pabelangerfungi: go distracted, will loop back in open topic19:45
dhellmannnot that I'm objecting, just making sure I fully understand19:46
dhellmannanteaya : that will be enough of them that we might as well move them all.19:46
anteayaoh okay19:46
fungidhellmann: mostly so that the infra-core and project-config-core reviewers have a chance to audit them to make sure they hopefully don't expose the private key material or other credentials we have secured on those hosts19:46
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:46
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting19:46
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
anteayaso scripts that don't run on release and signing slaves, in jenkins/scripts as well (this is for the rest of infra)?19:47
dhellmannfungi : ok. Since they are a mix of python and bash, how do we manage the installation on the nodes? is it ok for them to pip install things, for example?19:47
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
AJaegerdhellmann: in a virtual environment that they setup19:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:47
fungidhellmann: we do pip install some things from pypi if that's what you're asking19:47
dhellmannAJaeger : sure, they use a virtualenv now19:47
*** dmorita has quit IRC19:47
fungithough actually now that i think about it, no we don't any longer (twine was an exception)19:48
fungiwe now install distro packages of twine on release.slave19:48
dhellmannfungi : yeah, the scripts look for a virtualenv and create it if they need to, but it's not clear if that goes against security policies to do that at runtime vs. image build time or something19:48
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC19:48
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:48
pabelangerfungi: will have to get back to it next week, need to step away from computer19:48
*** kebray has quit IRC19:48
dhellmannin particular, the script that figures out which releases were requested is python and need pyyaml and the script that updates launchpad with comments after a release needs some launchpad libraries19:48
fungidhellmann: we try to make sure any dependencies are installed on the machine in its system context rather than using a virtualenv19:49
dhellmannthere are likely to be others, those are the big ones I can think of off the top of my head19:49
fungiideally from distro packages of those python libraries19:49
jeblairboth of those are in ubuntu19:49
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:49
dhellmannok, so I'll get the rest of the list of requirements19:49
dhellmannand I guess we can change the script to not use a virtualenv and require that those things be installed19:49
dhellmannhowever, some of the scripts themselves are installed as console scripts, too19:49
dhellmannI guess that will need to change19:50
jeblairthe desire for packages is more about a desire for stability of jobs that run in the post or release pipelines than security, per se19:50
dhellmannok, that makes sense, too19:50
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
fungiyeah, avoids shifting dependencies19:50
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
dhellmannand how do I express the dependencies on system packages for those scripts?19:50
fungidhellmann: puppet19:51
fungi#link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/modules/openstack_project/manifests/release_slave.pp19:51
*** armax has quit IRC19:51
dhellmannok19:51
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:51
fungiyou can see there where it's installing the "twine" package19:51
fungifor example19:51
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:51
fungialso python-wheel19:52
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:52
fungiother questions about this?19:52
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:52
dhellmannfungi : yes, can ttx and I get +2 approval on that part of the project-config tree?19:52
AJaegerdhellmann: I promise to give your changes priority in reviewing...19:53
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:53
fungidhellmann: not really without agreeing to review project-config changes in general. are the scripts that complex?19:53
fungiand going to experience frequent changes?19:53
ttxthey tend to change often19:54
dhellmannfungi : it's hard to say. if I have to move the code, I would like to move the review team with it, though.19:54
*** rderose has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
ttxbut maybe that's just a transition phase19:54
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
*** abhiraut has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
AJaegerI suggest to let's see how this turns out and then discuss again if needed19:54
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC19:54
dhellmannfungi : some of the python is a little twisty, but the tagging stuff is pretty simple19:54
anteayadhellmann ttx if one of you proposes something as long as the other +1's AJaeger and I will give it priority19:55
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
jeblairthe jenkins slave scripts directory isn't a great place for things that need to be updated frequently -- since they are installed on images, they can take weeks to actually be updated.19:55
dhellmannyeah, that's not optimal in this case19:55
fungiit seems like it's probably similar to some of the other scripts we have for, e.g., proposing requirements changes or translations updates from a complexity perspective19:55
*** pauloewerton has left #openstack-meeting19:55
ttxjeblair: I fear "urgent" release tools updates as we discover problems in a release and need to fix something in the next one coming in 10 min19:56
dhellmannfungi : there's a lot of launchpad and release notes stuff in here, too19:56
fungitrue, not the case at the moment for the release and signing slaves, but in zuul/nodepool v3 those become dynamically-generated workers19:56
dhellmannin fact, reno is needed and that's probably not available in a system package yet19:56
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC19:56
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
fungii'm worried that this topic is going to overrun the remainder of the meeting (and is probably not something we're going to be able to decide in the next 3 minutes)19:57
dhellmannyeah, I agree19:57
ttxyeah we should move that off meeting19:57
*** abhiraut has left #openstack-meeting19:57
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
*** ddieterly has quit IRC19:57
fungiyolanda: zaro: are your topics urgent that they get covered in the next minute?19:58
dhellmannfungi: have the tc meeting next, so I'll come back to -infra tomorrow and ping you to continue?19:58
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC19:58
*** rderose has quit IRC19:58
*** mrmartin has quit IRC19:58
yolandafungi, not from my side, i'm progressing on several areas on infra cloud19:58
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:58
fungidhellmann: yeah, it's likely a large-ish change both to the complexity of what we expect to run in release jobs and to the teams expected to review the tooling, so tomorrow would be good to continue19:58
zarofungi: no19:58
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:58
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** jjmb has quit IRC19:59
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC19:59
fungidhellmann: and we should try to get input from more project-config-core and infra-root people19:59
dhellmannfungi : sounds good19:59
fungiokay, i'm going to defer pabelanger, yolanda and zaro's topics to next week and skip open discussion19:59
fungithanks everyone!19:59
fungi#endmeeting20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 19:59:59 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-01-12-19.03.html20:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-01-12-19.03.txt20:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-01-12-19.03.log.html20:00
*** banix has quit IRC20:00
*** ddieterly has quit IRC20:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
*** yolanda has left #openstack-meeting20:00
ttxo/20:00
sdagueo/20:00
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:00
annegentleholla20:01
markmcclaino/20:01
mesteryo/20:01
thingeeo/20:01
jaypipes..............o/ ... o+-<20:01
dhellmanno/20:01
mordredo/20:01
* jaypipes ran in, slipped and fell.20:01
lifelesso/20:01
annegentleice jaypipes!20:01
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
*** gjayavelu has quit IRC20:02
ttxrussellb, flaper87, dtroyer, markmcclain, jeblair: around ?20:02
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
russellbo/20:02
ttxmark is here alright20:02
markmcclainttx: still here :)20:02
jeblairayep20:02
ttx#startmeeting tc20:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan 12 20:02:24 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)"20:02
ttxHi everyone!20:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'20:02
russellbi was talking to mestery, i blame him20:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:02
ttxOur agenda for today:20:02
ttx#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee20:02
* edleafe lurks suspiciously in the corner...20:02
*** rfolco has quit IRC20:02
thingeewould like to potentially add some more rubber stamp business20:02
thingeehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/243348/20:03
ttxthingee: which ones ?20:03
* mestery watches edleafe from the corner of his eyes20:03
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
thingeeand https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236712/20:03
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
ttxthingee: fine by me.. objections ?20:03
lifelesswell20:03
lifelessisn't there a one week thing for all items?20:03
thingeethings have had a lifespan more than a week20:04
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:04
ttxcross project ruberstamps are not really TC resolutions20:04
* rockyg peeks out from under a stone20:04
lifelessttx: I am obviously confused :)20:04
ttxit's more finally rubberstamping consensus20:04
jeblairwell, i thought they were20:04
ttxlifeless: we don't really vote on them -- we acknowledge existing consensus20:04
*** Shrews has left #openstack-meeting20:04
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:05
thingeeEveryone, these items have existed more than a week.20:05
dhellmannthingee : the second one appears to be in conflict with the first :-)20:05
ttxhence the name, rubberstamps20:05
ttxthingee: not as a TC meeting agenda item though, so I see what they mean20:05
thingeeah true20:05
lifelessthingee: the TC meeting protocol specifies a date when things have to be on the agenda20:05
ttxI'm fine delaying them until properly added to agenda.20:05
lifelessthingee: to let participants have time to read them20:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:05
annegentlelifeless: oh I see20:05
* thingee thinks it would be good if people in the tc are watching the repo regardless of agenda item20:06
ttx(or rather, I'm only fine adding them to agenda now if nobody objects, and I  would count this as objection)20:06
mesterythingee: Good idea20:06
annegentlelifeless: ok, that's a fair point20:06
ttxyeah it's a bit late to look into those20:06
annegentlettx: I'd say add to the agenda20:06
lifelessseparately, I want to drill into this 'not a resolution' thing20:06
lifelessbecause at least jeblair and I thought differently20:07
lifelessbut we can do that late20:07
lifelesslater20:07
ttxcross project specs are things that PTLs need to agree to20:07
lifelessttx: lets defer to open discussion ?20:07
*** AJaeger has left #openstack-meeting20:07
ttxsince it's difficult to have voting rules on that, we use the TC to check that consensus is there20:07
ttxbut we just ack consensus, otherwise our vote is just like someone else's vote. At least that's how we have done it until now20:08
*** dmorita has quit IRC20:08
ttxok20:08
thingeefine with me. There's an agenda item in the cross-project meeting to talk about getting team consensus.20:08
dhellmannI don't see a lot of votes on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236712/ either, fwiw20:08
ttx#topic Rubberstamp cross-project spec: Adds spec for Service Catalog standardization20:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Rubberstamp cross-project spec: Adds spec for Service Catalog standardization (Meeting topic: tc)"20:08
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:08
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181393/20:08
ttxwe have 720:08
ttxso I'll consider it ready for merging unless someone objects20:09
thingeedhellmann: I don't see objections currently since it existed oct 18 ;)20:09
lifelessI had one concern20:09
sdaguewe've been grinding at this for a long time, hopefully what's there is good for folks20:09
lifelesswhich for some reason was stuck in draft20:09
lifelessthere's a paragraph that claims to contain a list20:09
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:09
lifelessbut there is no list20:09
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
sdaguelifeless: which bit?20:10
lifelessso its a little confusing at best20:10
*** mfranc213 has quit IRC20:10
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
annegentlefor the service catalog, we've whittled for a while, and I think merging now is the right thing to do, with edits as we go20:10
lifelesssdague: line 11720:10
annegentlesince I dislike sentence frags as much as anyone :)20:10
lifelesssdague: the para above which also says 'list of' has an actual list with it20:10
*** mfranc213 has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:10
lifelesssdague: I don't want to hold it up20:11
lifelesssdague: but I'm only +1 while confused, for what thats worth20:11
sdaguelifeless: so the list in the paragraph above is not the list of things after it20:11
sdagueIt's saying "we'd like to get to having a list of things we need to change" and "here are some guiding principles"20:11
ttxok, lets approve, but maybe queue a clarification20:12
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting20:12
lifelesssdague: ok, so yeah - that didn't come through clearly. perhaps a post merge tweak?20:12
annegentlelifeless: right, it's saying we'll make a list as a task. but I can see the confusion point, sure20:12
sdaguebecause at this point, this document is mostly a statement of priciples and direction. The details have to come out as they come out20:12
ttxok approved20:12
sdaguelifeless: yeh, I'm so english blind on this spec at this point, if you have better words, please propose20:12
ttxpost merge tweaks welcome20:12
sdaguettx: thanks!20:13
annegentleheh me too on english-blind20:13
lifelesssdague: I can do that20:13
ttx#topic Refactor 4 opens as in Project team guide20:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Refactor 4 opens as in Project team guide (Meeting topic: tc)"20:13
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/26412720:13
ttxThis change is about bringing the version of the 4 opens in the governance up to date with the one in the project team guide20:13
*** cartik has joined #openstack-meeting20:13
ttxwe have 7 now, will approve unless someone objects20:13
ttx(tl;dr being it is mostly placing "principles" bits in the "open" they actually belong in)20:14
jeblairdo we have our stance on open core written anywhere else?20:14
ttxI don't think so20:14
annegentlenot that I can think of20:14
ttxI mean, we need to retire the wiki version obviously20:15
ttxand there is the subsequent change to remove it from PTG20:15
lifelessSo I'm fine with this tweak20:15
lifelessI still want to do something about the open core discussion20:15
mordreduhm20:15
mordredso - yeah20:15
ttxjeblair: but otherwise not that I know of20:15
mordredsorry, just read this20:15
jeblairi'm worried about approving this now because that effectively means we have repealed our open core stance20:15
mordredand the open core thing is vexxing20:15
mordredyea20:15
mordredthat's the main reason I wanted to add this to the governance repo in the first place20:15
ttxjeblair: why ?20:16
lifelessjeblair: wait, what ?20:16
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
ttxread the first line20:16
ttxthe end lines that I removed are a duplicate stance20:16
mordredOH20:16
ttxwhich do not bring additional info20:16
lifelessAm I reading the right diff ?20:16
sdagueyeh, expand the code20:16
dhellmannexpand the view so you can see the whole file20:16
ttxlifeless: no *they* are reading it wrong.20:16
sdaguelifeless: it's outside the diff20:16
mordredsorry - I was reading out of context - those lines at the bottom are lines that describe "Open Community"20:16
jeblairah that's different; let me put a comment there20:16
mordredyeah. thanks20:16
*** irenab_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
* mordred is bad at reading20:17
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:17
jeblairme too20:17
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:17
dhellmannmordred , jeblair : don't feel bad. I commented about an addition that was actually a removal yesterday. Diffs are hard.20:17
mordreddhellmann: maybe we could replace them with something more trendy and hipster20:17
mordreddhellmann: like emoji or something20:17
ttxwhich is why I want to remove the duplication in the first place :)20:17
*** cartik has quit IRC20:17
sdagueblockchain emoji20:17
dhellmannmordred: needs more social20:18
mordredsdague: YES!20:18
ttxalright approving now20:18
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:18
annegentleheh20:18
mordredsdague: we should definitely replace diffs with something based on blockchain20:18
lifelessis the mission in the foundation docs?20:18
ttx#topic Add interop and endusers to OpenStack Mission20:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Add interop and endusers to OpenStack Mission (Meeting topic: tc)"20:18
mordredblockchain is the new docker20:18
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/26413520:18
ttxSo... this resolution is the first step in the likely long road to updating our mission statement20:18
ttxThis was introduced by mordred in Tokyo during the joint meeting with the board20:18
mesterymordred: lol20:18
ttxThe goal being to mention "interoperability" and "end users" in the stated goals20:18
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:18
*** irenab has quit IRC20:18
*** irenab_ is now known as irenab20:18
ttxDuring that meeting we concluded that the mission statement was sufficiently central to OpenStack that it would be preferable that both the board and the TC agree to the change20:19
ttxThe first step is to propose a wording, and this is what some of us came up with20:19
ttxWe tried to be additive, and to minimize the change20:19
sdagueyeh, seems good to me20:19
*** dmorita has quit IRC20:19
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:19
annegentleespecially end users20:19
ttxalright, ready to approve unless there are questions20:20
jeblairlgtm20:20
jeblairannegentle, mordred, ttx: thank you for that! :)20:20
ttxgood to have lots of votes on this one20:20
*** Swami has quit IRC20:20
ttxapproved20:20
ttxrussellb, mordred: could you bring that to the board, or should I ?20:21
annegentlenow we all should look for 1-2 tasks we can do to advocate for users :)20:21
russellbttx: i can ask for it to be on the next board meeting agenda20:21
ttxannegentle: now we can't pretend we didn't know :)20:21
mordredttx: yes, russelb is good at doing things20:21
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
ttxI votes for him.20:21
annegentlettx: heh20:21
mordreds/russelb/russellb/20:21
ttxand voted too20:21
*** dslev has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
ttx#topic Brainstorming about what the TC would like to see on the "upstream dev" track in Austin20:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Brainstorming about what the TC would like to see on the "upstream dev" track in Austin (Meeting topic: tc)"20:22
annegentlethanks russellb20:22
russellbthanks :)20:22
ttx#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/austin-upstream-dev-track-ideas20:22
annegentleso weird to see "in Austin" (just have to say)20:22
ttxSo.. I hope we'll just have good submissions through the normal CFP process20:22
ttxBut there may still be things we really want to see covered there20:22
jeblairannegentle: they keep it weird there20:22
ttxand for which nudging some people to make a proposal could help in getting the right content there20:22
ttxlet's see what we have20:22
*** piet has quit IRC20:22
annegentlejeblair: so I hear20:23
annegentlejeblair: not as weird as portland I also hear20:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:23
annegentlettx: I added "How do you even doc?"20:23
*** dprince has quit IRC20:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:24
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
mordredannegentle: I think portland favors strange rather than weird, since they don't like bandwagoning20:25
annegentleha!20:25
*** cartik has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
ttxfrankly it all feels like things people would naturally submit... is there any must-have in there for which having a volunteer is absolutely necessary ?20:25
*** dslev has quit IRC20:25
* dhellmann hopes coming up with suggestions wasn't the same as volunteering20:25
dansmithmordred: thank you for noticing the difference20:26
sdaguedhellmann: ++20:26
annegentlewe do usually find session leaders20:26
ttxit is not20:26
sdagueyeh, I was hoping this was more of a pull than a push honestly at this stage20:26
ttxdhellmann: though some suggestions clearly point to someone ;)20:26
dhellmannannegentle : these are presentation ideas, though, right? so we need speakers to write talks.20:26
dhellmannttx: I'll work on obfuscating those20:27
annegentledhellmann: yea and they're being recorded so nearly workshoppy if we make the most of videos20:27
dhellmannannegentle : ++20:27
sdaguelike we should probably rope dansmith into doing a developing for upgradability talk (like the cp session from last time)20:27
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-meeting20:27
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:27
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:27
ttxsdague: yes we should20:27
dhellmannsdague : added as 4.620:27
ttxnudge nudge20:28
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC20:28
annegentleI made up workshoppy of course but yes, these need to be polished and re-usable20:28
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:29
ttxany large development process change that we really need to communicate ?20:29
ttxI think the last one was reno20:30
annegentleexplain release tags?20:30
annegentle(I even stumbled on it myself)20:30
ttxthe CFP-closes-two-months-before-event is going to bite us20:30
lifelessI've put it on the etherpad20:30
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
lifelessbut I think socialising how to work with DLM's is a thing to do20:30
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
dhellmannannegentle : let's talk offline about what you mean by that, it may be covered by our presentation in tokyo20:30
annegentledhellmann: ok cool20:31
ttxdhellmann: which no dev attended20:31
dhellmannif I'm wrong, we can add it to the list20:31
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:31
dhellmannttx: true, but we can share the link to the video20:31
ttxalso, cats20:31
*** macsz has quit IRC20:31
annegentlelolcats?20:31
dhellmannwe're not expecting all of them to come to these, are we?20:31
ttxjust cats20:31
*** cartik has quit IRC20:31
*** MarkAtwo_ has quit IRC20:31
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting20:31
ttxdhellmann: no but we are expecting all the attendees to be20:32
*** cartik has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
dhellmannk20:32
ttxsdague: what would be the next step with this brainstorming ? keep it live and have it trigger volunteers ?20:33
ttxmaybe start a -dev thread on it20:33
sdagueyeh, it's probably worth sharing as a -dev thread20:33
ttxI should do that20:33
fungijust to clarify, the anticipated audience are mostly not the sort of people who will be in design sessions 100% of the time (currenty active contributors), but rather people with some development background who are attending general conference talks (maybe also new or less active contributors)?20:33
ttxexplaining what the track is about and all20:33
annegentlettx: I did this one weird trick with grep through months of IRC logs, to see what questions newcomers had, do we have any similar analysis of what devs are asking?20:33
ttxfungi: no20:33
dhellmannfungi : no, these will not run concurrently with design sessions20:34
fungiohhhh20:34
fungithat helps a bunch20:34
ttxfungi: it's running on the Monday, when the design summit is not started yet, and is meant for openstack upstream devs20:34
annegentlettx: looking for a data set that's not us, since we're not the intended audience, ya know?20:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
* thingee can volunteer to fill speaker slots20:34
lifelessif only I'd pushed through that dev survey20:34
lifelessI keep stalling on it :/20:34
sdagueannegentle: actually, I think the target audience is us20:34
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:34
ttxyes, all of us20:34
*** topolznc has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
annegentlesdague: ok, for leveling up your dev skillz? that sort of thing?20:34
ttxannegentle: and learn what you need to learn20:35
sdagueI feel like this is going to be way more useful if each of us came up with 1 "you know, I really wish I understood X more"20:35
annegentlesdague: yeah20:35
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
lifelesssdague: ++20:35
annegentledo we have any data on which contributor pages or videos get the most views already?20:35
ttx#action ttx to explain on -dev what the track is about and point people to the etherpad20:36
edleafesubmitted anonymously, since we all know all that stuff already, of course20:36
sdaguehonestly, an overview of the neutron resource model, and what you need to put a thing on the network would be great.20:36
sdagueedleafe: or we are big enough to admit that we don't know everything20:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:37
edleafesdague: :)20:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:37
anteayaannegentle: I think that would have to come from jimmy wouldn't it?20:37
annegentlettx: I'll chase the data angle20:37
ttxtalk about new features in some lib that all projects should probably take advantage of20:37
annegentleanteaya: I'll start with a request at the foundation20:38
ttxetc20:38
annegentleanteaya: who's jimmy?20:38
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:38
fungii'm assuming a vulnerability management process presentation would fit best in the cross-project themes section? or is there a better section for horizontal effort presentations?20:38
*** cartik has quit IRC20:38
anteayaannegentle: jimmy macarthur20:38
*** cartik has joined #openstack-meeting20:38
dhellmannfungi : that seems like a good place for it20:38
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:38
ttxfungi: sounds good20:39
*** pabelanger has left #openstack-meeting20:39
*** otter768 has quit IRC20:39
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC20:39
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:39
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC20:39
ttxalright, I'll push that fun page to the rest of the world20:40
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
ttxsdague: you can reply to that and suggest people reply with "one thing that as an upstream dev I would really like to learn more about"20:40
ttxsince that's a brilliant idea20:40
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
sdaguesure20:40
ttxshould be a mine of presentations ideas20:41
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:41
ttxalright, lets move on but you can continue on the etherpad20:41
fungihrm... bindep integration in the new developer-facing features that need adoption category or the developer-oriented infra category?20:41
*** cartik has quit IRC20:41
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
fungimeh, i'll just pick one20:41
ttxskipping next topic since that was not updated20:41
*** cartik has joined #openstack-meeting20:42
ttx#topic Open discussion20:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: tc)"20:42
ttxgothicmindfood had something to mention20:42
gothicmindfoodhey everyone!20:42
lifelessfungi: either20:42
* mestery waves at gothicmindfood 20:42
ttxotherwise we can reconsider (again) how we approve cross-project specs20:42
gothicmindfoodI have a #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Leadershiptraining with some info/thoughts gathered on leadership training20:43
* mordred for one supports his new zingtrain overlords20:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:43
mordred(would be interested in participating)20:44
gothicmindfoodafter asking around for some opinions/thoughts I put together a few ideas, and I'll be sending an email to Mark Collier soon to talk foundation funding20:44
* thingee has a couple of things for opend discussion20:44
gothicmindfoodI purposely gathered intel/data from folks who had *ahem* diverse opinions on this the last time it was brought up in a meeting20:44
*** iben_ has quit IRC20:44
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC20:45
*** hdaniel_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
ttxI'm fine attending, if I can be available20:45
*** cartik has quit IRC20:45
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:45
gothicmindfoodand that was awesome. So I welcome more thoughts or volunteers who'd be interested in participating20:45
ttxsounds like they have an interesting approach20:45
*** toscalix has quit IRC20:45
*** cartik has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
gothicmindfoodttx: that, and good food. which is the only reason mordred is interested :)20:45
mordredalso in favor of sending a team of potentially skeptical scouts to come and report back20:46
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:46
jeblairmordred: i was thinking you were in the generally skeptical camp last time we talked20:46
*** rockyg has quit IRC20:46
gothicmindfoodyeah - I put that in the etherpad write up, but I want to reiterate: I think the more skeptics that go, the better20:46
jeblairmordred: food is sufficient motivation? :)20:46
mordredI am - but also the sandwiches are AMAZING20:46
ttxjeblair: of course it is20:46
mordredand honestly, if I have any amount of skepticism, I'd be a good candidate to give it a try20:46
ttxgothicmindfood: ok, keep us posted on where that goes20:47
gothicmindfoodttx: will do.20:47
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting20:47
ttxback on crossproject stuff...20:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:47
ttxLast time we discussed cross-project spec approval, we said that it required community consensus, and that the most convenient way to acknowledge consensus was to ask the TC members to validate that there was consensus20:47
lifelessI'm fine with a or B20:47
lifelessI'd like to go20:47
ttxHence the current system - everyone reviews the spec and when there is consensus, we push for a rubberstamping by the tc20:47
annegentlegothicmindfood: are there dates yet?20:47
*** rbak has quit IRC20:47
lifelessI've seen bad things in the space, but also good stuff, and good can be amazing20:47
ttxBut I think we have an issue if TC members only look at cross-project specs only once they have reached community consensus20:47
annegentle(sorry, had to read then type)20:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:47
*** macsz has quit IRC20:47
*** cburgess_ has quit IRC20:48
*** mudassirlatif has quit IRC20:48
jeblairgothicmindfood: as a self-identified skeptic, i appreciate the creative solution you are proposing and the work that must have gone into developing it.  :)20:48
ttxbecause then the current system is broken20:48
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
ttxjeblair: +120:48
*** cburgess has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
*** topol has quit IRC20:48
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
ttxjeblair, lifeless: so if you consider your cross-project specs vote is similar to your resolution votes, then we have a problem20:50
ttxsince you are supposed to have already voted +1 on the spec and use your +2 to say "yes, I see consensus"20:50
gothicmindfoodannegentle: no dates, unless you look at prescheduled options (option A) - the link I just added shows those. Option B would be on OpenStack's timetable20:50
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
lifelessttx: is this documented ?20:50
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
*** gordc has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
jeblairttx: the thing that caught my eye earlier was the idea that we're not actually voting.  i think we are voting on them to give them the weight of a tc vote.20:50
lifelessttx: like, is there a manual I missed reading?20:50
thingeeso I'm fine with getting more consensus from ptls or cross-project spec liaisons (https://review.openstack.org/266072) before approaching tc. At some point though, we need to move on though regardless of everyone being attentive.20:50
annegentlethanks gothicmindfood20:50
ttxlifeless: it was discussed in this meeting20:51
gothicmindfoodjeblair: thanks! Coming from my favorite skeptic, I appreciate that :)20:51
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:51
ttxmight be documented, let me check20:51
lifelessttx: the TC rotates20:51
dhellmannttx: I agree with jeblair. I thought that once we approved these specs, we backed them up.20:51
lifelessyah20:51
ttxjeblair: oh, we ARE voting. But before it comes to rubberstamp20:51
lifelessso there are multiple layers here20:51
*** topolznc is now known as topol20:52
dhellmannwhich is not the same as vote +1 at first and +2 later, which is a confusing process but I guess OK.20:52
*** cartik has quit IRC20:52
ttxbasically our vote is not a +2, it's the same level as a PTL +120:52
lifelessREADME.rst in openstack-specs does *not* describe special voting mechanisms or anything20:52
ttxPTLs are at least as important than us in getting the spec approved20:52
*** topol is now known as Guest4533520:52
jeblairttx: how they get on the agenda, and how we go about actually achieving the consensus we desire are not things i have strong opinions on -- only that our vote means it is a real tc vote.20:52
dhellmannttx: probably more, since they have to implement them20:52
ttxdhellmann: right20:52
dhellmannjeblair : ++20:52
lifelessnor does its CONTRIBUTING.rst20:52
ttxlifeless: yeah, we may have relied on oral tradition there :/20:53
dhellmannttx: it sounds like we need a TC section in the PTG20:53
ttxmostly because the crossproject meeting was just after this one and that's where those were discussed20:53
dhellmannor an expanded one, if there is already one20:53
lifelessdhellmann: that would be nice as well20:53
lifelessbut also, repos with different rules should have them locally documented IMO20:53
ttxoh well20:53
ttxthat doesn't solve the issue20:53
*** adiantum has quit IRC20:53
dhellmannlifeless : true20:53
ttxwhich is TC members should look at those specs earlier20:54
dhellmannlifeless : but a "here are your duties" list would be helpful. maybe that should go into the governance repo, though20:54
ttxthe same way we ask PTLs to look at them20:54
lifelessdhellmann: yes20:54
ttxif you wait for it to be pushed to the TC agenda, we have an issue20:54
ttxsince it's not a TC item, it's a crossproject item20:54
ttxthe only reason it's pushed as a TC item is a technicality20:55
ttxto get final rubberstamp on it20:55
ttxsince we have no other way to "approve" a cross project thing20:55
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
lifelessso20:55
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
lifelessthere are two disconnected issues20:56
lifelessone is the weird voting setup on the repo20:56
*** mhickey has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
lifelessby weird I mean non-standard20:56
jeblairwhew20:56
ttxright20:56
* jeblair sits back down20:56
lifelessseparately there is 'are tc members not reading cross project specs enough'20:56
lifelessI don't know that we have evidence/concerns on that20:57
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting20:57
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:57
lifelesssince jeblair, me and dhellmann seem to be more on the 'if we're voting, we're voting' angle20:57
lifelessbut ttx seems worried about the 'are folk reading' angle20:57
dhellmannlifeless : I'm also worried that folks aren't reading20:57
*** raildo is now known as raildo-afk20:57
*** Guest45335 is now known as topol_20:57
lifelessdhellmann: ack20:57
*** topol_ is now known as Guest1258120:58
dhellmannnot just the TC, though20:58
ttxbasically we raise those at the TC meeting to give it the final approval push, but lately it felt like that's when TC members start to register objections on them20:58
*** Guest12581 is now known as topol220:58
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:58
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:58
ttx(or others for that matter)20:58
dhellmannsee https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236712/ for example, which thingee wanted us to consider for approval today but that has a very small number of contributors20:59
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC20:59
ttxmeaning the "consensus" we are supposedly rubberstamping is not really there yet, and we are having a technical discussion about the spec rather than a social discussion about the presence of consensus20:59
dhellmannwe're basically in a state where if someone wants to do cross-project work, they already have to be well known and very noisy about it to get anywhere20:59
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
dhellmannwhich means we're not doing enough to grow leaders within the community21:00
annegentledhellmann: yeah21:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
ttxexcluding non-TC members from the technical discussion21:00
ttxand we are out of time21:00
ttxand the cross-project meeting starts :)21:00
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_21:00
cdentI think you're getting at some of the fundamental economics of openstack there21:00
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
cdentwe're paid21:00
thingeeI would like to say quickly while I have the tc's attention21:00
cdentit make it weird21:00
thingeeplease attend the cross-project meeting to discuss the cross-project spec liaison which aims on getting consensus from each team for spec for approval21:01
thingeeat least improving it21:01
annegentleyes21:01
annegentleplease21:01
ttxI'll be there in a minute21:01
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
ttxclosing here first21:01
ttxThanks everyone21:01
* harlowja joined twitter recently to be more noisy21:01
ttx#endmeeting21:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:01
harlowjalol21:01
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan 12 21:01:40 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-01-12-20.02.html21:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-01-12-20.02.txt21:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-01-12-20.02.log.html21:01
thingeecourtesy ping for Qiming TravT gordc dirk mriedem SergeyLukjanov21:01
thingeecourtesy ping for daemontool jroll boris-42 redrobot flaper87 rhochmuth21:01
thingeecourtesy ping for fungi flwang dims vipul johnthetubaguy rakhmerov21:01
*** macsz has quit IRC21:01
thingeecourtesy ping for docaedo stevemar mtreinish bswartz adam_g adrian_otto21:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:01
thingeecourtesy ping for zigo Piet sdake mugsie sheeprine thinrichs21:01
thingeecourtesy ping for jklare loquacities smelikyan Daisy skraynev odyssey4me21:01
thingeecourtesy ping for catherineD dhellmann dprince hyakuhei notmyname devkulkarni21:01
fungihey-o21:01
dimso/21:01
thingeecourtesy ping for emilienm cp16net claudiub armax david-lyle angdraug21:02
thingeecourtesy ping for smcginnis dtroyer21:02
thingeeplease meet in #openstack-meeting-cp21:02
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:02
annegentlecan't wait to see how long this list is21:02
EmilienMhello21:02
harlowjathingee why am i not in thee courtesy ping list, lol21:02
ttxis thaoh that's right we are still on this channel21:02
adam_ghiya21:02
docaedoo/21:02
ttxharlowja: it's opt in21:02
harlowjaoh21:02
claudiubo/21:02
annegentleoh yeah #openstack-meeting-cp21:02
* harlowja needs to request a courtesy call21:02
lifelessI was in it, I keep getting dropped :)21:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:02
docaedoI made the courtesy ping list! wheee!21:02
*** njohnsto_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
*** dslevin has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
*** jichen has quit IRC21:03
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
harlowjasomeday i'll be that cool21:03
*** dslevin has quit IRC21:04
*** gordc has left #openstack-meeting21:04
*** njohnston has quit IRC21:04
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:05
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:06
*** topol2 is now known as topol_21:06
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
*** topol_ is now known as topol21:07
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:08
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:08
*** krtaylor has quit IRC21:09
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC21:10
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
*** aysyd has quit IRC21:11
*** tsymanczyk has quit IRC21:11
thingeettx, harlowja I actually just grabbed ptls from the big tent list. I think this will change depending on how the cross-project spec liaison discussion goes21:11
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:12
*** Leom_ has quit IRC21:12
harlowjathingee its ok, i'm just whining21:12
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa21:12
harlowjalol21:12
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:12
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting21:12
ttxwe should have a bot feature21:12
ttxoptin pinglists21:12
ttx!pinglist-add cp-meeting +ttx21:13
openstackttx: Error: "pinglist-add" is not a valid command.21:13
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:13
*** hdaniel_ has quit IRC21:13
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2421:13
mtreinishttx: why not bake it into the ical yaml thing?21:13
*** armax has quit IRC21:13
*** merooney has quit IRC21:13
ttxwe need the bot to parrot it though21:13
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:14
mtreinishso the meetbot just parses the yaml (or the ical)21:14
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting21:14
*** njohnsto_ has quit IRC21:14
ttxI don't think it does21:14
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:14
mtreinishttx: right, I was proposing that's what we add :)21:14
ttxah, got you21:14
*** ayoung has quit IRC21:14
ttxmisinterpreted your "so"21:14
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:15
ttxmtreinish: YAFWP (yet another fun weekend project)21:15
mtreinishah sorry, I have a bad habit of prepending 'so' for no reason21:15
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:16
*** spandhe has joined #openstack-meeting21:16
mtreinishttx: heh, yeah it shouldn't be too hard :)21:16
ttxso, yeah. Me too21:16
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:17
*** vijendar has quit IRC21:17
*** kebray has quit IRC21:17
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC21:17
*** macsz1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:18
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:18
*** jtomasek has quit IRC21:18
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:18
*** itsuugo has quit IRC21:18
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC21:19
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:20
*** itsuugo has joined #openstack-meeting21:20
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:21
*** macsz has quit IRC21:21
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC21:21
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:21
*** dmorita has quit IRC21:22
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:23
*** timcline has quit IRC21:23
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
*** pratikmallya has quit IRC21:23
*** jprovazn has quit IRC21:24
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting21:24
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting21:25
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:25
*** vijendar has quit IRC21:25
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting21:25
fungimeetbot does take plugins at least21:26
*** tsymanczyk has joined #openstack-meeting21:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:26
*** bvandenh has quit IRC21:26
*** tsymanczyk is now known as Guest3071621:26
fungigranted, it's supybot which runs on twisted, so there's lots of fun to be had there, for possibly masochistic definitions of "fun"21:27
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC21:29
*** Guest30716 has quit IRC21:30
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:30
*** dslevin has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
*** esker has quit IRC21:31
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC21:31
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
*** pots2 has quit IRC21:32
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:33
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:34
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting21:35
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:35
*** bdrich has quit IRC21:35
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:36
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting21:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:37
*** ildikov has quit IRC21:37
*** rbak has quit IRC21:38
*** timcline has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:38
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC21:39
*** thangp has quit IRC21:40
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:40
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:40
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting21:40
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting21:41
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC21:43
*** fernnest has quit IRC21:43
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:43
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
*** gjayavelu has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC21:44
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:45
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:45
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-meeting21:45
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC21:46
*** tsymanczyk has joined #openstack-meeting21:46
*** erlon has quit IRC21:46
*** tsymanczyk is now known as Guest9771021:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
*** dmorita has quit IRC21:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:47
*** fernnest has joined #openstack-meeting21:48
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting21:48
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC21:48
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:48
*** julim has quit IRC21:49
*** rbak has quit IRC21:49
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
*** pratikmallya has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
*** adahms has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:50
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:51
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:52
*** kebray has quit IRC21:52
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:53
*** spzala has quit IRC21:53
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:53
*** mudassirlatif has joined #openstack-meeting21:54
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting21:54
*** pratikmallya has quit IRC21:54
*** rockyg has quit IRC21:54
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:56
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting21:56
*** rbak has quit IRC21:56
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** dmorita has quit IRC21:58
*** spzala has quit IRC21:58
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** baoli has quit IRC21:58
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:01
*** njohnston has quit IRC22:01
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting22:01
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** mfranc213 has quit IRC22:02
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC22:03
*** vhoward has quit IRC22:04
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
*** mhickey has quit IRC22:05
*** dkranz has quit IRC22:06
*** njohnston has quit IRC22:06
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting22:06
*** cdub has quit IRC22:07
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC22:09
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:09
*** dmorita has quit IRC22:09
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
*** thorst has quit IRC22:10
*** baoli has quit IRC22:10
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** lblanchard has quit IRC22:11
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** vgridnev has quit IRC22:12
*** eharney has quit IRC22:12
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:12
*** rbak has quit IRC22:12
*** matrohon has quit IRC22:14
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting22:14
*** dims has quit IRC22:15
*** thorst has quit IRC22:15
*** macsz1 has quit IRC22:16
*** rtheis_ has quit IRC22:16
*** cdent has quit IRC22:16
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:16
*** lblanchard has quit IRC22:17
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:17
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting22:18
*** pratikmallya has joined #openstack-meeting22:18
*** peristeri has quit IRC22:20
*** balajiiyer1 has quit IRC22:20
*** pratikma_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** baoli has quit IRC22:22
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:22
*** ayoung has quit IRC22:23
*** ja3 has quit IRC22:23
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC22:23
*** pratikmallya has quit IRC22:24
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith22:25
*** bobh has quit IRC22:25
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC22:25
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting22:26
*** ddieterly has quit IRC22:29
*** dmorita has quit IRC22:30
*** cwolferh has quit IRC22:30
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting22:30
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting22:30
*** AmirBaleghi11119 has quit IRC22:32
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting22:32
*** kebray has quit IRC22:33
*** baoli has quit IRC22:34
*** dmorita has quit IRC22:34
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting22:35
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC22:35
*** belmoreira has quit IRC22:36
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
*** otter768 has quit IRC22:39
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
*** timcline has quit IRC22:41
*** sgundur has left #openstack-meeting22:42
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting22:42
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting22:42
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** myoung has quit IRC22:45
*** myoung has joined #openstack-meeting22:46
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting22:46
*** vijendar has quit IRC22:46
*** Swami has quit IRC22:46
*** baoli has quit IRC22:46
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:47
*** gjayavelu has quit IRC22:49
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC22:50
*** MaxPC has quit IRC22:50
*** myoung has quit IRC22:50
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC22:50
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting22:51
*** piet has quit IRC22:51
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting22:52
*** rossella_s has quit IRC22:52
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting22:52
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:53
*** sarafraj has left #openstack-meeting22:53
*** dmorita has quit IRC22:53
*** eliqiao has quit IRC22:54
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting22:54
*** dmorita has quit IRC22:54
*** eliqiao has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** thorst has quit IRC22:56
*** alop has quit IRC22:56
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting22:56
*** alop has joined #openstack-meeting22:57
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:57
*** Paratosh has quit IRC22:57
*** BobH_ has quit IRC22:58
*** baoli has quit IRC22:58
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting22:58
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:58
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa23:01
*** Leo_ has quit IRC23:01
*** mfranc213 has joined #openstack-meeting23:03
*** Leom has quit IRC23:03
*** comay has quit IRC23:05
*** armax has quit IRC23:05
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_23:07
*** markmcclain has quit IRC23:07
*** mfranc213 has quit IRC23:07
*** pradk has quit IRC23:08
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting23:09
*** armax has quit IRC23:10
*** baoli has quit IRC23:10
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting23:10
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:11
*** kebray has quit IRC23:11
*** armax has quit IRC23:11
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting23:12
*** edtubill has quit IRC23:13
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC23:14
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC23:17
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** dmorita has quit IRC23:19
*** gjayavelu has joined #openstack-meeting23:20
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting23:22
*** baoli has quit IRC23:22
*** adahms has quit IRC23:22
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting23:23
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC23:24
*** neelashah has quit IRC23:24
*** markmcclain has quit IRC23:25
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting23:25
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting23:26
*** e0ne has quit IRC23:26
*** xyang1 has quit IRC23:27
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck23:28
*** annegentle has quit IRC23:31
*** eliqiao has quit IRC23:31
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC23:31
*** eliqiao has joined #openstack-meeting23:32
*** armax has quit IRC23:34
*** baoli has quit IRC23:34
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting23:35
*** spzala has quit IRC23:35
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:35
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting23:36
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith23:36
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** weshay_xchat has quit IRC23:37
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2423:38
*** armax has quit IRC23:40
*** spzala has quit IRC23:40
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:41
*** ddieterly has quit IRC23:41
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting23:42
*** tochi has joined #openstack-meeting23:42
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting23:43
*** spzala has quit IRC23:43
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting23:44
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting23:44
*** armax has quit IRC23:44
*** sdake has quit IRC23:45
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:45
*** dmorita has quit IRC23:45
*** blogan_ has quit IRC23:46
*** baoli has quit IRC23:46
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** armax has quit IRC23:47
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz23:47
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa23:47
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2423:48
*** angdraug has quit IRC23:48
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-meeting23:48
*** spzala has quit IRC23:48
*** oomichi_away is now known as oomichi23:49
*** weshay_xchat has joined #openstack-meeting23:50
*** ninag has quit IRC23:50
*** armax has quit IRC23:51
*** dlundquist has quit IRC23:51
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting23:55
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz23:55
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting23:56
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting23:57
*** baoli has quit IRC23:58
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!