*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:02 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 00:05 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:05 | |
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:08 | |
*** Swami has quit IRC | 00:09 | |
*** myoung has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:11 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:11 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:11 | |
*** Leom has quit IRC | 00:14 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 00:16 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:16 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:19 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:26 | |
*** pvaneck has quit IRC | 00:27 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:28 | |
*** banix has quit IRC | 00:32 | |
*** yassou has quit IRC | 00:35 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 00:36 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:37 | |
*** abhiraut has quit IRC | 00:39 | |
*** synegy34 has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:40 | |
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 00:41 | |
*** abhiraut has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:41 | |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:42 | |
*** abhiraut has left #openstack-meeting | 00:42 | |
*** gatekeep has quit IRC | 00:43 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 00:46 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:46 | |
*** hieulq_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:47 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 00:48 | |
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 00:48 | |
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:54 | |
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:54 | |
*** hoangcx has quit IRC | 00:54 | |
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:55 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 00:56 | |
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 00:57 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:57 | |
*** thorst has quit IRC | 01:02 | |
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:03 | |
*** maeca1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:03 | |
*** cdelatte has quit IRC | 01:04 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 01:07 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:07 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 01:08 | |
*** hoangcx has quit IRC | 01:09 | |
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:10 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:10 | |
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:11 | |
*** karthikp_ has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
*** thorst has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:12 | |
*** karthikp_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:12 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:14 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 01:15 | |
*** liuhanxi has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
*** jimholl_ has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:18 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 01:18 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:18 | |
*** piet has quit IRC | 01:22 | |
*** beekhof_mb has quit IRC | 01:22 | |
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 01:22 | |
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:22 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:22 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:23 | |
*** rfolco has quit IRC | 01:24 | |
*** hieulq_ has quit IRC | 01:25 | |
*** Apoorva has quit IRC | 01:26 | |
*** b1airo has quit IRC | 01:26 | |
*** b1airo has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:26 | |
*** hoangcx has quit IRC | 01:26 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
*** beekhof_mb has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:27 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:27 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:28 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:29 | |
*** yifei has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:29 | |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 01:29 | |
*** karthikp_ has quit IRC | 01:31 | |
*** b1airo has quit IRC | 01:32 | |
*** b1airo has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:32 | |
*** dslevin has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
*** unicell has quit IRC | 01:35 | |
*** jrist has quit IRC | 01:36 | |
*** dslevin has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:36 | |
*** hongbin_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:36 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:38 | |
*** banix has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
*** ebalduf has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:42 | |
*** kylek3h has quit IRC | 01:42 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:43 | |
*** amitkqed has quit IRC | 01:43 | |
*** amitkqed has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:43 | |
*** jimholl_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:43 | |
*** jamespd_ has quit IRC | 01:43 | |
*** liuhanxi has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:45 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:45 | |
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 01:47 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:48 | |
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:50 | |
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:50 | |
*** ivc_ has quit IRC | 01:51 | |
*** liuhanxi has quit IRC | 01:52 | |
*** liuhanxi has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:53 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 01:53 | |
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:58 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 01:58 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:58 | |
*** reed_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:00 | |
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 02:00 | |
*** reed_ has quit IRC | 02:01 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:05 | |
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:07 | |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:08 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 02:08 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 02:09 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:09 | |
*** woodster_ has quit IRC | 02:09 | |
*** hoangcx has quit IRC | 02:12 | |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 02:14 | |
*** jrist has quit IRC | 02:14 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:14 | |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 02:17 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 02:18 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 02:19 | |
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:19 | |
*** maeca1 has quit IRC | 02:25 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:26 | |
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:26 | |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
*** jamespd has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:27 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
*** Wenzhi__ has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
*** Wenzhi has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:29 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:30 | |
*** zhurong_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:31 | |
*** mkrai has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:35 | |
*** zhurong has quit IRC | 02:35 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:36 | |
*** Benj_ has quit IRC | 02:37 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 02:39 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:40 | |
*** b1airo has quit IRC | 02:41 | |
*** baoli has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:47 | |
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:47 | |
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:48 | |
*** vikasc has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:49 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 02:49 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:50 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 02:50 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:51 | |
*** dixiaoli has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:52 | |
*** esberglu has quit IRC | 02:52 | |
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:53 | |
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC | 02:55 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:56 | |
*** yanyanhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:57 | |
*** Namrata has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:57 | |
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:58 | |
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap_ | 02:59 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 02:59 | |
*** shubhams has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:00 | |
hongbin_ | #startmeeting zun | 03:00 |
---|---|---|
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 03:00:09 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hongbin_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 03:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 03:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: zun)" | 03:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'zun' | 03:00 |
hongbin_ | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zun#Agenda_for_2016-08-09_0300_UTC Today's agenda | 03:00 |
hongbin_ | #topic Roll Call | 03:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: zun)" | 03:00 | |
Namrata | Namrata | 03:00 |
shubhams | shubham | 03:00 |
mkrai | Madhuri Kumari | 03:00 |
*** julim has quit IRC | 03:00 | |
Wenzhi | Wenzhi | 03:00 |
yanyanhu | hi, yanyan is here | 03:00 |
itzdilip | Dilip | 03:01 |
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:01 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:01 | |
vikasc | vikas | 03:01 |
flwang | o/ | 03:01 |
*** armax has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
hongbin_ | Thanks for joining the meeting Namrata shubhams mkrai Wenzhi yanyanhu itzdilip vikasc flwang | 03:01 |
hongbin_ | #topic Announcements | 03:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: zun)" | 03:01 | |
hongbin_ | I have no announcement, anyone has? | 03:01 |
*** oferby has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
hongbin_ | #topic Review Action Items | 03:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Action Items (Meeting topic: zun)" | 03:01 | |
hongbin_ | none | 03:01 |
*** oferby has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:02 | |
hongbin_ | #topic Runtimes API design (mkrai) | 03:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Runtimes API design (mkrai) (Meeting topic: zun)" | 03:02 | |
hongbin_ | mkrai: ^^ | 03:02 |
*** roxanaghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:02 | |
mkrai | I have tested the api patch and it is working for all apis except for container-show command | 03:02 |
mkrai | I have uploaded the patch in zunclient for all container related command | 03:03 |
mkrai | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352357/ | 03:03 |
hongbin_ | Nice | 03:03 |
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:03 | |
mkrai | Everyone please review the patch | 03:04 |
hongbin_ | What is wrong with the show command though? | 03:04 |
mkrai | The container controller patch needs a revision which I will do after meeting | 03:04 |
hongbin_ | sure | 03:04 |
mkrai | hongbin_, Issue is with response being an object | 03:04 |
mkrai | It should not be a difficult issue | 03:05 |
mkrai | I will fix it today | 03:05 |
hongbin_ | sounds good | 03:05 |
mkrai | Rest of the commands are working fine :) | 03:05 |
mkrai | Please feel free to test the APIs and post your comments | 03:05 |
mkrai | hongbin_, I have also updated your compute patch | 03:06 |
hongbin_ | mkrai: Yes, I saw that. It looks good | 03:06 |
mkrai | Yes it is working now | 03:06 |
mkrai | That's all from my side | 03:07 |
hongbin_ | Thanks mkrai . | 03:07 |
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:07 | |
hongbin_ | Any question about the runtime API? | 03:07 |
hongbin_ | #topic Nova integration (Namrata) | 03:08 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Nova integration (Namrata) (Meeting topic: zun)" | 03:08 | |
hongbin_ | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zun/+spec/nova-integration The BP | 03:08 |
hongbin_ | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/zun-containers-nova-integration The etherpad | 03:08 |
hongbin_ | Namrata: ^^ | 03:08 |
Namrata | I am working on the specs of nova integration | 03:08 |
Namrata | and will submit it by this week | 03:08 |
*** larainema has quit IRC | 03:09 | |
hongbin_ | Great | 03:09 |
mkrai | Namrata, let us know if you need any help on that | 03:09 |
Namrata | yeah sure | 03:09 |
Namrata | Thanks mkrai | 03:09 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 03:10 | |
hongbin_ | Namrata: Could you tell us your general thoughs about the design? | 03:10 |
Namrata | I will include both the implementation details which we discussed in last meeting | 03:11 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:11 | |
*** sudipto has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:11 | |
Namrata | And as of now we don't of scheduler so we will consider Nova's scheduler only | 03:11 |
Namrata | And the driver will work same as ironic driver | 03:11 |
hongbin_ | OK | 03:12 |
hongbin_ | I remembered we discussed two approach at the last meeting | 03:12 |
hongbin_ | 1. Ironic approach (use nova shceduler) | 03:12 |
Namrata | Yeah i will write both the implemenatations in the spec | 03:12 |
hongbin_ | 2. VMWare approach (disable nova scheduler) | 03:13 |
hongbin_ | En, ok | 03:13 |
*** sudipto_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:13 | |
mkrai | hongbin_, Is there a way to disable scheduler? | 03:13 |
hongbin_ | mkrai: Just use Nova as a proxy | 03:13 |
*** sudipto has quit IRC | 03:14 | |
hongbin_ | Nova -> ZUn API -> Zun scheduler -> Zun compute | 03:14 |
mkrai | Ok got it | 03:14 |
hongbin_ | Like this: http://docs.openstack.org/kilo/config-reference/content/vmware.html | 03:14 |
yanyanhu | hongbin_, actually nova scheduler still takes effect. Just the scheduling happens cross multiple vcenters | 03:15 |
*** vinayp has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:15 | |
hongbin_ | yanyanhu: Then, it sounds like a two level scheduling | 03:15 |
yanyanhu | hongbin_, yes, basically, the 'real' scheduling is done inside vcenter/zun | 03:15 |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:15 | |
hongbin_ | Interesting | 03:15 |
yanyanhu | if we only have one zun/vcenter instance there | 03:15 |
mkrai | yes scheduler is tightly coupled so it can't be disabled I guess | 03:16 |
yanyanhu | so, what you stated is right | 03:16 |
hongbin_ | ok | 03:16 |
yanyanhu | mkrai, using the second way, the will be only one available host for nova scheduler to choose actually :) | 03:16 |
yanyanhu | s/host/nova-compute node | 03:17 |
yanyanhu | the compute-node is actually zun service | 03:17 |
mkrai | yanyanhu, How? | 03:17 |
*** liuhanxi has quit IRC | 03:17 | |
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:17 | |
yanyanhu | in that case, Zun will be a nova-compute node for Nova | 03:17 |
yanyanhu | so | 03:18 |
yanyanhu | there is no real scheduling happen at nova side I feel | 03:18 |
Wenzhi | yes just like ironic | 03:18 |
yanyanhu | if we choose another way, nova will be responsible to schedule instance | 03:19 |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 03:19 | |
hongbin_ | I think the first appraoch is more scalable: Nova choose a cluster, Zun pick a node in the cluster | 03:20 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 03:20 | |
yanyanhu | just my understanding, maybe not accurate | 03:20 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:20 | |
yanyanhu | hongbin_, what you mean here by cluster? | 03:20 |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 03:21 | |
hongbin_ | Like VMWare, Nova pick a cluster, vcenter pick a host | 03:21 |
yanyanhu | I see | 03:21 |
hongbin_ | Oh, I might misunderstand something | 03:21 |
yanyanhu | so two level scheduling | 03:21 |
hongbin_ | Yes | 03:21 |
hongbin_ | OK, let's discuss the detail in the spec Namrata will write | 03:22 |
yanyanhu | sure | 03:22 |
hongbin_ | Thanks Namrata for working on this | 03:22 |
mkrai | +1 | 03:22 |
hongbin_ | #topic Integrate with Mesos scheduler (sudipto) | 03:23 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Integrate with Mesos scheduler (sudipto) (Meeting topic: zun)" | 03:23 | |
hongbin_ | sudipto_: here? | 03:23 |
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles | 03:23 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
hongbin_ | It looks sudipto is not here. Anyone else want to discuss this topic? | 03:24 |
*** itzdilip is now known as dsunkum | 03:24 | |
*** piet has quit IRC | 03:24 | |
hongbin_ | OK. Then, let's start the open discussion | 03:24 |
hongbin_ | #topic Open Discussion | 03:24 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: zun)" | 03:24 | |
hongbin_ | I have one topic to discuss, if nobody else has anyting | 03:25 |
mkrai | hongbin_, After we have the basic docker API support, what shall we work on? | 03:25 |
yanyanhu | sure, go ahead plz | 03:25 |
hongbin_ | mkrai: There are several priority | 03:25 |
mkrai | We should decide on some features | 03:25 |
hongbin_ | mkrai: image, network, storage | 03:25 |
* sudipto_ is eavesdropping | 03:26 | |
hongbin_ | mkrai: Do you have any feature in mind? | 03:26 |
hongbin_ | sudipto_: hey | 03:26 |
mkrai | So I think we should add few of these topics in next meeting | 03:26 |
sudipto_ | sorry i am out for a customer visit... so couldn't join in time. | 03:26 |
*** acoles is now known as acoles_ | 03:26 | |
mkrai | I also feel image, storage and networking are priority | 03:27 |
hongbin_ | mkrai: sure, will start exploring additional topics next time | 03:27 |
hongbin_ | sudipto_: NP at all | 03:27 |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
*** hongbin_ has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
mkrai | Let's enhance the docker support first | 03:27 |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:27 | |
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:28 | |
hongbin | hey | 03:28 |
mkrai | Thanks hongbin | 03:28 |
hongbin | Not sure why my name changed | 03:28 |
hongbin | .... | 03:28 |
yanyanhu | haha | 03:28 |
hongbin | OK. Let's continue | 03:28 |
sudipto_ | yeah my view is the same, the mesos updates can wait till we finalise the docker support... | 03:28 |
hongbin | sudipto_: ack | 03:29 |
hongbin | For the next priority, I remembered we have an etherpad to list them | 03:29 |
* hongbin is finding the etherpad | 03:29 | |
*** hurricanerix has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
hongbin | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/container-management-service | 03:30 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
*** larainema has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:30 | |
hongbin | Several things in the list | 03:31 |
hongbin | 1. Implement a simple scheduler | 03:31 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:31 | |
hongbin | 2. Neutron integration | 03:31 |
mkrai | yes let's list it somewhere so that contributors can take it | 03:32 |
hongbin | 3. Cinder integration | 03:32 |
hongbin | mkrai: sure. First, we needs to decide which one is the priority first | 03:32 |
hongbin | 4. Glance integration | 03:32 |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 03:32 | |
mkrai | Yes | 03:32 |
hongbin | mkrai: Do we have a Keystone integration ready? | 03:33 |
vikasc | neutron intergration should be easiest one | 03:33 |
*** merooney has quit IRC | 03:33 | |
mkrai | Yes | 03:33 |
vikasc | since kuryr already supports libnetwork | 03:33 |
hongbin | vikasc: hopefully, it is easy | 03:34 |
*** csomerville has quit IRC | 03:34 | |
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:34 | |
vikasc | and kuryr currently supports baremetal only | 03:34 |
hongbin | mkrai: How about multi-tenancy? | 03:34 |
mkrai | hongbin, No it is not yet supported | 03:35 |
hongbin | mkrai: ack. I think multi-tenancy is very important | 03:35 |
mkrai | We need to look into it | 03:35 |
mkrai | Yes agree | 03:35 |
hongbin | #action hongbin created a BP for multi-tenancy support | 03:35 |
hongbin | Anything else? | 03:36 |
hongbin | 5. Host management | 03:36 |
hongbin | 6. Magnum integration | 03:36 |
yanyanhu | also Composition maybe | 03:37 |
yanyanhu | but not urgent | 03:37 |
hongbin | yanyanhu: ack | 03:37 |
mkrai | Shall we pick some priority topics to be included in next meeting? | 03:37 |
hongbin | mkrai: if you want, yes | 03:37 |
mkrai | I think multi tenancy and glance integration is priority I feel | 03:38 |
sudipto_ | mkrai, totally agreed. I think we have to narrow our focus to get something working first. | 03:38 |
hongbin | sudipto_: mkrai get the basic of runtime API working already | 03:38 |
sudipto_ | hongbin, oh great. I wasn't aware. | 03:39 |
yanyanhu | +1 as well for glance integration and multi-tenancy support | 03:39 |
sudipto_ | Maybe i could do some code reviews - if you guys add me? | 03:39 |
mkrai | sure sudipto_ I will add you | 03:39 |
hongbin | sudipto_: as core reviewer? | 03:39 |
sudipto_ | hongbin, well i didn't ask for that :) A basic reviewer would do too. | 03:40 |
hongbin | sudipto_: a basic review don't need to be added :) | 03:40 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 03:40 | |
hongbin | However, I can propose you to be a core | 03:40 |
mkrai | +1 for it hongbin :) | 03:41 |
sudipto_ | hongbin, alright sounds good! | 03:41 |
yanyanhu | +1 from me | 03:41 |
hongbin | sudipto_: will propose you later | 03:41 |
sudipto_ | hongbin, ok thanks! | 03:41 |
hongbin | anyone else want to become a core. Please contact me as well | 03:41 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:41 | |
hongbin | OK. Back to the Glance integration. | 03:42 |
hongbin | We have about 17 minutes left, want to discuss Glance integration now? | 03:42 |
*** myoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:42 | |
mkrai | I see glance integration is taken by Fei long | 03:42 |
hongbin | flwang: ^^ | 03:43 |
sudipto_ | flwang, are you there? | 03:43 |
hongbin | I am not sure if you guys know. Glare has been splitted out from Glance | 03:43 |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:43 | |
sudipto_ | I am not really sure where glance is going. | 03:43 |
sudipto_ | with Glare and all that. | 03:44 |
yanyanhu | yes, long thread in mailing list :) | 03:44 |
yanyanhu | some discussion (argument as well :P ) | 03:44 |
hongbin | Yes, it is a long debate | 03:44 |
hongbin | Glare's API is suitable to implement layers of docker images | 03:45 |
hongbin | Basically, Glare is like a superset of Glance | 03:46 |
yanyanhu | oh, I thought it is for template storing before | 03:46 |
hongbin | yanyanhu: It seems it is not. It is a model to represent the image and its meta-data | 03:46 |
yanyanhu | I see | 03:46 |
yanyanhu | so basically add versioning support | 03:47 |
hongbin | What we needs is the ability to express dependencies between image layers | 03:47 |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:47 | |
hongbin | which Glare can do | 03:47 |
sudipto_ | so you want to detach yourself from the docker hub and create a private registry of sorts? | 03:48 |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 03:48 | |
hongbin | sudipto_: Yes, that is an alternative | 03:48 |
flwang | sorry | 03:48 |
flwang | back | 03:48 |
hongbin | flwang: hey | 03:49 |
hongbin | flwang: I guess you saw the news that Glare was splited out? | 03:49 |
flwang | yep i know | 03:49 |
hongbin | flwang: Then, what the Glare API will look like, a superset of Glance API? | 03:49 |
flwang | and as the discussion with nikhil, implement the layer in glance is most like 'impossible' | 03:49 |
flwang | hongbin: it's an artifacts repo | 03:50 |
flwang | not a superset of glance api | 03:50 |
hongbin | flwang: I see | 03:50 |
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:50 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 03:51 | |
flwang | in other words, or IMHO, it's most like a definition for an OS/image | 03:51 |
*** dsunkum has quit IRC | 03:51 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:51 | |
flwang | it can define very detailed attributes of an image | 03:51 |
hongbin | flwang: but the image blob data must store somewhere? | 03:51 |
sudipto_ | till glance and glare sorts out stuff, should we just go with a private registry? | 03:52 |
*** itzdilip has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:52 | |
flwang | i would say the image data is still in glance | 03:52 |
flwang | sudipto_: that's a reasonable option | 03:52 |
flwang | since i can see it will still last very long time to settle down | 03:53 |
sudipto_ | flwang, same feelings. | 03:53 |
hongbin | The weakness of docker registry is the multi-tenancy support | 03:53 |
hongbin | and keystone | 03:53 |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 03:53 | |
flwang | hongbin: right | 03:54 |
hongbin | It looks docker registry is single tenant, that means we need to setup one registry per tenant | 03:54 |
hongbin | or modify the docker registry to make it compatible with multi-tennacy model | 03:54 |
flwang | hongbin: and it's hard to maintain i think | 03:54 |
hongbin | flwang: I might have a crazy idea. Have Glance backed by docker registry | 03:55 |
hongbin | so that we use Glance API at front, use docker registry as a backend | 03:56 |
flwang | hongbin: that's the initial plan I discussed with Sam | 03:56 |
flwang | years ago | 03:56 |
flwang | but i can't remember the details now :( | 03:56 |
hongbin | sounds like the idea was rejected | 03:56 |
flwang | because even if you can work out docker registry as a glance backend, you still have to make glance respect the layers | 03:58 |
flwang | right? | 03:58 |
hongbin | flwang: maybe not | 03:58 |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:58 | |
flwang | how? | 03:58 |
sudipto_ | how about an offline mailing list discussion on this? maybe not to the whole community but with a few of us in it? | 03:58 |
flwang | ok, sure | 03:58 |
sudipto_ | coz we are on the brink of the hour. | 03:58 |
hongbin | sure... | 03:58 |
flwang | let's back to zun channel | 03:58 |
hongbin | All, thanks for joining the meeting | 03:59 |
hongbin | #endmeeting | 03:59 |
hongbin | ... | 03:59 |
Namrata | thanks.. | 03:59 |
*** hongbin_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:59 | |
mkrai | Meetbot isn't working? | 03:59 |
hongbin_ | #endmeeting | 04:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 04:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 04:00:00 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 04:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zun/2016/zun.2016-08-09-03.00.html | 04:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zun/2016/zun.2016-08-09-03.00.txt | 04:00 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zun/2016/zun.2016-08-09-03.00.log.html | 04:00 |
*** sudipto_ has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** hongbin has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:02 | |
*** jamespage has quit IRC | 04:02 | |
*** b1airo has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:02 | |
*** hongbin_ has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 04:06 | |
*** vinayp__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:09 | |
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:09 | |
*** vinayp__ has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:11 | |
*** mkrai has quit IRC | 04:12 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:12 | |
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:13 | |
*** vinayp has left #openstack-meeting | 04:14 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:16 | |
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:18 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 04:20 | |
*** Na3iL has quit IRC | 04:20 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:22 | |
*** 16WAAYRKN has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:22 | |
*** unicell has quit IRC | 04:24 | |
*** mkrai has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:28 | |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:29 | |
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:29 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 04:32 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:32 | |
*** rossella_s has quit IRC | 04:38 | |
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:38 | |
*** Namrata has quit IRC | 04:40 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 04:42 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:43 | |
*** trozet has quit IRC | 04:45 | |
*** trozet has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:45 | |
*** yanyanhu has left #openstack-meeting | 04:48 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:49 | |
*** 16WAAYRKN has quit IRC | 04:49 | |
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:49 | |
*** coolsvap_ is now known as coolsvap | 04:51 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:52 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 04:55 | |
*** Poornima has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:57 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:58 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 04:58 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:59 | |
*** mtanino has quit IRC | 05:01 | |
*** r-mibu has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:02 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 05:02 | |
*** moizarif has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:02 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 05:03 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:03 | |
*** sudipto_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:05 | |
*** liusheng has quit IRC | 05:05 | |
*** moizarif_ has quit IRC | 05:06 | |
*** shubhams has left #openstack-meeting | 05:06 | |
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:07 | |
*** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:11 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 05:13 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 05:13 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:13 | |
*** AmitGalitz has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:14 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:17 | |
*** roxanaghe has quit IRC | 05:17 | |
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC | 05:20 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:21 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 05:21 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 05:23 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:23 | |
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:24 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
*** jtomasek_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:26 | |
*** jtomasek has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:29 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:31 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 05:33 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:34 | |
*** comay has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
*** unicell has quit IRC | 05:35 | |
*** unicell1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:35 | |
*** jtomasek_ is now known as jtomasek | 05:37 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 05:38 | |
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:40 | |
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:42 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:43 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 05:43 | |
*** trozet has quit IRC | 05:44 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:44 | |
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:47 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 05:48 | |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 05:49 | |
*** andymaier has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:51 | |
*** andymaier has quit IRC | 05:52 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 05:54 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:54 | |
*** nkrinner_afk is now known as nkrinner | 06:01 | |
*** zhangguoqing has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:04 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 06:04 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:04 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:05 | |
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:05 | |
*** roxanaghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:08 | |
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:10 | |
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:10 | |
*** kaminohana has quit IRC | 06:10 | |
*** ebalduf has quit IRC | 06:12 | |
*** roxanaghe has quit IRC | 06:13 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 06:14 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:15 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:17 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:19 | |
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:20 | |
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:21 | |
*** unicell1 has quit IRC | 06:21 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 06:22 | |
*** saju_m has quit IRC | 06:23 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 06:24 | |
*** radeks has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:24 | |
*** scottda has quit IRC | 06:25 | |
*** sweston has quit IRC | 06:26 | |
*** scottda has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:26 | |
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:26 | |
*** yuval has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:27 | |
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:27 | |
*** ttx has quit IRC | 06:27 | |
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:28 | |
*** Poornima has quit IRC | 06:29 | |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 06:31 | |
*** adiantum has quit IRC | 06:33 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 06:35 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:35 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 06:36 | |
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:37 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:39 | |
*** ihrachys has quit IRC | 06:39 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:41 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:42 | |
*** Poornima has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:44 | |
*** tesseract- has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:45 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 06:45 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:45 | |
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:45 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:47 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 06:47 | |
*** mickeys has quit IRC | 06:50 | |
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap_ | 06:51 | |
*** nkrinner is now known as nkrinner_afk | 06:52 | |
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC | 06:54 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 06:55 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:55 | |
*** rbartal has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:57 | |
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:57 | |
yamamoto | #startmeeting networking_midonet | 07:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 07:00:35 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is yamamoto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 07:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 07:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)" | 07:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'networking_midonet' | 07:00 |
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:01 | |
*** mkrai has left #openstack-meeting | 07:01 | |
yamamoto | #topic Agenda | 07:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)" | 07:04 | |
yamamoto | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NetworkingMidoNet | 07:04 |
yamamoto | not much agenda | 07:04 |
yamamoto | #topic Announcements | 07:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)" | 07:04 | |
yamamoto | nothing from me | 07:05 |
yamamoto | #topic Bugs | 07:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)" | 07:05 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 07:05 | |
yamamoto | we had gate blocking issues recently but most of them have been solved | 07:06 |
yamamoto | #topic Open Discussion | 07:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: networking_midonet)" | 07:06 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:06 | |
* yamamoto waiting for a while before closing the meeting | 07:06 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 07:07 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:11 | |
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 07:11 | |
*** tung_doan has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:13 | |
*** tung_doan has quit IRC | 07:14 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 07:16 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:16 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:18 | |
yamamoto | thank you! | 07:20 |
yamamoto | #endmeeting | 07:20 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 07:20 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 07:20:42 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 07:20 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_midonet/2016/networking_midonet.2016-08-09-07.00.html | 07:20 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_midonet/2016/networking_midonet.2016-08-09-07.00.txt | 07:20 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_midonet/2016/networking_midonet.2016-08-09-07.00.log.html | 07:20 |
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:21 | |
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:22 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 07:23 | |
*** jlanoux has quit IRC | 07:24 | |
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:24 | |
*** saju_m has quit IRC | 07:25 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 07:25 | |
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC | 07:25 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 07:26 | |
*** ddeja has left #openstack-meeting | 07:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:27 | |
*** elo has quit IRC | 07:31 | |
*** sshnaidm|afk has quit IRC | 07:32 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 07:33 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 07:36 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:37 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:37 | |
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:38 | |
*** khushbu has quit IRC | 07:40 | |
*** mikelk has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:40 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:43 | |
*** david-lyle_ has quit IRC | 07:46 | |
*** bvandenh has quit IRC | 07:46 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 07:46 | |
*** matthewbodkin has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:46 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:47 | |
*** anilvenkata is now known as anilvenkata_afk | 07:51 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:51 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:51 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 07:51 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:54 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 07:57 | |
*** coolsvap_ is now known as coolsvap | 07:58 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 07:59 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:00 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 08:00 | |
*** jamespag` has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:02 | |
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:03 | |
*** jamespag` is now known as jamespage | 08:03 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:03 | |
*** radeks has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 08:06 | |
*** dmacpher has quit IRC | 08:06 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:07 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 08:07 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:08 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:08 | |
*** pece has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:08 | |
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:09 | |
*** liuhanxi has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:10 | |
*** sshnaidm|afk has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:11 | |
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm | 08:11 | |
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC | 08:13 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 08:15 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 08:17 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:18 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:19 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 08:23 | |
*** khushbu has quit IRC | 08:24 | |
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
*** zhhuabj_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:27 | |
*** anilvenkata_afk is now known as anilvenkata | 08:28 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:28 | |
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC | 08:29 | |
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:31 | |
*** yassine is now known as Guest73697 | 08:32 | |
*** vikasc has quit IRC | 08:33 | |
*** zhhuabj_ has quit IRC | 08:34 | |
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:35 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:35 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 08:37 | |
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:37 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
*** rossella_s has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:38 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:39 | |
*** myoung is now known as myoung|afk | 08:40 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 08:41 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:42 | |
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles | 08:43 | |
*** mickeys has quit IRC | 08:44 | |
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:44 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 08:45 | |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:46 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 08:48 | |
*** mickeys has quit IRC | 08:48 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:49 | |
*** zhhuabj_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:50 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:52 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:53 | |
*** xiangxinyong has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:55 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 08:57 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 08:58 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:59 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:00 | |
*** roxanaghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:00 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:01 | |
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:01 | |
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:01 | |
*** zhonghua-lee has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:02 | |
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 09:02 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 09:05 | |
*** roxanaghe has quit IRC | 09:06 | |
*** electrofelix has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:08 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 09:08 | |
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap_ | 09:09 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:09 | |
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 09:16 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 09:19 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:20 | |
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:20 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:20 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 09:20 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:22 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 09:24 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 09:25 | |
*** zhhuabj_ has quit IRC | 09:27 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 09:29 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 09:30 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:30 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:36 | |
*** dixiaoli has quit IRC | 09:39 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 09:39 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:40 | |
*** zhhuabj_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:40 | |
*** numans has quit IRC | 09:46 | |
*** mrunge_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:46 | |
*** mrunge has quit IRC | 09:47 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 09:49 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:50 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 09:51 | |
*** vikasc has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:54 | |
*** ivc_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:59 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:00 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:01 | |
*** ivc_ has quit IRC | 10:01 | |
*** HeOS has quit IRC | 10:03 | |
*** ivc_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:03 | |
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:03 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
*** Nakato has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
*** zhurong_ has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
*** Nakato has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:06 | |
*** radeks has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:07 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:07 | |
*** zhangguoqing has quit IRC | 10:08 | |
*** Mishra has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:09 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 10:10 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 10:10 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:11 | |
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:11 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:11 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 10:20 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:20 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:21 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 10:24 | |
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:25 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 10:25 | |
*** Mishra has quit IRC | 10:27 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 10:30 | |
*** ntpttr- has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:31 | |
*** jlanoux_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:31 | |
*** jlanoux has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
*** ntpttr has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:39 | |
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|lnch | 10:39 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 10:41 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:41 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:41 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:46 | |
*** roxanaghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:48 | |
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:50 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:52 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:53 | |
*** roxanaghe has quit IRC | 10:53 | |
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:54 | |
*** jlanoux_ has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
*** Guest73697 has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 10:58 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC | 10:59 | |
*** zhangguoqing has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:01 | |
*** obondarev has quit IRC | 11:01 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 11:01 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:02 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:02 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:03 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 11:04 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 11:06 | |
*** tommylike__hu has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:07 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 11:08 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:08 | |
*** epico has quit IRC | 11:09 | |
*** r-mibu has quit IRC | 11:11 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 11:11 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:12 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 11:13 | |
*** tommylike__hu has quit IRC | 11:14 | |
*** rtheis has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:14 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:14 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 11:15 | |
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:16 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:16 | |
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC | 11:16 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 11:19 | |
*** r-mibu has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:19 | |
*** sudipto_ has quit IRC | 11:20 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:21 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 11:22 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:22 | |
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC | 11:24 | |
*** sudipto has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:24 | |
*** sshnaidm|lnch is now known as sshnaidm | 11:25 | |
*** kaminohana has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:25 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 11:25 | |
*** alyson_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:28 | |
*** ericksonsantos has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:29 | |
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:29 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 11:30 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 11:32 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:33 | |
*** samP has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
*** anilvenkata is now known as anilvenkata_afk | 11:35 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:35 | |
*** oferby has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
*** oferby has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:39 | |
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:39 | |
*** coolsvap_ is now known as coolsvap | 11:39 | |
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:41 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 11:42 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:42 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:43 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:43 | |
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:45 | |
*** ihrachys has quit IRC | 11:47 | |
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:47 | |
*** sudipto has quit IRC | 11:47 | |
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:50 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:51 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 11:51 | |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:52 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 11:53 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:53 | |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:54 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 11:56 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:56 | |
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk | 11:56 | |
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:57 | |
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:00 | |
*** yassine is now known as Guest7370 | 12:01 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:01 | |
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:02 | |
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:02 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:02 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:04 | |
*** ivyyy_ is now known as ivyyy | 12:04 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 12:07 | |
*** sridharg has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:09 | |
*** sudipto has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:12 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:14 | |
*** mrmartin has quit IRC | 12:14 | |
*** sudipto has quit IRC | 12:14 | |
*** anilvenkata_afk is now known as anilvenkata | 12:15 | |
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:15 | |
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:15 | |
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:20 | |
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:23 | |
tommylikehu_ | who is openstack | 12:23 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:24 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:26 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:27 | |
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:27 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 12:28 | |
*** tpsilva has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:28 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
*** ayoung has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm | 12:33 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:34 | |
*** maeca1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:35 | |
*** sshnaidm has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:35 | |
*** roxanaghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:36 | |
*** rossella_s has quit IRC | 12:38 | |
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:39 | |
*** uxdanielle has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:39 | |
*** uxdanielle has quit IRC | 12:39 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:39 | |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:40 | |
*** roxanaghe has quit IRC | 12:41 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:43 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:44 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:45 | |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 12:45 | |
*** lbrune has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:46 | |
*** guoshan_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:47 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 12:47 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:49 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:49 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 12:50 | |
*** jrist has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
*** Hosam has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:53 | |
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:53 | |
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:54 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 12:54 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 12:54 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:55 | |
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:55 | |
*** numans has quit IRC | 12:55 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:56 | |
*** epcim has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:58 | |
*** kylek3h has quit IRC | 12:58 | |
*** sshnaidm has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:58 | |
*** coolsvap is now known as _coolsvap_ | 12:58 | |
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:59 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:59 | |
Qiming | #startmeeting senlin | 13:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 13:00:19 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Qiming. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: senlin)" | 13:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'senlin' | 13:00 |
*** zul_ has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
Qiming | hello? | 13:00 |
*** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:01 | |
*** elynn has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:01 | |
*** lixinhui_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:01 | |
*** liuhanxi has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
*** andymaier has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:01 | |
*** dslevin has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
elynn | o/ | 13:02 |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 13:03 | |
Qiming | hi, elynn | 13:03 |
guoshan_ | hi, everyone~ | 13:03 |
elynn | evening Qiming | 13:03 |
Qiming | hi, guoshan_ | 13:03 |
*** myoung|afk is now known as myoung | 13:04 | |
Qiming | pls feel free to add items to the meeting agenda | 13:04 |
Qiming | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SenlinAgenda#Weekly_Senlin_.28Clustering.29_meeting | 13:04 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 13:04 | |
Qiming | due to firewall problem, adding meeting items is not easy now, we have to use proxy | 13:04 |
Qiming | yanyan cannot join us today, I heard nothing from xinhui or haiwei | 13:05 |
Qiming | let's get started? | 13:05 |
guoshan_ | ok, It's my first time in IRC meeting | 13:05 |
Qiming | thanks, guoshan_ | 13:05 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:05 | |
*** zul_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:05 | |
Qiming | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/senlin-newton-workitems | 13:05 |
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:06 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
Qiming | let's go thru the etherpad and see where we are | 13:06 |
lixinhui_ | hi | 13:06 |
Qiming | yanyan has updated the etherpad for Rally support | 13:07 |
Qiming | hi, lixinhui_ | 13:07 |
Qiming | we just got started | 13:07 |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:07 | |
Qiming | the Rally side support was just merged, Roman has help review another patch in senlin code base, which is good ... | 13:07 |
Qiming | I'm not gonna copy/paste yanyan's update here | 13:08 |
*** trozet has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:08 | |
Qiming | please read it | 13:08 |
Qiming | Will delete those text later | 13:08 |
Qiming | integration test | 13:08 |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:08 | |
Qiming | test job has been merged at gate side | 13:08 |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 13:08 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:08 | |
Qiming | we found things to be fixed related to neutron set up | 13:09 |
Qiming | these tests are pretty important for us to ensure we are not breaking any contracts with any other services | 13:09 |
*** piet has quit IRC | 13:10 | |
*** b1airo has quit IRC | 13:10 | |
Qiming | at the same time, I'm working on revising the docs about testing infrastructure | 13:10 |
Qiming | #link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/senlin/tree/doc/source/developer/testing.rst | 13:10 |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:10 | |
Qiming | the current doc is only about unit tests | 13:10 |
Qiming | while we have added api test, functional test, integration test and stress test (ongoing) | 13:11 |
Qiming | need to update the docs so we all know how to run them in our local env | 13:11 |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
Qiming | pls help review the patches and see if there things to be fixed | 13:12 |
*** Poornima has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
Qiming | https://review.openstack.org/347654 | 13:12 |
guoshan_ | sure, pleasure to do that | 13:12 |
*** cleong has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:12 | |
Qiming | https://review.openstack.org/348110 | 13:12 |
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:12 | |
Qiming | moving on ... | 13:12 |
Qiming | health management | 13:12 |
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:13 | |
Qiming | lixinhui_, the LB member status one is fixed? | 13:13 |
lixinhui_ | 2 of 3 patches have been approved | 13:14 |
lixinhui_ | the root one is pending for cores' approval | 13:14 |
Qiming | great | 13:14 |
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:14 | |
*** julim has quit IRC | 13:14 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 13:14 | |
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:14 | |
*** kylek3h has quit IRC | 13:14 | |
Qiming | next thing is about fencing | 13:15 |
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:15 | |
Qiming | I know you have added some support into python-openstacksdk side | 13:15 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:15 | |
Qiming | those are already well shaped, just address brian's concern would be fine | 13:15 |
lixinhui_ | neutron-lbaas community is not very active | 13:15 |
lixinhui_ | I added Armando as reviewer | 13:15 |
lixinhui_ | hope he can help | 13:15 |
lixinhui_ | in future, Octavia will replace lbaas | 13:15 |
lixinhui_ | Brian just add comments there | 13:16 |
Qiming | yep | 13:16 |
lixinhui_ | okay | 13:16 |
lixinhui_ | I will followup soon | 13:16 |
Qiming | for those of you who are not aware of these patches: | 13:16 |
Qiming | https://review.openstack.org/352723 | 13:16 |
Qiming | https://review.openstack.org/351061 | 13:16 |
Qiming | these are the ones added to sdk so that we can invoke nova service operations later -- for fencing's purpose | 13:17 |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:17 | |
Qiming | moving on to next item | 13:17 |
Qiming | documentation, not much update from me | 13:17 |
*** baoli has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
Qiming | but I did submitted some patches about api docs | 13:18 |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:18 | |
Qiming | one thing to notice is that the global version requirement of os-api-ref has been bumped to 0.4.0 | 13:18 |
*** permalac has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:18 | |
Qiming | which means it has a better support to success code and error code now | 13:19 |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:19 | |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 13:19 | |
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:19 | |
Qiming | if you are interested in it, you can check this subsection: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-api-ref/tree/doc/source/usage.rst#n185 | 13:20 |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:20 | |
*** cardeois has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:20 | |
Qiming | moving on to next one | 13:20 |
Qiming | profile/policy version control | 13:20 |
*** qwebirc78847 has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:20 | |
Qiming | yanyan has proposed a patch which I forgot to review | 13:20 |
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:21 | |
Qiming | please jump on to it when you have time | 13:21 |
Qiming | it is very important a feature, though in future we plan to generalize versioning control of many things | 13:21 |
Qiming | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348709/ | 13:22 |
elynn | will review it later. | 13:22 |
Qiming | ^ is the patch | 13:22 |
Qiming | thx elynn | 13:22 |
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:23 | |
Qiming | next topic is container cluster support | 13:23 |
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:23 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:23 | |
Qiming | haiwei has a new patchset for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349906 | 13:23 |
Qiming | though it still not comprehensive, as a working prototype, it looks not bad | 13:23 |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 13:24 | |
Qiming | also need reviews from you | 13:24 |
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC | 13:24 | |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 13:24 | |
Qiming | haiwei is not online today, seems | 13:24 |
Qiming | so we move on to next one | 13:24 |
Qiming | zaqar receiver support | 13:24 |
Qiming | yanyan has been pushing hard on zaqar support at sdk side | 13:25 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 13:25 | |
Qiming | due to api doc and some implementation nits, the patches are still pending for review/merge | 13:25 |
Qiming | but we are pretty close to get it done | 13:25 |
Qiming | next one | 13:26 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:26 | |
Qiming | events/notifications | 13:26 |
Qiming | not update from me on this, probably we won't have time to get it done in newton | 13:26 |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:26 | |
*** liuhanxi has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:26 | |
Qiming | some updates on cluster-collect | 13:27 |
Qiming | the senlin side has a fix to the docs merged: https://review.openstack.org/350982 | 13:28 |
Qiming | and finally we got API micro-versioning support merged in openstacksdk: https://review.openstack.org/343992 | 13:28 |
Qiming | following that, we got a new API (collect_cluster_attrs) merged: https://review.openstack.org/350978 | 13:29 |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:29 | |
*** vikasc has quit IRC | 13:29 | |
Qiming | I'm now working at senlinclient side on the micro-versioning and cluster-collect operation support | 13:29 |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
Qiming | the output is something like this: | 13:31 |
Qiming | $ senlin cluster-collect -p details.addresses.private[0] c1 | 13:31 |
Qiming | WARNING (shell) "senlin cluster-collect" is deprecated, please use "openstack cluster collect" instead. | 13:31 |
Qiming | 10.0.0.12 | 13:31 |
Qiming | 10.0.0.13 | 13:31 |
Qiming | 10.0.0.14 | 13:31 |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:31 | |
elynn | looks great! | 13:31 |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 13:31 | |
Qiming | and also this: | 13:32 |
Qiming | $ openstack cluster collect -f value -c attr_value --path details.addresses.private[0] c1 | 13:32 |
Qiming | 10.0.0.12 | 13:32 |
Qiming | 10.0.0.13 | 13:32 |
Qiming | 10.0.0.14 | 13:32 |
Qiming | need to add test cases then commit the patch | 13:32 |
elynn | a question, how would the users know what kind of attributes they can get? | 13:33 |
Qiming | it is a JSON path | 13:33 |
*** jckasper_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:33 | |
Qiming | when you do senlin node-show <node_id> | 13:33 |
Qiming | you get the attributes | 13:33 |
elynn | oh, I see. | 13:33 |
Qiming | then you think to yourself, how can I get all the values from all nodes instead of doing cluster node-show one by one | 13:34 |
Qiming | well, that is when you decide to use senlin cluster-collect or openstack cluster collect | 13:34 |
*** rodrigods has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
Qiming | by the way, just found a bug in sdk and proposed a patch | 13:35 |
Qiming | https://review.openstack.org/352853 | 13:35 |
elynn | Glad that we could provide this API. | 13:35 |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
*** rodrigods has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:35 | |
*** bill_az_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:35 | |
Qiming | when senlin is retrieving the details about a nova server, the 'image' property disappeared, so does the 'flavor' property | 13:36 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:36 | |
Qiming | hope it can be merged soon | 13:36 |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:37 | |
Qiming | besides that, I don't have more updates | 13:37 |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:37 | |
Qiming | questions/comments about items on etherpad? | 13:37 |
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
Qiming | okay, that is a no | 13:38 |
elynn | Not from me, newton-3 will be end this month? | 13:38 |
Qiming | :) | 13:38 |
Qiming | yep, http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html | 13:38 |
Qiming | newton-3 on august 29 | 13:39 |
Qiming | rc-1 on sep 12 | 13:39 |
elynn | okay.thanks | 13:39 |
Qiming | rc-2 on sep-26 | 13:39 |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 13:40 | |
Qiming | since we don't have a lot of features pipeline | 13:40 |
Qiming | so we don't need to practice a feature freeze type of thing | 13:40 |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 13:40 | |
Qiming | just work to our best ... deliver what can be made stable | 13:41 |
Qiming | #topic open discussions | 13:41 |
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussions (Meeting topic: senlin)" | 13:41 | |
Qiming | anything else? | 13:42 |
*** sbelous has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:42 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 13:42 | |
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:42 | |
lixinhui_ | Qiming, have you tried the vertioned_nova? | 13:42 |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 13:42 | |
*** anilvenkata is now known as anilvenkata_afk | 13:42 | |
lixinhui_ | versioned_nova? | 13:42 |
Qiming | no | 13:42 |
*** ivc_ has quit IRC | 13:42 | |
Qiming | what is versioned_nova? | 13:42 |
Qiming | a software? | 13:43 |
*** sbelous has left #openstack-meeting | 13:43 | |
lixinhui_ | https://review.openstack.org/350364 | 13:44 |
Qiming | okay, you mean versioned notification from nova | 13:45 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 13:45 | |
Qiming | it is good to add versioned_notifications as a target | 13:45 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:46 | |
Qiming | my question was whether that new target can be used for notifications with 'notifications' as topic | 13:46 |
*** hoangcx has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
lixinhui_ | why that way? | 13:47 |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:47 | |
Qiming | or, a different way to ask the question ... has nova migrated all their notifications to this versioned way? | 13:47 |
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:47 | |
*** rfolco has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
lixinhui_ | is that enough to migrate all instance.update? | 13:48 |
Qiming | a safer way to add 'versioned_notifications' as a Target is to keep the old one, we won't get hurt if there are not messages with that topic | 13:48 |
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:49 | |
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:50 | |
*** liuhanxi has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
Qiming | but if nova is only migrating part of their notifications to the versioned way, ... that is bad | 13:50 |
lixinhui_ | according to the doc, original one will be retired | 13:50 |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:50 | |
lixinhui_ | why we receive two channels | 13:50 |
Qiming | I never trust their docs | 13:50 |
Qiming | they said they will work out a v3 api | 13:50 |
Qiming | they said they will split scheduler out | 13:50 |
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz | 13:51 | |
lixinhui_ | I tested instance.update and service.update | 13:51 |
*** anilvenkata_afk is now known as anilvenkata | 13:51 | |
Qiming | we can listen to two channels, if one channel is really quiet, we can delete it later | 13:51 |
Qiming | yes, I figured that | 13:51 |
Qiming | but instance.update and service.update is not the whole world, right? | 13:52 |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:52 | |
lixinhui_ | how about noisy | 13:52 |
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:52 | |
lixinhui_ | according to its design, yes | 13:52 |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:52 | |
*** yb has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:52 | |
lixinhui_ | whole world of nova notifications | 13:52 |
lixinhui_ | just throw a question here | 13:52 |
*** AmitGalitz has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
*** yb has left #openstack-meeting | 13:53 | |
lixinhui_ | we can leave the old one till compute service failure detection | 13:53 |
Qiming | a target is constructed with a 'topic' and an 'exchange' | 13:54 |
Qiming | we already set the 'exchange' to 'nova' | 13:54 |
lixinhui_ | there is no change on exchange | 13:54 |
lixinhui_ | I use Rabbitmq as message provide | 13:55 |
Qiming | the combination means, we listen to 'notifications' from 'nova' | 13:55 |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:55 | |
Qiming | if nova has migrated all its notifications to the versioned implementation | 13:55 |
Qiming | that target should be quiet | 13:55 |
*** uxdanielle has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:55 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 13:55 | |
lixinhui_ | provider | 13:55 |
lixinhui_ | and confirm no change on exchange | 13:55 |
Qiming | if it is not, it means nova is still doing the migration | 13:56 |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
Qiming | I know you didn't change exchange | 13:56 |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:56 | |
Qiming | I'm trying my best to explain to you why I think keeping the existing target doesn't hurt us | 13:56 |
*** guoshan_ has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:56 | |
*** jckasper_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:56 | |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:57 | |
*** guoshan has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:57 | |
lixinhui_ | not I change the exchange | 13:57 |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:57 | |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:57 | |
lixinhui_ | I just trying to explain the test result | 13:57 |
lixinhui_ | anyway | 13:57 |
Qiming | if nova has migrated all notifications to versioned one, the existing target will be quiet, we won't get anything from it, we are not hurt | 13:57 |
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
Qiming | you are only testing instance.update and service.update, right? | 13:58 |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:58 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:58 | |
Qiming | do we know when an instance is stopped, or deleted? using the 'instance.update' notification? | 13:58 |
*** wanghao_ has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
Qiming | or maybe the protocol has changed, I haven't looked into that for a time | 13:59 |
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:59 | |
lixinhui_ | yes | 13:59 |
Qiming | okay, I'll do some experiements to verify | 13:59 |
lixinhui_ | stop or delete are details of instance.update | 14:00 |
Qiming | thanks for bringing this up | 14:00 |
Qiming | time is up | 14:00 |
Qiming | thanks for joining, guys | 14:00 |
Qiming | #endmeeting | 14:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 14:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 14:00:21 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/senlin/2016/senlin.2016-08-09-13.00.html | 14:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/senlin/2016/senlin.2016-08-09-13.00.txt | 14:00 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/senlin/2016/senlin.2016-08-09-13.00.log.html | 14:00 |
*** _coolsvap_ is now known as coolsvap | 14:00 | |
lixinhui_ | good night | 14:01 |
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:01 | |
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:02 | |
*** yuval has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:03 | |
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz | 14:04 | |
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:04 | |
*** elynn has quit IRC | 14:05 | |
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:05 | |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 14:05 | |
*** john-davidge has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:06 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 14:06 | |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:06 | |
*** john-davidge has left #openstack-meeting | 14:06 | |
*** rrecio has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:06 | |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 14:06 | |
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 14:06 | |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** rrecio_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** guoshan has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:09 | |
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:09 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 14:10 | |
*** lixinhui_ has quit IRC | 14:10 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:10 | |
*** rrecio has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
*** Hosam has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
*** mrmartin has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
*** Hosam has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:11 | |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz | 14:12 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:12 | |
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:12 | |
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:13 | |
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom | 14:14 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:15 | |
*** Hosam has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 14:16 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 14:18 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:19 | |
*** pece has quit IRC | 14:19 | |
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:21 | |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:22 | |
*** kaminohana has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:24 | |
*** RichB has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:25 | |
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:25 | |
*** mriedem1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:25 | |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:26 | |
*** mriedem has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:26 | |
*** mrmartin has quit IRC | 14:27 | |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 14:27 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 14:28 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 14:28 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:28 | |
*** sdake_ is now known as sdake | 14:30 | |
*** jorge_munoz has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:31 | |
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:32 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 14:33 | |
*** edtubill has quit IRC | 14:34 | |
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:35 | |
*** jorge_munoz has quit IRC | 14:36 | |
*** jorge_munoz_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:36 | |
*** mriedem1 is now known as mriedem | 14:36 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:36 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 14:36 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:37 | |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
*** rbartal has quit IRC | 14:43 | |
*** obondarev has quit IRC | 14:43 | |
*** jdurgin1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:45 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:47 | |
*** pnavarro has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz | 14:52 | |
*** yuval has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:55 | |
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:55 | |
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz | 14:55 | |
*** nkrinner_afk is now known as nkrinner | 14:56 | |
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:56 | |
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:56 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 14:57 | |
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:57 | |
*** dtrainor has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:57 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:57 | |
*** xiangxinyong456 has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:58 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:58 | |
*** saggi has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:58 | |
*** chenying_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:59 | |
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:59 | |
saggi | #startmeeting smaug | 15:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 15:00:04 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is saggi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: smaug)" | 15:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'smaug' | 15:00 |
saggi | Hi everyone | 15:00 |
chenying_ | hi | 15:00 |
saggi | Are we waiting on anyone? | 15:00 |
xiangxinyong456 | hi | 15:00 |
saggi | #topic Mascot and name selection | 15:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Mascot and name selection (Meeting topic: smaug)" | 15:00 | |
saggi | OK, so I'm going to announce the name change after this meeting. | 15:01 |
*** saju_m has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
saggi | We are changing to Karbor | 15:01 |
*** banix has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
yuval | heyt | 15:01 |
yuval | o/ | 15:01 |
xiangxinyong456 | :) | 15:01 |
saggi | and our mascot will be the Tardigrade with the majority of the votes. | 15:01 |
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:02 | |
saggi | Sorry beaver got +2 | 15:02 |
yuval | do we need to wait for governance approval before we start changing the name? or can we start sending patches and update the wiki immediately? | 15:02 |
*** nkrinner is now known as nkrinner_afk | 15:03 | |
saggi | I already got approvals from Thierry | 15:03 |
*** lbrune has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
chenying_ | Ok So we can start the patches about the name change. | 15:03 |
yuval | Myself and chenying listed the things require change: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/smaug | 15:03 |
*** adiantum has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
yuval | (under Project Affected by the name change) | 15:03 |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:04 | |
yuval | We need to submit one patch to openstack/governance, and all other patches must have "Depend-On" with that change id | 15:04 |
xiangxinyong456 | I guess we have a lot of work to do | 15:04 |
yuval | once everything is set, we pass the governance patch and the rest just get merged | 15:05 |
*** mrmartin has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
yuval | I can start working on that tomorrow morning, unless someone else wish to | 15:05 |
*** zhangguoqing has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
chenying_ | Yes I can do the patches about the project smaug and client. | 15:06 |
saggi | yuval: IIRC it doesn't fix the github mirrors. We need to ask for those to be changed manually. | 15:07 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
saggi | So who does what? | 15:08 |
chenying_ | There are about ten projects. | 15:08 |
yuval | Saggi, can you do governance and mailing list announce? | 15:09 |
saggi | Yes | 15:09 |
yuval | I'll take infra, requirements and launchpad | 15:09 |
xiangxinyong456 | I could do some works | 15:09 |
chenying_ | I can do the patches about the project smaug and client. | 15:09 |
yuval | xiangxinyong456: can you do devstack and wiki? | 15:10 |
chenying_ | smaug | 15:10 |
chenying_ | python-smaugclient | 15:10 |
chenying_ | smaug-dashboard | 15:10 |
chenying_ | openstack/requirements | 15:10 |
chenying_ | openstack-infra/irc-meetings | 15:10 |
chenying_ | openstack-infra/project-config | 15:10 |
chenying_ | openstack-dev/devstack | 15:10 |
chenying_ | openstack/governance | 15:10 |
chenying_ | openstack-infra/system-config | 15:10 |
chenying_ | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Smaug | 15:10 |
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz | 15:10 | |
chenying_ | https://launchpad.net/smaug | 15:10 |
chenying_ | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/smaug | 15:10 |
xiangxinyong456 | yuval: ok | 15:10 |
zhonghua-lee | let me check and update the documents | 15:10 |
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz | 15:10 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:10 | |
xiangxinyong456 | I do Devstack and wiki | 15:11 |
chenying_ | Have we missed some prjects? | 15:11 |
yuval | updated here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/smaug | 15:12 |
saggi | Could you add everything to this list https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/karbor-migration-tasks | 15:12 |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:12 | |
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:14 | |
saggi | $ python -c "import random; print ['Beaver', 'Tardigrade'][random.randint(0,1)]" | 15:14 |
saggi | Beaver | 15:14 |
saggi | So Beaver won the tie | 15:14 |
xiangxinyong456 | :) | 15:14 |
yuval | IMO it's to similar to quokka | 15:15 |
yuval | at least tell them to draw the distinguished funny tail :) | 15:15 |
saggi | :) | 15:15 |
chenying_ | :) | 15:16 |
chenying_ | It is cute. | 15:16 |
xiangxinyong456 | beaver is good | 15:16 |
saggi | The reason is that it makes a den to store food for later | 15:16 |
saggi | I assume? | 15:16 |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:16 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:17 | |
saggi | So I will just send the emails and notify Thierry that we are starting to send patches to move things around. | 15:17 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
*** jorge_munoz_ has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
saggi | Please add the relevant patches to the etherpad so that I can track everything | 15:18 |
saggi | OK? | 15:18 |
yuval | great | 15:18 |
xiangxinyong456 | ok | 15:18 |
chenying_ | ok | 15:18 |
saggi | #topic open discussion | 15:18 |
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: smaug)" | 15:18 | |
saggi | That was the only topic for tday | 15:18 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:18 | |
saggi | We can finish early if no one has anything to add | 15:19 |
*** jlanoux has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
saggi | ... | 15:19 |
saggi | OK | 15:20 |
saggi | Than we're done | 15:20 |
chenying_ | There is a good new. One backup software verdor cv, will develop a plugin about application protection. | 15:20 |
saggi | what application? | 15:20 |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:20 | |
chenying_ | database | 15:20 |
saggi | Are they supported in Trove? | 15:21 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
chenying_ | Maybe not. local database in vm | 15:21 |
chenying_ | don't support in Trove | 15:21 |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
saggi | Than it's important that we push yuval's patches | 15:22 |
*** asettle is now known as Apsettle | 15:22 | |
saggi | since they are critical to enable proper application features | 15:22 |
*** Na3iL has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:22 | |
chenying_ | I think so. | 15:23 |
saggi | good news! | 15:23 |
saggi | let me know when the patches are up | 15:23 |
*** jorge_munoz has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:23 | |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
saggi | Anything else? | 15:23 |
chenying_ | maybe more then one backup verdors plan to develop the plugins. | 15:23 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:24 | |
saggi | For the same DB? | 15:24 |
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:24 | |
chenying_ | I don't know. | 15:24 |
saggi | Anyway, the more support we get the better | 15:24 |
saggi | :) | 15:24 |
*** karthikp_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:25 | |
* amrith sits in the back rows ... | 15:25 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:25 | |
*** andymaier has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
*** radeks has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
yuval | lol | 15:25 |
xiangxinyong456 | I see Sean fix some bugs in smaug. | 15:25 |
chenying_ | I also see it. | 15:26 |
xiangxinyong456 | he does a good job | 15:26 |
saggi | :) | 15:27 |
xiangxinyong456 | :p | 15:27 |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 15:27 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
saggi | we need to take note for these stuff | 15:28 |
saggi | I rarely check that all strings are properly translatable | 15:28 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:28 | |
saggi | Anything else? | 15:29 |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:29 | |
saggi | Things seem to be looking up. Let's hope we get more cooperation in the future. | 15:30 |
saggi | Goodbye everyone | 15:30 |
yuval | goodbye :) | 15:30 |
xiangxinyong456 | bye | 15:30 |
*** oshidoshi has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:30 | |
saggi | #endmeeting | 15:30 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 15:30 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 15:30:45 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:30 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/smaug/2016/smaug.2016-08-09-15.00.html | 15:30 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/smaug/2016/smaug.2016-08-09-15.00.txt | 15:30 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/smaug/2016/smaug.2016-08-09-15.00.log.html | 15:30 |
*** Apsettle is now known as asettle | 15:30 | |
*** yuval has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
*** mageshgv has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:31 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:31 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:31 | |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
*** xiangxinyong456 has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
*** banix has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
*** ntpttr__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:33 | |
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:33 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:35 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:35 | |
*** belmoreira has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:37 | |
*** chenying_ has quit IRC | 15:37 | |
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:38 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 15:38 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:39 | |
*** leeantho has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:39 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:40 | |
*** numan_ has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:42 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:44 | |
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC | 15:45 | |
*** singhj has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:46 | |
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:46 | |
*** numan_ has quit IRC | 15:47 | |
*** sridharg has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:48 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:50 | |
*** tesseract- has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 15:52 | |
*** neel has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:53 | |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:53 | |
*** mikelk has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
*** cdnchris has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:54 | |
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:55 | |
*** xuan0802 has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:55 | |
*** xuan0802 has quit IRC | 15:56 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:56 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:56 | |
*** tbh has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:57 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:57 | |
*** tung_doan has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:57 | |
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:58 | |
*** Jeffreyc42 has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:58 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
*** xuan_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:59 | |
*** sripriya has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:59 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:59 | |
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
*** baumann has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 16:00 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** pnavarro has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** singhj has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:01 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** obondarev has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
*** banix has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:03 | |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:04 | |
*** KanagarajM has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:04 | |
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:04 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
*** RichB has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:04 | |
sridhar_ram | #startmeeting tacker | 16:04 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 16:04:48 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sridhar_ram. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:04 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:04 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'tacker' | 16:04 |
sridhar_ram | #topic Roll Call | 16:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:05 | |
vishwanathj | o/ | 16:05 |
sridhar_ram | who is here? | 16:05 |
neel | o/ | 16:05 |
*** seldenr has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:05 | |
sridhar_ram | .. for tacker meeting :) | 16:05 |
tung_doan | o/ | 16:05 |
tbh | o/ | 16:05 |
sripriya | o/ | 16:05 |
manikanta_tadi | Hi all | 16:05 |
janki | o/ | 16:05 |
KanagarajM | o/ | 16:05 |
sridhar_ram | Good to see you all ! | 16:05 |
xuan_ | o/ | 16:05 |
*** matthewbodkin has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:05 | |
sridhar_ram | lets start.. sorry for the delay | 16:06 |
sridhar_ram | #topic Agenda | 16:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:06 | |
sridhar_ram | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Tacker | 16:06 |
bobh | o/ | 16:06 |
sridhar_ram | we have lot to discuss.. | 16:06 |
sridhar_ram | #topic Annoucements | 16:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Annoucements (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:06 | |
*** natarajk has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:07 | |
*** zhurong has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
sridhar_ram | Thanks everyone for joining the Tacker Midycle Meetup ... i know it was lot of time commitment across two days | 16:07 |
trozet | o/ | 16:07 |
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:07 | |
sridhar_ram | #info https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tacker-newton-midcycle | 16:07 |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
*** baoli_ has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
*** pnavarro has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
sridhar_ram | #topic Newton Release timeline | 16:08 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Newton Release timeline (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:08 | |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:08 | |
*** unicell has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
sridhar_ram | #link http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html | 16:08 |
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:09 | |
sridhar_ram | Given we are big-tent project.. we need to adhere to the openstack release teams deadlines.. | 16:09 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
sridhar_ram | Our project is marked as "release-with-intermediary" | 16:09 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:09 | |
manikanta_tadi | So Aug 29 is the deadline for code freeze ? | 16:10 |
sridhar_ram | .. for based on that and the newton schedule above, here is the plan.. | 16:10 |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: will explain in a minute | 16:10 |
manikanta_tadi | sridhar_ram: Ok | 16:10 |
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:10 | |
sridhar_ram | #info Final release of tackerclient is on Aug 29th | 16:10 |
sridhar_ram | This means all tackerclient changes - CLIs, API clients - needs to be finished by Aug 26th (Friday) | 16:11 |
sridhar_ram | After this date no CLI change is possible for Newton | 16:11 |
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:12 | |
sridhar_ram | for e.g. CLI portion of vnffg, scaling, audit-event log to wrap up by this date | 16:12 |
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 16:12 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:12 | |
sridhar_ram | #info Intermediary release of tacker & tacker-horizon on Aug 29th | 16:12 |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 16:12 | |
sridhar_ram | this is a check point newton release for tacker (non-client) portions | 16:12 |
*** banix has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
sripriya | sridhar_ram: does this include tacker-horizon freeze? | 16:13 |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:13 | |
sridhar_ram | If your feature this wrapped up by Aug 26th it will get released as part of it.. | 16:13 |
*** tswanson_ has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
sridhar_ram | sripriya: no.. tacker & tacker-horizon always gets released together | 16:14 |
sridhar_ram | #info Final release of tacker & tacker-horizon on Sep 23rd | 16:14 |
*** santoshk has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:14 | |
sripriya | sridhar_ram: ok | 16:14 |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 16:14 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:14 | |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 16:15 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 16:15 | |
sridhar_ram | We also need at least 1 - 2 weeks to take care of integration issues.. | 16:15 |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:16 | |
sridhar_ram | that puts us to Sep 12th as the code-freeze date to make it to newton | 16:16 |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: so, in short we have time till Aug 26th for CLI and Sept 12 for server & horizon changes | 16:17 |
sridhar_ram | Any questions ? | 16:17 |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
manikanta_tadi | sridhar_ram: Thanks for clear insight | 16:18 |
sridhar_ram | We have a quick challenging time last time during Mitaka release, as we had teething integration and Critical bugs in the last week | 16:18 |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
sridhar_ram | I'd like to avoid getting us in that situation this time around.. | 16:19 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
sridhar_ram | So, we might need to punt some features that are not "release ready" to the follow on Ocata release | 16:19 |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:19 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:20 | |
sridhar_ram | Looking for the team's support in making a feature rich but at the same time well rounded release - less bugs, better docs, etc | 16:20 |
sridhar_ram | will stop my soap box now :) | 16:20 |
sridhar_ram | please reach out if you think ur feature won't be able to make it in these deadlines | 16:21 |
sridhar_ram | moving on.. | 16:21 |
sripriya | sridhar_ram: is it possible to provide any critical fixes of these features after the release? | 16:21 |
*** dkushwaha has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:21 | |
sridhar_ram | sripriya: yes, you can .. a critical bug fix can go into stable/newton branch at anytime.. but there are some restrictions | 16:22 |
sridhar_ram | like .. (a) no requirements.txt changes are allowed - you can pull in new dependencies | 16:22 |
sripriya | sridhar_ram: hoping we don’t have to :-) | 16:22 |
sridhar_ram | (b) no db migration scripts are allowed | 16:23 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya: yep, stable team at times asks teams to revert a patchset if it violates this policy | 16:23 |
sridhar_ram | it is lot easier to take care before the deadlines listed earlier.. | 16:24 |
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
sridhar_ram | #topic Newton Priorities | 16:24 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Newton Priorities (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:24 | |
sridhar_ram | continuing on the subject, I'd like to request the team to prioritize patchsets, fixes and most importantly the reviews that are planned for Newton first | 16:25 |
sridhar_ram | here is the etherpad with requests to help for newton release .. | 16:25 |
sridhar_ram | #link newton | 16:26 |
* sridhar_ram oops | 16:26 | |
sridhar_ram | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tacker-newton-release-priority | 16:26 |
*** prateek has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
sridhar_ram | can you please take a look at this etherpad and signup for NEED OWNERS and NEED REVIEWERS.. | 16:27 |
*** lbrune has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:27 | |
*** Guest7370 has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
sridhar_ram | anything not listed in this etherpad is deemed low priority for Newton and hence need to move to Ocata | 16:28 |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:28 | |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: Does it have any chance for alarm monitoring? I have intention to finish my code in this week or the early next week. | 16:28 |
sridhar_ram | so, if you think your patchset is something that is *must have* in newton please add it to this etherpad | 16:28 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan: can you remind me, does alarm-monitoring has any CLI / tackerclient changes ? | 16:29 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 16:29 | |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: no | 16:29 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:29 | |
*** mmalik4 has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:30 | |
manikanta_tadi | sridhar_ram : Should we also add VNFC BP to the priority list | 16:30 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan: okay.. | 16:30 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: I think I can finish before deadline | 16:30 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan: the main issue i see is getting reviewer's time .. other than that i don't see why it can't make it to newton | 16:30 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan: please add it to the blueprint list in the etherpad | 16:31 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: Ok. thanks sridhar | 16:31 |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: VNFC BP, IMO, is a best effort.. it came in late in the cycle, so if there is bandwidth *after* we are done w/ the existing ones we shd take VNFC | 16:32 |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: btw, does it have any dependency on tosca-parser ? | 16:32 |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: in that case, the answer will be no | 16:32 |
*** armax has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
janki | sridhar_ram: how about feature of passing vnfd file as API arg | 16:32 |
tbh | sridhar_ram, we don't have any dependency on tosca-parser | 16:32 |
manikanta_tadi | sridhar_ram: reviewers time is also a bottle neck to make the progess on spec | 16:32 |
sridhar_ram | tbh: good.. | 16:33 |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: agree, i acknowledge that is going to the bottleneck for next 4 - 6 weeks... no easy solution there | 16:33 |
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:33 | |
sridhar_ram | janki: i think that is an RFE level work and it might be okay to support it... | 16:34 |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:34 | |
dkushwaha | sridhar_ram, Regarding nsd, are we not planning it for newton? | 16:34 |
sridhar_ram | janki: again, if there is CLI impact it need to be done soon | 16:34 |
janki | sridhar_ram: ok. I am almost done. Will submit in 1-2 days | 16:34 |
janki | sridhar_ram: understood | 16:35 |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: I don't think NSD can fit newton.. it is clearly post-newton | 16:35 |
manikanta_tadi | sridhar_ram : true, I request the entire team in this forum to give their feedback on VNFC BP at their convenient time | 16:35 |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: however i think it will be first feature we will take up post newton release.. | 16:35 |
*** bvandenh has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:37 | |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: NSD is a significant feature with lots of new API and CLI... and i don't think we can wrap up spec & CLI by Aug 26th | 16:37 |
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:37 | |
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz | 16:37 | |
sridhar_ram | thanks for those who are already signing up in the etherpad .. please continue to do that! | 16:38 |
*** rossella_s has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
sridhar_ram | any question on newton priorities ? | 16:38 |
manikanta_tadi | sridhar_ram,: So other low hanging bugs will be taken for review after sep 23 | 16:38 |
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:39 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 16:40 | |
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:40 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:40 | |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: we will use our good judgement.. if there are low hanging bugs that helps towards fit-&-finish of newton release .. nothing stoping us to review & merge bef Sep 23 | 16:40 |
*** banix has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: for e.g. we have a bug where if bad input is given in horizon, there is an ugly looking exception thrown back.. | 16:41 |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
*** jdurgin1 has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
sridhar_ram | manikanta_tadi: it is a -ve scenario, yet.. but looks ugly as it is easy for users to get into that | 16:42 |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
sridhar_ram | so, please help w/ your +1s .. | 16:42 |
sridhar_ram | solicit folks to review and give their +1s.. | 16:42 |
manikanta_tadi | sridhar_ram : Understood! Thanks.. | 16:42 |
sridhar_ram | many +1s helps to get +2s :) | 16:43 |
sridhar_ram | we have beaten this to death.. | 16:43 |
sridhar_ram | moving on | 16:43 |
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:43 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:43 | |
sridhar_ram | #topic Blueprint only development process | 16:43 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprint only development process (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:43 | |
sridhar_ram | I'd like to propose a slight modification to our dev process... | 16:44 |
sridhar_ram | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352663/ | 16:44 |
sridhar_ram | This is something I was planning to bring up in the mid-cycle but didn't had time | 16:44 |
*** Benj_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:44 | |
sridhar_ram | There are already couple of blueprints in our queue that doesn't have a need to write an elaborate spec.. | 16:44 |
sridhar_ram | For e.g. tacker mistral workflows.. | 16:45 |
sridhar_ram | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/tacker-workflows | 16:45 |
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:45 | |
sridhar_ram | Please review the process change and leave your comments.. | 16:45 |
sridhar_ram | tacker blueprints are looked up across openstack group and beyond .. like OPNFV, etc.. | 16:46 |
KanagarajM | sridhar_ram, +1 :) | 16:46 |
sridhar_ram | we should use that more to publicize all the nice work that is happening in this group | 16:46 |
sridhar_ram | KanagarajM: thanks | 16:46 |
*** Benj_ has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
sridhar_ram | My intention is to make the communities members life as easy as possible.. no process for process-sake :) | 16:47 |
*** piet_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:47 | |
dkushwaha | sridhar_ram, +1 | 16:48 |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: thanks! | 16:48 |
sridhar_ram | #topic Sample mistral workflow - BP approval | 16:48 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Sample mistral workflow - BP approval (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:48 | |
sridhar_ram | related to the previous topic.. | 16:48 |
sridhar_ram | I'd like to request team's opinion on this BP.. | 16:48 |
sridhar_ram | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/tacker-workflows | 16:49 |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
sridhar_ram | if anyone think this BP shouldn't be approved .. please reach out in the ML | 16:49 |
sridhar_ram | #topic NSD | 16:49 |
*** openstack changes topic to "NSD (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:49 | |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: take it away | 16:50 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:50 | |
dkushwaha | all please provide your opinion on spec | 16:50 |
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:51 | |
sridhar_ram | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304667/ | 16:51 |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:51 | |
*** matrohon has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
sridhar_ram | the big decision is with or without mistral !! | 16:51 |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
*** natarajk has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:51 | |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: I'm glad you are already coming up to speed quickly on mistral | 16:52 |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:52 | |
*** Benj_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:52 | |
dkushwaha | sridhar_ram, I can try to finish the spec by august 26, please suggest the approach | 16:52 |
sridhar_ram | I know we have only few mins left.. perhaps we shd put that specific question in the agenda and have the team come prepared with their thoughts | 16:53 |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: again, are you looking to see if NSD can make it to newton release ? | 16:53 |
dkushwaha | sridhar_ram, yes | 16:54 |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: I frankly doubt it is possible .. but we can take that up in the #tacker channel after this meeting | 16:54 |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:54 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 16:54 | |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: anything else ? | 16:55 |
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:55 | |
*** liyifeng has quit IRC | 16:55 | |
dkushwaha | sridhar_ram, not for now | 16:55 |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: okay.. | 16:55 |
sridhar_ram | #topic Open Discussion | 16:55 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 16:55 | |
sridhar_ram | for once we have 5mins.. :) | 16:56 |
sridhar_ram | any general thoughts ? | 16:56 |
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
sridhar_ram | lots of good discussion in the midcycle .. we shd groom them into blueprints for Ocata.. | 16:56 |
*** ntpttr__ has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
*** ntpttr__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:56 | |
dkushwaha | sridhar_ram, are we considering the meeting timing change ? | 16:57 |
sridhar_ram | particularly any takers for Murano plugin for Tacker ? | 16:57 |
manikanta_tadi | sridhar_ram : yeah , midcycle meetup helped the team to understand roadmap | 16:57 |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: I didn't hear any consensus .. | 16:57 |
*** mageshgv has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
*** aarefiev_ is now known as aarefiev | 16:58 | |
*** baumann has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
sridhar_ram | let's not change until the newton release deadline is over.. | 16:58 |
sridhar_ram | anyone violently disagree with ^^^ ? | 16:58 |
*** baumann has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:58 | |
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:59 | |
sridhar_ram | we could move this meeting 2 hrs earlier .. 1400 UTC.. that was the something we discussed | 16:59 |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:59 | |
*** adiantum has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
sridhar_ram | i can put a doodle pool to decide a new time.. | 17:00 |
sridhar_ram | we are also missing gongysh | 17:00 |
sridhar_ram | times up folks | 17:00 |
sridhar_ram | thanks for joining | 17:00 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
sridhar_ram | #endmeeting | 17:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 17:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 17:00:25 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2016/tacker.2016-08-09-16.04.html | 17:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2016/tacker.2016-08-09-16.04.txt | 17:00 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2016/tacker.2016-08-09-16.04.log.html | 17:00 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:00 | |
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
*** sripriya has left #openstack-meeting | 17:01 | |
*** xuan_ has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
mmedvede | #startmeeting third-party | 17:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 17:01:45 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mmedvede. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 17:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 17:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: third-party)" | 17:01 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'third_party' | 17:01 |
mmedvede | anyone is around for third-party CI meeting? | 17:02 |
*** gokrokve has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:02 | |
*** numan_ has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** cknight has left #openstack-meeting | 17:03 | |
*** BobH_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:04 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
*** neel has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
asselin | hi, i'm here | 17:05 |
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:05 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:05 | |
mmedvede | hey asselin | 17:05 |
*** tung_doan has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
mmedvede | not too big of a crowd lately | 17:05 |
*** dkushwaha has left #openstack-meeting | 17:05 | |
*** qwebirc78847 has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
asselin | no, but a few updates going on in puppet-openstackci | 17:06 |
asselin | there was an incompatibility between zuul and nodepool dependencies reported yesterday and fixed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352560/ | 17:07 |
mmedvede | are you talking about pins? | 17:07 |
asselin | yes | 17:07 |
*** liyifeng has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:07 | |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:08 | |
*** KanagarajM has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:08 | |
asselin | when installed on the same system. We don't have tests for this...but this would be caught only at the functional level which we don't really have right now. | 17:08 |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 17:08 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
mmedvede | asselin: this is python package dependency problem, correct? | 17:09 |
*** piet_ has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
asselin | mmedvede, yes, for apscheduler>=3.0 | 17:10 |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 17:10 | |
mmedvede | ok, so installing in venv should take care of that too | 17:10 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 17:10 | |
mmedvede | it is not like zuul depends on nodepool and vice versa | 17:10 |
asselin | zuul required < 3.0. so jeblair created a new zuul tag 2.5 yesterday that depends on >=3.0 | 17:10 |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:11 | |
asselin | mmedvede, yes that's another solution and a good idea actually | 17:11 |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:11 | |
asselin | having each service run in it's own venv, not sure if -infra folks would object to that | 17:12 |
mmedvede | creating venv is not that much overhead | 17:12 |
*** ihrachys has quit IRC | 17:12 | |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 17:12 | |
jeblair | we won't run them in venv on infra production servers | 17:12 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:14 | |
mmedvede | jeblair: is it because it adds complexity in debugging? | 17:14 |
mmedvede | asselin: maybe can be optional just for all-in-one example somehow | 17:14 |
jeblair | mmedvede: it's also inconvenient for sysadmins | 17:14 |
jeblair | at any rate, the components should have compatible requirements, so i think we did the right fix this time | 17:15 |
asselin | mmedvede, either way it would require updating the individual puppet-<service> modules to optionally running in a venv. | 17:15 |
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:15 | |
mmedvede | right, might not be worth it | 17:16 |
*** piet_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:16 | |
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:16 | |
asselin | ok, so as long as there are compatible tags of the tools working together in a single node, I'm fine with the current approach | 17:17 |
jeblair | the 2.5.0 tag for zuul also includes *a lot* of bugfixes, btw | 17:17 |
mmedvede | asselin: do you have an idea how many third-party CIs run all-in-one, as opposed to similar to infra team's architecture? | 17:17 |
asselin | mmedvede, my guess is the majority of them...at least for cinder folks | 17:17 |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
asselin | jeblair, thanks again for creating the zuul tag. | 17:18 |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:19 | |
mmedvede | jeblair: +1, I upgraded to 2.5.0 recently, and it runs better so far. I have noticed memory footprint looks better. | 17:19 |
asselin | I personally prefer keeping tags for all 3rd party ci folks. They have enough stability/maintenance problems as is. | 17:19 |
jeblair | yeah, we were holding off on tagging that until the known memory leak cleared up, which it seems to have done | 17:19 |
*** epcim has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 17:20 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:21 | |
mmedvede | thank you for that | 17:21 |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:21 | |
jeblair | np :) | 17:21 |
mmedvede | worth it, would upgrade again :) | 17:22 |
*** armax has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
*** karthikp_ has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:23 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
*** Na3iL has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
*** roxanaghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:23 | |
mmedvede | should probably set the topic, as there are no set items on agenda | 17:23 |
mmedvede | #topic Open Discussion | 17:23 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: third-party)" | 17:23 | |
*** obondarev has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
*** gagehugo has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:24 | |
*** Swami has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
mmedvede | asselin: it seems there are either less problems in CIs, or people do not know about the meetings :) | 17:25 |
mmedvede | I hope it is the former | 17:25 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
asselin | I think there are less problems :) | 17:25 |
mmedvede | common CI definitely helps with that | 17:26 |
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:26 | |
mmedvede | thanks for watching that area | 17:26 |
asselin | \0/ glad to hear it :) | 17:26 |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:26 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:27 | |
*** natarajk has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:28 | |
mmedvede | if there is nothing else to discuss, one fyi for today: | 17:28 |
mmedvede | devstack has been switched to use neutron by default | 17:28 |
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 17:28 | |
mmedvede | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350750/ | 17:28 |
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:28 | |
mmedvede | I did not notice any side effects in our nova CI, but have seen problems in ironic third-party CIs, that might have been related | 17:29 |
*** lblanchard has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:30 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:30 | |
*** weshay has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
mmedvede | any objections to closing the meeting? | 17:30 |
asselin | none from me | 17:30 |
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:30 | |
*** zul_ has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
*** nishaYadav has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:31 | |
*** HeOS has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:32 | |
mmedvede | thanks for attending | 17:32 |
mmedvede | #endmeeting | 17:32 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 17:32 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 17:32:30 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:32 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-08-09-17.01.html | 17:32 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-08-09-17.01.txt | 17:32 |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:32 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:32 | |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2016/third_party.2016-08-09-17.01.log.html | 17:32 |
*** adiantum has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:34 | |
*** JoseMello has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:35 | |
*** rossella_s has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 17:38 | |
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz | 17:39 | |
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:39 | |
*** ivyyy is now known as ivyyyy-brb | 17:40 | |
*** zul has quit IRC | 17:40 | |
*** Swami has quit IRC | 17:40 | |
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:41 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 17:41 | |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:41 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:42 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 17:42 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:44 | |
*** Swami has quit IRC | 17:46 | |
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:46 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:46 | |
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:47 | |
*** knikolla has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:48 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:49 | |
*** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:50 | |
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:50 | |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:51 | |
*** KanagarajM has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:51 | |
*** baumann_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:51 | |
*** baumann_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:51 | |
*** mikelk has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:51 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:52 | |
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:52 | |
*** baumann has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
*** ezpz has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:53 | |
*** natarajk has left #openstack-meeting | 17:53 | |
*** mikelk has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
*** amakarov has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:56 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:56 | |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
*** Shrews has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:59 | |
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz | 17:59 | |
*** bethwhite_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:59 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:59 | |
*** LamT_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:00 | |
ayoung | KEYSTONERS.....chillll | 18:00 |
stevemar | ayoung: o/ | 18:00 |
dolphm | ajayaa, amakarov, ayoung, breton, browne, crinkle, claudiub, davechen, david8hu, dolphm, dstanek, edmondsw, gagehugo, gyee, henrynash, hogepodge, htruta, jamielennox, jaugustine, joesavak, jorge_munoz, knikolla, lbragstad, MaxPC, morgan, nkinder, notmorgan, raildo, rodrigods, rderose, roxanaghe, samleon, samueldmq, shaleh, stevemar, tsymanczyk, topol, vivekd, wanghong, xek: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-weekly | 18:00 |
dolphm | -meeting | 18:00 |
henrynash | chillin' | 18:00 |
dolphm | * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-weekly-meeting | 18:00 |
stevemar | dolphm: copy paste fail | 18:00 |
raildo | _o_ | 18:00 |
amakarov | hi all | 18:01 |
gyee | \o | 18:01 |
rodrigods | hello | 18:01 |
crinkle | o/ | 18:01 |
gagehugo | hey! | 18:01 |
jaugustine | o/ \o | 18:01 |
stevemar | /o\ | 18:01 |
dstanek | o/ | 18:01 |
knikolla | o/ | 18:01 |
LamT_ | o/ | 18:01 |
dolphm | stevemar: sounds like you're available to run the meeting? :D | 18:01 |
ayoung | o/\o | 18:01 |
lbragstad | o/ | 18:01 |
*** bethwhite_ has left #openstack-meeting | 18:01 | |
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom | 18:01 | |
ezpz | o7 | 18:01 |
bknudson | hi | 18:01 |
dolphm | stevemar: i thought you were supposed to be eating steak with topol right about now | 18:01 |
stevemar | dolphm: nah i'm at openstackSV, at the keynotes -- not as cool as keystones | 18:01 |
bknudson | I thought stevemar was conferencing | 18:01 |
ayoung | ezpz, wrong hand | 18:01 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 18:01 | |
stevemar | i randomly had 5 minutes to log on | 18:02 |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:02 | |
stevemar | dolphm: take it away! | 18:02 |
dolphm | alrighty | 18:02 |
dolphm | #startmeeting keystone | 18:02 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 18:02:22 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dolphm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 18:02 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 18:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:02 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'keystone' | 18:02 |
stevemar | dolphm: you remember how to run the meeting? | 18:02 |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
stevemar | :) | 18:02 |
bknudson | just like old times. | 18:02 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:02 | |
stevemar | bknudson: #bettertimes | 18:02 |
ayoung | maybe <o | 18:02 |
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:02 | |
lbragstad | nostalgia | 18:02 |
dolphm | #topic Scheduley bits | 18:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Scheduley bits (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:03 | |
*** pabelanger has left #openstack-meeting | 18:03 | |
bknudson | trump will bring back the good old days. | 18:03 |
dolphm | #info August 22-26 is final release for non-client libs | 18:03 |
henrynash | (3 minutes in...and first Trump reference already..) | 18:03 |
dolphm | #info Newton-3 deadline is August ~29 | 18:03 |
stevemar | hehe | 18:03 |
dstanek | "Let's make keystone great again" | 18:03 |
rderose_ | ++ | 18:03 |
gagehugo | +1 | 18:03 |
rodrigods | lol | 18:03 |
samueldmq | hi all | 18:04 |
stevemar | dolphm: i think the client libraries freeze the same time as the server side | 18:04 |
stevemar | the non-client libs (keystoneauth and keystonemiddleware) freeze a week before | 18:04 |
bknudson | do we get to choose when our libs freeze? | 18:04 |
stevemar | bknudson: nope! | 18:04 |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
dolphm | #link http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html | 18:04 |
dolphm | non-client libs freeze a week early to help ease requirements management at the end of the release | 18:05 |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:05 | |
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:05 | |
*** electrofelix has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
dolphm | #topic Let's make HMT great again: support for delete and update | 18:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Let's make HMT great again: support for delete and update (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:05 | |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:05 | |
*** piet_ has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
dolphm | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/project-tree-deletion | 18:05 |
dolphm | Delete patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244248/ (abandoned) | 18:05 |
notmorgan | i might be lurking tody | 18:05 |
* rodrigods hides in the corner | 18:05 | |
dolphm | Update patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243585/ (abandoned) | 18:05 |
dolphm | stevemar: have a minute for this one, since your name is on it? | 18:06 |
stevemar | dolphm: sure | 18:06 |
stevemar | right | 18:06 |
*** rgoodwin has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:06 | |
stevemar | so, we implemented all this stuff in the controller and manager and backend | 18:06 |
stevemar | and we don't have an API that can hit it | 18:06 |
stevemar | so... kinda pointless right now | 18:06 |
rderose_ | Revert it all! | 18:06 |
rderose_ | :) | 18:06 |
amakarov | dolphm, is my patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285521/ somewhere on the schedule? | 18:07 |
rodrigods | major issue is because in the HMT design, a project isn't owner of its subtree | 18:07 |
dolphm | amakarov: no? but feel free to add it https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-weekly-meeting | 18:07 |
gyee | see, see, rderose_ said it | 18:07 |
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:07 | |
stevemar | so yeah, as rodrigods said, there were issues around policy and what it should look like for deleting / updating a tree of projects | 18:07 |
dolphm | rodrigods: so the implementation is not ready to be exposed to the API? | 18:08 |
stevemar | i'm only half joking when i say revert it all | 18:08 |
dstanek | stevemar: -- | 18:08 |
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:08 | |
rodrigods | dolphm, looks like it is impossible to implement it cleany | 18:08 |
*** browne has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:08 | |
samueldmq | is there a REAL use case for it ? | 18:08 |
stevemar | my argument is that no one has pushed for it in months, so do we really need it? | 18:08 |
rodrigods | samueldmq, sure | 18:08 |
gyee | stevemar, trump was half-joking when he accept the nomination too | 18:08 |
notmorgan | rderose_: revert allof HMT! /snark, (sorry) | 18:08 |
henrynash | I think part of the problem was a lack of clarity on the conceptual meaning ....i..e is delete/update tree a single command policied in its own right...or is it shorthand for issue update/delete on every node in the tree and teh regular policy applies to each one? | 18:09 |
dstanek | rodrigods: so what can we do here? | 18:09 |
stevemar | i'm trying to encourage anyone to pick this up and finish it :) | 18:09 |
lbragstad | henrynash isn't that the cascade feature? | 18:09 |
stevemar | lbragstad: yep | 18:09 |
rodrigods | dstanek, think henrynash can be more precise about the issues since he made further investigations on it | 18:09 |
samueldmq | henrynash: yes, because there is no way to specify that in the current policies | 18:10 |
notmorgan | updating a whole tree is potentially scary (tm) | 18:10 |
stevemar | anyway, i didn't expect a solution to come out of this, just a PSA | 18:10 |
henrynash | lbragstad: yes, you could argue that this is expanding teh cascade capability to full delete/update (not just the enabled flag which is all you can do with it today) | 18:10 |
rodrigods | notmorgan, the update is to disable, that is required for deletion | 18:10 |
notmorgan | and/or deleting because of our lack of "soft delete" | 18:10 |
stevemar | i was cleaning old BPs and this one keeps getting bumped | 18:10 |
samueldmq | anyone picking this up ? | 18:10 |
dstanek | what does 'update a tree' actually mean? | 18:10 |
rodrigods | dstanek, disable it | 18:11 |
henrynash | I'm happ to pick it up, just not sure whether can do this for Newton | 18:11 |
stevemar | dstanek: only 'enabled' is allowed to be updated | 18:11 |
dolphm | henrynash: why does a disable have to cascade to take effect? | 18:11 |
bknudson | what happens if nobody picks it up? | 18:11 |
notmorgan | dstanek: specifically a disable | 18:11 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
stevemar | bknudson: revert it all! <joking> | 18:11 |
notmorgan | that cascades | 18:11 |
dstanek | rodrigods: do you have to explicitly disable all child nodes then? | 18:11 |
notmorgan | bknudson: since no public api... it could be removed? | 18:11 |
dolphm | henrynash: if any of a project's parents are disabled, the project is disabled, and amakarov's table should make that check trivial | 18:11 |
notmorgan | dstanek: today iirc yes. | 18:11 |
rodrigods | dstanek, for the current design, yes | 18:11 |
dstanek | sounds like we need to fix the glitch then | 18:11 |
bknudson | ok, just checking there's no huge bug if we don't do something. | 18:11 |
henrynash | dolphm: I was just describing what the current cascade does.... | 18:12 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
notmorgan | dstanek: explicit disable. it still preventx login so security is fine, just a cascade delete cannot occur w/o everything disabled as i understand it | 18:12 |
dolphm | henrynash: right | 18:12 |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
dolphm | rodrigods: it sounds like the problem is with checking the enabled/disabled state of a child (which is a read query), not with "cascading" a write to a bunch of rows in the db | 18:12 |
notmorgan | dolphm: correct. a cascade write would be absurd | 18:12 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:13 | |
notmorgan | and shouldn't be a thing we do. | 18:13 |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:13 | |
rodrigods | right | 18:13 |
stevemar | bknudson: we just end up with lots of ugly branches in our code :( | 18:13 |
rodrigods | but... as of today | 18:13 |
notmorgan | doing the "is any of my parents disabled" check should be what is done. | 18:13 |
rodrigods | we check if everyone is disabled | 18:13 |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
samueldmq | I think the code is in | 18:13 |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:14 | |
notmorgan | this is a QOL change for operators/users imo | 18:14 |
samueldmq | we just don't know how to expose that in the policies | 18:14 |
stevemar | notmorgan: you are hardly lurking :) | 18:14 |
stevemar | hehe | 18:14 |
dolphm | samueldmq: the perceived "enabled" state of a project is just whether a project AND all of it's parent's are enabled | 18:14 |
ayoung | samueldmq, policy is kindof all or nothing. It should check to see if you can do the operation based on a role, but dealing with hierarchy is kindof beyond scope | 18:14 |
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:14 | |
stevemar | dolphm: so yeah, just a PSA, didn't expect an outcome here | 18:14 |
ayoung | but.... | 18:15 |
notmorgan | stevemar: i can go away again, i just was dropping in to voice the "this should be safe from a security standpoint" view. | 18:15 |
dolphm | notmorgan: thanks :) | 18:15 |
stevemar | notmorgan: we love having you around :) | 18:15 |
dolphm | notmorgan: not for the going away again bit, though | 18:15 |
notmorgan | dolphm: lol | 18:15 |
ayoung | the part that should be checked is the applicability of the token used to request the operation to each of the node | 18:15 |
henrynash | stevemar: Happy to get this assigned to me to go think about it ad come back with a spec (or not) for Ocata | 18:15 |
ayoung | nodes to be dleted that is | 18:15 |
rodrigods | ayoung, right | 18:15 |
rodrigods | check auth in the whole tree | 18:15 |
ayoung | and what do we say if the scoped does not match...probably deny | 18:15 |
stevemar | henrynash: i'd be ok with that | 18:15 |
samueldmq | dolphm: that made me think in something ... if a parent is disabled, shouldn't its children be disabled too (by consequence) ? | 18:16 |
rodrigods | authz* | 18:16 |
dolphm | notmorgan: /nick notnotmorgan ? | 18:16 |
samueldmq | anyways, we don't do that today | 18:16 |
dolphm | samueldmq: correct | 18:16 |
rodrigods | samueldmq, that's the point | 18:16 |
rodrigods | we don't do that today | 18:16 |
ayoung | samueldmq, yes they should | 18:16 |
samueldmq | and we can't | 18:16 |
samueldmq | because backwards comapt | 18:16 |
samueldmq | and that would disable auth | 18:16 |
dolphm | samueldmq: i wouldn't not consider it to be backwards incompatible to fix that behavior | 18:16 |
rodrigods | don't think changing that breaks the API | 18:16 |
dolphm | samueldmq: great! | 18:16 |
samueldmq | can taht be considered a securit issue then we fix ? | 18:17 |
notmorgan | ayoung: uhm. wouldn't the owner of the top of the tree be allowed to delete even if they don't own down the tree? | 18:17 |
dolphm | it's not an API change so much as a change in the API's behavior | 18:17 |
notmorgan | just thinking through the usabilityu | 18:17 |
*** cdnchris has quit IRC | 18:17 | |
notmorgan | but traversing up the tree no. | 18:17 |
*** karthikp_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:17 | |
dolphm | notmorgan: right | 18:17 |
rodrigods | the API remains the same, the internal representation that changes | 18:17 |
ayoung | notmorgan, I was just thinking about that. I need to see what a Linux system does if you try that with a FS | 18:17 |
rodrigods | although, every GET project needs to look at the parents | 18:17 |
notmorgan | ayoung: depends on the FS iirc. | 18:17 |
rodrigods | to check if someone is disabled | 18:17 |
samueldmq | dolphm: ayoung: cool so we can technically fixthat | 18:17 |
stevemar | i'm excited to get to the rolling upgrade topic :) | 18:18 |
dolphm | it sounds like we have some consensus on the topic to move forward then? | 18:18 |
samueldmq | ++ | 18:18 |
rodrigods | henrynash will pick it up? | 18:18 |
samueldmq | henrynash: picking it up? | 18:18 |
dolphm | rodrigods: well played | 18:18 |
henrynash | yes | 18:18 |
rodrigods | :) | 18:18 |
*** dslevin has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:18 | |
samueldmq | henrynash: thanks | 18:18 |
rodrigods | henrynash, o/ | 18:18 |
notmorgan | ayoung: http://paste.openstack.org/show/552606/ | 18:19 |
notmorgan | ayoung: now. iirc you can delete files just not directory inodes. | 18:19 |
dolphm | #topic Let's make HTTP status code documentation and descriptions great again | 18:19 |
dolphm | lbragstad: o/ | 18:19 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Let's make HTTP status code documentation and descriptions great again (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:19 | |
dolphm | "The docs team wants to provide a template that we can add to our docs that gives some information regarding HTTP status codes along with formal and informal descriptions of what they mean." | 18:19 |
ayoung | http://paste.openstack.org/show/552607/ | 18:19 |
lbragstad | ^ | 18:19 |
dolphm | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349551/ | 18:19 |
lbragstad | some projects have already started | 18:19 |
lbragstad | ^ | 18:19 |
ayoung | notmorgan, so, to a directory, anything inside it is a dentry, whether file or subdir | 18:19 |
lbragstad | thoughts/comments/questions/concerns? | 18:20 |
dolphm | "Thoughts about the documentation and additional descriptions? Should we organize an API sprint to knock this out?" | 18:20 |
notmorgan | yes | 18:20 |
lbragstad | I'll take feed back to the next docs meeting | 18:20 |
notmorgan | ayoung: yes | 18:20 |
ayoung | so if I don't have perms to delete a subdir, I can't remove the dir | 18:20 |
ayoung | so if I have x/y/z | 18:20 |
notmorgan | ayoung: http://paste.openstack.org/show/552608/ | 18:20 |
ayoung | and I don't have permissions to delete y, the tree is protected | 18:20 |
notmorgan | ayoung: exactly.for POSIX, non-POSIX... lets just pretend we on't care here | 18:21 |
*** obondarev has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
bknudson | for keystone, each operation might have a different meaning for each status code. | 18:21 |
gagehugo | lbragstad: seems like it would look nicer than what it currently is | 18:21 |
lbragstad | bknudson yeah - that's the tough part | 18:21 |
notmorgan | bknudson: also we have duplicated use of status | 18:21 |
lbragstad | there are a lot of things that can represent a 401 | 18:21 |
notmorgan | basically the answer should be an "error code" with the status | 18:21 |
notmorgan | where we can provide it for security reasons | 18:21 |
dolphm | lbragstad: it sounds like this is a reverse of the normal API documentation structure, which is "here's an API request, and the possible status codes that could result from it" | 18:21 |
lbragstad | right | 18:21 |
ayoung | so...on cascading delete, we are doing something like rm -rf proj | 18:21 |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:22 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 18:22 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:22 | |
lbragstad | for example - see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349551/1/api-ref/source/v2/http-codes.yaml | 18:22 |
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:22 | |
bknudson | also, we can have a single status code that has multiple reasons. | 18:22 |
notmorgan | but we should at least clearly say status possible from API X is Y,Z,Q | 18:22 |
* ayoung just realized we moved on | 18:22 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 18:22 | |
notmorgan | ayoung: yeah sorry, just wanted to hand you the infos for further digesting down the line. :) | 18:22 |
stevemar | no one stops the ayoung train | 18:22 |
ayoung | can we say "you need role R to perform this operatoin?" | 18:22 |
amakarov | I'd be happy if I can find out where exactly was decided to raise 401 basing on status code in non-debug mode | 18:22 |
samueldmq | bknudson: ++ | 18:22 |
* stevemar runs off | 18:23 | |
samueldmq | bknudson: and maybe generalizing isn't the ideal | 18:23 |
stevemar | thanks dolphm | 18:23 |
*** nisha_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:23 | |
notmorgan | amakarov: so, 90% of the cases a 401 cannot give much more info | 18:23 |
samueldmq | why not define the status codes in each API ? as they may mean something different | 18:23 |
bknudson | the status codes already have meanings defined by the HTTP standard. | 18:23 |
notmorgan | because we're leaking auth related data to the user then (not auth info itself, auth related) | 18:23 |
dolphm | there's a table of authentication errors by status code and their reasonings here http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/identity/v3/index.html#authentication-and-token-management | 18:24 |
*** csomerville has quit IRC | 18:24 | |
notmorgan | we would need to restructure our exceptions to directly obscure the auth data. | 18:24 |
amakarov | notmorgan, ++ | 18:24 |
bknudson | http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/api/v3/identity-api-v3.html#http-status-codes | 18:24 |
notmorgan | auth-related data | 18:24 |
bknudson | ^ link to the old table of status codes | 18:24 |
lbragstad | one thing the docs folks wanted was to see if the projects would be interested in this and they would provide us with a template to fill out | 18:24 |
bknudson | "Normal response codes: 201 Error response codes: 413,415,405,404,403,401,400,503,409" -- not useful! | 18:24 |
ayoung | the tricky thing we do that messes some poeple up is return 404 when we don't want people to know the resource is there but they don't have access | 18:24 |
lbragstad | cc annegentle was driving that template effort | 18:25 |
bknudson | a random string of numbers. | 18:25 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:25 | |
bknudson | should have put "Sad!" | 18:25 |
ayoung | 418 | 18:25 |
notmorgan | so, i would recommend 1 of two things. | 18:25 |
*** acoles is now known as acoles_ | 18:25 | |
notmorgan | ayoung: i am not a teapot | 18:25 |
ayoung | notmorgan, I never said "you" were | 18:26 |
ayoung | 418 says "I" am teapot. | 18:26 |
dolphm | this seems like it's not super useful for a data-driven API, which is most of our API beyond auth | 18:26 |
notmorgan | either we restructure our execptions | 18:26 |
notmorgan | so we don't pass data back. | 18:26 |
notmorgan | if this is something worth changing | 18:26 |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
notmorgan | or we add some level of "error code" that can communicate more data to the end user | 18:26 |
*** nishaYadav has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
notmorgan | but not leak important things like "does X exist, or do you not have any access" | 18:27 |
amakarov | notmorgan, it will ease problem solving | 18:27 |
samueldmq | looks like it's orthogonal to whether define the status code or not ? | 18:27 |
ayoung | what I would like to see is that, if someone calls an API, but does not have any roles on their token, they get back a 401 with a list of roles that would be required | 18:27 |
*** prateek_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:27 | |
bknudson | btw, these docs are looking good. Room for improvement like everything, but there has been improvement | 18:27 |
*** Jeffreyc42 has quit IRC | 18:27 | |
samueldmq | I see lbragstad as 'define status codes in a single place, in the same way other projects are doing' (which is this topic) | 18:27 |
ayoung | something like a token with scope but no roles...not a pure unscoped token ,as that is a security thing.... | 18:27 |
bknudson | we already have securityexception to indicate to hide the details from the user. | 18:28 |
dolphm | can we keep the discussion on the documentation issue? | 18:28 |
ayoung | Let the user then request a token with the appropriate scope, if they like the risk | 18:28 |
samueldmq | dolphm: ++ | 18:28 |
ayoung | dolphm, is this purely a documentaion question? Did not realize. I thought it was about actually changethe responses | 18:28 |
notmorgan | the doc change is less useful when hitting the auth wall | 18:28 |
samueldmq | lbragstad: I'd say that's nice to have, just get what we had already from the docs dolphm and bknudson linked above | 18:28 |
notmorgan | since everything is 401ish | 18:28 |
lbragstad | I mainly wanted to bring it up here to see what people though - anne was interested in getting a template rolling | 18:29 |
notmorgan | otherwise the doc change is useful | 18:29 |
* ayoung though descriptions meant the message we passed back in the response. Understand better now | 18:29 | |
dolphm | i'm personally skeptical of the value of this, especially for us, because it doesn't match the workflow that i'd be following if i were utilizing API docs for the first time (i'd be looking at the operation first, then the status code i'm getting -- not the other way around) | 18:29 |
lbragstad | i can go back to the doc meeting and asking for more information about the intended audience | 18:29 |
bknudson | is the ask just do we want a summary of how we generally use return codes? | 18:29 |
bknudson | or how to make something like "Normal response codes: 201 Error response codes: 413,415,405,404,403,401,400,503,409" actually useful? | 18:29 |
dolphm | lbragstad: that's basically here http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/identity/v3/index.html#authentication-and-token-management | 18:29 |
lbragstad | dolphm i see | 18:30 |
*** prateek has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
dolphm | for auth, anyway | 18:30 |
lbragstad | dolphm sure | 18:30 |
samueldmq | dolphm: yes, having the status code described in the api description itself is more meaninigful to me | 18:30 |
dstanek | bknudson: that's what i don't quite understand | 18:30 |
dolphm | which is our only "interesting" use of status codes? | 18:30 |
samueldmq | as the API (arguments, etc) would be all in one spot | 18:30 |
dstanek | who is to use this, how and why? | 18:30 |
dolphm | samueldmq: that's a better way to describe it | 18:30 |
bknudson | any application writer wants to know this information! | 18:30 |
bknudson | deployers want to know why something failed | 18:30 |
ayoung | I suspect the goal is to keep the meaning of response codes consistent across the services, but having a single doc to start with | 18:31 |
bknudson | and currently we don't provide that information. | 18:31 |
ayoung | of course, we are long past "starting" | 18:31 |
lbragstad | dstanek yeah - i can bring all this to the next meeting and see if I can clarify it further | 18:31 |
amakarov | bknudson, as for me if I can determine the code that kicked request out, the problem is solved | 18:31 |
bknudson | amakarov: what if the same code means lots of things? like a 400 ? | 18:31 |
samueldmq | lbragstad: it would be nice to ahve an exceptions.yaml, somehting like parameters.yaml | 18:31 |
amakarov | whather it'll be by status code or some magic in status message - doesn't matter | 18:31 |
*** bill_az has quit IRC | 18:32 | |
amakarov | bknudson, that's the problem | 18:32 |
samueldmq | lbragstad: you reference the exceptions in the api description, then they get rendered by getting what is in that file | 18:32 |
lbragstad | ok so | 18:32 |
lbragstad | summary | 18:32 |
lbragstad | there is a fear of duplication | 18:32 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 18:32 | |
lbragstad | (duplication of docs) | 18:32 |
lbragstad | Does it match the workflow for anyone using this (why would they use this versus the regular API)? | 18:32 |
lbragstad | Does this make sense for a data-driven API? | 18:32 |
dstanek | done...you're welcome: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/api-wg/tree/guidelines/http.rst#n83 | 18:32 |
dolphm | #topic Let's make rolling upgrades great again | 18:33 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Let's make rolling upgrades great again (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:33 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 18:33 | |
dolphm | so, last week after we approved henry's spec for rolling upgrades, I proposed a simplification (hopefully) of the spec | 18:33 |
dolphm | this is the spec revision https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351798/ | 18:34 |
dolphm | i also proposed a draft of what our docs would look like for deployers https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350793/ | 18:34 |
bknudson | +154, -149 -- looks more complicated! | 18:34 |
ayoung | dolphm, any propsal to deal with revocations during that time? | 18:34 |
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:35 | |
dolphm | and implemented a read-only mode config option to support the spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349700/ | 18:35 |
dolphm | ayoung: yes - in that you can't disable or delete anything anyway, so no need to revoke anything ;) | 18:35 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:35 | |
*** obondarev has quit IRC | 18:35 | |
henrynash | so I have a number of questions/concerns about this: | 18:36 |
ayoung | dolphm, um..you do see thefallacy there, right? | 18:36 |
ayoung | You are, I assume, just joking. | 18:36 |
gyee | can't list ldap users either as we can't external IDs | 18:36 |
henrynash | 1) Obviously it is different to what other services are doing | 18:36 |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 18:36 | |
gyee | can't issue tokens and shadow users | 18:36 |
dolphm | the tl;dr of the change is that i cut out a few commands from henry's spec for managing metadata about the state of the rolling upgrade, added a read-only mode to protect the live migration process and the application from stomping on each other (which also prevents us from having to write code to handle multiple states of the DB in a single release) | 18:36 |
henrynash | 2) It isn't clear to me that a RO mode will suit everyone (and of course certainly not anyon on UUID tkes) | 18:36 |
dolphm | gyee: you can issue Fernet tokens of course, but not UUID/etc tokens | 18:37 |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:37 | |
gyee | dolphm, what about shadowing? | 18:37 |
henrynash | 3) Minor concern over use of config variable, since it means keystone comes up, by default, as RO (on a clean install) | 18:37 |
dolphm | gyee: there's certainly a constraint there, but my assumption is that if you're pursuing rolling upgrades, you're probably already on board with Fernet (if that's a bad assumption, i'd love to hear feedback) | 18:37 |
dolphm | gyee: it'd be blocked :( | 18:37 |
henrynash | (but you could get round that with a database variable instead) | 18:37 |
rderose_ | gyee: you wouldn't be able to onboard new users during the upgrade | 18:37 |
dolphm | gyee: no writes to the db during the data migration process at all | 18:37 |
gyee | dolphm, rderose_, yeah that make sense | 18:38 |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
dolphm | henrynash: (1) is my biggest concern, but i'd also wager that no other project other than maybe glance would remain particularly useful during a read-only mode | 18:38 |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
dolphm | glance can still serve images, for example | 18:38 |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:39 | |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:39 | |
dolphm | (during a rolling upgrade of a similar nature to glance) | 18:39 |
gyee | now rolling upgrade on a mult-site datacenter will be even more fun :-) | 18:39 |
dolphm | so, during a rolling upgrade of keystone, you'd suffer a "partial service outage", wherein you can't onboard new users (including shadowing), manage authz, tweak your service catalog, etc, but you'd be able to create and validate tokens all day | 18:40 |
rderose_ | ++ | 18:40 |
bknudson | I hope it doesn't take all day | 18:40 |
*** links has quit IRC | 18:40 | |
dolphm | gyee: the duration of read-only mode becomes the concern in that case -- the more nodes you're upgrading, the more time you're likely spending in read-only mode | 18:40 |
ayoung | dolphm, can we store revoations in a flat file, and run them all post upgrade? | 18:40 |
dolphm | bknudson: i hope not too :) | 18:40 |
dstanek | also PCI things would be off during that time. e.g. no recording failed auths | 18:41 |
dolphm | bknudson: in reality, you're not upgrading one node at a time, but groups of nodes at once | 18:41 |
bknudson | it would be interesting to see some kind of timing on this, since it's something we've had to guess on. | 18:41 |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 18:41 | |
rderose_ | dstanek: correct | 18:41 |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 18:41 | |
bknudson | I have no idea if the read-only period is 5 mins or 5 days. | 18:41 |
henrynash | dolphm: so it's probably worth perhaps you giving the reasons why you feel the current spec isn't teh right way to go | 18:41 |
* ayoung wonders if we should be backing revocations to a KVS anyway | 18:41 | |
bknudson | we should be backing all keystone data to a kvs. | 18:42 |
dolphm | ayoung: you can always write to the db yourself? keystone-manage revoke-things-manually | 18:42 |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:42 | |
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 18:42 | |
ayoung | dolphm, nah, I am thinking of all the Horizon log-outs | 18:42 |
gyee | anyone gone through multi-site upgrade so far, I presume there's a step to redo the replication after the upgrade? | 18:42 |
lbragstad | raw sql for the win | 18:42 |
*** mickeys has quit IRC | 18:42 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 18:42 | |
dolphm | ayoung: good point | 18:43 |
dstanek | gyee: what replication? | 18:43 |
bknudson | does the server return some http status? | 18:43 |
bknudson | when it's read-only | 18:43 |
henrynash | as far as I am concerned we have a perfectly good solution right now agreed...albeit with more steps required (which of course means more possibiliy of operater error) | 18:43 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:43 | |
gyee | dstanek, like replicating data between sites? | 18:43 |
dolphm | bknudson: yes, 503 on POST and PATCH, for example | 18:43 |
lbragstad | gyee are you thinking part of the deployment is in read-only? | 18:43 |
lbragstad | and the other part isn't? | 18:43 |
dstanek | gyee: in RO mode everything is RO until the upgrade is completed | 18:44 |
*** sneti has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
lbragstad | dstanek ++ | 18:44 |
lbragstad | dstanek thats how I understand it | 18:44 |
dolphm | bknudson: new exception is implemented here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349700/3/keystone/exception.py | 18:44 |
gyee | dstanek, right, but we'll have to configure to replace any new tables don't we | 18:44 |
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
gyee | replicate | 18:44 |
bknudson | makes sense. I'll not that we already see 503 errors (from proxy server) | 18:44 |
dolphm | gyee: i don't understand | 18:44 |
*** sneti_ has quit IRC | 18:45 | |
lbragstad | gyee no we just not allowing writes through keystone | 18:45 |
dolphm | bknudson: yeah, this would be the first 503 from keystone itself | 18:45 |
lbragstad | gyee the upgrade will still write to the database | 18:45 |
gyee | dolphm, you want to upgrade all the sites, then turn replication back on right? | 18:45 |
lbragstad | gyee which will replicate like it normally would | 18:45 |
dolphm | lbragstad: the database itself is not read-only, it's the keystone service that is rejecting write requests | 18:46 |
gyee | including the new tables and tables we don't want to replicate | 18:46 |
dolphm | gyee: *^ | 18:46 |
lbragstad | gyee what dolphm said | 18:46 |
dolphm | gyee: what tables don't you want to replicate? why do they exist | 18:46 |
henrynash | dolphm: what about my question of how the RO mode is achiveed...si this by code in keystone itself? If so, would this change only be execuatable for Newton->Ocata | 18:46 |
notmorgan | don't table creates get replicated? | 18:46 |
dolphm | henrynash: yes, it's literally this one liner https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349700/3/keystone/common/sql/core.py,unified | 18:47 |
lbragstad | henrynash read-only meaning keystone will reject requests to write to the database | 18:47 |
notmorgan | in standard replication models? | 18:47 |
lbragstad | notmorgan yeah | 18:47 |
dolphm | henrynash: any driver trying to open a write session with respond to http requests with a 503 instead | 18:47 |
notmorgan | why are we... i 'm not sure what the issue here is | 18:47 |
henrynash | dolphm: so that means we can't use it to roll upgrades from Mitaka to Newton | 18:47 |
notmorgan | henrynash: that is already the case. | 18:47 |
lbragstad | we're not flipping any specific database bits to make this read only | 18:47 |
*** mrmartin has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
henrynash | notmorgan: ? | 18:48 |
notmorgan | henrynash: mitaka => Newton is not rolling upgrade iirc, wouldn't the base be newton to -> o? | 18:48 |
notmorgan | since support is landing in n? | 18:48 |
dolphm | henrynash: and L129 documents a workaround for Mitaka->Newton https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350793/2/doc/source/upgrading.rst | 18:48 |
henrynash | notmotgan: yes it is | 18:48 |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 18:48 | |
henrynash | notmorgan: that's what we agreed in the spec at the midcycle | 18:48 |
henrynash | and that's what is already up for review | 18:48 |
dolphm | notmorgan: yeah, good support will be newton to O | 18:49 |
dolphm | cata | 18:49 |
notmorgan | dolphm: ok :) | 18:49 |
dolphm | but in my head, this is possible with some extra effort for mitaka -> newton upgrades if you really wanted to | 18:49 |
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:49 | |
*** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:50 | |
henrynash | so although I'm always up for simplification, I don't see why we should move away from a commitment of a full RW rolling upgrade.... | 18:50 |
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:50 | |
*** sneti has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:50 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:51 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 18:51 | |
*** andymaier has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:51 | |
dolphm | henrynash: no other project has successfully delivered on true rolling upgrades yet - i'm skeptical that we're going to be able to achieve it in a single release without serious race conditions and other unexpected bugs related to the complexity of the required implementations | 18:52 |
dolphm | when we have the testing in place to assert that we're doing things correctly and safely (or to show that we're doing it wrong), i'll feel much more comfortable pursuing more complicated implementations | 18:53 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
gyee | yeah, lets give it a try, experimental | 18:53 |
*** nishaYadav has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:53 | |
*** tr3buchet is now known as harry | 18:53 | |
dolphm | gyee: i can't stomach the idea of treating upgrades as "experimental" | 18:53 |
rderose_ | I think the difficult part, is that the code has to behave differently based on the deployment phase, read/write to old and new columns for example. Whereas with read-only strategy, it's much simpler in that respect. | 18:53 |
henrynash | given that in Newton we are doing all the migrartion in one go in the expand phase, I think this lowers our risk | 18:53 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:53 | |
*** harry is now known as tr3buchet | 18:53 | |
bknudson | if we implement the read-only upgrade, does that block moving to the full r-w upgrade? | 18:54 |
dolphm | gyee: almost ANY bug during an upgrade is treated as critical | 18:54 |
notmorgan | dolphm: ++ | 18:54 |
rderose_ | bknudson: I don't think so | 18:54 |
henrynash | bknudson: not technically...although the guidance from the offsite was have the same commands as the zero-downtime rolling upgrade approach, | 18:54 |
gyee | dolphm, yeah, but we guarantee this going to work? | 18:55 |
lbragstad | bknudson not that I am aware of - a RO upgrade is a little more restrictive and a few less cases | 18:55 |
*** myoung|alt has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:55 | |
dolphm | bknudson: no; because we can relax the requirement for read-only mode later, and introduce new commands for more granular steps in the ugprade process later | 18:55 |
rderose_ | gyee: oh yeah, 100% guaranteed :) | 18:55 |
*** myoung has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
gyee | alllrighty then | 18:55 |
dolphm | bknudson: the basic expand -> migrate -> contract pattern would still hold | 18:55 |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:55 | |
*** myoung|alt is now known as myoung | 18:55 | |
lbragstad | a lot of the complexity comes from the write-side of the problem | 18:56 |
dolphm | all / most * | 18:56 |
ayoung | 4 minutes left | 18:56 |
dolphm | ayoung: thanks | 18:56 |
*** nisha_ has quit IRC | 18:56 | |
*** gagehugo has left #openstack-meeting | 18:56 | |
henrynash | lbragstad: which we are not doing in N anyway...we are doing the migration in one go.... | 18:56 |
*** maishsk has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:56 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
lbragstad | henrynash but we don't claim any upgrade support currently, right? | 18:58 |
dolphm | henrynash: i absolutely want to get to a full R/W capable upgrade, but this feels like a safe step in the correct direction for the next release or two, until we get some experience operating and testing minimal/zero downtime upgrades as a broader community | 18:58 |
rderose_ | ++ | 18:58 |
henrynash | lbragdatad: for M->N, yes we will | 18:58 |
henrynash | lbragstad: we just doing do the migrations piecemeal, on the fly... | 18:58 |
*** AJaeger has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:59 | |
dolphm | henrynash: you mean we can't / aren't going to refactor the migrations we've already landed? | 18:59 |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:59 | |
henrynash | dolphm: no, but we do repair anything the leave unset | 18:59 |
dolphm | (time) | 19:00 |
dolphm | let's carry this on in a mailing list discussion? | 19:00 |
dolphm | i'd be happy to start it | 19:00 |
dolphm | #endmeeting | 19:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 19:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 19:00:34 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 19:00 |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:00 | |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2016/keystone.2016-08-09-18.02.html | 19:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2016/keystone.2016-08-09-18.02.txt | 19:00 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2016/keystone.2016-08-09-18.02.log.html | 19:00 |
fungi | infra team: assemble! | 19:00 |
* mordred hands fungi the conch | 19:00 | |
* jeblair attaches arms | 19:00 | |
crinkle | o/ | 19:00 |
AJaeger | o/ | 19:00 |
jesusaur | o/ | 19:00 |
* mordred found it laying outside | 19:00 | |
anteaya | nice | 19:00 |
fungi | (and i'll form the head) | 19:01 |
fungi | (until next election, maybe) | 19:01 |
Zara | o/ | 19:01 |
pabelanger | present | 19:01 |
nibalizer | o/ | 19:01 |
SotK | o/ | 19:01 |
mordred | fungi: if only we could vote on which body part each of us is going to be ... we need a 2-dimensional CIVS | 19:01 |
*** bethwhite_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:01 | |
ianw | o/ | 19:02 |
* mordred should clearly not be the liver | 19:02 | |
jeblair | mordred: just exhaustively list all options? | 19:02 |
zaro | o/ | 19:02 |
jeblair | mordred: the civs folks will never expect that :) | 19:02 |
Shrews | o/ | 19:02 |
anteaya | ha ha ha | 19:02 |
mordred | jeblair: but what if the top three answers were "fungi | head" , "fungi | arm" , "fungi | 19:02 |
anteaya | mordred: no way do I want you as my liver | 19:02 |
mordred | | gall bladder" | 19:02 |
pleia2 | o/ | 19:02 |
*** d34dh0r53 is now known as d34dh0r53_24_89 | 19:02 | |
jeblair | mordred: the people will have spoken | 19:02 |
mordred | jeblair: good point | 19:03 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
ianw | fungi: i never realised there was a car voltron until recently, i thought it was only cats | 19:03 |
* jeblair is *not* going to say brexit during *this week's* meeting! | 19:03 | |
Zara | \o/ | 19:03 |
Zara | oh wait! | 19:03 |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
mordred | Zara: it's ok - the meeting hasn't started for real yet | 19:03 |
Zara | :) | 19:03 |
*** oshidoshi has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
*** jlanoux has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:04 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:04 | |
fungi | today's topics brought to you by: zaro, ianw, AJaeger, jpmaxman, Krenair, fungi (if we get all the way through the proposed agenda anyway) | 19:04 |
fungi | #startmeeting infra | 19:04 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 19:04:40 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is fungi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 19:04 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 19:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:04 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'infra' | 19:04 |
fungi | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting | 19:04 |
fungi | #topic Announcements | 19:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:04 | |
fungi | #info New IRC channel #zuul for discussions on development of Zuul | 19:04 |
*** browne has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
fungi | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2016-August/004614.html | 19:04 |
fungi | #info New IRC channel #openstack-shade for discussions on development of the Shade library | 19:05 |
fungi | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2016-August/004616.html | 19:05 |
fungi | apparently the #openstack-infra show has two exciting new spin-offs | 19:05 |
fungi | hopefully these won't be like laverne and shirley | 19:05 |
mordred | in stereo? | 19:05 |
fungi | unless maybe it's the lesser known animated laverne and shirley. that might be okay | 19:05 |
fungi | except we hope these channels will last more than one season | 19:05 |
anteaya | I liked laverne and shirley | 19:05 |
jesusaur | should that be #openstack-zuul? or is it just #zuul? | 19:05 |
AJaeger | just #zuul | 19:05 |
fungi | just #zuul, as it's not openstack-specific | 19:05 |
jesusaur | gotcha | 19:05 |
anteaya | looks like #zuul was created in 2009 | 19:05 |
anteaya | which predates openstack | 19:06 |
mordred | anteaya: we're really good at time travel | 19:06 |
fungi | zuul gets used far and wide beyond our community borders, so trying to do what we can to avoid making it look like it's openstack-centric | 19:06 |
anteaya | you are so | 19:06 |
*** d34dh0r53_24_89 is now known as d34dh0r531234123 | 19:06 | |
ianw | there is also now #openstack-dib for diskimage-builder which may sometimes be relevant to infra concerns | 19:06 |
AJaeger | Just as quick announcement - if we need more time, we can discuss later: | 19:06 |
AJaeger | bindep: We've changed the default file name from other-requirements.txt to bindep.txt and once we have done a new bindep release, I suggest we advocate usage of it more. I plan to send an email to the mailing list about this. | 19:06 |
AJaeger | constraints: All tox based jobs can now use constraints in the gate. I'm currently struggling with a translation change (waiting for merge) and still test a bit but plan to send an announcement to the list about this in the next days. | 19:06 |
fungi | AJaeger: yeah, i left teh bindep one out of announcements for today, we still need a release, image updates... | 19:07 |
AJaeger | fungi, yeah... | 19:07 |
fungi | AJaeger: i have your items as meeting topics | 19:07 |
fungi | so we can discuss | 19:07 |
fungi | #info Results Presentation: Operator Information Needs | 19:07 |
fungi | Piet has invited infra team members (at least those okay with proprietary videoconferencing systems) to see a presentation summarizing feedback from operator interviews | 19:07 |
fungi | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2016-August/004611.html | 19:07 |
AJaeger | fungi, ok | 19:07 |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:07 | |
fungi | also the obligatory... | 19:07 |
fungi | #info Reminder: late-cycle joint Infra/QA get together to be held September 19-21 (CW38) in at SAP offices in Walldorf, DE | 19:07 |
fungi | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/QAInfraNewtonSprint | 19:07 |
fungi | #topic Actions from last meeting | 19:07 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:07 | |
fungi | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-08-02-19.04.html | 19:08 |
fungi | "1. (none)" | 19:08 |
fungi | #topic Specs approval | 19:08 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs approval (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:08 | |
fungi | #info APPROVED: Pholio Service Installation | 19:08 |
fungi | #link http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/pholio.html | 19:08 |
fungi | #topic Priority Efforts: A Task Tracker for OpenStack (zaro) | 19:08 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts: A Task Tracker for OpenStack (zaro) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:08 | |
fungi | zaro: you have some changes linked on the agenda for gerrit 2.11.4 upgrades and its-storyboard fixes, which i approved earlier today | 19:08 |
fungi | need to discuss anything specific about these? | 19:08 |
zaro | yes, one more change for its-storyboar #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/353046 | 19:09 |
zaro | also for gerrit upgrade. thanks for approving those. | 19:09 |
AJaeger | FYI, there are two changes up to fix warnings/errors building specs: 352215 and 352218 | 19:09 |
zaro | i'm going to test the features it bring today. | 19:09 |
*** myoung has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
zaro | i'm wondering if we need to schedule an upgrade time/date? | 19:10 |
*** myoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:10 | |
zaro | i mean to review.o.o | 19:10 |
zaro | or should i just work with an infra-root to approve and make sure it doesn't fail | 19:10 |
fungi | sounds good. as soon as you're comfortable with the state of review-dev, we should decide on a convenient window (or have you already checked out review-dev at this point?) | 19:10 |
zaro | have not tested on review-dev yet. | 19:11 |
anteaya | we are in R-8, feature freeze is R-5 | 19:11 |
fungi | since it's a minor update and we don't need to do any offline reindex, we should be able to schedule a brief outage on short notice | 19:11 |
zaro | will do today but shouldn't take too long | 19:11 |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 19:11 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:11 | |
*** olaph has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:11 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 19:11 | |
* mordred is excited | 19:12 | |
fungi | but yeah, we're ramping up to high volume time for our whole ci, so soon it'll be harder to do much with it | 19:12 |
*** ntpttr__ has quit IRC | 19:12 | |
Zara | =D I've tested the storyboard changes on review-dev and they look good | 19:12 |
AJaeger | It feels already very high volume ;( | 19:12 |
fungi | zaro: i could help with the upgrade-related restart on this friday if all goes well. just let me know later today and i'll send out a maintenance announcement | 19:12 |
anteaya | AJaeger: huge backlog at the very least | 19:12 |
*** ntpttr__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:12 | |
SotK | \o/ | 19:13 |
zaro | fungi: cool | 19:13 |
fungi | #topic Switch to chrony (ianw) | 19:13 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Switch to chrony (ianw) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:13 | |
fungi | ianw: there's a novel on the agenda for this topic. care to summarize? | 19:13 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 19:13 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:13 | |
ianw | fungi: ntpd has been giving us some issues since we tried to deprecate ntpdate | 19:13 |
anteaya | who is us? | 19:14 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:14 | |
fungi | our (openstack's) ci system | 19:14 |
*** andymaier has quit IRC | 19:14 | |
fungi | though it sounds like it primarily hit tripleo | 19:14 |
fungi | or their workers | 19:14 |
ianw | if i put up changes to switch everything to chronyd, will people have issues with this? | 19:14 |
*** kragniz has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:14 | |
*** andymaier has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:15 | |
pabelanger | I commented on the review, if we are going to do it, we'd need to create puppet-chrony as a drop in replacement for puppetlabs-ntp | 19:15 |
ianw | it seems chronyd is better suited to our needs than ntpd, as discussed (as noted, at some length) in the attached bug | 19:15 |
jeblair | what about ntpd for servers and chrony for zuul worker nodes? | 19:15 |
ianw | pabelanger: yep, happy to do that, if we agree to follow that path | 19:15 |
fungi | ianw: my take was that since chrony was what red hat is replacing ntpd with instead of rolling forward to a default ntpd that has deprecated ntpdate, we should switch to chronyd on red hat based platforms | 19:15 |
ianw | so i just wondered if it's worth keeping two things running in our puppet, etc | 19:16 |
jeblair | (could be an opportunity to move ntp out of the worker template and into a dib element) | 19:16 |
ianw | why i was proposing a global change | 19:16 |
pabelanger | jeblair: or ansible? | 19:16 |
fungi | as debian/ubuntu are sticking with ntpd as their default time sync implementation, we continue to use ntpd there | 19:16 |
jeblair | pabelanger: just so we're really, really, clear -- we are NOT using ansible to build images | 19:16 |
jeblair | every week we seem to have a conversation about that | 19:16 |
jeblair | and this is the last one i'm participating in | 19:17 |
pabelanger | jeblair: right, but have DIB elements to run ansible (over puppet) | 19:17 |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:17 | |
fungi | pabelanger: which dib elements are running ansible? | 19:17 |
jeblair | pabelanger: i don't have an opinion on that | 19:17 |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:18 | |
pabelanger | I'm pulling the topic sideways, but none today | 19:18 |
fungi | i thought we were trying to get configuration management/orchestration services out of our dib elements over time | 19:18 |
fungi | so that we can avoid having them installed on our images | 19:18 |
fungi | but yes, different topic | 19:18 |
pabelanger | I'm happy to talk more about it after the meeting | 19:19 |
jeblair | ianw: anyway, we know that separating long-running server infra from our worker images is something we want to do anyway, so pulling ntp from the worker puppet (but keeping it in server puppet), then doing something to install chrony in the images via an element seems like a good step | 19:19 |
fungi | so to bring this back around, are we saying switch from ntpdate/ntpd to chronyd on centos and fedora single-use job nodes, but stick with ntp-wait/ntpd on debian and ubuntu? or switch to chronyd on all single-use job nodes regardless of distro? | 19:19 |
*** andymaier has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
jeblair | do we have the same ntp-wait problem on debuntu? | 19:20 |
ianw | well i would rather not have two branches of time-keeping logic, so we should choose one or the other | 19:20 |
ianw | jeblair: in the minutes there is a review where someone is having issues, they are using a snapshot though | 19:20 |
fungi | to my knowledge, the symptom has so far only been observed on centos/fedora dib images booted in tripleo's environment | 19:21 |
mordred | so, replacing ntpd seems strange to me BUT - if it's a thing we need to do, I tend to fall in favor of doing it everywhere rather than just half of the places | 19:21 |
pabelanger | tripleo-test-cloud-rh2 was a networking issue | 19:21 |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:21 | |
pabelanger | tripleo-test-cloud-rh1 is actually working today | 19:21 |
ianw | https://review.openstack.org/352621 | 19:21 |
*** ksantoshk has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:21 | |
jeblair | fungi: oh. hrm. | 19:21 |
jeblair | okay, what's really going on then? | 19:21 |
anteaya | I'm in favour of the solution addressing the problem | 19:22 |
ianw | mordred: yes, that was my feeling, if we could get agreement | 19:22 |
mordred | ianw: ++ | 19:22 |
fungi | i just worry that switching all our distros to chronyd flip-flops us from using a non-default time sync implementation on one family of distros to using a non-default time sync implementation on the other family of nodes | 19:22 |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
fungi | i'm more in favor of sticking with whatever each distro's default recommendation is, even if they disagree | 19:22 |
jeblair | fungi: i lean toward that way of thinking as well | 19:22 |
* crinkle too | 19:23 | |
jeblair | (unless we have a Good Reason(TM)) | 19:23 |
*** santoshk has quit IRC | 19:23 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 19:23 | |
fungi | debian and ubuntu seem to be moving forward with the assumption that ntpdate should no longer be used and ntpd needs a rapid quiescence at boot option, while red hat seems to say you should continue to use ntpdate, or switch to chrony because that's what they plan to default to | 19:24 |
pabelanger | ianw: is 352621 an issue anymore now that ntpdate.service was enabled? | 19:24 |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:24 | |
*** santoshk has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:24 | |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 19:24 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:24 | |
ianw | pabelanger: i think it might be a separate issue due to the use of snapshots | 19:24 |
fungi | but my interpretation of the bug ianw linked is that red hat's package maintainers have little interest in doing away with ntpdate, and would rather just drop ntpd altogether | 19:25 |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:25 | |
ianw | if the choice is to maintain two time-sync paths, then i think i'd prefer to just have a decree that infra uses ntpd and we just suck up any issues | 19:25 |
jeblair | also, we don't use snapshots | 19:25 |
jeblair | (and we're not planning on supporting them in nodepool in the future) | 19:25 |
ianw | jeblair: sure, but my thought is that we might make life easier for everyone | 19:26 |
*** ksantoshk has quit IRC | 19:26 | |
ianw | if chronyd is making better choices about keeping the time in sync for our situation | 19:26 |
jeblair | yeah, just wanted to throw that out as not being a primary use case | 19:26 |
fungi | ianw: well, if support for ntpd on red hat is planned to evaporate, it doesn't sound like we should continue using it there | 19:26 |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 19:26 | |
fungi | does chronyd do a good job of keeping subsecond synchronization over teh course of a long-running job, or is it going to be more subject to skips and jumps? | 19:27 |
*** liyifeng has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
*** ntpttr__ has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
fungi | (and do we care, i guess?) | 19:27 |
*** mrhillsman has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
*** liyifeng has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:27 | |
ianw | fungi: i think for the most part, we're syncing the time in devstack-gate, and from that point we're not going to be jumping much | 19:28 |
ianw | of course we could move that sync out of d-g into a more generic part | 19:28 |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 19:29 | |
*** ntpttr__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:29 | |
fungi | i guess the ultimate requirements are, 1. make sure we have a fairly high-precision global synchronization of time on our job workers, and 2. make sure it's actually in sync prior to starting job payloads | 19:30 |
ianw | for something like this, are people happy with a "if redhat include ::chrony else include ::ntp" ? http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-kerberos/tree/manifests/client.pp | 19:30 |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:30 | |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:31 | |
ianw | really, that seems to want to say "kerberos needs the time in sync", but how that happens seems orthogonal | 19:31 |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 19:31 | |
jeblair | i'm still at: chrony in dib on rh, ntp in dib on debuntu (support both in d-g), and ntp in puppet for servers | 19:31 |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:31 | |
mordred | jeblair: what about rh servers? | 19:31 |
AJaeger | mordred: do we have any? | 19:31 |
mordred | git*.o.o | 19:31 |
rcarrillocruz | gits | 19:32 |
fungi | sure, our git servers at least | 19:32 |
anteaya | the git farm runs centos | 19:32 |
fungi | and pbx servers | 19:32 |
anteaya | pleia2: centos6 isn't it? | 19:32 |
mordred | I mean, it's old centos so does not have a problem currently | 19:32 |
fungi | or did we switch those to trusty/. | 19:32 |
*** merooney has quit IRC | 19:32 | |
AJaeger | mordred: ah, thanks | 19:32 |
fungi | mordred: git servers are centos 7.x... not sure how old you mean | 19:32 |
mordred | me either | 19:33 |
jeblair | if we want to advance the state of our puppet to be able to run servers on fedora, i'm not opposed to that conditional. | 19:33 |
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk | 19:33 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
pleia2 | yeah, they're on 7.2 | 19:34 |
fungi | ianw: what was the bugzilla link for that ntpd systemd element dependency bug pabelanger opened and the maintainer closed>? | 19:34 |
*** prateek_ has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
fungi | er, systemd unit | 19:35 |
*** ihrachys has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
ianw | fungi: not sure i saw that one. was it to wait for the network to be up before ntpd starts? | 19:35 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
fungi | yeah, i thought that's the one where they had said red hat was going to be defaulting to chrony anyway | 19:35 |
ianw | cause it kind of deliberately does *not* do that ... ntpd itself picks up when interfaces appear | 19:36 |
pabelanger | fungi: I haven't created that one etc. It was a dependency issue on networking, which ntpdate.service provided | 19:36 |
fungi | pabelanger: right, that's the one i'm referring to | 19:36 |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:36 | |
pabelanger | fungi: That fixed the need to restart ntpd to get ntp-wait working | 19:36 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:37 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 19:37 | |
ianw | yeah, it is the default for rhel and fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361382#c7 | 19:37 |
fungi | #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361382#c3 | 19:37 |
openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1361382 in ntp "ntp-wait hangs after boot for a long time, unless ntpd is restarted" [Unspecified,Closed: notabug] - Assigned to mlichvar | 19:37 |
*** mrhillsman has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:37 | |
fungi | just found it in the channel logs | 19:37 |
*** bobh__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:37 | |
*** radeks has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:37 | |
anteaya | fungi: thanks for the link | 19:37 |
AJaeger | ah, fungi-the-irc-search-engine ;) | 19:37 |
*** toscalix_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:38 | |
ianw | alright, well in conclusion, not much interest in switching to chronyd everywhere | 19:38 |
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:38 | |
*** toscalix_ has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
fungi | "As a long-term solution it's probably best to switch to chrony. It's the default NTP client in Fedora/RHEL [...]" | 19:38 |
ianw | i can see what it looks like to just switch centos/fedora, but i'm not really sold on keeping both paths tbh | 19:38 |
fungi | that's the quote i was looking for | 19:38 |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:39 | |
fungi | so based on that i can see switching to chrony as our default ntp client in fedora/centos | 19:39 |
fungi | because we're running a non-default on those distros right now | 19:39 |
fungi | and our usual preference is to operate our servers and run our jobs on as default an upstream choice of options as possible | 19:40 |
jeblair | we have a lot of switches like that in puppet, fwiw. comes with the territory i think. we could abstract it with a new module so we only have the switch in one place and use that module everywhere in puppet. | 19:40 |
pabelanger | I believe that discussion could also happen upstream with puppetlabs-ntp too, improving support for RHEL / fedore | 19:40 |
jeblair | (but i still think dib is the way to go if we want to focus on worker nodes first) | 19:40 |
mordred | ++ | 19:40 |
mordred | I think worker nodes are the most important part of this | 19:40 |
fungi | i concur | 19:40 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
*** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:41 | |
*** numan_ has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
fungi | #agreed We should take a phased approach switching CentOS/Fedora DIB images from ntpdate and ntpd to chronyd, and then consider whether to also switch to chronyd on our long-running CentOS servers and with conditionals in any of our various puppet modules | 19:42 |
ianw | ok, thanks, onward ... | 19:42 |
fungi | that a close enough summary? | 19:42 |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
anteaya | looks good to me | 19:42 |
fungi | thanks ianw! | 19:42 |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:43 | |
fungi | #topic Bindep uses now bindep.txt by default (AJaeger) | 19:43 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Bindep uses now bindep.txt by default (AJaeger) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:43 | |
mordred | \o/ | 19:43 |
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:43 | |
fungi | AJaeger just wanted to mention that some possoble mass change proposals are coming, i think | 19:43 |
fungi | at least after we get a new bindep release tagged, and then confirmed present on all our images | 19:43 |
AJaeger | yeah, exactly | 19:43 |
mordred | only like 150 projects | 19:43 |
AJaeger | yeah, only ;( | 19:43 |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 19:43 | |
*** Apoorva has quit IRC | 19:43 | |
fungi | i'm happy to submit that change when the time comes, if you want | 19:44 |
AJaeger | If anybody wants to vote in all PTL elections, please tell me and youcan do the changes ;) | 19:44 |
anteaya | I actually am surprised these days if I see an AJaeger patch that isnt' a mass change | 19:44 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 19:44 | |
anteaya | ha ha ha | 19:44 |
fungi | heh, AJaeger has a lot of good non-mass changes ;) | 19:44 |
anteaya | true | 19:44 |
*** nishaYadav has quit IRC | 19:45 | |
AJaeger | fungi, I'm fine doing it myself - like to complete this... | 19:45 |
fungi | anyway, for those that missed the discussion, rationale is in the review and commit message | 19:45 |
*** ihrachys_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:45 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:45 | |
*** Patifa has quit IRC | 19:45 | |
fungi | #link https://review.openstack.org/350184 | 19:45 |
fungi | there we go | 19:45 |
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz | 19:45 | |
fungi | #topic Constraints can be used in tox (AJaeger) | 19:45 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Constraints can be used in tox (AJaeger) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:46 | |
AJaeger | All tox based jobs can now use constraints in the gate. I'm currently struggling with a translation change (waiting for merge) and still test a bit but plan to send an announcement to the list about this in the next days. | 19:46 |
*** penick has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:46 | |
fungi | this was a ton of work, thanks for pushing through it AJaeger | 19:46 |
mordred | \o/ | 19:46 |
anteaya | thank you AJaeger | 19:46 |
rcarrillocruz | ++ | 19:46 |
*** ntpttr__ has quit IRC | 19:46 | |
AJaeger | A lot of work by many different people - implementation, review, design discussions, .... | 19:46 |
anteaya | thanks for shepherding it | 19:46 |
* mordred suggests AJaeger celebrate at White Trash Fast Food (it's what I would do if I were anywhere near Berlin) | 19:46 | |
anteaya | ha ha ha | 19:47 |
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:47 | |
anteaya | AJaeger: are you near Belin? | 19:47 |
anteaya | or just closer than the rest of us? | 19:47 |
* AJaeger will drink a glass of wine after the meeting ;) | 19:47 | |
AJaeger | anteaya: closer than the rest of you ;) 300 miles away | 19:47 |
anteaya | ha ha ha | 19:47 |
mordred | anteaya: :) | 19:47 |
anteaya | day trip for some fast food ha h aha | 19:48 |
*** mugsie_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:48 | |
fungi | wow, now that i've searched for that venue, i'm all up for catching a punk show there | 19:48 |
AJaeger | A plea for everybody: The tricky part are the post and release jobs with constraints. If anything unusual pops up, please carefully evaluate! | 19:48 |
*** mickeys has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
*** ihrachys has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
mordred | fungi: it's like the best place ever | 19:48 |
fungi | right, those have been switched the most recently, so not entirely certain all the bugs have shaken out | 19:49 |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 19:49 | |
*** AmitGalitz has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:49 | |
AJaeger | and those are also the ones that most people do not check ;( | 19:49 |
fungi | yep | 19:49 |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:49 | |
fungi | okay, anything else on constraints? | 19:50 |
AJaeger | nothing further from me on this unless there are questions | 19:50 |
fungi | #topic wiki status update (jpmaxman, Krenair, fungi) | 19:50 |
*** openstack changes topic to "wiki status update (jpmaxman, Krenair, fungi) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:50 | |
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom | 19:50 | |
fungi | jpmaxman has done some awesome work getting through an in-place upgrade to mediawiki 1.27 with a copy of our production data | 19:50 |
Zara | \o/ | 19:51 |
fungi | that demo is up for all to poke at and see if they can spot anything broken, particularly plugins/extensions we may have forgotten about | 19:51 |
fungi | #link https://wiki-upgrade-test.openstack.org/ | 19:51 |
*** coolsvap has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
anteaya | thank you jpmaxman | 19:51 |
fungi | it's set up with the newer "nocaptcha" recaptcha which is supposed to be a lot better at thwarting spammers | 19:51 |
* mordred hands jpmaxman a cat that isn't too angry | 19:52 | |
*** Jeffreyc42 has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:52 | |
fungi | also Krenair has worked out the bits needed to puppet a mw 1.27 deployment on ubuntu trusty | 19:52 |
fungi | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:wiki-upgrade+is:open | 19:52 |
*** lbrune has quit IRC | 19:52 | |
* AJaeger hands jpeeler a glass of wine and says thanks! | 19:52 | |
AJaeger | argh, completion ;( | 19:52 |
*** kylek3h has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
* AJaeger hands jpmaxman a glass of wine and says thanks! | 19:53 | |
*** Hosam has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:53 | |
anteaya | thanks krenair | 19:53 |
pleia2 | fungi: also important to note: "ReCaptcha module will be removed in the near future" https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-announce/2016-August/000193.html so it's good we're switching | 19:53 |
*** AmitGalitz has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
fungi | i've also added a trove database running mysql 5.6 and our "sane" configuration defaults which jpmaxman is working out some tests of our production data in next | 19:53 |
jpmaxman | hah hah | 19:53 |
fungi | after the meeting i'll be following up to the -dev ml with a call for testing on the wiki-upgrade-test site as well | 19:54 |
anteaya | oh good | 19:54 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 19:54 | |
anteaya | hopefully the keep the wiki folks will show up in droves | 19:54 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:55 | |
* jpmaxman blushes | 19:55 | |
fungi | worth noting, new account creation has been open again on the production wiki for a few weeks at this point (i'm just manually deleting spam and blocking spammer accounts a few times a day for now), but file/image uploads have been disabled since the older recaptcha plugin didn't cover them | 19:55 |
pleia2 | super glad to have Krenair's help on this, lots of great patches | 19:55 |
fungi | i don't think there's been any testing yet of whether the new nocaptcha confirmedit plugin covers file uploads but we can try that out after we switch production to 1.27 | 19:56 |
jpmaxman | happy to help hopefully we can bring this home | 19:56 |
anteaya | will new wiki allow file/image uploads? | 19:56 |
*** annegentle_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:56 | |
jpmaxman | anteaya: right now it is disabled | 19:56 |
fungi | yeah, "to be determined" | 19:56 |
anteaya | jpmaxman: thank you | 19:56 |
fungi | there are also some other extensions we can try adding to further thwart spammers, if need be | 19:57 |
jpmaxman | yeah there will be work still to be done for sure - the objective is a feature limited spam free wiki to start ;) | 19:57 |
fungi | as well as the somewhat nuclear option of adding a robots.txt to stop search engines indexing wiki content entirely | 19:57 |
fungi | if we need to | 19:57 |
jpmaxman | fungi: I got word we can do that as a short term solution if needed | 19:57 |
AJaeger | fungi, we could also only blacklist certain file types or all uploads from indexing... | 19:58 |
jpmaxman | I think the foundation would rather that than the google juice be diluted for all of www.o.o - but that ideally people would be able to find content on the wiki in the future so it should be a short term fix only | 19:58 |
fungi | AJaeger: yeah, we did that already. blacklisted pdfs and they switched to uploading images | 19:58 |
AJaeger | ;( | 19:58 |
anteaya | what do you mean you got word? | 19:58 |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:58 | |
jpmaxman | anteaya: briefly discussed with jamesmcarthur and sparkycollier | 19:59 |
fungi | he checked with the foundation site maintainers as to whether they thought it would help mitigate their concerns about the wiki spam influencing keyword rankings for the www site | 19:59 |
fungi | anyway, we're out of time | 20:00 |
anteaya | thank you fungi | 20:00 |
fungi | thanks everyone! | 20:00 |
*** gordc has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:00 | |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:00 | |
fungi | #endmeeting | 20:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 20:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 20:00:25 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 20:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-08-09-19.04.html | 20:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-08-09-19.04.txt | 20:00 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-08-09-19.04.log.html | 20:00 |
flaper87 | TC folks? | 20:00 |
flaper87 | annegentle dims dhellmann flaper87 johnthetubaguy mestery mtreinish thingee mordred morgan russellb sdague ttx | 20:00 |
* amrith carries pop-corn to comfy seat | 20:00 | |
flaper87 | o/ | 20:00 |
russellb | hi | 20:00 |
sdague | o/ | 20:00 |
johnthetubaguy | o/ | 20:00 |
annegentle_ | ohai | 20:00 |
thingee | o/ | 20:00 |
dims | o/ | 20:01 |
* edleafe finds a comfy seat in the back | 20:01 | |
* mugsie lurks | 20:01 | |
flaper87 | ooooooooooooooook, we've quorum | 20:01 |
flaper87 | #startmeeting | 20:01 |
flaper87 | Hello everyone! | 20:01 |
openstack | flaper87: Error: A meeting name is required, e.g., '#startmeeting Marketing Committee' | 20:01 |
devananda | o/ | 20:01 |
flaper87 | As usual, you can find today's agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Agenda | 20:01 |
flaper87 | Let's start with a few "easy" ones | 20:01 |
*** Shrews has left #openstack-meeting | 20:01 | |
flaper87 | #topic Clarify that cycle-trailing projects follow the milestone deadlines | 20:01 |
dhellmann | o/ | 20:01 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/348501 | 20:01 |
flaper87 | #fail | 20:01 |
AJaeger | flaper87: readd #startmeeting | 20:01 |
amrith | you want to startmeeting again | 20:01 |
flaper87 | #startmeeting tc | 20:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 9 20:01:34 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is flaper87. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 20:01 |
flaper87 | Hello everyone! | 20:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 20:01 |
flaper87 | As usual, you can find today's agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Agenda | 20:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:01 | |
flaper87 | Let's start with a few "easy" ones | 20:01 |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'tc' | 20:01 |
flaper87 | #topic Clarify that cycle-trailing projects follow the milestone deadlines | 20:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Clarify that cycle-trailing projects follow the milestone deadlines (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:01 | |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/348501 | 20:01 |
mordred | o/ | 20:01 |
mtreinish | ~o/ | 20:01 |
flaper87 | AJaeger: I got this | 20:01 |
flaper87 | #topic Refresh I18n ATC list | 20:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Refresh I18n ATC list (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:02 | |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/351480 | 20:02 |
notmorgan | flaper87: you can remove me from the ping list | 20:02 |
flaper87 | notmorgan: yup | 20:02 |
notmorgan | flaper87: as of today, I'm no longer part of the TC. | 20:02 |
russellb | notmorgan: thanks again for your service :) | 20:02 |
flaper87 | notmorgan: thanks for your service | 20:02 |
* flaper87 will update the governance repo | 20:02 | |
flaper87 | ok, this one has majority already | 20:02 |
annegentle_ | notmorgan: sorry to see you go, thanks for the support and service | 20:02 |
*** pabelanger has left #openstack-meeting | 20:02 | |
flaper87 | any reason why this shouldn't be merged ? | 20:02 |
annegentle_ | flaper87: looks good to me | 20:03 |
johnthetubaguy | we could try wait for consensus instead, just for giggles, but otherwise, I am happy | 20:03 |
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:03 | |
*** ihrachys_ has quit IRC | 20:03 | |
flaper87 | now, onto the one I skipped after my failed w/ my copy/paste to start the meeting | 20:03 |
dims | +1 | 20:03 |
annegentle_ | johnthetubaguy: 9 is pretty darn close :) | 20:03 |
flaper87 | #topic Clarify that cycle-trailing projects follow the milestone deadlines | 20:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Clarify that cycle-trailing projects follow the milestone deadlines (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:03 | |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/348501 | 20:03 |
flaper87 | This one has 8 votes already | 20:04 |
flaper87 | that's majority already. | 20:04 |
flaper87 | Any reason why this shouldn't be merged? | 20:04 |
dhellmann | does anyone have any other questions about that one? | 20:04 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
annegentle_ | can't think of one myself | 20:04 |
* flaper87 is good with it | 20:05 | |
*** kebray has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
flaper87 | ok, sold... I guess | 20:05 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:05 | |
flaper87 | Now, onto more heated topics | 20:05 |
flaper87 | #topic Replacing Morgan's seat | 20:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Replacing Morgan's seat (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:06 | |
flaper87 | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/2016-August/001233.html, including various proposals | 20:06 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/351104 (flaper87) | 20:06 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/351295 (dhellmann) | 20:06 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/351427 (anteaya) | 20:06 |
flaper87 | There are several proposals. The first one proposes using the next closest election to elect all the missing seats. If 1 or more vacants would open before the election, those would be added to the number of seats up for election. | 20:06 |
flaper87 | The second proposal is to adopt the same model as the foundation and it proposes three different scenarios: 1) Vacancy openned less than 4 weeks before the election and the seat will be contested, then nothing is done till the election. 2) Vacancy openned less than 4 weeks before the election and the seat will not be contested, then candidates that don't win a seat would be asked if they want to | 20:06 |
flaper87 | serve 3) Vacancy opens more than 4 weeks before the election, the TC consults the last results. | 20:06 |
flaper87 | The third proposal is to have by-elections as soon as the vacancies open, regardless what time in the cycle we're at. | 20:06 |
flaper87 | #link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By-election | 20:06 |
*** bill_az_ has quit IRC | 20:06 | |
flaper87 | I'm fine with either the first or the third option, to be honest. The 2 first points of the second option are fine. The third one is the one that doesn't sit well with me. The main reason is that if it happens too late in the cycle, then I believe we'd be pulling in someone in the TC that could loose to others anyway. | 20:06 |
flaper87 | The way the community and its members evolve in the cycle is really hard to predict, which is why I'd prefer to leave it up for elections either to the closest election or a by-election. | 20:06 |
* flaper87 hopes that summarizes the three proposals | 20:06 | |
flaper87 | (fairly summarizes would be better) | 20:06 |
anteaya | flaper87: the third proposal is not by-election as soon as the vacany is open | 20:07 |
flaper87 | anteaya: mind clarifying? | 20:07 |
flaper87 | anteaya: sorry about that | 20:07 |
anteaya | the third proposal is by-election, timing and details to be determined based on circumstances | 20:07 |
flaper87 | anteaya: thanks! Sorry for not summarizing it well :) | 20:08 |
dhellmann | it's reasonable to expect that we would want to do it relatively quickly, but it's not required | 20:08 |
anteaya | dhellmann: right | 20:08 |
mugsie | anteaya: but always holding a by-election? | 20:08 |
anteaya | mugsie: yes | 20:08 |
mugsie | OK. | 20:08 |
anteaya | by-election could be held with other election | 20:08 |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:08 | |
anteaya | or if vacancy occurs at christmas the electon could be held when it makes sense to do so | 20:08 |
annegentle_ | anteaya: other election such as a PTL election? Or along with the already-scheduled TC election? | 20:08 |
anteaya | annegentle_: either | 20:08 |
anteaya | whatever makes sense | 20:09 |
annegentle_ | anteaya: check, thanks for clarifying. | 20:09 |
anteaya | annegentle_: thanks for asking | 20:09 |
mordred | there are times when I wish we could CIVS a set of competing specs | 20:09 |
sdague | my preference is dhellmann's proposal, which aligns with how the board does it more or less. It feels to me like 5 month old results are still pretty fresh in the community given our current turn over rate. | 20:09 |
dims | i agree with sdague and dhellmann | 20:09 |
johnthetubaguy | so I am currently preferring option 2, because it saves lots of people a lot of time, and still seems to respect the will of the voters | 20:09 |
*** ntpttr__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:09 | |
flaper87 | sdague: 5 months old results is exactly what doesn't sit well with me | 20:10 |
mugsie | flaper87: no? | 20:10 |
*** ntpttr__ has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
russellb | the board doesn't actually specify "consult last results" | 20:10 |
flaper87 | Things change, people come/go, opinions evolve, etc | 20:10 |
russellb | it's just up to the individual directors to appoint, and in practice, that's how they've done it so far | 20:10 |
sdague | russellb: that's why I said "more or less" | 20:10 |
russellb | but it's not coded that way | 20:10 |
thingee | I'm ok with the 5 month old results. Not ok with an election to happen and assume voters will be around. | 20:10 |
russellb | the flexibility is nice | 20:10 |
mugsie | its a pretty short period of time. | 20:10 |
annegentle_ | I feel / sense that the 4 week window one is best for a bunch of groups; the electorate, the election officials not having to do a by-election on-demand, and the TC members themselves feeling like there's a process for when you just can't finish your term. | 20:10 |
*** merooney has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
anteaya | thingee: that is why the timing is not set in the patch | 20:10 |
sdague | russellb: to be fair, I'd also be fine with more flexibility in there as well | 20:11 |
edleafe | flaper87: we elect people for a full year; I doubt that someone who was voted for last election isn't desireable 5 months hence | 20:11 |
* annegentle_ still needs to vote | 20:11 | |
dhellmann | russellb : I would also be ok with a proposal that said it that way, but some other folks seemed to want the details written down | 20:11 |
flaper87 | thingee: fwiw, my proposal says we could elect the open sits on the next closest election. Not saying it's better, though | 20:11 |
anteaya | thingee: so the timing can be selected to ensure voters are around | 20:11 |
johnthetubaguy | thingee: good point, we don't have the best turn out anyways, a by-election is likely much worse | 20:11 |
*** asselin_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:11 | |
*** julim has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
flaper87 | edleafe: well, if that person won already, there's not much to do. If that person didn't win, then there is | 20:11 |
sdague | johnthetubaguy / thingee ++ | 20:11 |
thingee | anteaya: that's hard to figure though | 20:11 |
annegentle_ | oh, and I still am confused on one point... just a sec. | 20:11 |
thingee | anteaya: we already have problems with usual scheduled elections | 20:12 |
anteaya | thingee: we can look at email and gerrit activity | 20:12 |
edleafe | flaper87: but "won" is a relative term in CIVS | 20:12 |
*** david-lyle_ is now known as david-lyle | 20:12 | |
anteaya | thingee: yes we do, no argument there | 20:12 |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
annegentle_ | so do we need the wording from https://review.openstack.org/351104 so that the four-week proposal works (https://review.openstack.org/351295)? They are independent, right? | 20:12 |
flaper87 | edleafe: yeah yeah, made it into the N seats up for election | 20:12 |
sdague | and picking voting times then becomes another extra effort | 20:12 |
flaper87 | :P | 20:12 |
anteaya | but I think we are futher ahead to have more elections, when warrented, not fewer | 20:12 |
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:12 | |
thingee | sdague: right | 20:12 |
*** AJaeger has left #openstack-meeting | 20:12 | |
dhellmann | anteaya : flaper87's proposal and mine are mutually exclusive. We don't want both of them. | 20:12 |
amrith | flaper87, dhellmann I think the compromise between the three proposals is my Aug 8, 6:43am comment. with threshold = 4 weeks. | 20:12 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: ok | 20:13 |
thingee | going down a list of previous voted people is less effort imo | 20:13 |
dhellmann | oops, meant that for annegentle_ , tab-complete-fail | 20:13 |
* thingee is lazy | 20:13 | |
anteaya | thingee: yes it is less effort | 20:13 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: happens all the time right anteaya ? :) | 20:13 |
anteaya | no question about how much effort it is | 20:13 |
anteaya | I'm talking about value | 20:13 |
anteaya | and doing right by the electorate | 20:13 |
sdague | given the historical drift of candidates on the TC list (who ranked where cycle after cycle), I think that a special election is largely going to give us the same results as just pulling from the last election, except with a ton of extra work | 20:13 |
anteaya | annegentle_: all the time | 20:14 |
edleafe | vacancies are filled with either appointment or re-vote. Picking from previous results is just one way to handle an appointed replacement | 20:14 |
thingee | Looking at the list now of the next people in-line, are these people still active and participating? | 20:14 |
dhellmann | amrith : I don't think civs results in ties, does it? | 20:14 |
thingee | would anyone have a problem with them? | 20:14 |
anteaya | dhellmann: it can | 20:14 |
* flaper87 doesn't want special elections but a simple election on the closest one | 20:14 | |
*** ihrachys has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
amrith | dhellmann, let me check. I think I looked it up and found that it could. | 20:14 |
anteaya | dhellmann: but we have rules for tie breaking | 20:14 |
anteaya | dhellmann: we just have never had to invoke them | 20:14 |
dhellmann | k | 20:15 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
*** baoli has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
edleafe | thingee: that's the vetting process. If they aren't active, or would upset affiliation, move on to the next in line | 20:15 |
annegentle_ | thingee: yeah I wondered if we had polled the people next on the list yet... | 20:15 |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
dhellmann | sdague : I think you're probably right. | 20:15 |
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:15 | |
sdague | thingee: they mostly all seem active to me, and I wouldn't have a problem going down that list in order | 20:15 |
edleafe | thingee: or if they are simply no longer interested | 20:15 |
thingee | edleafe: +1 | 20:15 |
anteaya | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TieBreaking | 20:15 |
russellb | anyone have a link handy to the last TC election results? | 20:15 |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:15 | |
sdague | yeh, one sec | 20:15 |
sdague | http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_fef5cc22eb3dc27a | 20:15 |
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:16 | |
sdague | dtroyer would be the fix ask | 20:16 |
johnthetubaguy | just to be clear, did we rule out the not filling the seat until its next up for election approach? | 20:16 |
thingee | don't think anyone would be upset with dtroyer :) | 20:16 |
dhellmann | johnthetubaguy : we did not explicitly decide that. | 20:16 |
sdague | then david-lyle, sdake, anteaya, cdent (in that order) | 20:16 |
amrith | dhellmann, anteaya found the link I was loking for; thanks anteaya | 20:16 |
russellb | thingee: truth | 20:16 |
anteaya | johnthetubaguy: that would leave the seat vacant until next north american spring | 20:16 |
johnthetubaguy | anteaya: yes | 20:16 |
notmorgan | johnthetubaguy: my seat would be up in spring. | 20:16 |
anteaya | amrith: welcome | 20:16 |
notmorgan | long time w/ an unfilled seat. | 20:17 |
anteaya | johnthetubaguy: I didn't see that proposal up for discussion, no | 20:17 |
dims | All 4 algorithms end up with same result dtroyer | 20:17 |
anteaya | dims: this time | 20:17 |
dhellmann | johnthetubaguy : you raise a good point, and I think we should at least agree that we want to fill the seat if there's some minimum amount of time left. | 20:17 |
dhellmann | johnthetubaguy : my proposed minimum is 1 month | 20:17 |
dims | anteaya : y | 20:17 |
notmorgan | dhellmann: i think your review specified 4wks, i would go with that over 1 month | 20:17 |
notmorgan | dhellmann: since months vary in length | 20:18 |
dhellmann | notmorgan : tomato, tomato | 20:18 |
anteaya | and the rules we are creating are for filling the seat in an uncontesed way even if someone has an issue with the candidate | 20:18 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: the only reason I think we must do that is because we don't have a consensus model for reaching agreement | 20:18 |
notmorgan | dhellmann: precision :P | 20:18 |
flaper87 | that being filling up the seat | 20:18 |
mtreinish | dhellmann: yeah, I think that was a good minimum | 20:18 |
flaper87 | otherwise we could live with an empty seat until the next election | 20:18 |
sdague | yeh, 4 weeks seems like a very reasonable time frame | 20:18 |
dims | either works for me 4 weeks or 1 month | 20:18 |
johnthetubaguy | dhellmann: yeah, that seems a good minimum, 4 weeks | 20:18 |
annegentle_ | #link http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_fef5cc22eb3dc27a | 20:18 |
*** bethwhite_ has left #openstack-meeting | 20:18 | |
dhellmann | flaper87 : that's a separate discussion, but sure | 20:18 |
notmorgan | flaper87: to be fair, I could have also just disappeared and it would be the net effect of an empty seat until next election it was up | 20:19 |
dhellmann | notmorgan : we would have noticed | 20:19 |
flaper87 | notmorgan: sure, but we would have noticed | 20:19 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: what was an exercise in findability for me was "when do we hold TC elections" | 20:19 |
dhellmann | are we at least agreed on the 4 week question? | 20:19 |
anteaya | notmorgan: well then we would have had the disappearing leader issue again | 20:19 |
dims | +1 on 4 weeks dhellmann | 20:19 |
notmorgan | dhellmann: right, but there was no handling of that here, and has the same result. | 20:19 |
annegentle_ | answer: 5 weeks before the Summit | 20:19 |
anteaya | annegentle_: it is in the charter | 20:19 |
dhellmann | http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html | 20:19 |
sdague | dhellmann: yeh, seems like | 20:20 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: I'm not happy with it, tbh. 5 months old results don't sit well with be but most people seem to be happy with 4 weeks | 20:20 |
flaper87 | so, I'll live by it | 20:20 |
notmorgan | anyway. sorry. I'm going back afk and getting food. /me ducks out of this convo | 20:20 |
dhellmann | flaper87: yeah, one question at a time: so you're ok with 4 weeks? | 20:20 |
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:20 | |
flaper87 | dhellmann: no, I meant to say I'm not ok with 4 weeks. Perhaps we could make the threshold bigger: 8 weeks ? | 20:21 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : so you're saying if I resign 8 weeks before the end of my term, you would not replace me until the next election? | 20:21 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: yes | 20:21 |
dhellmann | that's not the direction I expected you to go | 20:21 |
anteaya | annegentle_: The election is held 3 weeks prior | 20:21 |
sdague | that seems long for me | 20:21 |
anteaya | to each design summit, with nominations due 4 weeks prior to the summit and | 20:21 |
dims | too long imho | 20:21 |
anteaya | elections held open for no less than five business days. | 20:21 |
dhellmann | why would you be willing to wait so long? | 20:21 |
annegentle_ | anteaya: oh I'd better find the other source I found. | 20:21 |
anteaya | annegentle_: #link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/charter.rst | 20:21 |
*** asselin_ has quit IRC | 20:21 | |
edleafe | dhellmann: 8 weeks before the next election, or the end of your term? | 20:22 |
anteaya | annegentle_: under Election for TC seats | 20:22 |
*** asselin_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:22 | |
dhellmann | edleafe : either, really | 20:22 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: the reason is that I don't feel ok with using a 5months old results to pick someone that will fill the remaining 7 months of the person leaving | 20:22 |
anteaya | annegentle_: the only doc that trumps the charter is the foundation by-laws | 20:22 |
dhellmann | edleafe : the question is how long do we want to allow an empty seat | 20:22 |
sdague | so, I guess the question we should figure out, is whether anyone objects besides flaper87 ? Because we're +6 on dhellmann's proposal right now | 20:23 |
edleafe | dhellmann: exactly. The next election keeps that vacancy short | 20:23 |
dhellmann | edleafe : I think I'm not being clear, so I'm just going to stop offering alternatives. Let's pick one of the two that are written up. | 20:24 |
*** ezpz has left #openstack-meeting | 20:24 | |
dhellmann | sorry, 3 | 20:24 |
*** cdelatte has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
edleafe | dhellmann: :) | 20:24 |
edleafe | I think 8 weeks is much too long | 20:24 |
sdague | dhellmann: agreed, we don't need to spend from now until the next election discussing how to fill an empty seat :) | 20:24 |
flaper87 | Ok, there are 7 votes on dhellmann review | 20:24 |
flaper87 | I guess we should go w/ that one | 20:24 |
johnthetubaguy | Honestly, I don't think running a new by-election gains enough to justify the effort of all those nominations, voting, etc, etc | 20:24 |
mordred | sdague: I disagree | 20:24 |
dhellmann | flaper87: this is a sort of important one, so I'd like to get most everyone on board one way or the other if we can | 20:25 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 20:25 | |
fungi | in the past we have had a tc election where some of the seats were for a one-year term and some for a half-year term, when bootstrapping the current committee size | 20:25 |
anteaya | yeah charter changes aren't simple majority | 20:25 |
annegentle_ | flaper87: only if you can support it. We can work towards consensus here. | 20:25 |
russellb | dhellmann: would be good to know if the others are abstain / -1 / neutral ... | 20:25 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:25 | |
flaper87 | dhellmann: I'm with your proposal. I'm not happy with the 4 weeks but I'm willing to live by it | 20:25 |
dhellmann | fungi : yeah, that's more or less what I based my proposal on. | 20:25 |
fungi | so there is precedent for a seat in an election being for a partial term | 20:25 |
sdague | dhellmann: right, I'd like to have everyone on the TC register here | 20:25 |
annegentle_ | only thing the charter says is, "After the initial election, the elections for the Technical Committee shall be held at least every six months." | 20:26 |
* flaper87 is not trying to rush the discussion but rather trying to reach consensus | 20:26 | |
sdague | I don't want to move forward on simple majority | 20:26 |
annegentle_ | #link https://www.openstack.org/legal/technical-committee-member-policy/ | 20:26 |
johnthetubaguy | +1 for getting everyones vote on this | 20:26 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : ok. I'm willing to discuss changing that, maybe as a separate thing next week? | 20:26 |
flaper87 | sdague: that is not what I said, fwiw | 20:26 |
russellb | maybe quick poll of whoever hasn't voted yet? | 20:26 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: sounds perfect | 20:26 |
annegentle_ | yeah I'm also fine with waiting | 20:26 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : I picked what seemed like a pragmatic number but I'm not wedded to it | 20:26 |
anteaya | Amendments to this Technical Committee charter shall be proposed in a special | 20:26 |
anteaya | motion, which needs to be approved by the affirmative vote of at least | 20:26 |
anteaya | two-thirds of the total number of TC members (rounded up: in a 13-member | 20:26 |
mtreinish | russellb: assuming they're around | 20:26 |
anteaya | committee that means a minimum of 9 approvers). | 20:26 |
sdake | sdague fwiw, I am still available for TC seat filling if necessary -but sounds like dtroyer using the 4 algos gets the seat. | 20:27 |
russellb | mtreinish: yup. | 20:27 |
sdake | ttyl ) | 20:27 |
*** radeks has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
anteaya | #link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/charter.rst under Ammendment | 20:27 |
sdake | :) i mean to say | 20:27 |
dims | sdake ack :) | 20:27 |
annegentle_ | sdake: thanks, good to know | 20:28 |
sdague | so ttx is out, dhellmann hasn't voted, who is the missing vote on there? | 20:28 |
anteaya | charter changes need 9 votes | 20:28 |
*** lblanchard has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
*** raildo has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
russellb | notmorgan hasn't voted, heh | 20:28 |
annegentle_ | russellb: right :) | 20:28 |
flaper87 | we have 12 votes | 20:28 |
notmorgan | i am not a member of the TC, I do not get to vote | 20:28 |
dims | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351295/ | 20:28 |
thingee | ttx did vote +1 at one point | 20:28 |
flaper87 | and one is dhellmann's on his own patch | 20:28 |
notmorgan | i officially stepped down effective today | 20:28 |
thingee | just not the current patch :) | 20:28 |
flaper87 | which counts like a vote | 20:28 |
flaper87 | :P | 20:28 |
sdague | mestery: ? | 20:28 |
russellb | notmorgan: i know, just joking ... were couting up the votes (or missing votes) | 20:29 |
notmorgan | email was sent to secretary@o.o confirming this. | 20:29 |
russellb | mestery is probably out, at openstack silicon valley | 20:29 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : I went ahead and registered my vote | 20:29 |
annegentle_ | russellb: he's tweeting from there anyway :) | 20:29 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: thanks | 20:29 |
flaper87 | that helps | 20:29 |
flaper87 | ok, we're missing ttx and mestery | 20:29 |
sdague | if we hold it open for 2 more days, think both of them will have a chance to weigh in? | 20:29 |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 20:29 | |
dhellmann | 10 is more than 2/3 of 12, right? | 20:29 |
flaper87 | we can wait for those and address questions/concerns next week if there are more | 20:29 |
sdague | it is | 20:29 |
anteaya | dhellmann: you need 9 votes | 20:30 |
flaper87 | but we should be fine | 20:30 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: it is but this is a good chance to practice consensus | 20:30 |
*** jprovazn has quit IRC | 20:30 | |
sdague | I just want to make sure people had the ability to voice an opinion | 20:30 |
dhellmann | annegentle_ : sure | 20:30 |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:30 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 20:30 | |
flaper87 | So, Does anyone have concerns about dhellmann's proposal? | 20:30 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351295/ | 20:30 |
edleafe | anteaya: the TC is only 12 members as of today, so technically, 8 are needed | 20:30 |
flaper87 | Any other questions about the process? | 20:30 |
flaper87 | Any other questions about the requirements? | 20:30 |
dhellmann | alright, I'm fine leaving it open until next week. we should ask dtroyer to join us for the meeting. | 20:30 |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:31 | |
*** baoli has quit IRC | 20:31 | |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: sounds good | 20:31 |
dtroyer | fwiw, I'm here | 20:31 |
amrith | edleafe, normally in the computation of vote margins, it is the size of the body, not the number currently present. so 9 is still required; IMHO | 20:31 |
dhellmann | dtroyer : I meant to make sure you were here next week :-) | 20:31 |
annegentle_ | dtroyer: thanks for being here | 20:31 |
edleafe | amrith: the body is only 12 | 20:31 |
dtroyer | dhellmann: roger | 20:31 |
amrith | no, the body is 13, 12 members. | 20:31 |
mugsie | amrith: the wording would indicate 12 memebers | 20:31 |
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz | 20:31 | |
sdague | dtroyer: so, question, do you remain interested in serving on the TC? | 20:31 |
flaper87 | we'll have to wait till ttx is back anyway. I don't have +W and It'd be great to have his opinion (and mestery's too) | 20:31 |
dhellmann | amrith : 10 is also > 2/3 of 13 | 20:31 |
sdague | because if the answer is yes, that simplifies talking with folks down the list | 20:31 |
dtroyer | sdague: yes, I would happily fill the remaining term if asked | 20:32 |
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz | 20:32 | |
sdague | ok, cool, so we have that data point in public | 20:32 |
dims | thanks dtroyer | 20:32 |
flaper87 | dtroyer: danke | 20:32 |
sdague | ok, I move we leave voting open until ttx and mestery express a vote, or next meeting, whichever comes first | 20:32 |
sdague | and we move to next topic | 20:32 |
dhellmann | ++ | 20:32 |
flaper87 | sdague: just said that :P | 20:32 |
*** karthikp_ has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
johnthetubaguy | ++ | 20:33 |
dims | ++ flaper87 sdague | 20:33 |
amrith | dhellmann, you are correct. sorry; 9 or > | 20:33 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : as chair, will you ping both ttx and mestery in the mean time? | 20:33 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: yup, on it | 20:33 |
flaper87 | moving on | 20:33 |
flaper87 | #topic Community-wide goals | 20:33 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Community-wide goals (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:33 | |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/349068 | 20:33 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/349069 | 20:33 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/349070 | 20:33 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: I'll let you summarize/introduce this one | 20:33 |
dhellmann | ok | 20:34 |
dhellmann | this is the write-up of the idea that we discussed the thursday of the training in ann arbor | 20:34 |
dhellmann | the idea is to be a little more active in encouraging the community to take some specific actions each cycle | 20:34 |
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:34 | |
dhellmann | I've included 2 specific proposals from the list that we discussed as examples | 20:35 |
dhellmann | there has been a fair amount of concern about consequences for not following through on goals, but very little discussion of the specific goals proposed | 20:35 |
*** dfflanders has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:35 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 20:35 | |
sdague | I think both goals are good small scoped ones | 20:35 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:35 | |
thingee | sdague: +1 | 20:35 |
* flaper87 likes what's up there | 20:36 | |
dhellmann | I'll try to summarize ttx's comments on the consequences by saying that failing to follow through is not an immediate trigger for being dropped, but it may be seen as part of a larger set of signals that a project does not really consider itself part of the community | 20:36 |
mordred | I also think that starting from a "hey everybody, let's all try to ..." is great. nobody has done it yet. might someone choose to not play ball? sure | 20:36 |
dhellmann | his wording on the mailing list is probably better | 20:36 |
sdague | good to test the process, mostly I've been thinking about how to use something similar to help drive the upgrades conversation | 20:36 |
mordred | and then yeah, ttx said that well | 20:36 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: are the two proposed the "typical" scope you'd expect? | 20:36 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: or are you ready for more to be proposed by others? | 20:36 |
annegentle_ | sdague: yeah and I was thinking of something around api-ref now that I have the numbers and the nav is coming together. | 20:36 |
thingee | ttx's wording http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/100670.html | 20:37 |
dhellmann | annegentle_ : my sense is that we only want a couple of these each cycle, so I don't think we want more right now unless we reject one of these | 20:37 |
mugsie | mordred: sure - but I am not sure I would be happy top have this morph into "do this or leave" conversation | 20:37 |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:37 | |
annegentle_ | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/100670.html | 20:37 |
sdague | annegentle_: right, we'd probably have done *this* for api-ref this cycle if we had this process | 20:37 |
mordred | mugsie: totally | 20:37 |
sdague | we kind of ad-hoced it | 20:37 |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
dhellmann | as far as scope, we want things to be finished in a cycle, rather than being of indefinite length, and that's going to naturally limit the scope | 20:37 |
sdague | but, it would be a very reasonable 3rd thing to use this process this next cycle | 20:37 |
mugsie | which is why I think there needs to be more concrete wording about consequences | 20:37 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: question: I don't remember if it was mentioned/discussed whether some of this goals would eventually become requirements for entrance to the big tent. I think I read new projects have 1 year to be compliant with some of these goals, is that right? | 20:37 |
dhellmann | large initiatives will need to be broken into phases | 20:37 |
mordred | mugsie: I think I'd rather just see people get excited about a few shared esprit-de-corps types of things - without us holding an axe over anyone's head | 20:38 |
*** Hosam has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: ok, makes sense | 20:38 |
flaper87 | For example, if all projects manage to migrate to py35, we might want to ask new projects to be py35 compliant | 20:38 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : I believe somewhere in that patch I say that all teams need to do the goals. that would apply to new teams, too. | 20:38 |
johnthetubaguy | sdague: I was just going to suggest we might want to add it still | 20:38 |
mugsie | mordred: yeah - but the ML has been hinting at it having consequences | 20:38 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : if we need to clarify that, we can work on language in another patch? | 20:38 |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
thingee | mugsie: I don't really find it productive to speculate that there would be a goal agreed that would cause problems. | 20:38 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: Also, forgive me if I'm behind on the ML discussion: do we see these as themes for a release such as what the product group has discussed? | 20:38 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: yup, sounds perfect. I;ve voted already | 20:38 |
dhellmann | annegentle_ : a bit more narrow, though ttx did mention that the foundation might use them as "look what we did" type messaging at summits | 20:39 |
johnthetubaguy | annegentle_: I think these goals are generally more specific | 20:39 |
mugsie | thingee: well, teams are differning sizes. A team might decide that actully writing docs this cycle is better for users, for example | 20:39 |
sdague | honestly, I really rather just think of this as information gathering and exposure | 20:39 |
mordred | mugsie: I tihnk thingee just said what I was thinking - hopefully these are all just putting words to things that are already on people's lists anyway | 20:39 |
johnthetubaguy | sdague: +1 | 20:39 |
mordred | mugsie: and I think there's a difference in "we couldn't get to it" and "screw you guys, we're not doing it" | 20:39 |
mugsie | the current 2 are fine, nice small, and common sense | 20:39 |
sdague | because I think that we state some goals, ask people to work towards them, make sure we captures what's getting done, and it helps us all have a better picture of the state of openstack | 20:39 |
thingee | mordred: +1 | 20:40 |
flaper87 | I think this is a very good start for the community-goals effort | 20:40 |
*** MeganR has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
thingee | flaper87: agreed, it has to start somewhere. | 20:40 |
annegentle_ | I sorta read it as "replace the giant cross-project spec with smaller goals" -- is that an accurate assessment? | 20:40 |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
thingee | annegentle_: I think specs will still exist as reference | 20:40 |
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:40 | |
thingee | there is no replacing here | 20:40 |
dhellmann | annegentle_ : not really. by the time something is ready to be approved as a goal, I would expect the path to finishing it to be very clear already. | 20:40 |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:41 | |
johnthetubaguy | dhellmann: so I was kinda expecting us to merge the goals post summit, but I guess this is us going to the summit with some merged ideas to spark the conversation? | 20:41 |
dhellmann | for example, one of the other things discussed was moving all projects so they can be deployed behind apache | 20:41 |
thingee | dhellmann: +1 | 20:41 |
sdague | this feels more about execution support | 20:41 |
flaper87 | johnthetubaguy: yeah | 20:41 |
dhellmann | figuring out how to do that is going to require work up front | 20:41 |
annegentle_ | ok that's useful thanks dhellmann thingee | 20:41 |
dhellmann | johnthetubaguy : right, we need to land these in time for teams to (a) know about the fact that we expect them to dedicate time to them and (b) have time to do any planning at the summit | 20:42 |
dhellmann | johnthetubaguy : in future cycles, we'll be doing this right before the PTG | 20:42 |
annegentle_ | only other question that I hadn't put on review is related to: if you author the goal are you then responsible/accountable for follow up in supporting teams to get what they need to complete the goal? | 20:42 |
*** maishsk has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
sdague | because a bunch of the openstack-specs were like "let's do this thing!" and even if they got approved, then actually doing that thing, and figuring out where that stood in all the projects, was pretty nebulous. And if you can't see how far away the end game is, people get demotivated | 20:42 |
*** omghai2u has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:42 | |
*** maishsk has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:42 | |
annegentle_ | sdague: yeah exactly the scenario I played through too | 20:42 |
sdague | it was amazing how much just doing this http://burndown.dague.org/ helped us work through our api-ref on nova | 20:42 |
dhellmann | annegentle_ : that's a good question. I hope not. I've written this so that we only want goals to be documented by a tc member, in part to avoid having the governance repo turn into the cross-project specs repo. | 20:43 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: ayup, got it. | 20:43 |
mugsie | so, in that line of thinking, would goals that only really affect a few projects be accepted? | 20:43 |
thingee | annegentle_, dhellmann: I don't think it should. it should be up to the team. | 20:43 |
dims | annegentle_ : +1 should have sufficient help to the teams | 20:43 |
flaper87 | sdague: lol, I read "execution support" entirely wrong | 20:43 |
flaper87 | sdague: good thing you elaborated on that | 20:43 |
sdague | flaper87: heh | 20:43 |
johnthetubaguy | sdague: it was so good we stole that for the configuration options: http://45.55.105.55:8082/config-options.html | 20:43 |
thingee | annegentle_, dhellmann the TC may review who has followed through the goals though and may reach out to projects. | 20:44 |
dhellmann | mugsie : the oslo goal that's up now affects fewer projects than I thought when I wrote it up, but we wouldn't be likely to take something as "community wide" if we knew from the outset that it was only 2 projects. | 20:44 |
dhellmann | thingee : yes, we need to do that review at the end of each cycle | 20:44 |
thingee | dhellmann: great, I think that's the only follow-up that needs to happen. leave the goal author out of it | 20:45 |
dhellmann | sdague : I may be interested in the code for that for release tracking | 20:45 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: and is it worthwhile to propose something that affects one team only? Or is that a 1:1 convo with that team's lead? | 20:45 |
*** rgoodwin has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
dhellmann | annegentle_ : these are for community-wide goals | 20:45 |
sdague | dhellmann: yeh, sure, I have thoughts about how to make it more generic. We can do that offline. | 20:45 |
thingee | dhellmann: I think it's going to be enough work just getting a goal agreed. | 20:45 |
dhellmann | annegentle_ : if we need a way to make recommendations to individual teams, we need a new process | 20:45 |
johnthetubaguy | sdague: markus_z did a bit of that, possibly | 20:45 |
flaper87 | thingee: ++ | 20:45 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
dhellmann | annegentle_ : I'd be happy to collaborate on designing that | 20:45 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: ok, thanks | 20:46 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:46 | |
flaper87 | ok, we have 5 more mins for this topic. Anything else people would like to ask? Other open questions? Huge objections? | 20:46 |
johnthetubaguy | dhellmann: would we not just use the team's own process for work, if its team specific? | 20:46 |
flaper87 | The review will be open till ttx is back so there's still time to comment on the review | 20:46 |
russellb | i like it. thanks for driving this, dhellmann | 20:46 |
annegentle_ | that's all I have, hadn't voted yet as I needed to ask these | 20:46 |
sdague | I think this process is useful for even fully understanding how far away we are from things, as dhellmann said, we didn't even know how big the oslo gap was (which is smaller than anticipated) until doing that analysis | 20:46 |
russellb | and the goals seem like obviously good ones | 20:46 |
johnthetubaguy | sdague: +1 | 20:46 |
sdague | which is incredibly valuable all on it's own | 20:47 |
dhellmann | johnthetubaguy : if the tc is asking a team to do something they're not already prioritizing, we may want to do that a different way | 20:47 |
*** asselin__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:47 | |
flaper87 | annegentle_: I always look forward to your questions, fwiw | 20:47 |
flaper87 | :) | 20:47 |
johnthetubaguy | dhellmann: honestly, that feels bad to me, but thats a separate conversation | 20:47 |
annegentle_ | heh :) | 20:47 |
johnthetubaguy | so I love the goals | 20:47 |
*** asselin_ has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
sdague | and I agree with russellb, thanks dhellmann for driving this | 20:47 |
dhellmann | johnthetubaguy : right | 20:47 |
johnthetubaguy | its totally something I wanted to see happen while I was on the TC, and love this approach | 20:47 |
flaper87 | Ok, unless there are other questions/comments, I think we can move on | 20:48 |
johnthetubaguy | I am tempted to say what we have before the PTG/summit is a draft that could get torn up, but thats just splitting hairs | 20:48 |
annegentle_ | johnthetubaguy: yeah I do think timing will matter too | 20:48 |
johnthetubaguy | we need something before, else nothing will happen | 20:49 |
johnthetubaguy | but its likely to get revised | 20:49 |
dhellmann | yeah, we're going to need to work quickly to get goals out of this summit to work on before the ptg in feb | 20:49 |
johnthetubaguy | but honestly, we should just do it | 20:49 |
flaper87 | johnthetubaguy: yeah, that was one of the goals | 20:49 |
dims | we should encourage PTL's to file some too? (ex stevemar to add a goal for keystone v3 api support in all projects) | 20:49 |
annegentle_ | dims: good Q | 20:49 |
dhellmann | dims : as written, this says tc members will write them up | 20:50 |
dhellmann | I want *us* to be active in this process. | 20:50 |
dims | dhellmann : ok collaborate with one of us to file it | 20:50 |
russellb | need to keep a reasonable limit on the number of these, too | 20:50 |
dhellmann | everyone can propose them, but I want us to take the step of documenting them, and choosing them | 20:50 |
johnthetubaguy | I guess its just a case of getting a sponsor via the ML | 20:50 |
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz | 20:50 | |
flaper87 | dims: and I see those as different goals but we can elaborate on this later | 20:50 |
sdague | dhellmann: ++ | 20:50 |
dims | right | 20:50 |
russellb | and just approve a couple/few highest priority ones.. | 20:50 |
sdague | let's start with us deep in the middle of this | 20:51 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: yeah I'd imagine a deadline, then a discussion meeting at regular TC meeting time. | 20:51 |
russellb | at least to start with | 20:51 |
dhellmann | dims : also, I do not expect us to be choosing from a bunch of written up goals each cycle. I expect us to have a list of things coming out of the summit, get it narrowed down, then write up a couple of finalists. | 20:51 |
russellb | dhellmann: ++ | 20:51 |
flaper87 | russellb: I thin kthe priority of some of these goals will be the key of how they will be merged | 20:51 |
flaper87 | dhellmann: ++ | 20:51 |
annegentle_ | dhellmann: oh even better | 20:51 |
sdague | dhellmann: ++ | 20:51 |
johnthetubaguy | dhellmann: ++ thats what I was kinda trying to say | 20:51 |
*** edtubill has quit IRC | 20:51 | |
dims | ack dhellmann | 20:51 |
flaper87 | ok, 10 mins left, let's move onto Open Discussion! Thanks again, dhellmann | 20:51 |
dhellmann | we're the last step in this process | 20:51 |
mtreinish | dhellmann: ++ | 20:51 |
dims | makes sense | 20:51 |
johnthetubaguy | +1 | 20:51 |
dhellmann | well, aside from implementation :-) | 20:51 |
johnthetubaguy | heh | 20:51 |
flaper87 | #topic Open discussion | 20:52 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:52 | |
flaper87 | dhellmann: got mestery to vote on the patch | 20:52 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : ++ | 20:52 |
flaper87 | ttx will vote when he's back | 20:52 |
* dims is away on vacation next week | 20:52 | |
flaper87 | * Agree to at least temporarily abandon stalled items: | 20:52 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/338796 | 20:52 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/314691 | 20:52 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/295971 | 20:52 |
flaper87 | #link https://review.openstack.org/295528 | 20:52 |
* flaper87 is away on vacation next week too | 20:52 | |
flaper87 | Any comments on those reviews? | 20:52 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : those release model items can be dropped | 20:52 |
mtreinish | flaper87: I'll abandon mine on that list | 20:52 |
flaper87 | Any reason why those shouldn't be abandoned ? | 20:52 |
flaper87 | mtreinish: thanks | 20:52 |
flaper87 | sdake: ^ | 20:52 |
mtreinish | I still need to write up the followup proposal | 20:52 |
dhellmann | flaper87 : sorry, the 'type' tag items | 20:53 |
mtreinish | I keep forgetting to do that | 20:53 |
thingee | don't think 338796 is stalled ... the author has been active and waiting for a response from the tc | 20:53 |
dhellmann | the release team isn't going to use those for now | 20:53 |
thingee | mordred: ^ | 20:53 |
*** thorst_ has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
sdake | flaper87 it makes it hard for me to find the original comments | 20:53 |
annegentle_ | thingee: yeah I'd agree with that assessment too | 20:53 |
russellb | mestery voted on the tc vacancy review as well | 20:53 |
sdake | flaper87 but i guess I can unabandon them when I get around to it | 20:53 |
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:53 | |
flaper87 | sdake: yes | 20:53 |
*** blakec has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:53 | |
dhellmann | sdake : yes, please | 20:53 |
flaper87 | sdake: please :) | 20:53 |
sdague | sdake: owner:self status:abandoned | 20:53 |
flaper87 | sdake: both of them, if you don't mind | 20:54 |
sdague | it's easy to search for them | 20:54 |
mordred | thingee: yah - it's on my list | 20:54 |
flaper87 | ok, who's out next week? | 20:54 |
fungi | oh, that reminds me we need the vmt to weigh in on https://review.openstack.org/350597 (which will just be a request to start with a thread on the -dev ml) | 20:54 |
sdake | flaper87 feel free to abandon them - they will be in my inbox | 20:54 |
thingee | flaper87: me | 20:54 |
thingee | spain and burning man | 20:54 |
flaper87 | sdake: either you or ttx can do that :( | 20:54 |
dhellmann | sdake : flaper87 doesn't have permission to do it | 20:54 |
sdake | flaper87 i'll get around to em some day when shit isn't on fire ;) | 20:54 |
sdake | oh ok | 20:54 |
sdake | got specific links? | 20:54 |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
anteaya | sdake: can we not swear please | 20:55 |
sdake | sorry | 20:55 |
sdake | some day when things are not on fire | 20:55 |
dhellmann | sdake : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295971/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295528/ | 20:55 |
anteaya | thank you | 20:55 |
sdake | thanks dhellmann | 20:55 |
flaper87 | sdake: https://review.openstack.org/295971 | 20:55 |
flaper87 | sdake: https://review.openstack.org/295528 | 20:55 |
flaper87 | so, thingee dims and myself will be out | 20:55 |
flaper87 | anyone else? | 20:55 |
annegentle_ | flaper87: your linking is on fire today :) | 20:55 |
dims | good job flaper87 :) | 20:55 |
mtreinish | flaper87: next week? | 20:55 |
flaper87 | sounds like there will be quorum so, there should be meeting | 20:55 |
dhellmann | yeah, thanks again for being chair flaper87 | 20:55 |
flaper87 | mtreinish: yes | 20:55 |
*** seldenr has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
annegentle_ | flaper87: yeah thanks | 20:56 |
flaper87 | my pleasure :) | 20:56 |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
edleafe | yeah - kudos flaper87! | 20:56 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:56 | |
flaper87 | edleafe: annegentle_ danke danke :) | 20:56 |
flaper87 | ok, anything else pressing to discuss ? | 20:57 |
russellb | thanks, flaper87, and enjoy your time off! | 20:57 |
*** radeks has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:57 | |
flaper87 | otherwise, we can call it a meeting and be happy to have closed it a couple of mins earlier | 20:57 |
flaper87 | Or I can do the flaper87 thing and keep talking till time's up | 20:57 |
* flaper87 is Italian, he knows how to do that | 20:57 | |
flaper87 | russellb: thanks :) | 20:57 |
sdague | thanks flaper87 | 20:58 |
sdake | flaper87 your wish is my command :) | 20:58 |
* flaper87 bows | 20:58 | |
sdake | enjoy | 20:58 |
flaper87 | ok, let's call it! | 20:58 |
flaper87 | thanks everyone | 20:58 |
flaper87 | have a great rest of your week | 20:58 |
amrith | thx flaper87 | 20:58 |
flaper87 | #endmeeting | 20:58 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 20:58 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 9 20:58:28 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 20:58 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-08-09-20.01.html | 20:58 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-08-09-20.01.txt | 20:58 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-08-09-20.01.log.html | 20:58 |
*** leong has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:59 | |
*** rfolco has quit IRC | 20:59 | |
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:59 | |
*** rfolco has quit IRC | 21:00 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 21:00 | |
*** leeantho_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:01 | |
*** isunil has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:01 | |
*** seldenr has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:01 | |
*** leeantho has quit IRC | 21:02 | |
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC | 21:02 | |
stevemar | dims: for sure | 21:05 |
*** omghai2u has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
*** leong has left #openstack-meeting | 21:06 | |
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
dims | stevemar : how was your presentation? | 21:06 |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:06 | |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:09 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:09 | |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:09 | |
*** leeantho_ has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
*** karthikp_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:10 | |
*** leeantho_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:13 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:15 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 21:15 | |
*** f13o has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:16 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 21:16 | |
*** isunil has quit IRC | 21:16 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:16 | |
*** blakec has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
*** ayoung has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
*** radeks has quit IRC | 21:20 | |
*** synegi has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:22 | |
*** baumann_ has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
*** rtheis has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
stevemar | dims: was good i think :) | 21:24 |
*** gordc has left #openstack-meeting | 21:25 | |
*** synegy34 has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:27 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:28 | |
*** leeantho_ has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:30 | |
*** zigo has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:33 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
*** maishsk has quit IRC | 21:34 | |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 21:34 | |
*** zigo has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:35 | |
*** cleong has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:37 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:38 | |
*** weshay has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:40 | |
*** jmckind has quit IRC | 21:41 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 21:41 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:42 | |
*** seldenr has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:48 | |
*** seldenr has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:50 | |
*** designbybeck_ has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
*** esberglu has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:55 | |
*** mickeys has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** f13o has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** mriedem has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:57 | |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:59 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:00 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
*** bobh__ has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
*** gouthamr has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
*** mickeys has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:02 | |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:03 | |
*** karthikp_ has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
*** alyson_ has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:06 | |
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 22:06 | |
*** xiaohhui has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:07 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 22:07 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:08 | |
*** jckasper_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:10 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
*** xiaohhui has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
*** uxdanielle has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:13 | |
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
*** jckasper_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:15 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
*** jckasper has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
*** efried has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:18 | |
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:20 | |
*** itzdilip has quit IRC | 22:21 | |
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:25 | |
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC | 22:25 | |
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
*** tpsilva has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:28 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:29 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:30 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 22:30 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:30 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:32 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:33 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 22:34 | |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:35 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:38 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 22:38 | |
*** sdake_ is now known as sdake | 22:38 | |
*** singlethink has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
*** toddjohn has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz | 22:41 | |
*** LamT_ has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
*** toddjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:41 | |
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:42 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:43 | |
*** Jeff_Collins has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:46 | |
*** itlinux has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
*** seldenr has quit IRC | 22:48 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 22:48 | |
*** Jeffreyc42 has quit IRC | 22:49 | |
*** rbak has quit IRC | 22:49 | |
*** Jeff_Collins has quit IRC | 22:51 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:51 | |
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC | 22:52 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 22:52 | |
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:52 | |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:55 | |
*** toscalix has quit IRC | 22:55 | |
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:57 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:59 | |
*** sindhu has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
*** JoseMello has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:01 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:05 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:07 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:09 | |
*** b1airo has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:09 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:11 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:11 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:11 | |
*** hemna is now known as hemnafk | 23:12 | |
*** sdague has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
*** karthikp_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:15 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:15 | |
*** karthikp_ has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:16 | |
*** karthikp_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:16 | |
*** rrecio_ has quit IRC | 23:18 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:20 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:20 | |
*** Swami has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
*** karthikp_ has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
*** saju_m has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
*** samP has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:24 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:27 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:27 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:27 | |
*** roxanaghe has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
*** cardeois has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:30 | |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:32 | |
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:32 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:35 | |
*** xyang1 has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
*** karthikp_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:35 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:35 | |
*** mmalik4 has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:38 | |
*** rubasov has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:39 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:39 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:39 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 23:40 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:40 | |
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:41 | |
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:43 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
*** gyee_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:47 | |
*** gyee_ has quit IRC | 23:47 | |
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC | 23:48 | |
*** karthik__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:49 | |
*** Patifa has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
*** karthikp_ has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 23:50 | |
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 23:50 | |
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:50 | |
*** b1airo has quit IRC | 23:53 | |
*** katomo has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:54 | |
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:56 | |
*** Fdaisuke has quit IRC | 23:56 | |
*** liuhanxi has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:57 | |
*** esberglu has quit IRC | 23:57 | |
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC | 23:58 | |
*** spzala has quit IRC | 23:59 | |
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:59 | |
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!