Thursday, 2017-06-15

ekcstime for congress meeting ramineni_ thinrichs00:00
ekcs#startmeeting congressteammeeting00:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 15 00:01:08 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ekcs. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.00:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.00:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'congressteammeeting'00:01
ramineni_ekcs_: hi00:01
ekcsHi all. Welcome back to another week. As usual, topics are here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-meeting-topics00:01
ekcspls feel free to add/comment/edit00:01
ekcshi ramineni_ !00:01
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck00:05
*** gmann has joined #openstack-meeting00:05
ekcsok let’s get started then.00:06
ekcs#topic announcements00:06
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:06
ekcsPike-2 released for congress and congress-dashboard00:06
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck00:06
ekcsclient 1.7 also released00:06
*** csaikia has joined #openstack-meeting00:06
ramineni_Great :)00:06
ekcsthe release for congress and congress-dashboard ended up being late because we forgot to set create the pypi project and set the project-config release job for congress-dashboard.00:07
ekcsthankfully the release went out despite the hiccup.00:08
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting00:08
ekcslesson learned for me is to do the release early especially for initial release like congress-dashboard.00:08
ekcsany other announcements?00:08
ramineni_Oh ok00:09
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC00:10
ekcsok moving on then =)00:11
ekcs#topic Rule ID logging for action execution00:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Rule ID logging for action execution (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:11
ekcsramineni_: is there anything to talk about on that front? any follow-up questions or discussions?00:11
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:12
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck00:13
ramineni_ekcs : actually I couldn't find a proper way to get the rule id in execute action part00:13
ramineni_Because , I think there we need to update trigger registry to store rule id somewhere00:14
ekcsyea so there are at least two ways to do it. one is to store rule id when the execute table is evaluated. that’s probably the more proper way.00:15
ekcsbut another is to after the fact query the execute table again using the explain feature to look at the rule that triggered it.00:15
ekcsdid you get my email about the explain feature?00:16
ramineni_Trace right?00:16
ramineni_Explain feature =trace ?00:17
ekcsyea. does that seem promising?00:17
ekcstheoretically you can query the execute table, find the rule that caused the particular entry that caused the recent execution, then query the policy engine again to retrieve the rule ID of that rule.00:17
ekcsnot sure if it’ll end up being more or less complicated than storing rule ID during first evaluation.00:18
*** unicell has quit IRC00:18
ramineni_Ya .. It's helpful .. Thanks.00:18
ramineni_But I'm able to get the rule id if it's the single table00:19
ekcssorry what do you mean “single table”?00:20
ramineni_Like execute [ nova.servers.pause], if there are 2 rules defined with same head00:20
ramineni_Then which rule caused that is not available00:20
ramineni_May be I have to dig more00:21
ekcsgot it do you have a sample output from trace?00:21
ekcsI think the information is there (in the SUCCESS and FAIL), but it’s not obvious how to read it.00:22
ekcsyou can also email me later.00:22
ramineni_Ya .. I'll email you on where I'm stuck00:22
ramineni_Thanks for the pointers00:23
ramineni_:)00:23
ekcsok great.00:23
ekcs#topic policy monitoring UI discussions00:25
*** openstack changes topic to "policy monitoring UI discussions (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:25
ekcsLast time I think we have more or less a consensus on the mockup except for remedial actions.00:25
*** armax has quit IRC00:26
ekcsI’m thinking we could focus on parts that don’t involve remedial actions. and it can always be added later.00:27
ramineni_Yes, sounds good00:27
ekcsbut I did also added some mock-up having to do with remedial actions.00:27
ramineni_UI part are we trageting for pike or q release00:28
ramineni_Ok .. great , can you share the link00:29
ekcsI’m hoping we can get the basic version into Pike. Just displaying the number of errors and warnings per policy in the main page, and displaying the warning and error table.00:29
ekcsdoes that seem reasonable?00:29
ekcslink is on the topics etherpad. here again: https://wireframepro.mockflow.com/view/congress-policy-monitor00:30
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting00:30
ekcsremedial action stuff we can discuss and target queen maybe?00:30
thinrichsHi all.  Sorry I'm late.00:30
ekcshi thinrichs !00:30
ekcswe’re discussing policy monitoring UI.00:31
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting00:31
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC00:31
thinrichsOk00:32
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting00:32
ramineni_Hi thinrichs00:32
thinrichsramineni_: hi00:32
ramineni_ekcs_: ok00:33
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC00:33
ekcswe’re talking about whether we can reasonbly finish the basic version in Pike, without addressing remedial actions.00:33
ekcsHere’s the latest mockup btw, https://wireframepro.mockflow.com/view/congress-policy-monitor00:34
ekcswe could also talk about the latest additions in the mock-up for remedial action, if there’s something to discuss now. or leave for another time. not urgent.00:36
thinrichsThe remedial action is the V2 comment, right?  That records how many action executions there were.00:37
thinrichsI would think we should separate (i) adding functionality to backend and (ii) creating the UI00:37
ekcsthinrichs: right. also some things in the per policy page00:37
thinrichsSo that we don't create a UI until the backend supports the info the front-end needs.00:37
thinrichsI don't think we have counters on the backend for how many times an execution fired00:38
thinrichsor even if all of the action-execution firings correspond to policy violations00:38
thinrichsThey could be sending out logs or shuttling data to another service00:38
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting00:39
ekcsthinrichs: right, we don’t. but knowing what front-end we’d like helps us know what back-end functionality is needed right?00:39
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting00:39
ekcsanyway the discussions around remedial action in the UI is early stage. we can move on if there isn’t much to talk about right now.00:41
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:41
thinrichs+1 to using the UI to generate requirements for backend00:42
ekcsok let’s move on for now then. feel free to comment on the mockup. (no signed needed I believe to comment)00:43
ekcs#topic policy library discussions00:43
*** openstack changes topic to "policy library discussions (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:43
ekcsThanks for the reviews on the policy lib data model patch. I’m working on a second patchset addressing the comments and including the API methods.00:43
ekcsOne point to address:00:44
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting00:44
ekcsis it important to have the UUID for the library policies?00:44
ekcsI remember hearing about how UUID was added to the policy enigne policies API because people wanted that.00:45
*** Apoorva has quit IRC00:45
ekcswould the same reasons apply here?00:45
thinrichsTrying to remember...00:45
thinrichsPeople definitely expected a UUID on all the resources00:45
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC00:46
thinrichsWe tried just having the name for a long time (and even called it the ID), but that didn't help00:46
thinrichsDo we expect the names to be unique for the library?00:46
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting00:46
ekcsHmm ok. So that means we should have UUID here too then?00:46
thinrichsThe names had to be unique for the policies so that we could reference policy A from policy B as A:foo00:46
thinrichsBut for the library, it's not as clear that all the names need to be unique00:47
thinrichsYou could have 3 policies named A, with a policy B that references A:foo, and it's the user's job to pick which version of A to instantiate.00:47
thinrichs(Maybe the 3 policies differ in whether they reference glance or glare; ceilometer or monasca; etc.)00:48
*** mickeys has quit IRC00:48
thinrichsIn both cases I'd lean toward having a UUID for each policy in the library.00:48
ekcshmmm. that’s a good point. I had designed for the names to be unique even in the library. but then you lose this use case.00:49
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting00:49
*** rfolco has quit IRC00:49
*** markstur has quit IRC00:49
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting00:50
ekcsbut regardless of whether names are unique, people want to see UUID.00:50
*** litao__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:50
thinrichsright00:50
ekcscorrect?00:50
thinrichsyep00:50
ekcsok.00:51
ekcsand hmm any more arguments for or against unique names in library?00:51
ekcsI can’t think of any reason to insist on uniqueness.00:52
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck00:52
ekcsexcept maybe it’s easier to activate a policy by name in CLI. weak argument though.00:53
thinrichsCould always do a lookup: given name, find the UUID00:54
thinrichs(meaning the CLI could do the lookup, and the API could require having a UUID)00:54
thinrichsOr the API could accept both00:54
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting00:54
thinrichsI've got to run home.  Just found out the nanny bailed (again)00:54
ekcsok later thinrichs00:55
*** markstur has quit IRC00:55
thinrichsThanks all!00:55
*** thinrichs has quit IRC00:55
ekcsramineni_: any more thoughts on uniqueness of names or anything else policy library?00:55
ramineni_Nothing from my side00:56
ekcsok then!00:56
ekcs#topic open discussion00:56
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:56
ekcsanything else to talk about?00:56
ekcsif not we can call it =)00:56
ramineni_Are we having ptg00:56
ramineni_?00:57
ekcsoh right. I responded probably to the questionaire.00:57
ekcsmeant to talk about it at some point when people are around.00:57
ramineni_Oohk ..np ..we can discuss next time then00:58
ekcsbasically I think it’s really helpful to have the time set aside to talk. but it may also be an option to do it remotely to avoid a trip. but the time difference makes it complicated too. and it’s hard to get the same kind of dedicated time.00:58
*** jaypipes has quit IRC00:59
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
ekcsyea please think about what you think is best and email me or ML and we can also talk about it at future meeting.00:59
ramineni_Ya , right00:59
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
ramineni_Sure00:59
ekcsalright then. more next time!00:59
ekcs#endmeeting01:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"01:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 15 01:00:01 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)01:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2017/congressteammeeting.2017-06-15-00.01.html01:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2017/congressteammeeting.2017-06-15-00.01.txt01:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2017/congressteammeeting.2017-06-15-00.01.log.html01:00
*** hieulq has quit IRC01:00
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting01:03
*** rfolco has quit IRC01:03
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting01:06
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC01:07
*** amotoki_away is now known as amotoki01:10
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:21
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** fzdarsky|afk has quit IRC01:24
*** aeng has quit IRC01:30
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting01:30
*** bkopilov has quit IRC01:32
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC01:34
*** yamahata has quit IRC01:39
*** iyamahat has quit IRC01:39
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting01:40
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting01:45
*** mickeys has quit IRC01:49
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC01:51
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC01:53
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting02:00
wanghaohi02:00
zhenguo#startmeeting mogan02:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 15 02:01:03 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is zhenguo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.02:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.02:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: mogan)"02:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'mogan'02:01
zhenguoo/02:01
litao__o/02:01
zhenguoliusheng, shaohe_feng, luyao, Xinran, zhangyang: are you here?02:02
*** VW has quit IRC02:02
liushengo/02:02
wanghaomiss me02:02
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting02:02
wanghao:(02:02
luyaoo/02:02
zhenguowanghao: hah02:02
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting02:03
Xinrano/02:03
zhenguowanghao: I find you say hi before the meeting :D02:03
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC02:03
wanghaohhaha02:03
zhenguoas always, the agenda:02:03
zhenguo#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Mogan#Agenda_for_next_meeting02:03
zhenguolet's jump in02:03
zhenguo#topic announcements and reminders02:03
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements and reminders (Meeting topic: mogan)"02:03
zhenguoWe got the first weekly tasks report sent out last week. thansk wanghao!02:04
liushengthanks02:04
wanghaomy pleasure02:04
zhangyango/02:04
zhenguoplease remember to update the etherpad to help summarize the report, thanks all02:05
zhenguoOur tempest coverage is improved and the work is still going on, thanks liusheng!02:05
liushengzhenguo: np :)02:05
wanghaoI see it, very cool, God sheng02:05
zhenguohah02:05
zhenguoWe don't have a time freeze for specs this cycle, but please write specs for you BP soon if it's needed to ensure there's enough time to review.02:06
liushenglol02:06
zhenguoContribution into mogan for the last 30 days02:07
zhenguo#link http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/mogan/3002:07
zhenguothe review stats is still not looks very well, so also please do more reviews02:07
zhenguoAnd as we are all in a same TZ, I propose to have a 'review hour' every day if it's feasible, wdyt?02:08
litao__sure02:08
wanghaoyeah,  I think it's great02:08
zhenguoNot only cores should paticipate, everyone can join or ping others for review during that time.02:08
liushengsounds great!02:08
wanghaoseems a little better then last week in revies.02:09
wanghaogood start at least.02:09
*** hemanth has joined #openstack-meeting02:09
zhenguohah, yes, as you all start to review patches02:09
wanghaoyeah02:09
zhenguowhich makes us like a real community02:09
litao__hah02:10
*** ekcs has quit IRC02:10
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting02:10
zhenguoand I stop to +A patch directly to let it be fully reviewed02:10
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting02:11
zhenguook, if you agree, we will find a time02:11
wanghaoem02:11
wanghaomaybe 4:30-5:3002:11
zhenguowanghao: hah, as you will end the day by 5:30, right?02:12
wanghaoyeah, change your brain before go home02:12
wanghaohaha02:12
zhenguolol02:12
zhenguoI'm ok with that time02:12
* litao__ which day?02:12
wanghaoevery day02:12
zhenguois it feasible for everyday?02:12
liushengI am also Ok02:13
litao__which day is the review day?02:13
*** hemanth has quit IRC02:13
zhenguolitao__ not review day, it's review hour02:13
zhenguolitao__: so everyday could has a review hour, lol02:14
wanghaozhenguo: maybe 1,3,5?02:14
litao__zhenguo: ok02:14
zhenguowanghao: sounds good02:14
liushengor 1, 2, 4 lol02:15
litao__like hackathon?02:15
zhenguolol02:15
wanghaolitao__: pretty much02:15
wanghaoliusheng: haha02:15
zhenguoeveryday is ok for me...02:15
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC02:15
zhenguoor every hour, hah02:15
wanghaozhenguo: yeah,02:16
zhenguoshaohe_feng: wdyt?02:16
wanghaozhenguo: we can just try it a week and see if it's ok next week.02:16
litao__zhenguo:  you are free02:16
zhenguolitao__: not really02:16
wanghao1,2,4 also fine to me02:16
zhenguoso 4:30pm to 5:30 pm every 1,2,402:17
*** noslzzp has quit IRC02:17
wanghaozhenguo: great02:17
litao__zhenguo: That's all02:18
liusheng+102:18
zhenguook, if someone else dissent this, we can discuss later02:18
zhenguonot much of announcement, anyone else have a thing here?02:19
zhenguothe Sydney Summit presentation is open, we really need a one to show what's mogan02:20
zhenguowe got a presentation selected on openstack days china next month :D02:21
litao__Sydney is a good place02:21
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC02:21
liushenghope we can go there :)02:21
wanghaocould we apply a project onboard in Sydney?02:21
zhenguohah, we can prepare more presentatins, if you want to go02:22
zhenguowanghao: seems yes02:22
wanghaoto introduce Mogan to users like other projects doing in Boston.02:22
wanghaoyes02:22
zhenguowanghao: not sure if it's allowed for non-official project02:22
wanghaozhenguo: yeah, aslo concern that too.02:23
litao__so make it official02:23
zhenguolitao__: hah02:23
wanghaolitao__: that's our try too to apply a project onboard02:24
wanghaozhenguo: maybe need more information about that.02:24
litao__wanghao: yes02:24
zhenguowanghao: yes, will check later, still got time02:24
wanghaozhenguo: cool02:24
zhenguook, let's move on02:24
zhenguo#topic task tracking02:25
*** openstack changes topic to "task tracking (Meeting topic: mogan)"02:25
zhenguo#links https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MoganWhiteBoard02:25
* zhenguo gives folks a few minutes to review02:25
shaohe_fengzhenguo: looks good02:25
zhenguoshaohe_feng: the time is feasible for you?02:26
liushengzhenguo: need to enrich versioned notifications now ?02:27
zhenguoliusheng: yeah, do you have concerns?02:28
zhenguoliusheng: before Pike, I think we should got enough notifications02:28
liushengzhenguo: no, just confirm is it high priorities now, hah02:28
liushengzhenguo: ok02:28
zhenguoliusheng: hah, you can try to add it for stable API which we will not change before Pike release02:29
liushengzhenguo: ok02:29
wanghaozhenguo: we also should mention developers to add notification in new features.02:30
wanghaozhenguo: if needed.02:30
shaohe_fengzhenguo: It's oK02:30
zhenguowanghao: sure02:30
zhenguoshaohe_feng: ok02:30
zhenguowanghao: also, for quotas, we shold add more02:30
liushengbtw, I will spend some time to know placement and think about how to integrate it to Mogan, what do you think ?02:30
liushengwanghao: agreed02:30
zhenguoliusheng: sure02:31
zhenguoliusheng: I will add you to the new flavor bp with me02:31
wanghaozhenguo: yes02:31
liushengzhenguo: ok02:31
shaohe_fengliusheng: great.02:32
*** markvoelker has quit IRC02:32
liushengshaohe_feng: :D02:32
wanghaoliusheng: consider we can support placement in scheduler, but not sure if it could be now.02:32
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting02:33
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting02:33
zhenguowanghao: besides node aggregates thing, we can move to that directly after the refactoring of flavor, hah02:33
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting02:33
*** dmacpher_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:33
*** shu-mutou-AWAY is now known as shu-mutou02:34
litao__liusheng: is it high  priority for placement?02:34
zhenguoso node aggregates spec needs to wait for a while02:34
liushengzhenguo: yes, that like what nova does now02:34
wanghaozhenguo: do you think we should support two scheduler way?02:34
wanghaozhenguo: placement or our own.02:34
zhenguoif the community are moving to placement, there's no reason for us not to02:34
wanghaoemm, sure02:35
liushenglitao__: may be, we need to reduce the burden which may will be bigger if we swith late02:35
*** dmacpher has quit IRC02:35
zhenguowanghao: we will still have a scheduler, placement only for resouces tracking02:35
litao__liusheng: sure02:35
zhenguowe will move our compute nodes there02:35
wanghaozhenguo: btw,  if there is no big issue in adopt node,  we can prepare to code it next week.02:35
zhenguomogan will not store baremetal resources02:35
wanghaozhenguo: yeah, I see.02:35
zhenguowanghao: yes, you can start coding I think, will try to make more people review that spec02:36
litao__zhenguo: I will work with wanghao to fullfill adoption02:37
*** markvoelker has quit IRC02:37
zhenguowanghao: aha, today is Thursday, our review hour..02:37
zhenguolitao__ : thanks02:37
zhenguolitao__: and if you like, you can also do quotas together with wanghao :D02:37
litao__zhenguo: yeah, I will02:38
zhenguook02:38
shaohe_fengzhenguo: I develop new devstack with nova02:38
shaohe_fengzhenguo: it can use placement now02:38
zhenguoshahe_feng: yes, nova has moved to placement02:39
zhenguobut we should find a way to use placement aggregates for our nodes aggregates02:39
zhenguoso I will not update the node aggregates spec recently until we got a outcome02:39
shaohe_fengzhenguo: agree.02:40
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting02:40
zhenguowanghao: for adopting servers, we will not save the manageable nodes right?02:41
*** ssalagame has quit IRC02:41
wanghaozhenguo: sure, and thanks litao_02:41
wanghaozhenguo: yes02:41
wanghaozhenguo: just get them from driver and show them to user diectly02:42
zhenguowanghao: ok02:42
litao__so it is simple02:43
zhenguoyes02:43
zhenguoanother thing I want to discuss is the port_type support02:43
zhenguoas ironic now support vif_attach and vif_detach, so we will move to use that API02:44
zhenguobut it's not support pass hints for physical ports to use02:44
zhenguoso we will lose the ability to specifying port_type when claiming a server02:44
zhenguobut the right approach is to push ironic support this, wdyt?02:44
wanghaozhenguo: I see now Mogan use port_type just to match the physical port from Ironic.02:45
*** beekhof_mb has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck02:46
zhenguowanghao: yes02:46
wanghaozhenguo: so you mean we will pass the port_type to Ironic?02:47
zhenguowanghao: yes, but ironic api doens't support it02:47
*** baoli has quit IRC02:47
litao__zhenguo: yeah , maybe we can push it to ironic project02:48
wanghaozhenguo: How Ironic to use the port_type?02:48
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-meeting02:49
zhenguowanghao: in fact, ironic now support vif_attach api, so we only need to pass a neutron port_id to it then it will choose one physical port to associate02:50
zhenguowanghao: we don't need to list all ports and select one ourselves, and set extra/vif_port_id to ironic02:50
*** mickeys has quit IRC02:50
wanghaozhenguo: ah  I see02:50
zhenguowanghao: so I would like to make ironic vif attach api support some more hints to the physical port02:51
zhenguowanghao: at least something like tag should be supported and I think it make sense02:51
litao__zhenguo: I remember it is done by nova rather than ironic02:51
zhenguolitao__ : nova has changed to just call ironic.vif_attach02:52
wanghaozhenguo: I see,  you mean we put the associate process down to Ironic.02:52
zhenguowanghao: yes02:52
zhenguowanghao: ironic now just sort the port and choose the first available one02:52
zhenguowanghao: it's move flexible to let ironic know which type of port we want to use02:53
wanghaozhenguo: emm agree02:53
wanghaozhenguo: it should be supported in Ironic02:53
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
zhenguowanghao:yes, so we can just drop that support provisionally02:53
zhenguoXinran: hi, please continue the refactor of vif_attach/detach, thanks!02:54
wanghaozhenguo: remove port_type in creation server?  I think it's no harmful even if we keep it now.02:55
wanghaozhenguo: since we didn't use it well.02:56
zhenguowanghao: but if we change to use ironic vif_attach, we can't support that02:56
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
zhenguowe can pass it down to ironic driver, but can't pass it to ironic :(02:57
wanghaozhenguo: emm,  okay,  I see your point.  maybe we remove it.  let's see the code02:58
litao__zhenguo:sounds good02:58
zhenguook02:58
zhenguoit's almost time02:58
zhenguowe can move to next topic if there is not things want to discuss here02:59
zhenguo#topic open discussion02:59
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: mogan)"02:59
zhenguowho's got a thing here02:59
Xinran ok, i will do it soon02:59
zhenguoXinran: thanks03:00
zhenguothanks y'all03:00
wanghaobye03:00
zhenguo#endmeeting03:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"03:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 15 03:00:57 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)03:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mogan/2017/mogan.2017-06-15-02.01.html03:01
litao__bye03:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mogan/2017/mogan.2017-06-15-02.01.txt03:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mogan/2017/mogan.2017-06-15-02.01.log.html03:01
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting03:01
*** aeng has quit IRC03:02
*** david-lyle has quit IRC03:04
*** ramineni_ has quit IRC03:06
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting03:12
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting03:13
*** jrichli has left #openstack-meeting03:16
*** dbecker has quit IRC03:20
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting03:21
*** rossella_s has quit IRC03:23
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting03:27
*** dbecker has joined #openstack-meeting03:35
*** ssalagame has quit IRC03:37
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:40
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting03:46
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting03:49
*** markstur has quit IRC03:49
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting03:50
*** mickeys has quit IRC03:51
*** hongbin has quit IRC03:55
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting03:55
*** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:57
*** wanghao has quit IRC03:58
*** iyamahat has quit IRC04:03
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting04:09
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting04:09
*** rbudden has quit IRC04:10
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC04:11
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC04:13
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:14
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting04:15
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting04:16
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:21
*** gouthamr has quit IRC04:24
*** adisky__ has joined #openstack-meeting04:24
*** zhurong has quit IRC04:28
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting04:28
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting04:32
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting04:32
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting04:33
*** csomerville has quit IRC04:35
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting04:40
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting04:47
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** mickeys has quit IRC04:52
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting04:58
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting05:00
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC05:00
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting05:01
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:05
*** markvoelker has quit IRC05:07
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:08
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC05:12
*** abramley has quit IRC05:13
*** markstur has quit IRC05:15
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting05:16
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting05:18
*** brault has quit IRC05:19
*** markstur has quit IRC05:21
*** andreas-f has joined #openstack-meeting05:22
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting05:23
*** ssalagame has quit IRC05:25
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:26
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting05:26
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting05:29
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
*** ayogi has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** edmondsw has quit IRC05:37
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** ayogi has quit IRC05:37
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** gyee has quit IRC05:39
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting05:39
*** markstur has quit IRC05:41
*** ayogi has joined #openstack-meeting05:43
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC05:43
*** ijw has quit IRC05:44
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting05:45
*** aeng has quit IRC05:47
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting05:48
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting05:48
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting05:50
*** mickeys has quit IRC05:53
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting05:58
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #openstack-meeting06:00
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC06:02
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting06:02
*** makowals has quit IRC06:03
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting06:04
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom06:10
*** rcernin has quit IRC06:11
*** ltomasbo|away is now known as ltomasbo06:13
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting06:17
*** gcb has quit IRC06:17
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting06:19
*** markstur has quit IRC06:23
*** rossella_s has quit IRC06:24
*** rwsu has quit IRC06:26
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting06:28
*** rbartal has joined #openstack-meeting06:37
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:37
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting06:37
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting06:39
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting06:39
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting06:40
*** prateek_cell has joined #openstack-meeting06:41
*** prateek_cell has quit IRC06:42
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting06:43
*** dims has quit IRC06:44
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting06:46
*** armax has quit IRC06:49
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting06:58
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting07:01
*** andreas-f has quit IRC07:07
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting07:10
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting07:12
*** iyamahat has quit IRC07:15
*** armax has quit IRC07:15
*** mickeys has quit IRC07:15
*** csaikia has quit IRC07:16
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting07:21
*** zhufl has joined #openstack-meeting07:21
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
*** oidgar has joined #openstack-meeting07:28
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC07:30
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting07:30
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting07:30
*** pewp has quit IRC07:30
*** ltomasbo is now known as ltomasbo|away07:32
*** pewp has joined #openstack-meeting07:33
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting07:34
*** rossella_s has quit IRC07:38
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC07:46
*** mugsie has quit IRC07:51
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting07:54
*** mugsie has quit IRC07:54
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting07:54
*** neiljerram has quit IRC07:57
*** blancos has joined #openstack-meeting07:57
*** hemanth has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** wriju has joined #openstack-meeting07:59
gmann#startmeeting qa08:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 15 08:00:17 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.08:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.08:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: qa)"08:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'08:00
chandankumargmann: hello08:00
gmannwho all here today?08:00
*** pradeepkumarks has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
zhuflhello08:00
blancoso/08:00
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
pradeepkumarkshello08:00
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting08:01
gmannnew time and happy to see more people :)08:01
masayukigo/08:01
gmann#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_Jun_15th_2017_.280800_UTC.2908:01
zhuflthanks for making the meeting time an hour earlier, now it's 4 PM in China:)08:01
gmann^^ today agenda08:01
*** samP has joined #openstack-meeting08:02
prateeko/08:02
*** ykatabam has quit IRC08:02
gmannzhyes, 5 for me and i can join dinner with masayukig and mtreinish due to that :)08:02
gmann#topic Previous Meeting Action review08:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Previous Meeting Action review (Meeting topic: qa)"08:03
gmannthere was 1 action for andreaf  - #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2017/qa.2017-06-08-17.00.html08:03
gmannand he sent mail for that08:03
*** acoles has left #openstack-meeting08:03
gmann#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-June/118283.html08:03
*** uk310y has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
gmannnice idea about keep monitoring the gate issues08:03
gmannhope everyone saw the mail08:04
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
masayukigyeah, I had a glance, but re-read it later..08:04
gmannthere is rotation things for gate issue categorization like bug triage08:04
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting08:05
gmann#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-gate-issue-categotisation08:05
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting08:05
*** rossella_s has quit IRC08:05
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC08:05
masayukiggmann: ok, I'll put my names later08:06
gmannno one yet assigned the slots but as andreaf mentioned we encourage new people to start taking those tasks and we can provide mentorship program also08:06
gmannmasayukig, thanks +108:06
gmannmay be few initial week we can do to give a glance of what needs to be done and how to report08:06
zhuflmaybe I can have a try, and I need guidance:)08:07
gmannzhufl, sure. it will be nice08:07
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:08
gmannso start putting your name on etherpad for the slot you want08:08
zhuflok, I'll put my names later08:09
masayukigcool!08:09
gmann#topic PTG08:09
*** openstack changes topic to "PTG (Meeting topic: qa)"08:09
gmannthis is just reminder about PTG schedule out #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/117369.html08:09
gmannstart preparing about it (mainly budget from company :)).08:10
zhuflI haven't got my visa still08:10
masayukig:(08:10
gmannzhufl, you applied and waiting for visa approval or it is rejected ?08:10
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting08:11
zhufl4 months passed, it is pending,' administrative processing'08:11
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting08:11
gmannzhufl, ohh, thats not good08:11
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC08:11
masayukigzhufl: you should ask the administrator(?) again..08:11
*** dosaboy has quit IRC08:11
gmannzhufl, one of my colleague had same issue and asked to return passport as travel was near and they issues 1 year visa for him08:12
chandankumargmann: masayukig for visa, we need letter from where can i get it for ptg?08:12
gmannzhufl, masayukig yea may be checking with them again will help08:12
gmannchandankumar, there is link in that mail to request IL08:12
zhufloh, I 'll try08:12
zhuflone of my colleague has the same situation with me08:13
gmannchandankumar, from india it is little bit difficult so try to make your application strong08:13
gmannhope you all get visa.08:13
zhuflmaybe travel visa is better08:13
chandankumarhope for best :-)08:14
gmannzhufl, yea, i also have business visa and good for conf etc08:14
gmann#topic Gate Stability - status update08:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Gate Stability - status update (Meeting topic: qa)"08:14
* masayukig doesn't need visas, actually even if I go to China..08:14
*** powerd has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
gmanngate seems stable now a days and did not find much issue if i have not missed any08:15
gmann#link https://goo.gl/ptPgEw08:15
gmannanyone aware of any critical issue?08:16
*** armax has quit IRC08:16
chandankumargmann: http://logs.openstack.org/74/473774/5/check/gate-tempest-python27-ubuntu-xenial/0af018f/console.html08:16
gmann#link http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html08:16
chandankumaradded recheck let me see if it agains fail08:17
*** ltomasbo|away is now known as ltomasbo08:17
*** mriedem has quit IRC08:17
gmannchandankumar, humm08:17
chandankumarsorry ignore08:18
gmannchandankumar, means?08:18
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
chandankumargmann: on one of my review, it got failed, i added recheck, if it again fails, i will let you know08:19
*** awaugama has joined #openstack-meeting08:20
masayukigchandankumar: the test case looks not good..08:20
gmannchandankumar, but strange failure. ok let's check it later08:20
gmannlet's move to next topic08:21
masayukigyeah08:21
gmann@topic Specs Reviews08:21
gmann#topic Specs Reviews08:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs Reviews (Meeting topic: qa)"08:21
gmann#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/qa-specs,n,z08:22
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting08:22
gmannblancos, i need to check this, was away last week - #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/461140/08:22
patchbotpatch 461140 - qa-specs - RBAC testing multiple policies08:22
gmannll try to check this08:22
blancosgmann Okay, thank you :)08:23
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:23
gmannmasayukig, your spec is +A   :) #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471623/08:23
patchbotpatch 471623 - qa-specs - Update document theme08:23
masayukiggmann: heh, thanks!08:24
gmannwe need to make HA testing moving as it seems stuck #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443504/08:24
patchbotpatch 443504 - qa-specs - Added spec for high availability testing08:24
*** caowei has quit IRC08:24
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting08:24
gmanni will check with samP if he need any help on this08:24
samPgmann: hi..08:24
gmann#action gmann to check with samP about HA testing spec08:25
samPI will update it.. now working on it08:25
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting08:25
gmannsamP, hi, you are here08:25
samPgmann: hi o/08:25
gmannsamP, thanks, i will review on revised version.08:25
samPI was working with LCOO on this.08:25
samP#link https://openstack-lcoo.atlassian.net/wiki/display/LCOO/Working+Space+for+Exteme+Testing+and+related+topics08:25
* gmann do not know how to undo action 08:25
samPgmann: its ok, leve it..:)08:26
samPgmann: you can mark it done on next meeting :)08:26
prateeksamP, can i help in implementing this ?08:27
samPprateek: That will be great..08:27
blancos(gmann: I think it's (#)undo action)08:27
prateeksamP, thanks08:27
gmannsamP, nice, what is that LCOO ?08:27
samPah..08:27
gmannprateek, thanks. its great.08:27
masayukigblancos: oh, I didn't know that :)08:28
samP#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LCOO08:28
gmann#undo action08:28
openstackRemoving item from minutes: #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LCOO08:28
gmannoh no08:28
masayukigheh08:28
gmann#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LCOO08:29
gmannsamP, thanks a lot, i will check08:29
*** trinaths has quit IRC08:29
gmannanything else on spec?08:29
samPgmann: I will update the spc asap, so we can move forword08:30
gmannsamP, cool\, thanks.08:30
samPgmann: np08:30
gmann#topic Tempest08:30
*** openstack changes topic to "Tempest (Meeting topic: qa)"08:30
gmann#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open08:30
zhuflhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/467483/08:31
zhuflcan we use resource_type defined in clients to assemble show method/delete method, like "show_" + resource_type?08:31
patchbotpatch 467483 - tempest - Refactor is_resource_deleted method08:31
gmannzhufl, i did not get completely08:32
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting08:32
zhuflmasayukig: do you get it?08:32
masayukigzhufl: you mean making a method dynamically?08:32
zhuflyes08:32
gmannzhufl, i see, i prefer not to do that, thats too much magic08:33
masayukigzhufl; gmann: yeah, I agree with gmann.08:33
zhuflbut if not, we have to add a method in every client08:33
gmannzhufl, we had in neutron clients which were hard to debug so we moved to plain method mapping08:33
blancosI had a question about #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/45787608:33
patchbotpatch 457876 - tempest - Add token related API to Keystone v3-ext/OS-OAUTH1...08:33
zhuflgmann: no, I don't mean the same as neutron ever did08:34
chandankumarI have moved tempest plugin sanity check code from project config to tempest https://review.openstack.org/47416408:34
patchbotpatch 474164 - tempest - Added script for doing tempest plugin sanity08:34
chandankumarfeedback are welcome to improve it08:34
masayukigzhufl: gmann: but I can try to think that. Or zhufl, you can take over it, if you want :)08:34
gmannzhufl, i think having explicit method in each client much better but i will check that patch tomorrow.08:35
gmannblancos, go ahead08:35
blancosIs this something that would belong in Tempest or Keystone's Tempest plugin?08:35
gmannchandankumar, 1 min please, next turn yours08:35
chandankumarack08:35
*** rossella_s has quit IRC08:36
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting08:36
gmannblancos, is it for patrole testing?08:36
hemanthit is for patrole as well as keystone tempest plugin funtional tests08:37
blancosgmann: I believe there are 1 or 2 commits dependent on it (as hemanth mentioned)08:37
gmannhemanth, ok, and no API test in tempest for that? as it can be covered in keystone plugin right?08:38
chandankumarjust one query if we have a tempest plugin for core project what tests will stay in tempest and what in tempest plugin?08:38
hemanthgmann: another patch is submitted for tempest api as well08:38
gmannblancos, hemanth ok, we can have in tempest like other keystone clients no issue as patrole need it08:39
hemanthgmann: can core team review the patch.. since last one month i am just rebasing :-)08:39
gmannblancos, can patrole consume clients from plugin?08:39
gmannhemanth, ohk, apologies for that. i will check that.08:40
gmannblancos, just a thought for future things but we can think later after meeting08:40
blancosgmann: We talked with andreaf about it and he didn't really like the idea08:40
gmannblancos, about consuming client from plugin?08:41
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
masayukigchandankumar: I think scenario tests and defcore tests will stay at least.08:41
blancosgmann: Correct08:41
gmannblancos, ok, make sense.08:41
gmannblancos, hemanth i will check that patch08:41
gmannchandankumar, go ahead08:41
hemanthgmann: thanks08:41
pradeepkumarksgmann: on similar lines, we have federation APIs whose clients are implemented in plugin(keystone)08:41
gmannhemanth, np!08:41
pradeepkumarksand hence patrole won't be able to consume those clients08:42
chandankumari have moved tempest plugin sanity check code from project config to tempest with some more improvement, https://review.openstack.org/47416408:42
patchbotpatch 474164 - tempest - Added script for doing tempest plugin sanity08:42
gmannpradeepkumarks, ok, i think we had federation APIs thing earlier also08:42
chandankumarplease have a look and more feedback to improve08:42
gmannpradeepkumarks, it should be configured globally right from devstack side08:42
pradeepkumarksgmann: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473458/08:43
patchbotpatch 473458 - tempest - Implement tempest client for keystone v3 identity_...08:43
gmannchandankumar, you are adding  script to intall plugins in tempest right?08:43
masayukigchandankumar: thanks for the updating, I'll have a look tomorrow :)08:43
pradeepkumarksi mean since the client is already implemented in keystone plugin, we can't let patrole consume it08:43
gmannpradeepkumarks, do you have patch up for that?08:44
chandankumargmann: yes, install one project then run sanity then uninstall and again repeat for others08:44
chandankumarif at any step it fails, the script will exist08:44
pradeepkumarksgmann: patch up for?08:44
gmannchandankumar, ok. make sense. thanks, i will add that in queue08:45
chandankumargmann: i have also improved tempest plugin list script08:45
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC08:45
gmannpradeepkumarks, putting federation APIs client in tempest or you want feedback first08:45
chandankumargmann: related patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473774/08:45
patchbotpatch 473774 - tempest - Fixed project lists for retrieving tempest plugins08:45
chandankumarthat's it from myside08:45
chandankumarmasayukig: gmann thanks :-)08:45
gmannchandankumar, i saw that, should be quick.thanks08:45
pradeepkumarksgmann: https://github.com/openstack/keystone-tempest-plugin/blob/master/keystone_tempest_plugin/services/identity/v3/identity_providers_client.py08:46
masayukigI have one thing: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471352/08:47
patchbotpatch 471352 - tempest - Revert "Check image after unshelve"08:47
pradeepkumarksthis is the identity_providers_client which is already there in keystone_tempest_plugin. we wanted to implement patrole testcases for these APIs08:47
*** trinaths has left #openstack-meeting08:47
gmannpradeepkumarks, if tests and usage only in plugin then client should be plugin side only but here as you mentioned patrole need it right?08:47
pradeepkumarksgmann: yes08:47
pradeepkumarksgmann: patrole testcases cannot be implemented otherwise08:48
gmannpradeepkumarks, as blancos mentioned same case for other client also, we can take same approach for your case also08:48
gmannblancos, hemanth are those clients present in plugin side also - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/45787608:48
patchbotpatch 457876 - tempest - Add token related API to Keystone v3-ext/OS-OAUTH1...08:48
pradeepkumarksgmann: incase of blancos, client wasnt already implemented at all08:49
pradeepkumarksgmann: not present in plugin either08:49
gmannmasayukig, thanks, interesting. i thought checking image is fine after unshelve from nova point of view08:49
gmannmasayukig, ll check this08:50
gmannpradeepkumarks, ok.08:50
pradeepkumarksgmann: in federation api case, we will need to add the same client (which is in keystone_tempest_plugin) into tempest as well08:50
pradeepkumarksgmann: should we do that?08:50
*** dosaboy has quit IRC08:50
blancospradeepkumarks: The consensus so far has been no Patrole tests for clients in plugins08:51
gmannpradeepkumarks, it will be duplicate. if tempest going to have those then we can remove from plugin08:51
*** electrofelix has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
masayukiggmann: thanks.08:51
masayukig9 mins08:51
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
pradeepkumarksgmann: ok08:51
pradeepkumarksgmann: we can remove those client from plugin instead of duplicating..if we have consensus08:52
gmannpradeepkumarks, blancos let me think on this and we all can discuss the best way.08:52
gmannpradeepkumarks, sure, ll let you know08:52
gmannlet's move08:52
pradeepkumarksgmann: sure, thanks08:52
gmannpradeepkumarks, np!08:52
gmannBug Triage & Integrated gate issue categorization:08:52
*** dosaboy has quit IRC08:53
*** kzaitsev_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
gmannthsi we already discussed in starting.08:53
gmann#topic Patrole08:53
*** openstack changes topic to "Patrole (Meeting topic: qa)"08:53
gmann#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole08:53
gmannblancos, any updates or anything to discuss08:53
blancosNot in the Patrole repo, but we currently have a spec in Nova for Patrole gates: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47114508:53
patchbotpatch 471145 - nova-specs - Patrole (RBAC) Nova Gating08:53
blancosWould appreciate QA's input/eyes :)08:54
gmannblancos, i see, but not sure it need spec :). i will check. i like to gate patrole on nova.08:54
gmannblancos, but need more feedback from johnthetubaguy08:55
blancosgmann: Okay, thank you08:55
gmanni will bring this on nova api meetin also08:55
gmannmeeting08:55
gmannalex_xu, good for policy testing  - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47114508:55
patchbotpatch 471145 - nova-specs - Patrole (RBAC) Nova Gating08:55
gmannKeystone tempest clients porting to Tempest project08:56
gmannpradeepkumarks, this is same we discussed right?08:56
gmannWelcome lwarderley, an intern in the Outreachy program. ping us anytime for any help08:57
uk310ygmann: Correct !That is what pradeep discussed now.08:57
gmannuk310y, thanks.08:57
uk310ygmann, thanks :)08:57
gmann#action gmann to discuss plugin clients in tempest with team and get consensus08:57
gmannlet me put action item08:57
gmann#topic Critical Reviews08:57
*** openstack changes topic to "Critical Reviews (Meeting topic: qa)"08:57
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC08:57
gmann3 min left08:58
gmannany more critical review, i think discussed lot08:58
gmannlet's skip the documentation08:58
masayukigheh, yeah08:58
gmann#topic Open Discussion08:58
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: qa)"08:58
gmann2 min left for open discussion08:58
masayukig1 min..08:58
gmann:)08:59
*** mugsie has quit IRC08:59
zhuflit's first time for me to stay until the end of the meeting:)08:59
gmannzhufl, good for us also :)08:59
masayukiggreat!08:59
* gmann really happy to see many people in meeting08:59
masayukiggmann: +108:59
gmannthanks all for joining.08:59
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting09:00
*** mugsie has quit IRC09:00
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting09:00
gmann#endmeeting09:00
zhufl+1 :)09:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"09:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 15 09:00:01 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2017/qa.2017-06-15-08.00.html09:00
samPthans all09:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2017/qa.2017-06-15-08.00.txt09:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2017/qa.2017-06-15-08.00.log.html09:00
samPs/thans/thanks09:00
*** blancos has quit IRC09:00
*** wriju has quit IRC09:00
chandankumargmann: Thanks for chairing the meeting :-)09:01
uk310ygmann: Thanks for chairing the meeting :)09:02
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting09:03
*** mickeys has quit IRC09:04
*** kzaitsev_ has quit IRC09:05
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC09:07
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting09:08
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting09:08
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC09:11
*** zhufl has left #openstack-meeting09:11
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting09:12
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting09:12
*** armax has quit IRC09:17
*** edmondsw has quit IRC09:18
*** hemanth has left #openstack-meeting09:20
*** hemanth has quit IRC09:20
*** mugsie has quit IRC09:22
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting09:22
*** mugsie has quit IRC09:22
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting09:22
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting09:27
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC09:29
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:38
*** shu-mutou is now known as shu-mutou-AWAY09:47
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:48
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting09:49
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz09:52
*** wanghao_ has quit IRC09:54
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC09:58
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting10:05
*** mickeys has quit IRC10:09
*** pradeepkumarks has quit IRC10:09
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting10:12
*** e0ne has quit IRC10:17
*** armax has quit IRC10:17
*** sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts10:23
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** mugsie has quit IRC10:27
*** noslzzp has quit IRC10:28
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting10:29
*** mugsie has quit IRC10:29
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting10:29
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC10:32
*** markstur has quit IRC10:32
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting10:34
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting10:36
*** noslzzp has quit IRC10:39
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:40
*** noslzzp has quit IRC10:42
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:43
*** dpyzhov has left #openstack-meeting10:44
*** noslzzp has quit IRC10:47
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting10:48
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:48
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting10:49
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting10:49
*** noslzzp has quit IRC10:50
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:50
*** noslzzp has quit IRC10:51
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:52
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:56
*** noslzzp has quit IRC10:58
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:58
*** torgomatic has quit IRC11:01
*** bkopilov has quit IRC11:02
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:04
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting11:04
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:04
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting11:05
*** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:06
*** epico has quit IRC11:06
*** tobberyd_ has quit IRC11:07
*** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:07
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:08
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:09
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC11:09
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting11:09
*** mickeys has quit IRC11:10
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC11:10
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting11:10
*** tobberyd_ has quit IRC11:10
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting11:13
*** markstur has quit IRC11:14
*** armax has quit IRC11:18
*** ericyoung has joined #openstack-meeting11:18
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:20
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:21
*** fzdarsky_ is now known as fzdarsky11:22
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:22
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:23
*** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:31
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:33
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:34
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting11:34
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC11:34
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:35
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:36
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:37
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:37
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:42
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:43
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:49
*** tobberyd_ has quit IRC11:49
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:49
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:50
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting11:51
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:51
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting11:51
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting11:52
*** abramley has quit IRC11:54
*** markstur has quit IRC11:56
*** uk310y has quit IRC11:59
*** julim has quit IRC12:00
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting12:06
*** pewp has quit IRC12:08
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC12:09
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** martinkopec has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** mickeys has quit IRC12:12
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting12:12
*** pewp has joined #openstack-meeting12:13
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** rbudden has joined #openstack-meeting12:16
*** armax has quit IRC12:19
*** prateek has quit IRC12:20
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:22
*** edmondsw has quit IRC12:24
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-meeting12:24
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** zhurong has quit IRC12:26
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting12:27
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting12:31
*** donghao has joined #openstack-meeting12:35
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-meeting12:35
*** donghao has quit IRC12:35
*** zhurong has quit IRC12:36
*** donghao has joined #openstack-meeting12:37
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC12:38
*** powerd has quit IRC12:39
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting12:40
*** noslzzp has quit IRC12:41
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:42
*** liusheng has quit IRC12:46
*** pchavva has joined #openstack-meeting12:50
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting12:50
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-meeting12:53
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting12:59
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting13:00
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC13:08
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting13:11
*** rbowen has quit IRC13:12
*** mickeys has quit IRC13:13
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting13:13
*** armax has quit IRC13:17
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting13:20
*** ayogi has quit IRC13:22
*** askb has quit IRC13:26
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting13:29
*** powerd has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC13:36
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** jamesden_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC13:40
*** rbowen has quit IRC13:40
*** powerd has quit IRC13:41
*** eharney has quit IRC13:42
*** mugsie has quit IRC13:43
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
*** takashin has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting13:46
*** bobh has quit IRC13:46
*** hashar has quit IRC13:47
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** powerd has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** VW has quit IRC13:56
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
mriedem#startmeeting nova14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 15 14:00:09 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mriedem. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'14:00
*** hferenc has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
gibio/14:00
edleafe\o14:00
dansmitho/14:00
takashino/14:00
mriedemhi!14:00
bauzas\o14:00
efriedo/14:01
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
sdagueo/14:01
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
mriedem#link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting14:02
mriedem#topic release news14:02
*** openstack changes topic to "release news (Meeting topic: nova)"14:02
mriedem#link Pike release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Pike_Release_Schedule14:02
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
mriedem#info July 27 is feature freeze (6 weeks away)14:02
mriedem#info Blueprints: 71 targeted, 68 approved, 22 completed, 2 not started14:02
mriedemi'm still working on culling the list of blueprints14:02
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
mriedemsince some are not started, or are blocked14:03
* alex_xu waves late14:03
mriedemi might start an etherpad for categorizing some of that stuff14:03
mriedemlike i did in newton14:03
mriedemer ocata14:03
*** spzala has quit IRC14:03
mriedemany questions on the release or schedule?14:03
mriedem#topic bugs14:04
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: nova)"14:04
mriedemnothing listed as critical14:04
mriedem#help Need help with bug triage; there are 78 (down 1 from last week) new untriaged bugs as of today (June 15).14:04
mriedemmake that 7514:04
mriedemsomeone opened 3 duplicate bugs last night14:04
*** hashar has quit IRC14:04
mriedemit's nice to have 1 page of untriaged bugs :)14:04
mriedemgate status - things seem ok14:05
mriedem3rd party ci - no news14:05
bauzaswill help14:05
mriedemanything else on bugs?14:05
mriedem#topic reminders14:05
*** openstack changes topic to "reminders (Meeting topic: nova)"14:05
mriedem#link Pike Review Priorities etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-nova-priorities-tracking14:05
mriedemi'm not sure how up to date that is14:06
edleafeugh - I need to update the scheduler stuff again14:06
mriedemhonestly i'm not sure how much people use that etherpad14:06
mriedemi don't really14:06
mriedemi don't have links handy,14:07
mriedembut i should remind that i believe queens summit call for presentations is open14:07
mriedem#link https://www.openstack.org/summit-login/login?BackURL=%2Fsummit%2Fsydney-2017%2Fcall-for-presentations%2F14:07
mriedem#info CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS IS OPEN UNTIL July 14, 2017 at 11:59PM Pacific Time (July 15, 2017 at 6:59 UTC)14:07
dansmithalready?14:08
mriedemso if you plan on or want to go to sydney, you've got a month to submit presentations14:08
mriedemdansmith: yeah, i guess14:08
*** eharney_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:08
bauzasyup14:08
mriedemthat's what everyone says :)14:08
sdagueit's always on the early side14:08
dansmithbut..14:08
dansmithanyway.14:08
*** caowei has quit IRC14:08
mriedemoh and the PTG14:08
mriedem#link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/14:08
mriedem#info The second Project Teams Gathering (PTG) will be hosted in Denver, September 11-15, 2017. 14:09
mriedemso if you're planning on going to that, time to start talking to the people that hold the money at your company14:09
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
mriedemremember to tell them how beautiful they are14:09
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
mriedem#topic stable branch status14:09
*** openstack changes topic to "stable branch status (Meeting topic: nova)"14:09
mriedem#link stable/ocata: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/ocata,n,z14:09
mriedemwe did a review push on ocata in the last week14:10
mriedemand we have an ocata release request up14:10
mriedem#link Ocata 15.0.6 release request https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474259/14:10
patchbotpatch 474259 - releases - ocata: release nova 15.0.614:10
mriedemhas quite a few high severity bug fixes in it14:10
*** eharney has quit IRC14:10
mriedem#link stable/newton: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/newton,n,z14:10
mriedem#topic subteam highlights14:10
*** openstack changes topic to "subteam highlights (Meeting topic: nova)"14:10
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:10
mriedemdansmith: cells v2 things?14:10
dansmithwe had a meeting,14:11
*** eharney_ is now known as eharney14:11
dansmithdiscussed the ironic fix I have up, which I think has maybe landed? need to check this morning14:11
dansmithgetting close to devstack goodness I think14:11
dansmithmelwitt's quotas series is starting to roll I think,14:11
*** cdent_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** cdent has quit IRC14:11
*** cdent_ is now known as cdent14:11
dansmithand the placement quota stuff has been seeing a lot of action14:12
dansmiththis was the first meeting where mriedem didn't show up with an armful of bugs, which was nice for a change14:12
dansmithI think that's it?14:12
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
mriedemmelwitt revived the console stuff14:12
mriedemand hit problems14:12
mriedemok moving on14:13
mriedemedleafe: scheduler things14:13
edleafeNot a lot of discussion. Mostly just went over the state of reviews.14:13
edleafeResolved to start work on the Custom Resource in Flavors spec14:13
edleafeDiscovered the cdent hates kidney pies.14:13
edleafeEOM14:13
cdentrather14:13
edleafes/the/that14:13
*** mickeys has quit IRC14:14
mriedemalex_xu: api meeting highlights?14:14
alex_xuthe spec for bug fix of the quota-classes API already merged14:14
alex_xugmann already have the patch14:14
alex_xu#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bug/169316814:14
alex_xuprobably just waiting for the update14:14
mriedemalex_xu: oh i didn't see the patch b/c it's not tied to the bp14:14
alex_xuand the progress of no-more-extension is good14:14
alex_xumriedem: yea, those patches submitted before the spec14:15
alex_xugmann: probably will update the patches14:15
alex_xuI think that all we have14:15
mriedemok thanks14:15
mriedemgibi: notification highlights?14:15
gibiyes14:15
gibiThe searchlight related notification additions are ready to review, mriedem already +2 on the first patch of the series.14:15
gibi#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/additional-notification-fields-for-searchlight+status:open14:15
gibiAdding tags to instance.create waits for the tags to be added to the boot request proposed in #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/394321/14:15
patchbotpatch 394321 - nova - Support tag instances when boot14:15
gibiWe have couple of notification transformations that only need a second +2 and a lot that are ready for core review14:15
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
gibi#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/versioned-notification-transformation-pike+label:Code-Review%253E%253D%252B1+label:Verified%253E%253D1+AND+NOT+label:Code-Review%253C014:16
gibithat is all14:16
mriedemthanks14:16
mriedemcinder/nova things, that's me14:16
mriedemworking on live migration (stvnoyes), swap volume (mriedem) and attach flows (jgriffith)14:16
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC14:17
mriedemstvnoyes has a change up to use the new attachment flow with live migration, i just need to review it14:17
mriedemswap volume is still being sorted out on the cinder side i believe14:17
jgriffithmriedem ready to merge... just waiting on reviews14:17
mriedemthere is a meeting in <2 hours for nova/cinder in #openstack-meeting-cp14:17
mriedemjgriffith: link?14:17
jgriffithgetting it..14:17
jgriffithhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/472786/14:18
patchbotpatch 472786 - cinder - Make migration completion work with Attach-V214:18
jgriffithsorry, it was between that and coffee... coffee won14:18
mriedemok14:18
mriedemas it should14:18
mriedem#topic stuck reviews14:18
*** openstack changes topic to "stuck reviews (Meeting topic: nova)"14:18
mriedemnothing on the agenda14:18
mriedemanyone need to air grievances here?14:18
mriedem#topic open discussion14:19
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"14:19
mriedemthere was nothing on the agenda14:19
mriedembut,14:19
* cdent still has no pony14:19
mriedemif i were better prepared i would have something about this change14:19
mriedem#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/ Adds spec for migrating the documentation suite to project repos14:19
patchbotpatch 472275 - docs-specs - Adds spec for migrating the documentation suite to...14:19
mriedemthat's a cross-project thing that i haven't followed closely,14:19
mriedembut essentially it means moving guides/docs into the projects14:20
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
bauzasis the docs team still using XML for documenting ?14:20
mriedemi still need to go through it myself, but bringing it up here so others are aware14:20
mriedembauzas: no14:20
mriedemrst14:20
bauzascool then, because I remember my early days of patching openstack with docs14:21
mriedemupdating the manuals is pretty easy14:21
mriedembut now we're going to own them14:21
bauzasif that's RST, I'm fine then14:21
bauzasbecause we already have lots of docs using it14:21
bauzasin tree I mean14:21
mriedemthere are other big things going on, like deciding on queens community goals14:21
bauzasI should review that doc spec then14:22
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:22
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
bauzasI did committed a bit on it in the past14:22
mriedemthis is all that's up for queens goals right now https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/index.html14:22
mriedemwhich doesn't affect us as we don't have an in-tree tempest plugin14:22
mriedemthere are other goals under review though14:23
mriedemi think that's it from me14:23
mriedemanyone else have anything for open discussion?14:23
hferenco/14:23
mriedemor need me to look into?14:23
hferencjust one small thing14:23
hferenchttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/464002/14:23
patchbotpatch 464002 - nova - Add AggregateMultiTenancyIsolation filter tests14:23
mriedemhferenc: ok - a callback to an earlier meeting/discussion14:24
hferencyes14:24
bauzashferenc: in my pipe of reviews14:24
hferencawesome14:24
hferencthx14:24
mriedembauzas beat me to saying bauzas' would love to review that14:24
bauzasthanks for that14:24
mriedemnot sure why i pluralized that14:24
mriedemone bauzas is enough14:25
bauzasbauzas's square ?14:25
bauzasoh man14:25
mriedemok let's call it a meeting then14:25
mriedemthanks everyone14:25
mriedem#endmeeting14:25
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:25
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 15 14:25:18 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:25
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2017/nova.2017-06-15-14.00.html14:25
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2017/nova.2017-06-15-14.00.txt14:25
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2017/nova.2017-06-15-14.00.log.html14:25
*** jamesden_ has quit IRC14:27
*** takashin has left #openstack-meeting14:28
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-meeting14:28
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:28
*** julim has quit IRC14:31
*** szaher has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting14:33
*** rbartal has quit IRC14:38
*** mugsie has quit IRC14:41
*** noslzzp has quit IRC14:41
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** mugsie has quit IRC14:42
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** makowals has quit IRC14:47
*** cdent has left #openstack-meeting14:47
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC14:52
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
*** reedip_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** fnaval has quit IRC14:55
*** csaikia has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
*** fnaval has quit IRC15:00
*** vkmc_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** caowei has quit IRC15:01
*** davidsha_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC15:06
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
*** trinaths1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
*** trinaths has quit IRC15:08
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:09
*** dklyle is now known as david-lyle15:10
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** janki has quit IRC15:12
*** mickeys has quit IRC15:14
*** felipemonteiro has joined #openstack-meeting15:18
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
*** tobberyd_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:22
*** efried is now known as help15:22
*** help is now known as efried-doc15:23
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC15:25
*** claudiub has quit IRC15:25
*** fnaval has quit IRC15:25
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:26
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
*** tobberyd_ has quit IRC15:28
*** powerd has quit IRC15:28
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
*** sridharg has quit IRC15:29
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
*** samP has quit IRC15:30
*** hashar has quit IRC15:31
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
*** caowei has quit IRC15:35
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
*** trinaths1 has quit IRC15:36
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC15:39
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
*** jkilpatr_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
*** donghao has quit IRC15:41
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC15:43
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC15:44
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** ssalagame has quit IRC15:46
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** trinaths has left #openstack-meeting15:47
*** e0ne has quit IRC15:51
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting15:53
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC15:53
*** reedip_ has quit IRC15:56
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC15:57
*** litao__ has quit IRC16:02
*** eharney has quit IRC16:05
*** csaikia has quit IRC16:05
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC16:05
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting16:09
*** armstrong has quit IRC16:10
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** julim has quit IRC16:11
*** rcernin has quit IRC16:12
*** andreas-f has joined #openstack-meeting16:12
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting16:15
*** mickeys has quit IRC16:15
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC16:16
*** martinkopec has quit IRC16:17
*** martinkopec has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC16:20
*** yamahata has quit IRC16:21
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** slaweq has quit IRC16:25
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting16:29
*** julim has quit IRC16:30
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC16:31
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting16:31
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** Apoorva has quit IRC16:32
*** abramley has quit IRC16:32
*** martinkopec has quit IRC16:33
*** jdurgin has quit IRC16:33
*** ssalagame has quit IRC16:33
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:35
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
*** jkilpatr_ has quit IRC16:37
*** unicell has quit IRC16:37
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting16:38
*** arxcruz has quit IRC16:38
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
*** eharney has quit IRC16:41
*** lhx__ has quit IRC16:43
*** slaweq has quit IRC16:43
*** bobh has quit IRC16:45
*** mickeys has quit IRC16:45
*** tesseract has quit IRC16:46
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** toscalix has quit IRC16:51
*** ssalagame has quit IRC16:51
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:53
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** oidgar has quit IRC16:54
*** sshank has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** pasquier-s_ has quit IRC16:55
*** ltomasbo is now known as ltomasbo|away16:56
*** hagridaaron has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** Swami has quit IRC16:59
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** yamahata has quit IRC17:00
*** yamahata_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** hagridaaron has quit IRC17:01
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC17:01
*** neiljerram has quit IRC17:03
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk17:08
*** abramley has quit IRC17:09
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** jtomasek has quit IRC17:13
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC17:13
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** pcaruana has quit IRC17:16
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:17
*** greghaynes is now known as greghayn117:18
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-meeting17:18
*** hagridaaron has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** efried-doc is now known as efried17:21
*** greghaynes has quit IRC17:22
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:23
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** greghayn1 has quit IRC17:25
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
*** vkmc_ has quit IRC17:31
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:31
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC17:32
*** hagridaaron has quit IRC17:34
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
*** hagridaaron has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
*** ekcs has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** mickeys has quit IRC17:50
*** felipemonteiro has quit IRC17:55
*** davidsha_ has quit IRC17:57
*** ijw has quit IRC18:01
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** ijw has quit IRC18:03
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** raildo has quit IRC18:04
*** hagridaaron has quit IRC18:07
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
*** oidgar has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
*** pewp has quit IRC18:17
*** pewp has joined #openstack-meeting18:21
*** jdurgin has quit IRC18:21
*** oidgar has quit IRC18:24
*** electrofelix has quit IRC18:24
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC18:26
*** lbragstad has quit IRC18:28
*** ssalagame has quit IRC18:29
*** fnaval has quit IRC18:30
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting18:35
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
*** hagridaaron has joined #openstack-meeting18:39
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
*** mickeys has quit IRC18:51
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
*** zengchen has quit IRC19:04
*** zengchen has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
*** sshank has quit IRC19:04
*** ijw has quit IRC19:05
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting19:11
*** abramley has quit IRC19:17
*** mriedem has quit IRC19:17
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC19:20
*** ericyoung has quit IRC19:23
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky|afk19:24
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting19:26
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
*** slaweq has quit IRC19:34
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
*** mtanino_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
*** mtanino_ is now known as mtanino19:46
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
*** dprince has quit IRC19:50
*** mickeys has quit IRC19:53
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
*** pchavva has quit IRC19:57
*** Guest11 has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
*** jprovazn has quit IRC20:03
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
*** eharney has quit IRC20:10
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC20:18
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting20:23
*** thorst has quit IRC20:27
*** rbak has quit IRC20:31
*** awaugama has quit IRC20:33
*** slaweq has quit IRC20:44
*** armstrong has quit IRC20:45
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** baoli has quit IRC20:50
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:52
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:54
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC21:10
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:10
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
*** Guest11 has quit IRC21:13
*** hagridaaron has quit IRC21:13
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting21:14
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC21:15
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
*** fnaval has quit IRC21:23
*** gouthamr has quit IRC21:23
*** hagridaaron has joined #openstack-meeting21:24
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck21:25
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:27
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** adisky__ has quit IRC21:34
*** Leo_ has quit IRC21:34
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting21:36
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
*** slaweq has quit IRC21:40
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting21:41
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting21:43
*** esberglu has quit IRC21:43
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
*** esberglu has quit IRC21:48
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting21:51
*** mickeys has quit IRC21:54
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:55
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting21:56
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting21:56
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
kevinbentonhi all22:01
mlavalleo/22:01
ihrachyso/22:02
armaxahoy22:02
kevinbenton#startmeeting neutron_drivers22:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Jun 15 22:02:22 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kevinbenton. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)"22:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers'22:02
kevinbentonbefore we go through the list of RFEs, there is one i would like to address right away because the spec is already ready and it's pretty simple22:03
kevinbenton#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/168603522:03
openstackLaunchpad bug 1686035 in neutron "[RFE] More detailed reporting of available QoS rules" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq)22:03
*** boden has joined #openstack-meeting22:03
kevinbentonthis is an admin-api to disover qos capabilities of the drivers22:03
mlavallethere is even a patchset already, I believe22:04
mlavalleah no, it is the spece22:04
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** bobh has quit IRC22:05
*** brenda has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
ihrachysok. you feel good about adding discoverability just for qos without looking at broader picture? (we may have this kind of request for other backend specific features)22:05
ihrachysbtw I am not saying that's not the right path22:05
ihrachysjust want to make sure that we see how we may need to deal with the extension in the future if/when we implement discoverability for other stuff22:06
kevinbentonihrachys: yeah, i think a broader capabilities API might be a good long-term goal22:06
kevinbentonihrachys: but i think with our limited resources we can just do this one and then force a future one to generalize22:06
kevinbentonrather than trying to preemptively do it22:06
ihrachysyeah I guess we already took enough broad major projects on our plate, so we can't really deliver anything more general in next X cycles :)22:07
ihrachysso I am fine, it's a needed thing, and if slaweq_ will work on it, I think we can give it a go.22:07
kevinbentonack22:08
ihrachysofc pie in the sky would be better22:08
mlavalle++22:08
amotokihi22:08
kevinbentonyeah, i was just thinking it's hard to envision up front capturing capabilities that aren't clear rule types like this22:08
kevinbentonamotoki, armax: thoughts?22:09
* armax mulls over22:09
armaxyeah, let’s not boil the ocean22:10
mlavallethat's the right expression, LOL22:10
kevinbentonamotoki: any objection?22:11
ihrachysarmax, yeah, let's leave THIS ocean as-is, we have several others in progress22:11
amotokigenerally  the discoverability like this is helpful.22:11
*** askb has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
kevinbentonok, let's approve and maybe next cycle we can generalize a bit better once things like the enforcement framework rkukura was looking into have taken shape22:13
kevinbentonfeature enforcement *22:13
ihrachysis it still on the radar, the Bob's thing?22:14
ihrachyshaven't heard of it for awhile ;)22:14
kevinbentonihrachys: i'm not sure. i haven't either. i'll have to sync up with him22:14
*** thorst has quit IRC22:14
kevinbentonok22:15
kevinbenton#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=Triaged&field.tag=rfe22:15
kevinbenton#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/149131722:15
openstackLaunchpad bug 1491317 in neutron "[RFE] Add TCP/UDP port forwarding extension to L3" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Reedip (reedip-banerjee)22:15
mlavallereedip has already a spec up for review22:16
mlavallehttps://review.openstack.org/47059622:16
patchbotpatch 470596 - neutron-specs - [WIP] Spec for Port Forwarding22:16
*** boden has quit IRC22:17
kevinbentonso i'm okay with this if it's done as an extension in the l3 agent22:17
armaxthere’s very little detail about how this would work with DVR22:17
armaxor L3 HA22:17
mlavalleat the time he is only proposing to implement the API22:18
kevinbentonarmax: well L3 HA is easy22:18
kevinbentonarmax: same as regular22:18
kevinbentonDVR is a problem though22:18
kevinbentonsince this does say it applies to floating IPs22:18
armaxmy suggestion would be to have any approach to DVR to be stated upfront22:18
armaxthe last we need is another broken experience22:18
kevinbentonarmax: so what do you suggest for RFE state? Approve it and have the feature depend on all of that being defined in the spec?22:20
armaxif reedip has enough cycles to put the spec in good shape we can approve and work on the spec to make sure we agree on the steps forward22:21
kevinbentonarmax: yeah, he reached out to me and said he has time to work on it22:21
mlavalleI agree, let him develop the spec and that's where we ask all the questions22:21
ihrachys+22:22
kevinbentonok, i'll put a note that the RFE is approved but the feature won't make it unless we get a clear DVR integration story in teh spec22:22
amotokiwe need to define the api behavior well on top of FIP API. +1 for spec. CVR impl including L3-HA will be straight-forward.22:22
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting22:22
armaxwell, any routing flavor22:22
armaxI appreciate that HA might be easy, but nothing is really easy about neutron22:22
kevinbentoni think API behavior will be easy to describe from what the expected external behavior is22:22
armaxHA is easy and yet there was quite some work to get it to play well to l2pop22:23
kevinbentonarmax: but this won't affect taht stuff22:23
armaxthe unexpected nuisance is always around the corner22:23
kevinbentonit's just on the existing floatingip22:23
armaxthat’s all I am trying to say22:23
kevinbentonthe problem is DVR that i can see22:23
armaxlet’s try to think about these upfront22:23
kevinbentonhow to get traffic from a compute node to another22:23
brendaIt’s need to be discussed that if port-forwarding needed to be applied to router’s external gateway ip?22:23
armaxand only by calling them out in the spec we can get more eyes on it and have more scrutiny22:24
brendaor the spec only focus on floating ips22:24
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC22:24
kevinbentoni think we should probably limit to floating IP to start22:25
kevinbentonexternal gateway isn't normall visible to users`22:25
kevinbentononce we have floating IPs worked out, then we can consider gateway interfaces22:25
brendayes, and there may be conflict when there are both snat and port-forwarding on external gateway22:25
amotokiexternal gateway address may be already used by other traffic and it leads to a bit complicated situation.22:26
kevinbentonyeah22:26
*** kylek3h has quit IRC22:27
kevinbenton#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/164941722:28
openstackLaunchpad bug 1649417 in neutron "RFE: Security group rule using address set" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Dongcan Ye (hellochosen)22:28
mlavalleso, this returned to us22:28
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting22:29
kevinbentonyeah22:30
kevinbentonso it sounds like the workarounds work but are hacky22:30
kevinbentonwhich is sort of what I suspected22:30
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck22:31
mlavallewe discussed the api one or two meetings ago22:31
mlavallewe talked about overloading remote id22:31
kevinbentonI just left a question about implementation resources22:31
mlavalleremote_group_id22:32
kevinbentonit kinda sounds like this is a request with nobody to implement it22:32
kevinbentonlet's revisit once we know if we have someone to do the work22:32
mlavallesounds good22:32
kevinbentonhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1653932 is still a TODO item for me22:33
openstackLaunchpad bug 1653932 in neutron "[rfe] network router:external field not exported" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Kevin Benton (kevinbenton)22:33
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
kevinbenton#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/166787722:33
openstackLaunchpad bug 1667877 in neutron "[RFE] DVR support for Configuring Floatingips in Network Node or in the Compute Node based on Config option." [Wishlist,Triaged]22:33
armaxI am sorry but I can’t help myself but disklike this use case22:34
*** thorst has quit IRC22:34
armaxit adds a layer of complexity that I found difficult to digest22:34
kevinbentonwhat do you mean you dislike the use case?22:35
kevinbentonyou don't understand it?22:35
kevinbentonor you don't want to support it22:35
armaxI have snowflakes22:36
armaxhate22:36
kevinbentonBasically DVR offers two things22:36
kevinbentondirect east/west routing22:36
armaxthis sounds like have snowflakes in the DC22:36
kevinbentonand direct north/south routing22:36
* armax loves to be lectured on DVR by kevinbenton 22:36
kevinbentonif you want east/west routing, you are forced to adopt the north/south22:36
kevinbentonand the north/south has a big deployment cost of getting the external network to every single compute node22:37
armaxyou want the cake and eat it too22:37
armaxon a per-node basis22:37
armaxI think that’s complexity for the sake of it22:37
kevinbentonno22:37
kevinbentonthat's an implementation detail22:38
kevinbentonthe use case i'm aware of driving this would be okay with it being a whole deployment-level thing22:38
armaxwhat is the fundamental raltionale to get your external network to only a fraction of your computes?22:38
amotoki the second sentence sounds complicated...  "Also proactively check the status of the agent on the destination node and if the agent health is down, then configure the Floatingip on the Network Node."22:38
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting22:38
kevinbentonarmax: you don't bring your external network to any of your compute nodes22:38
kevinbentonarmax: it only goes to a rack of network nodes22:38
armaxthis makes the overall solution brittle and prone to weird failure modes that are more difficult to troubleshoot should the platform be homogenous22:38
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC22:39
armaxthen use a HA router for N/S and a DVR router for E/W22:39
kevinbentonarmax: so you tell tenants they just create two routers in their network?22:39
armaxthis mix-and-match approach will spell trouble22:40
armaxfirst of all, we need to reconsider how we expose the router attribute to the regular tenant22:40
kevinbentonwhat router attribute?22:40
*** Swami has quit IRC22:40
*** hagridaaron has quit IRC22:40
armaxI am actually having second thoughts that hiding HA and Distributed to end user was a good idea to begin with22:40
kevinbentonarmax: what are you talking about? telling a tenant to create two routers and setup routes to point to one for E/W and one for N/S is a terrible solution22:41
kevinbentonarmax: it requires tenants to know about infra limitations22:41
armaxright, that’s a niche22:42
armaxcan you explain to me what limitation you see in bringing external connectivity to the compute layer?22:42
*** esberglu has quit IRC22:43
kevinbentonl3 fabric that can't have VLANs extended across it22:43
armaxif you are saying that you want distributed E/W without distributed DNAT that doesn’t spell out how it’s supposed to be implemented22:43
armaxwouldn’t routed networks solve that?22:44
kevinbentonarmax: nope. routed networks doesn't support BGP on external networks yet22:44
armaxright, but once it does?22:45
kevinbentonthen if the operator is willing to allow BGP into their network, yes22:45
armaxthat sounds like a much cleaner solution to me22:46
armaxno added complexity in neutron’s control plane22:46
kevinbentonha!22:46
armaxwin-win :)22:46
kevinbentonyou're joking, right?22:46
kevinbentonhow do you think the BGP prefix advertisement setup is going to get information from the server?22:47
armaxthat goes via well defined interfaces22:47
*** neiljerram has quit IRC22:47
armaxyou build on top of what you already have rather than ripping things out from whitin22:47
armaxwithin22:47
*** brenda has quit IRC22:48
kevinbentonso we're going to make this use case dependent on vaporware?22:48
armaxyou and I probably won’t reach consensus within 5 of these meetings and we should probably take this offline, but I’d like to hear other people’s opinions22:48
kevinbentonvaporware that would force the operator to adopt BGP nonetheless22:49
armaxno, make the vaporware a reality22:49
armaxthe simpler solution in the short term is not necessarily the one that’s gonna pay off in the long run22:51
*** hagridaaron has joined #openstack-meeting22:51
ihrachysbtw I have no educated opinion hence silence :)22:51
armaxLOL22:51
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting22:51
kevinbentonarmax: leave your comments on here https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/166787722:51
openstackLaunchpad bug 1667877 in neutron "[RFE] DVR support for Configuring Floatingips in Network Node or in the Compute Node based on Config option." [Wishlist,Triaged]22:51
armaxihrachys: I thought you had your hands occupied with popcorns22:51
ihrachysarmax, both22:51
armaxI thought I already had22:51
armaxmy opinion of this hasn’t changed, but I’ll reference this nail biting conversation22:52
ihrachysI can enjoy a good fight without getting into details. fist to the left, punch to the right.22:52
kevinbentonarmax: IMO a non-existent more complex feature is a pretty lame answer to this request22:52
*** aeng has quit IRC22:52
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC22:52
armaxkevinbenton: right now I am simply stating that I’d rather this addressed cleanly without a lame configuration toggle that makes the fabric brittle and difficult to troubleshoot22:53
armaxif a cleaner solution involved more work that currently doesn’t exist, so be it22:53
armaxI am tired of promoting hacks over hacks22:53
kevinbentonarmax: the 'cleaner' solution is dependent on a project not even tested in the neutron gate22:54
armaxthat’s not an excuse to encourage the stop-gap22:54
kevinbenton'stop-gap' is just a term for a solution you don't like22:54
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting22:54
ihrachysside note: a lot of things we rely on are not tested in gate, that's not a good argument22:54
amotokican we use routed network as an external network for FIP? perhaps no? i think i don't understand the baseline.22:55
kevinbentonihrachys: for normal neutron traffic operation?22:55
armaxperhaps we can find a different solution that is between a dummy config option and boiling the ocean with BGP22:55
armaxI am simply inviting people to think more carefully22:55
kevinbentonamotoki: armax is suggesting we extend support of routed networks to external networks with the using of the networking-dynamic-routing project22:55
armaxkevinbenton: right now I am simply saying that I hate the proposed solution to the use case presented22:56
*** mickeys has quit IRC22:56
kevinbentonamotoki: so the l3 agent in the rack can announce the addresses in that segment22:56
amotokiah i see22:56
armaxI am not 100% sold on the use case, but I guess I can get behind it22:56
kevinbentonamotoki: I think carl had put up a spec about it22:57
mlavalleand at this point we have an approved rfe, where the next step is to write a spec22:57
kevinbentonmlavalle: i'm not sure we even have it approved though22:57
kevinbentonit sounds like armax does not want to support splitting E/W from N/S in DVR22:58
armaxnot according to the proposal made, I suppose I should come up with a counterproposal22:58
kevinbentonsorry22:58
kevinbentonat time i think22:58
amotokii think it is nice if we have a solution not specific to dvr. dvr-specific logic will leads to less folks familiar with that22:58
armaxlet me mull over this a bit, it’s not exactly high up on the list of my priorities lately22:58
mlavallekevinbenton: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/166732922:59
openstackLaunchpad bug 1667329 in neutron "[RFE] Floating IP Subnets on Routed Provider Networks" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to John Davidge (john-davidge)22:59
mlavallesince John left, the agreement we made in the L3 subteam is to write the spec by the end of this cycle22:59
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck22:59
armaxfor which I am terribly sorry22:59
armax:'(22:59
mlavalleand implement in the next22:59
*** fnaval has quit IRC22:59
*** ijw has quit IRC23:00
armaxtime check23:00
armaxkevinbenton ^23:00
kevinbentonmlavalle: ok. so routed external nets maybe in queens23:00
kevinbenton#endmeeting23:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"23:00
mlavallecorrect23:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jun 15 23:00:24 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)23:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-06-15-22.02.html23:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-06-15-22.02.txt23:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-06-15-22.02.log.html23:00
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:00
*** Apoorva has quit IRC23:03
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting23:05
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** ihrachys has quit IRC23:07
*** davidsha has quit IRC23:07
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting23:09
*** edmondsw has quit IRC23:10
*** slaweq has quit IRC23:10
*** ijw has quit IRC23:13
*** aeng has quit IRC23:22
*** sdague has quit IRC23:28
*** hagridaaron has quit IRC23:28
*** hagridaaron has joined #openstack-meeting23:31
*** noslzzp has quit IRC23:32
*** mlavalle has quit IRC23:40
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting23:43
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting23:46
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting23:50
*** xyang1 has quit IRC23:51
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting23:52
*** hagridaaron has quit IRC23:52
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting23:53
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC23:56
*** mickeys has quit IRC23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!