*** mhen_ is now known as mhen | 02:42 | |
mrjoshi | #startmeeting glance | 14:00 |
---|---|---|
opendevmeet | Meeting started Thu Feb 20 14:00:32 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mrjoshi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'glance' | 14:00 |
mrjoshi | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
mrjoshi | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda | 14:00 |
croelandt | o/ | 14:00 |
mrjoshi | o/ | 14:00 |
mrjoshi | we have a short agenda for today | 14:04 |
mrjoshi | let's start | 14:04 |
mrjoshi | #topic release/periodic job updates | 14:05 |
mrjoshi | M3 next week | 14:05 |
mrjoshi | periodic jobs: all tips failing with "No package matching 'python3.13-dev' is available" | 14:05 |
abhishekk_ | Is that issue across project or just for us? | 14:06 |
croelandt | yeah I'm confused about this | 14:08 |
croelandt | didn't we push an change because it failed with an **old** version of Python? | 14:08 |
abhishekk_ | I think so | 14:08 |
abhishekk_ | @pdeore has pushed that change i guess | 14:09 |
croelandt | 0addd1a99b1be32cc11301730e86234ddfb3c3c1 | 14:09 |
mrjoshi | we did , for py3.11 | 14:09 |
croelandt | yes ^ | 14:09 |
croelandt | so now it should use py3.13 | 14:09 |
croelandt | and it is indeed trying to install the right package | 14:09 |
croelandt | but why is it not available? | 14:09 |
croelandt | What version of Ubuntu is that? | 14:09 |
mrjoshi | currently it's using ubuntu-noble | 14:10 |
abhishekk_ | Not sure but it should be nobel | 14:10 |
abhishekk_ | May be we need to ask in infra channel for help if it’s confusing | 14:11 |
croelandt | oh | 14:11 |
croelandt | just trying ubuntu 24.04 in a container | 14:12 |
croelandt | and they got 3.12 by default apparently | 14:12 |
abhishekk_ | So there should be another way to change the default? | 14:12 |
croelandt | python 3.13 does not seem to be in the default repositories :/ | 14:13 |
abhishekk_ | Ack, so need to shift tips job to run against 3.12? | 14:13 |
croelandt | but we merged the patch that moved the tips job from 3.11 to 3.13, how did the CI pass? | 14:13 |
croelandt | Does it not run on the same Ubuntu version as the periodic jobs? | 14:13 |
abhishekk_ | Not sure, i think safe to change it to 3.12 for time being and then troubleshoot | 14:14 |
croelandt | yeah | 14:15 |
croelandt | oh but we still merge stuff | 14:15 |
croelandt | so current patches run on something different | 14:15 |
abhishekk_ | I think that’s still 3.11 | 14:15 |
croelandt | oh but we're not running tips | 14:18 |
croelandt | ok ok | 14:18 |
croelandt | that's why we see no failures in teh CI | 14:18 |
abhishekk_ | Yes | 14:18 |
croelandt | so yeah we should have gone from 3.11 to 3.12, not 3.13 | 14:18 |
abhishekk_ | Right | 14:19 |
croelandt | ok, moving on then | 14:19 |
abhishekk_ | Ack | 14:19 |
mrjoshi | moving ahead | 14:19 |
mrjoshi | #topic Reviews | 14:19 |
mrjoshi | Deprecate the glance-cache-{cleaner,prefetcher,pruner} commands - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/933755 | 14:20 |
mrjoshi | Standardization of encrypted images - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/926295 | 14:20 |
mrjoshi | Modified create_image - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/910218 | 14:20 |
mrjoshi | Updating image upload - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/881939 | 14:20 |
mrjoshi | Adding SDK support for glance md-tags - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/897276 | 14:20 |
mrjoshi | Add SDK support for ``glance image-tasks`` - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/926231 | 14:20 |
abhishekk_ | 1st two | 14:20 |
abhishekk_ | Lets move them | 14:20 |
abhishekk_ | To next cycle | 14:21 |
mrjoshi | ack | 14:21 |
abhishekk_ | Either of us need to pick encrypted image work as original authors are no more around to take care of this | 14:21 |
croelandt | we should focus on SDK | 14:22 |
croelandt | I feel we've done 99% of the work to move to OSC | 14:22 |
abhishekk_ | So better discuss the work in PTG, assign it to volunteer and get it done in next cycle | 14:22 |
abhishekk_ | ++ | 14:22 |
croelandt | and we should be able to drop glanceclient (not as a library) soonish | 14:22 |
mrjoshi | yes | 14:22 |
abhishekk_ | agree | 14:22 |
croelandt | I hate having to maintain both | 14:22 |
abhishekk_ | I think you need to discuss with stephenfin to get a look at it | 14:23 |
mrjoshi | ack | 14:25 |
mrjoshi | that's all from me today | 14:25 |
mrjoshi | moving to Open Discussion | 14:25 |
mrjoshi | #topic Open Discussion | 14:26 |
dansmith | o/ | 14:26 |
croelandt | Nothing from me | 14:26 |
dansmith | I have something | 14:26 |
croelandt | hooray \o/ | 14:27 |
dansmith | I'm frustrated that this has not gotten the review it needs: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/glance-as-defender%22+status:open | 14:27 |
dansmith | and I'm not sure if we should just -W it for this cycle, given the timing | 14:27 |
dansmith | it needs critical review, and I think from someone with a reasonable understanding of cinder workflows | 14:28 |
dansmith | but I have gotten nothing from rosmaita and whoamirajat | 14:28 |
croelandt | Should we ignore the WIP patch? | 14:28 |
dansmith | I really would like to land at least the framework of that for E, but it's getting down to the wire | 14:29 |
dansmith | croelandt: the WIP is just glance-manage tooling at the end | 14:29 |
croelandt | I mean, is it truly work in progress or do you need more eyes on it? | 14:29 |
croelandt | ok, so you'd need rosmaita to look at it basically? | 14:29 |
dansmith | that's what I want, and he has promised almost weekly since last year when I bug him, but I'm tired of it | 14:30 |
dansmith | also asked rajat but got no response | 14:30 |
dansmith | and I know asking someone else close to FF is unlikely given everyone is busy | 14:30 |
dansmith | I think that at the very least, the safety check and format match patches should be glance-only | 14:31 |
dansmith | and those are pretty important, IMHO | 14:31 |
dansmith | the GPT stuff is more involved with the other projects | 14:31 |
croelandt | ok so first two patches are the "easiest" to review | 14:31 |
dansmith | croelandt: if you could at least look at the bottom two that would be helpful, but also happy if you want to test and review the upper ones for sure | 14:32 |
croelandt | yeah my thought was that maybe I review at least those | 14:32 |
croelandt | and once they're merged there might be more of an incentive for Cinder people to help review the "hard" ones | 14:32 |
dansmith | that would be appreciated | 14:32 |
croelandt | as in "only N patches to review" instead of "N+2 patches to review" | 14:33 |
dansmith | perhaps :) | 14:33 |
croelandt | one can dream | 14:33 |
dansmith | croelandt: thanks | 14:33 |
dansmith | abhishekk_: if you have any other ideas for reviewers, that would be great too :) | 14:33 |
abhishekk_ | Lately I am also not able to put time in reviews:/ | 14:35 |
abhishekk_ | Will try to take out some time for it | 14:35 |
abhishekk_ | Unfortunately it is only cyril and me as of now | 14:35 |
dansmith | abhishekk_: you've reviewed the bottom ones already | 14:36 |
dansmith | but yeah, okay | 14:36 |
abhishekk_ | whoami-rajat: is lot busy in escalation, so not much optimistic about his inputs | 14:36 |
dansmith | ack | 14:36 |
whoami-rajat | sorry, i started looking at the spec and got caught up in some other issue | 14:37 |
whoami-rajat | when do we have the deadline? | 14:37 |
abhishekk_ | So we have rc1 as well so we can definitely target this till then | 14:37 |
abhishekk_ | whoami-rajat: we are approaching m3 so we are almost near the deadline:) | 14:38 |
dansmith | yeah, this is why I'm bringing this up.. seems very close to review that and land the bits necessary, which is unfortunate given it's been sitting since last year | 14:40 |
dansmith | but, at least the bottom couple/few would help set the stage | 14:40 |
abhishekk_ | Ack | 14:41 |
mrjoshi | thanks dansmith, for highlighting this | 14:44 |
dansmith | mrjoshi: thanks for letting me complain :) | 14:44 |
mrjoshi | :D | 14:45 |
mrjoshi | anyone has anything else to highlight , or shall we wrap up? | 14:45 |
abhishekk_ | Nothing from me | 14:45 |
abhishekk_ | Just to inform, croelandt will be our new deputy | 14:46 |
abhishekk_ | All the best cyril and thank you Pranali | 14:46 |
mrjoshi | All the best Cyril; Thank you Pranali | 14:47 |
mrjoshi | let's wrap up then! | 14:48 |
mrjoshi | Thanks everyone for joining, Have a great weekend! | 14:48 |
mrjoshi | #endmeeting | 14:48 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Thu Feb 20 14:48:43 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:48 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2025/glance.2025-02-20-14.00.html | 14:48 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2025/glance.2025-02-20-14.00.txt | 14:48 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2025/glance.2025-02-20-14.00.log.html | 14:48 |
*** mhen_ is now known as mhen | 19:48 | |
*** haleyb is now known as haleyb|out | 22:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!