Thursday, 2014-07-17

*** sdmonov has joined #openstack-neutron00:00
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC00:01
*** beyounn has joined #openstack-neutron00:04
*** sdmonov has quit IRC00:04
*** ZZelle_ has quit IRC00:09
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron00:09
*** gduan has quit IRC00:10
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-neutron00:10
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-neutron00:12
*** xgerman has quit IRC00:14
*** 23LAA0QIE is now known as strictlyb00:14
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-neutron00:15
openstackgerritArmando Migliaccio proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Fix pep8 violations  https://review.openstack.org/10622000:18
*** JayJ_ has joined #openstack-neutron00:20
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-neutron00:21
*** dims_ has quit IRC00:21
*** seizadi has quit IRC00:22
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-neutron00:22
*** dfarrell07 has quit IRC00:23
*** JayJ_ has quit IRC00:24
*** JayJ_ has joined #openstack-neutron00:24
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC00:25
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron00:26
*** manishg has quit IRC00:27
*** mlavalle has quit IRC00:28
*** marun is now known as marun_afk00:28
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC00:30
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron00:32
*** banix has quit IRC00:32
*** nlahouti has quit IRC00:35
openstackgerritArmando Migliaccio proposed a change to openstack/python-neutronclient: Change help string related to router's distributed attribute  https://review.openstack.org/10754100:37
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: Shamelessly removing commented print line  https://review.openstack.org/10710300:39
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron00:40
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron00:42
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-neutron00:44
*** nplanel_ has joined #openstack-neutron00:45
*** iwamoto has joined #openstack-neutron00:45
*** sbfox has quit IRC00:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC00:47
*** gduan has joined #openstack-neutron00:54
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-neutron00:54
*** garyduan has quit IRC00:56
*** seizadi has quit IRC00:58
*** nplanel_ has quit IRC01:00
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron01:02
*** sbfox has quit IRC01:02
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron01:03
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron01:03
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-neutron01:04
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC01:05
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:06
*** trad5111 has joined #openstack-neutron01:15
*** trad511 has quit IRC01:15
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron01:16
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-neutron01:18
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC01:19
*** banix has quit IRC01:19
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron01:20
*** ijw-away has quit IRC01:20
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC01:20
*** gangil has quit IRC01:22
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC01:24
openstackgerritSridar Kandaswamy proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Specification for FWaaS changes for DVR  https://review.openstack.org/10622501:24
openstackgerritfumihiko kakuma proposed a change to openstack/neutron: OFAgent: Share codes of l2-population in OVS agent  https://review.openstack.org/8744001:25
*** mkashyap has quit IRC01:25
*** sbfox has quit IRC01:28
*** trad5111 has quit IRC01:28
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC01:29
*** dave_tucker is now known as dave_tucker_zzz01:29
*** dave_tucker_zzz is now known as dave_tucker01:29
*** leenheer1 has quit IRC01:30
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-neutron01:33
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-neutron01:39
trinathsHi Reviewers. May I have your valuable time for the review of my neutron spec at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105663/. kindly please review the spec.01:39
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron01:41
*** baohua has joined #openstack-neutron01:41
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron01:42
*** gduan has quit IRC01:42
*** stanzgy has joined #openstack-neutron01:45
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-neutron01:46
*** armax has quit IRC01:49
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron01:51
*** sbfox has quit IRC01:52
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC01:52
*** seizadi has quit IRC01:52
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-neutron01:57
*** liusheng has quit IRC01:58
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-neutron01:59
*** manishg has joined #openstack-neutron02:01
*** spandhe has quit IRC02:01
openstackgerritLi Ma proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Fix a log typo in ML2 manager.bind_port()  https://review.openstack.org/10660802:02
*** manishg_ has joined #openstack-neutron02:04
*** manishg has quit IRC02:05
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC02:06
*** ranger81_ has joined #openstack-neutron02:06
*** manishg has joined #openstack-neutron02:06
*** manishg_ has quit IRC02:08
*** ranger81 has quit IRC02:09
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron02:09
*** nplanel_ has joined #openstack-neutron02:12
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron02:16
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron02:17
*** dims_ has quit IRC02:17
*** gildub has quit IRC02:17
openstackgerritSayaji Patil proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Changes to remove the use of mapping tables from Nuage plugin  https://review.openstack.org/10561102:20
*** ijw-away has quit IRC02:21
*** baoli has joined #openstack-neutron02:22
*** [1]m1dev is now known as m1dev02:23
openstackgerritliusheng proposed a change to openstack/python-neutronclient: Correct the bash completion of CLI  https://review.openstack.org/10722602:24
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC02:27
*** linuxgeek_ has joined #openstack-neutron02:31
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-neutron02:32
*** padkrish has quit IRC02:36
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron02:36
*** padkrish has quit IRC02:41
*** baoli has quit IRC02:41
*** r-mibu_ has joined #openstack-neutron02:44
*** tongli has joined #openstack-neutron02:49
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron02:50
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-neutron02:51
*** chandankumar has quit IRC02:52
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron02:53
*** aveiga has quit IRC02:55
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-neutron02:55
*** gildub has joined #openstack-neutron02:59
*** beyounn has quit IRC03:01
*** popw has quit IRC03:01
*** yfried has quit IRC03:04
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-neutron03:10
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC03:11
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: VPNaaS: separate out validation logic for ref impl  https://review.openstack.org/10235103:11
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron03:18
*** a_le has quit IRC03:18
*** trinaths has quit IRC03:18
*** ijw-away has quit IRC03:22
*** wolsen has quit IRC03:23
*** tong_ has joined #openstack-neutron03:24
*** tong_ has quit IRC03:24
*** tongli has quit IRC03:24
*** tongli has joined #openstack-neutron03:25
*** chandankumar has quit IRC03:34
*** tongli has quit IRC03:38
*** tongli has joined #openstack-neutron03:39
*** popw has joined #openstack-neutron03:40
*** crc32 has quit IRC03:41
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-neutron03:44
*** wolsen has joined #openstack-neutron03:45
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron-specs: specification for securitygroup extension support for nuage plugin  https://review.openstack.org/10038903:45
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-neutron03:48
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron03:51
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron03:53
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC03:53
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron03:55
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC03:55
*** leenheer has quit IRC03:58
*** tongli has quit IRC03:59
openstackgerritBrandon Logan proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Plugin/DB additions for version 2 of LBaaS API  https://review.openstack.org/10560903:59
*** nplanel_ has quit IRC03:59
*** amcrn has quit IRC04:03
openstackgerritBrandon Logan proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Plugin/DB additions for version 2 of LBaaS API  https://review.openstack.org/10560904:06
openstackgerritBrandon Logan proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Tests for extension, db and plugin for LBaaS V2  https://review.openstack.org/10561004:06
openstackgerritBrandon Logan proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Implement Jinja templates for haproxy config  https://review.openstack.org/10686704:06
openstackgerritDoug Wiegley proposed a change to openstack/neutron: A10 Networks LBaaS Driver  https://review.openstack.org/10693704:08
*** ranger81_ has quit IRC04:08
*** ranger81 has joined #openstack-neutron04:09
*** gangil has joined #openstack-neutron04:09
*** sbfox has quit IRC04:15
*** seizadi has quit IRC04:16
*** dave_tucker is now known as dave_tucker_zzz04:18
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron04:18
*** ijw has joined #openstack-neutron04:18
*** banix has quit IRC04:20
*** mkashyap has joined #openstack-neutron04:24
*** pradipta_away is now known as pradipta04:25
*** ramishra has quit IRC04:26
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:26
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron04:26
*** ramishra has quit IRC04:30
*** ramishra_ has joined #openstack-neutron04:30
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-neutron04:31
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron04:33
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC04:37
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC04:38
*** mkashyap has quit IRC04:40
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-neutron04:47
*** a_le has quit IRC04:47
*** chandankumar has quit IRC04:48
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron04:48
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron04:48
*** ijw-away has quit IRC04:53
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron04:53
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-neutron04:56
*** manishg has quit IRC04:56
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-neutron04:57
*** chandankumar has quit IRC04:57
*** ramishra_ has quit IRC04:58
*** sdmonov has joined #openstack-neutron04:58
openstackgerritSteve Kowalik proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Raise exception if {subnet,port}-id are not found  https://review.openstack.org/10755804:59
openstackgerritBrandon Logan proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Plugin/DB additions for version 2 of LBaaS API  https://review.openstack.org/10560905:00
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-neutron05:00
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-neutron05:01
*** dims_ has quit IRC05:02
openstackgerritBrandon Logan proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Tests for extension, db and plugin for LBaaS V2  https://review.openstack.org/10561005:02
openstackgerritBrandon Logan proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Implement Jinja templates for haproxy config  https://review.openstack.org/10686705:02
*** sdmonov has quit IRC05:03
*** irenab has joined #openstack-neutron05:04
*** bashok has joined #openstack-neutron05:06
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron05:07
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron05:08
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-neutron05:10
*** hayim has joined #openstack-neutron05:13
*** ranger81 has quit IRC05:19
openstackgerritDoug Wiegley proposed a change to openstack/neutron: A10 Networks LBaaS Driver  https://review.openstack.org/10693705:23
*** shausy has joined #openstack-neutron05:25
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z05:33
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-neutron05:34
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:34
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-neutron05:38
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-neutron05:43
*** seizadi1 has joined #openstack-neutron05:45
*** seizadi has quit IRC05:45
*** ranger81 has joined #openstack-neutron05:45
*** sbfox has quit IRC05:46
*** ijw has quit IRC05:48
*** nlahouti has quit IRC05:48
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron05:49
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron05:50
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-neutron05:58
*** rohara has quit IRC06:00
*** dims_ has quit IRC06:02
*** hayim has quit IRC06:03
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/10597706:05
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-neutron06:12
*** seizadi1 has quit IRC06:15
*** ramishra has quit IRC06:16
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron06:16
openstackgerritPaddu Krishnan proposed a change to openstack/neutron: VDP Support in OVS Neutron Agent and Type Driver for Network Overlays  https://review.openstack.org/10556306:20
*** hayim has joined #openstack-neutron06:21
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-neutron06:22
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC06:27
*** Longgeek has quit IRC06:28
*** sballe_ has joined #openstack-neutron06:28
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-neutron06:28
*** jckasper__ has joined #openstack-neutron06:28
openstackgerritLivnat Peer proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Fix spelling mistake in the log message  https://review.openstack.org/10731806:29
*** nyechiel__ has joined #openstack-neutron06:29
*** padkrish_ has joined #openstack-neutron06:29
*** JayJ__ has joined #openstack-neutron06:29
*** Sukhdev__ has joined #openstack-neutron06:29
*** sbalukoff1 has joined #openstack-neutron06:30
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-neutron06:30
*** hayim2 has joined #openstack-neutron06:31
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-neutron06:31
*** SridharGaddam has joined #openstack-neutron06:31
*** gangil_ has joined #openstack-neutron06:33
*** lori has joined #openstack-neutron06:33
*** sgran_ has joined #openstack-neutron06:33
*** ramishra has quit IRC06:33
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-neutron06:33
*** hayim has quit IRC06:33
*** padkrish has quit IRC06:34
*** sgran has quit IRC06:34
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC06:34
*** sballe has quit IRC06:34
*** phil_h has quit IRC06:34
*** lori|away has quit IRC06:34
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC06:34
*** liusheng has quit IRC06:34
*** SridharG has quit IRC06:34
*** JayJ_ has quit IRC06:34
*** drankis_off has quit IRC06:34
*** krtaylor has quit IRC06:34
*** gmurphy has quit IRC06:34
*** ZZelle_ has joined #openstack-neutron06:34
*** xmltok has quit IRC06:34
*** obondarev_ has quit IRC06:34
*** JoeHazzers has quit IRC06:34
*** ZZelle has quit IRC06:34
*** gangil has quit IRC06:34
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC06:34
*** k4n0 has quit IRC06:34
*** linuxgeek_ has quit IRC06:34
*** x1b2j has quit IRC06:34
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC06:34
*** haleyb has quit IRC06:34
*** akamyshnikova has quit IRC06:34
*** linuxgeek_ has joined #openstack-neutron06:34
*** xmltok has joined #openstack-neutron06:34
*** JoeHazzers has joined #openstack-neutron06:34
*** akamyshnikova has joined #openstack-neutron06:34
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-neutron06:34
*** gmurphy has joined #openstack-neutron06:35
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-neutron06:35
*** x1b2j has joined #openstack-neutron06:35
*** phil_h has joined #openstack-neutron06:35
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-neutron06:36
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC06:36
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron06:36
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-neutron06:36
*** bashok has quit IRC06:36
*** gangil_ is now known as gangil06:36
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-neutron06:37
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron06:38
*** ramishra has quit IRC06:38
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC06:41
*** evgenyf has quit IRC06:41
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-neutron06:42
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC06:42
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron06:45
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron06:48
*** leenheer has quit IRC06:48
*** scheuran has joined #openstack-neutron06:49
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron06:51
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-neutron06:51
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron06:52
*** ijw-away has quit IRC06:52
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC06:56
openstackgerritfumihiko kakuma proposed a change to openstack/neutron: OFAgent: Implement arp responder  https://review.openstack.org/9418306:56
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-neutron06:58
*** ramishra has quit IRC06:59
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron07:00
*** x1b2j has quit IRC07:01
*** dims_ has quit IRC07:04
*** pasquier-s has joined #openstack-neutron07:04
*** pradipta is now known as pradipta_away07:06
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-neutron07:08
*** ranger81 has quit IRC07:13
*** nlahouti has quit IRC07:15
*** pasquier-s has quit IRC07:16
*** jistr has joined #openstack-neutron07:18
*** pasquier-s has joined #openstack-neutron07:18
*** luqas has joined #openstack-neutron07:19
*** padkrish_ has quit IRC07:23
*** pasquier-s has quit IRC07:23
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron07:23
*** bashok has joined #openstack-neutron07:23
*** pasquier-s has joined #openstack-neutron07:24
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-neutron07:25
*** drankis_off has joined #openstack-neutron07:26
*** drankis_off is now known as drankis07:26
*** ramishra has quit IRC07:26
*** leenheer has quit IRC07:28
*** gildub has quit IRC07:31
*** jschwarz has joined #openstack-neutron07:32
*** jgallard has quit IRC07:35
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-neutron07:35
*** padkrish has quit IRC07:36
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron07:36
*** dansmith has quit IRC07:37
*** SridharGaddam has quit IRC07:37
*** Sukhdev__ has quit IRC07:38
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away07:41
openstackgerritXu Han Peng proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Use EUI64 for IPv6 SLAAC when subnet is specified  https://review.openstack.org/10143307:42
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-neutron07:42
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-neutron07:43
*** dansmith is now known as Guest5419907:43
*** jschwarz has quit IRC07:43
*** jschwarz has joined #openstack-neutron07:43
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron07:45
*** amuller has joined #openstack-neutron07:48
*** ollivier has joined #openstack-neutron07:49
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron07:50
*** jp_at_hp has joined #openstack-neutron07:51
*** padkrish has quit IRC07:53
*** nlahouti has quit IRC07:54
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC07:54
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron07:54
*** zslot has joined #openstack-neutron07:58
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-neutron07:59
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-neutron07:59
*** safchain has joined #openstack-neutron08:00
openstackgerritAnn Kamyshnikova proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Fix enums usage for postgres in migrations  https://review.openstack.org/5311208:01
*** zslot1 has joined #openstack-neutron08:01
*** zslot has quit IRC08:03
*** jpich has joined #openstack-neutron08:03
*** scheuran has quit IRC08:03
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron08:06
*** dims_ has quit IRC08:06
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron08:10
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC08:10
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-neutron08:10
*** rwsu has quit IRC08:13
*** padkrish has quit IRC08:14
*** karimb has joined #openstack-neutron08:20
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron08:21
openstackgerritLivnat Peer proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Fix spelling mistake in the log message  https://review.openstack.org/10731808:22
*** ramishra has quit IRC08:22
*** JayJ__ has quit IRC08:24
*** JayJ__ has joined #openstack-neutron08:25
*** nlahouti has quit IRC08:25
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-neutron08:26
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-neutron08:28
*** rotbeard has joined #openstack-neutron08:30
*** karimb has quit IRC08:31
openstackgerritIlya Shakhat proposed a change to openstack/python-neutronclient: Python 3: compatibility of StringIO() and dict.iteritems()  https://review.openstack.org/10759108:32
*** dims_ has quit IRC08:32
*** mrmoje has joined #openstack-neutron08:34
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-neutron08:35
*** alex_klimov has joined #openstack-neutron08:36
*** menastress has joined #openstack-neutron08:38
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-neutron08:38
menastressHi, can someone help me to figure out where is openvswitch ml2-plugin source code?08:42
menastressI understand that it's a dump question, but in mech_openvswitch.py file written strange piece of code08:45
menastressDoes that code somehow relates to neutron/plugins/openvswitch08:47
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron08:47
*** karimb has joined #openstack-neutron08:47
openstackgerritBerezovsky Irena proposed a change to openstack/neutron: ML2 mechanism driver for SR-IOV capable NIC based switching, Part 1  https://review.openstack.org/7446408:47
*** tomoe__ has joined #openstack-neutron08:48
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC08:48
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron08:49
openstackgerritAnn Kamyshnikova proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Implement ModelsMigrationsSync test from oslo.db  https://review.openstack.org/7652008:52
*** ijw-away has quit IRC08:54
*** gangil has quit IRC08:54
trinathsHi Reviewers. May I have your valuable time for the review of my neutron spec at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105663/. kindly please review the spec.08:57
openstackgerritJoe Gordon proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Make readme reference git.openstack.org not github  https://review.openstack.org/10759608:58
*** ramishra has quit IRC09:04
*** yfauser has joined #openstack-neutron09:07
*** yfauser has left #openstack-neutron09:08
openstackgerritCédric Ollivier proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Add delete operations for the ODL MechanismDriver  https://review.openstack.org/9645909:11
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron09:19
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron09:21
openstackgerritBaohua Yang proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Add singleton support.  https://review.openstack.org/10760509:22
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC09:23
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:25
*** nlahouti has quit IRC09:26
openstackgerritBaohua Yang proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Add singleton support  https://review.openstack.org/10760509:26
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-neutron09:26
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron09:29
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-neutron09:33
*** bvandenh has quit IRC09:35
*** iwamoto has quit IRC09:36
*** kopparam has quit IRC09:40
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-neutron09:40
*** networkstatic has quit IRC09:41
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC09:41
*** Dafna has quit IRC09:43
*** baohua has quit IRC09:45
openstackgerritTrinath Somanchi proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Freescale FWaaS Plugin  https://review.openstack.org/10566309:45
*** kopparam has quit IRC09:45
*** oreillyd has joined #openstack-neutron09:45
*** tomoe__ has quit IRC09:47
*** linuxgeek_ has quit IRC09:47
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-neutron09:47
openstackgerritJyotsna proposed a change to openstack/python-neutronclient: neutron port-list -f csv outputs poorly formatted JSON strings  https://review.openstack.org/9992909:47
trinathsHi Reviewers. May I have your valuable time for the review of my neutron spec at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105663/. kindly please review the spec. I have updated the spec with reviewer comments.09:48
*** stanzgy has quit IRC09:56
*** jobewan has quit IRC09:56
*** stanzgy has joined #openstack-neutron09:58
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-neutron10:00
*** stanzgy has quit IRC10:07
*** jgallard has quit IRC10:11
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC10:12
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron10:18
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron10:22
*** yfauser has joined #openstack-neutron10:23
*** saju_m has quit IRC10:23
*** yfauser has left #openstack-neutron10:24
*** trinaths has quit IRC10:24
*** chandankumar has quit IRC10:25
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-neutron10:25
*** nlahouti has quit IRC10:26
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-neutron10:33
*** afazekas has quit IRC10:35
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-neutron10:36
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: Fix a log typo in ML2 manager.bind_port()  https://review.openstack.org/10660810:41
*** xuhanp has quit IRC10:41
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-neutron10:43
*** dguerri is now known as _dguerri10:44
*** _dguerri is now known as dguerri10:46
*** dgollub has joined #openstack-neutron10:49
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron10:51
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron10:52
*** dgollub has quit IRC10:53
*** dgollub has joined #openstack-neutron10:53
*** ijw-away has quit IRC10:56
*** nlahouti has quit IRC10:56
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:59
*** Dafna has joined #openstack-neutron11:00
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-neutron11:02
*** sgran_ is now known as sgran11:04
*** dguerri is now known as _dguerri11:05
*** yfried has joined #openstack-neutron11:10
*** julim has joined #openstack-neutron11:15
openstackgerritAnn Kamyshnikova proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Implement ModelsMigrationsSync test from oslo.db  https://review.openstack.org/7652011:16
*** lukego has joined #openstack-neutron11:16
*** skolekonov has joined #openstack-neutron11:16
openstackgerritBerezovsky Irena proposed a change to openstack/neutron: ML2 mechanism driver for SR-IOV capable NIC based switching, Part 2  https://review.openstack.org/10765111:18
*** suresh12 has joined #openstack-neutron11:18
*** ramishra has quit IRC11:20
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron11:20
*** _dguerri is now known as dguerri11:20
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron11:20
*** diegows has joined #openstack-neutron11:24
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC11:24
*** ramishra has quit IRC11:25
openstackgerritMiguel Angel Ajo proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Refactor the security_group_rules_for_devices call.  https://review.openstack.org/10452211:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:26
*** suresh12_ has joined #openstack-neutron11:26
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron11:26
*** suresh12 has quit IRC11:27
openstackgerritMiguel Angel Ajo proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Refactor the security_group_rules_for_devices call.  https://review.openstack.org/10452211:27
*** Dafna has quit IRC11:29
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-neutron11:29
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-neutron11:34
*** luqas has quit IRC11:40
*** kickinz1 is now known as kickinzA|bbs11:41
*** baoli has joined #openstack-neutron11:42
*** yfauser has joined #openstack-neutron11:42
*** yfauser has left #openstack-neutron11:42
*** Dafna has joined #openstack-neutron11:43
openstackgerritJulien Marin-Frisonroche proposed a change to openstack/neutron: XML support for multi-provider extension  https://review.openstack.org/10740011:44
openstackgerritOfer Barkai proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Enhance floating IP router lookup  https://review.openstack.org/5598711:44
akamyshnikovamestery, hi! can you take a look at this https://review.openstack.org/106725 fix of migration?11:46
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron11:51
*** garyk has joined #openstack-neutron11:52
*** kickinzA|bbs is now known as kickinz111:52
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron11:52
garykobondarev: please see http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.i18n/guidelines.html#choosing-a-marker-function regarding patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107318/11:53
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron11:53
garyksorry https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107137/211:53
*** ijw-away has quit IRC11:57
*** nlahouti has quit IRC11:57
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron11:57
openstackgerritenikanorov proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Flavor Framework implementation  https://review.openstack.org/10766111:57
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:58
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron11:58
*** unmeshg has joined #openstack-neutron12:00
openstackgerritenikanorov proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Flavor Framework implementation  https://review.openstack.org/10598212:01
unmeshgHi12:02
unmeshgMy devstack installation seems to be failing due to a neutron db sync error12:03
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:03
unmeshgthe traceback can be seen here : http://paste.openstack.org/show/86920/12:03
unmeshgI also dropped the neutron_ml2 database and rerun stack.sh12:04
unmeshgbut still hit the same issue12:05
*** ramishra has quit IRC12:06
*** irenab has quit IRC12:06
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron12:06
openstackgerritenikanorov proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Flavor Framework implementation  https://review.openstack.org/10598212:07
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron12:07
*** suresh12_ has quit IRC12:07
*** shausy has quit IRC12:07
openstackgerritMiguel Angel Ajo proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Refactor the security_group_rules_for_devices call.  https://review.openstack.org/10452212:07
*** ramishra has quit IRC12:09
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron12:09
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron12:12
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC12:13
unmeshgCan someone suggest how to get over the db sync error>12:16
*** banix has quit IRC12:17
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC12:17
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC12:18
*** ramishra has quit IRC12:19
*** tongli has joined #openstack-neutron12:19
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron12:20
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron12:21
*** diegows has quit IRC12:21
*** dave_tucker_zzz is now known as dave_tucker12:21
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-neutron12:21
*** JayJ__ has quit IRC12:22
*** JayJ__ has joined #openstack-neutron12:23
*** ranger81 has joined #openstack-neutron12:23
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron12:24
*** JayJ__ has quit IRC12:27
*** nlahouti has quit IRC12:28
*** dims_ has quit IRC12:30
*** ramishra has quit IRC12:30
*** nplanel_ has joined #openstack-neutron12:31
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC12:36
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron12:36
*** unmeshg has left #openstack-neutron12:37
*** dims has joined #openstack-neutron12:39
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC12:41
*** kbringard has joined #openstack-neutron12:42
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-neutron12:47
*** chandankumar has quit IRC12:50
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron12:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-neutron12:56
*** nlahouti has quit IRC12:59
*** bvandenh has quit IRC12:59
*** dguerri is now known as _dguerri13:00
*** luqas has joined #openstack-neutron13:00
*** k4n0 has quit IRC13:01
*** JayJ__ has joined #openstack-neutron13:05
*** _dguerri is now known as dguerri13:06
*** hayim2 has quit IRC13:07
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-neutron13:07
*** bashok has quit IRC13:11
*** JayJ__ has quit IRC13:12
*** JayJ__ has joined #openstack-neutron13:12
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-neutron13:13
trinathsHi Reviewers. May I have your valuable time for the review of my neutron spec at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105663/. kindly please review the spec. I have updated the spec with reviewer comments.13:13
openstackgerritLi Ma proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Race condition of L3-agent to add/remove routers  https://review.openstack.org/7323413:13
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron13:14
*** tristanC has joined #openstack-neutron13:14
tristanCHello folks, I'm looking for Liping Mao, do you know if he is around ?13:14
*** dgollub has quit IRC13:16
*** dgollub has joined #openstack-neutron13:17
*** absubram_ has joined #openstack-neutron13:22
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:23
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron13:24
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron13:26
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC13:28
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron13:29
*** nlahouti has quit IRC13:30
*** aveiga has joined #openstack-neutron13:34
openstackgerritfumihiko kakuma proposed a change to openstack/neutron: OFAgent: Implement arp responder  https://review.openstack.org/9418313:35
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-neutron13:38
*** Guest54199 is now known as dansmith13:39
*** dansmith is now known as Guest891113:39
*** aveiga has quit IRC13:40
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron13:40
*** Guest8911 has quit IRC13:43
*** dansmith_ has joined #openstack-neutron13:44
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-neutron13:44
*** jecarey has quit IRC13:44
*** nplanel has quit IRC13:44
*** JayJ__ has quit IRC13:45
*** JayJ___ has joined #openstack-neutron13:45
*** rohara has joined #openstack-neutron13:46
*** Youcef has joined #openstack-neutron13:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:47
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-neutron13:48
*** hayim has joined #openstack-neutron13:50
openstackgerritTerry Wilson proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Retry on unassigned ofport instead of treating it as a failure  https://review.openstack.org/10651713:52
*** suresh12 has joined #openstack-neutron13:53
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC13:53
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-neutron13:53
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron13:54
*** TrevorV_ has joined #openstack-neutron13:55
salv-orlandosafchain: do you think this can be backported? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60016/13:57
salv-orlandoI think people running icehouse are hitting the bug it fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/134214213:57
*** rolledback has joined #openstack-neutron13:57
safchainsalv-orlando, it should be13:58
*** ijw-away has quit IRC13:59
safchainsalv-orlando, do you want I try to backport it13:59
*** jorgem has joined #openstack-neutron13:59
salv-orlandoI’m wondering if we should backport the whole thing or just the bit for retrieving routers by agent13:59
salv-orlandomy vote is for the whole thing13:59
safchainsalv-orlando, agree with you14:00
*** ollivier has quit IRC14:00
salv-orlandocool if you want to go ahead I’ll +1 it and then some stable maintainer will merge it14:00
safchainsalv-orlando, k, I'll do14:00
*** alex_klimov has quit IRC14:01
*** xgerman has joined #openstack-neutron14:02
*** dfarrell07 has joined #openstack-neutron14:03
*** mrmoje has quit IRC14:04
*** ollivier has joined #openstack-neutron14:04
*** pradk has joined #openstack-neutron14:04
*** mrmoje has joined #openstack-neutron14:04
*** dguerri is now known as _dguerri14:05
*** sbalukoff1 is now known as sbalukoff14:05
*** hayim has quit IRC14:06
*** samuelbercovici has joined #openstack-neutron14:07
*** _dguerri is now known as dguerri14:07
*** suresh12 has quit IRC14:08
*** wolsen has quit IRC14:09
*** jckasper__ has quit IRC14:09
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron14:10
*** evgenyf has quit IRC14:10
openstackgerritLi Ma proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Race condition of L3-agent to add/remove routers  https://review.openstack.org/7323414:11
openstackgerritZang MingJie proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Log exceptions inside spawned functions  https://review.openstack.org/10636214:13
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC14:14
*** aveiga has joined #openstack-neutron14:15
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron14:15
*** kickinz1 is now known as kickinz1|afk14:16
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-neutron14:18
salv-orlandoHenryG: do you agree this can be pushed out to juno-3? https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/120740214:18
HenryGsalv-orlando: Yup, I agree. It's probably a bit too much to throw in the mix right now.14:20
*** ofer has joined #openstack-neutron14:20
salv-orlandook thanks14:21
*** Youcef_ has joined #openstack-neutron14:22
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-neutron14:22
*** samuelbercovici1 has joined #openstack-neutron14:22
*** yfried_ has joined #openstack-neutron14:24
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-neutron14:25
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC14:26
*** samuelbercovici1 is now known as samuelbercovici14:26
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-neutron14:27
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron14:28
*** ollivier has quit IRC14:31
*** Youcef has quit IRC14:31
*** yfried has quit IRC14:31
*** amcrn has quit IRC14:31
*** nlahouti has quit IRC14:32
*** marun_afk is now known as marun14:34
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg14:35
*** mrmoje has quit IRC14:36
*** mrmoje has joined #openstack-neutron14:37
*** ollivier has joined #openstack-neutron14:37
*** dansmith_ is now known as dansmith14:39
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z14:40
*** spandhe has joined #openstack-neutron14:41
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg14:41
*** armax has joined #openstack-neutron14:43
*** a_le has quit IRC14:44
*** ollivier has quit IRC14:46
*** kickinz1|afk is now known as kickinz114:47
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron14:49
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron14:49
openstackgerritMaruti Kamat proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Fixed audit notifications for dhcp-agent-network  https://review.openstack.org/9833014:49
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-neutron14:51
*** jlibosva has quit IRC14:51
*** JayJ____ has joined #openstack-neutron14:53
openstackgerritArmando Migliaccio proposed a change to openstack/neutron: L2 Model additions to support DVR  https://review.openstack.org/10210114:53
*** crc32_ has joined #openstack-neutron14:53
*** Youcef has joined #openstack-neutron14:53
*** WackoRob_ has joined #openstack-neutron14:54
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC14:54
*** armax_ has joined #openstack-neutron14:54
*** armax_ has quit IRC14:54
*** terryw has joined #openstack-neutron14:55
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron14:55
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-neutron14:55
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-neutron14:55
*** yfried__ has joined #openstack-neutron14:56
openstackgerritCedric Brandily proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Allow to import _LC, _LE, _LI and _LW functions directly  https://review.openstack.org/10713714:56
*** armax_ has joined #openstack-neutron14:56
*** xmltok_ has joined #openstack-neutron14:56
*** jorgem1 has joined #openstack-neutron14:57
*** spandhe_ has joined #openstack-neutron14:58
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron14:59
*** ijw-away has quit IRC14:59
*** wolsen has joined #openstack-neutron15:00
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron15:01
*** nplanel_ has quit IRC15:01
*** dansmith_ has joined #openstack-neutron15:01
*** jp_at_hp has quit IRC15:01
*** mriedem has left #openstack-neutron15:02
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC15:02
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z15:02
*** armax has quit IRC15:02
*** spandhe has quit IRC15:02
*** Youcef_ has quit IRC15:02
*** crc32 has quit IRC15:02
*** JayJ___ has quit IRC15:02
*** dgollub has quit IRC15:02
*** lukego has quit IRC15:02
*** oreillyd has quit IRC15:02
*** karimb has quit IRC15:02
*** jpich has quit IRC15:02
*** haleyb has quit IRC15:02
*** liusheng has quit IRC15:02
*** spandhe_ is now known as spandhe15:02
*** armax_ is now known as armax15:02
*** mrmoje has quit IRC15:02
*** yfried_ has quit IRC15:02
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:02
*** jorgem has quit IRC15:02
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC15:02
*** dansmith has quit IRC15:02
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC15:02
*** Dafna has quit IRC15:02
*** ygbo has quit IRC15:02
*** menastress has quit IRC15:02
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC15:02
*** xmltok has quit IRC15:02
*** dansmith_ is now known as dansmith15:02
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-neutron15:03
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-neutron15:03
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-neutron15:04
*** mrmoje has joined #openstack-neutron15:04
*** matrohon has quit IRC15:05
openstackgerritLiping Mao proposed a change to openstack/neutron: no quota for allowed address pair  https://review.openstack.org/10773415:06
*** dgollub has joined #openstack-neutron15:06
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-neutron15:07
*** Dafna has joined #openstack-neutron15:07
*** jp_at_hp has joined #openstack-neutron15:07
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-neutron15:07
*** karimb has joined #openstack-neutron15:07
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-neutron15:07
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-neutron15:07
*** menastress has joined #openstack-neutron15:08
*** jpich has joined #openstack-neutron15:08
*** pcm_ has quit IRC15:09
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-neutron15:10
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC15:10
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron15:12
*** padkrish has quit IRC15:13
*** karimb has quit IRC15:13
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron15:13
*** pcm_ has quit IRC15:13
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-neutron15:14
*** mestery has quit IRC15:16
*** baoli has quit IRC15:17
openstackgerritAnn Kamyshnikova proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Implement ModelsMigrationsSync test from oslo.db  https://review.openstack.org/7652015:18
*** suresh12 has joined #openstack-neutron15:18
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron15:18
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-neutron15:18
openstackgerritZang MingJie proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Set promote_secondaries when creating namespaces  https://review.openstack.org/10774315:18
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC15:19
*** baoli has joined #openstack-neutron15:19
*** ofer has quit IRC15:19
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron15:20
*** crc32_ has quit IRC15:20
openstackgerritAnn Kamyshnikova proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Implement ModelsMigrationsSync test from oslo.db  https://review.openstack.org/7652015:20
openstackgerritAnn Kamyshnikova proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Implement ModelsMigrationsSync test from oslo.db  https://review.openstack.org/7652015:21
*** suresh12 has quit IRC15:22
*** pradk has quit IRC15:23
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg15:24
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron15:25
*** leenheer has quit IRC15:25
*** suresh12 has joined #openstack-neutron15:26
*** s3wong has quit IRC15:26
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron15:27
*** gangil has joined #openstack-neutron15:27
*** spandhe has quit IRC15:29
*** leenheer has quit IRC15:31
*** garyk has quit IRC15:32
*** garyk has joined #openstack-neutron15:32
*** kbringard has quit IRC15:33
*** skolekonov has quit IRC15:33
*** banix has quit IRC15:34
*** ramishra has quit IRC15:34
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:35
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron15:35
*** leenheer has quit IRC15:35
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron15:35
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron15:36
openstackgerritLuke Gorrie proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Specification for Snabb NFV mechanism driver for ML2  https://review.openstack.org/9570715:37
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron15:38
*** pradk has joined #openstack-neutron15:38
*** leenheer has quit IRC15:39
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC15:40
*** xianghui has quit IRC15:40
*** banix_ has joined #openstack-neutron15:41
*** saju_m has quit IRC15:44
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron15:44
*** leenheer has quit IRC15:44
*** networkstatic has joined #openstack-neutron15:45
openstackgerritEvgeny Fedoruk proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: LBaaS TLS termination capability specification  https://review.openstack.org/9864015:47
*** kbringard has joined #openstack-neutron15:48
*** garyk has quit IRC15:51
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron15:51
*** mkashyap has joined #openstack-neutron15:53
*** diegows has joined #openstack-neutron15:53
trinathsHi Reviewers. May I have your valuable time for the review of my neutron spec at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105663/. kindly please review the spec. I have updated the spec with reviewer comments.15:54
*** evgenyf has quit IRC15:55
JayJ____Not sure whether this is correct place to ask for neutron help but asking anyway..15:55
JayJ____ have an issue with neutron in the install I did usign the sources from the master. Wondering whether there were any issues that you are aware? I'm using ML2. I cannot ping floating ip. Interestingly I can ping the router's external interface. The security rules are all correctly modified.15:55
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC15:56
JayJ____I posted logs here and about to post to askopenstack.com https://gist.github.com/jjanardh/27394f71b33f14650b8115:56
JayJ____Anybody to save my day?15:56
*** krtaylor has quit IRC15:57
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-neutron15:57
*** a_le has quit IRC15:58
*** linuxgeek_ has joined #openstack-neutron15:59
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-neutron16:00
*** afazekas has quit IRC16:01
*** jistr has quit IRC16:01
*** amuller_ has joined #openstack-neutron16:01
*** amuller has quit IRC16:01
*** padkrish has quit IRC16:03
*** Longgeek has quit IRC16:05
*** chandankumar has quit IRC16:06
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC16:06
*** jschwarz has quit IRC16:07
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron16:07
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-neutron16:07
openstackgerritnlahouti proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Support for extensions in ML2 Mechanism Drivers  https://review.openstack.org/8920816:08
*** tongli has quit IRC16:08
*** nplanel has joined #openstack-neutron16:08
*** tongli has joined #openstack-neutron16:09
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron16:11
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron16:12
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron16:12
*** banix_ has quit IRC16:13
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-neutron16:13
*** JayJ has joined #openstack-neutron16:14
*** manishg has joined #openstack-neutron16:15
*** rotbeard has quit IRC16:16
*** trinaths has quit IRC16:17
emaganacarl_baldwin: ping!16:17
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron16:18
*** banix has quit IRC16:18
*** kbringard has quit IRC16:20
*** garyk has joined #openstack-neutron16:21
rkukuraarmax: ping16:21
armaxrkukura: pong16:22
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-neutron16:22
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC16:22
rkukuraarmax: I just did a quick review of the ML2 changes for DVR, and have some concerns16:22
armaxrkukura: some is better than none16:22
rkukuraarmax: Are you in the bay area next week?16:22
armaxyes16:23
armaxI live in the bay area16:23
rkukuraI will be too. I’m wondering if we should sit down together, maybe Monday afternoon, to work through some of this?16:23
armaxis there anything that can be addressed sooner?16:23
armaxfrom now until Monday we could get a lot done16:24
rkukuraMaybe. See my review comments.16:24
armaxok16:24
rkukuraI’ve also got a lot of spec reviewing to do between now and Sunday’s spec approval deadline.16:25
*** padkrish has quit IRC16:25
armaxI’ll go over your details one more time, I think the -2 is a bit harsh, but ok16:25
rkukuraarmax: Lets discuss the review comments later today.16:26
armaxyou’re the ML2 guru a -1 is almost as sticky as a -2 ;)16:26
*** jpich has quit IRC16:26
rkukuraarmax: Maybe -1 would have been fine. Was just not sure if it would stick if you do updates, and I have trouble keeping up with rapid review cycles16:26
*** xmltok_ is now known as xmltok16:27
armaxyou’re right…let me see if we can make progress until Monday, but I’d be happy to get together regardles16:27
armaxs16:27
*** kbringard has joined #openstack-neutron16:28
rkukuraarmax: Feel free to ping me any time on this16:28
* rkukura heads downstairs for lunch16:28
armaxwill do, thanks for looking into this16:28
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-neutron16:28
*** ygbo has quit IRC16:30
*** rolledback has quit IRC16:31
*** carlp has joined #openstack-neutron16:34
*** trinaths has quit IRC16:34
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-neutron16:34
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron16:34
*** padkrish has quit IRC16:34
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC16:34
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-neutron16:35
*** jgallard has quit IRC16:35
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron16:35
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC16:35
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-neutron16:35
*** sbfox has quit IRC16:37
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-neutron16:39
*** baoli has quit IRC16:41
carl_baldwinemagana: pong16:41
emaganajust want to give you a heads up on the new patch for the multinode16:41
carl_baldwinemagana: Thanks, I’ll have a look today.16:41
emaganacarl_baldwin: I have also a patch waiting for another core16:42
emaganacarl_baldwin: Its a simple fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98279/16:42
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-neutron16:42
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-neutron16:42
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron16:43
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-neutron16:44
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-neutron16:44
openstackgerritSumit Naiksatam proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Group Policy API-1: EP, EPG, L2 Policy, L3 Policy  https://review.openstack.org/9590016:48
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC16:48
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron16:49
*** suresh12 has quit IRC16:49
*** padkrish has quit IRC16:49
carl_baldwinemagana: I will put it on my list.16:50
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-neutron16:50
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-neutron16:51
*** sbfox has quit IRC16:51
*** leenheer has quit IRC16:51
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron16:52
*** luqas has quit IRC16:53
*** luqas has joined #openstack-neutron16:54
*** saju_m has quit IRC16:55
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-neutron16:55
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-neutron16:56
*** networkstatic has quit IRC16:56
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron16:56
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron16:57
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC16:58
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron16:58
*** luqas has quit IRC16:59
*** emagana has quit IRC16:59
*** ijw-away has quit IRC17:01
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron17:02
*** zslot1 has quit IRC17:04
*** padkrish has quit IRC17:07
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-neutron17:07
*** sdmonov has joined #openstack-neutron17:07
*** amaretskiy has quit IRC17:07
*** WackoRob_ has quit IRC17:09
*** banix has quit IRC17:12
*** networkstatic has joined #openstack-neutron17:13
*** rolledback has joined #openstack-neutron17:14
*** rolledback has quit IRC17:14
*** rolledback has joined #openstack-neutron17:15
*** Dafna has quit IRC17:16
*** ihrachyshka_ has joined #openstack-neutron17:18
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC17:19
*** ofer has joined #openstack-neutron17:19
*** emagana has quit IRC17:20
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja17:20
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron17:21
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:21
openstackgerritSumit Naiksatam proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Group Policy DB-1: EP, EPG, L2 Policy, L3 Policy  https://review.openstack.org/9605017:22
*** afazekas has quit IRC17:22
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-neutron17:23
*** dgollub has quit IRC17:24
*** emagana has quit IRC17:25
*** pcm_ has quit IRC17:27
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-neutron17:28
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:29
*** amuller_ has quit IRC17:29
openstackgerritAbishek Subramanian proposed a change to openstack/neutron: ML2 Cisco Nexus MD - not overwriting existing config  https://review.openstack.org/10551417:29
*** trinaths has quit IRC17:30
*** chuckC has quit IRC17:30
*** ihrachyshka_ has quit IRC17:30
*** jlibosva has quit IRC17:31
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-neutron17:31
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron17:32
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron17:32
*** thedodd has quit IRC17:33
*** nyechiel__ has quit IRC17:33
*** ramishra has quit IRC17:35
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron17:36
*** ranger81_ has joined #openstack-neutron17:36
*** banix_ has joined #openstack-neutron17:36
*** m1dev has quit IRC17:38
*** ranger81 has quit IRC17:38
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-neutron17:39
*** beyounn has joined #openstack-neutron17:39
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron17:40
*** kbringard has quit IRC17:41
openstackgerritSumit Naiksatam proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Group Policy Plugin-1: EP, EPG, L2 Policy, L3 Policy  https://review.openstack.org/9639317:42
*** WackoRob_ has joined #openstack-neutron17:42
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:43
kevinbentonenikanorov: ha! https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/134317717:43
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron17:44
kevinbentonenikanorov: I believe the pythonic phrase for that is “We’re all consenting adults here”17:44
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC17:45
*** dave_tucker is now known as dave_tucker_zzz17:45
*** ofer has quit IRC17:46
*** WackoRob_ has quit IRC17:46
*** ZZelle has joined #openstack-neutron17:46
*** banix has quit IRC17:47
*** banix_ is now known as banix17:47
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC17:49
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-neutron17:49
*** ramishra has quit IRC17:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-neutron17:52
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron17:52
*** dfarrell07 has quit IRC17:54
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:57
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-neutron17:57
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron17:58
openstackgerritRobert Kukura proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Group Policy Mapping API-1: EP, EPG, L2 Policy, L3 Policy  https://review.openstack.org/10071617:58
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-neutron17:58
*** terryw has quit IRC17:59
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron17:59
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-neutron18:00
*** manishg has quit IRC18:01
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC18:01
openstackgerritSandhya Dasu proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Blueprint for ML2 mechanism driver for Cisco UCS Manager  https://review.openstack.org/9523618:02
*** ijw-away has quit IRC18:02
*** seizadi has quit IRC18:03
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC18:04
*** manishg has joined #openstack-neutron18:04
*** jp_at_hp has quit IRC18:04
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron18:04
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron18:04
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-neutron18:05
*** sbfox has quit IRC18:05
openstackgerritRobert Kukura proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Group Policy Mapping DB-1: EP, EPG, L2 Policy, L3 Policy  https://review.openstack.org/10179518:05
*** mkashyap has quit IRC18:06
*** dfarrell07 has joined #openstack-neutron18:06
*** jobewan has joined #openstack-neutron18:06
*** alagalah has quit IRC18:06
*** jckasper_ has joined #openstack-neutron18:06
*** leenheer1 has joined #openstack-neutron18:08
*** leenheer has quit IRC18:08
*** jckasper has quit IRC18:08
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-neutron18:09
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-neutron18:10
openstackgerritSayaji Patil proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Changes to remove the use of mapping tables from Nuage plugin  https://review.openstack.org/10561118:10
*** emagana has quit IRC18:11
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron18:12
openstackgerritRobert Kukura proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Group Policy Mapping Plugin-1: EP, EPG, L2 Policy, L3 Policy  https://review.openstack.org/10195718:12
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron18:18
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-neutron18:21
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC18:21
*** popw has quit IRC18:22
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC18:23
*** popw has joined #openstack-neutron18:24
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-neutron18:29
*** aveiga has quit IRC18:32
*** saju_m has quit IRC18:32
*** mkashyap has joined #openstack-neutron18:37
*** aveiga has joined #openstack-neutron18:38
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-neutron18:39
*** wolsen has quit IRC18:42
openstackgerritArmando Migliaccio proposed a change to openstack/neutron: RPC additions to support DVR  https://review.openstack.org/10233218:42
*** wolsen has joined #openstack-neutron18:43
*** pcm__ has quit IRC18:44
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-neutron18:44
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-neutron18:44
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-neutron18:44
openstackgerritArmando Migliaccio proposed a change to openstack/neutron: RPC additions to support DVR  https://review.openstack.org/10233218:45
*** bvandenh has quit IRC18:46
*** lykinsbd has joined #openstack-neutron18:47
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-neutron18:47
openstackgerritArmando Migliaccio proposed a change to openstack/neutron: L2 Agent-side additions to support DVR  https://review.openstack.org/8773018:48
*** seizadi has quit IRC18:50
*** networkstatic has quit IRC18:51
*** baoli has quit IRC18:54
*** ijw has joined #openstack-neutron18:54
*** baoli has joined #openstack-neutron18:54
*** lykinsbd has quit IRC18:55
openstackgerritSridar Kandaswamy proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Specification for FWaaS changes for DVR  https://review.openstack.org/10622518:55
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC18:56
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron18:57
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron18:58
Sukhdevmestery: Ping18:59
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron18:59
openstackgerritsean mooney proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: specification for adding DPDKVHOST support in ML2  https://review.openstack.org/10779718:59
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:02
*** ijw has quit IRC19:02
*** ijw-away has quit IRC19:03
*** jckasper__ has joined #openstack-neutron19:06
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC19:11
*** kaiserpathos has joined #openstack-neutron19:12
*** klindgren_ has joined #openstack-neutron19:13
klindgren_Hello,  Does anyone have neutron + config drive working.  I have both nuetron+dhcp and config drive working.  But config drive is missing the openstack/content/000 so I can't configure networking via config drive19:14
*** marun is now known as marun_afk19:15
*** dave_tucker_zzz is now known as dave_tucker19:15
armaxrkukura: ping19:18
rkukuraarmax: Wrapping up an GBP meeting, and have anyother ping queued19:20
armax:)19:20
armaxok19:20
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC19:20
armaxrkukura: plz ping me back if you have time19:20
rkukuraarmax: will do19:21
*** emagana has quit IRC19:22
aleksandr_nullHi Armax!19:22
armaxaleksandr_null:19:22
armaxhi19:22
aleksandr_nullHow are you ?19:22
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron19:22
armaxaleksandr_null: I’m well19:23
aleksandr_nullarmax: great +)19:23
*** SridharG has quit IRC19:23
aleksandr_nullArmando, have you look into logs ? I'm still trying to figure out whats happening and why snat namespace didn't configured properly.19:24
armaxaleksandr_null: there have been changes that merged lately so I am dealing with other issues, so short answer no19:25
aleksandr_nullOk =)19:25
armaxaleksandr_null: but I haven’t forgotten about you19:25
armax:)19:25
aleksandr_nullmay be you have some ideas what could be wrong ? I've checked environment and everything looks correct ;(19:25
*** emagana_ has joined #openstack-neutron19:26
armaxaleksandr_null: true..but now the codebase for dvr has changed a bit so you might be facing with something completely different19:26
aleksandr_nullAnd what about multiple snat's ? Or why not to combine fip and snat ?19:26
*** emagana has quit IRC19:26
armaxI am really the best person to ask this question, vivek or swami would be the ones in the best position, but they don’t seem to be in the room19:27
armaxsorry I am *not19:27
aleksandr_nullOk, thanks will try to reach them. I've seen discussions and only one behavior that looks like scaring for them is that source ip for snat'ted vm will be different depend on compute node but this fine. I've deployed a lot of clusters and could say that this isn't something that scares and/or disappoints a lot.19:29
aleksandr_nullbut with that neutron+ml2+ovs solution will look like the real one that wouldn't have a lot of single points of failure.19:31
aleksandr_nullof course there is some problems with dhcp agent remains but this is out-of-scope in terms of routing problems.19:31
*** banix_ has joined #openstack-neutron19:32
armaxyeah19:32
aleksandr_nullIs there is any discussions/talks that I could participate to improve/comment DVR-related things ?19:32
armaxthere’s a dvr meeting on wed 15utc I think19:33
*** dfarrell07 has quit IRC19:33
armaxand the l3 meeting on thu at 16utc19:34
armaxor 14 and 15utc respecitively don’t remember on the top of my head right now19:34
aleksandr_nullon which particular channel they happens ?19:34
aleksandr_nullthis one ?19:34
armaxhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings19:34
aleksandr_nullGreat! Thanks!19:35
aleksandr_nullI'm newbie in os development process but I have a lot of field and production related experience with networking, openstack, virtualization and so on. Maybe I could be useful +)19:35
*** banix__ has joined #openstack-neutron19:36
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:37
*** banix_ has quit IRC19:37
*** nlahouti has quit IRC19:37
carl_baldwinrossella_s: ping are you still around?19:37
*** alex_klimov has joined #openstack-neutron19:38
armaxaleksandr_null: great, we need people like you19:39
rkukuraarmax: couple more minutes19:39
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-neutron19:39
* armax thinks rkukura has one of those automated queuing systems that notify the caller of how minutes are left to get to the top of the queue19:40
*** ranger81_ has quit IRC19:41
*** ranger81 has joined #openstack-neutron19:41
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron-specs: Cisco VPNaaS with in-band Cisco CSR router  https://review.openstack.org/10466819:42
*** ranger81 has quit IRC19:46
*** banix__ has quit IRC19:46
*** emagana_ has quit IRC19:47
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron19:48
*** kbringard has joined #openstack-neutron19:51
*** carlp has quit IRC19:52
*** emagana has quit IRC19:52
*** Zemeio has joined #openstack-neutron19:52
rkukuraarmax: pong19:55
armaxrkukura: ping19:55
*** pcm_ has quit IRC19:55
rkukurathat seems backwards19:55
armax:)19:56
armaxI looked at your comments in more details19:56
armaxyou make great points19:56
*** banix_ has joined #openstack-neutron19:57
armaxI am working on addressing on some of them and I wanted to work with you to define the borderline19:57
rkukuraarmax: ok19:57
armaxbetween what is deemed necessary to unblock the patch and what can be ‘future’ work19:57
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron19:57
*** rolledback has quit IRC19:57
armaxor better still ‘refactoring’ and enhancement to the current models19:58
armaxfrom what I understood some of your considerations really go beyond dvr, am I correct?19:58
*** banix_ has quit IRC19:58
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-neutron19:59
rkukuraI think all the concerns are really with the current code, but I was also thinking this could be generalized a bit in the future.19:59
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron20:00
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC20:00
rkukuraarmax: I think my biggest concern is to make sure we understand distribute bindings from the point of view of the REST API, but short and longer term.20:00
armaxrkukura: agreed, however you mentioned that host in the bindings should probably be exposed as a property of the context20:00
*** mlavalle has quit IRC20:01
armaxas an example, I can see the value of abstracting that…but I was thinking of fixing this on the side to give more visibility to the change20:01
armaxI am taking care of this now20:01
rkukuraSecond biggest concern has to do with keepig as much as possible hidden inside ML2, and not exposed to drivers.20:01
*** banix has quit IRC20:01
armaxtrue, but l2pop does need to know about those20:02
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron20:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:02
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-neutron20:02
armaxotherwise how it won’t be able to have the required data to dissemiate to the agents20:02
rkukuraAnd third concern is to to make sure the DB schema is what we want if possible20:02
armaxthe db schema is always in flux, not sure we can really achieve that :)20:03
armaxwe can try and capture a model that’s general enough20:03
armaxbut there will be tweaks and changes always20:04
armaxthe thing we’d need to work out is whether we’d want this changes to be part of the dvr work20:04
*** ijw-away has quit IRC20:04
armaxor part of a work that encompasses these concerns of yours20:04
rkukuraIf it makes sense to break out some ML2 changes as separate patches, we can do that, but lets figure out what is needed first.20:05
armaxso that we can have a more flexible ML2 framework20:05
rkukuraarmax: Can we discuss the REST API a bit?20:05
armaxsure20:05
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC20:05
rkukuraRight now, the binding:vif_type and binding:vif_details attributes of a port are the results from its binding.20:06
armaxyup20:06
rkukuraFor normal ports, doing a get/show on port (as admin) will return these attributes.20:06
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-neutron20:07
rkukuraFor distributed ports, its seems we need to know which host_id we are talking about to return anything useful for these attributes.20:07
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron20:07
rkukuraOr are you assuming that all nodes will have the same vif_type and vif_details?20:07
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC20:08
armaxin the dvr case the nodes need to provide the same details20:08
armaxI think we could envision some sort of hybrid scenerio20:08
armaxscenario20:08
armaxbut not from the beginning I don’t think20:08
rkukuraarmax: But what if there is a mix of different types of nodes that need to bind differently?20:08
armaxmeaning using different vif types?20:09
rkukuramaybe, or the vif details can differ20:10
rkukurathings like SR-IOV are using these20:10
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron20:10
rkukurabut not sure if any of that appies to an l3_agent’s bindings20:10
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-neutron20:11
armaxI think to start simple we’d want an omogenous environment20:11
rkukuralong term, I’d like to have a generic_interface_driver for the agents, that, like nova’s generic VIF driver, bases what it does on vif_type and vif_details.20:11
armaxfrom a validation standpoint it’s very difficult to establish that the dvr functionality is sound across a number of combinations we don’t know of20:12
rkukuraarmax: But ML2 does currently support mixing Linux and HyperV compute nodes, for instance20:12
rkukuraarmax: I’m OK with making some similifiying assumptions for the initial DVR implementation, but feel its important to at least have a plan of how to remove those assumptions longer term.20:13
rkukuraDo you agree that we at least need to do the real ML2 port binding separately for each node of a distributed port?20:13
armaxagreed, I think you’re right, limitations may be in place20:13
armaxjust because of the implementation20:14
armaxI mean the first version of it20:14
rkukuraEven if port binding results in the same vif_type and vif_details for all hosts for the port, there are side effects such as drivers setting up ToR switch that need to happen, right?20:14
tristanCCan someone please cast a +2 on this [stable/icehouse] review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107733/ ?20:15
*** mandeep has quit IRC20:15
armaxright but DVR won’t be able to work with any driver20:15
*** padkrish has quit IRC20:15
rkukuraarmax: I understand it will only work with the ovs mechanism driver as the host-level binding.20:16
armaxyup, with l2pop20:16
rkukuraRight now, other mechanism drivers are often involved, setting up switches to trunk VLANs, etc.20:16
*** a_le has quit IRC20:16
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-neutron20:16
rkukuraI also understand DVR only works with VXLAN initially, but am not clear why that is the case20:17
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron20:17
armaxcurrently it only works with VxLAN20:17
armaxnot even vlan20:17
armaxwe’re figuring out if we can support GRE20:17
*** paraa has joined #openstack-neutron20:17
rkukuraanyway, the hierarchical port binding BP (spec in review) will be formalizing how these multi-level bindings are done20:17
armaxthere’s a larger discussion going on about this20:17
armaxI can forward the details20:17
armaxI’ll familirarize with this bp20:18
armaxI’d be happy to work on it with you20:18
rkukuraI think the trend will be for switches to do the tunneling and send the networks to the hosts as VLANs for large scale deployments20:18
armaxbut I’d see this largely hortogonal to what dvr is trying to achieve20:19
armaxam I wrong?20:19
*** a_le has quit IRC20:19
rkukuraYes, it should be, but I’m concerned if DVR cannot be made to work with VLANs with OVS at the host level.20:19
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron20:20
rkukuraIs it reasonable to assume that will be solved eventually?20:20
armaxit’s not impossible, but it’s harder20:20
*** banix has quit IRC20:20
armaxat the time vxlan was deemed an acceptable compromise20:21
armaxwe can definitely revisit20:21
rkukuraIts a first step20:21
*** ranger81 has joined #openstack-neutron20:21
armaxso you’re suggesting that vlan support is a blocker for dvr?20:21
*** pcm_ has quit IRC20:22
rkukuraI don’t think its required for an initial merge, but the architecture has to support VLANs I’d tink20:22
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron20:22
carl_baldwinrkukura: vlan will be addressed.  We need to discuss the priority of that (as well as GRE).20:22
rkukuracarl_baldwin: thanks20:22
armaxvlan has been on the back of your minds, we definitely need to figure out how to incorporate it in the existing framework20:23
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-neutron20:23
carl_baldwinrkukura: I was actually just asking the DVR team about VLAN and GRE this morning.  I’m going to go over the DVR backlog with Kyle soon.  Let me know if there is anything else we need to discuss as a backlog item.20:23
rkukuraLets assume VLANs will eventually be supported, and that hierarchical port bindings with switches allocating VLANs on links to hosts will need to be supported, which means each host of a distributed port needs to establish its own real ML2 port binding20:24
rkukuraIs that fair?20:24
rkukuraI think that’s what the current DVR code is doing, isn’t it?20:25
armaxcurrently there are multiple bindings per dvr port20:25
rkukuraright20:25
rkukuraand we were discussing what this should look like from the REST API point of view20:26
armaxcorrect20:26
rkukuraI see three options:20:26
armaxso we’d need to figure out how to bring that multiplicity at the rest level20:26
*** nlahouti has quit IRC20:26
armaxis that a fair statement?20:27
rkukura1) we pretend its not a problem, and expect vif_type and vif_details to always be the same for all hosts. Same for the status I think.20:27
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron20:28
armaxI think as far as DVR is concerned we’d want to hide this complexity to the API level20:29
rkukura2) we do enough  to get by. I think this means that port create and update operations that supply the host_id as an input parameter can return host-specific output data, but if the host_id isn’t an input, we need to indicate that at least vif_type isn’t available (maybe return a value indicating its a distributed binding)20:29
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:29
rkukura3) we introduce sub-resources under port for each hosts’ binding attributes20:29
*** jecarey has quit IRC20:29
armaxhowever with option 2 or 3 in place that complexity becomes visible20:30
rkukuraarmax: Normal users don’t see any of this, but admins do, and nova relies on it20:30
rkukuraI’m not really sure if the current code is trying to do option 1 or 220:30
armaxrkukura: I’d be inclined to say option 120:31
rkukuraAnd even if option 3 is the right solution, I think its not reasonable for juno20:31
armaxand yes, the admin may be interested in having visibility in these details20:31
armaxbut I am not necessarily convinced that exposing more complexity to an underlying feature to make distributed L3 is really the answer20:32
rkukuraSo with option 1, we do still bind each port separately, but only use one of these bindings to populate the port dictionary with results?20:32
*** pcm_ has quit IRC20:32
armaxnot sure I follow20:33
*** dfarrell07 has joined #openstack-neutron20:33
rkukuraMy concern with this is that even the existing mechanism drivers for ToR switches will not do the right thing.20:33
armaxthey obviously won’t because dvr has not been designed to work with them20:34
rkukuraIf the port is distributed which host’s data gets returned as the binding:host_id, binding:vif_type, binding:vif_details?20:34
armaxin which context?20:34
armaxi.e. on which call?20:35
rkukuraDVR shouldn’t need to know anything about how the L2 network connectiviity is being managed20:35
rkukuraOn create, update, and get calls20:35
armaxit looks like it needs to though20:35
armaxthat’s how east-west traffic is made possible20:35
rkukuraarmax: can you explain?20:36
*** erecio has joined #openstack-neutron20:36
*** m1dev has quit IRC20:37
armaxthere are changes being done at the l2 agent level to handle dvr traffic correctly20:37
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-neutron20:37
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-neutron20:38
*** klindgren has joined #openstack-neutron20:38
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-neutron20:38
armaxand to update the mesh of tunnels according to the vm’s being in the system20:38
*** klindgren_ has quit IRC20:38
rkukuraarmax: I understand that some of that is needed with l2pop. But isn’t the local l3-agent connecting to both L2 networks for east-west traffic and putting the traffic onto the destination’s L2 network?20:39
armaxfor instance dvr is responsible for populating the ARP table in the router namespace20:39
*** baoli has quit IRC20:39
*** baoli has joined #openstack-neutron20:39
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron20:40
*** emagana has quit IRC20:41
armaxnot 100% sure, but I don’t think that the l3 agent participates in that ones the rights flows are installed20:42
*** aveiga has quit IRC20:42
*** banix has quit IRC20:42
aleksandr_nullrkukura: Could you please clarify this assumption: 1) we pretend its not a problem, and expect vif_type and vif_details to always be the same for all hosts. Same for the status I think.20:43
rkukuraarmax: regardless of all the magic that needs to happen, at some point the outgoing data needs to flow over some L2 network, which for now has to be VXLAN but later could hopefully be any network_type.20:43
armaxcorrect20:43
aleksandr_nullI'm not have some deep knowledge in neutron insides but I'm worrying about "expect vif_type and vif_details to always be the same for all hosts"20:44
carl_baldwinrkukura: I’m trying to hang on to this conversation.  Is the main concern that the distributed port cannot currently handle heterogeneous binding on different hosts?20:44
armaxquestion is: do we want to pause the work now to address the future need of heterogenous networks later?20:44
aleksandr_nullIs it possible to get examples of expected behavior.20:44
rkukuraaleksandr_null: My undestanding is that with the current DVR code, port binding is occuring separately for each host of a distributed port. That is a good thing in my opinion. But I’m trying to understand what that looks like from the REST API perspective.20:45
armaxor do we want to proceed with the assumption that we’ll want to address this need in the future and that can done as a successive iteration?20:45
aleksandr_nullrkukura: completely agree20:45
aleksandr_nullSo am I =)20:46
rkukuraarmax: We want to proceed, but I think we should try to limit how much will need to be reworked later20:46
armax:)20:46
armaxthat’s an exercise I always fail to succeed at20:46
*** wolsen has quit IRC20:46
armaxand I might not be the only one20:46
rkukuraarmax: it might be worse if you didn’t try - its not all-or-nothing20:47
*** wolsen has joined #openstack-neutron20:47
armaxrkukura: I don’t disagree…it’s inevitable that needs change and it’s good to plan for change20:47
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC20:47
*** TrevorV_ has quit IRC20:48
rkukuraVery short term, with distributed bindings for DVR, the attributes that get returned don’t really matter - the OVS interface driver used by the L3 agent doesn’t pay attention to them.20:48
armaxrkukura: that everything has a cost and trying to find the right balance is difficult20:48
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron20:48
armaxespecially since we don’t know whether that flexibility is really going to be used sooner rather than later20:49
armaxI suppose flexibility would speed the adoption process for DVR20:49
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-neutron20:50
armaxbut at the same time the sooner we kick the tires the sooner we can start to get field-based feedback20:50
rkukuraFor the REST API, option 1 might be sufficient for DVR itself short term, but we might need to think about option 2 because REST APIs need to return something. Also, admins look at binding:vif_type to debug problems, so we should probably return somethig that makes some sense.20:51
armaxtrue20:51
armaxeven thought the device owner should be indicative20:51
armaxand give some insight to the admin as to what is going on20:51
armaxand device id20:51
rkukuraMy option 2 proposal would be to make the code return the following for a distributed port: binding:host_id = None, binding:vif_type = “distributed”20:52
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: L2 Model additions to support DVR  https://review.openstack.org/10210120:53
rkukuraBut if a port update contains a host_id value (even it its the same as the current value) we could return that hosts’ specific info. This is a real hack, until option 3 can be implemented.20:53
armaxI can explore option 2 to see if we get something that makes sense20:53
rkukuraI should have put a -1 on that patch that just merged - I really want to avoid a separate DVR port binding model.20:53
armaxwe can revisit in the ml2 patch you looked at20:54
*** banix has joined #openstack-neutron20:54
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: no quota for allowed address pair  https://review.openstack.org/10773420:54
armaxI thought you had looked at it and were fine with it20:55
rkukuraarmax: OK, I’m fine with defering the decison on what we return from the REST APIs for the binding attributes for now.20:55
armaxI’ll work on option 220:55
armaxand address the outstanding concerns that you raised inline, they are all excellent points20:55
rkukuraarmax: I was having trouble making sense of the individual patches, so just pulled the series in and looked at how it all worked20:55
*** a_le has quit IRC20:55
*** ajo|mac has joined #openstack-neutron20:56
armaxrkukura: you’re not alone20:56
rkukuraSo can we talk about the driver API view a bit?20:56
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron20:56
armaxsure20:56
armaxI think that it makes sense to hide as much as possible20:56
rkukuraDo you think adding bound_host and previous_bound_host properties for PortContext, and hiding the DVR-specific logic in the plugin rather than in the l2pop driver, makes sense?20:57
armaxare you referring to host and status being tricked down to the mech_driver?20:57
aleksandr_nullrkukura: I have one question for you and may be you could clarify it for me: What about multiple snat's ? Or why not to combine fip and snat roles to one?20:57
armaxI think it does20:57
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron20:57
armaxsince this change is affecting other parts of the code not touched by dvr20:57
rkukuraAt least the host. I’m still unsure how the status is supposed to work. That is currently not really part of the binding20:57
armaxI was going to do it on a new one based on top of the DVR one20:58
armaxor viceversa20:58
armaxso that we can identifiy the change in isolation20:58
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC20:58
armaxrkukura: would it make sense?20:58
rkukuraaleksandr_null: I’ve only had time to look closely at how DVR integrates with ML2, so don’t really know those details at all.20:59
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: What do you mean by “multiple snats”?20:59
armaxrkukura: I was actually looking at this right now21:00
armaxI mean prior to our chat21:00
rkukuraarmax: Maybe a quick stand-alone WIP patch for the distributed binding ML2 changes would be ideal for exploring this.21:00
rkukuraarmax: So the status also seems to be handled the same way in l2pop. Can we do something similar for this as PortContext properties?21:01
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron21:01
armaxyes21:01
armaxit makes sense21:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:02
rkukuraI think these two should allow removing the binding property that was added to PortContext, right?21:02
aleksandr_nullHi carl_baldwin! Basically usign regular router you're able to spin up multiple l3 agents on different network nodes to be able load balance north-south traffic to different nodes. Now I'm not able to run any additional l3_agent with dvr_snat role. So I make assumption that this is a limitation and this limitation doesn't looks good for me.21:02
armaxyes21:02
armaxthat was my assumption21:02
armaxI am gonna work on this and add you to the review to see if I had interpreted your concerns correctly21:02
rkukuraarmax: I think that is worth working on as an initial step21:02
armaxrkukura: yes, definitely21:03
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-neutron21:03
armaxI’ll file a separate patch and rebase the ML2 DVR one on top of it21:03
rkukuraThe next step I’d like to explore with you if we can is using/modifying the regular PortBinding model class rather than introducing a DVR-specific one.21:03
*** yfried__ has quit IRC21:03
rkukuraI’m hoping this would then allow using the existing port binding logic that does the binds outside transactions21:04
rkukurathe existing code rather than a copy of the code21:04
armaxI think the DVR specific one is needed to track the host-specific bindings21:04
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-neutron21:05
*** ijw-away has quit IRC21:05
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: You mean load balance N/S traffic through one given router or do you mean load balancing by distributing multiple routers across multiple nodes?21:05
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: RPC additions to support DVR  https://review.openstack.org/10233221:05
rkukuraI was suggesting that we add a host_id field as part of the primary key, so the existing table can have host-specific bindings. An empty value for this would be used for normal non-distributed bindings.21:06
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC21:06
armaxrkukura: I think I understand your concern about running the binding in the transaction21:06
armaxI think I didnt’ do a good job at resolving the merge conflicts when after your patch merged21:07
armaxI need to revise that21:07
armaxrkukura: I don’t think that’s possible21:07
armaxyou cannot have a null part of a key21:07
aleksandr_nullSecond variant would be ideal and personally think that it could be achieved by combining fip and snat roles. But if it impossible to do in juno timeframe then at least will be good to have first option.21:07
armaxthat’s why the extra model is necessary21:07
armaxrkukura: ^21:07
rkukuraarmax: I think if you have multiple keys, some can be nullable.21:08
armaxnot sure how you would enforce the uniqueness constraint of a key if some element of the keys are nullable21:09
armaxI am not 100% sure but I woudln’t be suprised if different DB backends behaved differently21:09
rkukuraarmax: I could look into this a bit, but probably not until I’ve done a bunch of spec reviews21:09
armaxI think the solution would be to have a binding table on its own21:09
armaxthat captures the bindings21:09
armaxand then another table that would hold (port, host, binding) altogether21:10
*** leenheer1 has quit IRC21:10
*** leenheer has joined #openstack-neutron21:10
rkukuraI’d really like to have distributed bindings use the same code as non-distributed bindings,  as much as possible21:10
armaxI’d need to review the conceptual model first, before really doing the translation into the logical model21:10
rkukuraarmax: OK. I may send you an email with what I think the DB model could look like.21:11
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: Multiple routers can still be distributed to multiple network nodes to load balance.  That hasn’t changed.  Load balancing N/S traffic within a single router is not currently possible.  That is what DVR is for.  There is a proposal for an HA router but that has not yet merged.21:11
armaxI think the dvr team tried that…what they reached today is largely a compromise that’s minimally invasive to the existing code21:11
*** JayJ has quit IRC21:12
*** JayJ____ has quit IRC21:12
armaxrkukura: we’d need to get the E/R model right21:12
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: combining snat and fip doesn’t make sense.  The fip namespace exists on a compute node and the snat namespace exists on a network node.21:12
armaxthen the translation to the DB schema is a piece of cake21:12
*** JayJ____ has joined #openstack-neutron21:12
*** JayJ has joined #openstack-neutron21:12
*** mrmoje has quit IRC21:12
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron21:13
*** a_le has quit IRC21:13
armaxso to recap21:13
rkukuraMy goal would be to have a single DB model used for both normal and distributed bindings so that the same binding code can work with either. Otherwise copies of the code will diverge over time. Adding hierachical bindings is one example where this code is likely to change21:14
armaxrkukura: I think that won’t be possible21:14
armaxwithout compromising the normalization of the DB21:14
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron21:14
aleksandr_nullcarl_baldwin: I'm telling that I wasn't able to run another l3_agent with dvr_snat and try to spin up even one router. It very easy to reproduce. Just start couple of l3_agents on different nodes and try to create a router. There will be an error about that another l3_agent with sant exists.21:14
aleksandr_null*with snat21:14
armaxand I’d rather keep the DB normalized21:15
armaxbut the code can be refactored in a way that can handle multiple cases so that we minimize the duplication21:15
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: Do you have that error posted somewhere where I can take a look?21:15
armaxstep 1 would be to figure out a way to expose a bind type that’s ‘distributed'21:15
openstackgerritKarthik Natarajan proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Design Spec For Brocade Vyatta L3 Plugin  https://review.openstack.org/10105221:16
rkukuraarmax: I agree that we’d end up with some DB columns that aren’t used in certain cases, but I’m not sure that is too bad.21:16
armaxstep 2 would be to encapsulate better info like status and host21:16
aleksandr_nullGive me some time and I will try to reproduce it again.21:16
armaxstep 2a would be to ensure we do things’21:16
armaxoutside the transation blocks21:16
aleksandr_nullcarl_baldwin: why not so have snap+fip on each and every compute node ? And because they will be co-exist on each and everty compute node it would be easier to merge them. Why this wouldn't work ?21:16
armaxstep 3 would be to figure out how to unify the model between single and distributed bindings21:17
armaxis that a fair summary?21:17
armaxrkukura: ^21:17
rkukuraarmax: Sounds good, with the possible exception that step 3 might make step 2a a lot easier21:17
aleksandr_nullmechanism is still the same. The only thing is that their is no DNAT, only snat for VM's that didn't have a floating ip. Remaining logic looks the same one.21:17
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: What would be gained by doing that?21:17
carl_baldwinIt sounds like what you want is SNAT done in the qrouter namespace on compute nodes.21:18
aleksandr_nullescaping of single-point-of-failure in terms of north-south traffic for VM's without floating IPs21:18
*** kaiserpathos has quit IRC21:18
armaxrkukura: I’ll look into that the thing is that the bindings are handled by the l3 agents21:19
armaxso it’s sort of a different story anyway21:19
*** tongli has quit IRC21:19
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: There is discussion about doing something different with SNAT.  There are pros and cons but there is not consensus.21:19
carl_baldwinI’ve started to enumerate options here:  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/decentralized-snat21:19
rkukuraarmax: Just to be clear, I’m not totally set on sharing the same DB model for normal and distributed bindings. If that doesn’t work out, and refactoring the code to work with either does work out, I’m OK with that.21:20
armaxrkukura: understood21:20
rkukuraarmax: Thanks! Anything else right now?21:21
armaxnot that I can think of21:21
armaxI’ll work on the patch and poke you again when it’s ready to review21:21
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: The current solution was chosen because it mimicks the behavior pre-DVR for default SNAT.21:21
rkukuraarmax: +221:21
armaxrkukura: thank you!21:21
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC21:21
*** chuckC has quit IRC21:22
aleksandr_nullcarl_baldwin: I've already read about that in shortcut thread and the only "unusual" behavior is that the vm's without fip will have outside address depends on compute node. As far as I know from my field experience it doesn't matter a lot. Much important not to have bottlenecks and spof21:22
rkukuraarmax: wish I could help more with this, but am spread pretty thin right now.21:22
*** WackoRobie has joined #openstack-neutron21:22
armaxrkukura: aren’t we all?21:22
armax:)21:22
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: The spof/bottleneck nature of the current solution is understood and has been accepted generally as a good enough first pass.21:23
aleksandr_nullOhhh...21:23
armaxrkukura: thanks, this was really helpful21:23
aleksandr_nullI'm really sorry. It wouldn't work for production at all.21:23
*** ranger81 has quit IRC21:24
aleksandr_nullcarl_baldwin: May I say my opinion about alternatives ?21:24
carl_baldwinIt isn’t the ideal for production but I know it works in production.21:24
aleksandr_nullJust Disable Default SNAT and Assign a Floating IP to all VMs shouldn't be considered as an options.21:25
carl_baldwinThe current non-DVR router is a full spof/bottleneck solution.  I’m not sure how this can be worse.21:25
aleksandr_nullAt least it allows multiple snat's (in terms of dvr)21:25
aleksandr_nullAnd Access Outside through Proxy also no so good idea.21:26
aleksandr_nullShared SNAT address is basically what I'm talking about :)21:26
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: Yes, I think you are talking about shared SNAT.21:26
*** ajo has quit IRC21:26
*** WackoRobie has quit IRC21:26
carl_baldwinThere was a thread about this on the ML.  A few people shared concerns about the shared nature of this approach.21:27
aleksandr_nullAs I already mentioned that doubts are nothing if we talking about real solution without spof.21:27
carl_baldwinI’m among those who have that concern.  We can’t just share an IP address between tenants in any environment.21:28
aleksandr_nullLater, of course it could be extended using vrrp and conntrack sync but that could be later.21:28
carl_baldwinThere are some environments where it might be perfectly acceptible though.21:28
aleksandr_nullI didn't understand position about "sharing" IP ?21:28
*** baoli has quit IRC21:29
aleksandr_nullIf you'll have a shared network between tenants it would be shared.21:29
*** erecio has quit IRC21:29
aleksandr_nullIn current and your model.21:29
carl_baldwin“Shared SNAT Address for each Compute Node”.  One address for a compute node which may host VMs from different tenants.21:29
aleksandr_nullI meant shared for VM's connected to one network/router. For different router you'll have to have different IP. It works this way now.21:30
openstackgerritKevin Benton proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Return a tuple of None's instead of one None  https://review.openstack.org/10747521:31
*** ofer has joined #openstack-neutron21:31
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: Okay, that is a bit different model and cannot be achieved by putting SNAT in to the fip namespace since the fip namespace is shared among routers.21:31
aleksandr_nullOf course it will lead to wasting of Public IPs but there is no way of solving that.21:31
aleksandr_nullExcept vrrp+conntrack21:32
aleksandr_nullBut as far as I know it not in juno timeframe.21:32
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: Essentially, it approaches 1 IP address per VM.21:32
carl_baldwinThis just doesn’t scale well.21:33
aleksandr_nullWy it's 1 IP per 1 VM ?21:33
aleksandr_nullOk. May I provide an example ?21:34
aleksandr_null1 compute node with 10 VM's from one tenant and 10 vm's for another tenant. 2 VM's from each tenant will have 2 Floating IP's. Two routers will have also 2 external IP. So for serving 20 VM's (4 of them will have Floatings) we have to use 2+4 Public IPs.21:35
aleksandr_nullTotally 6.21:36
carl_baldwinIt may work well under those conditions but your example doesn’t represent all deployments.21:36
carl_baldwinFor example, I don’t often see any one tenant’s VMs landing on the same compute host.21:37
*** phil_h has quit IRC21:37
aleksandr_nullWell, I may say that almost(except provider networks) all my deployments will fit but you wouldn't believe me.21:38
carl_baldwinIt is, by far, the exception rather than the rule.21:38
*** banix has quit IRC21:38
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-neutron21:38
aleksandr_nullI suggest.21:38
*** seizadi has quit IRC21:38
aleksandr_nullYou're right!21:38
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: I believe you that all of *your* deployments may fit.21:38
*** sbfox has quit IRC21:38
aleksandr_nullI could say names but I care only about component not the fame ;)21:39
aleksandr_nullSo whats wrong with different tenant VM's across multiple nodes ?21:39
aleksandr_nullOk I could improve example saying that there is additionally 9 compute nodes with the same placement as assignment.21:40
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: This model may be available in the future but it is not the one that we chose to go with initially.  More discussion is warranted to determine where to go from here.21:40
aleksandr_nullIt would be totally 60 FIPs used per 200 VMs.21:41
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC21:41
aleksandr_nullOk, may be I'm wrong in thinking that it is easiest way to implement that.21:41
*** JayJ____ has quit IRC21:41
*** JayJ has quit IRC21:41
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-neutron21:42
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC21:43
carl_baldwinEase of implementation was not the major concern.  The major concern was extra consumption of IP addresses and maintaining a model that behaved like the current model.21:44
*** dbite has quit IRC21:44
openstackgerritRobert Kukura proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Group Policy: Implicit Policy Driver  https://review.openstack.org/10472721:45
*** paraa has quit IRC21:45
aleksandr_nullIMHO behavior changing slightly but still clear.21:46
_cjones_Hey guys. I'd like to introduce a new provider:xxx field in the neutron sql db. Are there instructions somewhere of how to do this?21:47
_cjones_I'm just having trouble migrating the db.21:47
aleksandr_nullI'm not an adept of nova-network but lot of customers still insist of using it because of reliability. Behavior is almost the same and everyone is happy for pretty long time :)21:47
aleksandr_nullvrrp+cn-sync will improve that in future and everyone will be twice happier :)21:48
*** m1dev has quit IRC21:51
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-neutron21:52
*** seizadi has joined #openstack-neutron21:52
openstackgerritSayaji Patil proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Changes to remove the use of mapping tables from Nuage plugin  https://review.openstack.org/10561121:53
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC21:56
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-neutron21:56
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron21:57
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-neutron21:59
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:59
*** jckasper__ has quit IRC22:00
*** alex_klimov has left #openstack-neutron22:00
*** mkashyap has quit IRC22:01
*** ijw-away has joined #openstack-neutron22:02
*** kbringard has quit IRC22:02
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC22:03
*** ijw-away has quit IRC22:06
*** AbsinthMind has quit IRC22:08
openstackgerritfumihiko kakuma proposed a change to openstack/neutron: OFAgent: Implement arp responder  https://review.openstack.org/9418322:08
*** ranger81 has joined #openstack-neutron22:09
*** busterswt has joined #openstack-neutron22:11
busterswtI've got a Havana installation with a controller node handling Networking/Compute services with ML2/LinuxBridge. Seems Neutron needs python-six>=1.4.1, while some Nova services (conductor,scheduler) need python-six<1.4. Any suggestions on how to have these service co-exist on the same box, or am I looking at having to break them out?22:15
busterswtor am I doing it wrong?:)22:15
*** a_le has quit IRC22:18
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron22:18
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-neutron22:19
*** jckasper has quit IRC22:19
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-neutron22:20
*** absubram_ has quit IRC22:20
openstackgerritMichael Smith proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Modify L3 Agent for Distributed Routers  https://review.openstack.org/8941322:21
*** ranger81 has quit IRC22:22
*** dbite has joined #openstack-neutron22:23
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-neutron22:23
*** m1dev has quit IRC22:24
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-neutron22:25
*** ranger81 has joined #openstack-neutron22:26
*** pradk has quit IRC22:29
*** dbite has quit IRC22:29
*** emagana has quit IRC22:31
*** a_le has quit IRC22:32
*** dsneddon is now known as dsneddon_gone22:32
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron22:32
*** jobewan has quit IRC22:33
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:33
*** nlahouti_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:34
*** dims has quit IRC22:35
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-neutron22:35
*** nlahouti has quit IRC22:36
aleksandr_nullcarl_baldwin: And I also forgot to mention that you're already spending one external ip for each and every copy of distributed router so even one VM on node in tenant network have a floating IP then fip namespace have to have one ip for him :) So there is no additional IP wasting beside that :)22:37
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron22:37
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: That isn’t true.22:38
aleksandr_null?22:38
carl_baldwinEach component of a DVR router does not itself consume an IP address.22:39
aleksandr_nullHm. Give me a sec.22:40
*** thedodd has quit IRC22:43
aleksandr_nullOk. Reproduced. Two vm's. Two hosts.22:43
aleksandr_nullhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/87035/22:44
aleksandr_nullone for snat, two for dvr's, two for vm's.22:44
aleksandr_nullWhat I'm doing wrong ?22:44
*** s3wong has quit IRC22:44
lifelesscarl_baldwin: whats the best material read to get across DVR?22:45
aleksandr_nullhttp://imgur.com/cjbtCMw22:46
*** nlahouti_ has quit IRC22:47
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC22:47
*** nlahouti has joined #openstack-neutron22:47
carl_baldwinlifeless: What are you looking to learn?  Internals?22:47
aleksandr_nullcarl_baldwin: And I also look on snat through multiple routers. Didn't see this issue right now, maybe because I'm almost latest DVR branch.22:49
aleksandr_null*I'm on latest.22:49
lifelesscarl_baldwin: network interactions, design requirements for ops and deployment22:49
*** emagana has quit IRC22:49
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC22:50
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: Of your ports, 2 are floating ip.  One is consumed by the router (like pre-DVR) and the other 2 are consumed by the fip namespace:  1 per compute node.22:50
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-neutron22:50
*** nlahouti_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:50
*** ofer has quit IRC22:50
*** oda-g has quit IRC22:50
*** whn_ has quit IRC22:50
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC22:50
aleksandr_nullAnd how is differs from previously mentioned by me ? =)22:51
*** ofer has joined #openstack-neutron22:51
*** oda-g has joined #openstack-neutron22:51
*** whn_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:51
carl_baldwinlifeless: There are some Google documents linked to the bp:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-ovs-dvr22:51
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-neutron22:51
*** wolsen has quit IRC22:51
*** garyk has quit IRC22:51
*** linuxgeek_ has quit IRC22:51
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC22:51
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:51
*** ekarlso has quit IRC22:51
*** tcammann_ has quit IRC22:51
*** pradipta_away has quit IRC22:51
*** chrisf has quit IRC22:51
*** ToM-- has quit IRC22:51
*** boris-42 has quit IRC22:51
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC22:51
aleksandr_nullI've told that wasting will be 1 IP per compute node.22:51
*** nlahouti has quit IRC22:51
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-neutron22:52
*** m1dev has quit IRC22:52
*** chuckC has quit IRC22:52
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:52
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:52
*** dfarrell07 has quit IRC22:52
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC22:52
*** haleyb has quit IRC22:52
*** xgerman has quit IRC22:52
*** safchain has quit IRC22:52
*** sgran has quit IRC22:52
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC22:52
*** garyduan has quit IRC22:52
*** jaypipes has quit IRC22:52
*** mancdaz has quit IRC22:52
*** kevinbenton has quit IRC22:52
*** stefanb has quit IRC22:52
*** HenryG has quit IRC22:52
*** coolsvap has quit IRC22:52
*** raorn has quit IRC22:52
*** sweston has quit IRC22:52
*** insequent has quit IRC22:52
*** swat30 has quit IRC22:52
*** jamespd has quit IRC22:52
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** dfarrell07 has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** xgerman has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** safchain has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** sgran has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** mancdaz has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** kevinbenton has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** stefanb has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** raorn has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** sweston has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** insequent has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** swat30 has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** jamespd has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** wolsen has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** garyk has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** linuxgeek_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** pradipta_away has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** ekarlso has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** tcammann_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** chrisf has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** ToM-- has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-neutron22:53
*** Chinorro has quit IRC22:54
*** Chinorro has joined #openstack-neutron22:54
carl_baldwinThat was fun.22:54
carl_baldwinlifeless: where were we?22:54
*** amcrn has quit IRC22:54
*** ZZelle_ has quit IRC22:54
*** lori has quit IRC22:54
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC22:54
*** zacksh has quit IRC22:54
*** YorikSar has quit IRC22:54
*** mtreinish has quit IRC22:54
*** zigo has quit IRC22:54
*** Apsu has quit IRC22:54
*** adam_g has quit IRC22:54
*** skraynev has quit IRC22:54
*** flaviof_zzz has quit IRC22:54
*** roaet_ has quit IRC22:54
*** mgagne has quit IRC22:54
*** Lookcrabs has quit IRC22:54
*** mongo2_ has quit IRC22:54
*** pckizer has quit IRC22:54
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC22:54
*** radez_g0n3 has quit IRC22:54
*** StevenK has quit IRC22:54
*** comstud has quit IRC22:54
*** obondarev has quit IRC22:55
*** dsneddon_gone has quit IRC22:55
*** tchaypo has quit IRC22:55
*** rossella_s has quit IRC22:55
*** morgabra has quit IRC22:55
*** ilyashakhat has quit IRC22:55
*** tristanC has quit IRC22:55
*** baffle has quit IRC22:55
*** kashyap has quit IRC22:55
*** gkotton_ has quit IRC22:55
*** dkehn has quit IRC22:55
*** ondergetekende_ has quit IRC22:55
*** TrevorV has quit IRC22:55
*** shadyabhi has quit IRC22:55
*** BobBall has quit IRC22:55
*** ciypro|afk has quit IRC22:55
*** chuckC has quit IRC22:55
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** ZZelle_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** lori has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** zacksh has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** YorikSar has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** zigo has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** Apsu has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** adam_g has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** skraynev has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** flaviof_zzz has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** roaet_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** mgagne has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** Lookcrabs has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** mongo2_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** pckizer has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** enikanorov_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** radez_g0n3 has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** StevenK has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** comstud has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
kevinbentoncarl_baldwin: is your IRC exploding with chat messages as well?22:55
carl_baldwinlifeless: So, the google docs linked from the bp predate the specs repo.22:55
*** Apsu has quit IRC22:55
carl_baldwinkevinbenton: Yes.22:55
*** damia has joined #openstack-neutron22:55
*** damia is now known as lordd22:55
*** Apsu has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
carl_baldwinkevinbenton: I’m not sure if everyone is just getting dropped or if the room split or something.22:56
*** tristanC has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** dsneddon_gone has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** tchaypo has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** morgabra has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** ilyashakhat has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** baffle has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** kashyap has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** gkotton_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** dkehn has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** ondergetekende_ has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** BobBall has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** TrevorV has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** shadyabhi has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
*** ciypro|afk has joined #openstack-neutron22:56
kevinbentoncarl_baldwin: ok, thought it was just the bouncer i use22:56
kevinbentoncarl_baldwin: the core of the internet must be collapsing22:56
lorddsorry to interrupt folks, but what happened to the #openstack-lbaas?22:57
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron22:57
*** gildub has joined #openstack-neutron22:57
carl_baldwinlordd: dunno22:58
lorddgreat :D22:58
kevinbentonlordd: did it move to barbican?22:58
aleksandr_nullif you'll have two routers (one router per tenant) you still will get an external IP for every DVR or not ?22:58
kevinbentonlordd: #openstack-barbican22:58
kevinbentonlordd: or is that orthoginal?22:59
carl_baldwinaleksandr_null: You can contrive examples to make the numbers the same but the way it scales is one IP consumed per compute node.  Not one per distributed router component.23:00
lorddI thought the LBaaS was related to Neutron, not Barbican..23:00
*** rdo has quit IRC23:00
lorddanyway, off we go23:00
kevinbentonlordd: oh sorry, you’re right23:00
lorddsometimes I lose sense of how many projects there are23:01
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC23:01
kevinbentonlordd: yeah, apparently it’s supposed to be #openstack-lbaas https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS23:01
carl_baldwinlifeless: If you’re still around, you might start here:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-L3-Subteam#Blueprint:_neutron-ovs-dvr_.28Swami.2C_mrsmith.2C_viveknarasimhan.2C_armax.2923:01
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-neutron23:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC23:02
lorddok, sorry I did something wrong, the channel is there.. 1000 apologies23:02
kevinbentonlordd: no prob23:02
*** krtaylor has quit IRC23:02
*** rdo has joined #openstack-neutron23:03
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-neutron23:03
*** seizadi has quit IRC23:04
openstackgerritCarl Baldwin proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Modify L3 Agent for Distributed Routers  https://review.openstack.org/8941323:05
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC23:06
lifelesscarl_baldwin: thanks23:06
*** emagana has joined #openstack-neutron23:06
aleksandr_nullcarl_baldwin: I meant that in scheme snat+dvr IP consumption will be the same but -1 (because of no standalone snat).23:06
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-neutron23:06
*** emagana has quit IRC23:07
*** m1dev has quit IRC23:07
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-neutron23:08
*** jgrimm has quit IRC23:10
*** evanjfraser has joined #openstack-neutron23:14
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-neutron23:15
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron23:15
*** afazekas has quit IRC23:18
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC23:19
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC23:19
*** yamamoto has quit IRC23:20
*** a_le has quit IRC23:21
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron23:21
*** manishg has quit IRC23:23
*** sbfox has quit IRC23:27
*** ZZelle has quit IRC23:32
openstackgerritSridar Kandaswamy proposed a change to openstack/neutron-specs: Specification for FWaaS changes for DVR  https://review.openstack.org/10622523:33
*** nplanel_ has joined #openstack-neutron23:33
*** AbsinthMind has joined #openstack-neutron23:35
*** ofer has left #openstack-neutron23:37
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:37
*** a_le has quit IRC23:40
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron23:41
*** m1dev has quit IRC23:43
*** jorgem1 has quit IRC23:43
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-neutron23:44
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-neutron23:44
*** bashok has joined #openstack-neutron23:45
*** a_le has quit IRC23:45
*** a_le has joined #openstack-neutron23:45
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-neutron23:46
*** xgerman has quit IRC23:49
*** lordd has quit IRC23:50
*** lordd has joined #openstack-neutron23:51
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC23:52
*** networkstatic has joined #openstack-neutron23:52
*** networkstatic has quit IRC23:53
*** klindgren has left #openstack-neutron23:54
*** safchain has quit IRC23:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-neutron23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!